WEBVTT - P&L: O'Brien on "Trump, the Conflicts-of-Interest President"

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you at the grocery store

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p L Podcast

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. Pim I

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>was reading a story this morning. I want to read

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the lead to you when Donald Trump starts work in

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the Oval Office in January. In January, he will have

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 1>more potential business and financial conflicts of interest than any

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>other president in US history. The author of that is

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Timothy O'Brien, the head of Bloomberg Gadfly, Bloomberg Editor, Bloomberg View,

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>UH publisher. Tell us, what are some of those conflicts? Well,

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>they're myriad, Lisa. You know, he's he's coming into the

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:05.199
<v Speaker 1>b office having sat a top a boutique branding organization,

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the Trump Organization. It has a small clutch of lucrative buildings,

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>hotel operations and um UH and his basically a licensing operation. UH.

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>He's been a human shingle for about the last ten

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>years or so of his business life. He licenses his

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>name on everything from mattresses and underwear to other people's

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>building buildings, etcetera, etcetera, and um, his kids run it.

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>He's got a small clutch of family of close associates

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>who have helped him in that business for a long time.

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Now he's going into the White House and as president,

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>there are very few conflict of interest laws that apply

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to him, basically none. What kinds of disclosures does he

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>have to do as far as the business because it's

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a private, private business. Yeah. I mean, he's said throughout

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the campaign that he didn't need to release his tax

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>returns because he had already given the FEC documents about

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>his business operation. But the reality is all of that

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff is self reported. There are no meaningful numbers associated

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>with any of it. We have a guy coming into

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the White House who has substantial financial and business connections

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and we don't really know the full excent of what

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>they are, and he's free to make a number of

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>policy decisions that could essentially feather his own nest. Timothy O'Brien,

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to also mention that you were the author

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of Trump Nation, so you have some detailed history about

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Mr Trump. The president elect. If you could characterize what

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>are the most potentially the most confrontational uh, conflicts of interest,

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 1>what would they be. Well, he's a real estate developer,

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>so he has a lot of leverage. He's got a

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of loans. In particular, Deutsche Bank, the big German bank,

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>is one of his primary lenders. Deutsche is currently under

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>investigation by the Justice Department. Uh. The Trump's you know,

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the Trump cabinet, will have influence over the course of

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that investigation. UM. Deutsche is very close to the German government.

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So of course any foreign policy or trade agreements that

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump engages in overseas comes to bear on that. UM.

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>He he campaigned on being against lobbying and entrenched lobbyists,

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>but he's got lobbyists throughout his transition team. UM. Policy

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>domestically on taxes is going to affect his real estate operations. UM.

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>He's got I think currently about seventy five lawsuits outstanding,

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>either being filed against him or that he's followed against others,

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>including quite prominently the Trump University case. UM. He gets

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>immunity from having to appear on the witness stand in

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>those case is, but he's not immune from the consequences

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of that litigation, So that's going to play out as well.

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And there was a story today that Berkeley's analysts expect

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that the potential Deutsche Bank find by the Department of

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Justice will probably be much lower in a Trump presidency.

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>To your point about Dutch Bank being his major lender,

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much that's gonna play into it.

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Um is there or who will play the biggest watchdog

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>within the government. Who can play that role? Well, it's

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it really the chief executive of the United States has

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of latitude. There is by design not a watchdog.

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>The almost all of the conflict of interest laws at

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:27.919
<v Speaker 1>the federal level UM and at the executive branch don't

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>apply to the president. UM. We've relied on presidents in

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the past creating blind trusts to store their assets so

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>someone else can manage them. But those tend to be

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>security stocks and bonds. They don't It doesn't include things

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>like a real estate operation and golf courses. Trump has

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>said that he will distance himself from those operations by

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>letting his three children run them, but in fact that's

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>really not a prophylactic. He'll be talking. One would assume

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>about those businesses with his kids every day, so right

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>now we lack a watchdog. Well, coming up, we're gonna

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>be speaking with the Thin Dean, our government analyst for

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. We're gonna talking about the defense rather the

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Dodd Frank legislation and any attempts to change that. But

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just your point about lobbyists and people who are

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>veterans in Washington understand that a former representative, Mike Rogers,

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>he was a former Reagan attorney general and Heritage Foundation

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>fellow Edwin Meees also, so both of them. Uh, don't

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>don't forget about Rudy Giuliani himself, the firm that he

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>has been with until recently. Greenberg Um did lobby and

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>work for the Trump organization over the years on casino issues.

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>So all of this stuff is fairly deep and deeply

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>embedded in his portfolio and his transition team. Yeah, you're

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>saying that I Trump currently has owes as much as

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>six hundred and fifty million dollars. So that's a lot

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of money that he has. Be's a lot of money

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that he has at stake here potential for just a

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>quickly potential for reinstituting a glass Stiegel as a replacement

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>for Dodd Frank. You know, Trump has said all sorts

0:05:56.520 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of varying things about bank regulation, regulatory reform, Elizabeth Warren

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 1>of all people today, so that she'd love to allie

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>with him on some of this. So who would have

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>ever thought that Donald Trump and Elizabeth Warren would wind

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>up as strange bedfellows. So we're gonna have a lot

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 1>of wait and see on him in public policy. Thank

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you very much. Timothy O'Brien, Executive editor Bloomberg, Gadfly and

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg View. He is also the author of the book

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump Nation. I'm Pim Fox along with Lisa Abramowitz. This

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. I want to turn our attention now to

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Dodd Frank legislation. Nathan Dean is our government analyst for

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. He joins us, Now, bank stocks have had

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.799
<v Speaker 1>a great run over the last five days. A city

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>group up seven and a half percent, Golden Sacks of fourteen,

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley up fifteen, JP Morgan up twelve. Tell us

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>about the future of Dodd Frank, Nathan Dean, So, the

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>future of Dodd Frank is that it's going to get weakened. Uh.

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>You know now that we have President elect Donald Trump,

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a Republican Senate and a Republican House. UH, Congress is

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to push forth many of the

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>changes that they wanted to do for the last couple

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of years on dot frank. And they're going to weaken it. Well,

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>but what are the changes that they want to make?

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So they can't repeal it and they can't get rid

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of anything material, so vocal rule, for example, they can't

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>do that because you need sixty votes in the Senate

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to overcome a Democratic filibuster. But what they're gonna do

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>is there's a plan out in Congress right now called

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the Financial Choice Act. You pay ten percent of the LIBERATORYTIO,

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>so increased capital requirements buy the out of dot frank. UH.

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>And another rule that we're going to see, the fiduciary

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>duty rule at the Department of Labor. We expect that

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to get weakened. Uh. And so you're gonna see targeted

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>relief to certain sectors of the financial services industry small

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>mid sized banks round two or fifty billion in assets

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and below, asset managers, insurers, But you're not going to

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>see like a global repeal of dot frank. Nathan, just

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>go back for just a second. I want to want

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you to recast maybe just offer that detail about if

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you pay the ten percent at and if you have

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that that capital cushion, then you get to opt out.

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>You can in a sense, you're pain to get out

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of Dodd Frank exactly. So there's this idea for higher

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>requiring coup requirements, less regulation. The planets out in Congress

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>right now, and it has to be reintroduced next year,

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>so it may look a little bit different. Requires the

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>big eight g cs, Bank America, JP, Morgan, etcetera. To

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>have a ten percent leverage ratio right now, they're around

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>six now. Chairman Henseling estimates that in order to get

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>from six to eight a six to ten, those eight

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>banks would have to pony up about three D five

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion in new capital. Now that's a pretty high

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>price to pay. But if you go further down the line,

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 1>you start looking at the banks that are around fifty

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>billion in assets, ten billion assets, many of them are

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>already at that leverage ratio. So, uh, this Financial Choice

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Act really does favor the small and community sized banks.

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's you know, it's sort of interesting. I think

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>when I talk to people. Their impression is that UH

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and Mr Trump will roll back the majority of the

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Dodd Frank Act, and that include dudes much more risk

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>taking at the big banks, and that's one reason why

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>people are expecting profitability to go up. And yet it

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>sounds like that's not necessarily the case. Well, there are

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>many ways that they can do this. So for two

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>things to point out. One, the Republicans have tried over

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a times since two thousand ten to amend dot Frank.

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>They haven't succeeded because they've never been able to get

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that sixty vote in the Senate. Elizabeth warrened she's going

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to be able to cause a lot of problems in

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.239
<v Speaker 1>the Senate and block a lot of that big regulation. However,

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump now controls the financial regulators, and so he

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>can instruct the new heads of the SEC, se IFDC, UH,

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you know the Photo Reserve, when if Janet Yen leaves

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>into thousand eighteen to start looking at rolling back regulation

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and so UH, they can do things like putting out

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>notices saying that we're not going to enforce certain regulations,

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to hold you accountable. So I think

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>if you see in the short term, you're not going

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to see a lot of change, but in the long

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>term you're gonna see a lot more. Is there a

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 1>particular regular lation that you're thinking they could sort of

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>ignore or pushed to the side. The fiduciary duty is

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the perfect example. So this rule came up from the

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Labor Department. Uh. It caused a lot of problems with

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the life insurance industry, the broker dealers, the retirement investment advisors,

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>lots of pushback both from the Democrats, some Democrats and Republicans.

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Rule went into forest compliances in April. So what we

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>could see there is, uh, the new administration come out

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>put out a notice in March saying you don't have

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to comply, and then they'll have to repropose the rule. Uh.

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, any regulation, it's not like Donald Trump can

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>come in on day one, just sign an executive order

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and it goes away. They have to repropose it. And

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>so the quickest way to overturn a regulation is to

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>have Congress passidents law. But if they can't do it

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and they turn to the regulatory agencies, they have to

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>do a rulemaking process, which could take up the eighteen

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>months to two years Nathan non bank financial institutions such

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>as A I G, Met Life, Prudential Financial what can

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>we expect there? So, the Financial Stability or Recite Council

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is the one that controls the designation for A I

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>G and Prudential and met UH. And they serve at

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the pleasure of the Secretary of the Treasury. They can't

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>do anything unless the Treasury Secretary signs off on it.

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>And now the Secretary Treasury is going to serve at

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the pleasure of Donald Trump. And so when A I

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>G and Prudential have their annual reviews over their city status,

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>which which will take place sometime in the September of

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>October of two thousand seventeen, UH, it's not unlikely to

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>see at that time the f stocks say we're just

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>going to d designate you. You know, there's a lot

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 1>of talk about town. Is the f stock going to

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>be finished or not? Uh? And one of the easiest

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>ways to get rid of that that designation for AI

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>G and Prudential is to have the f stock do

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.439
<v Speaker 1>it in you know, later next year. Have the Republicans

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 1>been against the city a designation just real quick, yes, absolutely,

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>across the board, really really interesting Nathan dean government analyst

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Intelligence in Washington, d C, talking about the

0:11:53.480 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>implications UH in a Donald Trump administration. Well, our benchmark.

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>When we want to know anything about the retail industries,

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we call Bert Flickinger. He's the managing director a Strategic

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Resource Group. He can be followed on Twitter at Bert

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>underscore Flickinger. Alright, Bert underscore Flickinger, tell me about the

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>retail ice age that you've most recently witnessed. There's an

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>accelerating retail ice age, PIM and Lisa, and you're going

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to see a record number of bankruptcies UH for retailers.

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing the corporate bond debt trade down for everyone

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>from Neiman Marcus trading at eight year below most of

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>your listeners know issued in a hundred jay cruise trading

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>below forty searies is really struggling. And even today you

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and Lisa talked about the Southsayer of South Korea and

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the magic purses. The rasputant of retail is in the

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 1>headlines today and Bill Ackman, as he left j C

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Penney on death store step dropped the stock from forty

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>three to about a dollar twenty and then Steve sat off,

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the pride of Hamilton's College and sex fifth Avenue came back,

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>brought Penny back from the dead. They missed today, but

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna make it where a lot of their competitors

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>like the Bonton Uh as well as Sears Holdings which

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>still has softer side of Sears, are struggling, and even

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Neiman Marcus Group with Jones Barney their bonds are trading

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 1>at eighty year below. So there's gonna be a real

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 1>rationalization whether companies are impaired by RASP mutants like Bill

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Ackman or just poor consulting and financial advice. Well, and

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you noted that will be the most troubling year for

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>retail in a decade, and not to be outdone, eighteen

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>will be worth Why well, Lisa, and you you, you

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and PIM already reported declining oil prices. So so for us,

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the Harbinger is really Kazakhstan where Hudson Bay Company opener

0:13:55.960 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Brand was not expecting that the Harbingers her list to travel.

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>But go ahead, but tell us this story because Hudson

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Bay owns a fifth SAX with SAX with the Avenue

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>put their latest Crown Crown jewel license store uh in Kazakhstan.

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I know from our work with the State Department in USA.

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:17.079
<v Speaker 1>It was only a few years ago where people were

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>showing up on Saturdays with livestock and butcher butchering cattle

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>on their cars and selling pieces of meat, and State

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Department was asking us to come up with basic retail.

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>How you get to that luxury goods is beyond me.

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>But Sachs did at Harvey Nichols did at Harvey Nichols

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>closed their Kazakhstan store in less than a hundred days.

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>What's what's the barometer? The petro dollars aren't there. We

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>were in Paris for Fashion Week as well as Golden Week.

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>All the people from their maz to Le um Le

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Bon Marche. Printon told us the Sinoa, which your listeners

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>know as the Chinese, are there with cameras or calculators,

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>just snapping pictures and looking for a lower price. And

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>his pen reference in the b break. You can go

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to every luxury offline retailer. And that's why Neiman Marcus,

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>with its mountain of debt with Bergdorf, is in a

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>bad position for for maybe eighteen but Barney's is an

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>even worse position for seventeen and Jay Crew possibly for

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>this Christmas, Hanka and Kansas. How do you square the

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>sudden surgeon optimism about growth in the US and the

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>possibility of inflation. And frankly, the more that markets gain,

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the more that the wealthiest people will will gain money

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that they can spend at these at these retailers. So

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>why isn't this a positive? It's it's a positive in

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of the stock market. The wealth effect is your

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>referenced well, Lisa, but but but at the end, uh,

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you also have political problems. Mayor Michael Bloomberg under understood

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the balance of the public and private sector. Average family

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>takes four hours and forty minutes to come from the

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>suburbs the shop in Midtown Manhattan and Los Angeles, Mischigan

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>have Chicago with the traffic density, and the major cities

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in the US, UH, sevent of that time's lofts and traffic,

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>So people don't come anymore. So footfalls way down for

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>leading department stores and and luxury stores and all of

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>what we call the gateway cities. And it's not unique

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to Los Angeles or Vancouver, New York, or Miami at

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Aventure Mall. It's something we're seeing in Singapore and and

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>uh we're seeing in in Tokyo and and worldwide. And

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>also people have expenses coming up, So it's the aspirational

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>middle class. It's the middle upper UH that is has

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>everything from higher healthcare to tuition. So they're cutting back

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>on retail spending UH spending spending in other areas. And

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>then you have the millennials who even if they have

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>good jobs and have the money, UH, there are nesting

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>or what we call thrift ng and going to UH

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>savers or good wealth thrift stores or ladies ladies village

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>home improvement stores. So you could out to towns like

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>East Hampton and luxury retails not just boarded up. In

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>the faller of the Winner, it's largely boarded up. In

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>part of the summer, Tiffany had to close their store

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>um uh and a number of others closer stores. So

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>there'll be a great retail rationalization in the next few years.

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>To your point, but there'll be a real retail renaissance

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>starting in and really well capitalized capable retailers are win

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 1>particularly the ones with great merchant leaders. So who's that

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 1>who's it going to be? Who are the winners? Uh?

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>We we see, we see the winners across sector. Uh,

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 1>multi multi tier. It'll be Kroger, off Price, dollar dollar General,

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>t J t J, t j X, Cross stores early.

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>If you look at your point him the best leader

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>in retailer retailers Ben Camorados, a seminal genius founder of

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>t j X, with Carol Meyer, Woods and Ernie Herman. Uh,

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>their margins are twice as biggest Amazon. Their inventory turns

0:17:59.920 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>or six times. The rest of the department stores are

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>turning inventory two point three to two point seven times.

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>It's cash flow. The department stores are paying Uh, many

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of them are paying their vendors late. So the vendors

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 1>need cash to give to Lean fong in their factors,

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>less credit available exactly, Well, right, Bert, So then I'll

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>ho about on the flip side. I mean you said

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that there could be, was it correct? A record number

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of bankruptcies and retail in the upcoming years. So which

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>companies do you expect to go bankrupt? It's uh, you

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>never you never want to say it's it's all the

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>way over. But it looks like vulnerable. You could just

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>say which ones are vulnerably vulnerable to the curtain coming down?

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>So when the day Dumas stage. For lease day Dumas

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>stage is everybody from Jay Crew to Sears holding UH

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Bontan's trade traded way down, uh Neiman, Marcus Berg Door's

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>credit worthy now, but but see issues for them going forward.

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 1>And then UM yeah, even even undercapitalized on the on

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the low end, UH Fred's seems seems to be struggling

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit. And and then UM chain drug discount

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 1>shop COO. Wherever you see private equity getting greedy and

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 1>up streaming money to themselves, UH and big fees and

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's my professional view of Bill Ackman UH

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>in retail and won't comment on what he's done more

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>recently at Valiant. But when you have a great turnaround

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>leader like UM our mutual friend Frank Blake at Home

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Depot Bob near Delhi half killed the company, the UH

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>three founders Marcus blank Et Cetera brought Blake in and

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>UH complete upside Bert Clicking Share managing director at Strategic

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Resource Group on all things retail. This is Bloomberg Einstein's

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>The Greatest miss Stake, The Life of a Flawed Genius.

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>It was published in September and the author of the

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>book David bodenis it joins us now from London. David,

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for being with us. Thank you sir. Now.

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Your previous books have included such titles as E equals

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>MC squared. You've also written about computer generated fascism. What

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>inspired you to write this latest book, Einstein's Greatest Mistake?

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought, you know, if you write a book called

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Einstein is smarter than us and we're a bunch of

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>dumb schmunks, nobody's interested in that. But if you have

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a book that's like, oh, Paul Einstein, he had something

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>wrong because there was a psychological aspect of him that

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>we could understand when everybody's interested, including this author. I

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>loved um turning him into a human being and really

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing not just his great strength, which were magnificent, but

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>also what happened when he stumbled? How did he get stuck?

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>And what lessons does it give us? So what was

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>his biggest mistake? Because because stake, it was a psychologic

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>most it was a psychological mistake. He he believed that

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the universe was like a beautiful, clear book, that everything

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>was crisp and clear, that there was an order. It

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like a random magazine with a bit of this

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>and a bit of that. Um, And then he had

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>had so much reason for believing this. It made all

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.199
<v Speaker 1>sorts of sense about outer space. It led to notions

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of the expanding universe, just terrific insights that later when

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>people started studying things on the microscual on the micro

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>small level and quantum mechanics, which seem to be just

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.679
<v Speaker 1>that the universe isn't orderly, that it isn't super clear

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and crisp when you analyze. He just couldn't accept it.

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>You know. He he had this comment, God does not

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 1>play dice. Was he a religious person? Um? If you

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>if you make a sort of just I could to

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>say about that comment. So yeah, so Einstein said God

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>does not play dice with the universe. Everything's orderly and clear,

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a pattern set up in advance. And this good

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>friend Nell's boy used to say, Einstein, stop telling God

0:21:56.320 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 1>what to do, Like, how do you know it's great? Um?

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>So for religion. If Einstein he wasn't an atheist, He

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>thought atheism was very unscientific it um, you know, like

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you're presuming to know too much. At the other hand,

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't a believer in traditional like the details of

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>revealed religion. So he would think that Moses was very wise,

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>But he didn't think that Moses got the commandments from

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>gathering on Sinai. But there's a big space in between.

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And uh, Einstein loves the seventeenth century death Jewish philosopher Spinoza.

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>He thought, Spinoza, what what wrote about this? These waiting

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>patterns in the universe, not presuming to say where they

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.640
<v Speaker 1>came from, but just thinking, how magnificent is it that

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>there's instead of chaos and disorder around us, there's this harmony.

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>There's these patterns. Where do they come from? Maybe maybe

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>really floatful human beings can just discern that pattern, take

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>away the veil between us and deepest reality and see

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>what's there. And Einstein really wanted to do that. Can

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you maybe draw some connection to the way people look

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>at the markets and and money because you talk about

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>patterns and being able to understand the patterns and the

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.479
<v Speaker 1>and the moves is there. Can you define the difference

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>between a psychological mistake and a technical mistake that might

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>be applied to looking at the world of business and finance? Sure,

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>very much. The reason Einstein got stuck in his psychological

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>mistake was because his particular approach had been really successful before.

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And if something's worked really well, if your company has

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 1>done well, you tend to think it's because of my approach,

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.959
<v Speaker 1>my approach to the markets, my insight. Well, it might

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>actually just be chats, right, I mean, that's why tracker

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>funds on a simple level have done so well. So

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>very often people get not just so much a ruther

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of failure, but a rut of success. You're doing something

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 1>well and it's really hard to change it because it's

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>been very successful. The other thing that comes from Einstein

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>which might apply to the markets is he developed his

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>own tools, which is a great thing to do for him.

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 1>It was certain tools and mathematics. Within the markets, it

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>might be I don't know, certain quantitative people would brings

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>in or certain analytic approaches, and you become really proud

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>of your tools. You get good at using your tools,

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and you find it hard to imagine what would be

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>like using very very different tools. And then of course

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>behind it all is maybe what was your your first question?

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 1>If you believe, like Spinoza and Einstein, there's a deep

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 1>patterns waiting in the universe, you're not going to give

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>up till you find them. And some people, you know,

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>it always comes up. Somebody has this guaranteed way to understand,

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.719
<v Speaker 1>which appears to be turbulence in the market actually follows

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>such and such deep patterns, and we're very often disappointed.

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Those those in tights tend not to hold for more

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>than than temporary intervals. But just that belief is there,

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>and that belief, well, you can move a lot of

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.439
<v Speaker 1>money on that belief. Well, you know, one sort of

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>cliche about Einstein is that he took a long time

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to read and didn't do so well in school and um,

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and so what can we learn from where he was

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a genius? And is that true? Oh, it turns out

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that the story that Einstein was a bad students I've

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>managed to trace it back to Rocky one and written

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:02.959
<v Speaker 1>by Sylvester Stallone. And although Mr Stallone had magnificent biceps

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and um, other muscles, he's not noted as an Einstein scholar.

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out Einstein was actually einesteme was a

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>perfectly good student. Um, he was a good beat plus

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>or a minor students. He went to the Polytechnic in Zurich.

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>He did fail to get in on his first tribe.

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 1>But he's only sixteen, he hadn't even finished high school,

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and his scores and math and physics were strong, but

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>his his Latin and some of his friend led him down.

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>And he did quite well after a year of media

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>high school. So he was a strong student. But it's

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>nice is that he wasn't a perfect student. He wasn't

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>like oh an a plus student from Harvard or Columbia

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>who's always had the things easy. So Einstein got used

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to looking at things with a bit of a struggle.

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>So he was I don't want to call him a

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>total outsider. He was a moderate outsider. And there's a

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>great advantage as being a moderate outsider. You know what's

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>going on, but you're kind of willing that, you're kind

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of willing to take a fresh perspective. David bodanis author

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:55.719
<v Speaker 1>of Einstein's Greatest Mistake. Joining us from London. Thank you

0:25:55.760 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>so much. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg pien L podcast.

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>out there on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm out there

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio