WEBVTT - The Cycle: Rounding The Bases (Ep. 998)

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Reynolds here for mint Mobile. I don't know if

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you knew this, but anyone can get the same premium

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>wireless for fifteen dollars a month plan that I've been enjoying.

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:11.039
<v Speaker 1>It's not just for celebrities. So do like I did

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and have one of your assistants assistants switch you to

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Midmobile today. I'm told it's super easy to do at

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 1>mintmobile dot com.

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Slash switch upfront paymental forty five dollars for three month

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 2>plan equivalent to fifteen dollars per month required intro rate

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 2>first three months only, then full price plan options available,

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 2>taxes and fees, extra FEFL terms at mintmobile dot Com.

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 3>Hello everybody, and welcome back in to another episode of

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 3>the cycle. I am your host today, Mike Maher and

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 3>I am joined by not Ryan Warmley, but Kelly Kirby

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 3>and Kelly how are you doing today?

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm doing pretty well. I think the last time that

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 4>we did this was when I podcasted from Heaven, so

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 4>I upgraded. I upgraded for today, so I'm excited to

0:00:58.880 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 4>be back.

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you have the Betting Pros backdrop. You have very

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 3>for people watching on YouTube. She has very fun red

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 3>glasses that match her Cubs jacket, much more stylish than

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 3>the guy wearing a black shirt with a navy blue hat.

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 3>But I've been told that navy blue and black you

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 3>can do that. Now. It's not like it's no longer

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 3>like a fashion, no note, You're allowed to do it.

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 3>So I take full advantage and do it all the time. Absolutely,

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 3>all right, So you're all you all have the pleasure

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 3>of having me hosts today, and everyone knows how wonderful

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 3>and energetic a host I am. And so let's get

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 3>right into it, and let's do so this first segment.

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, for people who are new to it or

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 3>people coming back, the cycle used to be like one

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 3>long video, but now it's split into threes. And so

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 3>you're going to kind of like have him released over

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 3>the weekend on both audio and video, so you can

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 3>get him in kind of like smaller, more digestible segments

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 3>for the n season version, which we think works well.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 3>This first segment we're going to do rounding the bases

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 3>and up first. I have a couple of players I

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 3>wanted to talk about that I put in there in

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 3>the first note. I put in there that you seem

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 3>like you might have some thoughts on is Sandy alcontre

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 3>cooked because I know I recently wrote him up as

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 3>a buy low and since then things have not gone well.

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 3>They've actually gone even worse, and it's concerning. I would say,

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 3>but what's your concern level, And I would send the

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 3>question to you, is Sandy Lgandra cooked or or is

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 3>he still a by low?

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? When you put that in there and I told you,

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, well, that should be a short conversation because

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 4>I fear that he is. I don't like any of

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 4>the numbers that he's been putting up lately. And that

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 4>is coming from someone I was really really high on

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:53.239
<v Speaker 4>him in draft season. So it is that is an

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 4>l that I am pretty much taking on my first

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 4>if I am concerned about everything control speed, it's he's

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 4>just getting hit so hard that it just doesn't look

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 4>like he's he's back, and I wonder if he can

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 4>make it further back. So yeah, right now, I mean

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 4>you can buy him low, but you need to buy

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 4>like we're talking like low, like Jake McCarthy low. So

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 4>be very very careful.

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I would bet in some shaller leagues he's he's

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 3>dropped too, because I know a couple of weeks ago,

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 3>in the YouTube comments and on Discord, people were already

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 3>asking if they could drop him, and I was like, no, no,

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 3>he's going to turn things around, but he's a bilo,

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 3>don't dare drop him. And then he did. He did

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 3>throw a quality start against the Reds in there, not

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 3>like his most efficient start, but it was fine, and

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 3>then he just got chased out of the building by

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 3>the Dodgers. Two and two thirds innings, seven are in runs,

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 3>five walks, two strikeouts, seven hits allowed. It was it

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 3>was as ugly as it gets. And like I said,

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm someone who wrote him up as like a Bilow.

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 3>I was like, the stuff still looks okay here. I

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 3>just think he needs to find his control. I'm still

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 3>kind of in that in that boat where, like you know,

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 3>it's hard to say in LEAs where I need pitching.

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what I'm willing to give up to

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 3>get him. It's kind of more of like if you

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 3>drop him, I'll pick him up, but I'm not going

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 3>to trade anything meaningful for him right now, unless it's

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 3>like unless we're flipping you know, like a like a

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 3>bi low hitter, Like I don't know, maybe would you

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:30.919
<v Speaker 3>do like a Christian Walker or is that even that

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 3>too much to give up for him?

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 5>Right now?

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 4>That's way too much to give up for him, I think.

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm looking at his stack cast, like his

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 4>you know, his era is currently eight point three one.

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 4>His expected era is just it's lower, but at six

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 4>point four one, his you know, he's still got a

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 4>great ground ball percentage, but his hard hit percentage is

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 4>like forty six point four and you're just not going

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 4>to be able to survive with that. And his walk

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 4>rate is like fourteen something, which is six points higher

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 4>than his normal career average. And you know, if you're

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 4>giving up a war and letting everybody hit the ball

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 4>freaking hard off, you like, where's where's that going to go?

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 4>So no, no, not Christian Walker. Joey p would would

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 4>be yelling at you at this point, like bro me,

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 4>you think I think he would brow you in pretty hard.

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that's fair. I'm just I'm trying to be

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 3>more optimistic. His velocity is also down, but like not

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 3>down a ton, it's down like a mile per hour.

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it's a little bit less than mile per hour.

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 3>I just kind of feel like he's gonna get back,

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Like I also am holding out hope that I mean,

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 3>this is this could not be going worse for the

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 3>Marlins as a team. That is like definitely going to

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 3>trade him this year because of the of like the

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 3>range of outcomes here. There's one, maybe he's still hurt

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 3>or you know, dealing with something either like you know,

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 3>still not all the way back from his injury, or

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 3>dealing with some other injury. There's two. It's just that

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 3>he's just not the same picture anymore, because even like

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 3>he was really he was good in twenty twenty three,

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 3>but like not like he was, you know, and a

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 3>lot of us chalk that up to, like, you know,

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 3>that was kind of like leading up to the Tommy

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 3>John surgery. A lot of times you're dealing with something

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 3>before that diagnosis because you're like, you know, whether it's

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 3>your velocity or control, like something is just doesn't feel

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 3>right and that can affect the numbers. So I know,

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 3>I was kind of like buying into that. I was like, no,

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 3>those numbers are inflated just because of the injury, and

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 3>now he's going to be back, so there's the possibility

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 3>he's just not going to ever be at that pre

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three level anymore, which is definitely a real possibility.

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 3>And then there's the possibility that he turns things around,

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 3>and they really need that to happen as a team

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 3>now that it really matters for the Marlins, They're always

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 3>going to do what they're gonna do and not spend money,

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 3>but they need him to be good so they can

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 3>they can trade him, which is what I'm really banking

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 3>on in fantasy, because right now, even if you acquire him,

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 3>you're not going to get any wins within pitching for

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 3>the Marlins. So you know, I would love for him

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 3>to go do somewhere like my Red Sox if he

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 3>can turn things around. I assume the Dodgers will probably

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 3>acquire him for nothing and just like add him as

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 3>like their SP nine just in case.

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 4>Sure. When Justin Steele went down, I immediately texted my

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 4>dad and brother and was like, go get al Contra.

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 4>And you know, of course now now I'm taking the

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 4>l from them too, So yeah, it is. It's ugly,

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 4>but I could see him the SP nine in LA.

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 4>I think that's perfect.

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 3>If we'll talk about this in another segment, But I

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 3>feel like if I'm a major league team right now,

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 3>I might call the Marlins and see what the price

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 3>is because I don't want to wait for it to

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 3>go up, and like, you know, I might rather like

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 3>see if as an mL you know, like it's the

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 3>one thing in fantasy to buy a low but as

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 3>an MLB team, i'd give a call. They'll probably hang

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 3>up on you and be like, no, we can't trade

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 3>this bag of rocks right now for for what you're

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 3>offering the other player. I want to talk about someone

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 3>that I've talked about a lot, a lot in the

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 3>off season, and I took a lot of heat for

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 3>the amount of shares I have of him because everyone

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 3>knows that what happens every single year. And that's Mike

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Trout who left the game, uh yesterday, this we're recording

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 3>on Thursday. He left the game Wednesday with knee soreness,

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:10.679
<v Speaker 3>the same surgically repaired knee from from last year. Not great.

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 3>They said, it's precautionary. But don't love that, you know,

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 3>don't love Don't love him leaving a game. Nope, And

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.119
<v Speaker 3>I you know, I tweeted it out like we almost

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 3>made it to May. We almost. We had a full

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 3>April out of him. We almost made it to May,

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 3>and like the batting average wasn't good, but we already

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 3>had a bunch of home runs. I put in the

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 3>sheet everybody panic. I know, you know, my fantasy baseball

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 3>strategy this year was essentially Mike trot or bust because

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 3>I took him at what I considered to be a

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 3>value in so many leagues that you know, if he

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 3>went down, it wasn't gonna be pretty for me. I

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 3>don't even know what to ask you there. I feel

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 3>like I know what your what your thoughts on thoughts are,

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 3>what's your level of concern here for for you know,

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 3>the other said it's just precautionary, but it's that same knee.

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I feel like nothing with Trout is

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 4>every precautionary. I think it always turns into like caution

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 4>and then panic and then he's gone till July. It's

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 4>I think it wasn't this almost a year to the day,

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 4>because I had him last year, and I swear he

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 4>got into it on like April twenty ninth. Yeah, because

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 4>I made I made kind of the same thing where

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 4>I was like, well, almost got to May. I drafted

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 4>him nowhere because it was just I was risk averse

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 4>this year, mostly for having to deal with it last year.

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 4>So no, I thought of you instantly, I was just like, oh,

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 4>that is every league for him. And then I realized

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 4>we got to do this podcast, and I'm like, I'm like, oh, perfect, exactly,

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 4>like this is just this is you know, this is

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 4>him this, and I feel terrible for him. He's a

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 4>great player, but from a fantasy perspective, it's just, you know,

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 4>availability is important, and here we go.

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 3>So exactly, good luck. Yeah, he played twenty nine games

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:54.719
<v Speaker 3>last year and none of them were in May, so

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 3>it must have been like right around the same day. Yeah,

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 3>seems like a really you know, he's a great player,

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 3>seems like a really nice kid Eagles fan. I love that.

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 3>I love that about him. But yeah, I mean I

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 3>knew the risk I was taking when I drafted him,

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 3>but I felt like he was going late enough that

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 3>I was like, even if I get like a half

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 3>a season out of him, it's still worth it. But

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 3>only getting April out of him would not be ideal.

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 3>And kind of like you said, they're saying it's just precautionary,

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 3>but like it feels like in the past he would

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 3>like miss a game and they're like, oh, it's just

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 3>precautionary and then like done for the year, like we

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 3>just don't see him again. It's like, oh, actually that

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Soornie needs to be amputated and so you know, we

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 3>don't ever see him again. Yeah, it doesn't feel good

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 3>to be someone who has Mike Drout and just about

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 3>every league. Did you also see I put it in

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 3>the sheet. I don't know if you clicked on it.

