WEBVTT - An Interview With Gary Shilling: Masters in Business (Audio)

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So I have a funny story about my guest this week. UM,

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you probably know who he is. His name is Gary Shilling.

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>He's an economist. He's all over television and and print

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and everything. He's he's his background. He essentially built the

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>economics department at Merrill Lynch. He was Meryll's first chief economist. Um.

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>And we we get into a few stories about that,

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>but I have I have a really amusing story that

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>we just didn't get to um in our conversation. So

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I have at various times spoken at different events and

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and this was an event that was down in the Caribbean. Um.

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And they have a lineup of different people, this economist,

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that market strategist, and you sing for your supper. You

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you speak for an hour or two and then you

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:01.319
<v Speaker 1>get to play the Caribbean for a few days. So

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a good deal for everybody. And by coincidence, I'm

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>on a catamaran with my wife and Gary Shilling and

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>Gary's wife, and uh we're going out to do a

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>little diving, a little snorkeling. UM. I want to say

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it was Anguila or Antigua, and I never remember which

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is which, but you know, at a certain point, all

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>those islands they're beautiful, that's sunny, the water is gorgeous,

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's hard to tell where you are when you're

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>on a boat for a week or so. So we

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>go out to the dive location and it's a bright

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:38.559
<v Speaker 1>sunny day and everything is marked underwater. It's twenty feet,

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>it's thirty feet. It's crystal clear waters. And I have

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a tendency to to even win snorkeling, to like to

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>try and dive deep and and look at stuff. Um

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and so all of a sudden storm comes in out

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of nowhere. We come up from underwater and it's absolute

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>from bright blue size guys to totally gray. Can't see anything,

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>can't see more than ten ft. The boat, which was

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards off in that direction, is gone. And I'm

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good swimmer, and my wife is starting to panic.

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>What are we gonna do? We're stuck here, and I'm like, well,

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>we have two choices. It's the Carebbean. These storms blew

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>in and out in thirty seconds. We could just tread

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 1>water here and let it pass, or I'm pretty sure

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the boat is that way. I have good sense. I

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>have a really good sense direction. And I said, um,

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>look see where the see where these markings are on

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the floor, and where the entrance to this dive side

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>is straight line back that that's where the boat is.

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>So we could wait here for five minutes, wait for

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>this to pass. We could go back to the boat.

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.119
<v Speaker 1>She goes, take us back to the boat. Okay, So

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>she grabs onto my waist ban and I swim back

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to the boat um or at least where I think

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the boat is, and we're swimming for about seven minutes

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and lo and behold, oh look there's the outline of

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a sail. Oh that's the cameraman. There's a boat. And

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of course by the time we get to the camemar Ran,

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the skies are clearing. But meanwhile I assumed it was

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>just myself and my wife swimming back to the boat.

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>We look back, there's a line of forty people following us,

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>including Gary Shilling and his wife. It was a little

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.359
<v Speaker 1>nerve racking for people who either aren't good swimmers or

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 1>tends a panic a little bit. And so we all

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>get back on the camemar Ran and all of us

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>uh the cat then takes us to a cove with

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the water is three ft deep, and we all get

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>ripped roaring lye drunk and spent a few hours stumbling

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>along the beach. So that was the first time I

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>spent any time with h Gary Shilling. We've since remained

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>friendly and UM, I've always enjoyed him and his wife.

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>They're they're fascinating, lovely people and every year he sends

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a batch of honey uh to friends and family that

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>he raises himself. We spent a lot of time talking

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>about beak keeping, which is pretty hilarious conversation. Um, without

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>further ado, here is my chat with economist Gary Shilling.

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>This is Master's in Business with Barry Ridholds on Bloomberg Radio.

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>This week on Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio, my

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>special guest is Gary Shilling, an economist and proprietor of

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the a Gary Shilling Newsletter and Economic Forecast. A little

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 1>background about Gary got a degree in physics cum Laudy

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Magnicum Loudy from Amherst College before getting a master's and

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a pH d in economics at Stanford. Ended up on

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the research staff of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco,

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>before going on to set up the economics department at

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a little shop called Merrill Lynch, where he served as

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the firm's first chief economist. Wow, that's an amazing h

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>piece of history. Author of the book The Age of

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the Leveraging twice ranked as Wall Street's top economist according

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to Institutional Investor, and a legendary beekeeper, Gary, Welcome to Bloomberg.

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Very glad to be with you. So Gary and I

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>know each other for quite a few years. We'll we'll

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of our adventures together. But let's start

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>with the beginning. So physics, right, and I keep talking

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to people on Wall Street with a physics background. How

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>do you go from physics? Would from that to both

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a master's and a doctor in an economics at Stanford? Well,

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I like the discipline of physical sciences, and uh, there

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is a there is a yearning for closure own things.

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 1>You you want to fit things together. It isn't just

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of a flash here, a flash there. You want

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to see how things come out in terms of a

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>total and take some variables, put them into a formula.

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's that's a little oversimplified, but but the whole

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>idea is that there is a there's a discipline to

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>any any uh natural science, physics, chemistry, math, all these things. Uh,

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>they don't have quite the fuzziness that economics has. Now

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you get into economics, and you know, economic forecasting is

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>an art, it's not a science. But that discipline, I

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>think it's important because it kind of keeps you on

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>this straight and narrow But anyway, I started off there

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and then my senior year I had an attack of

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>common sense and decided I wasn't cut out to be

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 1>a research physicist. So I had a similar epiphany in

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 1>my senior years, and so I decided to move on.

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, it's one of these one of

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>these great developments where um, I was thinking about going

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to graduate school in economics, and I talked to amateurs

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>as a small school about a thousand students at the time,

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and talked to the president of the college, and he

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>suggested business school and a couple of other people, and

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I talked to the head of the economics department. And

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I had happened to have when I had an elementary

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>economics course and the sections were taught not by graduate

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>students because there were none, but by the faculty and

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and uh we talked about it. He suggested a couple

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of places and then he said, what's your academic record?

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>And I told him. He said, oh, you can get

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>anywhere you want to go. Where do you want to go?

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>And I said, well, I grew up in Ohio, I'm

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>here in Massachusetts. I've been an allergic sense birth. I'd

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>like to get into a decent climate. And he said, well,

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>how about Stanford? And I said the climate was fine,

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>how about the how about the economics department always one

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of the top two or three in the country. So

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>he called up, set it up. I got a I

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>got a teaching assistant ship, a resident assistant ship. I

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>never filled out an application. It was one of these

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>things where somebody really did something for it for me.

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>We all have that going out and went out of

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>his way. And well, as I say, the rest of history,

0:07:55.720 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that's fantastic. So from physics, from physics to Stanford, you

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>end up working in standard oil now ex on mobile correct?

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>How did that come about? And how did you go

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>from there to finance? Well it was interesting at that time. Uh,

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:14.239
<v Speaker 1>when I came out of Stanford there, Uh, my wife

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and I were would like to have stayed on the

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>West Coast. I met her. She was a physiology major

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>at Stanford and UH graduate school and uh, but there

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>are only three places of PhD economists could work in

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bay Area. One was that the San Francisco Fed

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and I spent a summer there and that was a

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty laid back place. The second was Bank of America

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>when it was Bank of America California, UM the g

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and Needy uh or origination and UH they sponsored my

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>my PhD research and that wasn't really quite active enough.

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>And the third one was Stanford Research Institute, and they

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't pay anything. So I told my wife there are

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 1>two things I'd never never do. One is work in

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>New York, and he was kidding to work. Well, that

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 1>was the beginning of a great forecasting career, because I

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>took a job as an economist with Standard Alone New

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Jersey now ax On Mobile. As you point out, Berry

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and Uh, well the aggressive story as we lived in

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a New York apartment for two years, moved to the suburbs,

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>commuter for twenty five years, but in nine nine I

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>moved our shop out to suburban New Jersey. And it's

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a mere coincidence. It's one point four miles from our

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.719
<v Speaker 1>house in Short Hills, New Jersey, just just by coincidence.

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a little bit about your time on

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. You not only were the first economist chief

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>economists from Merrill Lynch, you actually set up their entire economics. Yeah.

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.079
<v Speaker 1>That that's an interesting story because at that point the

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>bond houses on Wall Street had economists. Henry Coffin was

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>at Solomon Brothers, al Osian Art first Boston, Lynn Santao

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>at Aubrey G. Lampson. Uh. But Merrill was known as

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a But I was. I think I was the first

0:09:56.080 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>economist at a stock house Merrill Lynch, And at that

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 1>point economists were relatively new. I can remember Bill Freud,

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>who was the economist for New York Stock Exchange, remains

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a good friend. Uh. And he would have what he

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>called point Freud's friends. All the economis from Wall Street

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 1>over for monthly lunches at the New York Stock Exchange,

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and we all fit comfortably in one of those wonderful

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>ornate rooms. There couldn't have been more than twenty of us. Now,

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>how many dozens hundreds of economists are there in the

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street makes a lot of sense. Perhaps it it

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is part of the reason we obsessed so much on

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the day to day economic data that seems to come out.

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I recall less of an emphasis on that ten twenty

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>years ago then we see currently well, and of course

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a difference to the data then. I mean, at

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that point every economist would have a couple of researcher

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>assist since you get the data by mail, they laboriously

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>draw these charts. There were there were, you know, hardly

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>any computers. There was no there were no copy machines.

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was and of course that made you

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>think a lot more. You're listening to Masters in Business

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. My guest this week is Gary Shilling,

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 1>an economist and essentially physicist who produces his own economic

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>research and forecasts. We were discussing earlier that you had

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>helped set up the research department of Merrill Lynch and

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you were their chief economist. You also their first chief economists.

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>You also have the distinction of being the only person

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to be fired not once, but twice by Donald Reagan

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>from Merrill Lynch. Tell us how that came about. I

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>went there in nineteen sixty seven and there had not

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>been a recession in the US really since nineteen sixty six. One.

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh Now, I forecast recession for six seventy, which did occur.

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>But it was so different from Merrill Lynch because Mary

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.559
<v Speaker 1>Lynch at that point it was by listed stocks only.

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>That was the whole rationale of the firm, and the

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>idea of a recession was very upsetting. So Don Reagan,

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>who was running the place and I had a difference

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of opinion. Obviously he won. I took my entire staff left,

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>ended up at white Well, another Wall Street house with

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>no idea. In nineteen seventy eight, Mary Lynch would buy

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>why Well. So the story in the street, which is

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>literally true, was Chilling is the only guy fired twice

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>by Don Reagan. So we come back to you, come

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>back to Maryland, they buy white Well. Yea. And how

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>does the second firing come about? I mean, now, the

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>recessions that was automatic. As a matter of fact, I

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>found out later that that when when Reagan, the first

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>meeting between Don Reagan and Paul Hallingby was head of

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>white Well, that that Reagan said, Uh, if we get together,

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I want I want to know that there's one employee

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of white Weld who will not be invited to join

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the combined firm. So I was out from I was

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>out before I got in. So anyway, that was the

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>inducement to do what I really had in mind, which

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>was set up my own firm, own firm. So before

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we go to that, I want to talk about life

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:54.959
<v Speaker 1>at a big shop in the late sixties or seventies.

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>What was it like as a chief economist at Merrill

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Lynch back in the day. It was it was a

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun in in in many ways they had

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 1>a very good UH sales staff, particularly the institutional salesman.

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>These guys were hungry for input. I was very willing

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.079
<v Speaker 1>to travel all over the world, not only the US,

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>but Europe and Japan and UH. And it was it

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>was great working for these guys. Of course they were

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>they would they would really get their money's worth. I

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>remember one one salesman Minneapolis where this guy had scheduled

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>meetings with institutions every hour on the hour throughout the day.

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I went to the lunch meeting, UM and I get

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I get my fork ready for the first bite of lunch,

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.079
<v Speaker 1>and he says, well, Gary, tell us about the economy,

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and so the UH, the the entree, comes and goes,

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that goes, comes and goes, and we rushed you out

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>there to the next one. And I say, wait a minute,

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get anything. He said, don't worry. I got

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a sandwich. You can eat it on the elevator on

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the way down. So they kept you hopping as a

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>as an adjunct institutional sales. So you leave Merril almost

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the second time and set up your own shop. You

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>have your own models and your own forecasting set up

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that you put together. Let's let's talk a little bit

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>about the economy and economic indicators and what goes into

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>your process. What do you think of the most important

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>economic indicators, what do you follow and think has the

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>most resonance. Well, let me say this very just just

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>going into this that, as I mentioned earlier, forecasting in

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>my view as an artist not a science. Now, I

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>was trained as as econometrician. When I got to Stanford,

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I had had you know, if you're a physics major,

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you're a math major two whether you want to be

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>or not. And I was working there under kenn Arrow,

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Nobel Prize winner econometrician, and and I'd had only one

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>undergraduate economics course. So the the math side, the econometric

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>side was easy. The economic stuff I had to learn.

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>But I have found less and less interest in these

0:14:56.480 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>big models. They simply do not work. They blow up,

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>They produced nonsensical. Are they too complex or the You know,

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a very good question, and I don't think anybody

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>has really ever completely answered that. But but but they

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is you have to keep going in

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and plugging in and by the time you get all through,

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you and do it from from from scratch. But at

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that time there was this hope that somehow you could

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>devise a model of the economy. It would be unsolid

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>by human hands. You put in the inputs and outcomes

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the solution and that's all you need to know. So now, forecasting,

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>in my view, it's a whole combination of things, and

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it really can't be quantified in any precise way. It's

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly looking at various leading indicators. What's the federals, the

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve doing or not doing? Uh, what's the state

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of consumers? Right now? We think we're in this age

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of de leveraging, working off access debt from the eighties

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and nineties, and that you know, I put out this

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>book The Age of the leveraging in and I said,

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought we were going to have two percent real

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>GDP growth, And of course the FED and most people said,

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>oh no, it's gonna pick up. Well, where are we

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>two point two percent since this recovery started in the

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>middle of O nine. But it's it's looking at it's

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>looking at history. It's Kentucky winding. It's it's a whole

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>most of the Yeah, what is Kentucky wind. That's that's

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a Midwestern term for hunches. Okay, Kentucky wind.

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I like that. Well, that's that's when you're shooting. You know,

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>those guys were really sharp. They were, so you have

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to you have to know the wind because the wind

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>pushes the bullet a little bit. Oh yeah, I left.

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I talked to a friend of mine who

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>was a trained as a sniper, and I called him

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>up after I've seen this movie The you know, the

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>American Sniper, and I asked him about that and he

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>explained that that shot the guy made when he took

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>out the bad guy, said that was impossible because the

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>sandstorms and with the with the winds going in and

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>out of the buildings, it would it would cause the

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>bullet to drift. And even even with all the power

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>of that fifty caliber, fifty caliber rifle is still going

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to get I have a T shirt I have to

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>dig up somewhere. A buddy gave me, who was a

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>marine sharpshooter, their logo. Their their tagline was why run,

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>You'll only die tired. These guys are serious, serious shooters,

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and they calculate all that stuff, everything from from curvature

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of the earth to wind drift. It's all, it's all

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>part of it. So let's hold off discussing the economy

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.959
<v Speaker 1>itself to a later segment. Let's talk a little bit

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>about what goes into some of the these models and

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>what goes into some of the forecasts. What do you

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>look at So you mentioned interest rates, you mentioned consumer spending.

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>What other factors do you think are really significant? Well,

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>what's what's also very import important is what is the

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>consensus saying. Because I in order to in order to

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>push back against or to see where they're wrong. Yeah,

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>I have two basic principles has always been Eid and me.

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>One is that is that human nature changes very slowly

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>over time. So people react to summer circumstances in Simmler

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>ways and others. History is relevant. Now you still have

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to find the right piece of history. Mark Twain says

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>history doesn't repeat, but it rhymes. And the second one

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>is that you don't add value by rehashing the cansensus.

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean you are contrarian, and then you bucket consensus. Regardless,

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>where we agree, we pass over lightly. But where we

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>find something that's important is h is likely to happen

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>because you're judged by your forecasting record, Elemanly. And third

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is not yet within the purview of the consensus. That's

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>where we really get interested. This week on Masters in Business,

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm speaking with economist Gary shilling uh noted author and

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>forecaster um and physicists for that matter, as well as

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 1>an economist. Right out of school, you spend some time

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in the San Francisco Federal Reserve Office. What was that

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>experience like, Well, it was really at that point point

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>deciding that at least at that at that time, it

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>was a pretty sleepy operation. So I spent a lot

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 1>of time trying to figure out what indicators led the

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 1>stock market. Well, that was that was a that was

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a stupid exercise because you know, you think about it.

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>The stock market tends to lead almost anything else. If

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you could find something that consistently the stock market, hey

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 1>you'd make a fortune. So that was but that was

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a learning experience. That's what happens when you're young and naive.

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 1>So let me ask you a related question. Then, what

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>what indicators do people tend to obsess about that really

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 1>don't matter all that Well, it changes over time, but

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>right now the FED is is pretty much irrelevant in

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>my view. I mean, you're looking at a period where

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.880
<v Speaker 1>where the FED has has pushed out all this money

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>quantitative easing, it hasn't done much good. Why is that? Well,

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it's very simple. Uh, Basically, that money got into circulation

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:02.199
<v Speaker 1>and people use it to high assets stocks. But stocks

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>are owned principally by high income people who don't adjust.

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 1>They're spending much in relation to their assets. You've got

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:09.439
<v Speaker 1>three cars in the driveway, You're not going to put

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a fourth one in there. So it never got beyond that,

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't do much to help the basic economy.

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>It's the pushing on a string, the change in liquidity trap.

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>You can use all the technical terms, but basically the

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>FED IS in my view is it is pretty much irrelevant.

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>And also, of course in this slow growth period um

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the FED keeps pushing off the day that they're going

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>to raise rates. They're now a lot more concerned with

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world. Their charter is is strictly domestic,

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 1>full employment and price stability, but they obviously now are

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>expanding that because the rest of the world is it

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is a global economy. But I think all in all,

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the fet is is pretty impetent right now. It doesn't

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>make much difference what they do. So what has been

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the impact of zero interest rate policy? What's been the

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 1>impact of of QI on the overall economy? The effect

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of QUI on the overall economy has been surprisingly little.

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>It has pushed up asset prices, but you haven't gotten

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the modiplier effect. Normally, when the FED gives the banks

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 1>a dollar in reserves by lending and re lending and

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>what's called a fractional reserve system, they turn it into

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>seventy dollars of M two money seventy this point now

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it's one point four to one, so barely moving, barely moving.

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh And so it really hasn't hasn't had much, hasn't

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 1>had much effect. Uh So so the FED, the FED

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>is really really I think of pretty much on the sidelines.

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>And and the other thing about the quantitative easing is

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that the effects of this lower interest rates is created

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of distortions, a lot of zeal for yield.

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>You see the rush into leveraged loans, into emerging market

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>debt and equity, into UH, into commodities and hedge funds

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>and so on. Pension funds is still UH still cling

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to the idea of eight percent returns on their portfolios.

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>They say, we can't get that in conventional stocks and bonds.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get it some way. So they move out

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>on the risk curve, and I think a lot of

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:04.959
<v Speaker 1>them moved a lot further out on the risker than

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>they realized. I still don't understand where this a percent

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.239
<v Speaker 1>number has come from. It seems like they've made that

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>number up and that they had to. They want a

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>percent look in order to maintain a tax to for

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 1>its status. It's five percent is what you have to

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>put out. So I don't know where this number. Two.

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe very was five percent plus three percent

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>per inflation. But but but you don't have inflation, like

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, you haven't got any inflation. But of course

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the other thing is if they start lowering that number,

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>then they have to lower the other side the discounting

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>rate for the future liabilities, the punch and payments to

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>bring it back to the to the present value, and

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that greatly increases, you know, the lower the interest rate

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.959
<v Speaker 1>you're discounting with, that greatly expands there the current value

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>of those liabilities. So they get hit on both sides.

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>So there's a great reluctance to to face the reality,

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 1>to be honest about what they should really be expecting. Correct,

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that's correct, that that's quite fat sinating. So let's talk

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about what should have been done following

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis. What should Congress have done? What should

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the fiddle reserve have done in response to you know,

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the collapse and asset prices and and GDP and jobs. Well,

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:20.239
<v Speaker 1>bailing out Wall Street probably wasn't necessary, because we very

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>well could have had a full blown financial melch. What

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 1>about bailing out the bond holders? When we when we

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 1>talk about these bailouts, a lot of bad bonds were

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>paid out right, and I think that that really has

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>prolonged the agony. I think they probably went too far

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>on this whole and they and they really have way

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>overrated themselves in terms of what they can do. Listen,

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the look at the whole affection threeon dollar damage.

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>It's huge quantitative easing, and what do we get? Two

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>percent real GDP growth? I mean, it's telling you that

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>these forces of the leveraging are so great they're overpowering this.

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And these guys who constantly think that policy is gonna

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>is gonna overwhelm everything else and they're gonna get the

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>results they want. I think they're in a dream world.

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.239
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>guest today is Dr Gary Shilling. He is an economist, researcher, forecaster.

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:16.959
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about the present economy. Where

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 1>are we in the economic cycle. I'm not sure we're

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in a conventional economic cycle, and of course everybody wishes

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:27.679
<v Speaker 1>wishes we were. Everybody yearns for the idea of of

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>a very systematic cycle. And you can see where are you.

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I go out and I see presentations. A lot of

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the big banks have their representatives out and they say, oh,

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>here's a circle, and here's where we are in that. Uh.

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're in that kind of I don't

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>think we're in that kind of world right now. We're

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>going through this massive deleveraging or we're seeing slow growth,

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing commadi prices decline, We're seeing the strengthen the dollar. Uh,

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing competitive evaluations against the dollar. Uh. There's a

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of things going on here that I don't think

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>give you a very clear idea of a cycle per se.

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>And one thing I think it is, you know, there's

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>this yearning for nostalgia. We all have that and and

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>forecashers are just as subject to this as anybody else.

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And you always have this feeling, oh boy, if we

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>could get back to the days when it was a

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>nice cycle and I know that it's four years and

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>if pounds, I'd be thrilled to death. Yeah. But you know,

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and equal and people talk about equal, and hey, I've

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>been in this business a long time, very and equal.

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Everything was something you simply pass through on the way

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to going to access is on the top of the bottom.

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Don't value you exist at very briefly swing and in retrospect,

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that's right. So along those lines, let me ask you

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a um, let me ask you a related question. I

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>know your historian, I know you look at a lot

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>of economic data from days gone by. Is there any

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>period in history that's comparable to what we're living through now? Um,

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:56.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question at times when you're working off access.

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Is I suppose you could say that to a certain

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>extent outs what was going on in the in the

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirties, but both Great Depression or even yeah, that

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>was a great depression in the aftermath, but there were

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other things going on. There, a complete

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>shifting in policy from basically a lessay fair to too

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>much more government involvement in the economy. Whether that helped

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>or hurt. You know, historians argue about that. I don't

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>think there is a I don't think there is a

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>period right now where you can you can point to

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it and say, let's follow the script that does that

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>does happen from time to time. And I'm always looking

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>for those periods because but this is unique. You're saying,

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't see I don't see the relevance of that

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 1>right now. Can you say this is unprecedented? There's nothing well,

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 1>at least, and I think in in the experience of

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>modern economic forecasting, it is so um, I know you're

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a big bond bull and have been for a long time.

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Four years thirty four year bullmarket in bonds showing no

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>sign of ending. Where are we in this bond? Is

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 1>the bond bull market still alive? Ye? The yield on

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 1>the third year treasure was fifteen point to one percent.

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>And I said in writing, we're entering the bond rally

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of a lifetime because I saw inflation unwinding and with

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>lower inflation that would push down yields, push up bound prices.

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:20.479
<v Speaker 1>And and I think we're still in that. I mean

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>yields now obviously have dropped a tremendous, tremendous amount there

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>more like three little over under three percent for the

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>third year bond. I think we're gonna go to two

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 1>percent now, somebody in the year on the three year bond.

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Now somebody says, well, I mean, what's you know, what

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>does that do for you? And who would accept three

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 1>percent yield? I couldn't care less what the yield is.

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I never have as long as it's going down, because

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that means the price of the bonds is going on.

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>And when you look at the convexity of this whole thing,

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>if if I'm right. And you go from essentially three

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>percent to two percent on a thirty year uh coupon bond,

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:56.360
<v Speaker 1>You make thirty percent on your money, which I think

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a lot better than than whatever

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>is in second place, And my mortgage is going to

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>drop to two point nine percent. What does that do

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>for housing? What does that do for other items purchased

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 1>with debt? Well, of course, the question is under what

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>circumstance does that happen? If you're in a very low

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>inflationary environment, if you're in a slow growth growth, Yeah,

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're in a slow growth environment, and it has

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 1>other characteristics. I mean, you look at housing. You mentioned housing. Housing,

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>This recovery has been basically a rental market. It has

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>not been new homeowners that normally are the basis of housing.

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 1>They're the people by the starter houses from people that

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 1>then move up the Latin X, run on the ladder

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and on up and in housing not really happening because

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>people they don't have the incomes. Uh, they don't have

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the credit scores. Uh they and and of course it's

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>become you know, it's it's become a virtue as as

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>out of necessity people. Oh, I really don't want to

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>house on my own. I don't want to responsibility. I'd

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>rather live in a more urban environment. Chicken and egg there,

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know which way is a causality. But my

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>friend Jonathan Miller, who's been the show right well does

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>does a lot of interesting appraisal analysis, said that there

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>are so many people with either low equity, no equity,

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>or negative equity that a huge pool of inventory that's

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>normally for sale isn't on the market, and a huge

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>pool of potential buyers aren't participating, so you have few

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>buyers and even fewer houses. Yeah, and there are a

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people. You know, it's just like stocks, the

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>idea they take a beating in a stock and they say,

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I won't sell it till I get out. Even it's

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>irrational because the market is whatever the market is today.

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think there is that there is that pool

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of of people who owned houses they bought them there underwater,

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're basically saying, yeah, I want to shell, but

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't get out from under it. And of course

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>some people they have you know, they they they're upside down.

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>They mortgages worth more than the house. So uh, if

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>they sell it, they've got they've got financial problems, to

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>say the least. It also depends if you're in a

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>recourse or a nonrecourse state, if you can walk away

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>or not, or if you can talk your bank into

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>renegotiating the total UH amounts under a number of the

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 1>hamp and tamp program, if you could do a short

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>sale where you basically sell the market and the lender

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>forgives a difference. I mean, they're all kinds of variations.

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>So what do you see happening in housing over the

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years. Well, I think I think housing

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is is probably going to limp along here, but I

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>don't see anything really pushing it. I mean, I mean,

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>we're the we're the most over housed country in the

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>world possible exception maybe Spain. I mean, the National Association

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>relators would never tell you that. But well, it's always

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a good time to buy or sell a house according

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to that. Yeah, I remember an ad they had, But

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a great time to buy, it's a great time

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to sell that. It's always a great always a great

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>time to generate a sales commission. All right, yes, you

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>got it, um, So let's talk about energy, because you've

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>sent some really interesting things about energy. Oil prices of

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>drop cut in half over the past year. I understand

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you talked about twenty dollar a barrel oil. Yeah. Well,

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>here's the rationale, uh peck, is their cartel. Cartels exists

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to keep prices above equilibrium. That's the whole purpose that

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>encourages cheating. Somebody was more than their share, either in

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the cartel OPEC or outside Russia, American frackers, whoever. So

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the leader of the cartel's responsibilities to cut its own

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>production to accommodate the cheaters to avoid a price collapse. Well,

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>OPEC has been doing that for years, but they're getting

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>tired of it. In the last ten years, OPEC production

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>has been flat and all the growth has come in

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>non OPEC sources, a lot of recently from American from

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>American frackers. So the Saudias and their and their colleagues

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Persian Gulf. Back November seven, when we were

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>sitting down to our Thanksgiving turkeys, they decided they weren't

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna cut They basically said, we're gonna play it. We're

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna play in the labory game of chicken. We got

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>about five billion dollars in foreign currency reserves and work

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and see, we're gonna see who can take lower prices.

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>The longest OPEC production and with thirty thirty million barrels

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:01.959
<v Speaker 1>a day, they took off, basically took off the quotas.

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>It's now thirty one and a half million barrels a day.

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>She say, okay, now, how low the prices go before

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody chickens out, some major producer says, I've had it,

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I've got to cut back. It isn't the cost of

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>meeting budgets that's irrelevant here, Okay, maybe it maybe Venezuela

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>is fifty bucks of barrel, that's irrelevant. It isn't even

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the full full cycle cost, in other words, the costs

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.479
<v Speaker 1>of drilling the whole laying the pipes, the overhead. So no, no, no, no.

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>When you're a price war, it's the marginal cost. It's

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the cost once the pipes are laid, the oil is

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the ground. In other words, where is

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>your free cash flow disappear? And in the premium basis

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>in Texas and in the Persian Gulf, that's in the

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>ten to twenty dollar barrel range. So that's how I

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>get to that number. So you can actually see oil

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:48.959
<v Speaker 1>full down to twenty five or so dollars a barrel,

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and they're still making five or more dollars. That's right.

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 1>In other words, they may be losing money on a

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>full on the full cost basis, but in terms of

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the marginal cash in other words, you know, they still

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>have positive cash flow on a marginal basis, so that

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the incentive to keep producing. And now you know

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>price goes down, there doesn't stay there forever, but you

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 1>but you're kind to get to the point that you

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>have major production that disappears from the system, and we

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen that. There's still the world a washing oil. Sure,

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 1>oh sure, I mean you know, you're producing about two

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>million barrels a day more than demand. Right now, you're

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>showing floating around filled with oil and no place to

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>drop it off. That's that's quite fascinating. So normally when

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you talk about oil prices dropping from over a hundred

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars to dollars, we would be talking about a recession.

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you see your recession anytime in the next twelve months.

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't see the making of a recession. Uh. You

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>have recession, said, at least historically for two reasons. One

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>is the FED raisers interest rates to choke off what

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>they see is an overheating economy. Now, they may have

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>painted themselves into a corner here. They've been yelling and

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>screaming about raising rates. They've cry wolf an awful lot

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 1>their credibilities at sake. They may raise rage simply to

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>preserve credibility. But the kind of interest rate like they

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 1>did in ninety four, where the where they want three

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>inter basis points on on FED funds in six months

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>or so, I don't see that. So the other possibility

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 1>recession is a is some kind of a shock. That's

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>what we had with the collapse in dot com stocks

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in the late nineties. That was a housing uh in

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>in the in the mid two thousands, maybe China. So

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 1>in the last minute we have you you reading my mind.

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>What's the potential impact of China on the global economy. Well,

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the reality of China is that it's nothing has really

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:41.720
<v Speaker 1>changed their accept perceptions. China basically is not a leader.

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not a self lead comp country. China imports raw

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>materials and equipment and use it to manufacture goods that

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>they send to North America and Europe. So their activity follows.

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>That's where they are depending on that. Of course they

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>have infrastructure spending as well. But but the point is

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>that it's the perception of China. With a collaption in

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>stock prices and the devaluation, people are suddenly saying, oh

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:09.399
<v Speaker 1>my god, China isn't really independently growing. They haven't been

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 1>for years. But perceptions have reality, and we'll then have

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>enough follow on consequences with effects on commodity prices and

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 1>currencies and other developing countries. That's that's that's what's there,

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's if there's a recession out there in the

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 1>next twelve months or so, I think that's probably where

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>it would would be generated. Thank you to my guest

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Gary Shilling for spending so much time with us. Be

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>sure and check out our podcast extras where we continue

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. Check out my daily column on Bloomberg View

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Follow me on Twitter at Riholts. I'm Barry Ridhults.

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. Okay,

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:47.240
<v Speaker 1>so this is the podcast portion of the show where

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I stopped worrying about the time segments and we could

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>chat about anything before and I know I have to

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 1>get you out of here at a certain time, but

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that'll be easy. Before we started ask talking about some

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>other the questions that we've missed and some other stuff.

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:04.359
<v Speaker 1>These are all my questions. I have to ask you

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 1>about the bee keeping. You're you're famous on Wall Street

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:13.840
<v Speaker 1>for for being a beekeeper and mailing out honey to

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 1>various people as as holiday presents. Yea, including myself. I

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:23.240
<v Speaker 1>have I have a tub of honey, and I believe

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and you have a different inscription every year, and the

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>one that stands out was the FEDS funny money can't

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 1>buy this honey. Yeah, this year as treasury bonds saw

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 1>our bees make more. There you go. We always try

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to find something topical and usually related to the financial factor.

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>How on earth did you get into beekeeping? Well, it's

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>an interesting story I've got. We live in suburban New

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Jersey and I have a bunch of drawer fruit trees

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>around our premises, and I didn't think they were getting

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>pollinated properly. Uh. And I had this based on what

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>what makes you wake up one day and say, I'm

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>not sure our fruit trees A bunch of blossoms are

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 1>not that much a lot of fruit? Okay, that makes sense?

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Very simple road tests Anyway, I had this romantic idea

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of putting in some bee hives, and my wife kept saying,

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 1>come on, this is this is this is no far

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Mrs Suburbia. Well, then our third son, who was an

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:17.359
<v Speaker 1>animal ever since birth, did his senior college thesis on bees.

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 1>And that's all it took to push me over the edge.

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>So in afternoon when wait, wait, wait, he does his

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 1>his college thesis prompted from you, unprovoked, totally independent, totally independent. No,

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 1>there was no leading the witness on that one. So

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>he's doing this and and so uh uh he and

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I smuggle in a couple of highs one afternoon one.

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>What's how physically well the hive is the vertical essentially, Well,

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>you stack them up, you stack up the boxes. But

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the but the box that the dimensions are are sixteen

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and five inc inch wide, nineteen and seven acients long,

0:37:57.640 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're varying depths. And I can explain to you

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:03.480
<v Speaker 1>why they why the dimensions are Okay, this is very interesting.

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Bees have have been kept since uh time in millennia.

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh and by the way, honey never never spoiled. They've

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 1>taken it out of ancient Egyptian tombs which is just

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:16.479
<v Speaker 1>as good as the day the bees made it. Really, Yeah,

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea. I know it was good for

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:20.839
<v Speaker 1>a long time. I don't know it was good o now.

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Throughout this time though that they had bees, they were

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in various cavities and so on. There's what's called the skeps,

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 1>which is a it's a series of concentric rings. Have

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:35.879
<v Speaker 1>you ever seen a Utah road sign beehive state, that's

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a skeps. You know. It's a traditional kind of round

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. And and and the bees would be

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 1>in there and they when the left of their own devices. Uh,

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the bees make it has a hexonical cells, but they

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:52.280
<v Speaker 1>look like stags being down. Well, the way they harvested

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the honey was they basically killed the hive. They would

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>use sulfur smoke kill the hive and then crush the

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>combs to get the honey out. Well, that was very

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>inefficient because they had to have about twice as many

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:07.399
<v Speaker 1>twice as many hives as they were going to harvest. Uh.

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 1>And also after the advent of kerosene, that's Colonel Drake

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Droll as well, for lights, there was not the need

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:17.879
<v Speaker 1>for bees wax for candles, so wax, and it takes

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:20.879
<v Speaker 1>about ten times as much nectar to make a pound

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of wax as a pound of honey, so this is

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 1>very inefficient. In eighteen fifty one eighteen fifty one. Now,

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 1>honey bees are from the old all from the old world.

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 1>They came here with the European settlers. The Indians called

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 1>them the white man's fly. But a congregational preacher in

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:42.919
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia named Lorenzo Langfroft, Lorenzo Langfroft made a very interesting observation.

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:45.839
<v Speaker 1>He noticed that the v would only the bee would

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 1>only build, and the worker bees to do all this.

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 1>The drones don't do anything. She would only build her

0:39:51.160 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 1>comb within about three ace of an inch of any

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:58.240
<v Speaker 1>other solid object, including another another comb. So he developed

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 1>from that what's called the movable frame five you might

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:05.399
<v Speaker 1>you might our listeners may have seen those. In other words,

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 1>he put these in there, and and the bees they built,

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>they built out the wax coomb fill them upon. He

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 1>put a cap on there. You can take them out,

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>scratch off the caps, put in a central fuge, spin

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 1>them out and put them back. Okay, now coming back

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to the dimensions. He's the father of modern beekeeping and

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 1>those dimensions that I mentioned sixteen and five hy those

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:30.759
<v Speaker 1>were the dimensions of some scrap lumber he had. It

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a conversion from Netrick, but he was so influential

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:37.279
<v Speaker 1>that that became. Now it's a convenient size. But the

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:39.319
<v Speaker 1>guy never made a dime out of this because it

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>was so easy to copy. But yeah, that and and

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 1>so that now and you have these These boxes are

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 1>various depths. There's usually do two boxes on the bottom

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that the bees live in year round and they have

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 1>their honey to get through the winter. They have their

0:40:56.400 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 1>brewed in there, and they have um poland, which as

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 1>the nectar they feel they feed to the larva. And

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:06.719
<v Speaker 1>those boxes nine nine and five ah deep, if they're

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 1>full of honey, they weave eighty five pounds. So the

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>ones you stack up on top are called supers, and

0:41:12.560 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the honey we're gonna take off. And they're not

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>as deep as you can lift them, because try try

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 1>lifting eighty five pounds at at at at the shoulder height.

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 1>It's it's good for the for the stomach. Monthsls. My

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:27.800
<v Speaker 1>dogways eighty five pound. One of my dogs eighty five pounds.

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:30.719
<v Speaker 1>And I know when I had a carry him. I

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 1>know eighty five pounds an to lift um, so that's amazing.

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So but anyway, start you've been doing decades. Yeah, we'll

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 1>start off. And anyway, this their son, Steve. He took

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:46.239
<v Speaker 1>off for a job and the euro dollar pits in

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago Murk and I and and I had been

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd just been the flunky. He was a beekeeper. And

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it was like, if you're ever driven with somebody repeatedly

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to the same destination, they do the driving, you don't

0:41:56.600 --> 0:42:01.280
<v Speaker 1>pay attention. That was me. He takes off. I'm instantly

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 1>promoted a head beekeeper. So and I guess why then

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we were upped about twenty hives and so how much

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 1>spaces is physically taking in the backyard. Well, I've got

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen of them in our residents in Short Hills, New Jersey.

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 1>And I've got about horror on the grounds underground, underground

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in a corner of the property. Uh. And but I

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:23.920
<v Speaker 1>got about a hundred hives total, and and most of

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:27.799
<v Speaker 1>the well they're more further out Morristown, New Jersey area.

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:29.359
<v Speaker 1>And then I've got some we have a beach house

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:32.800
<v Speaker 1>on Fire Island some out there. But uh, but anyway,

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 1>but you know, this thing very it just keeps growing

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's very labor intensive. But I got one. I

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:39.839
<v Speaker 1>got a guy on my staff. We spend a lot

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:41.959
<v Speaker 1>of time working with me on this. You're talking about

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the bees labor or your labor, well and both. But

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:48.880
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't attend the thing to grow. But the

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:51.720
<v Speaker 1>damn thing just keeps growing. How many pounds of honey

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 1>do you generate? Well? Uh, this year, this year we

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:58.839
<v Speaker 1>took off pounds and that's a ton of change of honey. Yeah,

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:01.239
<v Speaker 1>and we give it all away. If I ever sold

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:03.800
<v Speaker 1>any i'd have to keep keep keep the books. And

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:06.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to make myself cry because my time

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:08.720
<v Speaker 1>would be probably worth a quarter an hour and probably

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 1>with a minor sign in front of it. But it

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:15.800
<v Speaker 1>very tremendously. Last year was our best year ever pounds

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and we saw us three tons of hunter. Yeah, we

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't stacked all over the office. And and my my admin,

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Beth Grant, she keeps saying, come on, uh, we don't

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 1>need this much honey. I think she really hopes we

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 1>don't have a great year because trying to figure out

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 1>where we're gonna have stacked all over the place. So

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:36.240
<v Speaker 1>what if how has these how how has these colony

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 1>collapse diseases been impacted your highs. That's probably one of

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the biggest misconceptions. In two thousand seven sixty minutes, the

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>TV show did this segment on colony collapse disorder. Now,

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>what that means is the bees leave the hive and

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:56.920
<v Speaker 1>they can't live long on their own outside. That's clear.

0:43:57.160 --> 0:43:59.759
<v Speaker 1>They don't come back. Um. And they said, this is

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:02.719
<v Speaker 1>the the end of the world. Well, it's actually no more,

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 1>no more food pollination. About about a third of everything

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>we eat depends on insect pollination, andent of that is

0:44:11.200 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 1>from honey bees. In any event, they said at the

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 1>end of the world. Well, what they didn't really they

0:44:16.080 --> 0:44:19.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't do their homework, because this is a reoccurring problem. Uh,

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 1>it's about every twenty five years. The first observation of

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 1>this country was eighteen sixty nine, and it's gets on

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the way. Now it's not the problem, but there are

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>but there are other serious problems. Uh well uh And

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 1>as a matter of fact, they just had a huge

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 1>study announced last year. All the big name U. S.

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:40.280
<v Speaker 1>D A. Anomalogists and the guys from the big schools

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:43.840
<v Speaker 1>where there you know, like Cornell and University of Maryland

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and Penn State and U C. Davis and so on,

0:44:46.400 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and they came up with three three areas, and everybody's

0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:51.399
<v Speaker 1>waiting with braided breath for what's the problem with bees?

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 1>How do we get out of this? The first one

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:58.439
<v Speaker 1>has to be that's interesting, It isn't uh no, that's

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the first guest. Pesticides. They said, maybe, but they're not

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:07.239
<v Speaker 1>at all sure, and interestingly enough, their European counterparts were

0:45:07.280 --> 0:45:10.799
<v Speaker 1>absolutely possibly convinced it was pesticized, and two months ago

0:45:11.080 --> 0:45:14.399
<v Speaker 1>these Europeans said, we're not so sure. But that's one.

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:18.719
<v Speaker 1>The second one is nutrition, farmers, fence, farmers, plant fence,

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:21.800
<v Speaker 1>road defense road and there's not a lot of wildflowers

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to give bees the the nectar and pollen that they need.

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So what they're doing is there encurreaged road defense room,

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:32.399
<v Speaker 1>meaning it's all cast crops, crops most of them don't

0:45:32.400 --> 0:45:34.759
<v Speaker 1>tend to have any nectar that are Pollen's interested in

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the piece. But what they're doing now a lot of

0:45:36.880 --> 0:45:41.879
<v Speaker 1>cases is uh they're encouraging. They're encouraging farmers to use

0:45:42.200 --> 0:45:44.760
<v Speaker 1>marginal land to plan there. There's an outfit, for example,

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:48.800
<v Speaker 1>called h called pheasants unlimited. Uh. They're in the Upper Midwest,

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and they basically raised pheasants and quail for for hunters.

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And and what they do is they provide the seed

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to farmers and and uh, and the nectar and pollen

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:02.280
<v Speaker 1>are as good for the bees, and then the seeds

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that chicks the pheasants and the quail chicks eat it,

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 1>which makes them better to be harvested by the hunter.

0:46:08.200 --> 0:46:11.920
<v Speaker 1>So there, and then the third that's fascinating because there's

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a farm near where I live, which is where I

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:18.319
<v Speaker 1>get my peach raspberry pies, called Young's Farm, and I

0:46:18.480 --> 0:46:22.680
<v Speaker 1>noticed they have rows and rows of plantings. And then

0:46:22.719 --> 0:46:26.280
<v Speaker 1>along the edge which is adjacent to the street, probably

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:29.759
<v Speaker 1>not harvestable. They have just a whole run of wildfire.

0:46:30.200 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's what's being done. And that's that's helpful,

0:46:32.360 --> 0:46:34.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's you know, it's not on a big enough scale.

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Then the third problem, which is probably most interesting, is

0:46:37.400 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a parasitic mic called verroa v A r r O.

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:44.319
<v Speaker 1>Read something about this. Now this is there there are

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:48.400
<v Speaker 1>five races of honey bees. The only one that's commercially

0:46:49.040 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 1>valuable is UH. The Latin. The scientific name is APIs

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 1>malafra APIs b malafra honey. Um. Now that one orange

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:02.319
<v Speaker 1>original bees are off from the whole, from the from

0:47:02.320 --> 0:47:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the old world. This one originated in in uh Southern

0:47:05.840 --> 0:47:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Europe and the Middle East. There's another race in the

0:47:08.920 --> 0:47:13.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Southeast Asia called APIs Serena. And this this

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 1>roa mite is indigenous indigenous on APIs Serena and APIs.

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And this this roa mites hangs on the bee, sucks

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 1>out there quota or blood. APIs SaRenna recognized this as

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:26.239
<v Speaker 1>the bad guy, and they grew them off each other.

0:47:26.320 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 1>They pull them off each other. It jumped over the

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Apisa and they don't understand it's a bad guy. So

0:47:33.520 --> 0:47:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you and and so one they co evolved together, and

0:47:36.239 --> 0:47:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that's how they managed to whoever figured out you need

0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to take this off. Now we see their offspring around.

0:47:42.560 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 1>If you didn't co evolve, you may not have developed

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that behavior. But but now they're they're they're right. Now

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:52.239
<v Speaker 1>you've got to treat with chemicals. Um are absolutely positively

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that high will be done in two years now. Yeah, yeah,

0:47:55.239 --> 0:47:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't treat until you take off the honey. But

0:47:56.800 --> 0:47:59.759
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna eat, of course. But they're but they're doing

0:47:59.840 --> 0:48:03.400
<v Speaker 1>some interesting things. Monshano has some interesting work where they

0:48:03.600 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 1>kill the mites believe the bees that you're trying to

0:48:06.280 --> 0:48:09.400
<v Speaker 1>kill one insect without killing another insight, and they're and

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 1>they're using some genetic uh, some some genetic modifications to

0:48:15.280 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 1>basically in effect try to disrupt the breeding cycle of

0:48:18.760 --> 0:48:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of the mice. That's a that's an experimental stage, but

0:48:22.239 --> 0:48:25.279
<v Speaker 1>that that has that's probably the greatest thing. But this

0:48:25.440 --> 0:48:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is this is a serious problem. And the thing is

0:48:27.680 --> 0:48:30.879
<v Speaker 1>he's mice mutate. I mean that the treatments that worked

0:48:30.920 --> 0:48:34.840
<v Speaker 1>just beautifully ten years ago are worth anything because they mutated,

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:41.279
<v Speaker 1>and the ones now sounds like penicillin resistance. It's a

0:48:41.920 --> 0:48:44.759
<v Speaker 1>how did you get from? It's amazing how first of

0:48:44.800 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 1>all you you've obviously studied this in great detail, But

0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:52.439
<v Speaker 1>as an economist, I don't really think of the next

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:57.520
<v Speaker 1>logical step as well. Of course, beekeeping should be well

0:48:57.560 --> 0:49:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that there there are, there are, there are, and treads

0:49:00.520 --> 0:49:04.400
<v Speaker 1>aybury and such as okay, well let's see. Well the

0:49:04.480 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 1>one that is not common but I like is it's

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 1>good physical exercise and particularly on a nice day, I

0:49:10.120 --> 0:49:12.880
<v Speaker 1>like to be outside. Uh. And you don't get a

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:14.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of that when you're sitting behind your desk on

0:49:15.040 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the lecture circuit or whatever. But you see the distribution

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:19.719
<v Speaker 1>of labor amongst the hives, that's got to be an

0:49:19.880 --> 0:49:22.759
<v Speaker 1>entire Yeah. But the other interesting thing is that this

0:49:23.320 --> 0:49:26.239
<v Speaker 1>with all these diseases and pests that beset honey bees

0:49:26.280 --> 0:49:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of decades, it is Uh, there's

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:34.759
<v Speaker 1>a whole logic, deductive logic sequence I go through when

0:49:34.800 --> 0:49:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I open a hive. I open a hive, I'm looking,

0:49:36.840 --> 0:49:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm listening, I'm smelling. Is there a coin there is

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:42.319
<v Speaker 1>she laying? If not, what do I do? I come

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:44.120
<v Speaker 1>home from a day in the in the b yards

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:46.840
<v Speaker 1>out with the bees, I'm rung out, not only physically

0:49:46.920 --> 0:49:49.640
<v Speaker 1>but mentally. You wouldn't think that, but it is. And

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:53.239
<v Speaker 1>and beekeepers tend to be above average intellect. You've got

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to have a natural curiosity because and another interest. Economists

0:49:57.280 --> 0:50:01.719
<v Speaker 1>just average inte life. So so bas you're saying that

0:50:03.120 --> 0:50:06.839
<v Speaker 1>the beekeeping is a greater intellectual challenge than No, I'm

0:50:06.880 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 1>not saying greater, but that's what I'm here. I'm hearing.

0:50:09.800 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Anyone can be an economist to be a beekeeper. And

0:50:12.800 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I know economics, it's plenty, but it's it's it's a

0:50:15.239 --> 0:50:17.960
<v Speaker 1>di virgence. It's it's it's sort of a you know,

0:50:18.000 --> 0:50:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm a type of guy. I always work. I just

0:50:20.080 --> 0:50:23.360
<v Speaker 1>change the venue and and and that's what it amounts to.

0:50:23.480 --> 0:50:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Where you're you're shifting, you're shifting gears to to something else,

0:50:26.840 --> 0:50:29.840
<v Speaker 1>but you're still going through that that mental process of

0:50:30.400 --> 0:50:32.759
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out what's going on there. It's like

0:50:32.920 --> 0:50:35.000
<v Speaker 1>it's like the economy you're trying to you're trying to

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:36.840
<v Speaker 1>put all that we talked about this earlier, trying to

0:50:36.880 --> 0:50:38.920
<v Speaker 1>put all these pieces together and see where you come out.

0:50:39.400 --> 0:50:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And uh, and you're never can be certain and and

0:50:42.320 --> 0:50:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and be keeping Hey, the visistant visistitudes the nature are tremendous.

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:49.360
<v Speaker 1>You do everything you possibly can. It's just like a forecast.

0:50:49.440 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>You cover all the bases and you're you're left a

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:55.640
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of luck some rents from then. You know.

0:50:55.719 --> 0:50:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I just I just was speaking at a conference and

0:50:58.440 --> 0:51:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the exact same convert station came up with you do

0:51:02.840 --> 0:51:05.040
<v Speaker 1>X and Y and Z. They all seem so different.

0:51:05.080 --> 0:51:07.440
<v Speaker 1>In my answer was they're really the same thing. You

0:51:07.719 --> 0:51:10.920
<v Speaker 1>look at a variety of ambiguous inputs, try and figure

0:51:10.920 --> 0:51:14.440
<v Speaker 1>out what matters and what doesn't and reach a reasonable

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:19.759
<v Speaker 1>conclusion within the context be keeping in economics, apparently the

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:23.640
<v Speaker 1>same same basic the process is what's so similar even

0:51:23.680 --> 0:51:28.640
<v Speaker 1>though it's totally different. Um that that that that's quite fascinating.

0:51:29.040 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 1>So earlier we were talking a little bit about, um,

0:51:33.760 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 1>what it was like when you were researcher at Mary

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:38.680
<v Speaker 1>lynch In a researcher at the Federal Reserve. What what

0:51:38.800 --> 0:51:44.600
<v Speaker 1>are some of your commentaries or research forecasts that you're

0:51:44.719 --> 0:51:48.200
<v Speaker 1>especially proud of that really have stood the test in

0:51:48.280 --> 0:51:53.120
<v Speaker 1>time or may have been unusually contrarian. What what stands

0:51:53.120 --> 0:51:55.560
<v Speaker 1>out to you? Well? I think I think the greatest

0:51:55.600 --> 0:51:59.759
<v Speaker 1>call I made was just one. I made a bullmark

0:52:00.040 --> 0:52:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're entering a von Rally of a lifetime. And

0:52:02.520 --> 0:52:05.520
<v Speaker 1>was that a lonely call? Where there are peoples? Barry

0:52:05.680 --> 0:52:09.680
<v Speaker 1>was so lonely. I wrote my first book in title

0:52:10.080 --> 0:52:14.400
<v Speaker 1>The title was is inflation ending? Question mark? Are you ready?

0:52:14.480 --> 0:52:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Question Mark? My answer to the first question, yes, Yes,

0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:21.080
<v Speaker 1>inflation is ending. We're going into a period of of

0:52:21.719 --> 0:52:24.920
<v Speaker 1>lower and lower inflation because my view is at government

0:52:25.760 --> 0:52:28.680
<v Speaker 1>excess spending is the route of inflation. The FED may

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:31.640
<v Speaker 1>be the handmaiden and implementing you. But it's the government spending.

0:52:32.080 --> 0:52:35.239
<v Speaker 1>And we saw a revolt against government, starting with Proposition

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:38.600
<v Speaker 1>thirteen in California in nineteen seventy eight and then Reagan's

0:52:38.640 --> 0:52:41.960
<v Speaker 1>election in nine eighty. And I said from that that

0:52:42.080 --> 0:52:44.640
<v Speaker 1>inflation was on the way out, and as a result,

0:52:44.920 --> 0:52:47.200
<v Speaker 1>we were. And so the answer to the second half

0:52:47.200 --> 0:52:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of the question, are you ready, no, because everybody was

0:52:50.280 --> 0:52:57.080
<v Speaker 1>betting on inflation. They had all their tangibles and their portfolios, uh, coins, antiques, artwork, goal, etcetera.

0:52:57.160 --> 0:52:59.040
<v Speaker 1>And I said, no, no, you don't have enough stocks

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:02.480
<v Speaker 1>or bonds because they will benefit from this. Now, that

0:53:02.719 --> 0:53:05.720
<v Speaker 1>was a very lonely call that book. Mcgrawl hill finally

0:53:05.880 --> 0:53:11.600
<v Speaker 1>got it out in nobody but inflation really peaked in

0:53:11.719 --> 0:53:15.040
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty, but nobody believed. The sales of the book

0:53:15.080 --> 0:53:17.440
<v Speaker 1>were an absolute disaster. As a matter of fact, McGraw

0:53:17.560 --> 0:53:20.560
<v Speaker 1>hill gave us the last couple of thousand copies. They

0:53:20.600 --> 0:53:24.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't want him. But it was but interesting in six

0:53:25.200 --> 0:53:28.319
<v Speaker 1>By then it was clear that inflation was fading. Uh.

0:53:28.400 --> 0:53:30.920
<v Speaker 1>There were two ex post reviews. One was in the

0:53:31.000 --> 0:53:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Boston Globe and the other was a Seattle Post Intelligencer

0:53:34.680 --> 0:53:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and they both you know, and both of these business

0:53:37.560 --> 0:53:39.440
<v Speaker 1>editors said, I saw this book, Oh my god, it

0:53:39.560 --> 0:53:42.120
<v Speaker 1>was happening, and they and so they wrote reviews. Well,

0:53:42.160 --> 0:53:43.719
<v Speaker 1>of course that was his hand as a pocketing your

0:53:43.800 --> 0:53:46.000
<v Speaker 1>underwear because the book was long out of print. But

0:53:46.160 --> 0:53:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a paric victory. But but yeah, I mean

0:53:49.040 --> 0:53:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that was that was very longly. I don't think there

0:53:51.120 --> 0:53:54.920
<v Speaker 1>was anybody else, at least notable known forecaster who was

0:53:54.960 --> 0:53:57.439
<v Speaker 1>saying anything like that. So so let me push back

0:53:57.480 --> 0:54:00.480
<v Speaker 1>about your your claim that it's the government's bending and

0:54:00.600 --> 0:54:04.720
<v Speaker 1>deficits that cause inflation. We have a nineteen trillion dollar

0:54:05.160 --> 0:54:09.320
<v Speaker 1>federal deficit and yet inflation is well non existent and

0:54:09.480 --> 0:54:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and going hard. Yeah, it's it's uh, yeah, I have

0:54:12.480 --> 0:54:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to fill that out and say, it depends on the

0:54:14.480 --> 0:54:17.080
<v Speaker 1>rest of the economy if you have an over employed

0:54:17.120 --> 0:54:19.800
<v Speaker 1>economy to start with, and then you put all that

0:54:19.960 --> 0:54:22.359
<v Speaker 1>government spending on top of it. But what you see,

0:54:22.400 --> 0:54:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what happened in the late sixties and seventies very

0:54:25.200 --> 0:54:28.160
<v Speaker 1>different today. You had, Yeah, you had a huge government

0:54:28.239 --> 0:54:32.800
<v Speaker 1>spending on war, on poverty and war in Vietnam, and

0:54:32.960 --> 0:54:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that really strained resources on top of a twenty year

0:54:36.200 --> 0:54:42.000
<v Speaker 1>private sector bull market generated generated all that inflation. Well,

0:54:42.040 --> 0:54:45.319
<v Speaker 1>again you've got the reversal that starting. And so now

0:54:45.400 --> 0:54:48.040
<v Speaker 1>we have the retiring boomers, We have a whole lot

0:54:48.120 --> 0:54:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of underemployment. People working part time would rather work full time.

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Um what else do we have in this environment? You

0:54:55.320 --> 0:54:59.719
<v Speaker 1>have increased global Yeah, that that's that's I think that's

0:54:59.760 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 1>been the greatest The greatest change in the last thirty

0:55:02.680 --> 0:55:05.719
<v Speaker 1>years is globalization. And so let's talk about globalization, but

0:55:05.800 --> 0:55:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I also want to get to I also want to

0:55:09.120 --> 0:55:13.600
<v Speaker 1>get to increased productivity and increased automation as other factors

0:55:13.680 --> 0:55:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that are driving this. So what has been the impact

0:55:16.200 --> 0:55:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of globalization on wages both here in the US and worldwide? Well,

0:55:22.480 --> 0:55:26.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a great equalizes are of wages obviously. UM. I

0:55:26.440 --> 0:55:30.160
<v Speaker 1>had was very interesting. This goes back years ago. Milton

0:55:30.200 --> 0:55:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Friedman had read one of my books. He was in

0:55:32.520 --> 0:55:35.000
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. He invited me in. It was in an

0:55:35.320 --> 0:55:39.680
<v Speaker 1>apartment there, uh greeting me at the door, hadn't shaved

0:55:39.719 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 1>in three days, had a bathrobe on. We sat there

0:55:42.280 --> 0:55:46.040
<v Speaker 1>for about three hours talking about about inflation and wages

0:55:46.080 --> 0:55:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and of course what was this Oh gosh, this was

0:55:49.280 --> 0:55:52.319
<v Speaker 1>this is about the mid eighties. And and his point,

0:55:52.360 --> 0:55:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of course is that that free markets govern everything, that

0:55:55.400 --> 0:55:58.880
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing else but and and uh and and I

0:55:59.080 --> 0:56:01.839
<v Speaker 1>was saying, well, you know, wages, you're here, You've got

0:56:03.280 --> 0:56:05.520
<v Speaker 1>an hour you know for the U A W I

0:56:05.600 --> 0:56:08.240
<v Speaker 1>think in this country and two dollars an hour in Mexico.

0:56:08.840 --> 0:56:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And I said, you know, you think it's gonna happen,

0:56:11.120 --> 0:56:14.320
<v Speaker 1>These are gonna equate. Well, they have come a lot closer.

0:56:14.480 --> 0:56:16.640
<v Speaker 1>And and that's what that's what's happened, is that is

0:56:16.680 --> 0:56:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that this is globalization. And of course you had a

0:56:19.280 --> 0:56:23.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of American labor which was enjoying, uh was enjoying

0:56:23.600 --> 0:56:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the fruits of basically isolation. I mean, we did not

0:56:26.520 --> 0:56:30.480
<v Speaker 1>have global competition. But that's clearly changed. Yeah, that that's

0:56:30.520 --> 0:56:32.480
<v Speaker 1>clearly changed. And so what it means is that we

0:56:32.600 --> 0:56:37.280
<v Speaker 1>simply can I compete in in uh, basic manufacturing or anything.

0:56:37.320 --> 0:56:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Even services. You know, you talk about doing routine legal services.

0:56:40.640 --> 0:56:42.600
<v Speaker 1>They do that in India, any place they speak English,

0:56:42.680 --> 0:56:46.040
<v Speaker 1>call centers and so on. So globalization has been a

0:56:46.200 --> 0:56:49.879
<v Speaker 1>very very important factor. And we're dealing with the we're

0:56:49.920 --> 0:56:52.719
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the aftermath of that right now. So let's

0:56:52.800 --> 0:56:56.240
<v Speaker 1>let's along those lines. Let's talk about demographics and retiring

0:56:56.320 --> 0:56:59.440
<v Speaker 1>baby boomers. What does that mean for the overall economy?

0:56:59.480 --> 0:57:04.359
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean for job possibilities and wages? Well,

0:57:04.600 --> 0:57:08.520
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting about that is that is that people are retiring.

0:57:08.560 --> 0:57:10.480
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, the reason the unemployment rate

0:57:10.480 --> 0:57:14.919
<v Speaker 1>has come down uh is UH is basically the people

0:57:15.000 --> 0:57:17.560
<v Speaker 1>dropping out of the labor for what percentage of the

0:57:18.000 --> 0:57:21.360
<v Speaker 1>fall from ten point whatever to five point one percent

0:57:21.480 --> 0:57:25.440
<v Speaker 1>unemployment is people leaving the way little labor for well,

0:57:25.520 --> 0:57:27.720
<v Speaker 1>let's put it this way. If you didn't have if

0:57:27.800 --> 0:57:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you hadn't had the if you hadn't had this participation rate,

0:57:30.520 --> 0:57:33.200
<v Speaker 1>which is anybody sixteen and over who is either at

0:57:33.320 --> 0:57:35.840
<v Speaker 1>working or actively looking for work, if you hadn't had

0:57:35.880 --> 0:57:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that decline from the peak in February of two thousand,

0:57:38.880 --> 0:57:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate today would not not not so that

0:57:43.720 --> 0:57:48.240
<v Speaker 1>many people have left the workforce but are still of working. Well, well, no, no, no,

0:57:48.440 --> 0:57:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that's everybody. Now, we we've got a lot of work

0:57:50.680 --> 0:57:53.439
<v Speaker 1>on that. About six of that are people are over

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:57.720
<v Speaker 1>are people retiring the post of as retiring, but are

0:57:58.160 --> 0:58:01.160
<v Speaker 1>middle aged people who said, you know, I can't find

0:58:01.200 --> 0:58:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a job, And of course, a lot of younger people

0:58:03.560 --> 0:58:05.760
<v Speaker 1>who said, I'm going to stay in college, I hope

0:58:05.760 --> 0:58:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I get a better job. Of course a lot of

0:58:07.360 --> 0:58:09.880
<v Speaker 1>them came out with big deaths but no better job prospects.

0:58:10.240 --> 0:58:12.560
<v Speaker 1>But what's fascinating about this With older people, and you're

0:58:12.560 --> 0:58:16.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about retiring poster or babies, the participation rates of

0:58:16.440 --> 0:58:19.600
<v Speaker 1>people UH sixty five to seventy four have gone up,

0:58:19.720 --> 0:58:23.040
<v Speaker 1>still pretty good lower, they're lower than younger people, but

0:58:23.120 --> 0:58:26.080
<v Speaker 1>they're going up and over seventy five. And why is that?

0:58:26.200 --> 0:58:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Two reasons. One is people in better health, they're living longer,

0:58:28.800 --> 0:58:30.959
<v Speaker 1>they want to stay actively. Also, a lot of people

0:58:31.000 --> 0:58:33.680
<v Speaker 1>simply do not have the access to retire, So you're

0:58:33.720 --> 0:58:36.960
<v Speaker 1>getting some very interesting diamics within that. But but the

0:58:37.040 --> 0:58:39.560
<v Speaker 1>bottom line is there are a lot of people out

0:58:39.600 --> 0:58:44.400
<v Speaker 1>there now training, having the skills to take jobs. That's

0:58:44.400 --> 0:58:46.560
<v Speaker 1>another issue. But if if you assume, if you get

0:58:46.640 --> 0:58:50.560
<v Speaker 1>people properly trained, there's there's really no shortage of labor

0:58:50.560 --> 0:58:54.760
<v Speaker 1>in the foreseeable future, that's amazing. So let's talk along

0:58:54.880 --> 0:59:01.280
<v Speaker 1>related lines. Let's talk about productivity gains and you directly automation.

0:59:01.640 --> 0:59:04.720
<v Speaker 1>What is the impact of Like in my office, I know,

0:59:04.920 --> 0:59:08.240
<v Speaker 1>we were six seven, we're now seven people were about

0:59:08.240 --> 0:59:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to be eight people. I know that to do what

0:59:11.160 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 1>we do thirty years ago would have taken fifty people,

0:59:16.360 --> 0:59:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and thanks to computer technology and software, each person does.

0:59:22.480 --> 0:59:25.080
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a bookkeeper. We outsource that to uh

0:59:25.360 --> 0:59:29.120
<v Speaker 1>an accountant who looks at stuff quarterly, who sees everything online.

0:59:29.560 --> 0:59:31.200
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the stuff that we used to do

0:59:31.480 --> 0:59:36.040
<v Speaker 1>with an assistant and a secretary, we that's all automatic.

0:59:36.120 --> 0:59:38.920
<v Speaker 1>It's all done on the on the everybody types. It's

0:59:39.000 --> 0:59:42.160
<v Speaker 1>not like you can be an executive type. And so

0:59:42.320 --> 0:59:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you're doing entering everything into the into the computer. And

0:59:45.520 --> 0:59:49.040
<v Speaker 1>then when you look at different tools like like what

0:59:49.320 --> 0:59:53.080
<v Speaker 1>we get from Salesforce as an example, as a sales

0:59:53.200 --> 0:59:57.200
<v Speaker 1>management of CRM tool, that would have been somebody's full

0:59:57.280 --> 0:59:59.360
<v Speaker 1>time job and now it's one piece of software for

1:00:00.040 --> 1:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>eight people, it's amazing how much more productive each of

1:00:04.480 --> 1:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>us are. What does that do to to job creation? Well, uh,

1:00:10.320 --> 1:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the whole the whole idea of industrialization ever

1:00:14.280 --> 1:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>since the industry revolution started in England and New England

1:00:17.200 --> 1:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>in late seventeen hundreds, was that it destroys a lot

1:00:20.000 --> 1:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of jobs. You know that, you know that the origin

1:00:22.880 --> 1:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of the word saboteur okay, sabbath. It comes from sabbath

1:00:27.440 --> 1:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>which were wooden shoes, and earlier the ductal Revolution, the

1:00:31.000 --> 1:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>workers wore wooden shoes, would grind him in the machines,

1:00:33.640 --> 1:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>direct the machines because it was putting people out of work.

1:00:36.120 --> 1:00:38.160
<v Speaker 1>They wanted to go back to hand weavers and ah as.

1:00:38.160 --> 1:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>You've always had this specter of of the destruction of

1:00:42.480 --> 1:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>jobs by automation. But but what has happened. Of course,

1:00:45.400 --> 1:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>it's created more jobs, and higher level jobs and higher

1:00:48.880 --> 1:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>page jobs with more productivity, and that's the basis of

1:00:52.160 --> 1:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>living standards. We've come to a we've come to a

1:00:55.080 --> 1:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>bit of a gap recently with globalization. That's one of

1:00:57.720 --> 1:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the reasons I think globalization is so important because it's

1:01:00.640 --> 1:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>given you this huge gap, in other words, more rather

1:01:03.000 --> 1:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>than a gradual increase in this transfer and and and

1:01:07.440 --> 1:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>upgrading and so on and getting rid of the secretaries

1:01:10.360 --> 1:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and the in house accountants and all the stuff you mentioned. Uh,

1:01:13.480 --> 1:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that's happened overnight, and it is simply left a lot

1:01:16.760 --> 1:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of people in the US and other western Western economies

1:01:20.760 --> 1:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>who simply are are not making that transition and not

1:01:24.280 --> 1:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>prepared to that and it may be a generational deal,

1:01:27.000 --> 1:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think it's the end of the world,

1:01:28.440 --> 1:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>but it is a it is almost a a quantum

1:01:32.120 --> 1:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>shift shift there because of globalization. So so you mentioned

1:01:36.080 --> 1:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that as we've gone through the industrial era and as

1:01:38.800 --> 1:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>we've seen um more and more heavy manufacturing put people

1:01:43.880 --> 1:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>out of work, but at the same time creat other jobs.

1:01:46.600 --> 1:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>When we look at technology technical especially biotech, internet, computer technology,

1:01:54.280 --> 1:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the amount of job loss that that's created, is that

1:01:59.280 --> 1:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>really going to be offset by new and related jobs

1:02:02.680 --> 1:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in that space, Because that's the big concern of a

1:02:04.840 --> 1:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, is that there are people who are

1:02:07.800 --> 1:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>creating software, creating technology that allows each person to do

1:02:12.720 --> 1:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>so much more. You've eliminated a huge swath of jobs.

1:02:17.040 --> 1:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>The jobs are being created just where that Where are

1:02:19.160 --> 1:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>they geographically? In other ways, are they in this country

1:02:23.160 --> 1:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>or are they in China? And now low end manufacturing

1:02:26.800 --> 1:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>moving on from China to lower cost areas Bangladesh, Vietnam,

1:02:31.080 --> 1:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Pakistan and so on. Well, we see the iPhone which

1:02:33.720 --> 1:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>is designed in the in the United States, design in

1:02:36.240 --> 1:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, but essentially it's manufactured in China, with components

1:02:41.360 --> 1:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and other parts made all of the world. But the

1:02:44.040 --> 1:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>bulk of which are in low cost countries. So what

1:02:48.200 --> 1:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is and yet there's also an app economy where all

1:02:51.520 --> 1:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>these software designers and all these people are making a

1:02:53.680 --> 1:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>whole run of different software to put on that that

1:02:58.480 --> 1:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>work pretty much anywhere, but they're mostly the United States, UM, Europe, India, Japan,

1:03:05.440 --> 1:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>places like that. So is that technology creating more jobs?

1:03:10.040 --> 1:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's creates creating more jobs, and of course it's

1:03:13.080 --> 1:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it's adding to income polarization because those are those yeah,

1:03:17.000 --> 1:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>those are those are high skilled jobs, those are high

1:03:19.400 --> 1:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>paid jobs. But what you've eliminated are these auto factories

1:03:24.080 --> 1:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>in this country that employed five thousand people that that's

1:03:26.760 --> 1:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>out Now. One of the interesting things coming out of this,

1:03:29.560 --> 1:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and particularly with what's going on right now, we've had

1:03:32.240 --> 1:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>eight years of basically no real income growth in the

1:03:36.000 --> 1:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>US and really Europe, Japan they developed world nowers adjusted

1:03:40.880 --> 1:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>for inflation, no no growth. People get frustrated after a

1:03:44.920 --> 1:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>while of that, and what's happening. We're beginning to see

1:03:47.800 --> 1:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that expressed politically. For example, in France, the National Front

1:03:52.360 --> 1:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>headed by this woman Maria la Penn. She may be

1:03:55.760 --> 1:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the next president of France. It's a very you may

1:03:58.440 --> 1:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>end up with Bernie Sanders or done Trump in the

1:04:01.480 --> 1:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>in the US, and and of course John Baynor, you know,

1:04:07.120 --> 1:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and there's this reaction to politicians in the center and

1:04:10.920 --> 1:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at the fringes UK the head of the new

1:04:14.280 --> 1:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>head of the Labor Party. I mean, you're getting very

1:04:17.200 --> 1:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting expressions of this. UH. And of course you know

1:04:20.320 --> 1:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking about French revolutions now where people out

1:04:22.920 --> 1:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>there tear it down the beast steel, but it is

1:04:25.400 --> 1:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it is a similar kind of impulse and we could

1:04:28.200 --> 1:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>get some very interesting political ramifications. So we just saw

1:04:32.000 --> 1:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that in Greece with Left coalition. Although I will tell

1:04:37.320 --> 1:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you the craziest thing, so we're recording this UH in

1:04:41.120 --> 1:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of fall two thousand and fifteen, so we

1:04:44.480 --> 1:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know the outcome of the election for any of

1:04:46.400 --> 1:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you in the future listening to this. We don't know

1:04:48.640 --> 1:04:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things. But one of the things that

1:04:50.920 --> 1:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I find fascinating is when you look at the shocking

1:04:54.400 --> 1:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and sudden rise of Donald Trump politically, he's much more

1:04:58.880 --> 1:05:03.480
<v Speaker 1>centrist then either the bulk of the Republicans on the

1:05:03.600 --> 1:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>right and the bulk of the Democrats on the left.

1:05:06.720 --> 1:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm amazed that when you strip away the bluster. He's

1:05:11.720 --> 1:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of a centrist, old school politician. How did who

1:05:16.360 --> 1:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>would have saw that coming? A few Yeah, but you know,

1:05:18.440 --> 1:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a hell raising aspect. It's like what was that

1:05:20.600 --> 1:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>movie Network News where the guys because you know, I'm

1:05:23.680 --> 1:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>not going to take it an Yeah, absolutely, I mean

1:05:27.680 --> 1:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's that it's that same kind of the same

1:05:30.120 --> 1:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of reaction, and that's what he's Bernie Sanders. I mean,

1:05:33.080 --> 1:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of course he's way to the left, but it's that

1:05:34.720 --> 1:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>same kind of same kind of appeal. It's kind of saying,

1:05:38.000 --> 1:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the centers politicians have not solved the problems. We got

1:05:41.600 --> 1:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to do something else, and and there's a there's a

1:05:43.880 --> 1:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>big hearing for that kind of thing. So this is

1:05:46.080 --> 1:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a this is a this is a kind of a

1:05:48.600 --> 1:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>cycle within the cycle, if you want to use cycles.

1:05:51.200 --> 1:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And we talked about whether they're relevant or not. But

1:05:53.120 --> 1:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you've had you've had globalization going on for you know,

1:05:55.720 --> 1:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>about three decades. But now in the aftermath of the

1:05:59.560 --> 1:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>global Great Recession oh seven oh nine, we're having this

1:06:03.360 --> 1:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>period of slow growth, as I called the age of

1:06:05.720 --> 1:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>d leveraging, no no growth and real incomes. And and

1:06:09.880 --> 1:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>as a result, I think the combination of these things

1:06:12.160 --> 1:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>is putting a lot of pressure on the political system

1:06:14.400 --> 1:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and and the conventional politicians really don't know how to

1:06:17.080 --> 1:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>react to this. So let me ask you a question

1:06:18.800 --> 1:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>about that. And I'm not sure where I pulled this

1:06:21.480 --> 1:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>number from, but there was some news article out not

1:06:24.600 --> 1:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>too long ago that said, the middle class has not

1:06:28.760 --> 1:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>seen in real terms, um forget nominal terms, but in

1:06:33.640 --> 1:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>real terms, has not really seen wage gains since nineteen three.

1:06:37.840 --> 1:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's I think that's I think that's probably valid. Yeah,

1:06:40.760 --> 1:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>if you look at if you look at real wages

1:06:44.360 --> 1:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know that pretty much is that their

1:06:47.640 --> 1:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>insurance costs are up in the Indian real family income,

1:06:51.000 --> 1:06:54.280
<v Speaker 1>That's that's what those statistics show you. And and you

1:06:54.360 --> 1:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>know the growth has has come on on the on

1:06:56.800 --> 1:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the top. There's a lot of income redistribution to look

1:06:59.080 --> 1:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>people on the bottom. And you know, people can say, oh,

1:07:01.720 --> 1:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>this is this is terrible, and of course the pope

1:07:03.640 --> 1:07:06.840
<v Speaker 1>is that was his theme as as well. But you know,

1:07:06.960 --> 1:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you say, if you if you have rapid growth, if

1:07:08.920 --> 1:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you have a dynamic economy, it is going to sort

1:07:11.920 --> 1:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>out the people who have the skills in order to participate.

1:07:16.080 --> 1:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>You look at China. Look how many billionaires are in China?

1:07:20.040 --> 1:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>And you say, well, yeah, but this is a country

1:07:21.680 --> 1:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>with a average income of what about a sixth of

1:07:24.160 --> 1:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>what we have. But yet when you see dynamics the

1:07:28.520 --> 1:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>people who take up, now you can say, well, that's

1:07:30.560 --> 1:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>not that's not equal distribution. But that's a judgment call,

1:07:33.920 --> 1:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that's not a market call. So what does the United

1:07:36.200 --> 1:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>States need to do to sort of restart that economic

1:07:39.360 --> 1:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>engine and go from forget five percent, how about going

1:07:43.440 --> 1:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>from two percent to over three percent? Well, I think

1:07:46.800 --> 1:07:48.919
<v Speaker 1>I think a certain extent, it's really just a matter

1:07:49.080 --> 1:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of having patients and letting this whole agent be leveraging

1:07:52.440 --> 1:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and run its course. Now, once people are no longer

1:07:54.800 --> 1:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>buried with debt they picked up in the last cycle,

1:07:58.080 --> 1:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that's right activity that's after that, we are going to

1:08:00.600 --> 1:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>see a return to rapid growth and it will be

1:08:03.480 --> 1:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>led by by technology and productivity. So you're up for

1:08:07.520 --> 1:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy who's says the bond bull market is still here.

1:08:10.680 --> 1:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>You're fairly optimistic. Oh, I am in the long run,

1:08:13.360 --> 1:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>very much so. And one of the reasons is my

1:08:15.480 --> 1:08:18.799
<v Speaker 1>basic philosophy. You know, I mean, right now, the easy

1:08:19.200 --> 1:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>long term uh forecast to sell is slow growth forever.

1:08:24.240 --> 1:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Because everybody looks around us. That's what I see right on, brother,

1:08:27.560 --> 1:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>You look at people like like Bob Gordon, Professor Northwestern.

1:08:31.880 --> 1:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>He's going around saying everything that is really productive, that's

1:08:35.800 --> 1:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>worth inventing, has been invented. Modern, by the way, we've

1:08:38.760 --> 1:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>heard that throughout the centuries, and it's always been wrong.

1:08:41.280 --> 1:08:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Modern ma enthusian, and it sells very well. Neil Ferguson

1:08:44.840 --> 1:08:48.719
<v Speaker 1>at Harvard, Uh, things are being dragged down by dragged

1:08:48.760 --> 1:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>down by regulation and so on. Larry Summers, you know,

1:08:52.280 --> 1:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>democratic fergusonsest stick to history. He's a terrible economic connentator.

1:08:56.360 --> 1:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Every time he talks about economics, he manages to get something. Well,

1:08:59.280 --> 1:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not major. But what what I'm saying, Barry, is

1:09:03.400 --> 1:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that that's the easy cell. And you know, I'm always yeah,

1:09:07.760 --> 1:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>it's yeah, And I'm always looking for, you know, where's

1:09:10.400 --> 1:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the hidden flaw that that's that's that's how I made

1:09:12.800 --> 1:09:16.519
<v Speaker 1>my career, is looking for where's the where's the why

1:09:16.640 --> 1:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>is it going to go wrong? And in this case,

1:09:18.720 --> 1:09:21.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, for example, they say that, uh, Gordon says

1:09:22.200 --> 1:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that the Internet and so on is finished. Computers, it's

1:09:26.040 --> 1:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>all realized I think those things are more in their

1:09:28.840 --> 1:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>infancy than there are for I mean, just just you

1:09:31.960 --> 1:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>be a couple of examples. The American Industrial Revolution started

1:09:35.960 --> 1:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>in the late seventeen hundreds, grew like topsy, but it

1:09:39.720 --> 1:09:42.559
<v Speaker 1>didn't get big enough to move the economy until after

1:09:42.640 --> 1:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the Civil War. I mean it ter yeah, railroads again

1:09:47.880 --> 1:09:50.639
<v Speaker 1>they started l seventeen hundreds, not until the latter half

1:09:50.680 --> 1:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of the nineteenth century. I mean, it takes a long

1:09:53.240 --> 1:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>time for these things. And you know, you look at you,

1:09:56.640 --> 1:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and I have have cell phone. I mean this has

1:09:58.400 --> 1:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>got more computer partner I b M three sixty this

1:10:01.520 --> 1:10:04.639
<v Speaker 1>this little gasht in your pocket. I jokingly tell people

1:10:04.800 --> 1:10:07.519
<v Speaker 1>there's more computing power on this than took Man to

1:10:07.600 --> 1:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the moon with it really is. And and I look,

1:10:10.960 --> 1:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and I was taking some pictures and here I am

1:10:13.120 --> 1:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>on our beach house here, you know, at home around

1:10:15.880 --> 1:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got just where it records where it is. I mean,

1:10:17.960 --> 1:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a big brother knows where you are. But but

1:10:20.560 --> 1:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>but my opinion that we are more in the infancy

1:10:25.439 --> 1:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>than we are finished on these new technology. Biotechnology, I

1:10:28.840 --> 1:10:31.479
<v Speaker 1>think is is much much more in its infancy and

1:10:31.960 --> 1:10:34.479
<v Speaker 1>what that is going to do for productivity growth in

1:10:34.560 --> 1:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the future. Now again, you're gonna have people who have

1:10:36.880 --> 1:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the right training. But you know, one of the problems

1:10:39.640 --> 1:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>we have in this country. One of the problems we

1:10:41.880 --> 1:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>have in this problem country. And there's a different topics,

1:10:44.400 --> 1:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>but I think related is the education system and and

1:10:48.080 --> 1:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we have the attitude, Um, we have

1:10:51.520 --> 1:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the attitude that everybody ought to go to college. And

1:10:54.320 --> 1:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it is true that people with college educations make more

1:10:57.160 --> 1:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>than high school grads. But you can't prove causality with statistics.

1:11:02.280 --> 1:11:05.439
<v Speaker 1>I guarantee you positively, absolutely, every time there's a total

1:11:05.479 --> 1:11:07.679
<v Speaker 1>eclipse of the of the sun, if you go outside

1:11:07.720 --> 1:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and beat a drum, it will go away hard percent correlation,

1:11:11.080 --> 1:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>no causality. The reality is, in my view, smart people

1:11:15.479 --> 1:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>go to college. But college doesn't make you smart. And

1:11:18.360 --> 1:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to recognize that and say, Okay,

1:11:21.000 --> 1:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of people who can have very

1:11:23.000 --> 1:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>credible jobs. Hey, what's the last time you hired a

1:11:26.439 --> 1:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>plumber to clean out a toilet? News charge your hundred

1:11:29.200 --> 1:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>bucks for fifteen minutes work. I mean, you know, there

1:11:31.760 --> 1:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of jobs that are not college educations,

1:11:35.479 --> 1:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>but they're certainly very credible. There's six estimates are the

1:11:39.200 --> 1:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>six hundred thousand jobs going begging now for people with

1:11:42.360 --> 1:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>computer skills to work in factories. And one of the

1:11:45.280 --> 1:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>things that's happening to solve that is the Germans. They

1:11:48.200 --> 1:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>have a very strong apprenticeship program history. They brought a

1:11:52.200 --> 1:11:54.479
<v Speaker 1>lot of their plants in the southeast and this country

1:11:55.479 --> 1:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and they have these apprenticeship programs combined with two year

1:11:58.200 --> 1:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>community college degrees, and these guys come out and they're

1:12:01.200 --> 1:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>very well paid. And American companies are emulating that same

1:12:04.200 --> 1:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. So I think that's one of the

1:12:06.479 --> 1:12:09.479
<v Speaker 1>most exciting things in education that this isn't say everybody,

1:12:09.600 --> 1:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we have a college for any for

1:12:12.360 --> 1:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>any intellectual capability in this country. Look at the poor

1:12:16.280 --> 1:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>profit college is absolute disaster total. They wouldn't exist without

1:12:20.439 --> 1:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>government subsidies and it is just a waste of moth.

1:12:22.920 --> 1:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>They came about on their own. Beginning, there was a

1:12:25.320 --> 1:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>huge movement to the private sector can do this on

1:12:28.160 --> 1:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>their own. And once they figured out they could suckle

1:12:31.080 --> 1:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>off the teat of Uncle Sam, they were all over

1:12:34.600 --> 1:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and there. Sure, and you know it's an entrepreneur Okay,

1:12:37.439 --> 1:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>why not? You know, you know, because we know where

1:12:40.840 --> 1:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>it helps making the money money, the old fashioned way,

1:12:43.360 --> 1:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>skill luck, Clair biyance Brand's higher work, and so much

1:12:45.800 --> 1:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>government subsidy you can't miss until they collapse under their

1:12:50.280 --> 1:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>own way. So so you're really a pretty optimistic guy

1:12:53.800 --> 1:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>about the future of America. I am, I am, I am.

1:12:56.320 --> 1:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we've got to get through this. This, this

1:12:58.600 --> 1:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the leveraging. How long does at last? Normally? You know,

1:13:01.720 --> 1:13:04.439
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the Ryano Rokoff data, it was

1:13:04.520 --> 1:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>waiting for it goes ten years. Now they are that

1:13:08.560 --> 1:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>data is over centuries. It's developed countries, it's banana republics.

1:13:13.560 --> 1:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of apples and oranges recently, but right now,

1:13:18.360 --> 1:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>right well recently, you know, if you go back to

1:13:20.680 --> 1:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the thirties, it was about ten years. We're eight years

1:13:23.320 --> 1:13:25.439
<v Speaker 1>into this now. At the rate we're going, it may

1:13:25.560 --> 1:13:28.599
<v Speaker 1>take longer than another two years to complete, but I'm

1:13:28.680 --> 1:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>convinced that it will be twelve years, fifteen years maybe

1:13:32.439 --> 1:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>something that if you use if you use a straight line,

1:13:34.600 --> 1:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the financial sector in this country has probably got another uh,

1:13:38.000 --> 1:13:40.679
<v Speaker 1>five or six years ago. The consumer working off xces

1:13:40.800 --> 1:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Stat's probably maybe a little bit longer, maybe seven eight years.

1:13:44.720 --> 1:13:47.479
<v Speaker 1>But that's just drawing straight lines. So you're guessing we're

1:13:47.560 --> 1:13:52.439
<v Speaker 1>halfway through. And as I mentioned earlier that one of

1:13:52.520 --> 1:13:56.519
<v Speaker 1>the really interesting questions is is our is the electric

1:13:56.640 --> 1:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>going to have the patience to go through this, or

1:13:59.080 --> 1:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get a react action. We're gonna get some

1:14:01.479 --> 1:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>oddball uh in oddballs in Congress and administration. Are we

1:14:05.920 --> 1:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>going to see a big push for goverment stimulus? And

1:14:09.120 --> 1:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>if we do, I think it will be fiscal. It

1:14:10.640 --> 1:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>won't be monetary, because you know we've already I think

1:14:13.240 --> 1:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>we've exhausted the monetary Yeah. Well that's the traditional listen.

1:14:18.439 --> 1:14:22.519
<v Speaker 1>Following the Great Depression, even following the two thousand recession,

1:14:22.920 --> 1:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>we saw a huge surge of fiscal stimulus that's been

1:14:25.960 --> 1:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>more or less missing this go around. What what would

1:14:29.360 --> 1:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the impact of that be to the de leveraging process.

1:14:32.800 --> 1:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Well it uh, I don't know that would necessary, it

1:14:35.600 --> 1:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>would necessarily reverse it. I mean, but it it could

1:14:38.880 --> 1:14:41.439
<v Speaker 1>mitigate it. It could speed it up a little bit,

1:14:41.560 --> 1:14:43.519
<v Speaker 1>speed it up a little bit. Yeah, and could speed

1:14:43.600 --> 1:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>it up. I just want my roads paved. You know.

1:14:46.560 --> 1:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>People accused me of being uh, well, well you're a

1:14:49.080 --> 1:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>big guy. No, No, I'm tired of replacing axles I

1:14:52.080 --> 1:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>want you know my run flat tires show up as

1:14:54.960 --> 1:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>flat because there were so many people know that. That's

1:14:57.200 --> 1:15:00.519
<v Speaker 1>That's a big difference between monetary and fiscal policy. Monetary

1:15:00.560 --> 1:15:03.479
<v Speaker 1>policy is a very blunt instrument. The Fed and other

1:15:03.560 --> 1:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>central banks you can raise and lower interest rates, can

1:15:05.760 --> 1:15:08.519
<v Speaker 1>buy and sell securities. That's yet and beyond that, the

1:15:08.560 --> 1:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>ship's fallwhard and you don't really see that immediately. Yeah,

1:15:11.200 --> 1:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the ships fall where they may. Fiscal policy can be pinpointed.

1:15:15.080 --> 1:15:17.439
<v Speaker 1>If you want to improve the roads, you put money

1:15:17.479 --> 1:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>into road construction, if you want to help the unemployed,

1:15:20.240 --> 1:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>increase unemployment benefits. It can be very very specific. It

1:15:23.680 --> 1:15:25.679
<v Speaker 1>doesn't say it's going to be efficient, doesn't say it's

1:15:25.680 --> 1:15:28.639
<v Speaker 1>going to be I'd like our electrical grid to be upgraded.

1:15:28.720 --> 1:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>It's it's terrible. It'd be nice if our ports were secure.

1:15:32.439 --> 1:15:36.439
<v Speaker 1>We know that they're still vulnerable to foreign or terrorist attacks.

1:15:36.560 --> 1:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>And I are on the same page here. I think

1:15:38.439 --> 1:15:41.679
<v Speaker 1>infrastructures is really and if you go if you travel

1:15:41.800 --> 1:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to Asia or Europe, our cellular system is awful, and

1:15:45.800 --> 1:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>our broadband, where we essentially created this technology, we're now

1:15:50.560 --> 1:15:53.759
<v Speaker 1>the back of the but we are terrible compared forget Korea,

1:15:53.840 --> 1:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>who kicks our but most of Europe is three to

1:15:56.720 --> 1:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>five times faster than US and cheaper. Yeah, it's in credible.

1:16:00.400 --> 1:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah alright, so I know I only have you for

1:16:02.800 --> 1:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a few more minutes. Let me go through some of

1:16:05.160 --> 1:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>my favorite questions to ask people and we'll get you

1:16:08.439 --> 1:16:13.519
<v Speaker 1>out of here on time. Um. So, before before you

1:16:13.560 --> 1:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>came to Wall Street, you mentioned you're working for Standard Oil.

1:16:17.240 --> 1:16:19.439
<v Speaker 1>What what did you do for them? What was your

1:16:19.600 --> 1:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>pre Wall Street experience? I was an economists there. They

1:16:23.240 --> 1:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>had what was called a general economics department. They had

1:16:26.360 --> 1:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>uh economists that covered various segments of the world. I

1:16:28.960 --> 1:16:31.639
<v Speaker 1>was in charge of the US and Canada in terms

1:16:31.680 --> 1:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of forecasting and analysis of the economy. And that was

1:16:35.640 --> 1:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a time when the major corporations they had two things

1:16:41.479 --> 1:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>they knew they had to have. You couldn't go to

1:16:43.520 --> 1:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>lunch with your fellow CEOs and other wizards without having them.

1:16:47.439 --> 1:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>But they didn't know what to do with either one.

1:16:49.439 --> 1:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>And one was econ economists and the other was computers.

1:16:53.080 --> 1:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>That's fascinating. So from that you decided from that and

1:16:57.080 --> 1:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>from that I decided, Uh, you know, in Standard Oil

1:16:59.840 --> 1:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>was it is a huge company obviously well run company.

1:17:03.240 --> 1:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be there forever, but it was fairly bureaucratic,

1:17:06.680 --> 1:17:09.439
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to imagine a little more active, and

1:17:09.520 --> 1:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that's why I went left for Wall Street. So, so

1:17:12.479 --> 1:17:14.160
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about some of your early

1:17:14.240 --> 1:17:18.439
<v Speaker 1>mentors who really influenced your You mentioned the professor at

1:17:18.439 --> 1:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Amherst who impacted your your career clearly mentor who else

1:17:22.400 --> 1:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>was a mentor of yours? Um, who influenced your thinking?

1:17:29.680 --> 1:17:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure I could name I. You know, I

1:17:31.479 --> 1:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>thought about that earlier. We talked about that, and I'm

1:17:34.280 --> 1:17:36.400
<v Speaker 1>not sure I could I could mention. I mean, I

1:17:36.439 --> 1:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I never, for better or worse, very I don't think

1:17:40.400 --> 1:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I ever had had the mentor. So let me ask,

1:17:44.000 --> 1:17:48.400
<v Speaker 1>let me rephrase that question slightly differently. What books throughout

1:17:48.479 --> 1:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>your lifetime have you found especially influential? Um. I guess

1:17:57.439 --> 1:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the some of the basic books on the

1:17:59.400 --> 1:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>economy and and uh um. But I think it's been

1:18:03.320 --> 1:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>more the philosophical aspects and some of the some of

1:18:09.280 --> 1:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>the some of the great thinkers who give us some examples.

1:18:13.479 --> 1:18:16.439
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned Milton Freedman or earlier. Yeah, certainly, I know

1:18:16.560 --> 1:18:18.759
<v Speaker 1>you don't agree with everything. He said. You know, Kane's

1:18:18.800 --> 1:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of interesting things. Um. My two thesis

1:18:24.120 --> 1:18:28.559
<v Speaker 1>advisers of Sanford ed Shawn Jack and Jack Early. They

1:18:28.600 --> 1:18:32.479
<v Speaker 1>came up to the idea that money pervaded in finance

1:18:32.600 --> 1:18:36.439
<v Speaker 1>and everything had a degree of money, even insurance policies. Uh.

1:18:37.040 --> 1:18:40.679
<v Speaker 1>But um, I can't say that I really studied under

1:18:40.920 --> 1:18:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, one great mentor and U or another. So

1:18:45.439 --> 1:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about the financial industry. Obviously a lot

1:18:52.240 --> 1:18:55.120
<v Speaker 1>has changed since you first joined Wall Street back in

1:18:55.160 --> 1:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the late sixties. What do you think is the most

1:18:57.280 --> 1:19:04.439
<v Speaker 1>significant shift we've seen you finance over the past forty years. Uh,

1:19:06.360 --> 1:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it's probably the poriferation of financial instruments. When I when

1:19:12.080 --> 1:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I got in, uh to Mary Lynch, and that was

1:19:15.439 --> 1:19:19.439
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen sixty seven, you had fixed commission rates. Um,

1:19:19.800 --> 1:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>everything was pretty well regimented. No competition, no, yeah, no

1:19:24.680 --> 1:19:28.479
<v Speaker 1>real competitions we know today regulation. I mean they even

1:19:28.560 --> 1:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>had resale holes, uh, fixed retail prices. You couldn't go

1:19:32.840 --> 1:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>into the store and buy you know, couldn't buy to

1:19:35.479 --> 1:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a toothpaste where the price wasn't fixed in many cases. Uh.

1:19:39.439 --> 1:19:44.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think what's happened is first First, first of all,

1:19:44.439 --> 1:19:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you have opened things up with allowing competition starting with

1:19:48.360 --> 1:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>may Day and a fixed commission race in nine, and

1:19:52.840 --> 1:19:57.400
<v Speaker 1>then also the proliferation of computers and an ability to

1:19:57.479 --> 1:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>trade and moving away from individuals curities. I remember Mary

1:20:01.200 --> 1:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>lynch Uh their trading operation that was looked like a

1:20:04.000 --> 1:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>race track where they had these belts that went around

1:20:06.960 --> 1:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>in a in a big view and a guy would

1:20:09.080 --> 1:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>take an order and stick it in um in this

1:20:12.120 --> 1:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>track and would go around with the guy on the

1:20:13.800 --> 1:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>other side. It would process, and I mean, you know

1:20:16.479 --> 1:20:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it now. You push a button and it yeah,

1:20:18.439 --> 1:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, music and well, and not only that,

1:20:20.640 --> 1:20:22.439
<v Speaker 1>we're at the point now where these guys want to be.

1:20:23.439 --> 1:20:25.880
<v Speaker 1>It's so fast that they want to be a short

1:20:26.000 --> 1:20:31.799
<v Speaker 1>a distance physically from that hundred and eighty six thousand

1:20:32.000 --> 1:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>miles a second, okay, but they want to be half

1:20:35.320 --> 1:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>them closer. Don't travel that fast. But you know, I

1:20:39.920 --> 1:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>mean that that kind of thing has has really and

1:20:42.920 --> 1:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>if you remember the beginning of The Big Short if

1:20:45.080 --> 1:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>you met that book by Michael Lewis, they talked about

1:20:47.520 --> 1:20:51.360
<v Speaker 1>all of these high frequency trading op brokerage firms that

1:20:52.200 --> 1:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>locate just outside of the Holland tunnel, so they're the

1:20:55.840 --> 1:21:00.680
<v Speaker 1>closest to the feed from from all streets. And then

1:21:00.800 --> 1:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>these guys from Chicago laying a fiber optic cable in

1:21:03.840 --> 1:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>a dead straight line, didn't care what was in the way, mountains, houses,

1:21:08.400 --> 1:21:10.519
<v Speaker 1>just buy it and blow through it. And now they're

1:21:10.520 --> 1:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>replacing that with you know, over the air microwave point

1:21:14.160 --> 1:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to point broadcast, so you don't even have to lay

1:21:16.920 --> 1:21:19.400
<v Speaker 1>fiber optic. You can just go. You have to have

1:21:19.479 --> 1:21:21.519
<v Speaker 1>a series of jumps because the curvature of the earth

1:21:21.600 --> 1:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>gets in the way. But that's how important speed was

1:21:24.880 --> 1:21:27.360
<v Speaker 1>to those guys. And and and the question is are

1:21:27.439 --> 1:21:31.640
<v Speaker 1>we able to handle this uh in terms of the

1:21:31.920 --> 1:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>effects of this. And we've seen this with you know

1:21:34.560 --> 1:21:41.880
<v Speaker 1>fair uh seven uh stock market nose dive one one day.

1:21:41.920 --> 1:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>We've seen him with flash crashes into bonds, and more

1:21:45.880 --> 1:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>recently we saw that with the E T F crush

1:21:48.439 --> 1:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>And and yeah, and and the question is are we

1:21:51.240 --> 1:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>are we really up to speed with with this? And

1:21:54.120 --> 1:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and then you have a much better question. And this

1:21:56.400 --> 1:21:58.479
<v Speaker 1>goes back to a lot of what we talked about

1:21:58.520 --> 1:22:01.559
<v Speaker 1>about automation and so on. Has that made us any

1:22:01.800 --> 1:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>better decision makers? I'll tell you one one one one

1:22:06.400 --> 1:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>uh one book that I always read. It's a whole

1:22:09.000 --> 1:22:11.160
<v Speaker 1>bunch of them. It's it's Shakespeare. I'm a great fan

1:22:11.240 --> 1:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of Shakespeare. And you go back and you say, you know,

1:22:13.880 --> 1:22:15.839
<v Speaker 1>first of all, that guy said things in an elegant

1:22:15.880 --> 1:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>way that none of you know, every the best line

1:22:18.320 --> 1:22:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I've ever written is going to be big, is worse

1:22:21.960 --> 1:22:24.120
<v Speaker 1>than the worst line he ever wrote. But you look

1:22:24.160 --> 1:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>at these and you say, has anything really changed? How

1:22:26.880 --> 1:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>are we making any better decisions with all this technology

1:22:30.760 --> 1:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and speed? I'm not sure we have? And is this

1:22:33.040 --> 1:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>this mean that it's given us more confidence that we're

1:22:36.479 --> 1:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're going bad and with more confidence than before.

1:22:41.720 --> 1:22:43.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean because you think, well, all that data is

1:22:43.439 --> 1:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>available and so on, So I'm not sure that that

1:22:46.320 --> 1:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>we're able to synthesize that data any better. And and

1:22:49.400 --> 1:22:51.519
<v Speaker 1>of course everybody else has the same data. And are

1:22:51.560 --> 1:22:54.439
<v Speaker 1>you any better off really in terms of for you know,

1:22:54.520 --> 1:22:57.439
<v Speaker 1>you're a forecaster, I'm a forecaster. Are we making better forecasting?

1:22:57.479 --> 1:23:00.479
<v Speaker 1>We did twenty years ago? But it's feels to me

1:23:00.640 --> 1:23:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that all this technology and all this high speed um

1:23:04.600 --> 1:23:07.640
<v Speaker 1>not specialists, not people who have an obligation to make

1:23:07.680 --> 1:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>an orderly market. It makes it feel like the market

1:23:11.000 --> 1:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>structure is a little less stable or a lot less

1:23:13.840 --> 1:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>states Well, I think that I think that's true. And

1:23:15.920 --> 1:23:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and and you really say, is that is that simply part?

1:23:20.280 --> 1:23:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Is that part of the you know, does that go

1:23:22.280 --> 1:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>with the territory? And you just have to expect these

1:23:25.240 --> 1:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>periodic uh glicies and and and and uh, you know

1:23:30.479 --> 1:23:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the puke point you reach me occasionally is it is

1:23:33.479 --> 1:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>this this part of the whole deal? And you you

1:23:35.200 --> 1:23:37.120
<v Speaker 1>live with it? And I say, that's that's part of

1:23:37.160 --> 1:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the deal. But but you know the thing about finances, finance, fundamentally,

1:23:43.960 --> 1:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the justification for finance is a grease the wheels of commerce.

1:23:47.800 --> 1:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It's it's if we had a barter system would be

1:23:50.080 --> 1:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty if it would be pretty rough? Uh too much

1:23:54.120 --> 1:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>what finances? But I think finance, and particularly leading up

1:23:57.479 --> 1:24:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to the collapse of nine in two thousand a, a

1:24:01.439 --> 1:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of those guys felt they were an end of

1:24:02.960 --> 1:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>themselves and they're only their only job was to make money,

1:24:06.800 --> 1:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't really think about are we contributing anything?

1:24:09.960 --> 1:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Are we improving productivity? Are we are we making it

1:24:13.840 --> 1:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>possible for investments uh to get to get productive things?

1:24:18.479 --> 1:24:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Done in the economy, and I think there's I think

1:24:21.400 --> 1:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of site and loss of of what

1:24:24.439 --> 1:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the ultment game, ultiment objective of finances. I couldn't I

1:24:29.120 --> 1:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>couldn't agree more so that's historically looking back. Let me

1:24:32.720 --> 1:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>ask you, UM, next question, what do you see as

1:24:36.040 --> 1:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the next important shifts in finance going forward? UM? Oh, gosh,

1:24:45.280 --> 1:24:49.360
<v Speaker 1>it's probably gone to do with globalization. UM. So no

1:24:49.479 --> 1:24:53.479
<v Speaker 1>more less of an impact of national borders than you have. Yeah,

1:24:53.520 --> 1:24:56.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, you mean that the technology is there,

1:24:56.560 --> 1:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and yet you do have you still have, you know,

1:24:59.400 --> 1:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>separate right regulations, separate exchanges. Um. There's there's a lot

1:25:04.040 --> 1:25:08.799
<v Speaker 1>of of particularly in Europe, where they're trying to combine

1:25:08.880 --> 1:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>this but on a on a global basis. But you know,

1:25:11.840 --> 1:25:15.519
<v Speaker 1>when when money can move around, move around at the

1:25:15.880 --> 1:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>touch of a touch of a key stroke. Um. The

1:25:18.920 --> 1:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>idea that you're moving into different regulatory jurisdictions because guys

1:25:23.120 --> 1:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>are always going to try to game system, they're going

1:25:25.000 --> 1:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to look for the lowest regulatory climate. And I think

1:25:28.080 --> 1:25:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that's probably something that's we're going to see is a

1:25:30.720 --> 1:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>lot more global control of of financial flows, not not

1:25:35.240 --> 1:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>control in the sense of big brother, but just common

1:25:38.400 --> 1:25:42.680
<v Speaker 1>regulations so that it's it's all under the same all

1:25:42.760 --> 1:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>under the same regulatory framework. So so down to my

1:25:46.880 --> 1:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>last two favorite questions. And and let me ask you this.

1:25:50.800 --> 1:25:54.439
<v Speaker 1>So the millennials, the people are just graduating college who

1:25:54.439 --> 1:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>we were discussing earlier. If one of them approached you

1:25:57.720 --> 1:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and said, Gary, I'm interested in the career finance, what

1:26:00.880 --> 1:26:06.360
<v Speaker 1>advice can you give me? What would you tell them? Uh?

1:26:06.840 --> 1:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Other than other than to become a great economist, of course, Uh,

1:26:11.240 --> 1:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I would. I would probably advise them to try to

1:26:15.200 --> 1:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>find an area where you are doing something is productive

1:26:19.720 --> 1:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and you're not just glorified shuffer of paper. Uh. Trading.

1:26:26.160 --> 1:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Trading is important. It lubricas the system. But but trading

1:26:30.080 --> 1:26:32.519
<v Speaker 1>just for the sake of making money. I mean, you

1:26:32.600 --> 1:26:35.439
<v Speaker 1>look at you look at corporate finance. Um, if you

1:26:35.560 --> 1:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>go back, you know, take Goldman Sacks that used to

1:26:38.360 --> 1:26:42.360
<v Speaker 1>be an investment banking house and and their job was

1:26:42.520 --> 1:26:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to their job was to work with clients and to

1:26:47.680 --> 1:26:51.559
<v Speaker 1>raise money for them to do investments and productive things.

1:26:52.080 --> 1:26:55.519
<v Speaker 1>And it was a win win situation. Uh. The client

1:26:55.640 --> 1:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>got the got the issue place, investors were satisfied with

1:27:01.320 --> 1:27:04.759
<v Speaker 1>it most of the time. And and uh, the investment

1:27:04.840 --> 1:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>banker got a fee. Okay, now what Wall Street has

1:27:08.840 --> 1:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>evolved in his trading houses, and that isn't a win

1:27:11.760 --> 1:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>win situation. It's a zero sum game. There's a winner

1:27:14.640 --> 1:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and a loser. Whether it's not like every it's not

1:27:16.840 --> 1:27:19.880
<v Speaker 1>like the pie is getting bigger. I don't think if

1:27:19.920 --> 1:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I were advising somebody, I'd say, I don't think you

1:27:22.280 --> 1:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>ought to be in that, uh, in that zero sum

1:27:25.360 --> 1:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>game business, because I somehow well, I don't think it's uh,

1:27:29.800 --> 1:27:31.519
<v Speaker 1>you know what, whether whether it just makes a lot

1:27:31.600 --> 1:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of money for you and you and you moved to

1:27:33.880 --> 1:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the Hamptons and so on, but it's not fulfilling and

1:27:36.640 --> 1:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not but I'm not sure. I'm not sure how

1:27:39.040 --> 1:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>sustainable that is. And then my final question, what is

1:27:44.080 --> 1:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it that you know about investing and finance and economics

1:27:48.080 --> 1:27:51.559
<v Speaker 1>today that you wish you knew when you began way

1:27:51.600 --> 1:27:59.360
<v Speaker 1>back in the nineties sixties. Mhm Uh. It's probably a

1:27:59.439 --> 1:28:05.400
<v Speaker 1>lot more respect for the unknowns out there and the

1:28:05.560 --> 1:28:09.479
<v Speaker 1>vicissitudes of nature, and the realization that the best laid

1:28:09.640 --> 1:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>plans of mice and van gang Off the galat that

1:28:13.600 --> 1:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you can that you can have a great forecast and

1:28:17.720 --> 1:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>all the fundamentals fall into place, and markets just simply

1:28:22.120 --> 1:28:24.920
<v Speaker 1>do not confirm it. And the way I put it

1:28:25.120 --> 1:28:28.120
<v Speaker 1>is marcuts can remain irrational a lot longer than we

1:28:28.200 --> 1:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>can remain solvent. I've heard that somewhere. Well, Gary, thank

1:28:31.880 --> 1:28:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you so much. This has been a delight. Um. If

1:28:34.479 --> 1:28:37.360
<v Speaker 1>people want to find your your newsletter or your research,

1:28:37.439 --> 1:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>how do they go about tracking you down while they

1:28:39.720 --> 1:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>can track us down? It's our website Www. A Gary

1:28:44.400 --> 1:28:47.519
<v Speaker 1>Shilling dot com. And you now have a Twitter handle.

1:28:47.600 --> 1:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I noticed, Oh yes, of course, and it's and it's

1:28:50.720 --> 1:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the same same at A Gary Shilling. Fantastic. Well, thank

1:28:55.280 --> 1:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you for spending so much time with us today. You've

1:28:58.439 --> 1:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>been listening to Masters in Business. If you enjoy this conversation,

1:29:02.439 --> 1:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>look up an Inch or down an Inch on iTunes

1:29:05.400 --> 1:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and you'll see the other sixty or so podcast we've had.

1:29:09.160 --> 1:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Let me make sure to say thank you to my

1:29:10.720 --> 1:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>head of research, Mike pat Nick and my producer Charlie Volmer.

1:29:15.439 --> 1:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Be sure and check out all the rest of our

1:29:18.439 --> 1:29:22.639
<v Speaker 1>other interviews. I'm Barry Ritults. You've been listening to Masters

1:29:22.680 --> 1:29:24.599
<v Speaker 1>in Business on Bloomberg Radio.