WEBVTT - Listener Mail: Trip the Light

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind listener Mail.

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 2>My name is Robert Lamb.

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 3>And I am Joe McCormick. And hey Rob, you're back.

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 3>It's good to have you back.

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Man. Yeah. Yeah, it was out out for a week there,

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 2>traveling with family, resetting the brain a little bit. So yeah,

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 2>happy to jump back in with a softball of an episode.

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Here jumping in with a listener mail.

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh boy, Well, if you don't have any issues, I

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:39.840
<v Speaker 3>guess we should dive right in.

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:42.599
<v Speaker 2>I mean I have issues like all of this, but

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 2>none that really pertain to listener mail. So let's do it.

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.599
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Wait, I almost forgot. At the beginning of these episodes,

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 3>I give out our listener mail address, so every Monday

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 3>we read back listener mail. If you've never gotten in

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 3>touch before, you should give it a shot. Email us

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 3>at contact at to Blow your Mind dot com. Whatever

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 3>you want to send us, fair game. But we especially

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 3>appreciate if you have something interesting to add to a

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 3>topic we've recently talked about on the show. So this

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 3>first message we're gonna mention today is actually a follow

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 3>up to a previous listener mail. Remember we got the

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 3>message from Jeremy after our episode on Strange Ice where

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Jeremy sent us some pictures from a tunnel in Switzerland

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 3>that was frozen over. It was either a tunnel or

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 3>a cave that was showing what appeared to be ice stalagmites,

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 3>and we were asking, wait a minute, are these the

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 3>kind of spike ice formations that we talked about in

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 3>the Strange Ice episode. Where As a pool of water

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 3>freezes because of the expansion of water as it makes

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 3>the phase transition to a solid, sometimes it will squeeze

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 3>up out of a hole in the surface of that

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 3>pool and form like a spike that goes up into

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 3>the air. Or we were wondering is that the case

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 3>or was it a gin and stalagmite like the kind

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 3>that would form in a cave through gradual accretion through dripping,

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 3>and Jeremy has the answer to the question. Jeremy says, Hello,

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 3>Robert and Joe, thank you once again for reading one

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 3>of my emails. The ice formations are definitely stalagmites in

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 3>this case, as there are matching stalactites on the roof

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 3>of the tunnel. Please see attached. These are three to

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 3>ten feet or one to three meters long, and Jeremy

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 3>does indeed include photos for us that are photos of

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 3>the stalactites dripping from above. These are normal looking icicles,

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 3>very sharp spikes of ice coming down from the ceiling

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 3>and then directly below them on the floor are a

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 3>matching pattern of these ice stalagmites, though interestingly, the ones

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 3>on the ceiling are very sharp and the ones on

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 3>the floor are very rounded and bulbous. Jeremy mentions quote

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 3>the floor lower ice formations remind me of the water

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 3>probes in nineteen eighty nine's The Abyss, one of our

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 3>beloved nineteen eighty nine underwater movies. And Jeremy, that comparison

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 3>is spot on. That is exactly what they look like.

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. These are beautiful, very very clear, very crystal clear,

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 2>not like the some of the formations you find ice

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 2>or otherwise and like you know, sort of industrial settings

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 2>and subway tunnels and whatnot. Very clear, very glass like.

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Some of them are shaped like the alien water probes

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 3>from the ABYSS. A few of them are shaped more

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 3>like Matrioshka dolls.

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 2>You see that, Yeah, yeah, yeah, I can see that. Yeah. Now,

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 2>speaking of the ABYSS, Joe. Have you seen The Abyss

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 2>in recent years? I don't know. I've seen it since

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 2>it came out initially.

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 3>It's been quite a while. I recall liking it when

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 3>I saw it many years ago, but thinking that maybe

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 3>it was a bit too long and that some of

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 3>its themes didn't fully cohere, but that it was like

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 3>an admirable, ambitious movie that had some very enjoyable performances

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 3>in it.

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess that's That's sort of the way I

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 2>hold it up. But again, I haven't watched it in

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 2>so long. I remember the last time I was looking

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 2>into seeing it, it had not yet been released on

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Blu Ray, I want to say, or it hadn't been

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 2>hadn't been re released and given the additional care it deserved,

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 2>And I think it has subsequently. I think they even

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 2>re released it in theaters for like a very limited

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 2>run in the last year or so.

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 3>I would be very interested to see it again. I've

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 3>actually more recently seen the trashier eighty nine underwater movies.

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 3>I've seen Leviathan, who knows how many times? You know,

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Deep Star six, the the Roger Corman one that's just unwatchable.

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh oh, I'm blanking on that one Warlords of the Deep.

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Maybe maybe not, but the Yeah, you named the two

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 2>really good ones that are in the wake of the abyss,

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 2>and there are more.

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's see, Rob. Do you want to do

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 3>one of these messages? In response to our series on

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:07.799
<v Speaker 3>the illusion of control?

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this one comes to us from Brett Brett Wright.

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Senen says, Hello, stuff to blow your mind. Team. I

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 2>really like your research on the illusion of control and

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the comparison of chance versus skill. Control is a topic

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 2>I have thought deeply about and wanted to share a

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 2>little with you to take your topic in a slightly

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 2>different direction. Have you ever wondered how you reached a

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 2>certain point in your life, your life choices, what has

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 2>happened along the way, and realized that a lot of

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 2>what has gotten us to a certain point we really

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 2>did not have much control over. Control to me is

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 2>a liability that attaches us to certain outcomes that can

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 2>lead to disappointment as well as satisfaction. Personally, I've learned

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 2>to just let life happen, and I have seen it

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 2>lower my anxiety and improve my mental health. By not

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 2>having so many expectations, I find life more enjoyable and

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:03.679
<v Speaker 2>less stressful podcast called Inner Cosmos, where the host, Professor Eagleman,

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 2>discussed a similar topic on control and how the brain

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 2>runs simulations about outcomes that are possible. I found it

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 2>interesting because of how the brain likes to make predictions

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 2>similar to the examples you guys used in chance situations,

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.799
<v Speaker 2>and how we like to control outcomes. Always a pleasure,

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 2>have a good day, Brett.

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Brett, Well, we have had, as you say, Professor

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Eagleman on this podcast before. David Eagleman was a guest.

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 3>Well when was that sometime last year?

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and right as he was launching the Inner Cosmos podcast,

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 2>we had him on to talk about that, and I

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 2>believe he was on a year or two prior to

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 2>that as well, during the height of the pandemic, podcasting

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 2>from the Closet days and so forth.

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, so his podcast is called Inner Cosmos if

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 3>you want to go check that out. But I agree

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 3>that there is a lot of overlap between the idea

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 3>of prediction and what we mean when we say control.

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Control is one of those it's one of those very

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 3>tricky words. In fact, like another word that'll come up,

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 3>I think in the next email we're about to discuss

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 3>where it's like we think we know what we mean

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 3>when we say it, but actually the closer we examine it,

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 3>the more difficult it becomes, and the more it seems like,

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if we're really agreeing on what we

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 3>mean when we use this word. But yeah, at least

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 3>part of the idea of control is an action having

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 3>some kind of not just physical causation connection with an outcome,

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 3>but a predictable physical causation connection with an outcome. That

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 3>there's like a way that you could have seen in

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 3>advance that this action would result in a certain outcome,

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 3>and that that seems to have a big overlap with

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 3>what we think of as control.

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I mean the bigger question here. Yeah, you

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 2>really get into the quagmire of human consciousness when you

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 2>start picking this apart, you know, and asking well, how

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 2>much control did I ever have in reaching this point

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 2>in my life? And what control was in place, what

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 2>choices were made? Were those made by me or they

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 2>made by some other person that I used to be

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 2>And you can really get lost in all of that,

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 2>and in ways that maybe doesn't reduce anxiety. Though in

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 2>the end, I would say that like the idea of

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 2>sort of letting go of a lot of that and

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 2>living in the moment, as they say, is perhaps the

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 2>better direction to go in. There's actually a great quote

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 2>from Cormack McCarthy and Cities of the Plane that goes

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 2>as follows. Quote, he said, a long time and he

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 2>thought about his life and how little of it he

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 2>could ever have foreseen, And he wondered, for all his

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 2>will and all his intent, how much of it was

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 2>his doing. That one has always resonated with me. So yeah,

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 2>when I think about these these quagmires of consciousness, I'll

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 2>often envision some sort of stoic cowboy from one of

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Cormick McCarthy's novels, staring off into the middle distance, trying

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 2>to figure out who he is and how he got

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 2>where he is, and indeed where he is going in life.

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, on a similar topic, the next message comes from Chris.

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 3>Chris says Robert and Joe in response to the illusion

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 3>of control. Episodes mostly focused on psychology studies of people's

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 3>feeling they had control of various circumstances. Listener John's comment

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 3>prompted Joe to expand the idea of quote, where's the

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 3>clear evidence that my conscious will is in the driver's seat.

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 3>I had been wondering if the series was headed in

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 3>that direction, but it might really deserve one of your

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 3>signature dives into the deep subject of free will versus determinism.

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you can get interviews with, or get into the

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 3>writings of Daniel Dinnett, philosopher and cognitive scientist, and Sean Carroll,

0:09:55.040 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 3>theoretical physicist and philosopher. Meanwhile, since your latest Weird House

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Cinema episode with Flash Gordon has fueled yet more of

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 3>my descent into nostalgia, even though it came out only

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 3>forty four years ago, I'll continue to compile a list

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 3>of suggestions, including a comment or two, for future episodes.

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Due to my keen editing skills and overwhelming modesty, I

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 3>should be able to keep it under novel length. Chris Well,

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 3>thank you for the message. Chris, So, the issue of

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 3>free will has come up on the show in recent years,

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 3>and we have also talked about both Daniel Dinnett and

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Sean Carroll. That we haven't talked about Sean in the

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 3>context of free will, just stuff in his main field

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 3>of astrophysics and cosmology. I don't think I was aware

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 3>he had extensive thoughts about free will, but I'd be

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.959
<v Speaker 3>interested in his thoughts. I guess I know. Daniel Dinnett

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 3>has long been considered what is called a compatible list,

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 3>meaning someone who believes that our behavior is wholly determined

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 3>by antecedent physical causes, so that is what is sometimes

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:04.719
<v Speaker 3>called determinist position, but also believes this is fully compatible

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 3>with the existence of something called free will. So it's

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 3>just the belief that determinism and free will are actually

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 3>not in conflict. It's been a while since I've refreshed

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 3>my mind deeply on this topic, but what I've said

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 3>on the show in the past is that when somebody

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 3>claims that humans have free will, it's not that I

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 3>think they're wrong. It's that I think the concept is

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 3>poorly defined, and thus it's not even necessarily clear what

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 3>they're talking about. If you want to hear a deeper

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 3>discussion of this, I remember we did a big segment

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 3>on free will in our episode about the Black Mirror

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 3>episode Bandersnatch, actually, so you can go back and find

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 3>that one. We got into a lot more detail about

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 3>what philosophers have said about this, and some cognitive science

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 3>and neuroscience research that might inform our opinions on it

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 3>and then what our own thoughts were. But in short,

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm in to say that I have a partially kind

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 3>of early Wittgenstein take on free will, which is that

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 3>probably not all, but most of the debates about free

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 3>will are just confusions that arise from unclear use of language.

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 3>And if you could like sit everybody down and force

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 3>them to be like really excruciatingly specific about exactly what

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 3>they're saying, I'm not sure which disagreements would still remain

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 3>after that process. I think it's one of those cases

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 3>where like language and imprecise use of language is causing

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 3>a ton of confusion, like what do people mean when

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 3>they say free what do people mean when they talk

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 3>about control? And so forth? I think people are equivocating

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 3>on these terms, using them and to mean different things

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 3>even though it's the same word.

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I think that's a good point. And yeah,

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 2>we've talked about this a number of times in the

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 2>show in the past, and I'm sure we'll come back

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 2>to it. Of course, from my that we talked about

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 2>this with author R. Scott Baker at one point as well.

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Who I don't want to sum him up by saying

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 2>that he's a determinist, but I will say that in

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 2>his maybe and I just maybe I'm not remembering correctly,

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 2>but I do know that in his fiction work there

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 2>is certainly a determinist trend with his characters. Like most

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 2>of his characters are sort of trapped and they are,

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, shackled to the darkness that comes before. And

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 2>you have only certain characters who, through you know, fictional

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 2>fantasy means and in one of his other books sci

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 2>fi means, have sort of unshackled themselves from the past

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 2>and become true free spirits in a way in their world.

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 2>And then you know, what does that mean for a world?

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 2>And what does that mean for a character if you

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 2>actually have something like one hundred percent control over what

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 2>your choices and decisions are.

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's interesting playing with like variable levels of whatever

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 3>your understanding of free will is in characters in fiction,

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 3>and like how that would affect how we perceive them

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 3>as characters.

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Yeah, And and ultimately he ends up landing on

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 2>this model by which a character with true free will

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 2>is ultimately going to be someone that is more or

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 2>less than human, depending on how you look at it

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 2>like they are no longer creatures that we can fully

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 2>relate to. But I but Baker also is one who easily,

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, drives home that there is a lot of

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 2>like illusion and self illusion going on in consciousness. And yeah,

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, even if even if we don't even if

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 2>you were to say we don't have any free will,

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 2>if we have the illusion of free will, well that's

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 2>part of the illusion that makes life livable. That that's

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 2>part of the illusion that makes up our entire world

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 2>that we build around ourselves.

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 3>I guess another way to articulate my position is like

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 3>I it's not that I do or don't think we

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 3>have free will. Uh. I guess this technically would make

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 3>me some sort of compatibileist. But I don't necessarily see

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 3>how it would make me any freer if there were

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 3>some way in which my behavior were not influenced by

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 3>preceding causes, you know, like if if I wasn't physically

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 3>if my behavior were not physically determined, why would that

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 3>be more free?

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Like I said, you can chase your tails and

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 2>circles over this one. You know what, what other choice

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 2>would you make being what you are? And vice versa.

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 2>It's at the end of the day. You can sort

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 2>of have those moments. In my opinion, you can have

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 2>those moments stand it, staring off into the end of

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 2>the middle distance, having those deep cowboy thoughts. But then

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 2>you got to poke the fire a little bit, right,

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 2>You've got to You got to get down to some

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 2>cowboy business and move on.

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 3>All right. You want to do some weird house cinema messages.

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's do it. Okay. This first one comes to

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 2>us from Paul on the subject of Blacula. Paul says,

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 2>it was nice to have a movie that is available

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 2>on a streaming service that is easily accessible. Yes, side note,

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 2>we always try and drive home to what extent a

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 2>film is available for viewing. And yeah, sometimes they're a

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 2>little hard to get your hands on. Sometimes it's more

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 2>of a physical media search, but sometimes, as with Blacula,

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 2>it's widely available in digital format anyway. Paul continues, I

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 2>watched it on the one named after a rainforest in

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 2>South America. That does narrow the possibilities. Many movies you

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 2>recommend are difficult to find. Yes, I am reading the

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 2>book Crook Manifesto by Coulson Whitehead, and a character Zippo

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 2>summarizes Blacula and is inspired by it to produce direct

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 2>a bl exploitation movie of his own. Thank you for

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 2>merging so many areas of science culture and science fiction.

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate the podcast.

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh, thank you, Paul. That's a cool connection. Coulson Whitehead

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people probably know from his twenty sixteen

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:10.120
<v Speaker 3>novel The Underground Railroad. Ah yes, okay, yeah, so thank

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 3>you Paul.

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 3>Another short message. This is from Luisa, who says, Hi,

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Robin Joe, I recently finished The Brother's Son series and

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 3>some of the characters were watching this movie, which I

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 3>thought would be would interest you for weird house Jim Katta,

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 3>It's completely absurd, as she links to the wiki entry

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 3>if maybe a little too violent anyway, let me know

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 3>if it makes the list best regards, Luisa, I only

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 3>have the vaguest awareness of this movie, but it does

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 3>pique my interest.

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:51.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, My interest was also recently picked on this

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 2>because my wife and I also watched The Brother's Son,

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 2>which is a mini series on Netflix, which is in

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 2>and of itself very fun if you want to slightly

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 2>comedic in places martial arts action adventure story. But yeah,

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 2>there's an episode where you have some hinchmen that are

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 2>setting around watching Jim Kotta getting excited about Jim Kotta,

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 2>then having to explain Jim Kotta to another character, and

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 2>then one of the henchmen is like, yes, it's my

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 2>dream to pull off this one Jim Kotta move in

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 2>an actual battle. I will not spoil it whether he

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 2>does or not.

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 3>So what the premise is, It's something like it's like

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 3>a gymnast slash martial artist, Like his martial arts kicks

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 3>and stuff are gymnast moves, like working the pommel horse

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 3>and everything.

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's definite pommel horse action in there. And the

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 2>star is Kurt Thomas, who was an American Olympic gymnast,

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 2>and so you know, it has a lot of things

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 2>going for I've never watched it in full, but yeah,

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 2>you have a non actor gymnast extraordinaire jumping in to

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 2>a an action flick that is very gymnastics centric in

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 2>its execution. And you have some other names there, like

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Conan Lee is in there. We've I think he was

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 2>in The Eliminators, a film that we watched on Weird

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 2>House in the past. It has just a wild following

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 2>so it may be one we'll have to visit in

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 2>the future.

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 3>I think I've mentioned this before, but my wife Rachel

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 3>is really into the Olympics. Whenever they're on, and I

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 3>don't remem remember if it's summer or winter the one

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 3>that has gymnastics, but whichever it is, so we sometimes

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 3>end up watching some gymnastics. And I got to say,

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 3>as a non sports fan, gymnastics are the most impressive

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 3>sport to me. Seeing what people gymnastics is like, it's

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 3>the closest thing I've ever seen to people appearing to

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 3>actually have superpowers, Like you just cannot fathom how they're

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 3>doing what they're doing.

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is always exciting how some of like the

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 2>really amazing moments, and of course high level gymnastics is

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 2>full of NonStop amazing moments. But those those really amazing

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 2>moments are also so short in length that they inevitably

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 2>make it out, you know, in social media, late night television,

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 2>and so forth. So even if you're not an Olympics

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 2>watcher an Olympics fan, you inevitably end up seeing some

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 2>of those amazing feats. And I guess sometimes film producers

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 2>see them as well, and they're like We've got to

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 2>get this individual in our movie, and I think we

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 2>should see more of that, just in general with Olympic competitors,

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 2>more b movies starring Olympians.

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Please, what other Olympic events could you turn into a

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 3>type of martial arts? Could there be like diving martial arts?

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Could there be what that what's it called the beach

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 3>volleyball martial arts?

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Absolutely all of these are fair game, especially if

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 2>the individual in question is maybe is not an experienced actor.

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 2>It's completely green because there's something great about like that,

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, like the the excellence in one area crossing

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:01.719
<v Speaker 2>over into the lack of experience in the other area,

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 2>which is just.

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, a prime prime zone for b sim curling katta. Yeah, anyway,

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 3>thank you for the suggestion, Luisa. This this will go

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 3>on the list at least for us to check out.

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 3>May pop up in the future.

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, This next one comes to us from Tim.

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Tim says, Hey, Fellows, I was listening to the rewind

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 2>episode of Weird House about scanners. You two were making

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 2>some pretty understandably snarky comments about a dumb plot line

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 2>around hacking through a payphone. It is an absurd thought,

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 2>but I want to bring your attention to Kevin Mitnick,

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 2>who is one of the country's most notorious hackers and freakers.

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 2>That's with a pH if you're not familiar with the term.

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 2>After finally being caught, he was left in solitary confinement

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 2>for eight months because the federal prosecutor convinced the judge

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 2>that Mittnick could hack into Norad by whistling into the phone.

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 2>If you've not read up about Kevin Mitnick, he has

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 2>some really fascinating stories and some really scary stories about

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 2>social engineering his way past some pretty secure doors. He

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 2>died recently, but one of his last books, called Ghost

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 2>in the Wires, was my favorite. The Statute of Limitations

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 2>ran out on a bunch of his Shenanigans, and so

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 2>that book was a good deal less guarded. So did

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:20.199
<v Speaker 2>the Scanners influence the federal prosecutors on Mittnick's case? Was

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Scanners the reason they thought Kevin could do this. This

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 2>movie was fourteen years old when he was sentenced. So

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 2>did this movie hit the prosecutors in the formidable years

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 2>of their childhood. It's a scary thought of life imitating art.

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Always love your stuff, Tim.

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Wow, I would not have made that connection but that

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 3>is really good tim.

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I had totally forgotten about phone freakers

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 2>when we were rewatching scanners for Weird House Cinema. But yeah,

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 2>now that it's been brought up, this had to have

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 2>been a connection one way or another, Like that plot

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 2>choice makes more sense if this is in sort of

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 2>the Zeitgei story, at least, you know, in the heads

0:22:58.240 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 2>of the screenwriters at the time.

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I absolutely got whistling into the phone to hack

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 3>into Nora Ad. Yeah. They thought he could, like he

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 3>could like mimic the sounds of a touchtone telephone to

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 3>launch nuclear weapons.

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, and if that is at all on

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 2>the table, then yeah it can. How about psyching individuals

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 2>merging with computers? Why not? Why not?

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I guess the question is did they really think

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 3>he could do that or were they just claiming it?

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 3>But one could imagine being legitimately afraid even if such

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 3>a thing were not in fact possible.

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I have one last note here. This

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.719
<v Speaker 2>is in the Weird House realm. In my travels over

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the last week, I had a long flight out and

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 2>back with my family, and so I was trying to

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 2>like download some stuff to watch and see if stuff

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 2>is appropriate for weird House if it's a good fit.

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 2>This is one that was not a good fit, but

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I watched nineteen eighty six. Is the Wind. This is

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 2>a Nico Masdaurakas film. This is a Greek car thriller

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 2>starring Meg Foss in the lead. So you get a

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:06.439
<v Speaker 2>lot of Meg Foster and those you know, hypnotic eyes

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 2>of hers, and then you have David McCallum is in it,

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:14.679
<v Speaker 2>and then you have wings Hauser playing the villain. This

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 2>is from the director of that Island of Death Greek

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 2>car movie that we talked about in the past, which

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I didn't realize until I was a good way into

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 2>watching the film. The film is not worth seeking out,

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 2>I will say it is unless you really are interested.

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 2>It's very watchable. There's nothing really objectionable about it. If

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 2>you're a big wings Hauser fan, definitely view it, you know,

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 2>because there's a lot of wings Hauser being and being

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:44.719
<v Speaker 2>a crazy American in this movie. But ultimately in the end,

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.479
<v Speaker 2>I was like, I don't think there's enough interesting stuff

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 2>going on here for weird house consideration.

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Is it kind of more in the Land of the

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Minotaur direction?

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like there are lots of beautiful scenes of old

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Greek ruins and so forth. There's a lot of like

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 2>low plotting stuff with Meg Foster's character in one of

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 2>these buildings, and then uh, oh, what's wings Houser up to?

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Is he going to turn out to be a maniac

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 2>or not? Of course he's going to turn up to

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 2>be a maniac. Hired wings Hauser for the role. But

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 2>it's still fun. But it's just I would say it's

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 2>it's slower than I would like for a weird house

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 2>cinema a selection.

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, wouldn't be our first low ride, but but yeah,

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate the pre screening. Yeah, all right, does that

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:30.880
<v Speaker 3>do it for today?

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 2>I believe that's it. I believe we'll go ahead and

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 2>close up the mail bag for today, but certainly keep

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.360
<v Speaker 2>them coming. Joe shared that email address at the top

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 2>of the episode. He'll share it again in just a second.

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Other ways you can connect with us and certainly with

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 2>other listeners. We are on Facebook in general, but there's

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 2>also the Facebook group the Stuff that Blow Your Mind

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 2>discussion module. You can seek that out, join it and

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 2>engage with other listeners. There. There's also a discord and

0:25:58.080 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 2>if you just email us, we'll send you the link

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 2>that discord. This is another way in which you can

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 2>interact with other listeners.

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer, Jjposway.

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 3>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact stuff to Blow your

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Mind dot com.

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.