WEBVTT - FINAL NFL Week 11 Bets: Seahawks-Rams, Bucs-Bills, Lions-Eagles, Ravens-Browns, Cowboys-Raiders and more

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Sharpers Square, presented by hard Rock Bat. We

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>are part of the Volume podcast network. This is the

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>show that makes the squares sharper and makes the wise

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.039
<v Speaker 1>guys pay attention. I am Chad Milman, I am joined

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>as always buy my co host, my companion, my bff,

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>professional better Simon Hunter HEADO Solomon, Chad.

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Are we doing?

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>We got a glorious morning in which we get to

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>watch football all freaking day. This is the strip down

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>in the room eavesdropping version of Sharper's Square. We're gonna

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>make some picks. We're gonna nail down the final five

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that we love based on the latest news and information

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and how lines have been moving. Some quirkiness happen on

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>out there. Are you ready, brother?

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 2>I am ready, all right.

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>First game up Cincinnati at Pittsburgh five at hard Rock

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Bat five and a half. Everywhere else. I bet into

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it at five and a half. I'm a little surprised

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't moved to five everywhere else because it looks

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>like the money is coming in on Cincinnati. I still

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 1>really like it at five and a half.

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Are you with me?

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you.

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm a little weary of it, but I'm going to

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 4>join you. I just I never understood this number all week.

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 4>Like I always said, the books aren't giving us extra

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 4>free points, but feels like in this game they are.

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, it's really a bet on Joe Flacco on

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 4>this offense and just how they match up and.

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 2>We're both the same boat.

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 4>We just we do not trust this defense where where

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 4>they're going to burn us here, but the hope is

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 4>Flacco will always have us an opportunity to get this

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 4>back door.

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 2>So once again this number. I don't know what the

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 2>books you're doing.

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 4>Here, but they really believe in this Pittsburgh side. I

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 4>just can't get to the fact they'll overrated this Pittsburgh defenses.

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, we just have not seen any evidence

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>from either defense this year that they can stop anybody.

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And this isn't even about Aaron Rodgers against the Chargers

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>last week, because those are always going to happen and

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>then there will be bounced back games and if you're

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>ever going to get healthy and look right again, it's

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>against the Cincinnati Bengals defense. To me, I am one

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent betting against the Steelers defense and betting on

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>T Higgins. Jamaar Chase being able to find ways to

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 1>get downfield against a really, really really bad Steelers defensive backfield.

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Cincinnati Bengals plus five and a half if

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you can find it, which you should be able to.

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>We're on the Bengals. Houston at Tennessee. We had said

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the week, get Houston. Right now the line

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>is five and a half. We had said, get Houston

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>once it gets under seven. I got a bad number.

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I bet Houston minus six and a half, even though

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I knew Davis Mills was going to be playing. I'm

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>a little surprised that went further, from six and a

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>half to five and a half. Does this give you

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>pause with the Texans.

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the biggest part gives you pause. I'm sure

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 2>it gives you pause as well.

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 4>It's been never ending amount of money right now coming

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 4>in on this Houston side, and the number has dropped,

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 4>like Chad just said, from seven and a half it's

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 4>open to now five and a half, which we always

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 4>say is such a key number. So the books are

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 4>kind of telling us they think Tennessee has a way

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 4>bigger chance to win this game than I gave them

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 4>any type.

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Of credit for. I just I still don't get how

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna.

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 4>Move and score against this defense, and how they're going

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 4>to stop what he marks and their run game of Houston.

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 4>So I always say there's certain games I'm just missing

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 4>and I'm overreading, and there's things I'm not looking at

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 4>right and this must be one of those games.

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 2>But I'm with you, like.

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm betting Houston taking a position on Houston. Just a

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 4>little nervous that there's something here I'm missing because clearly

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 4>the books and professionals have taken a stand on this

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 4>Tennessee team here.

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't get it either. What about this offense

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden it makes them think they're going

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to be able to move the ball down I just

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>keep thinking about that Chargers game two weeks ago when

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>they covered the game. But that's because they got a

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>pick six in the first quarter and then a punt

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>return in the first quarter, and the Chargers had every

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>chance to still cover that minus nine and a half

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and they gave up the back door field goal at

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the end. This is a bad offense. It cannot move

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 1>the ball, and it's going against probably the most elite

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>defense right now, the most complete defense in the NFL

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>with pascertain out for the Broncos.

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 3>So it's really really hard.

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I know it's Davis Mills, but even Davis Mills against

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>this defense has a better chance to me than cam

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Ward against the Texans defense. So yeah, we're still on

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Texans, and I guess we like it even

0:04:55.440 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>more now at five and a half, tricky Simon Tampa

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Bay Buccaneers, who we have been trying to figure out

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>all week. Why aren't we going all in on the

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Buccaneers? And then in the past twenty four hours,

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>this line has moved from five and a half to

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>six And that makes me glad that, like I haven't

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>bet the Buccaneers. You noted on the show on Thursday,

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield not really running the ball as much the

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>past few weeks, and that is to the detriment of

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that offense and his playmaking ability. I noted that without

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Bucket Irving, they have just been a different team and

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it impacts Baker's ability to use play action. Why do

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>we think this line is moving from five and a

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 1>half to six in the past twenty four hours?

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Is this public? Is this the wise guys? What's your take?

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 4>I think the public and the wise guys have been

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 4>betting Buffalo for the most part, and you know this

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 4>is really about the number. Right at five and a half,

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.359
<v Speaker 4>that's definitely a Bill's number. And you've seen the resistance

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 4>of the six. We did our show, I believe it

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 4>was Thursday's show where the number had hit six at

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 4>the rand of our showed a couple of books and

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 4>then literally by the time we posted all them, we're

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 4>back to five and a half.

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 2>So there has been resistance all week to the six.

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 4>But like you said, he woke up today and a

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 4>ton of books are showing six something even six and

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 4>a half, So.

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 4>I guess the proser it's finally coming on the bills,

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 4>And like I told you, there's I feel like we

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 4>have a lot of missing information right now in Baker

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 4>and the Bucks and what kind of.

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Injury he abstained, and I don't know what to do

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 2>with this one. Chad.

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 4>It's another game where I was, like you, very confident

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 4>Sunday on the Bucks, and every show we've done it's

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 4>gotten less.

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 2>I ended up not taking a position.

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 4>I did take a position all on them, but nin

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 4>as big as I thought when I really started diving

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 4>to the Baker stuff, and I haven't bet a dollar

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 4>more in this game. I honestly thought today i'd flipped

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 4>and maybe get to the bills, and I'm still not there.

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 4>I still just want to bet on Baker, especially now

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 4>that's at six. So maybe not a game we'll play

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 4>in the contest where personally I will be on the bucks.

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I have not been a dollar on this game, like

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>I want to be on the box. Maybe I'll just wait,

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'll wait and see if it gets to

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>six and a half. But like with the way the

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>money is moving, it may get there. But I've been

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been hesitating all week and I feel like if

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>there's something holding me back, there's no reason for me

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to pull the trigger because I get antsy. On Sunday

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Seattle at the Los Angeles Rams. The Los Angeles Rams

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>are three point favorites. This was our Brass Balls Better

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the Week presented by Hard Reck Bet. We're both on

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the Rams here. Here's what's making me nervous, and it's

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>got nothing to do with anything we talked about on

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the field. It's only because Matthew Stafford is just getting

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>glaized this week, like.

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Every single day.

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>There's something new about how Matthew Stafford is playing at

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>an MVP level, how he's getting all the accolades and

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>attention that he should have been getting for years.

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 3>So much media love. I feel like we've been chased.

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 4>It could be it's our biggest public player of the week,

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 4>but I think you stick to what we love. We

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 4>love this matchup for them. This is a great matchup

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 4>with US offense. Defensively, It's interesting how Sam Darnall reacts

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 4>to a really tough defensive front, and you know, a

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 4>defense that can be passed on if San Darnold has

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 4>the games he's been having. Yeah, chat, we might get

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 4>burned here, but one we're getting a great number, still

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 4>getting the three at hard Rock, and a lot of

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 4>books have moved to three and a half, and us

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 4>personally for our contest it's two and a half.

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know how we can avoid it. It's

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 2>great numbers.

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 4>We love the matchup, and the only neg thing I

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 4>can think of is just feels like it's very public,

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 4>Like the public is all over the rams but sort

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 4>of the pros. But I really thought the Seattle Seahawks

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 4>would be the public darling of the week, but it

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 4>looks like it's gonna be Detroit taking that dog that

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 4>the public really loves.

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 2>So it's it's.

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 4>Interesting watching the line movement. Like we talked, there's a show.

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 4>It was three at hard Rock. Three and a half,

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 4>got touched up a bunch of books, including hard Rock,

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 4>and they immediately got bet down. So we talk all

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 4>the time. There's some really sharp groups that use hard rock.

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 4>They clearly are taking a stand at Seahawks at three

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 4>and a half. They feel like that's too much. We

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 4>love them at three even better. We get a two

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 4>and a half in our contest, So I just I

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 4>don't know how we avoid this one.

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 2>I really love this number.

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, Los Angeles Rams, we're on them at three,

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore at Cleveland, this was Chat's choice. At eight and

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a half, it's at eight at hard Rock. Still a

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of seven and a half's out there, which is

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>surprising to me. I thought by now we'd start seeing

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot more money coming in on the Ravens and

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 1>pushing this number back up to eight and a half.

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I've loved it all week, haven't found a reason not

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:51.839
<v Speaker 1>to love it. It's the right spot. We've talked about

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the Browns at home. Just a reminder since the beginning

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of last season, where there's been a tremendous split for

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the Browns at home and the Browns away twenty points

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 1>at home, twenty points per game at home, thirty points

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>per game on the road. They give up about thirty

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>percent fewer rushing yards at home than they do on

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the road, about ten percent fewer passing yards at home

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>than they do on the road. It's just a different

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>defense at home. And this is a big number. So

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm still for better for worse. I'm still

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>all in on the Cleveland Browns.

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and Cleveland, though there's a lot of dogs this

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 4>week that Cleveland feels like it's the same one where

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 4>we see, just like you people, we see a thousand

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 4>different ways me and check and easily get burned on

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 4>this bet. And of course that's life when you're betting

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 4>really bad quarterbacks with bad teams.

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 2>But like we say at the time, we're just trying

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 2>to play the number.

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 4>Situationally, doesn't feel like it's a great spot for the Ravens.

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 4>On the flip side, for the Browns, they've been on

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 4>an absolute role of being just terrible on the road.

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 4>Now they're finally back home in a great match for them.

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 4>So it's it's really about the number. If this was

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 4>down to six and a half, seven, maybe we could

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 4>talk ourselves out of this, But like Chad said, it's

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 4>up to eight and now hard Rock, you know we're

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 4>suckers for anything over seven and a half, especially with

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 4>the hook. I wish I could still use the stat

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:11.439
<v Speaker 4>which we had been using all year, which is basically

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 4>home dogs greater than seven points through the first nine weeks,

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 4>it's like eighty percent clip they hit at But unfortunately

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 4>chatted his week eleven, that stat no longer matters, so.

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 2>I can't use it. But the thought process doesn't change here.

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 4>Right, It's an undervalued home dog going against an overrated

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 4>team on the road.

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Usually these spots really work out for us. Right.

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 4>The biggest worry here is who is healthy for Cleveland

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 4>in that running backfield. Who's gonna be carrying the ball here,

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 4>because we're not gonna win this on the quarterbacks arm.

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 4>We're gonna need a really staunch run game against a

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.319
<v Speaker 4>Ravens defense as suspect against their run. So love this

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 4>match up for them, lamar I said, I was never

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 4>gonna trust their coach. I was gonna wait to what

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 4>the B writers said about him. Apparently he was fully

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 4>go in practice, it was just a rest Dagg giving

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 4>him some days off because he took so many hits

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 4>I guess in that Vikings game. So nothing to worry

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 4>about if you if you are back in the Ravens

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 4>and worried about the more. But on the flip side,

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 4>for us, I still think he's not moving quite like

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 4>he was before the injury. Like you didn't going back

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 4>and watching that Vikings game, you never feel like he

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 4>fully went full speed because he just does.

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 2>Not trust that hamstring.

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 4>So in this type of matchup against Miles Garrett and

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 4>that defensive front, I just I love it for us

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 4>in so many different ways. So yeah, it's there's an

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 4>eight out there, like chets at a hard rock. I

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 4>don't won't be scared off if you go get to

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 4>seven and a half. I don't see his landen on eight.

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 4>I think seven and a half is plenty of points

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 4>in this matchup.

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, we're in on the Cleveland Browns. I love him.

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 3>We get funky like that.

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Detroit at Philadelphia. Philadelphia is a two and a half

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>point favorite. This Simon is our Rock and a hard

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Place Bet of the Week presented.

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 3>By hard Rock Bet Rock.

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Look, you just talked Detroit is becoming the public dog

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>for the week. It's probably what's been tamping down this

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 1>number and keeping it at two and a half at

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock. It's starting to move to three in some

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>other places. That tells me that the professionals are finally

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>coming in full force on Philadelphia here. Lots of reasons

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:26.359
<v Speaker 1>to like the Eagles, lots of reasons to like the Lions.

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go with what we've been talking about

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.719
<v Speaker 1>all week. I know people are saying there's stories every

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>day that there are problems with this Eagles offense. To me,

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>they are different than the problems last year. The problems

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>last year seemed like Jalen Hurts was lacking confidence. Jalen

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Hurst does not seem to be lacking confidence this year.

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts seems to be playing a very conservative type

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of football where he is doing what he needs to

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 1>do to get his team in a position to win.

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>That puts them in a position to win a close

0:13:57.679 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>game against a very good team by a field goal.

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 3>The flip side, the Lions have.

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 1>So many injuries again on defense that it's going to

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>be hard for them to execute as they normally would

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>against still a very very good Eagles offense.

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.479
<v Speaker 3>So we're on the Eagles.

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and this should be a gut right spot for

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 4>this Eagles offense. I just talked about their whole secondary

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 4>feels like it's out for Detroit and now you have

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 4>backups in one on ones against aj Guy iView as

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 4>a top five receiver and Demonte Smith.

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 2>The iView is a top ten, top fifteen receivers.

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 4>So if Hurts can't get it right here with the OC,

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 4>this is this is gonna eventually. I'm gonna say it's

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 4>going to start becoming a problem because it's it's November

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 4>at this point, Like it doesn't matter in September, October.

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 4>You're working through stuff. It's getting a little late here.

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 4>And I know I gave him the dry air excuse.

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Last week in the cold.

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah that was crazy.

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 2>It's true though.

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Again it's if you played sports, you know it's hard

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 4>to grip a ball in dry, cold air like that.

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 4>And I feel the same here where it's like it's

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 4>nice weather here in Jersey, it's gonna be football weather.

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if it's not gonna be in the

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 4>twenties or in the teams like it was in Green Bay.

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know if Hert's going to have that excuse.

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 4>And the flip side the lines offensively, I just think

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 4>that offensive line I still have so many questions about

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 4>them and the injuries they've had this season. This is

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 4>gonna be a real test for them against this Eagles

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 4>defensive front that was just flying last week? Is that

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 4>going to carry throughout the season? Look we've seen with

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 4>Fangs defense. Once they get rolling, once the guys are

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 4>comfortable in the defense like last year, they become unstoppable.

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 4>And that's why he is such an at importan piece

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 4>that Eagles team, that being a defensive coordinator.

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 2>So love this matchup.

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 4>Like we talked the pros, the ones that I can

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 4>talk to there on the Lions, this is to them

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 4>a Lion spot right. All the trends, all the numbers

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 4>point to it. Eagle is super dysfunctional right now. While

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 4>on the flip side, it feels the lines are rolling.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 4>But I still think people are viewing this Lion's team

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 4>as if it is a Ben Johnson run team. Offensively,

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 4>and then their defense does have healthy guys right now.

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 4>I just they just don't feel like the same team

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 4>that people are building up to be right now Detroit.

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 4>So again, no destruction with Detroit. I just don't think

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 4>they are a top two, top three team the NFC,

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 4>which this is what people are acting like they are

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 4>right now, and they can't believe they're a two and

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 4>a half point dog against this Eagles team. So it's

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 4>not shocking to see the public love for them so much.

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 4>But like Chad said, I am shocked this number hasn't

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 4>it three. Maybe it will by kickoff, but I just

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 4>think there's so much public love for the lines. Even

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 4>when people hear this, I believe you'll still gob to

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 4>get the two and a half.

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I don't think the Eagles are dysfunctional.

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I think this is exactly functional.

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 3>For the Eagles. This is just how they operate. Dallas

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 3>at Las Vegas.

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>This is a Monday night game. It was three and

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a half. This was Simon says, it's moved down to three.

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you were a little nervous about it on Thursday.

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>You're probably feeling better about it today. But the question

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is when we get to the other side of the break.

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Will this be one of our final five?

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 2>If you have something you like better, you can throw

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 2>it in. I mean, I'm with you.

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 4>It's not great having two Mondays in a row in

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 4>our contest. It's it's always weird going to sleep and

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 4>waking up and having another sweat for the show on

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 4>the Monday. But just about the number, I love the

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 4>number here happiest year. It came down because I couldn't understand,

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 4>I gain why the public re betting the Cowboys. I

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 4>did not know why professionals were acting like two guys

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 4>coming off injury reserved and joining the Cowboys defense was

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 4>going to save this team in such.

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 2>A big upgrade.

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 4>So I was just worried there was something I was missing,

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 4>And luckily, like Jeed said, the number has come down.

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.479
<v Speaker 4>Don't buy here though, if you're buying the Raiders, there

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 4>are so many three and a halfs. Don't don't just

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 4>take the plus three, get the hook.

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Get we need the hook.

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 4>With Genus Smith, So chop around five to three and

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 4>a half. But yeah, there's a couple of games this

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 4>week that could have gone either way. Luckily I didn't

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 4>give out the wrong one right The Broncos. They're up

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 4>to four and a half now, like that was a

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 4>game I was wavering on JK.

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Dobbins on IR.

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:59.120
<v Speaker 1>There's some other issues going on there, so it's been moving. Yeah.

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 4>And just again I feel like I dodge a bullet

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 4>there going the Raiders over that, because it's like, man,

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 4>if we're sitting here right now in the Raiders for

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 4>plus four and a half, I would have felt like

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 4>an idiot given him out on Tuesday. So luckily we've

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.239
<v Speaker 4>given out the best of the number. Hopefully people got it.

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 4>And matchup wise, we know Dallas is going to get Theirs.

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 4>I just I think Chip Kelly, this Raiders offense, this

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 4>is the exact spot you bounce back after extended rest

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 4>of that Denvery team against a future Dallas team that

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 4>just cannot stop the run, can stay out passes up

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 4>the seam, and that's.

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 2>Literally all the Raiders want to do.

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 4>Like, I'm not here to shoot on Chip Kelly, but

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 4>if you watch his offense, there's not much imagination to it.

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 4>He really does what geno strength is, which is just

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 4>pushing the ball downfield, up the middle of the field.

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 4>So I still love the matchup for them. The biggest

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 4>issue is I know you just do not like this

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:48.640
<v Speaker 4>Raiders team. You have not been betting this Raiders team.

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 4>So I'll try to convince on the other side, but

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 4>I get while you're hesitant about betting it.

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's do a quick message from hard Rock

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Bet and we'll come down to our final five. Today's

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>show is brought to you by our new presenting sponsor,

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock It's that time of year when every day

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>feels like a big game day. You've got Pro football,

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>college football, NBA, college hoopes, hockey, it's all happening. And

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>on hard Rock Bet, there's always something to bet on.

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't tried your first bet on hard Rock

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Bet yet, there's still time for you to get one

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets if you win.

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Just place a five dollars bet and if it hits,

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you get not only your winnings, but one hundred and

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars in extra bonus bets. And if you're not

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>sure what to place your first bet on, check out

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the hard Rock Bet stats Hub.

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 3>It's loaded with.

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Trends, streaks, and stats to help god your picks. Numbers

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>don't lie, and neither does the data in there. Here's

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>one that stood out to me again. Green Bay's Josh

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs has now scored a touchdown in fourteen straight games

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>versus NFC opponents. Check out the stats hub now, get

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the edge and bet with confidence. The hard Rock Bet

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 1>sportsbook app is the only legal sports book anytime you're

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in Florida, and it's also live in Arizona, Hio, New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois,

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and Colorado coming soon to more states too. Plus, hard

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Rock Bat offers new promos every single day, so whenever

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you're listening, just open the app and check out what

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got any day of the week. Download the hard

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Rock Bet app and make your first deposits payable in bonus.

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>BET's not a cash offer offered by the Seminole Tribe

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of Florida. In Florida, offered by Seminal hard Rock DIGITALLLC.

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>In all other states. Must be twenty one and over

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee,

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 1>or Virginia to play. Terms and conditions apply. Concerned about

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>gambling in Florida, call one eight three three play wise

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>in Indiana. If you were something you know as a

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>gambling problem and wants help, call one eight hundred and

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>nine with it gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, and Virginia.

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, berdy, let's talk about what we do like

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>and what we agree on. We do like the Rams.

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>We're going to play them. I think in the contest

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is two and a half. We've both been betting them

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>at two and a half and three. We clearly like

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland as an underdog seven and a half eight eight

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 1>and a half.

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 3>That is in.

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>We like the Eagles minus two and a half. We're

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>going to play that one. So we got three games

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that we know we like. We got one dog, two

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 1>short favorites at home, Cincinnati plus five and a half,

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and just.

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 4>So people don't freak out, Eagles are minus one and

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 4>a half in our contest.

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh got it even better.

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:43.360
<v Speaker 4>If it lands on two, we're gonna worry. I'm I'm

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 4>not winning the lot of rough. I'm losing a ton

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 4>of money if it lands on two. So I just

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 4>want to make sure people know it's one and a half.

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 1>Good to know, Good to know, Cincinnati plus five and

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a half, and it is five and a half in

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the contest, So yeah, if you want.

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 2>To be your baby Chad, you want to get it

0:21:58.200 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 2>in there. I got no issue with it.

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 4>Just checking the weather report Cincy Pittsburgh. Well, I mean,

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 4>we can talk of all the games affected by the

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 4>Lake effect win, but it's basically just what we saw

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 4>with that Green Bay game against the Eagles, right, it's

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 4>fifteen to twenty Promorro stayed wins thirty to thirty part

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 4>our gusts. So you know, this is the type of

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 4>game where it might not be a lot of kicking

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 4>field goals, we don't really care. We're expecting a lot

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 4>of touchdowns. So pretty interesting. The win is going to

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 4>be like that where I honestly think that benefits Cincy,

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.360
<v Speaker 4>Like that makes more randomness that I think will help

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 4>since the's defense hopefully in some ways.

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:34.479
<v Speaker 2>So I don't hate it.

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I just well, look, I think it's it's we got

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>we got three to choose two since he plus five

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half, Houston minus six and a half, the

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Raiders plus three and a half. If you feel that

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 1>strongly about the Raiders.

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:47.640
<v Speaker 3>We can go with it.

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I have no opinion on it, and I'm I have

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.199
<v Speaker 1>more of an opinion on the other two games, But

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>you don't seem to have an opinion on Cincinnati, Whereas

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we both feel like the Texans are the

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>right side.

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 2>They are.

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 4>I think it's just it's about the line movement and

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 4>our contest is seven and a half.

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 3>Forget it. I didn't know that.

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 4>I thought it was six and a half, Like that's

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 4>a that's a Tennessee line. No, I'm I'm having a tough, tough,

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 4>tough code this week because I do love the dogs

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 4>and we're both kind of grossed out by those dogs.

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 4>Like again, I'm I'm not here to force in Denver

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 4>because Denver is three and a half in our contest,

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 4>it's now four and a half.

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to force that one. In Cardinals is

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 2>an interesting game.

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 4>It's up to three and a half now, pretty first

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 4>start Jacksonville. I have to look see what that number is.

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:47.360
<v Speaker 4>That number has them budget all a week. Like there's

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 4>a couple of numbers like that that are just like

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 4>man as like as a professional, it's like, I think

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 4>I have to take these numbers like you said, we're

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 4>just we don't love them. That's the hardest part about

0:23:57.840 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 4>trying to get them as our five. It's like I

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 4>haven't bet into them like that to make them one

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 4>of my five.

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Were the Raiders.

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 4>I could take that stand, I guess, even though I

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 4>hate it, but I'm I bet it's the I bet

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 4>into it really heavy and it's a good number. I'm

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 4>gonna check right now first to make sure it's three

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 4>and a half in the contest, because at two and

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 4>a half, like we talked about, it's a it's a

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 4>not it's not in the contest or a conversation.

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, I wouldn't imagine that it is, because it's kind

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>of been three and a half from the day we

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>started talking about it.

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, it is all right. So this is what

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 4>I put in chat. I'll just give you what I

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 4>put in for us after a Thursday show. I put

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 4>an Eagles of minus one and a half, Cleveland plus

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 4>eight and a half, La minus two and a half.

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 4>I put your Sincion at plus five and a half,

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 4>and then I had Carolina and at plus three and

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 4>a half. Now, I still like Carolina, but like you

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 4>can tell, I'm not as confident as I was on

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 4>Thursday show. I just I just don't like the stuff

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 4>I've read and seen from Bryce shawng I out of

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 4>practice this week, but I still think it's such such

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 4>a huge number for an Atlanta team.

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 2>I just do not believe in to be favored in.

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you, I like I like the Panthers

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>more than I like the Raiders.

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so you want to do that, then just keep

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 4>it as I had it on Thursday.

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we didn't talk about we didn't talk about Yeah,

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>we didn't talk about the Panthers on the show at all.

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Just now, you and I both got a little bit

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 3>scared off because we did.

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>See some movement that worried us. I think in some

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 1>places this line has moved up to four, right.

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we.

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Were betting against the number that we talked about on Thursday,

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think you've probably been hearing some stuff and

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>I didn't like what I was seeing in the number.

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just don't have any faith in the Raiders.

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I could see brock Howers.

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 4>I know you hate them, but like with the way

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 4>we're set up right now, if you did, Carolina and

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 4>we would have two one pm games, both three road dogs,

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 4>which I love, and like I said, Arizona a team

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 4>might like it's two and a half, so like, that's

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 4>not going to force in there. And obviously Denver plus

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 4>three and a half, I'm not going to force in.

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, it's I'll put up to you if you

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 4>want to do. If you want to do Carolina over

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 4>the Raiders, let's do Carolina.

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 2>I can give you shift and I believe in this

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Raiders team once again.

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 3>I can't wait.

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>All right, So our final five are going to be

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 1>since A plus five and a half. The Rams are

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>two and a half in the contest. We still like

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 1>them at three if only people are only able to

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 1>get three.

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 3>We've betted at three.

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>The Cleveland Browns plus eight and a half in the contest,

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>there's mostly seven and a half's we still like it

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:45.159
<v Speaker 1>at seven and a half. It's Philadelphia minus one and

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a half in the contest. We have been betting it

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>at two and a half go ahead. We are not

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable with that. And then Carolina plus three and a half,

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 1>which you've been going back.

0:26:56.320 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 3>And forth on. But those are our final five.

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be back later on tonight to review

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>everything we've done today. All the misery, all the angst,

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>all the glory will be on Sharper Square YouTube seven

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>point thirty ish as soon as that last afternoon late

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>afternoon game ends. Watch or listen on YouTube at Sharper

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Square all the time.

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Like and subscribe to the channel.

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>You can download some Spotify Apple Pods where you get

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>your pods, rate review, subscribe, Levis five stars say whatever

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you want. Feedback is a gift until next time.

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 3>I love you.

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Hey, let's be careful