WEBVTT - COVID Origins, Ohio Train, ETFs, and Goldman (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's go Switch Gears

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to Big Farm. Another deal. There's a lot of things

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about here, but this deal came

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>out today. Fiser potentially looking at a company by the

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>name of Segan. I have no idea what's going on

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>here other than bankers are going to get paid. Lawyers

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>are going to get paid. So I want to break

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in with Sam Fizzelli, he said, of the European research

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and farmer analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. So Sam talk to

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>us about what is it Segan and Fiser and what's

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>going on there? Yeah, Hi, Paul, So I think this is,

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, not a surprise that Fiser's looking at companies,

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>because you know they in their four QUE results they

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>had a slide which showed twenty five billion dollars of

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>risk adjusted sales from deals to be done in twenty

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty twenty thirty, got that right, ye? So you know,

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's a lot of money risk adjusted, which means

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that when you look at a company company, their pipeline

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>drugs will have to be taking a notch down. And

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to get twenty five billion dollars with risk adjusted sales,

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you need something like, I don't know, thirty billion, thirty

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>five billion of sales. So the point is they need

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to do big deals. And here, although Season is not

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>necessarily a big company, today they say two or three

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of sales. Expectations on consensus have it going

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>up to about nine in twenty thirty. So you know,

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>does Fiser need to do this? Yes, something like this anyway,

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>does fi Fiser need to do some of the several

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of these years bill fits in? You know, Sam, I'm

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at the FA function for Fiser and it just

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>blows me away away. And this is obviously a complete

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>COVID call. Here. You know, this company had forty billion

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>in sales and then in twenty twenty one it doubled

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to eighty billion, and then you know they had one

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion in twenty twenty two, and then I'm looking

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>at the forecast on the FA function, consensus is back

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>down to like seventy billion. Run right here. How does

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>this company pivot from three year surge in sales and

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>profitability from COVID and again, thank them and Moderna very

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>very much for the work they did. How does this

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>company kind of reset itself in a post COVID world? Yeah,

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>with difficulty pulled. If you look at the share price chart,

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 1>you'll see that it's come back all the way down.

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So basically they're not getting a huge amount of credit

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>for the cash they generated, because it's very difficult to

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>know what is the value of cash. At the end

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of the day, it's all going to be down to

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>how good are they going to be in terms of

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the deals they do, And I think a lot of

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>people worry that they might overpay and do deals that

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>perhaps look optically nice today but they don't actually deliver

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in the long term. So you know, it's much easier

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to value and be interested and have an investment positive

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>investment view on a company where top line is growing

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>organically and then anything they do is in addition to

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that um But so that that's difficult. I don't know

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>how you how people get around this subject. You can

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>put certain you know numbers in your model that suggests

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>sure if they use the cash right, they can have

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a great story going forward. Well, Sam, you know, it's

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. I mean, I know you've been covering these

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>farmer companies for decades. You know how much of the

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>new drugs that come onto market are Fiser's scientists discovering

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:51.119
<v Speaker 1>something in their lab versus buying it? Good question? Yeah,

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>so it is a good question. And you know what

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>they all farmer companies have pretty much a state to

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>daim You know, I have very big business development teams

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of trying to get thirty to forty percent of their

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>pipelines out sourced externally because they've realized this is a

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>huge amount of innovation that goes on externally. And here's

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a little statistic. I'm preparing for a presentation in about

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>ten days time. I looked at the biggest drugs in

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two. Seven out of top ten we're from

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>where biotech companies. They were unlicensed Bionte. You know, the

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Fiser COVID vaccine came from Bionte. Moderna's vaccine key Truda

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that America's got twenty two billion of sales potentially this year,

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>or twenty four billion that came from an acquisition of

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a small biotechy farmer biofarma company in Europe called organ On.

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Which one is that key Truda y Truda, Yeah, twenty

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>four billion. Says it is a magic drug for cancer.

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully you never need it, but if you do

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and it works in you, it works like magic that

0:04:56.600 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it turns your immune system onto the cancers. Yeah, so

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>that's why it's doing twenty four point So that that's interesting.

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>So basically seventy percent of the big home runs were

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>made by third parties, not the big giant pharma conglomerates, no,

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.359
<v Speaker 1>but but Matt, they did do a lot of the

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>work that got them to market. Of course, that's why

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that's why biotech investing sam, I mean, it really is

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>not for the faint of heart, right, I mean it

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>this drug works and the stock goes crazy, or it

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work and it does the act exact opposite. Yeah,

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>So you need to be able to withstand that that

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>risk and also have a proper correct portfolio approach and

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>be disciplined, you know, have your rules about what it

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>is you like to invest in and why you invest

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>in them, stick with them, and then stick with them.

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you look at the long term, the

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>best returns come from companies which perhaps wasn't their first

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 1>drug that got to market. Maybe it was the second

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>or third that really made the difference. By the way, Sam,

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of M and A, how much of that

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>are we seeing in this high and rising interestate environment?

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine less. On the other hand, these big

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>companies surely have huge war chests of cash and maybe

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>don't need to finance everything. Yeah. I mean, remember farma

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>is massively cash generative, and you know they can pay

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:28.359
<v Speaker 1>They can pay equity if needed, right, so their equity

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.239
<v Speaker 1>is pretty much not that different to paying by cash.

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>But of course it depends on the target shareholder. So yes,

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you're right, there is there is. The calculation is a

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>bit different now, but there's a lot of need. There's

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>about two hundred billion dollars of drug sales that are

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>coming off patent by twenty thirty. Wow, Sam, what's the

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>next biggest i mean post pandemic role. What's the next

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>big area for biotech? Do you think to really make

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>a difference. Oh, I think it has to be to

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>really make a difference. It would be great if they

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 1>can get the more and more of the immune system

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>tuned into treating your disease and obviously manages side effects.

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of that going on, and of

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>course there's this gene editing going on, so there's a

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of work there that could help us. So long

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>as we can get the side effects and their safety

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>risk under control, that could really revolutionize medicine. See Sam

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>goes to these conferences. They're not like the conferences I

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>go in the desert or Data Miami where wire we

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>plague off and stuff. He goes to these conferences where

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you actually have to work during the weekend. What's the

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:36.119
<v Speaker 1>next conference coming up? Sam, Well, there's one that I'm sad,

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>not sad not to go to on the one hand,

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's the American Association for Cancer Research. I think

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that's where I'm guessing here. MODERNA will show us the

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>RANNA merc their mRNA vaccine for cancer, which has headlined

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>positive data. So let's look at the detail. And the

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>next big one would be asking in one of my

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>favorite cities. Cha go there, you go? I mean, and

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>these guys they actually go work the entire weekend. I mean,

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>who does that? Sam Fazzelli held He's head of European

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>research for Bloomberg Intelligence. He's our senior farmer analyst who's

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>been doing it in the city of London for decades.

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>One of the absolute best in the business for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have more coming up. This is Bloomberg, right.

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>This is a little awkward. And Matt, you're a CEO

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of a company announced that you're going to step down.

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Your stock goes up ten percent. It happens quite often.

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>It is awkward, and yeah, I always feel for the

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>incumbent when that happens. But it's a part of market

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>life because it does happen all the time. You know.

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Early in my career, I was a star I mean

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>star research assistant covering the railroad and trucking industries. And

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I worked for a guy by the name of Tony Hatch.

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>He's a consultant and analysts at ABH Consulting. Tony, I know,

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you know these railroad companies inside and out. Tell us

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>what's going on Union Pacific. Why would the stock surge

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>ten percent when the CEO says he's going to step down? Well,

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I want to confirm the Yeah, you

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>were a star assistant, but what does that mean by

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, to being a star research assistant? Means he

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>was good to bring on golf forsoms or what. Well,

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 1>since I don't golf, I'm assuming he took my place

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and I was really I would say his number one

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>skill exactly there, you figured, I'm kidding Union Pacific, you know,

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>on a Sunday, right. The company tried to say this

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>was part of a regularly planned issue they've been discussing

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>going back in the early last year. So that if

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it's regularly planned, and you have a task force assigned,

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and you've hired and outside, you know, a recruiting firm,

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>why would you release this on Sunday. The answer is

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>because one of their largest shareholders demanded that they do

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and put out an incredibly sharp letter that talked about

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>how Union Pacific, despite having what's well known to be

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the best franchise in the industry, has underperformed all of

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>his peers in just about every category. Echo to mention,

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>um UP has had a long history of allowing great

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>patience for its leadership. Paul. You can remember back to

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the UPSP merger when when that you know, there was

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a disaster, but the management team stayed intact. This time,

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:18.319
<v Speaker 1>I guess they've made it, made a decision to change.

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>It's the second time we've seen the board step in

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>over the actions of the CEO of Lance Fritz. They

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>did this when they announced they were going PSR. He

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>did not make that announcement, really, the board did. And

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>then they brought in Jim Venna from Canadian National Fame

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to be the COO to basically supervise their transition to

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>this new operating philosophy. It was expected that Venna might

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>be making a play for the top job then then,

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>being twenty nineteen, he did. He then left and Lance stayed,

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>making me think Lance was a pretty good political infighter.

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Now a major shareholder, sor Avna is saying that Jim

0:10:57.760 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Venas should take the job after all. So it's a

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>little of a replay, only this time with a Sunday

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>morning surprise that the board has agreed that if not

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>coming not taking the advice of their their shareholder too

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>with the person they picked, but to make a change.

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>It's it's unusual. If you looked at the track record,

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe you wouldn't be surprised if you looked at Union

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Pacific's performance. But given the history of this company and

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>their longstanding patients and unwillingness to listen outside advice, this

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is highly unusual. So what what can be done at

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a Union Pacific? What are some of these shareholders want

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 1>this company to change and perhaps improvement performance and shareholder returns.

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>We well, that's a really interesting thing that you ask

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>right now. You know, the the this PSR that that

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 1>precision scheduled railroading has has become a nasty phrase after

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>all the labor negotiations. It's even been related to the

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>accident in Ohio, though it has of course nothing to

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>do with that. But but the idea of bringing in

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>an operating guide to solve problems here at Union Pacific,

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and all the railroads had service issues over the last

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months, although they were almost entirely labor related. That

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>is not having enough cruise. This is a gesture where

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Union Pacific is sort of ignoring the wishes of its regulator,

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the Service Transportation Board, which has painted the target of

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>all railroad badness, if you will, on Up's back. And

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>so if you were to bring in a c OO

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>as CEO, you would in essence be saying we are

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 1>a inefficiency driven way to get to share all the

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>value rather than a growth driven lance didn't represent really

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>either side of this ongoing philosophical debate, and jim Na

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>as a person might not want to say he represents

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the operations side, but his resume suggested that. And then

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>when he was brought up as the attack guy coming

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>at Canadian National a year ago, when Children's Investment Fund

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>highlighted him as the successor, they got a lot of

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>what they wanted. TCI did, but they did not get

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Jim Venna. One of the thing the TCI allowed to happen,

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>as have analysts say, this was a move to pivot

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>from growth to back to margin and that is really

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>not what shippers want to hear, certainly not what the

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>regulators want to hear. What Union Pacific needs to do

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>is really take advantage of the many gifts it has.

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>It's incredible franchise. It's seemingly never put it all together.

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>There isn't a single you know, silver bullet. Oh, if

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>they just fix this, they're back. But as you may remember, Paul,

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>they you know they have the biggest franchise. You know

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that the connections to Mexico, widely diverse, all of the

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>great chemical franchise. Not not that that's a great topic

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>for these days, but they really control Texas. I want

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to ask about that, not Texas obviously, but Ohio. First

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of all, for those of us who don't cover the

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>railroads for a living, how many big railroad companies are there?

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it seems to me that there are only

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 1>a handful of them anyway, that operating all of North America,

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>so that you are correct, they are essentially you could

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>say seven or maybe eight. But in the US there

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>are the Big four War in the west, B and

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:05.839
<v Speaker 1>SAFT that's Berkshire's company, Union Pacific in the east, and

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Norfolk Southern and the Canadians go Transcon up in the

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>top and they both drop down through the center. CP

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>soon to acquire Kansas City. Southern will go all the

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>way to Mexico City. CN goes all the way to

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans. You have another railroad of some size in Mexico.

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>That's really it. But keep in mind you have a

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>highly developed highway system. So the rails are often thought

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to be they're called duopolies, and the STBs often used

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the monopoly word, but this is a duopoly that is

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>losing share at present in a rising freight market, you know,

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>forgetting today's economy, but over the last five years, and

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that shows you the importance of the highway. So yes,

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>there are many fewer railroads, but there's the competition for

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>freight is stronger rather than weaker. So what needs to

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>happen from a regulatory perspective to make sure something that

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>we saw in East Palestine, Ohio doesn't happen again? I mean,

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>if it's possible or was there lax regulation that led

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to the Norfolk Southern derailment that now seems to have

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>poisoned an entire region. So it appears highly and usually

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the National Safety Board and TSB released a preliminary report

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that's unusual, but there was so much heightened demand for

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>some kind of answer. That report says that although this

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>was a you know, a completely solvable problem, they didn't

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly say how. And it appears in Norfolk Southern you

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>did all. You played by all of the rules that

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they're supposed to have, including stopping the train when they

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>heard there. There will be some changes, most of which

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>will not have had any impact had they occurred before

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>this accident. In other words, ECB breaks. I'm getting into

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the weeds here, but a new kind of breaking system

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is one of the things some have proposed that has

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>no impact. That would have had no impact on this.

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Changing how you label trains likely would have had no

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>impact on this. It's not clear the solution of this

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>highly unlucky set of circumstances is either letting railroads not

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>carry this. Remember they're not allowed to carry these goods,

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>they're compelled to carry these goods. So allowing railroads the

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to say no, to change how the supply chains

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>for vinyl chlorider move to, that's some possibility. You know,

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily on the railroad here, since they appeared

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to have played by the regular rules. There is technology

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>coming that will have a better system for understanding when

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>bearings failed. This was a bearing in a single wheel

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>set in one hundred and forty nine car train that failed.

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>They were aware it failed just before the accident. New

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>technology could come that may allow them to have an

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>earlier look at this. But in many cases, I think

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>we're going to find this is just a set of

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>completely unlucky circumstances, and the crew did the right thing. Afterwards,

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the responders did the right thing. We had no injuries,

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>no fatalities, and I think, actually, what will ultimately be

0:16:56.640 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a solvable although reasonably expensive cleanup process Tony thirty seconds. Here,

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at Norfolk Southern. They spend a couple billion

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year in capital expenditures. There is there a

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>credible argument that they don't as an industry spend enough

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 1>on safety. No, the idea here that they they never

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 1>spend enough for people talk about their buybacks and their

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>dividends is really kind of it's like it's a populist

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>propaganda here. The rail system in the United States got

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a B plus, the freight rail system a B plus

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>grade from the American Society Civil Engineers. Highways got a D.

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 1>The alternative of moving these goods you take them off

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the railroad, will they go on the highway? On that

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>D rated system by by engineers? Where the railroad spend

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, massive amounts on a consistent basis on their network.

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>The cars in this case are owned by shippers, but

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>they were mostly the newer type of cars. You know,

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>there really isn't a case that this was a greed

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>over people right issue that's just populism. I just wouldn't

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>carry it. Yeah, well, you know, not a choice. Plastics

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>is not the key to the It's an option right there.

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, Tony, thank you so much. Tony Hatchi is

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a consultant analyst for the transportation industry at ABH Consulting.

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>He's been doing it for decades, covering the railroad stocks,

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>at trucking stocks, the shipping stocks. Good to get that

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>voice on, Jill. Thanks much for joining us here talk

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>to us about the why wca's Women's Empowerment ETF sounds fascinating. Sure, sure,

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. Yeah. I was formerly the chief

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Innovation Officer for WYDBCA Metropolitan Chicago and now I'm working

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>as an advisor with WYDBC A USA to continue to

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>work on the exchange traded fund that we launched in

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen with partnership with Impact Shares, which is a

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>nonprofit investment manager. The goal here was to create so

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 1>hang on, Jill, just to be clear, the YWCA itself

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>released this ETF. We're the Impact partner, so we eat

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Impact Shares released the ETF. There, the investment manager WYDBCA

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is sort of the consultant on the criteria that are

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>used to evaluate the companies m that are focused on

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>women's empowerment, policies and practices that companies can can impose

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in their workplace. UM and you know, with with over

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and sixty years of experience and women's issues,

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the y to BCA lends their leadership, voice, data, knowledge,

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>our networks, you know, to really make this an impactful

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>investing product. While we use this as an opportunity to

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 1>engage corporations on you know, what policies and practices they

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>can implement that will really impact women in the workplace,

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and as a tool to educate UM investors in the

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 1>general public just you know, people in general on the

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>importance of these different criteria and how you can make

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>an impact with your money. I would guess that number one,

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>by a long shot, is having decent maternity leave policies,

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and then I would guess that number two is on

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>site daycare and that everything else is way far behind that.

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.880
<v Speaker 1>A am I onto something here? Those are definitely things

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>we would like to see corporations and all businesses implement

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>in their workforce. But we look at the product itself,

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>uses equip research and Equilipe is a gender equity research

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>company in the Netherlands and they look at over four

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand publicly traded companies. They look at nineteen different criteria

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that empower women in the workplace, and then that information

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>is used by morning Star to create the Women's Empowerment Index,

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>which is used by Impact Shares for the product itself.

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So the Equilipe criteria look at gender balance in leadership

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in the workplace, equal compensation and work life balance, and

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>policies promoting gender equality, as well as an overall commitment

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to women's empowerment and their transparency in that area and

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>their accountability in that area. Be nice to see, I mean,

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it will be nice to see the performance because I

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>imagine companies that pay closure attention, that do a better

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>job of UM, you know, keeping talented and experienced women

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 1>on staff, do better at business. Absolutely. I mean what

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we see through the data is that, you know, companies

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:26.199
<v Speaker 1>that are inclusive and they incorporate these different criteria, UM

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 1>have great you know, they're they're more they're much more successful. UM,

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>they have lower turnover, they have the higher employee satisfaction. UM.

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's just all the way around. UM and

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and things like, um, you know, we look at paid sickly,

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the gender pay gap, the living wage. I mean, these

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 1>are all things that not only strengthen the women in

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the workforce, but then also have the knock on effect

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to strengthening the companies. Hey, Joe, give us an example

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of one of your holdings and why from your perspective,

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it's in the ETF UM. Well, okay, we have uh,

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 1>let's say, um Ndidia Uh is one of the top

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>holdings right now. UM. And you know, if they they

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>go out of their way. UM, well, we don't think

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it should be out of their way, but we uh,

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, to to really implement um, to be very

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>transparent about their pay. Um, their pay Uh, they pay

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a living wage, UM, they have great um uh leaves

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and work options. UM. So these are things that we

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>would like to see more companies adopting and employees being

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>more informed about so they can you know, ask their

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>companies to provide these um these things. We see these

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>criteria as sort of a roadmap for both corporate America

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and employees. People. You know, if you're looking for a job,

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:48.400
<v Speaker 1>these are the things you might want to think about

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a company having in place. It's I mean, it's so

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting because I come from I've been in Berlin for

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 1>the last six writers, right, and there they have what

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 1>seems to me um to be good maternity leave policy

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>and paternity leave and how long is that? Uh, it's

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>thirteen or fourteen months? Really, and then you know at

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that age m a kid is allowed to go to

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>daycare what they call quita. Right. But here in America,

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>where we have the worst maternity leave policies, it's like

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>one or two weeks, and then then then you still

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.719
<v Speaker 1>can't send a kid to daycare or any kind of

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>free education or or babysitting for like five years. It's

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>like the worst of both worlds in this country. And

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I just imagine that big companies could take advantage of

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that and outperform others. I see. Second among your holdings

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is Amazon, which is interesting because they've had this kind

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of anti unionist slant. Um, why do you include them

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>so highly? Well, there, it's it's based on their score

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that they received from a relief on the specific criteria.

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we we know they're there shoes with

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>all companies, and not all of them are doing the

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>most that they can do. In some situations. You know,

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I hate to say they're the best of the worst

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>because they have the highest score among their peers in

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>their particular sector for these issues. And that doesn't mean that,

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we let up on those companies that we

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 1>don't want to see them do more. But the way

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the index is or the way the products is constructed, now,

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 1>if they're in the top of their sector based on

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>these different criteria, they become a holding. All right, great stuff,

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>really appreciated. Jill O'Donovan, chief Innovation Officer the YWCA, I

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>think USA now she's advising on that. And they've got

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 1>the name of the name of the ETF is the

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Impact Shares YWC Women's Empowerment ETF and the ticker is

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 1>WOMN wo MN, so it's pretty easy to remember. And

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>if you go on the Bloomberg you can find out

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot about it as well. Just type d E

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>S and then you can click on the hold things

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>tab to see which companies they are involved in and

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you can see how they've done against other ETFs. I

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's a really important tool, you know, in the end,

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.479
<v Speaker 1>to see how companies do that treat workers better. Yeah, exactly,

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'll be interesting to see post pandemic, when people

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>have had a chance to work from home for multiple

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>years and maybe a hybrid type of arrangement or maybe

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>just working from home period. Will that put additional pressure

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>on companies to up their game in terms of fraternity care,

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.360
<v Speaker 1>healthcare and you know just that type of thing right well,

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully at the end of the day, companies that

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>do a better job of employing women do a better

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>job of making money, yes, and that puts incentive into

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the others, right, So I'll have to see how that

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>plays out. But certainly getting a lot of interest here,

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe even more so post pandemic. Everybody who's interested in

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the investment banking business, and you can count me at

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the top of that list. It's going to be paying

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>close attention to what we hear from our good friends

0:25:57.520 --> 0:25:59.239
<v Speaker 1>at Goldman sax To Markets are having one of their

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.439
<v Speaker 1>rare investor days where they trot their management teams out

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 1>in front of investors in analyst and our very on

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Alison Williams will be there. She's a senior global banks manager,

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>asset manager analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. Alison, you've been covering

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 1>these big investment banks for decades, you know, you know

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sachs first as a competitor to them when you

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>were at Morgan Stanley, now as an analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>What do you think this management team needs to get

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>across to investors tomorrow. What's their strategy for having this

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>investor day. I think a big part of the investor

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>day will be trying to put some detail behind how

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>they're going to achieve their medium term targets. So Goldman Sachs,

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>along with some other banks, last year, after a very

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>strong twenty twenty one, raised their profitability targets. Obviously, it

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>was a much different landscape last year, many challenging areas.

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Fixed in trading was an area of strength, especially for Goldman,

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and I would say that the cost ratio is really

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I think where there's going to be a lot of focus.

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>That's that's an area they said they were going to

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>miss last year. There's a lot of concerns about what

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>they're spending on comp what they're spending to invest, and

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>so I think from a metrics standpoint, we're going to

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:27.199
<v Speaker 1>want to hear, you know more about is the sixty

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>percent still a goal and what does that look like

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>for this year? And this unit, the AWM unit, which

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is I guess their asset and wealth management unit. Is

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it so awesome? I mean, is it totally better than

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody else's asset and wealth management units. I think it's

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.639
<v Speaker 1>it's very different, and I think that is an area

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 1>where they've executed well, sort of against their plan and

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously in the context of the environment. So you know,

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the last investor Day they focused on a few big opportunities,

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>or the last investor day was the first investor day, right,

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the last investor day was the first investor day. It's

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>only the second ever investment day that Goldman Sachs has

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>been too good previously to have an investor day. If

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to buy the stock, you don't have them

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you why. You figure out why you should buy

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 1>the stock. But now they're doing the work for you.

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>That should be a sign enough. Well, I think they're

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to give a little bit more detail and to

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 1>your point, like when when things are going well and

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>steady state, there's less of a need to sort of

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>put yourself out there in front of investors. I think

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>when they wanted to talk about some of these pivots

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and give some detail around their strategy. I think that's

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that's what sort of led to the first Investor Day.

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>So ironic, Alison, you and Paul Shirley. Remember in Liar's Poker,

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a trader at Goldman Sachs who's doing so well

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that he can come to work without wearing a suit

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and tie. He comes in with jeans and cowboy boots

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and he's allowed because he's doing so well. But at

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>some point he stops making money for the firm and

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>they're like, dude, put on a tire. You're out of here.

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>This is like the investor Day. So so, Alison, And

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that's by the way, So I mean, I think that

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>happens across Wall Street when people go towards more as

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>casual when things are going well, and then everybody's got

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:20.959
<v Speaker 1>to get the suit and tie. Everybody's going to come

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>into the office. And you know, when performance is good,

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things can can be ignored. Right, So, Alison,

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>how about Marcus their consumer banking effort. I'm not sure

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>if it's deemed a failure, but it's defertainly underperformed. Where

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>are they completely pulled the plug on that? If not,

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>how do they position it? So I think there are

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>elements of the you know, consumer strategy there. I think

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to continue the main product which was

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>always sort of a head scratcher that you know, what

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>what what why why they thought it was so special?

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone else thought it was a unique strategy.

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was basically you know, rolling up bounds transfer.

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>This is something that a lot of it UM card

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>companies did in the nineties, and so it seemed like

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>not really um, you know, it was a little puzzling

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>how they thought that was going to be sort of

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a differentiator or give them any kind of competitive advantage.

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>And so I think, you know, moving away from that

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and um and then there are some environmental factors. I

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>get it, by the way, Allison, because at the time

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought, wow, Goldman Sacks. If I bank with Goldman Sacks,

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>then I must be the very best. Like if I

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>pull out a Goldman Sacks card when we're all vying

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>over who pays for dinner, then I'm the man. You've

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>made it right and and and that and that's that

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.239
<v Speaker 1>was the idea behind the Apple card as well, Like

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just the cache of having it correct, and that

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I think is that's something that I think they're going

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to hold on to, right because in the credit card business,

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>as we said, as I just said, balance transfer is

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>one strategy. Another strategy is to offer, you know, to

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>provide some sort of cache behind the card. You know,

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>when we look at things like the Platinum card or

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the staff Are card, there's a lot of benefits, but

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it's also sort of the cachet of having those types

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of cards or other types of affinity cards, which kind

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of I think goes to Apple, where banks will try

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to leverage off of a strong name or something that

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the consumers have a strong affinity towards. Hey, Alison,

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>David Solomon, the chairman and CEO of Goldman SAX. How

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:31.959
<v Speaker 1>secure is his position, would you say these days? I

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>think that he has to instill some confidence again in

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the strategy he can't. There are certain things,

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the investment banking business you can't. You certainly

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>can't blame him for you know the fact that the

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>industry had a significant slide of fees. There were almost

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>no IPOs last year. But I do think that you know,

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you can manage to the cost side of things, You

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>can manage terms of your investments, and keep in mind

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that the consumer business was not hit. You know, that's

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>something that he inherited as a CEO. So um, even

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>though that you know, a lot of fingers point to

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 1>him that that wasn't necessarily sort of his um, you know,

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't that wasn't necessarily his initiative. He sort of

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>came into that. But I do think that, you know,

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of managing the cost, managing the investments going forward,

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>he does need to have a bit a little bit

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>more credible path and you know, they do have to

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>think about what they're going to say. Most people, I

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think expect a change in our return targets. It

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>would be a little silly a one year later to

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>reduce those. But I think he does need to provide

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a credible path. Um, what about a change at the

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>helm of Goldman when you meet up with all the

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>other super bank analysts, do you guys have like a

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 1>betting pool on how much longer Solomon's got? I mean,

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's probably not you know, I don't

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:03.719
<v Speaker 1>think that's really the main focus at Goldman Sachs. I

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>think that you know, he's there are very good stories

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>going on there if you look at their trading business,

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they really have knocked the cover off the

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>ball in terms of gaining revenue share there. The investment

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>banking too, they've done a good job even though it

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>was a bad year for the industry. The M and

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>A franchise, which is you know, that sort of very

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>associated with the Goldman brand. I mean, I think that's

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>very strong. I think when people think about the leadership

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>across the global investment banks that that's not really the

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>one that people are, you know, necessarily betting on a change.

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I think people are looking more towards some of the

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>other banks where there's been long standing leadership and wondering

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>when there's going to be a shift at those banks.

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, Alison, good stuff. I know you'll be downtown

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>at the Goldman Sachs headquarters tomorrow with all the other

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>financial analysts and investors waiting to hear what we're gonna

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>hear from Goldman Sachs with their investor day. Alison Williams.

0:33:56.880 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>She's a senior global banks and Asset Managers analysts for

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. She's been doing that for decades. He's got

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:09.800
<v Speaker 1>great perspective. Read her stuff on bi Go. A couple

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of months ago, thanks to Matt Miller's contacts at Ford,

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I was able to test drive a Ford F one

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 1>fifty electric truck and boy was it awesome. I was

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>really impressed. But now we've got a Big Take story

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>here that tells you, boy, there's some big issues with

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>where the aluminum comes in this truck, and that's the

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>subject of a Big Take story and a Big Take podcast.

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>So let's go to West Kasova. He's the host of

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Big Take podcast. So West, I just kind of

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:39.399
<v Speaker 1>going through this article. It's fascinating reporting as always, fascinating photography,

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 1>as always, great graphics, and it absolutely warrants being a podcast.

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about how Ford makes or gets the aluminum

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Forward's F one fifty pickup trucks. Yeah, this story is

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:56.800
<v Speaker 1>reported by Jessica Price Bryce in South Holli, Brazil and

0:34:56.880 --> 0:35:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Sherd Impress in the US. And they looked at was

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>where does the aluminum on this rock of the future,

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 1>as Ford describes it, the F one fifty lightning? Where

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 1>does it come from? And they were able to trace

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>back a lot of the aluminum on the truck to

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 1>a mining and a refinery in the heart of the

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Amazon in Brazil and down there there are thousands of

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>people who are suing now a refinery saying that the

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:33.800
<v Speaker 1>operation is really dirty and it is making them sick,

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and that it is destroying the environment. And they trace

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain all the way from there up through

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Canada and then into parts suppliers and then to Ford.

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 1>So are those parts suppliers only selling this aluminum to

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Ford or is that is that aluminum only going to

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Ford because other carmakers obviously use it as well and

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:04.359
<v Speaker 1>the material I mean, and is it just for the

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>lightning because Ford's been using a lot of aluminum in

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the F one fifty for many years now. Yeah, A

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of the aluminium used in all kinds of products,

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, soft drink cans, other vehicles, a lot of

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the things we buy because you know, we use a

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of aluminium comes from the same area. And there's

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies, there's a lot of refunders, so

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not just Ford. The reason they focused on Ford

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 1>where it was a couple of things. One is that

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>supply chains are often kind of black boxes, as they

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>describe it. It's really hard to find out the origins

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>where stuff comes from, especially when you have a really

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>long supply chain, like all the way from Brazil to

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:50.399
<v Speaker 1>the US. And what happened was the lightning was such

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a big deal when they announced it. Everyone was so

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>proud to be working on it that some of the

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>parts suppliers said, hey, we're supplying our parts to Ford's

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>new trout. And so they were able then to find out, Okay,

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>if these companies were sourcing it to Ford, where did

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 1>they get it? And they were able just by looking

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 1>through an enormous number of records and doing interviews to

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 1>trace it all the way back. And the other reason

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:16.959
<v Speaker 1>they looked at forward was that Ford described this as

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the truck that could possibly change everything that you have

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people ain't Tesla's and maybe they're really

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking about going to net zero in a carbon free future.

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 1>But people will buy pickup trucks. They need utility, they

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 1>want power, and maybe the environmental thing isn't the top

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of mind. So those people can be persuaded that an

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>electric truck is a good thing. Then you really shift

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>away from gasoline eventually to electric. And so this futuristic

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>trucks seemed like a good place to really look at Okay,

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>so how clean is it? So West who owns this

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 1>aluminum refinery? It's not forward, right, It's it's another company. No,

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it's another company, and it's based in Europe. And the

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>ownership of these companies is really long and involved in

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:10.439
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to rot here. But Ford is really

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 1>just getting these parts from their suppliers. And I should

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:20.399
<v Speaker 1>say that the companies themselves, and this is what comes

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>out in the story. The companies are following the laws

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of Brazil. That laws in Brazil over environmental regulations are

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:31.399
<v Speaker 1>pretty weak, and so the companies aren't necessarily breaking the law.

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>They're following the law. It's just that the laws themselves

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 1>don't enforce environmental regulations that protect them. The other thing

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that we should really say here is the reporters went

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to Ford and said, hey, we've found this out. What

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>do you say? And Ford immediately said, we did not

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>know this and we are now going to investigate this

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and so we're going to see what Ford Ashley does

0:38:57.680 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 1>about it. They said that they had no idea that

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the aluminum was coming from the Amazon, and that points

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 1>up to another problem is that these supply chains are

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>so long that a lot of times your suppliers say yes,

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:12.280
<v Speaker 1>it's all certified, but you don't really look to see

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 1>what about three or four suppliers down the lock right. Well,

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and when you buy the truck, you probably maybe if

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you care about the environmental impact, you look at Forward

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you look at a couple of their suppliers.

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>But consumers, obviously you can't go that far either. I'm

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 1>sure they'll be interested to read this piece. Where's the

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:31.879
<v Speaker 1>good aluminum come from? Like, if I don't want to

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>poison people in the Amazon, where should I get my

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>aluminum from? Yeah, this is a really big point, and

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:42.280
<v Speaker 1>this is something that I asked both Jessica and Sheridan,

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the reporters on the story, and they say, you know,

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>like let's say Ford, really they look at this and

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 1>they say, yeah, we don't want to get our aluminum

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>from this place anymore. That's problem. There aren't all that

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 1>many places you can get it. And so the conclusion

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that they really came to is that you're not gonna

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 1>just all of a sudden fine new sources of aluminium,

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 1>especially in the massive someone went Forward would need. You

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:09.439
<v Speaker 1>just have to do a better job of making sure

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the way you're getting a luminium is cleaner and that

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it's doing better by the environment and not just everybody

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of looking the other way. So what are the

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 1>people down there in Brazil really looking for? Are they

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 1>looking for them to stop production, to clean up production,

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:31.279
<v Speaker 1>to change the government rules. So there's all kinds of

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>things wrapped up in this because this has been going

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:38.840
<v Speaker 1>on for decades where mining companies had polluted water had

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, of course we've all heard about the deforestation

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>problems of the Amazon, ripping oak trees and kind of

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:47.839
<v Speaker 1>ruining an environment. Allow the water down there was just undrinkable,

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and some of the companies supply people who live there

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:54.399
<v Speaker 1>with bottle bobble water because they can drink the water.

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 1>It's everything from people saying, you know, their skin is

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that she too, horrible birth effects that they claim are

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:08.319
<v Speaker 1>the result of these environmental practices, and so what they're

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 1>looking for is redressed to the you know, the things

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 1>they've already suffered, and also to stop it going forward.

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, West great stuff, really appreciate it. West Kosovo.

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 1>He is the moderator for the host of the Bloomberg's

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 1>Big Take podcasts, and you can check that out wherever

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. In this edition talks about you know,

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 1>sourcing aluminum in Brazil. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews with

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three and

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:52.839
<v Speaker 1>on false Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Radio