WEBVTT - Reaction to Eagles making Super Bowl vs Chiefs & Bronny-Lakers drama

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in What's Driving Thick Right episode to ninety seven.

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>We will today, in very short order, get to the

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>NFC Championship Game, which somehow we had our maybe our

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>longest pot of all time and never got to. I

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>blame demons. He wouldn't shut up on Tuesday. I mean,

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>my god head to all these chiefs take so many

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>things to say, and because of it, we couldn't get

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to Jalen Hurts and the Eagles and Jayden Daniels and

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 1>all of that. We also, I did not anticipate sometimes

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I see stories coming down the pike. I did not

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>anticipate the latest as the world turns in relation to

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Bronni James. So we'll get to that as well, and

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a little kind of playoff picks recap all that coming

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>up shortly. Also a true media tour for me this

0:00:55.240 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>week the Collins Podcast, Levotard Show, and Patrick's show, Just

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Did Pardon My Take? Invited myself onto Adam Shin's show,

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>went on Damon Mindo Lara's show. I'm leaving some stuff out.

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>There is something incredibly cool happening. I don't think I've

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>even told Demonse, and I can't Demonse call me after

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the show to remind there's something really cool happening next

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>week around the time I get to New Orleans. I

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:31.199
<v Speaker 1>don't want to it's not my news, so to speak,

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to share it right now, and so I don't want

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to share it on the air. But a lot of

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff's a little oversaturation, I suppose by me, but I I,

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm too excited to talk about the Super

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Bowl and these games and the reps and the lunatics

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and all of it. Also, please like, rate, subscribe, review.

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Our goal was two hundred thousand by the Super Bowl

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. We're at one seventy one. So we're not

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna get twenty nine thousand between now and the Super Bowl.

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we get to one seventy five by our post

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl show, so we can do that, but also

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>subscribe on iTunes, Spotify, all that stuff. Okay, here's what

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:14.079
<v Speaker 1>missed the cut. It's all Pro Bowl related, and demon's

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I can just fix the Pro Bowl situation, okay, because

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not actually a problem that Drake May and

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson are gonna participate in the Pro Bowl games.

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that they will now be called Pro

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Bowlers for the twenty twenty four season. The problem is

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>that on football Pro Football Reference and you're gonna look

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>at the twenty twenty four season and it's gonna say

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Drake may was a Pro Bowler and Patrick Mahomes wasn't,

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:49.399
<v Speaker 1>and that's gonna be like, that's weird. So I actually

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>think this is a bookkeeping solution. The solution is bookkeeping.

0:02:55.160 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the official NFL record books should go go

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>back retroactively and moving forward and have the rule be

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>very simple. In order to be called a Pro Bowler,

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to make the original roster. Those are your

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>However many it is one hundred and six Pro bowlers

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:24.679
<v Speaker 1>a year are the guys on the original roster. If

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you were an injury replacement or a guy who opted

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>out replacement, then you do not get on Pro Football

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Reference or in the NFL record books a Pro Bowl

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>designation next to your name. That way, we don't have

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>this weird stuff where it's like, wait, Tyler Huntley the

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>year Lamar got hurt and he started four games, was

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a Pro Bowler. That is, that's on his record. So

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a book keeping solution more than anything. You can't

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>ask Josh Allen to go play in this game. He's devastated.

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>The artist hand Lamar and Derrick Henry are devastated. So

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just that's the way you do it. The other

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>thing that Greg Jennings brought up, which is a good point,

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is the Pro Bowl used to be in Hawaii and

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it was a vacation for your family and it was cool.

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Now it's in Orlando, and nothing against Orlando. People are

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>less likely to be like, Okay, I want to spend

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>time there as supposed to go into Hawaii. So there's

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the solutions. Demons. You had an interesting idea that I

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>think is worth throwing out into the audience before we

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>get the NFC championship game.

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm mad that I didn't think of what you said,

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 2>because that makes a lot of sense. But I just

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 2>said that they should make the Pro Bowl to where

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 2>up and coming stars in the college and the college

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 2>team should be able to play. So it makes it

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 2>more embarrassing for the NFL players that didn't make it,

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:50.119
<v Speaker 2>incentivizes them to make it, and gives the college players

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a taste.

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, and so it maybe gives more pressure for

0:04:56.040 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the NFL guys to actually to make the list to

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>make the list, but guys who made the list to participate,

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like, listen, you opt out, it's fine, but Shador

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Sanders taking your spot. Whatever it is, I think it's

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of it's kind of senior bullish, but would be

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool. All right, Right, let's get to the NFC

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Championship game. Go ahead, demons.

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 2>So Philly obviously watched the Commanders in the NFC Championship Game.

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Do you think they might have done that just to

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 2>come up short next Sunday?

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, I obviously think the Chiefs are the better team,

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>and I obviously think the Chiefs are gonna win the

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. But I also would like to give the

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Eagles credit because that was a tour de force rushing performance.

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes someone else has a take that I hear

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, god, dog it, that's the right take here,

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and Wild's had it on this football game, which was

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I watched Commander's Eagles, and I was like, man, Jaden

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>really got let down by his role players. When McNichols,

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Diami Brown and Austin Eckler are fumbling the ball like that,

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you want if you're gonna have a bunch of mistakes

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 1>as bad as painful as it is. You want it

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to be like it was with the Chargers or the Lions,

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 1>your star quarterback kills you, because at least then it

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>feels fair. I know that sounds silly, but you just

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want guys who are not main characters of the

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>story deciding your season. It's one of the reasons I

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>get so nervous with the Chiefs kick returner Nico Romihio,

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>who's an electric player, but he's not one of the

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>main characters here, and just the chance of him fumbling

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the ball or something bad happening there. Uh So, I

0:06:55.880 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I was making it about those Washington mistakes, and Wild's

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>on the show said, man, that game was over on

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the very first play of that Philly had the ball.

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>He's like, when Sakuon Barkley in the regular season destroys you,

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>goes for two hundred yards, and then Sakuon Barkley in

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the second game in the regular season goes for one

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards in the first quarter, and then Saquon Barkley

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>on the first play of your playoff game goes for

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a sixty yard touchdown. You're not beating that team. And

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, Okay, that's actually correct. Actually You're like, even

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>if Washington hadn't turned the ball over, they had no

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>chance all year longest stopping Saquon. And that is also

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>what I think is so interesting about this upcoming Super Bowl,

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>because Saquon is great, and I've taken my beating on

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>being dead wrong about him. Like there was no preseason

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>take I had more wrong than the Eagles missing the

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>playoffs and Saquon not being a difference maker. I was

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>just as wrong as someone can be about a sports

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>take about that exact thing. The Eagles not only didn't

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>miss the playoffs, they won the division, they got the

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>two seed during the Super Bowl, and Saquon, as opposed

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to not being a difference maker, had arguably the single

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>greatest season in the history of the running back position.

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Dead wrong across the board on it. With all that set,

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Saquon's going to annihilate the Chiefs. I'm

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>sure he'll be good. The Chiefs are too good at tackling,

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>too buttoned up, too well coached to let the other

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>team's best player ruin the game. So it's going to

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>have to be more on Jalen Hurts. And we'll get

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to Jalen shortly and more on the other guys. Saquan

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>will be good. I don't think he's going to be

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>dominant the way he has been up to this point.

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:05.199
<v Speaker 1>The other piece of this game that I really do

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:09.959
<v Speaker 1>want to give Philly credit for is it was early

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was still close, and they went for a

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>fourth and five. I think the score was thirteen to

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>twelve when they did it and not and Jalen hurts

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>through as good of a pass as you can throw

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>down the sideline to AJ Brown and they kept control

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.319
<v Speaker 1>of the game and they went on to score. That

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>was a That was the single highest leverage, non turnover

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>play of that football game. And it wasn't Saquan, and

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't something that was schemed wide open a crossing

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>route with a guy running naked over the middle. It

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>was a difficult throw, it was a high leverage throw.

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Jalen made the throw and AJ Brown made the catch.

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>So credit to them because that was enough. That was

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.599
<v Speaker 1>the first the moment of the game where it's like, oh,

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>could Washington kind of take control here? And Philly didn't

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>give him the opportunity. So that I think that has

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to be said because I've been not so much of

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a jail and hurts critic as much as a bit

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 1>of a jail and hurts skeptic. And again we'll get

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to hurts in a second, but before we do that,

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>let's talk toush pushes tomorrow.

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you've been saying that they should Jesus, you've been

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 2>saying that they should ban the toush push for years.

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Now you say it's bad for television. Do you think

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 2>with all of those offsides or the encroachment penalties from Washington,

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 2>that we've gotten closer to that getting banned?

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>All right? So that was a wild sequence. And also,

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm gonna sound annoying here probably I was

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>shocked how few people knew the referees could award a touchdown.

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>So many media members were like, I've never heard and

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>again this is my own nerd nerd, I guess. But

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the palpably, I even knew the language of it. It's like, yeah,

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>palpably unfair act it is. It is in place for

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:16.559
<v Speaker 1>really two scenarios. One is this a guy is break

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>so Saquon esque super long run, has nothing but daylight

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>in front of him, and a player from the bench

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>runs on the field and tackles that they had to

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>have a rule in place for if someone a coach

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>or a player from the sideline stops an obvious touchdown,

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.079
<v Speaker 1>that is more punitive than we'll give you the ball

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the one and that just intellectually makes perfect sense that

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>if that rule was not actually written as such, then

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>if in overtime of a game a guy is running free,

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you would do that like that It would actually be

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the smart thing to do to run on the field

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and stop them. The other reason, yeah, and so it

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>was people. When I say that, think of Mike Tomlin

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and Jacoby Jones. But Tomlin, like the referees could have

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in that situation theoretically if they thought Tomlin did that

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>on purpose, or if he did actually trip Jacoby Jones,

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>awarded them a touchdown. The other scenario it's in place

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>for is the one the referees were discussing here but

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>not reeally, which is if a team just commits a

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>pre snap penalty again and again and again, the game

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>can never move forward. So I'll give you a four instance.

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's say, and this is not a likely scenario, but

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it's likely enough that the would have to be in place. Okay,

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>So to Monsey, let's say In this game, Jaden Daniels

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>has the ball throws an interception. It's the exact golf

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>thing where golf throws a pick and then gets annihilated

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:21.679
<v Speaker 1>trying to make the tackle, except instead of the guys scoring,

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the guy is stopped at the one, and the the

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>team doctor says, oh, we have to check you for

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a head injury, and in fact, we have to take

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you to the locker room, and golf is gonna be

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, even if he's ruled eligible to play, he's

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.319
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be in for you know, ten to fifteen minutes,

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>however long that takes. Without this rule in place, the

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>smart thing, and it's you know, Philly ball on the one,

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the smart thing for the defense to do would to

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>be just encroach for twenty minutes and let him move

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the ball an inch, a quarter of an a half inch,

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>quarter whatever until they get the signal, Oh, the check's

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>done on golf, you know what I mean? Now go

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>ahead and play defense. You're giving up literal you know, millimeters,

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and what you're gaining is time. The other thing you

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>could do is be like, screw you, we hate you.

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>We're not letting this game end. We're just gonna clock stopped,

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and so that those rules, that's why that rule is there.

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>It actually makes perfect sense that the referees have to

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>have an ability to be like, no, screw you, it's

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. I did not think it was used properly,

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>even threatened to use properly in this specific situation, because

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>those guys were not trying to waste time and Jalen

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>was doing a hard count. Jalen was trying to drop him.

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>And I also thought the herd count was bad strategy

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>by Philly because you want to do a hard count

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>when you're on your own goal line, where a false

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>start doesn't hurt you at all, and an offside really

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>hurts the defense. Doing a hard count at the half

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>yard line, you're gaining almost nothing and you're really putting

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pressure on your lineman not to make

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a mistake. Okay, so there's the palpably unfair act, super

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>nerdy eight minutes. Now, as far as the tush push,

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that sequence was what I was talking about when I

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>said last year they're gonna get rid of it. They're

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna say it's for player safety. And you could even

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>argue that there because Luo hit Jalen in the head

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>on one of those dives. But it's just because it's

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>terrible television. It's an entertainment sport, and that was awful

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>TV for a long time. Okay, And I also said

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>last year, and I will say again, the only reason

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>it has not been banned yet, Demons is because the

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Eagles aren't quite good enough at it. And by that

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean this it is a basically guaranteed one to

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>two yards. If it ever became a guaranteed three to

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>four yards and they could do that on first and

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>ten and then second and six and then third and two,

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it would be banned immediately because the sport would be art.

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 2>They'll never do that. I mean, I'm assuming, yeah, yeah,

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 2>they're never gonna do that.

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Right, But so, but I think everyone this is where

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 3>anyone that's like, oh, it would be so unfair to

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 3>ban it, what if the Eagles got that good at it,

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 3>then you would definitely it would not be more or

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 3>less unfair, but it'd be like, okay, now we're if

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 3>you think it's unfair to ban it now, then you

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 3>would have to think it's unfair to ban it just

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 3>because they got better at it.

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>But we would all be like, uh no, it's getting banned,

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>like they you can't have that be the whole offense.

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Here's why I actually think Sunday as a whole made

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it more likely the tush push is here to stay

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>because other teams can't do it. The Bills kept trying

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and kept failing. If the whole league, you know, could

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.719
<v Speaker 1>do it consistently, it's just like, Okay, well this sucks

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>like it's not good TV. Everyone does it. There's no creativity.

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I think they'd get rid of it. But when Josh

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Allen is flailing about can't get it, doesn't get the

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>two point conversion, fumbles, the ball doesn't get pardon me,

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get the fourth and one, I feel like the league,

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the league looks at it and says, all right, like

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a Philly thing. They're the only ones who have

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>figured it out. They clearly it's not even just personnel

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>because Jason Kelsey retired. They had two different centers in

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 1>this game, and they figured that they did it no

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>matter what. So I actually think it's probably here to

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>stay for at least another year. All right, let's talk

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts.

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Hurts came out and said they let me out of

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 2>my straight jacket a little bit, SERRANI said it was nothing.

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 2>H do you think that this is something with Hurts.

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 2>I think everybody's reading too deep into it. That's my

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:46.239
<v Speaker 2>opinion of it.

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So why do you think he said it?

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean because he threw the ball more. I think

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 2>they were less reliant. I can't say they were less

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 2>reliant on Saquan, but those probably you just threw the

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 2>ball more. He was letting it rip, and I don't

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 2>know if that was necessarily the style that they've been

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 2>playing with all your I know aj Brown was complaining

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 2>about not getting the ball thrown to him.

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, So here's so, I don't think demon's a

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like a five alarm a five alarm fire, part

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>five alarm fire. Here's what I do think. I think

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts feels like I'm a better player. Then you're

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>allowing me to show. And I'm a great leader and

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>I care about winning first and foremost. So I'm not

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>going to make a big problem of this. But when

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>given the opportunity, I will remind America I can do

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>this whenever I am given the chance. My numbers are depressed,

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>not because of my own talent, but because it's what

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>my coach stylistic he wants us to be. Now, I

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>disagree with Jalen Hurts. I don't think Jalen Hurts can

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 1>consistently drop back and pass the ball and that's a

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 1>winning formula, but he thinks he can. And so the

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>reason I think it's something is it is just it

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>is similar to after the AJ Brown comments when Jalen

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>had a big game and he said down, he was like,

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>so is that what y'all wanted to see? He has

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>I think a bit of frustration that they have an

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>offense that it's not that it's run focused on Saquon,

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it's that it's also run focused on Jaalen. So many

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>designed quarterback runs, the quarterback power stuff, and I think

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>he feels like he is in a you know, in

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a straight jacket, a bit that he is prevented from

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>showing the world how excellent he can be. Which gets

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>me to the Super Bowl because obviously in last the

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 1>last Super Bowl, it was a drop back passing game

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and he was awesome. I think he's gonna have to

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>do that again for Philly to win this game. I

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>do not think that the recipe of amazing defense, amazing

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Saquon Barkley, and that that would be enough to beat

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs. I think he's going to have to somewhat

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>go toe to toe with Mahomes, not exactly, but at

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>least some ten to nine rounds, and we'll see if

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 1>he can do it. He clearly thinks he can. And

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:49.199
<v Speaker 1>I again, I think Jalen Hurts deserves massive credit for

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 1>his leadership, his toughness, what a great teammate he is,

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>his ability to protect the football. I think he deserves

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>credit for all of those things. I also don't think

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:06.199
<v Speaker 1>we need to or I'm not going to pretend that

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he is a great drop back passer just

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>because the Eagles keep winning, because I don't, and so

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I I the I think that is a real point

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of contention within the Eagles go ahead to mons E.

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 2>So Neil says or asks, isn't it entirely possible that

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 2>both the straight jacket comment and this is what you

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 2>wanted to see is just the teen trolling the media

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 2>who wants there to be more drama than there really is.

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's possible. I don't think it's likely. I don't

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>think that they are intentionally creating this kind of narrative

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.919
<v Speaker 1>around them just and then like privately behind closed doors,

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>laughing about it.

0:22:57.880 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 2>We got them.

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't. I think that's what it is. I

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:05.400
<v Speaker 1>do think there is a real tension there. I don't

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.199
<v Speaker 1>think it's debilitating. I don't think it's gonna have an

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>impact on the Super Bowl. But I don't think it

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is that they just they win these games all year. Yes, right,

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think part of it really is I don't

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>know that Sirianni and Jalen Hurts on the exact same

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>page all the time. It just doesn't feel that way

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to me. Again, I'm not there, But I don't think

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it's trolling the media. All right, let's talk about the

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>other side of that game.

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Jayden Daniels, Shade and Daniels had a rookie season. Quite

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 2>the rookie season can really cause the rookie season exceeded

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 2>any expectations. We've obviously seen sophomore slumps, but this guy

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 2>seems pretty promising. Do you think that the Commanders are

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 2>gonna be contenders moving forward? Is this going to continue?

0:23:56.359 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Well? I think that contenders is to me a touch strong.

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 1>They clearly have their guy at quarterback, and I think

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that he is going to inter next year as a

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>consensus top ten guy consensus, and I think that some

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 1>people will have him inter next year at number five Demonse.

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I think next year the one through four is gonna

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>be pretty lockdown. One Patrick, two, Josh three, Lamar, four Borrow.

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe some people have Burrow ahead of Lamar. I won't

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>because as much as the concerns about Lamar and the

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>playoffs are real, the concerns about Burrow's team making the

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>playoffs are real, So you've got to give Lamar the

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>nod there. I think some people will then say number

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:05.120
<v Speaker 1>five is Jayden Daniels. Now, if Jalen Hurts wins this game,

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>then I guess number five is probably gonna be Jalen Hurts.

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 1>But I think that he is going to be consensus

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>top ten in borderline top five. I do think that

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>if I'm the Commanders, I am having someone on my

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>team do a real deep dive into the off seasons

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of this past offseason of the Texans and the Packers

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 1>and figure out why those two teams didn't take a

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>step forward the way people thought they would after their quarterbacks.

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>I know Jordan Love wasn't a rookie. CJ was, But

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Love's first year starting had this type of year

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>not quite as good as Jayden this type of year.

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Say it again, injuries, I feel like was the common

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 2>denominator for I mean, Jordan Love got injured directly. CJ.

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Strouds receivers went down one by one. Nicole Collins came

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 2>back after like three games.

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>So listen, If it is as simple as that, then

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a you know, a pretty quick autopsy. I felt

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.479
<v Speaker 1>like it was a little more than that because you know,

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:19.679
<v Speaker 1>the Texans fired their offensive coordinator. They didn't you know,

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>they they clearly felt they didn't move forward offensively the

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>way they should have. So I I look at There's

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of ways to look at the Commander's playoff run.

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>One way is literally tied the record for the furthest

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>any team's ever gotten with a rookie quarterback, beat the

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>one seed, and you know that won two road playoff games.

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 1>That's one way to look at it. Another way to

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>look at it is played a Tampa team that people

0:26:54.800 --> 0:27:00.200
<v Speaker 1>liked but nobody thought was a contender, and that game

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>came down to a couple mistakes. Tampa made a fumbled

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>hand off early snap, and all of a sudden, you know,

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:11.400
<v Speaker 1>instead of them taking the lead, they're tying the game.

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 1>And they lose a Lions game where the other team

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>turned the ball over five times and you turn the

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>ball over zero, and then an Eagles game where you

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>got annihilated and allowed fifty five points. So kind of

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 1>glass half full, glass half empty. So I think that

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Jaden's excellent and he has exceeded anyone's realistic expectations. I

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>also do fear for the Commanders that they are going

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to be the trendy pick, similar to how the Packers

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:53.120
<v Speaker 1>or the Texans were, and you know, as Ben Solac

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>says all the time, and poor Ben getting killed on

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the internet this week. In the NFL, progression is not

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>linear always. It's not always here and then there and

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>then they're like the NBA is like that. The NBA,

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it's usually like you're a bad team, you fight to

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>be five hundred, you make the playoffs, you go on

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>one deep playoff run, and then you're a contender. That's

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 1>really how it works in the NBA. Typically the NFL,

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of fits and starts up and down,

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 1>like trying trying to move them. So I'm not trying

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:29.919
<v Speaker 1>to pour cold water on the commander's season, but I

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't going into next year, I would anticipate Detroit is

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>better than them. Philly.

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Saying that them losing the Philly like if they obviously

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 2>had to eventually play Philly sounds like that, like kind

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 2>of undid everything that they did.

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not, no, it's not that it undid everything

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>they did. It's that in the NFL, every year, really

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you are starting from scratch, and this idea that, well,

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we got so far last year, therefore you know you're

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you're you're really truly starting over. And when I look

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>at the roster, I do think Detroit will be better

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>next year. I do think Philly will be better next year.

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>And if we want to say they're right there, then

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>with everyone else, I don't know it. Maybe I mean

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that for Washington next year, the expectations should

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>be let's make the playoffs again. I think anything past

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that is probably a little too strong. All right, let's

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>go to the AFS. You think that's fair, right.

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, no, no, that's very fair. I don't think I

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't say, like they're going to go win the super

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Bowl next year, I would say that. Well, that's why to.

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Me is like every year there are five or six

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>what I consider contenders. Now that doesn't mean those are

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the only teams that can win the super Bowl, but

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>they're the only teams that if they won the super Bowl,

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be shocking, right, And going into this year,

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the I think the consensus six teams were Chiefs, Bills, Ravens. Well,

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe the Bills weren't won. They were to me, but

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe they weren't to the general public. Lions, Eagles, Niners,

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and I know the Niners fell apart, but they were

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>say it again.

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 2>No I was gonna throw the Bengals in there, but

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 2>oh yes, no, no, no they were.

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>You're the Bengals probably were where I had the Bills

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in my head. Like, and then there's the next group

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of teams that to me this year, Texans, Packers were

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:50.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, two of them where it's like, okay, we

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>expect them to be good, but I'm not ready to

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>call them contenders. All right, let's do Chiefs.

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Uh So you and Brew had wildly different takes on

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 2>why the Chiefs have become villains. Wild's actually discreet with

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 2>both of you guys and said that they're not villains

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 2>at all. What do you what's your what's your take there?

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, first let me Wilds thinks that the Chiefs

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't hated, and I think that's an insane opinion. Personally,

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>He's like, look at hown and people watch the games

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff. I think the Chiefs are well. He

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>also says hate watching is a myth, and that might

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>be true, but I think sports it doesn't really work.

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Is hate watching. It works as rooting for the other team,

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean? Like, so the you are

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>deeply invested in the game, you're not hating watching the

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>names rooting for the other team. I think the Chiefs

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>are simultaneously the league's most popular team and the league's

0:31:55.400 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>most hated team. I think amongst young people or super

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>casual fans, the Chiefs are probably the most popular team

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>in America. I think amongst people that have Sunday ticket,

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs are the most hated team other than your

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>team's number one rival. So like that's you know, if

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you're a Steelers fan, I think you hate the Ravens

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and your number two hate is the Chiefs. I think

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>if you are a Vikings fan, you hate the Packers

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and maybe the rest of the NFC North, and your

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>number two most dislike team is the Chiefs because of

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the success and other things, and the other things is

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot of work there, and I'll get to

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it in a second. Bru's answer was they're not exciting anymore,

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that they went from being a high flying team and

0:32:55.960 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 1>now they're not. And I think that is absolutely wrong.

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that maybe they would So here's where I

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>think Brew is kind of right. If they were still

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>scoring forty points all the time, I think they would

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>be less hated. But not scoring forty or even more

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>than thirty all year did not make them hated. What

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>made them hated was the success combined with the conspiracies,

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and you, I do not believe you can close success, correct,

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>It's the it's that all these games are close. It

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>feels like they're vulnerable when they're not. And then you

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>add to it the level of conspiracy associated with them,

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that I think the ref stuff has

0:33:54.320 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>taken on a totally different tone and feel over the

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 1>last six weeks to where it is the overwhelming sentiment

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of people that the games are not

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 1>on the level, and I feel like that is driving

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the villain narrative more than anything, because you look at

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the other like the Patriots were villains, yes, the success,

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>but then you add to it that they did have

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>two separate, documented, adjudicated cheating scandals. You then add to

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 1>it that Belichick embraced that villain role with his gruff

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>demeanor and kind of shadowiness. The Chiefs are none of that.

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 2>They've had no Patriots for the reason that the Chiefs

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:54.280
<v Speaker 2>are aided what do you mean? You know, because maybe

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 2>back then when they were doing all that cheating and

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 2>they were winning, it's like, oh, the Chiefs must be cheating,

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:00.399
<v Speaker 2>that's why they're getting all these wins. The the three

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 2>p oh I like that.

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Take that it's the audience has been conditioned to think

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the only way to win at this level is to

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 1>break the rules. Okay, maybe, but you know, Andy Reid

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is not Bill Belichick personality wise, and and Mahomes is

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>just visually objectively talented in the way Brady wasn't. That

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it's captivating for the audience, so you wouldn't think that

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:35.839
<v Speaker 1>they should be hated. But I think it I the

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 1>other and I didn't talk about this on the show

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 1>because it was just too unwieldy. But the other the

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:48.800
<v Speaker 1>non ref non style, non all of it, part of

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>some percentage of the Chiefs hate is I'm sorry, hate

0:35:56.200 --> 0:36:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to go here with it, but it's true, is actuallyogyny

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's anti Taylor Swift being shown for eighteen seconds

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 1>on the show. On the games, it is a reflexive

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>allergy to why are you showing this woman cheering for

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>this team as often as you are during my football games?

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 1>That was You saw a lot more of that last

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>year when people were freaking out over what when they

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 1>documented it was forty two seconds of airtime that Taylor

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 1>would get during the game's cheering. But a lot of

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that just feels like, really just kind of old school.

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 1>This is my sandbox. Get out of my sandbox, you

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean? He man woman hater type of nonsense.

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, speaking of nonsense, I did not see this

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 1>one coming, but Bronnie was a super hot topic on

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of shows yesterday. Your friend Colin Coward, when

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I was on his pod last night, led the pod

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about Bronnie, and I told him I totally disagreed

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:10.320
<v Speaker 1>with him. I know it was a big topic on ESPN,

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:13.440
<v Speaker 1>So go ahead, let's let's do the Bronny discussion.

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 2>So Bronni got some real minutes in that Philly game

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:20.360
<v Speaker 2>the other day, even first quarter minutes in fact, he struggled,

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 2>and JJ went on the podium and said that he

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of blamed himself, put him on national television. Stephen

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 2>A even came out and blamed Lebron or or said

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 2>that Lebron has a serious role in it. What's what's

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:33.440
<v Speaker 2>your whole take on the situation?

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I was shocked at the reaction to this game. Shocked. Now, Listen,

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Bronni did not play well. He was oh for five,

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 1>he had three turnovers. There's the there's no denying. And

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Bronni now is one for sixteen shooting in the NBA.

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I think oh for seven from three, and that's brutal

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>for a number of reasons, but not the least of

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>which are he's gonna play so little now, even if

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 1>he has a couple decent, you know, two three minute

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>stretches in garbage time, his numbers are gonna be horrifying.

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>And so you know that that just you know, is

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.319
<v Speaker 1>life of a late second round pick into the bench Guy.

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Where I was shocked was there has been so much

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>disingenuous commentary surrounding the Lakers and surrounding Bronni and folks

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 1>immediately resuming it after being quiet on all fronts for

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a month. The moment Bronni gets some more NBA minutes

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>and plays poorly, it just struck me as transparent. So

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 1>let me go to the Lakers piece of it, and

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:52.919
<v Speaker 1>then the Bronni piece of it. I know you all

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 1>saw it. It was TV commentary and also very popular

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 1>social media posts where they would show the Lakers record

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:07.800
<v Speaker 1>last year with Darvin Ham through ten games, twelve games,

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty games, twenty four games, and then their record this

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:14.800
<v Speaker 1>year with JJ Reddick. Show last year they won the

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in season tournament with Darvin Ham. This year they even

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>qualified for it with JJ Reddick, and it was, oh,

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone blamed Darvin, but now look at them now. And

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:28.840
<v Speaker 1>then the Lakers got hot, moved up to the five seed.

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:32.839
<v Speaker 1>The records are wildly different. They're five games over five

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred earlier than they have been in any year in

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the last few years. And all those accounts and takes

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 1>went away, and the exact same thing happened with Bronni. So,

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:47.799
<v Speaker 1>Bronni started off in the G League struggling, and you

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 1>would see his stats and his plus minus and his

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 1>all of it publicized all the time. And then the

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:03.880
<v Speaker 1>last few he is crushed in the G League. Last

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:08.359
<v Speaker 1>three games in the G League twenty three six and

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:13.399
<v Speaker 1>five averages a career. I had thirty something the other night,

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 1>forty three percent from the field, forty six percent from three,

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine percent from the line, and all those accounts

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>went away entirely, We're not talking about it. So I

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>was like, well, that's just shitty, you know, like the

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:36.959
<v Speaker 1>and so there was because there was so much of oh,

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, I know this is what lebron wants, but

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is it good for Bronni? Is he you know, is

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>so much of that. And then when Bronni was cooking

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in the G League, which now people are gonna be like, oh,

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:57.919
<v Speaker 1>anybody can cook in the G those the general conventional

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 1>wisdom was he's really going to struggle in the G League. Guys.

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>He didn't play that well at USC. It's grown men

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:09.240
<v Speaker 1>in there fighting to, you know, get a roster spot,

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and he had a bit of a slow start, but overall,

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>on the year, now in the G League, and don't

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 1>show the stats of the other guys yet. Just stay

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>stay with me on this. He's sixteen four and four

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and again in the last few weeks twenty three points

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:31.839
<v Speaker 1>at twenty three points per game, six rebounds per game,

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 1>five assists per game, two steals per game on forty

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:38.799
<v Speaker 1>three forty six eighty nine splits. And the other thing

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you were hearing, you heard a ton of right after

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:48.880
<v Speaker 1>he was drafted, was it's unfair to the guys. You know,

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:52.760
<v Speaker 1>he took someone's roster spot, he took someone's draft position.

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 1>He you know, this is this is nepotism at its worst.

0:41:57.719 --> 0:42:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Forget the fact that with an end of the second

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:09.840
<v Speaker 1>round pick, if someone said, hey, here's the deal. There's

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a kid who was a legitimate, top high school prospect

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 1>who had a massive medical event that derailed his freshman

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>year of college. However, his you know, at the NBA combine,

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 1>his shooting was off the charts. Everyone says his intangibles

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:34.839
<v Speaker 1>as far as characters suffer, off the charts, and oh yeah,

0:42:34.920 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 1>one just added bonus, he literally has the same DNA

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:43.319
<v Speaker 1>as arguably the greatest athlete of all time. Do you

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 1>think he's worth a flyer. I think a lot of

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 1>people are like, yeah, sure, fifty to fifth pick, fifty

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 1>six pick, why not? None of that commentary was there

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:55.760
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and then he was kind of validating

0:42:56.480 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the belief by his playing the G League. And then

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 1>he gets these minutes against the Sixers, and Steven Aid

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:11.000
<v Speaker 1>pleads with lebron to stop this. As if, guys, if

0:43:11.040 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you have an older team like the Lakers, and you

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 1>are on a back to back, it is totally reasonable

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:24.479
<v Speaker 1>and expected that the coach might then say, hey, kid

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 1>on the two way, who we drafted, who's playing the

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 1>best ball of his career. This is a game you

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 1>might get some minutes. Be ready. Now, again, Bronni played very,

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 1>very poorly, but for that to then be a controversy

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:43.799
<v Speaker 1>is absurd. But here's what really bothered me were if

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>we are going to recite Bronni's current NBA stats, then

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:56.760
<v Speaker 1>let's put them in context. So he was taken fifty fifth.

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 1>There were fifty eight picks in this year's draft, because

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:04.320
<v Speaker 1>there were picks taken away. The guy taking fifty sixth

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>has not played because he had knee surgery. So we

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:11.800
<v Speaker 1>will compare Bronni's NBA stats. The guy's taking fifty seventh

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and fifty eighth, We can put them on the screen.

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Bronni averaging three minutes a game, point three points point

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:24.200
<v Speaker 1>four rebounds, point three assists. That's can you imagine something

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:27.280
<v Speaker 1>being worse? Well, I don't know, man. The guy taking

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty seventh, that's averaging point eight points one rebound, point

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 1>three assists. And the guy taking fifty eighth, who's played

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:41.280
<v Speaker 1>double minutes per game. All the other Bronni and Ulbrick,

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:44.399
<v Speaker 1>pardon Ulric three and a half minutes when he's played

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:47.280
<v Speaker 1>RILs with seven and a half one point six points,

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:50.879
<v Speaker 1>one point eight minutes point four assists per game. They're

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 1>all the same. What about their G league numbers? And

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:59.759
<v Speaker 1>this is where people are really disingenuous. So Bronni's G

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>league numbers twenty eight minutes per game, sixteen four and four.

0:45:05.320 --> 0:45:08.400
<v Speaker 1>The guy taking fifty sixth has not played because he

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:12.799
<v Speaker 1>had ANEE surgery. Fine guy taking fifty seventh six points,

0:45:12.840 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 1>seven rebounds, one assist. The guy taking fifty eighth six points,

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:21.319
<v Speaker 1>five rebounds, point six assists. So what the hell are

0:45:21.360 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 1>we talking about? It was such a narrative, wasted draft

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:33.400
<v Speaker 1>picks service of Lebron's ego unfair. Okay, So the guy like,

0:45:33.600 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 1>let's just assume the Lakers board was what everyone else's

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:40.439
<v Speaker 1>board was. The three guys taken after him again. Put

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:43.359
<v Speaker 1>the G League numbers up again, because I think it's

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 1>worth noting. Lebron's played twenty Bronni's played twenty eight minutes

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a game. The guy taking fifty seven has played twenty

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:52.239
<v Speaker 1>four minutes a game. The guy taking fifty eight is

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 1>played twenty two minutes a game. So Bronni is getting

0:45:54.560 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a little more opportunity. Bronni's averaging sixteen a game. The

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:01.680
<v Speaker 1>other two guys are averaging six point six and six

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:05.279
<v Speaker 1>point seven. Brian's getting you four point two rebounds a game,

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the other two guys getting you seven point five and

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>five point seven. Brian's getting you four point two assists

0:46:10.640 --> 0:46:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a game. The other guys are given you one point

0:46:12.400 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 1>one in point six. So here's why I bring this up.

0:46:18.320 --> 0:46:22.799
<v Speaker 1>The little bit of data we have suggests, oh, that's

0:46:22.800 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a fine draft pick. It's totally in line. In fact,

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:32.319
<v Speaker 1>he is slightly outperforming the guy's taken after it. So

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to have that data and then seizon ten bad minutes

0:46:37.800 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 1>against the Sixers and do an impassion plead to Lebron

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 1>or to the league or to the Lakers to stop this,

0:46:46.200 --> 0:46:52.200
<v Speaker 1>like it's a farce, is to me just wild. And

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that all of these people were so quiet

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in the weeks leading up to it when he was

0:46:57.719 --> 0:47:01.960
<v Speaker 1>cooking in the G League. Now again he might be like, oh, Nick,

0:47:02.000 --> 0:47:04.400
<v Speaker 1>nobody's gonna talking about the G League. I'd be fine

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:08.319
<v Speaker 1>with that, except they were when he first started in

0:47:08.360 --> 0:47:11.799
<v Speaker 1>the G League and was playing really poorly, And so

0:47:13.000 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's bullshit, And I think there is

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:25.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of I don't like Lebron, and therefore I

0:47:25.320 --> 0:47:29.839
<v Speaker 1>am going to be wildly disingenuous about his son from

0:47:30.000 --> 0:47:33.440
<v Speaker 1>folks on social media and some folks in the media,

0:47:33.800 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in the actual media, and I'm no big fan of it.

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 1>If you couldn't tell. This episode of What's Right is

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:48.120
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by DAYA Pizza featuring dairy free cheese

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:52.279
<v Speaker 1>made with their new Daya oat cream blend. Dairy free

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:55.360
<v Speaker 1>cheese has come a long way. Daya's leading the charge.

0:47:55.400 --> 0:47:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Their pizzas offer the melting stretch of traditional cheese without

0:47:59.400 --> 0:48:02.320
<v Speaker 1>any day Each day A Pizza starts with a perfectly

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:06.000
<v Speaker 1>crisped crust, layered with savory, satisfying toppings, and finished with

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:09.919
<v Speaker 1>cheese that melts and stretches beautifully. The Dea Oak cream

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:15.360
<v Speaker 1>blend delivers a creamy, cheesy texture that's indistinguishable from dairy

0:48:15.680 --> 0:48:19.080
<v Speaker 1>based options. Every pizza is crafted to be dairy free,

0:48:19.280 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 1>making it a great choice for anyone seeking more inclusive

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:27.800
<v Speaker 1>meal options without compromising on taste. Data takes the concept

0:48:27.840 --> 0:48:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of dairy free to a new level, eliminating foam MoU

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 1>fear of missing dairy. These pizzas delivered delicious taste and texture,

0:48:36.800 --> 0:48:39.880
<v Speaker 1>making them perfect for any occasion, from casual dinners to

0:48:39.920 --> 0:48:43.680
<v Speaker 1>game day spreads. Enjoy a foam move free pizza night

0:48:43.960 --> 0:48:47.360
<v Speaker 1>with day of Visit dayafoods dot com for more information,

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:51.120
<v Speaker 1>or find DAYA Pizza at retailers like Whole Foods, Kroger,

0:48:51.200 --> 0:48:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and Walmart, coming soon to select publics and sprouts. Follow

0:48:55.200 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 1>DAYA on Instagram and TikTok for more updates and rest peas.

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:05.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, demons, we'll obviously go to next week. I

0:49:05.040 --> 0:49:09.760
<v Speaker 1>think we will do like a prop special uh show,

0:49:10.280 --> 0:49:14.279
<v Speaker 1>But let's just do a quick recap of where we're at.

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:19.600
<v Speaker 1>My quest for an undefeated postseason. Died early, so then

0:49:19.640 --> 0:49:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I side quest ten win postseason. I can't. I needed

0:49:25.840 --> 0:49:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to go undefeated last weekend, and I got the Washington

0:49:31.040 --> 0:49:35.080
<v Speaker 1>game very wrong. So so here so recap my record

0:49:35.080 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 1>if you would please.

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Uh So, your conference record right now is one in

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 2>one playoff record. You are eight three and one season

0:49:43.160 --> 0:49:46.319
<v Speaker 2>record fifty six forty three and three.

0:49:47.160 --> 0:49:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so figainst the spread more importantly, and maybe this

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:57.760
<v Speaker 1>needs to be a bigger piece of next year. Touchdown Genie,

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm just the I the I don't bet the anytime

0:50:02.440 --> 0:50:06.919
<v Speaker 1>touchdown stuff, but everyone loves it. And I've been undefeated

0:50:07.000 --> 0:50:10.719
<v Speaker 1>on the season on the times I've given one out.

0:50:11.080 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I told you guys, Kareem Hunt at plus one ninety

0:50:14.760 --> 0:50:17.040
<v Speaker 1>he scored the first touch round of the game. It

0:50:17.160 --> 0:50:21.880
<v Speaker 1>was just a snap in your teaser ended on a

0:50:21.920 --> 0:50:26.160
<v Speaker 1>sad note. It made I was I it's you know what.

0:50:26.239 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't blame you for it. I get the you

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:32.879
<v Speaker 1>had Washington. It was the right way to tease it.

0:50:34.120 --> 0:50:36.239
<v Speaker 2>But that was a bummer, honestly, like maybe it's because

0:50:36.239 --> 0:50:38.000
<v Speaker 2>I already lost the bat, but looking back on it,

0:50:38.040 --> 0:50:40.840
<v Speaker 2>probably you know, honestly, though, I think that teas and

0:50:40.880 --> 0:50:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Philly Beck could have been just as smart of a move.

0:50:44.560 --> 0:50:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Uh yeah, but.

0:50:46.960 --> 0:50:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it was. I mean, looking back on it,

0:50:50.680 --> 0:50:53.719
<v Speaker 1>it was the obvious move. However, I thought Washington could

0:50:53.719 --> 0:50:59.200
<v Speaker 1>win the game. Yeah, And so what I will say

0:50:59.280 --> 0:51:02.799
<v Speaker 1>is about the super line is kans City opening one

0:51:02.840 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and a half? Is the is fair? I'm not gonna

0:51:05.600 --> 0:51:10.359
<v Speaker 1>act like it's disrespectful. Philly's been so good. I would

0:51:10.360 --> 0:51:12.920
<v Speaker 1>have been annoyed if kanc City was underdogs. But it

0:51:12.920 --> 0:51:15.840
<v Speaker 1>feels like Vegas is and the listener or the betters

0:51:15.840 --> 0:51:20.839
<v Speaker 1>have kind of learned their lesson there. All right, let's

0:51:20.880 --> 0:51:23.279
<v Speaker 1>ask a few listener questions to Monday before we get

0:51:23.280 --> 0:51:23.719
<v Speaker 1>out of here.

0:51:24.239 --> 0:51:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Indy Nick, where do you see the game? Where do

0:51:27.600 --> 0:51:30.440
<v Speaker 2>you see the end game being? And the mainstream media

0:51:30.520 --> 0:51:33.200
<v Speaker 2>is going to be influenced by social media.

0:51:34.160 --> 0:51:40.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's positive. And I think that it's

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:45.680
<v Speaker 1>one thing for the mainstream media to be taking the

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:49.440
<v Speaker 1>temperature and the pulse of what people are talking about

0:51:49.920 --> 0:51:54.719
<v Speaker 1>genuinely and having that influence their coverage. I think that's

0:51:55.000 --> 0:52:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a good thing. The problem is social media is because

0:52:02.040 --> 0:52:06.840
<v Speaker 1>all of the algorithms are made in a way to

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:10.480
<v Speaker 1>generate the most engagement and to usually keep people the

0:52:10.520 --> 0:52:15.839
<v Speaker 1>most angry and outraged and online. That it skews your

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:20.040
<v Speaker 1>perspective of what people are actually talking about, or thinking

0:52:20.120 --> 0:52:27.719
<v Speaker 1>about or believing, and then eventually perception becomes reality. If

0:52:27.760 --> 0:52:30.640
<v Speaker 1>there is a small portion of the world or that

0:52:30.760 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 1>thinks something but that is amplified on social media, and

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that then therefore dictates what the actual media is covering,

0:52:39.480 --> 0:52:42.800
<v Speaker 1>then all of a sudden it does become the story.

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:47.480
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that there's a lot of things

0:52:47.520 --> 0:52:53.759
<v Speaker 1>involving the way discussions are framed and which discussions are

0:52:53.800 --> 0:52:58.600
<v Speaker 1>rewarded online that I don't know if the mainstream media

0:52:58.680 --> 0:53:03.560
<v Speaker 1>has a good grap grasp on what people what the

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:06.600
<v Speaker 1>majority of the population actually care about as opposed to

0:53:06.600 --> 0:53:10.680
<v Speaker 1>what the majority of their Twitter feed is talking about.

0:53:10.760 --> 0:53:12.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to bref.

0:53:13.080 --> 0:53:16.879
<v Speaker 2>Uh bref Nick. Time to admit your King Kingsbury take

0:53:16.960 --> 0:53:18.200
<v Speaker 2>is a category three.

0:53:19.440 --> 0:53:23.880
<v Speaker 1>It might be he maybe learned, maybe he listen. He

0:53:24.120 --> 0:53:26.840
<v Speaker 1>was he was not a good head coach in college.

0:53:26.840 --> 0:53:30.040
<v Speaker 1>He was not a good head coach at U Arizona.

0:53:30.480 --> 0:53:34.440
<v Speaker 1>But maybe he's he's been an excellent offensive coordinator for Washington,

0:53:34.719 --> 0:53:36.959
<v Speaker 1>and I do think he's gonna get another head coaching job.

0:53:37.160 --> 0:53:39.480
<v Speaker 1>But this is a great year for him. All right,

0:53:39.560 --> 0:53:40.520
<v Speaker 1>let's go on to Monkey.

0:53:40.560 --> 0:53:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I guess bear if there. He also added, is it

0:53:44.000 --> 0:53:45.080
<v Speaker 2>more Jayden than him?

0:53:45.640 --> 0:53:49.799
<v Speaker 1>Well, he listened. Jayden certainly helps, but he helped Jayden. I

0:53:49.800 --> 0:53:52.160
<v Speaker 1>think Caleb would have had a far better year than

0:53:52.200 --> 0:53:54.840
<v Speaker 1>he had this year if he had Cliff Kingsbury instead

0:53:54.840 --> 0:53:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of the coaching situation he had. So Cliff gets credit.

0:53:58.840 --> 0:54:03.640
<v Speaker 2>It's fair. Monkey says this takes on takes is so necessary.

0:54:04.000 --> 0:54:06.279
<v Speaker 1>Very well, that's not. Well, listen, We're gonna try to

0:54:06.320 --> 0:54:08.279
<v Speaker 1>do more of it. I don't want to listen. I

0:54:08.280 --> 0:54:11.160
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily want to always be like picking fights. So

0:54:11.200 --> 0:54:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I will also try to find some Yeah, I know

0:54:17.080 --> 0:54:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a spot for you and so uh so I will

0:54:21.719 --> 0:54:24.400
<v Speaker 1>also try to do some Hey, I saw this and

0:54:24.440 --> 0:54:26.560
<v Speaker 1>thought it was really good. You know what I mean?

0:54:26.600 --> 0:54:31.239
<v Speaker 1>A little balance balance. Yeah, all right, let's do Eric

0:54:31.280 --> 0:54:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and then get out of here.

0:54:32.680 --> 0:54:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Eric says Bronni is getting undue criticism for a fifty

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:39.880
<v Speaker 2>fifth pick, But was he not getting undue praise slash

0:54:39.920 --> 0:54:41.680
<v Speaker 2>coverage for his draft position too?

0:54:42.520 --> 0:54:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, listen, no, I don't know that he was getting

0:54:45.480 --> 0:54:50.600
<v Speaker 1>undue praise, but obviously he got more coverage than every

0:54:50.719 --> 0:54:54.799
<v Speaker 1>second round pick in the NBA history combined. But that

0:54:55.040 --> 0:54:58.080
<v Speaker 1>is I don't look at those as hand in hand.

0:54:58.239 --> 0:55:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I would look at it as coming into the draft,

0:55:02.560 --> 0:55:07.239
<v Speaker 1>people were like Bronni and bron gonna be an unstoppable duo.

0:55:07.760 --> 0:55:12.279
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna change the Lakers' fortunes. Then this level of

0:55:12.320 --> 0:55:15.280
<v Speaker 1>like vitriol and criticism would be to me more warranted.

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:17.000
<v Speaker 1>But there was none of that. It was a lot

0:55:17.040 --> 0:55:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of coverage. It wasn't a lot of oh my god,

0:55:19.640 --> 0:55:22.120
<v Speaker 1>this guy's gonna be amazing. I mean, I don't think

0:55:22.120 --> 0:55:27.280
<v Speaker 1>anybody was more optimistic, so to speak, or positive about

0:55:27.360 --> 0:55:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Bronni than I was. And I will admit, you know,

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:35.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm biased to a degree there. And I said, the

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:41.480
<v Speaker 1>goal is that in one to two years maybe he

0:55:41.480 --> 0:55:44.399
<v Speaker 1>can be a role player. That was like the hot

0:55:44.600 --> 0:55:48.399
<v Speaker 1>the top end of the optimism. I'm surrounding it all right,

0:55:49.000 --> 0:55:53.040
<v Speaker 1>like rate, subscribe, review some really cool stuff. Also, next

0:55:53.040 --> 0:55:56.160
<v Speaker 1>week gonna be doing a live show from New Orleans,

0:55:56.440 --> 0:55:59.920
<v Speaker 1>so that'll be great. Uh, see you guys there first thing,

0:56:00.120 --> 0:56:02.560
<v Speaker 1>first and a few hours. Great job, Demons, a great job.

0:56:02.600 --> 0:56:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Everybody will trade