WEBVTT - The A&G Replay Thursday Hour Four

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio of the

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong, Joe, Getty.

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Arm Strong and Jettie and he Armstrong and Getty Strong.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 2>And so I got a couple of stories. One of

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 2>them I told before, and I got to be vague

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 2>about them because they're They're real life stories people have

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 2>told me, and I don't want them to get in

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 2>trouble for you know, passing along more or less confidential information.

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 2>But I told the story a while back about somebody

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 2>who was talking to a group of working class assault

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 2>of the Earth gentlemen, the last kind of dudes that

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 2>you'd ever think that this would be a thing for.

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm not talking about like some Berkeley androgynous poetry majors.

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking about like work in class, work with their

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 2>hands guys, blue collar guys, talking about how much they

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 2>enjoyed the companionship of the female chatbots when they came

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 2>home from you know, a long day in the field

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 2>at night, and how you know they listen to them

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 2>and understand them and they look forward to it all

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 2>day long, and that sort of thing. And I thought, wow,

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if that crowd can fall under the sway

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 2>of this in its current form, mankind is doomed. No,

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 2>I've never tried it, but I almost don't want to

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 2>because I have some concern but with like a lot

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 2>of other things that I've dismissed and joked about, and

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 2>find it more appealing than I'd like it to be.

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, I would hope that your oogie factor would

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 3>overcome that temptation, but your illustration of the sort of

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 3>fellows who r like it is troubling.

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Although I'm luckily I'm not. I don't feel trapped in

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 2>a lonely world like a lot of people do. And

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 2>if you feel like it's you know, you're lonely and

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 2>it's really difficult out there to meet people and everything

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 2>like that, then this answer comes along. It must feel

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 2>good to you. So a slightly different version of this,

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 2>and also a real life story a mom was telling

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 2>me the other day, and it's a troubling story from

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 2>the beginning, as the daughter involved as twelve, but let's

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 2>go with thirteen because it's they're close enough to thirteen

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 2>but still are actually twelve had ended up in a

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.639
<v Speaker 2>situation by being in a friend's house or whatever. This

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 2>seventeen year old boy was hitting on this young girl

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 2>in a way that they wouldn't if they weren't a creep,

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 2>but they were, and apparently they are a very handsome,

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 2>smooth talking dude, so really got the attention of this

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 2>quite young girl.

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, mom gets contacted by the school saying, hey, we

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 2>are taking a look at your kid's search history and

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 2>computer use because maybe you know this, maybe you don't.

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I've had kids in the public school. They

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 2>allow you to use the Chrome book or you buy

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 2>your own Chromebook, but you have to be on the

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 2>school system and they have the right to check and

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 2>see what stuff you're doing on that computer, which I'm

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 2>fine with, but they have a variety of protection programs

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 2>that you know, if you're eighth grade boys looking at

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 2>porn on the Chromebook, the school will contact you and say, hey,

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 2>your kid's using a Chromebook for porn, and then you know,

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 2>you talk to them or step in or do whatever,

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 2>and then if you continue doing it, there's penalties down

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 2>the road.

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 3>But he's in many schools. If you say I'm I

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 3>want to be transgender, then they won't tell your parents.

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Excellent point. Wow, that is really good. Caught your thirteen

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 2>year old looking at naked women. Oh no, what a shock.

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Your thirteen year old wants to become a woman. Keep

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 2>it on the down low, not a mom and dad's business. Wow,

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 2>good point. But so anyway, this mom got contacted by

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 2>the school. Hey, you, your twelve year old daughter's computer

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 2>was showing them on this site talking to an advice

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 2>chat bot, sex chat bot. I guess it's particularly in

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 2>the area of sex advice. That twelve year old and mom.

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember from reading the back and forth or

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 2>asking the kid now, but either way found out the

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 2>kid was regularly going on this sex chat bot to

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 2>get advice on how to please a seventeen year old boy,

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 2>and really like got addicted and it'd be too much,

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 2>but like really kind of obsessed with, you know, as

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 2>soon as you get home from school, checking in with

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 2>the chat bot and see what the latest advice is

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 2>on how to please a seventeen year old boy. And

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 2>it just became a like hard to break cycle.

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Wow, Now if there had been, I can't imagine it

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 2>when I was like thirteen, fourteen years old. You know,

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 2>when you're a young man starting to understand things, your

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 2>body is capable of doing or certain urges that can

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 2>be enjoyed in a certain way. And there had been

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 2>some sort of chatbot I could talk to that would

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 2>tell me sexy stories or do whatever. Oh my god,

0:05:57.720 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 2>I would have never been I don't know how you

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 2>got me out of my room, but you know, so

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 2>you can have the sex talk with your kids. They're

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 2>having the sex talk with some chatbot.

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 3>What's really interesting is that, so far, as far as

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 3>I can observe, the premature sexualization of children, which the

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 3>left is so enthusiastic about, has mostly resulted in people

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 3>not pairing off, not actually having sex, not having relationships.

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 2>An interesting coexistence of those two things.

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:38.239
<v Speaker 3>Although it makes intuitive sense that there would be some,

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 3>maybe most, who having their normal development blocked in this way,

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 3>if you can picture that as a metaphor, A lot

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 3>of people go to the left toward this is all

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 3>sick and weird and I can't handle it, never mind,

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 3>and some people will go to the right being hyper sexualized,

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 3>addicted to pornography. Whatever. The point is the step by

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 3>step natural progression of the way you become aware of

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 3>the world in adulthood, everything from sex to taxes and

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 3>responsibility and paying bills and real deep emotional relationships with

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 3>another adult. That's an inch by inch process for the

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:23.559
<v Speaker 3>entire history of mankind, except now now, and I can't

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 3>resist another shot at the left.

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Forgive me. Now.

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 3>You go to your woke school where you're immediately sexualized

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 3>and you're surrounded by poor or whatever, and that step

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 3>by step is like vaulting a mile at a time

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 3>in a way that their pre young mind, skin and

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 3>hearts can't handle. It's incredibly troubling to me.

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I know, I can't imagine learning all the things that

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 2>I learned, like you said, little by little, inch by

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 2>inch over a period of years and just got dumped

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 2>on me, you know, like a bucket on my head,

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot of it, really bad ideas and bad advice

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 2>and all kinds of things. Yeah, I mean, so you're

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 2>gonna have the sex talk with your teenage daughter to

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 2>make sure she's said, well, she's fine, she's got you know,

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 2>you're not the only role model for them. They've got

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 2>another role model. It's the AI bot that they get

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 2>to talk to. And apparently it's a thing like they

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 2>this person became aware of it from friends because that's

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 2>what the friends are doing. Too, and god knows what

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 2>sort of you know, the whole garbage in, garbage out.

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Why is why are AI systems woke? Well because the

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 2>people programming them are and blah blah blah.

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 3>You got that issue as well. You know, I keep

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:34.839
<v Speaker 3>every time we talk about this sort of thing, I

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 3>have the same urge toward you know, some sort of

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 3>fundamentalist subcultural civilization or community or or you know, build

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 3>your own compound or something. And you know, people I'd say, yeah,

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 3>we're fundamentalists, and they say, like religious fundamentalists. No, Islamic fundamentalists. No, no, no, no,

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 3>we're just fun to We just concentrate on the fundamentals

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 3>of life in worship whatever. And no I'm not a

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 3>cult leader, and no I'm not sexing up the young women,

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 3>which tends to be an inevitable thing in these little

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 3>off hue communities. But yeah, we just there's a lot

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 3>of the modern world that sucks. Oh do you like

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 3>not do medicines and stuff? Oh no, no, no, we

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 3>do medicines and vaccinations, you know, and all this. Yeah,

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 3>we you know, we're not lunatics. We've just we've learned

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 3>to separate the wheat from the chaff of the modern

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 3>world because and this is this is so obvious and

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 3>so fundamental it almost seems stupid to say. But we all,

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 3>as human beings, tend to be swept up. And we

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 3>talked about this a couple of days ago in fascinating fashion.

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:42.839
<v Speaker 2>We all tend to be.

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Swept up by the culture and assume everything that is

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 3>offered to us is something we ought to take in.

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 3>And that's not true. There is some wheat, but there's

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 3>some not only chaff, but poison, like thumb tacks in

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 3>the wheat of the modern world.

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 2>This is a great idea. Man, if I had billions

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 2>fight elons billions, I would start towns like this, or

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 2>communities or I don't know how. You don't have it

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 2>them unfold, but you'd be like the Amish, except for No,

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 2>we're not gonna write buggies down the road to work.

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 2>It's ridiculous. But we're not gonna have the damned Internet.

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 2>We're not gonna have smartphones. We're not gonna have all

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 2>this stupid stuff. We're gonna go back to like way

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 2>back to two thousand and six. Okay, maybe I don't

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 2>know on the internet. I have to think about that.

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 2>But definitely not smartphones, Definitely not Ai, Definitely none of

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 2>that stuff. And I think a lot of people gravitate

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 2>toward that.

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna have backyard barbecues and the kids are gonna

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 3>all go off to the side, and they're gonna talk

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 3>and giggle and laugh, and we'll wonder what they'll say

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 3>and if they're saying, and then they'll invent if in

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 3>a game with a ball and a stick, and you know, yeah,

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 3>And is there any way to program morality into any

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 3>of this chatbot stuff? I mean, you couldn't force it,

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 3>but I mean, is there any way to have a

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 3>chatbot says, Wait a second, how old are you?

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm twelve. Well you shouldn't be having said and certainly

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 2>not being in a relationship with a seventeen year old.

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 2>There's either something wrong with them or they're just wanting

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.839
<v Speaker 2>to use you for sex. But this is a bad idea.

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Is there any way a chatbot whatever say that?

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, the issue is since groups, since we don't really

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 3>have shared a shared sense of morality anymore, because we've

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 3>become a much more diverse country, the it's impossible to

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 3>quote unquote infuse morality into it because nobody can agree

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 3>on what morality is or should be. Therefore, all things

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 3>digital are utterly a moral They are without morals. Does

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 3>that trouble anybody sending your child into a completely a

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:53.079
<v Speaker 3>moral environment? In this particular story, so chromebook got taken

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 3>away mom late at night. At one point realizes computers missing.

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh goes in the daughter's bedroom. Couldn't stay away from

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 3>the sex advice chatbot to please a seventeen year old

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 3>now has to sleep with the computer, all computer devices

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 3>in the bedroom to make sure they I mean, oh

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 3>my god, this is not something our parents had to

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 3>deal with. No, I realized that I had to deal

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 3>with and my kids are now mid twenties to early thirties.

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I realized the hubris that comes with saying this

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 2>is a harder time to be a parent. This is

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.199
<v Speaker 2>a harder time to be a parent that it was

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 2>for previous generations. It's horrible.

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, as somebody raised the just one more generation earlier,

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 3>You're right, you're one hundred percent. God, it's so crazy.

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, if you know anything about this or had any

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 2>experiences our text line four one five two nine to

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 2>five KFTC.

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Jack Armstrong and Joey, The Armstrong and Getty Show, The

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and take Out.

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Now I haven't heard this. Gavin Newsom and Bill Maher

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:12.599
<v Speaker 2>discussing some California policies.

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 3>We'll discuss I see today the Trump administration.

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 4>They talked about the fact that California had a rule

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 4>that schools cannot be required to notify parents if their

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 4>kids in school have changed their gender, their pronouns. That's

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 4>the kind of thing, even though it doesn't affect a

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 4>lot of people, that makes a lot of people go, well,

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 4>you know what, that's the party without common sense. Now,

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.959
<v Speaker 4>if that's your state, how are you are you?

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 2>I just disagree with that. I mean, the law was

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 2>you would be fired.

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 5>A teacher would be fired if a teacher did not

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 5>report or snitch on a kid talking about their gender identity.

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 2>I just think that was wrong.

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 3>I think teachers should teach. I don't think they should be.

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Required to turn in kids. And by the way, turning

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 2>that we're talking about their parents.

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 3>How can I snitch? The idea of a niche.

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 4>And a parent to me doesn't combine.

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 3>I just I don't. But what is what is the

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 3>job of a teacher.

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 2>It's to teach if Johnny's talking about some identity issue

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 2>or some issue about liking someone of.

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 3>The same sex, is that the teacher's job.

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, the one thing that's clear from that he

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 2>is not confidently coming out and saying it's ridiculous that

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 2>teachers would not be allowed to tell parents about it,

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 2>And he didn't say that. He had the opportunity right

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 2>off the bat to say that, and he didn't. So

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 2>there's no chance he's gonna be president the United States.

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 2>You cannot be president in the United States unless you're

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 2>willing to take a position on this. It's been proven

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 2>over and over the candidates who try to like fudge

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 2>these things and be into thinking they're gonna have it

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 2>both ways. Never works. Never works. Didn't work for Kamala,

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 2>ain't gonna work for Gavin. I can't believe he doesn't

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 2>have the balls to come out and say, even in California,

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 2>what just has gotta be an eighty twenty issue, maybe

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 2>to ninety ten.

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe he didn't have the balls to say

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 3>that out loud and to claim that Johnny, who now

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 3>wants to be called Jenny, that that would be snitching

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 3>on the kid and akin to maybe the kid hints

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 3>that maybe he likes boys. That's just that is so

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 3>with false. I mean, it's so funny. And also the

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 3>job of a teacher is to teach, to teach Hi

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 3>about the genderbread person in radical gender theory, Gavin, you

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 3>require them to teach that stuff.

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Now, with all the crap in California that they have

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 2>him teach that's not reading, writing and arithmetic, that ain't

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 2>gonna fly. And he's trying to conflate what DeSantis is

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 2>doing in Florida, where they have the law that you'll

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 2>be fired if you don't tell the parents, and he's

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 2>trying to act like that's what he's fighting against. No, no, no, no, no,

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 2>you went completely the other direction where the teacher is

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 2>not allowed to tell the parent. That's nuts. Yeah, and

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 2>every most people think it's nuts. As Bill Maher points out,

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 2>most people think that's nuts. I thought Gavin was smarter

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 2>than that. Here's the deal.

0:15:55.800 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 3>What's really wrecking him and people like him, thank God,

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 3>is more and more people are understanding the relationship between

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 3>the neo Marxists, the radical you know, gender theory crowd,

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 3>or the queer theory crowd, all these lunatics, the neo

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Marxists and their connection to frans stance, the teachers Union,

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 3>which is down with all this stuff. Gavin doesn't dare

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 3>defy the teachers Union, which is down with all this stuff.

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 3>So he went as far as he's gonna go with

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 3>his Yeah, there's a injustice there. We need to strike

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 3>a balance with the girls.

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 2>And so it's not the vice versa. So it's not

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 2>the voters that he has in the back of his

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 2>mind when he's answering those questions. It's the teachers union.

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 3>We have the teachers unions and the radical activist class,

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 3>of which he I think is to the extent that

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 3>he has any beliefs whatsoever, they seem to be quite progressed.

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 2>I think he believes he wants to be president.

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'd like to hear more of that exchange.

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no kidding, because.

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Mar cannot be I got to be able to say this.

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 3>He cannot be bull asked. I'll just say that, why

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:07.479
<v Speaker 3>do you so oily?

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Why do you take so much joy and cursing?

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, No, it's just it's it's a wonderful thing.

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 2>It's a wonderful thing.

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, I consider bull as to be a

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 3>perfect work universally understood and its meaning. It is brief,

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 3>it has a ring tw it, it has a rhythm

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 3>to it. It's perfect work.

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And unfortunately the substitutes do not carry the same

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 2>weight arm Strong, the Armstrong and Getty shot.

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Seven track.

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 2>The President decides to do something with an executive order

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 2>or whatever, often that they promised on the campaign trail,

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 2>their voters get all excited, Yay, they did it day

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 2>one like they promised. And then then I get an

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 2>alert on my phone. Some judge somewhere I've never heard

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 2>of it said no, you can't do that. And then

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 2>it stops, and everybody's like groans, like, oh, they can

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 2>do that, and it keeps happening over and over again.

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 2>And do we want that system to continue that way

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 2>or not? As part of what the Supreme Court was

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 2>arguing about yesterday, and as one of the justices said,

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 2>there are six hundred some federal judges and while I

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 2>do not question their motives, sometimes they are wrong. So

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 2>do we want them to be able to hold up

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 2>the whole country?

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 3>Let us discuss the very interesting and multifaceted oral arguments

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 3>yesterday before the Supreme Court with Tim Sandefer, vice president

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 3>for Legal Affairs at the Goldwater Institute, among other auspicious titles,

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 3>author of eight books, including most recently Freedom's Fories, How

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Isabel Patterson, Rosewilder and Ein Rand Found Liberty and Age

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 3>of Darkness. I've recommended it many times. It's terrific, Tim,

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 3>How are you, sir?

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Just great?

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:10.239
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for having me back.

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Guys published poet got to throw that in there, true, Yes,

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 2>a polymath, as they say.

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, Tim, So, ostensibly everyone's talking about that we're going

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 3>to discuss birthright citizenship in front of the Supreme Court,

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 3>and that did come up. But would you agree that

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 3>the more significant discussion was about nationwide injunctions by individual

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 3>federal judges.

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 5>Yes, absolutely. That was the focus of the argument, and

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 5>it was a very interesting argument. But I don't think

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 5>that it's a hard question. I think the answer is obviously,

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 5>nationwide injunctions are perfectly fine. They're the ordinary way of

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 5>doing business in the courts, and people who complain about

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 5>them either don't understand the system or are trying to

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 5>get away with something illegal.

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't always like that it happened, but I can't

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 2>see what the alternative would be as somebody pointed out.

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 2>So you're gonna let I guess it was you that

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 2>pointed it out yesterday in Twitter. The idea that so

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 2>every time a president does something, it's got to work

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 2>its way all the way through the courts up to

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court, and then a decision by the Supreme

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Court before the Supreme Court might say sometimes nine to nothing,

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 2>you can't do that.

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 5>And during that whole period of time, the government is

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 5>still doing the illegal thing.

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Right right, wow, So clearly it's two to one for

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 3>a judicial takeover of the government.

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 2>But I will stand up for liberty. Uh, Is there

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 2>no middle ground?

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 3>Has got to be three judge panel and not a

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 3>single yaho in rural Tennessee.

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think. I think having a single unit yaeho

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 5>in rural Tennessee is perfectly fine because that's what the

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 5>appellate process is sort of. That's why you appeal cases.

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 5>And by the way, that's why you should avoid appointing

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 5>yahoos to the federal bench. You might mention that too.

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 5>The argument, the argument against nationwide injunctions always seems to

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.919
<v Speaker 5>boil down to, well, this is a democracy, and the

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 5>majority it should all always get what it wants, and

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 5>the answer to that is no. What happened to all

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 5>of my friends who used to say, this is a republic,

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 5>not a democracy. The whole point of our system is

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 5>that the majority has to act lawfully, and if it

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 5>acts unlawfully, I can go in front of a judge

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 5>and get that given order from that judge prohibiting the

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 5>government from violating my rights. And the idea that we

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 5>should do this piece meal, that only a judge down here,

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 5>that his order only applies there. Meanwhile, the government can

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 5>do illegal things to everybody else in the country until

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 5>the case reaches the US Supreme Court makes no sense

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 5>at all.

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 3>The underlying theme here being folks that what we really

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 3>need to fear is the power of the government in

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.239
<v Speaker 3>this country. That's kind of the idea of forming it.

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 3>So there's no question that these nationwide injunctions were relatively

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 3>or practically completely unknown for one hundred and fifty years.

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Then there are a handful of them, and the number

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 3>of them is now skyrots every day.

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 2>It seems like on my phone, I see a judge

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 2>jumped in somewhere.

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 5>Actually, right, I actually don't think that that's true. I

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.959
<v Speaker 5>think that what happened was we just started calling them

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 5>by a different name. You know, there were been injunction

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 5>injunctions against unconstitutional government actions since before there was a constitution.

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 5>One of the points that was brought up during the

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 5>arguments was that British judges used to do this before

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 5>the American Revolution, and that was considered perfectly legitimate. It's

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 5>just that nowadays we call them nation right injunctions, or

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 5>we have some judges who write sloppily and don't explain

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 5>what they're actually saying or something. And okay, that's a problem,

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 5>I suppose. But the idea that you should limit the

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 5>injunction power of federal courts is what that is is

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 5>that's open door to the majority violating individual rights on

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 5>a scale that I mean, they already do it, but

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 5>you can imagine what it would be if we took

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.880
<v Speaker 5>away one of the most important protections for individual rights

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 5>in this country, which is getting an injunction from our

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:48.959
<v Speaker 5>federal court to protect their freedom.

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 3>And that's insane.

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 2>So I didn't want to get to this part too

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.199
<v Speaker 2>fast because you're a lawyer, and this part can't be

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 2>fixed with the law. It seems to me that we've

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 2>got a cultural problem in that presidents are way more

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 2>likely than they used to be to want to challenge

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:09.719
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court, either to like legitimately they don't think

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 2>the law is correct, or they don't care if they're wrong.

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:15.479
<v Speaker 2>They just want to get the political credit for trying.

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 2>And perhaps I don't know this, but it seems like

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 2>a likely response. The six hundred some federal judges out there,

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot more of them who are willing to

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 2>let their politics get ahead of their judge reasoning and

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 2>jump in and stop somebody they hate.

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 5>Yes, you're absolutely right about that, and especially the thing

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 5>about the President and Congress being willing to do things

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 5>that they know are unconstitutional because they know that the

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 5>judges are going to strike it down and they can

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 5>blame the judges and say all those evil activist judges,

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 5>or they can get away with their unconstitutional things. So

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 5>it's win win if you want to do something unconstitutional.

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 5>And honestly, every president's done this to some degree. Obviously

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 5>Franklin Roosevelt did this a lot. But the one that

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 5>I always six in my memory is George W. Bush

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 5>when he signed the the McCain Fine Gold campaign finance

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 5>Law and said when he signed it that he thought

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 5>it was unconstitutional, but that he would leave it to

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.239
<v Speaker 5>the courts to deal with. Well, I'm sorry, but if

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 5>you're the president, you take an oath to support and

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 5>defend the Constitution of the United States. And if you

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 5>ignore that oath and sign something that you know is

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 5>unconstitutional just because you think the courts will clean up

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 5>your mess for you, I think that's disgraceful.

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, a lot of the pieces I've read that

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 2>have been following the growth of this use that as

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 2>kind of like the patient zero because he said it

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 2>out loud, and then other presidents thought, hey, I can

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:34.439
<v Speaker 2>do that, I just won't say it out loud, and

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 2>Obama did it, and Biden did it, and Trump did

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 2>it in whichever order, and then Trump again and and

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 2>so how do we fix this?

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, there's a long answer and the short answer. The

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 5>short answer is elect good presidents. The long answer is

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 5>that we have to restore respect for the Constitution in

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 5>this country. I think it's the long term damage that's

0:24:55.480 --> 0:25:00.160
<v Speaker 5>been done to Americans understanding and appreciation of the Constitution

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 5>is horrifying. We have prominent law professors. There was a

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 5>law professor at at Georgetown Law School a few years

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 5>ago published an article in The Washington Post saying the

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 5>Constitution is obsolete. I don't respect it at all. Well,

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 5>you're a teacher of constitutional law for crying out loud.

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 5>And if we don't respect the Constitution, we don't love it.

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 5>It cannot protect us. The Constitution is just a promise,

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 5>and if we don't honor that promise, then it's not

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 5>worth the paper it's written on.

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 3>We should have written a law specifically putting him in jail.

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 3>In my opinion, Tim Sandefer is online from the Goldwater

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Institute Little Constitutional humor for exactly design for punish one man.

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 3>That's a good idea, so you know, blah blah blah.

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Disclaimer about it's difficult to read the tea leaves of

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 3>the oral arguments, blah blah blah. Did it strike you

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 3>that the justices, the sane ones that we like, we're

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 3>leaning in any particular direction as to the nationwide injunctions judges,

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 3>et cetera that we've been discussing.

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 5>Some of the judges have made clear for a long

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 5>time that they're against these what they call nationwide injunctions.

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 5>Justice Thomas in particular, some of the others are a

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 5>little harder to read. Justice Barrett, for example, and Justice Roberts,

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 5>who have become really the swing judges on this issue.

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 3>I thought the.

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 5>Most interesting judge if if anybody wants to go and

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 5>listen to the argument online, I thought Justice Jackson was

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 5>the one who is the most interesting. She clearly understands

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 5>how this area of the law works, and she rightly

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 5>says there's no there there that nationwide injunctions are perfectly legitimate.

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 5>They always have been and there's no problem. So she'd

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 5>be the one that I find most interesting. But how

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 5>to predict I think you're going to get. I think

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 5>Justice Roberts and Justice Barrett are going to a side

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 5>with the liberals and say, we don't have a problem

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 5>per se with nationwide injunctions, but maybe some of them

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 5>aren't very good, but as a as a blanket matter,

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 5>they're okay. And then they're going to want to hear

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 5>the underlying case about birthright citizenship, which obviously is a

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 5>huge deal.

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.199
<v Speaker 3>Right to me, is it even worth getting in to

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 3>what happened on that topic yesterday or do you think it's.

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 5>Well, they really just talked about whether or not they

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:08.439
<v Speaker 5>have a legitimate case in the first place, and they

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 5>haven't really briefed it or argued it yet. But that's

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 5>important because in order to get an injunction, you kind

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 5>of have to first show that you have even an

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 5>arguable point to make, and that was what they were

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 5>arguing about. And I will say, I know this is

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 5>talk radio, and we're all supposed to think that we

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 5>clearly have the right answer and everything. I think the

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 5>birthright citizenship question is a very hard question. I don't

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 5>think it's an easy question on either side.

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about that when we come back from the break.

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 2>I want to hear the arguments on both sides of that.

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting And clearly you've probably seen the breakdown. Who

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 2>speaks the most words? The chicks talk too much? Is

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 2>that given?

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 5>Well, Jessic sodomoy Are does love cutting off lawyers and

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 5>not letting them answer her question.

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the chicks talk too so much. I think that's

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 2>been and the new gal talks more than anybody.

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 3>That shouldn't happen in any organization.

0:27:56.400 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 1>Jack Armstrong and Joe Trottie Strong and Show Jack Armstrong

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and Joe Getty The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 3>Discussing the oral arguments before the Supreme Court yesterday with

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Tim Sanderfur, vice president for legal Affairs at the Goldwater Institute.

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 3>It was advertised as a birthright citizenship hearing it or discussion.

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 3>It really was much more a discussion of individual federal

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 3>judges and nationwide in junctions and that sort of thing.

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 3>But to the question of the Fourteenth Amendment, Tim, you

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 3>said before the break that it's not an easy call.

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad to hear you agree. I've thought the same thing.

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 3>What should we know about the fourteenth Amendment even come

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 3>to a semi intelligent opinion on this?

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, the first sentence of the fourteenth Amendment says, all

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 5>persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 5>to the jurisdiction thereof, are US citizens in all of

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 5>this case. All of these arguments turn on that phrase,

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 5>subject to the jurisdiction thereof. What does that phrase mean.

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 5>It's really tough because the word jurisdiction is one of

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 5>those words that can mean all sorts of different things.

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 5>It basically means power, but there's all sorts of different

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 5>kinds of power, and so that's what the argument turns on.

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 5>Some people think that it means you have to follow

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 5>the law. If you're born here and you have to

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 5>follow the law, then you're subject to the jurisdiction thereof,

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 5>and then that means you're a citizen. But that doesn't

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 5>really make a lot of sense because even foreign tourists

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 5>who come here for a vacation have to follow the law.

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 5>I mean, they have to stop at the red lights

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 5>and they can't steal things, So that can't be what

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 5>that means, right. Instead, the other side argues, jurisdiction thereof

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 5>means some kind of loyalty or allegiance, that there's citizenship jurisdiction,

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 5>as opposed to follow the law jurisdiction, and that difference.

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 5>You can see that difference for example, in this if

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 5>you're a foreign spy and you sneak into the country

0:29:58.080 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 5>and you spy for some foreign country and you get

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 5>it rested, you can be prosecuted for espionage, but you

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 5>cannot be prosecuted for treason. Why because you're not a

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 5>US citizen and you don't owe loyalty to the US,

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 5>so you cannot commit treason against the US. And so

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 5>there's two different kinds of jurisdiction, is the argument. And

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 5>so those who are against birth right citizenships say, subject

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 5>of the jurisdiction thereof means that your parents owed loyalty

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 5>to the United States as opposed to some foreign country.

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 5>And that would mean that illegal aliens, if they have

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 5>a child here, that child is not a citizen in

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 5>the United States. Now, that's also there's a problem with that.

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 5>There's a couple problems that. One of the problems with

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 5>that argument is that nobody has ever said that that's

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 5>what it means. In the one hundred and fifty years

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 5>since this has been in the Constitution, everybody has active

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 5>like if you're born here, you're a citizen all of

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 5>that time. And so suddenly discovering that we're at it

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 5>turns out that we've been misreading the Constitution for one

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 5>hundred and fifty years would be a huge, enormously radical

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 5>transformation and how are system works That would cause tremendous

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 5>disruption nationwide, and that would be a real problem. But

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 5>all of this, the real problem here in answering this

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 5>question is that when the amendment was adopted, there were

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 5>no such things as the illegal aliens because there were

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 5>no laws against immigration. And that means if you're an

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 5>originalist and you think the competition should be understood the

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 5>way it was originally intended. The Framers didn't ever think

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 5>about this because it wasn't against the law back then,

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 5>So we don't know what.

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 3>They would have thought about this question right right Well,

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 3>at the point that this enormously radical, disruptive president is overturned,

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 3>that's when you tag me and Tim and I come

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 3>in and explain to the good folks that, look, the

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 3>nature of global transportation, the movement of people or peoples

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 3>from one place to another has changed so vastly.

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 2>God, Joe's a living constitution guy. You can hear it coming.

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Out of what No, don't you dare no, that the

0:31:56.720 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 3>very nature of comings and goings from countries has been

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 3>so radically transformed. A Chinese national with not the slightest

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 3>notion of making life in the United States can can

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 3>depart China, arrive here, give birth, go back to China,

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 3>all in the span of seventy two hours. I'm inducing

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 3>labor in this case probably or getting very lucky, and

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 3>that child had citizenship. That's an eventuality unimaginable back in

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 3>the day, is the case.

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 5>I think so, And that's sort of true. But on

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 5>the other hand, the Chinese question came up back then

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 5>because there were so many Chinese in California in the

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 5>eighteen sixties. And Senator's rast, well, isn't this going to

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 5>make the children of the Chinese immigrants who back then

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 5>did not intend to stay in the United States? They

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 5>intended to go back to China. The senator's rest, does

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 5>this make their kids us? Senator US citizens? And the

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 5>Senator from California said yes, and then he was immediately

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 5>thrown out of office. So what does that mean?

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Nobody knows what that means a single case from eighteen

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 3>ninety eight, or is there more precedent?

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 5>Really, there really isn't. There's really just a handful of presidents,

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 5>and no Supreme Court case has ever said that birthright

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 5>citizenship is the is in the Constitution. There have been

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 5>some that have kind of mentioned it or kind of

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 5>assumed it, but none has said so outright.

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 2>I am surprised the polling shows that only about a

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 2>third of Americans want to do away with the way

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 2>we do it now. I'm surprised by that. I do

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 2>want to get to this. This is a journalistic question,

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 2>but I think it has an effect on people's respect

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:28.479
<v Speaker 2>for the law. It has come up recently, it has

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 2>become a pattern that anytime the media mentions a judge,

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 2>they mentioned what president appointed them. Do you think that's

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 2>a good idea or not? They didn't just barely got

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 2>a minute.

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 5>I think it's fine. I think people should know where

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 5>these For instance, I think it would help a lot

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.719
<v Speaker 5>of judges. You know, a lot of Republican appointed judges

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 5>have been ruling against the Trump administration, and I think

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 5>it would be helpful for people to know that these

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 5>questions are not things where it's all partisan. The law

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 5>is not just partisan politics. It's something much more profound

0:33:58.360 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 5>and much more important than.

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well I agree, But it implies that judge I

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 2>don't know. True.

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 5>I used to think.

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 2>I didn't used to think about it ever. If a

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 2>judge ruled, I just thought, well, that's interesting. Now it's

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 2>all who appointed him. Oh of course he said that.

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 5>That is true. That is a risk, But I think

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 5>we should air on the side of informing people as

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 5>opposed to keeping people in the dark.

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 2>So that's that was true.

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.399
<v Speaker 3>Tim Sander for the Goldwater Institute on the line, Tim

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:28.240
<v Speaker 3>final question, I've called for a monarchy.

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 2>You in favor of it? Yes or no?

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 5>No? I'm against him monarchy. I'm for the constitution.

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Joe.

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 2>One more question as a published poet, I was thinking

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 2>about this. Yesterday he won the Nobel Prize. Bob Dylan

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 2>good poet or not lousy poet?

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 5>Now read Robert Hayden or Richard Wilbur instead.

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:50.280
<v Speaker 3>How about Ringo Star Octopus's Garden creative Tam. It's always

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 3>great and enlightening. Thanks Millian for the time. Let's talk

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 3>again soon. Thanks guys.

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, I was actually thinking about this listening to

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:01.359
<v Speaker 2>Dylan lyrics. Why do they in everybody's head so much?

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:03.359
<v Speaker 2>Why do people keep going back to them? If it's

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 2>just gobbledegook, like a lot of real poets claim, it

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 2>can't be. It wouldn't lodge, it wouldn't It wouldn't make

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 2>the market made, would it? All right?

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 3>He was famously moody about his career and his music

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 3>in his Life's Philosophy. I think some of his stuff

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 3>is absolutely brilliant, and I think some of it's gobbledygook.

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 2>Humhm. Maybe maybe more on that another day, or maybe not.

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 2>We got plenty of stuff to tell you. I hope

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 2>you can stick around if you missus segment. I thought

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 2>that tim thing was really really good and you want

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 2>to listen to it again and get the podcast Armstrong

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:36.320
<v Speaker 2>and Getty on demand.

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong to arms Strong in Getty on demand.

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 2>We're not boring. A lot of news is boring and

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 2>tedious and depressing.

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 3>It makes you angry. You don't want to live your

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 3>life like that. Hey, I'm Jack Armstrong.

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 2>He's Joe Getty. We're Armstrong in Getty.

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 3>We try to bring you the truth and help you

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 3>figure out this crazy modern world.

0:35:56.400 --> 0:36:01.799
<v Speaker 2>About something about a comedic tone. We have a one

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:05.240
<v Speaker 2>ore Yes. Listen to Armstrong. You get it on demand

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 2>on the iHeartRadio app