WEBVTT - Surveillance: Gas Prices with Hochstein (Podcast)

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Farrell and Lisa Abramowitz. Daily we bring you

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>To find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and of course, on the Bloomberg terminal. Amos Hochstein, Presidential

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Coordinator for Energy Circuit Security for the President of the

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>United States, would like West Texas Intermediate quickly to get

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>back to eighty dollars a barrel. Amos, I'm gonna cut

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to the chase. You've read the Washington Post, Anny Hoyer

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and others. Uh lukewarm here on the microeconomics of price

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>theory of an eighteen cents tax on a galon of gas.

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>What's the plan to get oil back to eighty dollars

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a barrel? Well, good morning, Tom for a little thank

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>you for having me. Uh. Look, since the since the

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>late fall when Putin had a massive troops around Ukraine

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately the invasion followed by global sanctions, uh, the

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 1>price of gasoline at the pump of Americans has gone

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>up about two dollars UH, and diesel probably a little

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>bit more than that. So what we are looking at

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is this historic increase in price as a result not

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of normal economic times, but under a time of war,

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>at a time of of global security instability that is

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>affecting the market and as a result, as we go

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>into the into the driving season the summer, the President

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>really wants to give a break to American families during

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>these three months of the summer, and that's why he's

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>asked Congress to suspend uh the eighteen cent gas tacks

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and he's called on governors to do that the same.

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>So if the governor's match that, uh, that we're talking

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>about fifty cents a gallon less. But I want to

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>answer your question Tom directly. Look, we have done everything

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that we can to encourage the industry to increase production,

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>which they have, which they are going to this year record.

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get to record oil production at the end

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>by the end of this year or the next next

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>year's first quarter. Uh. We've released the President's ordered the

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>release of a million barrels a day from the strategic petroleumers,

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:35.239
<v Speaker 1>and he led the effort to do two million barrels.

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Here's the problem, and I know you're sitting in the Oval, Uh,

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the Oval Office with a Bloomberg terminal next to you

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>as you talk to the President, and you can bring

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>up log West Texas Intermediate quarterly like I can't. Anybody

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>can do this, bologny. It's about distillates, and it's about

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>not in my backyard. How is a centrist Democrat going

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to explain to left Democrats they need to come up

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>with a nod in my backyard policy to advocate greater

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:12.239
<v Speaker 1>distillate capacities in America? How do you do that? So time,

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you raise an excellent point that people tend to focus

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot on the oil production, but in reality, Uh,

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>it's that's not the issue alone, right. Uh. During the pandemic,

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>just during the years of the pandemic, we lost a

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>remarkable amount of refining capacity in the United States. And

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>those refineries that went out, some of them are gone

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're not coming back. We know that they're you know,

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>one of them has turned into a terminal. Uh. The others, though,

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>are there, and we can invest before we start talking

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>about building new refineries. Uh, we can bring back potentially

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the old refineries that have been taken out of commission

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that are still there and what we've with the President

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>has asked is for the industry to come to Washington

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to meet with Secretary Grant Holme UH and to bring ideas.

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>As he said in his letter, look, he has taken

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary measures over the last several months in a number

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of areas, both in energy and beyond UH, he is

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>willing to take those measures again. We're asking the industry

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to come and to give us their ideas. What do

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you need from the federal government from from us that

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>we can be weak to work with you to increase

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the capacity or finding capacity and distill it's in order

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to get gasoline not only produced, but then ultimately get

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>gasoline and diesel to the right places around the country.

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, at least, what's so important and what almost

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is talking about is what are we going to do

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to politically shift the distillate debate? To me, that's the

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>heart of the matter. The other heart of the matter,

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 1>almost is this idea that the response to that letter

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about from the President, from X and

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>from Phillip sixty six, from a whole host of other

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>companies was that the current administration has had obstructionist policies

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the oil and gas industries, and

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that they have not been very clear. What is your

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>response at a time when they have been increasing production

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and they invested more than they brought in during the

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>heart of the pandemic. So look, that's that's the difficulty here.

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>People say that we are standing in the way of

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>increased production, but look at the numbers, look at the

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>increase in production under the Biden administration. It's hard to

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>argue that we have done anything to stand in the

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>way of increased production. Uh, there's been an rise in

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>oil production. We know that by the end of the year,

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of next year, we're gonna hit record production.

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>So on average, the old production in the United States

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 1>in this last year and a half has been higher

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 1>than the one under our predecessor. Excuse me those records, Lisa.

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Have you met with the CEOs of the big oil

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>companies to talk about this and to talk about how

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>things can be clear for them to produce more? You have,

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and are there going to be certain well, sorry, go ahead,

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>let me know. I mean they're going to be scheduled

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>changes in terms of more specific policies that you'll put

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>out there that you think will allow them to refine

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>more or create more production in the near term. Well,

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that they have. My point is that they

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>have the tools they need. When I meet with the

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>oil company executives and the c e o s, and

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I've asked them over the last several months, do what

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 1>do you need from US? And and beyond what we've

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>talked about the last several days and the press about

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the tone, what do you need? They don't need anything.

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>They all say they have what they need. There are

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>some labor shortages, there are some spare parts and so on,

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>but they don't need policy changes from the from the

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>US administration. They have what they need. In fact, when

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it comes to federal land, they have more than what

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>they need. But as you and I both know, federal

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>lands where government leases are are less than ten percent

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of the overall US production. So the companies actually don't

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>need anything. What they do need is bankers in New

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>York and and their funds funders to send their investors

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to say, use the profits that you're having under these

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>record prices for the last level of months and invest

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>them back into the into production, investment, back into refinery, investment,

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>back into equipment, where that's where the rubbeats. It's not

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>just about the availability of the crude, it's about the

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>ability to turn that into product to refine it. Refining

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>capacity is really a critical issue here. And when you

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>speak to an oil executive, they say, why would I

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>invest in a new refinery, which is a long term investment,

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>when it is known that there is an intention to

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>get to net zero, albeit in a few decades from now.

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>They want they want to pivot to clean energy. So

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>what is your messaging to c e O S when

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you're asking them to pump more also knowing that eventually

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>there wants to be you want to wean off of

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels. So two points one right, it is not

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>just about the crude oil production. It is about refining.

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>And as I said before, we lost a lot of

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>refining over the last several years, specifically during the pandemic

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>UH and we'd like to see that come back. But

0:07:57.680 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you raise it a fair question, why why do you

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>make those investments and that and that's what we have

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. We need to make sure that we

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>have enough oil and gas in the economy now over

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the next several years to meet the demand that we

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:13.239
<v Speaker 1>have in the economy. And you're right, we're not shying

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>away from our climate goals, and they're aggressive, and we

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>want to accelerate. We want to see the accelerate the

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>movement to electric vehicles. UH the goals of I know

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the goal is about new car sales. You have several

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>American companies and global car companies saying that their vehicles

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>will be electric, so and that that's just new car sales.

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So we'll have a tail on that as the rest

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of the industry catches catches up. So the argument that

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>we're we don't want to invest in refining or invest

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in oil production now because of these policies, I don't

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>know that that really follows through UM and and meets

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact. We know we have the demand. So I

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 1>think that we'd like to work together with the IT

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>with the with the industry, tell us, tell us what

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you need, and tell us how you plan to use

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:11.559
<v Speaker 1>your record profits investing back into UH, into the industry,

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.839
<v Speaker 1>into production, into refining so that Americans can pay a

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit less at the pump and have the products

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that they need during this time almost we just have

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of time left. Has there been any

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>discussion about reducing demand or possibly putting out some sort

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of guideline to pull back in terms of how much

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>people use, akin to what we're seeing in the gas

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>base over in Germany. Well, first, I think on natural gas,

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Europe and the United States are are vastly different UH

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in our systems. Our price here is about six dollars.

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>There's about forty dollars on natural glass. But look, the

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>we're we have provided record investment through the infrastructure legislation

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that passed UH into mass transit UH and into into

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>rail UH that these are the things to convert people from.

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>If we had a better rail and mass transit system

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that was efficient and fast, then people All studies show

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>people would move from using vehicles to moving mass transit

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to using mass transit. So yes, we we'd like to

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>put the investments to work. That's what President Biden has

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>been offering all along. How can we move people away

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>from driving their cars to mass transit UH and to rail,

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and how do we move from gasoline cars to electric

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>vehicles which will also reduce the demand for gasoline. But

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we have to also be realistic that we need that

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>supply today as we get towards that better future that

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about. Thank you for the brief. Almost Axtein

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is with the White House and with President Biden with

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>energy policy. Maria today, oh in Brussels, and now is

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the Baltic States consider Ukraine as they consider Russia a

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>convert station with the President of Lithuania, Maria, good morning,

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Toma. Let's go straight of course, with the President

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of Lithuania, Mr. And Alzeta. From day one you've said

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Russia is a threat to European security. Ukraine has to

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>win and we need to see native troops deployed in

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>big numbers on the eastern flank. But I want to

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>ask you about a very delicate situation for you, a

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>so I appreciate you taking the time today on Kleinigrad.

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:27.839
<v Speaker 1>When you look at it on a map, it's between

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>your country Lithuania Poland, but it belongs to the Russian Federation,

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and the Russian Federation now openly accuses you your country

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>a blocking transport from the Russian Federation to Klenigrat. They

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>say there could be real repercussions. Are you concerned. We

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>got used to that kind of manipulation, this information and

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>threatening it comes very often, and you've got used to

0:11:55.559 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>have this very dangerous neighbor very near to and this

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>is nothing special. I just want to say that this

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>issue we are talking this is not bilateral issue between

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Lithuenia and Russia. I would like to remind you that

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in March, the European Council decided on the fourth package

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of sanctions, which include some ferous metals iron steel and

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>also some luxury goods. And what is Luthenia is doing.

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Luthenia is just implementing those sanctions according to the rules

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and prescriptions of European Commission. Now we are in the

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>situation they where we have to apply those sanctions in

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 1>post and this creates, of course some tension between Lithenia

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and Russia. But I think that Russia is just acting

0:12:55.440 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>this proportionally and they are trying to use the supportunity

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the just to blow the propaganda bubble. I would name

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>this like this, but when you say it's the propaganda bubble,

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 1>was specifically because the Russians what they say is that

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you're preventing the Russian Federation from supplying a territory of

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the Russian Federation, that is kelen Grad. What's the propaganda

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>no blockade? If we are talking about passengers, because you're

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>talking in action blocade could be seen by Russia's knowledge located,

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>because if we are talking about non sanctioned goods, we

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>are talking about passengers, there's not locate. There's absolutely free

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>movement between the territory of Russian mainland and region rout

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the territory of Luthenia. Now we are talking about this

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>concrete group, and of course we need precise setting of

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>just specifical features and tragulement how we can apply these

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>this fourth package of sanctions, and we are waiting for

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>European Commission's explanation to give that guidance. I wonder ever

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>since the ward started, is Vladimir Putting always on your

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>mind the idea that for Lithuania the Baltics, this is

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>almost an existential threat potentially too. No, we are concentrated

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>on our economic progress, prosperity of our people, and you know,

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>we don't have the time to think all the time

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>about Vladimir Puttin. Of course, we understand that situation in

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the eastern part of Europe is really dangerous and we

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>strongly condemned this war against Ukraine. We are a very

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>keen support of Ukraine trying to help to assist down

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>by all means, by military mean, economically, homanitarian means, and

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of course political component is very important too. So this

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is a reason why I in his very enthusiastic supporter

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of candidate granting candidate status to Ukraine, and I hope

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>very much, I am. I am looking forward that it

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it will happen this this evening. And of course you've

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>said Ukraine has to win because it's the right thing.

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>But if it doesn't and it gets defeated by Russia,

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the repercussions of that could be enormous for the rest

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of Europe. What do you mean by that and what

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>does victory Ukraine mean for you? The victory of Ukraine

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>means a victory of just historic truth, because they are

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>fighting for their freedom, for the right of the country,

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of the people of the country to decide about the future,

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>about their destiny, and nobody else and especially external forces

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>cannot decide where Ukraine have to do, what Ukraine have

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to do, and we have it should go. Ukraine is

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>according to to to I am fully convinced that Ukraine

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>is European nation because they prove every day by fighting

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>against the aggressor that they defend European values, they defend

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>democratic values, and so they are fighting not only for

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the freedom, they are fighting for our freedom from the

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>freedom of European Union too. And certain next week there's

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a NATO meeting, of course President Biden will be there.

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>The Boltics your country. You've said, we need more troops here, stations.

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>The eastern flank needs to be a priority. This is

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>not just about China. Russia's an equal threat. What are

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you going to tell the President of the States. This

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>is very important to have very adequate evaluation of the situation.

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>What is happening in the eastern flank of Natal And

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>we see the security issue is becoming more and more important.

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>The threats are becoming char lines very fast. I don't

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>want to to to to talk about some some some

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>threats which are theoretical, but we first of all, we

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>have to spend much more attention to the security of

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>feast and flank in order to make deterrence factors as

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>most effective if it is possible. And this is very important,

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>not to show our willingness in case of aggression, but

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to show that we are ready to increase a number

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:41.199
<v Speaker 1>of troops, to increase military equipment, in our countries, and

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of course very important is to switch to the current

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:49.880
<v Speaker 1>ear policy regime in Bolti countries to air defense regime.

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 1>It is very important too, and I'm looking forward that

0:17:54.000 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>conclusion text of NATO will be suitable to cooperate who

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>work with the leading country of our e FB troops

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in Lithuenia, namely Germany. I signed the communic with the

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 1>German Chancellor all of Charles two weeks ago and according

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to this communic, Germany is committed to send additional troops

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>up to brigade level so that scale up for a

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>military presence in Lithenia. And I think this is very

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>important to increase ort to scale up the military presence

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of other countries in Baltic, other Baltic countries too in

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Latin Estonian. Namely, Well, President, thank you so much for

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 1>your time. We appreciate it, of course, and Bloomberg has

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>always and your message is clear a peacement is not

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna work with Russia. Thanks so much, Tom, Thank you

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>so much Maria. Today in a conversation, folks, I honestly

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>never framed in my lifetime. I never thought we would

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>hear a kind of tone those statements from a member

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Baltic States, and Rita soon joins us here

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>with energy aspects, and I do want to note we

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>protect the copyright of all of our guests. I can't

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>say enough about the acuity of energy aspects. Uh notes

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you can get them from their people as you can.

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>And Dr Son, I want to speak here about demand,

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>which the fears are premature. And what I love about

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the energy aspects note is our geographic it is the

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>elosticities are responsiveness of demand. It's different on the Pacific

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>RIM than it is in Europe, etcetera, etcetera. What part

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of your oil demands study now is the most important

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:47.360
<v Speaker 1>for our listeners and viewers. I would say, first of all,

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you Tom, very kind words indeed, but I would

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>say have to we have to focus on Asia because

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>all the focus right now is on the US in

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of the market right and obviously with the US

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>federising interest rates, everybody is now expect geting a recession.

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>The questions have moved from oh are we going to

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>be in a recession to how deep is it going

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to be? To how does it compare to pass recessions?

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Whereas nobody is actually looking at emerging markets Asia is

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months behind us in the reopening cycle. They have

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>just started to reopen from COVID and by the way,

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>China hasn't even started to reopen, So there's quite a

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of upside to those demands. Even our own demount

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>numbers depending on that cadence of the Chinese reopening at least,

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>so this is absolutely critical. The hyper analysis of microeconomics

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>of Emerita send different from what we see at JP Morgan,

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>but both of them are completely focused on demand responsiveness

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Pacific RIM. That's the common feature of two

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>different houses, and sure there's a lot of distinction in

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 1>each region. The overall picture, though, is a tight oil market,

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm rita you highlight that as well. How much

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is what we're seeing right now a brief cooling in

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 1>some of the fears of the tightness of the market

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 1>before we reassert price up for there for a barrel

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of crude, especially as some people think that there already

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is a recession and our word baked into the price

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of oil. Yeah, I mean, look, have the balances necessarily

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be exactly what we had forecast after

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 1>the Russian invasion? No, Russian supplies are still hitting the

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>market probably about a million barrels per day or more

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>more or less more than what we had expected. But

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>they are still down about a million barrels per day.

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>But equally we've had the SPR at the same time,

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>demand is still coming in higher. So to your point,

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 1>the market is incredibly tight despite some of those moving parts.

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 1>I think the bottom line is underlying infantries are so low.

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Spec capacity is so low that you only need a

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit of movement, like such as Libya going offline

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of days. You can really swing balances

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>from being solvable to unsolvable in the matter of hours.

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>So what we're seeing right now is again this fear

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>of a recession turning people to kind of doubt the

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 1>demand recovery and say, Okay, you know, we've got all

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>these SPR barrels, but if demand doesn't keep up, prices

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>are going to come down. But I will also highlight

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple of other things, more technical factors. We tend

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 1>to get sovereign producer hedging at this time, large producers

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>in North America, even in Asia, and that has started.

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:27.479
<v Speaker 1>And it's a low liquidity environment, which means that even

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 1>take away all the fundamentals, there will be some downward

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 1>pressure on prices in the near term, but ultimately, especially

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>going into the winter, we think prices are going to

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>get head back higher. And so I'm reading maybe the

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>best way to characterize this is a head fake if

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you believe that this is hedging by sovereign entities. How

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>much of a head fake could it be? How much

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>do you still see energy prices rising heading into the

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:54.479
<v Speaker 1>winter months. I mean, do we think prices are going

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>to go back to a hundred forty dollar range for crude? Yes? Absolutely,

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>But does that mean that we don't fall ten dollars first?

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we could definitely go down first, and I

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>think for traders that matters a lot, right, it's always

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>about the entry point, But I think more in terms

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of consumers and refiners, ultimately the trajectory is higher. And again,

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>forget crew prices for a second. Think about diesel gasoline.

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Those prices are barely moved because the underlying fundamentals are

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>so strong right now. Crew tends to move a lot

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>more with these macro headlines. Product prices don't, and I

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 1>think that really tells you where the fundamentals are. And

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I think going into the winter, the risk of a

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.360
<v Speaker 1>diesel price bike is much much higher. Okay, Well in Rita.

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>As we talk about going into the winter, let's talk

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>about whether or not Europe is going to be adequately

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>prepared for the cold weather. You are Germany today triggering

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>phase two of its emergency gas plan, the alarm phase.

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's called what happens if we start to

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>see actual gas rationing in Europe. I think there's a

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>real risk of that. I mean, we believe that our

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>team absolutely believes that we've already put together a list

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of which industry is going to be hurt, so steel, cement, fertilizer,

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and so on. But I would say that we are

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>starting to see countries restart cold plants. So I think

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the choice has been made again. It was always about

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of green energy versus energy security. I do think

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see the move towards guaranteeing let's keep

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the lights on, UH and as long as whoever has

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 1>coal capacity decides to bring cold capacity back, then I

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 1>don't think the downturn in industry is going to be

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 1>as severe as we are expecting right now, just assuming

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that gas gets turned off and recent thank you so

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>much just a brilliant note from Energy Aspects this morning

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>out of Houston and London. Let's go right there now

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>with Andrew Lenoor's chief US economist, City Bank, of course,

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>with an important call for a much higher rate of

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>terminal value and all the other mathematical mambo. JOm do

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>am do I want to go to ten am tomorrow morning,

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>which you and I agree in my McKee agrees, I

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>think all agree. Inflation expectations are important. They have spiked up.

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Are we unanchored in our expectations? Yeah? Critically important time.

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 1>I think that was kind of the last data point

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that the FED could still point to and say there

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>was some notion that we weren't on a more inflationary journey.

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>And as that University of Michigan five to tenure expectation

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>lifts above three percent UM and we'll see where it

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>comes in tomorrow. Uh, that that just increases the concern

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that there really is an embedded sense to this inflation.

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we already saw it in in the labor market,

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>like you were just talking about where we have wage

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>growth by various different measures, you know, four to six

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 1>percent wage growth. Chare Powell was talking about that yesterday. Um.

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>And then you have price growth that is, you know,

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>six percent plus depending on the measure that that you

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>look at. Um. So, so I think there's a notion

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of a wage price firal here. Um. I think a

0:25:57.640 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit of what we're seeing. University of Michigan is

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 1>can firming that also. Um. Just like Mike McKie was saying,

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not that the five to tenure expectation is

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a correct expectation, but it just tells you something about

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:12.360
<v Speaker 1>how inflation is becoming a structural factor in the economy. Yeah,

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>but just as quickly as people get used to that, Andrew,

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>how much is a labor market shifting already? And we're

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily seeing that and claims going up although you

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 1>know they picked up a little bit, but really it's

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>not that significant. How much are we seeing just job

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>listings being taken down or not filled or companies pairing

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>back some of their business ambitions. Yeah. I think that's

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 1>what's difficult here is as an consists, you're always looking

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>at two things. You're looking at the level of activity

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and the level of strength, but then you're also looking

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>at the direction of travel and really what you want

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to get right, is the direction of travel, because that's

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>going to determine where you're going. And we know a

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of things are very strong. You know, the labor

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 1>market has been very strong, continues to be very strong,

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>lots of job openings, relatively few unemployed individuals. UM. But

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you know that that kind of leading edge of the

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 1>direction of travel, the weekly initial job bubless claims data,

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that's giving me a lot more of a real time

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>signal of the labor market, and something like job openings

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 1>which has lagged a couple of months. UM. So if

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 1>you look at those initial claims again, the levels still

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>very low. Hard to think that. Um, it's a difficult

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>time to find a job in most sectors at least

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>because the vacancies are so high. So it's not so

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>much of a concern about the labor market being soft today.

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Everybody would agree it's strong today. UM. But I'm watching

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.199
<v Speaker 1>those claims. I think that what we're seeing now is

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of some seasonal noise. Nothing to get

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.959
<v Speaker 1>too concerned about. Um, But it's definitely the case if

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you bring economists like me back on this show, UM,

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a month from now, two months from now, when we've

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>seen these initial jobless clams that have continued to trend up,

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 1>we'll have a lot more pessimistic view. Well, Thomas on

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a really good job today, not just talking about their

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>domestic labor market, but looking internationally and what the ramifications

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>from some of the global downdraft has been. And that

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>has been in the stronger dollar. And in addition to

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 1>jobless claims, we also got the current account balance out

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>for the United States, which is surprised to the downside.

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 1>We have a record trade deficit once again as the

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>strong dollar allows the US to import more goods. How

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.640
<v Speaker 1>does this factor into your view on the GDP level,

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>considering the prowess of the dollar and the ongoing sort

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of disinflationary object of that, but not the money coming

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 1>back into the U S economy. Yeah, so the tree

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>balance has really been kind of swinging around wildly, which

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a combination of the post COVID reopening

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 1>phase of the economy as as trade kind of gotten

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 1>more fully restarted, um as the economy is reopened globally,

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and then this kind of pattern of well, you had

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:42.719
<v Speaker 1>renewed waves of COVID which are disrupting goods, and then

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you have supply chain issues right on top of that. UM.

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>So I'm really being very careful with that trade data

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>right now in terms of interpreting it as any kind

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of longer term trend UM and where the economy is going. UM.

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>If I look at the effect of the stronger dollar, UM,

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, what one thing that's maybe surprising, maybe even

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit surprising to to me, and how this

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>has played out. UM. You know, like Tom was saying,

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we have revised up our terminal Fed funds policy rate

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>forecast to above four percent. Now I've been getting there

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>in the first quarter of three UM. So you know,

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:20.959
<v Speaker 1>we're really getting rates to quite high levels in the US. UM.

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>That's not an out their view anymore that your market

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>has been pricing something not too far off from that,

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and when we were at higher yield levels. UM. And

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the dollar, yes, his strengthen, UM. But you know, if

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you had just told me six months ago, you know,

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>we're all going to kind of think that Fed funds

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>effective is getting above three and a half percent. UM,

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>where's the US dollar? I would have thought a lot

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>stronger than where it is now. So I think relative

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to that counter factual, it's you know, maybe not as

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>much of a slowing factor for the economy. Andrew I

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this earlier in the show. But when Powell was

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>testifying on Capitol Hill yesterday and Elizabeth Warren was asking

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>him if a rate high would solve higher grocery prices

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>or higher prices at the pump, his answer obviously was no.

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>The FED isn't equipped to deal with some of those

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>more supply side driven challenges. What is your confidence that

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the Fed actually can get demand down enough to the

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>extent that it actually will offset persistent tight supply. Yeah,

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a really important question, and you know those questions

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that share powell answering UM yesterday and you know again today,

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>just to show how difficult this moment is for monetary

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>policy and for policy makers. UM, when there's a supply

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>side constraint and it's persistent, the only thing you can

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>do is gamp demand to try to bring the economy

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>back into equilibrium and bring inflationary pressure down. UM. I'm

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>very confident to answer your question that the Fed will

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 1>be able to slow demands sufficiently UM to bring demand down. UM.

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>The issue is how much slowing is that going to be?

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>How much of an output gap does the FED need

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to create, um, how much weakness in the labor market.

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the FED Summary of Economic Projections,

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>they have the unemployment rate that just moves up by

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a few tents of a percentage point um. So if

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you keep moving interest rates higher in financial conditions, it

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>will slow down the economy. Um. The real issue for

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the petistant whether or not they can slow it down.

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It's can they slow it down and have it be

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a relative moderate slow down and still get inflationary pressure down?

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>And thank you so much Andrew Holland Horst for City

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Group here with that shocking terminal rights statistic about four percent.

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to call that on the edge of outlier

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Join us live weekdays from seven to ten

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a m Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>each day from six to nine am for insight from

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. And

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and of course on the terminal. I'm Tom

0:31:53.280 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Keene and this is Bloomberg