WEBVTT - Injury Plague Has Set In 0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.880 Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio. 0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:10.480 Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio, 0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.760 your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice. 0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:18.600 Now along with the guys from fanball dot Com, here's 0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:23.000 the host for Fantasy Football Weekly. It is time for 0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:27.000 America's longest running fantasy show, Fantasy Football Weekly, in our 0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:29.600 I Heart Radio production. I am your host, Paul Charchy, 0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:31.920 and from fanball dot Com. My co host today are 0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:35.680 Brian Johnson in Scott Fish. Hello, gentlemen, what's going on charts? 0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.519 It's a injury plague week four, That's what's going on. 0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:41.960 So there's gonna be one of those times, and we're 0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.720 gonna be recommending guys. We may not even talk about 0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:48.479 Sean him in Culkin and get him in your line up, right, 0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.960 don't call him McCauley's cousin, though, no, it's not. I 0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:55.840 just made that up. Well, I would believe it. Teams 0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:57.400 are so thin right now that yeah, they call in 0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.560 McCauley's cousin. Over the course of today, we're gonna break 0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:04.520 down every matchup fantasy style. As always, we don't tell 0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.360 you which team will win, we tell you which players 0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.640 will help your fantasy team win. You'll hear letter grades 0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.280 on every meaningful fantasy player, and we like to give 0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.840 you the rationale behind it. You know, Here's it's not 0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:19.119 just that this guy's will be. Here's why he gets 0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.200 a B grade. And you can decide if you want 0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.440 to go along with us or not. Later on we'll 0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:26.000 answer three tough questions. We will also give you nine 0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.560 different players upon whom you can take a chance. These 0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:32.080 are guys that are not normally uh startable, and in 0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.280 many cases are on the waiver wire that you can 0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:36.400 pick up and play this week. And we'll also jump 0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:38.800 into a time machine to identify the players will be 0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:43.600 looking for on the waiver wire this week that everybody 0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:45.880 else is going to be trying to pick up next week. 0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:49.400 But Blamo already on your roster. You already got him. 0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:53.400 We we've established in earlier shows our time machine goes Blamo. 0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.600 That's sound. That's the time machine sound. It's a very 0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:01.280 futuristic sound. Blamo. Not really Um, it's like a batman, 0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:06.200 like old school batman. Yeah. But when you try to 0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.400 go pick these guys up and they're already in a roster, 0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.240 it feels like a Batman, punch to the gut. Somebody 0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:16.360 else has already beaten you to that guy. We begin 0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.680 with our matchups. First, one out of the gate, Carolina 0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.320 taking on Houston. Scott on the Carolina side, Kyle Allen 0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:27.400 four touchdowns the last week, He's got six touchdowns and 0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:31.320 two starts, no interceptions. A lot of people feel like 0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:32.960 he might be the better of the two quarterbacks for 0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.880 the Panthers. What do you think he does against Houston 0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.200 this week? Well, he got a week seventeen matchup for 0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:41.560 one of those, and he got Arizona's defense for the other. 0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:45.320 Helps is that is gonna help you look good? Uh? 0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:49.320 Mentioned last week when talking about Houston, this secondary has 0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:51.760 an aging vet, a guy they picked up in free agency. 0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.200 Just you know after week one and a rookie. Uh, 0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.440 it's it's actually still another decent matchup. The Texans are 0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.320 allowing three hundred yards per game and multiple touchdowns in 0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:03.480 two of the three games. I still have a B 0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.240 grade on Kyle Allen. I think Houston's d can get 0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.720 beat and they're not pressuring like they used to. Uh 0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:13.320 remember when J. J. Watt was something other than just 0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:17.760 a guy you saw on commercials. You know, I'll watch 0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.120 whole games and his name will come up like two times, 0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.799 and it's mostly because the announcers are gushing over how 0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.600 great he is, and then the whole game I'm waiting 0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.079 from to make a play. Yeah, we'll get to Derek 0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:31.960 Watt of l A the Chargers later. He's more relevant 0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:38.040 WAT than JJ right now. And definitely yeah, James Watt 0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.160 in the in the passing game the steam engin Wow. 0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.360 I think that's he's more relevant deep diving right now. Uh. 0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:46.600 D J. Moore, I'm not afraid. He only had two 0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:48.560 targets last week, but he did have eight in the 0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.480 game last year with Kyle Allen. I think it's just 0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.680 what the defense gave them last week. I mentioned last 0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:55.920 week how I thought Samuel's deep speed could get a 0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:58.800 score and it did. Uh. This matchup I think is 0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.760 a little better from or Um. I don't think that 0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:03.640 first game means a whole lot. He's going to be 0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:07.640 matched mostly on Lonnie Johnson making his third career start. Uh. 0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:09.640 That should be a good day for more. I'm giving 0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.320 him a B M. Also giving Samuel ob though as well. 0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.560 I think he can beat Jonathan Joseph. Still good, but 0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:17.400 he's he's getting up there. I think he could beat 0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.320 Jonathan Joseph. He grabbed five of his seven targets from 0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.919 Alan last week. Allen has trust in him. I like 0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.359 both of them with B grades. Olson, It's hard not 0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.400 to love this resurgence. Yeah, I'm happy for the guy. Yeah, 0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:30.840 I think we all, you know, we all wrote him 0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:34.279 off as dead. But Greg Olson's back, Yeah, exactly, And 0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.440 and Kyle Allen looking for him in the red zone 0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.320 is nice. Seventy five yards two touchdowns last week, hundred 0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:44.479 one week after a hundred ten yard game Arizona. Man, uh, 0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.320 this is this is crazy that it's it's it's a 0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.359 good matchup Houston is It's not a good matchup. Excuse me. 0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.200 Houston's top five. But this resurgence of Greg Olson is 0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.239 giving him a C grade just because Kyle Allen seems 0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.200 to like him in the red zone. McCaffrey a grade. 0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:01.560 Euston could be the best defense in the world, and 0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:05.440 I'm still giving McCaffrey and a grade. He's he's he's 0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.240 His upside is two hundred yards. Uh in a lot 0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:10.320 of games, He's got a one eight yard game and 0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.960 a two hundred yards exactly. Between those two was a 0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.799 math outing. Yeah, And Christian McCaffrey gets all the running 0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:20.400 back touches and Houston is giving up the second most 0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.680 receptions and over a hundred thirty seven total yards per 0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.120 game two running backs. So a grade for McCaffrey. On 0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.800 the other side, Watson, I'm giving him a B grade here. 0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.920 He has eight total touchdowns in three ways three weeks, 0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:36.080 including two with his legs. The most passing yards that 0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:39.000 the Panthers have allowed is only this year is two 0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.279 hundred eight and having allowed over two hundred fifty in 0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.760 the last eight games, and in that eight game stretch 0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.200 only three multi touchdown games. But I think, I think 0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.239 that it's it's gonna turn up for Watson here. He's 0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.520 he's a little too good to a lot of the 0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.880 quarterbacks they faced in that span weren't Deshaun Watson quality. 0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.480 So I'm going to give him a Can I give 0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.960 him a B minus Himma be you're happy with the 0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.200 beat the thirty seconds ago? Alright, I'll give him a 0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.480 bank you Hopkins gets an A. He's going to get 0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.440 a healthy Joseph Doseph James Bradberry, who is not as 0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.839 good as Ramsey or Hayward Bradberry has had ups and 0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:16.080 downs over his career, but Hopkins was able to catch 0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.160 five plus passes on each of those other two guys. 0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:21.880 He should be fine against Bradberry. Will Fuller I had 0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.960 firmly on the bench, but he has seven targets in 0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.440 each of the last two games. Dante Jackson should have 0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.680 been a tough matchup for him because Dante Jackson can 0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:33.919 run with will Fuller. Dante Jackson is likely out for 0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.040 this one. This is one where you watch. If Dante 0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:38.480 Jackson doesn't play, Fuller can get in your line up 0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:40.479 as a C grade. If he does, I'm benching. I 0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.800 think he's more than a C grade and you know 0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:44.919 you're waiting for you know, as we all know, it 0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:48.360 only takes one catch for will Fuller of the long 0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:52.080 one and um Dante Jackson himself has already given up 0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.479 two touchdowns, So even if he goes, I kind of 0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.800 liked him in this matchup anyway. I like him more 0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.880 than you stick him in any By the way, practically 0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.320 ree and fan ball scoring for will Fuller. He could 0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.360 be a very good DFS play. Stills in Q tier 0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.200 are splitting the slot snaps. I'm keeping them on the 0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.240 bench and hide after After eight point three yards per 0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:13.360 carry in game one, he had three point three yards 0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:15.760 per carry over the last two games. He was saved 0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:19.040 by a touchdown last week. Caroline is middle of the pack. 0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:21.920 They've allowed some good games to Brown, Gurley, Payton, Barbara, 0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:23.880 Dave Johnson. So I'm good give him a C grade, 0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.680 but I don't love it all right, that's the end 0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:30.120 of that. Cincinnati taking on the Pittsburgh Steelers. It's been 0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:33.400 a dismal year for Joe Mixon. Without a doubt, it 0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.800 looked a little better, I thought last week, offensive line 0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.840 getting a little healthier. What do you think about him 0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.520 against what's really a pretty good Pittsburgh run defense. Yeah, 0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:45.160 well I don't They haven't been that good. They've allowed 0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.560 the most totally yards of running backs per game at 0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:52.520 a take take it, take that, But but you were right. 0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:54.840 Mixon has been a major dud. And even more concerning, 0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:56.560 he was banged up earlier in the year, but he 0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:58.840 hasn't been on the field from more than the snaps 0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.880 in any game that it's not bell cow status. It 0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.840 is the injury else. But I'm bet not a bounce 0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:08.280 back here from mixing. As I said a hundred nine 0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.239 combo yards per game the Steelers are allowing to opposing 0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.760 running backs. Uh. They've also allowed the third most catches 0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.559 to running backs. Of course, Jio Bernard is a threat 0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:18.800 in that category, which makes him a viable dart throw 0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:20.800 in PPR leagues. But I'm giving mixing and B He's 0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.400 gonna bounce back in this game, I hope as a 0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.080 Bengals fan. Moving over the receivers, Tyler Boyd gets a 0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:28.560 b as well. Boyd is fourth and targets among all 0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.200 wide receivers and sets up nicely against the Steelers, who 0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.880 have allowed at least one wide receiver touchdown in every game. 0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.800 Fellows a lot receivers. Julian Edelman, Tyler Lockett, and Dante 0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.640 Pettis all fared well against Pittsburgh, and for what it's worth, 0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.680 Boyd scored twice in his loan meeting with Pittsburgh last year. 0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.080 I do believe J. J J. Green was healthy, but still 0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:47.520 but they have John Ross the Bengals do, but he 0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.280 gets to see always a boom er Bus play. But 0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:54.480 I'm leaning boom in this one. Um. Pittsburgh has allowed 0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.319 fifteen completions of twenty plus yards already that plays into 0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:04.160 a nuts. That's a season for some secondaries. And uh, 0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.320 you know, Ross had two great weeks and last last 0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.080 week he was shut down by trade as White understandably, 0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.240 he's one of the better shadow corners in the league 0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.280 these days. So I'm giving John Ross a CE. I 0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.120 do have to mention Audentate only because he's six five 0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.600 to thirty and looked pretty good last week eighty eight 0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.000 yards against the Bills. But he's on the bench for now. 0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:27.280 But we're watching I on audent Tate and Tyler Ifford 0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:29.360 gets a seed to uh. This will be his first 0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:33.760 game against the Steelers since three years since he's facing 0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.880 the Steelers. Uh. He ran three times the pass routes 0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.680 the cg USMA last week which was very encouraging and 0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.440 will dis Lee George Kittle both good games. Disley had 0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.839 a great game against the Steelers. So Iford is viable 0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.400 with the Sea and that that gives Andy Dalton see 0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:49.240 almost might take a chance on the runner up and 0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:52.880 real quick multiple touchdown passes of his last three against Pittsburgh, 0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:55.800 so he is viable, especially in two quarterback leagues over 0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.800 to Pittsburgh. James Conner another major disappointment at the running 0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:01.920 back position. But this is a bounce back spot for 0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.319 him obviously, and since he he gets an easy A, 0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:06.600 I won't even go into it. You're starting James Conner 0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:08.640 with confidence this week finally, so he gets an A, 0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.920 as does Juju uh Juju Smith Schuster. Of course, Bengals 0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.280 might be without their starting nickel corner b W. Webb, 0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:18.040 who's actually good at football, one of the rare players 0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.360 on the defensive side, which would leave Darius Phillips. Phillips 0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.280 and or Tony mccread a cover the slot. They are scrubs, 0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.320 needless to say, so, easy A for Juju. Colt Beasley 0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.080 caught eight balls out of the slot last week, so 0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.640 keep that in mind. For Juju and James Washington Deonte Johnson, 0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:36.360 I'll give them both the sea. The Bengals boundary corners 0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:39.720 are struggling big time outside of Buffalo's white outs. William 0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:43.160 Jackson and Drake Kirkpatrick have allowed three touchdowns to white 0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.160 I was already Deonte has out target Washington over the 0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.120 last two weeks, so I would lean his way if 0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:50.439 I had to pick one. But they're both dart throws 0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.840 with the C grade as his vance McDonald if he plays, 0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.120 he's questionable with the shoulder injury. Mike Tomlin says he's 0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:03.200 optimistic he'll play dead. They traded for Nick Vannett, so 0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:04.840 let's put it this way, it's a good matchup. He 0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:06.720 gets to see if he plays since he has allowed 0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.360 fifty plus yards to at least the last two tight 0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.200 ends they faced. One was rookie Dawson Knox, who actually 0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.360 scored a touchdown for Buffalo. But if you're banking on McDonald, 0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:17.520 this is a Monday night game. By the way, No, 0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:19.480 we don't leave it to Monday's night problem. I don't 0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:21.000 know if I mentioned that yet, So you better add 0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:24.240 Nick Vannette. If you're banking on Vans McDonald, you've gotta 0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.319 be able to pivot without dropping without dropping McDonald, which 0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.200 is a problem. And then, uh, you know I liked 0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.480 uh including Juju of course. Uh so I give Mason 0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.520 Rudolph a see. I like a lot of the Pittsburgh 0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:38.160 receiver looks so bad last year man a lot of 0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:43.600 But but Juju bail him out right and catch I 0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.720 know Juju go to bail himount twice in this game. Juice, 0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:48.880 have a monster game. I hope you're right. He's a 0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:52.000 he's a cheap DFS option on fanball and maybe a 0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.920 QB two. Yeah Rudolph in super FLEXI leagues, but yeah, 0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:59.480 he's really on the bench and standard Cleveland takes on Baltimore. 0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:01.720 Let's start on the Cleveland side where Nick Chubb gets 0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:05.120 a B grade against a tough Baltimore defense. He's averaging 0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.760 twenty four carries and targets together, which is good. No 0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:12.240 lack of volume here for Nick Chubb. But that's about 0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:14.080 the only good news I've got for you. The Ravens 0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:18.120 held David Johnson to fourteen yards earlier this year. Last week, 0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.360 Darryl Williams and Shawn McCoy were able to get a 0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:23.839 lot done. They put up a hundred ninety total yards 0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:26.559 between them. But the Chiefs are just such an outlier 0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:28.880 offense it's hard to draw any comparisons to the Chiefs 0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:31.160 and then the Browns, so I don't know that even 0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:34.280 matters here. Only one back it's top one hundred yards 0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:40.000 against Baltimore in their last twenty seven games. One yard 0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:43.199 rusher against Baltimore. Wow, that's it. Chubb ran for twenty 0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:47.040 yards against Baltimore last year as the brown starter, So 0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.600 we'll we'll put some up twenty and one hundred yards 0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:52.839 in this one, and to be greater, we're really hoping 0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.560 on a for a touchdown for Nick Chubb. Uh into 0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:57.640 the passing game where I've only got a couple of 0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.439 starters for you, Baker Mayfield with just a Sea grade, 0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.679 he's got to be Fantasy Football's most disappointing quarterback right 0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:08.079 Nobody else has better, Nobody has been more disappointed that 0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.520 Cleveland offense was. On my part, I thought, well, and 0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:16.280 you and everybody else, Scott Um. Tough matchup on the 0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:20.520 road in Baltimore. Yes, Patrick Mahomes humbled the Ravens last week, 0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:22.920 but that's Patrick Mahomes and you know you can't compare 0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.280 him to anybody else. Prior to the Chiefs game, the 0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.280 Ravens had allowed zero or one passing touchdown in seven 0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.920 of the previous nine games. I think you're likely looking 0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.400 at a one touchdown effort for Mayfield here, and then 0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:36.680 it'll be great for Odell Beckham, who's getting tons of 0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:41.760 targets thirty already. But get this, thirty targets nineteen receptions 0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:46.640 for Odell Beckham. That's it that stinks, and it's some 0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:48.600 of that's I think most of that is on Baker 0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.840 Mayfield just misfiring, which is crazy because he's such an 0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:58.000 accurate quarter history right now. Um, worrying Lee? Is that 0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:02.560 a word? Worrying Lee? Worrying Odell Backham has garnered one 0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:07.280 red zone target this year one. He's been targeted thirty times, 0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.120 only once in the red zone. Come on, Odell runs 0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:14.600 from the outside where cornerbacks Marlon Humphrey and Anthony Averett Waite. 0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:20.320 Cleveland be wise to put Odell opposite Averett, who's yielded 0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:24.320 ninety yards per game, that's fourth most among all cornerbacks. 0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.360 And ever it's given up two scores already. That is 0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.200 a winnable matchup for Odell, so he is a b start. 0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:35.160 Jarvis Landry's on the bench. Two career touchdowns with Baker 0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:40.160 Mayfield at the helm. That's it for Jarvis Landry and 0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.840 he somehow turned twenty three targets into just ten catches 0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.920 this year. Tough matchup against a good slock corner Brandon Carr, 0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:49.560 Jarvis Landry, you're on the bench. I dropped him in 0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:51.600 the league. I don't blame you. Qualms. That was like 0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.560 a couple of weeks ago, and I'm sure people like, oh, 0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:58.840 Jarvis Landry, you sabotage dropped Jarvis Landry, other others picked 0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.160 him up, probably started him in the getting nothing. Now listen, 0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.360 all y'all, let's go to the Baltimore side. Mark Ingram 0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.160 has been great and in two meetings with Cleveland last year, 0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:12.880 the combined Ravens running backs two meetings. Let me, I'm 0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:14.760 gonna slow this down to make sure people get it. 0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:18.720 Two meetings with Cleveland last year, the combined Ravens running 0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:25.080 backs three hundred forty rushing yards. I'm struggling to remember 0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:34.720 who they were, just running the guinea big shaver? Three? 0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:39.960 Is that your is in there too? Did shave my 0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.120 guinea pig? Here comes Ingram with his six yards per 0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.000 carry almost two touchdowns per game, no brainer, A grade 0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:48.640 for him. Lamar Jackson also in a grade. He faced 0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.120 Cleveland once last year and ran for ninety yards and 0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:54.360 two touchdowns. Brown secondaries a wreck with injury. You're gonna 0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.880 want to watch the status of Greedy Williams, Morgan Burnett, 0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.880 Denzil Award. They're all shaping up his game. Time Decisions 0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.960 paid special attention to Greedy Williams and Denzil Award, the 0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:07.320 fastest set of outside corners in probably the entire league. 0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.880 If those guys do play, they can use their speed 0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:13.480 to neutralize Marquis Brown and Miles Boykin. And if they 0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.040 don't go, I really like Marquis Brown and Miles Boykin. 0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:20.120 So let's talk about those guys. So for Markis Brown again, 0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:23.480 Greedy Williams Denzil a Ward if they're in. If they're 0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:25.520 in the game, I got Marquis Brown at more like 0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.000 a C level. If they're out of this game, then 0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:31.200 I like Markus Brown at an A level against backup cornerbacks. Um. 0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:33.320 And then also if they're out, Miles Boyken as a 0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.120 dart throw makes sense. Mark Andrews still not practicing with 0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:38.720 the foot injury, but should play here. He did say 0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:42.920 today that he was very yeah um and the only 0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.440 good tight end to face the Brown so far this year. 0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:49.760 Delaney Walker rocked him for two scores. Last thing, I'll mention, 0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:53.520 you need a deep sleeper running back Gus Edwards getting 0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.160 twenty two snaps and ten touches a game, and that 0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.960 by might be enough to make Edwards a potential sleeper 0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.720 against the Brown's team that they just ran through last year. 0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.640 People need warm bodies at running back more than every 0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:09.639 two now more than ever. J j I just said, 0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.680 just announced all thirty two teams. He's ready to come back. 0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.160 So what does that even mean? Announced to thirty two teams? 0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:17.960 I tweeted an hour ago. Does that an announcement to 0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.879 thirty two teams? It was? It was? I'm sure as 0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:22.720 they didn't contacted them in the Giants will be in 0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.360 touch show probably retweeted his own tweets saying that has 0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:30.240 no likes on it. J I, by the way, stinks. 0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:34.000 He wasn't good before all the knee problems. I went 0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.560 to bad for him. Fish certainly went to bed him. 0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:40.640 But yeah, we're done, right, I mean, yeah, alright, let's 0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.480 let's just the best case scenario for j GI. He 0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:45.439 ends up with the Giants and I'm still not very interested. 0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.720 Everything charge is available at fanball dot com. By going 0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.880 to famball dot com slash charts, you get instant access 0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:56.240 to my free weekly rankings, my free one thousand dollar 0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.960 weekly contest, all of our podcast, and it's your portal 0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:01.840 to Guillotine League. We are still forming Guillotine Leagues at 0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:05.280 fanball dot com. Slash Chart coming up next. It's a 0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.920 segment we call take a Chance on Me. Nine players 0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.800 who would not normally start, but guys you can start 0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:33.640 this week. You're listening to Fantasy Football Weekly Fantasy Football 0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.680 Weekly Returns courtesy of I Heart Radio. I am Paul 0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:38.680 Charchi and my Twitter account is at Paul Charchi in 0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:42.840 which makes sense. Brian Johnson is at b t x J. 0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:48.280 Scott Fish is at Scott Fish twenty four. These are 0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:50.479 nine players not normally in your starting lineup. We call 0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:52.160 it take a chance on me. Many of these guys 0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.800 available on the waiver wire, and it is a as always, 0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.520 a very very royalty free version of take a chance 0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.879 on me. When these guys pay out, you don't have 0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.320 to pay us anything. You can keep all the money 0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:07.480 in the royalty free version of take a chance on me. 0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.440 We begin at the quarterback position. Brian, who you got? 0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:12.919 I can sort of taste a little bit of vomit 0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:16.639 coming up, but I'm still taking Marcus Mariota at Atlanta. Wow, 0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:20.400 the Falcons just suffered another huge loss to their defense. 0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:24.199 Safety Kianu Neil tore his achilles for the second straight season, 0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.040 sadly for him, and when he went down last year, 0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:31.800 they got consistently shredded by anybody, especially when he went 0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.679 down with the injury. The look on his face was 0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:38.800 a look of recognition. I'm looking at him, going, he's 0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:42.600 had this before, he knows exactly what this is. Yeah, 0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.359 I felt bad for him. They say it's like a 0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:47.359 drape getting pulled up or something. I don't wanna think 0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:49.560 about it, but anyway, that the trend started already. Jacoby 0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.560 Brissette went for three ten and two after Neil went down. Um. 0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.640 The Falcons have also allowed two rushing touchdowns with quarterbacks 0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:58.160 so far at the season. Mariota is third in rushing 0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.040 yards among quarterbacks so far average six point four yards 0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.200 per carry, and despite a couple of down weeks, I 0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:05.920 think three total yards and two total touchdowns is safe 0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.240 FLOORA not the highest second over under of the week. Wow, Yeah, 0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.639 all right, let's go. I'd be even more impressed. You 0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.280 who told people to go with Corey Davis remember when 0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.399 he was a thing. All right, let's go with your quarterback, Scott. 0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:22.359 I am going with Washington QB tv D TBD. It 0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.440 sounds like keenum Is is back and ready to go. There. 0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.280 They're saying he's going to get the start. Uh, so 0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:30.680 I'm letting him back up as my take a chance 0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.639 on me. The Giants allowing three fifty yards passing and 0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:38.840 three touchdowns per game to opposing quarterbacks. As bad as 0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.520 Keenum has looked, he's still racked up multiple touchdowns in 0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:43.439 every game in three and thirty or more yards and 0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.600 two of those and uh, this isn't a ball hockey defense. 0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.080 You worry about those turnovers with keenom Uh they only 0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:53.320 intercepted Jamis Winston once. Which is which is? That's not 0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.040 ball hockeying at all. Now, worry on Keenum is what 0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.320 happens first drive or second drive? He throws a pick? 0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:03.679 That might be it. That's your work. I mean your 0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.760 upside is it's a Giant's defensive easily give up, you know, 0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:10.080