WEBVTT - Gregg and Frank's Quarterback Rankings

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and face for listening.

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy best Friends Forever, Do to to Do Do Do

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do Do do do didna

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>do Yeah? This as the Fantasy best Friends Forever here

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Fantasy Sports Radio New work along. Sorry Frankie Staffeld.

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I am Greg Sosman, channelman, Giman Man. Not much Greggy.

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately went to the Yankee game last night and they lost.

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>But your re grum well for fantasy Well, I wanted

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the Thankees to win ones it. That would have been ideal.

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Ground goes eight something like that. But aside from that,

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>shout out to listener watcher, I know he tweets us

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Constantine hooked me up. I saw that I tweeted.

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I was at the game. Come down to field level

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Section one twelve hooked it up with a beer. Now.

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>All he has to do is by you a beer

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>with a beer, no news, by you a beer now

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>because we owe him a beer. An he buys his

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>BFF beers and we buy him a beer. Listening you

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>come to the studio, you buy me a beer, we

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>will split the air for you. Yeah. Aside from the outcome,

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the game was very fun game. Yeah, from like the

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>seventh ending on it was me Cana, his fiance. I

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>believe so you and your fiance his fiance You want

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>to double day? Yeah, sp spontaneous double day with your fiancee.

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>But it was a time. That's awesome. That's awesome, Constantine,

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:10.959
<v Speaker 1>that that's cool. We look forward to you come in

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>live in studio, take a look on today's show and

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>really going forward, we realize what you want right and

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>ultimately what you need and that's just straight up rankings

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and inside the Road to Experts exclusive bed package. When

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 1>you use frankant Tank, you'll get Frank's rankings. If you

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>want a Venmomi you'll you'll get my rankings. But we're

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>also gonna go through them on the show live for you.

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Give you the rankings, give you who are sleepers are

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>at the position and simply have a debate upon it.

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>That's what this time of year is for. We are

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>officially in the middle of August, so which means we

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>are officially in the middle of the draft season. I think, Frank,

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>every weekend going forward up until the draft day, like

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I think I have a draft, Yeah, I would, except

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. Yeah, ex so this weekend, That's what's right,

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 1>one Monday, We'll got Mondays this weekend, so I have

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>one this Monday that we have the g S t

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 1>uh the next weekend plus Carton's draft, and then a

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>week later is my home draft. That's and that's where

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I got going on. So literally every weekend through the

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>beginning of football season, I'm rock and rolling, and I'm

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>sure all our watchers and listeners are too. Yeah, that's

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly the point right around now. I mean every weekend,

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>like you mentioned, there's drafts going on. So you know,

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>people want to know about our updated rankings, how we

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>feel about certain players. That is basically what we're trying

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to do here. And we're gonna talk about, you know,

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>tears rankings, which guy we have where, and maybe maybe

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of debate who yeah, and probably so.

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>So today we're obviously starting with the quarterback position. Uh

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 1>and and when we get you can get rankings and

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>debate and tears everywhere. Um, but we appreciate you watching us.

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate you given our rankings and our tears. Shot,

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll defend ourselves. And today we bring up with the quarterbacks.

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Tomorrow the running back wide receivers, and listen, if we

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>don't finish uh here, we don't finish the position in

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a day, we'll do it in tomorrow, like no big deal.

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>There's no pressure on this. Obviously, as breaking news comes,

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get to that too. So don't think you're

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna miss any breaking news because of our regular scheduled programming.

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Here we're all being said, Frank, what they started that

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>they Saturdayday has to do with your quarterback in the

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Flex League. Actually, last season in seventeen, Cam Newton average

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>eighteen rushing yards per game in his first five games

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of the season, sixty point four rushing yards per game

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>over his final eleven. Overall, finished first in every rushing

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>category for QB's last season, his seven hundred and fifty

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>four rushing yards was a career high so you saw

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>last year they were a little hesitant to let Cam

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Newton run loose and really, you know, let him do

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>his thing. But after those first five games, they really

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>just said, alright, Cam your thing, go out there, be

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>who you are, and he took off and from there

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>on out he ended up finishing as the top five quarterback.

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And I have him ranked at the top five quarterback

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>right now as well. And they ultimately last year they

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 1>kind of took the reins off him once they realized

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and deemed that he was healthy. This seems to me,

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Frank getting to Cam Newton, who is ranked as my

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>fourth ranked quarterback. UM, this seems like the one year

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in in meanly a while that he's not banged up

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 1>and bruised coming into the year. I mean, he's had

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>some shoulder issues. I remember he had the car accident.

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>He went deep into the playoffs previously. It's not the

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>case right now, like he is totally totally healthy. The

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>body feels good. He's still pretty young, under thirty years old.

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 1>I recognize there's new offensive coordinator, the new quarterbacks coaches,

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>the turners have come in here, but Cam is probably

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>still gonna Cam and when he is healthy he finishes

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>as a top of LEAs five quarterback every single year.

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't see how that changes this year. He's still

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the goal line beast. And I actually picked

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>things from Canuton. Yeah, so I actually have him as

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>my QB three. I moved him ahead of Russell Wilson

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. Um, and partially just look at what he

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>did last year. He finishes the QB two last season.

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned the rushing yards. He still had six rushing

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns last season. Thinking about this, he only threw twenty

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns last year. He now has the best weapons

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 1>of his career. He did what he did last year.

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>That was without Greg Olsen for a majority of the year.

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>That was without d J. Moore, who they just drafted

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>in the first round. So now you give Cam Newton

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the best weapons of his career. And there are question

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>marks with the offensive line. Uh, there's some injuries there.

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>We know that they lost. They lost a big piece

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the guy that went over to the Jacksonville Jaguars. Let

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>me out here, Greg the offensive lineman. So um, yeah,

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 1>so there's questions about the offensive line, but we've seen

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that with running quarterbacks that doesn't necessarily hurt all that much.

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson had a terrible offensive line last year, and

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>while he had to run around more, that kind of

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:36.799
<v Speaker 1>led to more fantasy production. So I'm not really worried

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>about that for Cam. I think he's in line for

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a big year. Al Right, So you said you moved

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson down a couple of pegs consensus, Russell Wilson

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>is h B two everywhere else, Aaron Rodgers is your

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>number one. Aaron Rodgers number my number one. I don't

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>want to kind of dwell on that. He's both of

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>our number ones. And then we get to number two.

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>That's where I have Russell Wilson as most of the

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>fantasy community. Frank, you have dropped them all the way

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>down to number four. How come? Well, I am worried

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>about this double Baldwin injury. Um, they say that he's

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be ready for a week one, but you have

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to worry about that. I mean, look, he's

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>not getting his repsin throughout training camp, and look he

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily need it. He's been with the team for

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a while. He has a rapport with Russell Wilson, and

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I was excited about Doug Baldwin in terms of you know,

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>he was gonna see a career high in targets. But

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you take Jimmy Graham off this team as well. Now

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>they have Nick Vanette, they have Ed Dixon, Tyler Lockett

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>their deep threat. They're trying to talk up Brandon Marshall.

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Now I worry a little bit about the weapons. I

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>still do like Russell Wilson. It's not like I dropped him,

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, outside my top ten or anything crazy like that.

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I moved them down a few pegs. I just feel

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>like Aaron Rodgers, Tom Brady, those guys are as safe

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>as they come. And and Cam Newton I think has

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more upside. Brian Schottenhimer offense worries me

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. So I just do think that when

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you're splitting hairs with these guys at the top, for

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>those reasons, I drop him down a few pegs. I

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>still do think he's an elite rushing quarterback. We know

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the floor that that brings every single year at least

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>four fifty rushing yards in every season. Actually, at least

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>four hudd and eighty nine rushing yards in five of

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>six seasons played with the Seahawks. Um. The offensive line

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>should be a little bit better. I just have some

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>question marks with the weapons there. So so I think

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons that I have Russell Wilson UM

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Tom Brady was really there was a bit inconsistency,

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>oddly enough from Tom Brady, specifically from week thirteen on.

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Let me let you know where he finished. Right against

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo in week thirteen he was twenty eight ranked quarterback.

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.239
<v Speaker 1>He had nine point three fantasy points. In Week fourteen

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs, he had eleven point three fantasy points,

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>finished twenty second that week. In Week fifteen against Pittsburgh

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>fourteen point seven fantasy points that was good for again

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty second, and then in Week sixteen against Buffalo he

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>finished in the top ten, number nine, with just sixteen

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>point six fantasy points. I get why everybody loves Tom

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Brady because he's the goat, right, He's one of the

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>greatest quarterbacks to ever do it and to ever live

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the The offense for the Patriots gets the red zone

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>more than any offense in football, but he had more

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>red zone attempts throwing the passing the ball, uh than

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady last year. UM. Nobody had more attempts in

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>general than Tom Brady last year. We had more passing

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>yards and Tom Brady last year. I understand all of that,

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>but how you ended what you did with Russell Wilson

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of described why I'm interested in him. They need

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>improve their line this offseason for the run game. You

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>asked the d J fluker. But they obviously also signed

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Wayne brand to the long term contract extension. They realized

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that this is by far the biggest weakness of this team.

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And yes, Doug Baldon being out hurt, but like there's

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>this connection between Doug Baldwin and Russell Wilson over the

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>past five seasons that I'm not exactly worried about that.

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he will will be back for Week one, maybe

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>he will whatever, but I'm not I'm not worrying about

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 1>that injury when it comes to Russell Wilson. And we

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>keep hearing that Seattle wants to go back to the

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>basics and back to what has worked in the past,

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 1>and nobody's talking so much about running the ball like

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 1>they used to. They're talking about the competition and that's

0:09:58.080 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>what they want to get to on the defensive side

0:09:59.880 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of the ball. All about competition, say with the wide receivers,

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:04.559
<v Speaker 1>the best player is going to play. The best player

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>on this team for the last couple of years, regardless

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of any position, has been Russell Wilson, and that ability

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to rush for the four hundred and fifty yards he's

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>going to every single year. To me, he makes up

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 1>for the fact that they don't necessarily give the red

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>zone as much as Tom Brady does his ability to

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.079
<v Speaker 1>rush for a touchdown. Yeah, Brady's gonna get you your

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.599
<v Speaker 1>your plunges from the one yard line, no doubt, but

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you can count on Russell Wilson to do

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that more. Um So, I'm definitely gonna have Russell Wilson

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>at two. In fact, to me, it's closer to put

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Newton over Brady than it is Brady over Wilson. I

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 1>didn't do it. I'm kind of gonna split the hairs there.

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Um So I have Wilson to Brady three and Newton four. Yeah.

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I respect everything that you said about Tom Brady, and

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>people might have a salty taste in their mouth if

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>they had him in fantasy last year. And look all

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the stats that you mentioned for him, the game by

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>game of stats. They're all valid. But then look at

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>what he did in the playoffs, right, Like, he's still

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady. Three thirty seven and three touchdowns against Tennessee's,

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>nine and two against Jacksonville, five and five passing yards

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and three touchdowns against the Philadelphia Eagles. So I don't

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>really have many question marks with Tom Brady for fancy

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, I'm probably not gonna own any of

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>these guys. But like if Cam Newton or Russell Wilson

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>were to slip a little bit, like maybe I'll take

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a shot on those guys. But like Aaron Rodgers, where

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna go in most drafts fifth sixth round, Tom

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Brady sixth round as well, Like, probably not gonna end

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>up with any of those guys regardless. Do you think

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the tier ends here because we both have the same

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:32.599
<v Speaker 1>four quarterbacks in some mored you so you were with me,

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that's here ends there? Yeah. I mean a lot of

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>people have Deshaun Watson and that's here too. I don't,

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and we'll talk about that. But I don't have him

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in the top tier. I don't. I I'm feeling more

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>confident on him. I don't have him in the top tier.

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:44.079
<v Speaker 1>Stone I am feeling more confident on him. And in

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:46.599
<v Speaker 1>reference to where you're taking quarterbacks, you put up a

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>really interesting poll about basically, what's your strategy with the quarterback?

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Do you take one of these top tiers? Do you

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>take Andrew Luck who? I actually didn't like that part

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of the poll, and a lot of thing I explained

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to that in a bit um, do you take a

0:11:56.800 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>middle round guy or do you take or you wait? Wait, wait,

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and every fantasy expert and every fantasy analyst is going

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to tell you to wait, wait, wait, hell. In that poll,

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 1>I voted for wait, wait, wait. But and maybe it's

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>just because we're in these quote expert drafts or high

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>stakes leagues draft but you only wait to a certain point,

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>like there's going to be value there and that's why,

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>or flex league like I drafted Cam Newton, was the

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>seventh round where I had basically my entire story lineup

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>was filled outside of my tight end and my quarterback.

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Like every position was filled outside of my tight end

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and my quarterback. So that's point like I had felt

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>like I waited enough and still somebody in my top

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>tier was there. So I understand why you're waiting for

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>a Stafford or Rivers guys are gonna get to throughout

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the show. If there's value there to be had, I'm

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>going to grab it. Like there's going to be that

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>point to me where if Aaron Rodgers still on the board,

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't care that he's a quarterback. The heat has

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>gone that not hate for him, the hate for the

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>position just goes too far, and I'm gonna grab it.

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And we saw that in the seventh round of our

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>draft over the weekend, where I felt like we had

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>hit that part and that's why I wanted Cam Newton

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>in the seventh round. Yeah, and I actually really like

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that pick. I no problem with taking him there in

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the seventh round. I think that's great value. Uh. The

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>reason why I couldn't do that, and again it's roster construction,

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>how you start your draft. I started my draft with

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 1>three running backs, so from there on out, I was

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of playing catch up on the wide receiver position.

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>So I was just loading up on wide receiver wide

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 1>receiver on all the picks after that, hopefully trying to

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>find like one of those mid round diamonds in the rough,

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys that could break out. I ended

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 1>up with like Josh Gordon Randall, Cobb. So so you

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>have draft up. Now you rand up with Josh Gordon

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in the fifth, you took carry on Johnthan who I

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>really liked in the sixth, um, and then we get

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to the seventh and you had I guess, only two

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers at the time in four running backs, which

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>is a story line up. I mean, you have your

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>story line up. We need three in this league. Um,

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>so you're one wide receiver away from from your story lineup.

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Essentially to me, like knowing exactly what you had said

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that draft ing that flover is gonna take Andrew Luck

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>on the turn, which he did, and you're you really

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>like Andrew Luck. I might have went with Luck there.

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a really big Randall Cob guy, for instance,

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 1>I might have taken Luck there. That's that's all I

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.199
<v Speaker 1>have to say about that. Yeah, So the way I

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>have it ranked, I have Andrew Luck is my QB five.

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I have Big Band is my QB six. A lot

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:09.199
<v Speaker 1>of people are not that aggressive on Big Ben. But

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 1>for me to get Ben Roethlisberger as late as I

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.959
<v Speaker 1>did and impair him with an upside guy and Patrick Mahomes,

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I have no problem with that. So I have Andrew

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Luck ranked as my sixth rank quarterback. I could be

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>talking into moving him to five before we continue our

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>rankings to get to the next year. I want to

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>talk to you at eight four four, eight four, three

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>six eight seven nine. I want to go to Mike

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in Philly. What's up, Mike? Hey? Are you guys doing

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to day? Doing great? Man? What's going on? Hey? Are

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you guys high on Mari Cooper this year? Frank is

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>much higher than I am on Mark Cooper, and Florida

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>was the highest out of all of us. I'll be honest.

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I drafted him as my wide receiver one in that

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>draft in the fourth round. Mind you, this was a

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>non PPR draft. I think where he's going is adequate.

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Right like last year, he was an early to mid

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>second round pick that might have been a little bit

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>too high, but you just look at the pedigree, the

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>background of John Gruden. Every year he's been a head coach,

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>he's had a one thousand yard receive. Everything that we've

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>heard U until this point is that they're going to

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>put Amari Cooper in the position to be this team's

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver one, to be the top target in order

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to succeed They're gonna move him all around the formation.

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>They're not just gonna keep him on the outside. I

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>know that's something Michael Florio spoke a lot about, and

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna move him before the play starts a

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>lot to get him moved off of the team's opposing

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>number one cornerback. And that's big because he plays in

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a division where he's gonna see Casey Hayward, where he's

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna see the Broncos corners as well. So, um, that's

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>important for him. I think where he's going, maybe that

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>three four swing, I think that's adequate value. I don't.

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel great about it. I don't think it's

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>like a steel I don't I think it's adequate. Let

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, when you said those Broncos cornerbacks obviously

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>not what they want, were Radley Roby the other starting

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to other starting quarterback right now for the Brackos, Like

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>one more call before we hit the break. We're gonna

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>go to Shawn in New York. What's up Sean? Hey, guys,

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and I called yesterday running backs in my sixteen team

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>standard league. Um, I'm gonna call it today about you know,

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe some mid round receivers that I could start at,

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>like a wide receiver three, maybe even two. I didn't

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>know if you guys had any players on your mind,

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe I could plug and start on draft night rank

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>so some mid round wide receivers. Look, I I waited

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>on some of these guys. So just to give you

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>an idea of who I ended up with. Like, I

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>got Josh Gordon in the fifth round. That's the twelve

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>team league. He's dropping a little bit. It is a

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>risky play, but there is some upside there. And then again,

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>guys like Randall Cobb right around here, I would say

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like the late twenties, early thirties in my rankings.

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Michael Crabtree, Randall Cobb, Jamison Crowder, Emmanuel Sanders, who I

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>feel like is being disrespected a little bit in drafts

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>right now. Uh, some later guys, Robby Anderson, Mark He's Goodwin,

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Cup, Robert Woods. I think those are all you know,

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>solid wide receivers. You know, high end wide receiver threes

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>who have a little bit more upside, who are slipping

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in drafts right now for whatever reason. And we've talked

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>about these guys, but I still do like them. Couple

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of those guys I like in that same section, Robby Anderson,

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Devin Funcis, Markey's goodwin. A little bit later on Nelson

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Aghilor and Cooper Cup all guys in that middle round

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers that I really really like this. Yeah, Mike

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Williams from l A two, I'm starting to warm up.

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I just rose him on my draft ward this morning. Actually,

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we take a break here, we'll come back. More quarterback

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>rankings coming up next, like a great pass rusher. The

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Roto Experts will help you sack your fantasy football competition.

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>When you register for their exclusive Edge Fantasy Package. You

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>get a cheat cheat generator, plus a player database with

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>sortable projections and rankings from the best in the business,

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and you can join the fantasy conversation in slack chat channel.

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Visit roto Experts dot com to register for the Exclusive

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Edge Fantasy Package and enter the promo code f n

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>T s Y and you get a temper said discount.

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>That's the Roto Experts dot Com Exclusive Edge Fantasy Football

0:17:51.840 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Package promo code f n T S Y Fantasy Best

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever Fantasy Sports Radio Network. We're giving you the

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>quarterback rankings, your tears, your debates and your sleepers were

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>doing this all week long, certainly not with the quarterbacks,

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 1>but that is where we begin. Frankie. You you mentioned

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you have Andrew Luck at number five. I have Andrew

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Luck ranked at number six. We have both bought in

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that he's back. He's healthy, uh, and he looks good.

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And I read a lot about Andrew Luck actually this morning,

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and I was reading how it's amazing though the guy

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>playing his first game and seemingly two years picked up

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Frank's Frank Rice's offense pretty easily in game one. And

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I know there was not you're not like a game planning,

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>but he looked good in that first preseason game, and

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you're completely buying that he's back. That's why he's number five,

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 1>because he still has a potential to finish his QB one. Overall,

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you're getting at the fifth spot, and in the expert draft,

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>he's going you know, around seven round eight, which is

0:18:55.960 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I think to really tremendous value. Um you mentioned before

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>as I gotta move away from Andrew Luck, and I

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>know we talked a lot about him. Unless you done

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to add with him? No, I mean, I

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>think we've laid it all out there. The fact that

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I haven't at qube five, I think just speaks volumes

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>how I feel about him. And I have him at

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>six because I do have Deshaun Watson ranked at number five?

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Where do you have Watson? I haven't one spot behind.

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I have two spots behind Andrew Luck haven't at seven. Okay,

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>so do you have another quarterback that's then Roethlisberger. You

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>said it's in there. We'll get to him in a second,

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to um, but I have I have Watson at five,

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:29.360
<v Speaker 1>And the more I've read about him, the more comfortable

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>an that he's healthy, like, he's fine, he's not wearing

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.239
<v Speaker 1>a brace, he's moving around like normal. And I get

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>all the negatives when it comes to de Shaun Watson

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>right that, like the touchdown rate is simply not sustainable

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>what he did last year, that he just cannot do

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 1>it again. That's fine, But if he does, you want

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to own the Shaun Watson essentially right, like this is

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>literally what you're banking on that he doesn't do it again. Yeah,

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just natural regression. I think that's fair to say.

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>And look, he was more prone to throwing interceptions in college.

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Who I get seven interceptions? His final year at Clemson.

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that's gonna factor itself into as well. Again,

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>his rushing floor is going to help hancel out some

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of those interceptions. I just I worry about the offensive

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>line there too. I think it's absolutely brutal. We've seen

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>how some guys that can help Russell Wilson, the mobile quarterbacks,

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>but especially a guy coming off a torn a c L.

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Remember the Shaun Watson house now torn a c LS

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>in both of his knees dating back to college. And

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you talk about a guy who's mobile, a rushing quarterback

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>with a bad offensive line, Like, there's a chance that

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>this guy and end up getting killed this year on

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>the field because of you know, just the lack of

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>protection there. So I worry about that. Look, he still

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>has DeAndre Hopkins, he has Will Fuller, he has two

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>great wide receivers. The running game is a little you know,

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>if he Lamar Miller, that's not your guy, Greg. So look,

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't trust that he's gonna be able

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to come close to what he did again last year.

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 1>If you want to take him, that's fine. I think

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>I just rank him honestly, I just ranked him this

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>high because this is where he's gonna go and draft.

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I will never take him where he's gonna go and draft.

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>You just drop him like I have Lamar Miller. I'm

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>never gonna take him. I don't feel comfortable dropping him

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>behind guys like my QB eight is Drew Brees Kirk Cousins,

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>like he probably realistically has more upside than those guys.

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he has a lower floor as well, like

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>those guys. I feel much safer about the floor there.

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I will admit that his upside is higher than those

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>guys Big Bene have ranked higher because I just think

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>here in a year out, he's consistent and he has

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>better weapons this year than ever before. To like they

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>just keep adding do they added James Washington, who they're

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>talking up in camps. They still have Juju, Like Juju

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 1>is better than Mark Tavis Bryant than a year ago,

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to see more targets like he was

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>incredibly efficient last year. Still has Antonio Brown, still has

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Levan Bell, has Vance McDonald, has Jesse James, Like the

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 1>guy has weapons up the wazoo. He's finished QB eight

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>in points per game three years in a row, and

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 1>I think he has the upside to be better than

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>than that. So I have Big Ben rank QB six.

0:21:57.480 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean you have to draft him ahead of

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Watson. That's just personally, I'm gonna wait and then

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna take Big Ben because I like that

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>value more so. That's why I haven't ranked that way.

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>So you're not for what reason, I guess, Like people

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>have come out against Ben pretty hardcore in the past

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 1>for the home and road splits. They were better last year,

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>significantly better. He had sixteen touchdowns at home, op posted

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>twelve touchdowns on the road. So it wasn't a big difference.

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>What about yards per game? What about yards per game?

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't in total yards whatever you have. It wasn't much.

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I could pull it up for you. But it wasn't

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>drastic by any means. No, Like he was much more

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 1>consistent weekend and week out. If you like him better

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>as like your best ball quarterback, I understand that completely.

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>But again, like the way I drafted in flex, I

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>drafted Big Ben and then a few rounds later I

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>got Patrick Mahomes, Like I love taking that veteran and

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>then taking that upside shot, Like what what do you

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>have to lose. You have the safe floor in my

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>opinion of a big ben and then you have that

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>breakout ability from a Patrick Mahomes. Like, look at the

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>weapons that Patrick Mahomes has. There's gonna be a lot

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of turnovers, but I mean, he has great weapons and

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be able to rustle ball with his legs

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. So so Patrick Mahomes is ware for you.

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I have Patrick Mahomes eleven. Yeah, so I have Patrick

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes fifteen. I'm concerned about the turnovers there. And I know, um,

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>he's got this monstrous arm and I think people are

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>really really excited about both him, uh and Jimmy Garoppolo.

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>But I want to talk about Garppolo a second. But

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I do feel like we've kind of come in too

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>hot with Mahomes a bit. And I understand you drafted Roethlisberger,

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>you drafted Mahomes, two guys that are in your top

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>twelve at the quarterback position, but neither guy that I'm

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>ultimately confident on. Yes, you want to hit on both,

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>but Roethlisberger and the Steelers do tend to go in

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a shell on the road that they don't put up

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>those monstrous numbers that they do. Um at home, I

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:39.719
<v Speaker 1>know we're looking at the quarterback, and we're looking at

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>the weapons, and you see what the Steelers have and

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you see what the Chiefs have, and there's all of

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>these different weapons, and you want to believe in the quarterbacks.

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So I do understand that, Um, but I think have

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback spot. I kind of just want consistency. And

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's I don't wannestly laziness in my part, but

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>I want to make it easy for myself. And we

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have so many decisions on a Sunday morning that I

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>like the fact that I could just plug in a

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:03.239
<v Speaker 1>dude and forget about it. And I think there's something

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to be said for that. Yeah, that's fair. Um, that's

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:08.719
<v Speaker 1>why you know you drafted Cam Newton. You're gonna you're

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:10.400
<v Speaker 1>not gonna have to worry about that. I didn't draft

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the second quarterback. If that's the way that you want

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to play fantasy football, you don't want to worry about

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 1>like choosing your quarterback, because it can be annoying at times.

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I understand that, but I mean, I mentioned I won

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>two leagues last year, just kind of like rotting the matchups.

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>One league, it was big Ben and Blake Bortles. The

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>other league, I had case Keenum and Jameis Winston once

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>he returned from injury. So you can win with just

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>playing the matchup matchups at the quarterback position, Greg. Last

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>year there was only uh, there was less than a

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>two hundred yard difference between big Ben's total home passing

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>yards and his road passing yards and sixteen at home

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and thirty five on the road, So he

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>was he was much more consistent last year than people realize.

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>And you know, look, people talk about Matthew Stafford, Philip Rivers. Oh,

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>these guys are so underappreciated for fantasy purposes. They're compilers.

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:00.199
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the end of the season, Yes,

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>they might finish as a top ten, you know, top

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>eight quarterback that year. But I've been looking at points

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>per game, Greg, and that's gonna give you a better

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 1>indicator of what they do on a weekend make out basis.

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>You want to talk about consistency. While Philip Rivers and

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Stafford have they compiled the numbers their points per game,

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>They finished outside the top twelve quite consistently. So you're

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that they are bus candidates for you this year.

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>They're not bus candidates, But like I understand more so

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>why they're being drafted where they are. If you want

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to take one of Rivers and Stafford, like I've been saying,

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and pair them with a Jimmy Garoppolo and Patrick Mahomes,

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to me, that makes more sense because you have that,

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you have that upside of one of those guys flops. Okay,

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>then you still have that safe floor of a Stafford

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>or Philip Rivers that you can fall back on and

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>play the matchups. But last year I drafted, I drafted

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Stafford as my quarterback in one league, and I think

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>three or four weeks into the season, I dropped him

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and I ended up picking Deshaun Watson up. Like, that's

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna probably happen more often than not. If you draft

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>these quarterbacks who are not runners, guys who are gonna

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>turn the ball over for a decent amount like Stafford

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers, you're gonna end up wanting to find a

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>quarterback with better upside. Anyway, You're gonna end up picking

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>up a quarterback who is playing against you know, the

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills this week or whatever other you know defense

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you wanna focus on attacking that week. Remember we were

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>doing that weekend a week out last year, there was

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:19.479
<v Speaker 1>one week where I had Jared Goff ranked higher than

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady and you killed me for I think it

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>was against the Giants. I did, and Jared Goff finished

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>with more Fantasy points. Did And I picked up Jared

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Goff that week everywhere and I started him. And it

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>seems like once the season starts more often than that not,

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 1>that's how we end up playing the game is we're

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna pick up a quarterback and stream him against the

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>best matchup. So why don't you just do that right

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>away in the draft? You take like that safe quarterback

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>if you want them, and then you take that upside shot.

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Because the reason I'll do it in a draft is

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>because those two guys may not out anything right like that.

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:51.959
<v Speaker 1>That Patrick Mahomes pick maybe brutal. I mean he may

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>he just for whatever reason may not be very be fair.

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 1>He was my second to last pick in the draft. Totally. Yeah,

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm not killing you for it. But you're asked me

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>why I wouldn't do that? Why take a guy if

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the value is there? Again, I'm not spending up for

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback. I'm not but when he's sitting there in

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the seventh and eighth round, like, that's when I you know, honestly,

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'd like to go at my quarterback. Yes,

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I could keep hiling on running backs, wide receivers, and

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I do, But as I look at my rankings,

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>which I have right now, I really really would prefer

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 1>one of my top seven quarterbacks. And I'm including Drew

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Brees in that, Like, I really would prefer to get

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:27.719
<v Speaker 1>one of those seven. But even and then is going

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 1>later than he ever has, so I don't really have

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>a problem with that, right And so for me, like

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I have this tier and it goes from eight to fifteen,

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and if I don't get the next day, I don't

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>wanna do that. But like I have this tier of

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 1>eight for fifteen with Kirk Cousins, Matt Stafford from me, Roethlisberger, Um,

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers, Matt Ryan and then you have Jimmy g

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and Patty My Homes in that. Right, there's those seven

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>dudes are in this tier, and I'm to me, they're

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>very interchangeable, Like I'm all going for the same price.

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they I don't really care which one I

0:27:57.520 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>get if I don't wind out with one of my

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>top seven, I will literally be the last one to

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>take a quarterback because I really don't care. I don't

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>know how to differentiate those guys. Like, maybe you can

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.479
<v Speaker 1>help me, but out of those guys, Kirk Cousins, Matthew Stafford,

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Ben Roethlisberger, Philip Rivers, not Ryan, and then Jimmy Gene,

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Hattrick Mahomes are more of the high upside plays. Of course,

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 1>how do you differentiate those guys? I think so For me.

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>The reason I have Mahomes and I have Jimmy Garoppolo,

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and I even have Mariota ranked higher than guys like Rivers, Stafford,

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan is because again, I want to take shots

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:30.640
<v Speaker 1>on those upside plays. Like like you said, if you're

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>just gonna wait till one of the last rounds, you're

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>probably just gonna take a shot on an upside quarterback.

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Are you gonna take a boring Rivers Stafford? Like I mentioned, yes,

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you might, you might. You might just want to. The

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>past three years, Rivers in points per game, QB twelve,

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>QB eight teen, QB six team. That's not what we

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>hear lately. What we've heard is, oh, every year Rivers

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>finishes the top twelve, top ten quarterback because he's a compiler,

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>but on a point per game basis like QB eighteen

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>QB sixteen, Are you satisfied with that? Last year there

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>were guys that we knew had the upside to break out,

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>like a Carson wentz uh we didn't know at the

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>time DeShawn Watson. But there are upside quarterback why not

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>take That's my whole thing this year is every year

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>there are quarterbacks that end up inside the top ten

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that we didn't expect. Who are they're more of upside guys.

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>They're not like the Philip Rivers, They're not like Matthew Stafford.

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Why not take shots on those guys? And that's why

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I have, ultimately Patrick Mahomes, Jimmy Garoppolo, Mariota ranked higher

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>than some of these other guys because I do think

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>they have upside, more upside than these others, and I'm

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>just gonna end up pairing them together. Stafford the last

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>three years QUB ten in points per game, QB eleven

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and points per game, QB fourteen and points per game, Like, Okay,

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, but don't you want to try and find

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the next Carson Wentz, the next Deshaun Watson, one of

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>those quarterbacks. Instead. To me, when you take a Patrick Mahomes,

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a Jimmy Garoppolo, or a Marcus Mariota, I think you

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>give yourself a better shot of finding that next upside

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>quarterback rather than just wasting a pick on one of

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>these compiling quarterbacks. And maybe it's because I think they're

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>going so late, but like I really, I have really

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>happened to like Marcus Mariota and Dak Prescott. I know

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned this. I think those both those two guys

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>are exactly the category that you're talking about, and maybe

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>they belong closer to Patrick Mahoways and closer to Jimmy

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Garoppolo because I think those two guys really at the

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>potential to finish the top ten quarterbacks. I think that

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>we in a new offense from Mariota and getting Ezekiel

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Elliott back and des Bryant and Jason wentten out for

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott, I think this helps both of them and

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I think both have a chance to be dynamic. And

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I know two years ago Mariota had this picture perfect

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>schedule and and was great with it, and then two

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>years ago, Dak Prescott firsted onto the scene, scored six

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:35.479
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns on the ground, then followed up scoring other six

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns on the ground in a year later. It was

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.239
<v Speaker 1>just the accuracy and the passing, which you question. Mark

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>is both of these guys, but they both use their

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>legs and if they could just you know, honesty, get

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>better as a quarterback. I think you're going to be

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>wanting them and they're not costing anything right now. They

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>are after that mid to your group, So maybe you're right, Like,

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe for me it's not the Patrick Mahomes, Maybe it's

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>me taking a Roethlisberger and one of those guys, like

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure, but I want to the only thing

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I could say, and I dealt with this last year

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:07.479
<v Speaker 1>and it cost me. I'm not saying I was right

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>by this, but I really really enjoy the plugging in

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a quarter just picking and plugging in and forgetting about

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback, not wasting family quarterbacks, not having to worry.

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>The only way that works is if you get an

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>elite quarterback, doesn't it Yestely absolutely Otherwise you're sitting there

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and you're just like I will see and this year

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I think deeper and only before before you get into it,

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>like I did with Kirk Cousins, Like I had Kirk

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Cousins last year, and I started a week in and

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>week out, and even there were many times I sat

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>here and you and Mike are just like, dude, like

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins is fine, but like Jared Goff is better

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>this week, Like just pick up Jared Goff and stubborn

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Land Like no, I'm gonna just stick with our Cousins

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and gop outperformed him. But how did it work? That's

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the thing. How did it work overall on a weekend,

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>week out basis on the championship in that league. But

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>we can saw use Kirk Cousins as an example just

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>because that was the one I brought up and that

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>was the one I actually started so last week last year.

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Rather Kirk Cousins finishes a top twelve quarterback, we're saying, right, one, two, three, four, five,

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>six thousands finished as QB eight points per game last year,

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you'll be sixty year before and QB twelve, so very consistent. Pod.

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I was gonna say, I think this

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>year more so than ever, while we have that top

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>four group as the elite, I would say it goes

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>about eight or nine quarterbacks who I think you can

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you can plug in and forget. And that goes about

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees her cousins. If you want to put to

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:31.959
<v Speaker 1>Shawn Watson in that category, because I do have him

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>rank QB seven, you put him in that category, Andrew

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:36.959
<v Speaker 1>Luck and Big Ben. For me, big Ben is one

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of those guys I'm not gonna bend there. But Okay,

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>so you're so you think, and maybe I have to

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>reevaluate my tears. You think there's nine guys that you

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>feel are plug and play guys. Everybody else is either

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a lottery ticket but a guy that could really perform

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>well in surprise people and a guy that is just

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, fine. Is that next year for you? I

0:32:57.440 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>guess I think that's fair to say. I still have

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I have go Roppolo, Mahomes and Mariotta still inside the

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>same tier, but I guess they don't really fit that

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>criteria in terms of because if I draft Jimmy g

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>or Mahomes, like, I'm going to have another quarterback and

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna end up playing the matchups again what I

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>did last year. You just while it takes up two

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>roster spots. You just play the matchups each week with

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys her cousins. Look, you know the

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>weapons that are there. I think he is one of

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the safest quarterbacks what he's been the past couple of

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>years with Washington, and to come over to Minnesota, I

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>think Drew Brees is gonna bounce back with some positive

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>touchdown regression as well. The reason I set up the

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>poll the way it is, Greg is because I think

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Luck is kind of the break between tears, and

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what I have for me is it's the top four,

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it's Andrew Luck and as QB five, who I think

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>he's just kind of like in a league of his

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>own because there is risk involved, but there is definite upside.

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>If I draft him, I do want an insurance quarterback

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>behind him, and then it's kind of like those mid

0:33:55.840 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>tier quarterbacks are Roethlisberger, Breeze, Kirk Cousins. So I think

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you can plug in and forget, and then you get

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>into that whole group of upside versus compiling veterans like

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan, Philip Rivers. So the reason I had an

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 1>issue with your poll essentially was because you wrote Andrew Luck,

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and to me, like I have Luck, Breeze and Watson

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 1>for me as guys that are in this uppert here

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of what you're describing. But wouldn't you say that

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:22.839
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Luck is a little bit better than those guys though,

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Like the only reason why he's not in that first

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 1>tier is because he's coming off injury, definitely, But he

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to me, he's like his own tier. You know, he's

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that guy in the middle round. So I don't think so, because, yes,

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>because Luck is coming off injury and that's a it

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 1>was a major major and listen, all of a sudden

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>he may get weak and then not play again. And

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I understand that we are all super possible and Andrew Luck,

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's why it's my six right quarterback. And I'm

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>fine making a fifth whatever. But I think Shawn Watson

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>belongs there given what he did his rookie year and

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>he's now healthy, same thing, and I know normal regression

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is coming. That's fine. And I think Drew Brees belongs

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in that tire as well, because it was one down

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>here for Breeze one year, right, crazy saying that, No, No,

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely he was one year for reason. But the

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:06.240
<v Speaker 1>defense is still really good, definitely, but we think positive

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 1>regression comes his way. I think he's fine, But the

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 1>thing is, I don't think he gets back to thirty

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 1>plus touchdowns throwing for all these yards. I think I

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna get back to being serviceable like last

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 1>year twenty three touchdowns. That's a fluke based on you

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 1>know how many passing yards he had. He led the

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>league in completion percentage. He's gonna throw for more touchdowns

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 1>this year, absolutely right, But the question is how many more?

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Like I could see him in nine range, which will

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>make him a solid weekend and week out starter, but

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 1>he's not getting back into that elite category for me.

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Eight four four, eight four three six seven nine. We

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>love your feelings and thoughts and opinions on this. When

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 1>we come back, I want to hit the next year

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the guys that you may not draft but may break out.

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Who are there? Who are our sleepers? You'll find out

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>when we come back. Fantasy Best Friends Forever, Fantasy Sports

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Radio Network. I think you know that you can listen

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to this show live on the award winning Fantasy Sports

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Radio Network. Listen on the I Heart Radio app to

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>tune in radio app, or download the Fancy Sports Radio

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Network app. The Fancy Sports Radio Network is the only

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>totally free seven three sixty five fancy sports network of

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 1>its kind without a subscription. Check out YouTube live want

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>the Fancy Sports Network YouTube page and participate in the

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:20.840
<v Speaker 1>program in there, where you can ask questions, discuss the

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 1>topics with other fantasy enthusiasts, or tell anyone that you disagree.

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Call into your favorite show and ask your question. The

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>number is eight four four eight four f n T

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>s Y. That's eight four four eight four three six

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>eight seven nine The Fancy Sports Radio Network. You're free

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Fancy Source twenty four hours a day. Telly Rotor dot

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:00.800
<v Speaker 1>com is pretty more than twenty five thousand dollars on

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:03.919
<v Speaker 1>the live for its subscribers this NFL season, entering paid

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 1>contests on FanDuel and bringing you along for the free roll.

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Have a chance to win big this year. Alongside sports

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Scrid CEO Jeremy Stein, one of the only men to

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>have won two separate million dollar prizes. Each week, will

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>select lucky subscribers to sweat with us and split fifty

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of the profits. No profits this week, no worries, You're

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 1>not able to get talks back in the hat. The

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>following week, head to Daily Rotor dot com slash sweat

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and learn how to get you know the action and

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>your share of twenty five thousand dollars in action. That's

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rotor dot com slash Sweat. We also want to

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:35.240
<v Speaker 1>remind you that Fantasy Factor is the only exclusively single

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 1>entry DFS site. They have free rolls registering all the

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>time and great promotions for free prizes. Keep a lookout

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 1>for Fantasy Factors free million dollars survivor contest opening about

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a week before NFL kickoff. Go to Fantasy Factor dot com.

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>That it's Fantasy Factor dot com. Frankie, we've touched on

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 1>really the top fifteen were so quarterbacks? Is there any

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those guys before we've gone that you kind

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of want to expand on? I think the love for

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo, Patrick Mahomes. I actually just moved Jimmy Garoppolo

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Patrick Mahomes, and if I could go back

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 1>and take him ahead of Mahomes this past weekend, I

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 1>would do it. I do think that there's a lot

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to like about Jimmy Garoppolo. Look the second season playing

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:22.399
<v Speaker 1>under Kyle Shanahan in his offense. We swaw what Matt

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Ryan could do. And I'm not saying that Jimmy G

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to be an m VP candidate, but sixties

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 1>seven point four percent completion percentage last year eight point

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>eight yards per attempt. To put that in perspective, Drew

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Brees led the league last season with eight point one

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>yards per attempt. Jimmy Garoppolo average hundred and sixty passing

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.240
<v Speaker 1>yards per game. He was the QB six from weeks

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 1>thirteen through seventeen. That's big time for Jimmy G. He

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>helped some people win, winning the playoffs last year, win championships,

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and that was with him really stalling in the red

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>zone and kind of learning on the fly. He only

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 1>had seven touchdowns in five games. He's going to be

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>better than that. So I think given the offensive line

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that they have there and approved being offensive line, they

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 1>drafted Matt McGlinchey, they signed center western richburg Um, they

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 1>get Pierre Garson back as well. I think there's I

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>understand the love for Jimmy Garoppolo. I have him ranked

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>as my tenth quarterback, and I wouldn't mind if you

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>came out of the draft with only him as your quarterback.

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I think you could do a lot worse. Yeah, So

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I have Jimmy Garoppolo ranked as my twelfth rank quarterback,

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and I feel the same way like if I come

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:24.920
<v Speaker 1>out with just Jimmy G. I'm all right with that,

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm actually going on the other side of you

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 1>and that. I actually thought the love for Jimmy G

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>would be even higher during draft season, like when at

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of last year, when everyone was sweating this dude,

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:36.359
<v Speaker 1>like people were talking about how he was a top five,

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>top six, top seven quarterback going into this year. And

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 1>as people calm down and we got far away from

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 1>last December, everything settled in and Jimmy Garoppolo, I don't

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:47.799
<v Speaker 1>know where he's average ranked, but everyone's kind of having

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>where you and I do in between ten and twelve. Now,

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>then this has Adventure's Boy, and I don't even know

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>if he's drafted him this year, but Jimmy Garoppolo is

0:39:57.280 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 1>somebody that he's not a rookie. In just a few

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:03.359
<v Speaker 1>practices came on, it was finished as a top five

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>quarterback all of those weeks, number six, whatever you said,

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and given a full season as a starting quarterback, given

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a full season practicing as a starting quarterback training camp

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with all of these guys. I think he's I think

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:17.279
<v Speaker 1>this guy is a limit man. Like, would it be

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 1>surprised to me if he finishes in that Andrew Luxx

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you breest here, absolutely not, Like, this is a guy

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 1>that is not costing you anything at all. He went

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 1>after Patrick Mahomes in our flex draft. This is a

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:30.319
<v Speaker 1>guy that I think you're getting now, very very late

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that absolutely, maybe even more so than Mariota and a

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott, has the ability to finish the top five

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 1>six quarterback. Yeah. I think that was more so reflected

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 1>in us playing in an experts draft that he got

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:44.840
<v Speaker 1>pushed down the board because according to Fantasy Pros ADP

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:47.439
<v Speaker 1>he's still going pick ninety. Okay, so that's a little high.

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:50.319
<v Speaker 1>He's uh, and he's going as the tenth quarterback off

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the board. I have no problem with him being the

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 1>tenth quarterback. Me personally, I would take Ben Roethlisberger over him, who,

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 1>according to Fantasy Pros is going behind Jimmy Garoppolo. But

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>picked nine, Uh, that's more so, and like what the eighth,

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:06.800
<v Speaker 1>ninth round, that's probably where he's gonna go. More so

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in home leagues. But if you end up taking to

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo in that round and then a couple of

0:41:10.960 --> 0:41:12.879
<v Speaker 1>rounds later, just back him up with like a Matt

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Ryan or something like that. Play the match ups with

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 1>those guys. I'm just gonna keep hammering home that strategy.

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:20.239
<v Speaker 1>If you don't take an elite quarterback, which you're on

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 1>record saying you want to do, and I have no

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 1>problem doing that. If you don't get Andrew Luck as well,

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 1>just take high upside and take a veteran and kind

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of just play the matchups and look if it doesn't

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:33.880
<v Speaker 1>work out, if Matt Ryan starts a year and he sucks,

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you drop him and hopefully pick up another quarterback. Maybe

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you find the Alex Smith from last year, or you

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 1>know the Deshaun Watson. You just randomly pick up a

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>rookie maybe you know Sam Donald or someone like that

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 1>ends up breaking out, you don't know. So that's why,

0:41:48.160 --> 0:41:50.319
<v Speaker 1>if you're not investing much in the quarterback position, you're

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 1>take an upside guy and then you wait and then

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you just back him up with a veteran. That's that's

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 1>what I like to do, all right. So the quarterbacks

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that we have not mentioned yet um. As we go

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:00.759
<v Speaker 1>through our rankings and you can get Frank's Inside the

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Road to Expert's Exclusive Edge package using the promo code

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Frank the tank Um Roethlisberger, we got a new rivers

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Um Mattie Ice, you you said kind of boring like

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ride. Do you do you think that he takes

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a step back, some positive regression for him year to

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:17.839
<v Speaker 1>inderste scarccasion. Yeah, I look, I think he'll be better

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:19.279
<v Speaker 1>than he was last year. You know, I was not

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a Matt Ryan guy last year, just because I think

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the price you had to pay for him, you were

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 1>paying for his m v P caliber season. And if

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you look at Matt Ryan in his career, it's a

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of up and down. One year very good, one

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:32.759
<v Speaker 1>year very bad. I don't think he ever gets back

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to that m v P form that we saw. I

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:36.879
<v Speaker 1>think that's kind of an outlier season for him. Would

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it surprised me if he bounced back and you know,

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>snuck his way back outside the top twelve throwing for

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, thirty touchdowns with in the fifteen interception, it

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't surprise me. But I don't think that he has

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that immense upside that we saw from a few years ago.

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the Falcons defense is a lot better. I

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 1>do think this team is going to get back to

0:42:57.239 --> 0:42:59.319
<v Speaker 1>running the football a ton of this season. So if

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you look at his care were he typically lives in

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that eight touchdown range. I just don't think he has

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that much upside. I have him ranked as my QB

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 1>seventeen right now. He's right behind Rivers and Stafford for me.

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 1>So the one the biggest name that we have not

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:18.200
<v Speaker 1>mentioned yet on this show is Carson Wentz. And there

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:21.319
<v Speaker 1>are people that believe Carson Wentz should be picked pretty early.

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:23.719
<v Speaker 1>I know Jake's been all over Carson Wentz and how

0:43:23.760 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Sean Jeffrey for that matter, But I have Carson ranked

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Wentz after today's news, I have ranked Carson Wentz seventeen.

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god. Yeah, well I originally before the show

0:43:38.760 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 1>started at like that, I dropped into seventeen because he's

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 1>not healthy, Like I'm I'm sorry, he's coming at with

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:49.359
<v Speaker 1>torn a c L and it's now rush against the clock.

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:52.959
<v Speaker 1>And the latest news was that he's not not necessarily

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be ready for a week one. And if

0:43:54.920 --> 0:43:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you're telling me the quarterback is not necessarily gonna be

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 1>ready for Week one. You're franchise quarterback. This is not

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 1>something you rush, especially when you have a capable backup.

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:07.719
<v Speaker 1>And when we say capable backup, we mean a guy

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that literally won you the Super Bowl, Carson Wentz. The

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Eagles are not going to rush. Is Carson Wentz worth

0:44:16.080 --> 0:44:18.919
<v Speaker 1>drafting and holding and picking another one of these guys? Okay, fine,

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:21.239
<v Speaker 1>and maybe using your strategy, frankly, that's the right way

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to do it. Like, maybe you get this deal on

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz because of the injury and no one's into it,

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and you start a Jimmy Garoppolo or Matt Ryan for

0:44:28.520 --> 0:44:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the first couple of weeks, then you get Carson Wentz back.

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that is a valid and fair strategy. But I

0:44:34.000 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot more questions to Carson Wentz. There

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 1>are answers, and I'm I just cannot safely say this

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:44.800
<v Speaker 1>guy is a top seven eight quarterback. He might be

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:47.160
<v Speaker 1>when he plays on a per game basis. That might

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:48.880
<v Speaker 1>be true. But the thing is, again, we don't know

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:50.520
<v Speaker 1>when that's gonna be. We don't know if he's going

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to be ready in Week one. Look the touchdown regression.

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 1>We know for a while that that was going to

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:56.239
<v Speaker 1>come down a little bit right, And and that's why

0:44:56.239 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to interrupt, because you you were the one

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty much all on saying listen to Shaun Watson.

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Obviously a touchdown regression, and I think you have to

0:45:02.200 --> 0:45:04.759
<v Speaker 1>say this anything about Wentz. Yeah, absolutely, even if he

0:45:04.840 --> 0:45:07.120
<v Speaker 1>was a hundred percent healthy, you know, I wouldn't have

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:09.759
<v Speaker 1>him ranked ahead of Andrew Luck. I would probably have

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 1>him ranked in that Deshaun Watson range again if he

0:45:12.320 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 1>was healthy. But remember Carson wins toward his a C

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:19.239
<v Speaker 1>L months after Deshaun Watson, definitely, so he needs a

0:45:19.280 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit more time here. And again, you know, the

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>only way the Eagles rushing back maybe is if they

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:25.960
<v Speaker 1>get off to a slow start. I don't know that

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that happens given the defense that they have. They still

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:30.560
<v Speaker 1>have a ton of weapons on the offensive side of

0:45:30.600 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the ball. They have J G. I and really the

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:35.719
<v Speaker 1>coaching staff there, I mean, Doug Peterson puts everyone in

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a great position to succeed. So I don't know that

0:45:38.560 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 1>they need to rush Carson Wentz back. It's for that

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:43.360
<v Speaker 1>reason that I have him ranked as my QB thirteen.

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I have him behind guys like Jimmy Garoppolo, Patrick Mahomes,

0:45:47.120 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 1>even Marcus Mariota again, Mariota to me is still young

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:52.799
<v Speaker 1>enough and has that upside in this group. I don't

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:56.280
<v Speaker 1>know that we've seen the ultimate ceiling from a Marcus

0:45:56.320 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Mariota yet. And this year you're getting him at a

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:02.000
<v Speaker 1>great discount because of what he did last season. People

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 1>are baking that into his value. And I loved that.

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 1>What you're getting where you're getting Marx married right now,

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's great. But yeah, I've dropped Carson Wentz

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:13.520
<v Speaker 1>down to QB thirteen. I just wonder Greg in home leagues,

0:46:14.600 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 1>is that going to be reflected? Is it gonna be

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:19.120
<v Speaker 1>reflected in home leagues in people's homely like, is Carson

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:20.799
<v Speaker 1>went still gonna be drafted as one of those top

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:22.680
<v Speaker 1>seven eight quarterbacks? I don't think he will be. Maybe

0:46:22.719 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 1>he will just be scared off by the intern. I

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>think more and more so, more and more the news

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that we're getting. I agree with you. I think he

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is gonna start to get pushed on the board, and

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it makes sense eight four four eight four

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:35.239
<v Speaker 1>three six eight seven nine. I want to go to

0:46:35.360 --> 0:46:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Dylan in Texas? What's up? Dyaling? Do we have Dylan? Hey, wait,

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:47.239
<v Speaker 1>what's up? And not much? I just got a draft question. Uh,

0:46:48.000 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going first overall in a twelve teen PPR. I'm

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:56.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna be taken gurly. Uh in the two three turn

0:46:57.640 --> 0:46:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I've been I've been doing this strategy lately, just go

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:02.360
<v Speaker 1>on three straight rbs. I've been. I've been in and

0:47:02.480 --> 0:47:04.799
<v Speaker 1>up with Mixing and Howard. I really like those guys

0:47:04.840 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 1>this year. I was just wondering if, I mean, do

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:09.960
<v Speaker 1>y'all agree with that strategy or should I be going

0:47:10.040 --> 0:47:13.760
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver RB because there's so much wide receiver value

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in the middle rounds. I just don't really care to

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:19.759
<v Speaker 1>take like a you know, a Digs or Feeling or

0:47:19.800 --> 0:47:22.720
<v Speaker 1>any of those guys. And that's like Mike Evans slips.

0:47:22.760 --> 0:47:26.319
<v Speaker 1>I might take him, but I love the three kind

0:47:26.360 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of elite RB kind of thing going. So what do

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you'll think about that? We'll say this is I agree

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:33.480
<v Speaker 1>with you that there's a lot of wide receivers you

0:47:33.520 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 1>can find in those middle rounds. Hell, I just did

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it this past weekend as well. But I will say

0:47:38.200 --> 0:47:40.879
<v Speaker 1>in a full point PPR, I think that's a little

0:47:40.880 --> 0:47:43.120
<v Speaker 1>bit dangerous. I think with your first three picks. I

0:47:43.160 --> 0:47:45.160
<v Speaker 1>have to come out of those with at least one

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:47.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver if you want to take you know, a

0:47:47.120 --> 0:47:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Mixing or a Jordan Howard, whoever you like more for

0:47:49.440 --> 0:47:51.799
<v Speaker 1>the PPR format in that second round, at that two

0:47:51.920 --> 0:47:53.759
<v Speaker 1>three turn, I think that's fine. I think you can

0:47:53.760 --> 0:47:55.880
<v Speaker 1>start with two running backs, but I think to start

0:47:56.120 --> 0:47:58.839
<v Speaker 1>three running backs in a full point PPR. Look, there's

0:47:59.480 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 1>many different ways to win in fantasy football. You could

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:04.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely pull it off. But me personally, I have to

0:48:04.520 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 1>come out of one of those first three rounds with

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:08.399
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver, especially in PPR gread. Yeah, I tend

0:48:08.440 --> 0:48:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to agree with you. I'm in my half point PPR

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:12.520
<v Speaker 1>league and I was looking at it this morning as well. Um,

0:48:12.560 --> 0:48:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm looking at the first two rounds right and

0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:16.719
<v Speaker 1>what I can do? And I have a leventh pick

0:48:16.960 --> 0:48:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in that Um, and I I the signing. Do I

0:48:22.280 --> 0:48:24.839
<v Speaker 1>want to do two running backs there? Direct? I could

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 1>saying Melvin Gordon and Dalvin Cooke would just use as

0:48:27.040 --> 0:48:30.080
<v Speaker 1>an example, Melvin Cook and Dalvin Melvin Gordon and Davin

0:48:30.160 --> 0:48:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook. Or do I want to go with the

0:48:31.840 --> 0:48:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones and a Dalvin Cook? And I mocked it

0:48:34.360 --> 0:48:37.000
<v Speaker 1>out this morning. And if I went with a wide

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 1>receiver and a running back, obviously go in any direction

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:41.479
<v Speaker 1>in the third round. If I go with a running

0:48:41.520 --> 0:48:44.160
<v Speaker 1>back running back, I have to be okay with essentially

0:48:44.160 --> 0:48:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Amari Cooper being my wide receiver one. And I don't

0:48:47.480 --> 0:48:51.480
<v Speaker 1>know that I'm willing to do that. And the other

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:54.399
<v Speaker 1>argument is, okay, if you draft running back wide receiver,

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:55.920
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna be your r B two? Because you have

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:57.879
<v Speaker 1>two stud r B two is going running back? Running back?

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I have the perfect answer for you, Greggy. So the

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:07.000
<v Speaker 1>guy that's there consistently is Alex Collins. Who am I

0:49:07.080 --> 0:49:10.360
<v Speaker 1>okay with that? I don't know the guy's What do

0:49:10.400 --> 0:49:12.239
<v Speaker 1>you like more Alex Collins as you RB two or

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Marie Cooper as your wide receiver one, neither particular. You

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:18.839
<v Speaker 1>can't have everything great Fantasy football. You're right, and I can.

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:20.840
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know the answer, you know, And honestly,

0:49:20.840 --> 0:49:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the answer to that question. Like I

0:49:23.680 --> 0:49:25.400
<v Speaker 1>really would like Derrick Henry to be there, like that

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:27.320
<v Speaker 1>would be ideal for me. I think you would be

0:49:27.360 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 1>there at the end of the third round. I think

0:49:28.640 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it's I think it's possible, right, Like, so you would

0:49:31.000 --> 0:49:33.279
<v Speaker 1>take Derrick Henry ahead of Alex Collins. I had Derrick

0:49:33.320 --> 0:49:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Henry one spot I had about so I think that's

0:49:35.560 --> 0:49:37.919
<v Speaker 1>like a personal preferencing. I agree. I agree, that would

0:49:37.960 --> 0:49:39.600
<v Speaker 1>make me feel like pretty comfortable I have. And then

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you also have the rookies that are there that you're

0:49:41.239 --> 0:49:43.000
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with, like a Royce Freeman. Is a rby too? No,

0:49:43.560 --> 0:49:46.160
<v Speaker 1>probably not. It's not terrible. I mean if you have

0:49:46.320 --> 0:49:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that anchor right, like a Melvin Gordon, as you, Lady one,

0:49:48.719 --> 0:49:50.879
<v Speaker 1>we both trust Melvin Gordon a lot, so I guess

0:49:51.080 --> 0:49:53.480
<v Speaker 1>so you could take two two wide receivers in round

0:49:53.520 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 1>two and three and then maybe take Royce Freeman in

0:49:55.600 --> 0:49:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the fourth. So then the answer to that question, I

0:49:57.480 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 1>know we're wearing up quarterbacks for the answer to my

0:49:59.200 --> 0:50:01.319
<v Speaker 1>question is gonna be, what's then better? Do you draft

0:50:01.360 --> 0:50:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon and Michael Thomas or Julio Jones and Dalmin Cook?

0:50:03.840 --> 0:50:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Which combination is better to you? I know it's personal preference,

0:50:07.560 --> 0:50:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and I get that, but I don't know the answer.

0:50:10.160 --> 0:50:15.400
<v Speaker 1>And a half point PPR it's very tough. That is

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a close one. I mean I think you'd think on it.

0:50:17.640 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I have a month, Yeah, I've I've already drafted a

0:50:20.080 --> 0:50:22.080
<v Speaker 1>team where I have Julio Jones and Dalvin Cook, so

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably lean that way. You know how much I

0:50:24.480 --> 0:50:27.920
<v Speaker 1>like Dalvin Cook and as consistent as Michael Thomas is.

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:29.719
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's what it comes down to you, right,

0:50:29.800 --> 0:50:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Like consistency verse upside, Like Julio Jones can be a

0:50:32.400 --> 0:50:35.440
<v Speaker 1>league winner for you, definitely, but he can severely outperform

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas. But Melvin Thomas is gonna give you a

0:50:38.080 --> 0:50:40.400
<v Speaker 1>safe floor every single week. Melvin Gordon gets could I

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 1>know I'm not Mr daln Cook. I love Melvin Gordon.

0:50:43.040 --> 0:50:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he could really outscore Dalvin Cook pretty handily myself.

0:50:45.840 --> 0:50:48.600
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's it's figuring out which to you

0:50:48.680 --> 0:50:50.439
<v Speaker 1>like better ultimately, And I think that's where my leagal

0:50:50.480 --> 0:50:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Who's the top on your draft board? Though, when it

0:50:52.600 --> 0:50:55.120
<v Speaker 1>came Melvin Gordon verse Julio Jones, I'd probably take Melvin Gord.

0:50:55.120 --> 0:50:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I would take Melon Gordon also, So then just take

0:50:57.160 --> 0:50:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the best wide receiver available, maybe Julio Jones there in

0:50:59.239 --> 0:51:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the second. You don't know he won't be that because

0:51:01.719 --> 0:51:03.399
<v Speaker 1>I talk to that person every day. It's his birthday today,

0:51:03.440 --> 0:51:06.120
<v Speaker 1>so Russ having birthday, having birthday, watches and listens every day.

0:51:06.600 --> 0:51:11.400
<v Speaker 1>So we appreciate Gordon Michael Thomas, not Um finishing up

0:51:11.480 --> 0:51:14.319
<v Speaker 1>or quarterback conversation Frank. A couple of quarterbacks we haven't

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:17.399
<v Speaker 1>gotten to that I think are worth mentioning at least

0:51:17.719 --> 0:51:23.080
<v Speaker 1>um specifically Jared Goff and Alex Smith two guys that

0:51:23.080 --> 0:51:24.799
<v Speaker 1>I happen to really like this year. I think Jared

0:51:24.840 --> 0:51:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Goff is a natural next step a lot of people expect,

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and Alex Smith. Everybody Washington is saying, this is the

0:51:29.400 --> 0:51:31.000
<v Speaker 1>best quarterback we've had here in years. And I get

0:51:31.040 --> 0:51:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins finishes a top ten quarterback. You read, you read,

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you read where he finished over the last three years,

0:51:35.760 --> 0:51:38.719
<v Speaker 1>and they think Alex Smith fits them better. His fourteenth year,

0:51:38.719 --> 0:51:40.120
<v Speaker 1>he could do a little bit of everything from throw

0:51:40.160 --> 0:51:42.360
<v Speaker 1>it deep to be consistent across the middle to a

0:51:42.360 --> 0:51:45.719
<v Speaker 1>guy like Jameson Crowder or dump it off to a

0:51:45.800 --> 0:51:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Chris Thompson. So I like Alex Smith, and he's gonna

0:51:48.560 --> 0:51:50.160
<v Speaker 1>be a guy that's not gonna be drafted. He's someone

0:51:50.239 --> 0:51:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you could pick up probably any given week. And remember

0:51:53.760 --> 0:51:55.719
<v Speaker 1>early on in the year he was number one, he

0:51:55.880 --> 0:51:57.520
<v Speaker 1>was King one for the first five weeks of the

0:51:57.560 --> 0:51:59.360
<v Speaker 1>season last year. So I think there's some love with

0:51:59.360 --> 0:52:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Alex Smith and the Jared Goff thing, along with Mitchell Robinsky.

0:52:02.360 --> 0:52:03.759
<v Speaker 1>I think it's easy. I think you're just looking at

0:52:03.760 --> 0:52:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a guy that's still improving as a quarterback and as

0:52:06.560 --> 0:52:08.399
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy player. I know people think the Bears will

0:52:08.400 --> 0:52:10.600
<v Speaker 1>break out. That's why they like Dr Whisky and Jared

0:52:10.640 --> 0:52:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Goff playing a good rams offense. To me, I think

0:52:12.880 --> 0:52:14.880
<v Speaker 1>he's a perfect streamer. You probably don't need to draft him.

0:52:15.040 --> 0:52:16.839
<v Speaker 1>That's why I have Alex Smith ranks ahead of both

0:52:16.840 --> 0:52:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Golf and draw Whisky. Golf is closer to the tier

0:52:19.760 --> 0:52:22.799
<v Speaker 1>above him than the Goff Drobisky tier. For me. Yeah,

0:52:22.840 --> 0:52:25.000
<v Speaker 1>so I have Goff and Alex Smith back to back.

0:52:25.040 --> 0:52:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I have Golf at eighteen and Alex Smith at nineteen.

0:52:28.080 --> 0:52:30.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not really a knock on Jared Goff. I just

0:52:30.080 --> 0:52:32.480
<v Speaker 1>think the QB position is so deep this year, and

0:52:32.600 --> 0:52:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you know there are guys ranked ahead of him who

0:52:34.680 --> 0:52:36.800
<v Speaker 1>have done it before. And Jared Goff finished as the

0:52:36.880 --> 0:52:38.680
<v Speaker 1>QB twelve last year. He was fine. I just think

0:52:38.760 --> 0:52:42.239
<v Speaker 1>he's all system quarterback. Brandon Cooks is there. He does

0:52:42.320 --> 0:52:44.680
<v Speaker 1>have better weapons. But remember the defense is also a

0:52:44.800 --> 0:52:47.239
<v Speaker 1>lot better this season as well. So are there gonna

0:52:47.239 --> 0:52:49.200
<v Speaker 1>be games where they need Jared Goff to do all

0:52:49.239 --> 0:52:51.759
<v Speaker 1>that much? Maybe there's more games this year where in

0:52:51.800 --> 0:52:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter they're just kind of like grinding out

0:52:54.160 --> 0:52:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the clock with Todd Gurley or whatever else. The you

0:52:56.600 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>know they want to throw back there. But I mean,

0:52:58.640 --> 0:53:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I like what you said about al Smith. I the

0:53:01.080 --> 0:53:02.600
<v Speaker 1>thing is, I don't know that I can walk away

0:53:02.600 --> 0:53:05.319
<v Speaker 1>from my draft with like him as like my QB one.

0:53:05.360 --> 0:53:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a very fine QB two. Maybe he's

0:53:07.880 --> 0:53:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the insurance policy you're looking for for your draft, and Andrew,

0:53:10.320 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 1>look me personally, I just can't walk out of a

0:53:12.760 --> 0:53:14.920
<v Speaker 1>draft with Alex Smith as I got a quarterback. Are

0:53:14.920 --> 0:53:16.640
<v Speaker 1>there any of the quarterbacks, um that we have not

0:53:16.760 --> 0:53:19.080
<v Speaker 1>mentioned on the show today that you feel, for whatever

0:53:19.080 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 1>reason you did talk about, whether it's a Derek Carr,

0:53:21.520 --> 0:53:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston of Lake Bordles, anybody come to mind for you. Yeah,

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:27.880
<v Speaker 1>like Jamis Winston as well. I like him more so

0:53:28.000 --> 0:53:29.800
<v Speaker 1>as a QB two. I think people are sleeping on

0:53:29.920 --> 0:53:31.879
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit too much. It's just it's hard

0:53:31.920 --> 0:53:34.359
<v Speaker 1>to swallow that three game suspension to start the year.

0:53:34.640 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 1>You never want to get off to a slow start

0:53:36.080 --> 0:53:38.960
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy football. So I understand where Jamis Winston is

0:53:39.000 --> 0:53:41.360
<v Speaker 1>being drafted, but remember in a super flexile if you

0:53:41.440 --> 0:53:43.759
<v Speaker 1>get Jameis Winston late and then come back and pair

0:53:43.840 --> 0:53:46.440
<v Speaker 1>him with like a Ryan Tannehill, just start Tannehill those

0:53:46.480 --> 0:53:48.319
<v Speaker 1>first three weeks and then you get Jamis Winston. Bag.

0:53:48.719 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I still do think the upside is there with the

0:53:51.160 --> 0:53:54.160
<v Speaker 1>weapons that Jameis Winston has. Another guy who you know,

0:53:54.480 --> 0:53:56.799
<v Speaker 1>we've heard mixed reports so far in camp, but has

0:53:56.840 --> 0:53:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the weapons is Case Kingdom. Yeah, we saw him do

0:53:59.040 --> 0:54:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it last year. Now with the Denver Broncos, he has

0:54:01.640 --> 0:54:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the Marris Thomas has Emmanuel Sanders. Again, he's more of

0:54:05.120 --> 0:54:07.839
<v Speaker 1>like a super flex A two uh in a two

0:54:07.920 --> 0:54:11.040
<v Speaker 1>quarterback league drafting messr QB two. I think those are

0:54:11.120 --> 0:54:13.960
<v Speaker 1>some sleeper candidates they're going in the super flexi format.

0:54:14.080 --> 0:54:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Continue the debate in our comments section. We appreciate you watching.

0:54:17.040 --> 0:54:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Please subscribe to our show, give us a like and

0:54:19.600 --> 0:54:22.080
<v Speaker 1>leave a comment, and rate us five stars. On iTunes

0:54:22.120 --> 0:54:25.279
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow running Back ranking Sleepers and Debate. We hope to

0:54:25.320 --> 0:54:27.400
<v Speaker 1>have you that For Franks Stavil my name is Gregg Souman.

0:54:27.600 --> 0:54:33.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll do it all again tomorrow. We hope does your