WEBVTT - 06/25/21 DPS Hour 2 Steve Palazzolo

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Hour two on a Friday. Come on in,

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>stay a while, spend a lot of time first hour

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Clippers down OO two, coming back, desperation time.

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Game three, got the win in convincing fashion. Game two tonight,

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Hawks at the Bucks, Game seven Islanders and the Lightning.

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Congrats to the Canadiens. They beat the Golden Knights and

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>overtime they go on to the Stanley Cup Final. The

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Mavericks are hiring Jason Kidd. The Clippers handled the Suns

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 1>one oh six ninety two. Chris Paul and Devin Booker

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>subpar performances there. Phone calls are welcome eight seven seven

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>three d P Show email address DP at dan Patrick

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com. You know you talk about droughts, sports droughts. Canadians.

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Last time they went to the Stanley Cup Final one

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it was nineteen ninety three. They beat Gretzky and the

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>La Kings. Barry Melrose, I believe, was the coach of

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the La Kings at the time, And you think about

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the proud tradition of the Montreal Canadians and you're going, oh,

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>that's right. In nineteen ninety three, and then you start

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to think, you know, at my age, I go, nineteen

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>ninety three wasn't that long ago? And then you realize, yes,

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was a whole generation ago. It was

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.559
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight years ago. We talked about the Phoenix Suns.

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I remember when they were in the NBA

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Finals against the Bulls. That was back in nineteen ninety three.

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a long time ago. And you start to think

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 1>of a sports drought, all right, the Canadians nineteen ninety three.

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Cleveland Indians. That's a sports drought. Detroit Lions,

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:42.559
<v Speaker 1>that's a sports drought. The Clippers, that's a sports drought.

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>The Atlanta Hawks, that's a sports drought. Milwaukee Bucks back

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in the early seventies. That's when they had Kareem and

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>they had Oscar Robertson. But that's it. So you had

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>these sports droughts that are still alive here. And Montreal

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is going to the Stanley Cup Final. The Indians are

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>over seven decades. That's a drought. That's like, what's worse

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>than a drought? Mclovin, like a super drought. I don't know,

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to find out. Oh my god, Todd

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>what's worse than a drought? Famine? Drought was far with

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>My answer is that I thought you're searching for an

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>actual vocabulary word. Well, no, a super drought. I don't

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>know the Weather Channel though, that's probably a thing now.

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the Indians almost beat the Cubs, which

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>would have been that. That's the og drought. The Indians

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>almost beat the Marlins as well, but they didn't. The

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Eagles had a drought for a lot this video. Philadelphia

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>had a huge drought. Yeah, yeah, you got yours. You're good.

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like the Bears got theres. You're good. It really

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>is like that. Yeah, the Cubs got theres, Like we're good.

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Nothing to see here, Let's move on. Red Sox of

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>course got theres. Yes. Point, if you're a fan of

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a certain team and because sign a contract, you get

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 1>one for the rest of your life. Like if I'm

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a Cleveland Indians fan and I'm forty, I could sign

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a contract for next year and says you're gonna win

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the World Series and you get to see it and

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:11.679
<v Speaker 1>go and all that stuff, and you're guaranteed to never

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>win one in your lifetime. Yeah, I take that. I

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>would have done it as a cub fan if you

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>ask me in twenty ten, yeah, yeah, I could see that.

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you said that to a Hawks fan,

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna win the title and you'll never win another

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>one in your lifetime. And ask you to try. Lions fan, Sure,

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>if we get one, you can take ten years off

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>my life. Go ahead, because the Lions have taken ten

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>years off my life. Your Fast Family is back, Fast

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and Furious F nine is now playing in theaters. Scan

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the code on your screen to buy tickets now. Isn't

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>there something you do on your computer with F nine?

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Is there? Am I like a like the keyboard. Is

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>there's something that happens with F nine? Or am I

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>just totally making something up here? I thought that signified

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>something on your computer. Yeah? Yeah, the F nine updates

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>fields on your computer. Whatever that means. I don't know

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>if that's what I was. I meant, yes, dud. The

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>key is most often used to open mission control on

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>an Apple computer. Okay, yeah, I thought there was something

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>with F nine, But uh, Fast and Furious. The Fast

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Family his back. It's a Friday, you know. I'm sorry

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that Friday New Pole, which is the best Fast and

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Furious I have all nine listed here. Is there one

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that's better than the other? They all sort of seem

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the same. Yeah, one is probably get some credit for

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>being one. Oh, I loved I loved one that you know,

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>aside from Tokyo Drift. All the other ones we were

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. And I loved Paul Walker, Vin diesel Um.

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Who's my U? Minka Kelly? She in there? Jordana Brewster, Oh,

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that's great. She should have got Minka Kelly would be

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 1>a great amission. Jordana Brewster. That's okay if that's my

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>consolation project, Yeah, not at all. Kevin Durant's social media

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>feed takes some time getting used to. We want our

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>star athletes to be honest. I hope that they always are.

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Makes my job easier. Sometimes Kade can be too honest,

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not talking about missteps with burner accounts. Seems

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to have put that behind him, but if somebody calls

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>him out, he likes to come back even harder. And

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:32.239
<v Speaker 1>the latest interaction was with Scottie Pippen. Scotty said Lebron

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>would have found a way to lead his team to

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>a series win where Durant fell short against Milwaukee. According

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to Pippen, Durant's problem was that he tried to do

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it all on his own. Katie was not having anything

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to do with that. He brought up that Scottie wouldn't

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>come into a playoff game because Phil Jackson designed a

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 1>play for Tony ku coach to take the last shot.

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Scotty took himself out of the game. We expect our

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>stars to take the higher road sometimes in social media,

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>but if you've ever been on a basketball court, that's

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>social media, Like you're talking trash during the game, and

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 1>it's not like you have a helmet on you. You're

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>right next to one another. You can say a lot

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of things. So social media seems to be a little

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>bit better when they actually act like real people in

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>real life. And I don't want to make Kadi mad either.

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>It seems to be pretty good. Now. I don't know

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>if Kevin should have responded to Scottie Pippen because Scotty

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>was talking about in this GQ article and the author

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 1>is Tyler Times, so he's interviewing Scotty and Scotty's promoting

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a bourbon and by the way, I hope that bourbon

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 1>does well because Scotty didn't do well. But he's promoting

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a new Bourbon line. And he started talking about the

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>difference between Lebron and KD, and he said, when you're

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>leading the troops, you got to know how to lead

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and win. Katie is great. As his offense was, it

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be his worst enemy because he didn't

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>know how to play team basketball. He kept trying to

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>go punch for punch. Have you ever seen Lebron take

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a shot like that? He ain't gonna take that shot.

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna be smarter, He's gonna force a double. That's

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>what Katie wasn't able to do. Katie can score better

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>than Lebron, but has he surpassed Lebron? Nah, he tried

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to beat Milwaukee instead of utilizing his team. You see

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying. Lebron would have figured out how to

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>beat them and wouldn't have been exhausted, and he may

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>not have taken that last shot. Lebron ain't KD. KD

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>ain't Lebron. Okay, I guess, I guess it's a fair criticism.

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just out of nowhere that Lebron is saying that.

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Scottis saying this. Well. Kevin Durant responded on Twitter and said,

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't the great didn't the Great Scottie hip and refused

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to go into the game for the last second shot

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>because he was in his feelings. His coach drew up

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the play for a better shooter question mark. He then

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>follows up this guy. Scott also wanted to enjoy his summer,

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>so he chose to rehab during the season. L L YO.

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>They followed Phil not you is there? Do they do

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a chalk outline of a body on social media? Because

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what they should do. Yeah, Scotty, rest in peace there. Okay,

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Durant is different than Lebron. Lebron we know has

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>been a facilitator. He's gonna end up probably top five

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and assist and the all time leading scorer in the

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>history of the game. But Scotty made it personal about

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>k D. If you went, if you criticize the team

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 1>or said, you know what, our team would have shut

0:08:56.240 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>those guys down. Whatever it is. And remember Scotty this

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>with the Golden State lawyers. I believe this is a

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago. He said, oh, our Bulls team

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>would have swept them. Okay, it made news because he

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>said it on our air, But okay, I mean Kevin Durant,

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 1>what he did was herculean. If you look, first of all,

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the last play in that game against the Box is

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>poorly designed because Katie is all alone and his teammates

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>are nowhere to be seen, nowhere to be found. I

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>got the feeling, you know, Joe Harris didn't play well,

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>James Harden didn't play well. I can facilitate. I didn't

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>think about this. I can throw it to somebody ten

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>times and if they can't make it the previous nine,

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>do I keep throwing them the ball because I'm going

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>to be a facilitator. Kyrie out hardened coming back from

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the hamstring and wasn't playing well. I don't look at

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Durant as a gunner. There are I can tick

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>off probably fifteen guys that I would think are more

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>volume shooters than Kevin Durant. But if I look at

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the situation here, Kevin Durant had to do all of

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. Do I think Lebron's a better player? Yes,

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>what I want Lebron on my team over Kevin Durant. Yes,

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>But it's not that I dislike Kevin Durant. I think

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>he's I can look at Kevin Durant and Kareem Abdul

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Jabbar as maybe the two most unstoppable players. You can't

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 1>guard Kevin Durant and you can't guard Kareem. I got

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a seven footer with a handle and range. All right,

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a damn good advantage you got there. But is

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>he a better player than Lebron? No, he's not. But

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I we get into these discussions, then it's an argument,

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and then all of a sudden has becomes semantics and

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>gifted talented. It's like Aaron Rodgers. Oh, he's the most

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>talented quarterback to ever play the game. Not the best,

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 1>but the most talented. Okay, Brady's the greatest because of

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>his resume. Okay, so this became a big deal. But

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the big deal was really what Scotty had to say

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>about Phil Jackson, and that is that last shot in

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a playoff game, one point eight seconds to go and

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Phil Jackson calls Tony Kukach's number during a timeout and

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Scottie sits down. Scotty said, you gotta read between the

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>fine lines here with that decision by Phil, and then

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:46.439
<v Speaker 1>he says it was a racial move to give Tony

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>ku Coach a rise how that doesn't bring up a

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>follow up question to say, are you calling Phil Jackson

0:11:56.320 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a racist? And of course he is. This is nineteen

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>ninety four postseason between the Bulls and Knicks. I got

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>more of a problem with that than I do that

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>he's calling out KD. I mean, Scotty has his opinion. Okay,

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>he's a top fifty player, he's a Hall of Famer,

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>he's got six rings. I loved watching him as a player,

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>as final all around town, who's ever played the game,

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>could do everything that you needed. But calling Phil Jackson out,

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>how does that not bring about elicit a Wait, you're

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>calling Phil Jackson a racist here, but I haven't seen

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a follow up. I haven't seen a correction by Scottie.

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>But man, did he do a disservice to Phil Jackson?

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Because that's just hanging there. That's like a marine layer

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and you're going, oh, it'll burn off eventually. Yeah, I

0:12:56.880 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 1>don't think it'd be that easy. All right, Poll question, mcleven,

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>whose career do you want? Kadi or Scottie Pippin fifty

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>six percent Kadi. By the way, I looked up the

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>ESPN dot com Top hundred lists from a couple of

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>years ago, Katie was already fourteen and Pippin was twenty one,

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>so and I think Durant might even move up higher.

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at it that way, Scottie is

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:25.679
<v Speaker 1>a great team player, not a solo artist. And if

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have those six titles, if he has three titles, like,

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>he's not a top fifty player of all time. But

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>he was there with Michael and he did whatever needed

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to be done to allow Michael to do what he

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>was going to do. They were rock stars. It's like

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Rodman did what he was supposed to do. So

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and Scotti is Keith Richards, not Mick Jagger, and I

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>think it bothers him. I think the documentary The Last Dance,

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that hurt him. I think Jordan did him

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a disservice. Now he's got a book coming out, and

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>who knows who he's taking shots at in that book

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that's coming out, But you know Michael did him a disservice. Yeah, mcclub.

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Katie is thirty two, kind of needs to win to

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>get into a top five, top ten? Does he need

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to win a couple more? He's a top ten player.

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll be a top ten player of all time,

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>could have won that one against Toronto too, if he

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't get hurt. Yeah, yeah, but he did. I mean

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Magic could have won another title if he didn't get hurt.

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, Larry Bird could have won more titles

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>if he didn't hurt his back. I mean the sport

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>is littered with that. I mean, if Anthony Davis doesn't

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>get hurt this year, what happens to the Lakers? Like,

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you can always do the what if, but you got hurt.

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why everybody's focusing on the Kevin Durant

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Scottie Pippen part of this. I guess because Durant responded,

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and if you can include a little secret here, folks,

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>if you can include Lebron into a conversation, you're gonna

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>get clicks. Yeah. Pippan also said he thinks Aaron Rodgers

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>going to come back on time. I didn't mention that,

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>but in the g I didn't see that. I didn't

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>read the whole article. Is that true? Okay? That's something

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>all right? Speaking of Aaron Rodgers, where is he on

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the Pro Football Focus Top fifty list? They just put

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>this out. I got some real questions here, take a break.

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>We'll discuss that coming up next to it at sixteen

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>after the hour. This is the Dan Patrick Show. M Drive.

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>You can hear it. My voice got energy right, you

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>can hear it every single day. Took my M drive

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>this morning. M Drive Boost and Burn supplement that can

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>help you drop those unwanted pounds and give you that

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>energy boost that you need for your summer plans. PAULI

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>was looking at me today and he said, I think

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I can see a four pack through your T shirt.

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>And I said, look closer, you'll see six And then

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you pulled your shirt over. Yes, I did. I know well.

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I was acting like Max Scherzer, like I was willing

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to take off my clothes. You were inspecting me. M

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Drive Boost and Burn at Walgreen's Right Ad Vitamin Shop

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>or M drive dan dot com, Free shipping, sixty day

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>money back, guaranteed nothing to lose except for some lbs.

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Get strong, get lean, look your best M drive dan

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com top to keep off the weight as you age,

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>fight back with M Drive Boost and Burn. Go to

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>M drive dan dot com or Walgreens. Write a vitamin shop.

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Don't let age beat shit. Todd rEFInd your prime with

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>M drive. Thanks for listening to The Dan Patrick Show podcast.

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to catch us live every weekday morning nine

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>until noon eastern six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio,

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and you can find us on the iHeartRadio app at FSR,

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>or stream us live on the Peacock app. Is a

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>combined no hitter? Really a no hitter. We'll discuss that

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>two best words in sports game seven? What are the

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>two worst words in sport? Yes? Time, load management? Okay,

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, all right, we'll get some phone calls if

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you can beat that the two worst words in sports?

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 1>If the two best are gained seven, and we have

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that tonight, What are the two worst words in sports?

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus has put out its list of the

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>top fifty players in the NFL. I'm going down the

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>list a little bit here, and I agree with a

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of the names that are in here. I was

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>surprised at a few names that we're in here. Some

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a little too high, some a little too low. I

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:41.479
<v Speaker 1>have a real problem with Josh Allen being the fortieth best.

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>But I want to have some context here, because we're

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>all about context. Steve Palazzolo, Pro Football Focus Senior analyst,

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>host of Pro Football Focus the NFL podcast. All right,

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>give me context here, Steve, of how you came up

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>with the fifty best players in the NFL. Yeah. The

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>context behind it is essentially all positions are created equal.

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Just for this exercise, we're not worried about positional values.

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, obviously if we were, it'd be all quarterbacks

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and that'd be it. So that's the first step, and

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>then it's looking forward. It's looking to twenty twenty one,

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>so it's taking not just last year, but you know,

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>multiple years of information and then saying, Okay, who are

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the best players going forward based off everything we know,

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and again not worried too much about the quarterback being

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the most valuable player on the field. Okay, what makes

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Donald number one on the list. He just we

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>grade every player on every play, Dan, and he is

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>just dominant, you know, from a pass rushing standpoint, from

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>a run defense standpoint, and it's been like that for

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, since he entered the league. He's been the

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>highest graded interior defensive lineman every year since his rookie season.

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And he just does it all. And it's one of

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>those things that shows up when he when he plays

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred nine hundred snaps. It shows up more than

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 1>more than just sack totals and tackle numbers. He's just

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the most unblockable player that we've ever seen. Really in

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the PF ERA then yeah, Patrick Mahomes two, Travis Kelsey three,

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Quintin Nelson four, Davante Adams five, Khalil mack Is six,

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady seven, Bobby Wagner eight, George Kittle nine, Aaron

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers ten. Um, I can't put Brady that high. Wagner,

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I like, but you know, like Khalil mack they're not

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>playing in really meaningful games. Give me your ration, now,

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>give me your ration now. Yeah. So with Brady, you know,

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 1>he was our number two graded quarterback last year. Now

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it was behind Aaron Rodgers. But again we're taking body

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>of work. So if you yeah, until Brady really shows

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>physical decline, he's our highest graded quarterback not only you know,

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of the pf ERA, but of the last four years,

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of the last five years. So we gave Brady the

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>nod there with Wagner. It's really a tough time for

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>linebackers in the NFL. Offensive coordinators are just attacking linebackers

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that everything that they they're spending right now this entire

0:19:57.600 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>offseason thinking of ways to make Bobby Wagner another line

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>backers lives are miserable, but Wagner has been the clear

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>top linebacker in the league since Luke Keikley retired, and

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Khalil Mack is similar to Aaron Donald.

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>It's just the down to down consistency. The sack totals

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>might fluctuate a little bit, but as far as just

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>winning one on ones and being a force in the

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>run game, that's where Khalil Mack shines every year. Give

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>me your biggest surprise, it's Bryce Callahan. Does anybody know?

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Callahan here, the cornerback for the Denver Broncos. Look

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>so early, pff Era. We did this back and we

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>started this in two thousand and eight, and Chris Harris

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Broncos was like the first guy where we

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>kept grading him well, grading him well, and people started

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to catch on, maybe this guy's pretty good. Bryce Callahan

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>could be that next guy. He has graded well with

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago Bears, with the Denver Broncos. He's done it

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in the slot, he's done it outside. He's only five

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>nine eighty eight. He shouldn't be that good. But we

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>grade production and he's just been really productive every time

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 1>he's been on the field. I the one that stood

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>out more than anything else is Josh Allen is forty

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>on this list, and I don't think anybody was more

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 1>valuable to their team last year than Josh Allen was.

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>What am I nat? He was fantastic last year. Again,

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I think you just have to take the entire body

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>of work. So if you look at Josh Allen, he

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>was he was average to blow average his first two years.

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Last year it was a legitimate breakout season. So the

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that he's even on the list after being a

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>below average quarterback, probably the twenty eighth, thirtieth best quarterback

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>his first two years in the league. I mean, I

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's just a testament to how much he's grown

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in the short area, intermediate area. His accuracy, decision making

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:36.160
<v Speaker 1>has gotten better. So, look, Allen was fantastic last year.

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's let's see it for one more year.

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, is he going to regress a little bit

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 1>or is he there? Is he an official superstar? And

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>if he is, he'll be in that top ten to

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty range. Probably next year. You got Dak Prescott at fifty.

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>That is that higher than you thought, lower than you thought. Honestly,

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it was it was close between Dak between

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson. If if another quarterback didn't land on the list,

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't have been all that upset. I think there's

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a cutoff between the Mahomes, Brady's Rogers

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and Russell Wilson's of the world, and then again Josh

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Allen kind of in that gray area. I think it

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 1>is a big year for Lamar to maybe you know,

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>get back to that MVP caliber self. But with Dak,

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I think what we've seen is he's played when he's

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>been on the field the last two years, the best

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>football of his career. Trending in the right direction. I

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>think we saw how valuable he was for the Cowboys

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>last year after he went down. So a lot of

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>things for Dak pointing toward him moving in the right

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>direction to be that top seven or eight quarterback moving forward.

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 1>And this is based on a body of work. Yeah,

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>So if it was just based off of last year,

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>how would this hold different? Would this list be? Yeah?

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>And so we do a list, you know at the

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>end of the season that is just looking back. It's like,

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>here's the we do a top one on one and

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just the two twenty twenty season. Josh Allen would

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>be much higher, you know. So Dak obviously wouldn't be

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 1>on the list. He only played the six games. So yeah,

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>it multiple year sample sizes do matter right in the

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>way guys trending or but also not overweighing too much

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>of one year. So I think there's a lot of

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>guys on this list where it's like, hey, just prove

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>it for one more year and then you'll, you know,

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you might be moving up the list for next year. Yeah,

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, I love Quinton Nelson and I thought that

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that would have been enough for Andrew Luck to stay.

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 1>But but it feels like Quinton Nelson's going to the

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame. Yeah. He's funny because as soon as

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 1>he came out, you know, so because we do you know,

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>some analytics and we grade tape, you know, we we

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>have a little battles with the offensive line community that thinks,

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe you don't know exactly what the offensive

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>line is doing. Quinton Nelson's the one who kind of

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>like brings us together the offensive line. Durus love him.

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>The analytics love him. He grades well, he finished his

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>plays um, he was outstanding at Notre Dame. Yeah he is.

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>He is on a Hall of Fame track. He's been

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the highest graded guard since entering the league, in his

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>three years. If we looked at this right now of

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>guys who are Hall of famers right now, is Aaron

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Donald a hall of famer? Yes? Or now? Right now? Yes? Absolutely?

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes, yes he will be. No right now? Oh,

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>right now. I think Mahomes is already. Yeah, he's been

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a star. I'd say no. Travis Kelsey. I think Kelsey

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>is Quentin Nielson. You can't say now for only three

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>years for a guard, I would say no right now, Okay.

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams, I'd say no right now. There's too many

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 1>good receivers in this era. Khalil Mack I think Mac

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is Yeah, we've got big body of work. Bobby Wagner, Yes,

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>him and Keithley are the two best linebackers of their era.

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Zack Martin not yet. No, DeAndre Hopkins, oh man, all

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the all the receivers are tough man. There's so many

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 1>productive receivers, right, how do you separate those? I don't

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>know if Hopkins actually is now, are we using opinions

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 1>or calculations when you're coming up with these with these lists. Yeah,

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's based off again, we grade every player, and

0:24:57.600 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>every player we put a grade out there. We can

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>look at year grades, multi year grades. It's not it's

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>not automated, um, but it's using that as a foundation,

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and then there's a little bit of intelligence that goes

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>into you know, howard guys used, how often have they

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>been on the field. So it's based off PFF grades

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>with a little bit of our own intelligence over the top.

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>When putting the list together, give me your top three

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>most challenged teams right now? Well, the Bucks and Chiefs

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely have to be up there, and then the Cleveland

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:30.919
<v Speaker 1>Browns are up there. When you talk about just pure

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 1>roster management, the Cleveland Browns have done incredible work. Offensive lines, outstanding,

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>good group of playmakers. They've they've rebuilt that secondary which

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>which really hurt them last year. The Browns have very

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>few weaknesses as a roster. The Bucks are clearly in

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>their own, you know, realm as far as they don't

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>have any weaknesses. They're running it back from the Super

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Bowl year. The Chiefs are a little top heavy with

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>their stars of course, with Mahomes, Kelsey and Tyreek Hill,

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and but the Browns are one of those teams that's

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>just so good all around and one of the most

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>talented in the NFL. The least talented team in the

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>NFL is I think the well the Texans, the Houston

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Texans Detroit Lions are battling for that. They're both rebuildings.

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>They should trade Deshaun Watson if they can, based off

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>all the moves they made this offseason. Yes, I mean

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the Texans are two years removed from being a playoff team.

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Last year they fell apart because the defense was horrible,

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and yes they should definitely. They're in full rebuild mode

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>in Houston and they signed about, you know, twenty you know,

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>mid tier type of free agents this offseason, So it

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>looks like more of an expansion team in Houston right now.

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Where do you label rank Kirk Cousins. I rank a

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of quarterbacks in that middle tier, and it's it's

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the old like number three starter in baseball.

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, a guy that eats up a lot of

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>innings and one year you can win fifteen games, another

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>year you can win ten. I think with Cousins and

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the mid tier quarterbacks, when you get

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>that good group of receivers, when you get that good

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, they'll produce. And Cousins is always had a

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>nice group of receivers, so he'll produce at a top

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>ten type of level statistically. But I don't think you're

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>asking Kirk Cousins to go and carry your team like

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you are some of those top tier quarterbacks. So he's

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 1>in that middle tier like I think maybe ten to

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve fifteen other quarterbacks are. Being a former minor league pitcher,

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious what you think of spider tack and all

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.359
<v Speaker 1>of the substances. The how did you cheat? Is what

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to know, Steve, when you were in the

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>minor leagues, I did not cheat enough because I didn't

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 1>take it out of the miners dan. I mean, I

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>hated having any sticky substances on my fingers. I hated it.

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really I thought it was just a little

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>bit of help for grip that guys used it for,

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and then I didn't realize it was an increase in

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>spin rates and all that stuff. So I consider it

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a missed opportunity, A good scuffed ball was nice though

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>for me because it was good for my splitter. You

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>get a little crazy movement on that if you get

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a nice scuffed ball. Not that I ever did that

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>intention but who scuffs it. It's more of a luck thing,

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>like if I wanted to keep you know, you throw

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a little sandpaper in there. But every now and again

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the umpire keeps a scuffed ball in there and you

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 1>get it and you just put it in the right

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>spot to get that extra movement. But a catcher can

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>help you. Your third basement could help you, right, Yeah, yeah,

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you get some of that. Again, I never I never

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>intentionally did that, which is why I never made it.

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, if if you want to scoff, you just

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you talk to the right people. The statute of limitations

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>is up. Steve. You're good like you know, you can

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 1>tell us how you were cheating. True, true, Not enough again,

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>apparently I didn't man the spider tack stuff I want

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to go throw right now. I know. Hey, great to

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again, Thanks for joining us. We love

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the worked at Pro Football Focus does. Thanks Steve. Steve

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Pezolo a former minor league pitcher and apparently an accidental cheater. Yes,

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>pob isn't he like six foot nine? Yeah, and he's

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a pitcher. He's a tall drink of water, Dan, Yeah, yes,

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the list. So in Green Bay, Aaron Rodgers

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>has the top rank wide receiver in the NFL and

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the top rank left tackle in David But I believe, yeah,

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a top So that's why would you want to

0:28:57.000 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>leave that? You don't want to leave that. So I've

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>said all along, Aaron Rodgers wasn't leaving. I just don't

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>know when he's showing up. You're not leaving. I just

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know when he's showing up. I had some phone

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>calls in here, Tim in California. Then we'll get to

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the worst words in sports. If the two best words

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in sports or Game seven? What are the two worst words? Tim?

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, DP and the Dan Edge. Talking about Scottie Pippen,

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>This story is just extremely fresh in my mind because

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>when I heard this coming out of Scottie Pippen's mouth,

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I just was like in shock because the next day,

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>after he didn't go in for the play, all the

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>fans booed him. And so after the game was over,

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the reporters asked him, how did you feel

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>about your own fans from Chicago booing you. And his

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 1>reply was, well, if I was a white guy, they

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have fooed me. And I was just like, are

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you serious now? So I was just kind of shocked

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>about that. I just wanted to try men all right, Well,

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Tim. I just want clarification from Scottie. I mean,

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I try to be fair to everybody. I might not

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>agree with what somebody says, but I at least want

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the context of what scott he was saying. Does he

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>realize that he's calling Phil Jackson a racist directly, indirectly accidentally.

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>If it's a racist move, then don't you have to

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 1>be a racist to do it? Like I'm just trying

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to get the backstory on this, give me other examples there.

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>If Scotty truly feels this, then that's the bombshell in

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>all of this, not that he called out KD. And

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I think what he's saying about there's truth in what

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>he's saying about KD. He's not Lebron. Lebron's not KD.

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>He's not a facilitator. I just think that what the

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Nets did this year, I don't know how many plays

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:01.479
<v Speaker 1>were diagrammed. You didn't have the line up together. Harden

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>was out of shape, came back, the hamstring stayed with him.

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Kyrie was in and out of the lineup. KD, who

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>was the unhealthiest you would think coming into this season,

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>was wonderful. Did everything that you wanted and it was

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a herculean task. Does Lebron make his team better? He

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>makes them different. If you throw the ball to somebody

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>but they don't make the shots, are you a great

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>facilitator or are you now making bad decisions like why

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>did you throw him the ball? You know? Has Lebron

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>taken inferior talent to the NBA Finals? Yes, I've said

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>many many times on this show that Cleveland Cavalier team

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that he took to the finals against the San Antonio

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Spurs was as bad as we've ever seen a representation

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in the NBA Finals. It just was you had guys

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>who couldn't start for most teams in the NBA and

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 1>they went to the NBA funds. Can KD do that? No?

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>He cannot. KD is going to be one of the

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>top ten players of all time. He's just different than Lebron.

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Would Lebron have made the nets better this year. He

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>would have made them different this year. You didn't have

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have a cohesive unit. When they played, it

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>was you know, it was fun. It was an a

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 1>one mixtape. But they weren't there together. And when it

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>came down to who's going to take the last shot, well,

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>there was nobody else to take the last shot. Kevin

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Durant was exhausted, and I thought the last play that

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>he shot, which was an airball, was poorly designed. But

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody's ever said Kevin Durant was selfish,

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>because he's not. He's never led the league in field

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>goal attempts, not once, but he's led the league in scoring.

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's fascinating. Is he better than Lebron? No,

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>he's not. But you know that's not a just because

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you're not better than Lebron doesn't mean, oh my gosh,

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you haven't had a successful career. You're not one of

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the greats of all time because he is. So Scotty's

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>saying that, it's just Scotty's opinion. I mean, if you're

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the second best player of your generation, that's okay. I

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>think I think you'll be okay with that. And it

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 1>feels like Katie and Lebron have a good relationship. They

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>did a commercial together. I mean, I don't know, I

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't think there's a real beef. I care

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the second best player on the planet. All right, I'm

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>good with that. All Right, we'll take a break. Phone

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>calls coming up. Oh, we're stacked up. Everybody's got the

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>two worst words in sports if the two best are

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and they got to be clean. By the way, Marvin,

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>make sure when you're screening that these guys, these are

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:01.479
<v Speaker 1>clean words. That they have the two worst words in sports. Also,

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a combined no hitter? Is it really a no hitter?

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>And you had the Cubs bullpen didn't even know they

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>were throwing a no hitter. Right, we'll take a break.

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>We're back after this on The Dan Patrick Show. Thanks

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 1>for listening to The Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be sure

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to catch us live every weekday morning nine until noon

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>eastern six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio, and

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you can find us on the iHeartRadio app at FSR

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 1>or stream us live on the Peacock app. Hey, it's Ben,

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:32.400
<v Speaker 1>host of the Fifth Hour with Ben Maller along with

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 1>my trustee sidekick David Gascon would mean a lot to

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 1>have you join us on our weekly auditory journey. You're asking,

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>what in God's name is the Fifth Hour? I'll tell

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you it's a spin off of that Ben Maller show,

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a cult hit overnights on FSR. Why should you listen?

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Picture if you will a world will We chat with

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:51.919
<v Speaker 1>captains of industry in media, sports and more every week

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Explorer some amazing facts about a human nature and more.

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Let'sten to the Fifth Hour with Ben mallerw on the

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast or wherever you get your podcast.

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I forgot I had a radio show over there, hitting

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:05.760
<v Speaker 1>golf balls on this simulator. Get to your phone calls

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the two worst words in sports. By the way, Fritzie

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>has a limerick off with one of our listeners coming

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 1>up next hour. I have to come up with the

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 1>topic for the limerick and this is for a shower shame. Yeah.

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>How about Durant and Pippin? Oh okay, you got you

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>got an hour to get ready for your limerick somehow

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>combining Kevin Durant and Scottie Pippin. Okay, I like it night.

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 1>Todd also has his suggestions two worst words in sports right,

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 1>run down the list and we'll get some phone calls. Okay,

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:46.760
<v Speaker 1>so we had load load management, so moving on rain delay, okay,

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 1>sold out. If you're looking photo going to a particular game,

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 1>intentional walk, makeup call, it's a hyphen. So I've made

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>two words, two and a half words commercial break under review,

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I could take a long time under protests and hey,

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not fair. We're protesting own goals. Saw that yesterday,

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Bench warnings. I'm fired, warning the benches, Hey, no obstructed view? Right? Quiet? Please?

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't like when the tennis jet says that I

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 1>think you should be able to scream at all times

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 1>as I can call and foreign substances slash pine time

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 1>all right? Is it two words? Sean and Idaho? What

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>are the two worst words in sports? Sean, good morning, Dan,

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 1>have to meet Friday? Uh well, Fritzie just stole my

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>thunder who we were going to go with? Commercial break?

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:39.319
<v Speaker 1>So I guess all I got is suck it back row.

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:45.919
<v Speaker 1>It's more than two words. Uh Mo and Arizona high

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Mo welcome back. Two worst words in sports? Good morning Dan,

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 1>danett um uh. The two best two worst words in

0:36:55.120 --> 0:37:04.919
<v Speaker 1>sports are oh, okay, oh David in Texas, David, Good

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 1>morning Dan. The two worst words are swept again and

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you won't find any cleaner. All right, thank you, Yeah, Paully.

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John has to be I know it's a name,

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, Tommy John. There's rarely any good news around that. Ye,

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 1>wide right, that's never or wide left? Part ways, coaches,

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>part ways with the team, any other ones? Mclov and

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you got one. There was a broadcaster's name. I was

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:41.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, but I'm not gonna say it. It was

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 1>tweeted at us. Okay, what is it? Twitter, I'll tell

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you off fair. I don't want to say it. Oh,

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna skip this wide for right now. Oh so

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 1>is this a friend of the show. No, it's not

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a Hello friend of the show. Don't worry about that.

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Is he a Fox broadcaster? Let's just oh okay, I

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:12.399
<v Speaker 1>see what you did with it. Jokes Jo tweeted, that's

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>just jokes. Berry in Long Island, Hi, Berry, welcome back,

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 1>good morning fellows. Worse two words in sports mock headline. Wow, Wow,

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that's Berry. Berry's a member of the trime and he's

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 1>taking a shot. I can't believe he just did that

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:39.399
<v Speaker 1>to man. I'm dare him cold Rex in Ohio? Hi, Rex,

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 1>what's on your mind? Hey, d how you doing good? Man? Well?

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:48.359
<v Speaker 1>This is this is for Michigan fans Ohio State. Okay,

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:52.399
<v Speaker 1>have a good day. Thank you, Rex. Thank you. That's

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a good nice little shot there. Eight seven seven three

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>d P show email irostp of Dan Patrick dot com

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Twitter handled at DP show, Uh Ryan and Iowa, Hey, Ry,

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:05.359
<v Speaker 1>what do you have for Hey? How's it going good? Yeah?

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I got two worst words in sports for you, vacated titles. Okay,

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, all right, I'm fine with that, although they

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 1>don't vacate them, certainly not in baseball. I still well,

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 1>it's a Friday. Look, I don't this is positivity Friday. Right,

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a meet Friday. But he's going a good mood. Yes,

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 1>along those lines, how about the deflator? Okay, now those

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:37.720
<v Speaker 1>are too funny as words in sports. That was funny

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:42.439
<v Speaker 1>that that's that's your nickname loss some weight? Yeah, oh yeah,

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:48.839
<v Speaker 1>that's why they what coincident? It's like, you know, Jay

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:52.919
<v Speaker 1>Williams of the Mothership said that his Twitter account got

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 1>hacked and and somebody put in there that you know,

0:39:56.880 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 1>they the Celtics have finally hired a per a color

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to be their head coach. Of course, they had a

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>player coach named Bill Russell to start out with. They

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 1>had the first all black starting five, Doc Rivers in there,

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Casey Jones in there, and then Jay Williams said that

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 1>his Twitter account was hacked. Okay, yeah, pulling. I've never

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:22.919
<v Speaker 1>been a hacker, but if I was going to hack someone,

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 1>especially Jay Williams had probably got a lot of money.

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I probably can't look for bank account numbers or social

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>squrity numbers. I probably wouldn't set them up to make

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:32.360
<v Speaker 1>an off handed comment about the history of the Celtics

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 1>coaching situation to embarrass him on a national platform. Hey guys,

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 1>we got Jay williams cecial scurity number. We're gonna hack him.

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:41.840
<v Speaker 1>You know what, we We've hacked his Twitter account. What

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 1>do you want to do? I mean, how about we

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 1>say the Celtics have finally hired a person of color

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to be their head coach. Yess, yes, hey, give me

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:55.719
<v Speaker 1>give me some dap. I dine out on that. But

0:40:55.760 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>to embarrass him, if you're going to hack somebody, would

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:05.439
<v Speaker 1>you hack them like that? It's the best I've seen,

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:08.839
<v Speaker 1>that moment of finally getting in. Yea, all right, we're in.

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 1>We're cracked. Now what do you want to Now? What

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>do we do? Say something dumb about the Celtic guys.

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Guys in it, you know, some room jumping up and down.

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Look at that, Look at that, Look at the reaction.

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 1>It's literally it's so stupid. Hey, dude, I just got

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a Orlovsky's bank account numbers. Let's make them say that

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton's gonna be an MVP candidate. Yeah, you can

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 1>just say you made a mistake, my bad, whatever. But

0:41:37.120 --> 0:41:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if if if somebody is going to

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 1>hack your account, I just don't think they would do that.

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:46.320
<v Speaker 1>And you can only use that once, right, your account

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 1>got hacked? Oh god, like skip Baylis should do that

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:52.560
<v Speaker 1>for the past twelve years. Hey, my account was hacking.

0:41:57.120 --> 0:42:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Kle in Florida. Hey Kal, what's on your mind? IDP?

0:42:01.040 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Are you doing the right? Yep, thank you, sir. Two

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:08.360
<v Speaker 1>worst words in sports have indubitably got to be TV

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 1>blackout all right, TV blanckow all right. That was big

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 1>back in the eighties. Uh, let's see what else do

0:42:16.120 --> 0:42:20.399
<v Speaker 1>we have? Your Jilan in Nashville? Hey, do ADP happy

0:42:20.440 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>meet Friday, Thank you, sir. Two worst words, Uh, double doink? Oh, okay,

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll playoff double doink there. Yeah, we always talk about

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Man game seven. Two best words in sports there. There

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of words that aren't good in sports. Yeah.

0:42:40.640 --> 0:42:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Seton Todd's limerick. Ah, we got a mock headline. Shot,

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 1>mock them headline. I like your limericks. Myck headline is

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 1>not as much, not as much, not as prim as

0:42:56.800 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you like them. Just a little less, no, a lot less,

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot day. One hour left the show is what

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:07.759
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do. Yeah, you got a guest for the

0:43:07.760 --> 0:43:13.800
<v Speaker 1>final hour. Time? Oh you wrote your letter? Did? I

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I need to rework it or write

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 1>another one, but I have an initial draft and uh

0:43:19.360 --> 0:43:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Christian and Maine. I believes your competition and the audience

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 1>is going to decide this for showers shame, final hour,

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 1>no guest coming up, set Polly Chritzi mcglo or s

0:43:30.160 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Julie dan Patrick show close out the second hour. Simply

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 1>save home security. It's all there in the name the title.

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:41.120
<v Speaker 1>It's simple for you to install, probably thirty minutes or less.

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to have a technician, electrician nobody's coming

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:47.320
<v Speaker 1>into your house, but it is safe. The Simply Safe

0:43:47.480 --> 0:43:51.320
<v Speaker 1>home security founders, Chad and Eleanor Lawrence, designed their first

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:53.839
<v Speaker 1>security system. They were in their kitchen and they did

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:56.279
<v Speaker 1>it for a personal reason because their friends had just

0:43:56.360 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>had their home broken into. They were struggling to find

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a security system that was simple to set up but

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 1>would make them feel safe. What I love about Simply Safe, Well,

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:05.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of things. They've been doing this for

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the last fifteen years. They've been partners of ours for

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 1>over a decade now. No contracts to sign, no hidden fees.

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 1>They have highly trained security experts ready whenever you need them.

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>There's always somebody on the other end of the phone

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 1>if there's a fire, burglary, of medical emergency, even just

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 1>setting up the system. Go to simply safdand dot com.

0:44:24.080 --> 0:44:26.799
<v Speaker 1>Customize your system, get a free security camera, get a

0:44:26.840 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty day risk free trial. There's nothing to lose at

0:44:30.040 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>simply safdand dot com and tell them we sent you