WEBVTT - Musk Could Earn $1 Trillion With New Tesla Pay Package 

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and Eva Low in Sent Francisco.

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Tesla proposes an unprecedented one trillion dollar pay package for Elon.

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 4>Musk plus Broadcom surges on earnings and a big new

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 4>AI chip customer who we report is Open Ai.

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 3>And we speak with Qualcom CEO Cristiano amon As. The

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 3>company partners with BMW to provide its automated driving brains.

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 4>But first we check out these markets, which are volatile

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 4>to say the least. As we head towards this weekend,

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 4>people taking money off the table. Look, we bought into

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 4>the stock market throughout this training day and actually earlier

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 4>in trade today. But in the Nazak one hundred now

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 4>rolling up over a bit ed we pull back on

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 4>some of the week's losses. We're now down eight ten

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 4>percent on an Asbak one hundred over the course of

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 4>five days, but remember we were shut on Monday, so

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.559
<v Speaker 4>that factors in the Friday sell off too. More broadly,

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 4>we think of a macro picture a week labor market,

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 4>and we'll dive into that, but for now, look at

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 4>the individual movers, which you've got.

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Yep, our top story, Tesla is up two and a

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 3>half percent. The board proposing a compensation package for Elon

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 3>Musk one trillion dollars is the headline. It is over

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 3>ten years, It is against multiple high bar milestones, both

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 3>operational and financial, and there are some safeguards in there

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 3>as well, additional safeguards to keep Elon Musk focused on Tesla.

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's get out of Bloomberg's Dana Hole.

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 3>Who covers Tesla and leads our coverage of Elon Musk.

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 2>And that's where I want to start.

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 3>What are the milestones operational and financial Danna that Elon

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Musk and Tesla have to hit if he's going to

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 3>get to the full one trillion package.

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So it's twelve tranches, and to sort of unlock

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 5>a tranch, there's two components. Market cap, which is basically

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 5>it's in half trillion dollar increments. So to reach the

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 5>first one, it's a two trillion dollar market cap, and

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 5>then everyone after that is by half a trillion. But

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:16.399
<v Speaker 5>it's operational milestones that include things like number of optimist robots,

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 5>number of robotaxis in deployment, cumulative car sales FSD take rate,

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 5>and these are very aggressive, very hard to meet milestones.

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 5>Tesla is nowhere close to them right now. But this

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 5>is what the board thinks is going to motivate Elin

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 5>to really dig in and really go guns blazing for

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.519
<v Speaker 5>this sort of AI robotics future that he recently outlined

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 5>and masterplanned Part four.

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 4>And perhaps what really motivates him is twenty five percent

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 4>ownership of the company. What's interesting and what motivates investors

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 4>is his dedication, particularly moving away from politics, which seems

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 4>to be one of the key points here in what

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 4>the voters, what the investors are going to have to

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 4>vote on. But it's also about thinking about succession. I

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 4>was interesting and the eleventh and the twelfth Trane Donna.

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean clearly, you know, Musk has been the

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 5>CEO of Tesla since two thousand and eight, and at

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 5>some point they need to come up with a real

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 5>succession plan. And I think that the committee worked very

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 5>hard over the past seven months to kind of make

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 5>it clear to investors that they are always talking about

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 5>secession plans and that whenever the time comes from us

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 5>to step down, they want his involvement in choosing a successor.

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 5>But this package is designed to keep Elon focus for

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 5>the long haul and to really motivate him and give

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 5>him that kind of like dopamine hit that he likes

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 5>of kind of you know, swinging for the fences and

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 5>doing crazy things that no one thought were possible.

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Donna, very quickly, how does this package compare with the

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty eighteen package being disputed in the courts?

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 5>So if twenty eighteen was a moonshot package, this one

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 5>really could be thought of as a Mars shot. And

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.839
<v Speaker 5>if you actually, you know, command f the proxy, there's

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 5>a there's a reference to a Marsh shot in one

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 5>of the footnotes. Because the numbers are so high, the

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 5>milestones are I mean, we're not just talking billions anymore,

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 5>we're talking trillions in marketcap. But remember Elon Musk has

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 5>always talked about wanting Tesla to be the most valuable

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 5>company in the world. This is a pay package that

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 5>incentivizes him to get there. And if he gets their shareholders,

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 5>we'll also get there, which is why I think you're

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 5>going to see a lot of investors support this package.

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 4>Dana, How question is with the course supported once again,

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 4>but really interesting take on this one trillion potential payday.

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 4>Let's get more from someone who used to be on

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 4>the board, and then we now push forward to the

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 4>future of Tesla with Steve Wesley from the Wesley Group.

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 4>You are indeed the founder managing partner. Steve, I'm really

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.119
<v Speaker 4>interested as to some of these milestones. Yes, it's about

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:49.679
<v Speaker 4>market capitalization is extraordinary. But to get twenty million cars

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 4>on the road, to get ten million of those with FSD,

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 4>to get one million robots one million robot taxis is

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 4>that realistic?

0:04:58.400 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 6>Well?

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 7>I think that should be awesoully hard for tough that

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 7>to do. And again I support incentive based pay packages

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 7>for CEOs, and the pay package sounds astronomical, but so

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 7>are the milestones to get it type. He's got a

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 7>double market cap just even to get the first milestone.

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 8>And I understand what they're doing.

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 7>They want to get must one hundred percent focused on Tesla.

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 7>But the big question is still, how do you get

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 7>Tesla back on a growth trajectory. It's got two years

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 7>of flat growth here. They've got to get permitting for

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 7>full self driving in San Francisco and Austin first, Thanks first,

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 7>and then they've got to start selling humanoid robots. Must

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 7>have said they're going to shoot for five thousand this year.

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 7>That feels a little aspirational, but whatever it takes to

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 7>kick the company into a higher gear, that's what shareholders

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 7>should be looking for.

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Steve Sectional page A fifty one of the proxy. If

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 3>I bring it up and you allow me to read

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 3>it to you, the board receives assurances that Mosk's involvement

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 3>with the political space would wind down in a timely manner.

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 3>The one of the reasons that Caroline and I wanted

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 3>to get you on the show is you did sit

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 3>on Tesla's board for three years. You've been a controller

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 3>of a state in California. How do those provisions come about?

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 3>How do you interpret it?

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 8>But look, I think there's two things going on.

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 7>Musk is saying, look, I want to be wildly incentivized

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 7>if I do great things for shareholders, and I think

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 7>shareholders I think the board is saying, okay, fair enough,

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 7>we're going to have to set awfully highest standards. And

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 7>that's not just going to be performance standards for selling

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 7>more cars, for getting full self driving and really showing

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 7>the promise of AI and Tesla and he's also going

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 7>to have to really make the humanoid robot proposition real.

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 7>I think if he does those things, he deserves a

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 7>big pay package.

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 8>If you've touched on something else.

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 7>The board clearly wants to see him focused on Tesla,

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 7>and that probably means less politics, less forcus on some

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.559
<v Speaker 7>of the other properties that are already doing extraordinarily well.

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 7>So you can see why the board constructed it as

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 7>they did. Let's see if shareholders support it. I have

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 7>a hynch state will and the big question is it's

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 7>going to be game on for Tesla. Kenny hit these right.

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Why gundation scores Within the operational goals, there is the

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 3>target to produce one million humanoid Optimus robots. There is

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 3>to build the Robotaxi fleet to one million vehicles. But

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 3>there is still a goal in there, Steve to produce

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 3>and sell and deliver twenty million electric vehicles to consumers.

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 3>In other words, Tesla's historic bread and butter. That seems

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 3>to contradict like the big picture vision for AI. You know,

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 3>in a world where Tesla operates a prietary ride hailing app,

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 3>he's still being asked to deliver tens of millions of

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 3>vehicles directly to the consumer.

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 7>And you put your finger on the lich fit here

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 7>as always. What I love about this is what I

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 7>suspect and I don't know about back to Elon wants

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 7>is an audacious, big target, because that's what gets ISS

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 7>adrenaline going great. What I think the board is pushing

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 7>for is, hey, don't forget. You've got to sell a

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 7>lot of electric and autonomous vehicles and competition's coming. So

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 7>let's come back to the real world for a minute.

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 7>Volkswagen unveiling twenty nine thousand dollars eighty two next week

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 7>in Europe. That's going to be hugely competitive. BYD Europe

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 7>sales up two hundred and twenty five percent. Well, Tesla

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 7>Europe sales are down fifty percent, cyber truck sales down

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 7>fifty percent. Now Forward's coming out with a thirty thousand

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 7>dollars competing truck, and in China, competition's huge. And now

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 7>not only is BYD rocketing up with more EV sales

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 7>for gly Star Wish a new ten thousand dollars EV

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 7>in China, biggest selling car in China. There's competition coming

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 7>from all sides, and I think this is the board's

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 7>way of saying, hey, don't forget, you still have to

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 7>sell a lot of cars if you want anywhere you're

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 7>this size of governess, it's not.

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 8>Going to be easy.

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:05.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Steve, So if you're on the board and as

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 4>an investor, how does he turn around the bread and

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 4>butter the selling of cars.

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 7>Well, again, that's we've talked about that one a lot.

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 7>Everybody is going to be coming out with a twenty

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 7>to twenty five thousand dollars car. Tesla has been late

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.319
<v Speaker 7>in getting that to market. They need to do it.

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 7>Here's the point that people really need to get.

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 8>Their arms around.

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 7>We're reaching cost parody for evs this year. Now people

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 7>are going to say, hey, what's going to happen in

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 7>Q three? I can tell you in Q three EV

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 7>sales are going to be up in the US because

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 7>everybody's rushing to still get that last government credit and

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 7>then it's going to go away. A lot of people

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 7>say me, o, my, is that going to crush the industry?

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely not. What you should understand. The average EV price

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 7>dropped fourteen thousand.

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 8>Dollars in twenty twenty five.

0:09:56.200 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 7>EV's are soon going to be cheaper than internal combustion

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 7>vehicles and that's going to continue for the rest of

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 7>our lives.

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Steve.

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Later in the program, we're going to go deep on

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 3>the shareholder initiated proposal for Tesla to invest in Xai.

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 3>But if you look across the broad package, would you

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 3>please kindly assign what chances you give that shareholders will

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 3>vote in favor of all of those provisions at the

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 3>November annual meeting.

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 7>Well, look, it's hard to note. It's the biggest pay

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 7>package in history by far. But again they've attached the

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 7>goals to such high numbers where they're trying to create.

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 8>A weird win.

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 7>I have a hunch the shareholders are going to support this.

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 7>I think what they really want to see is the

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 7>two things you've pointed out, one musk dropping back from

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 7>politics and focusing fully on Tesla into getting back to

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 7>the reality of selling more cars, getting full regulatory approval

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 7>for autonomous driving.

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:57.599
<v Speaker 8>Those are the goals ahead of him. I hope he

0:10:57.640 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 8>gets them.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Wesley a former Tesla board member now of Wesley Group

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 3>and somebody with a command of the world of electric vehicles.

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Now coming up shares a broadcommer surging today after news

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 3>breaks that an unnamed customer deal from the call.

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's open AI. That's next, Cary, what are you

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 2>looking at?

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking at the broader markets actually end look, maybe

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 4>it feeds into anxiety around in video's command of the

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 4>key hyperscalers and the growth that they see in terms

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 4>of their own chip provision, training and inference. We're down

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 4>four percent on in video. The socks are still up

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 4>four ten percent thanks to Broadcom, but more broadly we're

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 4>risk off. That's after the macro data. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Taking a look at the shares of broad coom up

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 3>eight and a half percent of times in the session,

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 3>reaching an all time high after posting record revenue. Bloomberg

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 3>then reported that a new customer broadcord So working with

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 3>the design and produce an artificial intelligence accelerator from twenty

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty six onwards is open AI. That's something that could

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 3>challenge in video. Let's bring in Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Cunjensabani.

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 3>As normal Hocktan does not name, he alludes to this

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 3>a six customer on the call, and when you publish

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 3>your research, research and reaction, that's where you looked at

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 3>A six and AI revenue.

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Why focus there.

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 9>I mean that is the center skate story right now. Look,

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 9>before this announcement, they were still the majority share owner

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 9>of the A six accelerator landscape, and with this announcement

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 9>now their share is actually going to increase if you

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 9>can believe that. So right now they are the number

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 9>two AI semi company after Nvidia. When you think of

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 9>the revenue size of AI revenues, I mean, just for comparing, contrast,

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 9>right their air revenue now is running or going to

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 9>be done, almost bigger than an entire data center revenue

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 9>of the number two GPU provider in AMD. So they're

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 9>increasing their share at an unprecedented rate. Not just adding

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 9>new customers and new revenue streams, were also increasing the

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 9>unit volumes at the existing customers, so gaining share at

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.439
<v Speaker 9>existing customers and as well as adding more customers.

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.719
<v Speaker 4>I mean a ten billion future backlo on coming from

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 4>open AI is nice conngent, But compare and contrast Nvidia

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 4>and broadcme for us because many want to mainly compete,

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 4>but really, are we seeing this as an alternative this

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 4>custom silicon or is it an and rather than an all?

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 9>At this point it is an end. Look, it's a

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 9>lot more nuanced than just saying that the A six

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 9>from Broadcom are going to kill in media. You know,

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 9>the use case is really limited to say ten top

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 9>ten global hyperscalers now, no doubt today these step top

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 9>ten represent the largest spenders when it comes to accelerators.

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 9>But the compute demand from these top ten today is

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 9>so much more. It's not coming at the cost of

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.439
<v Speaker 9>Nvidia GPUs. The bare case thesis is yes, in the future,

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 9>as these customers keep improving their own chips, gen after

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 9>gen keep improving their software, they could become sellers of

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 9>the computer based on their own chip, the case study

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 9>being the AWS and Anthropic deal.

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.119
<v Speaker 10>However, there's still a major huge.

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 9>Market of enterprises sovieign customers Neo clouds, which still makes

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 9>sense to be exclusively on the GPU's likes of Nvidia.

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 4>Qunjian Savani is always great to get your takes in

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 4>your analyst from Blueberg Intelligence, we thank you. Look Alphabet

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 4>actually a broad On customer. Let's talk about Alphabet right now, because.

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 11>Breaking news from the EU.

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 4>Google will be fined almost three billion euros that's three

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 4>and a half billion dollars by the European Union because

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 4>it's being ordered to stop favoring its own advertising technology services.

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 4>Now this comes hot on the heels of the fact

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 4>that Google seem to only get a slap on the

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 4>wrist when it comes to its monopoly of search coming

0:14:57.800 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 4>from Judge Meta. Here in the United States, the dog

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 4>ed is still looking at ad tech.

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 11>Will we see the EU find.

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 4>Implicate on that perspective, because it seems as though there

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 4>is a concern coming that it's got too much control.

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 3>It's not just a fine, you know, the European Union's

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 3>now saying to Google that it needs to stop favoring

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 3>its own ad technology platforms. And if you remember back

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty three, under the previous Competition Commissioner Margaret

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 3>the vest there they had been warned that they needed

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 3>to stop doing this, and over the term of Vesta's

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 3>tenure within the European Commission, she went after Google on

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 3>billions of euros of fine. So they have sixty days

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 3>to respond. Google's statement is this is unfair.

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Coming up in conversation on the jobs market, we're gonna

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 4>be speaking ed with Sarah Franklin, that's is CEO, on

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 4>the state of the tech labor markets. After that pretty

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 4>woful number coming from non time payrolls. That's a Blomberg

0:15:51.040 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 4>Tech US August payrolls out earlier today and again of

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 4>just twenty two thousand jobs, another downward revision in the

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 4>previous month, and unemployment rising to four point three percent.

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg International Economics and Policy editor Michael McKee breaks down

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 4>those numbers with a little bit of a tech slant

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 4>for US.

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 12>Yes, Carol, it was not a good month for Donald

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 12>Trump and his economic policies because job growth slowed tremendously

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 12>and it has been soling for the last few months.

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 12>You mentioned unemployment up seventy five basis points from July.

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 12>It's starting to go higher and higher. But in terms

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 12>of tech jobs, and I can see Ed rolling his eyes, going,

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 12>what does it mean for tech? Tech's not special? Tech

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 12>lost a lot of jobs as well. There's not one

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 12>tech category in the overall jobs report, but there's a

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 12>lot of different ones in there, and I've pulled out

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 12>a few to show what happened. In computer manufacturing twenty

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 12>one hundred jobs lost. Semiconductor manufacturing thirty seven hundred jobs lost,

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 12>computer systems designed that would be the software guys three

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 12>three hundred jobs lost.

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 10>So some real.

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 12>Job losses for the people in tech. And the President

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 12>foreshadowed it last night when he was asked about it

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 12>at that dinner with tech company executives, and he said, yeah,

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 12>maybe bad now, but just you wait, the Brooklyn guy

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 12>or the Queen's guy, quoting the Brooklyn Dodgers, wait till

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 12>next year. In a year from now, he said, when

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 12>these monstrous, huge, beautiful places, the palaces of genius, when

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 12>they start opening up, you'll see, I think you'll see

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 12>jobs numbers that are going to be absolutely incredible.

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 13>So we'll see if he is right. In a year.

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 3>My old eyes en roll Bloomberg's international economics correspondent Michael

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 3>McKee with a Teconomic special breakdown of the latest jobs

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 3>data from all in the State of the Labor Market.

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Sarah Franklin Lattice CEO joins us now lattus as about

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 3>with a new State of the People report, and we

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 3>come to you every job because of, like you know,

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 3>the rich data that you have on your own technology platform.

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 3>But the most simple place to start is to say,

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 3>look at Mike's reporting the breakdown of the latest jobs report,

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 3>and say, is AI impacting any of the technology sector

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 3>just yet?

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 6>The short answer is yes, we're seeing the impacts. We're

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 6>seeing the job growth slow, we're seeing unemployment tick up.

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 6>But what we're seeing really is transformation in the workplace.

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 6>You're seeing every job is changing and every company is

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 6>going through the transformational stage eliminating some of the roadwork

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 6>but also investing in ways to increase effectiveness of their people.

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 4>Sarah, much of the transition has to be led by

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 4>human resources.

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 11>But how much do.

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 4>You think the cuts come first and then the rehiring

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 4>of different types of talent then comes, or are we

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 4>seeing people just being asked to be more productive?

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 6>So with HR, it's an opportunity to be very strategic,

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 6>and layoffs are really more like a fad diet. There's

0:18:57.600 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 6>something where you get an immediate hit into the P

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 6>and L, but the real work, the healthy habits, are

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 6>not being implemented if you're not focusing on your workforce

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 6>effectiveness and the habitual training that you have with all

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 6>of your employees and the structures that you put in place.

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 11>We're going through change.

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 6>It's important to do this in a way that sets

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 6>up companies for long term success, and that's what HR

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 6>departments are really focused on today. When they're driving success

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 6>with AI.

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 4>Talk about that success with Ai, Sarah, because that is

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 4>something that's been questioned a lot in the last couple

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 4>of weeks by this MIT report, people worrying the ninety

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 4>five percent of pilots aren't delivering return on AI investment.

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 11>What have you heard from the people that hire.

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Caroline, it's so interesting because it's a headline that

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 6>people have latched onto because there is fear. There's fear

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 6>of what AI can do. And so when you can

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 6>easily say this MIT report says that they're failing, that's

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 6>easy to really embrace. But however, the reason the nuance

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 6>in the report is that it's AI alone, not really

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 6>when you look at AI that's set up properly, AI

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 6>that's integrated well with systems, and so what it tells

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 6>us is that we need to responsibly bring AI in.

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 6>You can't just set up AI and expect it to work.

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 6>All of us that may buy an Alexa for our home,

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 6>you can't just put it in your kitchen.

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Expect it to dend the lights.

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 6>You need to set it up, configure it and understand

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 6>how to use it. The same thing is true with AI,

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 6>and so where AI is succeeding. It's when we have

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 6>responsible practices, we have good integrations, and we have ethical

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 6>usage of it.

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 3>So in your own survey and your own report, one

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 3>of the things that struck me was the results around

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 3>people's attitude towards maintaining work life balance. It talks to

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 3>a bigger picture debate whether AI helps us and makes

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 3>life easier in our daily work life so we can

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 3>go and do more fun things outside of work. Is

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 3>that really happening within the workplace or in any of

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 3>the HR sectors that you track in.

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 6>There's definitely generational differences in the embracing of AI between

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 6>Z millennials and what we're seeing though, is that AI

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 6>whether it's freeing up time to have better work life

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 6>balance or to do more strategic work. I don't think

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 6>any of us want to do robotic work. We want

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 6>to be able to focus on what makes us human,

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 6>our creativity, our ingenuity, and this is what's so powerful

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 6>that AI is enabling us to do.

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 4>One of the tropes that's going around at the moment

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 4>is this nine ninety six culture. Dare I even reference

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 4>the lift heavy, run far Marry Young eat eggs a steak,

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 4>but Sarah more broadly, how much you see this culture

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 4>being adopted by those who want to grind being shunned

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 4>by those that have been in the workforce for a while.

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 6>Again getting back to there's a lot of fear. There's

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 6>a fear that I'm not going to be relevant. There's

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 6>a fear that my job may go away. And so

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:51.959
<v Speaker 6>a lot of this fear is driving the culture. And

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 6>so what's most important right now is that everybody understands

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 6>the urgency in scaling up themselves on AI and bringing

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 6>AI skills into their workforce, not just the workforce of tomorrow,

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:08.159
<v Speaker 6>but the workforce of today. And so it's fear that

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 6>drives this lack of balance. And what we need to

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 6>do as leaders is really help people understand that AI

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 6>can be here to help us, It can give us superpowers,

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 6>and it can really be a great way to us

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 6>to transform our businesses and get back to growth.

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 4>So Frank can putting the realistic nature to the new

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 4>work life balance or lat lere of CEO of Lattice,

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 4>We appreciate it. Meanwhile, coming up or you a mosque,

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't seem to rest.

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 11>Will you be the first trillionaire? More on the Tesna

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 11>CEO's pay package proposal. That's next.

0:22:38.520 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 4>This is blue Bag Tech. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 4>Let's take a look at the border markets. We do

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 4>that from the flens of tech though, and that's that

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 4>one hundred volatile day. At one point we saw that

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.679
<v Speaker 4>markets traded higher on the bad news being good news

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 4>in terms of woful jobs data means the FED is

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 4>going to cut. But now the market push is lower.

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:19.360
<v Speaker 4>We're off by tenhu percent. Maybe going to break back

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 4>to the green. But vodataile day ed.

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 11>Some key stocks to watch great.

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So our top story is that Tesla's board is

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 3>proposing a one trillion dollar conversation package for Elon Musk.

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 3>I know that we don't normally do this, but like

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 3>the stock's up three percent, a one sigma or one

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 3>standard deviation move for this stock is nearer to five percent,

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 3>and it kind of feels like a little bit unremarkable

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 3>despite the fact that we're talking about a one trillion

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 3>dollar compensation package. And of course the reality is that

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 3>it's over ten years and there's a lot in there

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 3>to get through. So let's get to Bloemdog's Max chaft In,

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 3>one of the team behind Bloomberg's Elon Inc.

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Podcast.

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I've spent four hours eating a three

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 3>hundred page document and there's a lot in it. But

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.959
<v Speaker 3>there are these milestones and targets that Musk and Tesla

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 3>need to hit to get to one trillion, which jumps

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 3>out at you off the page when you saw them.

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.479
<v Speaker 14>I Mean, the thing I think is most significant is

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 14>there there are provisions in here about succession planning, about

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 14>the idea that Elon Musk needs to come up with

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 14>a you know, with a way to who's gonna oversee

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 14>this company beyond him, which I think is really important.

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 2>And I think this trillion.

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 14>Dollar package reflects the fact that Tesla and Elon Musks

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 14>are kind of inextricably linked, you know, for better or worse,

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:40.239
<v Speaker 14>for worse being of course the political blowback that has

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 14>come from Musk's association with Donald Trump and his centrality

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 14>to many of the more unpopular policies pursued by the

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 14>Trump administration, but also the idea and many many Tesla investors,

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 14>as you know ed see it this way that Elon

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 14>Musk has some kind of special ability to see the future.

0:24:58.920 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 2>And that's what this is about.

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 14>This is a long long term bet on that relationship,

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 14>while also acknowledging that at some time that at some point,

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 14>hopefully for investors deep into the future, that that relationship

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 14>will come to an end.

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 11>It's so interesting.

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 4>Investors, of course, agreed to the previous fifty six billion

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 4>dollar pay package, and the judge that has overruled that

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 4>and put it on pause was like, it's unfathomably large.

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Was part of her concern, as well as the board's

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 4>role within it.

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 11>This time.

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 4>They've been very careful to try and make sure that

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 4>the board seems independent, but they are giving in on

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 4>what he wants, which is twenty five percent of ches.

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, he's been out there for the last year and

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 14>a half or so essentially campaigning for a bigger stake

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 14>in the company. And you might ask yourself, well, that's

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 14>kind of strange. How does a ceo who you know,

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 14>there are many owners who are putting these stickers on

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 14>their cars that say I bought this before he went crazy,

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 14>A CEO who has in some ways lost a part

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 14>of his customer base. How is he asking for a

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 14>massive periods?

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 2>And I think the.

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 14>Answer is, like I said, investors think this is a

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 14>bet on the future. It's not necessarily about cars about

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.719
<v Speaker 14>after this, it's about self driving cars. It's about Tesla

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 14>as this massive robotic car though.

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but Tronch eleven and Tronch twelve directly relate to

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 3>Musk's participation right in a succession plan. Just going back

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 3>to all of that, Bloomber's Matchchafkin for weeks, we'll be

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 3>going through this compensation proposal, thank you very much. There's

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 3>another side to it, in another story. A lot of

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 3>the momentum behind a shareholder resolution for Tesla to potentially

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 3>invest in Xai came from retail investors. One of those

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 3>that led the charge lobbying others in recent months is

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 3>Alexandre Merz aka Tesla Bloomer Mama on x. Metz is

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.640
<v Speaker 3>a prominent figure in that group of retail investors who

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 3>backed Tesla and Musk, a longtime Tesla investor and shareholder

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 3>and joins us now. So it's included a shareholder initiated

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 3>proposal for Tesla to invest in Xai.

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 15>Your reaction please great, very happy. Obviously we have worked

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 15>one that for a while. Well now. It all started

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 15>last year when another retail shareholder, Gully asked Elon whether

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 15>that is possible at that point, obviously Xa's valuation was

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 15>much lower. Elon had then responded that he would ask

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 15>the board. He came back a couple of quarters later saying,

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 15>this needs a shareholder vote, and then shareholders asked for

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 15>a proposal to be included.

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 11>And you'll get to vote in November.

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 4>Alexandra, why is it important that you have skin in

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 4>the game with Xai?

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 11>What is the future as you see it?

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 4>Because according to this pay package, it is still twenty

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 4>million cars on the road.

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 11>It is still FSD.

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 15>Oh, it is still cars. It is still fic D.

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 15>That is Tesla's bread and butter. But every Tesla now

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 15>and Ed knows because he drives one already has groc

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 15>in the car. And Groc is the Xai product of

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 15>the large language model that is used, derived from x

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 15>former Twitter communication and conversations, and the strongest, in my view,

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 15>a large language model there.

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 3>Is, Alexandra, I did use FSD on the ways work

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 3>this morning. I only used GROP during the journey. The

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 3>skeptic would say, Xai is burning through cash. It is

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 3>a company facing massive rivalry with open Ai and Anthropic.

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 3>It can't stand on its own two feet. This would

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 3>be Tesla bailing out XAI. How do you feel about that?

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Not at all.

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 15>I mean, honestly, we had recent reports from Elon saying

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 15>that XAI doesn't need any current cash. The question is

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 15>obviously at what price, And the shareholder proposal the way

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 15>it is proposed, does kick it back a little bit

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 15>to the board to find the right valuation, because when

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 15>we lobbied for this shareholder inclusion, we kept it very generic.

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 15>There is a clear definition, and I think the board

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 15>has clearly said they don't want to have the responsibility

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 15>of the basic decision. They are not recommending it or

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 15>four against it. This is shareholders deciding by themselves whether

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 15>they want XII or not. In my view, I think

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 15>it will be a fantastic financial investment. I also see

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 15>the synergies between XII and Tesla just growing with the

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 15>gods even more. But it is coming down to real

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 15>shareholder democracy, shareholders deciding whether this investment has to be

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 15>done or not.

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 4>Last time, the courts exerted their power over what shareholders

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 4>did sign off, and at that time the judge discussed

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 4>that it was fathomable amount of money that was being

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 4>offered to Elon Musk and that the board didn't have

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 4>enough independence. What do you make of this current pay

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 4>package proposal in that respect?

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 15>I mean, first of all, we're in Texas, We're not

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 15>in Delaware anymore. And then let me just quickly address

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 15>Delaware that judgment if it stands in appeal, and we

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 15>will know in a couple of months. There is in

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 15>October fifteenth the hearing, and then we'll probably know by

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 15>January February whether it stands or not. But if that

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 15>judgment stands, Tesla has in the current proxy now also

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 15>a shareholder vote on whether they want to have a

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 15>plan be in place for the twenty eighteen package to

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 15>be fulfilled. So if that Plan B becomes necessary, because

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 15>Delawarre's courts don't understand what our shareholder interest is. But

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 15>so if that happens, it will actually cost us billions

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 15>and billions more, probably fifty to sixty billion more than

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 15>what it initially cost us in twenty eighteen. So I

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 15>don't see how that would be in any favor to

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 15>US shareholders. The package will live Plan A or Plan B.

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 15>But such the question is, will we get it the

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 15>cheap way, the twenty eighteen way, or we will have

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 15>to pay sixty billion more because a judge ruled against.

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 4>Us, and eventually maybe one trillion if you hit an

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 4>eight and a half trillion dollar market capitalization and then

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 4>some key operational target.

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 2>And will be happy to pay.

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:56.239
<v Speaker 15>I can tell you that because if he gets it,

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 15>we got it.

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 4>Alexander Metz wellenf Investor Services is great to have you

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 4>back on the show.

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 11>Coming up, we'll talk.

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 4>To the guy position to be the Silicon Valley candidate

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 4>for California governor. Tech founder Ethan Agowell joins us this

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 4>will bring their tech. President Trump welcome top tech leaders

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 4>to the White House yesterday to discuss AI and the dinner.

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 4>CEOs reiterated their pleasures to invest hundreds of billions in

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 4>the United States, while Trump said chip makers that didn't

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 4>build in the United States would face substantial tariffs.

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 16>Just take a listen chips and so many conductors. There

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 16>will be putting tariffs on companies that aren't coming in.

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 16>We'll be putting a tariff very shortly, probably are hearing.

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 16>We'll be putting a fairly substantial teriff, or not that high,

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 16>but fairly substantial tariff, with the understanding that if they

0:31:56.720 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 16>come into the country, if they're coming in building planning

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 16>to come in.

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 13>It will not be a tiff.

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 2>We continue with technology and politics.

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Startup founder Ethan Agoole is aiming to position himself as

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 3>the Silicon Valley candidate in a run for California governor.

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 3>The two times startup founder has raised money from VC

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 3>firms like Andresen Horowitz in the past. Now he's looking

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 3>to win votes with his tech Forward campaign pitches. Ethan

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Agowyle joins US Now, this is early in a cycle.

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 3>It seems there will be a crowded field of many

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 3>political heavyweights, likely others from the technology industry. What chances

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 3>do you really have of being governor of California.

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 17>There's a lot of other candidates that are running, mostly

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 17>from southern California, most of whom are politicians. My view is,

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 17>if you are generally happy with the way things are

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 17>going in California, you have lots of other options. If

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 17>you are looking for a systematic reset and a complete change.

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 10>I present a different opportunity, a.

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 4>Different opportunity that leans into maybe Krypto being an ability

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 4>to pay your taxes. You're leaning into DMV apps, for example,

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 4>But at the same time, a load of our team

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 4>can't get into work today because the bar is down.

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 4>So I'm interested as to what the infrastructure perspective is here.

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, hey, hey Caroline, good to see you.

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 17>I mean, look, first and foremost, I trust Californians, which

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 17>is something that has been lost. Our politicians love telling

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 17>us what to do. Infrastructure is a key part of

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:29.959
<v Speaker 17>the platform. What what's happening is Californians like people come here.

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 10>I mean Ed and I were just talking.

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 17>People come here because they want to live a great life,

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 17>They want to enjoy the weather, they want to build

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 17>something for their family. And that stopped happening because jobs

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 17>aren't available here. You guys saw the jobs report this morning.

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 17>Companies are leaving the state. Were overregulated. You can't build

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 17>a house, you can't do anything without the government trying

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 17>to get a piece of it or.

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 10>Try to tell you what to do. That's what politicians

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 10>love to do.

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 17>So what we need is someone who understands the Californians

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 17>themselves can be trusted, who actually likes Californians, and who

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 17>actually wants them.

0:33:57.360 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 10>To realize their potential.

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 17>California is a state of massive potential and we're just

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 17>not realizing.

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 10>It because of all this regulation.

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's bring up some of the policies that are

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 3>on your platform, because I think that was Caroline's question.

