WEBVTT - Founding Critical Race Theory

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:24.836
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Getting Even is produced by Pushkin Industries. Subscribe to

0:00:24.916 --> 0:00:28.356
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Plus and you can hear Getting Even and other

0:00:28.436 --> 0:00:34.716
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin shows add free and receive exclusive bonus episodes. Sign

0:00:34.796 --> 0:00:38.756
<v Speaker 1>up on the Getting Even show page in Apple Podcasts

0:00:38.996 --> 0:00:46.556
<v Speaker 1>or at Pushkin dot Fm. Just like you cross intersections

0:00:46.556 --> 0:00:50.076
<v Speaker 1>and there's traffic moving north and south and east and west,

0:00:50.556 --> 0:00:55.476
<v Speaker 1>black women have been impacted by the combination of race

0:00:55.596 --> 0:01:00.996
<v Speaker 1>traffic gender traffic. So that's where intersectionality came from. That's

0:01:01.076 --> 0:01:05.036
<v Speaker 1>legal scholar and professor Kimberly Crenshaw. When she introduced the

0:01:05.076 --> 0:01:09.036
<v Speaker 1>concept of intersectionality in the late nineteen eighties, Crenshaw was

0:01:09.276 --> 0:01:14.316
<v Speaker 1>underlining the ways that race and gender discrimination converge. As

0:01:14.316 --> 0:01:16.796
<v Speaker 1>a student, she saw how laws that address race and

0:01:16.916 --> 0:01:22.556
<v Speaker 1>gender separately failed to deliver justice to those at the intersections.

0:01:22.556 --> 0:01:26.636
<v Speaker 1>Just an attempt to help lawyers see things that they

0:01:26.756 --> 0:01:31.276
<v Speaker 1>apparently were having a hard time sin. Intersectionality found its

0:01:31.276 --> 0:01:34.996
<v Speaker 1>way into the Oxford English Dictionary in twenty fifteen and

0:01:35.116 --> 0:01:38.436
<v Speaker 1>became widely used in discussions about the Women's March and

0:01:38.636 --> 0:01:42.716
<v Speaker 1>the Me Too movement. But intersectionality isn't the only phrase

0:01:42.756 --> 0:01:46.316
<v Speaker 1>that Timberly Crenshaw has coined. Crenshaw is one of the

0:01:46.396 --> 0:01:52.196
<v Speaker 1>handful of legal scholars who originated and developed critical race theory.

0:01:52.676 --> 0:01:57.356
<v Speaker 1>In Layman's terms, I would describe it as the study

0:01:57.436 --> 0:02:06.876
<v Speaker 1>of how law consistently supports institutionalized forms of racial inequality.

0:02:07.916 --> 0:02:13.076
<v Speaker 1>Like intersectionality, critical race theory was originally developed to unpack

0:02:13.196 --> 0:02:17.396
<v Speaker 1>issues of identity and status in our justice system, and

0:02:17.556 --> 0:02:21.836
<v Speaker 1>like intersectionality, critical race theory has become a household phrase.

0:02:22.396 --> 0:02:26.516
<v Speaker 1>It's also become a cornerstone for a national attack on education.

0:02:27.396 --> 0:02:30.356
<v Speaker 1>It's used to shut down any additions to the curriculum

0:02:30.396 --> 0:02:34.596
<v Speaker 1>taught in American public schools which would more accurately reflect

0:02:34.676 --> 0:02:43.316
<v Speaker 1>our nation's history. I'm Anita Hill. This is getting even

0:02:44.316 --> 0:02:47.796
<v Speaker 1>my podcast about equality and what it takes to get there.

0:02:49.156 --> 0:02:53.236
<v Speaker 1>I'll be speaking with people who are improving our imperfect world,

0:02:53.996 --> 0:02:58.676
<v Speaker 1>people who took risks and broke the rules. In this episode,

0:02:58.956 --> 0:03:05.836
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking with Kimberly Crenshaw about critical race theory. Crenshaw

0:03:05.876 --> 0:03:09.036
<v Speaker 1>and I have known each other since the nineteen eighties.

0:03:09.716 --> 0:03:12.076
<v Speaker 1>I think people need to know that. At the time

0:03:12.076 --> 0:03:15.476
<v Speaker 1>and need to there was just a handful of black

0:03:15.516 --> 0:03:19.276
<v Speaker 1>women law professors. We all either knew each other or

0:03:19.436 --> 0:03:22.116
<v Speaker 1>new of each other. We could all get in a

0:03:22.156 --> 0:03:26.996
<v Speaker 1>minivan if we had a lunch meeting. You know, we

0:03:27.076 --> 0:03:31.396
<v Speaker 1>just need one table, right, Yes, Crenshaw and I both

0:03:31.476 --> 0:03:35.356
<v Speaker 1>found that our formal education lack teaching about race, racism,

0:03:35.396 --> 0:03:39.676
<v Speaker 1>and the law. For Crenshaw, that meant creating the theories

0:03:39.676 --> 0:03:44.436
<v Speaker 1>that we're missing writing them herself. You know, funny, you

0:03:44.476 --> 0:03:47.716
<v Speaker 1>should say that my mic is sitting here on the

0:03:47.716 --> 0:03:51.836
<v Speaker 1>Critical Race Theory Book as we speak. It's the foundation

0:03:51.916 --> 0:03:57.076
<v Speaker 1>of everything, right, the critic It's called the Red Book now,

0:03:57.196 --> 0:03:59.756
<v Speaker 1>the Critical Race Theory the key writings that formed the

0:03:59.876 --> 0:04:05.716
<v Speaker 1>movement effectively. If we want to understand, for example, why

0:04:06.196 --> 0:04:10.996
<v Speaker 1>we still have housing segregation that in some ways is

0:04:11.236 --> 0:04:16.956
<v Speaker 1>as significant ablight upon our society as it was fifty

0:04:17.036 --> 0:04:21.716
<v Speaker 1>years ago, we have to look at how legally segregated

0:04:21.756 --> 0:04:25.996
<v Speaker 1>neighborhoods were created and sustained. If we want to understand

0:04:26.036 --> 0:04:32.756
<v Speaker 1>why schools remain racially separated, we have to understand the

0:04:32.876 --> 0:04:40.876
<v Speaker 1>legacy of decisions that are perfectly legal that sustain racial separation.

0:04:41.476 --> 0:04:46.236
<v Speaker 1>So the overall point is to understand that race and

0:04:46.356 --> 0:04:52.276
<v Speaker 1>racism are legally constituted concepts and processes. We like to

0:04:52.316 --> 0:04:55.596
<v Speaker 1>think of Critical race theory not so much of a thing,

0:04:55.756 --> 0:04:58.996
<v Speaker 1>but of a way of viewing a thing, a way

0:04:58.996 --> 0:05:01.596
<v Speaker 1>of viewing what we think. Race is a way of

0:05:01.716 --> 0:05:06.836
<v Speaker 1>understanding why it is utterly predictable who's most likely to

0:05:06.916 --> 0:05:10.356
<v Speaker 1>be the CEO and who's most likely to be the

0:05:10.436 --> 0:05:15.156
<v Speaker 1>person cleaning the CEO's office. Race is still a primary

0:05:15.356 --> 0:05:20.556
<v Speaker 1>factor in determining access to the good things in life.

0:05:21.156 --> 0:05:24.836
<v Speaker 1>As long as race is a predictive factor, we would

0:05:24.956 --> 0:05:29.436
<v Speaker 1>want to understand, well, how does it happen fifty years

0:05:29.516 --> 0:05:34.196
<v Speaker 1>after Brown versus Board of Education, the Civil Rights Act

0:05:34.316 --> 0:05:36.836
<v Speaker 1>of sixty four and sixty five? Why do we still

0:05:36.836 --> 0:05:41.076
<v Speaker 1>have these problems? Critical race theory attempts to ask those

0:05:41.156 --> 0:05:44.996
<v Speaker 1>questions and provide some answers from the vantage point of

0:05:45.036 --> 0:05:49.396
<v Speaker 1>the law. We didn't know it was called critical race theory,

0:05:50.156 --> 0:05:56.996
<v Speaker 1>but we started the thinking as a way of understanding why.

0:05:57.196 --> 0:06:01.356
<v Speaker 1>When we arrived at Harvard Law School, we saw ourselves

0:06:01.396 --> 0:06:06.316
<v Speaker 1>as advancing the cause of racial justice through learning how

0:06:06.316 --> 0:06:09.036
<v Speaker 1>to be good lawyers. And we got there and found

0:06:09.156 --> 0:06:13.676
<v Speaker 1>that there really weren't many courses, many any courses that

0:06:13.796 --> 0:06:18.276
<v Speaker 1>were dedicated to sharing the knowledge about how to do that.

0:06:18.476 --> 0:06:21.796
<v Speaker 1>Derek Bell's courses were no longer being taught. He left

0:06:22.356 --> 0:06:28.476
<v Speaker 1>before we got there, So we engaged in a strategy

0:06:28.596 --> 0:06:33.596
<v Speaker 1>of trying to ask politely the institution to teach us

0:06:33.596 --> 0:06:37.516
<v Speaker 1>these courses, and the institution didn't think that they were

0:06:37.916 --> 0:06:42.396
<v Speaker 1>as significant as we did. It was, in fact, Derek Bell,

0:06:42.516 --> 0:06:46.556
<v Speaker 1>who was this towering figure in legal education, who had

0:06:46.636 --> 0:06:50.676
<v Speaker 1>this famous class of Race in the Law that he

0:06:50.756 --> 0:06:55.356
<v Speaker 1>taught at Harvard. But it was his absence that really

0:06:55.476 --> 0:07:00.676
<v Speaker 1>drove you and the other students to organize. That's a

0:07:00.836 --> 0:07:04.476
<v Speaker 1>real irony. You would think that, Okay would be inspired

0:07:04.476 --> 0:07:08.476
<v Speaker 1>by Derek Bell, and that's how things happen. But when

0:07:08.476 --> 0:07:11.476
<v Speaker 1>you get to a place and you know something is missing,

0:07:11.676 --> 0:07:15.276
<v Speaker 1>you know it's needed, and that it has been there before,

0:07:15.996 --> 0:07:21.996
<v Speaker 1>you all were inspired to do something about it. Yeah,

0:07:22.036 --> 0:07:25.436
<v Speaker 1>we invited law professors of color from across the country

0:07:25.476 --> 0:07:29.876
<v Speaker 1>to come and teach a chapter out of Derek Bell's book, Race, Racism,

0:07:30.356 --> 0:07:34.236
<v Speaker 1>and American Law, and it came out of a concrete

0:07:34.316 --> 0:07:38.396
<v Speaker 1>engagement with institutions that weren't prepared to deal with us.

0:07:38.716 --> 0:07:42.556
<v Speaker 1>That cohort of students included Maria Matsuda. Some of the

0:07:42.596 --> 0:07:46.676
<v Speaker 1>people that we invited included Chuck Lawrence, Richard Delgado the

0:07:47.196 --> 0:07:52.836
<v Speaker 1>core group that eventually came together with about twenty other people,

0:07:53.316 --> 0:07:57.556
<v Speaker 1>and we called ourselves critical race theorists. Basically, we were

0:07:57.596 --> 0:08:01.476
<v Speaker 1>the kids who were watching the civil rights movement happened

0:08:01.756 --> 0:08:06.316
<v Speaker 1>on television. We were the ones who were aware but

0:08:06.556 --> 0:08:10.876
<v Speaker 1>not old enough to really become involved in the demands

0:08:10.956 --> 0:08:15.476
<v Speaker 1>for voting and the demands for even what we were called.

0:08:15.556 --> 0:08:18.036
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you and I grew up at a time

0:08:18.076 --> 0:08:20.756
<v Speaker 1>where it wasn't even a good thing to be called

0:08:20.756 --> 0:08:27.076
<v Speaker 1>a black person, right. So, becoming a law student going

0:08:27.116 --> 0:08:32.316
<v Speaker 1>into these institutions, after having watched the doors open and

0:08:32.916 --> 0:08:37.076
<v Speaker 1>understanding the role that students had played not only in

0:08:37.196 --> 0:08:41.556
<v Speaker 1>voting rights, not only snick, but the role that students

0:08:41.556 --> 0:08:44.556
<v Speaker 1>had played in universities, to say, look, universities, you are

0:08:44.596 --> 0:08:49.996
<v Speaker 1>not immune. You are not disconnected from what's happening in

0:08:49.996 --> 0:08:52.196
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the society. If we don't have the

0:08:52.236 --> 0:08:56.876
<v Speaker 1>ability to learn what the true history was, what reconstruction

0:08:57.076 --> 0:09:00.916
<v Speaker 1>was all about, how all of the advances from reconstruction

0:09:00.996 --> 0:09:04.716
<v Speaker 1>were rolled back. If we're not learning that stuff, we're

0:09:04.756 --> 0:09:09.996
<v Speaker 1>not learning the truth about America. So we went into

0:09:10.236 --> 0:09:14.356
<v Speaker 1>Harvard Law School with the sense that we were entitled

0:09:14.396 --> 0:09:18.556
<v Speaker 1>to learn this history. That's what desegregation was supposed to

0:09:18.556 --> 0:09:22.756
<v Speaker 1>be about, not just about bodies, but about knowledge. So

0:09:23.076 --> 0:09:26.636
<v Speaker 1>in going there and thinking, okay, well, the person we

0:09:26.636 --> 0:09:29.116
<v Speaker 1>were coming here to learn from, the courses we were

0:09:29.276 --> 0:09:34.116
<v Speaker 1>hoping to take are not being offered. Surely you're going

0:09:34.196 --> 0:09:38.716
<v Speaker 1>to do something about this, right, And the answer was

0:09:38.876 --> 0:09:44.356
<v Speaker 1>as instructive as the absence. The absence presented the moment

0:09:44.476 --> 0:09:48.236
<v Speaker 1>to raise the question, and the answer to the question

0:09:48.356 --> 0:09:54.716
<v Speaker 1>told us reams right, like, basically, there are no qualified

0:09:54.796 --> 0:09:58.756
<v Speaker 1>people of color, at least people we think who are

0:09:58.836 --> 0:10:01.636
<v Speaker 1>qualified to come here and teach. Well, that caused us

0:10:01.636 --> 0:10:05.756
<v Speaker 1>to say, well, what counts this qualification, particularly in an

0:10:05.756 --> 0:10:11.116
<v Speaker 1>institution and an entire field that into like yesterday largely

0:10:11.316 --> 0:10:13.996
<v Speaker 1>was a place that was not welcoming to people of color.

0:10:14.276 --> 0:10:17.716
<v Speaker 1>So how do you become qualified when your people weren't

0:10:17.716 --> 0:10:22.116
<v Speaker 1>really part of that institution? And we were coming so

0:10:22.676 --> 0:10:26.036
<v Speaker 1>inspired by what had happened during the first fifteen years

0:10:26.036 --> 0:10:28.436
<v Speaker 1>of the civil rights movement, we thought, of course it's

0:10:28.436 --> 0:10:31.556
<v Speaker 1>going to continue, right, these are the new lunch counters.

0:10:32.036 --> 0:10:36.076
<v Speaker 1>And we got there, Nita, just as the Supreme Court

0:10:36.116 --> 0:10:38.876
<v Speaker 1>was beginning to push back and beginning to say, we're

0:10:38.916 --> 0:10:40.756
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the road. We've done all the

0:10:40.796 --> 0:10:45.396
<v Speaker 1>reform that's necessary, So telling us why there wasn't more

0:10:45.476 --> 0:10:49.876
<v Speaker 1>coming became the text that we were reading and critiquing,

0:10:50.276 --> 0:10:54.076
<v Speaker 1>and that critique became critical race theory. This was a

0:10:54.156 --> 0:10:58.996
<v Speaker 1>conversation happening mostly inside law schools, and not even in

0:10:59.196 --> 0:11:03.316
<v Speaker 1>all law schools at that Nope, but law school conversations

0:11:03.356 --> 0:11:08.036
<v Speaker 1>were going on in the eighties and then ultimately though,

0:11:08.076 --> 0:11:12.636
<v Speaker 1>this idea started to spread outside of the law school,

0:11:12.676 --> 0:11:15.516
<v Speaker 1>and one of the factors was a book that you

0:11:15.676 --> 0:11:20.436
<v Speaker 1>co author, that book, Critical Race Theory, the key writings.

0:11:21.036 --> 0:11:26.436
<v Speaker 1>But even in the nineties, Kimberley wasn't It's pretty fair

0:11:26.556 --> 0:11:30.476
<v Speaker 1>to say that critical race theory was something that was

0:11:31.476 --> 0:11:38.156
<v Speaker 1>really still thought about in the academy in law and

0:11:38.436 --> 0:11:41.916
<v Speaker 1>even though it started to spread in other areas, it

0:11:41.916 --> 0:11:43.996
<v Speaker 1>was still by the end of the nineties, it was

0:11:44.076 --> 0:11:49.716
<v Speaker 1>still in academic. Yeah, people started reading it in political science,

0:11:50.316 --> 0:11:54.836
<v Speaker 1>in sociology and American studies and cultural studies, and so

0:11:54.876 --> 0:11:58.556
<v Speaker 1>that's where it existed until like last year, and then

0:11:58.596 --> 0:12:05.556
<v Speaker 1>it was discovered as the Unamerican anti American idea. I

0:12:05.556 --> 0:12:07.676
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this is one of the reasons. But

0:12:08.356 --> 0:12:12.156
<v Speaker 1>evidence of that is the extent to which it was

0:12:12.996 --> 0:12:17.956
<v Speaker 1>challenging for people to think about race and racial power

0:12:18.076 --> 0:12:23.556
<v Speaker 1>outside of the framework of an individually biased person. And

0:12:23.716 --> 0:12:28.116
<v Speaker 1>the solution to that narrow conception of what racism is

0:12:28.196 --> 0:12:30.796
<v Speaker 1>or could be was, well, let's not look at race,

0:12:31.036 --> 0:12:35.156
<v Speaker 1>let's all be colorblind. So there was sort of a

0:12:35.276 --> 0:12:39.836
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan discomfort with some of the core ideas in critical

0:12:39.916 --> 0:12:43.956
<v Speaker 1>race theory, which where race does not go away because

0:12:43.996 --> 0:12:47.236
<v Speaker 1>you don't name it. Racism is not something that you

0:12:47.276 --> 0:12:51.876
<v Speaker 1>can solve by being colorblind. My analogy has always been,

0:12:52.476 --> 0:12:57.316
<v Speaker 1>we realize that we built our institutions with toxic material

0:12:57.396 --> 0:13:01.916
<v Speaker 1>like asbestos. We don't think the solution to brown lung

0:13:01.956 --> 0:13:05.476
<v Speaker 1>disease is to not notice that this asbestos is there,

0:13:06.156 --> 0:13:11.836
<v Speaker 1>not use the word or terminology asbestos, and to criticize

0:13:12.116 --> 0:13:15.956
<v Speaker 1>those experts who can tell you where the asbestos is

0:13:15.996 --> 0:13:18.996
<v Speaker 1>tucked away in our institutions. We would never do that

0:13:19.556 --> 0:13:23.076
<v Speaker 1>with something that we really cared about. Yet we've done

0:13:23.116 --> 0:13:27.036
<v Speaker 1>that with race and racism. So it's only been, i

0:13:27.076 --> 0:13:31.196
<v Speaker 1>would say, in the reckoning around Black Lives Matter, and

0:13:31.276 --> 0:13:37.156
<v Speaker 1>in particular in twenty twenty during the uprisings around Brianna

0:13:37.236 --> 0:13:41.156
<v Speaker 1>Taylor and George Floyd that people started uttering the phrases

0:13:41.236 --> 0:13:45.236
<v Speaker 1>structural racism, and so I think that created both more

0:13:45.756 --> 0:13:49.316
<v Speaker 1>of a demand for critical thinking about race and then

0:13:49.636 --> 0:13:54.356
<v Speaker 1>quickly after that the backlash against critical thinking about race.

0:13:55.756 --> 0:13:59.676
<v Speaker 1>After the break, we discussed the recent backlash against critical

0:13:59.756 --> 0:14:03.476
<v Speaker 1>race theory, the power struggle over school curriculum and the

0:14:03.556 --> 0:14:09.236
<v Speaker 1>role of education, and moving us toward a more equal society.

0:14:13.036 --> 0:14:18.036
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to getting even I'm Anita Hill. I'm speaking

0:14:18.236 --> 0:14:21.756
<v Speaker 1>with Kimberly Crenshaw, the legal scholar who coined the terms

0:14:22.036 --> 0:14:26.716
<v Speaker 1>intersectionality and critical race theory. And we can't talk about

0:14:26.796 --> 0:14:31.916
<v Speaker 1>CRT without talking about education. Can you talk about how

0:14:31.956 --> 0:14:36.356
<v Speaker 1>your early education got you to thinking about race, gender

0:14:36.396 --> 0:14:42.356
<v Speaker 1>and the law. Well, you know, Anita, it's not even

0:14:42.516 --> 0:14:45.996
<v Speaker 1>my early education. It's sitting at the dinner table. My

0:14:46.076 --> 0:14:50.836
<v Speaker 1>mother was what we might call a race woman of

0:14:50.836 --> 0:14:54.236
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth century. She was born and raised in Kent, Ohio,

0:14:54.996 --> 0:15:00.116
<v Speaker 1>and partly because her father was the town's physician, they

0:15:00.636 --> 0:15:06.996
<v Speaker 1>weren't constrained by concerns that many other folks had to

0:15:07.036 --> 0:15:10.436
<v Speaker 1>worry about that if they demanded their equal rights, they

0:15:10.436 --> 0:15:14.756
<v Speaker 1>would lose jobs. The way that segregation was reinforced in

0:15:14.836 --> 0:15:21.196
<v Speaker 1>the North was through economic punishment, and because they relied

0:15:21.316 --> 0:15:26.316
<v Speaker 1>on the black community for their livelihood, they were freer

0:15:26.436 --> 0:15:30.916
<v Speaker 1>to demand certain rights. So my mom her first civil

0:15:30.996 --> 0:15:34.116
<v Speaker 1>rights action was as a three year old, integrating the

0:15:34.196 --> 0:15:38.156
<v Speaker 1>Waiting pool, and she talks about remembering what happened when

0:15:38.236 --> 0:15:40.596
<v Speaker 1>they decided to drain the pool with her in it.

0:15:41.676 --> 0:15:45.436
<v Speaker 1>Right said, she was splashing around and the water kept

0:15:45.436 --> 0:15:48.596
<v Speaker 1>getting lower and lower until it was sucked down the drain,

0:15:49.316 --> 0:15:53.436
<v Speaker 1>and her mom gathered her up, went to the neighborhood,

0:15:53.476 --> 0:15:56.596
<v Speaker 1>got a whole bunch of other black kids, went and

0:15:56.636 --> 0:15:59.436
<v Speaker 1>got swimming suits, and went right back and jumped back

0:15:59.476 --> 0:16:02.716
<v Speaker 1>into the pool that had been refilled. That was sort

0:16:02.756 --> 0:16:06.356
<v Speaker 1>of where she came from. And at our dinner table

0:16:06.476 --> 0:16:09.556
<v Speaker 1>we heard these stories. I was raised in the town

0:16:09.556 --> 0:16:12.556
<v Speaker 1>that she grew up in. The history was built in

0:16:12.596 --> 0:16:15.916
<v Speaker 1>the geography everywhere we went. That was the place that

0:16:15.996 --> 0:16:18.756
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to serve us at the counter, That was

0:16:18.756 --> 0:16:20.796
<v Speaker 1>the movie theater that didn't want to let us sit

0:16:20.836 --> 0:16:24.076
<v Speaker 1>where we wanted to sit. So that was the conversation

0:16:24.676 --> 0:16:28.956
<v Speaker 1>at the dinner table. So a lot of my childhood

0:16:29.156 --> 0:16:34.156
<v Speaker 1>was trying to navigate how to think about this thing

0:16:34.316 --> 0:16:38.996
<v Speaker 1>that happens, this thing called racism. So going to school

0:16:39.796 --> 0:16:42.596
<v Speaker 1>was a process of trying to figure out, well, why

0:16:42.636 --> 0:16:47.036
<v Speaker 1>aren't we talking about this. You are one of the

0:16:47.116 --> 0:16:53.876
<v Speaker 1>legal scholars who developed critical race theory beginning when you

0:16:53.956 --> 0:16:58.556
<v Speaker 1>were in law school. I wanted to go to law

0:16:58.596 --> 0:17:01.556
<v Speaker 1>school because I wanted to understand how to dismantle the

0:17:01.636 --> 0:17:04.876
<v Speaker 1>things that are just kind of built in. And my

0:17:04.916 --> 0:17:09.356
<v Speaker 1>eyes were continuously open to the fact that this thing

0:17:09.436 --> 0:17:12.996
<v Speaker 1>called racism is not just about people with a bad heart.

0:17:13.676 --> 0:17:16.676
<v Speaker 1>It's not about people who don't like us because of

0:17:16.716 --> 0:17:21.396
<v Speaker 1>our skin color. It's about deeply structured ways in which

0:17:21.436 --> 0:17:27.196
<v Speaker 1>disadvantage functions. It's about the historical ways that those platforms

0:17:27.236 --> 0:17:32.716
<v Speaker 1>of advantage and disadvantage can reproduce themselves without anybody intending

0:17:32.756 --> 0:17:36.196
<v Speaker 1>to do it. So law school was the place where

0:17:36.316 --> 0:17:38.636
<v Speaker 1>I'd be able to develop the tools to do something

0:17:38.676 --> 0:17:43.356
<v Speaker 1>about it. One could have figured that something like a

0:17:43.476 --> 0:17:46.516
<v Speaker 1>concept like critical race theory, like a way of thinking

0:17:46.556 --> 0:17:51.276
<v Speaker 1>about race, that there would be attacks. So why I'm

0:17:51.356 --> 0:17:54.756
<v Speaker 1>asking this rhetorically, but I'm also asking it literally, Why

0:17:54.796 --> 0:18:00.116
<v Speaker 1>didn't you see it coming? Well, you know I did

0:18:01.116 --> 0:18:04.316
<v Speaker 1>see it coming. I actually see worse coming. And that's

0:18:05.076 --> 0:18:09.356
<v Speaker 1>really what worries me so much. I mean, race reform

0:18:09.516 --> 0:18:14.156
<v Speaker 1>has in this country always been met with a backlash,

0:18:14.236 --> 0:18:19.436
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes the backlash was more powerful and lasted longer

0:18:19.476 --> 0:18:23.596
<v Speaker 1>than the reform did. So if you think about reconstruction,

0:18:24.276 --> 0:18:26.956
<v Speaker 1>you know, how do we take people who had been

0:18:27.036 --> 0:18:32.676
<v Speaker 1>enslaved and make them full fledged citizens? That lasted about

0:18:32.756 --> 0:18:37.596
<v Speaker 1>a decade. The reaction to that, the retrenchment to that,

0:18:38.316 --> 0:18:41.876
<v Speaker 1>lasted over a half century. In the mid eighties to

0:18:41.876 --> 0:18:45.836
<v Speaker 1>the nineties, the response to civil rights claim was you're

0:18:45.876 --> 0:18:53.356
<v Speaker 1>asking for handouts. Remedies are reverse discrimination, preferential treatment. That

0:18:53.476 --> 0:18:55.956
<v Speaker 1>was a backlash to the sixties, and it was a

0:18:56.036 --> 0:19:00.556
<v Speaker 1>backlash that articulated itself in the same way that the

0:19:00.596 --> 0:19:06.436
<v Speaker 1>backlash against reconstruction was articulated. So reform and retrenchment have

0:19:06.596 --> 0:19:11.236
<v Speaker 1>been a dynamic deeply structured into American society. So that's

0:19:11.276 --> 0:19:14.676
<v Speaker 1>a pattern that we've seen and I'm more or less

0:19:14.716 --> 0:19:19.076
<v Speaker 1>expected at. What worried me the most was when then

0:19:19.236 --> 0:19:24.236
<v Speaker 1>President Trump issued an executive order against all training in

0:19:24.276 --> 0:19:30.596
<v Speaker 1>the federal government to advance equal opportunity, framing that as discriminatory.

0:19:31.036 --> 0:19:33.996
<v Speaker 1>Most people, I think we're thinking ay, it would go

0:19:34.076 --> 0:19:38.956
<v Speaker 1>away if Biden got elected and he would rescind the order,

0:19:38.996 --> 0:19:43.116
<v Speaker 1>which happened. What they didn't anticipate would be that this

0:19:43.156 --> 0:19:47.636
<v Speaker 1>would become a multi state strategy. It would quickly go

0:19:47.716 --> 0:19:51.356
<v Speaker 1>through state legislatures where there wasn't much pushback, and it

0:19:51.396 --> 0:19:56.036
<v Speaker 1>would quickly turn into brush fires in school boards. I

0:19:56.076 --> 0:19:59.436
<v Speaker 1>think people didn't see that coming, and as a consequence,

0:19:59.476 --> 0:20:03.116
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't a sense of what the response should be

0:20:03.436 --> 0:20:06.356
<v Speaker 1>to the problem. Because what they're getting at is the

0:20:06.436 --> 0:20:10.196
<v Speaker 1>fundamental idea that in order to to become a more

0:20:10.236 --> 0:20:13.076
<v Speaker 1>perfect union, we have to address the ways in which

0:20:13.116 --> 0:20:17.156
<v Speaker 1>we are and always have been imperfect well, and what

0:20:17.236 --> 0:20:20.076
<v Speaker 1>it says is that it's ultimately going back to the

0:20:20.156 --> 0:20:24.076
<v Speaker 1>day when you were in school trying to figure it

0:20:24.116 --> 0:20:28.476
<v Speaker 1>out yourself. Yeah. Yeah, that is what we're doing to children.

0:20:29.436 --> 0:20:34.116
<v Speaker 1>And as you pointed out, when we were going into

0:20:34.236 --> 0:20:37.476
<v Speaker 1>law school with a sense that we had a right

0:20:37.596 --> 0:20:42.476
<v Speaker 1>to this more inclusive education, it was because it had

0:20:42.516 --> 0:20:45.236
<v Speaker 1>been there. It was because there were elements of it

0:20:45.756 --> 0:20:50.236
<v Speaker 1>in various places. And I think our opponents recognize that

0:20:50.716 --> 0:20:52.876
<v Speaker 1>if you give them a taste of it, if you

0:20:53.516 --> 0:20:55.916
<v Speaker 1>open up the door to any of this, it will

0:20:55.996 --> 0:21:02.036
<v Speaker 1>become the fuel that will energize future generations to ask

0:21:02.076 --> 0:21:06.916
<v Speaker 1>for more of it, so shut it down completely. Their

0:21:06.996 --> 0:21:12.476
<v Speaker 1>reaction shows how significant it is to be able to

0:21:12.556 --> 0:21:16.916
<v Speaker 1>really grapple with uncover the ground upon which we stand,

0:21:17.076 --> 0:21:21.156
<v Speaker 1>because if it was insignificant, they wouldn't be spending millions

0:21:21.156 --> 0:21:24.716
<v Speaker 1>of dollars trying to shut it down. Now, one of

0:21:24.756 --> 0:21:29.116
<v Speaker 1>the responses I've heard is for students of color, and

0:21:29.276 --> 0:21:34.036
<v Speaker 1>really any students or faculty teachers who are subjected to

0:21:34.276 --> 0:21:38.756
<v Speaker 1>having their curriculum stifled or whitewashed, there is a recourse,

0:21:38.836 --> 0:21:45.196
<v Speaker 1>and that is you go to predominantly black university or

0:21:45.556 --> 0:21:50.476
<v Speaker 1>college where perhaps if it's not a state's fund at college,

0:21:51.036 --> 0:21:55.476
<v Speaker 1>then you are able to teach whatever you want to learn,

0:21:55.556 --> 0:21:58.196
<v Speaker 1>what you want to understand race and someone in a

0:21:58.236 --> 0:22:01.916
<v Speaker 1>different way then you will if you're going to a

0:22:01.956 --> 0:22:05.876
<v Speaker 1>school where the material has been banned. You know, I

0:22:05.956 --> 0:22:08.276
<v Speaker 1>thought about that, and it really does get to this

0:22:08.396 --> 0:22:15.676
<v Speaker 1>larger question shit about choice as well as about the

0:22:15.756 --> 0:22:18.876
<v Speaker 1>value of degrees, and that's part of the racism and

0:22:18.916 --> 0:22:23.236
<v Speaker 1>structural racism that we exist with. When you get a

0:22:23.236 --> 0:22:26.996
<v Speaker 1>degree from Harvard or Yale or their University of Oklahoma,

0:22:27.076 --> 0:22:30.396
<v Speaker 1>it comes with a whole network of people and resources

0:22:30.436 --> 0:22:33.196
<v Speaker 1>that you're not likely to get in a smaller institution,

0:22:33.556 --> 0:22:35.996
<v Speaker 1>and especially not likely to get in an institution with

0:22:36.116 --> 0:22:39.356
<v Speaker 1>less funding, which is often the case for our historically

0:22:39.356 --> 0:22:44.996
<v Speaker 1>BIA colleges and universities. Do we ask students to give

0:22:45.076 --> 0:22:48.236
<v Speaker 1>up those benefits in order to learn about how to

0:22:48.356 --> 0:22:51.596
<v Speaker 1>end racism? Is it fair to those students? I mean,

0:22:51.716 --> 0:22:55.996
<v Speaker 1>is there an equal protection argument to be made that

0:22:56.196 --> 0:23:02.236
<v Speaker 1>something is lost when you are not provided with the

0:23:02.316 --> 0:23:07.876
<v Speaker 1>information that is critical to understanding bias and oppression in

0:23:07.956 --> 0:23:14.036
<v Speaker 1>this country. Well, one of the strategies that has been

0:23:14.156 --> 0:23:19.796
<v Speaker 1>much discussed is to raise precisely that argument that Brown

0:23:19.916 --> 0:23:24.956
<v Speaker 1>versus Board, and the entire legacy of that monumental case

0:23:25.756 --> 0:23:35.036
<v Speaker 1>was that democracy requires equitable educational opportunity. That's why the

0:23:35.356 --> 0:23:40.396
<v Speaker 1>real injury that Linda Brown experience wasn't simply that race

0:23:40.556 --> 0:23:44.316
<v Speaker 1>was taken into account in making the school assignment. That

0:23:44.356 --> 0:23:47.356
<v Speaker 1>would mean that the white students were harmed in the

0:23:47.396 --> 0:23:50.236
<v Speaker 1>same way that Linda Brown was harmed. And so the

0:23:50.356 --> 0:23:55.756
<v Speaker 1>main argument there was that the message of racial subordination

0:23:56.396 --> 0:24:03.356
<v Speaker 1>that is generated from segregation undermines our guarantee of democracy.

0:24:03.596 --> 0:24:08.876
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't end with just segregation. It includes the content

0:24:09.156 --> 0:24:13.876
<v Speaker 1>of education. It includes saying that there's only one story

0:24:13.956 --> 0:24:19.996
<v Speaker 1>that is the permissible official story of America, and it's

0:24:19.996 --> 0:24:24.956
<v Speaker 1>a story that does not explore the consequences of enslavement

0:24:25.076 --> 0:24:29.716
<v Speaker 1>and of all of the other racial dynamics that built

0:24:29.716 --> 0:24:33.916
<v Speaker 1>this country. So when you have an educational system that

0:24:34.116 --> 0:24:40.716
<v Speaker 1>denies and deprives constituencies of the actual factual information that

0:24:40.796 --> 0:24:45.676
<v Speaker 1>explains our history and explains how and why our society

0:24:45.716 --> 0:24:49.196
<v Speaker 1>looks the way it does now, I would say that

0:24:49.196 --> 0:24:53.996
<v Speaker 1>that compromises the very values that Brown versus Board of

0:24:54.116 --> 0:24:59.476
<v Speaker 1>Education embodied. So I think there is an argument to

0:24:59.556 --> 0:25:03.236
<v Speaker 1>be made. I think it has a deeper grounding in

0:25:03.316 --> 0:25:07.356
<v Speaker 1>what the fourteenth Amendment was all about. We cannot have

0:25:07.516 --> 0:25:11.596
<v Speaker 1>an equal citizen and when we're not willing to tell

0:25:11.596 --> 0:25:16.236
<v Speaker 1>the full story of when our society embraced inequality and

0:25:16.356 --> 0:25:20.036
<v Speaker 1>what the echoes of that embrace continue to be. So

0:25:20.156 --> 0:25:24.556
<v Speaker 1>my hope is that there will be more affirmative efforts

0:25:24.596 --> 0:25:28.676
<v Speaker 1>to fight back against this repression. The fourteenth Amendment does

0:25:28.716 --> 0:25:34.876
<v Speaker 1>embody a value, and these laws undermine that value. That's

0:25:34.916 --> 0:25:37.636
<v Speaker 1>what we need to be able to teach our young people.

0:25:37.716 --> 0:25:39.716
<v Speaker 1>That's what we need to be able to say to

0:25:39.756 --> 0:25:43.556
<v Speaker 1>ourselves and to our elected officials, and that's what we

0:25:43.556 --> 0:25:47.956
<v Speaker 1>should hold them accountable to. That value that was fought

0:25:47.996 --> 0:25:51.876
<v Speaker 1>and died for, that value that was resuscitated in mid

0:25:51.876 --> 0:25:54.796
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century, and that value that has to rise again

0:25:55.276 --> 0:25:58.796
<v Speaker 1>if we're to save this country. And this is where

0:25:58.996 --> 0:26:03.796
<v Speaker 1>a need of I feel that our generation has got

0:26:03.836 --> 0:26:07.916
<v Speaker 1>to make up for the losses. So for me, for

0:26:08.116 --> 0:26:10.076
<v Speaker 1>at least the rest of my life, it's like, well,

0:26:10.076 --> 0:26:12.116
<v Speaker 1>we've got to fight back because we have got to

0:26:12.116 --> 0:26:15.196
<v Speaker 1>pass on something to the next generation. It's got to

0:26:15.196 --> 0:26:19.436
<v Speaker 1>be better than what they're getting if these laws are effective. So,

0:26:20.036 --> 0:26:24.756
<v Speaker 1>you know, the performance that we are seeing by all

0:26:24.796 --> 0:26:31.236
<v Speaker 1>of these critics, the hyperbole, the hysteria around telling the

0:26:31.276 --> 0:26:35.476
<v Speaker 1>truth about the constitution, telling the truth about slavery, telling

0:26:35.516 --> 0:26:38.516
<v Speaker 1>the truth about the Civil War and the laws cause

0:26:38.596 --> 0:26:43.636
<v Speaker 1>and segregation. The response that we ought to collectively have

0:26:44.316 --> 0:26:46.676
<v Speaker 1>is to read all this stuff right, all this stuff,

0:26:46.836 --> 0:26:54.596
<v Speaker 1>learn all this stuff, and act accordingly. Kimberly Crenshaw's work

0:26:54.676 --> 0:26:58.356
<v Speaker 1>has helped move us to a more equitable world. Her

0:26:58.396 --> 0:27:04.076
<v Speaker 1>ideas have enriched the learning experiences of countless students. Education

0:27:04.236 --> 0:27:10.596
<v Speaker 1>is currency and stifling education has real costs. We all lose.

0:27:12.276 --> 0:27:16.796
<v Speaker 1>If we limit critical thinking about inequalities, we will pass

0:27:17.116 --> 0:27:22.676
<v Speaker 1>problems of racism on to our children. Quinshaw's words are

0:27:22.676 --> 0:27:26.916
<v Speaker 1>an urgent call to action, because learning the truth is

0:27:26.956 --> 0:27:30.316
<v Speaker 1>how we can equip the next generation with the tools

0:27:30.476 --> 0:27:37.636
<v Speaker 1>they need to reach equality. In the next episode, I'm

0:27:37.676 --> 0:27:41.676
<v Speaker 1>talking with Cherylyn Eiffel. We spoke on her last day

0:27:41.756 --> 0:27:46.316
<v Speaker 1>as president of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund,

0:27:46.796 --> 0:27:51.316
<v Speaker 1>the country's leading civil rights law organization. Oh, if you're

0:27:51.316 --> 0:27:53.996
<v Speaker 1>not daunted, you know something is very wrong with you

0:27:54.036 --> 0:27:56.996
<v Speaker 1>and you're probably not right for this job. So yes,

0:27:57.276 --> 0:28:03.036
<v Speaker 1>it is daunting, and I think it should be. Getting

0:28:03.076 --> 0:28:06.316
<v Speaker 1>Even is a production of Pushkin Industries, and it's written

0:28:06.316 --> 0:28:10.436
<v Speaker 1>and hosted by me Anita Hill. Is produced by Mola

0:28:10.476 --> 0:28:15.316
<v Speaker 1>Board and Brittany Brown. Our editor is Sarah Kramer, our

0:28:15.356 --> 0:28:20.436
<v Speaker 1>engineer is Amanda kay Wang, and our showrunner is Sasha Matthias.

0:28:21.756 --> 0:28:26.356
<v Speaker 1>Luis Gara composed original music for the show. Our executive

0:28:26.356 --> 0:28:31.956
<v Speaker 1>producers are Mia Lobel and Letal Malad. Our Director of

0:28:31.996 --> 0:28:38.836
<v Speaker 1>Development is Justine Lane. At Pushkin, Thanks to Heather Fane,

0:28:38.916 --> 0:28:45.836
<v Speaker 1>Carly Migliori, Jason Gambrel, Julia Barton, John Schnarz, and Jacob Weisberg.

0:28:46.556 --> 0:28:50.916
<v Speaker 1>You can find me on Twitter at Anita Hill and

0:28:51.076 --> 0:28:55.556
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook at Anita Hill. You can find Pushkin on

0:28:55.716 --> 0:29:00.076
<v Speaker 1>all social platforms at pushkin Pods, and you can sign

0:29:00.236 --> 0:29:04.516
<v Speaker 1>up for our newsletter at pushkin dot fm. If you

0:29:04.596 --> 0:29:09.116
<v Speaker 1>love this show and others from Pushkin industry, consider subscribe

0:29:09.396 --> 0:29:13.036
<v Speaker 1>to Pushkin Plus. Subscribe to Pushkin Plus and you can

0:29:13.156 --> 0:29:17.636
<v Speaker 1>hear Getting Even and other Pushkin shows add free and

0:29:17.796 --> 0:29:22.636
<v Speaker 1>receive exclusive bonus episodes. Sign up on the Getting Even

0:29:22.676 --> 0:29:28.436
<v Speaker 1>show page in Apple Podcasts or at pushkin dot fm.

0:29:28.476 --> 0:29:33.156
<v Speaker 1>To find more Pushkin podcasts. Listen on the iHeartRadio app,

0:29:33.876 --> 0:29:37.556
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you like to listen.