WEBVTT - Bloomberg Wall Street Week - November 29th, 2024

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 2>This is Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston, bringing you

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 2>stories of capitalism this week, reconciliation, what's needed to make

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 2>the tough decisions surrounding the national debt, and a look

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 2>at one of Wall Street's passion assets. We talk with collectors, advisors,

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 2>and auctioneers about the big business of fine art, but

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 2>we start with a story about demand, specifically the demand

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 2>for artificial intelligence. We know it will be big, and

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 2>that means we're going to need massive computing power from

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 2>data centers, and lots of them.

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 3>When you see the world's leading technology companies who are

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 3>as close to this as anybody, making the scale of

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 3>investments that they are, to me, that's an extraordinary sign

0:00:57.840 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 3>of the potential that they see in the future.

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Eric Schwartz is CEO of cyrus I, one of the

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 2>largest data center owners and operators in the world. Schwartz

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 2>is at the forefront of a modern gold rush as

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 2>big tech companies scramble for the resources to turn electricity

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 2>into computing power. We wanted to see for ourselves what

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the building blocks of the AI boom looked like. And

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 2>so we traveled to Texas, a state with one of

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 2>the highest numbers of data centers in the United States.

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 2>In a suburb north of Dallas, we met with Schwartz

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 2>at one of his firm's new facilities. It spans nearly

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 2>a million square feet. We toured the massive, high ceiling

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 2>building filled with row upon row of black cabinets shielding

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 2>racks of computers from prying eyes, all of which are

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 2>built a meter or so above ground level to permit

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 2>an elaborate system to pump cool air up into the

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 2>computer ax That explains the high ceilings, which let the

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 2>warm air rise to be recycled through the cooling system.

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Schwartz says the race to build data centers like his

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 2>in Texas is only getting started, with Cyrus one in

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>the process of adding additional buildings and capacity next to

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 2>its current facilities.

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:11.679
<v Speaker 3>The risk to us as a developer for those customers

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 3>is to ensure that we can keep up with their

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 3>demand and that we're delivering both capacity and service at

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 3>the levels they require. They're all operating mission critical infrastructure,

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 3>and their expectations are intensely high. We do our best

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 3>and are constantly investing to ensure that we can keep

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 3>up with those expectations. But our real challenge is to

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 3>make sure that we're keeping up with their requirements because

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 3>they're counting on this infrastructure to support the growth investments

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 3>that they're making.

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Keeping up with those requirements is not going to be easy.

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 2>But the good news for the United States is that

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 2>it has a strong head start. There are more than

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 2>seven thousand data centers worldwide, with nearly two thousand in

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 2>America alone. US data center capacity grew almost a quarter

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 2>in the last year alone, with another seventy percent set

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 2>to come online from centers already under construction.

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Today, the United States is a substantially larger data center

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 3>market than the other regions around the world, and that's

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 3>driven in part by the adoption of the Internet, by

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 3>the presence of the large technology companies who are based here,

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 3>but also by the fact that investment and progress against

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 3>artificial intelligence here in the United States is further advanced

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 3>than it is in other regions, and so right now

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 3>you'll see much stronger demanding growth in the United States.

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Other countries around the world are very focused on the

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 3>implications of artificial intelligence and are concerned about making sure

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 3>that they have the infrastructure in their economies to keep up.

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 3>And so we're seeing and will continue to see efforts

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 3>by other countries around the world to support that type

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 3>of infrastructure in their countries to support their economies and

0:03:59.120 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 3>their growth.

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Valtimore Slayzak is kkir's global head of Digital Infrastructure. His

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 2>firm is making big investments in data centers, including when

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 2>it teams with Global Infrastructure partners to buy Eric Schwartz's

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Cyrus one for fifteen billion dollars back in twenty twenty two.

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Like Schwartz, he sees big opportunities coming in Europe and

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 2>in Asia.

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 4>US is definitely, at least from our perspective, well ahead

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 4>in terms of the deployment of AI, and I think

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 4>it is a strategic element of I think the growth

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 4>going forward. If you just think about a couple of

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 4>maybe examples cloud companies, US cloud companies have about seventy

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 4>five percent global market share in terms of AI funding.

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 4>Eighty percent of it is coming in the United States.

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 4>So US is definitely leading the charge, so to speak,

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 4>in terms of deployment. But I think we see the

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 4>similar playbook being applied in Europe and in Asia Pacific.

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 4>But just to try to quantify the scale of it.

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 4>US data center market is about a fifteen gigabott market

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 4>growing to forty gigawatts. European market is about six gigabotte market,

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 4>likely going to triple or quadruple over the next four

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 4>or five years to twenty gigabotts, and then Asia Pacific

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 4>x China is on a similar trajectory, so the scale

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 4>is really different between US and those other markets.

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 2>Meeting that growing demand for data centers will not be easy.

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 2>There are a host of potential hurdles that people like

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 2>Christine Wood, headed the data center practice at Burns McDonald,

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 2>are finding ways to overcome.

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 5>We're looking at water availability, connectivity, location, demand, latency, and

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 5>then we secondarily look at the regulations, whether or not

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 5>they have zoning appropriate, zoning requirements, tax incentives, and really

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 5>if it makes a business business sense to be in

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 5>that specific location. And then once you go into more

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 5>of the design and construction, what we're starting to see

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 5>and what we have been doing, especially with our construction arm,

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 5>is that we really want to get ahead of some

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 5>of the labor and craft labor shortages that we see

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.919
<v Speaker 5>out on site, and so we are designing data centers

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:11.559
<v Speaker 5>that are more modular, have skid are able to work

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 5>within the craft shops of these different self performed contractors,

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 5>so that we can deploy these data centers more rapidly

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 5>and on a scalable basis.

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 2>But as big as those obstacles may be, the biggest

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 2>by far is finding the electricity of the centers require,

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 2>with Goldman Sachs estimating that they already consume one to

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 2>two percent of all the power supplied worldwide and that

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 2>that number could double by the end of the decade.

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 5>Power is becoming the long pole in the tent to

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 5>be able to find a data center site, and so

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 5>it really starts with that is the power puzzle that

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 5>we're seeing associated with the data center sites. And so

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 5>when we're walking through looking for great sites and supporting

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 5>our clients on the site due diligence is we're looking for.

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 5>Power is the number one item.

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 2>For data centers and their clients. Having enough power is necessary,

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 2>but not sufficient. The power also has to be there

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 2>without fail and without interruption of any kind.

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 3>No excuses. The infrastructure that it's operating here needs to

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 3>be available twenty four hours a day, three hundred and

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 3>sixty five days a year. Without interruption. So where it

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 3>starts is that for all of the equipment that we

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 3>have deployed here, whether it's the battery banks, whether it's

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 3>the cooling units, all of that, there is always a

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 3>backup for that equipment in the event that something were

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 3>to fail, and things always fail and you need to

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 3>have a backup to ensure that you don't have an interruption.

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 2>That backup at cyrus One's new Texas facility means layer

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 2>after layer of redundancy. The facility gets power straight from

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 2>the grid, but if that fails, batteries located behind the

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.119
<v Speaker 2>data center kick in. Those batteries are kept fully charged

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 2>by a series of generators which are constantly running, and

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 2>if all else fails, behind the batteries are a role

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 2>of equally large diesel powered locomotive engines. If a power

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 2>outage lasts beyond the life of the batteries, the engines

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 2>take over to ensure there's nothing to stop the center's operation,

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 2>including its elaborate cooling system, no matter what the problem.

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Eric Schwartz says this unprecedented need for a liable power

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 2>goes beyond just finding out where to get it and

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 2>how to make sure it's uninterrupted. It also demands an

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 2>upgrade if the entire way we generate and distribute power

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 2>in the United States and elsewhere.

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 3>So data centers are effectively technology factories, and like any factory,

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 3>we draw power to operate to operate the factory. And

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 3>so the challenge and the work that we do is

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 3>to work very closely with the utilities and the grid

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 3>operators to identify the right locations where we can connect

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 3>to that power and ultimately deliver it to our customers.

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 3>And this requires work and require there's a lot of collaboration.

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 3>But the United States in particular, then other countries as

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 3>well are investing in growing their power infrastructure, not only

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 3>for scale but for sustainability, and we're very focused on

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 3>making sure that we're locating in the right places.

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 4>Ultimately, what we think is will require a comprehensive solution.

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 4>So the technology companies themselves are large consumers of of

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 4>course this infrastructure, but that's not the only demand driver.

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 4>It's also unsharing, it's electrification. So there's other what I

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 4>would say are great signs of economic progress and growth

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 4>in the United States, and we should be really proud

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 4>of that, but it requires a new investment in generation

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 4>and in transmission right, it's something that we really haven't

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 4>seen over the last twenty years. So if you look

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 4>at the US grid over the last twenty years, effectively

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 4>stagnated in terms of the demand growth at about forty

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 4>one hundred TARO wide hours. What's really interesting that there's

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 4>been an interesting energy transition during that time. We've decommissioned

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 4>a lot of call plants that's dropped by a sixty

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 4>five percent, We've increased generation from natural gas by at

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and seventy percent, and increased generation from renewables,

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 4>and so the grid itself has really gone a very

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 4>positive transformation. And so what do we think with this

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 4>level of growth. The expectation is that the men side

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 4>of energy will have to go up at a two

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 4>to three percent, which is really different than what the

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 4>industry had seen over the last twenty years. And so

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 4>it require new generation to be developed and likely increase

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 4>investments in the transmission infrastructure to help enable this. And

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 4>I think from our perspective, we believe that again this

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 4>partnership could really create a power powerful solution.

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 2>The source of the energy used to power data centers

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 2>has become a key part of the equation At a

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 2>time when the world is trying to wean itself off

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 2>of fossil fuels, it raises the question of whether meeting

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 2>the demand will come at the cost of warming the

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 2>planet even further, something that those commissioning new data centers

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 2>have very much in mind.

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 5>We continue to see our clients have a lot of

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 5>sustainability goals around renewable and green energy, which is really

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 5>really great to see, and so with that, you also

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 5>want to think about where that capacity is coming from.

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 5>With renewables, solar and wind come on and off the

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 5>grid because the sun's not always shining or the wind's

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 5>not always blowing, and so a lot of times, some

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 5>of the other power generation plants, especially nuclear, they can't

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 5>ramp up and down on the grid like solar and

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 5>wind can. And so you actually have some capacity available

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 5>at some of these nuclear power plants in order to

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 5>serve some of these data center customers. And then data

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 5>centers also are a really good marriage for that nuclear

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 5>plant because they have a constant load.

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Cyrus One's customers are demanding that it find more ways

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 2>to get power from sustainable sources, but the company owner

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 2>KKR is seeking the same not just for Cyrus one,

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:08.959
<v Speaker 2>but for its infrastructure investments overall spike in power demand.

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean for the climate, Because at the

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 2>same time we were trying to get away from fossil fuels.

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Try to say the climate, how do you put those

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 2>two together.

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 4>We're obviously a huge investor in energy transition and we're

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 4>big believers in that. I don't think that those are

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 4>necessarily mutually exclusive. It's part of a comprehensive solution. So

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 4>as I just mentioned investments in generation effectively decommissioned call plants,

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 4>investments and natural gas plants, those are not only things

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 4>that help affordability, but also energy security. So we believe,

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 4>as you know, through our portfolio, we've been a very

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 4>large investor in renewable We have ten renewal platforms across

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 4>the globe, invested over thirty four billion dollars in sustainability

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 4>since twenty and ten, and we think that's an important

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 4>part of this solution.

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Wall Straight Week with David Weston

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Wall Straight Week with

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>David Weston's from Bloomberg Radio.

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 2>This is a story about reconciliation, something we may not

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>set out to achieve, something we might even resist as

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 2>long as we can, but something that most of us

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 2>end up coming around to in the end, reconciling with

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 2>one another today for the sake of what our children

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 2>need tomorrow. There's no shortage of issues, important issues for

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 2>us to disagree about, like whether our economy needs the

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 2>government to tax less.

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:31.719
<v Speaker 6>Cut taxes very substantially and create a great economy, or

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 6>spend more.

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 7>First time home buyers with twenty five thousand dollars, or.

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 2>What we should do about our southern border.

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 7>Allowing these millions and millions of people to come into

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 7>our country, and look at what's happening to the towns

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 7>all over the United States.

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 8>Have a broken immigration system and we need to fix it.

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Every year in the Mountains of Colorado, the Aspen Economic

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Strategy Group gathers leaders from business, government, and academia to

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 2>find common ground on important issue like these, seeking to

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 2>use evidence about the effects of policy to resolve policy

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 2>differences and to bring us closer to that reconciliation we

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 2>all need. So we went to Aspen to speak with

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 2>the group's executive director, Melissa Karney, who said that today

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 2>reconciliation faces a unique threat.

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 7>What's really interesting and I think challenging is our country

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 7>is definitely facing a reconsideration of an economic paradigm, and

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 7>from both parties, we're seeing a move towards more nationalist sentiment,

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 7>more protectionist sentiment, things that really move away from the

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 7>market based economic framework that's driven growth and dynamism for

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 7>so long. And so the agenda for this year is

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 7>really based on all, right, let's take this as given

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 7>to you. Political concerns, national security concerns, domestic discontent are

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 7>driving this reconsideration. And so we're pulling together people who

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 7>have studied these issues, who have worked on these issues,

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 7>who have been in government and grappled with these issues

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 7>for a very long time, to try and say, what

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 7>kind of trade policy should the US pursue. How can

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 7>we pursue industrial policy in a way that preserves and

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 7>promotes economic dynamism and economic growth while addressing the very

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 7>real national security and economic domestic challenges that are driving

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 7>this reconsideration.

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 2>One of the biggest issues in Aspen this year the

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 2>federal debt and what can be done about it. Since

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 2>the early two thousands, the United States has faced an

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 2>annual budget deficit as the government began spending more than

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 2>it collected through taxes. That deficit was made worse, first

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 2>by the Great Financial Crisis and then by the COVID

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 2>nineteen pandemic. In both instances, the US government stepped in

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 2>to rescue the economy, sending the federal debt surging from

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 2>nine point four trillion dollars before the Great Financial Crisis

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 2>to a whopping thirty five trillion dollars to day. And

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 2>the debt just keeps on coming, with the Congressional Budget

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Office expecting it to go by an additional two trillion

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 2>dollars this year alone. But if there's any good news

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 2>about the deficit, it could be that its alarming size

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 2>might force America's leaders to do something about it, even

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 2>if it means coming together from very different places. First

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 2>rule of holes is to stop digging, and you have

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 2>to the people who are in those positions of consequence

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 2>responsibility have to understand that they have to govern with

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 2>a recognition of limits. Tim Geitner served as Treasury Secretary

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 2>and President Obama's decidedly democratic administration, but when it comes

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 2>to the federal deficit, he's not far away from former

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Republican House Speaker, Kevin McCarthy.

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 9>You got to do something with the debt. You can't

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 9>maintain because what we did when COVID had and you

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 9>look in just hindsight, we didn't know what was going

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 9>to happen, so we up the spending knowing what was

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 9>coming out, but Congress never pulls it back. You've got

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 9>some entitlements that are so critical, but you want to

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 9>sustain those and be able to So you've got to

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 9>deal with it now, but you've got to do it

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 9>in a bipartisan manner. Otherwise one party attacks the other.

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Like McCarthy, Tim Geidner sees, bipartisanship is the only way

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 2>to address a problem that's only becoming more complicated with

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 2>each passing year.

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 6>In some ways, it's a much harder challenge because we're

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 6>going to have to spend more in defense, and because

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:21.479
<v Speaker 6>we have an aging population, it's going to be more

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 6>expensive to give them healthcare over time, and so we're

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 6>starting from a very bad place. They're going to have

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.919
<v Speaker 6>to make some trade offs, and of course these are

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 6>things you know you can't do in a partisan basis.

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 6>You know, one of the great strengths of what Hank

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 6>is built here is you know, you do get people

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 6>from different parts of the polical spectrum who disagree on

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 6>fundamental things to come together and sit there and listen

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 6>to people deep expertise, to debate hard things, and to

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 6>try to recreate a place where you can have hard,

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 6>pragmatic conversations about those tough trade offs ahead.

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 2>That Hank is talking about is his predecessor as Treasure Secretary,

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Hank Paulson, who served under President George W. Bush. Paulson

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 2>agrees with both Geitner and McCarthy that the debt is

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 2>a big problem, but he also sees a silver lining.

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 10>I would say, so I get asked all the time

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 10>about the economy, and I say, listen, don't ask me

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 10>about when the Fed's going to kind of interest rates

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 10>or what have you. Because we're in a great spot here.

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 10>But the one thing we know, the big cloud on

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 10>the horizon is our federal debt. It's unsustainable and if

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 10>not checked, it's altimately going to destroy our prosperity, which

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 10>can undermine our security, which is rooted in our economic strength.

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 10>And so the way I think about it, if you

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 10>want to look at the dark cloud right on the

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 10>negative side, that so many of us who have talked

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 10>about the deficit for so long it looks like we're

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 10>crying wolf, right, and so politicians and both parties sort

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 10>of are ignoring it. Right. But the longer we wait,

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 10>the more expensive it's going to be and the more

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 10>dangerous it's going to be to clean up this mess

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 10>before it strangles us. And so again, but that's the

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 10>bad news. Now what's the good news. The good news

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 10>is we're a rich country. Right there's a lot we

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 10>can do if we start working on it right away.

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 10>We're gonna need both revenues. We're gonna need taxes and

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 10>we're gonna need spending cuts. And people on each side

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 10>don't like to hear that, but there's plenty of ways

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 10>we can raise revenues and not impede growth by just

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 10>closing preferences and loopholes in the tax code. And believe me,

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 10>you can't deal with us without dealing with entitlements. But

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 10>you can clearly deal with entitlements through means testing and

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 10>other mechanisms while protecting those that need it the most.

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 10>So we can do both.

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 2>If Hank Paulson says we can get there, many of

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 2>us will believe him. He helped lead us out of

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 2>the Great Financial Crisis after all. But even if we

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 2>have a sense of where we need to go, what

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 2>are the steps between here and there? Paulson says part

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 2>of the answer is having a Treasury secretary who has

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 2>the trust of the president and ultimately those on both

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 2>sides of the isle.

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 10>The number one priority is, first and foremost, develop a

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 10>relationship of trust with the presidents, because Treasury secretary sounds

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 10>like it's a very important position, and it is, but

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 10>all the power really comes to what's delegated by the president,

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 10>and then the relationships they can build on both sides

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 10>of the isle. Right, So what you have to do

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 10>is you have to convince Democrats and Republicans come with

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 10>ways to bring them together. Regulators are independent, but you

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 10>can have a lot to say if you build relationships.

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 10>So I think a lot of it first and foremost

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 10>is building that relationship of trust, right with the president,

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 10>with both sides Democrats and Republicans in Congress, and with

0:20:57.800 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 10>your colleagues.

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Pulson's successor agree Ease, but says a Treasury secretary needs

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 2>to balance working across the aisle with speaking truth to.

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 6>Power and with markets and with people around the world

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 6>that want to believe that they can trust in what

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 6>you say, and you'll make choices with integrity. But I

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 6>think Hank's absolutely right. The most important thing is that

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 6>you have to recognize you have to be in a

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 6>position where you are able to say what you think

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 6>is truth and what is important for the country to

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 6>do or not to do. And sometimes you have to

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 6>be the break and the constraint, and sometimes you have

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 6>to be the accelerator, the catalysts that try to move

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 6>a system that's hard to move to better choices.

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 10>I've always said, you don't want some other's Treasury secretary

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 10>who's a politician who wants some day to be president

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.919
<v Speaker 10>of the United States, right, because there's a tendency to

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 10>say what people want to hear, right, And you need

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 10>to talk about what people need to hear. But you

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 10>need to have the support of your president to be

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 10>able to speak that way.

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 2>But let's face it, if we're politically easy to fix

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 2>our problem of rising down, we would have done it

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 2>long before.

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 11>Now.

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Kevin McCarthy knows a thing or two about the intersection

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 2>of politics and policy.

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 9>The interesting part about government. You've got very best idea,

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:11.919
<v Speaker 9>but that doesn't mean it passes. So you have to

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 9>understand policy and politics, and if you don't understand both,

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 9>you're not going to be successful at either.

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 2>And when it comes to the politics of the debt,

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Kevin McCarthy favors taking a chapter from history from other

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 2>times when Congress needed to take big action that was

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 2>politically fraud.

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:29.959
<v Speaker 9>The way to really tackle it is to look at

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 9>the way we handled after the Soviet Union collapsed in

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 9>the ninety right. We had all these military bases, but

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 9>the member of Congress is not going to vote to

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 9>shut it down, so they created what was called a

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.719
<v Speaker 9>brack a base realignment and closure. So if we create

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 9>something like this where all parties get to appoint some

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 9>they have to one package has to be able to

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 9>come out of that committee, no amendments. You voted up

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 9>or voted down. So at the end of the day,

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 9>that decision will be made on both parties doing it together.

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 9>Don't criticize each other, but that decision now. And these

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 9>big problems that are macro problems, you can't solve them

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 9>by one party, and our government is not designed where

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 9>one party rules. You have to have compromise.

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 2>In the end, it's not that we need to be

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 2>reconciled to doing something about the national debt. It's not

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.360
<v Speaker 2>really about what needs to be done. It's not even

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 2>about how we could go about it. It comes down

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 2>to reconciling ourselves to doing something. Now, if we fail,

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 2>we're going to have to reconcile ourselves to imposing the

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 2>problem on the next generation.

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Wall Straight Week with David Weston

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Wall Straight Week with

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>David Weston from Bloomberg Radio.

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 12>Ladies and gentlemen, of course, we'll welcome to our twentieth

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 12>century and contemporary evening seal.

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 2>This is a story about investing in our passions. For many,

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 2>art is a passion, but it's also a big business,

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 2>one that generated over sixty five billion dollars in sales

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 2>last year. And at the core of that business are

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 2>people who buy the art, people like Peter Krauss.

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 11>Remember these pieces of work, are these these assets, if

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 11>you want to call them that. They don't produce an income.

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 11>They don't have a coupon associated with them. The only

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 11>income that you get is the appreciation.

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 2>Krauss is chairman and CEO of Aperture Investors, and has

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 2>spent a career in finance, including as head of Alliance Bernstein.

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 2>With his wife, he has also become one of the

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 2>most avid art collectors on Wall Street.

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 11>My wife and I've been collecting since we got married,

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 11>which is forty four years. And the first thing we

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 11>bought was really sort of a small print, and I

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 11>said to the galerist, who's not alive any longer, I said, well,

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 11>you know what I like, and if you have any more,

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 11>give me a call. And he looked at me and

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 11>he said, here's what we're going to do. If you

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 11>want to collect art, he will come in every Saturday

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 11>and I will show you aren't. But if you think

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 11>I'm going to call you on the phone and tell

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 11>you there's something for you to come and see, that's

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 11>not happening. And I took his adminission seriously and we

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 11>went we my wife and I went in every Saturday,

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 11>and every Saturday he showed us work, most of which

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 11>we couldn't afford, but all kinds of paintings, very little sculpture,

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 11>but some. And we finally found a painting that we

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 11>liked and we bought and it was six thousand dollars

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 11>and we paid for it five hundred dollars a month

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 11>until it was paid off.

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 2>Over the decades, Kraus and his wife Jill have added

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 2>to that single work, paid for an installments, and assembled

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 2>a very large collection. It's people like the Krouses who

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 2>are at the center of a growing web of players,

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 2>including auction houses, banks and advisors. They connect one of

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 2>the kind assets to collectors of all levels, from the

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.120
<v Speaker 2>very experienced to those just starting out.

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:05.679
<v Speaker 8>A lot of times clients because they're because art is

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 8>such a passion for them, it's a pastime, and so

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 8>they'll let their guard down, which is, you know, wonderful,

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 8>But at the same time, you might you don't want

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 8>to be caught off guard and have a surprise later

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 8>and buy something that maybe you know was overpriced or

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 8>you just weren't aware of all of the factors involved.

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 2>Forteini Zidis is head of art Finance at City, one

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 2>of the major banks that have added art advisory and

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 2>financing to their investment offerings. When needed, they lend against

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 2>the investors' collections to provide the liquidity needed to acquire

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 2>new art. Zidis works with Mary Kate O'Hare who runs

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 2>City's art advisory business.

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 13>One of the most important roles of an art advisor

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 13>is the ability to tell a client no, because you

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 13>you know, sometimes clients will send us stuff and say,

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 13>what do you think about this, and it's it's you know,

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.679
<v Speaker 13>I think again. We're always looking out for our client's

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 13>best interest.

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 3>We are.

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 13>You want to make sure they're getting the best they

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 13>can So if we don't think it's the right piece,

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 13>we'll explain the reasons why. Then the client is equipped

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.880
<v Speaker 13>with the information, they can always make a decision say nope,

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 13>I love it, but then they go into it with

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 13>eyes wide open.

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Doing that can be a challenge in a market that's

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 2>notoriously opaque, but for buyers like Peter Krauss, variety and

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 2>risk can be both a bug and feature setting art

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 2>far apart from the kind of assets he's spent his

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 2>life investing in.

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 11>It's not like the stock market where you want to

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 11>buy a share of Tesla, and all the shares of

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 11>Tesla are exactly the same. Whether it's the first share

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 11>or the a share of the one million share, doesn't matter.

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 11>They're all the same. That's not true for it.

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 2>While each work of art is unique. So there's a

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 2>big business in bringing some clarity to the market and

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 2>in bringing together the buyers and sellers. Enter Edward Dolman, well.

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 14>Basically it's a sort of perfect form of the market.

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 14>It's is the ultimates of demand and supply where the

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 14>two meet with an auctioneer in front of all our

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 14>clients who have come along to bid for the works

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 14>of art that we've offered for sale.

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 2>After a twenty seven year career at Christie's, Edward Dolman

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 2>became CEO of Phillips, which specializes in contemporary art. Auction

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Houses like Phillips, Southeby's and Christie's provide a public forum

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 2>for price discovery at events throughout the year, including big

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 2>ones in the spring and the fall.

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 14>So the art business is essentially driven by this auction machine.

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 14>But round it is a huge sort of ecosystem of

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 14>galleries and collectors and museums and art institutions. So we're

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 14>a big community. But I do think the auctions are

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 14>properly at the heart of it.

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 12>And we can open up with good interests on the

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 12>phones in the room and online. Good luck to you all.

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:01.959
<v Speaker 12>At sixty seventy eighty thousand, I have with advanced it already.

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 14>It's been transformed actually in the time that I've been

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 14>in it advance, which is a long time, that's thirty

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 14>five years. When I first started, the market was opaque,

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 14>to say the least. The only people had any pricing

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 14>information where the auctioneers and the dealers who attended the

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 14>auctions and wrote down all the.

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 10>Prices in their catalogs.

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 14>And I think the biggest transformative event in our world

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 14>has been information and access to data. So really the

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 14>market we see now, what's so different about it is

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 14>the access to information that everybody has who's in that

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 14>room competing, whether they're in Asia or South America, or

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 14>Europe or America, they have access to the same information.

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Better information is one change in the auction business. Another

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 2>is the size of the guarantees auction houses are called

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 2>upon to give sellers and methods they've developed to help

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 2>share the risk of those guarantees with would be buyers.

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 14>As the sort of scale of of the auctions have

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 14>gone bigger, just in terms of monetary values, it's impossible

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 14>for the auction houses to take the risk on their

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 14>own balance sheets, and so you know, there has been

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 14>a very sophisticated sort of development of the concept of

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 14>the irrevocable bid, where an auction house will look and

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 14>try and find someone who wants to take the risk

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 14>from you, someone who actually loves the work of art

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 14>is very interesting wants to buy it at that particular level.

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 14>A key part of the auction business now is looking

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 14>for these counterparties and trying to make sure that the

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 14>risk is spread and is taken off the auction house

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 14>balance sheet and placed.

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 11>Elsewhere who like to open the bidding here.

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 2>The price may be public, and the seller may be

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:51.959
<v Speaker 2>protected by guarantees and arobical bids, But for the buyer

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 2>the question remains whether a work of art is worth

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 2>the prices being bid, and also how those prices might

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 2>be financed, which is we're for teenize Itis and her

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 2>colleagues at City come in at one.

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 4>Hundred seventy million for the wall is selling here to

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 4>you one U seventy million dollars.

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 8>The art market can be still opaque. It has gained

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 8>transparency in some ways, but in many ways it still

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 8>remains not a transparent market. A novice collector might need

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 8>some guidance. So some of the things we look at

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 8>when evaluating art, be that for an acquisition, a sale,

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 8>as collateral for an art loan for insurance purposes, we

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 8>look at a range of factors. We look at an

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 8>artist's market history it's a more established artist. We look

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 8>at longevity of that market and what's happening. We look

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 8>at the individual artwork itself, so the sale history of

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 8>that work, oftentimes or not oftentimes, but sometimes artworks might

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 8>show up for sale several times at auction, and what

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 8>does that tell you? Did it fail to sell? Is

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 8>it unquote fresh to the market? Work for which sometimes

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 8>there's a premium because that work has been off the

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 8>market for a number of years, and that creates a

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 8>lot of kind of excitement when it comes up for sale.

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Banks like City rely on their assessment of works value

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 2>in making loans to the buyers a good many loans.

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 2>According to Deloitte, outstanding borrowing against art could surpass thirty

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 2>six billion dollars this year, up from a projected twenty

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 2>nine to thirty four billion dollars in twenty twenty three. Banks,

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 2>non banks and boutique lenders have increased their lending by

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and nineteen percent over the past five years,

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 2>but these loans are not simply secured by the value

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 2>of the art being bought. They're made to the purchasers themselves.

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 8>As a bank, we offer recourse loans, which is different

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 8>than asset based lenders. So the art is definitely you know, important,

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 8>and that's why the clients are able to typically live

0:32:57.680 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 8>with the art on their wall, So we don't take

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 8>possession of the art, so clients keep it in their homes.

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 8>Typically the art can appreciate in value and they can

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 8>take that capital and put it towards other investments, purchase

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 8>more art, you know, various purposes, but it is primarily

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 8>based on the client's financial picture. There are asset based

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 8>lenders out there for sure that are competing. However, it's

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 8>a different model, I would say, because in some cases

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 8>they may have to take possession of the art. Typically

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 8>the rates would be higher than what a bank would offer.

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 2>As borrows money becomes a bigger piece of the puzzle.

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 2>It also means that now, more than ever before, the

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 2>fortunes of the art industry have become more closely tied

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 2>with interest rates, which may help explain why overall art

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 2>market sales were down four percent last year from the

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 2>year before.

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 14>You can actually look at the growth or contractions in

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 14>our market get a better understanding of the relationship of

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 14>art and finance, and I think it reflects a lot

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 14>of the lending that I was talking about, the sort

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 14>of explosion in terms of lending against works of art.

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 14>The interest rates on those loans have become a more

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 14>and more significant player in our world. So whilst the

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 14>stock markets have done reasonably well over the last couple

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 14>of years, you know, the art market has felt a

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 14>little bit of a decline, and I think that has

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 14>been driven largely by interest rates and significantly higher levels

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 14>of interest rates we have now than we add for

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 14>a long time between twenty forteen and sort of twenty

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 14>twenty two.

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:39.799
<v Speaker 12>Fourteen million, nine hundred thousands.

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Today the art market is larger and more transparent than

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 2>in the past, and it's interwoven with interest rates and

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 2>financing and expert advisors. But in the end, whether you're

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:53.479
<v Speaker 2>an art investor, a collector, or something of a mix

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 2>of the two, the value of your purchase depends in

0:34:56.560 --> 0:35:01.240
<v Speaker 2>part and whether it will resonate through times. In the media.

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 2>More generally, we follow a certain phenomena that rise up

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 2>and all of a sudden, there's a great deal of

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:09.399
<v Speaker 2>interest a certain artists or a certain form of art

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 2>sometimes which goes away from your experience over quite a

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 2>few years in this business. Can you discern the difference

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 2>between a fad and a trend?

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 14>It's a very good question. I don't think I can.

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 10>That's the truth.

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 11>I think it's impossible. I literally think it's impossible. I

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 11>think that if you were to ask yourself the question,

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 11>if you went back to Renaissance times and we're in

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 11>Leonardo da Vinci's studio and he was painting the Mona Lisa,

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 11>would you have known? Probably hard to tell.

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 2>But fortunately for a true collector like Peter Krass, it's

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 2>not about predicting where the market will go.

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:55.800
<v Speaker 11>As a collector, the key issue is trying to unlock

0:35:56.200 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 11>the language that the artist is using to communicate their

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 11>feelings or whatever they're putting into the art. And it's

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 11>trying to figure out that language. That's the mystery of me.

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:11.279
<v Speaker 11>And where you figure out that language, then all of

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 11>a sudden you see what the artist is doing. You

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 11>may not like it, it may not speak to you.

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:17.760
<v Speaker 11>But if it does speak to you, if that language

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:19.840
<v Speaker 11>is something you read and it does excite you and

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 11>it moves you.

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting for the true art collector. As for the

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 2>true artist, maybe it doesn't matter how many people are

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 2>moved by a piece. One can be enough that does it.

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 2>For this edition of Bloomberg Wall Street Week, I'm David Weston.

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 10>Stay with us.

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Today's top stories and global business headlines are coming up

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 2>right now