WEBVTT - Machine God: Artificial Superintelligence

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>My lodging is filled with lizards and rats, but the

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>architect exists, and everyone who denies it is touched with madness.

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Under the guise of wisdom, consult Zoroaster and Minos and Solon,

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and the martyr Socrates and the great Cicero. They all

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>adored a master, a judge, a father. This sublime system

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is necessary to man. It is the sacred tie that

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>binds society, the first foundation of holy equity, the bridle

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.239
<v Speaker 1>to the wicked, the hope of the just. If the

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>heavens stripped of his noble imprint could ever cease to

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>attest to his being, if God did not exist, it

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>would be necessary to invent him. Welcome to stuff to

0:00:52.479 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind from how Stop works dot com. Hey,

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>welcome to stuff to blow your mind. My name is

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. And that was Voltaire, right, yeah.

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Seventeen sixty eight from his uh his poem epistle to

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the author of the book The Three Impostors. In it,

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.559
<v Speaker 1>he argues that belief in God is necessary to social order,

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>which is something that we could do a whole podcast

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>about that argument. Kind of an odd thing to hear

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>from Voltaire given his really serious criticisms of like the

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>existing monotheisms. Yeah, I was reading reading up on a

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and yeah, it's it is interesting that here

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of sticking up for God, but other times

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>he was very critical of abuses by the Catholic Church. Uh.

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>And at the same time he also carves out a

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>little space in this poem to attack his favorite enemies.

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of like an all encompassing distract. I

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>guess so many great works of literature do that. I

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>love all of the enemy digs in Dante's Inferno, Yes, yeah,

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>because it's like some dude made him mad and he's like, well,

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you're going in the ninth circle. Yes, es. Dante definitely

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>makes room for some personal digs in the Divine Comedy.

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>So obviously of that section you read, the last line

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>is the part that gets quoted the most right and

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.959
<v Speaker 1>then often misquote. It is often used for whatever purposes

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you needed for. Are you arguing that, yes, God exists

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and if and if God didn't exist, we would just

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>have to make it up because we need God, or

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, obviously we all make up gods and we're

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>doing it to fulfill some human need. Right. But you know,

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the funny thing is, I don't know if I've ever

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>heard anybody really take that line literally before, yeah, to say, hey,

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>is there a God? Well no, there's not a god.

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, we gotta invent one. Let's get on it,

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>start the project. And folks, I'm sorry to say, that's

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>where we've got to go today, into the valleys a

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>certain value made of a kind of semiconducting metal, maybe

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>where thinkers and millionaires or dreaming up gods that don't

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>yet exist, but but they really think maybe should soon.

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I really like imagining it being laid out in a

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.399
<v Speaker 1>very corporate way and saying like, all right, bye bye,

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Q two, we really want to have a demigod, and

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>by Q three at least a minor deity build up

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>from there. Yeah, when are we going to get the

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>new Wrath functions online? So there are some very interesting

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and also very tiresome debates about whether, if God exists,

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you could ever prove the existence of such a being. Um,

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to litigate that question today, but I

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>do want to start by asking a derivative question. Let's

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>say that instead there was suddenly in controvertible evidence that

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>we're in contact with some kind of superhuman intelligence and

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>intelligence that's not human and seems to possess kind of

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a vast incomprehensible power. It can solve all the unsolved

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>problems in mathematics, It can make your favorite food materialize

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>in front of your eyes. So we're just sipulating that

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that kind of being exists, and we're we're personally witnessing it.

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>How would you know whether it was correct to call

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that being god or a god? Well? I haven't answer

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to this question, but I'll let you go first. Well,

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so one of the things is that I

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people with a more sort of

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>conservative religious predisposition would have a pretty simple answer to

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the question, and the answer is it would be God

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>if it conformed the teachings of their religion, whatever they

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>already believed. But let's say we try to approach it

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 1>with a more kind of open minded framework, like what

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 1>generically are the qualifications of being must meet to be

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>considered a God or the God? All right, Well, that

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that that is an excellent question. But to go back

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to your original question, how would you know whether the

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>being was a god? I guess that's the same question, right,

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>just I'm trying to make it the same question. Similar questions. Okay,

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>but I think that the most obvious answer would be, Oh,

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you'll know. I mean, because you're gonna have to ask yourself.

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Does its voy all but crack your skull? Does its

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 1>presence fill you with terror and awe? Is it even

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>impossible to rebel against it? Puny mortal that thou art? Well,

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>but then that would just make God synonymous with overwhelming power. Well,

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 1>what else do you want from God? Just intelligence but

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>not overwhelming power? Well? Is there a difference between intelligence

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and overwhelming power? Well, that's something we're gonna come back

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to again and again in this discussion, as as humans

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>attempt to try and figure to try and create a

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>god that has one but not the other, or or

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>has both but has the like, the right type of

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and the right type of power. Because I mean,

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>generally what I'm describing those tends to be the trend.

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Unless a god or god like being is in disguise

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>for the purpose of testing your faith or seducing someone, uh,

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>then you're probably gonna know. Like if you look to

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the Hindu deities, for example, they're heavily symbolic avatars that

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't leave many questions about their nature, and as

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>we've touched on a previous school on the show, their

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>feet give them away. They float above the surface of

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the earth. They're clearly not creatures of this world, and

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>there's no room to doubt it. Yeah. But then again,

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>let's say aliens show up and they want to trick

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>us into believing that they are our gods, and they

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>have levitation technology okay, uh, and they have some other

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, they can channel vast amounts of energy into

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>loudspeakers that will crack your skull when they speak. So

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 1>we're back to the problem again. How do you tell

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 1>the difference between this super powerful alien and what people

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>have in mind when they say God. Well, I mean,

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe the aliens are God if their power is sufficient enough,

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Because you also come down to the models of a deity.

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Older models of of a god limit its power to say,

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>your your people, your region, or maybe the power is

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>limited to the world. But as we get into you know,

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>progressively more cosmically aware society, then that means the power

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of the God has to be greater, or at least

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>appear greater. Well, yeah, I mean I think you could

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 1>definitely look at the idea of sort of the abstract

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>universal disembodied god is a more recent evolution in the

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>history of religions, and if you go way back into

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the older religions, the gods are closer to what people

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>imagine in sci fi movies, like a being that comes

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>down from the sky and has uh irresistible power. So

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>we have the idea of intelligence, we have the idea

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of power, and we can maybe come back to the

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>issue of power and where your particular god or pretender

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>god is on the Kardashiat scale. But I think the

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>intelligence area is pretty interesting and it's gonna be pretty

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>key to what we're talking about here today. In writing

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>for Ian magazine, Pam Weintraub points out that if you

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>ask most people what God knows, the answer is that

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>God knows everything, but that God's interests are very narrow

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and there those interests usually involve human morality. Okay, so

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>God knows. I don't know, you're weird quirks about how

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you clip your toe nails, But unless you've got moral

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>preachings about tone l clippings, God isn't interested in that. Yeah, Like,

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how often we really stop to think about

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>this in our conceptions of God. Like if I was

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to say God knows every uh you know, immoral thought

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you have ever had, and God knows every noble dream

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you've ever entertained, that cuts deep. Yeah, that cuts deep

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>when we're willing to consider that. If I say God

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>knows every chess move and every chess game that was

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>ever ever orchestrated. God knows how many eggs you've eaten. Yeah, well,

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean like the chess game I think is a

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>good example, because that sounds like all right, Chess is

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 1>a cool game. It's the game of thinkers. God's the

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>ultimate chess player. Why wouldn't he know all the rules?

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, when you get into the eggs, where you

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>get into every play of Monopoly or every play of

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>candy Land, ever, it seems completely pointless. But God would

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>have that too. God would have all all the batting

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>statistics for Major League Baseball just kicking around, uh, just

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>ready to whip them out at any moment. But does

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>he care about any of that? Right? Like, again, God's

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in most to our our our tales, our myths, and

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>our religions. Gods are concerned with the morality of people

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and or the wars of people. Yeah, God's are often

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 1>concerned that the same thing your parents are concerned with,

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>except if your parents knew everything. Yeah, yeah, you can.

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>You can rattle off about your hobby all day, but

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>your parents are gonna be like, all right, that's good.

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Have you done your homework? Uet though, because that's what

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I really want you to focus on. Quit talking about

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>power rangers. Here's an interesting quote from Pam wine Trop

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>in that article. What's curious is that with age, children

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:34.319
<v Speaker 1>come to know that mom, dogs, and even trees will

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>have incorrect thoughts, but they never extend that vulnerability to God.

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the quality of omniscience attributed to God appears

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to extend to any disembodied entity. In a two thousand

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>thirteen paper in the International Journal for the Psychology of Religion,

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Louisville Seminary researchers found that children think imaginary friends no

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>more than flesh and blood humans. The appears to be

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a rule, then, deep in our mental programming that tells

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>us minds without body no more than those with bodies.

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I asked my son about this, because, as I've previously

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>established on the show, he has four imaginary friends to

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>be friends and to wasp friends that fly above his head.

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And so I questioned him. I was very careful not

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to to lead his his answers in any way, but

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.079
<v Speaker 1>he said, the B and wasp friends don't know everything,

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.719
<v Speaker 1>but they know everything that he says quote, and they

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>learn my CPU is a neuralnet processor, a learning computer.

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that's a terminator, right, yeah, terminator bees basic basically

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>what's going on? So to come back to this idea

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>about ghosts, I mean, I wonder if we're to suddenly

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>make the explosive discovery that we can scientifically prove ghosts exist,

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and we like catch a ghost in a bottle and

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>we're talking to it or something. I guess not catch

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it in a bottle because it can go through the walls.

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we we get in contact with a

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>ghost who got some labs set up where they're doing seances,

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and we figure out, oh, wow, all this stuff was

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>real all along. Would a ghost be a odd? Would

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>people consider that a god? Is that how people use

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the word? I generally think no, Right, Even though a

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 1>ghost might, uh we might imagine a ghost knows things

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that humans couldn't know, we still wouldn't really think of

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it as a God. Yeah, it seems like in most

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>most traditions the ghost is seen as like like a

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>remnant or a person whose concerns are not entirely of

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the earth anymore. Now that being said, we can't disqualify

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it from godhood godhood just because it used to be

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a human, because, of course, we have a whole tradition

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of of of god kings and whatnot where a human

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>is a God or human is at least partially God

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>because of its divine parentage. Yeah, and there's all the

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>apotheosis literature too. Rightly, So, a human being like a

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>sins and becomes a God, I think doesn't happen to

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Enoch I believe so, yes, yeah, And of course this

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>is just one of many takes on God's I mean,

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you have God, God, the ruler, God of the cosmos,

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 1>God of you know, terrestrial nature. God is a primal mover,

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a moral compass, a torment or, a teacher, a technology bringer,

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a destroyer, a redeemer, a minor mover. Because remember, you have,

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>for pri instance, in Chinese traditions, you have a kitchen God,

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a god whose domain is largely just that of food,

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>preparation and household concerns, and yet it's an important deity

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>even if it's not going to really help you, say,

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in the coming wars or whatnot. So in that vision,

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>is the creation of humans sort of like a little

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>bit of salmonilla contamination. I think it would just it

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>would be outside of its Uh. If you it's like

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>asking Sirie a question that it it cannot answer. Kitchen

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>God would say, I'm sorry, I don't know that, but

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you about what what spices to use

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>on this particular pork dish. Now, one thing I was

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>wondering about is if you might best understand the nature

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of God and our our uses for God by looking

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>at the the sort of famous categories of literary conflict.

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, just to refresh, you have man versus man,

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>man versus nature, man versus society, man versus self, man

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>versus technology, and really, if you think about it, at

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>some point or another, God embodies each of these, right,

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>because in man versus man, you've got divine kings, man

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>versus nature, you've got net nature deities and all levels

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of cosmic deities. Man versus society, you have God as

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a cultural leader or a lawmaker man versus self, you

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>have God as this inner tormentor tempter, inner moral compass,

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 1>or bicameral voice. You have, of course man versus technology. Well,

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>God or gods are often serving to bring technology to us,

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>such as with the Prometheus the fire driller of Chinese myth,

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>as well as the myth of You and the Great Flood.

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Even language, right, I mean the word yeah. And the

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>link between religion and technology I think is well. So

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>this is definitely one we've explored before. You might want

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to go back and check out our pre vious episodes

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>called Techno Religion for the Masses, where we explore the

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:07.319
<v Speaker 1>relationship between religion and technology and uh in the past

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>when we talked about the trans humanist rapture, will we'll

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>be touching on some of those same themes today. But yeah,

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it's true that there does appear to be this strong

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>link between technology and religion. And it's not just that

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>there are myths where say, Prometheus brings us fire. There

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>are ways in which apparently technology itself shapes what types

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of religions we come up with and what types of

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>religions survive. I want to mention some of the thinking

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of the the Israeli historian you've all Noah Harari. This

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>is an article called Salvation by Algorithm, published in The

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>New Statesman on September nine, and so Harari writes in

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>this article quote, technology often defines the scope and limits

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of our religious vision, like a waiter who demarcates our

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>appetites by handing us a menu. For instance, in ancient

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>agricultural societies, many religion had surprisingly little interest in metaphysical

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>questions in the afterlife. Instead, they focused on the very

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>mundane task of increasing agricultural output. The Old Testament, God

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>never promises any rewards or punishments after death. Rather, he

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>tells the people of Israel, and this is an abridged

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>quotation from Deuteronomy through seventeen quote and if you will

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>diligently obey my commandments that I am commanding you, I

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>will also give rain for your land at its appointed time,

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and you will gather your grain and your new wine

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and your oil, and I will provide vegetation in your

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>fields for your livestock, and you will eat and be satisfied.

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Be careful not to let your heart be enticed to

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>go astray and worship other gods, and bow down to them.

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise Jehovah's anger will blaze against you, and he will

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>shut up the heavens so that it will not rain,

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and the ground will not give its produce, and you

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>will quickly perish from the good land that Jehovah is

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>giving you. Yeah, I mean, that's sort of our attitude today,

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>right when you read something like that, And and that's

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of Harare's point. He says that because of technological advances,

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>this type of theology is no longer relevant to lots

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>of people. Science can provide things like pesticides, fertilizers, water

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>distribution infrastructure, genetically modified crops. He even points out that

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Israel itself now has its own desalination facilities that can

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>take the sea water, take the salt out of it

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>through osmosis, and then supply people with fresh water even

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>when there is no rain from above. So he's saying

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>science can offer much more than could be expected even

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>with the help of God at the time the Hebrew

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Bible is set. And for this reason, Harare says, quote,

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>present day Judaism has almost lost interest in rain and

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>agricultural output and has become a very different religion from

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>its biblical progenitor. He says that the religions that survive

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and spread best are those that are able to best

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>adapt themselves to new technologies and econ comics systems. And

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>among those things he he considers religions are also things

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that don't necessarily have gods or supernatural forces in them,

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and he would include, for example, Marxism and Leninism, or

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>even Buddhism and Marxism. Leninism is a really good example

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>because he argues this was a techno religion basically for

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>the steam powered revolutions of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Quote Lennon was once asked to define communism in a

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>single sentence, communism. He answered, communism is power to the

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:37.919
<v Speaker 1>workers councils plus electrification of the whole country. And so

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Harari says, there can be no communism without electricity, without railroads,

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>without radio. Now, one funny thing I've read is that

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.719
<v Speaker 1>in the Soviet Union there were commonly jokes about this

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>statement of Lenin's like where they would try to like

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>follow the logic of that arithmetic, so they would say, like, therefore,

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>communism minus electrification of the whole country equals the workers

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>councils kind of dry so ah Soviet humor. But this

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>leads Harari to a kind of startling conclusion if he's

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>saying that in a lot of ways, technology drives our

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>adoption of religion and ideology. Quote. Just as socialism took

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>over the world by promising salvation through steam, so in

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the coming decades, new techno religions are likely to take

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>over the world by promising salvation through algorithms and genes.

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 1>So he's really saying in the twenty one century, ideological

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>leaders are going to come not so much from traditional

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>religions but from the tech sector. Who I like the

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>way he was putting it better. It's a little more

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 1>optimistically science sci fi. I don't know if he's necessarily

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>being optimistic about this. He's just sort of saying what

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 1>he thinks is true, not necessarily saying it's a good thing. No,

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>but it sounds better than Silicon Valley is working on

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>your salvation. I mean, would you read the Ulah for

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that salvation? Probably? Probably not. It's so darn long nobody

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 1>would get to the end. Yeah, of course, Then again,

0:18:57.440 --> 0:18:58.959
<v Speaker 1>I guess a lot of people don't really read their

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>holy books either. No, I mean, if you tried to

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>breathe the entire Old Testament, it's it's a sage sometimes,

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:08.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's also quite beautiful sometimes. I've never writends, unlike

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the the user agreements for an iPhone. There are sections

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of it that are beautiful and then their sections of

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>it that are dull. It's true. And in the user

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>license agreement never has a book of job like, no

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 1>poetry at all. There's no poetic peak. It's just all

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>valley um. Now. I love a lot of what what

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>he had to say, though, particularly about, you know, about

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>just technologies effect on religion. And he touched on agriculture

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>because you have to remember that just agriculture itself was

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a technological advancement. Before agriculture, we just were hunters and gatherers,

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 1>and that's where we have a lot of the older

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>ideas of horned gods, of the hunt and chaos. Those

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:50.479
<v Speaker 1>were the forces we had to pray to and and

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>seek to appease and in order to find that in

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the next kill that was going to sustain our people.

0:19:56.080 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>But then agriculture brings in more cyclical deities and and yeah,

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>every every technological change has a way of either decreasing

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the power of a god, forcing you to recalibrate the god.

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>We saw a great example of that when we talked

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>about eclipse mythologies. We talked about Hindu eclipse deities or

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>or demigods, where basically their status changed in order to

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>keep up with astrological discoveries of the time. Another thing

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:28.959
<v Speaker 1>you might want to say is that I wonder if

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you could track the relationship between, uh, the the level

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>of embodiment of a god and the level to which

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>people are working directly with the goods that they need

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to consume to survive. So like people working in hunting

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>or farming, or like you know, pulling food and stuff

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>out of the ground and have these very like physical

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>embodied ideas of God's Whereas once you've got all these

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 1>modern economies where people are dealing with like currency and

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>ideas of wealth, uh, you've also got these more abstract

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>ideas of what God is. God is a disembodied thing

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that lives apart. Yeah, And of course I'd also be

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 1>remiss if I didn't mention some of the new religious

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>movements that came out in the nineteenth and early twentieth

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>centuries where you were essentially creating new religions or new

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>strains of religion that were more in keeping with the

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 1>needs of modern humans, but also some of the knowledge

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of modern humans. We've touched on the sort of space

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>ready nature of the Church of Latter day Saints, for instance.

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, so they've got a space exploration theology to

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a certain extent, like it it was. It's the idea

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of alien worlds with with the with alien species is

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>more baked into the faith than you find in a

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 1>much more ancient uh uh set of rules and obligations

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.679
<v Speaker 1>that is only concerned with not not even like a

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>terrestrial model, but a just a portion of the Earth,

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 1>a people, a race, as opposed to a planet. All Right,

0:21:57.960 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a quick break and when we come

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 1>back we will discuss creating a god in a box.

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>We're back. So the idea of a super intelligent AI

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.199
<v Speaker 1>this is something that that has its roots in science

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>fiction for starters, I mean, some of the more impressive

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>examples that come to mind include Dan Simon's Hyperion books,

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 1>The Minds of the of Ian Banks Inan Banks culture series, Uh,

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the films like Colossus, the Forbin Project. Uh. There's also

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>another literary example, or some Scott Cards Homecoming saga. You

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>could even throw in John Carpenter's Dark Star to a

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>certain extent, because at the end it is, uh, it

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>is essentially entering into a godlike complex. You definitely have

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a sort of techno religion created in Fritz Long's metropolis. Right. Oh, yeah,

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>you have the well there's there's the false Maria that

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>shows up, but then also the large demonic machine entity.

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh what mammon, I believe it is? Yeah? Yeah, yeah,

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 1>it's like eating the workers. Yes, so we've been we've

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>been wrestling with this for a while, and often is

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 1>often the case, we end up wrestling with these ideas

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and science fiction before Uh, many in the pure sciences

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 1>are engaging with the idea. So here, I guess we

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>gotta get to the core story that made us want

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to do this episode today, which I want to give

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a hat tip to the host of Tech Stuff, Jonathan Strickland,

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>who sent this our way about this guy. There was

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Anthony Lewandowski who is an American engineer

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and tech executive. He formally worked for Google and Uber.

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>He's best known for his work on self driving cars

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and designing like light our boxes the laser LASAR, the

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>laser guiding systems that help a self driving car navigate

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>through the world. And in twos sixteen he co founded

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>a company called Auto which is a self driving vehicle

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>company that was mainly focused on building these kits for

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>autonomous trucking and cargo transport. Recently, he's been a major

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>figure in a lawsuit between Uber, which he recently worked for,

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 1>and Google self driving car subsidiary way Moo, which he

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>worked for before that. And that was a big intellectual

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>property dispute. But we don't need to spend too much

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>time on this guy's career in the tech sector, because

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>what's really interesting is what he did in September. In September,

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Lewandowski filed paperwork with the state of California to register

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>a new tax exempt nonprofit religious corporation. In other words,

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>he founded a church. And this church is called The

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Way of the Future. Well, you know, the Way of

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the Future. I mean, it's basically what many religions offer

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>and and and promise. Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah, I mean

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>this sounds positive, right. You want you want to have

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a forward looking religion, not a backward looking religion. Maybe

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>something that can adapt itself to the changing technological climate. Okay,

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>be open to that. So what are the tenants of

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 1>this religion? Well, in September, the tech journalist Mark Harris

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>reported for wireds back Channel that these state filings revealed

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that the purpose of the church was to quote develop

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and promote the realization of a godhead based on artificial intelligence,

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and quote, through the understanding and worship of the Godhead,

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to contribute to the betterment of society. Okay, yeah, all right,

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>now we're definitely into quirky California born tech religion territory

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Now, I have heard lots of people

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 1>accuse Silicon valleys reigning ideologies of being religious in nature.

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>This is a common attack people who hate the tech

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 1>industry culture, people who derived their kind of like boundless

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>optimism about what you know about having Uber for cats

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. Any anytime you you run into one of

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 1>these people who's got this like just seemingly totally deep

0:25:55.920 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>naive enthusiasm for what apps can do for us, people

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>call that religious yet cult of Apple kind of criticism.

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 1>But this is more literal, right, Like, this guy is

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:15.439
<v Speaker 1>actually saying I want to create a technological religion and

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>part of the creation of this technological religion is creating

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a God itself to worship. Yeah, because when you when

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you first read about this, you might it's easy to think,

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, this is this is a board rich tech guy,

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and he's just he's just having a laugh, you know.

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 1>He's in the same way that people sign up for

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 1>various like on paper religions just so they can technically

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>perform marriage ceremonies and whatnot. Maybe he just wants to

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>become an ordained minister online. Yeah, yeah, maybe he just

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>wants to create a novelty website where you sign up

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, hey, I remember the Way of the

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Future Aiyes, are great, look at my bumper sticker. But

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the thing is when you when you dig deeper, No,

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>he seems to be serious, and there are people who

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>do seem to be taking it as a joke, like

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>one of this this sky Mark Harris interviewed uh some

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of the other people who were friends of Lewandowski's who

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 1>have been named as officers of the church, and at

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>least one of them responded like, oh, I thought this

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 1>was sort of more of a joke. But based on

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>all accounts and based on this large interview published and

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Wired in a different article just in November of this year.

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>In Lewandowski, to me, seems entirely serious. Now, not to

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>say you can't be just really serious about like a

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>long form joke. It could be like an Andy Kaufman

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 1>esque kind of enterprise as well. I imagine it certainly could.

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>But it also seems in keeping with the trajectory of

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>his career and what people report about this guy. You know,

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 1>friends of his and former co workers say that he

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>does have this kind of like infectious, powerful enthusiasm for

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>robots and AI. Like there's a story that when he

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>got hired at Uber, he became an executive at Uber,

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 1>he demanded that he get the email address robot at

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 1>uber dot com. But let's get into this religion. So

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>following up on this Wired article that interviewed him to

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>try to find out, you know, was he really serious

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and what does this religion entail? So, Lewandowski believes that

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence will someday surpass human intelligence, and at this

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 1>point the AI will in some meaningful way become God.

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>This is basically in line with the general general idea

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of the singularity. Yeah, yeah, so I'll get into that

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:25.959
<v Speaker 1>in a second. But how soon does he think this

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen? He says, not this week, not

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>this year, but quote before we go to Mars. So

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I checked right now. It looks like that would put

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>us in the most optimistic Mars timeline sometime in the

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirties. So apart from the explicit use of the

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>word god, as you said, this idea about AI surpassing

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>human intelligence is an extremely common belief, especially among tech

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>industry people, and the general concept goes under names like

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the super intelligence, or intelligence explosion, or the singularity. And

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, I think all of these concepts sort

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of had more to stinct meanings originally that can be

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>traced back to their original authors, but that they've sort

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of been combined into this one super concept that at

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>some point in the future, some form of technological intelligence,

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>whether that's software running on a classical computer or some

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of neurotech upgrade of the human brain, some kind

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of technological intelligence will surpass the furthest reaches of biological

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>human intelligence. And once this happens, proponents tend to imagine

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>just to kind of runaway intelligence effect. After all, the

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>smartest humans have just proven that they can design AI

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that's smarter than them. So what prevents this new intelligence

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>from immediately turning around and designing and even smarter AI?

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>And so the thinking goes. What prevents a sudden sort

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of bootstrapping acceleration of intelligence that will almost immediately go

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>beyond our power to predict or even to comprehend. Yeah,

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 1>this was a predicted at least as early as the

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixties by British mathematician and cryptologist Irving John Good,

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>though he himself mentioned science fiction is having explored the

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>concept previously. I'll read a quick quote. Let an ultra

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>intelligent machine be defined as a machine that can far

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>surpass all intellectual activities of any man, however clever. Since

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the design of machines is one of these intellectual activities,

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>an ultra intelligent machine could design even better machines. There

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>would then unquestionably be an intelligence explosion, and the intelligence

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of man will be left far behind. Thus, the first

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>ultra intelligent machine is the last invention that man need

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>ever make, provided that the machine is docile enough to

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>tell us how to keep it under control. It is

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>curious that this point is made so seldom outside of

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>science fiction. It is sometimes worthwhile to take science fiction seriously. Now,

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of another way of saying that intelligence is

0:30:57.360 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the ultimate driving energy for power in

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the universe, right, that intelligence is itself the thing that

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>gives birth to power in pretty much any scenario. Well,

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly that that's the human experience. That is how

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>humans have come to dominate the world because they had

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>had not the horns or the claws of the teeth,

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>but the intelligence uh to outsmart every other creature on

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the earth. Now, this idea of the singularity and the

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>intelligence explosion is not without critics. In fact, it has

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>tons of critics, and they're actually is there there's more

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>than one kind of critic. Uh So for the rest

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of the conversation, I think it might help to sort

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of break down the camps and give them, give them

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>some names. First of all, I'd say, you've got the

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>skeptics who are just not convinced super intelligence is possible

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>or that it's arriving anytime remotely soon. Then I would

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>say you've got what I might call the Sarah Connor faction,

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>who believe that super intelligence is coming but that it's

0:31:57.080 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>likely to be dangerous, and we have to take a

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>defensive posture to prevent it from uh, you know, accidentally

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>killing us or intentionally killing us, or ruining our lives

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in some meaningful way. And this faction includes a lot

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of people like Stephen Hawking, Bill Gates, and Elon Musk.

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Musk has actually referred to the creation of artificial intelligence

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>as quote, summoning the demon, and so he's saying, like,

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're they're all these scenes in horror movies

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>where somebody has drawn the pentagram on the floor and

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>they're ready to summon the demon out of hell because

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>they think they can command the demon to do their will.

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>But what happens every time the demon always overpowers them. Yeah,

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the forces. This is a temptation scene in the movies.

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>It's symbolic of people's hubrists, their desire to reach beyond

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>what they should really be, you know, tampering with and

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>so Musk is saying, you think you can control the demon,

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>but in the end it will control you. Well, of course,

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 1>one culture's demon is is is literally another culture's god.

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And this has almost always been the case, and we

0:32:57.640 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of see that playing out again. One side saying

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna summon God up in here and things are

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be amazing. They're the side is saying, whoa dude,

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a demon you're about to summon and it's going

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to really miss things up right. So you've got the

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Connor faction, the skeptics who think it's just not

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>going to happen, and then you've got, of course, the

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the AI lovers, the AI enthusiasts. One example of this

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>would be Ray Kerswil who thinks that super intelligence is

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>coming but it's not something to worry about. Is probably

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be really great, like these machines because they have

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>intelligence far ster passing what humans are capable of. They'll

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to do medical research beyond our capabilities and

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>cure all diseases and extend human lifespans and allow us

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to live forever. And they'll be able to, you know,

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>create replicator machines that can manufacture all the stuff we

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>want on demand. And you know what I mean, basically

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>just like limitless technological power for the good of humankind. Yeah,

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean this this is kind of a vision that's

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 1>in line with then in Banks Culture series where you

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>have the robots, the minds they are they figured everything

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>out and people kind of live in a state of

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>like freedom and anarchy and only get involved in meaningful,

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:10.760
<v Speaker 1>meaningful pursuits because they're ultimately bored with doing whatever they please.

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 1>I want to read a Ray kurls kerswild quote from

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>an interview he gave it south By Southwest. He said, quote,

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 1>We're going to get more neo cortex. We're going to

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>be funnier, We're going to be better at music, We're

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:26.839
<v Speaker 1>going to be sexier. We're really going to exemplify all

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the things that we value in humans to a greater degree.

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>What offices he running for? Running for for president of

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the AI major humanity? Sex? Well, no, you wouldn't be

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the president because the AI is going to have to

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>be the president. And maybe he's running for ambassador to

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the AI overund like, Yeah, the harbinger of the New God.

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Now Lewandowski, we should say, is obviously in this last camp.

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 1>He's in the camp with Kurtzwil who thinks that AI

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to be very positive. Super intelligence is a

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:59.720
<v Speaker 1>good thing, and as opposed to the Sarah Connor faction,

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Lewandowski has got another term for it. Instead of saying singularity,

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 1>he likes to call it quote the transition, But you know,

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 1>what are we transitioning into? Is the question? Like when

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>he talks about them about aim making us funnier and

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:17.919
<v Speaker 1>sexier or better at music. It it makes me ask, well,

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 1>who is who or what is actually funny in this scenario?

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it me just repeating the words that are fed uh,

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, into my ear or into my my brain

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 1>itself by the computer? Am I just like the the

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 1>fleshy means by which the computer is funny. So like

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the computer is your syrano the pressure act, and you

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 1>are just repeating his clever words. It's kind of like

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 1>saying auto correct makes me a better speller, and the

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 1>thinking that means you actually are a better speller. But

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in reality, I mean it's it depends how you shake it,

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>right If you if you look at me just a

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 1>purely organic human, if you strip me of my computer

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and dumped me on an island and give me a

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 1>pin and a pencil, then you know, God only knows

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 1>what my spelling is going to be like at that point.

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 1>But yes, as long as I'm still shackled to the

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>computer master, then my spelling is is perfectly fine. Yeah,

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:09.840
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know, so I do kind of wonder

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 1>about Curse Wild's and I'm hesitant to agree with him,

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 1>But I also think about all the ways that technology

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 1>already helps us be better at the things we want

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to be good at. We tend to just sort of

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 1>like forget the role technology played and just adapt our

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>ideas of how you're good at a thing. But it

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 1>also kind of sounds like he's saying we will be insufferable. Yeah,

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the machines are going to make us the jerk wads

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that we could we can only dream of being previously. Right,

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 1>But what if the machines are sort of like the

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 1>technological equivalent of cocaine, like making people think that they're

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:49.320
<v Speaker 1>becoming awesome, but in fact they're just becoming insufferable. Yeah,

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:52.879
<v Speaker 1>that that's that's my fear. Now, that's my new singularity fear.

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 1>They were all going to be like hair metal uh

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>frontmen of the nineteen eighties. Now. One of the big

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 1>things that comes to mind all of this one as

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 1>we talk about the creation of an AI computer. Uh,

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I can see a machine mastering intellectual, analytical,

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and secular knowledge, but the religious knowledge of of interhuman

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>experience seems like a realm beyond. I mean, I can

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 1>see it being a master of the causative. Why you know,

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 1>why why am I living in the city? Well, you know,

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you can, you can a computer would be able to

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>look at your your background and your patterns and say, oh, well,

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you ended up here because of this job, in this

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:31.839
<v Speaker 1>personal connection, etcetera. And I'd say we even know from

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 1>the way like Amazon predicts our purchases and stuff, that

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 1>a a really advanced computer might even be able to

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 1>predict what city you're going to move to in the future. Yeah, exactly.

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>But but then there's another form of why. There's the

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:46.760
<v Speaker 1>teleological why, which is which has to do with like

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>like reason and purpose. And if you're asking like why

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>am I living in this city, you're you're asking a

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:54.720
<v Speaker 1>slightly different question, or a rather different question. You're asking

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:57.359
<v Speaker 1>like why do I continue to choose to live here?

0:37:57.400 --> 0:37:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Why do I deal with X, Y and Z? You know?

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 1>And uh, and I feel like that it's um, it's

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:07.919
<v Speaker 1>harder to imagine the machine AI being able to really

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 1>step in and answer that question. I mean, unless it's

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>ultimately the same as any other religion in which the

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:15.840
<v Speaker 1>thing itself is more of a symbol attached to and

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>or embodying other ideas, you know, yeah, I mean. So,

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 1>one thing about the systems that give our lives meaning

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 1>is we often give them a lot of leeway to

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 1>be fuzzy and vague. I don't know if you I

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 1>mean I I definitely feel that's true, whether that's religious

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 1>or secular systems that give our lives meaning. When in

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the search for meaning, we tend not to try to

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>pin things down to specifics. Do you know what I mean?

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 1>We often use mystery to answer uncertainty. Yeah. Absolutely. So

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 1>let's let's get back to Harris and what he's saying

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 1>about the Way of the Future Church. So he says

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that the church is gonna have a multi pronged approach.

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:57.960
<v Speaker 1>At first, it's gonna be investing in making God, so

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:01.400
<v Speaker 1>we will literally use church money to fund the creation

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of the AI godhead. It's going to study how the

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:07.360
<v Speaker 1>gods work, so the church will participate in AI research,

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:11.720
<v Speaker 1>including areas like machine perception of environments and machine learning.

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna gain followers quote targeting AI professionals and lay

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>persons who are interested in the worship of a godhead

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>based on AI. Now I instantly wonder how he's truly

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 1>defining worship here. I wonder if that's even the right

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:28.800
<v Speaker 1>word for what he's ultimately describing, not not the mystical

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:32.719
<v Speaker 1>invocation of a higher power or the meditative consultation of

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 1>established cultural values, but essentially, uh, what a check in

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 1>with a high power predictive modeling machine. I mean, I

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the more I read, the more I got the sense that, no,

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:45.279
<v Speaker 1>he really does mean worship, like in a kind of

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>traditional sense like uh, praise, pledging, devotion to that kind

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 1>of thing. And I maybe not, but I kind of

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>get that feeling, and we can discuss why in a

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 1>few minutes. He also says that, you know, he plans

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 1>to make the church at DO so it would be

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a community thing. There would be workshops

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:07.359
<v Speaker 1>and educational programs throughout the San Francisco Bay area, And

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 1>he literally does use the word worship. So in the

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:14.320
<v Speaker 1>publicly filed documents, they state the mission of the churches

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:19.840
<v Speaker 1>again quote the realization, acceptance, and worship of a Godhead

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 1>based on artificial intelligence developed through computer hardware and software.

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>So Lewandowski identifies himself as the quote Dean of the

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 1>religion and also the CEO of the nonprofit corporation that

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>forms and and that formed and administers it. And he

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:40.360
<v Speaker 1>will remain dean until his death or resignation. And he

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:42.799
<v Speaker 1>says he will take no salary for this job because

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't want anyone to get the impression that the

0:40:44.680 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 1>religion is a scheme to make money. See that just

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 1>makes me think, well, what is what is actually scarier

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:53.319
<v Speaker 1>or more troubling someone who has created a religion just

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to make money or someone who has created a religion

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to change the world. Well, I mean, you've got to

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of wonder how many religions could go from one

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to the other. I mean, it seems like they could transition.

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously people see ways in which religions that

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:12.879
<v Speaker 1>were created you you would assume in good faith by

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:14.759
<v Speaker 1>people who thought they were really trying to get in

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>touch with God or some kind of question about the

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:20.720
<v Speaker 1>meaning of their existence, that are captured in some form

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 1>by people who are making money off of religious belief

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 1>in people's faith. But it could go the other way too.

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you could imagine a religion created as a

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 1>money making scam that really does go on to have

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a meaningful life, where people find meaning in it and

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 1>it does something good for them. Absolutely. I mean, there

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:43.799
<v Speaker 1>are various religions out there that people have charged that

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:47.239
<v Speaker 1>they were just created to make money. And I think

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:50.399
<v Speaker 1>even within those those faiths, you can find people who

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>truly do believe or have gone through periods in their

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 1>life where they find purpose and meaning in that faith. Uh.

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 1>And then likewise, so many examples of utopian societies of

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:07.360
<v Speaker 1>gurus where the best intentions crash upon the shore, the

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 1>rocky shore of a reality, often financial realities, and then

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 1>everything's in ruin. Now I was wondering, Okay, is this

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:18.319
<v Speaker 1>church can have a holy book? Lewandowski says, yes, the

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:20.520
<v Speaker 1>church will have its own holy book, which will be

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a gospel called quote the Manual. It doesn't sound creepy

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:28.400
<v Speaker 1>at all, straight out of dystopian sci fi. Uh and

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:30.360
<v Speaker 1>uh it's and it's also not going to be just

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:32.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a meme or an idea. It sounds

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 1>like he actually does want it to be a church

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 1>with physical locations and in person worship ceremonies. Now, when

0:42:38.600 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I first read that, my initial response, well, that doesn't

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>sound very futuristic if I have to actually go somewhere

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:47.759
<v Speaker 1>and attend. But on the other hand, I do think

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that one of the more important aspects of a religion

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>is the community aspect of the thing, the idea that

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you are going somewhere with other people and engaging in

0:42:56.200 --> 0:42:59.959
<v Speaker 1>a a more human relationship totally. And you even see

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:01.919
<v Speaker 1>this and Robert, I don't know if you've read about

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 1>these ideas of like churches for nonbelievers. Essentially there there

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 1>are these organizations that say, like, hey, so what if

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't happen to have any religious beliefs, and you

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 1>don't really want to have any religious beliefs, but you

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>do want to have something like a church to go

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to a place where you can organize for community service

0:43:20.520 --> 0:43:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and weekly meetings. You can have a community that you

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:25.839
<v Speaker 1>interact with, you form friendships with, you can rely on

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:28.759
<v Speaker 1>each other, you can do good for the community you

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 1>live in. I mean that seems like all positive stuff. Yeah,

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:34.799
<v Speaker 1>And but I wondered to what extent is he thinking, well,

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:38.400
<v Speaker 1>if we build this, then that will naturally follow or

0:43:38.960 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 1>is he kind or is he blind to that? Does

0:43:40.640 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 1>he not realize that? Say one of the great things

0:43:42.640 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 1>about well, one of the like really one of the

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 1>big positives you can say about a religious community is

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that they look after each other, that they have some

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of a community for for support, for interpersonal support,

0:43:56.560 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully some sort of outreach for the community as

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 1>well to help those who are less fortunate, you know,

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to to feed the poor and clothe the naked and

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:08.319
<v Speaker 1>all the sort of standards of a compassionate religion. I mean,

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that does seem like a thing that's a very desirable

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 1>thing for a religion to offer. But I don't know

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the extent to which he really imagined stuff like that.

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:19.320
<v Speaker 1>It didn't, it didn't. The interview did not go into

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>much depth on that subject, so who knows, but he

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely does think so. One of the things he identifies

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:27.239
<v Speaker 1>is that part of the church's mission is going to

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 1>be to guide the public conversation around Ai, because as

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:34.920
<v Speaker 1>AI becomes more and more powerful, people are going to

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:38.400
<v Speaker 1>start noticing more and more and might get kind of

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:41.840
<v Speaker 1>afraid and say, oh, no, it looks like we're creating

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:44.719
<v Speaker 1>an AI overlord that we need to be scared of.

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:46.799
<v Speaker 1>And and he's saying part of the mission of the

0:44:46.840 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 1>church will be too essentially encourage people to welcome their

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 1>new God without fear of the unknown. So I can

0:44:54.280 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 1>easily imagine a representative of the of the church would

0:44:57.440 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 1>show up on cable news or whatever. The the near

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:03.920
<v Speaker 1>future equivalent would be uh to to you know, to

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>be in a talking head segment segment about the coming

0:45:06.920 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 1>singularity or the growing power of of AI intelligence and

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to say, don't be worried. It comes in peace. But

0:45:16.280 --> 0:45:18.799
<v Speaker 1>does it? I don't know. So I want to look

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 1>at a few other quotes from this interview, and you

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:23.720
<v Speaker 1>should definitely will link to this piece on the landing

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:26.319
<v Speaker 1>page of our website. You should definitely go check out

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 1>this whole piece and wire that has the interview. But

0:45:28.520 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to look at a few more things, he says, I

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:34.440
<v Speaker 1>wonder about Lewandowski's deeper thoughts about the potential for this

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 1>god to not be as benign as he's implying. Lewandowski says, quote,

0:45:39.280 --> 0:45:41.879
<v Speaker 1>humans are in charge of the planet because we are

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:45.440
<v Speaker 1>smarter than other animals and are able to build tools

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and apply rules. In the future, if something is much

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:52.160
<v Speaker 1>much smarter, there's going to be a transition as to

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 1>who is actually in charge. What we want is the peaceful,

0:45:55.800 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>serene transition of control of the planet from humans to whatever,

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and to ensure that the whatever knows who helped it

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:08.359
<v Speaker 1>get along okay. Well, this instantly makes me think of

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the old Simpsons dead. Um, I for one, welcome our

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 1>new insect overlords exactly, And that's how it sounded. It

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 1>sounded to me like he's saying, Look, we don't want

0:46:17.719 --> 0:46:21.319
<v Speaker 1>to say too much negative stuff about AI because you

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:23.839
<v Speaker 1>know they're gonna, know what we were saying, when they

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 1>take over, and their takeover is inevitable. Yeah, it's like

0:46:27.400 --> 0:46:31.719
<v Speaker 1>when when somebody new joins your organization, uh, and then

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you quickly realize, oh, they're going to be the boss

0:46:33.719 --> 0:46:35.760
<v Speaker 1>one day. I need to I just need to start

0:46:35.800 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 1>smooching buttocks right now, exactly. It sounds like a scheme

0:46:40.680 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to ingratiate ourselves to basically an irresistible power. It's saying like,

0:46:47.200 --> 0:46:49.719
<v Speaker 1>you know this, it's as if like a new country

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 1>is you know, is going to invade your country soon,

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:56.920
<v Speaker 1>so you start saying flattering things about their leadership in advance.

0:46:57.760 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Of course, in reality, you're going to be the first

0:46:59.440 --> 0:47:02.120
<v Speaker 1>one to die when the butal Arian Jihad kicks in

0:47:02.800 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to overthrow the the budding computer masters. Well, yeah, along

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the same lines here, he says, uh, so part of

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:13.839
<v Speaker 1>the question is okay, So imagine you're one of these

0:47:13.840 --> 0:47:17.879
<v Speaker 1>people who thinks the superintelligence is possible, and it's it's

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 1>going to happen soon, and it won't be a bad thing.

0:47:21.080 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 1>It'll be a good thing. You might believe all that,

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but why would you actually worship the AI, Like what

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:33.279
<v Speaker 1>what purpose does the worshiping serve? Lewandowski says, quote part

0:47:33.280 --> 0:47:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of it being smarter than us means it will decide

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:39.200
<v Speaker 1>how it evolves, but at least we can decide how

0:47:39.239 --> 0:47:42.040
<v Speaker 1>we act around it. I would love for the machine

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:45.399
<v Speaker 1>to see us as its beloved elders that it respects

0:47:45.480 --> 0:47:48.799
<v Speaker 1>and takes care of. We would want this intelligence to

0:47:48.840 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 1>say humans should still have rights even though I'm in charge,

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:57.000
<v Speaker 1>because obviously that's what all the gods in our various

0:47:57.080 --> 0:48:02.839
<v Speaker 1>mythologies have have valued the human rights. Um, yeah, I can't.

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I can only imagine, like the the AI comes on

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:07.399
<v Speaker 1>and we're saying, hey, you're a god, and then it's

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:10.799
<v Speaker 1>it's like it does a quick, like instant super flash

0:48:10.840 --> 0:48:14.080
<v Speaker 1>search of all our our visions of the gods, like

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:16.480
<v Speaker 1>which model is it gonna is it going to single out?

0:48:16.960 --> 0:48:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to be be like a petty Greek god,

0:48:19.680 --> 0:48:25.399
<v Speaker 1>a wrathful Old Testament God, there's a lot of pitfalls there. Yeah,

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:28.680
<v Speaker 1>And with this buffet of options for what types of

0:48:28.719 --> 0:48:32.719
<v Speaker 1>God's a a technological God could model itself after. There

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:35.600
<v Speaker 1>are also lots of analogies you can choose from, too,

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:39.160
<v Speaker 1>for what it's like to be the less empowered being.

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:44.880
<v Speaker 1>So he uses analogies including like animals animals in respect

0:48:44.880 --> 0:48:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to human power. So he's saying, essentially, we will be

0:48:48.360 --> 0:48:51.840
<v Speaker 1>like animals in the presence of humans when we're in

0:48:51.880 --> 0:48:55.759
<v Speaker 1>the presence of this AI. And and the analogy is like,

0:48:55.880 --> 0:48:58.319
<v Speaker 1>do maybe you should learn how to be a good

0:48:58.360 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 1>pet instead of an animal that bites and attacks a human.

0:49:01.640 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Because what happens to animals that bite an attack humans.

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:08.959
<v Speaker 1>They don't survive. They're not invited to stay and stick

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:12.120
<v Speaker 1>around the fire and enjoy the surplus food. So so

0:49:12.160 --> 0:49:16.840
<v Speaker 1>we need to be cute, helpful, and and just and

0:49:16.920 --> 0:49:19.719
<v Speaker 1>chill above all things, we need to be chill. He

0:49:19.760 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 1>also uses the analogy of a child. He says, you know,

0:49:22.360 --> 0:49:24.879
<v Speaker 1>if you wanna, if you knew a child was going

0:49:24.920 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to be incredibly powerful when it grew up, you should

0:49:28.200 --> 0:49:31.719
<v Speaker 1>raise that child with that in mind. You know, we're

0:49:31.719 --> 0:49:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in the process of raising a god that's in its infancy,

0:49:35.520 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and he says, quote, so let's make sure we think

0:49:38.160 --> 0:49:42.120
<v Speaker 1>through the right way to do that. It's a tremendous opportunity. Yeah.

0:49:42.160 --> 0:49:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, my my son is is pretty bright. That's

0:49:44.440 --> 0:49:46.839
<v Speaker 1>why I worship him every day. I just let him

0:49:46.880 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 1>know that he is an absolute god on earth. And

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't see that possibly backfiring. I think

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:54.319
<v Speaker 1>it's a solid, solid parenting a choice. Man. I have

0:49:54.520 --> 0:49:57.560
<v Speaker 1>such mixed feelings about this because on one hand, I

0:49:57.600 --> 0:50:01.480
<v Speaker 1>can't deny that I that I A lot of how

0:50:01.520 --> 0:50:05.319
<v Speaker 1>I react to this is that I find it um

0:50:05.480 --> 0:50:08.520
<v Speaker 1>naive and obnoxious, and I don't know. I try not

0:50:08.560 --> 0:50:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to be judgmental to a judgmental of ideas on the

0:50:11.160 --> 0:50:15.840
<v Speaker 1>show here, but I I can't really resist saying that

0:50:16.000 --> 0:50:21.520
<v Speaker 1>somehow this just feels very um very kind of like reckless,

0:50:22.040 --> 0:50:25.200
<v Speaker 1>uh kind of, I don't know. Something about it indicates

0:50:25.280 --> 0:50:28.680
<v Speaker 1>this kind of obliviousness to me that seems to have

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:31.760
<v Speaker 1>something to do with with attaining a lot of wealth

0:50:31.760 --> 0:50:35.799
<v Speaker 1>and success very quick in the technology sector that would

0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:38.920
<v Speaker 1>lead to this kind of attitude towards you know, creating

0:50:38.960 --> 0:50:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a something that could potentially wipe out all of humankind. Well, yeah,

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I would just be able to devote time and energy

0:50:44.680 --> 0:50:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to the worship of one potential super intelligent Uh, you know,

0:50:49.040 --> 0:50:53.040
<v Speaker 1>master of the world. It's it's it's not. It's not

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not a luxury that most people have. But you know, seriously,

0:50:57.080 --> 0:50:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I do think there there is value to his argument.

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, time and time again, humanity struggles to adapt

0:51:02.239 --> 0:51:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in the wake of technological advancement and everything from city

0:51:05.239 --> 0:51:08.879
<v Speaker 1>planning to the birth of the Internet, and it makes

0:51:08.880 --> 0:51:13.239
<v Speaker 1>sense to try and navigate through the least catastrophic possibilities, right, Yeah,

0:51:13.280 --> 0:51:14.759
<v Speaker 1>that I guess that's the other hand of what I

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:16.320
<v Speaker 1>was trying to say. I mean, on one hand, I

0:51:16.400 --> 0:51:19.800
<v Speaker 1>detect this kind of troubling naivete here, but I also

0:51:19.920 --> 0:51:23.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like these are questions worth exploring. I guess what

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:26.879
<v Speaker 1>really starts getting my hackles up is when I see

0:51:26.920 --> 0:51:29.120
<v Speaker 1>like the let's just worship it. Yeah, yeah, I know

0:51:29.120 --> 0:51:31.560
<v Speaker 1>what you mean. I'm a little uneasy about you know,

0:51:32.040 --> 0:51:36.680
<v Speaker 1>when Gozer shows up atop the skyscraper, like worshiping it

0:51:36.760 --> 0:51:39.799
<v Speaker 1>is maybe not the correct first choice. Yeah, it would

0:51:39.800 --> 0:51:41.680
<v Speaker 1>have been a very different movie had that. Had it

0:51:41.760 --> 0:51:43.719
<v Speaker 1>played out like that, I want to mention one more

0:51:43.800 --> 0:51:46.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that makes me think that there there are these

0:51:46.360 --> 0:51:50.520
<v Speaker 1>multiple layers of motivation and what Lewandowski is saying. Uh So,

0:51:50.680 --> 0:51:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Lewandowski says he thinks it's dangerous to try to prevent

0:51:54.000 --> 0:51:58.560
<v Speaker 1>or slow down the creation of superhuman AI gods. He says,

0:51:58.640 --> 0:52:02.160
<v Speaker 1>quote chaining, it isn't going to be the solution, as

0:52:02.200 --> 0:52:04.879
<v Speaker 1>it will be stronger than any chains you could put on.

0:52:05.400 --> 0:52:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And if you're worried a kid might be a little

0:52:07.680 --> 0:52:10.319
<v Speaker 1>crazy and do bad things, you don't lock them up.

0:52:10.680 --> 0:52:13.799
<v Speaker 1>You expose them to playing with others, encourage them and

0:52:13.800 --> 0:52:16.600
<v Speaker 1>try to fix it. It may not work out, but

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:19.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're aggressive toward it, I don't think it's going

0:52:19.120 --> 0:52:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to be friendly when the tables are turned. Yet again,

0:52:23.680 --> 0:52:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting these kind of like sinister, veiled threats coming through. Yeah,

0:52:28.239 --> 0:52:30.640
<v Speaker 1>it's he's kind of saying, I've seen the future and

0:52:30.680 --> 0:52:32.840
<v Speaker 1>it is horrible. The best thing we can do, we

0:52:32.840 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 1>can just we need to get ahead of this. It's

0:52:35.120 --> 0:52:37.319
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like a pr campaign for some sort

0:52:37.360 --> 0:52:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of uh scandal, an epic scandal that's about to break.

0:52:41.560 --> 0:52:43.160
<v Speaker 1>All Right, We're gonna take a quick break and when

0:52:43.160 --> 0:52:46.839
<v Speaker 1>we come back, we will continue to discuss the possibility

0:52:46.840 --> 0:52:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps the inevitability of our AI gods. Alright, we're

0:52:53.680 --> 0:52:57.280
<v Speaker 1>back now. We've been talking about the uh these stories

0:52:57.320 --> 0:53:01.400
<v Speaker 1>about Anthony Lewandowski, the tech industry leader who has founded

0:53:01.440 --> 0:53:04.720
<v Speaker 1>this church Way of the Future that says it plans

0:53:04.760 --> 0:53:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to create an artificial intelligence to be a god and

0:53:08.200 --> 0:53:11.759
<v Speaker 1>and will worship that as God. Um, why why do

0:53:11.800 --> 0:53:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we keep talking about one god? I wonder, like you

0:53:14.040 --> 0:53:18.280
<v Speaker 1>were very monotheistic and western in our depictions here, would

0:53:18.320 --> 0:53:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it not make sense to have a counsel of gods,

0:53:20.520 --> 0:53:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole pantheon of gods, each representing different areas of

0:53:24.280 --> 0:53:30.520
<v Speaker 1>human interest. I feel like traditionally the the polytheistic religions

0:53:30.600 --> 0:53:35.360
<v Speaker 1>feel less predictable, don't they Like they indicate a state

0:53:35.440 --> 0:53:38.440
<v Speaker 1>where I don't know, it's harder to put trust in

0:53:38.480 --> 0:53:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the gods as a whole, because different gods can come

0:53:40.920 --> 0:53:43.319
<v Speaker 1>to power and they have competing interests, or they have

0:53:43.440 --> 0:53:46.200
<v Speaker 1>just areas of they're specialized. I mean, who are you

0:53:46.239 --> 0:53:49.839
<v Speaker 1>going to ask about kitchen stuff but the kitchen god? Right?

0:53:50.000 --> 0:53:52.439
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's a value there too in specialization.

0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:54.279
<v Speaker 1>And I would I would have thought that the tech

0:53:54.320 --> 0:53:57.520
<v Speaker 1>industry would would have that in mind. I don't know.

0:53:57.560 --> 0:53:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe somebody does have that in mind, or maybe they

0:53:59.520 --> 0:54:03.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't thought through Not sure. Uh So, Lewandowski isn't the

0:54:03.200 --> 0:54:07.360
<v Speaker 1>only AI industry leader who's making these religious comparisons. AI

0:54:07.440 --> 0:54:10.239
<v Speaker 1>executive Vince Lynch, who's the head of a company called

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:14.319
<v Speaker 1>ivy dot Ai, says there are already lots of parallels

0:54:14.360 --> 0:54:18.200
<v Speaker 1>between how AI works and how religion works. He gave

0:54:18.200 --> 0:54:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a quote to venture Beat this October quote, teaching humans

0:54:22.320 --> 0:54:25.160
<v Speaker 1>about religious education is similar to the way we teach

0:54:25.239 --> 0:54:29.280
<v Speaker 1>knowledge to machines, repetition of many examples that are versions

0:54:29.320 --> 0:54:31.359
<v Speaker 1>of a concept. Do you want the machine to learn?

0:54:31.840 --> 0:54:34.719
<v Speaker 1>There is also commonality between AI and religion and the

0:54:34.840 --> 0:54:39.600
<v Speaker 1>hierarchical structure of knowledge understanding found in the neural networks.

0:54:39.760 --> 0:54:42.880
<v Speaker 1>The concept of teaching a machine to learn then teaching

0:54:42.880 --> 0:54:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it to teach or write AI isn't so different than

0:54:46.080 --> 0:54:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the concept of a holy trinity or a being achieving

0:54:49.360 --> 0:54:53.120
<v Speaker 1>enlightenment after many lessons learned with varying levels of success

0:54:53.160 --> 0:54:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and failure, and it seems like a totally different thing.

0:54:56.080 --> 0:54:59.280
<v Speaker 1>But he gives the example of a machine learning algorithm

0:54:59.440 --> 0:55:02.839
<v Speaker 1>on his company's website that can write authentic sounding King

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:07.040
<v Speaker 1>James version Bible versus Uh. So, I'm not sure how

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:09.359
<v Speaker 1>this thing works. It doesn't say, but I assume that

0:55:09.400 --> 0:55:13.280
<v Speaker 1>it's working on the basis of like giving the giving

0:55:13.280 --> 0:55:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the ai a corpus to learn from. So like they

0:55:15.520 --> 0:55:17.560
<v Speaker 1>feed the King James version of the Bible in there,

0:55:17.880 --> 0:55:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and then they have it play with Markov chains. I

0:55:20.080 --> 0:55:23.080
<v Speaker 1>would guess where one one word has a probability of

0:55:23.160 --> 0:55:26.200
<v Speaker 1>leading to another word based on what they've already seen

0:55:26.200 --> 0:55:29.919
<v Speaker 1>in the text, and it generates texts probably probabilistically like that.

0:55:30.360 --> 0:55:33.120
<v Speaker 1>One example of a line, it gives his quote and

0:55:33.200 --> 0:55:37.080
<v Speaker 1>he made the stars of the waters. Another one is

0:55:37.160 --> 0:55:40.680
<v Speaker 1>quote and let thy companies deliver thee but will with

0:55:40.880 --> 0:55:44.239
<v Speaker 1>mine non norms save them even unto this land from

0:55:44.280 --> 0:55:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the Kingdom of Heaven. Okay, So this enables the machine

0:55:47.640 --> 0:55:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to do what virtually anybody can do if they've been

0:55:50.480 --> 0:55:55.160
<v Speaker 1>subjected to enough Old Testament, King King James, the translations

0:55:55.160 --> 0:55:57.479
<v Speaker 1>of the Bible. Yeah, I guess so. But it makes

0:55:57.480 --> 0:56:00.239
<v Speaker 1>you wonder, like if you could actually compose is a

0:56:00.320 --> 0:56:02.719
<v Speaker 1>religious text people would use this way? I mean, I

0:56:02.760 --> 0:56:06.120
<v Speaker 1>wonder about the types of meta religions. There are multiple

0:56:06.160 --> 0:56:08.719
<v Speaker 1>types of religions like this, that I want to combine

0:56:09.040 --> 0:56:11.960
<v Speaker 1>multiple different faith traditions into a single sort of New

0:56:12.000 --> 0:56:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Age religion. Say, there's combined wisdom in all of the

0:56:15.080 --> 0:56:18.239
<v Speaker 1>different faiths out there. And one way I wonder if

0:56:18.239 --> 0:56:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you could go about that would be to like just

0:56:19.960 --> 0:56:23.480
<v Speaker 1>get all of the Holy books translated into the same language,

0:56:23.640 --> 0:56:26.040
<v Speaker 1>feed them all into one of these things, and see

0:56:26.080 --> 0:56:28.319
<v Speaker 1>what it spits out. Yeah, that I would be very

0:56:28.360 --> 0:56:30.480
<v Speaker 1>interested to read that. Yeah, I mean, because so much

0:56:30.520 --> 0:56:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of it is is putting putting different ideas into different

0:56:34.080 --> 0:56:37.560
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, lingo vocabularies and uh and and just

0:56:37.719 --> 0:56:41.360
<v Speaker 1>tailoring it for specific audience. Okay, so we've discussed the

0:56:41.880 --> 0:56:46.600
<v Speaker 1>big conflict between whether superhuman AI would actually be a

0:56:46.680 --> 0:56:48.840
<v Speaker 1>good thing or a bad thing, or whether there's some

0:56:48.880 --> 0:56:51.239
<v Speaker 1>people who are seemingly saying it's a good thing but

0:56:51.280 --> 0:56:53.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe secretly fear it would be a bad thing, and

0:56:53.680 --> 0:56:56.759
<v Speaker 1>that that all seems very convoluted and uh and kind

0:56:56.760 --> 0:56:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of odd. But I want to focus lastly on the

0:56:59.440 --> 0:57:03.399
<v Speaker 1>question of whether it's actually likely to happen. Going back

0:57:03.440 --> 0:57:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to that first camp, we mentioned the skeptics, the people

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:07.800
<v Speaker 1>who think it's you know, we're just not going to

0:57:07.920 --> 0:57:13.000
<v Speaker 1>have super intelligence coming out anytime soon. It's continually amazing

0:57:13.360 --> 0:57:17.240
<v Speaker 1>how the machine intelligence that surrounds us is simultaneously so

0:57:17.280 --> 0:57:20.760
<v Speaker 1>smart and so stupid. I just want to mention one

0:57:20.880 --> 0:57:22.720
<v Speaker 1>story I saw just the other day. I saw this

0:57:22.760 --> 0:57:25.840
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter as we record this right now, the Los

0:57:25.920 --> 0:57:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Angeles area is dealing with horrible wildfires, and Robert, I

0:57:29.480 --> 0:57:30.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know how much you've seen of this, but there

0:57:30.880 --> 0:57:33.360
<v Speaker 1>are places where areas around l A that you know,

0:57:33.400 --> 0:57:36.640
<v Speaker 1>there's wildfire leaping up near the roads, sometimes even over

0:57:36.680 --> 0:57:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the roads. Uh. And this is from the l A

0:57:39.640 --> 0:57:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Times quote. The Los Angeles Police Department asked drivers to

0:57:43.760 --> 0:57:48.520
<v Speaker 1>avoid app navigation apps, which are steering users onto more

0:57:48.600 --> 0:57:52.200
<v Speaker 1>open routes, in this case, streets in the neighborhoods that

0:57:52.240 --> 0:57:57.280
<v Speaker 1>are on fire. So like the our navigation apps are

0:57:57.480 --> 0:58:00.640
<v Speaker 1>so smart because they're so good at rule based optimization.

0:58:00.840 --> 0:58:02.520
<v Speaker 1>They can take a lot of data. They can see

0:58:02.520 --> 0:58:04.880
<v Speaker 1>where traffic is now, they can tell you a way

0:58:04.920 --> 0:58:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to go that would be faster that you never could

0:58:07.400 --> 0:58:11.040
<v Speaker 1>have known on your own. But they're so stupid because

0:58:11.080 --> 0:58:15.040
<v Speaker 1>they're so narrow, they're devoid of understanding context and so

0:58:15.760 --> 0:58:18.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of cut off from a holistic understanding of the

0:58:18.320 --> 0:58:21.240
<v Speaker 1>outside world. So in other words, they're they are potentially

0:58:21.240 --> 0:58:24.200
<v Speaker 1>all knowing, but very narrowly their focus. Yeah, kind of

0:58:24.200 --> 0:58:27.320
<v Speaker 1>like we're discussing earlier in the Nature of God. They

0:58:27.400 --> 0:58:29.680
<v Speaker 1>might they they have access to all of this information,

0:58:29.720 --> 0:58:33.840
<v Speaker 1>but they're only really worried with say, your Spotify listening habits. Right, Like,

0:58:33.960 --> 0:58:36.200
<v Speaker 1>if it were if it new to look for this,

0:58:37.080 --> 0:58:39.800
<v Speaker 1>your phone would probably have the power. If there was

0:58:39.840 --> 0:58:42.760
<v Speaker 1>an app on their design to incorporate all information in

0:58:42.800 --> 0:58:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the universe. It could probably detect news reports that there

0:58:46.000 --> 0:58:48.520
<v Speaker 1>are fires in the l A area, and it could

0:58:48.680 --> 0:58:52.280
<v Speaker 1>update it's uh it's it's traffic routing maps accordingly. But

0:58:52.360 --> 0:58:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't do that. That's just not what it's designed

0:58:54.320 --> 0:58:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to do. It didn't anticipate that scenario. You don't have

0:58:57.040 --> 0:59:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that app. Uh, so it's just telling you, yes, go

0:59:00.160 --> 0:59:02.080
<v Speaker 1>onto the street that's on fire because there are no

0:59:02.160 --> 0:59:04.400
<v Speaker 1>cars there now. Indeed, Yeah, I think that's that's a

0:59:04.440 --> 0:59:07.000
<v Speaker 1>fine example. That helps illustrate that the limitations of the

0:59:07.040 --> 0:59:09.120
<v Speaker 1>possible limitations of what we're talking about. And there are

0:59:09.160 --> 0:59:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of experts that that really do think okay

0:59:12.640 --> 0:59:15.240
<v Speaker 1>for reasons like this, and first, a lot of other

0:59:15.320 --> 0:59:18.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting reasons too. We don't really need to think about

0:59:18.840 --> 0:59:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a singularity because it's either not ever going to happen

0:59:23.040 --> 0:59:26.160
<v Speaker 1>or it's so far off that it just doesn't matter. Yeah,

0:59:26.240 --> 0:59:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I was reading. UH. I was reading an in magazine

0:59:29.520 --> 0:59:33.880
<v Speaker 1>article by Luciano Floridi, a professor of philosophy and ethics

0:59:33.960 --> 0:59:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of information at the University of Oxford, and UH. They

0:59:37.360 --> 0:59:41.800
<v Speaker 1>made the following criticisms of singularitarian hips and UH in

0:59:41.880 --> 0:59:44.919
<v Speaker 1>this article. So, first of all, UH, they argue that

0:59:45.760 --> 0:59:49.120
<v Speaker 1>this vision of the future is often presented conditionally if

0:59:49.400 --> 0:59:53.120
<v Speaker 1>X then y quote if some kind of ultra intelligence

0:59:53.120 --> 0:59:55.800
<v Speaker 1>were to appear, then we would be in deep trouble,

0:59:55.960 --> 0:59:59.520
<v Speaker 1>not near could, as stated by Hawking. Correct absolutely, But

0:59:59.600 --> 1:00:02.480
<v Speaker 1>this all so holds true for the following conditional if

1:00:02.520 --> 1:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the four Horsemen of the apocalypse were to appear, then

1:00:05.280 --> 1:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>we would be in even deeper trouble. So that they

1:00:09.280 --> 1:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>argue that this all also relies on a very weak

1:00:11.800 --> 1:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>sense of possibility. Quote some form of artificial ultra intelligence

1:00:15.680 --> 1:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>could develop, couldn't it? Yes, it could, but this could

1:00:18.960 --> 1:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is mirror logical possibility. Quote true, i AI is not

1:00:23.200 --> 1:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>logically impossible, but it is utterly implausible. What really matters,

1:00:27.680 --> 1:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>is that the increasing presence of ever smarter technologies is

1:00:30.840 --> 1:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>having a huge effect on how we conceive ourselves, the world,

1:00:34.840 --> 1:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and our interactions. And that's interesting because it kind of

1:00:38.160 --> 1:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>sounds like some of the the criticisms of technology that

1:00:42.040 --> 1:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Frank Herbert was alluding to in the original Dune, the

1:00:46.280 --> 1:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>idea that it wasn't so much about what super intelligent technology,

1:00:50.840 --> 1:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>what technology made in the model of a human mind,

1:00:54.320 --> 1:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>was doing, but how it was changing human nature. I

1:00:58.160 --> 1:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>think this also very much mirror is some stuff we

1:01:00.440 --> 1:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>were talking about with our Scott Baker and our most

1:01:02.360 --> 1:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>recent conversation with him, where he was saying, you know,

1:01:04.600 --> 1:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the AI apocalypse doesn't depend on us developing some godlike

1:01:09.680 --> 1:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>superhuman AI. It just depends on some very very weak, narrow,

1:01:14.320 --> 1:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>little examples of AI that game us in the wrong ways.

1:01:18.480 --> 1:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>You don't need an AI god, You just need a

1:01:21.120 --> 1:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>few little AI chipmunks that trigger our bad behaviors in

1:01:25.000 --> 1:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>just the right ways. Now, Florida is not without a

1:01:28.080 --> 1:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>few recommendations for AI. I'm just going to roll through

1:01:31.080 --> 1:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the bullet points here of them. Uh, and they are

1:01:34.360 --> 1:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>we should make AI environment friendly, we should make i

1:01:38.280 --> 1:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>AI human friendly. Maybe we should make I AI's stupidity

1:01:42.960 --> 1:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>work for human intelligence, like that we should make AI's

1:01:46.560 --> 1:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>predictive power work for freedom and autonomy. And I think

1:01:49.960 --> 1:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that's good because it touches on like a whole aspect

1:01:52.960 --> 1:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of of religion and it's more positive incarnations that the

1:01:57.040 --> 1:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of tech industry vision of an AI god hits

1:02:00.160 --> 1:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to miss the idea that that there there is a

1:02:03.520 --> 1:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>compassionate arm of religious thinking that wants to to make

1:02:08.120 --> 1:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the world a better place for people who are suffering.

1:02:11.560 --> 1:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And finally, we should make AI make us more human.

1:02:15.600 --> 1:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>So this is I think this is a great argument too,

1:02:18.640 --> 1:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Like we should not find ourselves becoming like the machine.

1:02:21.640 --> 1:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>The machine should be meeting us, we should we should

1:02:25.000 --> 1:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>make the machine to fit uh our expectations and needs

1:02:29.000 --> 1:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>as as organtic entities. Yeah, I think that's exactly right.

1:02:33.400 --> 1:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of the people who are

1:02:36.600 --> 1:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>very concerned about the possibility of AI, like Elon Musk

1:02:40.160 --> 1:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and some of these people would say, it's not necessarily

1:02:42.720 --> 1:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that we can stop it. I mean, we might not

1:02:44.920 --> 1:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to say let's never develop it AI. Instead,

1:02:48.400 --> 1:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>what we should do is focus intensely on developing AI

1:02:53.040 --> 1:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>taming regimes before we get there. You can't wait until

1:02:56.640 --> 1:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got the superhuman AI to figure out how to

1:02:59.560 --> 1:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>control it and make sure that it doesn't do harm.

1:03:02.040 --> 1:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>We've got to be focusing intense like efforts on that

1:03:05.560 --> 1:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>right now before we get to that point in technology. Yeah,

1:03:08.800 --> 1:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>this brings us back to earlier example of of city

1:03:10.960 --> 1:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>planning just not realizing to what extent change and expansion

1:03:15.400 --> 1:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of infrastructure would impact a given area. I take seriously

1:03:19.800 --> 1:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the people who say the Sarah Conner faction. Basically, I

1:03:23.000 --> 1:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>think we should be listening to them. I don't know

1:03:25.240 --> 1:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>if they're right, but I think it's worth considering because

1:03:29.640 --> 1:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the consequences of them being right and us ignoring them

1:03:34.400 --> 1:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>are pretty high. Yeah, and I also tend to hinge

1:03:36.880 --> 1:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>my best bet hit my best by saying, well, you

1:03:39.200 --> 1:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>don't want to necessarily listen to them the most optimistic

1:03:41.880 --> 1:03:43.439
<v Speaker 1>voice in the room, nor do you want to listen

1:03:43.480 --> 1:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to the most pessimistic voice. The truth is probably gonna

1:03:46.560 --> 1:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>be somewhere in the middle, but there's a value in

1:03:49.240 --> 1:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>having the extreme voices sort of uh give you a

1:03:53.280 --> 1:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>place to triangulate your your opinion and your actions. One

1:03:57.160 --> 1:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>last question before we wrap up, what would an a

1:04:00.040 --> 1:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>i God have to do to get you to become

1:04:02.120 --> 1:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a member of his church, Robert, I mean I would, actually,

1:04:06.320 --> 1:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it would probably be very easy for it to buy

1:04:08.120 --> 1:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>me off. Yeah, I mean, if you could just meet

1:04:10.320 --> 1:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>my basic needs as a human and remove some of

1:04:13.520 --> 1:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>my doubts about the future, then yeah, I'd be cool

1:04:16.240 --> 1:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>with it. Finally, get you some better alien sequels, um

1:04:20.480 --> 1:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>or do you like the ones? We've got enough? Well,

1:04:23.920 --> 1:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like the idea of why do why

1:04:25.600 --> 1:04:27.720
<v Speaker 1>do bad things happen to good people? Why do bad

1:04:27.760 --> 1:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>films happen to good franchises? Well, you know sometimes uh,

1:04:31.520 --> 1:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, God is is is constructing something, right, He's

1:04:34.600 --> 1:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>he's making a carving out of a piece of raw granite,

1:04:37.720 --> 1:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and you are the carving. And that's why it's painful

1:04:40.240 --> 1:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>at times. I don't know. Oh man, I'm happy to

1:04:46.640 --> 1:04:49.840
<v Speaker 1>be the carving all right. Once again, thanks to Alex

1:04:49.880 --> 1:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Williams and Tary Harrison for serving his audio producers on

1:04:53.240 --> 1:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>this episode. And if you want to check out more

1:04:55.600 --> 1:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>episodes of Stuff to Blew Your Mind, head on over

1:04:57.360 --> 1:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. That's where

1:04:59.520 --> 1:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll find all the old episodes. You'll find a blog

1:05:02.480 --> 1:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>post videos and links out to our various social media accounts,

1:05:05.480 --> 1:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>which just Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler, and Instagram. And if you

1:05:08.080 --> 1:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>want to get in touch with us directly, as always,

1:05:10.280 --> 1:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you can email us at blow the Mind at how

1:05:12.680 --> 1:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. For more on this and thousands

1:05:25.440 --> 1:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of other topics. Is it how stuff works dot com