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Did you also see, like if any team, any MLB

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.079
<v Speaker 3>team was going to do this, it would be the Angels.

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Did you see what happened with their pitchers yesterday?

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 4>I did not.

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:51.719
<v Speaker 3>I didn't even know this was a rule. You know,

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 3>I've been watching baseball a long time. I didn't even

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 3>know this was like a rule. And credit to the umpires.

0:10:58.200 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if they had to like call someone

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:01.959
<v Speaker 3>or if they just like knew this, but credit to

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 3>them for knowing. Because the Angels had two pictures go

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 3>out to the mound at the same time. They had

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Ryan Johnson from the dugout and Jake Eater I guess

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 3>this is his name from the bullpen, and so it

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 3>was like Spider Man me, like two pitchers standing on

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 3>the mound, and then I guess by Rule Johnson, who

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 3>came from the dugout, had to face at least one batter.

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 3>But I was just like, you know, we're already gonna

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 3>talk about Mike Trout. What is more Angels and dysfunction

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 3>than sending two pictures to the mound? Something that never

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 3>even happened to me in Little League.

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 4>I think about the Angels sometimes just in terms of,

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, yeah, the Rockies are terrible, the White Sox

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 4>are historically terrible, the Marlins are terrible. But you look

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 4>at the Angels and it's just always that question of

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 4>like the talent is occasionally there and has been there

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 4>kind of consistently, and just nothing and weird stuff like

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 4>this happens to them and you're just you're just kind

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 4>of it amazes me, Yeah, I guess. And for them

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 4>to be, you know, down the road from the Dodgers,

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm kind of like, you know, you could just copy that,

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 4>but obviously they're not going to do that. So yeah,

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 4>it's very angel That is a very Angels thing because

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 4>it's just weird, not dumb, just weird.

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And they're just this organization where it just like

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 3>never goes well and they're not even one of those

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 3>organizations that's extremely cheap. They're not like the Marlins, like

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 3>they spend money. They just spend it poorly. They spend right.

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean the rendn't contract alone, like you know,

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 4>you just you just kind of look at it going there.

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 4>They went after talent. They just never bothered to ask

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 4>if he liked baseball.

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that seems like an important part of the interview

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 3>because it seems like the answer is now, and he

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 3>basically said now. But like the Angels, if you are

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 3>struggling with your lineup pocisions, consider the Fantasypro's Lineup Assistant,

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 3>where our Lineup Assistant recommends optimal lineups and suggestions to

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 3>maximize your team's performance each day or a week. Just

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 3>sink your league for tailored guidance based on your roster

0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 3>and settings, and you can download the Fantasy Pros and

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 3>My Playbook app or visit Fantasypros dot com slash MLB

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 3>My Playbook to set your winning lineup today.

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 6>More rewards, more savings with American Express Business Gold turn

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 6>up to three hundred and ninety five dollars back in

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 6>annual statement credits on eligible purchases at select shipping, food

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 6>delivery and retail subscription merchants enjoy the benefits of membership

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 6>with the MX Business Gold Card. Terms apply. Learn more

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 6>at AmericanExpress dot com Slash Business dash Gold MX Business

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 6>Gold Card built for business by American Express.

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 5>Does it ever feel like you're a marketing professional just

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 5>speaking into the boyd boy? Well? With LinkedIn ads, if

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 5>you can know you're reaching the right decision makers, you

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 5>can even target buyers by job title, industry company, seniority skills. Wait,

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 5>did I say job title yet? Get started today and

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 5>see how you can avoid the void and reach the

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 5>right buyers with links. We'll even give you a one

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 5>hundred dollars credit on your next campaign. Get started at

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 5>LinkedIn dot com slash results. Terms and conditions apply.

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 3>And I know I use it a lot, just like

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 3>I use the Draft Wizard and Draft Season. One thing,

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:15.719
<v Speaker 3>since I'm in like eight or nine leagues this year,

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 3>one thing I really enjoy about it is if there's

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 3>like a new player that's going to be available on waivers,

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 3>whether it's like a prospect or someone I want to add.

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 3>You know, I have like a couple daily leagues where

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 3>I can just go and see he's available real quick.

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 3>But I can just go and like put his name,

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 3>type his name into Fantas Bros. And pull up all

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 3>my leagues and see like, okay, he's a free agent

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 3>in this league. I have him in this league already.

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Another team has him in this league. And so that's

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 3>a really cool feature that I feel like, we's your

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 3>promote more because I find it very cool.

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 4>M Yeah, for sure. I have a couple of leagues

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 4>that are on platforms that can't sink yet, and one

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 4>of them, I'm just like, can we just please move

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 4>this to Yahoo so I can just go in every

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 4>day and be like line upset. Thank you. It just

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 4>makes everything so much easier if you play in more

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 4>than one league. So platform is that Oh fan tracks?

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh you can't sing for it.

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 4>We can't do lineup position with fan tracks yet.

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh but you can still Yeah you can still see the.

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 4>You can still see it. It's just I mean, I'm

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm uber lazy. I wanted to just do it for me,

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 4>And there's a button in there that you can literally

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 4>just hit right, So I mean the lineup system's perfect.

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 4>Do it?

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 3>I got youa Yeah, I thought you could sink it

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 3>all no, you can sing, because I have all my

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Dynasty leagues are on fan tracks, mostly because sleeper reduces

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 3>to add baseball. All right, second base Here, we run

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 3>the first round a second I put in picture returns here,

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 3>and so a few of these pictures have already returned

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 3>and a few are returning soon. And so I'm going

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 3>to kind of get your thoughts on them. I don't

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 3>know we need to rank them rest of season, but

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 3>we can kind of gauge your interest on them rest

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 3>of season. So I'll just run through the list and

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 3>then i'll talk it to you. So Tony Gonsolin top

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 3>of the list because he returned last night for the

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Dodgers and looked really good. Six shut out innings, six hits,

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 3>nine strikeouts, exactly what you wanted from Tony Gonslin. Lucas

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Giolito returned last night as well. He looked really really

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 3>good for five and two thirds innings and then really

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 3>not great for one third of an inning. It looked

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 3>like he was also on his way to six shot

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 3>out innings, and then he kind of got squeezed at

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 3>one point and then he walked. I forget who he walked.

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm forgetting now, But he basically walked one batter, I

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 3>guess it was maybe George Springer, and then on an

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 3>O two count he was trying to put Dalton Varshaw away,

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 3>and you could he was. He had like pinpoint control

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 3>all night. He was just like dotting his fastball and

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 3>his The broadcast actually kind of jinxed him because I

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 3>was watching the game and they were like, you know,

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 3>he hasn't even like missed with any of these change ups.

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 3>He's really like getting it down on his own. And

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 3>then it was like boom. He tried throwing an O

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 3>two change up like you didn't want to throw it

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 3>in the zone, and we're right down the middle that

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 3>one for a two run home run. The next batter,

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Alejandro Kirk, who I believe you had in the leading

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 3>off home run con test, also homeward, and so he

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 3>went from six shot out innings to six innings three

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 3>earned runs in a flash. And then also to add

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 3>insult injury, the Red Sox had a six nothing lead

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 3>that the bullpen then lost, and the Red Sox not

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 3>only did Geolito not get the win, but the Red

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Sox also ended up losing the game in extras. But

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 3>still despite all that stuff. A really exciting debut for Geoledo.

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 3>I thought, I'm not really sure what to expect from

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 3>him coming out, but he looked pretty good. Tobias Myers

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 3>has now been back for two starts. He's someone that

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 3>I added in a bunch of leagues, not a high ceiling,

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 3>but someone who I feel just was solid last year,

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 3>like much more solid than I anticipated. Not very solid

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 3>in his two starts back six between over the course

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 3>of his two starts six total innings, four and runs,

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 3>seven walks, five strikeouts. So I'll stop there. Those are

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 3>the three that have already returned, and then I'll stop there.

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Thoughts on any of those three, either like their debuts

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 3>or rest of season value.

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I like Gonsolin, uh not for the strikeouts.

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 4>I think that if he can just kind of keep

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 4>doing that the whip in the one point zero to

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 4>one point one five range, I will take that because

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 4>the win equity with the Dodgers is so high. But

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 4>but the warning obviously is like he's not going to

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.239
<v Speaker 4>strike out nine guys every game. He's probably won't come

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 4>close for the rest of the season unless he figured

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 4>something out that we don't know about. But I laughed.

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 4>I laughed the Patriots Day when the Red Sox play,

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 4>you know, at four o'clock in the morning, because I

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:39.959
<v Speaker 4>feel like, like three years in a row, Gilito started

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 4>that game and like for the White Sox or for

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 4>the Red Sox, and they were he was so bad,

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.880
<v Speaker 4>And when he pitches in the morning, I just laughed

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.959
<v Speaker 4>because I was expecting him. But yeah, I mean he's

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 4>he's a dangerous pitcher, I feel like for fantasy because

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 4>he's he's going to have games where he blows up,

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 4>but he's one where that strikeout rate should stay, you know,

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 4>a strikeout Perennian somewhere in there, which is good. And

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 4>then with Myers, I have him in a couple of

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 4>leagues as well. You just sort of have to eat

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 4>the whip he's going to give you because he's also

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 4>going to strike out. When he gets against teams that

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 4>strike out at a high rate, he will get them,

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 4>but he's also going to walk them. So it's a

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 4>I'm in order. I'm mostly like I want Gonsolin. I

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 4>think you have him in the right order Gonsolin Julietle

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 4>Myers in terms of interest, Yeah.

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 3>That's where I would have him too. I added Gonsolin

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 3>in a couple of leagues, mostly because in those leagues

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 3>I flipped pitching depth for hitting, which I desperately needed.

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 3>And I was like, I'll just figure out pitching going forward. Well,

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, the ship's going down. We're either got to

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 3>start throwing some stuff overboard and change things up over

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 3>going down. And so I was just like, you know,

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm just going to stream pitchers like Giulido and Gonsolin

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 3>and see how long I can steer the ship in

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 3>the right direction. I yeah, I'm interested in all of

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 3>them rest of season. Like I'm not that excited about

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Myers right now based on the debut, but I'm hoping

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 3>it's just kind of like getting the cop shaking the

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 3>cobwebs off. So now for three pictures whose returns are imminent.

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Ranger Suarez, who listeners of the show will recognize as

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 3>the best picture in baseball, is set to return on Sunday. Finally,

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 3>for Phillies fans, you can only hope that means the

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 3>end of Taiwan Walker, but with that contract they gave him,

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 3>you never know. Brandon Woodruff is someone that I'm very

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 3>I actually drafted him in a couple of leagues just

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 3>ash him because I'm very excited about him. I didn't

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 3>love what I read about him though, like his most

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 3>recent rehab outing when they said all they want like

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 3>one more rehab outing. His velocity is down, like pretty significantly,

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 3>around like ninety two miles an hour. And that's especially

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 3>concerning because he's a fastball pitcher, like he's I put

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:54.959
<v Speaker 3>a note in here like like he's a sixty percent off.

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.360
<v Speaker 3>His pitchures are either fastballs or sinkers, and so if

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 3>his velocity is down, that's a problem. And so I'm

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 3>trying not to panic too much because it could just

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 3>be you know, this is his spring training. You know,

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 3>we see pictures all the time show up a spring

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 3>training velocity isn't necessarily there. They're hoping it comes back.

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 3>That being said, I wish it was higher than it was.

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 3>And then Lance mccallor's is apparently going to return. We

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 3>talked about him a week or two ago because of

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 3>I think Worm's two start pitcher was Hunter Brown, and

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 3>I was like, I think Lance McCullers might return this week.

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:28.239
<v Speaker 3>You might not get two starts out of him, but

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 3>he did not, But it sounds like he's going to

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 3>return now feels like we haven't seen him in a

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 3>really long time. And I can't say that I have

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 3>a ton of interest there. But what are your thoughts

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 3>on these three in terms of like interest value rest

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 3>of season or even in the short term.

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean I'm interested in Suarez, not because he's

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 4>the best picture in baseball on the cycle, but just again,

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 4>his numbers can be serviceable, right Like at this point

0:21:56.280 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 4>with injuries, He's one that I'm not necessarily for to

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 4>pick up. I'm not excited to pick up, but I

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 4>would have no problem getting him Woodraff. I'm in the

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 4>same boat as you. I drafted him a few different places,

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 4>like with my last pick, just kind of let's see

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 4>what we've got. And yeah, I mean, you know, I'm

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 4>kind of hoping he's like the anti Sandy el Contra.

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 4>You know where El Contra looks so good in spring

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 4>training and then just everything went off. But you know,

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 4>what he's been dealing with is just it's a scary

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 4>injury and so the ability to come back from it.

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 4>I have him, but I probably won't start him right

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 4>away because I want to see what this is going

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 4>to look like, and then I have no interest in

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 4>my colors. I pretty much have never had interested in

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 4>the colors. When his name was on here, I was

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 4>just like, what is it happening in? What year is it?

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 4>But now I get to text my friend Nick, and

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 4>because he loves my colors, so it'll be it'll be

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 4>fun to talk to him today. So that's my interest

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 4>in him is getting to text my friend Nick. That's it.

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 3>At least you have a reason. I don't have any

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 3>reasons to be interested other than you know, like maybe

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 3>like a really deep dynasty league or so somewhere where

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, rosters are big and I can just kind

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 3>of stash him and see what happens. But yeah, I don't.

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't have a ton of a ton of interest there,

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 3>even though, which is like sad to say, because he

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 3>used to be a really good picture. It's just like

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 3>impossible to know what to expect. And it's definitely not

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 3>like there are some of these pictures, you know, whether

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 3>it's like a young upcoming prospect or a veteran coming back.

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes I want to be early, and you know, let

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 3>me let me get in there early, grab him a

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 3>week early, stash him and then put him out there

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 3>for his first couple of starts and like, see what happens.

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, if it doesn't go well, you know, I'll

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 3>take the lump. He's someone I don't want to be early.

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Like I'm willing to be late on him. I'm willing

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 3>to you know, if he comes out really good, it

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 3>looks really good, maybe I'll put in a bit and

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 3>see see how it goes. But like, I won't be

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 3>upset if I don't if I don't get him, and

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm not willing to take that initial risk of you know,

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 3>his first first appearances back now, third Base, I wanted

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 3>to do We've done this on the on the show

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 3>in the past, but it felt like now that we're

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.959
<v Speaker 3>a month in and we've seen, you know, some decent performances.

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 3>You know, we have a decent amount of data to

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 3>look out for these players. I wanted to do real

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 3>or not real, and I don't think it has to

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 3>be necessarily black and white, you know, like this player

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 3>is good, this player is bad, but just in terms

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 3>of what they're doing right now, all these players are

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 3>off to really good starts. And I want to get

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:20.360
<v Speaker 3>your thoughts on if you think let's say instead, let's

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 3>say it's like a scale of real or not real,

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 3>like is it more real or more not real as

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 3>opposed to black and white. So the first player I

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 3>wanted to put on there is someone that I just

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I should have added him in more

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 3>leagues early on, because I just thought it was like,

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 3>all right, he's gonna do this for a week and

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 3>then we won't see him again. He's been doing it

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 3>for a month. Jorgete Planco looks really really good and

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 3>probably needs to be rostered everywhere, especially if he has

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if he has third based eligibility everywhere

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 3>or if that's just a Yahoo thing, but if he

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 3>has third base eligibility, he definitely needs to be rostered.

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 3>It might just be like second in other places, but

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 3>really really good. He's betting eighty four with nine home

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 3>runs and a stolen base, and it kind of looks legit.

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 3>It kind of looks like he's just kind of back

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 3>and maybe he's like healthy. What are your thoughts on

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 3>Hori plancoor real or not real?

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 4>I would say he's as close to fully real at

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 4>this point as he's going to get, if that makes sense,

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 4>Like you know, he's he's hanging out at an eleven

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 4>point three strikeout rate. I can he keep that up?

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 4>I have no idea. His career strikeout rate is like

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 4>nineteen and he was so bad last year, and I

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 4>think like with the injuries and how the Mariners just

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 4>had no offense, like so I'm definitely intrigued. I wouldn't

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 4>have any problem training for him, And for sure, if

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 4>he has third base eligibility, I would I would hold

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 4>on to him no problem, because.

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I wonder.

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 4>I think it's more real than that everywhere or.

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Yaho thing or Yaho gives everybody eligibility everywhere. I was

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 3>interested to get your thoughts on this player because we

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 3>talked about him a few maybe two weeks ago. He's

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.680
<v Speaker 3>someone I considered for Cell High candidate at the time,

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:04.719
<v Speaker 3>and I ended up talking myself out of him being

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 3>a sell High candidate just because I couldn't find a

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:09.959
<v Speaker 3>reason that what he was doing wasn't legit. I think

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 3>those numbers have come down to earth a little bit now.

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 3>But what about Jung Hu Lee? Real or not real?

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 4>I think he's real. But I had the same feeling

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:20.880
<v Speaker 4>as you where I was like, let's I'm not sure

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 4>about the power being real. So when he was really

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 4>on that run, I thought, you know, is he gonna

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 4>Is he gonna slug five twenty six for the rest

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 4>of the season. I don't think so. But I also

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 4>his betting average alone kind of makes him real to me.

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I would call him real, I think at

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 4>this point. But I had the same I remember having

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 4>exactly the same thoughts as you on selling high for him.

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I will say that when I looked at his

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 3>stackcast page a couple of weeks ago, I mean, it's

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 3>still very red. It was like all red, and now

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 3>some of that has kind of like scaled back down,

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 3>so he seemed to be slowing down a little bit.

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 3>But I would lean like, maybe right on the middle,

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 3>you know, the mean meatia in whichever middle word do

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 3>you want to use of real or not really, he's

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 3>right there in the middle. Now, this other name is

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 3>someone I definitely wanted to get your take on, especially

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 3>as a Cubs fan, because I talked about him a

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:14.360
<v Speaker 3>little bit last week. I kind of stuck my nose

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 3>up him a little bit, and so I'm want to

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 3>see if you want to push back on Pete Crow

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong or not real or not real?

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 4>I think Pete Krow. Armstrong is also sitting kind of

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 4>in that median spot where, like looking at his stat

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.239
<v Speaker 4>cast page, everything is just right in the center. So

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 4>I feel like he has some value. He's got the

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 4>speed obviously, but it's not like if you can get

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 4>something good for him, if someone is willing to buy high,

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:43.719
<v Speaker 4>I would be okay moving him at this point as

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 4>a Cubs fan, he's super fun. Obviously, I want him

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 4>to keep doing what he's doing, but statistically speaking, I

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 4>feel like there's going to be a drop and if

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 4>you want to get out now is probably a good time.

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 4>But if you do want to hold on for the

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 4>stolen bases, I mean, I don't think he's gonna hurt you.

0:27:56.960 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 4>He's just not going to be doing this for the

0:27:58.480 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 4>rest of the year.

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I thought of some about some of what he

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 3>was doing was a little fluky. What about Tyler Soderstrom.

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 4>I love Soderstrom, so I'm going to say that he's real.

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 4>Everyone keeps talking about trying to, you know, sell him high,

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 4>and I just don't know why you would. He's still

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 4>playing in a minor league park, he's still his ex

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 4>slog is still at five sixty eight, so I'm I'm

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 4>fine holding onto him. I also don't think first space

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:28.640
<v Speaker 4>is all that deep power wise anymore, so I don't

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 4>know where else you're going to get him, So I

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 4>have no problem. I would say that he is ninety

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 4>percent real.

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just traded for him in one of our leagues.

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 3>I want to say I flipped Freddy Perta for him.

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 3>I can't remember exactly. I think that's I think that

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 3>was the deal Freddy Prout for Tyler Soderstrom. Also, he's

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 3>been playing a lot of left field. Actually watched him

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 3>make a pretty nice play in left field last night.

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 3>So outfield eligibility would also be be helpful, especially in

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm in a couple leagues where I kind of like

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 3>I have a bunch of first basemens, so I've like

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 3>I loaded up my first base uder and field and

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 3>utility spot, and I could really use another outfielder. So

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm excited about that. What about Nick Pavetta.

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean I don't I don't really believe in

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 4>in Pavetta. I've never really believed in him, so yeah, Like,

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, what he's doing is really great, and you know,

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 4>San Diego is a nice park to pitch in. But

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 4>like I think that, I think the wheels could come

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 4>off on him. So I would put him below the

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 4>median in terms of real and if I had him,

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 4>I would definitely be looking to see if I could

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 4>flip him for something.

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:33.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just feel like, if you can tell how

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 3>you should. I've seen this movie before and it always

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 3>ends up in him in four Zra with a lot

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 3>of strikeouts, and that's just it's just what that movie is.

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 3>It's a good movie, but you know that's what it is.

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Hunter Brown, really or not real?

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think he's doing pretty much exactly what I

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 4>thought he was going to do this year. And his

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 4>era is a little low, it's going to bounce back

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 4>up a little bit, but it's still under his expected

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 4>as under three. His strikeout rate is right in line

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 4>with kind of where he normally, and he's cut down

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 4>the walks, which he did after May last year, like

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 4>and we talked about that. I mean, how many times

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 4>did we talk about that on podcasts, Like after May

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 4>thirty first last year he was phenomenal, And so I

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 4>think he's just picked back up. So yeah, I would

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 4>he's one hundred percent reel in my world.

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think so. Too. I think the second half

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 3>last year was the beginning of the breakout, and I

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 3>think we're seeing the breakout now. And then Nick Lidolo.

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 4>I like Lidolo.

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 3>I you like him or do you like like him?

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 4>I just like him.

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean he's not one I'm going to seek out,

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 4>but he if you have him, I'd hold on to him.

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 4>Does that make sense? Like he's kind of in that

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 4>middle range. I think he's good, but he's not something

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 4>that I'm unless I can get him for nothing, I'm

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 4>not going to search him out.

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I feel like I've I've had him for a

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 3>long time in dynasty leagues, and I've kind of always

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 3>wanted him to be better than what he is, and

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 3>so I'm happy that we're finally seeing a little bit

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 3>of it. But it also seems a little fluky, and

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 3>I think some of the expected numbers kind of kind

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 3>of show that as well.

0:30:58.600 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he has a three he has a three

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 4>five percent walk rate. That's not gonna that's not going

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 4>to stay there.

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, zero point eighty six whip batting average against

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 3>one ninety four, bad bit two fourteen. You know, there's

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 3>some regression coming, negative regression I know, I know the

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:18.479
<v Speaker 3>chat likes when I when I defined positive and negative

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.479
<v Speaker 3>regression for sure. All right, well, let's close it out

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 3>with home plate. And I was originally going to do

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 3>some news notes and injuries, which which is a lot

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 3>of times what we do here, but I feel like

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 3>we've already touched on some of those in other ways.

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 3>So I found this story on MLB dot com that

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 3>I thought was interesting that I sent to you right

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 3>before the show calls seven burning questions, where they're kind

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 3>of looking at as you would expect seven questions for

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the season in baseball. But I thought

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 3>we're interesting. There may or may not be some fantasy

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 3>irrelevance here, but I thought it was interesting enough to

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 3>take a quick look at it, and so I'll just

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of go through them. We can go pretty quickly,

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 3>because you know, it's not the most fantasy relevant thing here,

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 3>and I don't want to get people grumbling, but I

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 3>thought it was interesting. Aaron Judge obviously, you know, if

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 3>he wasn't already like one of the best hitters in baseball,

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 3>the best hitter in baseball is just off to another

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 3>ridiculous start. In addition to power their first burning question

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 3>was how long can Judge stay around batting four hundred?

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Can it be for the Do you think he has

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 3>a realistic shot at batting four hundred this year?

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 4>I do if other teams figure out they should just

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 4>walk him, Like where what are we? I mean, I

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 4>don't know why the Orioles ever pitched him, so I

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 4>think he could hang out. I would see if he's

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 4>going to lose it. My guess would be in mid August.

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 4>I think I think he'll stay up there for a while.

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, especially if you know, we find out that

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Major League Baseball is using special Aaron Judge balls again,

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 3>which you know would only help him even more. It's

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 3>a shame that Worm is not on that episode because

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 3>their next burning question is can the Orioles turning around?

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 3>They're already at the bottom of the AL East, and

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be a competitive division. It's gonna be

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 3>a hard one to dig out of. I mean, I

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 3>have my own thoughts. What are your thoughts on the Orioles.

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 4>I felt in the off season they didn't make any

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 4>moves pitching wise, and that's coming back to haunt them.

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 4>And Gunner got off is off to a still start

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 4>because of injury. So I mean they might be able

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 4>to turn it around, but I don't know how they

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 4>compete back in that division.

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Worm took a lot of heat for including Gunner

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Henderson as a buy low because people didn't think you

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 3>could actually buy low on him. I think you can

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 3>buy low lower than what his value really is. You

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 3>just just still don't have to give up a lot

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 3>to get him. But he did this to me last

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:22.479
<v Speaker 3>year too. I have him in our keeper league, and

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 3>he started a little last year too, So I'm moping

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 3>for fantasy that he can just for baseball in general,

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 3>he can turn it around. But yeah, I had the

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 3>same thoughts. The Reels lost Corbyn Burns. They didn't really

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 3>do a whole lot to add pitching. The pitching that

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 3>they do have is banged up, and they just they're

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 3>running the ghost of Charlie Morton out there, which isn't

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 3>which isn't working for them. And then they have top

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 3>prospects that they refused to play, so that does not

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 3>be there. What about the NL West? Their third burning

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 3>question was can the NL West keep this up?

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if it was still that unbalanced schedule and

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 4>they all got to play the Rockies.

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 3>I was gonna say it should be the l The

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 3>question should be the could the NLS minus the Rockies

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 3>keep this up? Although maybe it's could the NL West

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 3>be this good? And are the Rockies the worst team

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 3>I've ever seen? Because we all thought it was going

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 3>to be the White Sox, it might be the Rockies.

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 4>Right, Yeah, I mean, I think one of the four

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 4>is going to fade. I'm not sure which one, but otherwise, yeah,

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I can I can see lots of wildcard

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 4>teams coming out of that division because they just are

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:21.240
<v Speaker 4>all stacked.

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 3>So, yeah, they're I thought the Dodgers were going to

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 3>run away with that division. It's a lot closer than

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was going to be. I feel like

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 3>the Padres, Giants, and Diamondbacks are all kind of over overperforming,

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 3>like to an extent. But I think they're all good.

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 3>So we'll see. And like you said, playing the Rockies,

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, that's a you know, good medicine to have

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 3>whenever you're you know, whatever, you get cold. Their fourth

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:49.800
<v Speaker 3>one is will Ronald Acunya turbocharge the Braves resurgence because

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 3>it's getting late early in Atlanta.

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm going to say no, like, just I.

0:34:56.560 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 3>Know that's all I have fantasy purposes. I hope you will.

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Because I also stashed him. I was also hoping he

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 3>would kind of like be back by now, or at

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 3>least maybe not back by now, but like you know,

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 3>we'd be talking rehab assignment. But like it seems like

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 3>they're really slow playing this with him, which I wish

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 3>I knew that before I drafted him and stashed him,

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 3>because I was like, all right, he's already kind of

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 3>around his spring training. Let's give him like most of April.

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 3>He'll be on the rehab assignment by the end of April.

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 3>I'll get him mid May. And like now it's like, oh,

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 3>he's started running in the outfield, but we don't have

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 3>a timetable, and I'm like, well, that's not great. Like

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Brave need him now more importantly.

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:37.760
<v Speaker 4>I need him now definitely more importantly.

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, how about a different West Division? Also the other

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 3>thing not to go back for the Braves, but the

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Braves are playing the Dodgers again, and it's like I

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 3>feel like, these poor Braves, I got them to such

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 3>a slow start, and it's like I feel like every

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 3>time I turn around, they're paying the Dodgers, who emerges

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 3>in the crowded Al West.

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I can tell you I want it to

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 4>be on the athletic like a lot, but I yeah,

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 4>I guess I would go with Houston just because if

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 4>Gilbert is out for a long period of time then

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 4>I think that really hurts Seattle's chances of being able

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:14.320
<v Speaker 4>to stay with them. And I'm just not a big

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 4>Rangers believer, but they they might give they would give

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 4>them a run, So I would go Astros Rangers in

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:21.240
<v Speaker 4>that order.

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's that's kind of where I'm at too. That

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 3>does feel like the most wide open division because the

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Angels are twelve and seventeen. But even there, you know,

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 3>that's probably better than what we were expecting for them,

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 3>and it just the athletics, especially if like Kurts can

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 3>get going. That offense can be really good, especially in

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 3>that a net ballpark is a real X factor of

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:43.839
<v Speaker 3>just like offense, offense, offense, and they can just out

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 3>hit everyone at home. I don't think they're going to

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:49.239
<v Speaker 3>have lasting power though. I think it's probably gonna end

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 3>up being like the Astros just seem to win this

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 3>division always, so I assume it'll just be the Astros again,

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 3>and if the Rangers lose to grom at some point,

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 3>which you know we'll see, that would hurt them too

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 3>for sure. On our next video, I also have a

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to talk about Rangers pitcher, So if you

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 3>want to check out our next video, and we talk

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 3>about Waivers and bileus so high, we'll could talk some

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:12.839
<v Speaker 3>more Rangers. So two more here and then we get

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:14.879
<v Speaker 3>out of here. Will the trade market open early again?

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:17.959
<v Speaker 3>Because there was some early trades last year? I believe

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Luis Ariaz is the name they mentioned. He was traded

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 3>like right around now, maybe been traded on Star Wars Day,

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember. So do you think the trade market

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:30.439
<v Speaker 3>opens up early again? You know this time the most

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 3>likely candidate unfortunately be Sandy al Contra, and it doesn't

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 3>sound like he's getting moved early based on how he started.

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 4>Right, Yeah, I mean, I think it depends on how

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 4>much the Dodgers panic given their pitching situation, Like if

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 4>they get to SP fifteen sixteen, like will they start

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 4>to really kind of move things around. Cubs are in

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 4>sort of the same boat where I mean, their offense

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:53.799
<v Speaker 4>is fantastic, their pitching is like what should we do here,

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 4>So I think it'll get going a little bit earlier,

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 4>but I mean I wouldn't look I doubt as early

0:37:59.360 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 4>as last year.

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Also confirmed it was Star Wars Day, May fourth traded.

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 3>May the fourth be with you?

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:07.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think i'd look more June.

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:10.319
<v Speaker 3>How about will we see Otani pitch? This might be

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 3>the most interesting one for fantasy?

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 4>This is by far the most interesting one for fantasy.

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, judges doing what Judge is doing? I I

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 4>just don't know. I don't know if they I it's

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 4>the same question, right, like how deep into their rotation

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 4>our injury is going to go before they are like, okay, fine,

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 4>we'll ramp him back up, because I mean that's going

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 4>to take a little bit of time. It's going to take,

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 4>and it's just going to take some energy and focus

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 4>away from his hitting, which has been so like this

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 4>year it's been interesting. But like he's such a good player.

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 4>So I would say, no, I think they hold him

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 4>and then give him the full year next year. That's

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 4>my guess.

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, It's it's interesting because he like he started like

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 3>ramping up and then they shut him down, and like

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:54.879
<v Speaker 3>now he's throwing bullpens again and I'm like, what's going

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 3>on here? Like is he can a picture or not?

0:38:56.920 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if they're gonna kind of kind of like

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 3>save him until like getting ready for the playoffs, like

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 3>you know, like ramp him up and at the end

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:07.319
<v Speaker 3>of the season and then having the playoffs, because there

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:09.319
<v Speaker 3>were rumors that you could pitch in the playoffs last year,

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:13.360
<v Speaker 3>which I thought was was ludicrous. Then again, Code Senga

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 3>pitched in the playoffs last year, and that was a

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 3>great idea.

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 4>It really went well, Yes for sure, Yeah.

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 3>You really want to make your season debut in the

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 3>playoffs for here, all right, we'll wrap it up there.

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 3>We have a couple more segments to get to. If

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 3>you enjoyed this, or even if you didn't check out,

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 3>make sure you check out the next two videos of

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:33.959
<v Speaker 3>the cycle. The next one, as I mentioned, we're gonna

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 3>be talking waiver wire ads, bilos Sell High and then

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 3>some deep league targets as well. And then for the

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:43.320
<v Speaker 3>final video or audio if you prefer these on audio,

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna talk pitching pitching streamers to start, pitchers and

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 3>pitchers to target for your weeks. And so for Kelly Kirby,

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 3>I am Mike Mayer and thank you for stopping by.

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 7>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:39:56.960 --> 0:39:59.320
<v Speaker 7>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:02.280
<v Speaker 7>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 7>or Spotify, follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 7>Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:11.240
<v Speaker 7>dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB