WEBVTT - How Magnetic Storage Works

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tech Stuff from how

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland, senior writer for how stuff

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com, and today I thought it might be interesting.

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>So perhaps I'm mistaken to talk about data storage, specifically

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>magnetic storage. So there are a lot of different ways

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to store data, you know, like there's always writing it down,

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the type of data storage all the way up

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to like holographic memory storage. And magnetic storage has played

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a really important role in the history of technology in

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>general and computers in particular. So I want to focus

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>on how magnetic storage works. Who came up with that

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>idea and even dive into the science of magnets. Yes,

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>insane clown posse, I'm looking at you. We're gonna discover

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>how magnets work. So if you've been wondering since that

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>video I got, I got your hook up. So first,

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about why magnetic storage was a necessity in

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the first place. So how do you preserve information so

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that you can access it again later? Because in the

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>old days, and I'm talking like tens of thousands of

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>years ago, verbal communication was where it was at you

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>stored all that information up in your head. Someone would

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>tell you something important and you had to remember it.

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps they would tell you within the context of a story.

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 1>And then eventually, if you were trying to preserve information,

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you would tell that same information to someone else and

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>pass it along. This way, this is essentially folklore. That's

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>how knowledge was maintained for centuries. And then way back

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in the day, someone said, hey, what if we made

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>up some symbols to represent these sounds we're making to

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>communicate with each other, and then we put those symbols

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>into some sort of fixed format, like in a clay tablet,

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>And that way we can preserve the information a lot longer.

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>And if Bob, who's really good at making fires, can

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>explain how to make fires, and we we put it

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>down in this format, we'll be able to make fires

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>even if Bob does something stupid like walks off the

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>edge of a cliff or something. And writing was born.

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>It probably went a little differently from the way I

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>explained it, but I think I got the gist of it.

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Not everyone, however, was a fan of this development. Believe

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it or not. There were people who were against the

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>whole idea of writing stuff down. Socrates was actually a

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>critic of writing stuff down, or at least that's what

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>we hear, because Socrates didn't write anything down, his students did. Uh.

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>He said that the written word is fixed, and therefore

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it can't defend itself or any arguments it makes, so

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it's inherently flawed. If someone writes down an argument and

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>your access to the argument is in that written format,

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:04.399
<v Speaker 1>and you have questions or you have attacks on that argument,

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 1>it can't defend itself. The person who wrote it could

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>if they were there, but if they're not there, then

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the argument has to stand on its own, and therefore

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it has to be less effective. Let's say that an

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>actual human being. He also said that if you write

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff down, you don't have to remember it yourself, and

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>that makes you less intelligent, because if you're not actually

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 1>committing something to memory, you're getting super dumb. Uh. This

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>might sound a lot like some of the arguments people

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>have made about Google and the Internet, and it's absolutely correct.

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Every single time we have created a new way to

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>permanently store data in some form or another, people have

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>brought up this idea that it's making us more dumb,

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Like they might say, hey, Back in the day, you'd

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>have to remember all your phone numbers, like all the

0:03:57.560 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>numbers of the friends and family that you would be

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>calling a regular basis. But now it's all on your phone,

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>so you don't remember it. You may not be able

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to rattle off more than two or three phone numbers

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>today because of that, therefore you are more dumb. I

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>don't subscribe to that particular argument. I think having the

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>accessibility of information outweighs the fact that we are no

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>longer able to remember it necessarily. Uh. The point I

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>would make is that comprehension is always more important than

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>being able to recall something. You might be able to

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>recall some information, but if you don't truly comprehend it,

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it's no It's of no use to you. So I

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's necessarily a measure of intelligence. It's certainly,

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 1>perhaps more of a statement about our memories than anything else.

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>But I'm getting off on a tangent here. So I

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>think the developments we've had have been phenomenal. We wouldn't

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>be where we are today if we were still depending

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>upon just telling each other the important stuff and hoping

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>that they would be able to then tell other people

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the important stuff we just told them and in way

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 1>that was accurate and effective. We clearly wouldn't be where

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we are today if we still depended upon that. And

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to travel all the way across the

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>world to find a specific guru to learn how to

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>perform a particular skill. I can just go onto YouTube

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>and watch like thirty or forty videos until I find

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>one that actually makes sense. So that's progress. Take that, Socrates. Now,

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>throughout history, we saw many advances in the way we

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>store information, and as we developed more advanced technology, it

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>became clear that a compatible method of storing data would

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>be really handy. So imagine what computers would be if

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>they could not save information, they'd be practically useless. You

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>need to have a way of storing data somehow, whether

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 1>it's in magnetic storage, optical, solid state punch cards, whatever.

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:53.479
<v Speaker 1>You need something that can record the information otherwise it's

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>only good for a moment. And a lot of folks

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>worked on this problem, and as is the case with

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>many technological developments, some of that work had nothing to

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>do with computers, but more with researching fundamental scientific questions

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 1>and finding answers to questions lead other people being able

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to use that information in practical ways that we didn't anticipate.

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And this is kind of another soapbox I like to

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>get up on, uh to argue for the importance of

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 1>exploratory science. Applied science is really interesting. Applied sciences when

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to find a particular solution that will work

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>for some sort of problem. Right your you might be

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>researching whether or not a specific material would be great

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to use for a particular purpose, like bulletproof material something

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>like that. But exploratory science, when you're not necessarily looking

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>for applications, is also important because we expand our knowledge

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>about how the universe works, and it can open up

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to leverage that knowledge in ways we could not

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>have anticipated when we first started looking into the issue

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. It's in and stuff, So I

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>argue that exploratory science needs to continue to be supported.

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's uh now acknowledge all this, take a deep breath,

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and get ready to jump into the strange world of magnetism. So, first, magnetism,

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>or more specifically, electro magnetism, is one of four fundamental

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>forces that govern the atomic behavior in our universe. So

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the other three if you're keeping track, are the strong

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, and gravity, And if

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to rank those from the weakest to the strongest,

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you'd start with gravity. Gravity is negligible at the atomic scale.

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>It's there, but it's so faint as to be almost absent.

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>And this is largely because gravity is dependent upon mass,

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>So at the atomic scale, mass masses are so small

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>there's barely any gravitational attraction between particles. But gravity is

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of nifty because while it's weak, it is there.

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, there's a gravitational pull on every bit

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of matter from every other bit of matter in our universe.

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>So you, that is you listening to me right now,

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you are are exerting a gravitational pull on the Sun,

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and on Alpha Centauri, and on the Andromeda galaxy. You

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>are exerting a gravitational pull on everything else that is

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>matter in our universe. It's just that that gravitational pull

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>is so weak as to be practically nothing, but it

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>is there. So since gravity is something we ourselves can

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and do experience in our daily lives, we categorize it

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>as one of the familiar forces. Now, next in the

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>rank from weakest to strongest, is the weak force. Now

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that's responsible for nuclear beta decay and some other decay processes.

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>And this one's pretty difficult to explain. And since I'm

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>are you going to have to explain magnetism, I'm gonna

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>call for a pass on this one. Let's mulligan it.

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 1>But this is a force that we do not experience

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>firsthand in our daily lives, So this one actually falls

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>into the category of unfamiliar forces. Now next in strength,

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>so second strongest if you prefer, is the electromagnetic force,

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.839
<v Speaker 1>the one will be focusing on today. Now, this is

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a force that exists between all particles that have an

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>electric charge. So electrons, for example, will bind to a

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>nucleus because electrons have a negative charge, and a nucleus,

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>which only contains positively charged protons and neutral neutrons, is

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>net positive. And you know that opposites attract, so we

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>have the negative electrons attracted to the positive nucleus. We

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>can and do experience electromagnetic forces on a daily basis,

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>so this one is one of the familiar forces. And

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>then we have the strongest of them all, all the

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>strong nuclear force. This is the force that holds a

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>nucleus together it's a dominant force in various chemical reactions,

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>and it has to be strong because it's doing something

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 1>that's really difficult to do. It's holding together similarly charged particles. Remember,

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a nucleus is a bunch of protons and neutrons. The

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>protons all have a positive charge. They don't want to

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 1>be and when I say want, I don't actually mean

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>they have motivations, but they don't want to be next

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to each other. Those parts, those similar charges are repelling

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>one another. So the strong nuclear force has to be

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 1>stronger than the electromagnetic force in order to hold protons

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>together in a nucleus with a bunch of neutral charge particles. Ah,

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:52.959
<v Speaker 1>it does have a very short range, however, so while

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it's stronger than the electromagnetic force, it does, the range

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>does not reach very far outside of a nucleus, so

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>we do directly observe it in our daily lives, and

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>therefore it is an unfamiliar force. So gravity and electro

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>magnetism are familiar forces. The strong and weak nuclear forces

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>are unfamiliar forces. Uh So what makes electro magnetism tick

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and how did we even figure out how to make

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.599
<v Speaker 1>good use of it? Well, let's start by imagining a

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>bar magnet. A lot of this is going to go

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>back to stuff that you probably learned in elementary school,

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>middle school, high school, those physics courses, that kind of stuff,

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>basic science. So you've got your bar magnet. Uh, let's

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>just say it's a rectang. It's rectangular in shape. So

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you know you've you've got uh, your north pole and

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>your south pole on the magnet. Um this these represent

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the various charges, magnetic charges of the magnet, opposites tracked.

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>So if we were to bring this bar magnet close

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to another bar magnet, the north end of our bar

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>magnet would start to exert a poll on the south

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the other bar magnet. Or if we were

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to try and bring the north pole of our magnet

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 1>close to the north pole of the second magnet, it

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>would push against each other, just like I was mentioning

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a second ago. Now, magnets produce a field around them

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that we can represent as lines of force, and those

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>lines exit from the north pole, loop around the magnet

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and enter the south pole. A permanent magnet is always

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>producing the sort of magnetic field. It's it's consistent, it

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:37.559
<v Speaker 1>doesn't waiver. Um. You may hear about things like electromagnetism.

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk a little bit more about in a in

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a bit, where you have to move a coil through

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a varying magnetic field, will a permanent magnet creates a

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>consistent magnetic field unless you start doing things like moving

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it around, in which case you're really just moving where

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the magnetic field is. You're not actually fluctuating the field itself. Now,

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>inside a magnet a permanent magnet are microscopic regions called

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>magnetic domains, and each of these domains is essentially a

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>tiny magnet with its own north and south pole. Only

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>by aligning the poles of all of these uh magnetic

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>domains in a similar direction, like north south, will you

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>get a permanent magnet. So if you could just zoom

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>in on a permanent magnet, you would see all these

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>tiny regions that are essentially magnets that are all aligned

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the same way north south. If you didn't do that,

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>if the alignment was mixed up so that you had,

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, an equal mixture of north south and south north,

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>they would cancel each other out and you wouldn't have

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a magnet. It would just be inert magnetically speaking. So, uh,

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that is something that's interesting because you can actually do

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that to magnets in a couple of different ways. I'll

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about that in a second. So all of that

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 1>is changeable. Bomb bom bomb. I wrote that in my notes.

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Actually I had to say it. I could show Dylan,

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.559
<v Speaker 1>but he's working on something else. By the way, when

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>all those magnetic domains are aligned north south, what happens

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>if you were to cut the magnet in half right

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>between the north and south pole. So imagine you've got

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>this rectangular bar magnet. You've got you've labeled one in

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the north pole, the other in the south pole. You

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>cut the magnet in half horizontally across, well, you would

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>end up with two magnets. The middle of that magnet

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>would become the south pole for the north end and

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the north pole for the south end. That's because those

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>magnetic domains I was talking about, those tiny regions inside

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the magnet themselves itself, those are all aligned north south.

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>So if you cut the magnet across, you still have

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>those magnetic domains lined up north south, so the overall

0:14:57.000 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>magnetism is preserved. You get two magnets for the price

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of one, but don't cut into magnets magnets, they tend

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to be at least the ones that we typically use

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>for things like our fridges and stuff are ceramic magnets,

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and they don't cut so well unless you have like

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a a diamond saw, which some of you probably do.

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>And and if you cut magnets normally, then disregard my warning.

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about people who don't typically do that sort

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of thing. If you are going to do it, where

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>eye protection because that stuff can shatter anyway. Uh, if

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you do that with the magnet. Essentially, each magnet has

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>approximately half the magnetic domains of the old magnets, so

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>they're not particularly you know, the the individual magnets aren't

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>as strong as they were when they were a single magnet.

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Because you're you're magnets, You're overall magnet strength is dependent

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>upon the accumulative effect of the magnetic domains within it,

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, So each of those magnet domains are tiny magnets.

0:15:57.680 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>There are three ways to get them to line up

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>so that the overall material becomes a magnet itself. Like

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>how you get them all to line up like north south?

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>So way number one is to whack on it with

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>something heavy, which isn't a joke. If you hold the

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>material in the north south direction and strike it with

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a hammer, you physically realign the magnetic domains and you

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>can knock the material into a weak magnet. There's a

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>bit more to it than that, but that's the basic idea,

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and that that does mean that you're not going to

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>get a very strong magnet as a result, but you

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>can physically force those magnetic domains to be in the

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>same direction and create a magnet that way. Way number

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>two is that you can place the material inside a

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>strong magnetic field and make sure the material is in

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the north south alignment and you just leave it there

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and if it's a strong magnetic field, it will start

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to realign the magnetic domains within your target material so

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that they gradually line up with the magnetic fields direction.

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So you just have to have a strong enough one

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to affect the magnetic domains in your target material and

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>then eventually you end up with a magnet. So that's

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of cool. And way number three is yes, zap

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>it with electric current. So one hypothesis is that this

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>is how loadstone, which is a naturally magnetic material you

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>can find here on Earth, was originally formed the ideas

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that loadstone, which is made up of this stuff called magnetite. Uh,

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>some of it was struck by lightning over the the

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the millennia that Earth was forming. So you have magnetite

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 1>on the surface of the planet. Occasionally lightning strikes and

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>hits some of this magnetite and then magnetizes it. That

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>was That's one hypothesis. But there's another one which suggests

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that magnetite gained its magnetic properties during the time when

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Earth was forming, and it was through more of a

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>just a physical uh, the physical process of cooling where

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>these magnetic domains aligned in the proper way. Here's the thing,

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know how it all got started. We

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have that information. No one was around back then

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to write it down or put it in magnetic storage.

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's still a bit of a mystery. But we

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>do know that those are two possible ways that this

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:20.479
<v Speaker 1>could have come about. And uh, you can also render

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>magnets inert by changing the alignment of the magnetic domains

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>within it. If you heat a magnet up beyond its

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>cury point, which is different for different magnetic materials, it

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>loses its magnetism. The heat warps the material and makes

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the magnetic domains fall out of alignment. So what used

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to be magnetic will no longer be. So something that

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 1>would stick to your fridge no problem, will just slide

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.959
<v Speaker 1>off and hit the floor, and everyone will be sad,

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>unless you just did it as a scientific experiment, in

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>which case you might be happy that you've got the

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>result you expected. Now we can experience magnetism because of electrons.

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>This time, negatively charged sub atomic particles hold the key

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to whether a material is affected by magnets or isn't.

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, might wonder like, why are some things magnetic

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>and some things aren't? Why do magnets stick to some

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 1>materials but slide right off of other materials? And ultimately

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the answer falls with electrons. Now, electrons orbit the nucleus

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>right in the atoms. You remember your basic description of

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>an atom, where you have a nucleus at the center

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 1>and electrons orbiting at different orbital shells around the electrons. Typically,

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>electrons will pair up with other electrons. You'll get pairs

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of electrons. They have a state that's called spin, and

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>each electron in a pair has the opposite spin of

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>its partner. So we can describe spin as up or down.

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>For example, if one electron is spinning up, the other

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 1>one by necessity has to be spinning down. You cannot

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>get both electrons in a pair to spin in the

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 1>same direction in the same orbital That just that ain't cricket.

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:06.199
<v Speaker 1>It's part of the quantum mechanical principle we call the

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>poly exclusion principle. And until I did a research for

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>this show, I could have sworn that referred to the

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>practice of non inviting Polly shortier parties. So I guess

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you've learned something new every day. That got a smirk

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>from Dylan. It's maybe he'll laugh when he listens to

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>it the second time. Uh. Some elements have an unpaired

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>electron in an orbital just because that's just how it

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>works out. So those unpaired spinning electrons generate a very

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>tiny magnetic field, and we call it an orbital magnetic moment,

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>which sounds like something you'd expect in a romantic science

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>fiction film. Iron, for example, has four unpaired electrons that

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>all have the same spin. Those four unpaired electrons have

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>an orbital magnetic moment. So magnetic moment has a magnitude

0:20:56.720 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and the direction, which means it is a vector. The

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>bottom line is this vector refers to the strength of

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the magnetic field and the torque it can exert. So

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 1>a permanent magnets magnetic moments are composed of all the

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>moments of its atoms. In other words, you've got all

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:18.199
<v Speaker 1>these atoms that represent an orbital magnetic moment because of

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 1>the spin of the electrons of the unpaired electrons. If

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you've got enough of them and they're aligned the right way,

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that determines the permanent magnets magnetic moments. So iron and

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>several other magnetic elements have a crystalline structure, right, so

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 1>think of it like scaffolding. It makes this very ordered

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of structure as opposed to something that looks much

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 1>more chaotic. So as iron cools from a molten state,

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>atoms line up into this crystalline arrangement, and groups of

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>atoms that have a parallel orbital spin will line up

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>within the crystal and those form those magnetic domains I

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier. The qualities that make good magnets are also

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the same ones as the qualities that make materials attracted

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 1>to magnets. So a strong magnet will attract iron and

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>other elements that have these orbital magnetic moments in alignment. Now,

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>not all permanent magnets are equal. The ceramic magnets you

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>may have on your fringe door a pretty weak all

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:20.199
<v Speaker 1>things considered. They're made of a mixture of iron oxide

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 1>and a ceramic composite. These are ferric magnets, that's what

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>we call them, ferric for the iron that's in them.

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 1>But on the other end of the scale are neodymium magnets,

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a rare earth element magnet there is much much stronger

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>than the ferric magnets we tend to use, and they

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>typically contain a mixture of neodymium, iron and boron. They

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>could be really strong too, uh, I have played with somewhere.

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>If they get into contact with something like a metal table,

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>it can be really hard to remove them. We had

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>some here at how Stuff Works that were potentially causing injuries. Uh.

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>One person slipped one in their pocket and then found

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>themselves stuck to a filing cabinet for a little bit. Uh.

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>This was way back in the day, but it was

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>one of those things where a lot of us didn't

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>have a whole lot of experience with it because at

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the time they were fairly uncommon. Today you can order

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:19.679
<v Speaker 1>neodymium and other rare earth magnets online without much trouble.

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 1>But when I started um, first of all, how stuff

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>works was easy because there are only three things, so

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>it was easy to explain how stuff works. Once you

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>wrote the three articles, you were done. But over time

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>more stuff was made and we had more work to do,

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and at that point it was more. It was more

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>uh uh, well, it was easier to get ahold of

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>neodymium magnets at that point. Now, some materials are called

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>temporary or soft magnets, and those will produce a magnetic

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>field in the presence of another magnetic field and retain

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 1>some of that magnetism for a while after they leave

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the field itself, so they're very easy to LUNs. So

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>imagine that you've got something like a paper clip and

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you put it within the range of a magnetic field

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>for a while, and it starts to have its magnetic

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 1>domains aligned according to this magnetic field. You remove it

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and you find you can pick up other paper clips

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:19.959
<v Speaker 1>with it, but only for a little while, and then

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it stops working. That's that's very typical with soft or

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>temporary magnets, they very quickly will change, but then they

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>will over time change back to being, let you know,

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>not magnetic. But if they're also hard magnetic materials, these

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it's harder to change them, but then they will stay

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>changed for longer. So stuff like iron, if you're able

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to really realign those magnetic domains and iron magnet will

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 1>hold that magnetic ability much much longer. And that's how

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 1>you can end up with permanent magnets as opposed to

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>some that will just temporarily be magnetic. Um it's kind

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 1>of interesting. Uh. So then you've got electro magnets and

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.959
<v Speaker 1>this will only produce the magnetic field in the presence

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of electricity. And I'm sure everyone listening to this has

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>done some variation on the the experiment where you take

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>an iron nail and you coil some wire around it,

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>usually some insulated copper wire around the nail several times, uh,

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and then you run an electric current through the wire

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and you create an electro magnet. The nail becomes magnetic

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and you can pick up all sorts of stuff with it.

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>The strength of the magnetic field is dependent upon the

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>number of coils around the nail as well as some

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>other factors, but that's the primary one. Uh. And UH,

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you know it's it's a cool, little basic science experiment

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:51.679
<v Speaker 1>you can run, but it's also the basis of a

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>ton of the work done in electrical fields, including general electronics, computers, storage.

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>It is an important fundamental piece of technology. UH. And

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the very simple applications of this you can find in

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff like electric transformers or electric motors and dynamos. Like transformer,

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 1>you can have two different coils of wire, one that

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.239
<v Speaker 1>is got a lot more coils to it, uh, like

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe twice as many as the second one, And when

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you run a current through the the larger number of coils,

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the magnetic field it generates induces electricity to flow through

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the second set of coils, but steps down the voltage

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>because you have half as many coils around a core

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>as you do with the first one. Uh. That's how

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you can step down or step up voltage. And that's

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>why alternating current ends up being much more effective for

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>distributing electricity across the distances than direct current, because you

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>can't do that with direct current. You need that alternating

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>electric current in order to create the magnetic field that

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>will induce electricity to flow through a separate set of coils.

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Just like you need a varying magnetic field to induce electricity,

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you need that varying electricity to produce a varying magnetic field.

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:27.919
<v Speaker 1>It's this interesting relationship, a fundamental relationship in our universe

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>between electricity and magnetism. And uh, that's why I was

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>saying before. If you have a permanent magnet and you

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>just put it next to a coil of wire, it's

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to induce electricity to flow apart from when

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you first introduce the magnetic field to the coil, because

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not varying. You'd have to spin the the permanent magnet,

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>which would uh, you know, effectively, according to the coil's perspective,

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>change the alignment of that magnetic field. That would induce

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>electricity to flow through the wire. But just having a

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>standard magnet staying perfectly still next to wire, you don't

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>get the electricity to flow that way. And that is

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 1>a very important aspect to memory storage as well. And

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that's our lesson on the physics of magnets. Without diving

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>too deeply into quantum mechanics, I think we're ready to

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 1>talk about our use of magnets with electronics. But first

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break to thank our sponsor. All right,

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we're back, and we just learned how magnets work in general,

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>But when did we figure out they could be useful

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:45.239
<v Speaker 1>for storing information? So I'm gonna skip over all the

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>historic uses of magnets leading up to data storage because

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I cannot spend another hour talking about compasses, or ironically,

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>i'll lose Dylan here in the studio. So in the

0:28:56.040 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>late nineteenth century we saw a boom in innovation that

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>was mid to late nineteenth century was a crazy time

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in the world really for inventors discovering not just fundamental

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>principles of science, but how to apply them in technology.

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about stuff like Samuel Moore successfully sending an

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>electrical signal that could be decoded into communication, all the

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>way up to Alexander Graham Bell showing that electricity could

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>also be used to carry audio signals and then be

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>converted from electricity back into audio signals. That really got

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>things moving. And over at Thomas Edison's Menlo Park, a

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>guy named Oberlin Smith got a gander at a cylinder

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>phonograph and got some interesting ideas. So first let's talk

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>about this cylinder phonograph. It would record sound by transforming

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>audio waves into electrical signals. That would then cause a

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>needle to etch grooves into a wax cylinder. So you've

0:29:56.680 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>got this wax cylinder. It would slowly spin, a needle

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>would be dragged across it, and as sound came in,

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>it would cause the needle to wiggle around and that

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>should cause variations in the etching on the wax cylinder itself. Now,

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>when you took that cylinder out and you put it

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in another phonograph and you placed a needle on it,

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>uh within the groove and he started to earn the

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>thing the cylinder, the needle would start to shake because

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>it's following the groove that was made by the previous recording. Essentially,

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that whole process would be reversed. The shaky needle would

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>generate an electrical signal which would then go to a

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>essentially a speaker a diaphragm and cause it to vibrate

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and that would generate the sound. So you would get

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a replica of the sound you made when you were

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>speaking into the wax cylinder phonograph. Now, Oberlin Smith wondered

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>if he might be able to do the same thing,

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>only instead of using a wax cylinder, he would record

0:30:56.720 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>sound onto magnetic wire, not ape, not a disk, but

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>an actual length of wire using magnetism. Now, he was

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>not successful in this attempt, but he published his ideas

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in a journal called Electrical World in eight and ten

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>years later a Dutch inventor inventor named Valdemar Poulson gave

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it another go. He began a working magnet recorder. He

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>started building it. He called it the telegraphone Poulson, and

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>he filed a patent for this invention in eighteen nine.

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>So one year after he started working on it, he

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>showed it off at the nineteen hundred Paris Exhibition. So

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>how did it work? What exactly was it doing? How

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>was it preserving this audio information in a magnetic format

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>so that it could be played back? Well? Paulson knew

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that he needed a magnetically hard material. If you remember

0:31:57.120 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>what I was talking about before the break, that's a

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>material that we're retain its magnetic moment indefinitely. It may

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>very gradually revert back to its original status, but it

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>will hold it over a great deal of time. And

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>if you want to record data for later retrieval, obviously

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you want to make sure that that data remains intact.

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise you have a self destructing or at least a

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>self erasing message on your hands. So Poulson had to

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>experiment with various factors to make certain he could record

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>anything to the medium. To begin with, if the medium

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>has a coercivity factor that's very high, that means you

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>have to use stronger magnetic fields to affect it. I'm

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>always talk about magnetic fields. Now I'm thinking about the

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Book of Love. It's great song by a group called

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the Magnetic Fields. Back back to this. So you have

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to have a really strong magnetic field in order to

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 1>affect that material, and uh, that can be difficult. It

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>can start to eat in on your efficiency. And you

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>need the magnetic information to be distinct enough so that

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:02.719
<v Speaker 1>you could get a would replay signal. And uh, you know,

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>when you're reading the material back later, you want to

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>make sure you can actually hear what was recorded and

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>not just get some sort of muffled you know, simulation

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of the of the sounds you made. So to record

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>information onto a wire, you first need a recording head.

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>You need something that's going to generate a magnetic flux

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that can affect the medium you're using the wire in

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>this case. This, by the way, is also true for

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>other methods of magnetic storage, including cassette tapes, VHS tapes,

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>floppy disks, and some hard drives. When I say some

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>hard drives, I mean magnetic hard drives. Obviously there solid

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 1>state hard drives that are not affected in this way.

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 1>They don't use that that technology, they are not part

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of this discussion. So the recording head is a transducer,

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and basically a transducer is something that converts some physical

0:33:57.120 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>quantity into an electrical signal, or as the reverse, So

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you might have a transducer that can measure pressure like

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 1>air pressure and change that into an electrical signal. That's

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 1>a transducer. But in this case we're talking about things

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 1>like a microphone a transducer, and a microphone converts pressure

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 1>from sound waves into electrical signals. With recording devices, you

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>can use one transducer to pull double duty one of them.

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>It can act as both a recording head when recording,

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's actually writing something to the storage medium,

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 1>or it could be a read head when playing a

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.359
<v Speaker 1>signal back. It's reading the signal and then converting it

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:39.280
<v Speaker 1>back into whatever it was originally before it was stored

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:43.720
<v Speaker 1>in that format. Now these days, most recording devices still

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 1>use that are still using magnetic storage, have a dedicated

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>recording head and a dedicated read head so that each

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 1>transducer can be optimized for its respective role. You don't

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 1>see a whole lot of them where it's doing both things. Uh.

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Some very cheap electronics, probably because then you don't have

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 1>to have as many components in It makes it less

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 1>expensive to produce. Now, the right head's job, or the

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>recording head if you prefer, is to convert electric current

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 1>into a magnetic field. But you remember what we said

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 1>about electro magnets, that's pretty easy to do. The field

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it generates needs to be strong enough to affect the

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>storage medium, the wire, but also it has to fall

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>off quickly as you move away from the recording head.

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>In other words, you don't want the effect to be

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 1>widespread in area, or else you're going to end up

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>affecting way too much wire at once. You'll end up

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 1>with having to use way more wire to record very

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>short sounds. In this case, and not only is that inefficient,

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 1>but you'd also run the risk of writing over stuff

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you've just recorded. Let's say that you're writing something to wire.

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:57.919
<v Speaker 1>If the magnetic field is wide enough so that it's

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:01.439
<v Speaker 1>constantly overlapping what you just corded, then all you're really

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>doing is muddling your recording with every successive sound. So

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a coil of wire creates the magnetic field when electricity

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:13.280
<v Speaker 1>runs through it. This wire is coiled around a soft

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>magnetic material. Remember those are the kinds of magnetic materials

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that are easy to influence. But then we'll go back

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:24.359
<v Speaker 1>to their natural state shortly after the magnetic field they've

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 1>been exposed to has gone away. This creates what we

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>call a magnetic flux, and it concentrates at the tip

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of the soft magnetic material that's the core of this coil.

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:40.959
<v Speaker 1>A common design for early recording heads was a ring

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:44.799
<v Speaker 1>that had a small gap cut into it, and then

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you would wrap the wire around the inside of this ring,

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 1>like you know around the ring. So imagine just a

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>regular ring. You cut a little gap at one end.

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:58.720
<v Speaker 1>On the other end, you've wrapped this this coil of wire,

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:01.399
<v Speaker 1>and you run electricity through it. Turns the ring into

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a magnet, but the gap creates a difference in this

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 1>magnetic field. The soft material, the soft magnetic material, conducts

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>magnetic flux easily and the gap doesn't. This causes the

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>magnetic flux to do something we call fringing. It fringes.

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>A fringe field is a bit tricky to explain, but

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>it's easier to understand if you imagine a horseshoe magnet.

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>So the two ends of the horseshoe are the two poles,

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the north pole and the south pole. The fringe field

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>is the magnetic field that extends outside the space between

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the two poles. That would be a fringe field. Now,

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that fringe field is what the right head uses to

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>actually record information onto the magnetic medium. Now, with sound,

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about an analog approach, meaning you'd find a

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 1>smooth variability in the medium. You would create that by

0:37:56.360 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 1>varying the magnetic flux in subtle ways. The record warding

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>head adjust the magnetic flux by varying the current running

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 1>through the head and the recording medium thus has a

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 1>variability in the magnetic flux recorded within the wire itself.

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>The wire represents a sort of copy of the flux.

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 1>If you were to run the wire back. So let's

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 1>say you've got the red head. The transducer acts as

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a red head, and you run the wire next to

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it uh sequentially, so you're just spinning one reel pulling

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 1>wire across so that this red head is very close

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to it. That would create a varying magnetic field across

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the gap in the red head, and that then would

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>create a varying magnetic field in the core of the

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 1>red head, which would induce a current to flow through

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.319
<v Speaker 1>the coil of wire, which then could be sent to

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 1>an amplifier. The varying electric electrical signal goes to a

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 1>transducer such as speakers, and then it can play back

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the sound. Now, those old wire recorders moved at a

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:02.799
<v Speaker 1>pretty good clip. A post war wire recorders would play

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>back wire at about twenty four inches per second, so

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:09.719
<v Speaker 1>two ft a wire per second. That's about sixty one

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 1>per second for you folks on the metric system, if

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to record an hour's worth of audio, you

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>would need seven thousand, two hundred feet of wire or

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:25.320
<v Speaker 1>about two thousand one of wire, and you could only

0:39:25.360 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>record along one direction of the wire. So if you

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>want to listen to it again. You don't have to

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:34.879
<v Speaker 1>wind all the wire back up into a reel and

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>then play it out across a reed head all over again.

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Most of these early ones were hand cranked too, so

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you would get variability on the sound quality as it

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>was played back, plus when you were recording, so it

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:53.840
<v Speaker 1>took a steady hand to create a decent recording and

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 1>a decent replication. And if you wanted to rerecord over it.

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that you've you know, you recorded an hour

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of someone catterwauling, and then you're like, well, that wasn't

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>really worth it. I would love to use this wire

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:09.879
<v Speaker 1>to record something else. You would first have to run

0:40:10.000 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that wire by a strong permanent magnet, and that would

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 1>effectively erase the stuff that was on it before, because

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the strong permanent magnet would cause all those uh, those

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>those magnet magnetic domains inside the wire to realign to

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:30.799
<v Speaker 1>the permanent magnets magnetic field. It essentially erases all the variability,

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 1>all the flux that was copied there before and turns

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it back into a uniform medium which you then could

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:43.839
<v Speaker 1>run through and record stuff on again the same thing.

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:46.280
<v Speaker 1>By the way, it's true for lots of other magnetic

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:50.319
<v Speaker 1>storage media. Now, eventually Poulson began to work with other

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 1>types of magnetic media, and a big breakthrough came with

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the invention of plastic. I say the invention of I

0:40:57.400 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>really mean the mass production of plastic has been around

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 1>for a pretty a long time, but I'm talking about

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 1>when we really started producing it on a mass scale.

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 1>So you can use plastic film coated with a ferro

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>magnetic powder. This is how cassette tapes, VHS tapes, even

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 1>floppy disks work. You can make a cheap recording medium

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:18.800
<v Speaker 1>this way. Uh, the invention of the cassette tape itself

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 1>was another big jump because engineers figured out how you

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:24.319
<v Speaker 1>could double the amount of material you could record on

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a tape if you just recorded on half of it

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 1>at a time. Now, this is a little tricky to

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>explain without the use of visual aids, but I'll try

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and give it a shot. So imagine that you've got

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a length of flat ribbon in front of you. You

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:42.439
<v Speaker 1>might think of cassette that cassette recorders are actually putting

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:45.399
<v Speaker 1>information on both sides of the ribbon, but that's not

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:48.719
<v Speaker 1>what is happening. All the information for side A and

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 1>side b are on one side of that ribbon, but

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 1>they are one hundred and eighty degrees opposite each other,

0:41:56.239 --> 0:42:00.080
<v Speaker 1>side by side. So you lay out the ribbons so

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it's horizontal in relation to you. You're looking at a

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>horizontal strip of ribbon. Imagine a line going down the

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 1>middle of that ribbon horizontally. The top half of the

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:15.920
<v Speaker 1>ribbon is one side of the cassette and the bottom

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:20.080
<v Speaker 1>half is the other side of the cassette. So when

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you put a cassette into a cassette player, the reed

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:27.800
<v Speaker 1>head is positioned over just one half of that tape

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and it reads what's off of that. When you flip

0:42:30.880 --> 0:42:35.399
<v Speaker 1>the cassette over, then the side of the tape that's

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 1>running across the reed head is the opposite of of that.

0:42:40.000 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's the bottom of the ribbon as opposed

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to the top of the ribbon, and that's all you're

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 1>able to listen to side b uh. So that's kind

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of cool, I thought. Now, next, I'm gonna talk specifically

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 1>about using magnetism to store information for a digital computer,

0:42:55.800 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 1>which is a little bit different from what I've been

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:00.799
<v Speaker 1>chatting about so far. But first, let's take another quick

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:10.880
<v Speaker 1>break to thank our sponsor. All right, So in the

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:13.720
<v Speaker 1>last section I talked about how magnetic recording can create

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:17.879
<v Speaker 1>a variable magnetic flux for analog playback. But what about computers.

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Computers rely on binary language, not analog. It's not a variability,

0:43:23.800 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a collection of zeros and ones. You have to

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:30.800
<v Speaker 1>describe computer information in this format as either a zero

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 1>or one. Ultimately, when you get down to it, every

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:37.239
<v Speaker 1>computer language out there, once you get down to the

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>very basics, ends up being translated into zeros and ones

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 1>because computers just don't deal with these variable fields. So

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:48.479
<v Speaker 1>how do you get it to do that? So, while

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:51.879
<v Speaker 1>the format is more or less obsolete, I'm gonna talk

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:55.360
<v Speaker 1>about floppy disks for a bit, and that's because there

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of parallels between floppy disks and cassette tapes,

0:43:58.239 --> 0:44:01.280
<v Speaker 1>which I talked about in the last section. Floppy disks,

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:04.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way, used to come in several sizes. When

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I first started using computers, the standard size in the

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 1>US was the five and a quarter inch disc. There

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:12.919
<v Speaker 1>were larger discs that came before that, but the first

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 1>ones I ever used were five and a quarter inch.

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people thought they were called floppy disks.

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Because the outer sheath of the disc itself was flexible.

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Some people even thought you could fold them up and

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:26.120
<v Speaker 1>put them in your pocket, which technically I guess you

0:44:26.160 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 1>could do, but you wouldn't be able to use them

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:31.320
<v Speaker 1>later because you mangle the disk inside and it would

0:44:31.320 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 1>no longer spend properly inside a computer. So don't do that.

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Later on came the three and a half inch discs,

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and these had a hard plastic casing, but they were

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:45.800
<v Speaker 1>still floppy disks because the disk inside, the actual medium

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:50.360
<v Speaker 1>upon which information was stored, was still this flexible material.

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 1>A lot of folks thought that these three and a

0:44:53.040 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>half inch discs were actually hard disks. They said, you know,

0:44:56.640 --> 0:44:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the floppy disks were the five and a quarter three

0:44:58.520 --> 0:45:01.439
<v Speaker 1>and a half Because the plastic it is sturdy, that's

0:45:01.480 --> 0:45:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a hard disk. No, that's not a hard disk. But anyway,

0:45:04.800 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that's all ancient history, and you guys probably don't even

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:11.080
<v Speaker 1>understand what I'm talking about. Get off my lawn, all right.

0:45:11.120 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Inside the outer covering of these discs was the actual

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 1>disc itself. We call the floppy disks that, but they're

0:45:19.520 --> 0:45:22.839
<v Speaker 1>not disc shaped. If you were to show someone a

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 1>floppy disk and they had absolutely no context for it.

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 1>They knew what the word disc meant. They take one

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 1>look at and say, why the heck do you call

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:34.279
<v Speaker 1>it a disc. It's because on the inside there is

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a disc of material, and it is essentially a plastic

0:45:39.040 --> 0:45:43.480
<v Speaker 1>base that's coated with ferro magnetic materials. And the advantage

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of this is that if you apply a magnetic field

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to it, it would record that information permanently, or at

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 1>least until you erased it and wrote over it, or

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:55.319
<v Speaker 1>if you encountered a really strong magnetic field, and it

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 1>was a really fast way to record a lot of information.

0:45:59.000 --> 0:46:04.279
<v Speaker 1>So disks are organized into concentric rings. You can kind

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of think of an old vinyl album in the same

0:46:08.200 --> 0:46:11.960
<v Speaker 1>way how the grooves slowly move inward on the um

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:15.880
<v Speaker 1>on the disc, But in this case their actual concentric

0:46:16.000 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 1>rings of information, not not just one line that slowly,

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, swirls inward towards the center. So when a

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:28.920
<v Speaker 1>computer is reading information back, it can it can reference

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 1>some information at the at the front of the disc

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and learn exactly where a file is located, and it

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:37.319
<v Speaker 1>can then position the read right head directly over the

0:46:37.360 --> 0:46:39.880
<v Speaker 1>appropriate part of the disc, rather than having to go

0:46:39.960 --> 0:46:43.360
<v Speaker 1>through the whole thing sequentially. So with the cassette tape,

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:46.719
<v Speaker 1>if you want to listen to a specific song, you

0:46:46.800 --> 0:46:49.320
<v Speaker 1>have to wait. You mean, you can use fast forward

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to speed things up, but you can't jump straight to

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the track you want to hear, unlike you could with say,

0:46:56.440 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 1>compact disc. Well, in this way, a flop disc is

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:03.960
<v Speaker 1>more like a compact disc in that a computer can

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 1>understand exactly where the file is stored within those concentric

0:47:09.520 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 1>rings and go straight there. In other ways, it is

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:16.880
<v Speaker 1>very different from a compact disc, but in that specific

0:47:16.960 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 1>way it is similar. Now in other words, it's kind

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of like lifting a record player's needle off of one

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 1>groove and skipping ahead to a specific song on an album,

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 1>lowering the needle and then playing it, and thank goodness

0:47:30.880 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 1>record players are coming back. So that you guys know

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 1>what I'm talking about when I say these things. This,

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:40.360
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is a type of direct access storage,

0:47:40.840 --> 0:47:44.400
<v Speaker 1>meaning the computer can get direct access to that information

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in a very short amount of time. When writing to

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a disc, first the drive will use in a race coil,

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and this essentially just clears a section of the storage

0:47:55.320 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 1>medium for writing. So it's it's kind of like exposing

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that steel wired to a permanent magnet. It's that same principle.

0:48:02.239 --> 0:48:06.800
<v Speaker 1>You want a clean slate to write upon, and typically

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:09.800
<v Speaker 1>this clean slate is a bit wider than the actual

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 1>right section you're going to be working on. You want

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the area that is a clean slate to be larger

0:48:17.760 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 1>so that you have a buffer zone at either end,

0:48:20.200 --> 0:48:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and that way it keeps adjacent files from interfering with

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:26.759
<v Speaker 1>each other. If you were writing information to that part

0:48:26.760 --> 0:48:29.719
<v Speaker 1>of the disc and it went over that area, you

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 1>would start writing on top of some other file and

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 1>then the storage wouldn't work at all. So the right

0:48:38.360 --> 0:48:41.240
<v Speaker 1>head puts data on the disk drive by applying one

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of two magnetic fields to the tape. It either aligns

0:48:47.120 --> 0:48:52.399
<v Speaker 1>the magnetic material as north south or south north. That

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:55.560
<v Speaker 1>means it's either a zero or a one. Like so

0:48:55.640 --> 0:49:00.120
<v Speaker 1>imagine that north south magnetization represents a zero and ou

0:49:00.360 --> 0:49:03.400
<v Speaker 1>north represents a one. The right head can then go

0:49:03.560 --> 0:49:08.680
<v Speaker 1>through this disc very very quickly, applying these magnetic fields

0:49:08.680 --> 0:49:11.640
<v Speaker 1>one after the other, maybe several North south in a

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:15.920
<v Speaker 1>row followed by a south north or whatever, and it

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:19.359
<v Speaker 1>is recorded on the disc itself, and when you read

0:49:19.400 --> 0:49:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it back then you know by looking at the code,

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh these are you know, three zeros in a row

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and then a one. It replicates those zeros and ones

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that were recorded to the storage medium. This, in a

0:49:32.600 --> 0:49:35.680
<v Speaker 1>way is much more simple than a variable magnetic flux

0:49:35.719 --> 0:49:38.960
<v Speaker 1>because you only have to have two magnetic states. You

0:49:39.040 --> 0:49:41.920
<v Speaker 1>just have to have something that represents a zero and

0:49:42.040 --> 0:49:46.440
<v Speaker 1>something that represents a one. No other values are accepted,

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:49.840
<v Speaker 1>so you just have to have those two basic modes,

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and the same basic principles apply to other computer magnetic storage.

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Magnetic hard drives use a very similar approach to the

0:49:57.760 --> 0:50:01.280
<v Speaker 1>ones I described for floppy drives. And you probably heard

0:50:01.320 --> 0:50:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that it's a bad idea to expose computers to strong

0:50:03.960 --> 0:50:06.680
<v Speaker 1>magnetic fields, and the big reason for this is that

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:10.920
<v Speaker 1>magnetic storage. If you bring a strong permanent magnet close

0:50:11.000 --> 0:50:14.359
<v Speaker 1>enough to magnetic storage media, you'll erase the data that's

0:50:14.360 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 1>stored there. That includes data that's on a hard drive

0:50:17.719 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 1>if it's a magnetic drive, right, if it's a solid

0:50:21.680 --> 0:50:24.719
<v Speaker 1>state drive, it's a different story. Or if you were

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to take a strong permanent magnet and threatening someone by

0:50:29.320 --> 0:50:32.120
<v Speaker 1>by holding a compact disc with all their photos on it,

0:50:32.160 --> 0:50:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and you're saying if you come any closer, I'm going

0:50:34.239 --> 0:50:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to ruin your pictures by putting this magnet up to

0:50:36.680 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the c D. It won't work because the information stored

0:50:40.560 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 1>on the CD is an optical format, not magnetic, and

0:50:44.680 --> 0:50:48.759
<v Speaker 1>magnets aren't going to affect it at all, so you

0:50:48.760 --> 0:50:50.799
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be doing that anyway. It's kind of a jerk move,

0:50:51.480 --> 0:50:54.120
<v Speaker 1>but it wouldn't work, is what I'm getting at. So

0:50:54.160 --> 0:50:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in future episodes I plan on exploring stuff like optical

0:50:57.880 --> 0:51:01.160
<v Speaker 1>storage and how that works, how is it similar to

0:51:01.400 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and different from magnetic storage? And also solid state drives,

0:51:06.040 --> 0:51:08.880
<v Speaker 1>which are you know, pretty much the standard and a

0:51:08.920 --> 0:51:12.839
<v Speaker 1>lot of different computers these days, which have incredible advantages

0:51:13.040 --> 0:51:15.480
<v Speaker 1>in how quiet they are and how fast they are,

0:51:15.880 --> 0:51:17.919
<v Speaker 1>but they tend to be a lot more expensive than

0:51:17.960 --> 0:51:21.520
<v Speaker 1>your old style magnetic drives. I'll talk about those in

0:51:21.600 --> 0:51:24.200
<v Speaker 1>future episodes too, And if you guys have any questions

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:26.600
<v Speaker 1>about the stuff I mentioned here, feel free to send

0:51:26.640 --> 0:51:30.480
<v Speaker 1>me an email. My address is tech stuff at how

0:51:30.560 --> 0:51:33.319
<v Speaker 1>stuff Works dot com, or you can always drop me

0:51:33.360 --> 0:51:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a line on Facebook or Twitter. The handle of both

0:51:36.520 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of those is text stuff H s W. And I

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:48.080
<v Speaker 1>will talk to you again really see for more on

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:50.920
<v Speaker 1>this and thousands of other topics. Is it how stuff works?

0:51:50.920 --> 0:52:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Dot com two