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 3>What is the specific proposal you have to fix infrastructure

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 3>like BART, to fix housing, jobs creation in Silicon Valley, etc.

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, it starts and ends with SEQUA. SEQUA is the

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 17>California Environmental Quality Act. It was passed in the seventies

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 17>when Reagan was governor, and it initially had some good ideas,

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:29.799
<v Speaker 17>but it's been leveraged and extorted to all help at

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 17>this point where anybody can sue anybody to stop any

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 17>construction from happening. And that's why you don't see modular

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 17>construction happening in San Francisco. That's why you don't see

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 17>construction happening in housing in LA. That's why there was

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 17>a water treatment facility in Huntington Beach. It was going

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:46.959
<v Speaker 17>to do fifty million gallons of drinkable water. It got

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.839
<v Speaker 17>stopped under SEQUA. There's six hundred thousand people that live

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 17>up in Mendocino that are getting a pg and e

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 17>pgne's plant is getting shut down.

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 10>They're not going to have access to.

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 17>Reliable power because the salmon and the eel are going

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 17>to have trouble. I mean, these are just ridiculous things

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 17>that are happening in California. I think that California humans

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 17>should actually live well.

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 3>And if I'm going to jump in a you're basically

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 3>saying I want to deregulate. Yes, very similar to what

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 3>the Trump administration is proposing across a number of industries.

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:16.319
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:18.760
<v Speaker 17>I don't think this is a democratic or Republican issue.

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:20.280
<v Speaker 10>I think this is just common sense.

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 17>Like the reason California is losing half a million people

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:26.439
<v Speaker 17>is because the regulation is driving jobs out.

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 10>It's that simple.

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 17>Like other states like Arizona, they beg companies to come

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 17>to their states to create jobs. California does everything it

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 17>can to kick companies out. MASA Son announced that he's

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 17>investing a trillion dollars in data centers. All of that

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 17>money is going to Arizona. Why is it not coming

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 17>to California. Whatever you think of Elon I mean we

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 17>just talked about his pay package, whatever you think of

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 17>the guy. Tesla is based in California. They moved to

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.839
<v Speaker 17>Texas and they're creating twenty two thousand jobs in gigafactory there.

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:55.320
<v Speaker 17>Why are those jobs not in California. Are we shocked

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 17>that people are leaving? Of course, not because there's no

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 17>jobs here. It's it's really that simple in terms.

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 4>Of policy and how you work with an administration that

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 4>perhaps the current governor is very much on TikTok, actively

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 4>working against. I'm interested as to what you think the

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:13.879
<v Speaker 4>relationship of Silicon Valley and whether you think that it's

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 4>a voting base. But we'll get behind you, because boy,

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:18.839
<v Speaker 4>they pro the administration, some.

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 11>Of them at the moment, it feels.

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 4>And you're running on a Democratic ticket.

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 10>I am running as a Democrat.

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 17>Thirty four percent of California voted for Trump, So the

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 17>notion that California is a deep blue state is just

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 17>not true. We're not ninety five five or ninety ten.

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:36.320
<v Speaker 17>We need to understand that the state has shifted. And again,

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:39.360
<v Speaker 17>I don't blame people. They're frustrated with what they're seeing.

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 17>So look, my view is, if you want to vote

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 17>for somebody who's going to kind of keep things the same,

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 17>there's a lot of smart candidates, just Katie Porter, Antonio Vilergrosa,

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:50.320
<v Speaker 17>et cetera, who are doing a good job in SoCal

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 17>But if you are actually frustrated with what's happening, and

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 17>you think the state can realize it's potential better.

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 10>That's where you come to me.

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 17>Where you want a little less regulation, a little less

0:36:59.280 --> 0:36:59.879
<v Speaker 17>of government all.

0:36:59.840 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 10>Over over your back.

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 4>We are of course going to be inviting you, alongside

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:07.800
<v Speaker 4>other candidates to be joining us as the race heats

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 4>up for California.

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 11>Governor Ethan Algois. We appreciate your time today, stay well.

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, coming up Qualcom CEO Cristiano i'mon joining us to

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 4>discuss the chip designers you partnership with BMW, deepening that

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 4>relationship as it aims to improve self driving capabilities.

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 11>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 4>Qualcomm Well, it's steering deeper into the auto industry, teaming

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 4>up with BMW to debut it's new Snapdragon Ride Pilot.

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 4>It's an automated driving platform design to be safety and

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 4>driver assistance. The system is just being rolled out in

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 4>the all new BMWIX three. Let's bring in Qualcom CEO Christiano,

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm on for more. You call it a revolutionary driver

0:37:57.640 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 4>assistance system.

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 11>How is your software that different?

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 13>Look?

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 18>We are incredibly excited about what we did with BMW.

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 18>There's been three years in development, focus on safety, and

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 18>it's different for a number of reasons.

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:15.800
<v Speaker 13>I think the first one is one of the things.

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 18>You saw about BMW I x three it's the incredible range.

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 18>So when you talk about assistant driving in autonomy, you

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 18>need to put server class computing power in Intel's cars,

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:33.279
<v Speaker 18>and with Qualcom technology there's no compromise. You have all

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:37.240
<v Speaker 18>the computing power, but you still have efficiency on power consumption.

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 18>You can get incredible range. The second thing is it's scalable.

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:43.800
<v Speaker 18>It goes into every tier car, so we're super excited

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 18>about it.

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Christiano, I've been studying the Snapdragon Ride pilot, the sec architecture,

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 3>the software piece. This is highly analogous with the camera

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 3>based system that Tesla has right with FSD. You just

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 3>talked about it being scalable for that reason, did you

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 3>benchmark against that?

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 13>So two different important parts.

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 18>First, the architecture is scalable, starting from basic level ADS

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 18>all the way to multiple cameras and multiple sensors for

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 18>you to do navigation on autopilot.

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 13>And urban environment and high wain environments.

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 18>That means it can scale to entry level AIDAS systems

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 18>and entry level cars.

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 13>All the way to the full capabilities.

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:38.280
<v Speaker 18>The other thing is has been certified now in sixty

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:42.800
<v Speaker 18>countries and going. It's launching and a lot of people

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 18>will be able to see the performers. Actually, we're super

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:48.520
<v Speaker 18>excited for people to see how it performs. And one

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 18>thing that is great about this we've done this with BMW,

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 18>but it's available for the entire industry, every OEM we'll

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 18>be able to use it and BMWN welcome. We want

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:00.840
<v Speaker 18>that and people will be able to see compare and

0:40:00.880 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 18>I think that's a great opportunity.

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, my question was one of sort of an

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 3>academic one because it's the argument of a camera based

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 3>only system from an economic standpoint versus also including.

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Lidar and radar.

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 3>But you're super focused on the compute, not just performance

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 3>but energy usage of the compute. Could you talk a

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 3>little bit about how you engineered to that level.

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:27.320
<v Speaker 18>Yes, I think the qualcom DNA ED is it's about

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 18>efficient computing because we design all of our chips assuming

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.280
<v Speaker 18>there's a battery on the other side.

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:35.399
<v Speaker 13>It's not plugged to the wall.

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:37.839
<v Speaker 18>So I think you have the benefit of a lot

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:41.319
<v Speaker 18>of the QUALM energy efficiency compute, and you have the

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:43.760
<v Speaker 18>ability to get a lot of the computing power require

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 18>in an architecture that's actually incredibly efficient from a turmo

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 18>management and from a power management.

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:52.359
<v Speaker 13>The second thing to fully.

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:55.399
<v Speaker 18>Answer your par question is you do have the capabilities

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 18>to do navigate on autopilot in urban and high environments

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 18>even if you have complex sensors are cameras in radars.

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 4>Chris, you want to push us forward because your real

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 4>focus on auto has been one of diversification of qualcom

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:14.280
<v Speaker 4>more broadly. Of course, the auto sector has its trials

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 4>and tribulations. How much is this going to drive growth

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 4>for you for the business in the longer.

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 18>Term, Caroline's a great question. Remember we talked about our

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 18>pipeline of forty five billion dollars in automotive, which is

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:29.720
<v Speaker 18>kind of translating into revenue. We see quarter after quarter

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 18>record revenue for Qualkon, especially because it's not about moving

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 18>with the size of the market. Is moving into share

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:41.720
<v Speaker 18>as new cars or a lounge for technology. The pipeline

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 18>is converting, and I look at this stack that we're

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 18>launching on the SnapTag and right pilot with bmw IS.

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 18>We look at that as an opportunity for expansion. In

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:57.880
<v Speaker 18>the forty five billion pipeline, one third of that is ADS,

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 18>and it's included of course the BMW project, but now

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 18>other OEMs can use it, and that's going to be

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 18>upside on the forty five billion pipeline.

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Christiano last night that the President hosts a number of

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:14.840
<v Speaker 3>technology leaders at the White House. I believe you're invited

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:18.280
<v Speaker 3>but unable to attend. And his message is very simple,

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:21.720
<v Speaker 3>tariffs are coming specific to chips, but those that invest

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:25.359
<v Speaker 3>in America will be spared. How is FOLKOM thinking about that?

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:27.839
<v Speaker 3>You know, a lot of emphasis gets put on TSMC

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:30.720
<v Speaker 3>in Arizona, but is that like big enough to serve

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 3>all of you.

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 18>Yes, it's unfortunate that we couldn't attend. We send a representative,

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 18>but we had the big party in San Diego to

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:41.920
<v Speaker 18>Stadium for the forty universary of Qualcom.

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 13>And to your question, look, we're excited about that.

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 18>Remember we were a fabulous company, so we need a

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 18>supply chain that is resilient and in America. We like

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:55.840
<v Speaker 18>the fact that TSMC, which is one of our suppliers

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 18>and invest in America. We like the fact that Sansung,

0:42:58.280 --> 0:43:01.040
<v Speaker 18>another one of our suppliers, investing in the America. And

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:05.800
<v Speaker 18>for Qualcom, this is exactly great news. We want diversification

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:09.719
<v Speaker 18>of manufacturing. We want more capacity in America, and we have.

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Si Intel an option, Christiana, not an option today.

0:43:13.800 --> 0:43:16.600
<v Speaker 18>I think we would like Intel to be an option.

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:22.919
<v Speaker 18>They have been talking about moving to the next process technology,

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 18>which they call it the one that comes after eighteen A.

0:43:28.000 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 18>For us, we need a technology that has efficient power consumption.

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:34.919
<v Speaker 18>I think we just had this whole conversation on car.

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:37.839
<v Speaker 18>So if in the future Intel's ready for us, we'll

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:38.400
<v Speaker 18>be an option.

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:41.760
<v Speaker 13>Right now. Our supplier's realitysm C and SASA.

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Welcome CEO, Christianamon. It's great to have you back on

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:46.839
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Tech. Thank you very much.

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 11>Does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech ed? What

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:50.719
<v Speaker 11>a week?

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, huge headline, one trillion compackage Felon Musk. We have

0:43:54.320 --> 0:43:57.320
<v Speaker 3>months to digest it. Don't forget check out the podcast.

0:43:57.400 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 3>You know where to find it on Bloomberg Terminal and

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 3>online on Apple Spotify at iHeart. A short week, but

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 3>a big week from New York City in San Francisco.

0:44:06.200 --> 0:44:07.239
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech