WEBVTT - House GOP Leaders Ready Funding Plan 

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple card playing Android

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, Listen on demand wherever

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 3>All that seems kind of moot in the context of

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 3>maybe our government's going to shut down tonight at midnight

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 3>when we'll be fast asleep. But Wendy Schiller, she joined

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 3>us in Brown University, and we want to get some

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 3>informed comments about how this might play out here.

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 4>So Wendy A, I'm.

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Not sure if you're in the business of predicting shutdowns

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 3>or not, but I'd love to get your perspective on

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 3>just kind of how the whole process here is unwinding.

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 3>In Washington, We've got a couple of civilians, President elect

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Trump and Elon Musk right smack in the middle of

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 3>the discussion in the news cycle. And I've got a

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 3>President of the United States who I haven't heard anything from.

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 3>So house is developing well.

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 5>I think President Biden has seeded sort of the negotiating

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 5>power of the Democrats to Jakim Jeffries, who's the Democratic

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.759
<v Speaker 5>leader in the House Representatives.

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.119
<v Speaker 4>And Chuck Schumer, Senator from New York.

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:15.479
<v Speaker 5>Who's still the majority leader of the United States Senate

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 5>till January third. So there basically Biden said, you know,

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 5>you decide what our position will be, and I'll likely

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, sign it.

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.199
<v Speaker 4>So he's seated all of that negotiating power to them.

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 5>And I think this is really important for everyone to remember.

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 5>We have a bi cameral legislature. You know, the founders

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 5>set it up this way on purpose. You two institutions

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 5>that have very different electoral incentives, very different internal structure,

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 5>different terms of office.

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 4>And we're seeing that play out right now. I mean,

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 4>the Senate's just literally hanging out waiting.

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 5>For the House to deliver something, and the Democrats control

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 5>the Senate, so all of this is about.

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, the passes the House, it'll go through not so fast.

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 5>The Democratic controlled Senate will say no, we're not going

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 5>to pass it. So the Democrats have some risk here

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 5>because they be party to the shutdown.

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 4>The way the Republicans are.

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 5>And since it's a divided government right now, it's really

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 5>unclear for the voters who are you actually going to blame.

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 5>Right now, the Democrats have decided they're going to blame

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 5>elon Musk. They have made Musk a target of their communications,

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 5>and you're starting to see a little bit of this

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 5>creep into some of those Republicans who voted against the

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 5>package yesterday.

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 6>I mean, we just had a story that came out

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 6>on the Bloomberg terminal saying that House Speaker Mike Johnson

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 6>is currently strategizing a way to rush a spending bill

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 6>through the Chamber to avoid a government shut down ahead

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 6>of that midnight deadline that we've been talking about. I

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 6>do know that the longest government shut down in recent

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 6>history was in twenty eighteen under the Trump administration. It

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 6>lasted thirty five days. If we were to enter into

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 6>a government shutdown, how do people actually analyze and predict

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:49.399
<v Speaker 6>the longevity of how long it could last.

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know, if you're thinking Trump and Trump's strategy,

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 5>you think, well, if we're going to go into US shutdown,

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 5>let's shut it down till I get inaugurated, and then

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 5>then of course we'll open it back up because at

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 5>that point the Republicans will control the House and the Senate,

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 5>so we'll have more sway and he's willing to sort

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 5>of live with the costs that are incurred. Usually, you know,

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 5>a shutdown on this length usually costs several billion dollars,

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 5>not only in pay for federal employees, but for all

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 5>sorts of disruptions to all sorts of services that the

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.519
<v Speaker 5>federal government provides to the economy. So you're going to

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 5>see a cost here. But then Trump gets to be

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 5>the hero by reopening.

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 4>The government on his terms, and I think that's the

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 4>way he's thinking.

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 5>The debt ceiling is the interesting question here because the

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 5>Republicans have voted against this bill yesterday, really voted against

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 5>it because the dead ceiling extension ran through twenty twenty

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:42.839
<v Speaker 5>seven and basically gave Trump an unlimited checkbook. And they

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 5>are deficit hawks, and even they were not willing to

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 5>go there for Donald Trump. So there must be something

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 5>that they're sensing about how they would face the voters

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 5>again in twenty six that says we don't want to

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 5>be responsible for blowing up the federal.

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 4>Debt and the deficit even more than it is.

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 6>I mean, we're sitting here in December, we're still about

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 6>a month away from inauguration day. Paul and I were

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 6>chatting earlier how typical Is it historically that we have

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 6>the president elect implementing it weighing in on these things.

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 6>Where is Biden and Harris in this conversation? Is this

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 6>all typical?

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's it's you know, we haven't had as

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 5>much ringmanship, let's say, in December with an election switch.

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 5>We've certainly hadmanship with Ronald Reagan in December, with Barack

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 5>Obama in December.

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 4>So you've had sitting presidents have this issue.

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 5>But the transition in power, I mean, it does really happen, right,

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you won the election, You're going to be president.

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 5>But in terms of the Trump sway of the GOP,

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 5>that's what we're talking about here, is that it is

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 5>a wholly owned subsidiary of Donald Trump. But right now

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 5>we're seeing cracks in that coalition. And the question is

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 5>what's driving those cracks. Is it get rid of Elon Musk.

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 5>Is it thinking that this is just a bridge too

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 5>far in terms of federal spending, or is that they

0:04:57.240 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 5>think they'll get some political gain by shutting it down

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 5>and we open under Trump with more capital with a

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 5>Republican control House and Senate. We're just not getting any

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 5>real signals from the Republicans that matter, meaning the ones

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 5>that voted against the bill yesterday.

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 4>But a shutdown is not a way to.

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 5>Start an administration, no matter what Donald Trump thinks. It's disruptive,

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 5>and he's got very high approval ratings. Now I'm not

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 5>sure those are going to go higher by inconveniencing a

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 5>lot of people over the next couple of weeks.

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Wendy is, do some people in Washington, on either side

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 3>or both sides of the auduld that they view President

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 3>elect Trump is maybe even a lame duck president. I

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 3>don't really need to bend over backwards for this guy

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 3>because he's only here for four years.

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 5>Well, certainly, if you're a senator that was elected in

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty four or even twenty twenty two, you're thinking

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 5>you're probably going to outlast Trump. But then again, lots

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 5>of people thought Trump might not run again, get the

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 5>nomination and win again. I just don't think you can

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 5>underestimate Donald Trump's political power. But you have an economy

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 5>that seems to be coming along in terms of growth,

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 5>and the employment numbers are sort of okay, you know,

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 5>not disastrous or anything, but inflation is really sticky.

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 4>And the question is if there isn't a real change in.

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 5>People's perception of the economy by the summer, I think

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 5>a lot of Trump's clout could diminish, even among his

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 5>own base, and.

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 4>Then you're looking at the next electoral cycle.

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 5>So that is where separation of powers is really crucial here.

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 5>It creates different incentives and we're seeing those incentives play.

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 4>Out right now.

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 6>When you am curious, do you know the intricacies of

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 6>what the potential financial implications could be for non essential

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 6>government workers? Do they get paid retroactively or do they

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 6>just go without pay?

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 5>Typically, Congress insists on passing a separate bill to authorize

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 5>retroactive pay for federal employees that have been furloughed or

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 5>not paid during a shutdown, So you know, it varies

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 5>depending on the shutdown, depending on the Congress. You can

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 5>see where most people would want to see people paid

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 5>for work that they do, but if you're not working,

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 5>then there could be an argument, well, you weren't working,

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 5>so this is a bloat of the federal government, and

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 5>we're not paying you for work that you didn't do.

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 5>You know, the problem with the Republican Party is that

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 5>the federal government civilian force is large and diverse and

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 5>spread out all across the country. So in every congressional

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 5>district there will be federal employees or people associated with

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 5>the federal government that will lose income because of a shutdown,

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 5>and those congress people are going.

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 4>To hear from those employees.

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 5>So this becomes very sticky if they don't agree to

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 5>retroactively reimburse these employees.

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 4>But remember the reason that Donald Trump.

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 5>Quote unquote caved in twenty eighteen and reopened the government

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 5>was that the FAA and air traffic controllers and sort

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 5>of our TSA employees, all of that became very difficult

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 5>for people who weren't.

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 4>Getting paid and decided not to show up for work.

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 5>And that clog in the economy is what pushed Trump

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 5>to the table, and so that's why it's curious that

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 5>he'd want to start an administration with another clog in

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 5>the economy.

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 3>All Right, Wendy, thank you so much. We appreciate that.

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Wendy Shulis, she's a professor at Brown University and she

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 3>is the intermim director of the Watson Institute. Joining us

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 3>from Providence O Rhode Island versus that zoom thing. So again,

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 3>I guess the initial deadline is going to be midnight tonight, right,

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 3>so we'll wake up tomorrow and the government will need to.

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 6>Be open or not right obviously, like you exactly.

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 2>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Normal Linda sitting in for Alex Steel here today on

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Paul Suni where you are streaming live on YouTube. Ahead

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 3>over to YouTube dot com and search Bloomberg Podcast. Also

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 3>doing this whole live thing from the Bloomberg Interactive Broker

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 3>studio here in New York City. The government shutdown is

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.199
<v Speaker 3>a thing, and we kind of kind of getting used

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 3>to it. I guess it seems to happen at least

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 3>once a year these days. Let's put this whole thing

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 3>in perspective and how the next several days might unfurlier.

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 3>Christopher smart joint is he's a managing partner at our

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Growth Group, and he's a former Special Assistant to the

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 3>President for International Economics. Joining us from Boston via that

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 3>zoom thing. Hey, Chris, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 3>I guess again, we've all in this market become I guess,

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of used to these threats of government shutdowns. What's

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 3>a little bit different this time is we have a

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 3>couple of civilians that are really weighing in and almost

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 3>driving part of the conversation. That is President elect Trump

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 3>and Elon Musk really involved here. What do you make

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 3>of that whole dynamic, because that seems a little bit unique.

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 7>It seems very unique. I'm not sure we're supposed add

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 7>modify us to unique, but it is a very different

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 7>rhythm from the traditional government shutdown background music that many

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 7>investors are used to at this time of year. Along

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 7>with the Salvation Army bell ringers and anybody singing carols

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 7>at your door. There is always the drama of when

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 7>Congress will go home, will there be a budget or

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 7>will there be a continuing resolution? And what services married

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 7>and I may not get shut down for a few days,

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 7>as you say, the difference, one big difference this time

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 7>is we have a president elect who's not really president,

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 7>scuttling what had been agreed by all sides earlier this

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 7>week we have, as you say, as civilians, somebody who's

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 7>not even headed for a government role, an official government

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 7>role at least, who's also sort of driving the dynamics

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 7>on social media that we haven't really seen anywhere.

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 2>In the past.

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 7>And then I guess to me the third thing, as

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 7>from the market's perspective, there's one thing that the markets

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 7>always hate, which is the debt limit debate that comes

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 7>up from time to time and the threat of the

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 7>United States defaulting here the fact that President like Trump

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 7>has sort of introduced this is one of his asks

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 7>in the continuing Resolution, at least that's what it's been

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 7>in the last twenty four hours. We'll see how that evolved.

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 7>But markets would love to see this thing go away.

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 7>The problem is getting the math to work on that

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 7>particular part of an already complicated bill becomes very, very difficult.

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 6>It feels like in markets we have so many things

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 6>to worry about right now. Honestly, my eyes are on

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 6>so many different things right now, especially with this being

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 6>a FED week. But of course as a concern, as

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 6>we're thinking about the uncertainty that could be upcoming in

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:31.719
<v Speaker 6>this situation, what is the impact on markets here? Historically

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 6>do we really care about a government shut down in

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.719
<v Speaker 6>terms of the near term, I.

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 7>Think probably less so this time around. First of all,

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 7>the sell off that we've seen this week was squarely

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:48.439
<v Speaker 7>linked to the fed's statements and more hawkish music coming

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 7>from that part of Washington. If we were sort of

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 7>really on the verge of a recession and you worried

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 7>that government spending would be cut off and government activity

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 7>would tip the balance into a recession, then I think

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 7>markets will be paying much more, much closer attention to

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 7>what's going on right now. But you have an economy

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 7>that is on the margin running a little bit hotter

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 7>than the FED would like, and you know, from a

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 7>macroeconomic perspective, a little bit of cooling, even if it

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 7>comes from a shutdown, is probably not a bad thing overall. Obviously,

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 7>from a governance perspective, from a predictability perspective, from a

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 7>political perspective, it's it's never a good thing when you

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 7>have it this kind of dynamic in the in the background.

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 7>And I think the thing around these government shut off

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 7>shutdown excuse me, is that once they happen, it's never

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 7>clearer if it's going to be a quick one or

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 7>a long one, and once ide start digging in, this

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 7>could go on well into the into the new year.

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 3>So again, we were just talking with one of our analysts,

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence, who covers the Washington policy, and he had

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 3>raised his risk of a shutdown or os of a

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 3>shutdown to forty percent. That's up from I think twenty

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 3>or thirty percent just a day or two ago. My senses,

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 3>you feel like it's maybe even higher than that.

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 6>Here.

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 3>What are the what's the politics of a shutdown here?

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 3>How would you view the politics of a shutdown that

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 3>might go through the holidays.

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm not.

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.959
<v Speaker 7>Sure anybody benefits from a shutdown, but the question is

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 7>always can you blame the other person more? And obviously

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 7>I think at this stage it looks like this has

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 7>been a shutdown that's been triggered by Elon Musk and

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 7>Donald Trump scuppering this late deal that the Republicans Democrats

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 7>had agreed to. Having said that President Trump just won

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 7>a big election, it's very easy for him to write

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 7>the narrative that this is Washington insider backroom dealing that

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 7>he is fighting against and has promised to eliminate in Washington.

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 7>So I'm not sure I think both sides feel like

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 7>they've got the upper hand here, which should think, as

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 7>you say, leads me to believe that the odds are

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 7>maybe higher than forty percent. Although you know, these things

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 7>tend to change very quickly from one hour to the next.

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 7>It just doesn't seem to me that anybody's got a

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 7>real reason to compromise at this stage. The one, you know,

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 7>minor deadline that's coming up is actually the president's inauguration.

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 7>Does he want to be sworn into office with the

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 7>government still shut down? But between now and then, I'm

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 7>not sure what's going to force one side or the

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 7>other to come to the table.

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 6>When we're thinking about the market, what sectors in particular

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 6>could be potentially exposed to the impact of a government

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 6>shut down.

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 7>Again, if it's shutting things down for a week or

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 7>a month, even two months, the macroeconomic impact is fairly

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 7>fairly limited. Obviously, you can see government contracts that don't

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 7>get written, you know, maybe defense contracts that don't get

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 7>done this year or get pushed into next year. You

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 7>get a lot of uncertainty. You know that maybe some

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 7>businesses aren't planning their investments the way they would like

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 7>to given the uncertainty around government spending. But the real

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 7>questions are not so much around the shutdown itself, as

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 7>I think everybody is looking to both the tax debate

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 7>that's going to come into line very quickly and what

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 7>sort of differences they can expect in terms of corporate

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 7>taxes and potential rollbacks of President Biden's subsidies to the automotive,

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 7>to the electric vehicle, to the clean energy industry. And

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 7>then the other piece of that I think that he's

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 7>driving things are the terraff wars that are building up.

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Christopher Smart, thank you so much for joining us. Chris Smart,

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 3>he's a managing partner in a growth group, former Special

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Assistant to the President for International economics, just giving us

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 3>his thoughts here on the potential shutdown. I think as

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Chris was just mentioning, he kind of feels like this

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 3>is somebody that may come to fruition and so have

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 3>to see will pay attention. That's starting midnight tonight.

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Playing and

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Broun Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Normal Linda sitting in for Alex Steel on Paul Swooney

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Your Life here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio, or

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 3>streaming live on YouTube as well. So check us out

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 3>on YouTube dot com slots Boom Bloomberg podcast Again, Like

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Charlie Pellet, I'm trying to figure out what the heck

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 3>going on in this market, what's driving the higher here?

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm seeing a couple of things, maybe, you know,

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at the top go on the Bloomberg terminal,

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Fed's favorite inflation gauge cools to the slowest pace since May.

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 3>So maybe this economic data people is really starting to

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 3>digest it and say, all right, maybe this inflation thing

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 3>is is not as concerning as maybe we thought. That

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 3>might give the FED some room on the rates here,

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 3>you know. And I think the question is maybe the

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 3>reaction to the Fed's meeting on Wednesday again, SMP off

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 3>two and a half percent last top of three and

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 3>a half percent. Maybe that's a little bit of an overreaction.

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 6>We're seeing real estate the best performing sector today and

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 6>then information technology is the second best.

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Real estate and that's my career.

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Real estate.

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 3>All right, very good. We appreciate that Sandy Berger joins us.

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 3>She's the chief client officer. I'm sure she's got some

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 3>thoughts here. The firm's experient and she joins us via zoom. Sandy,

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 3>what do you make of the last I don't know,

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 3>four five, six days in this marketplace. We've got geopolitics,

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 3>we've got domestic politics with the government shutdown, We've got

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 3>federal reserve. Boy, there's a lot of cross currents for

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 3>investors to navigate.

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's been an exciting week, and every day there

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.679
<v Speaker 1>is a new twist. In turn. We've been telling our clients,

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 1>who are corporate executives, family business owners and entrepreneurs to

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>be ready for anything and to be thoughtfully and thoughtfully

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>diversified in their portfolios. That's what we've been doing for them.

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of the economy right now, things are

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>looking pretty good in our We have a strong economy,

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 1>strong corporate earnings. There are some wild cards on out

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>there that could change things, and I think we got

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a taste of some of those wild cards this week,

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 1>especially in terms of the Fed's decision regarding interest rates

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and slowing down the pace. There so a lot of

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>volatility within the week. We wouldn't be surprised if volatility

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>continued into twenty twenty five. But at this point on

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>our base case scenario, we're not expecting any major changes.

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>We think things look good out there.

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 6>Sandy, you mentioned wild cards. There's so much volatility. Where

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 6>are you guys staying, what do you like right now?

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 6>And where are you avoiding?

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>So within our portfolios, as I was mentioning, we really

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>truly believe that now more than ever, diversification is important,

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and we're pretty well balanced between bonds and equities, though

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>tilting toward equities. Within the equity markets, we do like

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the US market, particularly large cap value. It really has

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 1>not been the place to be for a long time.

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>On balance, we think that there's some real opportunity there.

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>We also like small caps in the United States, also

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>on the value side, and really looking at the higher

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>quality small company so companies that have strong balance sheets,

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that have great business models, that are going to do

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 1>well during good economic times and bad. And then we

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>do have some of our allocation overseas. We're particularly more

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 1>bullish on Europe at this point and also Japan.

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 6>When we look at the fact that we've hit so

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 6>many record highs for the S and P five hundred

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 6>in the market more broadly this year more than fifty times.

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 6>Is there any discussion around whether or not market valuations

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 6>have been too high?

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>In our estimation, the US large cap growth area is

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>running pretty hot. Still, we think valuations are high there.

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>You look at the SMP five hundred earnings currently pees

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>at twenty two, an average is more like sixteen. So

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you could make some arguments that some stocks have gotten

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>ahead of themselves. That's why we are tilting toward value

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in some of the areas of the market that haven't

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>gotten as much play. But you know, it all depends

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 1>upon what happens in the economy in how corporate ar

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>needs continue in the period ahead. And again, without some

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of these wild cards coming into tuition I talked about inflation,

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>interest rates would be another wild card, and of course

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 1>we have deficits and tariffs out there as well. We

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 1>could see sustained levels in the markets if those wild

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 1>cards don't show their ugly faces and create some surprises

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 1>and sandy.

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, since the election, at least from my perspective,

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:53.360
<v Speaker 3>has been a palpable sense of optimism, economic optimism, optimism

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 3>about the markets, optimism about taking risk. Do you get

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 3>that when you talk to your clients.

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>So, our clients are mostly based in the United States,

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>we have some that are located overseas, and they represent

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>all aspects of the political spectrum. And so what I've

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>noticed it's clients who have strong political views on one

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>side of the spectrum, where the other that are either

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the most bullish around economy or the most concerned. So

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing a lot of different things from our clients,

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and our jobs really is to meet them where they are,

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind what they're trying to achieve with their

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>long term financial plans and what they're really focused on,

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and making sure that we're helping them make decisions about

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>their portfolios that are going to be invested in service

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>of what they're trying to achieve, and keeping them keeping

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a check on any strong feelings one way or the

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 1>other between bolishness or bearishness. We hear it all, Paul Sandy.

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 6>One of the latest wildcards, of course, that we're monitoring

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 6>and the rest of the market is monitoring today is

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 6>the potential government shutdown. How have markets historically responded to

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 6>government shutdowns and what are you all thinking about what

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 6>we're seeing today in about thirty seconds.

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Or less, Nora, the shutdowns tend to be a non

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>market event, in a non economic event, so we've been

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>telling clients who've been concerned not to worry about it.

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>The interesting thing about this potential shutdown is that it

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>really is an early test, perhaps of the cohesiveness of

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party. So if we were to see a

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>prolonged shutdown, and that's not necessarily what we're expecting, but

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>if we saw one, that could put into question some

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Republican Party's ability to rally around other policies

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that people are expecting to come into fruition, like tax

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 1>reform later next year.

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Sandy, thank you so much. We appreciate it. Thanks for

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 3>your time, Sandy Berger, Chief Client Officer, Experient giving us

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 3>her thoughts on the markets.

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you'll get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 2>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Thehart Radio app, tune In, and the Boomberg Business App.

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal