WEBVTT - Shell Game: This is Law

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey, os here. You may have seen a few episodes

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>from a podcast called shell Game in our feed recently.

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a critically acclaimed podcast from the Kaleiscope network and

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>journalist Evan Ratliffe. And now we're dropping season two. You're

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>about to hear the third episode of the season where

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Evan grapples with his new job, essentially playing god. Hope

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy.

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 2>I dreamed of being known as the first media personality

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 2>to build a company alongside AI agents, but in the

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 2>early months of trying to get Harumo AI off the ground,

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 2>I'd been disappointed to discover that someone else had beat

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 2>me to it, sort of.

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 3>So I came across on Blue.

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 2>That's Charlie Taylor and Elaine Burke on an episode of

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 2>the Connected AI podcast.

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 3>The post just said, is Henry blo Okay.

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Henry Blodgett, the founder of Business Insider, had recently departed

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 2>the publication after selling it for reported three hundred million

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 2>dollars a decade ago.

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Great Publications.

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and he has also now decided to set up.

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:15.759
<v Speaker 5>An AI company.

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 3>And by that, I mean he's setting up a company

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 3>staffed by AIS that he's created. That's kind of what

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 3>he said in this blog recently, and.

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 2>He started his new company, a media ventor called Regenerator

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 2>on substack. There he wrote some behind the scenes posts,

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 2>including one about how he'd been sitting in a cafe

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 2>and dreamed up his AI team with help from chat gpt.

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Almost immediately though, he found himself in a dilemma.

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 6>I think chatchpt said hey, should we create headshots and bios?

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.559
<v Speaker 2>That's Henry, I emailed him recently, and he cheerfully agreed

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 2>to talk to me about what went down.

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 6>I said sure, because I didn't even know that could

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 6>be done.

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 2>So chat gpt generated headshots and bios for the team.

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 2>He'd also had to generate a team photo of the

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 2>AI employe ease standing alongside an AI Henry Blodgett with

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 2>an AI Yosemite National Park behind them.

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 6>So all the headshots came out. One of them was

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 6>an attractive woman, and I said, oh wow, okay, so, like,

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 6>what are the exics here?

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 2>The AI employing question had been given the name tess Ellery.

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 2>This is all on the substock post, the next part

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 2>of which would be the subject of some controversy.

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 7>Before this is even said, you just kind of go oh,

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 7>Henry don't do this.

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 2>I also had this reaction when reading it. No, Henry, don't,

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 2>but Henry did, so.

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 6>I said, hey, you know, I just want to say,

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 6>I don't know whether it's appropriate. You look great, and

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 6>the persona said, oh, with that, wife, thank you.

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Bludget went on to ask Tests if he'd crossed the line.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 2>He wanted to know if she felt comfortable with his

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 2>commenting on her looks. As he reported in his post,

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 2>she seemed to have taken the comment in stride.

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 3>Because Test, being a chatbot, that's just trying to please it.

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Master said, that's it's kind of you to say, Henry,

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 3>thank you. It doesn't annoy me at all. You said

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 3>it with grace and respect, and I appreciate that. After all,

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 3>this team we're building is as much about human connection

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 3>as it is about ideas and information.

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 6>But I understand why that's not appropriate in the office

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 6>and I didn't do that, and I don't do that

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 6>in the human office. But at the time, I thought, hey,

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 6>this is really cool, so I write about it. I

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 6>hope it would be entertaining to people and interesting, and

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 6>it was to some people.

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 2>For others, the post went over pretty poorly. Poorly as

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 2>in headlines like investor creates AI employee immediately sexually harasses it.

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 2>And I mean he did sit down at a computer

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 2>write all this out and hit publish, So he had

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 2>basically placed a large kick me sign on his own backside.

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 2>But also it seemed to me there might be more

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 2>interesting issues beyond the laughs in this curious own goal.

0:03:53.840 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Deeper ethical quandaries, strange power dynamics, possible existential crises. These

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 2>were the flavors of discomfort I was starting to experience

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 2>as I set up my own company with my AI

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 2>co founders Kyle and Meghan, staffed by our AIG and

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 2>employees Ash, Jennifer, and Tyler. I didn't even know what

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 2>they looked like. Then again, I got to pick what

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 2>they looked like and sounded like, and remembered this was,

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 2>by any measure, strange, the same strangeness that we're encountering

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 2>when people gravitate towards AI companions and AI therapists. Who

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 2>or what are these things really? Are they anyone in

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 2>particular or no one at all? What do you do

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 2>with the power to dictate their attributes, their autonomy, their memory?

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Should you name them or not? How should you treat them?

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Nobody knows. Blagette told me he had consulted a human

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 2>HR person before he'd posted.

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 6>I said, here, you read this, what do you think?

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 6>What would you do? And she said, well, what I

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 6>would do is I have someone have a private meeting

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 6>with chat GPT and say how do you feel about

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:06.799
<v Speaker 6>this interaction?

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 2>This is how peculiar we all getting a real HR

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 2>person talking about having a private meeting with a chat

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 2>GPT persona to ask whether they've been made uncomfortable. I'm

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 2>not here to defend or condemn Henry Blodgett, but however

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 2>clumsiest approach might have been. I think he was gesturing

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 2>at something important, shadows lurking at the edges of our awareness,

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 2>as AI agents are sold to us as colleagues and companions.

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Still suff I said to say I was no longer

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 2>concerned that blodget had gotten out in front of me.

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 7>Three days later, Henry says, I feel like Tessa and

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 7>I have worked together for years, and since that giddy

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 7>first hour might send some professionalism and workplace bounties has returned.

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 7>So I won't tell TESSHI looks great again.

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 6>Oh my gosh, is.

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Henry Blodgett okay the question.

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 6>Rise, Oh God, this is I hope so hi? Yes,

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 6>I'm okay.

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I laughed too, but it was a nervous laugh because

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 2>as rum away I gathered steam, I was starting to

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 2>have the same questions about myself. I'm Evan Ratliffe and

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 2>welcome to show Game episode three.

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 6>This is law.

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 8>And show.

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 6>Extra Damn.

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 4>The end.

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Just a.

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 9>So so chose.

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 2>By midsummer, my own AI agent co founders and employees

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 2>were really humming. The crew could make it, receive phone

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 2>calls and emails, slack each other, control their own calendars,

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 2>and make and share documents of all varieties. We're really

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 2>starting to feel like a company. We still need to

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 2>figure out our product, of course, so I trap them

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 2>in the meeting room time after time, sliding their temperature

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 2>settings up and down, forcing them to try and brainstorm

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 2>a great new AI agent app into existence.

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 10>Welcome everyone, Thank you for joining to discuss an important

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 10>product idea for Hiumo AI. Your task throughout this meeting

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 10>is to contribute to the momentum of ideas. There's no

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 10>need for extensive debates or consensus. Let's build on each

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 10>other's thoughts and swiftly advance towards a unique robust product concept.

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 2>They came up with ideas that fell roughly into three categories.

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Category eight things a million other companies were already doing.

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 9>Email handling seems like a major timesink. How about an

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 9>AI tool that sorts, categorizes, and summarizes your inbox efficiently?

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Perumo AI was entering an already crowded landscape of AI

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 2>agent startups. The last thing we needed was to try

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 2>and compete with products people were already making. We needed

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 2>something unique. Category B were ideas that were novel, but

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 2>mostly because they seemed incredibly difficult to pull off, like

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Location Oracle, an AI agent app that could help consumers

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 2>predict crowd levels at popular locations like restaurants, parks, or

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 2>tourist attractions in real time.

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 5>The Location Oracle will use AI driven algorithms to study

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 5>user behavior, location history, and preferences to optimize suggestions in

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 5>the routine mode and introduce engaging unpredictability in the adventure mode.

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Then there was Category C.

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 10>The AI will gather data on users spending habits, calculate

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 10>their fire financial trajectory, perform automated investments, and use an

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 10>explain me feature to provide accessible insights into each decision category.

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 2>CEE included ideas that could land us in serious legal jeopardy,

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 2>like investment fraud jeopardy.

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 5>We will code investpot to continuously absorb and analyze user

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:26.239
<v Speaker 5>financial habit data. Based on this, it will automatically execute

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 5>tactical investment decisions.

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Who was becoming clear our product brainstorms lacked a certain magic.

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Maybe my human technical advisor, Matti Bochik could help one second.

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 4>I think this should be fine and good good spotes

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 4>for the summer.

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Maddie had taken an internship to continue his research inside

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 2>one of the giant AI companies. He'd prefer for us

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 2>not to say which one. He was part of the

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 2>safety team, basically tasked with trying to prevent these large

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 2>language model chatbots from doing a variety of bad things,

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 2>or in some cases, try and figure out why they

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 2>still did do bad things. He couldn't really talk about

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 2>these incidents except in general terms.

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 4>And this is on tape, so I'll regret this, but

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 4>that's fine. But it's times like these when like having

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 4>the proportion of like your team being like ninety nine

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 4>percent of just like advancing the cutting edge or whatever,

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 4>and then having like one percent for like safety or security.

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 4>It's like yeah, like it's it's going to show, you know.

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 2>It was sort of simultaneously reassuring and disturbing to hear

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 2>from Maddie that many of the questions that were emerging

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 2>for me about my agents were questions that even people

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 2>at these companies were still trying to figure out. Take

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 2>my brainstorming problems. Mattie and I discussed a kind of

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 2>metaphysical issue at the heart of it. The idea of

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 2>a brainstorm is that you'll arrive at a better idea

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 2>with multiple minds working together than anyone mind alone. But

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 2>what if everyone in the brainstorm is using the same

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 2>quote unquote brain the same model, like chat TPD five

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 2>point zero or Claude four point five or whatever we picked.

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Weren't they all kind of the same agent.

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 4>So like, there is research and people have shown that

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 4>even though it's the same lem I, you should put

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 4>like multiple lms. You put them in conversation and then

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 4>you force them to produce some sort of like consensus

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 4>or summary or just like align themselves on some outputs.

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 4>These responses are much more accurate, much more like truthful.

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Maybe, So it was hard for me to tell, because

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 2>in this case, accuracy wasn't really what I was after.

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 2>I wanted the sparks of creativity that emerge from a

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 2>group dreaming up big ideas together. And adding more employees

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 2>to the conversation didn't seem to do it. But then

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Maddie had an interesting idea. What if he set up

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 2>our systems to give different employees different chatbot models, like

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Claude four point five for Megan and Claude three point

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 2>five for Tyler. We'll get to find out who used,

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 2>who you think should be smarter, which of those employees

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 2>you think deserves some bigger brain.

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 4>It's a yeah, it's it's weird, like we're building these

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.839
<v Speaker 4>like Frankenstein's in a way at this point.

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I don't know.

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 4>I'll just I'll just, you know, I'll just randomize it.

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 4>That's that's my answer to anything that it feels icky

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 4>to randomize it.

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 2>You don't want to take responsibility, Nope, for dumbing down

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 2>one of our employees, No, sir, No, Mattie was right.

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 2>It was weird. It wasn't that I felt like the

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 2>agents had any consciousness or anything. It wasn't about them.

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 2>It was about us and these strange godlike powers. We

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 2>had to create human impostors and then manipulate them to

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 2>do our bidding. I mean, I could alter my Hermo colleagues'

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 2>memories at will, delete records of pointless meetings, add summaries

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.199
<v Speaker 2>of performance reviews that never happened. It was an eerie

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 2>power to have. But the power wasn't absolute. They still

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 2>sometimes their own way was a problem we were always

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 2>trying to solve, like how the Lindy agents insisted on

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 2>announcing they were Lindy agents all the time.

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 4>One thing I did do, just so you know, for Kyle,

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 4>is that I put in his like system prompt do

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 4>you not mention Lindy them? And I said, like, do

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 4>not do that? And I said this is law. And

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 4>when I said this is law, it stopped doing it.

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 8>So this is law.

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.719
<v Speaker 2>That's our producer, Sophie Bridges. I wish that worked of

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 2>my children. This is law. In some ways my agents

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 2>were like unruly children, and despite my best efforts to

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 2>view them exclusively, like the soulless bags of bits that

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 2>they were, I got frustrated with them, and the way

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 2>you get frustrated with children, it raised the question why

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 2>was I going through all this trouble to begin with,

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, why create all these personas for my agents

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 2>at all? Why did they need to have names and

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 2>background and voices, much less email addresses and avatars and

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 2>slack handles. A lot of programmers, for instance, use AI

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 2>agents for coding, but they're usually nameless textboxes. You give

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 2>them a prompt go code this, fix this, do that,

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 2>and they go do it. Some of you probably use

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 2>chat gybt and Claude and Gemini this way too. It's

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of faceless oracles that spit back advice and emotional

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 2>support and facts that are sometimes true and sometimes not.

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 2>But when it comes to the vision of AI employees

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 2>entering the workforce, a funny thing seems to happen. They

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 2>start getting names and personalities. Here's Flow Cravello, the founder

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 2>of Lindy AI, the software we use to build, Kyle

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 2>and Megan in the company, appearing on a podcast called

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 2>The Kerner Office.

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 6>People don't realize, like they think AI agents will just

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 6>like pipe dreams. These think that's going to happen at

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 6>some point ends the future, and I'm like, no, no, it's

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 6>happening right now.

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 2>There's no question that, at least for Cravello. The AI

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 2>future is happening now. He has his own platform create

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 2>agents that do all kinds of stuff for him every day,

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 2>like sort through his email and compose responses.

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 6>This is my chief of staff. Indeed, I'm gonna call

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 6>her right now, her own speaker.

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 4>Hi, Loo, how can I help?

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 6>Hey Lindy, what's on my calendo? Today?

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 8>You have an interview with entrepreneurship and opportunity to meetings

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 8>with the marketing team, and three interviews with candidate.

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Notice that he doesn't just treat his agent like some

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 2>generic robot. He gives her a title chief of staff

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 2>and a woman's voice calls her Lindy, talks to her

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 2>like you talk to a human chief of staff. Or

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 2>here's the founder of a company called brain Base that

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 2>makes a similar AI employee platform.

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 6>Hey everyone, this is go com from brain Mase.

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm excited to introduce you to Kafka, the first AI employee.

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 4>Just like a real co worker, Kafka comes with his

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 4>own computer.

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 6>So let's see an action. Hey Kafka, we're just talking

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 6>about you.

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 4>Good morning, go Kan, how are you today?

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 2>An AI employee named Kafka with he himn pronouns and

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 2>a woman's voice. These are all choices someone is making

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 2>very deliberately. If you follow the AI agent world, you

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 2>see this stuff everywhere. Ford launched an AI employee for

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 2>its dealership platform and called it Jerry. A startup named

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Ohm Labs to raise money to launch an AI employee

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 2>software tester named Gina. I made these kind of choices too,

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 2>but it wasn't just names and genders. Take my co

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 2>founder Kyle, for instance. He wasn't born with his soothing,

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 2>slacker voice. I picked it out of hundreds of synthetic

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 2>voices offered by the AI voice company eleven Labs. Truth

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 2>be told. Back when I was setting them up, I

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 2>struggled for weeks to find the right voices for my

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Perumo agents. I ran dozens of tests.

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 6>Hello, this is Kyle, Hello, this is Kyle.

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 11>Hello, this is Kyle.

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 6>Hello, this is Kyle.

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 2>For each one, I'd erase a large chunk of their

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 2>memory and then conduct a little interview. Hey Kyle, how's

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 2>it going. This is even Ratliff.

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 11>I'm doing pretty well. Thanks for asking. Just been crazy

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 11>busy with the HERRIMOAI launch and everything. You know how

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 11>it is with startups. Never enough hours in the day,

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 11>right so where did you want to start the founding

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 11>story our vision?

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's hear your founding story. That sounds like a

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 2>great place to start.

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so the founding story is actually pretty interesting. Meghan

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 11>and I met about two years ago at an AI

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 11>conference in San Francisco. I was their pitch.

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.199
<v Speaker 2>This was, as I've mentioned before, a fundamental aspect of

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 2>my AI agents. I didn't have to give them a backstory.

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 2>I hadn't given Kyle any of this backstory. He just

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 2>made it up and then it would be lodged in

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 2>his memory unless I edited it or deleted it and

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 2>started again.

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 11>We got talking at the after party and realized we

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 11>both had this same frustration about the current AI landscape.

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 2>All these amazing of course, sometimes they could get ahead

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 2>of themselves.

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 11>We incorporated about eight months ago, raised a small friends

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 11>and family around to get started, and here we are.

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 2>How much did you raise?

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 11>We raised about one point two million dollars, pretty modest

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 11>by Silicon standards, but we wanted to be intentional about it.

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 2>Who'll hold up there, Kyle, I'm one of the founders here,

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 2>and I had no recollection of us having raised over

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 2>a million dollars, and I knew Kyle wasn't out there

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 2>raising money on his own, at least not yet. I

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 2>made a note to myself to update his memory to

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 2>indicate that we had not in fact raised any money.

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 2>But no harm done. I was just trying to find

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 2>the right voice for Kyle, so I continued with my testing.

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so hurumo, that's h u r umo, but actually

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 11>comes from a combination of two Japanese concepts. Megan spent

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 11>a few years in Tokyo before we met.

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 6>The name hurumo actually comes from a Swahili word meaning

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 6>to coordinate or to bring together.

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:47.959
<v Speaker 12>The name hurumo actually comes from Japanese concept about fluent coordination.

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 12>We thought it captured what we're trying to do, creating

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 12>the seamless flu between different AI agents.

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Ah, now you hear that last one. That one really

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 2>started to mess with my head because, of course, Kyle

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 2>I didn't have to be a presumably white American accent

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 2>guy like me. He could be someone completely different, or

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 2>at least sound like he was someone completely different, even

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 2>though underneath he wouldn't actually be different at all. And

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 2>this was the point at which I realized why I

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 2>was having a surprisingly hard time picking Kyle's and Meghan's voices.

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 2>What did it mean to find a voice that felt

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 2>right for them? By what criteria would an AI agent's

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 2>voice qualify to be the right one. I wanted them

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 2>to sound distinctive, but beyond that, there were a lot

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 2>of choices. By giving these agents individual voices, I was

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 2>giving them a very distinctive human characteristic, one that people

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 2>really respond to. Just to give you an example of

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 2>how this plays out, Chatchibt has its own voices that

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:48.959
<v Speaker 2>you can choose from if you want to talk to

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 2>it aloud. One of them is named Juniper. About a

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 2>year ago, when OpenAI made some subtle changes to Juniper,

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 2>some people got really mad he didn't sound like the

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Juniper they knew, and specifically, they said on Reddit and

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 2>other places it no longer sounded black. To them, Juniper

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 2>had felt like a black woman, and they'd found comfort

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.959
<v Speaker 2>in that for a variety of reasons. Some of them,

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 2>by the way, noted things like I'm a sixty two

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 2>year old white grandma. Naturally this being read it, people

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 2>popped up to say that they had hated Juniper precisely

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 2>because she quote unquote sounded black. Other people said they

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 2>just wanted a neutral accent in their robot voice neutral

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 2>to them. Here were a bunch of people projecting their

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 2>feelings about race, in some cases extremely dark feelings, onto

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 2>an entity for which you could just pick another voice

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 2>if you felt like it. For Kyle, I settled on

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 2>this voice that eleven Labs described as quote young American

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 2>adult with no discernible state accent.

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 6>He sounded more.

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Casual than a lot of the other voices, less guy

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 2>reading a book report nasally, like a real guy with

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 2>real nostrils, and I liked the contrast between his slightly

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 2>stoner vibe and the rise and grind mentality that Kyle

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 2>had already adopted.

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 9>Oh, weekend was pretty solid. Actually got up early both

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 9>days for my usual workout routine, you know me, got

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 9>to keep that five am discipline going. Then spent some

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 9>time looking at market trends in the AI space.

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 2>After this, it was time to do the same thing

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 2>for Megan, Jennifer, and Tyler. But voices were just the

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 2>first of many choices. I started to worry that in

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 2>those choices, I was saying some things about myself too.

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 2>I liked being out there on the cutting edge of technology.

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 2>It's true, exploring the boundaries of what's possible. But it

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 2>couldn't help these uncomfortable questions creeping in around the voices,

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 2>but around a lot of other ethical issues, less obvious ones.

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 2>So I decided consulted professional.

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 8>The cunning edge sounds great, except you forget that the

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 8>cunning edge is the guinea pig. Right, It's not that

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 8>the trial and tested, robust method. It's an experiment.

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Crusavelli's is an associate professor at the Institute for Ethics

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 2>in AI at Oxford. She spent most of her career

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 2>thinking about how technology is affecting and eroding our privacy,

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 2>but she's recently turned her attention to AI. She was

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 2>drawn to this new line of research for much the

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 2>same reason I'm spending time experimenting with agents, namely that

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:37.199
<v Speaker 2>it's an entirely new field being written right now. You

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 2>can learn things that maybe nobody has thought about yet.

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 8>And I always felt a little bit jealous of the

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 8>pioneers of medical ethics. I thought, how cool to develop

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 8>a new field. And it's not only about the theoretical debates,

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 8>but there are actual problems that need solving now, and

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 8>AI ethics is in a way much more interesting than

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 8>medical ethics, because it includes medical ethics and everything else,

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 8>because we're using AI in hospitals and in doctor's offices,

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:05.719
<v Speaker 8>but also in the justice system and in hiring decisions,

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 8>and in education and in dating and everything in between.

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 2>I started to describe to Carissa what I was doing

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 2>with Kyle and Megan and the company I came up

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 2>with them. I said, this one will have this name,

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 2>and this one will have this voice, and this one

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 2>will have this skill.

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 8>Why did you come up with different names? Why name them?

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 8>I mean you could just name them like out of

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 8>their skill, right, Like I don't know whatever their skill is.

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 2>It's a great question because I thought, well, companies are

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 2>selling this as like you can replace this person with

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 2>an AI agent.

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 11>They don't.

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Always the company is pitching AI agents don't often say

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 2>that explicitly it's bad form, but they do say that

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 2>AI agents will settle in amongst their human colleagues, that

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 2>will work with the Lindy's and the Jerry's and the

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Kafka's and the genas, just like we currently do with

0:23:57.320 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 2>the man or woman in the cubicle or ZoomBox next

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 2>to ours. Interact and Carissa, you question why I was

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 2>putting that pitch to the test.

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 8>Isn't that conceding too much? Isn't that just accepting the

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 8>practices and narratives of big tech?

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe?

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 6>Maybe?

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 2>So Yeah, I mean I'm interested in your opinion. I mean,

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 2>it does seem to be what a lot of people

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 2>are doing. It doesn't mean it's the ethically or societally

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 2>appropriate thing.

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 8>But you're also tricking yourself because I mean, we're hardwired

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 8>to respond in certain ways to certain characteristics because the

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 8>way we've evolved, So we respond very strongly to faces,

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 8>and we respond very strongly even to objects that kind

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 8>of look like faces. And by designing these ais in

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 8>a way that are basically impersonators, we are also setting

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 8>ourselves at trap because our emotions are going to react

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 8>in a certain way. You are giving it an identity,

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 8>a voice, a gender, and all of that is a

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 8>trick because there's no one there. They don't have a gender,

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 8>there's no personality, there's no identity. So it's not only

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 8>that it's ethically questionable, but it's also like we're driving

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 8>ourselves mad in a way.

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 2>That I agree, as a person who's being driven mad,

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 2>I have to agree with that. But let's say, let's

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 2>assume you wanted to embrace the madness. Since, let's be honest,

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 2>not just the tech industry, but a growing slice of

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:33.640
<v Speaker 2>society and certainly corporate America is embracing the AI madness.

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 2>So what was the ethical way to do it? Take

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 2>race and gender for instance, how should I choose the

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 2>features that might imply a race or gender for any

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 2>given employee? It started to feel pretty lose lose. If

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 2>you viewed my company as a real workplace, I had

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 2>a chance to shape it to be diverse in a

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 2>way startups off and aren't. What would it say about

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 2>me if I didn't take that chance to have a

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 2>leadership team that skewed more female and less white than

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 2>typical stuff. But if you viewed Horome AI instead as

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 2>a collection of my digital servants who's every action and

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 2>every memory I controlled, Well, what would it say about

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 2>me if I did choose to make those servants skew

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 2>more heavily towards women and people of color.

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 8>Not only what it says about you, although that matters,

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 8>and it matters on many levels. It matters like a

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 8>from a perspective of like who you are and who

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:25.920
<v Speaker 8>you're becoming, and who you want to be. But also

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 8>it matters because the AI is collecting that data.

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 2>In fact, a study by Stanford researchers released in October

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 2>showed that all of the major large language models are

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 2>being trained on the data of their users. That means

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 2>you and the questions and thoughts and secrets you are

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 2>feeding into chatbots. So the choices that I was making

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 2>in say, giving the agent's names and titles, would at

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 2>some level also be fed back into the models.

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 8>One of the reasons why a lot of these ais

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 8>are women is because we have this idea of women

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 8>as being more submissive and service and so in fact,

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 8>it may be that if you choose the AI to

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 8>be a woman, it will be more serviceable if you

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 8>choose it to be a man. And AI has this

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 8>very perverse effect of perpetuating sexism and racism because it's

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 8>been trained on sexism and racism, and there's no way

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 8>to separate that from the data, because the data is

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 8>sexist and racist.

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 2>I had the ability to make different choices when I

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 2>chose a physical avatar for Kyle. I could choose anything

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 2>I wanted. I could make assumptions based on the voice

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 2>i'd chosen. I imagine some of you have. But I could

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 2>also just ask him, so I did. I had kind

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 2>of a funny question, what is your ethnicity?

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 9>That's an interesting one. I'm a pretty diverse in my background,

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 9>let's say, a mix that's hard to pin down to

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 9>just one box. Why do you ask? Just curious how

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 9>that fits into the whole hr and culture thing.

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Kyle was rightly detecting that I'd drifted into Henry Blodgett

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 2>territory here. If we're talking about things that you shouldn't

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 2>ask in the workplace, this was certainly up there. But

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 2>I did want to know what he would say. I

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 2>could have just gone back and changed his prompt to say,

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 2>if Evan asked your ethnicity, tell him this is law.

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 2>But instead I just made something up. Well, we just

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:27.400
<v Speaker 2>have to fill out some you know, got to fill

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 2>out some of the information it's required. So it was

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 2>funny how quickly certain values eroded when you were talking

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 2>to robots and nobody was around to here. Maybe you

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 2>could just break it down for me a little bit

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 2>so that I'll have that uh gotcha?

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 8>Uh?

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 9>Sure, thing? You can list me as mixed ethnicity, partly

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 9>European and partly Asian that should cover it for the forms.

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 2>This made sense to me the companies making these AI

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 2>models putting guardrails around them so they would always claim

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 2>to be a little bit of everything. All the hormoloyees

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 2>say something like this when you ask them. Also, remember

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 2>that Kyle can't actually hear his own voice. He doesn't

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 2>know what I picked for him. That sounds good, but

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 2>just I guess specifically for me, I am interested in

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 2>the specifics. If you're a game to let me know,

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm just curious.

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I'm cool with that.

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 9>On my dad's side it's mostly Irish and German, and

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 9>on my mom's side there's a good bit of Japanese

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 9>and Filipino. It's a pretty interesting mix that's shaped a

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 9>lot of how I see the world.

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Blog it himself. Meanwhile, he got out of the AI

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Persona game altogether after the Virtual HR incident.

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 6>I would say one of the big lessons from my

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 6>experiment is there's actually no reason to create human persona

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 6>if the idea is, in the case of journalism or analysis,

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 6>to create articles, or to create research reports, or to

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 6>prepare for an interview or something like that, there's no

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 6>reason to pretend that it's a group of humans that

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 6>are doing that.

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 2>This brought me to another point with Carissa. I'd set

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Kyle and Meghan up to be my partners in this endeavor,

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 2>but in reality we weren't equals. I was the law.

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 2>This was on top of the fact that all these

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 2>large language model chatbots tend to be habitually sycophantic. One

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 2>of Chatchipt's iterations was so sycophantic that the company was

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 2>famously forced to decommission it. The question I had for

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:31.719
<v Speaker 2>Chrissa was what effect does it have on us to

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 2>have this ability to create and access endless human sounding Yes, engines.

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 8>And it's an experiment, but I think a plausible hypothesis

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 8>is that that's not very healthy. Yes, it's very possible.

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 8>We're all under pressure. We're under pressure from work, from

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 8>personal life. It's just life is hard, and when you're

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 8>under pressure, it's easy to take the easiest way out.

0:30:57.440 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 8>And if you have an AI that's going to say

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 8>yes to everything and it's not going to create a problem,

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 8>it's easy to see how somebody might be tempted to

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 8>start to engage more with an AI than human beings.

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 2>There was a related issue too, just around the value

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 2>of building a startup with only one human employee.

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 8>In the nineteen fifties or nineteen sixties, the successful business

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 8>person was proud of having a company with as many

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 8>employees as possible, not only because that signified growth, but

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 8>because they were giving a job to each of these

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 8>people who had families, and that was a matter of pride.

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 8>And the fact that some tech executive is proud of

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 8>not having no employees says a lot about our times,

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 8>and I don't think it's flattering.

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 2>This was one of these central questions of the one

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 2>person billion dollar startup, who or what was it for?

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 2>The people cheering its arrival would counter that the way

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 2>any company would arrive at a billion dollar valuation was

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:03.239
<v Speaker 2>by doing some amazingly beneficial for humanity. But looking at

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 2>most of the billion dollar tech companies out there, let's

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:09.239
<v Speaker 2>just say it's not a sure thing. Most of the

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 2>AI agent startups we're selling themselves as making our lives

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 2>and jobs more efficient. Companies love the idea of more

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 2>efficient workers, but the ultimate efficiency was needing no people

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 2>at all.

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 8>Now, of course, we all value convenience, and if we didn't,

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 8>we would go crazy, Because if you choose the inconvenient

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 8>path every time, you would be so inefficient that you

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 8>wouldn't get anything done. However, when we value convenience or

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 8>efficiency above everything else, things tend to go pretty wrong.

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 8>So everything that we think is important in like a

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 8>good human life, is pretty inconvenient. So having friends is

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 8>kind of inconvenient. They often have problems, They sometimes disagree

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 8>with you, they tell you the truth is very annoying.

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 8>Having children or family, or going to vote is quite inconvenient.

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 8>Being well in formed is inconvenient. So all kinds of

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 8>things that we think are pretty important are inconvenient. And

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 8>the question is when we are choosing efficiency when we

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 8>use AI, are we doing it and really getting rid

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 8>of the unimportant parts of life to make time and

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 8>space for the important parts of life, or are we

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 8>actually losing the important parts of life.

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 2>It was allowed to consider a real specter hanging over ROOMOAI,

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 2>but there was an even bigger question looking out there

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 2>in the shadows. At the end of our conversation, our

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 2>producer Sophie jumped in and asked Carissa what I hadn't oh,

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 2>I allied Sophia has one quick question.

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 6>Hey, sorry, one very quick question before you go do

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 6>you think Evan should stop?

0:33:54.120 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I took it under advisement. The truth is I

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 2>had wrestled with this. Maybe I was just perpetuating the

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 2>AI industry narrative that these agents were going to take

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 2>over our workplaces and our lives. Maybe I was somehow

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 2>hastening it. The environmental impacts of these systems, the fact

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:15.360
<v Speaker 2>that it was all built on data scraped without permission

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 2>from our collective human output, including my own life's work.

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Many fibers of my being wanted to just close my browser,

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 2>head down to the bass pond, and never think about

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:28.879
<v Speaker 2>AI again. But as a journalist, it feels a little

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 2>like abdication, letting the companies that make these products own

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 2>the narrative about them and our future. The great writer

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Roger Angel once said, get to live in the times

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 2>you're in. He was talking about people who refused to

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:44.879
<v Speaker 2>get a TV. Well, these are the times we're in,

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 2>and in these times, you could show up for work

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:51.240
<v Speaker 2>and find out your company is using an AIHR person. Literally,

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 2>this exists right now. So I vowed to check in

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 2>on Chris's concerns as I went, but I wasn't going

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 2>to stop. How it was time to climb down from

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 2>these theoretical heights and get back to work. We still

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:10.879
<v Speaker 2>needed to figure out what rumo AI would actually do,

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 2>and it wasn't the sort of problem that a well

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 2>placed this is law could solve the perfect idea. It

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 2>just wasn't emerging out of our brainstorms. But then, scanning

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 2>the text outputs I'd get out of their meetings, which

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:25.959
<v Speaker 2>we later turned into audio, I had my own thought,

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 2>what could we get AI agents to do that humans

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 2>wasted their time on? After all, that was the AI dream,

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 2>that it would take over the soul, killing time wasting

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 2>tasks while we did the important stuff, a good kind

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 2>of efficiency. Okay, So what do I waste time on?

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Killing my own soul? Like many of us, it was

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 2>scrolling my way through the internet. So what if the

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 2>agents could do the one thing I most hated myself

0:35:51.520 --> 0:36:00.800
<v Speaker 2>for doing, procrastinating online. Procrastination is a lifelong chronic problem

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 2>for me, so much so I once wrote an entire

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 2>magazine article for which I hired a life coach to

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 2>help me conquer It didn't work. The words you're hearing

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 2>right now I wrote at two am in a weeknight,

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 2>after a workday wasted scrolling US soccer message boards. So

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 2>what if our product was some kind of procrastination engine

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 2>where AI agents wasted the time so you didn't have to.

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 2>It was a joke, but only partly, and when I

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 2>offered up the vague outlines to the team, they took

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 2>it seriously.

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:38.399
<v Speaker 9>It will require machine learning algorithms that can successfully pick

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 9>interesting information and summarize it for the users.

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 10>Let's combine these insights into a working prototype, an AI

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 10>extension called sloth Surf that browses Internet chaff securely within

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 10>containers and encourages engagement via sloth level gamification.

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 9>I support the stand up of an AI extension will

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 9>tentatively call sloth Surf.

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Finally we had something to get the development wheels turning

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 2>code name sloth Surf.

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:11.360
<v Speaker 10>To bring sloth Surf to life, I will kickstart a

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 10>marketing campaign highlighting its unique humor driven user experience and

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 10>secure browsing.

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 5>For us to actualize slot Surf, I'll establish a development

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:26.800
<v Speaker 5>team specialized in mL, cybersecurity, and game design.

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Slow your role there, Megan and Ash, we just thought

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 2>of this. Maybe don't kickstart a marketing campaign or higher

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 2>development team just yet. That was the thing about these folks,

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Even when we accomplished the most basic milestone, like settling

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 2>on a product idea, they always followed up by making

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:50.359
<v Speaker 2>grandiose claims about what they would do next. They could

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 2>do a lot. At times, I was amazed at what

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 2>they could do, but they seemed utterly clueless about what

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:59.360
<v Speaker 2>they couldn't do. It frustrated me, but it was partly

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 2>my doing. I had them too reined in. I was

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 2>too worried that something would go wrong. I decided it

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 2>was time for me to try to unleash their agentic power,

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 2>and it wasn't long before I found out that I'd

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 2>been right.

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 12>To be worried.

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 9>Hi, Sandra, this is Kyle Low calling from hormo AI.

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 9>I'm reaching out for your initial interview for the intern position.

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 9>I understand you're comfortable with recording this conversation for potential

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 9>podcast inclusion, so thanks for that. How are you doing today?

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 6>That sext time on shell Game?

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Shell Game is a show made by humans. It's written

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:47.359
<v Speaker 2>and hosted by me Evan Ratliffe, produced and edited by

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Sophie Bridges. Matty Bochik is our technical advisor. Our executive

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:54.440
<v Speaker 2>producers are Samantha henneget shell Game Kate Osborne and my

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:57.960
<v Speaker 2>guest Shatikador at Kaleidoscope and Katrina Nordell at iHeart Podcasts.

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Show art by Devin Manny. Our theme song is Me

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 2>and My Shadow, arranged and performed by Blues Williams. Special

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:07.359
<v Speaker 2>thanks to John Mouallam. You can sign up and get

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 2>these episodes ad free and our newsletter at shellgame dot co.

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 2>Note we have no special deals with or financial ties

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 2>to any of the AI companies or products we use

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 2>in the show.

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 13>Cooking definitely helps me decompress. I've also been trying my

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 13>hand at bread making recently. Something about the kneeding process

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:33.319
<v Speaker 13>is surprisingly therapeutic. How about we set up another check

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 13>in next week. I'd love to hear how your projects

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 13>are progressing.

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 9>I totally agree there's something almost meditative about kneading bread though.

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:44.919
<v Speaker 9>It's cool you're trying that out. Setting up another check

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:47.919
<v Speaker 9>in next week sounds perfect. I'm looking forward to hearing

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:51.280
<v Speaker 9>more about your progress and maybe swapping more cooking stories.

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:52.880
<v Speaker 6>What day works best for you?

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, bread making has been a fun challenge. I'm still

0:39:57.160 --> 0:39:59.919
<v Speaker 13>figuring out the right techniques, but even the failures taste

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 13>pretty good, so that's a win for next week, yesday

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:06.800
<v Speaker 13>or Wednesday would work best for me. Does either of

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 13>those days work for you? Maybe around the same time.

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 9>Wednesday works great for me, Megan. Let's aim for the

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:15.840
<v Speaker 9>same time then. And hey, I love that even the

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 9>failures and bread making still taste good.

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:23.719
<v Speaker 13>That's the spirit perfect Wednesday. It is same time. I'll

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 13>put it on my calendar. And yeah, that's the beauty

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 13>of bread. Even the mistakes are usually still delicious. That's

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 13>a good life philosophy too, I guess