Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom much. Why would the elites
Speaker 1: want to cancel Abraham Lincoln Obama knew more about Russia
Speaker 1: Gate than we were told. Conspiracy theorist Jennifer Granholm for
Speaker 1: a Biden Energy secretary? And will there be a COVID
Speaker 1: relief package? Buck Sexton coding the news and disseminating information
Speaker 1: with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake America great, You're a
Speaker 1: great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show. Homeless
Speaker 1: CIA analysts. I can speak to three hours without a
Speaker 1: phone call. Try doing that sometime. No, Welcome to the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show. Friends, honored and privilege to have you
Speaker 1: here with me. There are only a few names that
Speaker 1: you can think of from a American history that we
Speaker 1: are all supposed to that we all have some degree
Speaker 1: of reverence for right that we're supposed to believe. No
Speaker 1: matter who you are, where you come from this country,
Speaker 1: you're supposed to think, well, that's a great man. There
Speaker 1: are only a few names where that is the case.
Speaker 1: And you can start with the founding fathers, the people
Speaker 1: on Mount Rushmore, and you would add Martin Luther King Junior,
Speaker 1: and you beat some people would add I don't know
Speaker 1: you know, they're they're a handful of these names out
Speaker 1: there that when someone says who's a great American and
Speaker 1: we can all agree on it, there are only a
Speaker 1: handful of names that come to mind, And for a
Speaker 1: lot of people, they were at least under the impression
Speaker 1: until recently that Abraham Lincoln was one of them, that
Speaker 1: Abraham Lincoln would be free from cancel culture, that this
Speaker 1: would be a guy that we could all agree did
Speaker 1: something pretty extraordinary and wasn't perfect by any means, But
Speaker 1: at the end of the day, he was on the
Speaker 1: right side and was the commander in chief of a
Speaker 1: military that ended slavery in the United States, and that's
Speaker 1: a pretty remarkable thing. So we tend to give him
Speaker 1: a lot of plaudits for this, and as we know,
Speaker 1: he was assassinated afterwards for it. But Abraham Lincoln would
Speaker 1: be one of those names where you'd say, well, the
Speaker 1: greatness of what he accomplished with the ending of slavery,
Speaker 1: the greatness that he accomplished with all of this, wouldn't
Speaker 1: that then make him at least somewhat immune to these
Speaker 1: efforts to destroy historical figures based upon some perception of
Speaker 1: what they should be that's constantly changing and very new
Speaker 1: to our current moment. But then I bring you the
Speaker 1: modern American lib the left, the Democrats, and their wokeness,
Speaker 1: their psychological disorder known as wokeness. We have yet another
Speaker 1: example of just how far that will go. You have
Speaker 1: Abraham Lincoln as a name that a San Francisco high
Speaker 1: school board or some kind of a committee that's looking
Speaker 1: to rename schools, and it's in San fran and they
Speaker 1: want to get rid of Abraham Lincoln's name from a
Speaker 1: school because he was I believe the quote is insufficiently
Speaker 1: committed to black lives mattering or to the matter of
Speaker 1: black lives. Now, for the man that ordered hundreds of
Speaker 1: thousands of Americans to their deaths or to extreme pain, mutilation,
Speaker 1: being wounded on the battlefield to end slavery, to say
Speaker 1: that he was insufficiently committed to black lives mattering would
Speaker 1: seem to be the height of insanity, and it is.
Speaker 1: But there's a reason behind all of this. So we
Speaker 1: need to start examining what's really going on in this
Speaker 1: country because we're at this point where we're told that
Speaker 1: the Democrats are calling for unity, that Joe Biden and
Speaker 1: his would be cabinet. They're saying unify, and as we know,
Speaker 1: unify really means bend the need of me. Do what
Speaker 1: I say, and we'll call it unity. But while they're
Speaker 1: calling for this, we also see time and again they
Speaker 1: don't particularly have any sense of unity to America as
Speaker 1: we know it. There's something very different going on. And
Speaker 1: it usually is incremental that this happens. They start with
Speaker 1: something where we say, okay, fine, you know, and this
Speaker 1: is why when there was that old dust up about
Speaker 1: about Confederate generals, I was saying, look, I'm I'm not
Speaker 1: somebody that is going to carry any water for the
Speaker 1: keep up some of these Confederate General's statute side of
Speaker 1: this brief it's, you know, it's a community decision, a
Speaker 1: commun unity standard. But understand this, they're coming for the
Speaker 1: founding Father's next. In fact, Donald Trump said at the time,
Speaker 1: well what about Jefferson? What about Washington area? Are they
Speaker 1: going to tear down those statues? There is here in
Speaker 1: New York City. I've seen this so many nights because
Speaker 1: I go for walks sometimes right near what is known
Speaker 1: as Columbus Circle, named for Christopher Columbus, is a very large,
Speaker 1: very prominent statue of Christopher Columbus. There is an army
Speaker 1: of NYPD officers that are deployed in a huge circle
Speaker 1: with barricades, and they've got they've got all kinds of
Speaker 1: additional e su and vehicles deployed. It's it's crazy. And
Speaker 1: I've asked the cops. I've said, is this really because
Speaker 1: you guys are worried that one night the radical left
Speaker 1: is just going to show up and destroy this statue
Speaker 1: of Christopher Columbus. And they said, yes, absolutely, that is
Speaker 1: why we are deployed here. And this is in one
Speaker 1: of the ritzier parts of New York City. It's outside
Speaker 1: the Time Warner Center. So even Deblasio realizes this would
Speaker 1: get some attention. But they say that Columbus was a
Speaker 1: genocidal essentially a genocidal maniac who was engaged in the
Speaker 1: exploitation of humanity and so on and so forth. They
Speaker 1: don't care that we celebrate Columbus for discovering the New
Speaker 1: World for Europe and the rest of the world. They
Speaker 1: don't care about that. That's that's not enough. And as
Speaker 1: we see with Abraham Lincoln, it's not enough that he
Speaker 1: was the commander in chief and the president who led
Speaker 1: us into war, a war that did end slavery in
Speaker 1: this country, and that he called for the freeing of
Speaker 1: the slaves during that war. What's really happening here? There
Speaker 1: is an essay that I came across. I've never I've
Speaker 1: never even heard of this publication before, and I haven't
Speaker 1: heard of this author before. But I thought this essay
Speaker 1: was extraordinary. And I read constantly of the commentary all
Speaker 1: over the web, and I'm always looking to see who
Speaker 1: who's worth reading because most of it, ninety percent of
Speaker 1: what's published on the internet, even by so called conservatives
Speaker 1: or whatever it is, really it's repetitive. It's an echo chamber.
Speaker 1: It's just not worth spending much time on, at least
Speaker 1: for me as someone who's reading this stuff all day long.
Speaker 1: This was really good. It was at unheard dot com
Speaker 1: and the author is Matthew Crawford, who is a fellow
Speaker 1: at the Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture at the
Speaker 1: University of Virginia. The title is How Race Politics Liberated
Speaker 1: the Elites? And this is absolutely top notch analysis. It's
Speaker 1: it's phenomenal. Really, it's a really really strong piece. And
Speaker 1: here let me give you some of what we're talking
Speaker 1: about here and why this I think defines our current
Speaker 1: moment for the Democrat Party and for the left. The
Speaker 1: idea of a common good this is a quote from
Speaker 1: the piece, has given way to a partition of citizens
Speaker 1: along the lines of a moral hierarchy. Instead of feeling
Speaker 1: bound up in a shared fate with one's country a countryman,
Speaker 1: one develops an alternate, alternate solidarity that is placeless. The
Speaker 1: relatability across national borders that the genteel folk feel in
Speaker 1: one another's company, the gracious ease and trust, the shared
Speaker 1: points of reference in high prestige opinion has something to
Speaker 1: do with their uniformly high standing in the moral hierarchy
Speaker 1: that divides citizen from citizen within their own nations. The
Speaker 1: decision making class has discovered that it enjoys the mandate
Speaker 1: of Heaven, and with this comes certain permissions, certain exemptions
Speaker 1: from democratic scruple. This is spot on, this is excellent.
Speaker 1: He's talking about how in our country now, because America,
Speaker 1: I mean, the short version of this is that because America,
Speaker 1: according to the left now, is inherently racist and misogynist,
Speaker 1: it gives the elites that gives this ruling class a
Speaker 1: mentality that they owe no allegiance to that entity, to America,
Speaker 1: at least to the idea, to the ideals of traditional America.
Speaker 1: They have something better, they're working for something better, and
Speaker 1: so there's no need for them to debase themselves by
Speaker 1: pretending that our flag waving, jingo wistic we love the
Speaker 1: founding Fathers and the Constitution nonsense, should in any way
Speaker 1: slow their role. They get to do whatever they want.
Speaker 1: They know better. You see, they're above it. But this
Speaker 1: is a version of something I've said to you many
Speaker 1: times before. There are those of us who take tremendous
Speaker 1: pride being American, and then there are those of us
Speaker 1: who take pride in believing we are better than America,
Speaker 1: and those are called liberals. Those are leftists. That's what
Speaker 1: they are. That's how they think. The reason that they're
Speaker 1: constantly encouraging the most toxic identity politics, racial politics, gender politics,
Speaker 1: the reason they do this is because they've adopted a
Speaker 1: philosophy that America is actually bad, that there's this moral
Speaker 1: rot at the center of this country. They've identified it.
Speaker 1: It's almost like they stumbled upon some secret knowledge and
Speaker 1: now they're spreading this great wisdom to all the rest
Speaker 1: of us, and anyone who rejects this, anyone who sees
Speaker 1: this for the intense hypocrisy that it is, is shouted down.
Speaker 1: Part of the patriarchy, part of the racist, misogynistic system.
Speaker 1: And also it gives the people at the top a
Speaker 1: total pass for not working for what we think of
Speaker 1: as the common good, not working for what we consider
Speaker 1: to be universal American values. They can live their lives.
Speaker 1: This is why they can fly on private jets to
Speaker 1: climate change conferences where they're going to talk about how
Speaker 1: you should be. You know, walking three miles or biking
Speaker 1: ten miles to work every day can put all that
Speaker 1: co two in the air. Well, they're above you, you see,
Speaker 1: they're working for this better world, this better place. You
Speaker 1: are part of this traditional America that's just so racist
Speaker 1: and misogynistic and so awful. And so this goes way beyond,
Speaker 1: even way beyond the usual liberal hypocrisy. This is a
Speaker 1: kind of religion of elites excellence, and they are devotees
Speaker 1: of it, and they also get to think of themselves
Speaker 1: as great heroes for standing up for the pressed. I mean,
Speaker 1: how many of you does this sound like your smug
Speaker 1: neighbor who has a big Biden Harris sign in their yard, right,
Speaker 1: don't they always think that they're somehow so morally enlightened,
Speaker 1: even if their own personal choices are really crappy, and
Speaker 1: even if they don't really care about other people or
Speaker 1: help them very much. But they stand for equality. In fact,
Speaker 1: these days they stand for equity the preferred term, which
Speaker 1: is just the quality of outcome, which is Marxism. Back
Speaker 1: into this piece for a second quote. In the Revolt
Speaker 1: of the Elites, Christopher Lash spelled out in greater detail
Speaker 1: the role that claims of racial and sexual oppression play
Speaker 1: in securing release from allegiance to the nation, not just
Speaker 1: for those who identify as its victims, but for those
Speaker 1: with the moral sensitivity to see victimization where it may
Speaker 1: not be apparent, and who make this capacity a touchstone
Speaker 1: of their identity. It becomes a token of moral elevation
Speaker 1: by which we recognize one another and distinguish ourselves from
Speaker 1: the broader run of citizens. Both Lash and Hannah Arrant
Speaker 1: argue that black Americans serve a crucial function for the
Speaker 1: white bourgeoisie as the emblement proof of America's illegitimacy. They
Speaker 1: anchor a politics of repudiation in which the idea of
Speaker 1: a common good has little purchase, and quote saying all
Speaker 1: those elitist, white, college educated liberal democrats out there, the
Speaker 1: libs who are always talking about racism, they don't do
Speaker 1: anything to solve racism. They don't spend any time in
Speaker 1: black majority neighborhoods. They don't really know what's going on
Speaker 1: within the black community. But they love pointing out the
Speaker 1: racism all around them all the time, even where there's
Speaker 1: no actual racism. Sometimes they do this because by demeaning
Speaker 1: traditional America American values, by saying that this place is
Speaker 1: racist and wrong and evil, they're not bound by the
Speaker 1: generally held conceptions of what makes a good American citizen
Speaker 1: these days, because they know better. They're above it, they're
Speaker 1: elevated beyond it. Doesn't this all sound exactly like the
Speaker 1: ethos the modern philosophy of a democrat. Don't you all
Speaker 1: have friends that are just like this. They've never actually
Speaker 1: been in a high crime, majority minority neighborhood for more
Speaker 1: than a couple of hours or maybe driving through it.
Speaker 1: But they want to give you lectures about BLM. That's right,
Speaker 1: they want to lecture you about BLM from their million
Speaker 1: dollar house in an all white suburb. These are the
Speaker 1: kind of libs we're talking about here, the ones who
Speaker 1: are frauds, the ones who are fakes. How do they
Speaker 1: get away with this in their own minds? This is
Speaker 1: how they don't take pride in being Americans. They think
Speaker 1: they are better than America, they know better than America,
Speaker 1: and they want to transform this place in this image.
Speaker 1: And that's what we are facing now going forward. You're
Speaker 1: in the Freedom This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast,
Speaker 1: How Race Politics Liberated the Elites by Matthew Crawford. Unheard
Speaker 1: dot Com is the site. And I just I thought
Speaker 1: this was a fascinating analysis. And I like to give
Speaker 1: people credit when they do something like this that really
Speaker 1: advances the conversation. Other people just like to rip people
Speaker 1: off and pretend it's there's no want. I want Matthew
Speaker 1: Crawford to get the high five he deserves for this.
Speaker 1: And he goes on, and I think we have to
Speaker 1: remember there's a another way to prove this analysis or
Speaker 1: this line of thinking, the legitimacy, the integrity of this
Speaker 1: philosophical approach, because it's not only in America that this
Speaker 1: actually has now spread. It's gone beyond American borders. So
Speaker 1: you'd think that the left's unique revulsion at the longstanding
Speaker 1: history of slavery in this country and then Jim Crow
Speaker 1: and segregation, and you know, they say that they're they're
Speaker 1: confronting that even today. That's what the left will tell you.
Speaker 1: But yet there are BLM protests in London, in Paris,
Speaker 1: in Germany. And the author points this out. This illegitimacy
Speaker 1: transcends any particular historical facts about slavery and segregation, and
Speaker 1: indeed transcends America, as one can surmise by the ease
Speaker 1: with which American grievance politics have been exported throughout the
Speaker 1: Western world. In this we sometimes see the use of
Speaker 1: historical American references that have been weirdly transposed, as when
Speaker 1: a house once lived in by Rosa Parks was relocated
Speaker 1: from Detroit to Berlin, the financial seat of the European Union.
Speaker 1: Under the Empire of Christendom, the market for material relics
Speaker 1: from the Passion of the Christ was similarly global. They
Speaker 1: left the Holy Land that ended up in various seats
Speaker 1: of earthly power, most recently, the Transatlantic Festival of George
Speaker 1: Floyd attests to the fact that it isn't simply America
Speaker 1: that stands accused the social order is corrupt. Then the
Speaker 1: labor movement once had an alternative order to offer in
Speaker 1: its stead, drawing on the socialist tradition. It was one
Speaker 1: that included African Americans, not as African Americans, but as workers,
Speaker 1: and this movement was fairly successful. What happened then, The
Speaker 1: prominence of the term repressed in the nineteen sixties is
Speaker 1: significant and marks a shift into a new terrain of
Speaker 1: psychologized politics. The object of attack for the new left
Speaker 1: was no longer leis a fair capitalism, but society, the
Speaker 1: Freudian super ego more or less, with its insistence on
Speaker 1: standards of behavior that are binding on all society, is
Speaker 1: to be taken as inherently oppressive and discredited in the
Speaker 1: name of liberation. Effectively, America is so oppressive, racist, evil,
Speaker 1: gender discriminatory. It's such a bad place that the left
Speaker 1: can completely rewrite the rules of what we should be
Speaker 1: trying to achieve in this country. And on a personal level,
Speaker 1: they feel no particular allegiance to traditional America, and they
Speaker 1: feel like their actions are always justified because they're working
Speaker 1: for this greater idealized future. Isn't this every lib you know?
Speaker 1: Isn't this every smug Biden voter you've come across in
Speaker 1: the last year or so. I'm sure there are some exceptions,
Speaker 1: but I'm betting it's most of them. Just to finish
Speaker 1: this up quote, if the ideal of a demoralized public
Speaker 1: sphere was a signature aspiration of liberal secularism, it seems
Speaker 1: we have entered a post secular age populism, and because
Speaker 1: it became widely noticed that we have transition from a
Speaker 1: liberal society to something that more closely resembles a corrupt theocracy.
Speaker 1: End quote. Yeah, this is the religion of the elites
Speaker 1: we are talking about. Thanks for listening to the buses
Speaker 1: and show posts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. I've been
Speaker 1: saying for four years now that it's a certainty that
Speaker 1: Barack Obama, when he was president, knew that his administration
Speaker 1: on the way out was running essentially a spying and
Speaker 1: and disinformation campaign against the incoming Trump administration. It's obvious
Speaker 1: there's no way that Komey and Brennan and Clapper and
Speaker 1: go down the list there's no way that they would
Speaker 1: have been able to that they would have felt comfortable
Speaker 1: doing stuff if they didn't feel like ultimately they had
Speaker 1: cover from Obama for it, that he had at least
Speaker 1: been informed. And you'd say, well, how does that protect them?
Speaker 1: They would say, they went through chain of command. This
Speaker 1: is how bureaucracies avoid accountability. No one is ever really
Speaker 1: accountable for anything because everyone's accountable for everything. That's the
Speaker 1: way they do it. So they just say, well, I
Speaker 1: didn't I approve this FISA, but somebody else wrote up
Speaker 1: the FISA. Well I wrote up the FISA, but somebody
Speaker 1: else provided the raw mature of the raw information I
Speaker 1: used for the FISA. Well I approved it, but somebody
Speaker 1: else was supposed to review it. Right, So no one
Speaker 1: ever really gets nailed. But they all know what they're doing, right.
Speaker 1: They're all part of what is almost like a federal
Speaker 1: government racketeering operation. You know, that's what you see happening here,
Speaker 1: they're all, they're all a part of it. You want
Speaker 1: to bring like a Rico charge against them because it's
Speaker 1: a multi layered conspiracy, and that is exactly what Russia
Speaker 1: collusion was. And I understand right now, there's frustration because
Speaker 1: the Durham probe has not resulted and even a report,
Speaker 1: and I knew it wasn't going to happen on a
Speaker 1: timeline for the election, because ultimately, guys like Durham, guys
Speaker 1: like Bill Barr, they understand the politics involved here and
Speaker 1: they're not they for whatever, for their own reasons, for
Speaker 1: their own ethical choices and decisions, they will not bend
Speaker 1: the rules to be more political. They won't do it.
Speaker 1: They also maybe won't allow the other side to get
Speaker 1: away with doing it, but they themselves will not, will
Speaker 1: not bend the rules in order to score political points.
Speaker 1: So they weren't going to accelerate the Durham probe, That's
Speaker 1: what I'm telling you. But now it's been it's been
Speaker 1: designated as a special counsel, and as we know, the
Speaker 1: Democrats will just say, oh, who cares, We'll get rid
Speaker 1: of that as soon as there's a Biden, a Biden presidency.
Speaker 1: It will be more difficult, though, and it will give
Speaker 1: us something to work with and perhaps even escalate to
Speaker 1: where the Republicans are talking about impeachment. And I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna say this, I believe in using all the tactics
Speaker 1: and all the stratagems that the left engaged in against Trump.
Speaker 1: I think that we should hold them to their standards
Speaker 1: going forward, which means the bar for a Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden presidency, for impeachment, for special counsel, it's very low,
Speaker 1: very low. Take toll this with that phone call that
Speaker 1: Trump had with his Ukrainian counterpart. If that can get
Speaker 1: you impeach Joe Biden, better watch his step the moment
Speaker 1: the Republicans take back the House majority, and I'm not
Speaker 1: going to stand in their way. I'm gonna be cheering
Speaker 1: them on, saying, Yep, let's go for it. What's good
Speaker 1: for one side, good for the other. The only way
Speaker 1: to make them think twice about the kinds of underhanded
Speaker 1: tactics they use is to make them live by those tactics.
Speaker 1: It's the only way. Now, let's get back to what
Speaker 1: the former president Obama knew and hat tip Sean Davis
Speaker 1: of the Federalist dot Com for this piece. D and
Speaker 1: I declassifies handwritten notes from John Brennan twenty sixteen CI
Speaker 1: referral on Clinton campaign's collusion operation. Here's what he writes.
Speaker 1: Quote on Tuesday, Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe declassified
Speaker 1: and released to Congress handwritten notes from CI director Brennan,
Speaker 1: as well as a CIA investigative referral to James Coomey
Speaker 1: and Peter Struck requesting that they investigate Russian knowledge of
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton's anti Trump collusion smear operation. He goes on
Speaker 1: top US intelligence officials were so concerned heading into the
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen election that the Russians were aware of and
Speaker 1: potentially manipulating Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's plans to smear
Speaker 1: Donald Trump as a Russian agent, that they personally briefed
Speaker 1: President Barack Obama on the matter. Newly declassified Central Intelligence
Speaker 1: Agency documents show CI officials also requested that the FBI
Speaker 1: investigate Russian knowledge of the Clinton campaign's collus Lusian smear operation.
Speaker 1: Newly declassified handwritten notes from the former CI director John
Speaker 1: Brennan show the US intelligence community knew in twenty sixteen
Speaker 1: that Russian intelligence was actively monitoring and potentially injecting disinformation
Speaker 1: into Clinton's anti Trump collusion narrative. The intelligence concerning Russia's
Speaker 1: knowledge of Clinton campaign plans was so concerning to Brennan
Speaker 1: and other national security officials that they personally informed Obama
Speaker 1: of the matter in the Oval office in the summer
Speaker 1: of twenty sixteen. These are handwritten notes from CI director Brennan,
Speaker 1: So they were telling the president then Barack Obama, they
Speaker 1: were telling him, Yeah, there's Russian disinformation stuff going on here.
Speaker 1: We got real concerns about this. But you know, maybe
Speaker 1: we could also use this. Maybe we run with this. See,
Speaker 1: that's what the decision was. This would be something like
Speaker 1: if a person came in and said, you know, I know,
Speaker 1: I know that you know, John my neighbor assassinated not
Speaker 1: John Wilkes Booth, obviously, John my neighbor assassinated Abraham Lincoln.
Speaker 1: I mean, you could walk into a into a police
Speaker 1: station and you know, there's no statute of limitations on murder,
Speaker 1: so you know, they would usually say, okay, let's a
Speaker 1: normal reaction would be, let's take this person for psychological evaluation,
Speaker 1: or maybe you just ignore them and say get out
Speaker 1: of here, buddy. But it's not always the case that
Speaker 1: people will act ethically when they're presented with information that
Speaker 1: a normal analysis would tell them is absurd, and so
Speaker 1: it also provides an opportunity for the unscrupulous. They can
Speaker 1: use that as the basis for an investigation. That's exactly
Speaker 1: what they did in Russia Gate. All this stuff was
Speaker 1: being said, all these rumors, They had no real evidence
Speaker 1: at all, and there was Russian disinformation out there, and
Speaker 1: they figured, well, what if we just rely on the
Speaker 1: Russian disinformation and pretend and that we believe it, and
Speaker 1: maybe we do a little bit, but not really, but maybe,
Speaker 1: and then we start monitoring, investigating spying on the Trump campaign. Right,
Speaker 1: this would be like your neighbor John all of a
Speaker 1: sudden has police officers banging on his doors saying, we
Speaker 1: have a you know, we have a report that you
Speaker 1: assassinated Abraham Lincoln. They could do that, right, I mean
Speaker 1: they could say that. I mean maybe in that case
Speaker 1: the case was never opened. It's not their jurisdiction, but
Speaker 1: you get what I'm saying, right, I mean, you know
Speaker 1: they could. They could come to you and if you
Speaker 1: were accused of a murder in California when you were
Speaker 1: actually in Omaha, Nebraska, and the police knew that they
Speaker 1: could still continue the investigation of you, they could still say, well,
Speaker 1: you know, it's not totally not totally proven yet, but
Speaker 1: we rely at some level on good faith operations from
Speaker 1: people who have this kind of power. If you're willing
Speaker 1: to abuse good faith, you can find a justification to
Speaker 1: investigate anyone you want for anything you want. That's exactly
Speaker 1: what Obama and all the clowns around him did. Now
Speaker 1: we know Obama knew about this, and Obama never spoke out.
Speaker 1: He would have known that there was Russian disinformation, that
Speaker 1: the Russians were actively trying to lie about Trump to
Speaker 1: get this whole story of stealing the election and Trump
Speaker 1: working with the Russians. He would have known that it
Speaker 1: was all out there. Did he ever speak out about this? Obama, right,
Speaker 1: the great patriot, the guy who loves the country so much.
Speaker 1: I mean, if you read the reviews of his most
Speaker 1: recent autobiography, because I think he's got four now, at
Speaker 1: least three, you're either reviews. I've never seen such sycophantic
Speaker 1: rantings from people who at least ostensibly make a living
Speaker 1: from telling people important truths that they may not want
Speaker 1: to hear in the media. Right, they don't really make
Speaker 1: a living doing that, but that is what they say.
Speaker 1: They love Obama in a way they've never loved any politician.
Speaker 1: The Democrats and the mainstream Democrat Party and its elites
Speaker 1: and intelligentsia think that Barack Obama is really above human
Speaker 1: not quite a god, but not quite a human being either.
Speaker 1: He's something even more special than that. And they were
Speaker 1: never going to push him on. Why didn't you, out
Speaker 1: of love for your country, come forward and say, hey, guys,
Speaker 1: this stuff about Trump being a Russian trader, it really
Speaker 1: is really not it's really not true. We should say,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of other reasons that we as Democrats
Speaker 1: don't like this guy. But that's not what No, of
Speaker 1: course he was silent about it, pretend that he didn't
Speaker 1: know anything about it. No, no, no, you know, it's
Speaker 1: just the intelligence community. Man, there's no politics here. It's
Speaker 1: just the ice doing what they do. That's what they
Speaker 1: tell us, that's what they claim. It's all a lie.
Speaker 1: We are heading into this period in American politics where
Speaker 1: I think they hope, the left and the Democrats, hope
Speaker 1: that they can bend us to their will about what
Speaker 1: we even remember that the brainwashing will extend well beyond
Speaker 1: their most ardent supporters to people who are just trying
Speaker 1: to keep up with what's going on and they are
Speaker 1: overwhelmed by the propaganda machine. So let me just tell
Speaker 1: you right now. Let's get this for our purposes on
Speaker 1: the record so we can remember this. Barack Obama knew
Speaker 1: about the Russia collusion smear against Trump, almost certainly ordered
Speaker 1: it to escalate. He definitely knew about it, and he
Speaker 1: did nothing to stop it. As completely unethical political assassin.
Speaker 1: Democrats went after the Trump administration with this lie for years.
Speaker 1: It is the worst political scandal of my lifetime. It's
Speaker 1: a disgrace. And all this stuff about respect our democracy
Speaker 1: and give up Trump and all this other stuff is
Speaker 1: coming from people who do not give a crap about
Speaker 1: the ideals or the rules or the aspirations enshrined in
Speaker 1: the Constitution and in the history of this republic. They
Speaker 1: could care less about any of that. They're raw exercise
Speaker 1: of power. Me me, me, I want mine. I'm right,
Speaker 1: I'm a lib You be quiet. The media agrees with me.
Speaker 1: That is how they view all of this, So get
Speaker 1: ready for that going forward. Don't expect any good faith
Speaker 1: operations from their side. They feel like they largely got
Speaker 1: away with this, which means they'll try similar stuff in
Speaker 1: the future. And the only way that we can push
Speaker 1: back is by shouting the truth in their faces and
Speaker 1: refusing to bend when they try to coerce us with
Speaker 1: even more lies. You're in the freedom hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the buck Sex and Show podcast hasn't been talking here.
Speaker 1: It's hardly a profile. Encourage from McConnell come out and
Speaker 1: say this. Now, his delay has had a real world
Speaker 1: impact and been physically dangerous for some people around the country,
Speaker 1: which we'll talk about over the course of this broadcast.
Speaker 1: What what's seeing it? What kind of craziness is se
Speaker 1: Ann saying? Now that's been physically dangerous. Let's go ahead.
Speaker 1: That is physically dangerous. The people have for maccado to
Speaker 1: det No, it's not. The guy hadn't been declared the
Speaker 1: president by the Electoral College. That's when he's the president elect.
Speaker 1: You know what's next, The meeting's going to say you
Speaker 1: have to declare the winner of the presidency before the
Speaker 1: actual election happens. Look at the polls, man, look at
Speaker 1: the polls. Well, that's not how it works, is it.
Speaker 1: As we know, you better not trust those polls. Just
Speaker 1: remember this. Look at look at just a series of
Speaker 1: issues from from recent times, whether it is on this
Speaker 1: election or it's on the BLM movement, the renaming of statues,
Speaker 1: police reform, all of these issues. The people that try
Speaker 1: to try to bend the knee to the lad in
Speaker 1: the hope that this will bring them closer to our
Speaker 1: side and will open dialogue, and the Democrats will all
Speaker 1: of a sudden respond in good faith. They're always disappointed
Speaker 1: because when they're making outlandish demands or they're they're basing
Speaker 1: their whole argument in lies, in misrepresentations, and you say, okay, okay,
Speaker 1: but they're so angry about this, fine, we'll give them.
Speaker 1: It's like it's like giving a child throwing a tantrum
Speaker 1: what he wants. It's not going to get better now
Speaker 1: they know, Oh, okay, so we just we just throw
Speaker 1: another tantrum. Great, Okay, we can do that again. This
Speaker 1: is the only way you can deal with the left.
Speaker 1: You make overtures to the Democrats when it is in
Speaker 1: our interests and within our principles, and when it shows
Speaker 1: good faith from their side. That's it. You don't do
Speaker 1: it because you hope they'll be less crazy once you've
Speaker 1: given them something they want. That never works. Oh, you're
Speaker 1: just encouraging the encouraging the monster. That's all you're doing,
Speaker 1: all right, Mitch, McConnell said, calls Biden president elect the
Speaker 1: day of the Electoral College vote being held. Do they say,
Speaker 1: all right, good for Mitch McConnell that, you know, No,
Speaker 1: of course not. They hate Mitch McConnell, They hate the Republicans.
Speaker 1: It's hardly a pro valid courage. And people are data.
Speaker 1: I know Stelter and Berman apparently sound the same, but
Speaker 1: they do kind of sound the same. Hire the a
Speaker 1: pervalid courage. What was he supposed to do? Why call
Speaker 1: him president elect Biden before he's actually formerly the president elect?
Speaker 1: This is a United States senator. There were legal challenge
Speaker 1: making their way through the court. There still are legal
Speaker 1: challenges making their way through the courts. But you see,
Speaker 1: it's it's not enough. They tell you right now, admit
Speaker 1: that they're just say Biden is a president and tell
Speaker 1: us that there was no fraud. We can all be friends.
Speaker 1: Just say that there wasn't fraud and that Biden really
Speaker 1: won one, fair and square, no cheating whatsoever. Will like you,
Speaker 1: then I guarantee you if you do that, if you
Speaker 1: were to profess to you know, your co workers, or
Speaker 1: if you were to say online and someone you're having
Speaker 1: a debate over politics, or if you know what, you're right.
Speaker 1: Biden didn't that. There wasn't cheating to help him win.
Speaker 1: There was no frall. This was totally fair. And they'll say,
Speaker 1: ha ha, you lost, you suck, it's all. It's all
Speaker 1: over for you. You you know, you dumb trumper. Like
Speaker 1: they don't. They don't want to be fair minded to
Speaker 1: you at all. So when they pretend that that's where
Speaker 1: this is coming from, it's a trap. It's a trap.
Speaker 1: It's the guy who you walk past on the street.
Speaker 1: It says, hey, madam, I'm having a really hard time here,
Speaker 1: and you know, I just I just could you, I
Speaker 1: just can you? Can you just give me a dollar?
Speaker 1: I swear, I just I need a dollar for bus fare,
Speaker 1: and you know then I'll be fine. And you say
Speaker 1: all right, buddy, and you go for your wallet and
Speaker 1: he goes no, and he pulls out a knife and
Speaker 1: he says, I'll just take your wallet, thanks so much.
Speaker 1: That's how the Democrat play this game. Do not forget it.
Speaker 1: But also don't forget that Trump's not going anywhere either way.
Speaker 1: They're starting to realize it's what two even Romney knows
Speaker 1: at play eighteen. Well, I think President Trump will continue
Speaker 1: to have substantial influence on the party. And I think
Speaker 1: if you look at the people who are rumored to
Speaker 1: be thinking of running in twenty twenty four, besides the president,
Speaker 1: those are people who are trying to appeal to kind
Speaker 1: of a populist approach. So I don't think Trump is
Speaker 1: um is going away, but I hope that we can
Speaker 1: have disagreements over policy and a vision of our respective
Speaker 1: parties without continue to promote a narrative which puts democracy
Speaker 1: itself in jeopardy. And when you tell people that voting
Speaker 1: doesn't work and that democracy can't work because we don't
Speaker 1: have legitimate elections, that's a very dangerous thing to be saying.
Speaker 1: No one says that democracy doesn't work. I mean, now
Speaker 1: he's just creating straw men. We're saying that when Democrats
Speaker 1: change major rules than an election to create mail and balloting,
Speaker 1: which are which leaves the door wide open for fraud.
Speaker 1: And then there's all these really sketchy numbers and all
Speaker 1: these affidavits. We got questions and we want answers. Oh,
Speaker 1: but why are you threatening our democracy? Democrats? We're arguing
Speaker 1: for faithless electors in twenty sixteen. Do you remember that
Speaker 1: the Democrats were arguing for the election to be nullified
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson
Speaker 1: Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Just for your viewers
Speaker 1: out there. I know one of the ind officials who
Speaker 1: we just saw get vaccinated is planning on traveling after
Speaker 1: the second dose. This is a source of confusion. But no,
Speaker 1: this is one of the misperceptions here. Just because you
Speaker 1: get vaccinated with that second dose does not mean you
Speaker 1: should be participating in things like traveling in the middle
Speaker 1: of an outive control pandemic, or that you're liberated from masks.
Speaker 1: Everything still applies until all of us get the two
Speaker 1: dose regiment, and we don't think that's going to happen
Speaker 1: until June July. But and again this goes back to
Speaker 1: what we just talked about, Chuck. We don't know if
Speaker 1: just getting the vaccination prevents serious illness or does it
Speaker 1: also prevent you from getting infection entirely, meaning you can
Speaker 1: still get infected with the virus potentially and pass it
Speaker 1: on to others. So really, really critical, don't let your
Speaker 1: guard down just because you got vaccinated, you still might
Speaker 1: be able to get affect with the virus and pass
Speaker 1: on others, so please keep that in mind. So there's
Speaker 1: a lot they don't know. And the response to what
Speaker 1: they don't know is you can't have basic liberties and
Speaker 1: freedoms back, you can't live your life because they don't know.
Speaker 1: So let's just air on the side of continued isolation, depression,
Speaker 1: destruction of small businesses still at least next summer, until
Speaker 1: the virus is zero. None of us are safe. None
Speaker 1: of us are safe. This mentality is outrageous. Unfortunately, it
Speaker 1: is the consensus mentality among the elites and democrats, among
Speaker 1: social media giants. They will censor you, as they have
Speaker 1: done to me for even questioning this. We've got another buddy, though,
Speaker 1: who also questions it and sees the damage the devastation
Speaker 1: across the country and in his hometown area of Boston.
Speaker 1: Jerry Callahan is with us now. He is the host
Speaker 1: of the Jerry Callahan Podcast, longtime Boston radio legend. Jerry,
Speaker 1: Thanks for joining us, Hey, Buck, how's it going. I'm
Speaker 1: all right, man, but I'm worried because I think that
Speaker 1: the lockdown left is already showing us that they have.
Speaker 1: They have no intention of letting us start to go
Speaker 1: back to normal life until at least next summer, and
Speaker 1: others are saying until this time next year already. And
Speaker 1: it seems to me that no matter how much we
Speaker 1: can show that the data doesn't support some of the
Speaker 1: things they're doing. And what they're doing is catastrophic for
Speaker 1: millions of people who are going bankrupt, their businesses are
Speaker 1: going under. They just don't seem to care, Jerry. They
Speaker 1: think they've got all the ant No, it is frightening Bucket.
Speaker 1: It's getting worse. And today on my podcast, we developed
Speaker 1: we came up with a new word. We've heard of, Karen's.
Speaker 1: We all know what a Karen is. Well, now we
Speaker 1: have gooped us. Guptas are cable TV doctors who don't
Speaker 1: ever want this to end, who are literally telling us
Speaker 1: you will not be liberated. I mean that that's kind
Speaker 1: of a scary word. It should be at least that
Speaker 1: we're not going to liberate you from all these restrictions
Speaker 1: and these rules, and you're gonna have to continue wearing
Speaker 1: a mask, and you're gonna have to stay out of
Speaker 1: restaurants and bars and and don't travel. I mean He
Speaker 1: literally says, you're not going to be able to travel
Speaker 1: even after you get the vaccine. Well, what is the
Speaker 1: point of the vaccine? It's it's bizarre. And I think
Speaker 1: you and I have agreed on this for a while
Speaker 1: now that they're just they're never going to let this go.
Speaker 1: They're going to continue to try to keep us under
Speaker 1: their control forever. Well that's that's where I wanted to
Speaker 1: go next, because I think that we should establish a
Speaker 1: kind of philosophical understanding right now of what we're actually
Speaker 1: facing here. Because let's just say, for example, that we
Speaker 1: were to listen to everything that these various Blue check
Speaker 1: mds who go on on the different cable channels, that
Speaker 1: doctor Fauci, who I honestly think is a disaster, and
Speaker 1: just I don't know if he's not that bright, I
Speaker 1: don't know what his problem is. His judgment is horrible.
Speaker 1: I think it's more than he's a coward, actually than
Speaker 1: he's dumb. But you look at where this all goes, Jerry,
Speaker 1: and the moment that we start seeing stories in let's
Speaker 1: say May or June about you know, there's gonna be
Speaker 1: some relaxation. The cases are way down, We've got you know,
Speaker 1: fifty million Americans vaccinated, one hundred million Americans vaccinated. I
Speaker 1: can almost see right now you're gonna see stories about
Speaker 1: but what about mutations, what about COVID twenty what about
Speaker 1: COVID twenty one. We have to keep these things, you know,
Speaker 1: ready to go here because of the moment. And then
Speaker 1: I think people realize that if there's a zero risk
Speaker 1: to your health standard that these people can enforce and
Speaker 1: shut down your business and keep you away from relatives
Speaker 1: on the holidays. If that's the standard, they can use
Speaker 1: that standard going forward for other things too. And just
Speaker 1: once they're done with the mutations of the virus, you know,
Speaker 1: and I know what we're moving on to, and John
Speaker 1: Kerry will be leading the way, and it'll be we
Speaker 1: have to do these things to control climate change. It's
Speaker 1: for your own good. And I'm telling you, I don't
Speaker 1: know if you agree with me on this, Buck because
Speaker 1: you're in New York City. I'm in Boston. I'm kind
Speaker 1: of disappointed in the level of compliance and the just
Speaker 1: the the docile submission of so many people. I'm out
Speaker 1: every day, I'm running or walking the dog, and when
Speaker 1: i'm by myself, I'm not wearing a mask, because why
Speaker 1: would I let me tell you everybody else's They are
Speaker 1: all going along with this, and they're accepting these measures,
Speaker 1: even if they make no sense. Seem it's one thing
Speaker 1: if they tell you you must do whatever because of
Speaker 1: this reason, and they give it and they explain it. Well,
Speaker 1: what happened yesterday in Boston The mayor shut all gyms
Speaker 1: for the next three weeks. I mean they've already been
Speaker 1: living with all kinds of restrictions and you know, limited
Speaker 1: hours in space, and he just said we're going to
Speaker 1: close all gyms for three weeks. And you know what
Speaker 1: the reason is. He didn't have one. He literally does
Speaker 1: not have one. They're not a hotspot, they're not a vector.
Speaker 1: I could give you the numbers. It's unbelievable. They do
Speaker 1: not there's no evidence that the the virus is transmitted
Speaker 1: in gyms. He just said, we're locking you down because
Speaker 1: that's what we did last time. We did a lockdown,
Speaker 1: and we're gonna follow that protocol. So he puts people
Speaker 1: out of work, puts people out of business essentially ten
Speaker 1: days before Christmas, and doesn't really give them a reason.
Speaker 1: And if that doesn't outrage, I mean it should outrage
Speaker 1: everyone as much as it does me and you and
Speaker 1: it doesn't and that I don't know that just bothers me. Well,
Speaker 1: one thing I think, and we're speaking to Jerry Callahan.
Speaker 1: He is the host of Jerry Callahan podcast, long time
Speaker 1: ball and radio legend. Jerry, you know, we've had a
Speaker 1: couple of things coinciding here. One is that the lockdown
Speaker 1: left turn this into a kind of anti Trump thing,
Speaker 1: that this was about, that there was this political separation.
Speaker 1: And that's why I'm running around now saying forget about Trump,
Speaker 1: for this isn't about Trump. This is about freedom. This
Speaker 1: is about what's true. This is about free discourse and
Speaker 1: individual liberty and businesses that should be surviving. And and
Speaker 1: there's still this mentality I think of, oh no, but
Speaker 1: that's what trumpers say or something has nothing to do
Speaker 1: in my mind, this has nothing to do with Trump.
Speaker 1: This is about what's what's true and what's happening around us.
Speaker 1: And then there's also the most concerted suppression campaign I've
Speaker 1: ever seen in social media. And I've been formally reprimanded
Speaker 1: by the social media giants for sharing CDC studies, for
Speaker 1: sharing things that I just say, well, look at this
Speaker 1: doesn't this raise the following questions, and they'll put these,
Speaker 1: you know, fact checks that aren't actually checking any facts.
Speaker 1: They just say, well, this lacks context, doctor Fauci said, otherwise, Oh,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. So so now if doctor Fauci says something,
Speaker 1: it's a fact check. That's fascinating because he told us
Speaker 1: at the beginning of the pandemic, when this was considered
Speaker 1: to be far more dangerous actually by the individual case
Speaker 1: fatality that it was, don't wear masks. That was Fauci
Speaker 1: this year. But now he's a one man fact check. Oh,
Speaker 1: that's fascinating. He told us on March nine, Buck, don't
Speaker 1: hesitate to go on a cruise. Doctor Faucci told us
Speaker 1: to go ahead, you know, go ahead, go on a cruise,
Speaker 1: have fun, and by the way, go on Tinder and
Speaker 1: find love if you're if that's what you're looking for.
Speaker 1: Doctor Fauci gave you his blessing, and we know he's
Speaker 1: been wrong about everything, and yet you can't challenge him.
Speaker 1: It is bizarre, and to me, it is it flies
Speaker 1: in the face of you know what we see every
Speaker 1: day on the streets. I'm walking around, you're walking around,
Speaker 1: You're seeing these restaurants and businesses, and Jim, it's just
Speaker 1: closed up, boarded up, gone forever. So you try to
Speaker 1: point out this real ancillary effects here, this this real
Speaker 1: collateral damage, and it's like, yeah, but um, you know
Speaker 1: it's a virus or you know people they give you
Speaker 1: the number three thousand dead and you say, but do
Speaker 1: you know how many people are unemployed or on drugs
Speaker 1: or alcohol or their business is destroyed, and it's it's
Speaker 1: almost irrelevant. They don't want to hear it. They just say, yeah,
Speaker 1: but the virus. It's like the only thing that matter
Speaker 1: is when your your eyeballs tell you that there's a
Speaker 1: lot of other things going on that just a really
Speaker 1: really bad for society as a whole. What are you
Speaker 1: seeing in Boston about this, Because in New York we've
Speaker 1: had a couple of people and in New Jersey too.
Speaker 1: In New Jersey there's analysts, Jim, they've been telling everyone
Speaker 1: they got a one point two million dollars and counting
Speaker 1: uh finds from the city and from the state of
Speaker 1: New Jersey. In New York, we had this this pub
Speaker 1: and restaurant on Staten Island where the guys wouldn't shut
Speaker 1: down even though they were told they were in the
Speaker 1: red zone or the orange zone or whatever it was,
Speaker 1: and call those babies, Pete Davidson, and I say, those
Speaker 1: there are a bunch of babies. But go ahead, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I heard that guy. It's it's nice if you're in
Speaker 1: media and making a ton of money and can work
Speaker 1: remotely and or you know, not have to worry about
Speaker 1: a paycheck at all, that you get to just tell
Speaker 1: people that are losing their business is losing you know,
Speaker 1: decades of work in some cases. And the other thing
Speaker 1: that I would say, Jerry, is that when we see this,
Speaker 1: the chance that any one individual restaurant is a real
Speaker 1: problem in this pandemic, based on New York City's official numbers,
Speaker 1: is very very low. They say they think there's one
Speaker 1: percent of the spread they can trace to restaurants. One percent.
Speaker 1: We're shutting down ten thousand restaurants. I believe, go ahead.
Speaker 1: It's it's much like the gyms. They don't like the
Speaker 1: Antilles gym, they have zero they've had zero members test pausing,
Speaker 1: and they've had something like a million visits since they
Speaker 1: opened up illegally. But you're right, restaurants, it's like one
Speaker 1: percent gyms. It's much much less than one percent. So
Speaker 1: again they're telling you to do things that make no sense.
Speaker 1: It's one thing to tell you to do something, it's
Speaker 1: another thing to not give you a reason. It's the
Speaker 1: same thing here. They came up with these new rules
Speaker 1: because there was a spike, and we know that most
Speaker 1: of the cases are at home or nursing homes or hospitals.
Speaker 1: So they decide, you know, here's an idea, let's make
Speaker 1: everyone go home and get out of the restaurants and
Speaker 1: get out of the gyms. And here, yesterday the restaurants
Speaker 1: were already operating and limited capacity. Yesterday they closed all
Speaker 1: bar seating, no reason given, just we decided we have
Speaker 1: to do something here to make it look like we're
Speaker 1: trying to protect you from the evil virus. So we're
Speaker 1: not going to let people sit at the bar anymore.
Speaker 1: And they're just going to keep coming up with new
Speaker 1: measures until every damn restaurant is gone. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: the last number I saw, it was five thousand restaurants
Speaker 1: in the state, restaurants and bars that have gone under.
Speaker 1: It's obviously higher in New York and across the country.
Speaker 1: And it doesn't seem to affect these you know, these
Speaker 1: these public officeholders who risk nothing, who sacrificed nothing. Did
Speaker 1: you sit there in their office and say, you know what,
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna put another thousand people out of business
Speaker 1: and put another countless thousands of people out of work
Speaker 1: before Christmas. And they don't, they don't bet an eye.
Speaker 1: It's remarkable, is Jerry Callahan? I'm with you on this stuff. Man,
Speaker 1: keep the faith and hold strong up there in Boston.
Speaker 1: Go check out the Jerry Callahan podcast. Where have you
Speaker 1: listen to? Podcast? Jerry, thanks so much for joining us man.
Speaker 1: We appreciate it. Thanks. Buck, good Lucky, You're in the
Speaker 1: freedom Mine. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Yesterday,
Speaker 1: the United States witnessed a medical miracle. The first doses
Speaker 1: of a COVID vaccine were administered to frontline workers across
Speaker 1: the country. The President promised a safe and effective vaccine
Speaker 1: and record time, and President Trump delivered. Earlier this year,
Speaker 1: we heard from several news outlets and so called fact
Speaker 1: checks that President Trump would need quote a miracle to
Speaker 1: be right. That was an NBC News article. We were told,
Speaker 1: according to helpline quote, a vaccine will still take more
Speaker 1: than a year to develop. USA Today warned us that
Speaker 1: quote despite medical researchers progress, a vaccine quote was more
Speaker 1: than a year away, and National Geographic even told us
Speaker 1: that achieving a vaccine within quote a year to eighteen
Speaker 1: months would be absolutely unprecedented end quote. These reports deserve
Speaker 1: their own fact check false indeed, And we see once
Speaker 1: again how fact checking is abused by libs, how fact
Speaker 1: checking isn't really about facts. It's just a way to
Speaker 1: try to add additional gravitas to their opinions and to
Speaker 1: use it to silence opinions they don't like. Oh, we
Speaker 1: did a fact check and we're right and you're wrong.
Speaker 1: We fact check Trump and here's what we found. How
Speaker 1: do you fact check a prediction? They don't never think
Speaker 1: about this. How do you fact check a prediction? Does
Speaker 1: that ever occur to the people that are trying to
Speaker 1: do this stuff? You can't, right, if I told you
Speaker 1: that the stock market was going to be down fifty
Speaker 1: percent in six months, you can't fact check me on that.
Speaker 1: Hopefully that doesn't happen, by the way, because nobody knows,
Speaker 1: not possible to fact check it. So what they do
Speaker 1: is they call it a fact check. Then let's say
Speaker 1: experts disagree, that's not a fact they conflate these things.
Speaker 1: They do this intentionally. The media did this about the vaccine,
Speaker 1: and this, yes, certainly had some impact on the election.
Speaker 1: We had a lot of people who are being told
Speaker 1: all year you can't expect that there'll be a vaccine
Speaker 1: because the media is telling you that Trump is lying
Speaker 1: and Trump's never going to get a vaccine, and that's
Speaker 1: what they were saying. And then we turned around and say, well,
Speaker 1: hold on a second, what would perception have been, what
Speaker 1: would people have been thinking was likely to happen by
Speaker 1: the end of the year in terms of the election,
Speaker 1: And if they believe that a vaccine was on the
Speaker 1: way and would be here in December, as it is,
Speaker 1: this is now. The fact is that it is here.
Speaker 1: Did do they feel any sense of remorse or any
Speaker 1: sense of embarrassment for getting this wrong? Now? Of course not.
Speaker 1: They did it for a reason, and unfortunately the reason
Speaker 1: was to stop Trump from winning this election. So they
Speaker 1: view this probably as a big success. They got away
Speaker 1: with yet another lie. Russia collusion was a lie, but
Speaker 1: did it work for the Democrats? Trump is trying to
Speaker 1: destroy the Post Office was a lie? But did it work?
Speaker 1: And now we have the vaccine coming this year, they
Speaker 1: said it would never happen. Who was right, who was wrong?
Speaker 1: How to pay attention to this stuff? Got to remember
Speaker 1: it too, because these are the people who will turn
Speaker 1: around now. I mean, this is the same news media
Speaker 1: that is going to say that we should all, you know,
Speaker 1: respect our journos, and they're gonna try this whole game
Speaker 1: of oh now now we can finally trust them, Now
Speaker 1: we can finally trust them. No, we actually cannot trust them.
Speaker 1: We cannot, and it's because they've shown us who they are. Here.
Speaker 1: Here's among the most preposterous, the most vain, ignorant, and
Speaker 1: worthless of the journals because he's just a journalist, man,
Speaker 1: Jim Jim Accostum's just a journalist. This guy managed to
Speaker 1: build a career around Trump hatred and then acts like
Speaker 1: he's honest and ethical as a journal I mean, it's absurd.
Speaker 1: This is what he yells at the White House Press
Speaker 1: secretary after she leaves the podium, like the sniveling little coward.
Speaker 1: He is. Play really interesting turn of events, and good
Speaker 1: for those who covered what was a story all along
Speaker 1: and not Russia disinformation. For you to accuse others of
Speaker 1: disinformation when you spread it every day you hear that
Speaker 1: nasty little It's it's like he's like a mean girl
Speaker 1: in high school. Isn't hippo critic girl? For you to
Speaker 1: see it, it's been you spread disinformation every day. This
Speaker 1: is this is CNN's White House Correspondent senior, a White
Speaker 1: House correspondent. Well, we're supposed to take him seriously. Now,
Speaker 1: I don't know if anyone takes down Lemon seriously, but
Speaker 1: here he is talking about the White House Press Secretary thirteen.
Speaker 1: He's still pursuing on ongoing litigation at the moment. Did yes,
Speaker 1: she also works for a girl? Bye? I mean there's
Speaker 1: no other girl. Bye, good bye. That's all he's got for.
Speaker 1: That's that's how respectful they are of the White House
Speaker 1: Press sectorty. That's how respectful they are of the process
Speaker 1: and the sacred norms of our democracy. These journalists make
Speaker 1: a mockery of their profession on a regular basis, and
Speaker 1: then they turn around and they expect the rest of
Speaker 1: us to give them respect. They expect us to treat
Speaker 1: their pronouncements as though they don't come from a place
Speaker 1: of ignorance. Partisanship, bitterness, vanity. Yeah, those are the defining
Speaker 1: characteristics of the modern political media these days. That's what
Speaker 1: they actually show us day in and day out, so
Speaker 1: I think we should treat them as such. I have
Speaker 1: absolutely no desire, no plan, no willingness to pretend that
Speaker 1: the journos are somehow going to get better in the
Speaker 1: next four years. I think we all know they're only
Speaker 1: going to get worse, and they deserve to be held
Speaker 1: to account, and that means substantial amounts of mockery and ridicule,
Speaker 1: because that's what really bothers them. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the Busess and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Georgia
Speaker 1: Senate on Off just a few weeks away. As I've
Speaker 1: been telling you, this is absolutely critical. I want to
Speaker 1: get the most up to date information on this possible
Speaker 1: to all of you. For that, we bring in our
Speaker 1: friend Ryan Grudusky. He's the author of They're Not Listening
Speaker 1: How the Elites Created a National Populist Revolution, and he
Speaker 1: is a political political big brain. He's gonna tell us
Speaker 1: what's going on here. Ryan, Thanks so much for joining,
Speaker 1: Thank you for having me. What is happening right now
Speaker 1: with the early vote in Georgia tell us so as
Speaker 1: of right now, seven hundred and fifty As of this morning,
Speaker 1: seven hundred and fifteen, seven hundred, fifteen thousand, rather people
Speaker 1: have voted in the state of Georgia. Georgie is one
Speaker 1: of the one of the states like many that do
Speaker 1: not register people by parties, So we don't know what
Speaker 1: person's party has come out and vote, but we do
Speaker 1: know their we do ano their age and their race.
Speaker 1: So about fifty four point five percent are have been
Speaker 1: a non Hispanic wife, eight thirty three point one percent
Speaker 1: have been non Hispanic Black. Most of the people are
Speaker 1: fourty nine percent of Olas who have voted are over
Speaker 1: the age of sixty five. And most interestingly, about eighteen thousand,
Speaker 1: a little over eighteen thousand and five hundred are vote
Speaker 1: people who did not vote in the twenty twenty general election.
Speaker 1: They're new voters. So how's it looking right now for
Speaker 1: Leffler and Purdue, the Republican candidates. Well, ideally, for Republicans,
Speaker 1: you want the black vote because blacks vote ninety percent
Speaker 1: or above. For the Democrats, you like the black vote
Speaker 1: to be under thirty percent. They're at thirty three point one.
Speaker 1: It's been dropping every day. It was over at thirty
Speaker 1: I think seven and thirty eight percent the first day.
Speaker 1: So the energy and momentum for a huge surge of
Speaker 1: Stacy Abrams voters, especially in the Atlanta metro area, has
Speaker 1: kind of diminished somewhat slightly as days go by. Now,
Speaker 1: one thing I've learned covering Georgia is that Stacey Abrams
Speaker 1: has a tendency to take credit for everything she does
Speaker 1: it or sho doesn't do it. Um, you mean you
Speaker 1: mean the governor of the Governor of Georgia, Ryan, the
Speaker 1: fake governor of Georgia. Yo. So she was talking about
Speaker 1: how she was getting one point I guess three million
Speaker 1: absentee ballots out. A majority of those actually came from
Speaker 1: senior citizens, military personnel, and disabled who automatically get ballads. So, um,
Speaker 1: they were not anyone that she was requesting for a ballot.
Speaker 1: They were people who would get ballots normally under Georgia law.
Speaker 1: As of right now, one point six million people total
Speaker 1: have requested absentee ballots. By the way, is crazy high.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be a huge, huge, huge run off election,
Speaker 1: much higher than past run off elections. So this so
Speaker 1: just so we can some of the top line here, Um,
Speaker 1: we have a Georgia runoff that is already showing that
Speaker 1: people are very they're they're very focused on this. Ryan.
Speaker 1: I'm hearing from some folks on the right who want
Speaker 1: to say this that much publicly, but they they are
Speaker 1: saying the Democrats could actually steal these two seats, that
Speaker 1: that could happen, and everyone needs to take that very seriously.
Speaker 1: What do you say to that. The law in Georgia
Speaker 1: is probably the election laws in Georgia are probably some
Speaker 1: of the worst in the country as far as I
Speaker 1: could tell. So. So, for instance, after it came out
Speaker 1: of Joe Biden was ahead in the vote count, Donald
Speaker 1: Trump requested a recount, which is perfectly legal for a
Speaker 1: loser to look for a recount, and they found between
Speaker 1: three or four thousand more Trump votes during the recount
Speaker 1: in Georgia, which gave him a little bit of an edge,
Speaker 1: but it didn't put him over the number he needed
Speaker 1: to win. Now, if you remember, David Purdue was the
Speaker 1: winner of that election, but he didn't win enough to
Speaker 1: he didn't get over fifty percent to avoid a runoff.
Speaker 1: So I simply asked, well, how much of those three
Speaker 1: or four thousand to David Purdue get and they said, oh, well,
Speaker 1: we can't count those because only the loser can request
Speaker 1: to recount, So they could not count any other of
Speaker 1: the votes besides the Donald Trump votes. So David Purdue
Speaker 1: very well could have ended up getting over fifty percent
Speaker 1: of the vote had he been able to request or recount,
Speaker 1: but he can because of Georgia's so so he may so. Then,
Speaker 1: to be clear, this is not even a little bit
Speaker 1: beyond the realm of possibility what you're laying out here.
Speaker 1: By the numbers, Purdue might have actually won enough to
Speaker 1: not even be in a runoff, But because of the Georgia,
Speaker 1: because of the Georgia laws, they weren't able. They weren't
Speaker 1: able to look for those irregularities that they did find
Speaker 1: for Trump that might have put Purdue over. So there's
Speaker 1: no runoff. Correct, Yes, unbelieve the Republicans would have to senate. Yes,
Speaker 1: it is. It is the most insane series of laws
Speaker 1: you've ever heard of in your life. A big problem
Speaker 1: that I've had, I've raised to a lot of people
Speaker 1: is these drop off, these these ballot drop offs that
Speaker 1: they've been having. They have twenty one in one county alone,
Speaker 1: and the question comes up of ballot harvesting. It is
Speaker 1: illegal in the state of Georgia. Two ballot harvest You
Speaker 1: can't deliver any other ballot besides your own. But the
Speaker 1: problem is, and under the law written in the words
Speaker 1: and the Georgia law is that you have to have
Speaker 1: two people witness you dropping off a ballot. Right now,
Speaker 1: because of COVID, they made these in these draw of
Speaker 1: these ballot the ballot drop off boxes where you just
Speaker 1: walk into a box, you deliver it, but there's nobody
Speaker 1: watching these boxes to make sure there only one ballot
Speaker 1: is going in there at a time. They have a
Speaker 1: camera these boxes, but the camera's only looking to see
Speaker 1: if someone you know, destroys the boxes, not if somebody
Speaker 1: delivers fifty or sixty ballots at one single time. There's
Speaker 1: so much money in Georgia, by the way, right now
Speaker 1: that Carl Rove could hire somebody to sit in front
Speaker 1: of every ballot drop off place all day long, every
Speaker 1: single day to make sure that no one's dropping up
Speaker 1: sixty or seventy ballots thirty times a day. But no
Speaker 1: one's doing that. As a right now, we're speaking of
Speaker 1: Ryan Grudusky, author if they're not listening how the elites
Speaker 1: created a national popst revolution. And he's a political analyst, Ryan,
Speaker 1: tell me this, what is the GOP not doing in George.
Speaker 1: I mean, let's let's put aside the issue of fraud
Speaker 1: for a second. There's also the possibility, it seems that
Speaker 1: maybe they could win these two Senate seats fair and
Speaker 1: square based on all the money and attention that these
Speaker 1: races are getting. What do you make of that risk
Speaker 1: and what would you want to see the GOP and
Speaker 1: these candidates and Trump and Pence do to make sure
Speaker 1: that we don't lose Senate control. Because I can handle
Speaker 1: whatever whatever the outcome of the presidential election is. I
Speaker 1: feel like we can weather that storm. It gets a
Speaker 1: lot harder whether if the Democrats have the House and
Speaker 1: the Senate. Yeah, so, I mean there's I mean, I
Speaker 1: can't over how much money and people there are right
Speaker 1: now in Georgia so far, and Georgia the Republicans, not
Speaker 1: the Democrats, just Republicans that have knocked about six million doors,
Speaker 1: which is basically every one of their voters five times over.
Speaker 1: They've done in a tremendous GEO TV job. There's tons
Speaker 1: of money being ported and one of the major problems
Speaker 1: of the Trump campaign was that they did not have
Speaker 1: any money in the Shatnuga media market. Now Chatanooga media
Speaker 1: market is only two percent of Georgia, but it's even
Speaker 1: the most Republican area of Georgia. So all two percent
Speaker 1: are heavily Republicans. In the ninth Congressional Marge Now congress
Speaker 1: from Marjorie Green, Margie Taylor Green's congressional district the second
Speaker 1: most Republican district of the state and the most Republican
Speaker 1: area of that congressional district. She had a voter, she
Speaker 1: did not have a Democrat opponent in the general election,
Speaker 1: and there was about seventy thousand fewer voters in her
Speaker 1: district than in the neighboring district. And those are two
Speaker 1: of the most Republican areas of the state. So I
Speaker 1: hope that those mistakes that I've reached out to several
Speaker 1: super pacts working in the state, and I've told them,
Speaker 1: you know, you need to make sure you Yeah, I
Speaker 1: know it's only two percent of the state, but it
Speaker 1: is an important two percent the state for Republicans that
Speaker 1: you should be advertising. I know, Miss McConnell and Carl
Speaker 1: Rove are spending a lot of time and energy down
Speaker 1: there as well as well as Donald Trump Junior. The
Speaker 1: President had a huge turnout. Mike Pence's turnout has been
Speaker 1: fairly low. Honestly right now, it has not been that
Speaker 1: strong as far as turning out major A lot of
Speaker 1: people to his rallies goes, but they I mean the
Speaker 1: problem is is the messaging that Trump gave early on
Speaker 1: it don't vote early, vote day of I think it
Speaker 1: was the wrong message to really have. I think that
Speaker 1: voting early is really really important because you don't know
Speaker 1: what's going to happen on election day. You get sick,
Speaker 1: your kid gets sick. Yeah, there's a snowstorm, there's a hurricane,
Speaker 1: whatever the case is, and you can't get to the polls.
Speaker 1: And Democrats are definitely utilizing this early ballot system. As
Speaker 1: far as the problems that went on last time, I
Speaker 1: think that there is a major issue right now with
Speaker 1: the Secretary of State's office. It's not just the Secretary
Speaker 1: of State who's incompetent, which he is. He's basically just
Speaker 1: a rich guy who wanted to run for governor one day,
Speaker 1: so he ran for secretary of State as a platform
Speaker 1: to then run for governor with no experience being Secretary state.
Speaker 1: The deput Secretary state for her last name is Foush.
Speaker 1: I forget her. First night's Diae, but it might not
Speaker 1: be dynas Foush is the last name for that. She's
Speaker 1: been making a lot of the calls and she's incredibly incompetent.
Speaker 1: Her big plan earlier this year was she wanted to
Speaker 1: have Cardi B cut commercials for the state to ask
Speaker 1: for poll watchers. Now, if you're a Republican, what kind
Speaker 1: of poll watchers is Cardi B going to attract? Sit
Speaker 1: there and make sure everything's going okay for your election?
Speaker 1: This is what this is what the state is right
Speaker 1: now in the Secretary of State's office. So there's very
Speaker 1: little competence there. And basically, since the Senators have both
Speaker 1: called on him to resign because of his incompetency with
Speaker 1: this election, he has kind of been blowing a lot
Speaker 1: of people off. So would you say it's on track
Speaker 1: or are you concerned now about these two Senate seats
Speaker 1: that will determine control of the United States Senate for
Speaker 1: the next two years? Well, I'm certain. I mean, the
Speaker 1: landmark pole just came out. It's a pretty good polling
Speaker 1: for him in Georgia's as far as polls go, which
Speaker 1: a lot of them have been off, but it's a
Speaker 1: pretty good polling for him, and they both had Laffler
Speaker 1: and Purdue up by one point. The attack ads against
Speaker 1: Perdue are very very effective, and he has not been
Speaker 1: able to really respond to them. In the fact of
Speaker 1: the insider trading and selling so many stocks, it's been
Speaker 1: very very very very very effective. Now that being said,
Speaker 1: also is a known quantity in Georgia because of his
Speaker 1: congressional run, is high probode congressional run, and he's pretty
Speaker 1: well hated throughout Georgia. Nonetheless, if they're able to sit
Speaker 1: there in serge these people out of the inner city,
Speaker 1: we'll see. I will say the one thing going for
Speaker 1: them going for a Laffler and Purdue that was not
Speaker 1: going for a Trump is they do not alienate suburban
Speaker 1: white voters. In the same capacity, Perdue and Laffler both
Speaker 1: overperformed Trump, and we'll really Purdue becau. Laffler had another
Speaker 1: Republican but Purdue overperform Trump in the sixth and seven
Speaker 1: Congression district which are the two suburban Atlantic Congression districts
Speaker 1: that flow from Republican to Democrats since twenty eighteen, just
Speaker 1: to switching gears. Before we let you go, we're speaking
Speaker 1: of Ryan Grudusky, author, if they're not listening, how the
Speaker 1: elites created a national populist revolution. Ryan, You and I've
Speaker 1: talked to this before, but I want you to lay
Speaker 1: it out for everybody. In the post election analysis here,
Speaker 1: there was a problem for Trump with what was the
Speaker 1: primary What was it white working class voters not turning
Speaker 1: out enough, or was it white college educated suburban voters
Speaker 1: who either wouldn't vote for them or voted for Biden.
Speaker 1: So the main problem with the Trump campaign was their
Speaker 1: idea always was we're listening, We're gonna lose white college
Speaker 1: educated voters. Guy's kind of baked in the bread. So
Speaker 1: we're gonna make up for that by getting more minority
Speaker 1: voters out. Now in a state Lake Florida, in a
Speaker 1: state Lake Texas, that idea worked, and it worked very
Speaker 1: very well. They did an excellent job. And they did
Speaker 1: an excellent job, by the way, in almost every major
Speaker 1: city Los Angeles, New York, Philadelphia, Detroit, Cleveland, El Paso, Miami.
Speaker 1: All these cities, especially those experienced surges of the Black
Speaker 1: Lives Matter riots did vote more Republican, which was great.
Speaker 1: The problem is in places like Wisconsin, Arizona, Pennsylvania, there
Speaker 1: just were not enough of those voters to make up
Speaker 1: for the only way you were going to make up
Speaker 1: for that surge of non college educated, surge of college
Speaker 1: educated whites voting Democrat was by getting non college educated
Speaker 1: whites to vote Republican and more of them and registering them.
Speaker 1: There was never a ground game in place at all
Speaker 1: by any Republicans for the last four years. And I
Speaker 1: brought this idea to Brad Parscal back in twenty seventeen.
Speaker 1: I said, there are forty seven million non college educated
Speaker 1: white Americans who are not registered to vote. If you
Speaker 1: register ten percent of them, you don't have a problem.
Speaker 1: And most of those people, by the way, live in
Speaker 1: the Midwest. They live in the swing states that Trump
Speaker 1: flipped from Obama, so it's not impossible to sit there.
Speaker 1: And when every one of those states all over again,
Speaker 1: there is This is a truth about campaigns. When it
Speaker 1: comes to voter registrations, it's very difficult and there's not
Speaker 1: a lot of money in it, so there's not a
Speaker 1: lot of consultants who want to go run a voter
Speaker 1: registration organization, and looking up Brad Parscal made a lot
Speaker 1: of money off that campaign. It seems like he kind
Speaker 1: of took that advice. So there's not a lot of
Speaker 1: money in voter registration, let's look at doing other things.
Speaker 1: So they chased phantom Hispanic voters in New Mexico for
Speaker 1: three years and lo and behold, I mean it just
Speaker 1: didn't work out. I'll say there's one statistic for you
Speaker 1: before we go, because they know running a time, there
Speaker 1: were twenty three counties that flipped from Obama to Trump.
Speaker 1: In Wisconsin, twenty two of those twenty three counties, Trump
Speaker 1: increases percentage and they had over ninety percent turnout. Basically
Speaker 1: everybody you possibly want to do. They did great down
Speaker 1: ground game, but the number of registrated voters in those
Speaker 1: twenty three counties decreased by eight thousand, even though the
Speaker 1: population increased, because there was no effort on the part
Speaker 1: of the GUPE to registered new voters in those areas,
Speaker 1: especially those who have kind of formed by the way.
Speaker 1: So I don't believe the politicians help them. That is
Speaker 1: the big like the Rosanne voter, the shameless voter, those
Speaker 1: p those kind of characters who are in our country
Speaker 1: who feel like government doesn't respond to their needs. They're
Speaker 1: the ones going to be tapped into. And there was
Speaker 1: no effort on part of the GOP, the RNC, the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign thanks to Jared Kushner to reach out to
Speaker 1: those voters. They would have made the absolute difference, and
Speaker 1: voter fraud aside, he would have been able to win
Speaker 1: a bunch of those states that he lost. Ryan Grudusky
Speaker 1: check out his book They're Not Listening Billbill on Amazon. Ryan,
Speaker 1: always insightful man. Thanks for joining us. Thank you, you're
Speaker 1: in the freedom, hud This is the buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast shots have been administered. Hope is on the way,
Speaker 1: and our job here is to guarantee that this enough
Speaker 1: money to facilitate the delivery, as well as to do
Speaker 1: other things that we can agree on. And as I've
Speaker 1: said repeatedly, number one, we're not leaving here without a
Speaker 1: COVID package. Not gonna happen. We're gonna stay here until
Speaker 1: we get a COVID package, no longer, no matter how
Speaker 1: long it takes, We'll be here until we get a
Speaker 1: COVID package. They better get a COVID package. It's Really,
Speaker 1: it's so shameful that we're at this point. We've gone
Speaker 1: this many months where the federal government, I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: say it, the Congress and even at some levels the administration. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right, the administration not getting enough support to people
Speaker 1: who are suffering in these in these states where the
Speaker 1: lockdown libs are just making everything impossible. Well, what are
Speaker 1: they supposed to do? You're not allowed to work. Not
Speaker 1: everyone has savings to endure these tough times, right, So
Speaker 1: what is supposed to happen now? What's the reality of
Speaker 1: people's lives who don't get this don't get this assistance.
Speaker 1: Mcmcconnell tweeted this out earlier today. The American people need
Speaker 1: more help. We need vaccine distribution money, We need to
Speaker 1: re up the paycheck protection program to save jobs. We
Speaker 1: need to continue to provide for laid off Americans. Congressional
Speaker 1: leaders are on both sides are working until we get
Speaker 1: this done. I mean the fact that here we are,
Speaker 1: it's it's almost Christmas, they're almost going on vacation. They
Speaker 1: still haven't worked out this package because the vain, selfish,
Speaker 1: conniving Democrats and the somewhat ineffectual and you know, incompetent
Speaker 1: Republicans can't figure this thing out. It really really makes
Speaker 1: you wonder. They impoverish people, they destroy their businesses. They
Speaker 1: say they're going to send help, and then they don't
Speaker 1: send help, and they wonder why we have the feelings
Speaker 1: we do about politicians that about politics in this country.
Speaker 1: I'm sure they'll get some kind of a deal done,
Speaker 1: or I hope they'll get some kind of a deal done,
Speaker 1: but that it's taken this long in itself is a
Speaker 1: scandal and a disgrace, and we should remember that. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Clearly, these numbers that I went over
Speaker 1: a moment ago, they're going in the wrong direction. We
Speaker 1: are just on the verge of a huge breakthrough with
Speaker 1: the vaccine, but we're also dealing with a second wave.
Speaker 1: We've got to beat it back. We've got to protect lives,
Speaker 1: we've got to protect our hospitals. So I think, unfortunately,
Speaker 1: I don't say it with anything but sorrow, but I
Speaker 1: do think it's needed. We're going to need to do
Speaker 1: some kind of shutdown in the weeks ahead, something that
Speaker 1: resembles the pause we were in in the Sprint shutdown
Speaker 1: number two in NYC. And oh, it's coming to a
Speaker 1: city near you. Two friends, wherever you are across the country,
Speaker 1: you're going to see more of this, more calls for this.
Speaker 1: Seems so strange to me that shutdowns work so well,
Speaker 1: or lockdowns work so well that they're always followed by shutdowns.
Speaker 1: What's that all about. I've got somebody who's willing to
Speaker 1: ask these questions. Look at the data, tell us what's
Speaker 1: really happening. Jordan shack Tell is with us now. He
Speaker 1: is an investigative journalist based in DC. Jordan, thanks so much. Yeah,
Speaker 1: thanks for having me. Buck, what do you make of
Speaker 1: what's happening right now? And you just give us your
Speaker 1: your broad stroke thoughts on what we're seeing here where
Speaker 1: you still have politicians say they act like this is
Speaker 1: some fight that we're gonna win, meaning that we're gonna
Speaker 1: stop this virus if only we just do what they say.
Speaker 1: And I want to know how many times across the world,
Speaker 1: not even just in the US, just in New York,
Speaker 1: across the world we have to see that it doesn't
Speaker 1: work like that. Yeah, this is a never ending war.
Speaker 1: It's like the you know, the war in Afghanistan, and
Speaker 1: now we're in the the vaccine edition of this process
Speaker 1: and this war that we're fighting. And I think that
Speaker 1: what's been really interesting that's come out in the past
Speaker 1: couple of days you see people like Fauci and the
Speaker 1: usual suspects and all these cockdown governor saying, oh, wait,
Speaker 1: hold on, hold on a second. You can't just return
Speaker 1: to normal life. You know, we need we need to
Speaker 1: get eighty ninety percent of this population the vaccine and
Speaker 1: then we can start thinking about it. And of course
Speaker 1: this is without any of the consent of the government whatsoever.
Speaker 1: You know, no one has voted on any of these policies,
Speaker 1: and they want to continue the insanity as long as possible,
Speaker 1: it seems. And what are you finding, I mean, what
Speaker 1: are some of the areas in your research that you're
Speaker 1: coming up on where you just feel like people need
Speaker 1: to know more about certain facts and certain realities we're
Speaker 1: dealing with here with COVID. So one of the really
Speaker 1: big things that we're going to see with this vaccine
Speaker 1: deployment is it's really going to expose how the COVID
Speaker 1: testing process is so incredibly broken, and that most of
Speaker 1: these testing manufacturers don't actually test for COVID nineteen. They
Speaker 1: are just trying to ring up some positives. Because this
Speaker 1: has become I just wrote about this. The testing industry
Speaker 1: has become a two hundred and fifty million dollar per
Speaker 1: day revenue industry just in the United States, so you
Speaker 1: can push that out globally and it's a multi billion
Speaker 1: dollar per day industry, and it's becoming almost too big
Speaker 1: to fail. And what we're going to see with the
Speaker 1: vaccine deployment is that people who have been inoculated from
Speaker 1: the virus may still test positive because as we know,
Speaker 1: a lot of these tests don't work. So it's going
Speaker 1: to create a lot of confusion among the public. And
Speaker 1: I don't see any of the people in government or
Speaker 1: these highly touted bureaucrats talking about this issue because it
Speaker 1: seems like with these big pharma companies, there's just too
Speaker 1: much money to be made, there's so much corruption, and
Speaker 1: we're just going to have to deal with this mess
Speaker 1: until people eventually organize and try to take the power back.
Speaker 1: What do we know about the fail rate on these tests, Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's incredibly high. What they do is um it's similar too.
Speaker 1: I guess the analogy you could use is a microscope,
Speaker 1: you know how many magnifications. If you go you know,
Speaker 1: ten X on a microscope, you're not going to see,
Speaker 1: you know, these these tiny fragments. And if you go
Speaker 1: one hundred X, you're going to see a bunch of stuff.
Speaker 1: But if you're going one hundred xs on these tests,
Speaker 1: you're not necessarily seeing live virus. You're seeing a bunch
Speaker 1: of fragments of stuff. And what happens with these ultra
Speaker 1: sensitive testing processes is that they're finding a bunch of
Speaker 1: dead virus or you know, some other fragments of coronaviruses
Speaker 1: and that's enough for them because they set it up
Speaker 1: this way to label these cases, to diagnose people as
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen cases, but they were never really you know, sick,
Speaker 1: or they never really acquired the actual virus in the
Speaker 1: first place. You can ask, is this like official record
Speaker 1: and no one just talks about it? Or is this contested?
Speaker 1: Oh no, this is this is how they're doing things.
Speaker 1: So it's called a cycle threshold. People can google that,
Speaker 1: and the psych goal threshold for identifying um these viruses
Speaker 1: is much lower. You know that when you get to
Speaker 1: these amazingly high levels, like a lot of these tests
Speaker 1: are doing thirty eight, thirty nine, forty times amplification instead
Speaker 1: of you know, the science really says that it should
Speaker 1: be below thirty based on you know, the work I've done.
Speaker 1: But what they're they're finding is, you know, they're they're
Speaker 1: purposely cranked up to a point where they're finding all
Speaker 1: these positives. And you know, my hypothesis is that they're
Speaker 1: doing it on purpose, because they know the information is
Speaker 1: out there, and they're doing it on purpose because you're
Speaker 1: not going to make any money if you're if your products,
Speaker 1: you know, are testing and then everyone's coming back negative.
Speaker 1: So I think it's really become a malicious, corrupt industry.
Speaker 1: And unfortunately it's it's encouraged by organizations like the FDA,
Speaker 1: which are just rubber stamping these these labs and these
Speaker 1: you know, other healthcare organizations and there's no accountability whatsoever
Speaker 1: in this process. And you know, they call it the
Speaker 1: case demic for a reason because we just have an
Speaker 1: out of control case labeling problem and it's kind of
Speaker 1: propping up this pandemic because on the other end of
Speaker 1: the spectrum, you have most state health departments. If anyone
Speaker 1: tests positive and dies within thirty days of a COVID
Speaker 1: nineteen diagnosis, they're labeled COVID nineteen no matter what. So
Speaker 1: when you have all these false positives, it's basically propping
Speaker 1: up an entire pandemic industry at this point, and also
Speaker 1: giving an excuse for these lockdown governors to just continue
Speaker 1: to keep us locked up in perpetuity. And a vaccine
Speaker 1: isn't going to solve that problem. We're speaking of Jordan's
Speaker 1: Shack Talley. He's an investigative, a journalist based in DC's
Speaker 1: been looking very closely at COVID. Jordan, I get a
Speaker 1: lot of heat from people for just even asking questions
Speaker 1: about masks. And I understand the theory behind how masks
Speaker 1: work and in the certain situations where masks could work,
Speaker 1: And I know that you know that this is now
Speaker 1: a very touchy subject for a lot of people. I
Speaker 1: would ask you to explain. Explain this to me. Based
Speaker 1: on the data that you've seen and all the numbers
Speaker 1: that you've crunched. In New York City, we're told that
Speaker 1: there is this is the official New York City Health
Speaker 1: Department number. One point seven percent of COVID spread in
Speaker 1: this current wave comes from indoor dining and restaurants. So
Speaker 1: that's a situation where people are in an enclosed space,
Speaker 1: circulated the same air with no mask on while they're
Speaker 1: eating for hours at a time. That's one point seven
Speaker 1: percent of the spread. Yet I walk around the streets
Speaker 1: outside here, and I'd say ninety to ninety five percent
Speaker 1: of people outdoors walking alone primarily have masks on. Where
Speaker 1: is the science, What is the study that suggests that outdoor,
Speaker 1: open air spread of a person alone walking around a
Speaker 1: major city is at risk for COVID? Yeah, there is none.
Speaker 1: A lot of us have been looking into this for months,
Speaker 1: and it's it's total mythology. It's based on this notion
Speaker 1: that there's you know, these silent spreaders. But this idea
Speaker 1: has never actually been proven. And as you just said
Speaker 1: when you talked about the data of you know, the
Speaker 1: New York City Health Department when they're track, when they're
Speaker 1: doing this useless contact tracing and asking people, you know,
Speaker 1: how what did you do in the last couple of weeks?
Speaker 1: And some people have went to a restaurant, but only
Speaker 1: one percent or whatever could identify the restaurant as being
Speaker 1: possibly the source of infection. There's no science behind this
Speaker 1: asymptomatic spread stuff. It's just pure speculation. There's no all
Speaker 1: these scientific papers, they don't really track asymptomatic spread. They
Speaker 1: model asymptomatic spread based on the hypothesis that it actually exists.
Speaker 1: But that's the whole basis for masks too. So we're
Speaker 1: doing all these we're basically unwilling participants in a countrywide
Speaker 1: and global medical experiment with these masks. But the whole
Speaker 1: idea behind asymptomatic spread hasn't been proven. So the whole
Speaker 1: thing is just ridiculous. And I'm already seeing and this
Speaker 1: is this is common now. You'll hear them say, even
Speaker 1: if you're vaccinated, you have to continue all of the measures,
Speaker 1: the protective measures that we institute, never mind the fact
Speaker 1: that protective measures are on a shaky ground at best
Speaker 1: in many cases. But even after you're vaccinated, because we
Speaker 1: don't know, but theoretically you could still get infected and
Speaker 1: pass the virus to other people, even though you won't
Speaker 1: have symptoms yourself. I mean to this, I just want
Speaker 1: to say, what the hell are they talking about? Where else?
Speaker 1: And where else? In pandemic or public health is this
Speaker 1: the policies, This the idea, we don't know if this
Speaker 1: thing could happen, but we're gonna make you do stuff
Speaker 1: because you know, theoretically, maybe it could happen. And also
Speaker 1: on asymptomatic spread, the guidance for dealing with flu, for example,
Speaker 1: is always you know, if you have symptoms, stay away
Speaker 1: from If you're sick, stay away from people. And I'm
Speaker 1: fine with then. If you're sick, you stay away, If
Speaker 1: you're sick, you quarantine, you know, et cetera. That makes
Speaker 1: perfect sense to me, no problem without whatsoever. But you
Speaker 1: bring up the asymptomatic spread issue, and we've been led.
Speaker 1: I mean, the mantra now is that asymptomatic spread is
Speaker 1: almost a majority of the spread that's going on. How
Speaker 1: is that possible? Yeah, it's total speculation. And when they're
Speaker 1: when they're trying to make policies based on unknowns, that's
Speaker 1: just so insane and suicidal. Like there's also a possibility
Speaker 1: that you know, when I when I get in my car,
Speaker 1: I'm going to get hit by a bus. You know,
Speaker 1: that could happen to anyone. But you don't live your
Speaker 1: life based on potential outcomes that could happen when you,
Speaker 1: you know, go outside of your safety zone. People need
Speaker 1: to be allowed to live their lives. So the idea
Speaker 1: that you know, because you've been because the vaccine isn't
Speaker 1: proven to slow this mythical idea of asymptomatic spread, that
Speaker 1: we all need to keep our businesses shut down and
Speaker 1: our stay at home and forever because these people are
Speaker 1: telling us it's amazing how far they've moved the goalpost.
Speaker 1: I mean a guy like Faucci and March was saying, oh,
Speaker 1: you know, just just stay home for two weeks. And
Speaker 1: now Faucci did an interview today saying that, oh yeah,
Speaker 1: we're gonna have to wear masks in social distance until
Speaker 1: next winter, not this winter. We're gonna have to go
Speaker 1: till you know, twenty twenty two. Now, like what these
Speaker 1: people have been given so much power that is basically
Speaker 1: driven us, you know, society completely insane because we keep
Speaker 1: following these people recommendations, they keep getting power, they keep
Speaker 1: getting the spot like they're loving it and they don't
Speaker 1: want to give it back, and the reality tells us
Speaker 1: that we're just going to have to take it back
Speaker 1: from them and ignore them. At this point, Jordan, when
Speaker 1: do you think that will happen. I mean, one of
Speaker 1: my big disappointments. And I keep saying this to people
Speaker 1: would come on who share a willingness to be reality
Speaker 1: based about all this COVID stuff and ask important questions
Speaker 1: and understand the trade off that are being made. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm here in New York. I feel like New Yorkers
Speaker 1: will if we were told, if we were told, sorry, guys,
Speaker 1: mask up social distance and intermittent lockdowns for the next
Speaker 1: five years. That's what the FOUCH tells us. The Fouch
Speaker 1: has spoken, you'd have a lot of people say, yeah,
Speaker 1: five years, got to do it. I mean maybe a
Speaker 1: majority of people in this city, which is just madness. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the people here are insane too. I'm going to I'm
Speaker 1: going to Florida for a couple of weeks this winter,
Speaker 1: and Florida is like the perfect example of I think
Speaker 1: it's going to have to happen in pockets and with
Speaker 1: people that are lucky enough to have responsible leaders like
Speaker 1: you know, governed Governor Santis and Florida. In New York City,
Speaker 1: in DC, ninety percent of the people have been propagandized
Speaker 1: by this idiocy. And I thought in the beginning that
Speaker 1: after a couple of months people would wake up. But
Speaker 1: you know, it's been like a year. So I'm thinking
Speaker 1: that maybe my my my read on human psychology, who
Speaker 1: was just off unfortunately, and that people are willing to
Speaker 1: be programmed to you know, just live live in fear.
Speaker 1: You know. It's just like this giant social psychosis of
Speaker 1: Stockholm syndrome. And it's just it's unfortunate that people are
Speaker 1: just acting as cattle. And it's it's funny you bring
Speaker 1: that up. And I was just telling I was just
Speaker 1: telling this audience yesterday that it does remind me of
Speaker 1: of a terrorist hostage taking situation, where when we just
Speaker 1: get a little glimpse, you know, when the terrorist, you know,
Speaker 1: throws you the the crusts of cold pizza that have
Speaker 1: been brought to them by the hostage negotiators. You know,
Speaker 1: the people that have been taken hostage, they're grateful for it,
Speaker 1: right because they're oh my gosh, they're they're starving, right,
Speaker 1: or when they're allowed to go to the bathroom, or
Speaker 1: when they're just treated with any basic human dignity, there
Speaker 1: actually will be this sense of gratitude to the hostage
Speaker 1: taker instead of oh my god, I should, you know,
Speaker 1: take the oozy out of your hands, and you know,
Speaker 1: they go to this other place sometimes, and that's just
Speaker 1: the way human psychology for a lot of people. I
Speaker 1: think that we're facing that with these lockdowns where oh, okay, well,
Speaker 1: well for a month we'll be able to go to
Speaker 1: the gym and then maybe they'll shut it down again.
Speaker 1: But at least they're trying. I want to say, no,
Speaker 1: they're not trying. They're not making the right decisions. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's just at this point, my patience is non existent
Speaker 1: with these type of people. I know that they've been
Speaker 1: psychologically pushed into this cave of fear, but you know,
Speaker 1: enough is enough. I'm not going to I feel like
Speaker 1: my patience has just worn out. I don't you know.
Speaker 1: If people will keep wanting to wear masks outside and
Speaker 1: think that they're you know, doing something virtuous, that then
Speaker 1: good on them. At this point, I think we just
Speaker 1: need to build a coalition around, you know, the people
Speaker 1: who are still sane and try to make a difference
Speaker 1: with those folks, because it's been almost a year and
Speaker 1: these people have been so manipulated and propagandized, and if
Speaker 1: they're gonna be you know, spineless, cowards for the rest
Speaker 1: of their lives, and they can go ahead and do so.
Speaker 1: I just I'm at that point right now where we
Speaker 1: just have to figure out how we can create free
Speaker 1: societies and pockets. And the people of you know, New
Speaker 1: York and DC are basically at this point. If they
Speaker 1: if they are not going to do anything, then we're
Speaker 1: not going to continue to fight for them. Jordan Shack
Speaker 1: tell investigative journalists down in DC. Jordan, God bless her
Speaker 1: the holidays. Man, We'll talk to you in the new year.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me. You're in the freedom of This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. First thing, It's
Speaker 1: not going to be like turning a light switch on
Speaker 1: and off. It's not going to be overnight. It's going
Speaker 1: to be gradual. And I think we will know when
Speaker 1: we see the level of infection in the country at
Speaker 1: a dramatically lower level than it is right now, that
Speaker 1: we can start gradually tiptoeing towards normality. I don't believe
Speaker 1: we're going to be able to throw the masks away
Speaker 1: and forget about physical separation and congrete settings for a while,
Speaker 1: probably likely until we get into the lake ball in
Speaker 1: early next winter. But I think we can do it
Speaker 1: another year, folks. That's Vrouci right now, Another another year
Speaker 1: of this, that's what he's saying. You think that's fair minded. Now,
Speaker 1: notice he says it's not a light switch, it's gradual. Why.
Speaker 1: I thought this was about saving lives, and that if
Speaker 1: you disagree with any of the measures being taken, you
Speaker 1: don't care about lives. So we should take no risk. Then,
Speaker 1: so we should have maximum lockdown. Why not just tell
Speaker 1: everybody their stay at home orders across the country for
Speaker 1: the next ninety days. Can't leave your house once a
Speaker 1: week to get groceries like they had in Italy and
Speaker 1: find and imprisoned if you don't listen. Now, of course
Speaker 1: I think that's all insane. But I'm just saying, what's there? Oh,
Speaker 1: because that's just too much. But I thought this was
Speaker 1: about lives, and you can't argue with them because that's
Speaker 1: the way they set this whole thing up. It turns
Speaker 1: out that there are restrictions on freedom. It turns out
Speaker 1: there are trade offs that they can demand even with
Speaker 1: their oh it's about lives formulation that are too extreme.
Speaker 1: So we are negotiating over what is acceptable, even though
Speaker 1: they think that we are just supposed to be dictated to.
Speaker 1: We are constantly in a state of figuring out where
Speaker 1: we draw these lines, figuring out what's too much, what's enough.
Speaker 1: And I think that anyone who believes that we should
Speaker 1: go through this for another year is is just out
Speaker 1: of their mind, just out of their mind. There's no
Speaker 1: reason to believe that that's what we should have to do,
Speaker 1: especially given to the vaccine. Fifty percent of the deaths
Speaker 1: are in It's not among senior citizens, it's in senior
Speaker 1: citizen homes, which means that if we get the vaccines
Speaker 1: to people in senior citizens homes will cut the death
Speaker 1: rate in half. In half. That's by the numbers, that's
Speaker 1: by the statistics, and then we can focus on getting
Speaker 1: into the risk population. If we can't cut the death
Speaker 1: rate of COVID nineteen by seventy five percent within sixty days,
Speaker 1: we're doing something wrong. That should be our goal. And
Speaker 1: when this is down, you're gonna tell me we can't
Speaker 1: start to live life again. Not on my watch. We're
Speaker 1: gonna fight on this one. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: bus Sex Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Team buck,
Speaker 1: it's time for roll Call. Roll Call. Remember to go
Speaker 1: to bucksexon dot com and check in on our latest
Speaker 1: posts and stories. You can also listen to the podcast
Speaker 1: of the buck Section show there. So if anyone ever
Speaker 1: is like, hey, how do I listen to Bucks Exton
Speaker 1: or who is this guy? Just tell them to go
Speaker 1: to buck Sexton dot com. That is the move. That's
Speaker 1: what we got to do. And we also want you
Speaker 1: to follow on all the various social media accounts or
Speaker 1: whichever ones you use. We're on Facebook, We're on Twitter,
Speaker 1: We're on parlor of course, we're on Instagram. We're all
Speaker 1: over the place. So even on TikTok, I know some
Speaker 1: of you say, oh, Buck, the Chinese are spying on you.
Speaker 1: I already told you they have They have my OPM file. Officially,
Speaker 1: they have it. They took it, okay, so they already
Speaker 1: know a lot about the Buckster. I'm not particularly worried.
Speaker 1: And whatever I put, what I put on TikTok is
Speaker 1: China is a problem. So I think they already know that.
Speaker 1: They already know that. Producer, Mark, You're ready for this
Speaker 1: crazy snowstorm. We're about to get walloped with in the
Speaker 1: New York, New Jersey area. I don't plan on going outside.
Speaker 1: They're saying two feet of snow. Yeah, that's a lot
Speaker 1: of snow. Not having a car right now is just great.
Speaker 1: I do remember when I lived in central Massachusetts in
Speaker 1: the Pioneer Valley for four years of college that after
Speaker 1: a really after a really big snowstorm, get going out
Speaker 1: to your car because it was always freezing outside. It's
Speaker 1: not like it's snows and then it's sixty degrees because
Speaker 1: obviously it would melt anyway, but it's not like it snows.
Speaker 1: Then you have a nice day and you can just
Speaker 1: you know, you always end up going out because you
Speaker 1: gotta usually use your car when the snow is still happening,
Speaker 1: and you gotta take like the what do you call
Speaker 1: those things you know that you keep in the trunk
Speaker 1: the brush, Yeah, the car brush, the scrapers, brush, scraper,
Speaker 1: that's what do you do? Have one of those? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Of course my wife still has one in your car. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you gotta get there. I will say, though, it's satisfying
Speaker 1: when you break that big chunk of ice on your
Speaker 1: windshield and get to throw it off, you know, you
Speaker 1: feel like a real man. I used to love the
Speaker 1: snow and stuff as a kid. But once you have
Speaker 1: to shovel it yourself and clean off your car, no,
Speaker 1: it's not satisfying. It's not fun. It's my little hands
Speaker 1: get cold and you know, and then I got to
Speaker 1: wear gloves. But the gloves don't allow me the same
Speaker 1: dexterity I would normally have. Yep, yep, yep. Actually the
Speaker 1: only time in my life I was towed was during
Speaker 1: a snowstorm in Amherst, Massachusetts. They towed my car. My
Speaker 1: my I had a wood paneled Buick Roadmaster. Those of
Speaker 1: you who don't know, if you see one of those
Speaker 1: now on the road, they're actually they're considered a classic.
Speaker 1: And I mean that they're actually they're listed as a
Speaker 1: classic car. Now. That's because they're from the early nineteen nineties,
Speaker 1: so we're going back now thirty years those cars. Isn't
Speaker 1: that like the quintessential like eighties nineties American car. So
Speaker 1: in the eighties there was this wood paneled kind of
Speaker 1: a look like a station wagon a little different called
Speaker 1: the wagon ear. A lot of people had wagon ears.
Speaker 1: Those are pretty cool, like I would drive a wagon
Speaker 1: ear today. But there was also there was I think
Speaker 1: an Oldsmobile station wagon that was very, very pop Oldsmobile
Speaker 1: station waking is very popular. Does Oldsmobile even exists anymore?
Speaker 1: I don't think it does. I don't think so. I
Speaker 1: don't think I don't think so. But I was in
Speaker 1: the Roadmaster, which is not quite the car in the
Speaker 1: Chevy Chase Vacation movie, which I think is the ultimate
Speaker 1: wood paneled station wagon. You know what I'm talking about,
Speaker 1: the National Lampoons. Yeah, of course. So I had a
Speaker 1: what car does Chevy Chase though drive in in the
Speaker 1: Vacation movies? You know that ament a wagon? Queen Family truckster.
Speaker 1: That's what he was driving. It was created specifically for
Speaker 1: the film. It was based on a nineteen seventy nine
Speaker 1: Ford Ltd Country Squire station wagons. So that's the real one,
Speaker 1: the nineteen seventy nine Ford Ltd Country Squire station wagon.
Speaker 1: That's the ultimate wood paneled station wagon. You know that
Speaker 1: wood paneling on the side by the way, whoever thought
Speaker 1: that was a good idea? Why would you want a
Speaker 1: car made of wood? You know, it doesn't seem safe
Speaker 1: or anything logic right, that doesn't seem like I don't
Speaker 1: want it to turn in to what all those splinters
Speaker 1: become little missiles and go through my face in an accent.
Speaker 1: That's not good. I mean, imagine it's just for decoration.
Speaker 1: But yeah, it's not real wood, obviously that would be
Speaker 1: Actually I think originally there might have been some wood
Speaker 1: in there, but it later it was just like a
Speaker 1: veneer kind of a plastic substance that looked like what anyway,
Speaker 1: So that's what I drove. And I got towed during
Speaker 1: a snowstorm. I'll never forget that. I was like what,
Speaker 1: but it was because of the plows on. This is
Speaker 1: the only time I've ever been towed. I thank god
Speaker 1: I've avoided getting towed to New York City because that's
Speaker 1: a traumatic experience. Well, you don't have a car when
Speaker 1: you live in New York, Yeah, I did for years.
Speaker 1: I had that station where I got to New York City,
Speaker 1: I parked it on the streets. It was how It
Speaker 1: was a nightmare. It was a nightmare. I had to
Speaker 1: basically sleep in the car in the mornings and deal
Speaker 1: with the street cleaners as they came by. It was
Speaker 1: not fun. All right, let's get to our roll call
Speaker 1: here as producer Mark and I hunkered down in our
Speaker 1: respective dumiciles for what it's going to be the biggest
Speaker 1: snowstorm in New York City in ten years. They're saying,
Speaker 1: so yeah, Ryan, right, saying hey back, I'm listening to
Speaker 1: your show on Freedom nine three seven blasting the Freedom
Speaker 1: Hunt's message of truth. Thank you, Ryan, love when we
Speaker 1: hear from our Colorado team buck for whatever it's worth.
Speaker 1: I agree with your assessment on ag Barr being a
Speaker 1: good man that did everything reasonably possible. I also agree
Speaker 1: we must assess this position we find ourselves in post
Speaker 1: election with truth, keep on keeping it real with what
Speaker 1: we were up against. Brother Ryan. Thanks so much. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm an AG Barr advocate and supporters. Still, I
Speaker 1: don't go with this stuff that he didn't do. I
Speaker 1: think he saved the Trump presidency. They were Weissman was
Speaker 1: going to try to call for prosecution of him and
Speaker 1: or impeachment of him, but Barr stepped in and head
Speaker 1: them off at the past with the political hit. Barr
Speaker 1: saved this administration from the Russia collusion trap. He saved them,
Speaker 1: and that's why they were so upset when he came
Speaker 1: out and gave that press conference and talked through what
Speaker 1: was in the report and talked about the executive summary.
Speaker 1: So let's not forget that. You shouldn't forget that. I
Speaker 1: don't think it would be fair to do so. And
Speaker 1: I think he's an ethical guy. I think he you know,
Speaker 1: he stepped in on the Roger Stone thing. People are
Speaker 1: forgetting right now. I know there's a lot of upset
Speaker 1: people out there because of what's going on with Trump,
Speaker 1: but Barr was an asset to this administration, and he
Speaker 1: was a highly competent and solid attorney general. This is
Speaker 1: not a Jeff Session situation, friends, it's not. And people
Speaker 1: who were telling you otherwise, that's that's just an unfair
Speaker 1: read in my opinion. All right, Next up here, David
Speaker 1: hey Buck. The Challenger Netflix documentary is amazing. The top
Speaker 1: engineers basically knew it was going to happen. Really sad. Oh,
Speaker 1: so this is about the Challenger disaster. I didn't I
Speaker 1: thought it was I didn't realize that that was the
Speaker 1: because I haven't ever been a whole lot of Challenger
Speaker 1: things that've been sent up in the air. Was the
Speaker 1: only other one. When you say the Challenger, what do
Speaker 1: you think of? Yeah, I know that was a dumb thing.
Speaker 1: I just said a lot, but I really did think.
Speaker 1: I was like, oh, yeah, the Challenger, like, you know,
Speaker 1: maybe one of the happy missions that it went on,
Speaker 1: not the woman watches a documentary on happy stuff. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I know, I know. Even the octopus made the octopus friend.
Speaker 1: I was like, but the octopus is gonna die. I
Speaker 1: got so sad. I got so sad. I eat octopus.
Speaker 1: I love it, taste delicious. I got so sad when
Speaker 1: the octopus was dying. Really did, really did like choked
Speaker 1: me up. Man. I can't but I can't watch any
Speaker 1: any human to any human to animal friendship, you know.
Speaker 1: Spec I mean with dogs, I'm a total mess, but
Speaker 1: any human to animal friendship, you know, you know, it
Speaker 1: really really really gets to me, which is kind of
Speaker 1: what do you think about. I'll watch a movie where
Speaker 1: there's like bad guys getting shot all over the place,
Speaker 1: like human beings getting blown away with all kinds of
Speaker 1: weaponry and everything, and I'm just like, you know, may man,
Speaker 1: you know, it's tough. Human beings are rough species. And
Speaker 1: then I watched like a dog gets cancer in a
Speaker 1: movie or something, and you know he has to be
Speaker 1: put down, and I'm, man, I'm I'm a mess. Can't
Speaker 1: handle it now. Yeah. Yeah, it's like Gordon Gecko says
Speaker 1: in the movie Wall Street, you know about wasps, they
Speaker 1: love animals they hate people, which is not really true,
Speaker 1: but it's kind of a smug way of putting it.
Speaker 1: We do, we do love animals. All. I'm a Catholic,
Speaker 1: I'm a Protestant, so technically not a wasp um anyway, David,
Speaker 1: I will check out the Challenger documentary. I'll probably watch it.
Speaker 1: With the snow Princess with the big snow that's coming
Speaker 1: and sometimes asked why I call her that, It's because
Speaker 1: she comes from one of the snowiest parts of the
Speaker 1: United States, and she's like, very she loves snow, Brucer Mark,
Speaker 1: How does missus Mark feel about snow? Because because snow
Speaker 1: Princess is obviously based on her name alone, she loves it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's an ing. She loves It's it's like her environment.
Speaker 1: What were we saying it's an inconvenience to her and
Speaker 1: most people. Yeah, so she's not like, yeah, look at
Speaker 1: all the snowflakes. It's amazing and beautiful. Oh no, I
Speaker 1: have to shovel this and clean it off my car.
Speaker 1: Take some more utilitarian view of the snow. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: some people could you. You know, I always love those
Speaker 1: stories where you hear from people that have lived like
Speaker 1: their whole life in a place without snow and then
Speaker 1: they see it for the first time. That must be
Speaker 1: kind of a bugout, you know. Yeah, I would imagine
Speaker 1: that is amazing. If you've lived like in Florida your
Speaker 1: whole life and then you go to New York during
Speaker 1: the winter. Well, I was even thinking, like sub Saharan Africa, Right, Well,
Speaker 1: that show up You've you've lived your whole life in
Speaker 1: Kenya or something, and you show up and you're like, wait,
Speaker 1: what is all this? So I've met people that have
Speaker 1: talked about that experience. All right, Scott buck On this
Speaker 1: evening show you mentioned the people from a DJ are
Speaker 1: looking to claims of voter fraud. Has anyone in a
Speaker 1: lazy DJ sent out agents from the myriad of agencies
Speaker 1: at their disposal to interview many of the Democrat operatives
Speaker 1: poll workers named in the hundreds of affidavits concerning voter fraud.
Speaker 1: Let's be honest, any real pressure you put on these
Speaker 1: dirt bags will lead them to taking to talking in
Speaker 1: order to save their hides. Scott my understanding is they
Speaker 1: have actually looked into, they have followed up on some
Speaker 1: of these affidavits, and and this I think is where
Speaker 1: there's so much of the disconnect right now. It's not
Speaker 1: that the people are lying who say what they say
Speaker 1: in the affidavits. That's not the belief from some of
Speaker 1: the follow up from the DOJ, and I do have
Speaker 1: sources in the DOJ I've talked to about this. It's
Speaker 1: that what they saw there is no proof of, or
Speaker 1: what they believe they saw there's no proof of. So
Speaker 1: an example, and before people get frustrated with what I'm saying,
Speaker 1: if I saw someone with a box of ballots and
Speaker 1: I just happen to see that every one of those
Speaker 1: ballots went for Joe Biden, and then all of those
Speaker 1: ballots are in a giant pile of overall ballots. What
Speaker 1: I saw, that's my word, and I can say I
Speaker 1: saw that, But how do you prove and how do
Speaker 1: you prove to a judge now that they're in the
Speaker 1: general pile that there was a mysterious box of a
Speaker 1: thousand only Joe Biden ballots that got counted at one point.
Speaker 1: And I know it's very frustrating, but That's what a
Speaker 1: lot of these affidavits are attesting to things that I
Speaker 1: believe they saw all and that are true. But if
Speaker 1: we can't prove it because Democrats remove the safeguards, we're
Speaker 1: not going to get the judicial satisfaction and justice we want.
Speaker 1: That's my essential point here, and that's just it sucks,
Speaker 1: but that's where we are. That's what we're dealing with.
Speaker 1: So Scott, have they followed up on all these leads? No,
Speaker 1: but I believe they. I know they followed up on
Speaker 1: some of them, and they've said, Okay, well you saw that.
Speaker 1: What do we do now, Well, how do we prove
Speaker 1: that this is true? A person going in front of
Speaker 1: a judge and saying, hey, I saw I saw ten
Speaker 1: thousand ballots. I swear I saw ten thousand ballots that
Speaker 1: showed up at one am and all went for Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: then the judge is gonna say, okay, well, how do
Speaker 1: how do we prove that a person's word alone will
Speaker 1: not be enough for a judge to toss out votes?
Speaker 1: And I know you don't want to hear that, and
Speaker 1: I don't want to say that, but what I'm telling
Speaker 1: you is the truth about this situation. We've got to
Speaker 1: find a better way. We've got to find the smoking gun.
Speaker 1: We've got to have more than what we've had so far.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. We're rolling on with Roll Call Don next
Speaker 1: up here, Hello, team Buck. Love your show, Buck, I've
Speaker 1: been a longtime fan back to your guest hosting on
Speaker 1: the Rush days. Well, thank you so much, Don. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I feeling if for Rush Limbaugh was an amazing experience
Speaker 1: those many times I got to do it. So my
Speaker 1: question is how do we overcome this fraud of an election?
Speaker 1: Seems like we need to organize to focus our collective
Speaker 1: efforts to ensure the fairness of future elections somehow and
Speaker 1: nice respect, they'll take conservatives at the local level and
Speaker 1: in our respective states. Your thoughts. Thanks to you and
Speaker 1: Prucer Mark for a great show. Prucer Marky sending you
Speaker 1: thanks on high five. Well, thank you for listening. There
Speaker 1: we go, as for how to conservative at the local
Speaker 1: level respective states, what do we do? Yes, we absolutely
Speaker 1: need to look at all of the all of the shortcomings,
Speaker 1: all of the open doors for fraud in this and
Speaker 1: close them. And that's why this process of bringing these
Speaker 1: lawsuits has been important, despite what the media is saying about, Oh,
Speaker 1: it's a threat to our democracy. No, we need to
Speaker 1: see where was this happening, How was this happening. We
Speaker 1: need to stop it going forward, and if we can
Speaker 1: prove it beyond a reasonable doubt right now, or even
Speaker 1: by a preponderance of the evidence, I think would be
Speaker 1: the civil standard in these cases. But it needs to
Speaker 1: be a preponderance of the evidence or a you know,
Speaker 1: more of the fifty one percent standard. If we can
Speaker 1: do that, then maybe we pull off a last minute.
Speaker 1: But you know, as I've been saying to you folks,
Speaker 1: it's it's ninety nine percent plus a done deal now
Speaker 1: with Joe Biden as the next president, that's where we are.
Speaker 1: I will not lie to you. There are other people
Speaker 1: out there who are you know, who are millionaires, big
Speaker 1: platforms that they're gonna pander. They're gonna tell you, oh, no,
Speaker 1: just stay in the fight any moment now I'm saying, no,
Speaker 1: we stay in the fight. But we have to face reality.
Speaker 1: And the reality is this is not going to go
Speaker 1: the way we want it to unless a miracle happens.
Speaker 1: That's the truth. You know. I wish people that take.
Speaker 1: You know, I take a risk. I'm still building a career.
Speaker 1: I still got bills to pay, you know, I still
Speaker 1: am trying to, you know, create and build a family.
Speaker 1: The same thing with Prucer Mark. But I gotta tell
Speaker 1: you the truth. There are other people. They doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: I mean, the audience could leave them, right, they could flee.
Speaker 1: It doesn't They never have to work a day in
Speaker 1: their lives. They but they want the attention, they want
Speaker 1: the ratings, they want the power. That's what matters. So
Speaker 1: they'll lie to you. They'll lie to you. I won't
Speaker 1: do it, John writes deer Buck. Don't misunderstand that what follows.
Speaker 1: I'm a true conservative. I seldom disagree with you, and
Speaker 1: I very much enjoy your show. You've got grit. The
Speaker 1: other night, however, you said, in response to a listener's
Speaker 1: comment that there will be no secession. You don't know
Speaker 1: that for sure, no one does. But this I do know. Nations,
Speaker 1: like the nations, like people, are mortal. Nothing in this
Speaker 1: world lasts forever. America is no exception. As much as
Speaker 1: you appreciate history, I need not remind you that history
Speaker 1: is replete with vanished civilizations, empires, and nations. This might
Speaker 1: seem like stating the obvious, but judging for what I've seen,
Speaker 1: few Americans stop to think of it. America will end someday.
Speaker 1: Of course, we do not know when or how, so
Speaker 1: secession conceivably might be a factor. Remember too, President Reagan's
Speaker 1: observation that freedom is always one generation away from being
Speaker 1: lost again. I hope you don't misunderstand the spirit of
Speaker 1: which I say this. I'm not trying to be contentious.
Speaker 1: I'm merely being realistic and taking the long view. Keep
Speaker 1: up the good work. Best wishes to you and Mark John.
Speaker 1: I appreciate it, and you're right. I always say this,
Speaker 1: no one can predict the future. I can't predict the future. No.
Speaker 1: That's why I say it's ninety nine percent. I don't
Speaker 1: say it's one hundred percent that Joe Biden's the president.
Speaker 1: I say it's ninety nine percent. No one can predict
Speaker 1: the future, but we have to prepare based on what
Speaker 1: the odds are, what the probabilities are. And I think
Speaker 1: when I said there won't be secession, what I really
Speaker 1: want to say is we should not push for secession.
Speaker 1: We're not at that point. That's not where we want
Speaker 1: this country to go. But you're right, the future is
Speaker 1: not said and we don't know. We continue in the fight,
Speaker 1: my friends. That's why we have the motto of the show.
Speaker 1: That's why I'm here with you, talking to you every day,
Speaker 1: because no matter what, we keep our shields high.