WEBVTT - Surveillance: Science Is The Key To Progress, Romer Says

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Ye, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane.

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Daily we bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:34.319
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. The

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that was interesting, and you I thought were really

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>on top of this was who will run the United Kingdom?

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's this whole pregnant issue of the when

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of it and the who of it. I couldn't get

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it now, I couldn't get a straight answer. And this

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>goes to the tension that Gideon Rose tries to find

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>in Foreign Affairs Magazine is all of you know, I'm

0:00:56.360 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a huge fan of a print subscription too. Were in

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>fairs you throw it at every smart mouth college graduate

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and says, shut up and read this, Gideon, who will

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>run the world? What did you find out? Well? Uh,

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the it's an interesting question. And what I will say

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>is there's a big debate going on UM and it's

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>not just about whether China will overtake the US. It's

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>if the US UH can get its act together to

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>desire and reinvigorate its international leadership and there's everything there

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>from somebody who says the fight is over, China has

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>one to arguments saying no, the United States can reinvigorate

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the liberal international order post Trump and keep it going,

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and not all of us can be right. And the

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>really interesting question is, like those year end summaries about

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>what the market's gonna do, all you can do is

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the logic and try past predictions or no,

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and performance is no guarantee of future results. What's going

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to happen in the forward looking balance of power? Is

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>anybody's game? Well, Gideon, I always think it's valuable to

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>talk to you into a distinction between ability and willingness.

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>The discussion that we often have about China and leading

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the world, it's about their ability to do so. Do

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>they have the willingness to take a global leadership role?

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Um no, Yes and no. So the interest that there's

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating piece in the issue by um orienta mastro

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>American China expert arguing that what China is going for

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and has already largely achieved, is essentially exclusive dominance in

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>its sphere in Asia and a contestation with the US

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>for global uh leadership and power. More there and so

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the uh, they're playing a regional game and a domestic

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>economic and economic growth game as well as a global

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>leadership game. But in something like strategic affairs, they war

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>want to push us out of the Pacific than organize

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>an entire Okay, it just goes in my book of

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the Summer, Robert Cappel and the Return of Marco Polo's World.

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>And one of your advertisers and foreign affairs is stravits

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>is Fletcher School as well. What's the Gideon Rose scorecard

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>on the South China Sea? Is it China one US zero?

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This year? Uh, there's no question. Well, things are drifting

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 1>in China's favor. Essentially the United States with Brexit and Trump,

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 1>the anglosphere is taking itself out of the geopolitical game

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and so essentially, uh, the normal operations of global order

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>maintenance continue, but nobody believes that anymore because the United

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>States really doesn't have his heart in it. But China

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't actually taking advantage to make new moves forward, and

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>they're obviously weak and have been pushed back because of

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the trade policies. The question is what's gonna happen next?

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's anybody's investador Hosses. In the issue, Greg Mankeew

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of Harvard Allen Blind to the former vice chairman at Princeton,

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go to Senate Warren. Good Morning one or

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>six one FM Boston. Elizabeth Warren's strengthening democracy at home

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and abroad, and she says the urgency of the moment

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>could not be overstated. It sounds like she's running for office.

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So you can't have any other candidates. We would love

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to feature all the major candidates in the next cycle.

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:59.839
<v Speaker 1>We've already had. We've had John kay sick in, we've

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>had the president. What is a president written in? I

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>say for you, the president has not um a Secretary Pompeo,

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>where we love to have the administration and we we

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>pride ourselves on being open to all voices. Uh. And

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>we've had a Secretary Pompeo in last issue. So uh.

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And we want the Republican candidates as well as the

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>democratic ones. Democracy is the new inWORD. You know, it's

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>like we're taking a journey. Okay, we're doing democracy. What

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>does democracy mean to Gideon Rose, Well, that's a great

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>question because there's no as people have been pointing out

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>in many respects, the populist movements are majoritarian democratic movements.

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a real sense in many of the countries we're

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:41.679
<v Speaker 1>talking about, from from Turkey and Russia all the way

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>to Eastern Europe and elsewhere. There's no question that there's

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of popular support for certain kinds of policies.

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't necessarily mean that the liberal democracy and

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the rule of law and some of the things that

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>we think beyond simple majoritarian You get to decide what happens.

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>That stuff is under threat, and the really interesting question

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 1>forward is whether not democracy will succeed, but will liberal

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>democracy succeed? Gideon Rose, thank you so much, John Say

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>thirties six percent. You know they've got these little things

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in the magazine, and the answer is for the price

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of one point three six beverages of your choice at

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Hemmingways at the in Paris, you you just get in

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>brilliance for Christmas? Is that think you know, human well,

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that Bill's already got one you're going to get would

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>be that it's a small price to pay not just

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>for new information, but rather for the context that allows

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you to organize the information you actually have. You got

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a ton of data all the way through your terminals

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>through everything, and what we provide is a way to

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:45.359
<v Speaker 1>contextualize that and fit all the data into some pattern

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that is intellectually I think, yes, Gideon, Gideon, the Foreign

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Affairs is thick and heavy. You throw it at the

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>smart mouth college kid and say shut up and read this.

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>So I actually have one of those smart math college

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>kids myself this year, and so I wrote the lead

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>issue because I felt like I needed to do the

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>next generation what to think, and I wasn't sure that

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>anybody else could do it. So I went out and

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>did it to my college kids son in the pages

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>of n Affairs. Gieon Roal, thank you so much. Foreign

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Affairs at Magazine don't leave home without it. It's not

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 1>Joining us for a quick chat from London and Retail.

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Andrew felstaed Uh joins us. Andrew, good morning. Your article

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>this morning is on the crushing disappointments of Brexit United

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Kingdom Retail. Can you take it worldwide? Well? The interesting

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>thing was, I mean we were all expecting Christmas to

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 1>be bad in the UK because of the uncertainty of

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a Brexit, asas also mentioned France and Germany and said, um,

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>things were quite tough there too. Well, things are quite

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>tough there too. I mean these are these are real drops,

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>aren't they. I mean, there's no other way to put it,

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that's right. I mean we were all expecting, you know,

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Christmas to be taff and Germany had quite a poor

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>autumn because it had really unseasonable weather. And I mean

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>retailers are always blaming the weather, but actually it does matter.

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Because you have a hot spell in sort of September, Rocktome,

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>then no one actually wants to buy a coat coat.

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>So your high value items that you rely on bolstering

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>your profits, that's not happening. It's quite bad. New the

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.239
<v Speaker 1>blur I saw. I mean, and I can't name Laura

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Ashley since time begin with the X number of stores

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>are shutting down. I mean, come on, the one word

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in your report, I mean Amazon is global and it's

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>beginning to have an effect across all retail, right, that's right.

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>But don't forget that a sauces online too. So if

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>anybody was supposed to be well set up to compete

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>with ours, and it's as Nasals often been touted as

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>an Amazon acquisition target because one thing that Amazon hasn't

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>really got right is fashion and whatever you say about

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>as it has got fashion right for the young shopper,

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>well are they going to take I mean it's they're

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>enjoying it. Our shares on sale today it reduced, I

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>mean exactly. I mean, are you announcing the effect of

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:27.239
<v Speaker 1>this transaction? No? No, no, but but but Asace should

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>be a challenger to Amazon, the challenger for me is

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>your from me. He throw on, you're driving in and

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>they're on the right side as you quietly got by

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.079
<v Speaker 1>his Herod's. And then there's Harvey Nichols and the rest

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of it. What's the state of fancy London shopping? That's

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>so many of our listeners are aware of. Fancy London

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.439
<v Speaker 1>shopping is doing pretty well because the pound is still weak,

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>We've still got lots of travelers. A fancy London shopping

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have any problem, and neither really should bargain basement

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>London shopping. You know, when we spend we all want

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to barking. Where there is real trouble is this mid

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>market where they're not cheap and they're also not aspirational.

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 1>That's where the real trouble is. But I think fancy

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>London shopping no problem. Let me bring in my colleague

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>PIMPM and it's a real retail turm wail, whether it's

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>UK or here. Yeah. Well, I was just going to

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>go through the list of retailers that have actually shuttered

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>some of their operations. Debenham's, House of Phraser, Home Base,

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Marks and Spencer New Look, John Lewis Patissary, Valerie, and

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of course all the Toys r Us stores were forced

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to close because of that. And I'm just wondering, does

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>this mean that there's going to be an excess of

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>real estate coming on the market. Yes, there will be.

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>The I mean the other thing, all those shops closing,

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>all things being equal, they should have started to benefit

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the ones that are left. You get a last man

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>standing effect. But you know, the uncertainty over Brexit has

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>really overshadowed that, and it's also overshadowed the fact that

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>people actually have more money in their pocket. The fundamental

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>was a good it's just everybody's worried. You know, they

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>stopped spending because they're worried what's going to happen in March.

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe also that there's gonna be a clamor

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>for staffing because many of the people that work in

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>retail and in many of those kinds of jobs on

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the high Street, and indeed in logistics and so on.

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>They come from countries outside the United Kingdom. That is

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 1>certainly a problem that that retailers and and those restaurants

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and coffee shops have all alluded to. So it depends

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>what happens in March, really, and also we've learned that drivers,

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, just people that are driving the lorries the

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>trucks throughout the the United Kingdom, that there is a

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>shortage of over fifty thousand drivers because recruiters, well, new

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>immigration rules are going to make it more difficult for

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>them to get those people. And that's going to hit online.

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>That's another challenge to online if if things can't be delivered.

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you get the sense that people are spending money

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in order to stock up on food and essential items?

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Those are reports that we've heard in the news meeting, No,

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>not at all. I get the sense that everybody is worried.

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a bit like sort of two thousand and eight,

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>really two thousand and nine, when everyone was worried about

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis on what was going to happen, and

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>they held off from spending. One retailer said to me,

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it's as if somebody switched the lights off in October.

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Everybody I talked to says October November has been very difficult.

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>This is this isn't some excuse for portraying that this

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 1>mood on the high street is real? Do you find

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 1>it also that inventory levels stark scarcity has also been

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a factor that they just don't have enough on the

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 1>shelves because of these issues. Well, no, not because of Brexit.

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I think some retailers have bought very tightly because you know,

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>they knew things were going to be pretty tough, so

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 1>they've bought quite tightly, and actually Marks and Spencers had

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the opposite effect. They've actually they've struggled with their fashion

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 1>views and they had some great fashion this season and

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>probably is it in are enough of it? So they

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>did have some shortages of the great stuff that they had.

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you scientifically at the Keen household, this

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>is a great comment. They're sold out of everything, not

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>enough things to spend. Because you're a retailer, there aren't

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>any prizes for overstocking. You know, these retailers kind of

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>monitor consumers many they know things are going to be tough,

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>so they think, you know what, I'll just order in

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit less. What's gonna be the global the global losses?

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can you judge yet the margin compression that

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see? Um, not yet. I mean one

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>thing that we will see. I mean was saying they

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>did off on Black Friday and that wasn't deep enough.

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 1>Other people have been doing much bigger savings. So if

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>people are discounting like crazy, that means margins will be hit.

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>So we know that, Um, what we don't know is

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 1>the extent yet. I gotta say a source shares right now,

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the online retail are down near to day. One thing

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>about a SOOCE is it it's always been quite a

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>strong It's always had quite strong growth. It's always been

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a market favorite. So you know, when

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you do have bad news from a company like that,

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.719
<v Speaker 1>it does become compounded because people have been used to

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>them performing and they stopped performing, and so there's an

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>outside effect. So it was always bound to be a

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>big hit for them. Andrew Felster, thank you so much,

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciated today. What do you see in the stock market?

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I see that this is going to be a pretty

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>quiet week. One of the big issues to talk about

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>initial public offerings and is there enough money in order

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to soak up all of the new issues that are

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>either scheduled to go out between now and the end

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>of the year and coming up a lot of money.

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>What I find extraordinary is besides the FED meeting, we're

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in a holiday mode. I get that, except I'm seeing

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a tape deteriorates for the morning. We started out FED

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>dead and all of a sudden negative futures through to

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 1>yields you know, coming you know, we're just sort of

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a new g market into the FED meeting. Well,

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think there's also the issue, as I said,

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of cash. Right, unless there's new cash that comes into

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the market, you don't see stock prices move higher. And

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 1>if you take a look at the flows, particularly the

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>equity flows, you've seen people come out out exactly where

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>are they going? Just going to cash and people either

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>cash maybe or people got to spend it things, you know,

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Despite the CPI numbers that come out on a regular basis,

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I find that people tell me things are more expensive.

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Insurance is more expensive, utilities and more expensive. Taxes are

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>going up, and many people have not necessarily saved for

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the tax bill. It's going to come in twenty nine

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>when they find out that they're not able to deduct

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>all those property tax Well, that's a very New York

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>City kind of thing. No, no, no, sir, This is

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>this is California, New Jersey, Canna. This is everywhere. What

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing is the mystery about taxes for this year

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is permanent. Throughout every accounting practice, every single customer, every

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>walk of life is in the same panic about Okay,

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>what what are my taxes really gonna look like? Well,

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and also you end up figuring out that you work

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>more than half the year in order to pay your taxes.

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Very good our interview already on this Monday or interview

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of the week, and I would say, what a wonderful

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>way to set up two thousand nineteen for all Americans.

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>He is Paul Romer, He is out of Colorado. He

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>is someone who did mathiness at Chicago and then I

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>went on to an extinguished career in economics at a

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>number of institutions and the Laurea Jones. I can't remember

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>if I've spoken to you some Stockholm in the blur,

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember it. All, what was it like? Is

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it young Turk to work with George acre Love? If

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you wrote a paper he did a co write with

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>acre Love, were you trembling as you did this? No, George,

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>George is a very modest guy. And Mr Yell I

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I love. Yeah, Harry's married to Janet, you know, and

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that's right, um, and Janet's great too. But George is

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>very easy to work with and it was just a

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>joy to write that paper with him. You came out

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of Chicago already known there for just a complete ability

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to grab the Mathew Nous of economics, and more than

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>anyone I know, you've somewhat stayed away from it. Are

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>we at a better point in Matthew Nous now where

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>we're not slaves to the model? You remember when Harry

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Truman was reputed to have said I wanted one armed

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>economists because he gets sick of this. Well, on the

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>one hand, this and the other hand that. Unfortunately, with math,

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a two handed problem. Some math can be very helpful,

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it can really clarify our understanding, but too much of it,

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>or Matthews the wrong way, can confuses, can exclude. And

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>so what we need to do is get to that

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Goldilocks use of just the right amount of masks to

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:08.640
<v Speaker 1>zoom in on the things we really need to understand.

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about the path from nifty seven.

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean the folks on the Modern Ears seven Samuelson

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>textbook The Clouds part for solo at M I T

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and N seven ish, and then the entire issue of

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>how we grow moves forward and what you canonize is

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 1>innovation and folding it into what's called indogenous growth. How

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>are we doing? Are we growing within our system? Now?

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Are we making it up? But actually, let me let

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>me tell you the story. When I tried to explain

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to my son what I do at work, I said, well,

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to understand why it is that your grandparents,

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>when they were your age, didn't have these great things

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>like a video cassette recorder. He looked at me and

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>he said, Dad, that's obvious. When nanny and granddad were kids,

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the VCR hadn't been invented yet. Is there anything else

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 1>with your work that I can help you with? No?

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>But but but the other place, it's sort of been

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>obvious to everybody that innovation is really what drives standards

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.479
<v Speaker 1>of living, What and you know, Solo recognized this. What

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I did, though, was say we can understand it. We

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>don't want to just say innovation happens. We need to

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 1>understand what causes it, and then what policies can we

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 1>use to increase the rate of innovation, to increase discoveries?

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Raise is your Paul Romer is your world? The fault

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of this gilded age in that we've applied the innovation

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to the benefit game of a gain rather of a

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>modest or narrow segment of the American population, and everybody's

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 1>flat on their back and a luddite America because it

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>hasn't benefited that. Yeah, I think that, you know, people

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>like me who have been advocates for innovation really need

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 1>to be held to account. The first problem is it

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like everybody's getting a share of the benefits.

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>And moreover, we're actually in a period where people have

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.920
<v Speaker 1>less confidence in science then they used to have twenty

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.919
<v Speaker 1>years ago. And that's the thing that troubles me the

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>most because science is the is the key to progress.

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>It's what it's the greatest thing humans have ever invented.

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>And if we lose our faith in science, you know,

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>where are we going to get the extensions of health

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and life, and pim Fox has comes to American exceptionalism

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and that that is is Professor Rohmer says that that

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>loss of confidence, Well, my question would be indeed art

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>if that loss of confidence exists, but you still have

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a cadre of scientists and technicians that are able to

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>figure out what really goes on. But you have of

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the population basically putting on the brakes and making it

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>more difficult for those innovations to reach the public. What

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>do you do. You've been involved in smart cities. What

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>can you physically do well. I think what would be

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>a terrible mistake is for the say the scientists, to

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>say we're smart. Just let us make all the decisions.

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>We're in control. Just just let us do our thing. Um,

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 1>people in science, people in the government. We need to

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 1>be accountable to the public. If the public doesn't understand

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing, why we're doing it, that's on us,

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and we need to do a better job of explaining

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.199
<v Speaker 1>it and rebuilding that kind of faith in what we

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>do and belief in the idea that facts are our friends.

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the mistakes that we have made

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>is we've fed this kind of doom and gloom scenario

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that there's that there's no hope for the future. And

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, for example, fun climate change. We can solve

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 1>climate change. We can manage that problem, just like we've

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>managed every other problem. The only question is how do

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>we decide to move forward. But we've got to be

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>careful not to make everybody so pessimistic and also make

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>sure that they see benefits in their own lives if

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.959
<v Speaker 1>we want to keep this consensus for more discovery, more change,

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:54.959
<v Speaker 1>more growth. Granted, but it reminds me of Daniel Patrick

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>moyna hands comment about people are entitled to their own opinions,

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>but they're not a title to their own facts. If not,

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>if we're not are all looking at the same fact

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:09.719
<v Speaker 1>based situation, how do you even take that first step?

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But one of the things I've been talking about recently

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>is having a sharper separation between the people who established

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the facts and then the people who have to make

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>decisions based on those facts. And often those decisions involve compromise.

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.400
<v Speaker 1>That's just the way of the world. The people who

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>are providing the facts should not be thinking about compromise.

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>They should not be thinking about who wins who loses.

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>They just need to say facts or facts here they are,

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you figure out what to do with it. And sometimes frankly,

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 1>in the academic community we kind of pretend we're acting

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>like the facts people. But then we started staying you

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 1>should do this, you should do that, And that's that's

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>mixing the roles in a way that I think isn't helpful.

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>They celebrated Rome couple of years ago the and I

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>find him phenomenal Chad Jones explaining the growthiness in English.

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Chad has done a great job. And he talked about

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 1>rival non rival products, which is fancy economic talk, which

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 1>is our thinking and our ideas are not the same

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>as accountable item like a pencil or a bow tie. Okay, fine,

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 1>help our audience with the threat that all this intellectual

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>mumbo jumbo is only the purview of the wealthy and

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the haves. What do they have nots? Do ye? Well? First?

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Um if I mean, they'll be put in a plug

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.199
<v Speaker 1>for my lecture. And in Sweden, I actually avoided the

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>use of that term non rival because it's a little

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>too jargon e and really just try to explain what

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>we really mean, which is that when you codify knowledge

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in a in words or in math, then you can

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.719
<v Speaker 1>share it with everybody. So conified knowledge is very different

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>from like a pound of of copper, because you can't

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>all use the copper at the same time. You can

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>all use the knowledge at the same time. Now, on

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>this question of how everybody gets to share, we have

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>two very different systems for producing new codified knowledge. One

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>is the the system of science and open, transparent exchange

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of ideas. The other is the market, where there's some

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>control a way to make money on ideas. We need

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to decide as a society, where do we draw the line.

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Where do we draw line between say that ni H

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>National Institutes of Health, which is fund discovering new farmancy coals,

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Where do we give it over to the to the

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>pharmaceutical sector. And one of the things we can do

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>is if there are too many people capturing too much

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 1>of the profits is just used to Do you have

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>an optimism, professor rumor quickly, because we're gonna have to go,

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you have an optimism that our political system could

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>clear this market and get to a better technological outcome. Yeah,

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm just a incorrigible optimists. So my view about

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>people is like Churchill's view about the US. They always

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>do the right thing after they exhaust all the alternatives.

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>So we'll eventually get back on track on these big challenges.

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, and congratulations again on Well, it

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>was just assumed that work him Fox was so penetrating

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:04.719
<v Speaker 1>decades ago that we almost take it for granted, this

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>idea of moving on from solo fifty seven to where

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>are we going and how do we grow? And that

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>was before the video cassette recorder or I was gonna say,

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>professor is optimistic for no other reason than he needs

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>congratulations for his marriage. It was a laureate marriage, right Sweden,

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 1>You didn't marry an Austrian economist. No, no, no, no,

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm married a French literature professor. That's that's that's that's

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 1>why optimists. That's more rationalistic. Tell Mr mccron right now

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>on the markets, Douglas cast joins us. We're in our

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Brooker Studios. Mr cass in Florida with Sea

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Breeze Partners. Doug abut your positioning right now. First of all,

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>following Um Paul Roma a Nobel laureate, I am not

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>worthy Um, I would say I exist. I'm usually considered

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 1>something of a Cassandra tom And and Pim and I'm

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.239
<v Speaker 1>following Paul Roma, who is, by his own admission and

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:26.919
<v Speaker 1>incurable optimists. So I have no better person to quote

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>than Woody Allen, who may be the second most pessimistic

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the state of the economy and the

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>state of the market. Um Woody Allen said something in

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>an op ed in The New York Times back in

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>nine It was entitled My Speech to the Year's Graduates,

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 1>in which he wrote, more than any other time in history,

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 1>mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair, an

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>utter hopelessness, the other to total extinction. Let us pray

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>we have the wisdom to choose correctly. He went on

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 1>to write. The trouble is our leaders have not adequately

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 1>heratus with this mechanized society. Unfortunately, are politicians are either

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>incompetent or corrupt, sometimes both on the same day. So

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that's where basically I spend clear markets. And there's a

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 1>fair amount of gloom out there right now with a

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>good correction as well. In your history, how do you

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 1>call bottom? How do you get back on board? If

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you're cautious. My approaches us an old Ben Graham um

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>approach back in the nineties who wrote the book Security Analysis.

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>And I tie all my investment decisions, whether it's buying

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.959
<v Speaker 1>or shorting a stock, or buying or shorting the indices

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to the difference between the current share price UM and

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the intrinsic value or private market value of a company,

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>or in my view, what the market is worth. And

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that's how I do it. So when the prices UM

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>sell at a discount to intrinsic value of the buyer

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.199
<v Speaker 1>and when they're at a premium to intrinsic value on

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 1>the seller and um UM today we have we have

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a number of problems. John Farrow and the About an

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 1>hour ago mentioned that in the past we've had monetary options,

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>we've had a functioning G twenty. Today not so much.

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>And we're in a flat and increasingly an interconnected world.

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>It relies on coordination and cooperation. And although there are

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>still some living in the sixties and endorsing policies appropriate

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>for a day gone by, we do live in a

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>flat and interconnected world. And I've mentioned the past three

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>questions that keep me up at night. Um. Firstly, in

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a paper listened cloudy world? Are investors and citizens as

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>safe as the markets assume? We are? A second in

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a flat world? Is it even possible for America to

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:55.199
<v Speaker 1>be an oasis of prosperity and a driver of engine

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>or engine of global economic growth? And finally three, with

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the g H GEO political coordination and roll time low,

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.119
<v Speaker 1>how slow and a nept will the reaction be if

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the wheels do fall off? I think the reason I

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>want you to remember these questions is that the answers

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 1>might serve as a valuation buster in the full fullness

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of time. We have this uh, We're living in a

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 1>connected world. We have lack of cooperation between the superpowers.

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>It's problematic and more impossible than any other time in

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the past. My bottom line is, at best, we're in

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a period of substandard returns, more likely a period of

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>steady strikeouts. By Ahead Doug cast, the SMP five hundred

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>is down more than eleven percent since the first of October.

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Today we get a note that Goldman Sachs says they

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>have a solution to high uncertainty about the stock market

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>next year. Is that yeah? They say, now now is

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the time to get defensive. After the markets down, still

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:58.479
<v Speaker 1>plane dumb? So why do they bother? I mean like,

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when does the does the emperor really have

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>no clothes? We all know the off repeated Buffet comment.

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>is fearful. If you stick, if you rely on price momentum,

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're a passive investor, you're in uh E T

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>S or risk parity quant strategies that are agnostic to

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>balance sheets, income statements, and intrinsic value. You will be

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>negative like oldman Sacks when prices are going down. I

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>always say the changing market structure has produced an environment

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>where sellers live lower and buyers live higher, which is

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>antithetical to Ben Graham and Dodd and Warren Buffet. And

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll stick with those three because they've done pretty well

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>over time. Um So I have said for some time

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that the markets are under pricing and underappreciating risks, and

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that the markets would be ancuffed by a number of factors.

0:29:57.520 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna run out of time. Let's let's come back

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>with Douglas asked. I want to talk to him about

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>some specific ideas, particularly his vocal, vocal statements on Twitter

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>through the years as well. Mr Cast of CBS Partners.

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>This will be out on our podcast with Paul Romer

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. I think it's pretty cool Romer than casts

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>on your podcast. I mean, you know Romer and Cast.

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a certain balay to it. Paul Romer

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and Doug cast back to back. Where else can you

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>do that? Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast.

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio.