WEBVTT - Leading Off September 25th, 2024 (Ep. 907)

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? Everybody, Welcome into Leading Off the Fantasy

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Pros Baseball Podcast. We are presented by Bet three six five.

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>If you bet five bucks, we'll get one hundred and

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty in bonus bets when you use that promo code

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>leading Off, and that is only with our friends over

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>at Bet three six five. It's not the season finale

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>for the show, but for myself, Joel Rico and my

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>dear friend and co host Casey Bubba, this is the

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 1>last time you will see us on Fantasy Pros for

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the season. Really appreciate all you guys who continued listening

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Peanuts and cracker Jacks in the live chat

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 1>have really kept the shows going as well, So thank

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you to all involved. This is our last show, so

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna make it a good one. We're gonna be

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about a lot of different things today, playoff races,

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>some streamers, injury updates, all the usual stuff. We're gonna

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>have some fun. Bubba, how you doing today?

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Doing great?

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Glad to be here for the last hurrah of the

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 3>diehard baseball guys that we are.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 2>So it's good to be here.

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 3>The football guys will come back and Joet and he

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 3>knows what's going on in September and all that fun stuff.

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 3>So you guys will enjoy that and make fun of

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 3>them all you want with your peanuts and cracker jacks,

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, we're here to get you some streamers, get

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 3>you to the finish line for those that are still grinding.

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 3>So thanks looking forward to it, And if you're in

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 3>the Southeast, stay safe. Things are looking nasty.

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Down your way.

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen what's going on.

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Hurricanes coming through. Like there's a chance like tomorrow's gonna

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 3>be complete wash out of Atlanta and the Mets.

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 2>There's like zero percent chance that plays.

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 3>And right now there's about a forty percent chance of

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 3>rain starting about an hour there. They have a night game,

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 3>so's things can get interesting in the Southeast and for

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 3>the next couple of days.

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>That's what it was because I heard some people online

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>saying there's a chance for the games to get delaid

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and then the Braves might get to throw sale in

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>a not Game one sixty three, but Game one sixty

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>two to kind of decide all the marbles. We're gonna

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about some of the wild card

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff in the second, but that would be quite the

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>advantage of getting to use Chris Sale a second time there.

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Considering the season he's put together, It'll all be fine.

0:01:57.720 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>It always is pretty fun following these races in the

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>live week of the season, and that's where our story

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>begins today. Talking about the Padres, this was this is

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool. You don't usually see this, but they punched

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 1>their ticket to October with a game ending triple play

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to leave Shoheo Tani in the on deck circle. But

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>were you watching this one? Where were your thoughts on

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>all of this crazy situation that happened.

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 3>I was recording last night' Bubba and the Bloom had

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 3>the game on in the background, and I was kind

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 3>of looking at it, like what just happened there, kind

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 3>of confused, And then we finished our recording like right

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 3>about that same time, and I got like a million

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 3>alerts on my phone about Padres clinched the postseason, the

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 3>ending with a triple play, all this stuff, and it

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 3>was absolutely amazing, and it was poetic justice that one

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 3>of the worst managers in baseball doesn't bunt in that scenario,

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 3>and he had to bunt on for the first pitch apparently,

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 3>and then wiped it off after the first pitch and

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 3>then that took place.

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm just I say it, not just.

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 3>I know it's a Giants Dodgers thing, but Dave Roberts

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 3>has cost that team so many big games down the line.

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Like he is, he's been blessed with the great with

0:02:57.760 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 3>the great team, and to see it end like that

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 3>night just made me laugh so much. For the years

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 3>of everyone telling me how great the Dodgers are and

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 3>the Giants suck. But we have three World Series, like

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 3>legit World Series in the last you know, fifteen years,

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 3>unlike the Dodgers.

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>The rivalry is a live and well folks. But yeah,

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I have heard a lot of criticism of Dave Roberts.

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>It seems like every year we get down of this time.

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know how true it is because I

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>don't focus on it so so much, not being a

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>California guy, but they're not usually as prepared as they

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe should be, and it definitely definitely feeds into some

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of the rivalry. There for sure is Bubba rooting for

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the Padres. Joseph in the chat is wondering.

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 3>I am a big Padres fan. I wouldn't mind seeing

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 3>the Dbacks, but the Giants have been beating them down

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 3>the last two nights, which made me laugh because I

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 3>did not see that coming. But if I had to

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 3>pick an NL team, it's Phillies and Padres for me.

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Those are the two that I'm really really pulling for.

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 3>It's hard not to love the Phillies team. Man, there's

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 3>so much fun like the last few years in the

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 3>postseason watching them celebrate there a blast. But this Padres

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 3>team's cool too, Like there's a lot to like there

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 3>with them. So yeah, I'm rooting for pretty much eleven

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 3>teams not named the Dodgers should win, and I'm a fan.

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>As long as the World Series doesn't go back to

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Chavez Ravine, Bubba will be a happy fella at the

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the season. I do want to talk a

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit about some of these final wild card spots

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>because we are down to just a few games left.

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the American League to start off here, Buba,

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>just briefly, because we'll get into the fantasy stuff. But

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>what do you expect to happen with those final two

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>wild card spots? Do you expect it to be as

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it currently says? The Tigers and the Royals, the Twins

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>and the Mariners also have a chance, and I guess

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox, if they run very pewer here, could

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>have a mathematical chance. How do you see those final

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>two spots breaking down?

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Though?

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 3>I think the Tigers, man, this is like a momentum thing.

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 3>We've seen it year after you Like, I'm not saying

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 3>they going to the World Series like the Dbacks were,

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.559
<v Speaker 3>but we all it feels like every year we get

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 3>like one team that just runs so pure at the end.

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 3>They find their way in the postseason. Now, how you

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 3>know far does it get from there?

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Who knows?

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 3>But I think the Tigers are getting in for sure,

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 3>and Oils had the advantage on them technically. But if

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 3>you go to fangrafts, Tigers eighty seven and a half percent,

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Royals eighty two percent, So it looks like they're pretty

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 3>much locked in.

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned though, that.

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 3>That's actually for the Yeah, no, they're pretty much locked

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 3>into the playoffs right there. The Twins have a shot,

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 3>like you mentioned, and you're looking at the Red Sox,

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 3>it's like a slimmer of a whole, like zero point

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 3>seven percent right now for the Red Sox. So the

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Twins are gonna need a miracle. I feel like it's

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 3>a Tiger's Royal situation there, which is fun for baseball.

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Two new teams we haven't seen in a while. The

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Royals have fallen off of late, because if you would

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 3>have had this question early September, you would think they'd

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 3>have a chance to like make a little noise in

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 3>the postseason. But they got the pitching yacht Reagans, you

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 3>got Lugo and walk is no slouch. That'll keep you

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 3>in a lot of playoff games. But yeah, Tigers, come

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 3>on Treek Scouble game one of a playoff game, Like,

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 3>let's go.

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty fun stuff.

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the question at this point is who's getting

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the ball in Game two? I think that's the only rule.

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's the Yeah, it is Kyder Montero, the guy

0:05:58.120 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 3>you want to go to battle with, Like that is

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 3>like brand Herder's actually probably been the best number two

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 3>option of late. And that's the conundrum, and that's why

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 3>certain teams just can't go the distance.

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Like if the Tigers went the.

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 3>Whole dang thing, that's like beyond proving any analytic person correct,

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 3>So that'll be nuts. But yeah, I just I'd love

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 3>to see schools like the old theory, like would be

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 3>great to see Trout in the playoffs. Like there's certain

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 3>players I just they deserve the big stick once in

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 3>a while. And the year Schoobl's having right now. I

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 3>know we've talked about it all the time on this show, Like, dude,

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 3>just put them on the stage for one game. Let

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 3>them have it, and I'll give the Tigers fans credit.

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 3>They're coming out in droves. I saw a tweet from

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 3>a Beat writer today the weekend series in Detroit. It's

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 3>almost all sold out already, all three games in Detroit.

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Like that's insane for the Tigers. So it's cool to see.

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>And our friend Marty Tallman, I don't know if you

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>saw yesterday you wont himself some free tickets courtesy of

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the Tigers. So good for him to get out there

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and support We got a lot of Detroit.

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 2>The Tigers get it.

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 3>The Tigers get it man, Like they're a franchise that

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 3>doesn't fill out the place. They're not that they don't

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 3>spend a lot of money, but hey, we need to

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 3>push these young kids to go. Here's some tickets. Like

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 3>they gave out a bunch. That's that's smart baseball. Unlike Pittsburgh.

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 3>That is smart baseball.

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh we'll talk a little bit about in the pocketbooks

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later on. I think that Minnesota might

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>have a chance just based on the schedule. They have

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of games left against the Marlins and then

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>they'll be facing the Orioles to end the season, who

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>won't really be playing for so much. Where with Kansas City,

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, they got to end up facing the Braves,

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>who will be playing for a lot. So I don't

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's set in stone that final spot there. I

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>thought the Twins, like a couple of weeks ago, I

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>would have thought that they had a chance to maybe

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>be a World Series team. Really good offense, solid three

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>headed monster in the rotation, good bullpen. But they have

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>really really fallen apart here in terms of the National League. Here,

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it's the Mets, the Diamondbacks, and the Braves are the

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>only teams that are really competing for those final two spots. Bubba,

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bit worried for the Mets. What do

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you think is gonna happen?

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Though?

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like they're probably gonna be the odd man

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>out based on the way things are trending. But what

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>do you think.

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's rough, but I still think I just it

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 3>depends on how this whole rain thing plays out. I

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 3>know that's kind of a cop out answer. Atlanta, like

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 3>there is all these jokes on Sunday, They're going to

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 3>their house of horror. They stink in Atlanta, and dude,

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 3>they got smoked like they were red hot coming in

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 3>got smoked on Tuesday night. Schwelly's a beast. There's no

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 3>doubt about that. But yeah, you got sale and you

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 3>got freed coming up like they have their three best

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 3>lined up to face the Mets. I still have a

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 3>weird feeling the Mets get through, I really do. I

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 3>agree it's almost a coin toss. Like if you look

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 3>at fangrass projections, Mets are seventy seven percent, Braves are

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 3>seventy percent. I think it's closer than that. I think

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 3>it's like that number probably flips if the Braves win

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 3>the night. Like it's that simple. It's that close of

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 3>a coin toss situation. And you're mentioning the schedule coming

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.839
<v Speaker 3>up here, you got like you said, Atlanta gets Kansas

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 3>City this weekend. Singer Luga Reagan's you know, not a

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 3>cakewalk scenario there and that's if that stays in line,

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 3>of course, and then you got this Mets team that

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 3>hopefully isn't reeling after this, but they get Milwaukee who

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 3>might be off. You got ray montoss Myers, their pitchers

0:08:57.720 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 3>aren't going deep. I think Mets are set up for

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 3>a better weekend, let's put.

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 2>It that way.

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we've also talked about how the Brewers are probably

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be facing They're probably through with the drinking

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>for now, with the celebrating, but they're not playing for

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>much at this point. So if you don't see the

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 1>A team lineups, if you see a starter get scratched

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>or something there, don't be shocked. It could really go

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>either way. In the National League, with the Braves and

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the Mets, they always tend to play each other in

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the final week of the season, which does make things

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty fun. Sticking in Atlanta, Spencer Schwellenbach had a great

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>final start of the season, the kind of cap off

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a breakout year for him. Really, seven innings of one

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>run ball with four strikeouts. He finishes up with a

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>three forty seven ERA and one zero seven WHIP over

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty games starts. I kind of want to pair him

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>with the next guy tanner Byby but a great year himself.

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Seven innings of one run ball himself yesterday, and he'll

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>finish with the exact same era of three forty seven

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>with a one to twelve whip. So just thinking about

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:51.599
<v Speaker 1>both of these guys separately or together, I kind of

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>wanted to frame them together because I think there's a

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>chance they go pretty close in drafts next season. What

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts on the pair, Bubba, and who would

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 1>you be more interested in trusting in twenty twenty five

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>drafts as probably your SP two. I would imagine I'm.

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Still a Tanner Biby guy, but it's probably more just

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 3>biased because I was all in on Biby this year.

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 3>I wrote articles on him, and I got a lot

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 3>of pushback early in the preseason, like I was over

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 3>excited on him, and he made the adjustments and it

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 3>was great to see.

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 2>As no downplay on Schwellenbach.

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Like he's absolutely amazing as well, but it's kind of

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 3>like the whole are you paying for the career year?

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Is this his career year?

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 3>A lot of questions to be said about Schwellenbach there.

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 3>It's quite the jump. He took massive increase in the

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 3>innings as well. I'm gonna lean with the Biby camp

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 3>on this one. He's the ace of their staff, so

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 3>to be your SP two is pretty sweet. Now, Schwelly

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 3>is a great to option b if that's how it

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 3>plans out. But I'm going to buy you on this one.

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you think do you think they will go close together?

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I know it's way too early, but it feels like

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:47.959
<v Speaker 1>they'll probably be in a similar type of range in

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of sps and overall of my am I crazy there.

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Now, they'll be pretty close.

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Like Bibby'll probably be around five or six give or

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 3>take on, maybe maybe four if he creeps up, but

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 3>he'll be an SP and like Schwellenbuck in the early

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 3>draft I did was tenth round and we all said

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 3>a that was that was late August. Like, he's gonna

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 3>move up and he keeps pitching better and better. He

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 3>should be a fifth or sixth round pick when all

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 3>things are said and done. So yeah, they should be

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 3>going quite quite close together for sure.

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>That'll be an interesting one to monitor. I think it's

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>just because the eras are ending on the same number.

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I figured it was a decent discussion point. But I

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>think Bouten Francis is also somebody that deserves a bit

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of our time. I don't know if we've talked too

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>too much about him on the show. I'm sure he's

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>come up, but I think he deserves a little segment

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>here another shout out outing from him. Yesterday, I'll be

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 1>at just five innings. They could have probably let him

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>go a little bit longer. I think it was like

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy one seventy two pitches, but we'll take it over

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the second half. One point eight zero ERA and a

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>point six zero whip. It's unbelievable type of numbers that

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 1>you'd say, if you just saw those numbers, you'd think,

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 1>all right, I was de Gram, maybe that was Strider,

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>but the point six whip is just absurd. He's gonna

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>finish with a three to three ERA and a point

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>ninety three whip over one hundred and three and two

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 1>thirds innings. Insane to think he'll get one or two

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>down ballot Czy Young votes after this performance. I know

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the innings are a bit lacking, but he's been the

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>best pitcher in baseball in the second half of the season.

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he might get one or two. But is

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that just the Toronto Homer popping out in me.

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 3>No, like baby, No, I do think he should get

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 3>some if it's either third fourth place votes, he should

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 3>get some acknowledgment on the cy Young you know there's

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 3>gonna be there should be one hundred percent going to

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 3>one guy in Detroit and then you fill in the

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 3>blanks afterwards on that. So I don't see an issue

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 3>with Francis getting some you know, third fourth rate round

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 3>type stuff.

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how interested I'm gonna be heading into

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the next season. I feel like he's gotten a lot

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of babbit block and there will be some concerns for

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>me taking him too early next year. But man like this.

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a shame that the Blue Jays wasted this in

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a season where it didn't matter. But one of the

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>best stretches I've ever seen from a starting pitcher, and

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe that will ever see from a starting pitcher. Point

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>point six whip and like said, unbelievable stuff he did

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>for your ratios. We got a question here regarding a

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of pitchers. How would we order Schwellenbach, Yuri and

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:12.079
<v Speaker 1>Sandy al Contra for next season? So Sandy start the

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>year Schwelley's healthy, but I think i Contra's healthy heading

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>in helps. Sorry sorry, but I think al Contra is

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of close to healthy now, so I think he'll

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>be ready to start the year. But he sounds like

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you're Schwellenbach over al Contra.

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Schwellenbach because he finished the year and Contra did not

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:32.319
<v Speaker 3>throw this year, So I'd have all Contra second yeary third.

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 3>That's my only difference. Like al Contra is, you know,

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 3>maybe the best. I've always been a little down on

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 3>him because he's a he has to accumulate, So how

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 3>much is he gonna accumulate next year is the question.

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 3>So I'm gonna go Schwellenbach just because he finished this

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 3>year on the mount.

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's totally fair. Yeah, when you see guys

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>get hurt in the year or they don't throw at all,

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it definitely makes you worry wonder what they're gonna look

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>like coming into next season. I think I'm probably on

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the same page. I wouldn't really have much of a

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.439
<v Speaker 1>problem going Yuri over Sandy just because of some of

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the things you meant, like the strikeouts, the volume concerns.

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>But like Angelo said here, Yuri was kind of born

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on the injured reserve. It's hard to know when he's

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be healthy or not. He's dealt with a

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff considering what is he twenty one, Like,

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>he's gone through quite a bit at this point.

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, very very young and talent's there's got to somehow

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 3>stay healthy.

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Man.

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 3>It's an issue with the Elizardo Yuri al Contra Garrett like,

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 3>that's almost every picture in Miami. He's had issues and

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 3>must be a Florida thing. Tampa Bay and Miami have

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 3>some fun stuff with the with the elbows and.

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>The Dodgers who had at some points, to say, two

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>whole rotations with the pitchers on the IL. They had

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>like nine pitchers. Good pictures on the IL at certain

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>points this season. Let's change gears and talk about some hitters,

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and we'll start in your neck of the woods, Bubba

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>with Elliott. Is it Elliott? I think it's Elliott, right,

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Elliott right, it's Elliott.

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was jelln Ryan a ways back when I

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 3>went to the Giants game for the first time early

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 3>this season and they announced him in warm ups as

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Elliott Ramos, I was like, what, yeah, so now it's

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 3>always it's Elliott from here on out.

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I still hear Elliott, he I hear all these kind

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of names, but it's Elliott. It just imagine that the

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>h is not there, essentially, But he went four for

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>five yesterday. It is twenty third homer of the season.

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Looking at a two seventy batting average, one hundred and

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty one WRC plus almost an eight hundred ops and

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a fairly fairly small sample size of one hundred eighteen games.

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>It's fairly small, but it's also fairly large, depending on

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>how you want to look at it. What's your interest

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>level heading in the next season, Bubby, You've got to

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>watch him up close and personal this year. Is he

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>actually a breakout star or is this something that we

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>should probably be wary of in drafts next year.

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm a fan. I'm a big fan of what we

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 3>saw this year. He was a big time prospect, one

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 3>of our top prospects. For a while, people thought he failed,

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 3>kind of like Luis Montos, and maybe Mantos figures it out.

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 3>It's like, I know, I've said it on this show

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 3>in mini shows. Young players need reps. It's just that simple.

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 3>And you know they finally just ran with him. He

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 3>had a couple of hot streaks, he had a couple

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 3>of slumps. They stuck with him, and he's put together

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 3>a really good season. He's a staple in the lineup.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 3>He's going to be the starting left fielder for hopefully

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 3>years to come in San Francisco. And is he going

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 3>to be an MVP? I don't know if he has

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 3>that level, But could the dude be a two to

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 3>seventy hitter that gets you close to thirty home runs

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 3>each year? Like that's legit who Elliott Ramas can be.

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 2>And I'm a big fan of him going forward.

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 3>ADP wise gets interesting because there's a lot of outfielders

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 3>in play there, but he could be a very very

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 3>strong asset. Just the speed He'll have some but not

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 3>ton so that's what's will probably push him down a

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 3>little bit. But I think everything else pretty solid. I

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 3>think he's got one hundred and fifty combined runs in

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 3>RBI is too. Like he's putting together a pretty strong

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 3>season for the Giants. And that's why I tweeted last

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 3>night when he hit his home run, I said, I

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 3>know schemes, I know Jackson Merrill. I just hope Elliott

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 3>gets a few rookie of the Year votes to acknowledge

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 3>how good he actually has been this season.

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>He's been fantastic, And I think part of that Once

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you said that, I went and looked at the at

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the betting odds. In the National League, it's just such

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a stacked field, and in the American League, it's like

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>it almost feels like it's gonna go to somebody by

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>defaults like, Okay, I guess it's gonna be Heal, I

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>guess it'll be Cows, or I guess it'll be Wells

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>or whoever. In the NL, there's like five or even

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>more legitimate Rookie of the year's in most season Skeiins

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Merrill absolutely a lot of seasons getting it done, Cheerio

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of seasons is getting it done. And

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 1>then showed at Imanaga, who probably will end up on

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:10.120
<v Speaker 1>some cy young ballots, but the fact that he's thirty

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>one years old probably takes some of that away. But

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it is a stacked field in the National League, and

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody else who could potentially be there in a less

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>stacked season, Tyler Fitzgerald, who I believe still has rookie

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>eligibility even though he's a little bit older. I think

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 1>he's twenty six, but hell of a season he's put

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>together in just ninety two games, and he had a

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>home run yesterday, which is partly whyse on the sheet,

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>but also we're starting to wrap up the year a

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I wanted to evaluate things as a whole

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 1>now to some extent, a two eighty seven batting average,

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 1>fifteen homers and seventeen steals over ninety two games that

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.719
<v Speaker 1>pro rated out over a whole season is probably not

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Probably it is a first round type of player. But

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at a high strikeout rate. You're not looking

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>at a great track record. Not a bad one, but

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>not somebody that you would have thought would be a star.

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>What's your interest level in Fitzgerald and would you prioritize

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>him over Ramos? I no different positions in all but

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the two Giants assets there. Where do you put them?

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 3>Obviously the lazy answer depends on your format. Five outfielders,

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 3>probably Ramos if you need speed, Fitzgerald, Like I took

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 3>Fitzgerald around eleven of that too early draft because I

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 3>want twenty twenty upside at my middle infield, and I

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 3>understand the strict right, it's gotten better and this is again,

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 3>a young player getting tight like regular reps. He's the

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 3>starting shortstop. He's going to be the starting short stop

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 3>next year. He plays pretty good defense. He's been in

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:27.479
<v Speaker 3>a pretty good slump of late. They kept running him

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 3>out there. They's moved him down the order, kept running

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 3>them out there. Matt's starting to wake up again, like

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 3>young players will do this, and I think there is

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 3>a lot of talent trying not to be a home run.

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:38.959
<v Speaker 3>If anybody's listened to me long enough, I'm very narcissistic

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 3>when it comes I'm very very angry when it comes

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 3>to my giants, Like there's no sugarcoating that. But when

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 3>I see like development, that's something I like to see.

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Ramos has developed. Fitzgerald has developed wisely even this time around.

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 3>Starting look like he took a lefty deep yesterday. Like

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 3>he's starting to look like a little bit better ballplayer.

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 3>I'm not all in on him yet, but the future

0:18:57.720 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 3>is not as bleak as I once thought. We'll see

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 3>this stuff signed free agents, and that's a whole nother podcast.

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I'm very optimistic when we're seeing with Fitzgerald.

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 3>I think if you want like a power speed guy,

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 3>say we talk about how shortstop drives up. If you

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 3>miss out on shortstop, not a bad plan, be.

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Not about at all. And they've already locked up Matt Chapman.

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's see if they open up the pocketbooks a little

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>more this offseason. I'm sure Bubba is hoping for it,

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>but I want to shout out Ryan in the chat

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>here real quick, thanks showing Bubba won the ship a

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:25.439
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago and joined the sweet taste of victory.

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>You enjoy that, Ryan, enjoy the last couple weeks of

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the season, or couple weeks, a couple of days of

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the season at this point, hanging that banner, it will

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>fly forever for you, my friend. Let's talk about Michael

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 1>Harris before we jump into some injuries. He's been on

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>an absolute ridiculous heater, multiple hits in five consecutive games,

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and in four of them he has three hits. Over

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks, he's hitting four oh seven, unbelievable stuff.

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like he's probably gonna be somebody that I

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've kind of gone back and forth, interested,

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>not that interested, but it's hard to look at what

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>he's done as of late and think that the Braves

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>will be fully healthy next year and not be interested.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Michael Harris is going to go bob

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 1>a third round or so? And would you have interest

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>where he is going to go?

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 2>You think, yeah, he's a third rounder for sure. It's

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:08.479
<v Speaker 2>a lot of that.

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 3>I think you know, everyone's gonna see the shiny new toy.

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 3>They're gonna go Jackson Marrow, They're gonna go Jackson Curio

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 3>and those things where last year that's where Michael Harris

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 3>was going. So it's just going to push him down

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 3>by default. And it's like again, it's I keep saying

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 3>I want the back end round one right now. A

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 3>lot can change. Obviously it's September twenty fifth, for crying

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 3>out loud, but it's so loaded you get like two

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 3>great picks right there. In reality, you can get Michael

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Harris as well, like you could set up for like

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 3>a just thunderdome in the back end there. So I

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 3>think he will fall just by default because there's so

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 3>many good players and it could be a nice little

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 3>bounced back spot because you're not expecting the you know,

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 3>massive batting numbers, but the power speed's legit and the

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 3>only question is a coon He'll be back where does

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Harris hit? That's the million dollar.

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Question, Hitt. And second, I would love it if he's

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.479
<v Speaker 1>down at ninth. I wouldn't hate it, but definitely wouldn't

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 1>like it as much. The argument is he would like

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>turn over for a Kunya and I'll be and whoever else.

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's not terrible. We've seen him produce from that

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 1>spot before. I'd like to see him at the top

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of the order, though, but just an incredible season. And

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to your point, the outfield in the third and fourth

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>round next year is gonna be pretty good. You know

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be able to double tap a couple of

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>those guys. Hell, even at the back end of the

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>first you might be able to take four outfielders in

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>your first four picks. Ye Julio, Carrol Surio, Mike Harris

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>hypothetically if you're drafting it like the back end of

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the first round. I don't know that if that's something

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd want to do necessarily, but it doesn't sound too

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>shabby as of right now. If you're able to get

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 1>all four of those guys.

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 3>No, man, it's the old philosophy I've been trying to

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 3>instill the last couple of years and I bring it

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 3>up on a mile out of my shows is we

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 3>got to stop focusing so much on positions. Yes, you

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 3>need to fill a roster, but in the end, it's

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 3>the final stat line the matter. So these are the

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 3>four best players, all right, let's rock and roll. Like

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 3>two years ago, I think it was a labor draft.

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Ryan took five outfitters in his first seven picks, and

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 3>he was not happy on the live stream. He won

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 3>the league. He won the league. So you just build

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 3>the best team. That's that's why Fitzgerald comes into play

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 3>now at stuff like that.

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, it's something you know. Even just last year,

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 1>like Al two Vea and Bryson Stott were both targets

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 1>of mine, and there came some drafts where I was like,

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>especially early on, I was like, I have Al two

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>v I don't need to take Stott. Throw him in

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>the middle endfield for all. I mean that wasn't like

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>he was an amazing player this year. But throw him

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in the middle enfield, throw him in the utility spot,

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 1>wherever it is you can find room. It's why the

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Otawani dh clogging that whole thing up. I think it's

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of gone with the Dodo Bird over the last

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of years between him and what Ozun has done

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. I don't think people mind clogging up to

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>DH with those type of numbers. But let's go onto

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the injury segment. We'll talk Nester to Cortes. He's gonna

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>undergo an MRI on his elbow on Friday. Does not

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>look like we're gonna see him again in the regular season, Babba,

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I think you can, probably if you're in a daily

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:39.880
<v Speaker 1>league at this point, just cut bait and pick somebody

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>else up.

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the only weird caveat i'd take just wait for

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 3>the results because he's still technically scheduled to pitch tonight,

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 3>so for some reason, it's just like a minor thing

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 3>where they move him back to day. You're gonna want that.

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 3>Someone in the chat way early on, I think was mentioning.

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 3>They asked him, was potit starting right now? It's rumored

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 3>to be Marcus Stroman jumping in there for that star

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 3>he's been on the bullpen. But yeah, I just yes,

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 3>if the result obviously comes back negative, you drop in

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Nester Cortez one hundred percent on board there, But as

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 3>wonky as things are right now, just sit back because

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 3>the Orioles are not good versus lefties of late, so

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 3>somehow you getting nester.

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 2>I'd run with it.

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Second half Orioles have been really, really not good. I

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>want to pair a I want to pair a couple

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of guys together here, Francisco Lindor and Jordan Alvarez. They're

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>both I mean, for Lindor it's in play that he

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>could come back today, not sure if it's one hundred

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:31.880
<v Speaker 1>percent going to happen. Jordan Alvarez hoping to get back

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in the lineup this weekend. I guess my question is

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 1>for those people playing in weekly or semi weekly lineups.

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>If you're on the NFBC, you got to set a

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Friday through the weekend lineup. Are you putting these guys

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in if we don't have any clarity, like let's say

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:45.959
<v Speaker 1>they have to miss Friday, are you putting them in?

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Specific it looks like Lindora'll be back. I guess this

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 1>is specifically a Jordan Alvarez question. How confident do you

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>feel that he is going to play over the over

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>the weekend.

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'll give you this much, because about maybe five

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 3>minutes before we started recording chan roam of the Houston

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Astros beat reporter said, jord On Alvarez and Chas McCormick

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 3>will not accompany the Astros to Cleveland. They'll stay back

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 3>and train with the team. So that answers your question.

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 1>So that puts a bow on his season. I guess yes. Okay,

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 1>So Jordan Alvarez, get him out of your lineups. I

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>guess that's that's a tough one to do it this

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>time of the year. But if he's not gonna play,

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna play. Lindor looks a little rosy, or

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody in the chat saying that he grabbed a bat

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 1>last night, I think that. I don't think he actually

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>had an at bat. I think you mean, like in

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the dugout he grabbed a bat or something.

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 3>He think he was getting loose. I'm just worried with

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 3>the way the weather's so bad.

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 2>What are you doing?

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>That's another point. Yeah, Like if he, you know, takes

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a bad swing and strains something or something, plus you

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>gotta worry about the weather. Although it is, you know,

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 1>the guy who's gonna come second in MVP voting, So

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not somebody that you really want to put on

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 1>your bench, but it's a. It's a tricky situation if

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>we don't have an update or we probably will. But

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>let's say Friday he's scratched. I think he's probably somebody

0:24:57.880 --> 0:24:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting for the weekend.

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, No, it's definitely an up in the I

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 3>set him for the first half of the week, so

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 3>second half I need to see a lot more positive

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 3>news in that direction.

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's lock Clayton Kershaw not face hitters this week, and

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>there isn't currently a plan for one that will happen,

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>no idea when he is going to face hitters, So

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:17.199
<v Speaker 1>he's not going to pitch in the regular season. That

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>seems clear enough. Any chance you think that Kershaw pitches

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs, and hell doll, the Dodgers won him

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>pitching in the playoffs.

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Right now, it's literally I don't think he pitches in

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs. I think we've seen the last of Kershaw

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 3>this season, unless a miraculous change takes place in his health.

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Because he looked like he was going to face pitchers

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 3>on our hitters on Tuesday and he's basically shut down again,

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not feeling too optimistic about that.

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>The last piece of injury news is another bad one.

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:43.640
<v Speaker 1>No good stuff comes out this time of year. Really,

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Austin Riley season is done. He will not be available

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 1>for the postseason as he continues to recover from a

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>fractured hand. You think that him missing the last couple

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 1>weeks of the season potentially takes a round or two

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>off the price next year, Like you said, finishing healthy.

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 3>No, No, he was hitting the ball so well as

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 3>kind of a freak injury. I think you ready to

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.439
<v Speaker 3>rock and roll for the regular season. You might get

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 3>a discount and take advantage of him.

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>If I do see a discount, I probably will. Although

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>as a whole it was pretty disappointing season, but I

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>think the Braves just had some bad juju this year.

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll be willing to invest back into the next season.

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's run through some potential streamers for those of you

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>still in the hunt. This week, we're going to talk

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>about a few guys for the daily lineups. Obviously, weeklies

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>are long done for the year, but let's talk about

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>tonight Cody Bradford and Brady Basso on either side of

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the equation, Bubba Oakland and Texas. If you're in a

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>daily league, are you streaming either of these guys, I

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>think I would with Bradford. What do you think?

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 3>I love them both, and I just want to throw

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.439
<v Speaker 3>out I think Basso's very, very good because in September,

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Texas is striking out thirty four percent of the time

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 3>verus left. He's hitting one forty nine with a thirty

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 3>five WRC plus as a team. That is atrocious, atrocious stuff.

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 3>So I like both those pitchers and I'll throw one

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 3>more out there real quick for you. Joey Cantillo going

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 3>up against the Reds, a team hitting one seventy one

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 3>with a thirty eight WRC plus with a twenty nine

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 3>percent carry versus lefties in the month of September. So

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Antillo is another one who's actually been pretty good of late.

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 3>So there's some nice, nice Wednesday streams for you.

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>There are some decent options I'm looking into Thursday. Again,

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>these are not all set in stone. I just kinda

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>want to get Bubba's thoughts on a couple of them.

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>The first one is a little bit dicey. I will

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>admit Kyle Gibson at Colorado. Colorado is really not a

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>team that scares me. Gibson is kind of whatever. But

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>let's say it's a fifteen team league here, Bubbo, and

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll only type of deal. You're streaming him in deeper

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>leagues or you're just trying to steer clear of Kyle Gibson.

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 3>Deeper leagues. You can stream shallow leagues. No, because you

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 3>said the Rockies don't scare you, Kyle Gibson scares me.

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.400
<v Speaker 3>So that's that's the difference there. But in deeper formats, yes,

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 3>you still roll Kyle out there because it is a

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 3>chance at a w You got.

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Kumar Rocker at Oakland tomorrow. I know that it hasn't

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>been maybe as good as we would have hoped, but

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:47.479
<v Speaker 1>still pretty decent stuff against a team like Oakland. I

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:49.679
<v Speaker 1>think that in most cases I'm streaming him, especially if

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for strikeouts. But but you have any worries

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>about throwing Kumar Rocker out tomorrow.

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:57.479
<v Speaker 2>If you need strikeouts, go for it.

0:27:57.520 --> 0:27:58.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if he has enough to get a win,

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 3>so definitely, depending on what you're looking for.

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 1>That's true. David Festa against Miami coming off of not

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 1>a great one, but a fantastic matchup here, Bubba Festa

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 1>has disappointed me a little bit, but I do love

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the skills and I do love the matchup.

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I agree, skills are great matchups great over gave

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:18.360
<v Speaker 3>it four early but settled down on Monday. If you're

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 3>looking for a little at late late push the season,

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 3>I could see rolling the dice with festa.

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Angelo mentioned Reese Olsen in the chat here. He's also

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>on the list for his start against Tampa. What's your

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>interest level for that one?

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 3>It just depends on how far Olsen goes in the game.

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 3>But phenomenal matchup Rays have been pretty garbageably, especially a

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 3>lot of strikeouts.

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's move into Friday, there's just one and again these

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>are a little bit dicey. As we go further and

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>further along, you never really know one hundred percent. But

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>as of right now, jpcars line up to start against Seattle.

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>He's been not too bad in the second half. Seattle's

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>been a great matchup. What's your interest level here, Bubba?

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 3>I like series. Just make sure you need it because

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 3>the one thing I'll say is they have turned it

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 3>on in September two sixty seven, average one twenty five.

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 3>I have WRC plus versus lefties, and a lot of

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 3>that is Jay Rod warming up in a big way.

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 3>So if you really need, you know, strikeouts and a

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 3>chance to win. Sure, if you're pretty safe, be cautious

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 3>with this one.

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Fred Dinger in the chat we just mentioned Kintio Bubba

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is a fan of using Joey Cantillo for Saturday. A

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of guys I've highlighted, Nick Martinez at the Cubs,

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Andre Polante at your Giants, Bubba, what's your thoughts on

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>these two.

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Cubs are one of the hottest teams in baseball right now,

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 3>So I'm gonna steer clear of that one. So no

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 3>attacking the Cubs in my mind. Polante if you're desperate,

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 3>a lot of pitch to contact there, but he has

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 3>pitched really well. I'll give him that much over the

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 3>last month or so. So if you're looking for some upside,

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 3>I get it. Probably he's going opposite Blake snell Win

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 3>might be tricky.

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I put Baba through the ringer there just quick fire,

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 1>quick fire streaming questions. But that is kind of the

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>group of options. Things will miss, things will mix around

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. But Bradford, Basso, Kumar Rocker for strikeouts,

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>David Festa re Andre Polante, those are kind of the

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>main ones here. Over the last few days For Sunday.

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even gonna try and recommend anything because I

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what's going to happen for anybody, But

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>through Saturday, those are our favorite picks, just for fun.

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how fun this is in Baltimore, but

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>eloy him and has dropped down optioned to Triple A.

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>What does his future look like at this point? Is

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>he somebody that's gonna slowly fade out of baseball, you think,

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>or does somebody give him another chance to actually live

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>up to that potential. It feels like we're kind of

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>running out of time at this point.

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think he'll get a shot just because baseball

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 3>is so bleak, and he'll be affordable, i'd imagine, But

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 3>it's been bad. An injury is lack of power when

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 3>he does play, and then you know, getting basically traded

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:44.719
<v Speaker 3>for and sent to Triple A not looking good for you, Lay,

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 3>that's for sure.

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 2>They might need to hang.

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 3>His jersey open the little dugout once again to bring

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:49.959
<v Speaker 3>him back to life.

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:51.959
<v Speaker 1>They're not hanging it in the rafters anywhere. I'll tell

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you that at this point. Roddy Tillas, I saw you

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it on your sub stack. I don't understand why

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 1>teams do this. I saw some people trying to defend

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the pirates and say and say, no, no, you know what,

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>he didn't get the advats he did. They they cut

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>him with a few games left so he wouldn't get there.

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>It's just the scummy move over a couple hundred grand

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it was two hundred to two hundred and

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty k. People don't forget this type of thing. Bubba

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>teams players guys looking to sign. It's not like Pittsburgh

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is a big free agent destination anyway. Do you think

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>this has much of an impact on their ability to

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>bring in players at all?

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 2>It will.

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 3>It will probably give like Paul Skeens a re signing

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 3>with the team, stuff like that. There's gonna be a

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 3>lot of trepidation in those thoughts.

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 2>That's put it that way.

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 3>You could have let him play Tuesday, get four played

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 3>appearances in DFAM on Wednesday. That's a very simple fix

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 3>to the problem. It wasn't like you're bringing up a

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 3>top prospect. You brought up Richie or Joshua. Pelasio's kind

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 3>of know who he is and the over Pigero in

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 3>his eighty eight WRC plus, so you didn't really neither

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 3>one's the first basement to top it off, just throwing

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 3>that out there. You could have waited a day. You

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 3>could have done the right thing. There was no need

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 3>to make this move. Pirate bad teams stay bad teams.

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know why they would have needed to

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>make it like the season's done on Sunday, let him

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>finish out the year. Is just embarrassing a player who,

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>albeit he wasn't amazing for them this year, but there

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>was a stretch where Rowdy Teles was really really good.

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 3>And they were in the playoff hunt at that time.

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 3>They were continuing for like a while, like they were

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 3>actually good.

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I just think it's a bad, bad thing

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to do to a good guy, to a somebody around

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>baseball who is known as a good guy. I love

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>him for my time in Toronto. Obviously he's not a superstar,

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:32.959
<v Speaker 1>but you shouldn't do this kind of thing to players.

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>The Angels did it last year, a similar thing when

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>there was somebody who could have gotten some kind of

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>bonus or some health relief thing and they cut him.

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a catcher. I can't remember exactly

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>what it is somebody listening is gonna know what I'm

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about and think I'm insane for not remembering it.

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>But there are these little weird people moves that people

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>don't forget, especially those players around the league who are

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be looking for deals as free agents. But

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 1>let's move on, and let's talk about the three up

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and three down quickly to Reik Scooble, to nobody's surprise,

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>have an nitting seven strikeouts and no earn runs. Ory Polanco,

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>who has been on the down or just ignored a

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>lot this season. I have dragged his name through the

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>mud because he was one of my most drafted players.

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>He very much disappointed me. He went four for four

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>yesterday with a home run, and then Von Grissom also

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 1>had probably his best game of the season. Hasn't been

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>much this year, but he did have a three hit

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 1>game himself. So I wanted to highlight a couple of

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>names there along with three school who haven't really done much,

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Ory Polanco and Von Grissom. Bubba, you gonna be buying

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the quote unquote dip next season on either.

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I'm not gonna say no, but Polanco injury concerns

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 3>throughout the entire season and Griffon. We know the talents there,

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 3>but what's playing time look like there's a lot of

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 3>question marks.

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 2>For both of them.

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I'd rather take a chance on Grissom considering

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:44.959
<v Speaker 1>what we saw when he first came up. He's got

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:48.239
<v Speaker 1>a good ballpark, a decent team. Where with Polanco I

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know at this point. Three down John Carlos Stanton

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the golden sombrero of the night. JP Crawford also had

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>one as well. Brandon fought two and two thirds, four

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>earn runs, six hits and two walks. Not good stuff

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>from brand and it fought to end the season. And

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>then a surprise name on the down Logan Gilbert. Four

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>earned runs in three homers over six innings yesterday against Houston.

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Not his best. It wasn't terrible. Usually the down is

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit worse than that, but no starting pitcher,

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you've up more than four earned runs yesterday.

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 1>So it was hard to be good pitching, hard to

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>find a true true blow up. But Baba, that will

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>take us for the last time this season. In two

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>our best bets of the day for Wednesday, and Joey

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>p and the Welsh are still up on the graphic.

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>You'll get them back on Friday for the finale, but

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>you're stuck with us for one more time. Here on

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the Best Bets of the Day, presented by a Bet

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>three six five Bubba, how are you wrapping up your season? Here?

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 3>On leading off, we're staying on the plus money train

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 3>here going Taylor Ward over one and a half total

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 3>basis at plus one twenty five, talked about how good

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 3>he's been lately. Gets a great matchup there against Davis

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 3>and the Chicago White Sox had another good game on Tuesday,

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 3>Corbyn Carrol. I think the the Dbacks bats wake up

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Versu or Tyler Black. Mason Black pitching for the Giants

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 3>on Wednesday night, Corbyan Carol over two and a half hits,

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 3>runs in RBIs at plus one twenty five might do

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:11.399
<v Speaker 3>that in one at bat. And then Joey Cantillo talked

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 3>about him earlier over five and a half strikeouts at

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 3>plus one thirty. I was shocked to see plus one

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 3>thirty on this one as the red strikeout a ton

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 3>of Cantio has been getting six plus k's in his outings,

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 3>so I like that one quite a bit.

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>And TiO you are interested in him. He had that

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>amazing start. What was it against the White Sox? It

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>was like ten strikeouts, seven shutout innings. He has I

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>mean it is the White Sox, but he still has

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot in him. I think that he could be

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody that's pretty interesting. And tonight, I mean, plus money

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 1>plus one thirty for five and a half strikeouts does

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>feel pretty attainable for him. My bats, I'm starting off

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>with one that I hit the last time. I'm doing

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the exact same thing over here. David Peterson over two

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half earned runs. I don't trust him. I

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't trusted him throughout this streak. The underlying data is

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 1>not good. He's still got command issues, the strikeouts aren't

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 1>really there. And I think Atlanta, just based on the

0:35:57.360 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 1>way we're trending here, I think that they're going to

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:00.800
<v Speaker 1>get to him tonight. They don't even need to really

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 1>get to him for this one to hit. They just

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>need to get three earned runs. I think that is

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely gonna happen tonight. Shouldn't say definitely, but I think

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a good chance. Austin Gomber is the second one.

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>How can we wrap up a season without betting against

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 1>Austin Gomber. It's Saint Louis coming into town. They're not

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:20.240
<v Speaker 1>world beaters necessarily, but Austin Gomber is not very good, folks.

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:22.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he has the odds start here and there

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:25.800
<v Speaker 1>where he's okay, but by and largely somebody that you

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 1>can target. So I'm taking plus three and a half

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>earned runs. That one is at plus one zero five,

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:32.359
<v Speaker 1>a little bit trickier at over three and a half,

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>but I'm pretty confident that he's not gonna have a

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>great start tonight. And then we're wrapping it up. I'm

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:39.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna be on the right side of history here. We're

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 1>taking the Angels money line to beat the White Sox

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>tonight and get them into the history books. I think

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that there's only so long the White Sox can hold

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 1>this one off. They won yesterday. I don't see it

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>happening again. So those are our best bets of the day.

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:57.280
<v Speaker 1>And Bubba, the final thing to do on the season

0:36:57.320 --> 0:36:59.359
<v Speaker 1>here for Leading Office pick our final home run call

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>for today and I guess through the final week end

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of the season.

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm gonna go back to the well thought Monday

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 3>would be the day for it. We're going back to

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 3>it on Wednesday. I already picked Corbyn Carroll over two

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 3>and a half runs.

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:09.439
<v Speaker 2>Hits an rby.

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:11.400
<v Speaker 3>I said it might happen and one at bat, and

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:13.919
<v Speaker 3>that a bat will be a home run for Corbyn Carroll.

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 3>I really do believe Mason Black is not that great.

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 3>A heat shuts down the d Backs, I would be

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 3>just amazing happy at the same time. But yeah, give

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:24.800
<v Speaker 3>me some Corbyn Carroll going deep on Wednesday in the desert.

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I am targeting Austin Gomber once again here and it'll

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>be I believe they were teammates at one point, his

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 1>old teammates on Nolan Aeronado.

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 2>No, they were traded for each other.

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>That's right, that's right for each other. I forgotten, my god, it.

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Was Austin Gomber and a bucket of balls and a

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 3>couple other things for Aeronado and cash.

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Some shoelaces, a bunch of bunch of spare parts. I've

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:51.400
<v Speaker 1>totally forgotten that. That is pretty funny. But Nolan Aeronado,

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna take Gomber yard tonight in Colorado.

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:56.359
<v Speaker 1>It's been a bit of a down season for him,

0:37:56.360 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think the situation is right for as Angelo says,

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>auestome goober to get hit around a little bit tonight.

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 1>But guys, this is bringing us to the end of

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the show. I can't promise we're gonna cut the black

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:11.319
<v Speaker 1>and do a Sopranos type of ending or anything like that.

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>But I want to just take a moment to say

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you to Fantasy Pros, to everybody who let us

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 1>take the reins here for the show, to Joe piece

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a Pa, to Chris Welsh. They're gonna be back on Friday,

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 1>but I really do appreciate them trusting us with their

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 1>baby over the final However many shows we did Bubba fifteen, seventeen,

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty shows or so, it's been a hell of a

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:33.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun getting to talk here with you three

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:35.359
<v Speaker 1>to four times a week, and we get to talk

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot more putting the shows together and stuff. So

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you to Fantasy Pros, thank you to Joe and Chris,

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and thank you to you guys who continue to listen

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to the show. I know how strange it can be

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:46.840
<v Speaker 1>when you're listening to your favorite podcast and there's a

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>different voice and you're probably thinking, what the hell. Some

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 1>people might just tun it, turn it off, and I

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't blame them, but you guys stuck around, whether it's

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast side on the YouTube side. So truly,

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:57.280
<v Speaker 1>from the bottom of my heart, thank you to everybody

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:59.839
<v Speaker 1>who helped make the show what it is. Bubba. Any

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 1>final thoughts before we do sign off here, No.

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 3>It's been awesome. It's been pleasure getting to do it

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 3>with you, my friend. You know, we usually record a

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 3>couple times a year. Anyways, it was fun to get

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.319
<v Speaker 3>to do it multiple times a week now. Watching your

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 3>ascension in this world is a lot of fun. So

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 3>looking to see what's next in store for you. But yeah,

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:18.840
<v Speaker 3>I've always enjoyed. This is my third year kind of

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:21.799
<v Speaker 3>being one of the September subs. It's been been great.

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:23.839
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking forward to probably doing it again next year

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:25.359
<v Speaker 3>with you and see you'll see where it goes. But

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 3>thanks to all the listeners in here, and I'll just

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:30.359
<v Speaker 3>keep supporting, support us off and do whatever we do.

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:32.759
<v Speaker 3>But if you guys like football, guys that'd like to

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:34.800
<v Speaker 3>talk baseball from time to time, Friday as your show.

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 3>But if not, Joe and I have other content for

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 3>you can check out, so enjoy and thanks to everybody

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 3>for listening.

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, make sure you follow Bubba over on Twitter. He's

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:45.319
<v Speaker 1>severely under followed at B d Ententrich bd E N

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:47.799
<v Speaker 1>t R e K. I'm at Joel Rico ninety nine.

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:50.240
<v Speaker 1>But go prioritize Bubba. I should not have more followers

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 1>than this guy does. It's ridiculous. Go ahead and hit

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the follow button over there. But guys, I hate to

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 1>actually end the show, but that's gonna do it for

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 1>us for today, this season for us. But there's gonna

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 1>be leading off with Joe and Welsh on Friday. I

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 1>do have some plans throughout the off season. We're gonna

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>be doing some stuff. We won't go away. There will

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 1>still be content on the baseball side. Make sure you

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 1>guys are helping us out with those subscriptions, ratings, reviews,

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 1>doing all that stuff to help the numbers stay steady

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:19.839
<v Speaker 1>throughout the off season. But guys, for the final time

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>this season, for Casey Bubba, I am Joe Alrico. Good

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 1>luck down the stretch. Have a great night. Cheers.

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:32.359
<v Speaker 1>us is by leaving

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 3>A positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify, follow us

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:39.880
<v Speaker 3>on x, Instagram, and TikTok at Fantasy Pros, and subscribe

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:42.760
<v Speaker 3>to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com Slash Fantasy

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Pros MLB