WEBVTT - Ep35  "What sticks in your brain and what doesn’t? "

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>If you take a look at a brain, how can

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you tell immediately if it belongs to a piano player

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>or a violinist? How can a dog learn to walk

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>on its rear legs like a human? And what does

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>this have to do with how you become an expert

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>at something? Or what would happen if Venus and Serena

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Williams had a hypothetical brother, Fred who hated tennis? And

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>how do governments respond to change just like brains do?

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:39.639
<v Speaker 1>And finally, why am I so optimistic about the brains

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>of digital natives. Welcome to the inner Cosmos with me

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.599
<v Speaker 1>David Eagleman. I'm a neuroscientist and author at Stanford and

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in these episodes we sail deeply into our three pound

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>universe to understand why and how our lives look.

0:00:58.360 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 2>The way they do.

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode is about brain plasticity, which is the ability

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of the brain to change and adapt throughout your life.

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>The word plasticity comes from the word plastic, which is

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a material that you can mold into any shape and

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 1>then it holds onto that shape. And that is what

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is impressive about brains. You can expose them to any

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of situation or experience, and they hold on to

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the change. The vast forest of neurons in your head,

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>These connections change their strength, and sometimes they unplug and

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>they seek around and they replug in somewhere else. It's

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a living forest of eighty six billion neurons in your head,

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and this constant reconfiguration, this is how you learn and remember.

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>The interesting part I want to address today is exactly

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>when these changes in the brain happened, because it's not

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Most of the stuff that happens in

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>your life makes no change at all to your brain.

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>So what's the difference between the stuff that sticks and

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that doesn't. So let's start today in Hungary

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:23.959
<v Speaker 1>with an educational psychologist named Laslow Polgar. The thing about

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Laslow is that he loves chess, and he's written some

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>well known chess books. But that's not the super interesting

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>thing about him. The super interesting thing is that he

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>got very interested in the theory of child rearing and

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>he believed quote, geniuses are made, not born. So he

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>started preparing himself for fatherhood even before he had a spouse,

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and he read the biographies of four hundred famous intellectuals

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>like Socrates and Einstein, and he noted that what they

0:02:55.880 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>all had in common is they started their intellectual pursuits

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>at a young age and they studied intensively. So he

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>concluded from this research the idea that he could, with

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the right effort, turn his future children into geniuses in

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a particular area which he and his wife could think

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>about and pick. So they considered various domains, but they

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>chose chess in part because the success of these children

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>could be easily measurable with chess. So he and his

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>wife had three daughters together, Susan, Sophia and Judete, and

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>he made the move, which was unusual in Hungary at

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the time, to homeschool them, and he taught them German

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and English and Russian and high level math, but he

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>primarily taught them chess from the moment that they were

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:48.119
<v Speaker 1>big enough to play with the pieces.

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 2>So what was the result.

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>By the time his eldest daughter, Susan turned fifteen years old,

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>she was the top ranked chess player in the world.

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen teen eighty six, she qualified for the men's

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>World Championship, which was a first time achievement for a female,

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and within five years she had earned the men's Grand

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Master title and then in the middle of Susan's astounding accomplishments,

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Her fourteen year old middle sister, Sophia, achieved fame for

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>her sack of Rome, which was her stunning victory at

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a tournament in Italy, which ranked as one of the

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>strongest performances ever by a fourteen year old. Sofia went

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>on to become an international master and a woman grand master.

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 2>And then there was.

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>The youngest sister, Judite, who is widely considered the best

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>female chess player on record. She achieved grand master status

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>at the tender age of fifteen years and four months,

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and she remains the only woman on the World Chess

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Federation's Top one hundred list, and for a while she

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>held a position in the top ten. So what accounts

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>for their success, Well, their parents trained the girls every

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>single day. They didn't just expose them to chess, they

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>fed them on chess.

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 2>The girls received hugs.

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>And stern looks and approval and attention based on their

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>chess performance, and as a result, their brains came to

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>have a great deal of circuitry devoted to chess. Now,

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in other episodes how the brain is always

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>rewriting itself in response to its inputs. But the fact

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 1>is that not all information streaming into the pipelines is

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 1>equally important. How brains adjust themselves has everything to do

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>with what you're spending your time on, and that's why

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the Polgar sisters became biological chess machines. And it's the

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>same thing with your brain. It'll reconfigure to whatever you're doing.

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you decide to make a career change to ornithology,

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the study of birds, more of your neural resources will

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>become devoted towards learning the subtle differences between birds, like

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 1>their wing shape, or their breast coloration, or their beak size,

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>while maybe previously your neural representation of birds with something

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>more crude, like is that a birder and airplane. So

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>let's dive in to unpack how the brain makes changes

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and when it doesn't, which will tell us everything we

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>need to know about how to make changes stick in

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>your own brain. There's a great story about the violinist

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Yetsak Pearlman after one of his concerts and admiring concertgoer

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>said to him, I would give my life to play

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>like that, and Pearlman said, I did, Now what did

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>he mean? Well, every morning, Pearlman drags himself out of

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>bed at five point fifteen. He takes a shower and batakfast,

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 1>and then digs into his four and a half hour

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>morning practice. He then takes a lunch and an exercise session,

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and then launches his afternoon practice for another four and

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a half hours. He does this every day of the year,

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>except for concert days, when he does only the morning

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>practice session. And you know what, Brain circuitry comes to

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>reflect what you do. So the cortex of Jasah Pearlman,

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>or any highly trained musician changes through time into something different.

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>And this isn't a metaphorical claim. You can see this

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>with brain imaging, even with an untrained eye.

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you how.

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the strip of brain right underneath

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>where you wear headphones, that's an area called the motor cortex,

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's what directs your body how to move all

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of its six hundred exquisitely beautiful muscles. Now, if you

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>zoom in on a region of the cortex involved in

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>hand movement, you'll find something amazing, which is that musicians

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>have a little puckered shape on their cortex where non

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>musicians don't. So think of it like an extra wrinkle

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>on the wrinkly outer bit of the brain, the cortex.

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Why do the musicians have this.

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>It's because they use the muscles of their hands in

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinarily detailed way, much more so than non musicians,

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>so their.

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Brains devote more real estate to that task.

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>The thousands of hours of practice on the instrument physically

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>molds their brains. And by the way, this is wildly specific.

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>So imagine that you compare the brain of a violinist

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>like Pearlman to the brain of a pianist like Vladimir Ashkenazi.

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>What they both have in common is a deep dedication

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to their craft and countless hours of practice, and yet

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>their brains look sufficiently different that you can easily see

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>which brain belongs to whom. And that's because string players

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>like Pearlman show that extra wrinkle mostly on one side

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and one hemisphere, because his left fingers are doing all

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the detailed work while the right hand mostly just runs

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the bow over the strings. In contrast, a pianist like

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Ashkenazi has that extra wrinkle in both hemispheres because both

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of his hands are performing meticulous patterns on the ivories.

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 1>So simply by looking at the brain which used to

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>be done in autopsy, but now you can do with

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a brain scan. You can tell what kind of musician

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you have in the scanner. You can discern this just

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 1>by looking at the wrinkly bits on the motor cortex.

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 2>And we can read even more from the brain's patterns.

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>It represents not only that a hand is doing less

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>or more, but sometimes what what in particular it's doing.

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>So let's say you get a job at an assembly

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>line and you're randomly assigned to one of two jobs.

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Either you put little marbles into jars, or your job

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>is to screw the jar lid shut. Okay, so both

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>jobs use your right hand, but the first requires fine

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>use of your fingertips, while screwing the lid on makes

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>use of your wrist and forearm. So if you're the

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>jar filler, the real estate in your cortex that represents

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>your fingers will increase, and this is at the expense

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:38.559
<v Speaker 1>of the real estate devoted to your wrists and forearms.

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 1>If you are the lid turner, the opposite happens. You

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>get more representation for your wrist and forearm and less

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>for the detailed movement of your fingers. So in this way,

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>what you do over and over becomes reflected in the

0:10:55.800 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>structure of your brain, and these changes involve more than

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the motor cortex.

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 2>For example, if.

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>You spend months learning to read Braille, the bit of

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>your cortex that represents touch from the index finger that

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>will grow. If you take up juggling as an adult,

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the visual areas of your brain involved in that they increase.

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>This is because brains reflect not simply the outside world,

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>but more specifically your outside world, and this is what

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>underlies getting good at something. Professional tennis players like Serena

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 1>and Venus Williams they spend years training so that the

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>right moves will come automatically in the heat of the game. Step, pivot, backhand, charge, fallback, aim, smash.

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 2>They train for.

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Thousands of hours to burn the moves down into the

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>unconscious circuitry of the brain. They craft their brains into

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>overtrained machinery. He might have heard of the ten thousand

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.839
<v Speaker 1>hour rule, which suggests that you need to practice a

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>skill for that many hours to become an expert, whether

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>this is surfboarding or spelunking, or saxophone playing or whatever.

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Although we can't quantify the exact number of hours, the

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>general idea is correct. You need massive amounts of repetition

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to dig the subway maps of the brain. There's a

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:28.719
<v Speaker 1>guy that I mentioned in an earlier episode. His name

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is Destin Sandlin, and he made a video where he

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>tries to ride a bike that someone gave him with

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>reversed steering, so when you push the handlebars to the left,

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the wheel turns to the right and vice versa. This

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.839
<v Speaker 1>is a super difficult thing to learn how to ride.

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 1>So what he did is he spent every day working

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>on this and trying it out, and he crashed and crashed,

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>but eventually he got it. But the point I want

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to make here is that you know, he's an engineer,

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.719
<v Speaker 1>and it only took him a few seconds to cognitively

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>understand how the bike worked, but that proved insufficient to

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>ride it. He needed to invest weeks and weeks of practice.

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Hence the ten thousand hour rule.

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:21.599
<v Speaker 1>And this dynamic changing of the brain happens from intensive

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>physical practice that you do, whether that's swimming or playing

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the harmonica, or swinging a tennis racket or using a

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:32.199
<v Speaker 1>rake or whatever. But these measurable brain changes, they don't

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 1>just apply to the physical they apply to the mental also,

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>so for example, when medical students study for their final

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>exams over the course of three months, particular areas of

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>their cortex changed so much that you can see this

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>on brain scans with the naked eye. And you see

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>something similar if you teach a person how to read

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>backward through a mirror. And here's another example. Areas of

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the brain that are involved in spatial navigation are visibly

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 1>different in London taxi drivers from the rest of the population.

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>In each hemisphere, the taxi drivers have an enlarged region

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>part of the hippocampus, which is an area involved in

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>your internal maps of the outside world. So what you

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>spend your time on changes your brain. You are more

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>than what you eat. You become the information you digest.

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is how the Polgar sisters were able to

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>blossom into world champion chess players. It's not because some

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>gene codes for skill at chess. It's because they practiced

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>over and over chiseling pathways in their brains to encode

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the powers and patterns of knights and rooks and bishops

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and ponds and kings and queens. So brains come to

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>reflect their world.

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 2>But how does this happen? Exactly. Well, let's see the.

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Answer by zooming in on a weird illusion that most

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of us have experienced, the phantom phone vibration. I recently

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>saw a meme online. It was a picture of a

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>human brain with the title that reads, Hey, I think

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>your phone just buzzed in your pocket, and then on

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the bottom it reads, just kidding. Your phone isn't even

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>in your pocket, you moron. Now, the phantom cell phone

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>vibration is a menace that is unique to the twenty

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>first century. It happens because of a momentary spasm or

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>quivering or shaking, or a touch on your leg, And

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>as long as the frequency and the duration of that

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>feeling is vaguely similar to that made by your phone,

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>your brain decides on your behalf, that's something interesting is

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>happening with your phone. So thirty years ago, if you

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>had noticed a leg twitch, you would have interpreted the

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>feeling as a fly landing on you, or a movement

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of your clothing, or something accidentally brushing past you. So

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>why does your interpretation differ from one generation to the next,

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Because your phone now serves as the optimal explanation for

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a whole range of twitchy feelings. So here's how to

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>understand what's happening there in the brain. Think of a

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>mountainous landscape. Now, picture a lake somewhere there that's encircled

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>by mountains. For a rain drop to end up in

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that lake, it doesn't need to fall from the sky

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and land directly in the water. Instead, it only needs

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to hit the surrounding hillsides. It can land on the

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>northern slope or the southern, or the eastern incline or

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the western and in any case it's gonna slide down into

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the lake. So the lake is what's known as an

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>attractor state. Anything nearby will flow to that spot, and

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you have lots of such attractor states in your brain.

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:23.439
<v Speaker 1>So the feeling on your thigh doesn't have to be

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a buzzing phone.

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 2>It can be a slight shift.

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Of your genes or a twitch of your thigh muscle,

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>or an itch or graze past the sofa.

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 2>As long as the feeling is close, the signals.

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Slide down the landscape to their attractor state, and then

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>you reach to check for an important message. The landscape

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>gets formed by what is important in your world. For

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>another example, think about the way we interpret the sounds

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of language. It feels natural to you that you can

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>understand the sounds of your native language, but foreign languages

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>often have really close sounds that you can't hear the

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 1>difference between.

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Like ooh and eh. But why why can you not

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 2>hear those?

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>As it turns out, there is something different about the

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>brains of the people who speak those languages. But they

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>weren't born that way, and neither were you. If you

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 1>look at the space of all the possible sounds that

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.959
<v Speaker 1>humans can make with our mouths, it makes a relatively

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 1>smooth continuum. You can kind of make any sound. But

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:39.360
<v Speaker 1>despite this, you learn from experience that specific sounds mean

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, whether they're uttered by your dad, or

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 1>your babysitter or your teacher. Your brain figures out that

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a drawn out E and eclip to e both belong

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>to the E category, or maybe your friend from Texas

0:18:55.680 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 1>says a or whatever. But your experience teaches you that

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>all the speakers mean the same sound, regardless of exactly

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>how they're pronouncing it, and so your neural networks carve

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>out a landscape in which all these sounds roll down

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the hillsides to the same interpretation. There's a lake in

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>your brain that represents E, and all the inputs from

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 1>all around end up in that lake and in neighboring valleys,

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you gather up sounds that are equivalent to A or

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I or O and so on. So with time, your

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:37.199
<v Speaker 1>landscape looks different from someone who's grown up in another

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>language and who needs to distinguish the smooth continuum of

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>sounds differently than you do. To think about an example

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of this, imagine a baby born in Japan call him Hyato,

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and a baby born in America call him William. From

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>their brain's point of view, there is nothing different about them.

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>But in Osaka, Hayato hears Japanese all around him.

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 2>From day one.

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>In Palo Alto, William hears the tones of English, where

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 1>different sounds carry meaning. An example of what these two

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>babies hear differently is the distinction between the.

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 2>R and L sounds.

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So in English, these carry information like the word right

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>versus light or raw versus law, But in Japanese there's

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>no distinction between these two sounds. So as a result,

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>William's internal landscape builds a mountain range between his interpretation

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of R and L, such that the difference between these

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>two sounds is perceptually clear. In Hyato's brain, the landscape

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>develops into a big valley, so that both R and

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>L flow into a single lake because they have an

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>identical interpretation. So as a result, Hyato can't hear the

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>difference between those two sounds. Now, obviously, the children's brains

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>were not born this way. Had William's pregnant mother moved

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>to Osaka and Hyato's pregnant mother to Palo Alto, the

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>boys would have had no trouble in becoming fluent speakers

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and listeners in their new language.

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 2>As opposed to a genetic issue.

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Their neural landscapes are carved by what is relevant in

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>their immediate environment. And what's fascinating is that you can

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>see this carving happening even before the children learn how

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to speak. For example, make a continuous R sound and

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>then switch it over to L. So L, now, how

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 1>can you tell if an infant here's that change?

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 2>So it turns out the trick.

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>To the experiment is this, Infants will suck faster at

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the nipple when they detect a chain. When they hear

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>a change from one sound to another sound, they go

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>from suck suck suck to suck suck, suck, suck. So

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>at the age of six months, both Hyato and William

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>will both suck faster when the R changes to L.

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>But by twelve months, Hyato stops detecting the change. R

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and L sound the same to him. Both sounds are

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>sliding down into the same valley. Hyato's brain has lost

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the ability to distinguish these sounds, while William's brain, having

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>passively listened to his parents speak tens of thousands of

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>English words, has learned that there's information carried in the

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>difference between these two sounds. Hyato's brain, meanwhile, has picked

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>up on other sound distinctions, which to William would be indistinguishable.

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>So your auditory system begins universally and then wires itself

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>to maximize the distinction unique to your language, depending on

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>where on the planet you happened to stick your head

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>out of the womb. And similarly, the buzzing phone isn't

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>something you were born to detect. Instead, it's high relevance

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 1>carves your neural landscape such that you have a broad

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>catch all for neighboring sensations, all of which you will

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>interpret as a buzzing cell phone in your pocket. Like kyata.

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>With the R and the L, you combine the twitches

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and vibrations and quiverings into a single interpretation of what

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>just happened. Now, from what we've seen so far, we

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>might think that repetition is the key to molding the

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>circuitry in your brain. But in fact, there's a deeper

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>principle at work. So now we're going to talk about relevance.

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>There's an old joke that goes, how many psychiatrists does

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:57.679
<v Speaker 1>it take to change a light bulb? And the answer

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is only one, But the light bulb has to want

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to change. Now, if you listen to episode two, you

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>may remember a dog that I talked about named Faith.

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>She is very memorable because Faith was born with out

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 1>front legs and she figured out how to walk by

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>pedaly on her hind legs, sort of like a human.

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>When I told her story in episode two, I said

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 1>it as though her brain had just figured out her

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>unusual body plan. But we can now dig a little

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>deeper for a hidden bone. Was there something special about Faith?

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Could any dog have pulled us off? And if they

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 1>could have, why don't all dogs walk by?

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 2>Peeda Ly?

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Faith's rewritten maps were all about relevance to her life.

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Her brain was shaped by her goals. Faith needed to

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 1>get to her food. That required a solution. It wasn't

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:54.959
<v Speaker 1>going to be the same one that was used by

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 1>her four legged siblings. She had to derive a novel solution,

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>so her brain tried out various strategies until it found

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>when that worked balancing on her two back legs and

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 1>lurching forward step after step. This allowed her to get

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>what she needed, and after a while, she became good

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>at this method of locomotion. In the absence of finding

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>an answer to her challenge, she would have starved and died.

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Her drive for survival allowed the flexible circuitry in her

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 1>brain to try out a bunch of hypotheses and solve

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 1>the problem getting her to food and shelter and loved ones.

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 2>So goals matter.

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 1>A brain's goals play a critical role in how and

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>when it changes. For the Polgar sisters, achieving their expertise

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>depended on a desire to achieve their expertise. Same with

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Yitzak Pearlman or Vladimir Ashkenazi. Imagine for a moment that

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Serena and Venus Williams had a brother, Fred, and that

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>their parents had put a tennis racket in Fred's hands

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and forced him to go through all the years of

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>practicing that his sisters went through. But imagine that he

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>found tennis repulsive. He never got good feedback from his

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>classmates about his performances, and he didn't win any contests,

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and his elders didn't lavish him with praise. The result

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of all that practice would be nothing. Fred's brain would

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 1>show little reorganization. Although his body was going through the

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 1>same motions as his sisters, the motions would be misaligned

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>with his internal incentives. So this is easily shown in

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the laboratory. So imagine an experiment in which someone is

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 1>tapping out Morris code on your foot while someone else

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>totally separately is playing a sequence of sounds.

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Now, if the.

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Task is that you can win cash for decoding the

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 1>message on your foot, then the brain regions involved in

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>touch to that part of your body will develop higher resolution.

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 1>The regions involved in your hearing won't change, even though

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that brain area is also receiving stimulation. Now imagine the

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>reverse game. Now, answering questions about subtle differences between the

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>sounds earns the cash while attending to your foot doesn't

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>yield anything. Now we'll see changes in the auditory cortex

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>where you're doing the hearing, but the touch in your

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:39.160
<v Speaker 1>somatosensory cortex won't change. The inputs from the world are

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:42.679
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same in both cases. But what changes in

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:47.159
<v Speaker 1>your brain depends on what is rewarded. And this is

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>why Fred Williams gets no better on the tennis court.

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>He derives no reward from it. In his brain, just

0:27:55.600 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>like in yours, the maps of the neural territory reflect

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 1>to the strategies that have won positive feedback. Now this

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of understanding about motivation and relevance leading to change

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in the brain. This understanding opens new pathways for recovery

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>from brain damage. So imagine that a friend of yours

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>suffers a stroke. That damage is part of her motor cortex,

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, one of her arms becomes mostly paralyzed.

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>So after trying many times to use her weakened arm,

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>she gets frustrated and just uses her good arm to

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>accomplish all the necessary tasks in her daily routine. This

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>is a typical scenario, and her weak arm becomes only

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>weaker because she's never choosing to use it. Now, the

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>lessons of brain plasticity that we've been talking about offer

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a solution that is counterintuitive. The solution is known as

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>constraint therapy. You strap down her good arm so that

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>she can't use it, and that forces her to employ

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the weak arm. Now, this simple method retrains the damaged

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>cortex by forcing use of the bad arm and cleverly

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>taking advantage of these neural mechanisms underlying desire and reward.

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Because she has inherent motivation to get the sandwich to

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>her mouth, or to turn the key in her front door,

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>or to raise the cell phone to her ear, and

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to perform all the other actions that underlie a dignified,

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>self sufficient life. So while constraint therapy starts off as frustrating,

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the approach proves to be the best medicine because it

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>forces the brain to try new strategies, and the reward

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>locks in the methods that work. It seems paradoxical that

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the solution of the problem is to make things worse,

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>but that's precisely what solves. So let's return to faith

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the dog. Are all dogs able to walk on their

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>back legs? Sure, but most dogs will never have the

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>reason or motivation to attempt it, and certainly no reason

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to master it. And that's why Faith became famous, not

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>because she's the only dog in the world who could

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>do it, but because she's the only one who made

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>it happen. You may know that some blind people learn

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>how to navigate using echolocation. They make sounds with their

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>mouth and they listen for the echo to give them information.

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>But it turns out that people with perfectly normal vision

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>can learn how to echo locate. Also, the issue is

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>just that most cited people simply are insufficiently motivated to

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>pour the hours and hours into redefining their neural territory. Now,

0:30:56.680 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>reward is a powerful way to rewire the brain, but happily,

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>your brain doesn't require cookies or cash. More generally, change

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>is tied to anything that's relevant to your goals. If

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you're in the far North and you need to learn

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>about ice fishing and different types of snow, that's what

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>your brain will come to encode. If instead your equatorial

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and you need to learn which snakes to avoid and

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 1>which mushrooms to eat, your brain will devote its resources accordingly.

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Using relevance as it's north star, the brain flexibly picks

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>up on important details. It's billions of neurons serve as

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a colossal canvas for painting the world that we happen

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to find ourselves in, and with it we develop expertise

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and whatever has relevance to us, whether that's basketball or

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>theater or badminton or Greek classics or cliff jumping or

0:31:56.680 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>video gaming or line dancing or wine making. Whenever a

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 1>task is roughly aligned with our larger goals, our brain.

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Circuitry comes to reflect that.

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Now, with how brains rewire based on what's relevant, I

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>realized really interesting analogy some years ago. Governments do the

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>same thing. They continually self design based on what's happening

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in the nation. So just look at what happened. In

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>response to the attacks of September eleventh, two thousand and one,

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the United States government altered its structure. It established the

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Department of Homeland Security, which absorbed and restructured twenty two

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>existing agencies, And the same thing happened with the simmering

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Cold War. This initiated a large shift in nineteen forty seven,

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>which spawned the Central Intelligence Agency, and in a thousand

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>small ways, a government subtly mirrors the current aims of

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a nation and the events of its outside world. So

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you have budgets swelling and shrinking to echo priorities when

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>external threats loom. The military pocketbook expands when peacetime follows.

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Social initiatives gain. Just like brains, nations respond to changing

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>situations by shifting their resources and redrawing their organizational charts

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to meet the challenges that they face. So how does

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the brain know when something important has happened and that

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it should change its wire accordingly. Well, one strategy is

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to turn on plasticity when events in the world are correlated.

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>So the idea here is to just encode only those

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 1>things that co occur, Like you see a cow and

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you hear a move, and in this way related events

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>become bound together in the brain tissue. Now, you generally

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want to implement these changes too quickly, because sometimes

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>there are associations that are spurious.

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 2>You might see a cow.

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 1>But you hear the bark of an unrelated dog, and

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't want your brain to permanently store every accidental cooccurrence.

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 2>So the brain solution is to change slowly, just a

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:21.799
<v Speaker 2>little at a time.

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>And in that way it comes to encode only those

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>things that commonly coincide real matches distinguish themselves from noise

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>by occurring together over and over and over. But despite

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the wisdom of slow and steady change extracting averages like this,

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 1>that's not the whole story. Because just think about one

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 1>trial learning in which you, let's say, touch a hot

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>stove and you learn not to do that again. So

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:54.919
<v Speaker 1>you've got emergency mechanisms that exist to make sure that

0:34:55.239 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 1>life threatening or limb threatening events are permanently retained. The

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>story of one trial learning goes deeper than that. Think

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>about when you were young and your aunt taught you

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a new word. She says, this is called a pomegranate. Now,

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you didn't need to learn that in an emergency situation,

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and you didn't need your aunt to say this association

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>one hundred times. She calmly told you once, and you

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>got it in one trial. Why It's because it was

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>salient to you. You loved your aunt, and you derived

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 1>social benefit from knowing a new word and being able

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to ask for the delicious fruit. This is one trial

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 1>learning not because of threat, but instead because of relevance.

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Inside the brain.

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>This relevance is expressed through these widely reaching systems that

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>release chemicals called neuromodulators. By releasing these with high specificity,

0:35:56.280 --> 0:36:01.280
<v Speaker 1>these chemicals allow changes to occur only at specific places

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and times instead of all over at every moment. An

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 1>especially important chemical messenger here is called acetylcholine.

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Neurons that release the.

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Seedlcholine are driven by both reward and punishment, and they're

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>active whenever you're learning a new task and need to

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>make changes, but they're not active once the task is

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>well established.

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 2>So here's what you need to know.

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 1>The presence of acetylcholine at a particular brain area tells

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it to change, It doesn't tell it how to change.

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>In other words, when the neurons that spit out acetal

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:39.320
<v Speaker 1>coline are active, they simply increase plasticity in the target areas.

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>When they are not active, there's little or no plasticity.

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>So here's an example. Imagine I play for you a

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:57.760
<v Speaker 1>particular note on the piano, say D flat. The note

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:01.760
<v Speaker 1>triggers activity in your auditory cortex, but it doesn't change

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>anything about how much territory is devoted to D flat.

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Why not?

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 1>It's because the note doesn't mean anything in particular to you. Now,

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>let's say every time I play the note, I give

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you a warm chocolate chip cookie. Now the note accrues

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a meaning, and the brain territory devoted to D flat expands.

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Your brain assigns more real estate to that frequency because

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the presence of reward suggests it's important. Now, let's say

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any cookies available, so instead of handing

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>you the treat, I play the D flat. At the

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 1>same moment that I stimulate neurons in your head that

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 1>release a setal colin. The cortical representation for that tone expands,

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 1>just like it did with the cookies. Your brain allocates

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 1>more terrain to that frequency because the presence of the

0:37:56.640 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>acetyl coline indicates that it must be important. So a

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>setyl colin broadcasts widely throughout the brain, and as a result,

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it can trigger changes with whatever kind of relevant stimulus,

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:13.280
<v Speaker 1>whether that's a musical note or a texture or something verbal.

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a universal mechanism for saying this is important. Get

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>better at detecting this. It marks relevance by increasing territory,

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and changes in neural territory map on to your performance.

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:33.440
<v Speaker 1>So as an example of that, imagine that you have

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to learn how to play some crazy new musical instrument.

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 1>So a couple of weeks of practice improves your speed

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and your skill, and you have a correspondingly large increase

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in the brain areas that are involved. But if you

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>are a seedyl colin release is blocked with a drug,

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:55.399
<v Speaker 1>those brain areas don't grow and your skill never improves.

0:38:56.320 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 1>So the basis of the behavioral improvement is not simply

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the repeated performance of the task. It requires these neuromodulatory

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 1>systems to encode relevance. Without the acetyl coline, the ten

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand hours is wasted time. So with the hypothetical Fred Williams,

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 1>who hates tennis, why didn't his brain change even after

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the same number of hours of practice as his sisters.

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 1>It's because these neuromodulatory systems were not engaged in his

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>head as he drilled backhands over and over. He's like

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you practicing the instrument with no acetal colin.

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:39.359
<v Speaker 2>As a quick side note, these acetal.

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Colin neurons reach out widely across the brain. So when

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>these start chattering away, why doesn't that turn on plasticity

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>everywhere they reach, causing widespread neural changes. The answer is

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that acetyl coline's release and its effects are modulated.

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:58.280
<v Speaker 2>By other neural modulators.

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 1>So while acetal colon turns on plasticity, other neurotransmitters like

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:07.279
<v Speaker 1>dopamine are involved in the direction of change, encoding whether

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 1>something was punishing or rewarding. Researchers all over the planet

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 1>are still working to decipher this very complex choreography of

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the neurotransmitter systems. But what we know is that collectively,

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>these chemical messengers allow reconfiguration in some areas while keeping

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the rest locked down.

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:31.760
<v Speaker 2>So let's go back to the London taxi drivers.

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 1>They're famous for having to memorize the entire map of

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the streets of London, and they train for months and

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:41.359
<v Speaker 1>months on this task, and I mentioned before there are

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 1>physical changes in the structure of their brain as a result.

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 1>These cavies are able to pull off this staggering feet

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:52.839
<v Speaker 1>because the map is relevant to them. This is their

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:56.760
<v Speaker 1>desired employment, which is going to pay for their home mortgage,

0:40:56.840 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 1>or their child's tuition, or their upcoming marriage. But interestingly,

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>since the study of the cabbys was first published in

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the year two thousand, the need for this kind of

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 1>memorization has essentially gone away. Now it's just as easy

0:41:12.680 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to have Google memorize all the streets of London, and

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>more generally, all the streets interlacing the planet. So the

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:21.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of brain changes that we saw at the turn

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of the century, we probably.

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Won't be seeing in them anymore.

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting is that AI algorithms don't care about relevance.

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:33.759
<v Speaker 1>They memorize whatever we ask them to, which is a

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 1>super useful feature of AI, but it's also the reason

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that AI is not exactly human like, because AI just

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:44.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't care which problems are interesting or germane. It just

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 1>memorizes whatever we feed it, So whether that's distinguishing a

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:52.760
<v Speaker 1>horse from a zebra in a billion photographs or tracking

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>flight data from every airport on the planet, it has

0:41:56.000 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 1>no sense of importance except in a statistical sense. Contemporary

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:06.320
<v Speaker 1>AI could never by itself decide that it finds irresistible

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a particular sculpture by Michaelangelo, or that it hates the

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:14.840
<v Speaker 1>taste of bitter tea, or that it's aroused by signals

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of fertility. AI can dispatch ten thousand hours of intense

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 1>practice in ten thousand nanoseconds, but it doesn't favor any

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>zeros and ones over others. As a result, AI can

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:31.719
<v Speaker 1>accomplish super impressive feats, but not yet the feat of

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:35.240
<v Speaker 1>being anything like a human who cares about some things

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:59.239
<v Speaker 1>more than others. Now, how does the modifiability of the

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:03.640
<v Speaker 1>brain and its relationship to relevance bear on the way

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:08.239
<v Speaker 1>that we teach our young The traditional classroom consists of

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a teacher that's droning on, possibly reading from bulleted slides.

0:43:13.239 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>This is totally suboptimal for brain changes because the students

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 1>aren't engaged, and without engagement there's little or no plasticity.

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:27.320
<v Speaker 1>The information doesn't stick. Now, we are not the first

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:30.879
<v Speaker 1>generation to make this observation. The ancient Greeks had noted this.

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have the tools of modern neuroscience, but they

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 1>had a sharp eye, and they defined seven different levels

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:41.719
<v Speaker 1>of learning, and the highest level where the best learning occurs,

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:47.799
<v Speaker 1>is achieved when a student is invested and curious and interested.

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:51.839
<v Speaker 1>Through a modern lens, we would say that a particular

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:56.240
<v Speaker 1>formula of neurotransmitters is required for neural changes to take place,

0:43:56.560 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and that formula correlates with investment and curiosity and interest

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:06.880
<v Speaker 1>this trick of inspiring curiosity. This is woven into several

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 1>traditional forms of learning. So, for example, Jewish religious scholars

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:16.400
<v Speaker 1>will study the Talmud by sitting in pairs and posing

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting questions to each other, like why does the author

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:22.799
<v Speaker 1>use this particular word instead of a different word? Or

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 1>why do these two authorities differ in their account? Everything

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 1>gets cast as a question, which forces their learning partner

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 1>to engage instead of memorize. And although this is an

0:44:33.760 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>ancient study structure, I recently stumbled on a website that

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 1>poses talmudic questions about microbial biology. Questions like, given that

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:50.279
<v Speaker 1>spores are so effective in ensuring survival of bacteria, why

0:44:50.320 --> 0:44:54.239
<v Speaker 1>don't all species make them? Or do we know for

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 1>sure that there are only three domains of life bacteria,

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Archaea and Eucaria, Or how come peptides made enzematically don't

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 1>seem to get strung together to make a respectably sized protein.

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 2>This site has hundreds.

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Of questions like this, which coaxes an active engagement in

0:45:14.040 --> 0:45:18.320
<v Speaker 1>its readers instead of simply telling them answers and more generally,

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 1>this is why joining a study group always helps. It

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter if you're studying calculus or history or whatever.

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:30.360
<v Speaker 1>A study group activates the brain's social mechanisms to motivate engagement.

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I saw a wonderful interview in the nineteen eighties where

0:45:35.239 --> 0:45:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the author Isaac Asimov gave an interview with the television

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:43.600
<v Speaker 1>journalist Bill Moyers, and Asimov saw the limits of the

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 1>traditional education system with really clear eyes. And here's what

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:50.360
<v Speaker 1>he said. He said, quote, today, what people call learning

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:52.960
<v Speaker 1>is forced on you. Everyone is forced to learn the

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:55.760
<v Speaker 1>same thing on the same day, at the same speed

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:59.799
<v Speaker 1>in class. But everyone is different. For some, class goes

0:45:59.840 --> 0:46:02.279
<v Speaker 1>to fast, for some, it goes too slow, for some

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in the wrong direction. Asimov had a vision for individualized education,

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:11.839
<v Speaker 1>although he couldn't see the details. He was squinting into

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the future, and he anticipated the Internet. He said, quote,

0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 1>give everyone a chance to follow up their own bent

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:23.800
<v Speaker 1>from the start, to find out about whatever they're interested

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in by looking it up in their own homes, at

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:30.240
<v Speaker 1>their own speed, in their own time, and everyone will

0:46:30.400 --> 0:46:31.800
<v Speaker 1>enjoy learning.

0:46:32.840 --> 0:46:33.360
<v Speaker 2>End quote.

0:46:34.320 --> 0:46:37.759
<v Speaker 1>It's through this lens of triggering interest that a lot

0:46:37.760 --> 0:46:40.839
<v Speaker 1>of philanthropists like Bill and Melinda Gates are aiming to

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 1>build adaptive learning. The idea is you leverage software that

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:49.680
<v Speaker 1>quickly determines the state of knowledge of each student, and

0:46:49.719 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 1>then instructs each student on exactly what he or she

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 1>needs to know next. It's like having a one to

0:46:55.719 --> 0:47:00.200
<v Speaker 1>one student teacher ratio. This approach keeps each student the

0:47:00.280 --> 0:47:03.279
<v Speaker 1>right pace, meeting him where he is right now, with

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the material that will captivate and This past May, Saul

0:47:08.320 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Kahn gave a great talk at TED where he talked

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 1>about using AI to personalize learning. With AI, the students

0:47:16.160 --> 0:47:18.280
<v Speaker 1>can learn at their own pace and in their own way,

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:22.279
<v Speaker 1>and he's increasingly making con Academy as a way to

0:47:22.360 --> 0:47:27.280
<v Speaker 1>show how AI can create totally personalized learning experiences based

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:32.839
<v Speaker 1>on that student's individual strengths and weaknesses, like asm Off

0:47:32.880 --> 0:47:35.759
<v Speaker 1>and Gates and con and many others. I am a

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:39.959
<v Speaker 1>cyber optimist on the topic of education. I always find

0:47:40.000 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 1>myself on Wikipedia, where I'm just following my interest. I

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:46.239
<v Speaker 1>click on one link and I'm reading, and then I think, WHOA,

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 1>what's that? And I follow that link and after about

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 1>twelve links, I'm down some mole hole and I think, Wow,

0:47:52.680 --> 0:47:55.960
<v Speaker 1>how did I get from that topic over here? I

0:47:56.040 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 1>think that drilling down through these blind mole holes of

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:04.080
<v Speaker 1>wikiped without any pre specified plan may turn out to

0:48:04.160 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 1>be a near optimal way to learn and more generally,

0:48:08.640 --> 0:48:12.040
<v Speaker 1>what the Internet allows is for students and all of

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 1>us to answer questions as soon.

0:48:15.400 --> 0:48:16.760
<v Speaker 2>As they pop into our heads.

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:20.840
<v Speaker 1>We get the answer in the context of our curiosity.

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:24.160
<v Speaker 1>And this is the powerful difference between the way that

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:27.400
<v Speaker 1>many of us grew up with just in case information,

0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:30.440
<v Speaker 1>like just in case you need to know it the

0:48:30.440 --> 0:48:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Battle of Hastings occurred in ten sixty six, and what's

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:39.000
<v Speaker 1>happening now, which is just in time information, which is

0:48:39.400 --> 0:48:42.400
<v Speaker 1>getting the information the moment that you seek the answer.

0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:46.399
<v Speaker 1>Generally speaking, it's only in the latter case, when you're

0:48:46.400 --> 0:48:49.879
<v Speaker 1>doing just in time information that you find the right

0:48:50.040 --> 0:48:52.280
<v Speaker 1>brew of neuromodulators present.

0:48:53.680 --> 0:48:54.600
<v Speaker 2>The Chinese have.

0:48:54.560 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 1>An expression an hour with a wise person is worth

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:02.440
<v Speaker 1>more than one thousand busos, and this insight is the

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:05.520
<v Speaker 1>ancient equivalent of what the Internet offers.

0:49:06.200 --> 0:49:08.760
<v Speaker 2>When the learner can actively direct her.

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Own learning by asking the wise person precisely the question

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:17.719
<v Speaker 1>that she wants to answer, the molecules of relevance and

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:19.320
<v Speaker 1>reward are present.

0:49:19.400 --> 0:49:22.320
<v Speaker 2>They allow the brain to reconfigure.

0:49:22.760 --> 0:49:26.319
<v Speaker 1>When you toss facts and an unengaged student, it's like

0:49:26.360 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 1>throwing pebbles to dent a stone wall. It's like trying

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to get Fred Williams to absorb tennis. So in this

0:49:34.560 --> 0:49:39.960
<v Speaker 1>light we have great opportunities because of the gamification of education.

0:49:40.480 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 1>You have this adaptive software which keeps students working at

0:49:45.600 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 1>their point of struggle, where finding the right answer is

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 1>frustrating but achievable. If the student can't get the answer,

0:49:53.560 --> 0:49:56.479
<v Speaker 1>the questions stay at the same level. When he gets

0:49:56.560 --> 0:49:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the right answer, the questions get harder. So there's still

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a role for the teacher here to teach foundational concepts

0:50:03.000 --> 0:50:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and to guide the path of learning. But fundamentally, given

0:50:07.360 --> 0:50:13.080
<v Speaker 1>how brains adapt and rewrite their wiring, a neuroscience compatible

0:50:13.120 --> 0:50:16.840
<v Speaker 1>classroom is one in which the students drill into the

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 1>vast sphere of human knowledge by following the paths of

0:50:22.040 --> 0:50:28.880
<v Speaker 1>their individual passions. So the future of education looks very favorable.

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:31.520
<v Speaker 1>But one question remains, and I just want to address

0:50:31.560 --> 0:50:34.880
<v Speaker 1>this here because I get asked this so often. Given

0:50:34.920 --> 0:50:38.799
<v Speaker 1>that the brain becomes wired from experience, what are the

0:50:38.920 --> 0:50:43.279
<v Speaker 1>neural consequences of growing up on screens? Are the brains

0:50:43.440 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of digital natives different from the brains of the generations

0:50:47.120 --> 0:50:50.520
<v Speaker 1>before them. Now, it comes as a surprise to many

0:50:50.560 --> 0:50:53.520
<v Speaker 1>people that there aren't more studies on this than neuroscience.

0:50:53.840 --> 0:50:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't our society want to understand the differences between the

0:50:57.800 --> 0:51:00.280
<v Speaker 1>digital and analog raised brain.

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we would. But the reason there are no.

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Good studies on this is because it's inordinately difficult to

0:51:09.440 --> 0:51:14.560
<v Speaker 1>perform meaningful science on this. Why because there's no good

0:51:14.680 --> 0:51:20.280
<v Speaker 1>control group against which to compare a digital native's brain.

0:51:20.760 --> 0:51:24.800
<v Speaker 1>You can't easily find another group of eighteen year olds

0:51:25.040 --> 0:51:27.840
<v Speaker 1>who haven't grown up with the Internet. You might find

0:51:28.120 --> 0:51:32.719
<v Speaker 1>some Amish teenagers in Pennsylvania, but there are dozens of

0:51:32.880 --> 0:51:36.600
<v Speaker 1>other differences with that group, such as religious and cultural

0:51:36.600 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and educational beliefs. Where else could you find young people

0:51:40.480 --> 0:51:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of the same age who grew up without access to

0:51:43.719 --> 0:51:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. You might be able to turn up some

0:51:46.520 --> 0:51:50.880
<v Speaker 1>impoverished children in rural China, or in a village in

0:51:51.000 --> 0:51:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Central America or in the Kalahari Desert, but there are

0:51:54.280 --> 0:51:57.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be other major differences with those children and

0:51:57.520 --> 0:52:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the digital natives whom you intended to understand, including wealth

0:52:01.760 --> 0:52:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and education and diet, So it's not a useful control group. Okay,

0:52:07.680 --> 0:52:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So maybe you could compare millennials against the generation that

0:52:11.760 --> 0:52:15.480
<v Speaker 1>came before them, like their parents, who didn't grow up online,

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:19.279
<v Speaker 1>but who instead played street stickball and stuffed twinkies in

0:52:19.320 --> 0:52:22.080
<v Speaker 1>their mouths as they watched The Brady Bunch. But this

0:52:22.200 --> 0:52:27.640
<v Speaker 1>is also problematic because between two generations there are innumerable

0:52:27.680 --> 0:52:32.280
<v Speaker 1>differences of politics and nutrition and pollution and cultural innovation,

0:52:33.280 --> 0:52:36.160
<v Speaker 1>such that if you find differences in the brain, you

0:52:36.200 --> 0:52:37.160
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what to.

0:52:37.160 --> 0:52:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Attribute it to.

0:52:39.080 --> 0:52:42.719
<v Speaker 1>So this is an intractable problem to pull off a

0:52:42.760 --> 0:52:45.920
<v Speaker 1>well controlled experiment about the effect of growing up with

0:52:45.960 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. Nonetheless, I can tell you the root of

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:54.480
<v Speaker 1>my optimism about this. Never before have we had the

0:52:54.760 --> 0:52:59.280
<v Speaker 1>entirety of humankind's knowledge in a rectangle in our pockets,

0:52:59.600 --> 0:53:03.560
<v Speaker 1>with constant and immediate access. Some of you will remember

0:53:03.640 --> 0:53:06.719
<v Speaker 1>taking trips down to the library and you look around

0:53:06.800 --> 0:53:10.120
<v Speaker 1>for the Encyclopedia Britannica, and you find the letter and

0:53:10.200 --> 0:53:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you hope there's an article there about what you're looking for,

0:53:13.120 --> 0:53:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and if it's there, you hope that it's not too

0:53:15.960 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 1>many decades old and that the information is still relevant.

0:53:19.520 --> 0:53:21.880
<v Speaker 1>And if you can find an article there, then you

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:24.120
<v Speaker 1>have to go to the card catalog and you flip

0:53:24.160 --> 0:53:26.960
<v Speaker 1>through it and hope that there's a book somewhere in

0:53:27.000 --> 0:53:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the library that addresses what you want to know in

0:53:30.680 --> 0:53:35.319
<v Speaker 1>a surprisingly brief period. This is all changed, and as

0:53:35.360 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a result, we've all seen the transition of dinner time debates,

0:53:39.680 --> 0:53:44.239
<v Speaker 1>where the winner has transitioned from being the loudest or

0:53:44.280 --> 0:53:47.120
<v Speaker 1>most pervasive to the person who can whip out the

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:51.200
<v Speaker 1>phone the fastest and google the fact in question. Discussions

0:53:51.280 --> 0:53:54.720
<v Speaker 1>move really rapidly now, they leap from one solved question

0:53:54.800 --> 0:53:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to the next, and even when we're by ourselves, there's

0:53:57.840 --> 0:53:58.200
<v Speaker 1>just no.

0:53:58.360 --> 0:54:01.680
<v Speaker 2>End to the learning that goes on. When we look up.

0:54:01.640 --> 0:54:04.439
<v Speaker 1>The Wikipedia page, which cascades is down the next link

0:54:04.480 --> 0:54:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in the next such that six jumps later, we're learning

0:54:08.120 --> 0:54:09.960
<v Speaker 1>facts that we didn't even know we didn't know.

0:54:10.560 --> 0:54:14.800
<v Speaker 2>And the great advantage of this comes from a simple fact.

0:54:14.960 --> 0:54:18.200
<v Speaker 1>All new ideas in your brain come from a mashup

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:22.799
<v Speaker 1>of previously learned inputs, and today we get more new

0:54:22.920 --> 0:54:26.919
<v Speaker 1>inputs than ever before. And so our children are living

0:54:27.000 --> 0:54:33.439
<v Speaker 1>in a time unparalleled in richness. Our knowledge sphere has

0:54:33.520 --> 0:54:37.719
<v Speaker 1>exploded in diameter, and as it grows, it offers more

0:54:37.880 --> 0:54:42.719
<v Speaker 1>doors for entry. So young minds have the opportunity to

0:54:42.880 --> 0:54:48.160
<v Speaker 1>cross link facts from completely different domains to generate ideas

0:54:48.239 --> 0:54:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that previous eras couldn't even have imagined, and this partially

0:54:51.880 --> 0:54:56.600
<v Speaker 1>explains the exponential increase in human scholarship. We have faster

0:54:56.680 --> 0:55:01.360
<v Speaker 1>communication and more mashups than ever before. So it's not

0:55:01.480 --> 0:55:04.440
<v Speaker 1>clear what all the social and political consequences of the

0:55:04.480 --> 0:55:08.839
<v Speaker 1>Internet will be, but from a neuroscience perspective, it unlocks

0:55:09.000 --> 0:55:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a much richer level of education. So in earlier podcasts

0:55:15.320 --> 0:55:18.840
<v Speaker 1>we looked at brain changes resulting from changes to the

0:55:18.880 --> 0:55:22.320
<v Speaker 1>body plan in terms of either new sensors or new limbs,

0:55:22.600 --> 0:55:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and in this episode we turn to changes that result

0:55:25.239 --> 0:55:30.359
<v Speaker 1>from practiced motor acts or rewarding sensory inputs. But the

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:35.520
<v Speaker 1>larger principle that ties all these scenarios together is relevance.

0:55:35.719 --> 0:55:39.799
<v Speaker 1>Your brain adjusts itself according to what you spend your

0:55:39.840 --> 0:55:42.960
<v Speaker 1>time on as long as those tasks have alignment with

0:55:43.520 --> 0:55:47.560
<v Speaker 1>rewards or your goals. For a person who goes blind,

0:55:48.160 --> 0:55:52.799
<v Speaker 1>expanding the other senses takes on a heightened relevance, and

0:55:52.840 --> 0:55:56.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the deeper origin behind the changes that allow

0:55:56.440 --> 0:56:00.720
<v Speaker 1>her visual cortex to get taken over. If a person

0:56:01.080 --> 0:56:04.960
<v Speaker 1>passes her fingers repeatedly over the bumps of braille but

0:56:05.120 --> 0:56:08.919
<v Speaker 1>has no motivation to learn it then no rewiring takes

0:56:08.960 --> 0:56:10.840
<v Speaker 1>place because the right.

0:56:10.760 --> 0:56:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Neuromodulators just aren't present.

0:56:14.000 --> 0:56:16.080
<v Speaker 1>And in the same way, if you add a new

0:56:16.520 --> 0:56:19.720
<v Speaker 1>telelimb to your body and it has relevance to you,

0:56:19.719 --> 0:56:22.680
<v Speaker 1>your body will learn how to use that, just like

0:56:22.840 --> 0:56:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Faith the dog mastered a unique body plan and learned

0:56:27.200 --> 0:56:29.800
<v Speaker 1>how to walk on her back legs because it mattered

0:56:29.840 --> 0:56:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to her. So the lesson I want to leave you

0:56:32.760 --> 0:56:35.360
<v Speaker 1>today with is when you need to learn something, find

0:56:35.360 --> 0:56:39.560
<v Speaker 1>some aspect of that that matters to you. My students

0:56:39.640 --> 0:56:42.680
<v Speaker 1>ask me this all the time about advice on getting

0:56:42.719 --> 0:56:44.879
<v Speaker 1>through their final exams, and I tell them it's all

0:56:44.920 --> 0:56:49.560
<v Speaker 1>about relevance. Figure out what is the aspect that matters

0:56:49.560 --> 0:56:51.719
<v Speaker 1>to you. You're facing this dumb exam that you might

0:56:51.760 --> 0:56:55.359
<v Speaker 1>not care about, but you do care about getting into

0:56:55.400 --> 0:56:57.920
<v Speaker 1>graduate school and this is one important wrong on the

0:56:58.000 --> 0:57:01.319
<v Speaker 1>ladder to get there. Or you want to impress that

0:57:01.480 --> 0:57:03.680
<v Speaker 1>girl or boy over there, and so you need to

0:57:03.680 --> 0:57:06.080
<v Speaker 1>study so you can have this stuff on the tip

0:57:06.120 --> 0:57:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of your tongue. Or you appreciate the sacrifice that your

0:57:10.160 --> 0:57:12.759
<v Speaker 1>parents made in getting you here and you want to

0:57:12.760 --> 0:57:14.840
<v Speaker 1>make them proud and that would be meaningful to you,

0:57:15.200 --> 0:57:18.960
<v Speaker 1>or whatever the personal details don't matter, but the key

0:57:19.120 --> 0:57:22.439
<v Speaker 1>is to remind yourself of the relevance so you can

0:57:22.560 --> 0:57:26.480
<v Speaker 1>plug into that, so you can get the right neurotransmitters present,

0:57:26.840 --> 0:57:29.439
<v Speaker 1>so they can make the impression, so that they can

0:57:29.840 --> 0:57:34.080
<v Speaker 1>make the information stick, so that you're not like Fred

0:57:34.120 --> 0:57:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Williams who swings at the tennis ball but whose brain

0:57:36.680 --> 0:57:41.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't change, but instead you're taking in the information and

0:57:41.040 --> 0:57:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you're making these changes in your forests of neurons so

0:57:44.720 --> 0:57:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that you can recall it later.

0:57:47.080 --> 0:57:51.400
<v Speaker 2>That's what brain plasticity is all about.

0:57:54.520 --> 0:57:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Go to Eagleman dot com slash podcast for more information

0:57:57.960 --> 0:58:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and to find further reading on all of this. Send

0:58:00.880 --> 0:58:04.560
<v Speaker 1>me an email at podcast at eagleman dot com with

0:58:04.840 --> 0:58:08.439
<v Speaker 1>questions or discussion, and I'm making sporadic episodes in which

0:58:08.480 --> 0:58:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I address those until next time. I'm David Eagleman, and

0:58:13.760 --> 0:58:15.560
<v Speaker 1>this is Inner Cosmos.