1 00:00:02,560 --> 00:00:09,119 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:07,840 --> 00:00:10,600 Speaker 2: In video, one name making up a little more than 3 00:00:10,640 --> 00:00:13,039 Speaker 2: four percent of the index and almost one hundred percent 4 00:00:13,080 --> 00:00:15,319 Speaker 2: of the enthusiasm to buy stocks in the last twenty 5 00:00:15,360 --> 00:00:18,520 Speaker 2: four hours, that single name adding two hundred and seventy 6 00:00:18,560 --> 00:00:21,079 Speaker 2: six points sixty five billion dollars in market cap in 7 00:00:21,120 --> 00:00:25,239 Speaker 2: a single day, a single day. That's a new record. 8 00:00:25,280 --> 00:00:27,640 Speaker 2: The old record belonged to Meta, and that was only 9 00:00:27,680 --> 00:00:30,280 Speaker 2: three weeks old. The move wasn't just isolated to just 10 00:00:30,320 --> 00:00:33,120 Speaker 2: one stock, one sector, or even one country. It was 11 00:00:33,240 --> 00:00:37,240 Speaker 2: enough to help push equity markets worldwide to record highs. Stateside, 12 00:00:37,280 --> 00:00:40,159 Speaker 2: the SMP all time high, then that's that one hundred 13 00:00:40,440 --> 00:00:42,919 Speaker 2: all time high. In Europe, the stock six hundred all 14 00:00:42,960 --> 00:00:46,479 Speaker 2: time highs. Germany stacks all time high. Even in Japan 15 00:00:46,840 --> 00:00:49,800 Speaker 2: we reclaimed a milestone going back to nineteen eighty nine, 16 00:00:49,840 --> 00:00:53,920 Speaker 2: then K two to twenty five at all time highs. 17 00:00:54,280 --> 00:00:57,880 Speaker 2: This is happnik with negative GDP in the UK, negative 18 00:00:57,920 --> 00:01:01,600 Speaker 2: GDP in Germany, negative GDP in Japan, and interest rates 19 00:01:01,600 --> 00:01:04,920 Speaker 2: in America at multi decade highs. The stock market is 20 00:01:04,959 --> 00:01:07,640 Speaker 2: evidently not the economy, and high interest rates have done 21 00:01:07,680 --> 00:01:11,280 Speaker 2: little to dampen the enthusiasm to buy equity. Some are confused, 22 00:01:11,560 --> 00:01:14,399 Speaker 2: Marko Klanovic a JP Morgan saying we find current market 23 00:01:14,440 --> 00:01:18,760 Speaker 2: developments odd. Others are nothing but jubilant. Danives of Wedburth 24 00:01:18,840 --> 00:01:20,880 Speaker 2: says this is a game changing moment for the tech 25 00:01:20,920 --> 00:01:24,640 Speaker 2: bulls and puts jeb fuel in the tech ball market thesis. 26 00:01:24,680 --> 00:01:27,520 Speaker 2: As the derivatives of AI play out over the coming 27 00:01:27,560 --> 00:01:31,240 Speaker 2: twelve to eighteen months. To discuss a week full of records, 28 00:01:31,440 --> 00:01:33,080 Speaker 2: I pleased to say we're joined by a good friend 29 00:01:33,080 --> 00:01:36,440 Speaker 2: of this program, Mohammad al Arian Muhammed, what a week 30 00:01:36,480 --> 00:01:38,800 Speaker 2: it's been. I just want your early response, your initial 31 00:01:38,800 --> 00:01:42,120 Speaker 2: reaction to the price section yesterday, off the back of 32 00:01:42,160 --> 00:01:43,800 Speaker 2: earnings on one single name. 33 00:01:45,080 --> 00:01:47,039 Speaker 3: I think John is totally understandable. 34 00:01:47,440 --> 00:01:50,880 Speaker 1: I think there is a revolution going on in AI 35 00:01:51,520 --> 00:01:54,680 Speaker 1: fed by four things that will only grow in importance, 36 00:01:55,600 --> 00:02:02,080 Speaker 1: and that is computing, power, data, and financing. There is 37 00:02:02,120 --> 00:02:05,200 Speaker 1: a very long runway both on the supply side and 38 00:02:05,240 --> 00:02:08,839 Speaker 1: on the demand side for this sector. On the supply side, 39 00:02:08,880 --> 00:02:14,359 Speaker 1: we're going to see capabilities improving expanding. On the demand side, 40 00:02:14,919 --> 00:02:17,280 Speaker 1: it's not just about AI, add ons that a lot 41 00:02:17,320 --> 00:02:20,960 Speaker 1: of companies are talking about today and trying to do. 42 00:02:21,440 --> 00:02:24,680 Speaker 3: It is about developing things that are AI native. 43 00:02:25,160 --> 00:02:27,920 Speaker 1: So when I look at this, I totally understand the 44 00:02:28,000 --> 00:02:30,919 Speaker 1: excitement about the sector, and I totally understand how that 45 00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:36,120 Speaker 1: sector can suck investment into many other things. So it 46 00:02:36,120 --> 00:02:39,560 Speaker 1: doesn't surprise me. This is a secular story, John. Now, 47 00:02:39,600 --> 00:02:41,639 Speaker 1: will there be excesses in parts of the market. Of 48 00:02:41,720 --> 00:02:44,400 Speaker 1: course there will be, But there is something real going 49 00:02:44,440 --> 00:02:48,320 Speaker 1: on that can enhance productivity and have a huge impact. 50 00:02:48,480 --> 00:02:49,880 Speaker 3: Secularly, call it. 51 00:02:50,040 --> 00:02:53,320 Speaker 2: A secular story. Can we talk about the cyclical impact. 52 00:02:53,800 --> 00:02:56,160 Speaker 2: We were talking to YenS Norvig of Excite Data, and 53 00:02:56,200 --> 00:02:58,560 Speaker 2: he was making the connection between what would happen to 54 00:02:58,600 --> 00:03:01,639 Speaker 2: growth in America to activity in America and how the 55 00:03:01,680 --> 00:03:04,320 Speaker 2: Federal Reserve might have to reconsider how high rates might 56 00:03:04,360 --> 00:03:06,079 Speaker 2: have to be in the years to come. Are you 57 00:03:06,160 --> 00:03:07,280 Speaker 2: making that connection. 58 00:03:07,000 --> 00:03:09,680 Speaker 3: Yet in years to come? 59 00:03:09,919 --> 00:03:12,200 Speaker 1: Yes, John, But this is not a FED that has 60 00:03:12,280 --> 00:03:14,960 Speaker 1: been basing policy on years to come. This is a 61 00:03:15,000 --> 00:03:18,520 Speaker 1: FED that's been basing policies on past data. 62 00:03:18,960 --> 00:03:20,720 Speaker 3: It's been overly data dependent. 63 00:03:21,680 --> 00:03:24,040 Speaker 1: But he's right in the sense that when working out 64 00:03:24,040 --> 00:03:27,800 Speaker 1: productivity and growth potential, you've got to factor that in. 65 00:03:28,160 --> 00:03:31,960 Speaker 1: It is a transformational and it's not the only one, John, 66 00:03:32,040 --> 00:03:34,880 Speaker 1: you know, for you've been hearing me three that say, 67 00:03:34,920 --> 00:03:37,680 Speaker 1: there's three of them. There's what's happening to genitive AI, 68 00:03:38,240 --> 00:03:41,480 Speaker 1: there's what's happening to life sciences, and there's what's happening 69 00:03:41,720 --> 00:03:46,520 Speaker 1: to green energy. And you've talked to my colleague Michael 70 00:03:46,560 --> 00:03:49,280 Speaker 1: Spence on these issues, and you know how strongly he 71 00:03:49,360 --> 00:03:50,040 Speaker 1: feels as well. 72 00:03:50,160 --> 00:03:52,360 Speaker 2: Spencer was fantastic. I want to talk about the recent 73 00:03:52,360 --> 00:03:55,120 Speaker 2: FED communication we've had as well, Mohammed. Governor Walla, what's 74 00:03:55,120 --> 00:03:56,720 Speaker 2: the rush? Do you share that opinion? 75 00:03:56,920 --> 00:04:00,360 Speaker 1: What is the rush? Do you remember when when you 76 00:04:00,440 --> 00:04:03,880 Speaker 1: repeated what I said a few months ago when you 77 00:04:03,960 --> 00:04:06,040 Speaker 1: asked me what's going to happen? I told you what 78 00:04:06,200 --> 00:04:08,480 Speaker 1: let me tell you what should happen, and let me 79 00:04:08,480 --> 00:04:08,720 Speaker 1: tell you. 80 00:04:08,760 --> 00:04:09,480 Speaker 3: What will happen. 81 00:04:10,000 --> 00:04:13,640 Speaker 1: And I said at that time three cuts starting in June. 82 00:04:14,200 --> 00:04:16,000 Speaker 1: And that was at a time when the market was 83 00:04:16,040 --> 00:04:20,760 Speaker 1: seeing six to seven cuts starting in March. So we 84 00:04:20,839 --> 00:04:23,799 Speaker 1: are now in a really good spot. We are now 85 00:04:23,960 --> 00:04:27,080 Speaker 1: at a point where the market has finally converged to 86 00:04:27,200 --> 00:04:31,800 Speaker 1: what the FED has signaled, and it's really important to 87 00:04:31,880 --> 00:04:35,800 Speaker 1: try and maintain that alignment because there's so much else 88 00:04:35,880 --> 00:04:39,520 Speaker 1: going on. So I think it is right to say patients, 89 00:04:39,520 --> 00:04:43,160 Speaker 1: but that communication shouldn't go too far. What's going to 90 00:04:43,200 --> 00:04:48,400 Speaker 1: be hard, John, is to stick to the three cuts, 91 00:04:49,240 --> 00:04:51,599 Speaker 1: both by the market and by the Fed, at a 92 00:04:51,640 --> 00:04:54,880 Speaker 1: time when the inflation data is going to get much 93 00:04:54,920 --> 00:04:55,520 Speaker 1: more bumpy. 94 00:04:55,720 --> 00:04:58,400 Speaker 2: Muhammed, what surprised me? I'll tell you what didn't surprise me. 95 00:04:58,720 --> 00:05:01,800 Speaker 2: That's spread closing to close. I'll tell you something else 96 00:05:01,800 --> 00:05:03,720 Speaker 2: that didn't surprise me. How that spread closed? I was 97 00:05:03,760 --> 00:05:07,719 Speaker 2: with you the market coming towards the Federal Reserve. It's 98 00:05:07,760 --> 00:05:10,120 Speaker 2: what didn't happen as that spread close that shocked me. 99 00:05:10,600 --> 00:05:13,000 Speaker 2: We've priced out all those cuts we had priced in 100 00:05:13,360 --> 00:05:15,920 Speaker 2: since the end of October. We've pushed out the timing, 101 00:05:16,000 --> 00:05:18,480 Speaker 2: we've reduced the magnitude of interest rate cuts this year. 102 00:05:18,720 --> 00:05:21,440 Speaker 2: And yet still this equity markets carried on rallying. The 103 00:05:21,480 --> 00:05:23,799 Speaker 2: two year yields are fifty basis points in just something 104 00:05:23,880 --> 00:05:26,320 Speaker 2: like three weeks and change. And my habit in still 105 00:05:26,480 --> 00:05:29,040 Speaker 2: this equity market carried on running. And if you'd asked 106 00:05:29,080 --> 00:05:31,680 Speaker 2: me at the time, whatever my views worth back then, 107 00:05:31,920 --> 00:05:33,760 Speaker 2: if we're going to close that gap in that fashion, 108 00:05:33,920 --> 00:05:35,840 Speaker 2: if trewe ye yelds we're going to reprice higher by 109 00:05:35,920 --> 00:05:38,280 Speaker 2: let's say, fifty basis points in three weeks. I would 110 00:05:38,279 --> 00:05:41,080 Speaker 2: have said stocks down, stocks down, hard stocks are up. 111 00:05:41,520 --> 00:05:43,760 Speaker 2: How do you explain that, Muhammad? How important is monetary 112 00:05:43,760 --> 00:05:47,320 Speaker 2: policy to equity market pricing given the dynamics in Nvidia, 113 00:05:47,560 --> 00:05:48,880 Speaker 2: in AI, in big tech? 114 00:05:50,320 --> 00:05:53,440 Speaker 1: You know, John simply put is one of three factors. 115 00:05:53,560 --> 00:05:57,160 Speaker 1: Interest rate risk, of course, has been a significant headwind, 116 00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:01,320 Speaker 1: but you've had two very strong tailwinds. One we just 117 00:06:01,360 --> 00:06:05,640 Speaker 1: talked about, which is a secular journey that we've embarked 118 00:06:05,640 --> 00:06:10,919 Speaker 1: on led by these incredible innovations. And then the second 119 00:06:11,400 --> 00:06:14,200 Speaker 1: significant tailwind is the strength of the economy. You know, 120 00:06:14,240 --> 00:06:16,839 Speaker 1: we were also surprised by a three point three percent 121 00:06:16,920 --> 00:06:19,800 Speaker 1: growth rate in the fourth quarter. We were also surprised 122 00:06:19,800 --> 00:06:23,200 Speaker 1: by an almost five percent growth rate in the third quarter. 123 00:06:23,320 --> 00:06:28,000 Speaker 1: And the US locomotive has been strong enough to offset 124 00:06:28,120 --> 00:06:32,600 Speaker 1: the numbers you showed in terms of recessions in Germany, 125 00:06:32,839 --> 00:06:33,760 Speaker 1: UK and Japan. 126 00:06:34,040 --> 00:06:35,960 Speaker 2: Do you think that should lift all boats abroad? Though, 127 00:06:36,080 --> 00:06:38,360 Speaker 2: and you mentioned the recessions in the UK, Germany and Japan, 128 00:06:38,600 --> 00:06:42,159 Speaker 2: we've also got all time highs in Germany and Japan. Mahammick, 129 00:06:42,160 --> 00:06:43,920 Speaker 2: can you explain that just by the US alone. 130 00:06:45,520 --> 00:06:48,000 Speaker 1: Well, what you can explain by is people looking at 131 00:06:48,080 --> 00:06:54,919 Speaker 1: valuations differentials and seeing that other markets look incredibly cheap 132 00:06:55,040 --> 00:06:58,320 Speaker 1: relative to the US and wanting to go fishing there 133 00:06:58,440 --> 00:07:01,560 Speaker 1: as well. Of people have been saying, well, if I'm 134 00:07:01,600 --> 00:07:04,000 Speaker 1: going to invest in the US at these levels, just 135 00:07:04,160 --> 00:07:09,400 Speaker 1: look at how much cheaper other markets are. So you're 136 00:07:09,440 --> 00:07:14,720 Speaker 1: getting massive spillovers because people are looking at relativities. 137 00:07:14,800 --> 00:07:18,120 Speaker 2: John, do you think those easy financial conditions should be 138 00:07:18,160 --> 00:07:21,760 Speaker 2: of concern to certain central banks still grappling and lacking 139 00:07:21,800 --> 00:07:24,960 Speaker 2: confidence of getting inflation backed down towards target. 140 00:07:26,240 --> 00:07:29,160 Speaker 1: So you're taking me to the question that you know, 141 00:07:29,400 --> 00:07:31,680 Speaker 1: I don't really like discussing, which is what is the 142 00:07:31,720 --> 00:07:35,520 Speaker 1: appropriate target? Were living in a world where, given everything 143 00:07:35,560 --> 00:07:40,240 Speaker 1: that's going on on the supply side, we're talking about jeopolitics, 144 00:07:40,240 --> 00:07:44,920 Speaker 1: we're talking about companies, we're wiring their supply chains, we're 145 00:07:44,920 --> 00:07:47,920 Speaker 1: talking about what's happening in the labor market, that when 146 00:07:47,920 --> 00:07:50,640 Speaker 1: you look at all this, if I was a central banker, 147 00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:54,200 Speaker 1: I would be aiming at the actually long journey back 148 00:07:54,240 --> 00:07:56,960 Speaker 1: to two percent. I wouldn't wish to get back to 149 00:07:57,000 --> 00:08:00,320 Speaker 1: two percent because in the back of my mind I believe, 150 00:08:00,440 --> 00:08:03,440 Speaker 1: as I believe right now, that if I was to 151 00:08:03,520 --> 00:08:06,560 Speaker 1: set an inflation target today, it will be hired than 152 00:08:06,560 --> 00:08:08,880 Speaker 1: two percent. It will be closer to three percent. But 153 00:08:09,000 --> 00:08:11,080 Speaker 1: of course I can't change that because I've missed my 154 00:08:11,120 --> 00:08:14,720 Speaker 1: target for so long. So in the back of my mind, 155 00:08:14,840 --> 00:08:17,760 Speaker 1: I would not be in a rush to force it 156 00:08:17,840 --> 00:08:20,760 Speaker 1: back to two percent, And that's really important. If that 157 00:08:20,920 --> 00:08:26,400 Speaker 1: is my mindset, then I can live with these financial conditions. 158 00:08:26,440 --> 00:08:28,000 Speaker 1: If my mindset is I need to get to two 159 00:08:28,000 --> 00:08:31,960 Speaker 1: percent really quickly and that's the right inflation target, then 160 00:08:31,960 --> 00:08:33,760 Speaker 1: I would be concerned about financial conditions. 161 00:08:33,800 --> 00:08:35,920 Speaker 2: Well, mahould, we also have to acknowledge why you said 162 00:08:35,920 --> 00:08:38,120 Speaker 2: that all that time ago. The reason you said that 163 00:08:38,200 --> 00:08:40,760 Speaker 2: is because you believed initially that in order to get 164 00:08:40,800 --> 00:08:44,440 Speaker 2: back to two percent and oversay eighteen months two years, 165 00:08:44,679 --> 00:08:46,880 Speaker 2: we needed to crush the economy to do that. The 166 00:08:46,960 --> 00:08:49,640 Speaker 2: lesson of last year was that maybe we don't. Perhaps 167 00:08:50,240 --> 00:08:52,480 Speaker 2: what's the question now that you'd be asking with regards 168 00:08:52,480 --> 00:08:54,760 Speaker 2: to that, do you think we can achieve that inflation 169 00:08:54,840 --> 00:08:57,560 Speaker 2: target without crushing the service side of the economy. Given 170 00:08:57,600 --> 00:09:00,800 Speaker 2: the disinflationory trends that have emerged over the previous six months. 171 00:09:01,600 --> 00:09:03,280 Speaker 3: So let me give you my probabilities. 172 00:09:03,400 --> 00:09:06,160 Speaker 1: I think it's about fifty five percent probability that we 173 00:09:06,200 --> 00:09:11,080 Speaker 1: can that we can get towards a stable inflation rate 174 00:09:11,200 --> 00:09:13,280 Speaker 1: that's low enough. It won't be two percent, but that's 175 00:09:13,320 --> 00:09:16,720 Speaker 1: low enough, and that's stable enough that it anchors inflation 176 00:09:16,880 --> 00:09:19,280 Speaker 1: expectations without crushing the economy. 177 00:09:19,320 --> 00:09:20,560 Speaker 3: I'll give that a fifty five percent. 178 00:09:21,240 --> 00:09:25,160 Speaker 1: I'll give a thirty percent of probability that either because 179 00:09:25,400 --> 00:09:27,880 Speaker 1: of an external shock and there's a lot going on 180 00:09:27,960 --> 00:09:32,120 Speaker 1: in the world right now, or a domestic political change, 181 00:09:32,920 --> 00:09:37,520 Speaker 1: or a policy mistake from the FED of staying too 182 00:09:37,600 --> 00:09:41,360 Speaker 1: tight for too long, fifteen percent that will slip into 183 00:09:41,360 --> 00:09:43,439 Speaker 1: a mild recession. And so thirty percent will slip into 184 00:09:43,520 --> 00:09:47,679 Speaker 1: mild recession. And fifteen percent is that the productivity gains 185 00:09:48,040 --> 00:09:51,679 Speaker 1: that will occur over a number of years happen much 186 00:09:51,720 --> 00:09:54,880 Speaker 1: more quickly, and then we find out that we get 187 00:09:54,920 --> 00:09:57,319 Speaker 1: towards some people call the low landing that grows stays 188 00:09:57,320 --> 00:10:00,679 Speaker 1: incredibly robust while inflation stays well behaved Mohammed. 189 00:10:00,679 --> 00:10:03,439 Speaker 4: Governor Waller yesterday was talking about they want to see 190 00:10:03,480 --> 00:10:06,559 Speaker 4: a couple of months of inflation data to make sure 191 00:10:06,600 --> 00:10:08,880 Speaker 4: that they're prepared for these cuts. You're looking at June. 192 00:10:08,920 --> 00:10:12,960 Speaker 4: What needs to happen in terms of goods disinflation between 193 00:10:12,960 --> 00:10:14,880 Speaker 4: now and June for you to be comfortable. 194 00:10:15,720 --> 00:10:16,880 Speaker 3: No, I'm comfortable now. 195 00:10:17,040 --> 00:10:20,880 Speaker 1: Okay, I'm comfortable now because I look way beyond. I 196 00:10:20,920 --> 00:10:28,280 Speaker 1: think that data dependency doesn't mean data obsession. It's very, very, 197 00:10:28,400 --> 00:10:33,120 Speaker 1: very problematic if you get obsessed by data, because you 198 00:10:33,280 --> 00:10:37,280 Speaker 1: need to look forward. Your measures act with a lag, 199 00:10:37,600 --> 00:10:40,320 Speaker 1: as you know and Marie, so if you are totally 200 00:10:40,360 --> 00:10:43,720 Speaker 1: basing policies on the last few months of data, you 201 00:10:43,720 --> 00:10:44,560 Speaker 1: will get it wrong. 202 00:10:45,080 --> 00:10:48,120 Speaker 3: And that is why we have had such a reactive FED. 203 00:10:48,320 --> 00:10:52,439 Speaker 1: That is why communication has been such a problem. So 204 00:10:52,679 --> 00:10:55,080 Speaker 1: I don't need to see two more months of data 205 00:10:55,720 --> 00:11:00,000 Speaker 1: to feel comfortable cutting three times starting in June because 206 00:11:00,080 --> 00:11:03,680 Speaker 1: of what I see ahead. But if this FED remains 207 00:11:03,760 --> 00:11:08,560 Speaker 1: obsessed with being data dependent and seemingly solely data dependent, 208 00:11:08,960 --> 00:11:13,520 Speaker 1: that they want to see goods inflation staying well tamed 209 00:11:13,920 --> 00:11:16,960 Speaker 1: while service inflation coming down, that's what they need to see. 210 00:11:16,960 --> 00:11:17,200 Speaker 3: Maham. 211 00:11:17,320 --> 00:11:19,280 Speaker 2: Let's just finish this segment by asking a simple question. 212 00:11:19,320 --> 00:11:21,840 Speaker 2: I know it's difficult to answer, but what evidence is 213 00:11:21,880 --> 00:11:25,720 Speaker 2: there that they are sufficiently restrictive looking across the economic 214 00:11:25,800 --> 00:11:27,880 Speaker 2: data we've had not over the last month, but over 215 00:11:27,880 --> 00:11:28,920 Speaker 2: the last twelve. 216 00:11:30,280 --> 00:11:31,920 Speaker 3: So boring costs have gone up. 217 00:11:32,440 --> 00:11:35,080 Speaker 1: True, spreads haven't gone up like everybody expected, but that 218 00:11:35,160 --> 00:11:37,520 Speaker 1: has to do with the fact that credit risk has 219 00:11:37,559 --> 00:11:42,679 Speaker 1: got has been supported by economic growth. Inflation has come down, 220 00:11:43,559 --> 00:11:46,480 Speaker 1: and it's not just a supply side issue where you've 221 00:11:46,520 --> 00:11:50,920 Speaker 1: seen major adjustment and interest rate sensitive sectors, so there 222 00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:55,440 Speaker 1: is evidence that they've had an impact through higher rates. 223 00:11:55,679 --> 00:11:55,920 Speaker 3: John. 224 00:11:56,000 --> 00:11:59,920 Speaker 1: My concern, honestly is that now the market and the Fed, 225 00:12:00,679 --> 00:12:04,040 Speaker 1: surprised by the fact that the inflation numbers are getting 226 00:12:04,120 --> 00:12:07,160 Speaker 1: more bumpy, will end up being too tight. 227 00:12:06,960 --> 00:12:07,559 Speaker 3: For too long. 228 00:12:07,960 --> 00:12:11,120 Speaker 2: Okay, let's just go there again. Let me ask that question, Muhammad, 229 00:12:11,160 --> 00:12:13,560 Speaker 2: you think the biggest risk here is that they hold 230 00:12:13,600 --> 00:12:14,880 Speaker 2: too long, not cut too soon. 231 00:12:15,600 --> 00:12:15,920 Speaker 3: Correct. 232 00:12:15,920 --> 00:12:19,000 Speaker 1: If they don't cut in June, then you'll hear me say, 233 00:12:19,120 --> 00:12:22,160 Speaker 1: oh no, we're now making the opposite policy mistake that 234 00:12:22,200 --> 00:12:23,959 Speaker 1: we made back in. 235 00:12:23,920 --> 00:12:24,560 Speaker 3: Twenty twenty one. 236 00:12:24,760 --> 00:12:27,560 Speaker 2: Interesting this conversation, Mohama's going to continue. It's fantastic to 237 00:12:27,559 --> 00:12:29,400 Speaker 2: have you with us, Mohammed al Arian. You know where 238 00:12:29,360 --> 00:12:31,080 Speaker 2: the elephant in the room is here, it's the three 239 00:12:31,160 --> 00:12:33,600 Speaker 2: hundred billion dollars in Russian Central Bank reserves that were 240 00:12:33,920 --> 00:12:37,360 Speaker 2: effectively frozen back in twenty twenty two. What are we 241 00:12:37,360 --> 00:12:38,040 Speaker 2: going to do with them? 242 00:12:38,400 --> 00:12:42,160 Speaker 4: It's a great question these reserves. Some people are saying, potentially, 243 00:12:42,200 --> 00:12:43,960 Speaker 4: if there's going to be an opening to have a 244 00:12:44,000 --> 00:12:46,400 Speaker 4: peace negotiation, does the US use this as a caroten 245 00:12:46,480 --> 00:12:49,839 Speaker 4: stick approach. This is something that everyone says, amongst all 246 00:12:49,880 --> 00:12:51,920 Speaker 4: the sanctions that's been levied on Puchin, this is the 247 00:12:51,920 --> 00:12:52,640 Speaker 4: one that hurts the most. 248 00:12:52,760 --> 00:12:54,800 Speaker 2: Muhammed A Leran still with us, Mohammad, we don't have 249 00:12:54,840 --> 00:12:57,079 Speaker 2: to talk about this directly, but more broadly, the world 250 00:12:57,120 --> 00:12:59,360 Speaker 2: become in a more fragmented place. You and I've been 251 00:12:59,360 --> 00:13:03,480 Speaker 2: talking about assuring, friendshuring, deglobalization over the last few years. 252 00:13:03,600 --> 00:13:05,920 Speaker 2: When you look at those things, Mohammed, does that still 253 00:13:05,960 --> 00:13:08,000 Speaker 2: contribute to your idea that this is going to be 254 00:13:08,360 --> 00:13:12,640 Speaker 2: a regime post pandemic that has higher inflation, more volatility 255 00:13:12,640 --> 00:13:14,520 Speaker 2: than the one we had before the pandemic. 256 00:13:15,880 --> 00:13:20,480 Speaker 1: That's absolutely because you have two distinct factors. You have 257 00:13:20,640 --> 00:13:27,520 Speaker 1: first the non commercial determination of supply chains for geopolitical reasons, 258 00:13:28,679 --> 00:13:31,520 Speaker 1: and then you have a second factor that's coming in 259 00:13:31,600 --> 00:13:35,360 Speaker 1: as well that tends to aggravate all that, which is 260 00:13:35,360 --> 00:13:41,040 Speaker 1: the continued weaponization of economic and investment tools for the 261 00:13:41,080 --> 00:13:44,880 Speaker 1: purposes of national security, which is totally understandable, but both 262 00:13:45,120 --> 00:13:49,960 Speaker 1: these tend to be inflationary. John, I think the biggest surprise, 263 00:13:50,200 --> 00:13:54,080 Speaker 1: including for me, is that the Russian economy did not 264 00:13:54,240 --> 00:13:57,960 Speaker 1: suffer as much as most of us expected, did not 265 00:13:58,040 --> 00:14:01,520 Speaker 1: suffer in terms of the contraction. There were projections of 266 00:14:01,520 --> 00:14:05,440 Speaker 1: ten to fifteen percent when Russia was thrown out as 267 00:14:05,480 --> 00:14:09,360 Speaker 1: swift when the sanctions were put on, and the IMF 268 00:14:09,360 --> 00:14:13,840 Speaker 1: in its latest projections increased growth for this year in 269 00:14:13,920 --> 00:14:17,400 Speaker 1: Russia to over two percent. And that tells you two things. 270 00:14:17,520 --> 00:14:21,360 Speaker 1: One that with hindsight, the West should have been much 271 00:14:21,400 --> 00:14:26,840 Speaker 1: harder on the sanctions, fewer exceptions, and taken the risk 272 00:14:27,080 --> 00:14:30,320 Speaker 1: of collateral damage that you just heard Michael talk about. 273 00:14:31,640 --> 00:14:34,360 Speaker 1: Because the second issue that that does it signals to 274 00:14:34,360 --> 00:14:36,720 Speaker 1: the rest of the world that maybe you can live 275 00:14:36,800 --> 00:14:40,120 Speaker 1: outside the Western system. Well, that is not as much 276 00:14:40,240 --> 00:14:42,520 Speaker 1: as a threat as most of us thought it was. 277 00:14:42,600 --> 00:14:44,480 Speaker 4: Well, we were talking earlier Peater Cheer about the fact 278 00:14:44,560 --> 00:14:48,160 Speaker 4: that Russia just created new markets India and China is 279 00:14:48,160 --> 00:14:50,560 Speaker 4: where they now sell all their energy in Europe at 280 00:14:50,600 --> 00:14:53,280 Speaker 4: one point was one of their biggest partners. So in 281 00:14:53,320 --> 00:14:56,280 Speaker 4: that sense, Muhammad, have sanctions actually worked. 282 00:14:57,960 --> 00:15:00,720 Speaker 1: So not only had they created new market and Marie 283 00:15:01,120 --> 00:15:05,560 Speaker 1: that created new payment systems that bypassed the dollar completely. 284 00:15:06,320 --> 00:15:09,920 Speaker 1: And that is I think what has surprised many, including me. 285 00:15:10,280 --> 00:15:13,200 Speaker 1: The Russian technocrats, working with others, have come up with 286 00:15:13,280 --> 00:15:17,760 Speaker 1: this very clunky system but nevertheless allows for international payments 287 00:15:18,080 --> 00:15:21,480 Speaker 1: without going through the core of the system, which is 288 00:15:21,560 --> 00:15:24,160 Speaker 1: this image of little pipes being built. 289 00:15:23,840 --> 00:15:24,560 Speaker 3: Around the core. 290 00:15:25,800 --> 00:15:29,120 Speaker 1: And the worry is that you're going to encourage more 291 00:15:29,160 --> 00:15:32,800 Speaker 1: people to build these little pipes. So that's the fragmentation 292 00:15:34,280 --> 00:15:37,840 Speaker 1: of the economy. Look, there was a decision to be 293 00:15:37,880 --> 00:15:41,760 Speaker 1: made early on about how hard are you on energy? 294 00:15:42,000 --> 00:15:45,440 Speaker 1: Should you threaten secondary sanctions or not, And for the 295 00:15:45,480 --> 00:15:48,640 Speaker 1: reasons that Michael pointed out, the decision was don't go 296 00:15:48,800 --> 00:15:49,240 Speaker 1: that far. 297 00:15:49,800 --> 00:15:52,400 Speaker 3: And therefore that you know. 298 00:15:52,560 --> 00:15:55,440 Speaker 1: Sanctions are as effective as the sanctions you employ. 299 00:15:55,880 --> 00:15:58,920 Speaker 3: And there were two major loopholes left in round one. 300 00:15:59,320 --> 00:16:01,280 Speaker 2: It's hard to know the answer to the following question 301 00:16:01,320 --> 00:16:04,320 Speaker 2: with any certainty, but let's just explore it any way. Mohammad, 302 00:16:04,360 --> 00:16:07,760 Speaker 2: the elephant in the room. If they confiscate those Russian 303 00:16:07,800 --> 00:16:11,120 Speaker 2: central bank reserves that were frozen two years ago. How 304 00:16:11,160 --> 00:16:14,000 Speaker 2: concerned would you be that other countries would begin to 305 00:16:14,040 --> 00:16:15,720 Speaker 2: ditch Western currencies. 306 00:16:17,120 --> 00:16:19,560 Speaker 1: I think other countries would look at that very carefully. 307 00:16:19,800 --> 00:16:23,200 Speaker 1: Look John, In economics, there's always this notion that says, 308 00:16:23,840 --> 00:16:26,720 Speaker 1: make sure that you have enough tools to meet the 309 00:16:26,800 --> 00:16:31,240 Speaker 1: number of objectives you have. And we are pursuing sanctions 310 00:16:31,760 --> 00:16:37,280 Speaker 1: for three objectives. One is to punish Russia, two is 311 00:16:37,320 --> 00:16:40,960 Speaker 1: not to excessively harm the global economy, and three is 312 00:16:40,960 --> 00:16:44,160 Speaker 1: not to excessively harm the role of the dollar in 313 00:16:44,280 --> 00:16:49,280 Speaker 1: the global system. And you cannot get these three objectives 314 00:16:49,640 --> 00:16:53,000 Speaker 1: with just a single tool of sanctions. And that's why 315 00:16:53,040 --> 00:16:57,520 Speaker 1: you hear you know, sanctions are not enough. But the 316 00:16:57,680 --> 00:17:00,360 Speaker 1: risk is that you end up trying to pursue all 317 00:17:00,440 --> 00:17:03,040 Speaker 1: three using a single sanction, and then you end up 318 00:17:03,080 --> 00:17:04,359 Speaker 1: with not satisfying any of this. 319 00:17:04,480 --> 00:17:06,760 Speaker 2: Great, I am Hammed, This was great, just awesome to 320 00:17:06,800 --> 00:17:09,159 Speaker 2: catch up with the good friend of this program, good 321 00:17:09,200 --> 00:17:11,360 Speaker 2: friend of mine. Mohammed al Aaron of Bloomberg Opinion