WEBVTT - Tech News: FTX Co-Founder Arrested!

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are you. It's time for the

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>tech News for Tuesday, December twenty twenty two, and we've

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of updates on big stories today. It's

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:36.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be I think a chunker of an episode. So first,

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>let's tackle the total mess that is the collapse of

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>f t X and the consequences that collapse has had

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>in the world of finance in general and cryptocurrency in particular,

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and co founder Sam Bankman freed specifically. But first, in

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>case you're not familiar with f t X, I'll set

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a little foundation. So f t X was the second

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 1>largest cryptocurrency exchange in the world. So a cryptocurrency exchange

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>is an organization designed to take currency in one form

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and exchange it for an almost equal value in some

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>other form, just like you would do if you were

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to visit a foreign country and you wanted to swap

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>out your native cash for the cash of the country.

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>And I say almost equal value because the exchange, of

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>course takes a little cut of each transaction. That's one

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>way that the exchange makes money. And like a lot

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of exchanges, customers can also choose to store their currency

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in whatever digital form it might be in within the

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>exchange itself, rather than extracting the money to put into

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a separate digital wallet. Sometimes taking money out also means

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that you get a cut taken out of it. So

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>once those cuts start adding up, a lot of customers say,

0:01:57.880 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'll just leave it in there, so

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that way I'm not losing more money by taking it

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>out of the system. So, as I said, f t

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>X was the second largest cryptocurrency exchange. It was behind

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>another company called Finance, which we are also going to

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about in this episode. And f t X also

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>issued its own cryptocurrency token that was called f t T.

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>And yes, one major problem with this story is that

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>we use a lot of initialisms and it stinks and

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, but that's just how it is. So f

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>t X the exchange would award f t T tokens

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to customers, and you could also trade your money in

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>for f t T. You could actually just cash into

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>f t T if you wanted to, and you can

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>use f t T to hold your wealth. Now, while

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>ft t was native to f t X is exchange,

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>it was also an accepted token on other exchanges. Now,

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the co founders of f t X, as

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I said, was Sam Bankman freed or s b f

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>as a was known in the crypto world, and I

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>hate that. So I'm just calling him Sam so that

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't just have initials everywhere. Before co founding f

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>t X, Sam had also co founded a hedge fund

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that focused on crypto. He did this a couple of

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:19.119
<v Speaker 1>years previously. That company was called Alamator Research. Well. Back

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in November, a crypto news outlet called coin Desk published

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a leaked records sheet that indicated that f t X

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>was funneling money from exchange customers to go to Alamator

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Research in order to cover investment losses and loans and

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>things like that, which is kind of like robbing Peter

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to pay Paul. You take cash that isn't yours from

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>one source in order to cover debts that are yours elsewhere.

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>The publication of that leaked record sheet led to a

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>full on collapse of f t X, which was exacerbated

0:03:54.760 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>first when financed chairman Cheung Peng c z Jo, we'll

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>just called Chong Peng said that Finance, which had been

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>an early investor in f t X, was dumping its

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>holdings of f t T. So Binance had millions of

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 1>f t T tokens that it kept as a result

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of being an early investor in f t X. So

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Binance says, we're dumping it, We're getting ready, we're cashing out.

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>That sent the value of f t T into the crapper. Right,

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>if you flood a market with an asset, the value

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of that asset decreases. So then Binance said, you know what,

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna help you out. We're gonna buy f t X,

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and then almost immediately backed out of that non binding agreement,

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>which really it was like a shot to the heart,

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and Finance was to blame. So f t X really

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>took it that time. And there's also the question of

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of millions of dollars of f t X customer

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>funds having just gone missing. You know, there are there

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>are records of transactions that happened that went to some

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>mysterious recipient, where all this money that should have belonged

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to ft X customers was essentially at least by appearance stolen,

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and there are a lot of people who suspect that

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>either Sam or one of as many crypto bros took

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the money before things totally fell apart. The collapse of

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>f t X, which was already coming at a time

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>when crypto was having a rough go of it sent

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a huge ripple out in the crypto world, and we

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>saw investors start to lose even more confidence in crypto

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and values would drop across the board. Pretty much. That's

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>our foundation. Now we can actually talk about what's happened recently.

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>So first up, Sam's headquarters for f t X was

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Bahamas over the last year or two. So

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these crypto exchanges maintain their headquarters overseas

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and places that have let's say, relaxed laws and regulations

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>regarding financial institutions somewhere that's out of the purview of

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>major financial regulators, like like what we have here in

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the United States. But you know, rich people they really

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>hate it when someone else steals their money or causes

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>them to lose money. So rich people will go to

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>really great links in order to get justice, as opposed

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 1>to say, if a poor person is robbed, you don't

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>see nearly as much effort to help that person. Yes,

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>this is commentary, but it's also true. Okay, so yeah,

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it stinks anyway. In the wake of this collapse, with

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>all these rich people losing lots of money and then

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the revelations about f t X and alimated research, the

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>police in the Bahamas launched an investigation into f t

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>X and our buddy Sam. Folks over here in the

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>United States were likewise eager to look into the matter,

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and the Senate Banking Committee wished to hold a hearing

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>about f t X this week. In fact, it was

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>supposed to happen today, and they wanted Am to testify

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>at this hearing. Sam reportedly declined to acquiesce to their request, so,

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>in other words, he told him to pound sand and

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>senators said they had offered two different dates for Sam.

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>They had included the option for him to attend virtually

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>where he wouldn't have to actually travel to the United States,

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and he still declined, and his attorney said he had

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>no intention of obeying any subpoenas that the Senate might request.

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>So it sounded like Sam was really holding out to

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>avoid being pinned down. But that would not last because

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>while we were hearing about Sam deciding not to appear

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>before the Senate. The Bahamanian authorities were preparing to arrest him,

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and they did on Monday evening. So last night, the

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>U S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>indicted Sam and sent the sealed indictment to the Bahamanian

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>authorities and they acted upon it. So presumably this also

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>sets the stage to extradite Sam from the Bahamas to

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States, where he will face new risk charges.

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Now this is a separate but parallel effort with what

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing about the Senate hearings. In fact, senators were

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>surprised to learn of Sam's arrest and some have expressed

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>disappointment that he will not appear before the Senate to

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>explain the situation that led to f t x's collapse.

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>As for the charges that Sam faces, they reportedly include

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>counts of securities fraud, conspiracy, securities fraud itself, wire fraud conspiracy,

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>wire fraud itself, and money laundering. Yeah, rich people really

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>don't like it when folks take their money. The U S.

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, accuses Samba committing a

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>quote years long fraud end quote, meaning this isn't just

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>about the months that led up to f t x's demise. Essentially,

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the SEC seems to be saying that f t X

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>was really not so much a cryptocurrency exchange as it

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>was a funnel that would collect money from customers and

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:05.199
<v Speaker 1>then send that to Alimated Research in order to fund

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>trades and real estate deals and to give out massive

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>loans to the company's founders, including Sam, who, according to

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the SEC, borrowed a staggering one point three three eight

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars from Alameda. That's a lot of money to borrow.

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Right on top of the SEC's charges against Sam, there

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>are other agencies waiting to get in line to take

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>their shot. They include the U. S. Attorney's Office for

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the Southern District of New York, which we mentioned earlier,

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and also the Commodity Futures Trading Commission or c f TC.

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Sam will appear in court in the Bahamas today. He

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>does not have the luxury of saying no to that appointment,

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Bahamanian government is pretty darn eager to talk

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to Sam outside his discussions with the US because the

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>government very much wants to reclaim more than two hundred

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty million dollars worth of Bahamas property that Sam and

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>f t X executive Ryan Salami. Um, it's maybe it's Salame.

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>It's s A L A M E that I'm gonna

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>say Salami anyway, Ryan, I'll say Ryan and Sam purchased

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>two million plus dollars of Bahama, Bahamas property in the past.

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>That's actually thirty five different properties across New Providence, Bahamas.

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Those properties have been tangled up in the bankruptcy proceedings

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>for f t X because uh, you know, ft X

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>brought in a new CEO in order to oversee the

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>company going into bankruptcy. But the Bahamanian government says that

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 1>one having a U S court handled Bahamanian property is

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>inefficient because it could be done much more smoothly in

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bahamas. So it's a waste of resources, is what

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>they're saying. But more importantly to having a foreign court

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>handled that sort of thing is illegal by Bahamanian law anyway,

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>That it's against the law in the Bahamas for property

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Bahamas to be handled by a foreign you know,

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>legal system essentially, is what it comes down to. I

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:13.439
<v Speaker 1>only include this part of the story to show how

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>incredibly complicated. This whole crypto issue has become because it

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>affects both digital and real world assets. Current fd X

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>CEO John I, dismantled in Ron Ray, probably doesn't want

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>any of that to happen. He doesn't want the properties

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to be relegated over to the Bahamanian authorities because it's

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>his job to try and squeeze as much out of

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the corpse of f t X in order to return

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>assets to investors as he possibly can, So surrendering two

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>million bucks worth of real estate doesn't really fit in

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>with that plan. And y'all, I cannot wait for the

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>flood of TV series and films that will cover this

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>mess in the future. Now, before I go to break

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and then move on to a related topic, I have

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>one last thing to say about f t X. The

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Australian Financial Review reports that an inner circle I called

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it a cabal, but an inner circle running f t X,

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>had created a secret chat group in the days leading

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>up to the collapse, and that chat group had the

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>name according to the Australian Financial Review of wire Fraud. Now,

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that seems like it's a supremely stupid thing to do

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to me, Like I just I just can't see why

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>anyone would make a chat group called wire Fraud. I mean,

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was gallows humor, right, maybe it was done

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>as a tongue in cheek, snarky way of of trying

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the situation, because otherwise you're you're leaving

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a smoking gun laying around on purpose. But then the

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>group was also using Signal, which is a messaging and

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>chat at that's known for you know, secrecy and encrypted messaging.

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's possible that wire Fraud wasn't meant to be

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>humorous or ironic or or sarcastic. It was just you know,

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to get everyone on the same page. Now, Sam for

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>his part, denies knowing of such a group and said

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that if it does exist, he was not in it.

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, wild, Okay, we're gonna take a quick break.

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we'll talk about some other issues

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in the crypto world and a couple of other stories,

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 1>but first let's go to these messages. Okay, we are

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>done talking about the recent developments with f t X

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and Sam Bankman Freed, But now let's talk about Finance,

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the world. Uh. The former

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>investor into f t X, and then arguably slayer of

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>f t X, and now it is at the center

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of its own turmoil. Although to say now is being unfair,

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>because it turns out Finance has been under serious investigation

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>for years, well before the collapse of f t X.

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:17.439
<v Speaker 1>The Wall Street Journal reports that Finance has been trying

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to mollify customers and reassure them that unlike f t X,

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Finance has the reserves to cover all customer funds that

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>are stored within the exchange, and then a little extra

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>as a reserve. But the journal sites and accounting professor

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>named Douglas Carmichael, which side note, if you have the

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>name Douglas Carmichael, I think it's the law that you

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>have to be an accounting professor. Anyway, He says that

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the quote unquote proof that Finance has offered so far

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>is probably not sufficient to back up what the company

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>is claiming. It's probably not going to be enough for

0:14:55.640 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>serious investors to feel comfortable with the situation. Shan Now,

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily the case that Finance doesn't actually have

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the funds, but so far the evidence being shared is

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>not enough to support the claim that everything is hunky dory.

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And the proof so far is a single report which

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>is more like a five page letter from a quote

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>partner at the South African affiliate of the global accounting

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>firm Mazaars end quote in the county in the Land

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of Oz. According to the journal, the report included three

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:38.359
<v Speaker 1>whole numbers in it an exhaustive report of finances, systems

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and policies. No, it was not that, obviously, um, it

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>was not an audit report. It did not actually go

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>into what control systems, if any, that finance uses. Uh So,

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in other words, a lot of stuff that investors might

0:15:55.560 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>want access to, a lot of transparency did not come

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>forward in this letter, in this report. So that's part

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of why Carmichael says investors are probably not really satisfied

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>with this report because all they got were these three numbers.

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Two of those numbers also had a bit of concern

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to them. So one of the numbers is about how

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>much total currency in bitcoins are in the exchange, and

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the other numbers how many total bitcoins customers held in

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the exchange. So, in other words, let's say you all

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>bank at the same place, does the bank actually have

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>enough money so that if every single person who had

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>an account came in and withdrew all of their money,

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the bank would be able to cover it in this case.

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, what Finance had been saying is, yes, we

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>have a one to one cover for all currency held

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in our exchange. But as it turns out, those numbers

0:16:56.280 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>are not the same. They the currency actually has few

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>were bitcoins in its reserves than customers have quote unquote

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>held in the exchange, by the tune of our almost

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>well actually a little bit more than fifteen thousand bitcoins. Now,

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 1>this is an exchange that has more than half a

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:17.479
<v Speaker 1>million of those ding dang darn things. So it's not

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>like it's not like fifteen thousand represents a huge percentage, right,

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's still concerning. Right if if everyone suddenly got

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>nervous and decided to withdraw their money out of the exchange, Well,

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>based upon this, the exchange does not have the currency

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to cover all of that, and that was one of

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the big concerns with f t X and really lead

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>to its collapse. However, Finance also says, hey, the reason

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>for this is that we also issue loans to customers,

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, loans of cryptocurrency. So some of the money

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that belongs to US is outstanding. It's not it's not

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>currently in our reserves, but it's where we hold it

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:00.080
<v Speaker 1>in the form of loans that have been is you

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 1>to customers, and those loans will be repaid with interest,

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>which means ultimately, yes, we can cover everything. In fact,

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>we have one collateral. Our collateralization is really what we

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>call it. It's just that right now, technically they don't

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 1>have it. So things are just kind of shaky on

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>an investor front. But uh, that's not the end of

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 1>finance's troubles by a long shot. So the U s

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice has actually been actively investigating finance for years,

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>particularly in realms of money laundering and processing payments that

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>sidestep international sanctions, such as money that gets funneled to

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>places like Iran uh where which should otherwise be subjected

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to UH two sanctions. Reuter's reports that Binance has been

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>responsible for processing ten billion dollars in illegal payments this year,

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and that does not sound good. Apparently, the US government

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 1>has even been in discussions with finances legal teams over

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the matter of plea deals. You know, when you start

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>talking plea deals, that's just things are starting to build

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>up against the crypto exchange here in the States at least.

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>But Reuters also reports that the various departments within the

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>d o J that are involved in this investigation, and

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>there are three major departments that are part of this,

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>they aren't completely aligned on when to move forward with

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>any charges filed, and some of those departments have a

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>more methodical approach than others. So by that, I mean

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>there are divisions within the d o J that are

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>very thorough when they build a case, which can be

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>frustrating to other departments that tend to act more aggressively.

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:50.719
<v Speaker 1>And I think there are valid arguments for both approaches. Right,

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>being methodical leads to building a better case against a

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 1>suspect if in fact, you determine that there is a

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>case to be made, or it might save you lots

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>of time and money if you realize, oh, you know,

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 1>there's not enough there there. Meanwhile, being aggressive can mitigate

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>ongoing harm, right You can cut off the harm that

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is happening right now by acting faster. That is, assuming

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, that the case has merit. If the case

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have merit, then being aggressive can cause more harm. Obviously, anyway,

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>there's no telling where this is going to end up

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in the long run yet, but it does mean things

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>are increasingly chaotic, so much so that Finance temporarily halted

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 1>withdrawals of U s d C earlier today in an

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>effort to stem a transactional problem on the platform. So

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>U s d C is a stable coin that is

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>linked to the US dollar. UH. Investors sometimes use us

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>DC to swap one form of cryptocurrency to another without

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>actually having to convert it to real US dollars. Uh.

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just you know, a digital version of the US

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>dollar in in many ways, it's a stable coin, is

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>what's called. Anyway. The issue, according to Chung paying himself,

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>is that if a Binance customer wants to convert p

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a X or b U s D into USDC, so

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in other words, these specific forms of crypto into the

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>stable coin U s DC, that process requires routing through

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a bank that's in New York, and at the time

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>where people were trying to do this, the bank had

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>not yet opened. So Binance decided to clamp down on

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 1>those transactions in an effort to swap out a different

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>token two facilitate these switches from one cryptocurrency to another.

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.719
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, over the last twenty four hours, Binance

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 1>has seen customers would draw more than one point six

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars worth of assets from the exchange. So even

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>if all these investigations ultimately lead nowhere Finance, this situation

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>right now is a bit rocky because investors have freaked

0:21:56.080 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>out due to multiple red flags. So crypto is in

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:05.439
<v Speaker 1>a really delicate place right now. I'm not suggesting that

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>crypto is gonna completely collapse and that it will no

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>longer be the grand experiment that it was, but rather

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 1>it's in for a real hard time in the at

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 1>least the short term, if not the long term, as

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>these major exchanges that have kind of built themselves up

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>into being pillars of the crypto community, a community that

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>infamously values itself on being decentralized, are now in potential

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>jeopardy either because of a lack of investor confidence or

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 1>in the case of Finance, being the active subject of

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>massive investigations into money laundering and other violations. Like that's

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>bad news. That does not necessarily mean that there would

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>be a direct effect on the cryptocurrency values themselves, but

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 1>frequently what you'll see is investors get worried, they start

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>pulling their investments, they convert it back into a different

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>form of currency, and in some cases they may just

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>cash out entirely and say you know what, Uh, this

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting approach, it's not for me. I'm done,

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and that ultimately ends up hurting the entire crypto community. Personally,

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:25.199
<v Speaker 1>I think that crypto is not great. I think there

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of reasons why crypto is not great.

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that the the selling point of it being

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 1>decentralized is a smoke screen. It's really just centralized in

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a different way, um, and that it consolidates wealth in

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a different group of people than what we saw before.

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like it's I wouldn't say it's worse

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>than what we already have, but I wouldn't say it's

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>better either. It's just different, um, and different in a

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>way that's very unstable. So I am very much against

0:23:55.320 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole crypto thing from that perspective. Maybe it survives

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>all of these trials and tribulations, it will mature to

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a stage that is more reliable, less volatile, more acceptable

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 1>as an actual currency as opposed to a commodity. But

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that's all. Those are a lot of ifs, and I

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>remained skeptical. I'd love to be proven wrong. It's just

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I suspect I will not be all right, that's enough

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>of that. We're gonna take another quick break when we

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>come back. We've got a few more tech stories to cover.

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Quite a few actually, as I look at my lineup,

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>but they're shorter as they involve lots of other stuff.

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna take a break, come back and tackle

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>those in just a moment. Okay, we're back. So one

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>ongoing story we have talked about several times on this

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:59.719
<v Speaker 1>show is Microsoft's bid to acquire the video game company

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 1>at division Blizzard, and of course, Activision Blizzard itself is

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the source of lots of stories, many of them dark ones.

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, the US Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, has

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>sued Microsoft. In fact, it did this last week in

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>an effort to block this acquisition, and has called the

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>merger and anti competitive move that or reduce competition in

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the video games market. Now, The New York Times predicts

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that this is going to be a very tough case

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>for the FTC to prove in court because courts typically

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>see companies like Microsoft and Activision Blizzard as being distinct

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and they are not necessarily companies that compete directly with

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>one another. Therefore, when companies that don't directly compete merge,

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a reduction in competition because the two

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>companies didn't represent competing entities in the first place. So

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the logic that the New York Times is using.

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>They're they're thought of as a vertical mergers, and that

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, usually such a merger isn't viewed as having

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a measurable impact on competition. As a result. Now, it

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 1>may turn out that the FTC is going to just

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 1>completely fail in this effort, but we are seeing this

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of resistance to that specific merger of Microsoft and

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Activision Blizzard happening around the world. In some cases, we've

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>seen it where it appears that Sony representatives have played

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>a part in sowing UH distrust in the acquisition, suggesting

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that Microsoft is kind of locking video game publishers and

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 1>developers away behind their own corporate UH boundaries and that

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>ultimately that will cut off access to competitors like Sony.

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>So the long story short, the argument is that hey,

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 1>if if Microsoft buys Activision Blizzard, then in the future,

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Sony is not gonna be able to get access to

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Activision Blizzard titoles, something that Microsoft reps have said multiple

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>times is just not what's going to happen um Anyway,

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting to see the FTC push hard against

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>moves that it sees as potentially being anti competitive, because

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>here in the US for the last several decades that

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>just hasn't been the case. There's been a very lass

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a fair approach which was really infamous in the eighties

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 1>that allowed companies to kind of consolidate and grow larger

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and buy up their competition with really no resistance from

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the US government. That is changing, but it does mean

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that the FTC is going to have a very long

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 1>list of battles to fight. And also Microsoft has a

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>history of getting out of these kind of situations. At

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 1>one point, courts had ruled that Microsoft was to break

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:58.959
<v Speaker 1>apart into different companies, but ultimately that decision was reversed

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and so the company continued as as we know it.

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 1>So I I suspect this is probably not going to

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>succeed in court based upon just how long a shot

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it is. But I also feel that consolidation in general

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:20.719
<v Speaker 1>typically is not the best for the end consumer in

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>most cases, So uh, and also big tech getting bigger

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is not something I'm terribly interested in seeing. It's just

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that I think there are other battles into space that

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>are more important. Okay, we're not done yet. We got

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>some Twitter and some Tesla news. Of course we do,

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>because you can't get away from me. On Musk. On Sunday,

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>he tweeted, quote, the boats are in for a surprise

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow end quote. And turns out so was most of

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Southeast Asia. You see, Musk had promised to rid Twitter

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of bots. That was like one of his big things

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>when he was first being so braggish about buying Twitter,

0:28:57.880 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>before he decided that he didn't want to buy Twitter,

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>before he decided, yeah, no, I will buy Twitter. So anyway,

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:05.479
<v Speaker 1>the solution that he and his team apparently came up

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>with was not to identify bots on the platform and

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>then block those bots. Instead, it was to cut off

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>access to entire mobile networks that had been known to

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>carry bought traffic on them. But these networks are also

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>used by you know, real human beings who actually use

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and in some cases rely upon Twitter. So Twitter essentially

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>cuts access off from these networks, and that left tons

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of legitimate users unable to access Twitter on their devices,

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and then in came a flood of complaints and requests

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>for help. So what did Twitter do well? It did

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the exact same thing we saw when the company rolled

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>out the paid for blue verification check marks last month.

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>It subsequently rolled the decision back. This time, Twitter reps

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>actually claimed the whole problem was due to quote routing

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>configuration changes end quote, which sounds to me like it's

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 1>just a lie to cover up the fact that the

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>company made a unilateral move that affected both bots and

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>real people equally, then had to back pedal. I want

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to stress it sounds to me like a lie. I'm

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>not saying it is a lie, it just sounds like one.

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Now one might start to call in the question Musk's

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>reputation for being a genius at this point, you know,

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>just from based upon recent evidence. That is, if the

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>person had not already dismissed such an idea years ago.

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Many of you out there, I'm sure, are in that

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>camp already. And last week three members of Twitter's Trust

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and Safety Council resigned. They said that under Musk, Twitter's

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>users safety is on the decline and that the council

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 1>isn't being listened to, and that Twitter is actively becoming

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a more dangerous place instead of a safer one, particularly

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>for really houlnerable people like kids. As such, these council

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>members have decided that if they cannot do anything about it,

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and if Musk is not going to listen to them,

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason to stay. They are not authorized to

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>make the changes needed to improve safety, and Twitter does

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>not really have the resources needed to make such a

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>thing possible, now that so many people have left the

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>company somewhere around by some estimations, and it sounded pretty

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>darn grim. There's also news about Tesla's UH advertising woes.

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Obviously those continue. I'm not going to go into great

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 1>detail because those numbers are changing so fast. By the

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>time you listen to this it will be out of

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>date anyway. But let's just say that Twitter is UH

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is having real problems on the advertiser front, and the

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>hope that subscriptions to Twitter Blue is somehow going to

0:31:55.760 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>counteract that, I think is optimistic. Say, Tesla is facing

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a class action lawsuit that claims the company has engaged

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in fraud. Now, Tesla's lawyers are saying, quote mere failure

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to realize a long term aspirational goal is not fraud

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 1>end quote, and they're asking a judge to dismiss this case. Now,

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 1>those of y'all who have listened to tech stuff for

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a while, you likely know my thoughts about this. Yes,

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Tesla has failed to realize a long term aspirational goal

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>in the form of creating a truly autonomous vehicle, and no,

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>failure is not fraud. However, during that time, Tesla has

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>also marketed products called autopilot and full self driving, which,

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>if we are to assume that you know, words mean things,

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>suggests that the vehicle should be capable of operating all

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>on their own and yes, on its web pages if

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:00.080
<v Speaker 1>you go and read it, Tesla has repeatedly said it

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that it's advanced driver assist features are not a substitute

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>for a human driver. They are not an autonomous system. However,

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the company continues to market those tools with names that

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>suggest otherwise. On top of that, Elon Musk has repeatedly

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>proclaimed we're just a year or two away from full

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 1>on robo taxis, where you'll be able to turn your

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>car into a revenue generator. And this isn't something he's

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>only said recently. He's been saying it over the years,

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and each year comes and goes and they don't achieve

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that goal. And again that's not necessarily fraud on its own.

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 1>But when you start taking into these into consideration, a

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>combination of all this with the marketing and the naming conventions,

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>things get a lot more muddy. I mean, if I

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>were to sell you a bottle of flying potion, and

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you were to drink the bottle of potion and then

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you break your leg as you jumped off a tree

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>limb when you fell to the ground, I couldn't just say, oh, well,

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I just failed to get the potion right. It's an

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 1>aspirational goal. No, you would say I committed fraud because

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I sold you a potion that doesn't do the thing

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that I said it does. Now, if I left a

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>little label on that potion that said does not actually

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:16.760
<v Speaker 1>give you flying powers, I might have a pretty decent argument.

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably be called a scumball for legitimate reasons, But

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>I have an argument to say, like, hey, no, no, no,

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:26.919
<v Speaker 1>I have a disclaimer here. So we'll have to wait

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and see if courts agree with Tesla's lawyers on the

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>matter or if it will proceed. Because I just don't

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>know I mean, you could and you you can't say

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 1>legitimately that Tesla said on its web page this is

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 1>not an autonomous system. But again, the marketing and naming

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>makes it difficult. Right, It's a very muddy sort of

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>thing to look at. Now, there were some other news

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>items I had originally lined up to talk about that

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 1>I I was going to include, but it would have

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>made this episode run super long. It involved stuff like

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 1>there were worries about surveys that show Tesla's brand image

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>has taken a real nose dive. It's gone into negative territory,

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:11.800
<v Speaker 1>which is not completely on the company itself, although partly,

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are a lot of people complaining about

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:16.919
<v Speaker 1>things like build quality of Tesla vehicles, but it also

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously takes into consideration things like Ellen Must's behavior on Twitter,

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>which really has no, you know, direct relationship with Tesla,

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 1>but still is having an impact on people's perception of it.

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Then I also had a story about um Meta cutting

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 1>back on rideshare allowances as a part of cost cutting measures.

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But I feel like we've done enough bad news. Let's

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:46.879
<v Speaker 1>end with something that's actually kind of amazing. Although we're

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>also going to take a step back and a little

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>reality pill in the process. We're going to talk about

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>fusion and a breakthrough at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>in California. First, let's give a quick rundown on nuclear fusion.

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 1>The nuclear power that we use around the world right

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:09.879
<v Speaker 1>now in order to generate electricity is fission. That's where

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you harvest energy that's generated upon the splitting of heavy atoms.

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:19.240
<v Speaker 1>This splitting perpetuates a series of reactions that keeps things going,

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>and when you use this with careful controls, you can

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>release tons of energy in the form of heat that

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you can then harness to generate electricity. However, the fission

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>process creates dangerous nuclear waste that you have to figure

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 1>out what to do with, whether that's to process it

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>further or to you know, bury it somewhere or whatever.

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 1>And there are other dangers involved, including the possibility of

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>accidents like we've seen at sites like Three Mile Island

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>or Chernobyl or Fukushima. Those dangers range from releasing radioactive

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>material into the environment all the way up to nuclear meltdown.

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So there are some big challenges with fission to do

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 1>it in a way that is not just safe but

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:07.399
<v Speaker 1>people feel comfortable with it, right, So that's that's part

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of it. There is another nuclear process called fusion, and

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 1>fusion we have to light atoms that fuse together. This

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 1>process also releases energy, but it also requires a good

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:23.400
<v Speaker 1>amount of energy to get the reaction going in the

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 1>first place. Because atoms don't want to get that close, right,

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to fuse together like this. You have

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to force them to do it, and that means you

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 1>have to exert energy to make it happen. Once they

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>do it, they release energy, but you've gotta spend energy first.

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 1>So fusion is the nuclear process that occurs in stars,

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>where you know, gravitational forces and pressure are providing the

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>energy needed to generate and sustain fusion. That's not something

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>we can easily replicate here on Earth, right, we can't

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>just make a man your star. So the sun generates

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the light we see through fusion as high erogen combines

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to form a type of helium at a temperature of

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 1>millions of degrees. Shout out to they might be giants.

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 1>If we can harness the power of fusion in a

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>way where we can release sustainable energy that we can

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 1>convert into electricity, that would be a tremendous breakthrough. It

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 1>would totally revolutionize the energy economy. It's the kind of

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 1>thing that could provide a way to entirely ditch fossil

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 1>fuels and things like internal combustion engines and switch to

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 1>electric motors because electricity would be plentiful, it would be cheap,

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>it would be environmentally friendly, it would not produce things

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:44.359
<v Speaker 1>like the dangerous nuclear waste that fission plants do, and

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 1>the fuel we'd be using would be among the most

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 1>plentiful in the universe. Kind Of there's an asterisk by that,

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not going to go into great detail about

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that anyway. A huge obstacle to fusion has been finding

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a way to initiate reaction so that the net output

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of energy is greater than the net input we used

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to get the reaction going. So if you have to

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:11.880
<v Speaker 1>spend more energy to get things moving then you get

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 1>out of the process, that's a net loss. You get

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:17.359
<v Speaker 1>yourself a nonstarter. It doesn't make sense. You're just gonna

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 1>be losing energy in the in the whole system. So

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the researchers at Livermore have managed to initiate a reaction

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and get more energy out then was put in with

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:33.399
<v Speaker 1>their lasers. And to be clear, I'm not saying they

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>created energy. You cannot create energy. Rather, the energy needed

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to start a process was less than what the process released.

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like how if you were to light

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a pool of fuel with a match, the energy given

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 1>off by the burning fuel would be way bigger than

0:39:51.160 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the energy you use to light the match itself. You

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:58.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't generate it, it's just the process that's releasing that energy. Now,

0:39:59.640 --> 0:40:02.280
<v Speaker 1>there are are some asterisks that we have to address

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:05.840
<v Speaker 1>before we can say all our energy concerns are behind us.

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 1>For one thing, we do get a net positive amount

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of energy out of this reaction only if we're just

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 1>considering how much energy the lasers were directing to the

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 1>fuel source. So in that sense, it took two point

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:24.280
<v Speaker 1>zero five mega jewels from lasers to start a process

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately released three point one five mega jewels of energy.

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:32.799
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, more energy out than what you put in. However,

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 1>to power those lasers would require more than just two

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:40.800
<v Speaker 1>point oh five mega jewels because these pew pew laser

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 1>beams are not efficient. In fact, they are far from it.

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 1>They are very inefficient. It took three hundred mega jewels

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to power the lasers, then the lasers generate that two

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>point oh five mega jewle beam. So yeah, if we

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:58.959
<v Speaker 1>factor in that the three hundred mega jules we needed

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to power the system, well, releasing three point one five

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 1>mega jeweles is not a Grand Slam home run, right However,

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it is a step forward, and there are other methods

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 1>we can use besides lasers to initiate fusion. Some of

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:16.799
<v Speaker 1>them may prove to be far more efficient in the

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:20.319
<v Speaker 1>long run. So this is a good development, right it is.

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>It is something we should celebrate. It is not an

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:28.280
<v Speaker 1>earth shattering breakthrough because we still have some massive hurdles

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to overcome and we are not going to be switching

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:34.839
<v Speaker 1>over to fusion power right away, but we are a

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 1>little closer to that goal. So that is something I

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 1>think we need to be excited about. It's just important

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that we also understand the limitations that still stand in

0:41:43.080 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 1>our way, because my fear is that if we don't

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge those things, then people start to get upset when

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 1>a year or two or five later they're saying, where

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the heck are these fusion reactors we were supposed to have? Right,

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's like well, I heard that there was a ether.

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we have them yet? We have to understand

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 1>what the challenges are, the engineering challenges, the science that

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:10.360
<v Speaker 1>needs to be perfected in order for us to be

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 1>able to create an efficient system, so that we have

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:18.879
<v Speaker 1>a realistic expectation of how far along we are and

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:22.400
<v Speaker 1>how far away our goal is. And that way we

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 1>don't get discouraged, because if we do get discouraged, then

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:28.360
<v Speaker 1>funding gets cut, and if funding gets cut, we never

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 1>get to where we want to go. Okay, that's it.

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:35.399
<v Speaker 1>This was a super long news episode. Hopefully Thursdays will

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 1>be much shorter. Hope you are well. If you have

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:41.080
<v Speaker 1>suggestions for future topics of tech Stuff, please get in

0:42:41.120 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 1>touch with me. You can leave me a voice message

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 1>on the I Heart radio app. It's free to download

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and use. You can just navigate on over tech Stuff,

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:51.960
<v Speaker 1>use that little microphone icon, leave a voice message up

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to thirty seconds, end lengths, and you're good to go.

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Let me know if you would like me to use

0:42:55.960 --> 0:42:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in the future episode. I only do it if you

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 1>tell me to Otherwise, if you for you can hop

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 1>on over to Twitter and send me a message. The

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>handle for the show is tech Stuff hs W and

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again really soon. Yea. Tech Stuff

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is an I heart Radio production. For more podcasts from

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:22.799
<v Speaker 1>my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.