WEBVTT - Japan Leads Asian Stocks Higher, Google Pixel Launch

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Doug Krisner.

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 2>You can join Brian Curtis and myself for the stories,

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 2>making news and moving markets in the APAC region. You

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 2>can subscribe to the show anywhere you get your podcast

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 2>and always on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal, and the

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business app. Let's get to our guest, Todd Walsh's

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 2>with us. He is the CEO of Alpha Cubed Investments.

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Todd is normally based in California. Day today we find

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 2>him in New York City. Todd, good of you to

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 2>make time to chat with us. I think we can

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:42.919
<v Speaker 2>agree that seemed like a lot of panic selling at

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 2>the end early part of last week. Things have settled down.

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 2>What do you make of the gyrations that we saw.

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Was this all about an unwind of the end carrier?

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Is there something else happening here?

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, hey, Doug, thanks for having me on. And of course,

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 3>trees don't grow to the sky.

0:00:59.200 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 3>We've had eighteen months of a toward increase in the

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 3>AI ecosystem tech sector stocks, so you know we've all

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 3>been expecting a little bit of a correction. We got it.

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 3>We've been looking at questions about, you know, where is

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 3>the ROI going to be coming from? On all the

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 3>capex that's going on out there, there's an element of

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 3>this is kind of normal, but you know, when it happens,

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't feel normal. And of course we have the

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 3>CPI print coming out, we think we're going to see

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more volatility at it. It kind of

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 3>feels like we're at the doctor's office in the waiting

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 3>room right now.

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So if you're expecting some volatility tied to that

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 2>report on consumer prices, is it possible that we don't

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 2>get a market friendly report, which is to say, something

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 2>that confirms that inflation is cooling at the same rate

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 2>that we have been expecting.

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:51.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, don't say possible. Anything's possible, right. The biggest issues

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 3>if we stop and really think about what's going on,

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 3>we kind of need to thread the needle a little

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 3>bit here. If we get a strong CPI report, meaning

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's not coming down, cpis up, rate cuts

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 3>could be off the table, and we know that's bad

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 3>news for the market. But if we get a weak

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 3>CPI report and we start leaning more towards an actual

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 3>recession that might even be worse for the markets. We

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 3>did a little study of initial rate cuts when the

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 3>FED starts cutting rates. Since nineteen eighty three, the market's

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 3>up about twenty one percent in the first year after

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 3>the first rate cut, but that's only if there's no

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 3>recession after the first recession rate cut. When there is

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 3>a recession two thousand and one, two thousand and eight,

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 3>the market was down in an average of fifteen percent.

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 3>So we are looking for what's been happening up to

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 3>this point, which is marginal slowing, marginal acceleration in the

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 3>economy with some mixed positive economic data to kind of

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 3>back that up. And what we want to see again

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 3>is marginal decrease in that inflation number. We kind of

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 3>need the right kind of inflation number to get where

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:56.959
<v Speaker 3>we need to get here. We think we're going to

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 3>have it.

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 2>So I hear what you're saying when it comes to

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of an one of me that shifting into lower gear.

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 2>All we have to do is remember the market's response

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 2>to that relatively disappointing employment report for the month of July,

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 2>and I hear what you're saying too about the lack

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 2>of ROI when it comes to AI. But I'm wondering

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 2>whether or not what we have viewed principally in the

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 2>market up until this point has been confined to let's

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 2>call it a market event rather than a macro economic event.

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 2>To go back to the question that I asked at

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 2>the top of the conversation about the unwind of the

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 2>carry trade in yen and whether or not this revealed

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot of leverage and maybe a big part of

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 2>that leverage was tied to your trade on AI.

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 3>You know that's possible. We still aren't out of the

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 3>woods yet, and one of the possible catalysts for volatility

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 3>does revolve around that carry trade online. Are there unknown

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 3>victims out there? Is there leverage that we don't know about.

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 3>But underneath the surface, the recovery that we saw last

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 3>week was you know, enjoyable. But the daily technicals, relative strength,

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 3>amount of money flows, a lot of the daily technicals

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 3>we look at, they are all still in the negative

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 3>and they haven't crossed into the positive yet. And on

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 3>top of the CPI report, you know, Iran seems intent

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 3>on retaliating against Israel, and that's a big unknown. We've

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 3>got a lot of catalysts for volatility. Sell offs are

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 3>a lot like earthquakes, right we want to watch for aftershocks,

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 3>and let's not be too hasty about, you know, going

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 3>right in and buying. Because the guys have cleared, we

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.679
<v Speaker 3>think we've got a little more volatility ahead most likely.

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 2>We saw a big move in crude oil in New

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 2>York today. We were up more than four percent in

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 2>the regular session. A lot of this is the market

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 2>really braced for Iran's response to that assassination that took

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 2>place in Tehran of the Hummas leader. Talk to me

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 2>broadly about the commodities trade right now? Do you want

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 2>to be exposed to commodities if you're assuming a down

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 2>shift in global growth?

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 3>You've got a short term catalyst with what's going on geopolitically,

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 3>But we don't think commodities are the place to be.

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 3>In fact, we think the FED is going to achieve

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 3>their desire to cut rates. When they pivoted back in

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 3>November of last year, the value dividend trade caught fire,

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:21.239
<v Speaker 3>and for the first time in about two or three years,

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 3>that trade that had been left for dead has actually

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 3>returned almost the same amount since that November pivot. As

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 3>we've seen in the white hot Nasdaq one hundred they're

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 3>both from that date up plus or minus about twenty

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 3>five percent. And you know what, Doug, I don't think

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 3>most people know that. And now if the FED moves

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 3>to a more dubbish stance and starts cutting rates, we

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 3>might have the wind at the back of that trade

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 3>for you know, a year or two as the Fed

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 3>tries to achieve their dot plot goal of getting you know,

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 3>rates down to potentially two and a half percent over

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 3>the next two or three years. So we like the value.

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 3>We like dividend trade. The dividend trade right here.

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, as I'm listening to I'm looking at the

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 2>bond market and whether wondering whether there's opportunity there as well.

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 3>There may be some short term opportunity there. In general,

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 3>though we think it's going to be marginal. The keyword

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 3>again is marginal on the on the interest right front.

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 3>We don't think rates are going to come crashing down.

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 3>We think the Fed's going to achieve its goal and

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 3>marginally bring down rates. You know, the FED Fund's futures.

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 3>I think last week we're looking at about one hundred

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 3>percent expectation for a fifty basis point rate cut. Where

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 3>are they at today? Now we're fifty to fifty. I

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 3>think as we go through as investors, we need to think,

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 3>catch our breath and think things through. Our thesis this

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 3>year was hold tack, but look for volatility. Let's not

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 3>pay too much, Let's slow down a little bit. Trees

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 3>don't grow to the scot The value dividend trade has

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 3>the wind at it's back, but we don't think it's

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 3>going to be an aggressive move. We think it's something

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 3>we can participate in marginally. And the same old's true

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 3>for the bond market. Bond market's been inverted depending on

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 3>which timeframes you're looking at, for a very long time.

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 3>We think the Fed is going to achieve it's cool

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 3>bringing rates down, and that'll happen all the way across

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 3>the curve. But the farther out we go, the more

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 3>marginal it's going to be. So the answer is yes,

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 3>but again marginally.

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 2>So how do you know when to enter any market

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 2>if there is a lot of volatility? I mean, and

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 2>you expect, let's say, whether it's stocks or bonds, you

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 2>expect those assets to trade in a certain range. How

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 2>do you know the entry point? I know we're talking

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 2>about timing here, and most people don't like to discuss

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 2>timing a market. But that's essentially what you're describing, isn't it.

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I love that question. It's the nine trillion dollar

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 3>question out there right now on the AI ecosystem, the

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 3>tech and AX. Everybody wants to know when do I

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 3>get in? How do I get in? Most investors, let's

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 3>face it, in a lot of professionals kind of missed

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 3>out on the bulk of that trade. The only way

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 3>to enter that trade is dollar cost average using volatility,

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 3>just incrementally move in. But we think of the market

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 3>has almost two big chunks. There's the AI ecosystem tech trade,

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 3>which the valuations got astronomical. We're seeing some consolidation there,

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 3>and we can slowly dollar cost average into some of

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 3>those areas for people coming in with new money. The

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 3>rest of the market the other four hundred and ninety

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 3>three stocks, which I call the forgotten four ninety three.

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 3>There's value in that value trade, so we want to

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 3>enter that trade sooner rather than later.

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Todd will leave it there, always a pleasure. Thanks for

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 2>making time to chat with us. Todd Walsh, there, CEO

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 2>of Alpha Cubed Investments joining us from New York. Well,

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Alphabet's Google is holding a major event tomorrow for a

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 2>tech hardware launch. We have a preview from Bloomberg's Charlie Pellett.

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 5>Google is trying to outshine Apple's annual iPhone launch and

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 5>is letting longtime executive Rick Ostrolo takes out her stage.

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 5>He's the former president of Motorola who joined Google in

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 5>twenty sixteen. He will helm the first major product launch

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 5>after the company this year, unified under his leadership the

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 5>teams developing hardware and the Android operating system. In a

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 5>sign of a more aggressive push into consumer devices, Google

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 5>moved up its annual flagship Pixel smartphone launched to August

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 5>from October, preempting the next Apple iPhone debut in New York.

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 5>Charlie Powlett's Bloomberg.

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 2>Radio, Well, let's take a closer look at the Google

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Pixels story with our own Bloomberg Tech editor of Vlad

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Savov joins us from our studios in Hong Kong Flat.

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 2>It's always a pleasure. Are we going to be overwhelmed

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 2>or underwhelmed tomorrow?

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>What do you think?

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 4>I think both extremes. There's always a shade of gray

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 4>with these things. I do believe that one of the

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 4>interesting things with Google this year is how far ahead

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 4>they're going to be in terms of their own design

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 4>and cameras technology and so on. That's kind of being

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 4>gone under the radar. I do feel like the company

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 4>is very confident about the how where itself and although

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 4>these things have kind of become commoditized, it does have

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 4>a leadership as far as camera software goes. And if

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 4>the thing that happens, which a lot of people are anticipating,

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 4>is that Google is going to increase sales, I feel

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 4>like there'll be much greater awareness of all the things,

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:18.119
<v Speaker 4>all the strengths of the Pixel line.

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>To date, on top of all the AI stuff.

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 4>So immediately after the event, I guarantee you you will

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 4>not be overwhelmed, but I do feel like a lot

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 4>of people will see some of these strengths that just

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 4>the world hasn't known about with the Pixel line to date.

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you think there's a change inside Alphabet when it

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 2>comes to the smartphone, I mean, developing your own technology

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 2>On the hardware side, it seemed like that they were

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 2>maybe a little bit more willing to allow some of

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 2>the other companies like Samsung. I'm thinking of primarily to

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 2>take the lead on that front. I mean, I know

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 2>that the Pixel story has been out there for a while,

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 2>but it never felt as though the company was being

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 2>super aggressive. Here is that beginning to change absolutely.

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's such a major change when you think

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 4>about it.

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I was just thinking.

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 4>Google had an event here in Hong Kong launching one

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 4>of its smartphones in twenty eleven on its own brand. So,

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 4>like I say, it's been going for a very long time.

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 4>But when you launch your phone in October, what you're

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 4>saying is everyone who wanted an iPhone already has a

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.319
<v Speaker 4>ninth phone, so you're giving up on that audience. Samsung

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 4>refreshes his devices early in the year and then around

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.359
<v Speaker 4>this time July August, so you're kind of the afterthought

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 4>for a whole bunch of people. Coming in the middle

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 4>of August, coming a month ahead of the iPhone, says

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 4>we are going to compete directly against Apple. We're going

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 4>to compete directly against Samsung too. Even though Google rica

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 4>Osterolo we mentioned he's the leader now, he went immediately

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:37.719
<v Speaker 4>as soon as he got the new job to talk

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 4>to Samsung to signal that the partnership and the collaboration

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 4>with the two companies is as strong as ever. But

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.199
<v Speaker 4>the signal is the release date.

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 2>The elephant in the room I think we can agree

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 2>is artificial intelligence, right when it comes to the handset.

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we know that that's what Apple is trying

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 2>to build in in terms of hype for the launch

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.559
<v Speaker 2>of the iPhone sixteen. Do you think we're going to

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 2>get kind of a sense of that from Google tomorrow

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 2>where the company is going in terms of the smartphone

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 2>being a device where artificial intelligence is kind of baked

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 2>into the cake.

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh absolutely.

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 4>And in order teasers that Google has done for this event,

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.199
<v Speaker 4>it was Pixel meets AI, which is a fun thing

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 4>to say because Google is one of the companies that

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 4>has been putting AI into smartphones for years and years now.

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 4>Its own camera software is all about AI and machine learning.

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 4>But you have to now put it front of mind

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 4>for everybody. Something has been doing the exact same thing.

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 4>They talk about Galaxy AI every time they talk about

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 4>their products. Google likewise Apple with Apple Intelligence. That's going

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 4>to be the theme at least for the next year

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 4>or two. Everyone is going to turn AI as the

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 4>selling point for devices, and the devices we're talking about

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 4>smartphones and laptops.

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Most people already have one.

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.959
<v Speaker 4>So each company in the industry now sees AI as

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 4>the big selling point to get us all to upgrade

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 4>those devices.

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Isn't there The risk though, when you jump in whole

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 2>hog like this so to speak, that as the check

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 2>technology changes, that you have to do a major kind

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 2>of re engineering or kind of a major tweak to

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 2>a device like a smartphone that needs to kind of

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 2>incorporate a lot of this AI technology, so that the

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 2>first generation maybe is going to be kind of radically

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 2>different from the next generation.

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, And as far as the companies that concerned, that's

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>great news. Stuff great next year as.

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, right, right, So if it's a driver of sales

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 2>planned obs lescence, I think that's what they call it, right.

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 2>What are some of the things that you're looking out

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 2>for in particular.

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 4>Well, it really is this whole integration of hardware and software,

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 4>and I would actually say the ecosystem play again comes

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 4>to the surface is a very important thing. Samsung set

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 4>out is still much in the same way that Apple did,

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 4>and we kind of expect Google to do the same thing.

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 4>Google already has its Pixel watch. It already has its

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 4>own in house design process. Going back to the first

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 4>thing I mentioned, Google has been putting all.

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>The pieces together.

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 4>It's just most people don't know about these picks of

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.319
<v Speaker 4>phones and the whole lineup. So in this event that's

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 4>coming up, we're probably going to get another watch, We'll

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 4>probably going to get several smartphones, and it's the ecosystem

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 4>of devices is the way that they work together. Also,

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 4>don't forget, under Rick Osterlo's leadership, you have Google Nests,

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 4>which are the home devices, home cameras, such things, thermostats.

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.239
<v Speaker 4>You have a whole bunch of other home devices, personal devices,

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 4>all the Internet software. If Google makes all these things

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 4>work together as seamlessly as it hopes, there will be

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people who can be swung to the

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 4>pixel side of things.

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Is this a device that will have an opportunity in

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 2>the China market?

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>You think zero? Google services are not there?

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 4>The Google Play Store, which is a real big selling

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 4>point for Google because that's where you get all your

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 4>international apps, it doesn't play there. And the Chinese smartphone manufacturers,

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 4>let's give them their own new credit. They are right

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 4>up there in terms of cameras, technology. They have their

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 4>own app stores, they have we chats, and an entire

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 4>ecosystem that Google has no presence in. So unfortunately, Google,

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 4>the world's big smartphone market where Apple is a big player,

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 4>is out of bounds.

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Do we know anything about the part suppliers here and

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 2>where this device is being kind of created or manufactured.

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, Fox contends to be the company that Google has

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 4>been worked has worked with in the past. It does

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 4>it's manufacturing in Vietnam in Taiwan. Taiwan is actually plays

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 4>host to Google's hardware engineering hub. We can remember that

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 4>Google took over HTC smartphone design team. They took on

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of design and engineering people, so you can

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 4>say Taiwan plays a really big role in developing all

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 4>of this.

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 2>So very quickly vled what markets in Asia might Google

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of target for this new pixel phone.

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 4>Japan absolutely, Japan has always been a really big market

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 4>for Google. It has good relationships and one of the

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 4>interesting things in Japan is that the Chinese players don't

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 4>have that much of a presence, needed does Samsung, so

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 4>it has the biggest opportunity there. It's a developed market,

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of potential there, but.

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 2>It's always a pleasure. Thanks for making time to chat

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 2>with us on this launch tomorrow taking place for the

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 2>new Google Epixel phone. Vlat's have off Bloomberg's Tech editor

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 2>joining us from Hong Kong. So we know that the

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Democrats are rallying around Vice President Kamala Harris and her

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 2>running mate Tim Walls. Walls, you may know, has had

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 2>a long history with China. He taught English in China

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen eighty nine and nineteen ninety and since that

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 2>time he's visited at least thirty times. Let's take a

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 2>closer look now with Michael Sobolik. He is senior fellow

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 2>at the American Foreign Policy Council. Michael, good of you

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 2>to make time to chat with us about this story.

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you have a sense of how mister Walls's backstory

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 2>regarding China may play out in this campaign.

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 6>Governor Walls is really unique. He has so much personal

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 6>experience living in China and working in China, far more

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 6>than the average American politician and far more than the

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 6>average vice presidential candidate. It could cut one of two ways.

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 6>On the one hand, Governor Walls, by all accounts, has

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:14.479
<v Speaker 6>one of the strongest records on China human rights that

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 6>we've seen from any member in the House of Representatives

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 6>in recent memory. When he was a member of Congress,

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 6>he got photos with the Dalilama. He and his wife

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 6>literally got married on the anniversary of the Tenaman Square

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 6>massacre on June fourth, So he has a strong record

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 6>on being publicly vocal on the need for human rights

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 6>in China. On the other hand, he's also an equally

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 6>vocal proponent on engaging China and promoting exchanges between Washington

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:46.199
<v Speaker 6>and Beijing. And in this day and age where national

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 6>security concerns tend to trump a lot of others, it's

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 6>unclear how those two competing priorities would play.

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Out for it. You know, it's very interesting because there

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:59.239
<v Speaker 2>was an article written back in nineteen ninety after he

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 2>returned from a teaching in China. I think it was

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 2>the Star Herald maybe in Minneapolis, and he was quoted

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 2>as saying, if the Chinese people had proper leadership, there

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 2>are no limits on what they could accomplish. They are

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 2>such kind, generous and capable people. They gave and gave

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 2>and gave to me. That was nineteen ninety. Relationship between

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 2>the US and China very very different these days, isn't not.

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 6>It is as different as it could possibly be. But

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 6>I'll say this, Governor Wallas, like when he wrote those

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 6>words so long ago, tapped into something that is still

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 6>true today in twenty twenty four, which is, the Chinese

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 6>people are not the enemies of the American people at all,

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 6>nor should they be. I've been to China as well,

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 6>and I've experienced that same hospitality and generosity that Walls

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 6>experienced when he was there too, and I think many

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 6>Americans would attest to the same thing. The problem for

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 6>Washington policymakers is not the Chinese people, it's the Chinese

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:02.719
<v Speaker 6>Communist Party. And that distinction is quite meaningful, and I

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 6>am gratified greatly that Governor Waltz recognizes that difference.

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's an important distinction to make. But in terms

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 2>of influencing policy, imagine a world where Kamala Harris is

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the next president. Is it the role of the vice

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 2>president at all to kind of get involved with setting

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 2>the agenda?

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 6>So that's going to vary from administration to administration. To

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 6>be sure, We've had vice presidents like Dick Cheney, who

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 6>are one of the most prominent presences in any room

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 6>and played a major hand in national security. I think

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.239
<v Speaker 6>Vice President Joe Biden when he served Barack Obama, in

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 6>some cases fit that bill as well. If Kamala Harris

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 6>wins the presidency, that'll be her decision to make. But ultimately,

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 6>if she wins, she is going to face this million

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 6>dollar question in American foreign policy. Is China the Chinese

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 6>Communist Party a potential competitor or an adversary? And Shijinping,

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 6>the leader of China, is not really leaving America with

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 6>much of a choice. We're going to have to choose

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 6>one or the other.

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>How do you.

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 2>Imagine Beijing would react to this type of situation where

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 2>you have someone in the administration who knows so much

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 2>about China.

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 6>I think they'll probably try to play this much like

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:23.120
<v Speaker 6>they have attempted to work with President Joe Biden. So

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 6>President Biden talks regularly about how many hours he spent

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 6>meeting with Schijingping when he was Barack Obama's vice president,

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.160
<v Speaker 6>and that was quite intentional. Barack Obama and the US

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 6>government around twenty twelve twenty, even as early as twenty

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 6>ten and twenty eleven, knew that Chijingping was the heir

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 6>apparent in China, and Joe Biden spent a lot of

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 6>time cultivating a very personal relationship with Chijingping and what not,

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 6>just she at the most highest levels. But what Chinese

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 6>diplomats will often do is try to fall back on

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 6>mutual feelings of friendship and cooperation and shared cultural experiences

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 6>to try to get American politicians to give a little

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 6>bit on the competitive agenda. I am certain they will

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 6>try to do the same thing with Walls if he

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 6>assumes the vice presidency. In fact, as governor of Minnesota,

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 6>he's already received some of those diplomatic overtures.

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 2>So we know, and you mentioned the Walls record on

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:25.400
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to human rights, particularly in China. How

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 2>do you think he's going to frame the conversation around

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 2>the South China Sea.

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 6>So he's on record as a member of Congress saying

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 6>that the United States needs to stand up to China

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 6>and call out their illegal territorial claims in the South

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 6>China Sea, and listen, that's great. We need to hold

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 6>the Chinese Communist Party accountable for their illegal actions with

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:51.239
<v Speaker 6>our rhetoric. But we are at a point in our

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 6>security situation where we need to move beyond words. We

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 6>need to start making the Chinese Communist Party pay for

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 6>dangering the security of our allies and our partners and

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 6>frankly American interests in the South China Sea. And this

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 6>is the big question with Governor Wallas. He has a

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 6>strong rhetorical record on human rights with China, but he hasn't,

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:15.439
<v Speaker 6>in the position of a representative, really been in a

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 6>position to make those hard executive level decisions on how

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 6>do you assess those trade offs, because if you want

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 6>to hold them accountable, you're probably going to have to

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:28.360
<v Speaker 6>give a bit on the cooperative agenda with Beijing. And

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 6>it's really unclear how he's going to make that calculation

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 6>if he wins the selection.

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 2>With Kamala Harris, I'm sure that this topic will come

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 2>up during the vice presidential debate. Michael, thank you so

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 2>much for making time to chat with us. Michael Soberlik,

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Senior Fellow at the American Foreign Policy Council. He was

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 2>speaking to us from right outside the District of Columbia

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 2>in Alexandria, Virginia. This has been the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast,

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 2>bringing you the stories making news and moving markets.

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>In the Asia PAS.

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Visit the Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to get more

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 2>episodes of this and other shows from Bloomberg. Subscribe to

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:11.399
<v Speaker 2>the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else you listen,

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 2>and always on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal, and the

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business app.