WEBVTT - Surveillance: Forward-Looking Data Is Up, Achuthan Says

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jay Lee.

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg I

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>speak at George Bowie. Shall we well. Funcer Security has

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>had a fixed income research George, Great to see you,

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Good morning. Trying to work out what's going on here

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>in global markets, trade risk diminishing, but a tip to say,

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>three months ago global growth bottom and gout. To what

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>degree is the latter exclusive from the former. I'm trying

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to get my head around that. Many other people out

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. Now. I think what we're seeing, at least

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in the fixed income markets, it's it's a little bit

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>closer to sort of what you'd consider more of a

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>normal market in the sense that I've seen a pretty

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>material adjustment across the yield curve. Yield curve was was

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>was was was inverted earlier this year, we've seen that

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>steeping out as ten ure yields and longer dated yields

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>have moved up, while the feed is cut rates and

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a positively sloped upward sloping yield curve is a very

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>good indicator, UH, certainly for future economic growth. It takes

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>this sting, if you will, out of things like tail risks. UH.

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>There's still some concerns obviously about trade, but trade seems

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to be moving in the right direction, and the data

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>is getting a little bit better. The date is really better.

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 1>For those brave enough to go into long duration, long

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 1>ago and far away, they're up solid double digits, if

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>not more. What do you do now, or into yurine planning?

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 1>If you've got that big double digit gain in a ten,

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty or even longer bet, whether it's munis or others,

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>what do you do? I think you move away away

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>from what we would call it sort of a duration bet,

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>so long long maturity bonds, and then you focus more

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>on bonds or our companies that are more cyclically exposed.

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>That if you're if you're willing to bet that there's

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>an economic soft landing, which we think is underway, then

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>parts of the bond market like high yield should do okay.

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>These are companies with a little bit more leverage, but

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>with higher yielding UH securities, higher yielding opportunities, A blended

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>portfolio is gonna have a yield of roughly about five

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>point six five five point seven five with not a

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of duration. There's been a shift in sentiment over

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of weeks from inflation will never pick

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>up again to we're seeing the beginnings of reflation and

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>inflation is underpriced in the market. Do you agree with

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that sentiment shift? I think as we kind of move,

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I think people are looking forward to the beginning of

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>next year and the data is getting a little bit better.

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>The economic data is better, and there is a little

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>bit of an upward lift on the inflationary front. But

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>in addition to that, the technicalities of how inflation is

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>calculated is likely to deliver a lift early next year

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.519
<v Speaker 1>as the linked effects of last year start to roll

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>off the numbers. This is all very technical, not wildly exciting,

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>but it will show optically that the headline inflation numbers

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>are gonna start to rise as we get into the

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>beginning of next year, and you're starting to see that

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>getting priced in now in some of the securities. What

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>do I do if I'm a saver, I got a

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>pot of money. It's not a lot of money, but

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I got a pot of money, and I just don't

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>want to be in equities. So you buy dominion, you know,

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you buys a couple of utilities from the old days,

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Florida power and light, and then you buy coupon. What

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>do you buy right now? So you know, I think

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>what you I think? You have to calibrate your return

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>expectations of fixed income. That's well's far ago talk John

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>for lower yields, lower yields, and how much expecting more

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>than a full like a three percent full yield is optimistic. Uh,

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's challenging if you're a saver anywhere in the world.

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Anywhere in the world, it is very difficult to generate

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>significant coupon income. So if you're you know, a mom

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and pop saver out there, an investment grade relatively low

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>risk portfolio is in this sort of three percent kind

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of range. If you want to take a little bit

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>more risk and you go into high yield you know,

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>now we're talking five and three quarters percent type of yields.

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Beyond that, you're now going into the depths of emerging markets.

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>You're going overseas, you're going into corners of the market.

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna pick up a significant amount of risks. So

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I think a three percent kind of yield, maybe a

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 1>little bit higher depending on how you blend your portfolio.

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>It's about the best you can hope for. And I

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>think you have to be realistic about your fixed income portfolio.

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>It's an anchor. It it's an anchor to your overall portfolio.

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's but but the but the yield on it

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be gonna be relatively low. Is the best

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that you can hope for in the world of fixed

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>income that's gonna be tough gun at into for many

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>if you out there on now. It's just a final

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>question on the regional boss. You mentioned emerging markets. Many

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 1>people thinking about that high bite a trade to the

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>trade story. I want to buy the foreign assets Europe.

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Even though fixed income has araut it really hard on

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years, I'm thinking more about emerging markets.

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>What's your advice to those people? So on the emerging

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>markets front, I think you have to tread cautiously, especially

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>as it relates to fixed income. You've mentioned a few earlier,

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think you're gonna talk about it later in

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the show. You know, there's a variety of meaningful geopolitical

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>issues around the world, which maybe makes emerging markets look

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 1>optically cheap, but they're cheap for a reason. You have

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of political unrest in different parts of the market.

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>The thing we would look for is um you know,

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 1>if the dollars is getting stronger, that sometimes kind of

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>can weigh a little bit on on EM. We'd sort

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of take an up and quality type of trade for

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>for e M that's gonna have a yield sort of

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>roughly equivalent to high yields, so you can use it

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>as a diversification, but not a real sort of material

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>yield pickups. So we would use em as a more selective,

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>selective type of of of allocation for fixed income portfolio.

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Juge BORI, thank you big week I had for you.

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate your time this morning. George Boy Then West

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Founca Securities had a fixed income research right now in

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong, providing great leadership to Bloomberg Television and to

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Newsy Von Man joins us as well. Von this

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>weekend was different. Quickly here describe why this weekend was

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>so different for the chief executive Carry Lamb. Well, Tom,

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>this the protest right now have reached another level here

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 1>after the death of a student last week. This man

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>was a twenty two year old student, the university student

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>who fell off a car park near during a demonstration

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>where police used tear gas disperse a crowd, and that

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is what sparked the violence over the weekend and what

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>has really transpired here this evening riot police right now

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>are still in the streets territory wide trying to stop

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>these protesters, but we haven't seen any kind of site

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>at this point. And and more violence here this morning.

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Those two incidents of of a man that was set

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>on fire by a protester after there were some verbal clashes,

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and of course that police officer that shot a protester

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>at point blanks this morning. Yvonne on the ground there

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>is this is the mood different have you Can you

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>actually feel the shift? Yeah, I mean we have felt

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the shift. And there was a while the last couple

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of weeks where things were stimmering down a little bit,

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and now we've reached another type of fever pitch, I

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>would say, because the death of the student is what

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:48.239
<v Speaker 1>really sparked more people on the streets over the weekend.

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>We had already ninety arrest on Saturday and Sunday. Dozens

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>injured already. Today, school was canceled for some universities and

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>some secondary schools, and a hundred and seventy flights were canceled.

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.559
<v Speaker 1>So we're kind of back into this more violent type

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of wave that we've seen, uh, and the crowds have

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>really it hasn't just been one area now, it's it's

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the Central Business business district where we saw traffic was disrupted.

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Police refined tear gas near Central Landmark, one of the

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>close to the business district here where many people are

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>going to work. They had to hide and take covers

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in the luxury malls here as they were pure gas

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and washing washing their eyes with water. And that was

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>something that we hadn't seen in some time. And so

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you feel it and you certainly feel it, especially with

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the closures around the retail malls, the banks, and of

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>course the vandalism that we've seen all across the city.

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.599
<v Speaker 1>How explosive was President Ji Jim Ping's explanation that he

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 1>would like to see a patriot ruling Hong Kong regardless

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>of people. Better get used to Ceo lamb, right. I

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>mean that was another China just digging their heels saying

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that they're not going to give in to any of

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>these demands. But the police, Hong Kong Police spoke mean

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>today during a press conference did say that they that

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>he believes that there is no chance at this point

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of the p l a W will be deployed in

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the city. So they're still sticking by police, Hong Kong

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Police at the moment and defending their actions, especially with

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>this morning with that shooting. But it is once again

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>carry Lamb talking today saying that these actions from the

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>writers that she called them go far beyond just demands

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>right now. Now they're treating citizens, as she says, as enemies.

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>So you know, she's still calling for a doctor the violence,

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>but we haven't seen any of that yet. Even man,

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. On the Monday evening of Hong

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Kong with us here in the studio in place to say,

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>is Sarah Manic moving global equity seat I oh, good

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>morning to Sarah. Morning. Within the equity market at all

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>time high, there is this rotation that many people are

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>focused on two cyclicals from defensives to value from growth.

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Your thoughts on what is underpinning that move and where

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 1>it's heading in the months to come so a couple

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 1>of things on value which we think can lead for

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of quarters. So, first of all, this

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>rally and value the encyclicals that we've seen has been

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>about the strongest that's happened since late two thousand and sixteen,

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>which is when the election occurred. And also it's been

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 1>less fits and starts and more sustainable, so we do

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>think it has legs. Basically, what we've seen is the

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>economy is less bad than we thought, Earnings came in

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>better than expected. We're seeing some progress on tariffs, but

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>definitely that's in kind of fits and starts itself. All

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that should lead to value continuing to be the leader

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in the market for a quarter or two, but after

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that earnings growth load of mid single digits next year,

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>we probably will go back to this quality growth kind

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of environment less bad. Sounds like the conditions to generate

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a squeeze, not a sustainable rally, not a sustainable rotation.

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that essentially what you're communicates into clients. Yeah, I'm

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing more of a reversion to the mean. Value has

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 1>been undervalued for a while, and we think it will

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>go back to the mean. But then after that, not

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 1>traded a premium because what you need in place or

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>value to really work is strong earnings growth and a

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 1>stronger economy, which we're not going to see that going forward.

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Earlier this morning, Tom came made a really good point

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that five stocks account for of the S and P

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>five hundred. Those stocks are tech. What will drive tech

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>further up at this point? I think that's going to

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.959
<v Speaker 1>be challenging the old world of where investors. You know,

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>what we saw this narrow market for most of this

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>cycle of the past decade was investors were willing to

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>pay pretty high premiums for these high structural growth companies.

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>We think it's going to be more of a garp

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>environment growth a reasonable price. People won't pay these premiums

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>for these tech comes. So does that mean that another

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>sector will get leadership here or that we'll just sort

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of uh, not see very much by way of gains here.

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>We think that other sectors will get leadership like quality

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>growth with more defensive characteristics that are less dependent on

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the economy. But people are going to be careful about

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>how much they pay for that growth. So you can

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>see pockets of healthcare where pipelines are strong payments, companies

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>with a good tail win on global payments areas such

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>as that. The the acclaim of nouvene over decades is

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you knew what you owned. That was the whole nouvene racket.

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Way back. Instead of buying a mutual fun you bought

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a fixed portfolio of bonds and it was a great

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and beautiful thing, particularly when priced down yield up. Now

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you're in the equity area of it. But I'm fascinated

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>how Nouvine is structured to protect people when we finally normalize,

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a belief out there somewhere in the future will

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>get somewhat higher rates. Somewhere in the future, we may

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>actually get a correction. Heaven forbid a bear market. How

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>does Nuvine protect against that like you did a zillion

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Well, we think of Nuvine today. It's a

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>lot different than it used to be. It's a trillion

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>dollar asset manager, multi asset class firm, offerings across publics

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and private so we can provide any kind of solution

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>for investors. The equity business is a three billion assets

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>center management business, deep specialist movement doing it for sixty

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>five years. And domestic equities, so you very deep history

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and investing that we think that you're part of t

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I a Kreft. I mean you were there before, but

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>now you're part of TI a Creft, right, that's right.

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>T I acquired Nuvine. Yeah, they acquired Okay, what's your

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>ex real assumption? I mean, you know, we're just the

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>four of us. Nobody's listening. But what you know, what's

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>your actual assumption you're working with right now with all

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 1>the heritage of Nwvine's bond view. I mean, you know,

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the equity side, so no, but I still

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>got to have an actual assumption. What is it? I

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>mean I don't personally have one. I don't think that's

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>my area of expertise. And what we're thinking about right

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>now with the equity business, what we're thinking about is

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>how do we position our client portfolios around the world

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>so that we can offer them diversification. Make sure that

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're able to UM diversify, not have large

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>factor bets, so that we can own quality companies UM

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, around the world, and make sure they are

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.719
<v Speaker 1>a client portfolios are diversified within equities. So let's talk

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>about that regional diversification. At the moment, many people are

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>thinking about going GEP brought from outside the United States

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>into places like Europe, into emerging markets, what your advice

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>for them at the moment. So with this value rebound

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that we've seeing, we actually think it's positive for Europe,

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>which has been a huge la rate over the past decade,

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 1>so your tends to be more cyclical. We actually think

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that Germany may be starting to stabilize this brexit may

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>make some progress, So Europe in general, we're a little

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>bit more positive on emerging markets. We like those a lot,

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly Brazil, which is a little bit out of the

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>trade cross hairs. Nice reform story in place, and China

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>if tariffs can continue to make progress, we think that

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>China should continue to rebound. From here, let's start with Europe.

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>If I go in at the index level and end

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>up owning a load of financials, do I want them?

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Donnot want them? We kind of generally like financials from here.

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>We think that they can continue to do well as

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a ten year creeps up. European financials we think could

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>look reasonably attractive if Europe does start to stabilize the

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>European financials, European industrials could be a nice sector that

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it's nice sectors to own going forward. I'm trying to

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>understand how you price geopolitical risk, and I'm thinking of

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong uh the Hang Sang Index losing almost three

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>percent on the heels of the violence that we saw

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>overnight in the region. How do you view that in

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of specific momentary risk versus larger systemic issues. I mean,

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>geo political risk has been an issue around the world

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, ranging from Brexit to the protests

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong. Typically, what we've seen is it remains

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>somewhat localized and has not become a global problem like

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>it has in the past. So for us, it's been

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>making sure that you avoid that local area while these

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>very hard to predict events are taking place. So not

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>buying the dip, not buying the dip Right now, I

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>want to give you a massive shout out. Maybe it's

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>because you're in Chicago with Morning Star leaning over your shoulder,

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>but the way on your website you display your funds

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>track record as an act of God, I just wish

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody did this, where you just say look, this is

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>year to date. That's what people want to know. And

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>it's great that the new ven e s G Large

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:57.239
<v Speaker 1>cap value fund. You know it's three beeps under SPX,

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's not bad at all this year. We'll take it.

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>How do you respond to so many people in funds

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>through well intentioned reasons, that are enjoying single digit returns

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>this year? They're looking at the cross heres of the

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>year end and they're going, wait a minute, what am

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I doing? Yeah? I mean I think you know the

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>job of the active managers to lead by performance. So

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you know two goals here. One is you want to

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>make sure that you can beat your benchmark and also

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that you can't perform relative to your peers that you

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>can justify the fees that you're charging. So I mean,

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, if you have funds that are struggling,

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you need to be looking closely at them and figuring out,

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, what we need to do better, because if

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be an active manager with the infiltration

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of passive, you need to make sure that you cannot

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>beat your benchmark and deserve the fee that you're you're charging. Sarah,

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you, it's great to say this morning. We're gonna

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>have to get you back. I know you've got to

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>run out of the studio for another employment some michalled

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>bloom Black TV. I think Sarah Manic has to go

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to She's gonna run out of one studio to another

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>because she has to leave a little bit early. Sarah,

0:16:55.200 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you. John. Let's get right to it with our guests,

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 1>because this is like a road show. You got your

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>rubber Chicken, and you're all set up here right now

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>for your road show for the Saudi Arabian Oil Company.

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Doing it with the Ritz with Steven Short. Who's gonna

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>stand up and tell them what oil is gonna be

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>from the Short Report with the most insanely hyper detailed

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>view of American hydrocarbon Stephen Short, and we're through. Design's

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>been way too long, Stephen, good morning. Can you tell

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a ram Co that they need to settle on fifty

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>dollar oil or sixty dollar oil? Which way is that

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 1>gonna cut? I think at this point, Tom, with what

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing in the market, with regard to economic growth

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>demand to k going out into the future, that lower

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>for longer would certainly be the mantra. I think even

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>at that sixty dollar range, I think that is clearly

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, a a realistic range. But for all intents

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>and purposes. It is well below what a ramco is

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 1>planning on and what it's trying to sell its investors on.

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>So I think that there's a good degree of hopium

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 1>that um that Saudi Aramco is hoping the market is

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>smoking on on this idea that will see higher prices.

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that the New York giants here this weekend hope? Yeah,

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you're going to rub that in a little bit. Lincoln

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>one point five trillion dollar valuation potentially would yield a

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>five dividend yield based on an initial seventy five billion

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 1>dollar dividend. Stephen doesn't get it done versus the all

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>majors in Europe in the United States five uh five percent.

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:50.199
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm highly skeptical on a percentage and on

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>the assumptions going into that that percentage, we're we're dealing

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>with the market that's undergoing a tectonic shift with regard

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to the future prospects of growth. We'll see. What's so

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>important here is you are the king of calculating the

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>flows the first second derivative of all these barrels. Do

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>we have any clue what Saudi Aramco has? Do we

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>have any understanding of the underlying assets or their Shorky

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and derivatives. Yes, no, not that we can we can

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>tell UH ascortaining with any sort of significant confidence. It's

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:29.880
<v Speaker 1>almost similar akin to the economic numbers that we get

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>out of China. You just have to kind of go

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 1>along and trust the process and hope the oil is there.

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>We certainly have have a mechanism UH in the market

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of a balancing act and looking at the spread markets.

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>But but certainly I think there is a degree of skepticism.

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 1>But that said, Tom, I think this is a demand

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>size sized market rather than supply side. We just had

0:19:55.920 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians just announced the fifty billion barrel discovery of

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 1>new oil. And when we consider that this market demand

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>decay or demand peaking within the next twenty years. Really,

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the question is how long can demand last

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 1>rather that how much supply is still in the ground? Yeah,

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>demand peaking in the next twenty years. One of the

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>potential details in the six hundred page Hairsale prospectus that

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>was released on Saturday, giving more insight into Aramco's financials,

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>which is unusual. It was reversal in course for them

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>having denied that in the past as being a possibility

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>also though, revealing a sharp drop in profit related to

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the attacks on its facilities in September. How big of

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a concern was that for you? Uh? Well, certainly, I

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>think that it is with with with any of that region.

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>When you have a one one source that is your

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>primary source of income, whether it is for Iraq or

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in Saudi Arabia and so forth, when you see that

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of vulnerability in the supply chain. Uh. In the

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 1>process spects of the the younger generation of people around

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the world and their view on fossil fuels, it's not positive. Uh.

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>And so my my biggest concern going forward and spend

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>my biggest concern because I always thought it was kind

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 1>of odd and worrisome that people were looking at the

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>demise of oil as as a as a weapon, as

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a as a price weapon, and they were looking at

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>as some kind of with some kind of glee. And

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 1>my concern and this will I am confident, well it

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>is bearing out and will only escalate in the years

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to come, is when these economies that have been late

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to the game to diversify in Saudi Arabia with the

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>serampical I I p O. Let's face it, there are

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 1>ten years too late with this, I p O. And

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>they are not going to get the valuations and the

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>long term benefits UH to diversify. So I think it's

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>going to lead to an extreme level of of geopolitical

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>unrust unlike we've we've ever seen in any of our lifetimes.

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Steven a wife and the politics. Just for a moment,

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I just want to focus on how the stock will behave,

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>how will perform the traits of the company relative to

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>its peers in the oil market. There was a great

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>article over the weekend and Barons about the royalty agreement

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>with the Kingdom. The royalty agreement with the Kingdom is

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 1>highly progressive, and I just wondered to what degree that

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>will make it more or less sensitive to the oil

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>price just in terms of the equity performance. Yeah, I

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>think that that And and I don't want to you know,

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I I appreciate you want to stay away

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>from the geopolitics, but but certainly we're with that special

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 1>arrangement between between the House and its relationship with with

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>with the state company, and now you want to open

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 1>this up to outside investors. UH. It clearly is going

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to be a sticking point and and quite Frankly, I

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>don't have any sort of crystal ball and and this

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is why I'm staying away, uh from from this issue

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>at this point, that there are just too many known

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.360
<v Speaker 1>unknowns uh I and I. This is getting a lot

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>of height because it is a monumental decision given given

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the c grissy of of the Saudi government. But when

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>we look at Western oil companies, western oil companies, the

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>likes of BP and Shell, they don't even call themselves

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>oil companies anymore. That they are natural gas, their power,

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>their energy companies. And I think Saudi is using this

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>as a potential way to rebrand themselves as well. But

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>when you throw in, uh that that special relationship with

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>with the House and and and and what what they're

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>going to get, I think there's going to be a

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of well or you know, known unknowns as to

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the impact of their of MBS desire to diversify the

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>kingdom away from its mainstay of oil output. Yeah, I

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's I think it's really markable that you're saying

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>if they're ten years too late with this, I p O.

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I do want to just go back to the point

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>made in that perspective that global oil demand may peak

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>within the next twenty years. They were citing a forecast

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>from industry consultant I h S Market. I'm wondering, Uh,

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>when do you think that we will see peak oil demand?

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Lisa. I think it's gonna be sooner

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 1>rather than later. I think long term forecasting was invented

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to make astrology look respectable. So what I I believe

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 1>my eyeballs and and my eyeballs are telling me every

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>time that I see a Tesla or a Prius or

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 1>BMW now doubling the amount of evs it's going to

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 1>make two going to deliver it to the market, and

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 1>the decisions by Volvo and so forth. Uh, that is

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>oil demand that is lost. It is never coming back.

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I myself, I'm an oil guy. I own an electric

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>hybrid SUV my children. I don't envision ever owning a

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 1>gasoline only car. So with regard to demand, Okay, it

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 1>happens sooner rather than later. Stuff. We're gonna use five

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>as a potential jumping off point when we peak. I

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>think it happens well before that. Steven Shark, thank you

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>so much, really appreciate it. We protect the copyright of

0:24:53.359 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>all our guests and particularly Mr Shark, this is a

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>joy to have on right now, A lot for a

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>thun who was with the Economic Cycle Research Institute. This

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>is a venerable approach to thinking about our economy back

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>into the thirties. And a gentleman by the name of

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Moore, which centers around E c R I economic

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>cycles and that and also the structural changes of the

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>American economy. I want to start with an open, open

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:37.959
<v Speaker 1>conversation as you join us from London today, you and

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I are at Clarridgees. We're having our usual afternoon tay

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and we're having a tay and someone from the United

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Kings turns to you and says, why is the US

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>so dominant in technology? What is technology done to your

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 1>cycle research that many, including Jeffrey Moore, didn't have to

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>worry about. Well, it's uh, you know, these are disruptors,

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the various innovations, uh, and so it's certainly changing the

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>contours of the cycle, the amplitudes of the cycle. Um

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>here and there, but um as long as we and

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, when we do cycle research, we're

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>not talking about the last decade or the last couple

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of decades. We're talking about the last couple of centuries

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>during which there's been a lot of technological change, you know, um,

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you know these mentions of both all of these things.

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And so what you find is that as you have

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>large new innovations, disruptive innovations, UM, they can change the

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>contours of the cycle. They can um eventually lead to

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>hopefully some productivity growth, some boost and productivity growth. UM.

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>But as long as you are in a free market

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 1>oriented economy, you also are going to be contending with

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the business cycle itself. And that we've seen that time

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and time again. We've tried to find the the circumstances

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>under which, um, the free market cycle is not expressed,

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's fairly limited, I mean, certainly nothing that we're

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>dealing with at the moment. So I know your research

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>called out that the current global industrial slowdown that we're

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 1>experiencing right now actually began before the trade war began

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in early Is that also just suggest that maybe it

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>can start turning before we get any kind of movement

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>on the trade deal. Yeah, absolutely it does. UM. So

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I think when when turning points happen, uh, and and

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>they usually catch people off guard. UM. The natural instinct

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>is to look around and and and look for what's

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 1>salient and maybe connect the dots and say, you know,

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>this made that happen. And and certainly the trade war,

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the real onset of the hard trade war developments, uh

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 1>seemed to coincide with the global industrial slowdown that we've

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>been experiencing. But actually, as you say that, the industrial

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>slowdown began quite a bit earlier. And now everybody is,

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, hanging on bated breath, what's the next development

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>in the in the trade war to you know, tomorrow

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the President is going to be speaking in New York.

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Is he going to give anything away in terms of

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>what the next development is. Everybody's waiting to hear that.

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>But meantime, the cycle itself is moving along, and our

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>work is showing that the forward looking data the leading

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>indicators of global industrial growth, not actual global industrial growth,

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>but the leading indicators have have um started to move up.

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>And so we are more oriented, we're once more ready

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to see an upturn in global industrial with or without

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the trade war end keep him for another three blocks,

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>crisis over. I mean, if if the industrial cycle globally

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to see a stabilization, maybe beginnings of a

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>turn up. We have to have China driving there, don't

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>we What's going on in China? Yeah, it's interesting. What's

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>what here? So the US, by the way, the manufacturing

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>cycle is still decelerating. Um. Europe, I think is where

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>everything is actually started in terms of the global industrial upturn.

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>They seem in many ways even just becoming less bad

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to have kind of kicked this off. And you're right, UM,

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in China, UM are leading indicators of global and excuse me,

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of Chinese industrial production growth UM have begun to improve.

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I know that the p m I is the official

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>p m I or the Jason p m I are

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>giving conflicting signals at the moment. Uh, but our leading

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>indicator of Chinese industrial growth is moving to the upside.

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 1>They are participating. I think other kind of ex Asia,

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>extra Japan economies are already starting to participate as well.

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Last and very quickly here and I want to come

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>back and continuing this. Buried in your report is a

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>trench in four or five paragraphs where you are adamant

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing is not flat on its back. What's the vector

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>on US manufacturing right now? Uh? Well, we we are,

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>we are at the end of the line. I'm afraid

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the global manufacturing cycles, we went in

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to the downturn later than the rest of the world,

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and we do not have any clear signs of an

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>upturn there yet. And and in US manufacturing, and we

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>are seeing some bottoming in our in our would hopefully

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>we don't know that it's bottoming, but perhaps bottoming in

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the US manufacturing indicators. The problem, the fly in the

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>ointment in the United's dates is the employment cycle, the

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>job cycle that is still cycling down. And I think

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it's still happening in manufacturing. It gets a little difficult

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to read with the GM strike um, but it's it's there,

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's worrisome. This has been wonderful lot from Thank

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>you so much to tell about this with the Economic

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Cycle Research Institute UH from London today. Thanks for listening

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer.

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast. You

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio