WEBVTT - Short Stuff: Cramming

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you welcome to the Short Stuff. I'm Josh and

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of Chuck. Who's here? Say hi Chuck an

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:16.080
<v Speaker 1>uh Dave see the producer Jerry the mega meta uber

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>producer Uber with an oom loud Even that was a

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>good Jerry. Um. This is short stuff, the stuff you

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>should know, A short version of stuff you should know,

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>but shorter, that's right. And this has to do with

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>something that I have been guilty of from grades kindergarten

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>through my undergraduate degree, which is to say, cramming for

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>the test. I've always procrastinated when it comes to my

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>school testing. I always crammed. I always did pretty good.

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a sort of a B student, and I never

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>thought it mattered much, and now I feel terrible about it.

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Right until that time the cop pulled you over and

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>asked you how to explain Pythagoras Pythagoras theorem, and you

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>were like, oh, man, I knew this, I knew this,

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and I forgot it. Yeah, because cramming is uh, it

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>sort of works if you're looking to skate by and

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>make that grade in and like walking in there minutes

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 1>after you finished studying. You might do okay, but you're

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>not gonna learn anything, and you're not going to remember

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. And that's the point. Like, yes, you can

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>cram and do okay on a test, you could even

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.479
<v Speaker 1>get through college or high school like that. And that's

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>why a lot of people who cram say, well, whatever

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it works, I'm fine with it. But the point of

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>learning all this stuff is to actually learn it. So

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>when you look at it like that, like you don't

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>actually learn anything, you just are are doing rote memorization.

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>And then then it kind of makes sense to look

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>for other ways. And luckily, um, they figured out that

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>there are plenty of other ways to learn aside from cramming.

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Before we get into that, let's talk about exactly why

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>cramming is terrible. Yeah, so you know, obviously we're saying

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you're really not learning much. It's there have been studies

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>done and there are a lot of people who study this. Uh.

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>One of these guys from the House Stuff Works article

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>is Dr Robert A. Bork from u c l A

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>psychology department, and he's like, there's a dramatic forgetting rate

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>after you take that test. And you might think, well,

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 1>who cares, man, I pasked the test, but uh, that's

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a big deal when that test is a building block

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>for more lessons, Like if it's a language class he

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>points out, or math class, all of that stuff matters.

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>You gotta learn that stuff. You can't cramp. I mean,

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I guess you can cram for a language final or

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.519
<v Speaker 1>a language test, but it's not gonna do any good

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>when the next test comes around and you never learned

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the first stuff. Yeah, you'll never be a French major

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:54.679
<v Speaker 1>like that. You SAP know what's SAP in French? Exepp

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 1>perfect um. And then the other part is when you're

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>cramming too. Usually you are you're you're adjusting your normal

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>schedule to like really debilitating degree. You're not cramming from

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, um nine am, two ten pm the day

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>before the test. That's that's studying. Cramming usually involves like

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>just like squeezing whatever time you have out of the

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:29.239
<v Speaker 1>handful of hours right before the test. Maybe you sleep

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>for a little bit right before and then going to

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>take the test. In my experience, it's always just been

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:39.119
<v Speaker 1>going in and taking the test right after you finished studying. Yeah,

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>remember God, just remember this the Family Ties when Alex

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>pe Keaton took speed, it's so great. Every study. Every

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>family sitcom has always had somebody take speed, and it's

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>always to study. Remember Jesse Spanoh, Jesse, I saved by

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the bell where she's like, I'm so excited. That's so excited.

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>They were doing a performance of that song and she

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>was like freaking out about getting it wrong. So she

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>was rehearsing and rehearsing and taking speed. I know, like,

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you're too fast. I don't remember. It's it's great. It's

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>one of watershed moments in television history, Jesse collapsing in

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Zack's arms because she's so excited. But I think that

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>shows coming back. It is in the same stars are

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be like teachers, so cramming. Uh yeah, you

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>cram right until the last second. No good, you're not

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>learning long term. And there are some interesting ways to

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>combat this though. And should we take a break now? Yeah,

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. All right, it's a little early,

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's a perfect place, so we'll be right back.

0:04:44.000 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>All right. Well, now we're on the road, driving in Chuck.

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Want to learn a thing or two from Josh Man

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Chuck stuff you should know? All right, all right, I

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>jumped the gun. We took an early break, but here's

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the deal. If you want to study effectively. Uh, they

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>say that, you know, studying something twice is obviously the

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>best way, and even three times and more is the

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>best way to retain something and really learn something. But

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it gets even more specific. It's called the spacing effect.

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>They say, if you study some and then you go

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and take a break and do something else and then

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>come back to studying that same thing, you're gonna retain

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>even more than if you just did it twice in

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a row. That's right. So this is like really really

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>important to remember, because if you want to learn anything,

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>there's just a certain thing you have to do and

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>that is not cramp And like this could even be

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't, I didn't see anywhere like how far spaced

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>out it needs to be. But I got the impression

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that there's a sweet spot too far. And it's basically

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 1>like seeing the material like brand new again and you

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>don't even remember the first time, but too close. And

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>studies have shown that you actually, um don't uh, you

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>don't see it differently than you did the time before.

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Like if you read a chapter and then go back

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and read the chapter again, you're not doing anything to

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>help yourself you want to space it out some and

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 1>in doing that, you're they think you're you're encoding things differently. Yeah. So,

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>like you said, if you do something twice in a row,

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 1>it's so familiar to you, you're encoding it in the

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>exact same way. If you take that little break, you'll

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>encode it differently and remember it longer. And not only that,

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>but there are different ways to encode uh. And they

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>suggest like changing your um like where you study, Like

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>if you sit down in your favorite fat chair in

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.559
<v Speaker 1>your office to study your thing, take a little break,

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>go to a different room for the second take, and

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that will just mix it up in your brain enough

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>so you'll encode it more permanently. That's right. Um, So

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty cool. That's a that's a good, good bit

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of advice. And there's there's there's other reasons why they

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>think this works, um really well. Another one is that

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>like if you struggle to recall um, whatever the information

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is for some reason, you're that that exertion of brain

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>power UM makes you learn it more. And there's this

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a pretty good example in this article from House

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to Folks, where like if you meet somebody, um and

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to remember their name like thirty seconds later.

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>That's great, and you'll probably remember their name because it's

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>right there in your working memory. But the next day

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you're probably not going to remember it. But if you, like,

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you meet somebody and then an hour later you have

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to recall their name and you really try to recall it,

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you're probably going to remember it the next day because

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>they think you're struggling with that recall. You're exerting an

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>effort with recall. And it makes sense because you know,

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're like, what's that person's name again, and you

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>don't even bother to try to recall, um, you will,

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>You're not You're not going to learn it. Or if

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you even if you ask the person what their name

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>is over and over again, you're not just getting it

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in there. Um, You're you're never going to learn it either.

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:12.559
<v Speaker 1>So it makes sense struggle struggle to recall might help

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>with this, uh this learning. Yeah, I'm the worst with

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>names like that, and I've tried. I know we both are.

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>We I've tried all the things I try to remember

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to think of pneumatic devices, pneumonic devices, pneumatic and uh,

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I just can't do it. So you hear a lot

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of hey Man out of me, and it's no offense.

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I never forget a personality or a face, so you're encoded.

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just those names. I think everyone should wear name tags.

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 1>But they've done plenty of studies about this. There was

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>one in two thousand nine from u c l A

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>from Dr Nate Cornell with a K and found that

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>spacing was more effective than cramming for nine of participants,

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>which is I mean, there it is, there's your proof.

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, But the thing is they also surveyed those

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>participants and found out that basically all of them still

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>thought cramming was effective. And the reason why is because

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it is effective, but it's not effective for long term learning.

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>So what they figured out in addition to spacing, um

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that spacing is well, I guess in kind of in

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>conjunction with spacing, because another technique that really helps people learn,

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's called inner leaving. I think it should be

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>called inter weaving. But whatever, it's where you take. You know,

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>let's say you have two hours to study math. You're

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>actually better off to study math for thirty minutes, then

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>go study, say French or something else for another thirty minutes,

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:44.199
<v Speaker 1>and then yeah, and then right, and then study um

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>model airplane building for thirty minutes and then go back

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to the math. You're gonna do better than you did

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>if you spent two solid hours on math, even by

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>breaking it up, which is very counterintuitive because it seems

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>like to be distracted. But hey man, the studies don't lie. Yeah.

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Is two thousand fifteen study that tested middle school kids

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>with algebra and geometry, two subjects at a very hard

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>time with and a day after their lesson was complete, Uh,

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the students who enter wove or enter love scored better

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>than students who got regular instruction. And then here's the

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>real kicker. A month later, that interleaving group was up

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>seventy six percent. And that's kind of the whole point,

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>which is like long term learning something rather than just

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:35.439
<v Speaker 1>recalling something for a test. Right. Yeah, that's there's your

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>proof right there. Seventy percent after a month is that's

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 1>all I needed to hear. So from now on, it's

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>inter leaving and encoding, uh, and spacing for me. Yeah,

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And I try to do that because our job is

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of like taking a test in ally, and I've

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>gotten into and I know we both have our own

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of methods worked out now, But um, I've gotten

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>into a groove now where I will read stuff like

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>on the laptop and then not look at it for

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a bit, and then read and highlight the printed version

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and then leave it for a bit and then eventually

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>underline the key parts on the highlighted printed version. And

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>that in addition to just general like you know, videos

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and other like ways of learning, that's kind of the

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>sweet spot for me. Yeah, because you're spacing it out

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's it works. Yeah, I know, writing something down

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>has always been a suggestion, like if you write it out,

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:32.839
<v Speaker 1>then you're more likely to remember it. That's a big thing.

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, for sure. Like if there's a very difficult

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>concept that we have to explain, it's way easier to

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>write it out. On one hand, you're like proving to

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>yourself that you understand it, but you're also definitely like

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>re encoding it in a different way. And the other

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>thing I find interesting too is if you actually physically

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>move to like a different room or a different location

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, Um, just being surrounded by that

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>different stuff or different sound, different smells, different sites. Even

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>if when you're learning the exact same information, your brain

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is encoding it in a different way. I just find

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that endlessly fascinating and it makes total sense too. Yeah,

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>and I've always, you know, seen over the years when

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you said across from me that your signature Josh Clark

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>three point chicken scratch handwriting. No one else on the

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>planet can see without a magnifying glass or read even

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>with the magnifying glass. Yeah, I sometimes can't. I'm like,

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 1>what is I What did I say here? But the

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>point is it's not even to go back and reread

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>almost never is. If it is, then I make it

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>super legible. It's just writing it out. Help me remember it,

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you know. Yeah, it's good stuff. We have her tricks.

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Well that's it. Go forth and stop cramming everybody. You

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>will be a more well rounded, happier, smarter human being. Okay, okay,

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 1>And since I said okay twice, it's uh the end

0:12:54.840 --> 0:13:00.439
<v Speaker 1>of short stuff and short stuff. Oh wait, Stuff you

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>should Know is a production of iHeart Radio's How Stuff Works.

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the iHeart

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.