WEBVTT - Frida with Angela Campos

0:00:01.000 --> 0:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>On the Bechdelcast, the questions ask if movies have women

0:00:04.720 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and them, are all their discussions just boyfriends and husbands

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>or do they have individualism? It's the patriarchy, zeph and

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>best start changing it.

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 2>With the Bechdel Cast.

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Jamie, Hi, Caitlin, would you draw me like one

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 3>of your freeda girls self portraits?

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Question Mark. Well, no, that's not how that works at all.

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yeah, that doesn't make sense. That's not how that works.

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 4>I appreciate the ask, but really, you really need to

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 4>look within, look.

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 2>To your darkest parts.

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 3>What I should have said is, hey, Caitlin, would you

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 3>draw me like one of your selves?

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, we'll get there, We'll continue to navigate.

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 3>It's a work in progress.

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, this joke will kind of coagulate throughout the episode.

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 4>In the meantime, Welcome to the Bechdel Cast. My name

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 4>is Jamie Loftus, my name is Caitlin Derante. This is

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 4>our podcast where we examine movies through an intersectional feminist lens,

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 4>using the Bechdel Test simply as a jumping off point.

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 4>And what is that though? I wonder well. The Bechdel

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:20.479
<v Speaker 4>test is a media metric originally created by queer cartoonist

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 4>Alison Bechdel, often called the Bechdel Wallace Test because it

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 4>was co created with her friend Liz Wallace. Originally made

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 4>as a bit as will become actually relevant in today's episode,

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 4>but it was originally created as a bit for her

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 4>comic collection Dykes to watch out for, and was originally

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 4>sort of this conversation about how not just women or

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 4>people of marginalized genders never talk to each other in movies,

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 4>but how.

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Queer women specifically never get to talk to each other

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 2>in movies.

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 4>A lot of versions of this test, the one we

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 4>use requires that two characters of a marginalized gender with

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 4>names speak to each other about something other than a

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 4>man for more than two lines of dialogue, and it

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 4>should be you know, a plot relevant exchange that would

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 4>be nice, and we're we're going to get into it today.

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 4>So let's get our guest in here, a long time

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 4>movie request, and it's happening, baby, It's finally here.

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Our guest is an art historian and is currently in

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 3>a PhD program in art and education. So I am

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 3>not the person with the highest degree.

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Hey, don't be humble. You used to teach paint night you.

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Art, Yeah, but I only have a master's. I don't

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 3>have a PhD.

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 2>That's true. And you do need a master's to do

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>paint night.

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 3>You need a PhD to teach paint night class. Sorry,

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 3>I have completely derailed your introduction. But yes, art historian

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 3>and in a PhD program in art and education. It's

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 3>an hala campos. Welcome, helone, welcome. Bye.

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 5>I'm very happy to be here, so excited.

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 3>So happy to have you.

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 5>I still only have a master's degree.

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Too, So okay, well that makes me feel better.

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 5>I'm currently in the PhD program. So yeah, it's fine, mate,

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 5>It's it's okay. Don't worry. We're in the same.

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I will not be upscaled on my own podcast. No,

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 3>So we're talking about Freda, the two thousand and two

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 3>biopic directed by Julie Taymoor starring Salma Hayek, and.

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, come on, and Alfred Molina.

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 3>And sorry, Alfred, of course, Alfred Molina.

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Now hold the damn phone. We can't. Let's not bury

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 2>the wee.

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 4>Alfred Molina is in this.

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Movie, sorry to erase a male presence.

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, as we've said many times on this show, and

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 4>it will be complicated in this movie. If Alfred Molina

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 4>is speaking, it passes the factel test automatically rules be damned.

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 3>That is yes, yes, Well, we haven't brought up Alfred

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Molina quite some time.

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 2>It's because you got married, so I'm moving on.

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 3>He's off the market for you.

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Anyways, sorry, So we're talking about Freda and we're curious, Angela,

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 3>what is your relationship with the movie with Frieda Callo

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 3>as an artist and historical figure. Tell us everything.

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, first, I remember watching the movie when I was

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 5>way too young to be able to watch it. I

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 5>remember that it was I don't know if my mom

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 5>had it on DVD or something, but I remember watching

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 5>it because especially the scene. I don't want any spoilers yet,

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 5>but the scene with the sister traumatized me horribly. Oh yeah, yeah,

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 5>So I remember tiny parts of the film in my

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 5>unconscious mind, and I never rewatched it until I started

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 5>studying artists at eighteen nineteen years old. So, when you're

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 5>an art historian, especially in Mexico, you're kind of tired

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 5>of Frida Calo. Well, even if you're a Mexican person,

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 5>you're kind of tired of of Frida because she has

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 5>been exploited by the capitalist system in a way that

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 5>she would have hated being a communist.

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 3>No exactly.

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 5>Yes, yeah, but she's constantly, constantly in our media, in

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 5>our international propaganda to come to Mexico and the idea

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 5>people have of Mexico so as a Mexican is it's

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 5>kind of annoying. So people tend to put her away,

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 5>no and say, ah, Frida Calo, I don't like her.

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:46.679
<v Speaker 5>No so, And the taboo in art history, I believe

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 5>is to like her. So when I had my twentieth

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 5>century art class, because you have other artists from twentieth

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 5>century that are important, like Marie Squiero, not Tina Modotti,

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 5>who is in a movie of course, Remeliosa or Leonora Carlington.

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 5>All of these women that surrounded the same a time

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 5>and space as Prida Galo tend to be more popular

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 5>within the art history crowd. But then you realize, when

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 5>I had my art history class for the twentieth century,

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 5>I really found out the true sense and the true

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 5>the importance of fridacal No. Her paintings are not only

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.119
<v Speaker 5>this thing of oh I'm so sad, I'm so sick.

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 5>I have a horrible life, which we all complain about constantly.

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 5>But it's a thing of how she pioneered something in

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 5>art that is so common nowadays, and maybe that's why

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.679
<v Speaker 5>we don't notice it or consider it as important because

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 5>we have normalized it. But she did it first, and

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 5>it's not about her technique, her esthetic. It's about that

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 5>innovation that she brought to art history. And I found

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 5>that out until I studied the twentieth century in the

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 5>last symesters of my degree, and it was extramely shocking

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 5>because I realized my internalized missa genia against Rida Callo,

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 5>my prejudices against her, and how stereotypes of her had

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 5>shaped the image I had of her, instead of just

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 5>letting go and going with the flow and realize myself

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 5>if I liked her or not, which is something that

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 5>I also think. S al Mahaik said about her that

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 5>she didn't like her at first, and then she explored

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 5>her and she realized that she was amazing. That's what

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 5>happened to me too. So that's my journey with Ridakalo

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 5>and now I of course love her and yeah, what

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 5>about you so interesting?

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean that, Yeah, I feel like that happens a

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 3>lot where something gets mainstream afied.

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, like over it's like saying you like Coldplay.

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 3>You're like, exactly, sure you do, but everybody does.

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 5>Everybody does, and everybody when they come to Mexico. I

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 5>have cousins in Spain and they're like, I want to

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 5>see Frida. I want to see Frida, And I was like,

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 5>they behave, like Frida and Diego are the Sistine Chapel

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 5>or something, And then I realize they are for people

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 5>that aren't from here. And we have normalized going to

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 5>be Yes artists and se Diego's murals, we have normalized

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 5>being close to Lacasa Soul. We have normalized those things

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 5>about these great artists because we have them at least

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 5>in Mexico City, and being very centralist here unfortunately, but

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 5>at least in Mexico City, we have them very close

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 5>to us. So it's also a thing of re cherishing

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 5>what we have in our own art history and realizing

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 5>it's it's not just anything that we should skip and

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 5>and consider. Oh again, no, it's examly that we should

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 5>maybe explore from other perspectives.

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes things are very well known because they are good, yeah,

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 3>and it so rarely happens, but in the case of

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 3>Free to Callow, It's true. Yes, Jimmy, how about you?

0:08:57.880 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 3>What's your history?

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 4>I had not seen this movie before for a silly

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 4>reason that I will get to.

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 2>But I was introduced to.

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:10.559
<v Speaker 4>Frieda Callo's work through what we're going to talk about today,

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 4>this very sort of sanitized image of who she was.

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 4>I probably was introduced to Free to Callo in high school,

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 4>like on a pair of socks or something. I like,

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 4>she's a very frequently and like you were saying on

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 4>there's like the fact that her politics mean that she

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 4>would fucking hate that.

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 2>But she felt like, Yeah.

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 4>This pantheon of frequently reproduced figures that I actually didn't

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 4>know much about. You would see her next to like

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 4>Einstein and like all of these sort of iconic innovative

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 4>people just presented without context for monetary gain.

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 2>That's how I learned who she was. And then I.

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 4>Did read the book this movie is based on in

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 4>high school, a biography of Free to Callo by Hated Herrera.

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 4>I read that in high school and like completely fell

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 4>in love with her just out of sight. I have

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 4>a framed print of the two Fridas. Yeah, the more

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 4>I learned about her I mean she's still to this day.

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's like a travesty that she's presented, so,

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, simply, and I feel like in this way

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 4>that is very white feminism driven, completely lacking context, lacking

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 4>her politics, lacking her identity, and lacking her queerness as well,

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.959
<v Speaker 4>like which was something I had to learn from a book.

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 4>It wasn't something that was readily being printed about her

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 4>when I was in high school.

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 2>So I've always been fascinated by her.

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 4>I avoided this movie for years because a college professor

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 4>who was really mean to me is one of the

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 4>credited screenwriters. So for one of so, Diane Lake, I'm

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 4>calling your ass out. You were such an asshole to

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 4>me in twenty fourteen, and so, I like kind of

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 4>vowed to never watch this movie due to the.

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Transgressions of one Diane Lake.

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 4>However, I am very glad that I finally have cause

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 4>to watch it because there's so much to talk about.

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm so curious, but I don't know.

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 4>I feel like I'm going to figure out how I

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 4>feel about it in real time. I like Julie Taymoor

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 4>in general. I think she's a very creative director.

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 2>I was one of the cringe fans of across the

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 2>universe me too, good, good, Yeah, I love her.

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 5>I still played for my students when we see the

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 5>Vietnam War and stuff. I still play something because it's amazing.

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 5>I don't care.

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 2>I was like, you had to be there, and if

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 2>you were there.

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 5>You understand exactly. Yeah.

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, we'll talk about her a little bit.

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.559
<v Speaker 4>I've also wanted to shout out her funniest credit, which

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 4>is the Bad Spider Man music.

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, Killing All the Spider.

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 5>Man, the musical that she'll not be named. Yes.

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 4>So anyways, I hadn't seen it, and I am very

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 4>glad that I did, because it gave me like reason

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 4>to revisit her life, which I hadn't in a while. Kaitline,

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 4>what is your history with this film and this political figure.

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:19.479
<v Speaker 3>I had seen the movie before, probably about twenty years ago,

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 3>and I didn't revisit it, although I remember liking it

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 3>at the time, but enough time had passed that I

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 3>forgot almost everything you learn in the movie, and then

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 3>I relearned much of it by visiting the Free to

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Callo Museum in Mexico City. I went to La Casasoul

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 3>and I went with friend of the cast Adriana Ortega,

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 3>who was on our Youtumama dambiena episode Loved and who

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 3>coincidentally connected us with you Anhela.

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 2>She's just the best.

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, she's Yeah.

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 3>She took me to the museum and obviously much of

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 3>her art is in the museum, as well as like

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 3>different dresses she wore, different outfits she wore throughout her life,

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 3>different kind of medical apparatus that she wore, and I

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 3>was like, oh, right, she's dealt with chronic pain throughout

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:21.119
<v Speaker 3>her life. I also relearned that she was a communist.

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 3>I relearned that she was bisexual, all this stuff, and

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 3>I was like, oh yeah. And then so remembering that

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 3>this was about a year ago that I went to

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 3>the museum and relearned all this information, So I was like,

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 3>I wonder how much of that is in this biopic,

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 3>because I was like, I bet Hollywood is gonna like

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 3>wash a lot of that out.

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 2>I thought that.

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 4>Her bisexuality would have been sanitized big time.

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, there are a lot of aspects of

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Freda's life, as far as I can tell, that are

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 3>somewhat erased or scaled back on in this biopic, But

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 3>it does show more about her than what I would

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:03.839
<v Speaker 3>have expected, because I was like, oh, I bet this

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 3>movie like Capitalism washes her political ideology. I bet it

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 3>straight washes her queerness, you know, but it it doesn't.

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't. And we'll talk about that a lot. But yeah,

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 3>I really enjoyed going to the museum and learning about it,

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 3>and then rewatching this movie. I was like, oh my gosh,

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 3>setting aside things that the movie might again scale back

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 3>on or kind of a RaSE about Frida's life, it's

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 3>a really enjoyable movie.

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 3>I find it very fun and entertaining, and I enjoy

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 3>it just as a piece of cinema. And then I

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 3>also I didn't finish it. I have about twenty minutes left.

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 3>But there's a documentary called Freeda that came out recently, yeah,

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 3>on Prime that takes excerpts from her diary, from letters

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 3>she wrote, correspondences from other figures in her life, including

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Diego Rivera and other friends and lovers of hers and

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 3>their diaries, and it just has all this sort of

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 3>like voice over photographs of her, video of her, I

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 3>guess film film footage of her, obviously her works of art,

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 3>and so that provides a little bit more context. So

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 3>I learned some more stuff from that, and uh, yeah,

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 3>I really appreciate free to call it as an artist

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 3>and historical figure. And I like the movie a lot,

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 3>but there's lots to talk about. Yes, so let's take

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 3>a quick break and then we'll come back and get

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 3>into the recap.

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 2>And we're back. We're back. Shall we get into the

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 2>flim the movie.

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 4>I just was like, I'm kind of panicking about but

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 4>you know what, I just I need Diane like to

0:15:59.000 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 4>know how I feel.

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's leave it in. Let's leave it in.

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 3>I could bleep out the name if you wanted to.

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 4>I guess that there are four credited writers on this movie,

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 4>and I guess an uncredited scriptwrite from Edward Norton, which

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 4>I don't even know if I want to talk about.

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 4>I was like, when you learn a fact and you're like,

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 4>h I don't know if I can engage with that

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 4>fact right anyways, No.

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Leave it in, Okay, We'll leave it in. Okay. So

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 3>the movie opens on Frida Callo as an older adult

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 3>near the end of her life. She's in bed which

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 3>is being loaded onto a truck. We will find out

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 3>why because this pays off later in the movie. Then

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 3>we flash back to nineteen twenty two in Mexico City.

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Frida is a teenager. I think she would have been

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 3>around fifteen years old at the time renowned artist Diego

0:16:56.680 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Rivera played by A one Alfred Molina.

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 4>Oh Fort Molina. I will say, I love Salamahayak so much.

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 4>It was so distracting watching her be fifteen years old.

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 5>Truly.

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 4>She was doing this like I don't know, like taking

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 4>this childlike stance. Yeah, just get a different actor. It's

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:17.360
<v Speaker 4>just a couple scenes.

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean, was in her thirties when she recorded a film,

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 5>So it's like, yeah, that's strich.

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, very very movie like it happens all the time.

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 4>But the cut too, is severe. It was like whoa, okay, cool.

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 4>It reminded me of an episode of like Penn fifteen

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:34.479
<v Speaker 4>kind of it was giving Penn fifteen.

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Anyways, so Diego Rivera is at her school painting a

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 3>nude portrait of a woman with whom he's also having

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 3>an affair, and Frida and her friends sneak in too

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 3>watch him work. One of these friends is her boyfriend

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Alejandro aka Alex.

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Played by baby Diego Luna.

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh love to see him. So, Jamie, You're lifelong crush

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 3>is in the movie, and my more recent crush, Diego

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Luna is in the movie. So the boys are there.

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 5>He's Mexico's crush too. Yeah, human guy. Oh my god,

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 5>Mexico's proudest moment.

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 4>That's another there being Caitlin crush.

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they're my boys. Okay, So they are together, Frida

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:31.640
<v Speaker 3>and Alex. Then we see Frida's childhood home. We meet

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 3>her mother, her father who is a painter and photographer,

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 3>her sister Christina played by Mia Maestro, and she's about

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 3>to get married. So they're gearing up for the wedding.

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 3>One day, Frida and Alex are on a bus. This

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 3>is when she was eighteen years old, discussing politics and Marxism.

0:18:54.800 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 3>The bus crashes, leaving Frida with several serious injuries broken bones,

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 3>her pelvis was impaled by the handrail of the bus,

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 3>and she has several operations in this Really I think

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 3>cool stop motion animation sequence.

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, for a time, you see like a biopic about

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 4>an artist and it doesn't even attempt to like bring

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 4>in their craft into the filmmaking.

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 2>I was so glad they did that. It looked really cool.

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for sure.

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and it was very Julie de Marco that too, Like, yes,

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 5>the whole esthetic of that of that scene because in

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 5>a crossing universe, for example, she does similar things. And

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 5>I also love that they use the skulls the calacas

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 5>because of the relationship with Rita's idea of that, but

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 5>also Mexican typical art very cool.

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 3>So she's in recovery for a long time after the accident.

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Doctors are uncertain if she'll ever walk again. One day,

0:19:56.359 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Alex comes in and tells Frida that he's moving to Europe,

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 3>so they effectively break up and Frida is devastated. And

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 3>then while she's recuperating, her parents gift her painting supplies

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 3>and they install a mirror on the ceiling of her

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 3>four poster bed so that she can paint self portraits.

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 3>So she starts painting a lot, and eventually she starts

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 3>walking again, and one day she approaches Diego Rivera and

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 3>shows her paintings to him and wants his professional opinion

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 3>because she's hoping to make a career out of painting

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 3>to make money and help support her family. They have

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.959
<v Speaker 3>substantial medical bills that have piled up from all of

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 3>these operations, and Diego Rivera is like, wowie wow a wooga,

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 3>you're a great painter and your work is very original

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 3>and it's terrific. And so he becomes a mentor to

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 3>her and kind of takes her under his wing. He

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 3>brings her to a party full of artists and political activists.

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 3>They're talking about you know, socialism and communism and drinking

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:14.959
<v Speaker 3>and you know stuff that you do at a party.

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 3>One of those parties, right, Antonio Benders is there as

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 3>the Videlfarro Cicios. He and Diego are like frenemies.

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 4>I never thought i'd see the day where Alfred Blina

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 4>and Antonio bender has got into a physical altercation.

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 2>But today was that day.

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 5>By the way, a very big favor by casting Antonio

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 5>and they just let.

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Me say that, oh is because is he not?

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he didn't look like that. No, no, no, all.

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean Alfred Blina is casting of Diego Rivera like

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 3>it was.

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 5>Also a favor for yes.

0:21:55.880 --> 0:22:00.919
<v Speaker 4>The biopic treatment in the biop at least.

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So we're at this party. Ashley Judd is also

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 3>there playing Tina Medotti, who was an Italian American photographer, model, actor,

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 3>political activist, she and Freda do a sexy dance and

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 3>have a little kiss together. Meanwhile, Diego is trying to

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 3>sleep with Freda. He is a known womanizer, and she's like,

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm not gonna sleep with you, dude, and he's like, okay, fair,

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:34.360
<v Speaker 3>We'll just be comrades, colleagues and friends, but we'll never

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 3>sleep with each other.

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 2>And that gets her horny, and then.

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 3>They immediately they immediately start making out and having sex.

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 4>I do love that Freda from the very beginning of

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 4>this movie is canonically horny, because that also seems to

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 4>be historically true.

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, very horny person who had many affairs.

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 4>Truly a murderer's row list of lovers, extramarital affairs like

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 4>she had Paul.

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, goals, you know, incredible, Yeah, my goals. At least,

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 3>so time passes, Freda and Diego fall in love. They

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 3>get married, though her mother disapproves of the marriage because

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 3>Diego Rivera is an atheist and a communist. Frida also

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:28.479
<v Speaker 3>has doubts about her relationship with Diego. We see at

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 3>the wedding Diego's ex wife, Lupe Marine played by Valeria Golino,

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 3>causes a scene she insults Frieda. Frida gets upset that

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Diego doesn't defend her. It's day one of them being

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 3>married and already not off to a great start.

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Or at all. Yeah.

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Then Frida finds out that Lupe lives right above Diego's

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 3>apartment with the children they have together, which infuriates Frida

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 3>at first, but then she and Loupe start like hanging

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 3>out out and Lupe teaches Frida how to make her

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 3>molay recipe, and she tells Frida about Diego Afferre's various infidelities,

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 3>and this pattern of behavior does not change with Freida.

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 2>No imagine that a man that changing impossible? Yeah, wun't you?

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 3>So Frida finds out about his many affairs, often with

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 3>the models he paints portraits of. There's also a political

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 3>undercurrent to the film, as previously kind of hinted at.

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 3>But Diego has painted a socialist portrait in a government

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 3>building in Mexico City, but his party thinks he's a

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 3>trader because he's like making art for a bourgeois government.

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.880
<v Speaker 3>So there's like this push and pull there.

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 4>He's making art for Edward Norton Rockefeller, which was yes,

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 4>the most interesting jump scare in this movie for me

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 4>where you're like, what.

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 2>The hell are you doing here?

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 3>I had a similar jump scare with Ashley Judd. Oh yeah,

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 3>I was like, uh yeah, what is she doing here?

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 5>I was expecting an Italian actress or something, and they

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 5>actually judge showed up right right.

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:21.919
<v Speaker 3>Well, isn't Valeria Galino an Italian actress?

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 5>Wouldn't she is the one who plays Slooper Marino.

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, she probably would have made more sense in that

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 3>role anyway. So that's about to happen where Frida and

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 3>Diego go to New York for a solo exhibition of

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:40.719
<v Speaker 3>Diego's Diego then paints a mural in the Rockefeller Building.

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 3>Edward Norton is playing like Rockefeller Junior. Frida's voiceover is

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:50.919
<v Speaker 3>talking about the class disparity and poverty she sees in

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 3>New York. This is also highlighted in that documentary. I

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 3>was referencing the way she talks about New York, the

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 3>way she talks about like rich Americans especially, She's like,

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 3>these motherfuckers are the most boring losers I've ever met.

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 3>She talks about like having visited Harlem and how it

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 3>was such a beautiful, vibrant neighborhood that reminded her of

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 3>neighborhoods in Mexico City, like the way she describes New

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 3>York I found very funny. Anyway. Diego continues to be

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 3>unfaithful to Freda on this trip, but Frida is also

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 3>having affairs. We see her with a woman who Diego

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:35.919
<v Speaker 3>head also slept with. Then Frida reveals to Diego that

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 3>she's gregnant, although he expresses concern about her body being

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 3>able to handle a pregnancy because of the injury she sustained,

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 3>and sure enough, she has a miscarriage and is rushed

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:55.120
<v Speaker 3>to the hospital. Her miscarriage inspires some of her paintings.

0:26:55.880 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 3>It's obviously very devastating to her also, and around this

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 3>time that Frieda's mother falls ill and passes away. Diego

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 3>is still in New York doing this Rockefeller Building painting,

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 3>and he has put Vladimir Lenin into the mural, and

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 3>some people are like woo hoo, hero, and then all

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.880
<v Speaker 3>the capitalists are like, boo, take that out of there,

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:28.400
<v Speaker 3>but Diego refuses to compromise his vision, so he's fired

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 3>from this commission and the painting is destroyed, which enrages Diego.

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 3>They return home to Mexico, where he feels like restless

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 3>and creatively unfulfilled, and he resents being back in Mexico

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 3>he was having a great time in New York. And

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 3>it's kind of throughout the movie, but it's especially around

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 3>this point where I'm like, what about Frieda's art, Like

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 3>we see more of that?

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, because he was also very resentful against her because

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 5>they returned Mexico because she was homesick. That was his

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 5>idm oh so, so he's like, Nah, this is your

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 5>fault that we're here. Yeah, and yeah, she says something

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 5>along the lines of I want to return to that

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 5>artist that you were painting, Maggie, Yes, and not being

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 5>a pompos guy in brockefit.

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Corporate chill, yeah, capitalist stooge.

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Right. I that just not as well, Kaitlyn.

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 4>I was curious what others thought about it, were like,

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 4>I feel like we see a lot of Frida's paintings,

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 4>you know, brought to life through these stop motion animations

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 4>that Samahayak is very frequently in, and they're presented, but

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 4>like it's not fully contextualized what is motivating them? And

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 4>I wish that there was a little more, especially in

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 4>a biopic about an artist, to like have a fuller

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 4>idea of what was inspiring these pieces, because I loved

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 4>the visuals of it, but it felt like a little

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 4>less focused on her art than I would have liked.

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and we'll talk more about it. But that was

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 3>something I definitely noticed throughout the movie.

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 4>But I also know that, like in her lifetime, her

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 4>art career was not sufficiently like Diego Rivera's art career

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 4>always got precedence over hers too.

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, yeah, right, and.

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 5>This was a systemic issue in Mexican and art ya exactly.

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 3>My thing is, well, if that was like where his

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 3>art was always like overshadowing hers, like, shouldn't the movie

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 3>like call more attention to that and like address that. Yeah,

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 3>examine the systemic patriarchal, sexist context for that, anyway, we'll

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 3>talk more about it. So then Freda hires her sister, Christina,

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 3>who had recently left her abusive husband, to help out

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 3>in Diego's studio. Diego and Christina promptly have sex, which

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 3>is like the ultimate betrayal to Frida. She I don't

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 3>know if tolerated was the right word, but she put

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 3>up with his infidelities, but this was like the last

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 3>straw him sleeping with her sister, So she leaves Diego

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 3>and she stops talking to her sister for a while.

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Frieda moves back into the house she grew up in.

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 3>She cuts off all her hair, making her the baldest

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 3>woman in charge. She starts dressing androgynously some of the time,

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 3>which is something we've seen her do already different times

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 3>throughout the film. It's also clear that she's having trouble

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 3>supporting herself. She considers selling some of her paintings, but

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 3>comments are made about how they don't have enough commercial

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 3>appeal sort of thing. Then Diego approaches Frieda asking if

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 3>she'll house Leon Trotsky played by Jeffrey Rush and his

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 3>wife Natalia, who have been granted asylum in Mexico after

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 3>being exiled from the Soviet Union and then from Norway.

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 3>I think, and Frida agrees. So Trotsky moves in and

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 3>he takes to Frida. Immediately, he marvels her paintings. He

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 3>really likes her, and they start having an affair. They

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 3>also visit some pyramids, yes where I also went on

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 3>that same trip to Mexico City, and they're stunning, but

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 3>I was like, wow, I recognize these places. I went

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 3>there and so this affair is ongoing between Frida and Trotsky.

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Natalia finds out about it, so she and Trotsky move out,

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 3>which is dangerous for them, and an assassination attempt is made,

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 3>although Trotsky survives it this one at least.

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 5>Just a quick note that I found out earlier that

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 5>the actress who plays Natalia Trotzky's wife, and Salamahayek had

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 5>worked together Indlos Milos, Mexican Away from nineteen ninety five previously.

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 5>Oh well, yeah, yeah, so in this film their enemies

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 5>of course, because she ends up hating Frida Calo for

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 5>sleeping with her husband, but they had previously worked together

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 5>in a very good Mexican film. Yeah, that's so cool.

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'll have to check that one out. So then

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Frida goes to Paris for an exhibition of hers.

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 4>And the only people she hates more than Americans are

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 4>French fields, which is that seems.

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 2>To be you know, the order of operations there.

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 3>And she's writing letters to Diego saying that she misses

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 3>him and she does want to be with him after all,

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 3>but the next time they see each other, he asks

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 3>for a divorce. Trotsky is then eventually murdered and the

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Mexican government thinks that Diego had something to do with it,

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 3>and so they interrogate Frida, asking where Diego is, but

0:32:57.480 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 3>she won't cooperate, so she's arrested and put in jail.

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 3>I think is what happens here. Her sister Christina bails

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 3>her out and then they make up. Frida's health has

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 3>started to decline around this point. Some of her toes

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 3>are amputated after they're discovered to be gangrenous, And the

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 3>movie doesn't make this super clear, but I think she's

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:26.479
<v Speaker 3>had additional operations and again is suffering from chronic pain.

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Diego comes back and wants to get married again, and

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 3>at first Frida's like, I don't need your pity. I

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 3>don't need you to save me, and he's like, I'm

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 3>the one who needs saving. So they get married again,

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 3>and by now it's I think nineteen fifty three, she

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 3>finally has her first solo exhibition of her paintings in

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 3>her own country, something that she's been waiting for her

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 3>whole life. But she's too ill to leave her.

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 5>Bed because she had her leg amputated. Two in nineteen

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 5>fifty three.

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Right, which is like somewhat clear in the movie.

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, because she takes the leg now.

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, She's like, give me my leg back.

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:12.839
<v Speaker 3>So Diego goes to this exhibition on her behalf. He

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.800
<v Speaker 3>gives a monologue about her work as an artist.

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Big movie moment that also happened.

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Happened in real life where Frida shows up. She has

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 3>had people carry her in in bed so that she

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 3>can enjoy the event, but you know, obeyed the doctor's

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:35.720
<v Speaker 3>orders of like not leaving her bed. And then shortly

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:41.240
<v Speaker 3>after this she passes away on July thirteenth, nineteen fifty four.

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 3>So that's the movie. Let's take another quick break and

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 3>then we'll come back to discuss and we're back. One

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 3>of the main things that I I am curious about

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Angela is as far as what we know about Frida Carlos'

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 3>life and art and political positions and all of that,

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 3>how does it compare to what is shown in the movie.

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 3>And are there important things about Frida that were left

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 3>out or glossed over in this biopic.

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 5>I believe generally she was depicted very accurately because Almachayk

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 5>was very passionate about this. She even contacted Dolores Olmelo,

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 5>who was the last lover and the person who, aside

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 5>from his kids, held Diego Riveda's inheritance and Frida Carlos artwork.

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:50.320
<v Speaker 5>So she was a very rich woman and there was

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 5>a museum that recently closed in the south of Mexico

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 5>City that had all her collections and stuff. But Salmachayik

0:35:56.840 --> 0:35:59.919
<v Speaker 5>contacted this woman and asked her for permission to put

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 5>Frida's paintings in the film, and sal Machaik, I think,

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 5>was very passionate about this project, so she didn't want

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 5>to depict Rida Calo in a way that wasn't truthful.

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 5>But again, it has some things that are immediately not true,

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 5>like the fact that all the dialogue is in English

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:22.400
<v Speaker 5>and they try to include some Spanish in a sometimes

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 5>in a forced way, and like stereotypical Mexican way, I think.

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 5>But I think that the spirit of Rida Calo is

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 5>very well represented in the terms of her being a rebel.

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 5>Every time they say she cannot do something, she finds

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 5>a way or a loophole to do it. The horny

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:43.400
<v Speaker 5>aspect that you were mentioning, no or I think what

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 5>is very washed down is how violent Diego was towards

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 5>Frida in his relationship with her, because it's still very romantic.

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 5>I understand that it's from Frida's perspective, which was very romanticized,

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 5>and her idea of him. Never she never realized how

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 5>violent it was what he did to her, But it

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 5>could have been more critical in that way because it

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 5>was terrible. He was a very very bad man, and

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:15.280
<v Speaker 5>not only towards Frida. Earlier on, I mentioned other Mexican

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:18.520
<v Speaker 5>female artists from this time, including Marie Squeredo, who was

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 5>If we use intersectionality as a tool for this, we

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.360
<v Speaker 5>can see that she has a higher level of dissidence

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 5>and because she was a brown woman, for example, she

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 5>was racialist. And Marie Quero wanted to paint murals and

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 5>she was extremely targeted, but she could only paint canvas

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 5>paintings because Cicos and Rivera never let women have public

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:46.319
<v Speaker 5>spaces for muralism, which is very interesting because there is

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 5>a book called Lipse la Tlunas by Dina co Misenko,

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:54.399
<v Speaker 5>a researcher that basically discovered female muralists in Mexico who

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 5>did paint, but they granted them small spaces. Now instead

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:03.360
<v Speaker 5>of the big lace where the president holds his and

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 5>now hers because we will not have female president speeches.

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 5>They gave them the little building in the little part

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 5>of town that nobody actually saw. No, And this was

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 5>because of a monopoly that these guys had, these men

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 5>had in muralism in Mexico. And also it has to

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 5>do with the rivetas incoherence with his political discourse and

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 5>his political beliefs, because Fridaclo was much more coherent than him.

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 5>She never sold out, let's say, and the Oribta was

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:39.760
<v Speaker 5>coherent only when he could be kind of dramatic about it,

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:44.240
<v Speaker 5>like with the Rockefeller thing. There he decided, no, no, no,

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:47.399
<v Speaker 5>I have to follow my ideology and I will never

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 5>back down. But then why did you go there in

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:54.359
<v Speaker 5>the first place if you're such a communist, right.

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 2>It always felt like a pr thing.

0:38:57.160 --> 0:39:00.760
<v Speaker 4>From his Yeah, yeah, like deciding halfway through painting something

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 4>for Elon Musk, like, actually I don't like this guy.

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 2>You're like, well, we are.

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:07.879
<v Speaker 3>Here and he already paid you.

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:11.439
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. So he was kicked out of the Communist Party

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 5>from Mexico three times because of these incoherences. And Freda

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 5>was much more strong in this sense too. And I

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:24.359
<v Speaker 5>think that all of those little nuances I mean, it's

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 5>a film. It's a two hour film. You can really

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 5>depict them exactly, but there are little details that I

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 5>think would enrich this general idea we have a freedom

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:37.799
<v Speaker 5>and make her even more of an admirable character like

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 5>we see her when we find out all of these nuances.

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:44.880
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for contextualizing that better, because I think that

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 4>that also speaks to Kaitlyn what you were saying a

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 4>little earlier about While we see a lot of her work,

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 4>the context of how welcome women were or were not

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:57.919
<v Speaker 4>into art in Mexico and the US at the time

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 4>isn't fully explore in a way that I feel like

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 4>would make sense to do in this movie.

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 2>And I also, I mean, I found.

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 4>A quote from Diego Rivera because I remember from reading

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 4>this book all these years ago that the abuse that

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 4>he subjected to her and others was horrific, And I

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 4>was like, one of the disappointing elements of the movie,

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:24.479
<v Speaker 4>or I think the most disappointing element of the movie

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:28.279
<v Speaker 4>to me was kind of making the Hollywood choice to

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 4>have the action of the movie we're following Frida's life,

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 4>but the most important thing we're following, according to the movie,

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:40.720
<v Speaker 4>as her relationship with Diego, which obviously that's complicated because

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 4>it was one of the most deeply important relationships of

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 4>her life. Anyways, here's this quote I found from Rivera

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 4>that sort of bears this out. He said, if I

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 4>ever loved a woman, the more I loved her, the

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 4>more I wanted to hurt her. Frida was only the

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 4>most obvious victim of this disgusting trait.

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 2>So he also stated himself.

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 5>Like, don't do it right right.

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, one of the things that I thought was interesting

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 4>because I went back and fact checked this because I

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 4>was like, what a weird line of dialogue if this

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 4>was made up. But he says early in the movie

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 4>essentially when he says like, if we get married, it

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:23.280
<v Speaker 4>will have to be an open marriage because I can't

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 4>do anything else. And he says like, oh yeah, I

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 4>talked to this doctor and he said I'm like, I

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 4>can't do monogaby, which is like the most scumbag thing

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 4>he could possibly say, And it turns out that actually happened.

0:41:37.120 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 4>He yeah, the real if Diego Rivera talked to some

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 4>doctor at a party and he was like, yeah, you're

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 4>diagnosed as always going to cheat.

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:51.919
<v Speaker 3>Well, coming at it from a polyamorous standpoint, like, he's

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 3>clearly someone who was inclined toward polyamory, and it seems

0:41:55.960 --> 0:42:00.919
<v Speaker 3>as though despite Friedo's affairs, seems like she was only

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 3>having those because she knew that Diego was in response

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 3>to Yeah, exactly. So that's what tends to happen when

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 3>a polyamorous person and a monogamous person get together, is

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:16.240
<v Speaker 3>that it doesn't quite work.

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 4>But well, I'm not trying to like make any sort

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:25.240
<v Speaker 4>of disparaging statement towards polyamory, for sure, like Diego Rivera

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:26.879
<v Speaker 4>was an abuser like that.

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, to be clear, being polyamorous and being an abuser

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 3>and a liar and not honoring the type of relationship

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:37.440
<v Speaker 3>your partner wants are two very separate things. And I

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 3>don't want to conflate ethical non monogamy with any kind

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:45.040
<v Speaker 3>of partner abuse because there was nothing ethical about what

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Diego Rivera was doing in his relationship.

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:52.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and most relationships at that time in art in

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 5>Mexico had that for that. That's why she's so amazing

0:42:56.040 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 5>because she portrayed these personal, very personal pain and suffering

0:43:02.080 --> 0:43:05.800
<v Speaker 5>and process. But it was a political statement too, because

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 5>she understood power relations and she understood disparity in gender,

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:18.000
<v Speaker 5>and she understood how hurtful a binary system was because

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 5>she was also, like you said, very androgenous in some

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 5>points of her life. And she understood these things and

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 5>she depicts them in her art. And this is amazing,

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:32.439
<v Speaker 5>at least for me, because it's a very weird thing

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:37.080
<v Speaker 5>when the hegemony at the time was these male artists

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 5>who painted these murals that represented the official version of

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:46.120
<v Speaker 5>Mexico's history, and they should be doing things that serve

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:49.919
<v Speaker 5>our country, not which was Vasconcelos's this course, the guy

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 5>that proposed muralism as our national art, and muralism is

0:43:56.640 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 5>it's like derivera in an art movement, I would say,

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 5>like big in the terms of a big figure also

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 5>towering over you all the time, also telling you a

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:10.279
<v Speaker 5>version of how you should be, also showcasing everything that

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 5>is wrong with the system. And he even included freedom

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:19.400
<v Speaker 5>in one of the paintings. Now it's always her painting

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 5>in a private space in a studio on canvas, and

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 5>him painting in a public space with the government and everything.

0:44:27.480 --> 0:44:31.960
<v Speaker 5>Creating a national basically nationalism, not creating our idea of

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 5>what it is to be Mexican. So It's very interesting

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:37.839
<v Speaker 5>for me to see that now the idea of what

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 5>it is to be Mexican has more to do with

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:45.360
<v Speaker 5>Freida than with Diego. But it isn't surprising because Flida

0:44:45.600 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 5>showcases a lot of experiences that unfortunately Mexican women have,

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:53.839
<v Speaker 5>and Carlos Moncivice even said that she was kind of

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:58.480
<v Speaker 5>a new version of the Virgin of Galla lupetuous. So

0:44:58.520 --> 0:45:03.000
<v Speaker 5>she represents Mexican going both the good than bad things,

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:06.760
<v Speaker 5>better than the Rivera, who was paid to represent Mexico.

0:45:06.960 --> 0:45:10.360
<v Speaker 4>Right, yeah, right, right, so he was always beholden to

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:14.799
<v Speaker 4>somebody else. I'm curious what you both think about this,

0:45:15.120 --> 0:45:19.399
<v Speaker 4>because going back and sort of reviewing, how I think

0:45:19.520 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 4>this movie is more political than I was expecting it

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 4>to be. Communism was more explicitly addressed than I would

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:29.239
<v Speaker 4>have expected in a mainstream.

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Movie, especially because Hollywood is so afraid of communism historically.

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:39.040
<v Speaker 4>Right, I mean whatever, It's very like one oh any

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:43.839
<v Speaker 4>kind of stuff. But I felt like the movie kind

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:48.279
<v Speaker 4>of implies that Freda comes by her political beliefs via

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:52.240
<v Speaker 4>Diego Rivera, and that rubbed me the wrong way because

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 4>she joined the Communist Party.

0:45:53.880 --> 0:45:56.840
<v Speaker 2>When she was a teenager, like she was really.

0:45:56.600 --> 0:46:02.320
<v Speaker 4>Politically active far before she was like romantically attached to Rivera.

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:05.400
<v Speaker 4>And I felt like the movie kind of suggested that

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 4>when she started seeing him after she had gone through

0:46:09.480 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 4>this first recovery, that that was how she arrived at

0:46:13.200 --> 0:46:15.720
<v Speaker 4>her political beliefs, and I just it's not true.

0:46:15.840 --> 0:46:18.400
<v Speaker 3>I didn't feel that quite so much, especially because we

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:21.360
<v Speaker 3>see that scene with her on the bus with Diego

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Luna's character, that's true, where they're talking about He's like,

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:27.840
<v Speaker 3>you always read things in the wrong order. You have

0:46:27.920 --> 0:46:30.720
<v Speaker 3>to read this one guy before you read Mark.

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 5>You have to read Hale before Mark. Yeah.

0:46:34.200 --> 0:46:37.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, I guess I just met like her explicit

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:39.240
<v Speaker 4>connection to the party.

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:43.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah yeah. And also, there were twenty five hundred students

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 5>in the SCA, which was at the time the only

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:49.759
<v Speaker 5>high school in Mexico, and she was like one of

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:53.120
<v Speaker 5>thirty five women out of those twenty five hundred students,

0:46:53.640 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 5>and she joined the Kachucas, which was a group that

0:46:56.800 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 5>was highly political and Candro, her boyfriend, was one of

0:47:02.080 --> 0:47:06.479
<v Speaker 5>the leaders for student autonomy and student movements, which will

0:47:06.480 --> 0:47:10.279
<v Speaker 5>eventually have a very dark history in Mexico. So it's

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:13.520
<v Speaker 5>very interesting because she was always involved that she always

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:17.040
<v Speaker 5>was going to end up being a communist. No, right,

0:47:17.400 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 5>So it isn't related to Viego Rivera, I think, and

0:47:20.600 --> 0:47:23.759
<v Speaker 5>we shouldn't attribute it to him because also, like I said,

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:26.319
<v Speaker 5>he's not a coherent communist at all.

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 4>He's really bad at being a communist.

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:33.319
<v Speaker 3>I do think the movie after that scene where she

0:47:33.520 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 3>is discussing like Marxism with Alex, it's almost always us

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:44.440
<v Speaker 3>seeing Diego Rivera talk about his communist ideology, and Frida

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:48.440
<v Speaker 3>we don't see discussed it that much, except for that

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:52.080
<v Speaker 3>one scene where she's they've arrived in New York. She

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:55.280
<v Speaker 3>keeps calling it Gringo Landia, which is very funny. Yeah,

0:47:55.280 --> 0:48:00.360
<v Speaker 3>and she's talking about like income disparity and poverty. Aside

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:05.359
<v Speaker 3>from that, her political ideology isn't super clear, and if

0:48:05.400 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 3>it comes up in the movie, it's usually in the

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:11.360
<v Speaker 3>context of what Digo Rivera is doing or what he's

0:48:11.400 --> 0:48:12.840
<v Speaker 3>painting or what he's saying.

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:17.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. And also for that when she was buried, well

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:18.920
<v Speaker 5>not she was, she wasn't buried when it was she

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:21.759
<v Speaker 5>was cremated and the ashes are in the Akasa sut

0:48:21.960 --> 0:48:25.000
<v Speaker 5>but when she was in her service, for when she died,

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:28.920
<v Speaker 5>they carried the communist flag to a Yasatats, which is

0:48:29.000 --> 0:48:33.200
<v Speaker 5>like the palace of fine arts in Mexico City, and

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:36.920
<v Speaker 5>in her service, the communist flag was carried with her.

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:41.839
<v Speaker 5>So she really really really believed and cared about communism.

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:45.640
<v Speaker 5>And that's what I also find very interesting about how

0:48:46.040 --> 0:48:50.800
<v Speaker 5>she has been made into a token for feminism. I

0:48:51.400 --> 0:48:53.640
<v Speaker 5>personally I am a feminist and I have been in the

0:48:53.680 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 5>feminist intersectional field in Mexico for more than ten years.

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:02.319
<v Speaker 5>But I always is kind of cringed when they said, ah, yes,

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:05.439
<v Speaker 5>Frida a feminist icon, because when they do that, they

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:10.040
<v Speaker 5>expect then for Freda to be super coherent with feminism.

0:49:10.400 --> 0:49:13.239
<v Speaker 5>And then they find out about her relationship with Diriba

0:49:13.280 --> 0:49:15.680
<v Speaker 5>and they cancel her and they're like, oh no, But

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:19.319
<v Speaker 5>she allowed herself to be in that relationship and she

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:23.880
<v Speaker 5>helped a man like that exists, and it's like, you

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:28.840
<v Speaker 5>can expect her to be a communist. She understood feminist ideas,

0:49:28.960 --> 0:49:31.920
<v Speaker 5>but she never called herself a feminist because that wasn't

0:49:31.960 --> 0:49:36.839
<v Speaker 5>even chronologically coherent. And I have seen when I went

0:49:36.840 --> 0:49:39.239
<v Speaker 5>to the States one time, at Barnes and Noble, I

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 5>saw these set of cards that had like feminist icons

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 5>and like Ruthbetter Ginsburg, Frida Calo, Hillary Clinton.

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:49.400
<v Speaker 4>And I was like, what, right, like the people you

0:49:49.440 --> 0:49:53.560
<v Speaker 4>see printed on socks gentrified.

0:49:52.960 --> 0:49:56.719
<v Speaker 3>Areas and you're like, oh, no, she was not.

0:49:56.840 --> 0:49:59.440
<v Speaker 5>She would die if you put her next to Heary Clinton.

0:49:59.480 --> 0:50:01.680
<v Speaker 5>Oh my god. Yeah, that's what the America that she

0:50:01.840 --> 0:50:05.520
<v Speaker 5>was referring to in her diary, right, So it's no.

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:09.520
<v Speaker 5>And I think that's very interesting how they decided to

0:50:10.040 --> 0:50:13.040
<v Speaker 5>pick and choose which part of her rebellion to take,

0:50:13.080 --> 0:50:17.600
<v Speaker 5>and they chose those feminist traits and whitewash them, of course,

0:50:17.640 --> 0:50:21.799
<v Speaker 5>and this white feminism that you were mentioning, but they

0:50:21.920 --> 0:50:24.400
<v Speaker 5>completely left out not in the movie I'm saying, but

0:50:24.600 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 5>in the in how readily is treated by the culture

0:50:28.360 --> 0:50:32.040
<v Speaker 5>in Mexico and the United States and other countries mainstream

0:50:32.080 --> 0:50:35.759
<v Speaker 5>feminist movement, right. And I think that's interesting.

0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:38.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's like one of the I feel like many

0:50:39.200 --> 0:50:44.920
<v Speaker 4>offshoots of like corporatized feminist discourse that is just like

0:50:45.080 --> 0:50:48.839
<v Speaker 4>so aggravating, where it's like, oh, the idea of being

0:50:48.880 --> 0:50:53.520
<v Speaker 4>a feminist means that you're a woman who did something successfully, yeah,

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:56.759
<v Speaker 4>and like not even connecting it to any like you're saying,

0:50:57.160 --> 0:51:02.040
<v Speaker 4>like a coherent political ideology, like putting those three women

0:51:02.040 --> 0:51:02.640
<v Speaker 4>next to each.

0:51:02.480 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Other, what do they politically have in common?

0:51:05.800 --> 0:51:06.720
<v Speaker 3>So disparate.

0:51:07.400 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 2>It's really all over the place.

0:51:09.320 --> 0:51:11.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but I will say, like, I do appreciate that

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 4>this movie does. I don't know if I'm like grading

0:51:14.120 --> 0:51:16.759
<v Speaker 4>it on like a two thousand and two sliding scale

0:51:17.080 --> 0:51:21.120
<v Speaker 4>of like it was doing more than I expected it

0:51:21.160 --> 0:51:25.120
<v Speaker 4>to politically, although it does feel like politically I think

0:51:25.120 --> 0:51:25.440
<v Speaker 4>it did.

0:51:25.640 --> 0:51:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Caitlin, I think like you're saying, make.

0:51:28.040 --> 0:51:34.040
<v Speaker 4>It clear that Diego's communist ideals could be showy versus productive.

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:37.319
<v Speaker 4>I don't think he's held fully to task for that,

0:51:37.600 --> 0:51:40.960
<v Speaker 4>but at least it's not presented like they were both,

0:51:41.320 --> 0:51:44.719
<v Speaker 4>you know, like incredible and politically flawless.

0:51:44.800 --> 0:51:44.960
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:51:46.160 --> 0:51:50.359
<v Speaker 4>The other element of Freda's life that I was, well,

0:51:50.360 --> 0:51:53.279
<v Speaker 4>I feel like it's complicated by a lot of the

0:51:53.280 --> 0:51:56.080
<v Speaker 4>production stories around this movie, which we'll get to because

0:51:56.120 --> 0:52:02.880
<v Speaker 4>Samahayak later discusses how Yeah just bullied and harassed she

0:52:03.040 --> 0:52:07.080
<v Speaker 4>was by Harvey Weinstein before and throughout the production of

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:09.359
<v Speaker 4>this movie. She spoke about that during the Me Too

0:52:09.440 --> 0:52:14.200
<v Speaker 4>movement and has more sense. So this it sucks because

0:52:14.200 --> 0:52:17.319
<v Speaker 4>I feel like this particular element of the story is

0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:18.880
<v Speaker 4>kind of tainted.

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 2>By those stories.

0:52:20.080 --> 0:52:26.360
<v Speaker 4>But Freda's queerness and a willingness to not just reference

0:52:26.400 --> 0:52:28.359
<v Speaker 4>it in passing, which I was kind of wondering at

0:52:28.360 --> 0:52:31.759
<v Speaker 4>the beginning, where there is one like affair she's had

0:52:31.800 --> 0:52:33.880
<v Speaker 4>with a woman who I guess has also hooked up

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:38.760
<v Speaker 4>with Diego, and it's discussed and there's like a little

0:52:39.160 --> 0:52:41.240
<v Speaker 4>handsiness under the table, and I was like, I wonder

0:52:41.239 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 4>if that's all the movie is gonna do in terms

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:49.200
<v Speaker 4>of like referencing that she was famously bisexual or I mean,

0:52:49.239 --> 0:52:52.880
<v Speaker 4>it sounds like her sexual identity was like very complicated,

0:52:52.880 --> 0:52:54.520
<v Speaker 4>and you know, I doubt she would want to be

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:57.120
<v Speaker 4>put in one particular category.

0:52:57.560 --> 0:53:01.040
<v Speaker 3>That could possibly be true for her gender as well,

0:53:01.120 --> 0:53:05.640
<v Speaker 3>especially because I mean, sure I'm speculating here, but you know,

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Speaker 3>the way she would dress sometimes in men's clothes, possible

0:53:10.280 --> 0:53:15.080
<v Speaker 3>that she was gender queer before that was ever an expression,

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:18.560
<v Speaker 3>or perhaps she'd just like to wear men's clothes sometimes

0:53:18.600 --> 0:53:21.160
<v Speaker 3>hard to say, but she definitely didn't shy away from

0:53:21.520 --> 0:53:27.880
<v Speaker 3>engaging with androgyny totally with her sexuality her queerness.

0:53:27.560 --> 0:53:29.560
<v Speaker 4>Which is like why it's kind of like, I mean,

0:53:29.640 --> 0:53:32.319
<v Speaker 4>going back to like the mainstream discourse around her, It's

0:53:32.400 --> 0:53:34.400
<v Speaker 4>kind of like, as I was reading through, there's been

0:53:34.480 --> 0:53:36.960
<v Speaker 4>so much written about her, obviously, but sort of like

0:53:37.200 --> 0:53:41.680
<v Speaker 4>very modern attempts to like retroactively put her in a

0:53:41.719 --> 0:53:45.200
<v Speaker 4>box and claim her where It's like, first of all,

0:53:45.280 --> 0:53:47.840
<v Speaker 4>you'll never know, and second of all, like that just

0:53:47.840 --> 0:53:50.759
<v Speaker 4>seems antithetical to what like how she lived her life

0:53:50.800 --> 0:53:51.280
<v Speaker 4>in general.

0:53:52.120 --> 0:53:52.719
<v Speaker 2>Anyways, all I.

0:53:52.680 --> 0:53:56.840
<v Speaker 4>Had to say, I appreciated that they reference that this

0:53:56.960 --> 0:54:02.239
<v Speaker 4>fluidity with her sexuality existed throughout her life, and we

0:54:02.280 --> 0:54:07.200
<v Speaker 4>see a sex scene with Josephine Baker, and a complicated

0:54:07.239 --> 0:54:10.560
<v Speaker 4>part of that is that Harvey Weinstein, I guess, insisted

0:54:10.600 --> 0:54:14.440
<v Speaker 4>on that because he wanted Samahayak to appear full frontal

0:54:14.520 --> 0:54:18.279
<v Speaker 4>nude in the movie because he was angry throughout the

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:24.040
<v Speaker 4>production that she looked quote unquote too ugly. So that

0:54:24.200 --> 0:54:26.400
<v Speaker 4>was like because at first I was like, oh, wow,

0:54:26.640 --> 0:54:30.640
<v Speaker 4>it's so rare to see queer sex scenes in a

0:54:30.680 --> 0:54:33.120
<v Speaker 4>mainstream movie at all, and then you find out the

0:54:33.160 --> 0:54:36.680
<v Speaker 4>reason it's there, and so there's that it's.

0:54:36.560 --> 0:54:39.000
<v Speaker 5>Very sad, Yeah, to find out afterwards.

0:54:39.160 --> 0:54:43.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I'll share some of the piece that she

0:54:43.960 --> 0:54:46.720
<v Speaker 3>wrote in the New York Times.

0:54:46.800 --> 0:54:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh Yes, her op.

0:54:48.200 --> 0:54:54.520
<v Speaker 3>Ed yes entitled Harvey Weinstein is My Monster Too, because

0:54:54.560 --> 0:54:58.040
<v Speaker 3>this also informs another thing about the movie that I

0:54:58.080 --> 0:55:03.520
<v Speaker 3>want to talk about, which is representation of disability. So

0:55:03.960 --> 0:55:08.600
<v Speaker 3>first I'll start by sharing a quote from this piece

0:55:08.880 --> 0:55:12.440
<v Speaker 3>where she talks about her passion for this project and

0:55:12.480 --> 0:55:15.520
<v Speaker 3>her love of Free to Callo. She says, quote, one

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:18.680
<v Speaker 3>of the forces that gave me the determination to pursue

0:55:18.680 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 3>my career was the story of Free to Callo, who,

0:55:22.320 --> 0:55:25.720
<v Speaker 3>in the golden age of the Mexican muralists would do small,

0:55:25.760 --> 0:55:29.600
<v Speaker 3>intimate paintings that everybody looked down on. She had the

0:55:29.640 --> 0:55:34.320
<v Speaker 3>courage to express herself while disregarding skepticism. My greatest ambition

0:55:34.480 --> 0:55:36.840
<v Speaker 3>was to tell her story. It became my mission to

0:55:36.920 --> 0:55:40.560
<v Speaker 3>portray the life of this extraordinary artist and to show

0:55:40.600 --> 0:55:45.360
<v Speaker 3>my native Mexico in a way that combated stereotypes unquote.

0:55:45.520 --> 0:55:49.439
<v Speaker 3>So again to showing her appreciation for the subject matter,

0:55:49.760 --> 0:55:52.239
<v Speaker 3>her passion for the project. It was like one of

0:55:52.280 --> 0:55:54.800
<v Speaker 3>the main things she wanted to do in her career

0:55:55.280 --> 0:55:59.160
<v Speaker 3>as an actor, and so with this project she was

0:55:59.160 --> 0:56:03.400
<v Speaker 3>passionate about. She took the concept to Harvey Weinstein, who

0:56:03.719 --> 0:56:06.680
<v Speaker 3>at the time, she heard good things about as a

0:56:06.680 --> 0:56:10.319
<v Speaker 3>film producer. His name came with a level of prestige.

0:56:11.040 --> 0:56:14.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, he was known to have made excellent films.

0:56:14.200 --> 0:56:17.640
<v Speaker 3>So she went to him, approached him with the project,

0:56:17.880 --> 0:56:23.400
<v Speaker 3>and he then started sexually harassing her incessantly. She kept

0:56:23.440 --> 0:56:26.160
<v Speaker 3>telling him no, I won't do this, No I won't

0:56:26.200 --> 0:56:28.840
<v Speaker 3>do that. No, no, no, and him being told no

0:56:29.120 --> 0:56:34.040
<v Speaker 3>enraged him and they entered a legal battle over the movie,

0:56:34.680 --> 0:56:38.439
<v Speaker 3>where he named all these stipulations that the only way

0:56:38.440 --> 0:56:42.120
<v Speaker 3>that he would proceed with, you know, producing and financing

0:56:42.320 --> 0:56:45.640
<v Speaker 3>the movie is if she met these kind of unrealistic

0:56:45.680 --> 0:56:50.000
<v Speaker 3>criteria on a really short deadline. But she managed to deliver,

0:56:50.719 --> 0:56:53.920
<v Speaker 3>so the movie went forward into production. And then this

0:56:53.960 --> 0:56:58.440
<v Speaker 3>is where I'll start quoting from the piece, she says. Quote.

0:56:58.560 --> 0:57:01.319
<v Speaker 3>Halfway through shooting, Harvey turned up on the set and

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:05.040
<v Speaker 3>complained about Frieda's unibrow. He insisted that I eliminate the

0:57:05.080 --> 0:57:09.239
<v Speaker 3>limp and berated my performance. He then asked everyone in

0:57:09.239 --> 0:57:11.719
<v Speaker 3>the room to step out except for me. He told

0:57:11.719 --> 0:57:13.640
<v Speaker 3>me that the only thing I had going for me

0:57:14.160 --> 0:57:16.560
<v Speaker 3>was my sex appeal and that there was none of

0:57:16.600 --> 0:57:19.040
<v Speaker 3>that in this movie. He told me he was going

0:57:19.080 --> 0:57:21.400
<v Speaker 3>to shut down the film because no one would want

0:57:21.440 --> 0:57:25.040
<v Speaker 3>to see me in that role. It was soul crushing

0:57:25.240 --> 0:57:28.280
<v Speaker 3>because I confessed lost in the fog of a sort

0:57:28.320 --> 0:57:31.440
<v Speaker 3>of Stockholm syndrome. I wanted him to see me as

0:57:31.440 --> 0:57:35.040
<v Speaker 3>an artist, not only as a capable actress, but also

0:57:35.120 --> 0:57:39.080
<v Speaker 3>as somebody who could identify a compelling story and had

0:57:39.680 --> 0:57:43.000
<v Speaker 3>the vision to tell in an original way, which I

0:57:43.000 --> 0:57:46.600
<v Speaker 3>feel like speaks to something that so many women. And

0:57:46.640 --> 0:57:49.160
<v Speaker 3>this is me speaking now, I've stopped quoting for a

0:57:49.160 --> 0:57:51.360
<v Speaker 3>moment to be clear, but you know it speaks to

0:57:51.480 --> 0:57:55.240
<v Speaker 3>something that so many women and people of marginalized genders

0:57:55.600 --> 0:58:00.360
<v Speaker 3>deal with as far as imposter syndrome, and goes on

0:58:00.400 --> 0:58:03.320
<v Speaker 3>to say quote I was hoping he would acknowledge me

0:58:03.360 --> 0:58:05.760
<v Speaker 3>as a producer who, on top of delivering his list

0:58:05.800 --> 0:58:08.640
<v Speaker 3>of demands, shepherded the script and obtain the permits to

0:58:08.760 --> 0:58:12.200
<v Speaker 3>use the paintings. I had negotiated with the Mexican government

0:58:12.360 --> 0:58:15.040
<v Speaker 3>and with whomever I had to to get locations that

0:58:15.080 --> 0:58:17.840
<v Speaker 3>had never been given to anyone in the past, including

0:58:17.840 --> 0:58:21.479
<v Speaker 3>Freda Collos houses and the mural of Collo's husband Diogoro Vera,

0:58:21.880 --> 0:58:25.320
<v Speaker 3>among others. So again, she as a producer did like

0:58:25.360 --> 0:58:29.880
<v Speaker 3>all these incredible feats to get this movie made, she says,

0:58:29.920 --> 0:58:32.600
<v Speaker 3>but all of this seemed to have no value. The

0:58:32.640 --> 0:58:35.680
<v Speaker 3>only thing he noticed was that I was not sexy

0:58:35.720 --> 0:58:38.000
<v Speaker 3>in the movie. He made me doubt if I was

0:58:38.040 --> 0:58:40.840
<v Speaker 3>any good as an actress, but he never succeeded in

0:58:40.880 --> 0:58:43.080
<v Speaker 3>making me think that the film was not worth making.

0:58:43.560 --> 0:58:46.400
<v Speaker 3>He offered me one option to continue. He would let

0:58:46.440 --> 0:58:48.120
<v Speaker 3>me finish the film if I agreed to do a

0:58:48.160 --> 0:58:52.360
<v Speaker 3>sex scene with another woman, and he demanded full frontal nudity.

0:58:53.160 --> 0:58:57.200
<v Speaker 3>She goes on to describe the pressure he put on

0:58:57.320 --> 0:59:00.840
<v Speaker 3>her and director Julie Taymoor to include this full frontal

0:59:00.920 --> 0:59:03.800
<v Speaker 3>nudity sex scene. They felt they had to concede.

0:59:04.080 --> 0:59:07.080
<v Speaker 4>He also, like I think, threatened to fire Julie Taymor

0:59:07.200 --> 0:59:11.960
<v Speaker 4>if Samahayak didn't comply with including this scene. Like it

0:59:12.080 --> 0:59:15.120
<v Speaker 4>just was like threats to basically sabotage this entire production.

0:59:15.240 --> 0:59:17.480
<v Speaker 4>She had spent the better part of ten years trying

0:59:17.520 --> 0:59:19.720
<v Speaker 4>to make right happen. And I mean, I feel like

0:59:19.720 --> 0:59:23.760
<v Speaker 4>you can attribute so much of how authentic this feels

0:59:23.800 --> 0:59:29.080
<v Speaker 4>as opposed to other biopics to the willpower of Samahayak,

0:59:29.120 --> 0:59:31.600
<v Speaker 4>and also the fact that she, like you're saying, Caitlin

0:59:32.080 --> 0:59:34.480
<v Speaker 4>is a really talented producer.

0:59:34.080 --> 0:59:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Which I feel like is such.

0:59:36.560 --> 0:59:42.240
<v Speaker 4>A double standard in Hollywood in general, where when a male.

0:59:42.080 --> 0:59:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Actor produces his own work, it's.

0:59:44.080 --> 0:59:49.000
<v Speaker 4>Really drawn attention to, but with women it's almost always minimized.

0:59:50.120 --> 0:59:54.280
<v Speaker 5>And the things she got PERMASI for are truly impossible

0:59:54.320 --> 0:59:58.680
<v Speaker 5>in Mexico because Frieda and Diego are considered patrimonial artists

0:59:59.040 --> 1:00:02.840
<v Speaker 5>and getting permitt for anything related to them is impossible.

1:00:03.440 --> 1:00:07.520
<v Speaker 5>So what she did is truly a big fit. Yeah.

1:00:07.560 --> 1:00:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Before I read this piece, I assumed that they had

1:00:10.680 --> 1:00:14.320
<v Speaker 3>just built doubles of those sets, not realizing that they

1:00:14.360 --> 1:00:19.120
<v Speaker 3>actually like shot on location and yeah, like la asuol

1:00:19.160 --> 1:00:22.400
<v Speaker 3>and stuff. Yeah, and then she describes the day that

1:00:22.440 --> 1:00:25.600
<v Speaker 3>they shot that sex scene, she had a nervous breakdown.

1:00:25.720 --> 1:00:29.280
<v Speaker 3>She was throwing up, she was shaking uncontrollably because she

1:00:29.400 --> 1:00:34.000
<v Speaker 3>knew she was conceding to the will of this predator

1:00:34.120 --> 1:00:36.080
<v Speaker 3>and that's what made her feel so sick.

1:00:36.440 --> 1:00:36.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:00:36.800 --> 1:00:39.800
<v Speaker 3>He then tried to sabotage the release of the movie

1:00:39.840 --> 1:00:43.280
<v Speaker 3>after it was completed. He like didn't want it to

1:00:43.320 --> 1:00:45.360
<v Speaker 3>be in theaters really, and.

1:00:45.360 --> 1:00:49.200
<v Speaker 4>He sabotaged her Oscar campaign almost wholesale yep.

1:00:49.480 --> 1:00:52.560
<v Speaker 3>So, and then the piece concludes with Somemahaik talking about

1:00:52.720 --> 1:00:57.560
<v Speaker 3>women being devalued and undervalued as artists and filmmakers and she,

1:00:57.880 --> 1:01:02.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, longs for gender equity in Hollywood. So a

1:01:02.960 --> 1:01:05.720
<v Speaker 3>piece worth reading if any listeners want to learn more,

1:01:05.760 --> 1:01:11.240
<v Speaker 3>but truly sickening to be reminded of all the horrors

1:01:11.280 --> 1:01:13.479
<v Speaker 3>that Harvey Weinstein puts so many people through.

1:01:13.920 --> 1:01:18.040
<v Speaker 5>I think it's very sad and kind of meta that

1:01:18.360 --> 1:01:21.320
<v Speaker 5>they're making a film about free that but also about

1:01:21.320 --> 1:01:26.400
<v Speaker 5>her abuser and this horrible person that controlled the art

1:01:26.760 --> 1:01:30.400
<v Speaker 5>world in Mexico. And I find a lot of parallel

1:01:30.520 --> 1:01:34.720
<v Speaker 5>lines between Harvey Weinstein's figure and the Rivera's figure in

1:01:35.320 --> 1:01:37.360
<v Speaker 5>the making of the movie and in the story that

1:01:37.400 --> 1:01:40.760
<v Speaker 5>they're telling. So it's so sad that it's so contradictory,

1:01:40.880 --> 1:01:45.720
<v Speaker 5>know that they're telling this story and it happens on set, yeah.

1:01:45.520 --> 1:01:48.600
<v Speaker 4>Right, all while scaling back the abusive nature of the

1:01:49.160 --> 1:01:52.920
<v Speaker 4>other person. Like I just wanted to add as a

1:01:53.040 --> 1:01:57.160
<v Speaker 4>I guess like punctuation on that that. Alfred Melina also

1:01:57.240 --> 1:02:02.080
<v Speaker 4>did interviews around this time, and also before hating Harvey Weinstein, before.

1:02:01.840 --> 1:02:02.400
<v Speaker 2>It was cool.

1:02:02.840 --> 1:02:06.040
<v Speaker 4>He's a real one he is, Yeah, but they he

1:02:06.160 --> 1:02:08.720
<v Speaker 4>sort of expanded on how Weinstein, when he was not

1:02:08.720 --> 1:02:13.800
<v Speaker 4>successful in getting Samahayak to creatively compromise, started talking to

1:02:13.840 --> 1:02:15.960
<v Speaker 4>other actors to see if he could turn them against her,

1:02:16.600 --> 1:02:20.520
<v Speaker 4>including going over like trying to basically get Alfred Malina

1:02:20.600 --> 1:02:22.760
<v Speaker 4>on his side and being like, she's one of the

1:02:22.760 --> 1:02:24.520
<v Speaker 4>best actors in the world, and what do I see

1:02:24.560 --> 1:02:29.800
<v Speaker 4>on screen? Nothing but Freeda. Molina expressed disbelief. Well, that's

1:02:29.800 --> 1:02:34.960
<v Speaker 4>the whole fucking point, isn't it. He's me like, which

1:02:35.160 --> 1:02:38.920
<v Speaker 4>like yeah, And then sort of subsequently for the amount

1:02:38.960 --> 1:02:42.480
<v Speaker 4>of time Weinstein had power after that was Black Belt

1:02:42.720 --> 1:02:44.040
<v Speaker 4>by Miramax.

1:02:44.760 --> 1:02:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I.

1:02:46.400 --> 1:02:49.040
<v Speaker 4>Mean it's just it's so I mean, it's like a

1:02:49.080 --> 1:02:53.000
<v Speaker 4>story we're very familiar with now, but just hearing how

1:02:53.640 --> 1:02:55.960
<v Speaker 4>how hard Salmahayak had to work to even get this

1:02:56.200 --> 1:02:59.960
<v Speaker 4>in production because looking at the Freedom movies that almost

1:03:00.120 --> 1:03:04.880
<v Speaker 4>happened and thankfully didn't one with Jailo with Jelo, but

1:03:05.080 --> 1:03:09.840
<v Speaker 4>also the biography by Hayden Herrera was first optioned in

1:03:09.920 --> 1:03:12.760
<v Speaker 4>nineteen eighty eight, and they wanted to have either Meryl

1:03:12.800 --> 1:03:17.680
<v Speaker 4>Streep or Jessica Lang played Frieda or you Madonna almost

1:03:17.680 --> 1:03:21.880
<v Speaker 4>played Frieda with Robert de Niro starring as Diego Rivera,

1:03:22.560 --> 1:03:24.640
<v Speaker 4>and you're like, no offense for Robert Nio, but like,

1:03:24.960 --> 1:03:26.880
<v Speaker 4>there's a whole there's so many reasons for him not

1:03:26.920 --> 1:03:28.320
<v Speaker 4>to play Diego Rivera.

1:03:28.840 --> 1:03:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:03:29.200 --> 1:03:32.440
<v Speaker 4>So the fact that this movie that Samahiak's production is

1:03:32.480 --> 1:03:36.200
<v Speaker 4>the one that prevailed is amazing.

1:03:36.600 --> 1:03:39.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, with a Mexican woman as a lead from Quatsa

1:03:39.840 --> 1:03:43.840
<v Speaker 5>qual Cosbera Cruz who came up through a telenovela SI

1:03:43.920 --> 1:03:46.960
<v Speaker 5>stem in Mexico and ended up in Hollywood. No, So

1:03:47.160 --> 1:03:50.200
<v Speaker 5>that's also something that I found very valuable about. I

1:03:50.240 --> 1:03:53.840
<v Speaker 5>love Salama Kayak, of course, and I think that that's

1:03:53.840 --> 1:03:57.960
<v Speaker 5>why she's so aware of the fact that what Harvey

1:03:57.960 --> 1:04:00.880
<v Speaker 5>Weinstein did to her, because it's very colmon here in

1:04:00.920 --> 1:04:04.000
<v Speaker 5>Mexico in the telenovela system too. So I don't think

1:04:04.120 --> 1:04:07.400
<v Speaker 5>unfortunately it was the first time she encountered these predators

1:04:07.440 --> 1:04:09.360
<v Speaker 5>in her job. Yeah.

1:04:09.640 --> 1:04:11.840
<v Speaker 4>I read an interview she did in twenty twenty one

1:04:12.000 --> 1:04:14.600
<v Speaker 4>that sort of followed up on the op ed you

1:04:14.920 --> 1:04:18.600
<v Speaker 4>read us Passages from Caitlin, where Yeah, she basically confirms

1:04:18.680 --> 1:04:22.400
<v Speaker 4>that she's like, I don't mean to minimize my experiences

1:04:22.440 --> 1:04:25.280
<v Speaker 4>with Weinstein. They were very traumatic, but that had already

1:04:25.320 --> 1:04:29.680
<v Speaker 4>happened to me so frequently that I almost like tried

1:04:29.680 --> 1:04:31.600
<v Speaker 4>to take it in stride at the time, because it

1:04:31.640 --> 1:04:33.760
<v Speaker 4>was just how I was conditioned to believe things were

1:04:33.800 --> 1:04:37.240
<v Speaker 4>going to work, no matter where I was working or

1:04:37.280 --> 1:04:41.920
<v Speaker 4>at what level, which is miserable.

1:04:42.800 --> 1:04:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Yes, indeed, I wanted to touch on the other thing that

1:04:47.720 --> 1:04:52.480
<v Speaker 3>the piece alludes to, as far as like compromises that

1:04:52.520 --> 1:04:56.880
<v Speaker 3>she felt she had to make in order to appease

1:04:57.080 --> 1:05:00.280
<v Speaker 3>this monster of a person, as far as is the

1:05:00.320 --> 1:05:05.640
<v Speaker 3>representation of disability where Frida Collo dealt with chronic pain.

1:05:05.800 --> 1:05:10.480
<v Speaker 3>She had many surgeries throughout her life, she had a miscarriage,

1:05:11.040 --> 1:05:15.680
<v Speaker 3>and the movie You Know examines how this inspires some

1:05:15.840 --> 1:05:18.520
<v Speaker 3>of her artwork. But it seems like the movie attributes

1:05:18.600 --> 1:05:21.520
<v Speaker 3>all of this to the bus accident that we see

1:05:21.560 --> 1:05:23.360
<v Speaker 3>happening on screen, which he sent through.

1:05:23.680 --> 1:05:24.560
<v Speaker 5>Ye right.

1:05:24.880 --> 1:05:28.480
<v Speaker 3>The movie does not mention that she had polio as

1:05:29.040 --> 1:05:31.200
<v Speaker 3>a child, I believe when she was six years old,

1:05:31.920 --> 1:05:35.680
<v Speaker 3>which caused leg pain and for her to have a

1:05:35.720 --> 1:05:40.080
<v Speaker 3>limp when she walked even before the bus accident. And

1:05:40.360 --> 1:05:44.040
<v Speaker 3>I saw criticism that the movie tends to downplay and

1:05:44.080 --> 1:05:50.200
<v Speaker 3>erase Freda's physical disability. This could be because Freda is

1:05:50.240 --> 1:05:54.720
<v Speaker 3>played by an able bodied actor, but I read a

1:05:54.720 --> 1:05:59.080
<v Speaker 3>piece from a writer who is disabled named Marta Russell,

1:05:59.200 --> 1:06:03.560
<v Speaker 3>who took issue with the disability rature, particularly the scene

1:06:03.560 --> 1:06:07.680
<v Speaker 3>where Frida is doing that seductive dance with Ashley Judd's character.

1:06:08.400 --> 1:06:12.480
<v Speaker 3>The movie depicts her in you know, high heels dancing.

1:06:12.920 --> 1:06:16.760
<v Speaker 3>There's no visible limp, but the real life Frieda wore

1:06:17.360 --> 1:06:20.920
<v Speaker 3>several layers of socks on her right shoe that was

1:06:20.960 --> 1:06:24.760
<v Speaker 3>also like build up to compensate for her smaller limb.

1:06:24.840 --> 1:06:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Her right leg was was it her right le? One

1:06:28.040 --> 1:06:33.480
<v Speaker 3>of her legs was considerably smaller and weaker because of

1:06:33.560 --> 1:06:36.480
<v Speaker 3>the polio, I believe, or maybe it was a combination

1:06:36.560 --> 1:06:38.640
<v Speaker 3>of the polio and the bus accident.

1:06:38.840 --> 1:06:42.200
<v Speaker 5>There was another thing, m There are historians who believe

1:06:42.280 --> 1:06:46.600
<v Speaker 5>that the polio diagnosis was kind of invented by her

1:06:46.600 --> 1:06:50.800
<v Speaker 5>family because it was a how do you see in

1:06:50.840 --> 1:06:57.440
<v Speaker 5>English congenital disease. Congenital congenital disease called spina bifida spleet

1:06:57.480 --> 1:07:01.240
<v Speaker 5>spine that her and her siblings all had, and it's

1:07:01.280 --> 1:07:03.640
<v Speaker 5>proven she had a little brother that was born and

1:07:03.720 --> 1:07:06.840
<v Speaker 5>died as a little baby named Guillermo, and they all

1:07:06.920 --> 1:07:11.520
<v Speaker 5>had disability. And what is interesting is that like historians

1:07:11.520 --> 1:07:15.200
<v Speaker 5>that have worked with Freda in their careers have discussed

1:07:15.200 --> 1:07:18.320
<v Speaker 5>about this topic and so why would the family decide

1:07:18.320 --> 1:07:21.680
<v Speaker 5>to say it's polio? And it also has to do

1:07:21.720 --> 1:07:25.280
<v Speaker 5>with the fact that all the siblings had this diagnosis

1:07:25.320 --> 1:07:29.800
<v Speaker 5>of spineappifida. And what is interesting about this is that

1:07:29.840 --> 1:07:32.840
<v Speaker 5>they also proposed the idea that Frida didn't only have

1:07:33.040 --> 1:07:36.960
<v Speaker 5>a miscarriage, she had two abortions. No, and many believed

1:07:37.000 --> 1:07:41.040
<v Speaker 5>that she did because she was scared of passing down

1:07:41.120 --> 1:07:46.000
<v Speaker 5>that condition to her children. So it's that's why they

1:07:46.040 --> 1:07:49.360
<v Speaker 5>tend to believe that there's like weird thing there that

1:07:49.400 --> 1:07:53.360
<v Speaker 5>we don't know about with the where the family said

1:07:53.440 --> 1:07:58.200
<v Speaker 5>something and then Frida behaved towards it. But also Frida

1:07:58.360 --> 1:08:05.160
<v Speaker 5>had a very internalized ablest attitude against herself. They say

1:08:05.240 --> 1:08:08.080
<v Speaker 5>that the way she dressed, even the one a skirts

1:08:08.120 --> 1:08:10.760
<v Speaker 5>that she wore and the outfits that she were, especially

1:08:10.840 --> 1:08:13.320
<v Speaker 5>later running her life when she encountered the biggest tissues

1:08:13.400 --> 1:08:18.920
<v Speaker 5>and complications, they hit her disability with her legs. So

1:08:19.160 --> 1:08:22.680
<v Speaker 5>it's very interesting to notice how everything that we know

1:08:22.720 --> 1:08:27.400
<v Speaker 5>about her disability is kind of contradicting each other's versions

1:08:27.439 --> 1:08:30.759
<v Speaker 5>of the facts. And I found that very interesting because

1:08:30.760 --> 1:08:36.719
<v Speaker 5>it tells you how it's invisibilized, not like the movie does.

1:08:37.160 --> 1:08:42.160
<v Speaker 5>And it's also something that hasn't been researched as other

1:08:42.320 --> 1:08:46.639
<v Speaker 5>aspects of her life. And we don't know an official

1:08:46.720 --> 1:08:50.040
<v Speaker 5>version of the facts. So why do I suddenly find

1:08:50.080 --> 1:08:53.879
<v Speaker 5>out that all of her siblings had this same disease

1:08:54.680 --> 1:08:55.760
<v Speaker 5>and so on and so forth.

1:08:55.880 --> 1:08:59.919
<v Speaker 3>No, Right, So, even though we might not know exactly

1:09:00.520 --> 1:09:04.960
<v Speaker 3>what the specifics were of her source of pain and disability,

1:09:05.080 --> 1:09:08.759
<v Speaker 3>we do know that she did deal with chronic pain

1:09:09.320 --> 1:09:14.200
<v Speaker 3>and again walked with a limp. And the movie more

1:09:14.320 --> 1:09:18.280
<v Speaker 3>or less erases that it's very inconsistent. But then you

1:09:18.320 --> 1:09:24.160
<v Speaker 3>find out why, Yeah, because apparently Harvey Weinstein insisted that

1:09:24.280 --> 1:09:25.680
<v Speaker 3>was the case, or to be.

1:09:25.720 --> 1:09:29.920
<v Speaker 5>Sixy Yeah, and just the fact from what I was

1:09:29.920 --> 1:09:32.080
<v Speaker 5>saying that I forgot to say. They say that she

1:09:32.120 --> 1:09:35.200
<v Speaker 5>couldn't walk at three years old, for example. Oh, so

1:09:35.240 --> 1:09:37.920
<v Speaker 5>that's why they believe it second genital disease and not

1:09:38.000 --> 1:09:40.080
<v Speaker 5>so much something she contracted later.

1:09:40.400 --> 1:09:45.640
<v Speaker 4>I see, Yeah, it's so I'm willing to find this

1:09:45.680 --> 1:09:48.240
<v Speaker 4>wholesale on Harvey Weinstein.

1:09:48.479 --> 1:09:50.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but maybe that's just the easiest answer.

1:09:51.040 --> 1:09:53.840
<v Speaker 4>I do think that this also like connecting with what

1:09:53.880 --> 1:09:58.720
<v Speaker 4>you're both saying, there is such a resistance to depicting

1:09:59.439 --> 1:10:01.640
<v Speaker 4>and especially responsibly depicting disability.

1:10:01.680 --> 1:10:02.640
<v Speaker 2>And then the further.

1:10:02.400 --> 1:10:04.719
<v Speaker 4>Back you go, especially if you're doing a historical piece,

1:10:05.120 --> 1:10:08.120
<v Speaker 4>the harder it is to sort of parse out how

1:10:08.160 --> 1:10:12.120
<v Speaker 4>disability was spoken about or not spoken about then versus now.

1:10:12.200 --> 1:10:15.960
<v Speaker 4>So it's like a very I mean, as disability advocates know,

1:10:16.040 --> 1:10:19.960
<v Speaker 4>it's a very very difficult needle to thread, and it

1:10:20.160 --> 1:10:23.160
<v Speaker 4>just seems like the only thing that is certain is that,

1:10:23.400 --> 1:10:27.120
<v Speaker 4>because of how this production was being controlled, this was

1:10:27.160 --> 1:10:31.439
<v Speaker 4>not a production that was going to handle the issue

1:10:31.439 --> 1:10:32.720
<v Speaker 4>of disability responsibly.

1:10:33.160 --> 1:10:38.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's very sad. It is because also Frida didn't.

1:10:38.880 --> 1:10:42.120
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's a whole conversation about why would disability

1:10:42.400 --> 1:10:45.759
<v Speaker 5>make someone vulnerable on this ableist world, how it's built

1:10:45.960 --> 1:10:50.400
<v Speaker 5>in enablest manner and everything. But Frida also didn't want

1:10:50.560 --> 1:10:54.160
<v Speaker 5>to look vulnerable against the world. No, and that's why

1:10:54.280 --> 1:10:58.799
<v Speaker 5>she herself didn't want to accepting her paintings, of course,

1:10:59.000 --> 1:11:02.519
<v Speaker 5>but in her because when you see pictures of her

1:11:02.800 --> 1:11:07.680
<v Speaker 5>in everyday life. She was performing all the time, her outfits,

1:11:07.720 --> 1:11:11.720
<v Speaker 5>her whole esthetic, how she dressed. It was like performance art.

1:11:12.520 --> 1:11:14.600
<v Speaker 4>It reminded me of I feel like again, just like

1:11:14.680 --> 1:11:18.040
<v Speaker 4>how at least how my art education was, because I

1:11:18.120 --> 1:11:20.160
<v Speaker 4>was not an art major or anything like that. But

1:11:20.200 --> 1:11:23.200
<v Speaker 4>I feel like it's often presented in contemporary classes, like

1:11:23.280 --> 1:11:25.880
<v Speaker 4>Cindy Sherman was the first artist to ever do that,

1:11:25.960 --> 1:11:28.599
<v Speaker 4>And you're like, but that's so clearly what Frida is doing. Yeah,

1:11:28.760 --> 1:11:31.919
<v Speaker 4>she's presenting herself in all these different ways and in characters,

1:11:31.920 --> 1:11:33.879
<v Speaker 4>and like, it's just it's amazing.

1:11:34.320 --> 1:11:37.479
<v Speaker 5>And Cindy Sherman does it in her pictures, but Villa

1:11:37.520 --> 1:11:41.120
<v Speaker 5>Cala didn't her everyday life. No, And it's very very

1:11:41.160 --> 1:11:45.560
<v Speaker 5>interesting because she had a whole persona that she embodied

1:11:45.600 --> 1:11:48.000
<v Speaker 5>every time that she was out in public, or she

1:11:48.080 --> 1:11:50.800
<v Speaker 5>was having a party in her house, or and it

1:11:50.880 --> 1:11:54.919
<v Speaker 5>had to do with a very particular set of tools

1:11:54.960 --> 1:11:58.040
<v Speaker 5>that she had developed because of her queerness, because of

1:11:58.040 --> 1:12:01.240
<v Speaker 5>her disability, because of the chata just she had encountered

1:12:01.240 --> 1:12:04.960
<v Speaker 5>throughout her life. And I think it's nowadays it's one

1:12:04.960 --> 1:12:08.760
<v Speaker 5>of the most appropriated parts of Frida Carlo that the

1:12:08.880 --> 1:12:14.040
<v Speaker 5>braids and the rebon in her hair and the Mexican attire,

1:12:14.520 --> 1:12:17.880
<v Speaker 5>like stereotypically Mexican and all of that, and it's part

1:12:17.960 --> 1:12:24.000
<v Speaker 5>of what she did to both conceal her insecurities and

1:12:24.080 --> 1:12:28.000
<v Speaker 5>also showcase herself as whatever she wanted to do, and

1:12:28.040 --> 1:12:29.719
<v Speaker 5>that was shown in her attire.

1:12:29.800 --> 1:12:34.639
<v Speaker 4>I think, yeah, this movie does adequately show that Freda

1:12:34.680 --> 1:12:38.519
<v Speaker 4>color is really cool, but never enough. It feels like

1:12:38.960 --> 1:12:42.280
<v Speaker 4>I wanted to acknowledge something that I don't know how

1:12:42.320 --> 1:12:44.599
<v Speaker 4>to address. I was going back in because I've seen

1:12:44.640 --> 1:12:48.759
<v Speaker 4>it referenced over the years of casting for this movie.

1:12:49.160 --> 1:12:53.080
<v Speaker 4>Because Alfred Molina is a white guy, he is of

1:12:53.240 --> 1:12:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Spanish and Italian descent, and so there has been a

1:12:56.960 --> 1:13:01.240
<v Speaker 4>fair amount of criticism around his casting. The complicating factor

1:13:01.360 --> 1:13:04.000
<v Speaker 4>there is that Selma Jyak directly asked him to play

1:13:04.000 --> 1:13:07.160
<v Speaker 4>the part, and like went to his play and was like,

1:13:07.360 --> 1:13:10.040
<v Speaker 4>you're the guy, and I guess, like, you don't say

1:13:10.040 --> 1:13:14.479
<v Speaker 4>no to Selma Jyak, And I don't know, because I

1:13:14.560 --> 1:13:17.960
<v Speaker 4>was looking into Dico Rivera's background and he is also

1:13:18.400 --> 1:13:20.799
<v Speaker 4>very multicultural but also very Mexican.

1:13:20.920 --> 1:13:23.440
<v Speaker 2>So it's just yeah, I mean, it doesn't.

1:13:23.160 --> 1:13:25.479
<v Speaker 4>Seem like if this movie was being made today that

1:13:25.520 --> 1:13:30.120
<v Speaker 4>Alfred Molina would be the right choice for this part.

1:13:30.240 --> 1:13:32.559
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, I just saw a lot of conversation around

1:13:32.600 --> 1:13:35.719
<v Speaker 4>it then and now I saw a red carpet interview

1:13:35.720 --> 1:13:39.760
<v Speaker 4>with him at the premiere of this movie, and him

1:13:39.920 --> 1:13:44.519
<v Speaker 4>addressing the criticism and being like, there's no doubt, like

1:13:44.560 --> 1:13:47.680
<v Speaker 4>I am of Spanish Italian descent, and there are a

1:13:47.760 --> 1:13:50.720
<v Speaker 4>lot of people in Mexico who were upset that I

1:13:50.760 --> 1:13:54.280
<v Speaker 4>had been cast, and I understand why, which then leads

1:13:54.280 --> 1:13:55.200
<v Speaker 4>to the question.

1:13:55.280 --> 1:13:56.519
<v Speaker 2>Well, then why did you do it?

1:13:58.000 --> 1:14:00.280
<v Speaker 4>But I just wanted to acknowledge that as well, because

1:14:00.280 --> 1:14:03.200
<v Speaker 4>it feels like something that's frequently cited in this movie,

1:14:03.240 --> 1:14:08.040
<v Speaker 4>and also just throughout Alfred Molina's career, he's been cast.

1:14:08.640 --> 1:14:10.679
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think of his role in Indiana Jones

1:14:10.680 --> 1:14:13.080
<v Speaker 4>as kind of another example of this.

1:14:14.160 --> 1:14:18.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, He's definitely played characters of ethnic backgrounds that are

1:14:18.560 --> 1:14:20.320
<v Speaker 3>certainly not his own.

1:14:21.240 --> 1:14:23.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, and I'm the last person to want

1:14:23.960 --> 1:14:28.000
<v Speaker 4>to bring down the hammer on our boy, but I

1:14:28.000 --> 1:14:30.519
<v Speaker 4>still acknowledge that. I want to seem like I was

1:14:30.600 --> 1:14:33.120
<v Speaker 4>not willing to engage with that discussion just because it

1:14:33.160 --> 1:14:34.000
<v Speaker 4>was Alfred Polina.

1:14:34.920 --> 1:14:38.800
<v Speaker 5>I relate that also to some recent criticism I have

1:14:38.880 --> 1:14:43.760
<v Speaker 5>seen against Rida Calo herself, no, that she really portrayed

1:14:43.800 --> 1:14:51.120
<v Speaker 5>herself as these indigenous Mexican women, especially towards her adult years.

1:14:51.880 --> 1:14:56.439
<v Speaker 5>And lasos Fridas, of course has the European Frieda and

1:14:56.520 --> 1:15:01.840
<v Speaker 5>the Mexican Frieda depicted there. But her dad was German, No,

1:15:02.040 --> 1:15:05.040
<v Speaker 5>and her mom was well, her grandfather from her mom's

1:15:05.040 --> 1:15:08.320
<v Speaker 5>side was an indigenous man, but her grandmother from her

1:15:08.360 --> 1:15:12.400
<v Speaker 5>mom's side was a Spanish descent also, and almost all

1:15:12.479 --> 1:15:19.320
<v Speaker 5>Mexicans we have this complex mixture of ethnicities and races

1:15:19.360 --> 1:15:24.679
<v Speaker 5>and backgrounds. So it would be very hard to cast

1:15:24.880 --> 1:15:29.839
<v Speaker 5>someone that is perfect for the egorrita because our history

1:15:29.840 --> 1:15:33.320
<v Speaker 5>in Mexico comes from and I'm not saying that's something

1:15:33.400 --> 1:15:36.920
<v Speaker 5>good that happened. It's the invasion of Mexican by the

1:15:36.960 --> 1:15:41.360
<v Speaker 5>Spanish was basically and the creation of the Mestizo race,

1:15:41.400 --> 1:15:44.679
<v Speaker 5>which is the mixture of indigenous and white Spanish people,

1:15:44.840 --> 1:15:50.439
<v Speaker 5>is basically the rape of thousands of Mexican original community women.

1:15:50.960 --> 1:15:55.000
<v Speaker 5>But this is something that Frila Calo has also been

1:15:55.000 --> 1:15:59.800
<v Speaker 5>accused of doing, of appropriating cultures that are not her

1:16:00.240 --> 1:16:02.840
<v Speaker 5>and stuff like that, and I think that's a very

1:16:02.880 --> 1:16:06.120
<v Speaker 5>complex discussion. Now. The other day, I was teaching cultural

1:16:06.160 --> 1:16:09.519
<v Speaker 5>appropriation with my students and they were like, but when

1:16:09.840 --> 1:16:12.439
<v Speaker 5>when is it appreciation and when is it appropriation? And

1:16:12.720 --> 1:16:15.400
<v Speaker 5>they were telling me examples, and I was like, it's

1:16:15.720 --> 1:16:19.080
<v Speaker 5>very hard. We have to contextualize every single example to

1:16:19.200 --> 1:16:23.720
<v Speaker 5>understand what happens there. Not because some may say I

1:16:23.760 --> 1:16:29.479
<v Speaker 5>freely doesn't have any right to portray indigenous experiences in

1:16:29.840 --> 1:16:34.120
<v Speaker 5>her art, but also her grandfather was from indigenous assent,

1:16:34.320 --> 1:16:37.400
<v Speaker 5>and you know, Alfred Molina, I think has the same thing.

1:16:37.560 --> 1:16:42.400
<v Speaker 5>He comes from a Spanish Italian background. He's not Mexican.

1:16:42.600 --> 1:16:45.720
<v Speaker 5>Diria was. But Mexican is not a race or an ethnicity,

1:16:45.760 --> 1:16:46.680
<v Speaker 5>it's a nationality.

1:16:47.640 --> 1:16:50.519
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, and that was why I felt naive when

1:16:50.520 --> 1:16:52.320
<v Speaker 4>I was looking into this, because I feel like i'd

1:16:52.320 --> 1:16:54.639
<v Speaker 4>seen it presented like you're talking about the same way

1:16:54.680 --> 1:16:56.840
<v Speaker 4>that I saw a lot of I feel like it

1:16:56.880 --> 1:16:58.519
<v Speaker 4>was like ten years ago or so. There was just

1:16:58.560 --> 1:17:01.160
<v Speaker 4>like this wave of criticism that's exactly what you're.

1:17:01.000 --> 1:17:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Describing about free to callow.

1:17:02.439 --> 1:17:05.000
<v Speaker 4>And then a piece that I we can link it

1:17:05.040 --> 1:17:06.719
<v Speaker 4>in the description of this, but I read a piece

1:17:06.800 --> 1:17:11.920
<v Speaker 4>by Tanya Nunez who wrote a whole essay basically saying

1:17:11.920 --> 1:17:13.559
<v Speaker 4>what you just said, Angela, whereas like.

1:17:14.040 --> 1:17:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Well it's not that simple.

1:17:15.439 --> 1:17:19.280
<v Speaker 4>And you know, even if there were contemporary criticisms, if

1:17:19.320 --> 1:17:22.840
<v Speaker 4>free to Callo was working today, she wasn't. Those weren't

1:17:22.880 --> 1:17:26.519
<v Speaker 4>the conversations going on then, and during her lifetime, she

1:17:26.600 --> 1:17:29.800
<v Speaker 4>was largely not trying to profit off of this.

1:17:30.080 --> 1:17:33.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, she only sold one painting, which was the two

1:17:33.160 --> 1:17:36.599
<v Speaker 5>Freedas for two hundred and fifty dollars ry. No, she

1:17:36.640 --> 1:17:39.000
<v Speaker 5>only had one solo exhibition, which was the one that

1:17:39.040 --> 1:17:42.160
<v Speaker 5>picked her in the movie. The other exhibitions were with

1:17:42.200 --> 1:17:46.599
<v Speaker 5>other artists, so she didn't really profit. She was Diego's

1:17:46.600 --> 1:17:50.080
<v Speaker 5>wife most of the time for the public, right, unfortunately.

1:17:50.200 --> 1:17:52.880
<v Speaker 4>And it's like a conversation she's mostly having with herself

1:17:52.960 --> 1:17:55.600
<v Speaker 4>throughout her life and like trying to understand her identity

1:17:55.840 --> 1:17:59.360
<v Speaker 4>and then looking into Diego's background. Yeah, it says on

1:17:59.400 --> 1:18:06.160
<v Speaker 4>scholarly journal Wikipedia it says Diego was of Spanish, Americandian, African, Italian, Jewish, Russian,

1:18:06.200 --> 1:18:07.240
<v Speaker 4>and Portuguese descent.

1:18:07.600 --> 1:18:10.320
<v Speaker 2>So it's just like, yeah, I don't know.

1:18:10.479 --> 1:18:13.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's what happens with the American continent.

1:18:13.520 --> 1:18:16.760
<v Speaker 3>No, yeah, yeah, and I think that's the I mean,

1:18:16.800 --> 1:18:21.360
<v Speaker 3>this is something I have spent a lot of time

1:18:21.400 --> 1:18:25.519
<v Speaker 3>and effort learning slash unlearning as far as because I

1:18:25.560 --> 1:18:31.599
<v Speaker 3>think a lot of white Americans do view being Mexican

1:18:31.760 --> 1:18:36.760
<v Speaker 3>as a racial identity. Yeah, and I've heard people be like, oh, no,

1:18:36.840 --> 1:18:40.000
<v Speaker 3>he's not white, he's Mexican. It's like, well, that does

1:18:40.040 --> 1:18:42.799
<v Speaker 3>not preclude him, Like he could still be a white Mexican.

1:18:42.880 --> 1:18:45.479
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. I'm white as folk, and I'm Mexican because my

1:18:45.560 --> 1:18:48.559
<v Speaker 5>daddy's from Spain and my mom's sambili is from Spain too,

1:18:48.640 --> 1:18:52.439
<v Speaker 5>and I have a Mexican nationality. It doesn't mean anything, no.

1:18:53.000 --> 1:18:55.559
<v Speaker 3>Right, right. So there's a lot of I think still

1:18:55.560 --> 1:19:00.720
<v Speaker 3>to this day, misunderstanding about the difference between like the

1:19:00.760 --> 1:19:06.200
<v Speaker 3>ethnic and national and racial background of everyone in Latin America.

1:19:06.439 --> 1:19:10.320
<v Speaker 3>And there's so much erasure also of Afro Latin X people.

1:19:10.560 --> 1:19:14.200
<v Speaker 3>Of course, there's so much erasure of indigenous people who

1:19:14.280 --> 1:19:17.720
<v Speaker 3>were the original inhabitants of what would become known as

1:19:17.800 --> 1:19:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Latin America. And it's such a fraud history with colonization

1:19:22.479 --> 1:19:26.439
<v Speaker 3>and the Transatlantic slave trade. It has created a lot

1:19:26.479 --> 1:19:31.160
<v Speaker 3>of confusion for a lot of people. And so it's

1:19:31.320 --> 1:19:34.320
<v Speaker 3>something that I think we've gotten wrong on the podcast

1:19:34.360 --> 1:19:35.520
<v Speaker 3>before and.

1:19:35.360 --> 1:19:38.160
<v Speaker 5>For sure, and it has to do with what Riverta did.

1:19:38.439 --> 1:19:41.760
<v Speaker 5>He created this Mexican nationalism that makes you believe that

1:19:41.840 --> 1:19:45.800
<v Speaker 5>we are a race they said, the say the Bronze race,

1:19:46.000 --> 1:19:51.320
<v Speaker 5>that it comes from that glorious indigenous past, from the

1:19:51.360 --> 1:19:56.960
<v Speaker 5>Mechicas and all of these pre Hispanic civilizations that emulates

1:19:57.120 --> 1:19:59.519
<v Speaker 5>how Europe treated the Greeks and the Romans. That's what

1:19:59.600 --> 1:20:03.320
<v Speaker 5>Basco Clos and the muralist projected here in Mexico. But

1:20:03.360 --> 1:20:08.120
<v Speaker 5>at the same time, governments mistreat alive indigenous people who

1:20:08.160 --> 1:20:11.000
<v Speaker 5>are living in our world today, you know. So it's

1:20:11.800 --> 1:20:14.680
<v Speaker 5>a it's an issue, and Dio Riverta was a very

1:20:14.680 --> 1:20:19.519
<v Speaker 5>big participant in that. And this idea, the stereotype of

1:20:19.560 --> 1:20:21.920
<v Speaker 5>what it is to be Mexican is also created by

1:20:21.960 --> 1:20:25.240
<v Speaker 5>our own nationalism and how we portray ourselves to the world.

1:20:25.320 --> 1:20:31.240
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, Tangled Web, I mean, I've spoken to Mexican

1:20:31.280 --> 1:20:35.080
<v Speaker 3>American people who are racially white who have said I'm

1:20:35.080 --> 1:20:36.720
<v Speaker 3>not white, I'm Mexican.

1:20:37.600 --> 1:20:40.599
<v Speaker 5>No. And we even have a term in Mexico called

1:20:41.120 --> 1:20:45.679
<v Speaker 5>white Secans, which are the white Mexicans that are middle

1:20:45.720 --> 1:20:49.519
<v Speaker 5>high class people that behave like assholes to towards everyone,

1:20:49.600 --> 1:20:53.559
<v Speaker 5>and they believe that they're superior and this systemic and

1:20:53.720 --> 1:20:58.640
<v Speaker 5>super super rooted racism we have in Mexico and classism

1:20:58.680 --> 1:21:03.240
<v Speaker 5>and everything, and there's the white secun label. And once

1:21:03.280 --> 1:21:06.880
<v Speaker 5>I had a student that's me, future are white secut

1:21:07.240 --> 1:21:09.559
<v Speaker 5>and I was like, well, yeah, I'm white and I'm Mexican.

1:21:09.600 --> 1:21:12.040
<v Speaker 5>I hope I don't behave like a serty people white secun.

1:21:12.120 --> 1:21:17.799
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, yeah, yeah, for people in the US especially,

1:21:17.840 --> 1:21:21.519
<v Speaker 3>it's it is, we're just like severely under educated about it,

1:21:21.600 --> 1:21:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Like it's embarrassing. Yeah.

1:21:25.160 --> 1:21:28.320
<v Speaker 4>With regard to just like closing the loop on the

1:21:28.320 --> 1:21:31.439
<v Speaker 4>Alpha Molina thing, it was tricky because it involved digging

1:21:31.520 --> 1:21:34.960
<v Speaker 4>up two thousand and two media, which is either hard

1:21:34.960 --> 1:21:37.960
<v Speaker 4>to find or kind of inscrutable when you read it.

1:21:37.960 --> 1:21:41.920
<v Speaker 4>It just seemed like they're two separate strains of criticism

1:21:41.960 --> 1:21:46.879
<v Speaker 4>going on, one being that Alpha Blina is white and

1:21:47.200 --> 1:21:52.080
<v Speaker 4>the other just that he had no connection to Mexican culture,

1:21:52.640 --> 1:21:55.679
<v Speaker 4>and that because Diego Rivera was such a prominent Mexican

1:21:55.760 --> 1:21:59.280
<v Speaker 4>figure that they were like, well, why this, why do we.

1:21:59.320 --> 1:22:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Have this British like that?

1:22:01.640 --> 1:22:04.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, which is I think a fair criticism, And I

1:22:04.160 --> 1:22:06.760
<v Speaker 4>also think he gives a great performance because it's South

1:22:06.800 --> 1:22:09.200
<v Speaker 4>for Bolina is a star.

1:22:09.400 --> 1:22:13.479
<v Speaker 5>He's amazing. I have something to say about this because

1:22:13.720 --> 1:22:16.200
<v Speaker 5>there is a part of the film where they a

1:22:16.760 --> 1:22:19.760
<v Speaker 5>trotsky and Frida paints it to Frida's there is a

1:22:19.800 --> 1:22:24.200
<v Speaker 5>woman singing do you remember like yourna? Yes, yes, that

1:22:24.320 --> 1:22:27.720
<v Speaker 5>woman who appears in the movie. She is created as

1:22:27.800 --> 1:22:31.080
<v Speaker 5>Lapelona and Death. No, she plays death which we call

1:22:31.160 --> 1:22:35.200
<v Speaker 5>lapelona sometimes. That woman is famous for singing that song.

1:22:35.200 --> 1:22:38.080
<v Speaker 5>Her name is Celle la Varagas, and cevel la Vargas

1:22:38.320 --> 1:22:43.200
<v Speaker 5>is from Costa Rica. But she said that famous quote

1:22:43.200 --> 1:22:49.639
<v Speaker 5>that says los Mexicano that means Mexicans are born wherever

1:22:49.680 --> 1:22:54.719
<v Speaker 5>they fucking want. This is because she is considered Mexican

1:22:54.760 --> 1:22:57.240
<v Speaker 5>and an icon for Mexican culture, but she wasn't born

1:22:57.240 --> 1:23:01.040
<v Speaker 5>in Mexico. And Chaveel la Vargas is also related to

1:23:01.240 --> 1:23:05.000
<v Speaker 5>the queerness of in the film. This is a very

1:23:05.120 --> 1:23:08.400
<v Speaker 5>like nice detail in my opinion, because tavel la Baga

1:23:08.479 --> 1:23:10.200
<v Speaker 5>is that old lady that you see in the movie,

1:23:10.720 --> 1:23:14.360
<v Speaker 5>is actually someone who had a relationship with Frida. Oh oh,

1:23:14.439 --> 1:23:20.360
<v Speaker 5>they had a very passionate affair. And Chavelas appears in

1:23:20.400 --> 1:23:27.639
<v Speaker 5>Frida's movie Singing too, San Maachayek portraying Frida No, and yeah, yeah,

1:23:27.680 --> 1:23:32.320
<v Speaker 5>it's it's incredible because if you don't know this nice story,

1:23:33.120 --> 1:23:36.519
<v Speaker 5>you wouldn't know. That's another way that they introduced free

1:23:36.560 --> 1:23:39.839
<v Speaker 5>theat Aquaerness by bringing one of her, the actual person

1:23:39.880 --> 1:23:43.879
<v Speaker 5>that she had an affair with, into the film. Yeah, yeah,

1:23:44.080 --> 1:23:45.040
<v Speaker 5>so cool.

1:23:45.680 --> 1:23:49.479
<v Speaker 4>Oh gosh, that's just like such a w to make

1:23:49.520 --> 1:23:54.559
<v Speaker 4>a cameo in your lover's biopic, Like really good stuff.

1:23:54.680 --> 1:23:56.400
<v Speaker 4>That's I didn't know that. That's really cool.

1:23:56.640 --> 1:23:56.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:23:57.560 --> 1:23:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think an extension of the conversation of cast

1:24:00.120 --> 1:24:02.880
<v Speaker 3>in this movie can extend to the crew as far

1:24:02.920 --> 1:24:08.200
<v Speaker 3>as like, why did a white woman from the US

1:24:08.520 --> 1:24:13.280
<v Speaker 3>who is not Mexican or Latina? Why was she the

1:24:13.280 --> 1:24:15.439
<v Speaker 3>one hired to direct this movie? Right?

1:24:15.520 --> 1:24:19.719
<v Speaker 2>Why was it a majority white writers? Including Diane Lake?

1:24:20.640 --> 1:24:22.479
<v Speaker 2>By the way, what was she doing here?

1:24:22.960 --> 1:24:27.759
<v Speaker 3>Sworn enemy of Jamie She's my new enemy. Yes, yes,

1:24:28.400 --> 1:24:31.320
<v Speaker 3>I saw that and like IMDb and I read it

1:24:31.400 --> 1:24:33.800
<v Speaker 3>really quickly, and I thought it said Diane Lane. I

1:24:33.880 --> 1:24:36.760
<v Speaker 3>was like, oh, wow, is Diane Lane a screenwriter? But

1:24:36.800 --> 1:24:38.680
<v Speaker 3>then it's a slightly different is it?

1:24:39.200 --> 1:24:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Fred Callos super fan, No I wish instead it's my

1:24:43.040 --> 1:24:46.280
<v Speaker 4>sworn enemy who gave you a C because I was

1:24:46.360 --> 1:24:48.240
<v Speaker 4>late to class too many times.

1:24:49.560 --> 1:24:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Grow up?

1:24:50.560 --> 1:24:54.720
<v Speaker 3>You know what? Lateness is just a construct invented by

1:24:54.800 --> 1:24:56.480
<v Speaker 3>capitalism exactly.

1:24:56.560 --> 1:25:00.759
<v Speaker 4>Lateness is on timeness leaving the body. And I don't

1:25:01.320 --> 1:25:05.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't care for this. There was one writer, one

1:25:05.080 --> 1:25:07.960
<v Speaker 4>credited writer because also it is said that Edward Norton

1:25:08.040 --> 1:25:10.240
<v Speaker 4>worked on the screenplay but was not credited as a

1:25:10.240 --> 1:25:15.880
<v Speaker 4>writer for like WGA reasons. But there was one writer

1:25:16.080 --> 1:25:20.200
<v Speaker 4>of Mexican descent who worked on the screenplay, Gregory Nava,

1:25:20.720 --> 1:25:25.439
<v Speaker 4>who had worked on a number of movies prior. He

1:25:25.520 --> 1:25:34.080
<v Speaker 4>also directed Selena, the Jlo Celena movie. Oh yes, anyways,

1:25:34.120 --> 1:25:36.400
<v Speaker 4>from what we can tell. And also it's always so

1:25:36.800 --> 1:25:42.519
<v Speaker 4>inscrutable because the ways that movie writing credits happen, who knows.

1:25:42.840 --> 1:25:45.160
<v Speaker 4>But yes, it seems like there was only one Mexican

1:25:45.200 --> 1:25:48.360
<v Speaker 4>writer involved in the writing of this movie, although there

1:25:48.479 --> 1:25:53.880
<v Speaker 4>was one famous communist writer involved, which maybe is attributable

1:25:53.960 --> 1:25:57.639
<v Speaker 4>to how political this movie did get. In the script

1:25:58.200 --> 1:26:00.840
<v Speaker 4>where clans I recog it is his name, and I

1:26:00.880 --> 1:26:05.120
<v Speaker 4>was like why because I went into a big blacklist

1:26:05.760 --> 1:26:09.920
<v Speaker 4>research hole and I wonder why. But Anyways, he was

1:26:09.960 --> 1:26:13.160
<v Speaker 4>a screenwriter who was called in and subpoenaed by the

1:26:13.200 --> 1:26:17.280
<v Speaker 4>House Committee of on American Activity. Is he was a

1:26:17.320 --> 1:26:21.920
<v Speaker 4>card carrier communist and it seems like just generally a

1:26:21.960 --> 1:26:23.320
<v Speaker 4>real one from what I can tell.

1:26:24.200 --> 1:26:28.080
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, and then Diane Link Boom, and then.

1:26:27.960 --> 1:26:30.519
<v Speaker 4>She's she worked on it as well, and it's her

1:26:30.560 --> 1:26:33.920
<v Speaker 4>only screenwriting credit, her other credit disrespecting me.

1:26:35.720 --> 1:26:37.000
<v Speaker 3>I call that a discredit.

1:26:37.439 --> 1:26:37.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:26:38.000 --> 1:26:43.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. What I was telling Kaitling during the break is

1:26:43.439 --> 1:26:50.840
<v Speaker 5>that the DP the cinematographer uses who is Yeah, he's

1:26:50.880 --> 1:26:55.120
<v Speaker 5>an amazing and amazing cinematographer who is Mexican. So and

1:26:55.160 --> 1:26:58.000
<v Speaker 5>I also when I saw the credits, I really saw

1:26:58.080 --> 1:27:03.360
<v Speaker 5>a bad lance between male and female crew, which I enjoyed.

1:27:03.840 --> 1:27:07.559
<v Speaker 5>I don't know their backgrounds, but I don't see that

1:27:07.680 --> 1:27:09.680
<v Speaker 5>very often, so I was happy about it.

1:27:09.760 --> 1:27:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure.

1:27:11.280 --> 1:27:14.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, especially at the top. It is largely

1:27:14.479 --> 1:27:18.800
<v Speaker 3>a woman driven movie as far as the director, half

1:27:18.840 --> 1:27:22.479
<v Speaker 3>of the writers, Selma Hayek producing, and.

1:27:22.400 --> 1:27:25.920
<v Speaker 4>I do feel like when women are producing their own projects,

1:27:26.000 --> 1:27:29.240
<v Speaker 4>you tend to see more gender parody in the cruise,

1:27:30.040 --> 1:27:32.640
<v Speaker 4>which is just another way of saying you have to

1:27:32.640 --> 1:27:34.120
<v Speaker 4>have representation at every level.

1:27:34.160 --> 1:27:35.439
<v Speaker 2>Of production of course.

1:27:35.760 --> 1:27:39.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we were talking about Rodriguo Prieto, I think quite

1:27:39.720 --> 1:27:41.920
<v Speaker 4>a bit earlier this year, because he just had like

1:27:42.040 --> 1:27:47.040
<v Speaker 4>the wildest last year where he was the cinematographer for

1:27:47.080 --> 1:27:49.720
<v Speaker 4>both Barbie and Killers of the Flower Moon, which is

1:27:49.880 --> 1:27:53.760
<v Speaker 4>just like the range, the range this man has. I mean,

1:27:53.800 --> 1:27:58.040
<v Speaker 4>his resume is wild. The same year he did Frida,

1:27:58.120 --> 1:28:02.800
<v Speaker 4>he also did eight Mile. He's got range with I mean,

1:28:03.640 --> 1:28:06.160
<v Speaker 4>he loves to do a totally different movie.

1:28:06.680 --> 1:28:11.519
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. He also, like I told Caitlin, I'm a swiftly

1:28:11.680 --> 1:28:14.160
<v Speaker 5>so I love him because she he directed all of

1:28:14.160 --> 1:28:17.840
<v Speaker 5>my favorite videos recently. Really yeah, I didn't he was

1:28:17.880 --> 1:28:18.559
<v Speaker 5>sweet Taylor.

1:28:18.760 --> 1:28:22.559
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, wow, oh my god, wait, so many twists in turns.

1:28:23.920 --> 1:28:26.439
<v Speaker 4>I knew that, like because he's like Martin Scorsese and

1:28:26.520 --> 1:28:29.760
<v Speaker 4>Julie Taymore and I think Inatu's go to guy.

1:28:29.880 --> 1:28:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Like oh right, we were talking about it because he

1:28:34.080 --> 1:28:39.360
<v Speaker 3>shot Wolf of wall Street in Robbie's first major role,

1:28:39.680 --> 1:28:44.200
<v Speaker 3>and then shot her whatever ten years later as Barbie.

1:28:43.800 --> 1:28:46.000
<v Speaker 2>As a sorry for shooting you that way and wolf

1:28:46.040 --> 1:28:48.040
<v Speaker 2>of yeah gesture.

1:28:48.960 --> 1:28:52.960
<v Speaker 4>Now he literally directed the Cardigan there, wow.

1:28:52.920 --> 1:28:58.360
<v Speaker 5>Cardian Fortnight. Yeah. She also works with another Cinemata refer

1:28:58.439 --> 1:29:01.519
<v Speaker 5>who's a woman. Yeah, I think he's her Nay, but

1:29:01.800 --> 1:29:06.280
<v Speaker 5>she also works with Rodrio Prito, so I am very proud.

1:29:06.040 --> 1:29:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Of them every time.

1:29:08.479 --> 1:29:10.839
<v Speaker 4>Wow, this is a fun recur He's a fun recurring

1:29:10.840 --> 1:29:13.479
<v Speaker 4>Bachtel cast character because every time I learned something new

1:29:13.479 --> 1:29:16.160
<v Speaker 4>about him, it is completely unexpected and fascinating.

1:29:17.080 --> 1:29:18.720
<v Speaker 3>And he did a great job with this movie. It

1:29:18.840 --> 1:29:19.840
<v Speaker 3>looks so cool.

1:29:19.920 --> 1:29:20.960
<v Speaker 2>It's beautiful.

1:29:21.200 --> 1:29:24.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, it's so pretty, the colors.

1:29:23.840 --> 1:29:25.960
<v Speaker 4>And I just love the idea of him going back

1:29:25.960 --> 1:29:28.200
<v Speaker 4>to his hotel room at the end of the day

1:29:28.280 --> 1:29:31.439
<v Speaker 4>of shooting on Frida and answering an email about eight

1:29:31.479 --> 1:29:36.519
<v Speaker 4>miles like, yeah, yeah, he opened up his hotmail dot

1:29:36.560 --> 1:29:41.559
<v Speaker 4>com two thousand and two web book or palm pilot

1:29:41.640 --> 1:29:45.120
<v Speaker 4>or whatever the fuck you were using then, So, does.

1:29:44.920 --> 1:29:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Anyone have anything else to discuss?

1:29:49.560 --> 1:29:54.000
<v Speaker 5>Oh, I have my notes with Osama we say in Spanish,

1:29:54.040 --> 1:29:56.839
<v Speaker 5>and I take notes of everything when I get excited.

1:29:57.160 --> 1:29:59.200
<v Speaker 3>But oh, I have pages of notes.

1:29:59.280 --> 1:30:00.000
<v Speaker 2>You're in good comfort.

1:30:00.479 --> 1:30:05.599
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah. Just what I think is very nice about

1:30:05.800 --> 1:30:09.120
<v Speaker 5>the movie is also they don't portray the art as

1:30:09.200 --> 1:30:13.120
<v Speaker 5>much as we wanted them to do. No, as Jamie

1:30:13.120 --> 1:30:16.800
<v Speaker 5>think was mentioning earlier on but what I like is

1:30:16.840 --> 1:30:21.479
<v Speaker 5>that they really create these life paintings and free the

1:30:22.080 --> 1:30:25.040
<v Speaker 5>an aesthetic at the end of her life that came

1:30:25.080 --> 1:30:30.000
<v Speaker 5>from what we call in Mexico exbotos. Exbotos are little

1:30:30.040 --> 1:30:34.080
<v Speaker 5>paintings made in rural Mexico, in outside of Mexico City.

1:30:34.960 --> 1:30:38.840
<v Speaker 5>People are very Catholic, especially in those places, and when

1:30:38.880 --> 1:30:42.880
<v Speaker 5>something happens to them, they pray for it to get better. Know,

1:30:43.040 --> 1:30:44.880
<v Speaker 5>something bad happens, they pray for it to get better.

1:30:45.200 --> 1:30:47.160
<v Speaker 5>So what they do is that they go to the

1:30:47.200 --> 1:30:52.519
<v Speaker 5>town's painter, and the painter ask them what the event was,

1:30:53.760 --> 1:30:57.880
<v Speaker 5>who are they praying to, what saint and who is

1:30:57.920 --> 1:31:00.839
<v Speaker 5>this being dedicated to? Know, So it has a format

1:31:01.240 --> 1:31:05.360
<v Speaker 5>and it's text an image of the event. And then

1:31:05.479 --> 1:31:08.040
<v Speaker 5>what they do with those little paintings is that they

1:31:08.160 --> 1:31:11.040
<v Speaker 5>hang them at the church. And after they leave the church,

1:31:11.080 --> 1:31:14.160
<v Speaker 5>and after they have asked for help from this saint,

1:31:14.520 --> 1:31:17.519
<v Speaker 5>they have to move on and carry on with their lives. Know.

1:31:18.200 --> 1:31:22.400
<v Speaker 5>And Frida, I think, and this was said by Marta Samora,

1:31:22.640 --> 1:31:26.000
<v Speaker 5>who was a biographer of Frida, how Frida took this

1:31:26.120 --> 1:31:29.120
<v Speaker 5>idea of expotos and put it in her painting. And

1:31:29.160 --> 1:31:31.719
<v Speaker 5>I think that's very nice because it's something very niche

1:31:32.080 --> 1:31:35.120
<v Speaker 5>of Mexico and that most people from other countries don't know.

1:31:35.520 --> 1:31:37.479
<v Speaker 5>But if they look at afrida color of painting and

1:31:37.520 --> 1:31:39.960
<v Speaker 5>they look at an expoto, they will see the similarities.

1:31:40.000 --> 1:31:44.080
<v Speaker 5>And Frida did this to survive. Basically, she wanted to

1:31:44.120 --> 1:31:49.360
<v Speaker 5>create these paintings that looked like exbotos and she carried

1:31:49.360 --> 1:31:52.639
<v Speaker 5>out that in her life. She painted with all her

1:31:52.720 --> 1:31:56.320
<v Speaker 5>pain and her suffering in the canvas and this personal

1:31:56.400 --> 1:31:59.920
<v Speaker 5>and political intersection that she was so good at the

1:32:00.479 --> 1:32:02.200
<v Speaker 5>and she was the only one at the time that

1:32:02.240 --> 1:32:06.719
<v Speaker 5>did it as well as that, and then she carried

1:32:06.760 --> 1:32:07.599
<v Speaker 5>on with her life.

1:32:07.840 --> 1:32:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:32:08.320 --> 1:32:11.679
<v Speaker 5>So it's amazing because we see her in the movie

1:32:11.720 --> 1:32:15.040
<v Speaker 5>having fun. I mean, of course this in the civilization

1:32:15.080 --> 1:32:19.040
<v Speaker 5>of the disability is not good, but she has fun.

1:32:19.680 --> 1:32:22.400
<v Speaker 5>We also see her in other aspects now, her alcoholism,

1:32:22.520 --> 1:32:26.639
<v Speaker 5>her addiction to paint bills. But Frida tried to carry

1:32:26.680 --> 1:32:31.080
<v Speaker 5>on despite all of the things that went on. And

1:32:31.160 --> 1:32:33.400
<v Speaker 5>I don't think it has to do with this saving

1:32:33.520 --> 1:32:37.519
<v Speaker 5>race or trying to get rid of the idea of

1:32:38.320 --> 1:32:40.680
<v Speaker 5>suffering and pain. But because she was a rebel at

1:32:40.680 --> 1:32:41.080
<v Speaker 5>the end of the.

1:32:41.160 --> 1:32:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Day, yeh, I do appreciate the movie contextualizing where some

1:32:48.400 --> 1:32:52.120
<v Speaker 3>of her inspiration comes from and her paintings like something

1:32:52.120 --> 1:32:55.000
<v Speaker 3>will happen and then you see it inspire one or

1:32:55.040 --> 1:32:58.439
<v Speaker 3>several of her works of art. My main thing is like,

1:32:59.160 --> 1:33:01.519
<v Speaker 3>I just feel like the relationship between her and Diego

1:33:01.600 --> 1:33:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Rivera takes up too much narrative real estate.

1:33:04.360 --> 1:33:07.519
<v Speaker 4>Which seems to be the through line with how most

1:33:07.680 --> 1:33:11.120
<v Speaker 4>of the adaptations of her life in fiction like She's

1:33:11.200 --> 1:33:15.560
<v Speaker 4>I feel like still too frequently presented as equally built.

1:33:15.280 --> 1:33:16.879
<v Speaker 2>With because I feel like this movie is called.

1:33:16.680 --> 1:33:19.400
<v Speaker 4>Frieda, but it could easily be called Frieda and Diego

1:33:19.600 --> 1:33:21.120
<v Speaker 4>and yeah, yeah.

1:33:20.800 --> 1:33:25.000
<v Speaker 5>Exactly right. And they wanted to be separated at the

1:33:25.080 --> 1:33:27.840
<v Speaker 5>end of their when in their second marriage they had

1:33:27.840 --> 1:33:30.680
<v Speaker 5>the house created by Juana Gorman in Sananjel that were

1:33:30.800 --> 1:33:36.760
<v Speaker 5>two houses again goals, yeah, goals, And she didn't even

1:33:36.800 --> 1:33:38.960
<v Speaker 5>live there for that long because her dad got sick

1:33:39.000 --> 1:33:42.400
<v Speaker 5>and she went to La Casasoul and they lived separate

1:33:42.520 --> 1:33:45.479
<v Speaker 5>lives at the end. So I don't think they wanted

1:33:45.520 --> 1:33:48.439
<v Speaker 5>to be seen as an item, and they were seen

1:33:48.479 --> 1:33:52.639
<v Speaker 5>as an item all throughout their relationship, so at least

1:33:52.640 --> 1:33:55.280
<v Speaker 5>Frida as an art historian, of course I'm biased, but

1:33:55.360 --> 1:33:58.000
<v Speaker 5>I would have liked to see her creative process a

1:33:58.000 --> 1:34:03.320
<v Speaker 5>bit more same. Yeah, how did she know which colors

1:34:03.320 --> 1:34:05.799
<v Speaker 5>to use? How did she decide the size of the painting?

1:34:05.920 --> 1:34:07.800
<v Speaker 5>How did she come up with a little girl with

1:34:07.880 --> 1:34:11.439
<v Speaker 5>the skull face, the watermelons, not all of those things?

1:34:11.520 --> 1:34:15.200
<v Speaker 5>How did she decide to do that? I would have

1:34:15.280 --> 1:34:18.559
<v Speaker 5>liked to see the creative process come to life instead

1:34:18.600 --> 1:34:22.720
<v Speaker 5>of just being the end result of the painting exactly.

1:34:23.080 --> 1:34:23.599
<v Speaker 2>I agree.

1:34:23.640 --> 1:34:27.080
<v Speaker 4>I feel like this is something I've noticed in biopics

1:34:27.160 --> 1:34:31.320
<v Speaker 4>about women again, specifically where it's just like there's always

1:34:31.400 --> 1:34:36.719
<v Speaker 4>less focus on process when the story is about a woman.

1:34:36.880 --> 1:34:39.719
<v Speaker 4>I think because I think about like biopics of the

1:34:39.800 --> 1:34:43.479
<v Speaker 4>last couple of years, Oppenheimer immediately comes to mind, where

1:34:44.080 --> 1:34:47.679
<v Speaker 4>there are very sort of like magical, you know, sort

1:34:47.760 --> 1:34:51.719
<v Speaker 4>of the sequences about and then he's scienced or whatever,

1:34:52.600 --> 1:34:55.720
<v Speaker 4>but there is also sequences where you're explained like this

1:34:55.800 --> 1:34:58.479
<v Speaker 4>is the process, this is how he gets there.

1:34:58.520 --> 1:35:00.160
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like even with movies about.

1:35:00.080 --> 1:35:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Male artist, there is just inherently more of a focus

1:35:03.160 --> 1:35:06.599
<v Speaker 4>on process. And I'm not upset that there's a focus

1:35:06.640 --> 1:35:08.640
<v Speaker 4>on process, but that should be something that is like

1:35:09.000 --> 1:35:13.080
<v Speaker 4>across the board available to any exceptional person exactly, like

1:35:13.120 --> 1:35:14.919
<v Speaker 4>why would you not want to know how the sausage

1:35:14.960 --> 1:35:15.200
<v Speaker 4>is made?

1:35:15.280 --> 1:35:18.000
<v Speaker 5>And it's not very obvious if you don't know, for example,

1:35:18.000 --> 1:35:21.120
<v Speaker 5>that Frida had this obsession with mirrors or with death,

1:35:21.960 --> 1:35:24.640
<v Speaker 5>it's not very obvious. I mean it's in the film

1:35:24.840 --> 1:35:27.680
<v Speaker 5>language now that at the beginning she starts looking at

1:35:27.680 --> 1:35:30.480
<v Speaker 5>herself in the mirror and that's how the movie begins.

1:35:31.000 --> 1:35:33.960
<v Speaker 5>But she truly had an obsession with looking at herself

1:35:34.000 --> 1:35:36.679
<v Speaker 5>and with time passing because she spends so much time

1:35:36.720 --> 1:35:40.720
<v Speaker 5>in bed with death. She wanted to die at the

1:35:40.800 --> 1:35:43.360
<v Speaker 5>end of her life so bad, and when she did,

1:35:43.439 --> 1:35:47.040
<v Speaker 5>she was very happy. Her last drawing said that, No,

1:35:47.680 --> 1:35:51.880
<v Speaker 5>so everything that I think I would have liked to see,

1:35:52.479 --> 1:35:55.960
<v Speaker 5>how do you become Frida Calo as an artist? Because

1:35:56.160 --> 1:35:59.759
<v Speaker 5>as a person, I think it's clear some things missing,

1:36:00.080 --> 1:36:03.760
<v Speaker 5>like with this ghost. But as an artist, how did

1:36:03.800 --> 1:36:08.839
<v Speaker 5>she find that particular esthetic that is so divisive because

1:36:09.280 --> 1:36:12.240
<v Speaker 5>people either love her or hate her, but it causes

1:36:12.720 --> 1:36:15.519
<v Speaker 5>an impact, And how did she find that? I would

1:36:15.560 --> 1:36:17.280
<v Speaker 5>have loved to see that in the movie.

1:36:17.680 --> 1:36:22.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, I agree. I also in the like mainstream feminist.

1:36:22.800 --> 1:36:26.679
<v Speaker 2>Capitalistic way. I literally it was really annoying.

1:36:26.720 --> 1:36:29.880
<v Speaker 4>I saw like a modern defection of free to call it,

1:36:29.920 --> 1:36:33.080
<v Speaker 4>where it's like free to caller, queen of the selfie.

1:36:32.600 --> 1:36:36.680
<v Speaker 2>And you're like, no, we're like it's.

1:36:36.120 --> 1:36:40.160
<v Speaker 4>Like patronizing, right, Like we're I don't know. All of

1:36:40.160 --> 1:36:43.120
<v Speaker 4>her work is like you have to be having three

1:36:43.280 --> 1:36:46.120
<v Speaker 4>or four conversations that wants to really talk about it

1:36:46.479 --> 1:36:49.200
<v Speaker 4>and seeing people sort of cherry pick the part of

1:36:49.240 --> 1:36:52.200
<v Speaker 4>her work that they resonate with and then ignoring the

1:36:52.200 --> 1:36:56.519
<v Speaker 4>political aspect, ignoring the identity aspect, because so much of

1:36:56.600 --> 1:37:00.479
<v Speaker 4>Freda's work was connected to her connections to my Mexico

1:37:00.640 --> 1:37:05.160
<v Speaker 4>and like understanding what her identity was across time, and

1:37:05.360 --> 1:37:06.960
<v Speaker 4>like it's just irritating.

1:37:07.160 --> 1:37:10.760
<v Speaker 5>Only Frida could have done that, like putting such universal

1:37:10.800 --> 1:37:15.200
<v Speaker 5>feelings like pain, the fear of abandonment, the fear of

1:37:15.280 --> 1:37:18.880
<v Speaker 5>a miscarriage, all of those things she had depicted, but

1:37:19.520 --> 1:37:22.760
<v Speaker 5>intersecting it with politics. She was a genius for that.

1:37:23.160 --> 1:37:25.160
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it's awesome, and I mean the fact that so

1:37:25.200 --> 1:37:28.759
<v Speaker 4>many people can miss it maybe is just like speaks

1:37:28.800 --> 1:37:31.200
<v Speaker 4>to how complicated the work is. But it's also like,

1:37:31.439 --> 1:37:33.040
<v Speaker 4>just read a little bit.

1:37:34.120 --> 1:37:36.200
<v Speaker 3>I want to share a quote from her. I think

1:37:36.240 --> 1:37:39.800
<v Speaker 3>this is something she said later in her life, but

1:37:40.040 --> 1:37:42.160
<v Speaker 3>just kind of tying it back to the things that

1:37:42.240 --> 1:37:49.280
<v Speaker 3>inspired her art, and the movie skimming over her political ideology,

1:37:49.320 --> 1:37:52.680
<v Speaker 3>not ignoring it or erasing it, but like again, focusing

1:37:52.960 --> 1:37:59.120
<v Speaker 3>way more on Diego Rivera's politics than Frida's. But she said, quote,

1:37:59.800 --> 1:38:03.400
<v Speaker 3>I have a great restlessness about my paintings, mainly because

1:38:03.479 --> 1:38:07.360
<v Speaker 3>I want to make it useful to the revolutionary communist movement.

1:38:07.760 --> 1:38:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Until now I have managed simply an honest expression of

1:38:10.960 --> 1:38:14.200
<v Speaker 3>my own self. I must struggle with all my strength

1:38:14.280 --> 1:38:17.640
<v Speaker 3>to ensure that the little positive my health allows me

1:38:17.760 --> 1:38:22.400
<v Speaker 3>to do also benefits the revolution, the only real reason

1:38:22.479 --> 1:38:26.559
<v Speaker 3>to live unquote obviously translated from Spanish. So she was like,

1:38:27.120 --> 1:38:33.000
<v Speaker 3>my work means nothing unless I'm moving the communist movement forward,

1:38:33.200 --> 1:38:36.640
<v Speaker 3>is how she felt. I think later in life, and

1:38:36.720 --> 1:38:39.640
<v Speaker 3>maybe also earlier, but yeah, yeah, I feel like I'm like,

1:38:39.680 --> 1:38:41.400
<v Speaker 3>can we get a little more sense of that in

1:38:41.439 --> 1:38:42.400
<v Speaker 3>the movie, please.

1:38:43.560 --> 1:38:45.400
<v Speaker 4>I think the last thing I had that I just

1:38:45.439 --> 1:38:48.479
<v Speaker 4>wanted to say, like I was glad was reflected in

1:38:48.520 --> 1:38:54.080
<v Speaker 4>the movie was that even though the movie, as we've

1:38:54.280 --> 1:38:57.720
<v Speaker 4>all said, is sort of unduly focused on Diego as well,

1:38:58.120 --> 1:39:01.639
<v Speaker 4>I did like that we see that friendship between Frida

1:39:01.680 --> 1:39:06.000
<v Speaker 4>and Lupe develop and that you get real moments, because

1:39:06.000 --> 1:39:08.200
<v Speaker 4>I feel like, again I was like a little bit

1:39:08.320 --> 1:39:11.840
<v Speaker 4>like oh no, Weinstein production when Lupe makes the scene

1:39:11.840 --> 1:39:14.280
<v Speaker 4>at their wedding and You're just like, okay, is she

1:39:14.439 --> 1:39:17.200
<v Speaker 4>just gonna be presented as irrational?

1:39:17.520 --> 1:39:19.040
<v Speaker 2>And but I thought that the.

1:39:18.960 --> 1:39:22.240
<v Speaker 4>Way that played out for you know, big Hollywood movie

1:39:22.360 --> 1:39:25.400
<v Speaker 4>was more nuanced and thoughtful than I thought it would be,

1:39:25.479 --> 1:39:28.360
<v Speaker 4>and seems to be at least the friendship is like

1:39:28.439 --> 1:39:33.920
<v Speaker 4>reflective of their actual experience. And then a relationship I

1:39:33.960 --> 1:39:38.000
<v Speaker 4>wish I had seen more of was between Frieda and Christina,

1:39:38.160 --> 1:39:40.880
<v Speaker 4>because it seems like her relationship with Christina was very

1:39:41.360 --> 1:39:45.479
<v Speaker 4>dominant in her life, and it is true that Diego

1:39:45.520 --> 1:39:48.360
<v Speaker 4>had an affair with her sister. But again, I feel

1:39:48.360 --> 1:39:50.759
<v Speaker 4>like the movie defers to how does Freeda feel about

1:39:50.760 --> 1:39:55.120
<v Speaker 4>that in relation to Diego and doesn't really like it

1:39:55.120 --> 1:39:58.040
<v Speaker 4>seems like most of the progress in the relationship with

1:39:58.080 --> 1:40:01.840
<v Speaker 4>her and her sister takes place offic screen, which I

1:40:01.840 --> 1:40:03.840
<v Speaker 4>don't know, I'm nipicking at this point, but it would

1:40:03.880 --> 1:40:07.000
<v Speaker 4>have been nice to see the relationships that we know

1:40:07.120 --> 1:40:10.960
<v Speaker 4>were very significant to free to, you know, proportionally reflected

1:40:11.040 --> 1:40:13.599
<v Speaker 4>in the movie instead of just going back to Diego

1:40:13.640 --> 1:40:14.080
<v Speaker 4>all the time.

1:40:14.240 --> 1:40:18.040
<v Speaker 5>Heard that too, Yes, because she learned how to position

1:40:18.160 --> 1:40:21.840
<v Speaker 5>people in a painting from her dad being a photographer,

1:40:21.880 --> 1:40:24.800
<v Speaker 5>and her dad was a very successful photographer during the Porfiliato,

1:40:24.800 --> 1:40:28.320
<v Speaker 5>which was a dictatorship regime we had before the Mexican

1:40:28.360 --> 1:40:32.919
<v Speaker 5>Revolution and after her dad had a lot of problems

1:40:32.960 --> 1:40:36.679
<v Speaker 5>because of the revolution, and the Mexican Revolution was based

1:40:36.720 --> 1:40:39.639
<v Speaker 5>on the freedom at least one part, on the freedom

1:40:39.680 --> 1:40:43.400
<v Speaker 5>of indigenous people and their land being returned to them,

1:40:43.520 --> 1:40:46.000
<v Speaker 5>and well that was happening. The gorilla was in Paris

1:40:46.080 --> 1:40:51.600
<v Speaker 5>learning how to paint. So it's so, it's how I

1:40:51.600 --> 1:40:56.000
<v Speaker 5>would have also liked to see the context because Mexico

1:40:56.040 --> 1:41:01.200
<v Speaker 5>at that time was chaotics, like very chaotic. We had

1:41:01.280 --> 1:41:04.120
<v Speaker 5>just gone through a civil war, and I would have

1:41:04.200 --> 1:41:07.719
<v Speaker 5>liked to see how that context affected freedom. Her family,

1:41:08.479 --> 1:41:14.200
<v Speaker 5>being a bourgeois, very high class European who profited from

1:41:14.200 --> 1:41:18.040
<v Speaker 5>the regime before the revolution, what that did to her life,

1:41:18.479 --> 1:41:21.920
<v Speaker 5>and why that radicalizes her into communism too, So I

1:41:21.960 --> 1:41:23.080
<v Speaker 5>would have liked to see that.

1:41:23.280 --> 1:41:26.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, she you know, would frequently kind of fudge the

1:41:26.880 --> 1:41:29.080
<v Speaker 4>year she was born to line up with the year

1:41:29.120 --> 1:41:32.559
<v Speaker 4>that the revolution started nineteen ten. Yeah, like connect her

1:41:33.120 --> 1:41:37.600
<v Speaker 4>identity to like I am a born revolutionary.

1:41:37.400 --> 1:41:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that she would kind of erase her background

1:41:41.000 --> 1:41:44.600
<v Speaker 3>coming from a like well to do family.

1:41:44.600 --> 1:41:47.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, which Diego Rivera was also from a pretty yeah

1:41:47.880 --> 1:41:48.960
<v Speaker 4>wealthy family as well.

1:41:49.360 --> 1:41:51.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's why he could study art no and not.

1:41:52.720 --> 1:41:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Right fuck after France for a couple of years.

1:41:55.080 --> 1:41:57.679
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and didn't become a soldier is one of the

1:41:57.680 --> 1:41:58.839
<v Speaker 5>factions of the revolution.

1:41:58.960 --> 1:42:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeahm hmmm. All this to say, I feel like Frida's

1:42:04.160 --> 1:42:08.920
<v Speaker 3>life deserves a whole series rather than just a two

1:42:08.960 --> 1:42:12.800
<v Speaker 3>hour film. So if we ever see any more like

1:42:12.880 --> 1:42:17.519
<v Speaker 3>kind of biographical stories about her on the screen, it

1:42:17.560 --> 1:42:21.320
<v Speaker 3>should be a long TV series because there's just so

1:42:21.439 --> 1:42:27.240
<v Speaker 3>much well speaking to her relationships with the women in

1:42:27.280 --> 1:42:30.680
<v Speaker 3>her life that the movie kind of touches on but

1:42:30.920 --> 1:42:37.599
<v Speaker 3>could have examined more the Bechdel test. The movie does pass,

1:42:37.880 --> 1:42:38.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean.

1:42:38.520 --> 1:42:40.720
<v Speaker 4>Not as much as you would like it too for

1:42:40.800 --> 1:42:43.920
<v Speaker 4>a biopic about women that had a lot of women

1:42:44.080 --> 1:42:46.439
<v Speaker 4>who were important in her life.

1:42:46.479 --> 1:42:48.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but it does.

1:42:48.760 --> 1:42:52.439
<v Speaker 3>But then she does talk to Alfred Molina a lot

1:42:52.479 --> 1:42:55.200
<v Speaker 3>and to the Bye Laws of the Bechdel cast.

1:42:55.400 --> 1:42:56.519
<v Speaker 2>I forgot my own role.

1:42:56.720 --> 1:43:01.479
<v Speaker 3>You know, people of marginalized genders. Speaking to Alred Molina

1:43:01.640 --> 1:43:03.960
<v Speaker 3>about Alfred Bina is an automatic.

1:43:04.320 --> 1:43:05.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:43:05.560 --> 1:43:08.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so in that way, it's actually kind of unprecedented.

1:43:08.960 --> 1:43:13.080
<v Speaker 5>You have converted me to Alfred Morina fans.

1:43:13.439 --> 1:43:17.160
<v Speaker 4>Yes, well, you you've joined an elite group because Alfred

1:43:17.160 --> 1:43:18.760
<v Speaker 4>Molina is a past guest.

1:43:18.560 --> 1:43:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Of this show. Yeah. Oh my. We still don't know

1:43:22.320 --> 1:43:23.320
<v Speaker 2>how we pulled it off.

1:43:23.360 --> 1:43:26.440
<v Speaker 3>We don't have to know, but we talked about Aaron Brockovich.

1:43:26.800 --> 1:43:28.400
<v Speaker 5>Oh I love that movie.

1:43:28.760 --> 1:43:37.680
<v Speaker 4>He's wow, that's amazing. You're amazing, King, He's amazing. I

1:43:37.720 --> 1:43:42.760
<v Speaker 4>love to praise this man on our phone show. But yes,

1:43:42.800 --> 1:43:44.920
<v Speaker 4>it does pass the actual test, but I do feel

1:43:44.960 --> 1:43:46.439
<v Speaker 4>like I wish.

1:43:46.240 --> 1:43:49.320
<v Speaker 2>It did more more. Yeah.

1:43:49.520 --> 1:43:54.040
<v Speaker 3>As far as our metric, the Nipple scale scale, where

1:43:54.080 --> 1:43:57.800
<v Speaker 3>we rate the movie zero to five nipples based on

1:43:58.000 --> 1:44:02.400
<v Speaker 3>examining it through an intersectional Felm and this lens, I'm

1:44:02.600 --> 1:44:05.960
<v Speaker 3>inclined to give it maybe like a three point five.

1:44:07.280 --> 1:44:10.759
<v Speaker 3>I do wish that, you know, for a movie called

1:44:11.120 --> 1:44:16.280
<v Speaker 3>freeda that is allegedly about her life, and the main

1:44:16.320 --> 1:44:18.640
<v Speaker 3>thing we know about her life is that she was

1:44:18.680 --> 1:44:21.880
<v Speaker 3>an artist, like you know, as a public figure. If

1:44:21.920 --> 1:44:24.599
<v Speaker 3>someone's like, who's Free to Callo, You're like, oh, an

1:44:24.680 --> 1:44:28.040
<v Speaker 3>artist And for us to not see as much as

1:44:28.080 --> 1:44:31.360
<v Speaker 3>you would think we would about her artistic process, more

1:44:31.360 --> 1:44:34.920
<v Speaker 3>about her inspirations, so much narrative real estate going to

1:44:35.000 --> 1:44:37.960
<v Speaker 3>her relationship with Diego Rivera, And yes, that was an

1:44:38.000 --> 1:44:41.120
<v Speaker 3>important relationship in her life. But I feel like we

1:44:41.240 --> 1:44:44.720
<v Speaker 3>end up learning more about Diego Rivera than we do

1:44:44.840 --> 1:44:49.879
<v Speaker 3>about Free to Callo and her backstory and her political

1:44:49.920 --> 1:44:54.240
<v Speaker 3>ideologies and her identity and all this stuff. So wish

1:44:54.520 --> 1:44:57.679
<v Speaker 3>the movie had focused a bit more on Freeda.

1:44:58.680 --> 1:45:00.599
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't feel like too much to ask.

1:45:01.080 --> 1:45:04.519
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't, but I do. I do appreciate that. Again,

1:45:04.600 --> 1:45:08.280
<v Speaker 3>for a movie from two thousand and two, which was, like,

1:45:08.280 --> 1:45:11.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, a Hollywood produced movie, I assumed that so

1:45:11.840 --> 1:45:18.720
<v Speaker 3>much of her, especially her queerness and her communist ideology,

1:45:19.160 --> 1:45:23.080
<v Speaker 3>would have been erased or really really downplayed, maybe only

1:45:23.120 --> 1:45:26.280
<v Speaker 3>mentioned in passing but never shown on screen. But like,

1:45:26.560 --> 1:45:31.360
<v Speaker 3>you have three different romantic or sexual moments between her

1:45:31.560 --> 1:45:34.799
<v Speaker 3>and another woman in the movie. One of them carries

1:45:34.840 --> 1:45:37.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot of baggage because it was basically forced to

1:45:37.920 --> 1:45:41.360
<v Speaker 3>exist by Harvey Weinstein, but the benefit of it is

1:45:41.400 --> 1:45:46.040
<v Speaker 3>that you do see this like steamy, perhaps exploitative, but

1:45:47.000 --> 1:45:47.439
<v Speaker 3>I know it.

1:45:47.439 --> 1:45:50.519
<v Speaker 4>It's like knowing that Salma Hayek felt ill the day

1:45:50.560 --> 1:45:51.240
<v Speaker 4>that has happened.

1:45:51.560 --> 1:45:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I just it.

1:45:52.760 --> 1:45:57.280
<v Speaker 4>I Ugh, Yeah, Harvey Weinstein can't suffer enough.

1:45:57.120 --> 1:45:58.200
<v Speaker 2>As far as I'm concerned.

1:45:58.280 --> 1:46:01.519
<v Speaker 3>No rot in hell, but the fact that there is,

1:46:01.640 --> 1:46:03.800
<v Speaker 3>because in two thousand and two it was very hard

1:46:03.880 --> 1:46:07.639
<v Speaker 3>to find even if there were queer characters, we wouldn't

1:46:07.720 --> 1:46:12.920
<v Speaker 3>see any type of like kissing between two women or

1:46:13.000 --> 1:46:16.240
<v Speaker 3>kissing betraying men or anything like that. It is a

1:46:16.320 --> 1:46:17.479
<v Speaker 3>relief to see that.

1:46:17.640 --> 1:46:17.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean.

1:46:17.960 --> 1:46:20.920
<v Speaker 4>And also with Josephine Baker, which I didn't know. I

1:46:21.000 --> 1:46:23.120
<v Speaker 4>was like, she also had an affair with Georgia O'Keefe,

1:46:23.120 --> 1:46:24.519
<v Speaker 4>but I guess that they were like, we've hit the

1:46:24.600 --> 1:46:27.840
<v Speaker 4>upper limit of affairs we can show in this movie.

1:46:27.920 --> 1:46:30.719
<v Speaker 4>But I was like, if they gave Trotsky a steamy

1:46:30.840 --> 1:46:33.360
<v Speaker 4>kiss and we don't see a queer love scene, I'm

1:46:33.400 --> 1:46:37.160
<v Speaker 4>gonna I'm gonna like explore not that, but like, just

1:46:37.840 --> 1:46:41.240
<v Speaker 4>it was very weird seeing Trotsky in a horny count Yeah.

1:46:41.400 --> 1:46:44.960
<v Speaker 5>I hated so hard, so weird.

1:46:45.160 --> 1:46:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Jeffrey Rush get away from her.

1:46:47.439 --> 1:46:52.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to see that ever, Horny Trotsky, No,

1:46:53.000 --> 1:46:54.639
<v Speaker 4>thank you whatever, good for them.

1:46:54.720 --> 1:46:56.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm happy for them, but I don't want to I

1:46:56.479 --> 1:46:57.400
<v Speaker 2>don't want to look at.

1:46:57.320 --> 1:47:01.080
<v Speaker 3>It nor anyway of the day. I mean, this is

1:47:01.080 --> 1:47:07.280
<v Speaker 3>a movie about a queer, disabled communist Latina artist, and

1:47:07.439 --> 1:47:11.040
<v Speaker 3>the movie is like, yes, that's all here. We're used

1:47:11.040 --> 1:47:13.639
<v Speaker 3>to crumbs and this movie gives you more than crumbs.

1:47:13.880 --> 1:47:17.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and the movie is not criticizing her for because

1:47:17.200 --> 1:47:21.080
<v Speaker 4>I feel like often when we see marginalized characters, it's like,

1:47:21.800 --> 1:47:24.519
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, it's just led to their downfall or

1:47:24.520 --> 1:47:27.639
<v Speaker 4>whatever exactly, or like the movie is encouraging you to

1:47:27.680 --> 1:47:28.639
<v Speaker 4>not be on their side.

1:47:29.040 --> 1:47:32.559
<v Speaker 5>And what led to her downfall we know by what

1:47:32.600 --> 1:47:35.360
<v Speaker 5>the movie says is in big part a man, which

1:47:35.439 --> 1:47:36.719
<v Speaker 5>I think is very accurate.

1:47:37.280 --> 1:47:41.439
<v Speaker 2>So true, that certainly seems that way.

1:47:41.640 --> 1:47:44.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and they also portrayed the alcoholism part, which I

1:47:44.640 --> 1:47:46.760
<v Speaker 5>think is very important. They don't say that a lot

1:47:46.800 --> 1:47:50.639
<v Speaker 5>about free them. She was an alcoholic, so it's important

1:47:50.680 --> 1:47:53.880
<v Speaker 5>to talk about it. So yeah, I think it portrays

1:47:54.400 --> 1:47:57.360
<v Speaker 5>the nuances of her life very well, but I think

1:47:57.400 --> 1:48:01.800
<v Speaker 5>it could do it more. Of course, what I am satisfied,

1:48:02.160 --> 1:48:05.840
<v Speaker 5>I think it's I watched it as a little girl,

1:48:05.880 --> 1:48:09.800
<v Speaker 5>I shouldn't have. I got scarred for life by seeing

1:48:09.800 --> 1:48:13.680
<v Speaker 5>Freda's sister betray her in that way. But now as

1:48:13.720 --> 1:48:17.960
<v Speaker 5>an adult, I think that this is a very good movie.

1:48:18.640 --> 1:48:22.719
<v Speaker 5>At least two understand how we can start to think

1:48:22.760 --> 1:48:26.400
<v Speaker 5>about biopics in a way that they actually portray the

1:48:26.479 --> 1:48:29.600
<v Speaker 5>character in an integral manner and not just pick and

1:48:29.680 --> 1:48:31.559
<v Speaker 5>choose whatever we want to make them.

1:48:32.960 --> 1:48:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree.

1:48:34.680 --> 1:48:37.320
<v Speaker 3>So you're going three and a half, kid, Yes, I'm

1:48:37.360 --> 1:48:43.360
<v Speaker 3>going three and a half. I will distribute them between Samahayek.

1:48:44.000 --> 1:48:47.920
<v Speaker 3>I want to give at least one nipple to the

1:48:48.680 --> 1:48:56.640
<v Speaker 3>wedding toast that actually judges character. Yes, I love that

1:48:56.720 --> 1:49:00.760
<v Speaker 3>so much. If anyone ever asks me to give a

1:49:00.800 --> 1:49:04.080
<v Speaker 3>toast at their wedding, I'm just going to cite that

1:49:04.240 --> 1:49:07.479
<v Speaker 3>exact speech noted because it's basically she's just like, I

1:49:07.520 --> 1:49:10.840
<v Speaker 3>don't believe in marriage. I think it's either delusional or

1:49:11.520 --> 1:49:15.559
<v Speaker 3>a way to trap women. But if people recognize that

1:49:15.600 --> 1:49:18.639
<v Speaker 3>and they decide to get married anyway, then good for you.

1:49:19.400 --> 1:49:22.839
<v Speaker 3>That's pretty cool, and that's how I feel about marriage.

1:49:22.920 --> 1:49:27.920
<v Speaker 3>So one nipple, two the representation of free to call

1:49:28.080 --> 1:49:32.200
<v Speaker 3>having underarm hair very good. That is something you don't

1:49:32.479 --> 1:49:34.880
<v Speaker 3>see in movies, where like there will be a movie

1:49:35.040 --> 1:49:38.880
<v Speaker 3>either at a time or a place where women would

1:49:38.880 --> 1:49:42.799
<v Speaker 3>not have removed their body hair, but because it's a movie,

1:49:42.880 --> 1:49:47.080
<v Speaker 3>it's like, yeah, all these characters in Cold Mountain don't

1:49:47.280 --> 1:49:49.960
<v Speaker 3>have any body hair, and it's just like what right?

1:49:50.720 --> 1:49:52.760
<v Speaker 4>Or when you see like I'm trying to think of

1:49:52.840 --> 1:49:53.280
<v Speaker 4>what there.

1:49:53.360 --> 1:49:56.080
<v Speaker 2>I saw a historical movie.

1:49:55.800 --> 1:50:01.160
<v Speaker 4>Recently with nudity and every woman had a wax, and

1:50:01.200 --> 1:50:02.640
<v Speaker 4>You're like, what is this?

1:50:03.000 --> 1:50:04.599
<v Speaker 2>Like what are we doing here?

1:50:05.120 --> 1:50:08.559
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it feels like such a tiny thing, but it

1:50:08.600 --> 1:50:12.040
<v Speaker 4>is wild how historically recently, just like any sort of

1:50:12.280 --> 1:50:14.880
<v Speaker 4>body hair was just sober boten. There was like that

1:50:15.360 --> 1:50:18.280
<v Speaker 4>red Carpet moment with Julia Roberts, like less than twenty

1:50:18.400 --> 1:50:20.720
<v Speaker 4>years ago where she had armpit hair and it was.

1:50:20.760 --> 1:50:24.439
<v Speaker 2>Like a global news story. You're like, grow up.

1:50:24.800 --> 1:50:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, anyways, and then whatever I have left, I'm not

1:50:27.840 --> 1:50:30.400
<v Speaker 3>really keeping track, but I would certainly want to give

1:50:30.439 --> 1:50:34.280
<v Speaker 3>some of my nippleage to free to call oh herself, Yeah,

1:50:34.600 --> 1:50:35.599
<v Speaker 3>feminist icon.

1:50:38.400 --> 1:50:40.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna do three and a half as well. I

1:50:40.320 --> 1:50:42.640
<v Speaker 4>think that because you could just as easily call this

1:50:42.680 --> 1:50:46.040
<v Speaker 4>movie Free to in Diego sort of takes away a

1:50:46.080 --> 1:50:48.000
<v Speaker 4>little bit of like the focus where you want the

1:50:48.320 --> 1:50:51.679
<v Speaker 4>movie to be, and I do agree that it seems

1:50:51.720 --> 1:50:53.920
<v Speaker 4>to be at least as far as biopics go, and

1:50:53.960 --> 1:50:57.920
<v Speaker 4>like how wildly inaccurate biopics tend to.

1:50:57.880 --> 1:51:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Be or gloss over entire areas.

1:51:00.640 --> 1:51:04.400
<v Speaker 6>Of the subject's identity because of what is considered acceptable

1:51:04.400 --> 1:51:06.519
<v Speaker 6>to a mainstream audience at the time of production. I

1:51:06.560 --> 1:51:09.680
<v Speaker 6>think this movie does so much more than I was

1:51:09.720 --> 1:51:14.599
<v Speaker 6>expecting and does seem to be like a solid sort

1:51:14.640 --> 1:51:18.519
<v Speaker 6>of one on one to what Frida's life was sort

1:51:18.520 --> 1:51:21.040
<v Speaker 6>of in the in the major beats, but there's no Yeah.

1:51:21.040 --> 1:51:24.080
<v Speaker 4>I wish that there was more focus on her artwork,

1:51:24.120 --> 1:51:28.200
<v Speaker 4>her process, and what motivated her art, versus this hyper

1:51:28.240 --> 1:51:31.680
<v Speaker 4>fixation on the relationship with Diego, because that can be

1:51:31.720 --> 1:51:34.800
<v Speaker 4>important in her life and not be the thrust of

1:51:34.960 --> 1:51:37.200
<v Speaker 4>her life, which it seems like towards the end of

1:51:37.200 --> 1:51:40.639
<v Speaker 4>her life how she felt as well, also huge question

1:51:40.720 --> 1:51:43.160
<v Speaker 4>of like would she want her life story be commodified

1:51:43.200 --> 1:51:43.920
<v Speaker 4>into a movie?

1:51:44.840 --> 1:51:49.040
<v Speaker 5>Maybe not but by Hollywood no, definitely not.

1:51:49.320 --> 1:51:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, made by a sex criminal multi millionaire no.

1:51:55.560 --> 1:51:58.120
<v Speaker 4>Right, So it's also dogging, I mean, just the darkness

1:51:58.200 --> 1:52:02.360
<v Speaker 4>in this production. I hate how it's like such a

1:52:02.400 --> 1:52:07.120
<v Speaker 4>horrible example of how even making art that is, you know,

1:52:07.439 --> 1:52:11.920
<v Speaker 4>more subversive than you're used to seeing required on Selma

1:52:11.960 --> 1:52:16.160
<v Speaker 4>Hyak's part, the like cooperation with an absolute monster to

1:52:16.200 --> 1:52:19.680
<v Speaker 4>even make it possible, and subsequently erasing all of her

1:52:19.720 --> 1:52:22.400
<v Speaker 4>amazing production work and all of this stuff, and having

1:52:22.479 --> 1:52:25.720
<v Speaker 4>the release and the awards campaign for this movie to

1:52:25.760 --> 1:52:30.679
<v Speaker 4>be completely sabotaged basically. But anyways, I like the movie

1:52:30.880 --> 1:52:34.280
<v Speaker 4>quite a bit, and so I'm going to give one

1:52:34.360 --> 1:52:38.960
<v Speaker 4>nipple to free to callow one nipple to Salma Hayek.

1:52:39.840 --> 1:52:44.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to give hm Well one nipple.

1:52:43.920 --> 1:52:47.040
<v Speaker 4>To olt from Malina Well of course, and I'll give

1:52:47.080 --> 1:52:51.679
<v Speaker 4>my final half in a showing of waving the little

1:52:51.680 --> 1:52:52.320
<v Speaker 4>white flag.

1:52:52.479 --> 1:52:54.320
<v Speaker 2>I'll give the last half to Diane Lake.

1:52:55.320 --> 1:52:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Whoa see, I thought you were going to be like

1:52:57.000 --> 1:52:59.760
<v Speaker 3>and I'm going to give a pile of shaite to

1:52:59.800 --> 1:53:00.519
<v Speaker 3>die and like.

1:53:00.960 --> 1:53:03.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm growing up. We'll let bygone speak up by gones.

1:53:03.439 --> 1:53:06.799
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, two hours ago you were a different person.

1:53:07.080 --> 1:53:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but she was so wrong to give me a sea.

1:53:11.000 --> 1:53:13.320
<v Speaker 4>Come on, maybe your class was less boring.

1:53:13.360 --> 1:53:14.519
<v Speaker 2>I want to showed up on time.

1:53:15.120 --> 1:53:18.439
<v Speaker 4>Who maybe if all you did, if she did Okay,

1:53:18.439 --> 1:53:20.200
<v Speaker 4>now I'm being meeting again. All she ever did was

1:53:20.240 --> 1:53:22.280
<v Speaker 4>talk about how she was a credited writer on Freda.

1:53:22.439 --> 1:53:23.000
<v Speaker 5>Oh my god.

1:53:23.000 --> 1:53:26.200
<v Speaker 4>I was like, yeah, they came out fifteen years ago, lady,

1:53:26.800 --> 1:53:28.120
<v Speaker 4>what's new anyways?

1:53:28.240 --> 1:53:28.559
<v Speaker 2>All right?

1:53:28.640 --> 1:53:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, anyway, Anela, how about you? What say you?

1:53:33.720 --> 1:53:36.400
<v Speaker 5>I agree with you. I think three and a half

1:53:36.560 --> 1:53:41.040
<v Speaker 5>is a good rating. My first nipple goes to Saramahayak

1:53:41.040 --> 1:53:45.200
<v Speaker 5>two because she did this amazing production and I think

1:53:45.560 --> 1:53:49.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm very proud that she's my my Paisana.

1:53:49.600 --> 1:53:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

1:53:50.320 --> 1:53:54.400
<v Speaker 5>Then my second one would go to the scene the

1:53:54.439 --> 1:53:59.840
<v Speaker 5>sequence that has Treats giving assassinated Anthea painting the two

1:54:00.040 --> 1:54:02.080
<v Speaker 5>that's at the same time. I found such a good

1:54:02.320 --> 1:54:06.200
<v Speaker 5>sequence that was my favorite part of the movie. And

1:54:06.960 --> 1:54:10.360
<v Speaker 5>the third one I would like to give to Frida

1:54:10.439 --> 1:54:16.280
<v Speaker 5>as an artist, but also particularly her showing up to

1:54:16.360 --> 1:54:20.280
<v Speaker 5>the exhibition for the last in her bed.

1:54:20.600 --> 1:54:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's such a good moment. Yeah.

1:54:23.120 --> 1:54:26.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. And some doctors think that that probably was the

1:54:26.760 --> 1:54:29.720
<v Speaker 5>thing that ended up killing her going out like that,

1:54:30.000 --> 1:54:32.520
<v Speaker 5>but I mean it was worth it, I think for her,

1:54:33.040 --> 1:54:35.640
<v Speaker 5>and I think it was such a good moment both

1:54:35.680 --> 1:54:36.880
<v Speaker 5>in the movie and in her life.

1:54:36.960 --> 1:54:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:54:37.440 --> 1:54:39.520
<v Speaker 3>I like the part where she's like, burn this judas

1:54:39.560 --> 1:54:43.600
<v Speaker 3>of a body because it betrays me. She was in

1:54:43.680 --> 1:54:47.600
<v Speaker 3>so much pain. Yeah, she was absolutely suffering.

1:54:47.880 --> 1:54:51.120
<v Speaker 5>And there are some historians that believe that she committed

1:54:51.160 --> 1:54:55.040
<v Speaker 5>suicide by taking eleven instead of the seven pills she

1:54:55.160 --> 1:54:59.280
<v Speaker 5>had prescribed to her, because her nurse said that. But

1:54:59.320 --> 1:55:02.120
<v Speaker 5>we don't know. She died on her own terms, and

1:55:02.120 --> 1:55:04.200
<v Speaker 5>she didd everything on her own terms, and I think

1:55:04.200 --> 1:55:07.960
<v Speaker 5>that's amazing. My half of a star would go to

1:55:08.120 --> 1:55:12.640
<v Speaker 5>Rodrigo Prieto because yes, yes, he's also my Paisano. And

1:55:12.680 --> 1:55:14.960
<v Speaker 5>the cinematography is amazing, and he gave us a lot

1:55:14.960 --> 1:55:17.760
<v Speaker 5>of different movies to talk about in the span of

1:55:17.760 --> 1:55:19.240
<v Speaker 5>two minutes, so it was great.

1:55:19.440 --> 1:55:22.920
<v Speaker 4>Yes we should, Kaitlin now would be a good idea

1:55:22.960 --> 1:55:25.720
<v Speaker 4>for the Matreon. Just choose two random movies. He was

1:55:25.720 --> 1:55:29.040
<v Speaker 4>a cinematographer for you could pick almost any genre of movie.

1:55:29.640 --> 1:55:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Let's do it. Let's do that for December, yeah, in November.

1:55:34.480 --> 1:55:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much Angle for joining us and for

1:55:38.160 --> 1:55:42.720
<v Speaker 3>lending your expertise. Is there anything you'd like to plug

1:55:42.840 --> 1:55:44.280
<v Speaker 3>or anything like that.

1:55:44.640 --> 1:55:47.320
<v Speaker 5>I would like people to look at Tina Modotti's pictures,

1:55:47.920 --> 1:55:50.880
<v Speaker 5>her photographs. I would like to plug her even though

1:55:50.920 --> 1:55:53.320
<v Speaker 5>she's been dead for a few years now, because she's

1:55:53.360 --> 1:55:56.200
<v Speaker 5>portraying the movie and her pictures are portrayed for a

1:55:56.280 --> 1:56:00.680
<v Speaker 5>quick sequence. But I think that it's amazing how she

1:56:00.920 --> 1:56:05.360
<v Speaker 5>depicted everything communism and the Mexican Revolution and the Mexican

1:56:05.440 --> 1:56:07.680
<v Speaker 5>working class through her pictures. So look at in them

1:56:07.720 --> 1:56:13.600
<v Speaker 5>out these pictures. My Instagram account is Angela CMPs. It's

1:56:13.920 --> 1:56:16.600
<v Speaker 5>private for now, but I'll make it public for a

1:56:16.640 --> 1:56:20.440
<v Speaker 5>couple of days if anyone wants to follow act now

1:56:20.800 --> 1:56:23.160
<v Speaker 5>because if not, my students will find it and I

1:56:23.160 --> 1:56:28.160
<v Speaker 5>don't want them following me because teenagers in social media

1:56:28.200 --> 1:56:34.600
<v Speaker 5>are not my favorite thing. So that's about it. Thank

1:56:34.640 --> 1:56:37.640
<v Speaker 5>you so much for having me. I could talk to

1:56:37.840 --> 1:56:42.800
<v Speaker 5>two amazing women for two hours about my favorite topic.

1:56:42.920 --> 1:56:46.000
<v Speaker 5>So I don't know why I cannot do this every

1:56:46.040 --> 1:56:47.520
<v Speaker 5>day of my life, but I wish I could.

1:56:49.080 --> 1:56:52.720
<v Speaker 2>We'll have you back for another movie. Yeah, come back anytime.

1:56:53.320 --> 1:56:55.680
<v Speaker 5>Whenever you want to have me. I'll come back because

1:56:55.720 --> 1:56:57.360
<v Speaker 5>I had so much fun. Thank you very much.

1:56:57.400 --> 1:57:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh my gosh, thank you. I had a class truly.

1:57:00.760 --> 1:57:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:57:01.320 --> 1:57:04.640
<v Speaker 3>And as far as where you can find us, it's

1:57:04.800 --> 1:57:10.120
<v Speaker 3>on the same old places Instagram. It's on the Patreon

1:57:10.200 --> 1:57:15.560
<v Speaker 3>aka Matreon five bucks a month, two bonus episodes every month,

1:57:15.600 --> 1:57:17.360
<v Speaker 3>plus the back catalog.

1:57:17.160 --> 1:57:21.760
<v Speaker 4>Right now, because it's ok tuba. We are doing two

1:57:22.160 --> 1:57:26.560
<v Speaker 4>scary movies that center women, we did and we just

1:57:26.640 --> 1:57:29.800
<v Speaker 4>an episode on the Exorcist and we're covering Pearl later

1:57:29.920 --> 1:57:33.000
<v Speaker 4>in the month. So yeah, head over there, check that out.

1:57:33.000 --> 1:57:35.200
<v Speaker 4>You can get our merch at teapublic dot com. Slash

1:57:35.280 --> 1:57:38.400
<v Speaker 4>the Bechdel Cast And.

1:57:38.880 --> 1:57:40.960
<v Speaker 3>With that, I'm gonna get in bed and then make

1:57:41.000 --> 1:57:44.640
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of men carry me around in bed.

1:57:45.400 --> 1:57:46.080
<v Speaker 5>As you should.

1:57:46.440 --> 1:57:50.240
<v Speaker 4>Yes go, everyone deserves that moment.

1:57:50.360 --> 1:57:54.200
<v Speaker 5>Yep, bye bye.

1:57:57.160 --> 1:58:00.440
<v Speaker 3>The Bechdel Cast is a production of iHeartMedia, host by

1:58:00.520 --> 1:58:04.360
<v Speaker 3>Caitlin Derante and Jamie Loftis, produced by Sophie Lichterman, edited

1:58:04.480 --> 1:58:07.640
<v Speaker 3>by Moe laboord our theme song was composed by Mike

1:58:07.760 --> 1:58:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Kaplan with vocals by Katherine Voskressensky. Our logo and merch

1:58:12.280 --> 1:58:15.240
<v Speaker 3>is designed by Jamie Loftis and a special thanks to

1:58:15.280 --> 1:58:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Aristotle Acevedo. For more information about the podcast, please visit

1:58:19.760 --> 1:58:21.280
<v Speaker 3>linktree slash Bechdelcast