1 00:00:06,559 --> 00:00:09,560 Speaker 1: My lodging is filled with lizards and rats, but the 2 00:00:09,680 --> 00:00:13,720 Speaker 1: architect exists, and everyone who denies it is touched with madness. 3 00:00:13,840 --> 00:00:19,119 Speaker 1: Under the guise of wisdom, consult Zoroaster and Minos and Solon, 4 00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:22,560 Speaker 1: and the martyr Socrates and the great Cicero. They all 5 00:00:22,600 --> 00:00:26,400 Speaker 1: adored a master, a judge, a father. This sublime system 6 00:00:26,480 --> 00:00:29,240 Speaker 1: is necessary to man. It is the sacred tie that 7 00:00:29,320 --> 00:00:33,960 Speaker 1: binds society, the first foundation of holy equity, the bridle 8 00:00:34,080 --> 00:00:37,239 Speaker 1: to the wicked, the hope of the just. If the 9 00:00:37,280 --> 00:00:40,680 Speaker 1: heavens stripped of his noble imprint could ever cease to 10 00:00:40,720 --> 00:00:44,000 Speaker 1: attest to his being, if God did not exist, it 11 00:00:44,040 --> 00:00:52,440 Speaker 1: would be necessary to invent him. Welcome to stuff to 12 00:00:52,479 --> 00:01:01,320 Speaker 1: Blow your Mind from how Stop works dot com. Hey, 13 00:01:01,400 --> 00:01:03,240 Speaker 1: welcome to stuff to blow your mind. My name is 14 00:01:03,320 --> 00:01:06,880 Speaker 1: Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. And that was Voltaire, right, yeah. 15 00:01:07,280 --> 00:01:10,920 Speaker 1: Seventeen sixty eight from his uh his poem epistle to 16 00:01:10,959 --> 00:01:13,560 Speaker 1: the author of the book The Three Impostors. In it, 17 00:01:13,640 --> 00:01:16,559 Speaker 1: he argues that belief in God is necessary to social order, 18 00:01:16,840 --> 00:01:19,920 Speaker 1: which is something that we could do a whole podcast 19 00:01:19,959 --> 00:01:22,720 Speaker 1: about that argument. Kind of an odd thing to hear 20 00:01:22,760 --> 00:01:26,800 Speaker 1: from Voltaire given his really serious criticisms of like the 21 00:01:26,840 --> 00:01:30,120 Speaker 1: existing monotheisms. Yeah, I was reading reading up on a 22 00:01:30,120 --> 00:01:32,720 Speaker 1: little bit, and yeah, it's it is interesting that here 23 00:01:32,720 --> 00:01:34,480 Speaker 1: he's kind of sticking up for God, but other times 24 00:01:34,480 --> 00:01:38,120 Speaker 1: he was very critical of abuses by the Catholic Church. Uh. 25 00:01:38,240 --> 00:01:40,800 Speaker 1: And at the same time he also carves out a 26 00:01:40,840 --> 00:01:43,760 Speaker 1: little space in this poem to attack his favorite enemies. 27 00:01:44,160 --> 00:01:48,680 Speaker 1: So it's kind of like an all encompassing distract. I 28 00:01:48,720 --> 00:01:51,040 Speaker 1: guess so many great works of literature do that. I 29 00:01:51,080 --> 00:01:54,880 Speaker 1: love all of the enemy digs in Dante's Inferno, Yes, yeah, 30 00:01:54,960 --> 00:01:57,840 Speaker 1: because it's like some dude made him mad and he's like, well, 31 00:01:57,840 --> 00:02:01,000 Speaker 1: you're going in the ninth circle. Yes, es. Dante definitely 32 00:02:01,080 --> 00:02:04,080 Speaker 1: makes room for some personal digs in the Divine Comedy. 33 00:02:04,120 --> 00:02:06,960 Speaker 1: So obviously of that section you read, the last line 34 00:02:07,040 --> 00:02:09,320 Speaker 1: is the part that gets quoted the most right and 35 00:02:09,360 --> 00:02:12,959 Speaker 1: then often misquote. It is often used for whatever purposes 36 00:02:13,000 --> 00:02:15,680 Speaker 1: you needed for. Are you arguing that, yes, God exists 37 00:02:15,680 --> 00:02:17,400 Speaker 1: and if and if God didn't exist, we would just 38 00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:19,240 Speaker 1: have to make it up because we need God, or 39 00:02:19,280 --> 00:02:22,240 Speaker 1: you're saying, obviously we all make up gods and we're 40 00:02:22,280 --> 00:02:24,800 Speaker 1: doing it to fulfill some human need. Right. But you know, 41 00:02:24,880 --> 00:02:26,920 Speaker 1: the funny thing is, I don't know if I've ever 42 00:02:26,960 --> 00:02:33,040 Speaker 1: heard anybody really take that line literally before, yeah, to say, hey, 43 00:02:33,120 --> 00:02:35,639 Speaker 1: is there a God? Well no, there's not a god. 44 00:02:35,680 --> 00:02:37,359 Speaker 1: Oh well, we gotta invent one. Let's get on it, 45 00:02:37,720 --> 00:02:40,639 Speaker 1: start the project. And folks, I'm sorry to say, that's 46 00:02:40,639 --> 00:02:45,080 Speaker 1: where we've got to go today, into the valleys a 47 00:02:45,120 --> 00:02:48,600 Speaker 1: certain value made of a kind of semiconducting metal, maybe 48 00:02:49,280 --> 00:02:53,560 Speaker 1: where thinkers and millionaires or dreaming up gods that don't 49 00:02:53,639 --> 00:02:57,160 Speaker 1: yet exist, but but they really think maybe should soon. 50 00:02:57,680 --> 00:03:00,120 Speaker 1: I really like imagining it being laid out in a 51 00:03:00,240 --> 00:03:03,399 Speaker 1: very corporate way and saying like, all right, bye bye, 52 00:03:03,480 --> 00:03:07,120 Speaker 1: Q two, we really want to have a demigod, and 53 00:03:07,440 --> 00:03:11,800 Speaker 1: by Q three at least a minor deity build up 54 00:03:11,800 --> 00:03:13,280 Speaker 1: from there. Yeah, when are we going to get the 55 00:03:13,320 --> 00:03:18,680 Speaker 1: new Wrath functions online? So there are some very interesting 56 00:03:18,840 --> 00:03:23,320 Speaker 1: and also very tiresome debates about whether, if God exists, 57 00:03:23,400 --> 00:03:27,080 Speaker 1: you could ever prove the existence of such a being. Um, 58 00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:29,760 Speaker 1: we're not going to litigate that question today, but I 59 00:03:29,800 --> 00:03:33,840 Speaker 1: do want to start by asking a derivative question. Let's 60 00:03:33,880 --> 00:03:38,320 Speaker 1: say that instead there was suddenly in controvertible evidence that 61 00:03:38,400 --> 00:03:42,480 Speaker 1: we're in contact with some kind of superhuman intelligence and 62 00:03:42,600 --> 00:03:46,360 Speaker 1: intelligence that's not human and seems to possess kind of 63 00:03:46,400 --> 00:03:51,240 Speaker 1: a vast incomprehensible power. It can solve all the unsolved 64 00:03:51,360 --> 00:03:56,640 Speaker 1: problems in mathematics, It can make your favorite food materialize 65 00:03:56,680 --> 00:04:00,880 Speaker 1: in front of your eyes. So we're just sipulating that 66 00:04:00,880 --> 00:04:04,640 Speaker 1: that kind of being exists, and we're we're personally witnessing it. 67 00:04:05,480 --> 00:04:08,360 Speaker 1: How would you know whether it was correct to call 68 00:04:08,520 --> 00:04:11,920 Speaker 1: that being god or a god? Well? I haven't answer 69 00:04:11,960 --> 00:04:14,480 Speaker 1: to this question, but I'll let you go first. Well, 70 00:04:14,520 --> 00:04:16,279 Speaker 1: I mean, so one of the things is that I 71 00:04:16,279 --> 00:04:17,880 Speaker 1: think a lot of people with a more sort of 72 00:04:17,920 --> 00:04:21,640 Speaker 1: conservative religious predisposition would have a pretty simple answer to 73 00:04:21,680 --> 00:04:24,760 Speaker 1: the question, and the answer is it would be God 74 00:04:24,880 --> 00:04:28,000 Speaker 1: if it conformed the teachings of their religion, whatever they 75 00:04:28,080 --> 00:04:30,880 Speaker 1: already believed. But let's say we try to approach it 76 00:04:30,920 --> 00:04:33,359 Speaker 1: with a more kind of open minded framework, like what 77 00:04:33,839 --> 00:04:38,039 Speaker 1: generically are the qualifications of being must meet to be 78 00:04:38,200 --> 00:04:42,080 Speaker 1: considered a God or the God? All right, Well, that 79 00:04:42,080 --> 00:04:44,480 Speaker 1: that that is an excellent question. But to go back 80 00:04:44,480 --> 00:04:46,560 Speaker 1: to your original question, how would you know whether the 81 00:04:46,600 --> 00:04:49,080 Speaker 1: being was a god? I guess that's the same question, right, 82 00:04:49,120 --> 00:04:52,680 Speaker 1: just I'm trying to make it the same question. Similar questions. Okay, 83 00:04:52,720 --> 00:04:55,880 Speaker 1: but I think that the most obvious answer would be, Oh, 84 00:04:56,000 --> 00:04:59,360 Speaker 1: you'll know. I mean, because you're gonna have to ask yourself. 85 00:04:59,440 --> 00:05:02,080 Speaker 1: Does its voy all but crack your skull? Does its 86 00:05:02,080 --> 00:05:05,039 Speaker 1: presence fill you with terror and awe? Is it even 87 00:05:05,040 --> 00:05:09,080 Speaker 1: impossible to rebel against it? Puny mortal that thou art? Well, 88 00:05:09,080 --> 00:05:13,920 Speaker 1: but then that would just make God synonymous with overwhelming power. Well, 89 00:05:14,440 --> 00:05:16,719 Speaker 1: what else do you want from God? Just intelligence but 90 00:05:16,760 --> 00:05:20,520 Speaker 1: not overwhelming power? Well? Is there a difference between intelligence 91 00:05:20,560 --> 00:05:23,920 Speaker 1: and overwhelming power? Well, that's something we're gonna come back 92 00:05:23,960 --> 00:05:27,160 Speaker 1: to again and again in this discussion, as as humans 93 00:05:27,440 --> 00:05:29,440 Speaker 1: attempt to try and figure to try and create a 94 00:05:29,480 --> 00:05:32,560 Speaker 1: god that has one but not the other, or or 95 00:05:32,640 --> 00:05:35,400 Speaker 1: has both but has the like, the right type of 96 00:05:35,400 --> 00:05:38,360 Speaker 1: intelligence and the right type of power. Because I mean, 97 00:05:38,560 --> 00:05:41,640 Speaker 1: generally what I'm describing those tends to be the trend. 98 00:05:41,720 --> 00:05:44,640 Speaker 1: Unless a god or god like being is in disguise 99 00:05:44,760 --> 00:05:48,520 Speaker 1: for the purpose of testing your faith or seducing someone, uh, 100 00:05:48,600 --> 00:05:50,760 Speaker 1: then you're probably gonna know. Like if you look to 101 00:05:50,800 --> 00:05:54,960 Speaker 1: the Hindu deities, for example, they're heavily symbolic avatars that 102 00:05:54,960 --> 00:05:57,520 Speaker 1: they don't leave many questions about their nature, and as 103 00:05:57,520 --> 00:05:59,640 Speaker 1: we've touched on a previous school on the show, their 104 00:05:59,680 --> 00:06:02,400 Speaker 1: feet give them away. They float above the surface of 105 00:06:02,400 --> 00:06:05,359 Speaker 1: the earth. They're clearly not creatures of this world, and 106 00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:07,440 Speaker 1: there's no room to doubt it. Yeah. But then again, 107 00:06:07,680 --> 00:06:10,080 Speaker 1: let's say aliens show up and they want to trick 108 00:06:10,200 --> 00:06:12,560 Speaker 1: us into believing that they are our gods, and they 109 00:06:12,600 --> 00:06:17,120 Speaker 1: have levitation technology okay, uh, and they have some other 110 00:06:17,320 --> 00:06:19,520 Speaker 1: you know, they can channel vast amounts of energy into 111 00:06:19,600 --> 00:06:23,040 Speaker 1: loudspeakers that will crack your skull when they speak. So 112 00:06:23,200 --> 00:06:25,039 Speaker 1: we're back to the problem again. How do you tell 113 00:06:25,080 --> 00:06:28,719 Speaker 1: the difference between this super powerful alien and what people 114 00:06:28,800 --> 00:06:31,920 Speaker 1: have in mind when they say God. Well, I mean, 115 00:06:31,920 --> 00:06:34,640 Speaker 1: maybe the aliens are God if their power is sufficient enough, 116 00:06:34,839 --> 00:06:37,720 Speaker 1: Because you also come down to the models of a deity. 117 00:06:37,760 --> 00:06:42,120 Speaker 1: Older models of of a god limit its power to say, 118 00:06:42,200 --> 00:06:46,000 Speaker 1: your your people, your region, or maybe the power is 119 00:06:46,040 --> 00:06:48,279 Speaker 1: limited to the world. But as we get into you know, 120 00:06:48,320 --> 00:06:53,120 Speaker 1: progressively more cosmically aware society, then that means the power 121 00:06:53,160 --> 00:06:55,080 Speaker 1: of the God has to be greater, or at least 122 00:06:55,120 --> 00:06:57,360 Speaker 1: appear greater. Well, yeah, I mean I think you could 123 00:06:57,400 --> 00:06:59,919 Speaker 1: definitely look at the idea of sort of the abstract 124 00:07:00,279 --> 00:07:05,000 Speaker 1: universal disembodied god is a more recent evolution in the 125 00:07:05,080 --> 00:07:07,560 Speaker 1: history of religions, and if you go way back into 126 00:07:07,600 --> 00:07:11,960 Speaker 1: the older religions, the gods are closer to what people 127 00:07:12,000 --> 00:07:15,200 Speaker 1: imagine in sci fi movies, like a being that comes 128 00:07:15,280 --> 00:07:21,280 Speaker 1: down from the sky and has uh irresistible power. So 129 00:07:21,320 --> 00:07:23,440 Speaker 1: we have the idea of intelligence, we have the idea 130 00:07:23,440 --> 00:07:25,960 Speaker 1: of power, and we can maybe come back to the 131 00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:29,920 Speaker 1: issue of power and where your particular god or pretender 132 00:07:29,960 --> 00:07:33,520 Speaker 1: god is on the Kardashiat scale. But I think the 133 00:07:33,560 --> 00:07:36,280 Speaker 1: intelligence area is pretty interesting and it's gonna be pretty 134 00:07:36,320 --> 00:07:38,880 Speaker 1: key to what we're talking about here today. In writing 135 00:07:38,920 --> 00:07:41,480 Speaker 1: for Ian magazine, Pam Weintraub points out that if you 136 00:07:41,480 --> 00:07:45,560 Speaker 1: ask most people what God knows, the answer is that 137 00:07:45,640 --> 00:07:49,720 Speaker 1: God knows everything, but that God's interests are very narrow 138 00:07:49,840 --> 00:07:53,360 Speaker 1: and there those interests usually involve human morality. Okay, so 139 00:07:53,480 --> 00:07:57,560 Speaker 1: God knows. I don't know, you're weird quirks about how 140 00:07:57,600 --> 00:08:01,000 Speaker 1: you clip your toe nails, But unless you've got moral 141 00:08:01,160 --> 00:08:05,360 Speaker 1: preachings about tone l clippings, God isn't interested in that. Yeah, Like, 142 00:08:05,800 --> 00:08:07,800 Speaker 1: I wonder how often we really stop to think about 143 00:08:07,840 --> 00:08:09,920 Speaker 1: this in our conceptions of God. Like if I was 144 00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:13,720 Speaker 1: to say God knows every uh you know, immoral thought 145 00:08:13,720 --> 00:08:16,840 Speaker 1: you have ever had, and God knows every noble dream 146 00:08:16,880 --> 00:08:19,480 Speaker 1: you've ever entertained, that cuts deep. Yeah, that cuts deep 147 00:08:19,480 --> 00:08:21,760 Speaker 1: when we're willing to consider that. If I say God 148 00:08:21,880 --> 00:08:24,920 Speaker 1: knows every chess move and every chess game that was 149 00:08:24,960 --> 00:08:29,280 Speaker 1: ever ever orchestrated. God knows how many eggs you've eaten. Yeah, well, 150 00:08:29,320 --> 00:08:30,600 Speaker 1: I mean like the chess game I think is a 151 00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:33,520 Speaker 1: good example, because that sounds like all right, Chess is 152 00:08:33,520 --> 00:08:35,719 Speaker 1: a cool game. It's the game of thinkers. God's the 153 00:08:35,800 --> 00:08:38,000 Speaker 1: ultimate chess player. Why wouldn't he know all the rules? 154 00:08:38,080 --> 00:08:39,880 Speaker 1: But yeah, when you get into the eggs, where you 155 00:08:39,920 --> 00:08:42,440 Speaker 1: get into every play of Monopoly or every play of 156 00:08:42,559 --> 00:08:45,760 Speaker 1: candy Land, ever, it seems completely pointless. But God would 157 00:08:45,760 --> 00:08:48,320 Speaker 1: have that too. God would have all all the batting 158 00:08:48,360 --> 00:08:53,120 Speaker 1: statistics for Major League Baseball just kicking around, uh, just 159 00:08:53,160 --> 00:08:55,920 Speaker 1: ready to whip them out at any moment. But does 160 00:08:55,960 --> 00:08:59,320 Speaker 1: he care about any of that? Right? Like, again, God's 161 00:08:59,480 --> 00:09:03,000 Speaker 1: in most to our our our tales, our myths, and 162 00:09:03,000 --> 00:09:05,960 Speaker 1: our religions. Gods are concerned with the morality of people 163 00:09:06,640 --> 00:09:09,240 Speaker 1: and or the wars of people. Yeah, God's are often 164 00:09:09,280 --> 00:09:12,079 Speaker 1: concerned that the same thing your parents are concerned with, 165 00:09:12,240 --> 00:09:15,760 Speaker 1: except if your parents knew everything. Yeah, yeah, you can. 166 00:09:15,800 --> 00:09:17,800 Speaker 1: You can rattle off about your hobby all day, but 167 00:09:17,960 --> 00:09:19,600 Speaker 1: your parents are gonna be like, all right, that's good. 168 00:09:19,640 --> 00:09:21,800 Speaker 1: Have you done your homework? Uet though, because that's what 169 00:09:21,880 --> 00:09:24,160 Speaker 1: I really want you to focus on. Quit talking about 170 00:09:24,280 --> 00:09:27,680 Speaker 1: power rangers. Here's an interesting quote from Pam wine Trop 171 00:09:27,720 --> 00:09:31,440 Speaker 1: in that article. What's curious is that with age, children 172 00:09:31,440 --> 00:09:34,319 Speaker 1: come to know that mom, dogs, and even trees will 173 00:09:34,400 --> 00:09:38,440 Speaker 1: have incorrect thoughts, but they never extend that vulnerability to God. 174 00:09:38,640 --> 00:09:41,640 Speaker 1: In fact, the quality of omniscience attributed to God appears 175 00:09:41,679 --> 00:09:45,000 Speaker 1: to extend to any disembodied entity. In a two thousand 176 00:09:45,000 --> 00:09:47,840 Speaker 1: thirteen paper in the International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 177 00:09:48,480 --> 00:09:52,760 Speaker 1: Louisville Seminary researchers found that children think imaginary friends no 178 00:09:52,880 --> 00:09:55,520 Speaker 1: more than flesh and blood humans. The appears to be 179 00:09:55,559 --> 00:09:58,120 Speaker 1: a rule, then, deep in our mental programming that tells 180 00:09:58,200 --> 00:10:02,160 Speaker 1: us minds without body no more than those with bodies. 181 00:10:02,480 --> 00:10:05,360 Speaker 1: I asked my son about this, because, as I've previously 182 00:10:05,440 --> 00:10:08,880 Speaker 1: established on the show, he has four imaginary friends to 183 00:10:09,200 --> 00:10:12,440 Speaker 1: be friends and to wasp friends that fly above his head. 184 00:10:13,000 --> 00:10:15,160 Speaker 1: And so I questioned him. I was very careful not 185 00:10:15,240 --> 00:10:18,200 Speaker 1: to to lead his his answers in any way, but 186 00:10:18,240 --> 00:10:21,079 Speaker 1: he said, the B and wasp friends don't know everything, 187 00:10:21,160 --> 00:10:24,719 Speaker 1: but they know everything that he says quote, and they 188 00:10:24,840 --> 00:10:28,920 Speaker 1: learn my CPU is a neuralnet processor, a learning computer. 189 00:10:29,400 --> 00:10:34,480 Speaker 1: Yeah that's a terminator, right, yeah, terminator bees basic basically 190 00:10:34,480 --> 00:10:36,640 Speaker 1: what's going on? So to come back to this idea 191 00:10:36,679 --> 00:10:39,240 Speaker 1: about ghosts, I mean, I wonder if we're to suddenly 192 00:10:39,280 --> 00:10:44,000 Speaker 1: make the explosive discovery that we can scientifically prove ghosts exist, 193 00:10:44,120 --> 00:10:46,160 Speaker 1: and we like catch a ghost in a bottle and 194 00:10:46,240 --> 00:10:48,160 Speaker 1: we're talking to it or something. I guess not catch 195 00:10:48,160 --> 00:10:50,200 Speaker 1: it in a bottle because it can go through the walls. 196 00:10:50,240 --> 00:10:52,240 Speaker 1: But you know, we we get in contact with a 197 00:10:52,280 --> 00:10:54,920 Speaker 1: ghost who got some labs set up where they're doing seances, 198 00:10:55,000 --> 00:10:57,040 Speaker 1: and we figure out, oh, wow, all this stuff was 199 00:10:57,120 --> 00:11:00,720 Speaker 1: real all along. Would a ghost be a odd? Would 200 00:11:00,720 --> 00:11:03,720 Speaker 1: people consider that a god? Is that how people use 201 00:11:03,840 --> 00:11:07,000 Speaker 1: the word? I generally think no, Right, Even though a 202 00:11:07,040 --> 00:11:10,679 Speaker 1: ghost might, uh we might imagine a ghost knows things 203 00:11:10,720 --> 00:11:13,520 Speaker 1: that humans couldn't know, we still wouldn't really think of 204 00:11:13,559 --> 00:11:16,240 Speaker 1: it as a God. Yeah, it seems like in most 205 00:11:17,040 --> 00:11:19,680 Speaker 1: most traditions the ghost is seen as like like a 206 00:11:19,760 --> 00:11:25,240 Speaker 1: remnant or a person whose concerns are not entirely of 207 00:11:25,360 --> 00:11:29,920 Speaker 1: the earth anymore. Now that being said, we can't disqualify 208 00:11:29,920 --> 00:11:32,240 Speaker 1: it from godhood godhood just because it used to be 209 00:11:32,280 --> 00:11:34,600 Speaker 1: a human, because, of course, we have a whole tradition 210 00:11:34,679 --> 00:11:38,280 Speaker 1: of of of god kings and whatnot where a human 211 00:11:38,520 --> 00:11:42,000 Speaker 1: is a God or human is at least partially God 212 00:11:42,000 --> 00:11:45,200 Speaker 1: because of its divine parentage. Yeah, and there's all the 213 00:11:45,320 --> 00:11:48,880 Speaker 1: apotheosis literature too. Rightly, So, a human being like a 214 00:11:49,040 --> 00:11:51,520 Speaker 1: sins and becomes a God, I think doesn't happen to 215 00:11:51,679 --> 00:11:54,360 Speaker 1: Enoch I believe so, yes, yeah, And of course this 216 00:11:54,559 --> 00:11:56,280 Speaker 1: is just one of many takes on God's I mean, 217 00:11:56,280 --> 00:11:59,640 Speaker 1: you have God, God, the ruler, God of the cosmos, 218 00:11:59,679 --> 00:12:03,440 Speaker 1: God of you know, terrestrial nature. God is a primal mover, 219 00:12:03,600 --> 00:12:07,720 Speaker 1: a moral compass, a torment or, a teacher, a technology bringer, 220 00:12:07,920 --> 00:12:12,240 Speaker 1: a destroyer, a redeemer, a minor mover. Because remember, you have, 221 00:12:12,880 --> 00:12:16,200 Speaker 1: for pri instance, in Chinese traditions, you have a kitchen God, 222 00:12:16,480 --> 00:12:20,120 Speaker 1: a god whose domain is largely just that of food, 223 00:12:20,120 --> 00:12:24,360 Speaker 1: preparation and household concerns, and yet it's an important deity 224 00:12:24,440 --> 00:12:26,440 Speaker 1: even if it's not going to really help you, say, 225 00:12:26,440 --> 00:12:28,880 Speaker 1: in the coming wars or whatnot. So in that vision, 226 00:12:28,960 --> 00:12:30,720 Speaker 1: is the creation of humans sort of like a little 227 00:12:30,720 --> 00:12:33,920 Speaker 1: bit of salmonilla contamination. I think it would just it 228 00:12:33,960 --> 00:12:36,640 Speaker 1: would be outside of its Uh. If you it's like 229 00:12:36,679 --> 00:12:39,880 Speaker 1: asking Sirie a question that it it cannot answer. Kitchen 230 00:12:39,880 --> 00:12:42,440 Speaker 1: God would say, I'm sorry, I don't know that, but 231 00:12:43,360 --> 00:12:46,520 Speaker 1: let me tell you about what what spices to use 232 00:12:46,559 --> 00:12:48,880 Speaker 1: on this particular pork dish. Now, one thing I was 233 00:12:48,920 --> 00:12:52,520 Speaker 1: wondering about is if you might best understand the nature 234 00:12:52,520 --> 00:12:55,240 Speaker 1: of God and our our uses for God by looking 235 00:12:55,280 --> 00:12:59,559 Speaker 1: at the the sort of famous categories of literary conflict. 236 00:13:00,240 --> 00:13:02,480 Speaker 1: You know, just to refresh, you have man versus man, 237 00:13:02,920 --> 00:13:07,560 Speaker 1: man versus nature, man versus society, man versus self, man 238 00:13:07,679 --> 00:13:11,640 Speaker 1: versus technology, and really, if you think about it, at 239 00:13:11,679 --> 00:13:15,400 Speaker 1: some point or another, God embodies each of these, right, 240 00:13:15,960 --> 00:13:18,280 Speaker 1: because in man versus man, you've got divine kings, man 241 00:13:18,400 --> 00:13:22,000 Speaker 1: versus nature, you've got net nature deities and all levels 242 00:13:22,040 --> 00:13:25,560 Speaker 1: of cosmic deities. Man versus society, you have God as 243 00:13:25,600 --> 00:13:29,280 Speaker 1: a cultural leader or a lawmaker man versus self, you 244 00:13:29,320 --> 00:13:33,280 Speaker 1: have God as this inner tormentor tempter, inner moral compass, 245 00:13:33,400 --> 00:13:38,439 Speaker 1: or bicameral voice. You have, of course man versus technology. Well, 246 00:13:38,600 --> 00:13:42,120 Speaker 1: God or gods are often serving to bring technology to us, 247 00:13:42,160 --> 00:13:46,280 Speaker 1: such as with the Prometheus the fire driller of Chinese myth, 248 00:13:46,720 --> 00:13:49,040 Speaker 1: as well as the myth of You and the Great Flood. 249 00:13:49,520 --> 00:13:52,680 Speaker 1: Even language, right, I mean the word yeah. And the 250 00:13:52,760 --> 00:13:55,720 Speaker 1: link between religion and technology I think is well. So 251 00:13:55,760 --> 00:13:58,199 Speaker 1: this is definitely one we've explored before. You might want 252 00:13:58,200 --> 00:14:00,720 Speaker 1: to go back and check out our pre vious episodes 253 00:14:00,880 --> 00:14:04,040 Speaker 1: called Techno Religion for the Masses, where we explore the 254 00:14:04,080 --> 00:14:07,319 Speaker 1: relationship between religion and technology and uh in the past 255 00:14:07,320 --> 00:14:10,560 Speaker 1: when we talked about the trans humanist rapture, will we'll 256 00:14:10,559 --> 00:14:14,160 Speaker 1: be touching on some of those same themes today. But yeah, 257 00:14:14,240 --> 00:14:16,600 Speaker 1: it's true that there does appear to be this strong 258 00:14:16,679 --> 00:14:20,240 Speaker 1: link between technology and religion. And it's not just that 259 00:14:20,280 --> 00:14:24,680 Speaker 1: there are myths where say, Prometheus brings us fire. There 260 00:14:24,680 --> 00:14:29,280 Speaker 1: are ways in which apparently technology itself shapes what types 261 00:14:29,320 --> 00:14:31,880 Speaker 1: of religions we come up with and what types of 262 00:14:31,880 --> 00:14:34,640 Speaker 1: religions survive. I want to mention some of the thinking 263 00:14:34,720 --> 00:14:38,920 Speaker 1: of the the Israeli historian you've all Noah Harari. This 264 00:14:39,000 --> 00:14:41,840 Speaker 1: is an article called Salvation by Algorithm, published in The 265 00:14:41,880 --> 00:14:46,280 Speaker 1: New Statesman on September nine, and so Harari writes in 266 00:14:46,280 --> 00:14:50,480 Speaker 1: this article quote, technology often defines the scope and limits 267 00:14:50,560 --> 00:14:54,040 Speaker 1: of our religious vision, like a waiter who demarcates our 268 00:14:54,080 --> 00:14:57,880 Speaker 1: appetites by handing us a menu. For instance, in ancient 269 00:14:57,920 --> 00:15:02,680 Speaker 1: agricultural societies, many religion had surprisingly little interest in metaphysical 270 00:15:02,760 --> 00:15:06,400 Speaker 1: questions in the afterlife. Instead, they focused on the very 271 00:15:06,480 --> 00:15:11,760 Speaker 1: mundane task of increasing agricultural output. The Old Testament, God 272 00:15:11,840 --> 00:15:16,200 Speaker 1: never promises any rewards or punishments after death. Rather, he 273 00:15:16,240 --> 00:15:18,560 Speaker 1: tells the people of Israel, and this is an abridged 274 00:15:18,640 --> 00:15:23,240 Speaker 1: quotation from Deuteronomy through seventeen quote and if you will 275 00:15:23,280 --> 00:15:26,840 Speaker 1: diligently obey my commandments that I am commanding you, I 276 00:15:26,880 --> 00:15:30,200 Speaker 1: will also give rain for your land at its appointed time, 277 00:15:30,640 --> 00:15:33,160 Speaker 1: and you will gather your grain and your new wine 278 00:15:33,160 --> 00:15:36,200 Speaker 1: and your oil, and I will provide vegetation in your 279 00:15:36,240 --> 00:15:39,800 Speaker 1: fields for your livestock, and you will eat and be satisfied. 280 00:15:40,280 --> 00:15:42,760 Speaker 1: Be careful not to let your heart be enticed to 281 00:15:42,760 --> 00:15:46,280 Speaker 1: go astray and worship other gods, and bow down to them. 282 00:15:46,280 --> 00:15:50,080 Speaker 1: Otherwise Jehovah's anger will blaze against you, and he will 283 00:15:50,080 --> 00:15:52,480 Speaker 1: shut up the heavens so that it will not rain, 284 00:15:52,880 --> 00:15:55,600 Speaker 1: and the ground will not give its produce, and you 285 00:15:55,680 --> 00:15:58,720 Speaker 1: will quickly perish from the good land that Jehovah is 286 00:15:58,760 --> 00:16:03,200 Speaker 1: giving you. Yeah, I mean, that's sort of our attitude today, 287 00:16:03,280 --> 00:16:05,400 Speaker 1: right when you read something like that, And and that's 288 00:16:05,440 --> 00:16:08,760 Speaker 1: sort of Harare's point. He says that because of technological advances, 289 00:16:08,840 --> 00:16:11,920 Speaker 1: this type of theology is no longer relevant to lots 290 00:16:11,920 --> 00:16:16,920 Speaker 1: of people. Science can provide things like pesticides, fertilizers, water 291 00:16:17,000 --> 00:16:21,160 Speaker 1: distribution infrastructure, genetically modified crops. He even points out that 292 00:16:21,280 --> 00:16:26,120 Speaker 1: Israel itself now has its own desalination facilities that can 293 00:16:26,200 --> 00:16:28,400 Speaker 1: take the sea water, take the salt out of it 294 00:16:28,440 --> 00:16:31,880 Speaker 1: through osmosis, and then supply people with fresh water even 295 00:16:31,920 --> 00:16:35,160 Speaker 1: when there is no rain from above. So he's saying 296 00:16:35,240 --> 00:16:38,120 Speaker 1: science can offer much more than could be expected even 297 00:16:38,160 --> 00:16:40,320 Speaker 1: with the help of God at the time the Hebrew 298 00:16:40,360 --> 00:16:43,720 Speaker 1: Bible is set. And for this reason, Harare says, quote, 299 00:16:43,880 --> 00:16:47,240 Speaker 1: present day Judaism has almost lost interest in rain and 300 00:16:47,280 --> 00:16:51,080 Speaker 1: agricultural output and has become a very different religion from 301 00:16:51,120 --> 00:16:54,560 Speaker 1: its biblical progenitor. He says that the religions that survive 302 00:16:54,640 --> 00:16:57,120 Speaker 1: and spread best are those that are able to best 303 00:16:57,240 --> 00:17:01,480 Speaker 1: adapt themselves to new technologies and econ comics systems. And 304 00:17:01,520 --> 00:17:06,040 Speaker 1: among those things he he considers religions are also things 305 00:17:06,040 --> 00:17:09,560 Speaker 1: that don't necessarily have gods or supernatural forces in them, 306 00:17:09,640 --> 00:17:13,280 Speaker 1: and he would include, for example, Marxism and Leninism, or 307 00:17:13,320 --> 00:17:16,920 Speaker 1: even Buddhism and Marxism. Leninism is a really good example 308 00:17:16,920 --> 00:17:20,159 Speaker 1: because he argues this was a techno religion basically for 309 00:17:20,320 --> 00:17:24,359 Speaker 1: the steam powered revolutions of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. 310 00:17:24,880 --> 00:17:28,560 Speaker 1: Quote Lennon was once asked to define communism in a 311 00:17:28,640 --> 00:17:33,760 Speaker 1: single sentence, communism. He answered, communism is power to the 312 00:17:33,760 --> 00:17:37,919 Speaker 1: workers councils plus electrification of the whole country. And so 313 00:17:37,960 --> 00:17:42,320 Speaker 1: Harari says, there can be no communism without electricity, without railroads, 314 00:17:42,400 --> 00:17:45,560 Speaker 1: without radio. Now, one funny thing I've read is that 315 00:17:45,880 --> 00:17:48,719 Speaker 1: in the Soviet Union there were commonly jokes about this 316 00:17:48,800 --> 00:17:51,040 Speaker 1: statement of Lenin's like where they would try to like 317 00:17:51,080 --> 00:17:54,520 Speaker 1: follow the logic of that arithmetic, so they would say, like, therefore, 318 00:17:54,600 --> 00:17:58,920 Speaker 1: communism minus electrification of the whole country equals the workers 319 00:17:58,960 --> 00:18:04,080 Speaker 1: councils kind of dry so ah Soviet humor. But this 320 00:18:04,160 --> 00:18:06,600 Speaker 1: leads Harari to a kind of startling conclusion if he's 321 00:18:06,600 --> 00:18:09,119 Speaker 1: saying that in a lot of ways, technology drives our 322 00:18:09,160 --> 00:18:13,320 Speaker 1: adoption of religion and ideology. Quote. Just as socialism took 323 00:18:13,359 --> 00:18:16,159 Speaker 1: over the world by promising salvation through steam, so in 324 00:18:16,200 --> 00:18:19,040 Speaker 1: the coming decades, new techno religions are likely to take 325 00:18:19,080 --> 00:18:23,240 Speaker 1: over the world by promising salvation through algorithms and genes. 326 00:18:23,840 --> 00:18:27,159 Speaker 1: So he's really saying in the twenty one century, ideological 327 00:18:27,240 --> 00:18:29,960 Speaker 1: leaders are going to come not so much from traditional 328 00:18:30,040 --> 00:18:33,520 Speaker 1: religions but from the tech sector. Who I like the 329 00:18:33,520 --> 00:18:36,040 Speaker 1: way he was putting it better. It's a little more 330 00:18:36,960 --> 00:18:40,400 Speaker 1: optimistically science sci fi. I don't know if he's necessarily 331 00:18:40,400 --> 00:18:43,400 Speaker 1: being optimistic about this. He's just sort of saying what 332 00:18:43,480 --> 00:18:46,159 Speaker 1: he thinks is true, not necessarily saying it's a good thing. No, 333 00:18:46,280 --> 00:18:49,119 Speaker 1: but it sounds better than Silicon Valley is working on 334 00:18:49,160 --> 00:18:51,600 Speaker 1: your salvation. I mean, would you read the Ulah for 335 00:18:51,640 --> 00:18:55,520 Speaker 1: that salvation? Probably? Probably not. It's so darn long nobody 336 00:18:55,560 --> 00:18:57,400 Speaker 1: would get to the end. Yeah, of course, Then again, 337 00:18:57,440 --> 00:18:58,959 Speaker 1: I guess a lot of people don't really read their 338 00:18:59,000 --> 00:19:01,040 Speaker 1: holy books either. No, I mean, if you tried to 339 00:19:01,080 --> 00:19:04,280 Speaker 1: breathe the entire Old Testament, it's it's a sage sometimes, 340 00:19:04,320 --> 00:19:08,120 Speaker 1: but it's also quite beautiful sometimes. I've never writends, unlike 341 00:19:08,200 --> 00:19:13,320 Speaker 1: the the user agreements for an iPhone. There are sections 342 00:19:13,359 --> 00:19:16,040 Speaker 1: of it that are beautiful and then their sections of 343 00:19:16,040 --> 00:19:17,880 Speaker 1: it that are dull. It's true. And in the user 344 00:19:17,920 --> 00:19:21,040 Speaker 1: license agreement never has a book of job like, no 345 00:19:21,160 --> 00:19:23,880 Speaker 1: poetry at all. There's no poetic peak. It's just all 346 00:19:24,000 --> 00:19:27,280 Speaker 1: valley um. Now. I love a lot of what what 347 00:19:27,359 --> 00:19:29,639 Speaker 1: he had to say, though, particularly about, you know, about 348 00:19:30,080 --> 00:19:33,840 Speaker 1: just technologies effect on religion. And he touched on agriculture 349 00:19:33,920 --> 00:19:36,960 Speaker 1: because you have to remember that just agriculture itself was 350 00:19:36,960 --> 00:19:41,560 Speaker 1: a technological advancement. Before agriculture, we just were hunters and gatherers, 351 00:19:41,600 --> 00:19:43,439 Speaker 1: and that's where we have a lot of the older 352 00:19:43,480 --> 00:19:46,920 Speaker 1: ideas of horned gods, of the hunt and chaos. Those 353 00:19:46,960 --> 00:19:50,479 Speaker 1: were the forces we had to pray to and and 354 00:19:50,520 --> 00:19:52,960 Speaker 1: seek to appease and in order to find that in 355 00:19:53,040 --> 00:19:55,720 Speaker 1: the next kill that was going to sustain our people. 356 00:19:56,080 --> 00:20:00,320 Speaker 1: But then agriculture brings in more cyclical deities and and yeah, 357 00:20:00,359 --> 00:20:04,680 Speaker 1: every every technological change has a way of either decreasing 358 00:20:04,680 --> 00:20:07,880 Speaker 1: the power of a god, forcing you to recalibrate the god. 359 00:20:08,000 --> 00:20:09,880 Speaker 1: We saw a great example of that when we talked 360 00:20:09,880 --> 00:20:15,560 Speaker 1: about eclipse mythologies. We talked about Hindu eclipse deities or 361 00:20:16,320 --> 00:20:21,760 Speaker 1: or demigods, where basically their status changed in order to 362 00:20:21,880 --> 00:20:26,560 Speaker 1: keep up with astrological discoveries of the time. Another thing 363 00:20:26,800 --> 00:20:28,959 Speaker 1: you might want to say is that I wonder if 364 00:20:29,000 --> 00:20:33,000 Speaker 1: you could track the relationship between, uh, the the level 365 00:20:33,040 --> 00:20:35,879 Speaker 1: of embodiment of a god and the level to which 366 00:20:35,920 --> 00:20:40,040 Speaker 1: people are working directly with the goods that they need 367 00:20:40,080 --> 00:20:43,480 Speaker 1: to consume to survive. So like people working in hunting 368 00:20:43,560 --> 00:20:46,480 Speaker 1: or farming, or like you know, pulling food and stuff 369 00:20:46,520 --> 00:20:48,640 Speaker 1: out of the ground and have these very like physical 370 00:20:48,760 --> 00:20:52,000 Speaker 1: embodied ideas of God's Whereas once you've got all these 371 00:20:52,040 --> 00:20:55,199 Speaker 1: modern economies where people are dealing with like currency and 372 00:20:55,320 --> 00:20:59,480 Speaker 1: ideas of wealth, uh, you've also got these more abstract 373 00:20:59,560 --> 00:21:02,480 Speaker 1: ideas of what God is. God is a disembodied thing 374 00:21:02,560 --> 00:21:05,480 Speaker 1: that lives apart. Yeah, And of course I'd also be 375 00:21:05,520 --> 00:21:07,640 Speaker 1: remiss if I didn't mention some of the new religious 376 00:21:07,680 --> 00:21:10,880 Speaker 1: movements that came out in the nineteenth and early twentieth 377 00:21:10,920 --> 00:21:15,200 Speaker 1: centuries where you were essentially creating new religions or new 378 00:21:15,200 --> 00:21:17,639 Speaker 1: strains of religion that were more in keeping with the 379 00:21:17,680 --> 00:21:20,400 Speaker 1: needs of modern humans, but also some of the knowledge 380 00:21:20,400 --> 00:21:23,280 Speaker 1: of modern humans. We've touched on the sort of space 381 00:21:23,359 --> 00:21:27,520 Speaker 1: ready nature of the Church of Latter day Saints, for instance. 382 00:21:27,560 --> 00:21:31,399 Speaker 1: Oh yeah, so they've got a space exploration theology to 383 00:21:31,440 --> 00:21:36,640 Speaker 1: a certain extent, like it it was. It's the idea 384 00:21:36,760 --> 00:21:40,240 Speaker 1: of alien worlds with with the with alien species is 385 00:21:40,280 --> 00:21:44,680 Speaker 1: more baked into the faith than you find in a 386 00:21:44,800 --> 00:21:48,879 Speaker 1: much more ancient uh uh set of rules and obligations 387 00:21:48,880 --> 00:21:51,679 Speaker 1: that is only concerned with not not even like a 388 00:21:51,760 --> 00:21:55,119 Speaker 1: terrestrial model, but a just a portion of the Earth, 389 00:21:55,400 --> 00:21:57,919 Speaker 1: a people, a race, as opposed to a planet. All Right, 390 00:21:57,960 --> 00:21:59,720 Speaker 1: we're gonna take a quick break and when we come 391 00:21:59,720 --> 00:22:03,199 Speaker 1: back we will discuss creating a god in a box. 392 00:22:06,000 --> 00:22:10,040 Speaker 1: We're back. So the idea of a super intelligent AI 393 00:22:10,080 --> 00:22:13,199 Speaker 1: this is something that that has its roots in science 394 00:22:13,240 --> 00:22:15,360 Speaker 1: fiction for starters, I mean, some of the more impressive 395 00:22:15,359 --> 00:22:19,600 Speaker 1: examples that come to mind include Dan Simon's Hyperion books, 396 00:22:20,320 --> 00:22:24,399 Speaker 1: The Minds of the of Ian Banks Inan Banks culture series, Uh, 397 00:22:24,480 --> 00:22:28,560 Speaker 1: the films like Colossus, the Forbin Project. Uh. There's also 398 00:22:28,800 --> 00:22:32,960 Speaker 1: another literary example, or some Scott Cards Homecoming saga. You 399 00:22:32,960 --> 00:22:35,600 Speaker 1: could even throw in John Carpenter's Dark Star to a 400 00:22:35,600 --> 00:22:38,359 Speaker 1: certain extent, because at the end it is, uh, it 401 00:22:38,480 --> 00:22:41,840 Speaker 1: is essentially entering into a godlike complex. You definitely have 402 00:22:42,080 --> 00:22:46,360 Speaker 1: a sort of techno religion created in Fritz Long's metropolis. Right. Oh, yeah, 403 00:22:46,440 --> 00:22:49,119 Speaker 1: you have the well there's there's the false Maria that 404 00:22:49,160 --> 00:22:52,960 Speaker 1: shows up, but then also the large demonic machine entity. 405 00:22:53,200 --> 00:22:57,680 Speaker 1: Uh what mammon, I believe it is? Yeah? Yeah, yeah, 406 00:22:57,960 --> 00:23:01,120 Speaker 1: it's like eating the workers. Yes, so we've been we've 407 00:23:01,119 --> 00:23:03,240 Speaker 1: been wrestling with this for a while, and often is 408 00:23:03,400 --> 00:23:05,360 Speaker 1: often the case, we end up wrestling with these ideas 409 00:23:05,359 --> 00:23:10,160 Speaker 1: and science fiction before Uh, many in the pure sciences 410 00:23:10,200 --> 00:23:12,440 Speaker 1: are engaging with the idea. So here, I guess we 411 00:23:12,520 --> 00:23:15,560 Speaker 1: gotta get to the core story that made us want 412 00:23:15,560 --> 00:23:18,080 Speaker 1: to do this episode today, which I want to give 413 00:23:18,080 --> 00:23:21,160 Speaker 1: a hat tip to the host of Tech Stuff, Jonathan Strickland, 414 00:23:21,160 --> 00:23:25,280 Speaker 1: who sent this our way about this guy. There was 415 00:23:25,320 --> 00:23:30,480 Speaker 1: a guy named Anthony Lewandowski who is an American engineer 416 00:23:30,720 --> 00:23:34,120 Speaker 1: and tech executive. He formally worked for Google and Uber. 417 00:23:34,320 --> 00:23:36,680 Speaker 1: He's best known for his work on self driving cars 418 00:23:36,720 --> 00:23:40,200 Speaker 1: and designing like light our boxes the laser LASAR, the 419 00:23:40,280 --> 00:23:44,520 Speaker 1: laser guiding systems that help a self driving car navigate 420 00:23:44,560 --> 00:23:47,600 Speaker 1: through the world. And in twos sixteen he co founded 421 00:23:47,640 --> 00:23:50,359 Speaker 1: a company called Auto which is a self driving vehicle 422 00:23:50,400 --> 00:23:53,119 Speaker 1: company that was mainly focused on building these kits for 423 00:23:53,160 --> 00:23:57,520 Speaker 1: autonomous trucking and cargo transport. Recently, he's been a major 424 00:23:57,560 --> 00:24:01,480 Speaker 1: figure in a lawsuit between Uber, which he recently worked for, 425 00:24:01,520 --> 00:24:04,919 Speaker 1: and Google self driving car subsidiary way Moo, which he 426 00:24:04,960 --> 00:24:08,080 Speaker 1: worked for before that. And that was a big intellectual 427 00:24:08,080 --> 00:24:10,240 Speaker 1: property dispute. But we don't need to spend too much 428 00:24:10,280 --> 00:24:12,840 Speaker 1: time on this guy's career in the tech sector, because 429 00:24:12,840 --> 00:24:18,200 Speaker 1: what's really interesting is what he did in September. In September, 430 00:24:19,280 --> 00:24:23,480 Speaker 1: Lewandowski filed paperwork with the state of California to register 431 00:24:23,640 --> 00:24:28,439 Speaker 1: a new tax exempt nonprofit religious corporation. In other words, 432 00:24:28,560 --> 00:24:32,359 Speaker 1: he founded a church. And this church is called The 433 00:24:32,400 --> 00:24:34,879 Speaker 1: Way of the Future. Well, you know, the Way of 434 00:24:34,920 --> 00:24:38,840 Speaker 1: the Future. I mean, it's basically what many religions offer 435 00:24:38,960 --> 00:24:42,119 Speaker 1: and and and promise. Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah, I mean 436 00:24:42,160 --> 00:24:44,080 Speaker 1: this sounds positive, right. You want you want to have 437 00:24:44,080 --> 00:24:47,360 Speaker 1: a forward looking religion, not a backward looking religion. Maybe 438 00:24:47,640 --> 00:24:51,760 Speaker 1: something that can adapt itself to the changing technological climate. Okay, 439 00:24:51,920 --> 00:24:53,600 Speaker 1: be open to that. So what are the tenants of 440 00:24:53,640 --> 00:24:59,160 Speaker 1: this religion? Well, in September, the tech journalist Mark Harris 441 00:24:59,160 --> 00:25:03,600 Speaker 1: reported for wireds back Channel that these state filings revealed 442 00:25:03,640 --> 00:25:06,800 Speaker 1: that the purpose of the church was to quote develop 443 00:25:06,880 --> 00:25:12,760 Speaker 1: and promote the realization of a godhead based on artificial intelligence, 444 00:25:13,320 --> 00:25:17,320 Speaker 1: and quote, through the understanding and worship of the Godhead, 445 00:25:17,359 --> 00:25:21,560 Speaker 1: to contribute to the betterment of society. Okay, yeah, all right, 446 00:25:21,560 --> 00:25:27,520 Speaker 1: now we're definitely into quirky California born tech religion territory 447 00:25:27,520 --> 00:25:30,800 Speaker 1: at this point. Now, I have heard lots of people 448 00:25:31,000 --> 00:25:37,119 Speaker 1: accuse Silicon valleys reigning ideologies of being religious in nature. 449 00:25:37,480 --> 00:25:39,800 Speaker 1: This is a common attack people who hate the tech 450 00:25:39,840 --> 00:25:43,919 Speaker 1: industry culture, people who derived their kind of like boundless 451 00:25:43,960 --> 00:25:48,000 Speaker 1: optimism about what you know about having Uber for cats 452 00:25:48,119 --> 00:25:51,240 Speaker 1: or whatever. Any anytime you you run into one of 453 00:25:51,280 --> 00:25:55,639 Speaker 1: these people who's got this like just seemingly totally deep 454 00:25:55,920 --> 00:26:00,800 Speaker 1: naive enthusiasm for what apps can do for us, people 455 00:26:00,840 --> 00:26:06,160 Speaker 1: call that religious yet cult of Apple kind of criticism. 456 00:26:06,200 --> 00:26:10,399 Speaker 1: But this is more literal, right, Like, this guy is 457 00:26:10,440 --> 00:26:15,439 Speaker 1: actually saying I want to create a technological religion and 458 00:26:15,600 --> 00:26:19,000 Speaker 1: part of the creation of this technological religion is creating 459 00:26:19,040 --> 00:26:22,000 Speaker 1: a God itself to worship. Yeah, because when you when 460 00:26:22,040 --> 00:26:24,600 Speaker 1: you first read about this, you might it's easy to think, 461 00:26:24,600 --> 00:26:27,200 Speaker 1: all right, this is this is a board rich tech guy, 462 00:26:27,440 --> 00:26:29,359 Speaker 1: and he's just he's just having a laugh, you know. 463 00:26:29,440 --> 00:26:32,679 Speaker 1: He's in the same way that people sign up for 464 00:26:32,840 --> 00:26:36,639 Speaker 1: various like on paper religions just so they can technically 465 00:26:36,760 --> 00:26:39,760 Speaker 1: perform marriage ceremonies and whatnot. Maybe he just wants to 466 00:26:39,760 --> 00:26:43,159 Speaker 1: become an ordained minister online. Yeah, yeah, maybe he just 467 00:26:43,160 --> 00:26:45,560 Speaker 1: wants to create a novelty website where you sign up 468 00:26:45,560 --> 00:26:47,040 Speaker 1: and you're like, hey, I remember the Way of the 469 00:26:47,080 --> 00:26:50,000 Speaker 1: Future Aiyes, are great, look at my bumper sticker. But 470 00:26:50,520 --> 00:26:52,800 Speaker 1: the thing is when you when you dig deeper, No, 471 00:26:53,080 --> 00:26:55,760 Speaker 1: he seems to be serious, and there are people who 472 00:26:55,960 --> 00:26:57,960 Speaker 1: do seem to be taking it as a joke, like 473 00:26:58,880 --> 00:27:02,280 Speaker 1: one of this this sky Mark Harris interviewed uh some 474 00:27:02,320 --> 00:27:05,040 Speaker 1: of the other people who were friends of Lewandowski's who 475 00:27:05,080 --> 00:27:07,919 Speaker 1: have been named as officers of the church, and at 476 00:27:07,960 --> 00:27:10,399 Speaker 1: least one of them responded like, oh, I thought this 477 00:27:10,520 --> 00:27:14,120 Speaker 1: was sort of more of a joke. But based on 478 00:27:14,160 --> 00:27:17,520 Speaker 1: all accounts and based on this large interview published and 479 00:27:17,560 --> 00:27:20,040 Speaker 1: Wired in a different article just in November of this year. 480 00:27:20,040 --> 00:27:25,240 Speaker 1: In Lewandowski, to me, seems entirely serious. Now, not to 481 00:27:25,240 --> 00:27:27,639 Speaker 1: say you can't be just really serious about like a 482 00:27:27,720 --> 00:27:30,560 Speaker 1: long form joke. It could be like an Andy Kaufman 483 00:27:30,680 --> 00:27:33,920 Speaker 1: esque kind of enterprise as well. I imagine it certainly could. 484 00:27:33,920 --> 00:27:36,480 Speaker 1: But it also seems in keeping with the trajectory of 485 00:27:36,520 --> 00:27:38,840 Speaker 1: his career and what people report about this guy. You know, 486 00:27:38,920 --> 00:27:41,119 Speaker 1: friends of his and former co workers say that he 487 00:27:41,200 --> 00:27:45,600 Speaker 1: does have this kind of like infectious, powerful enthusiasm for 488 00:27:45,760 --> 00:27:48,600 Speaker 1: robots and AI. Like there's a story that when he 489 00:27:48,920 --> 00:27:51,800 Speaker 1: got hired at Uber, he became an executive at Uber, 490 00:27:52,040 --> 00:27:55,439 Speaker 1: he demanded that he get the email address robot at 491 00:27:55,560 --> 00:27:59,160 Speaker 1: uber dot com. But let's get into this religion. So 492 00:28:00,160 --> 00:28:02,760 Speaker 1: following up on this Wired article that interviewed him to 493 00:28:02,800 --> 00:28:04,840 Speaker 1: try to find out, you know, was he really serious 494 00:28:04,880 --> 00:28:08,320 Speaker 1: and what does this religion entail? So, Lewandowski believes that 495 00:28:08,480 --> 00:28:12,359 Speaker 1: artificial intelligence will someday surpass human intelligence, and at this 496 00:28:12,440 --> 00:28:16,679 Speaker 1: point the AI will in some meaningful way become God. 497 00:28:18,000 --> 00:28:20,560 Speaker 1: This is basically in line with the general general idea 498 00:28:20,560 --> 00:28:23,520 Speaker 1: of the singularity. Yeah, yeah, so I'll get into that 499 00:28:23,560 --> 00:28:25,959 Speaker 1: in a second. But how soon does he think this 500 00:28:26,040 --> 00:28:28,760 Speaker 1: is going to happen? He says, not this week, not 501 00:28:28,920 --> 00:28:31,919 Speaker 1: this year, but quote before we go to Mars. So 502 00:28:32,000 --> 00:28:33,960 Speaker 1: I checked right now. It looks like that would put 503 00:28:34,040 --> 00:28:36,840 Speaker 1: us in the most optimistic Mars timeline sometime in the 504 00:28:36,880 --> 00:28:40,640 Speaker 1: twenty thirties. So apart from the explicit use of the 505 00:28:40,680 --> 00:28:43,560 Speaker 1: word god, as you said, this idea about AI surpassing 506 00:28:43,640 --> 00:28:47,640 Speaker 1: human intelligence is an extremely common belief, especially among tech 507 00:28:47,680 --> 00:28:51,120 Speaker 1: industry people, and the general concept goes under names like 508 00:28:51,240 --> 00:28:56,760 Speaker 1: the super intelligence, or intelligence explosion, or the singularity. And 509 00:28:57,200 --> 00:28:59,400 Speaker 1: to be clear, I think all of these concepts sort 510 00:28:59,400 --> 00:29:02,360 Speaker 1: of had more to stinct meanings originally that can be 511 00:29:02,400 --> 00:29:05,680 Speaker 1: traced back to their original authors, but that they've sort 512 00:29:05,720 --> 00:29:10,160 Speaker 1: of been combined into this one super concept that at 513 00:29:10,200 --> 00:29:14,360 Speaker 1: some point in the future, some form of technological intelligence, 514 00:29:14,400 --> 00:29:18,160 Speaker 1: whether that's software running on a classical computer or some 515 00:29:18,280 --> 00:29:21,720 Speaker 1: kind of neurotech upgrade of the human brain, some kind 516 00:29:21,760 --> 00:29:27,040 Speaker 1: of technological intelligence will surpass the furthest reaches of biological 517 00:29:27,120 --> 00:29:32,200 Speaker 1: human intelligence. And once this happens, proponents tend to imagine 518 00:29:32,240 --> 00:29:35,840 Speaker 1: just to kind of runaway intelligence effect. After all, the 519 00:29:35,960 --> 00:29:39,480 Speaker 1: smartest humans have just proven that they can design AI 520 00:29:39,640 --> 00:29:43,360 Speaker 1: that's smarter than them. So what prevents this new intelligence 521 00:29:43,400 --> 00:29:47,600 Speaker 1: from immediately turning around and designing and even smarter AI? 522 00:29:47,800 --> 00:29:50,640 Speaker 1: And so the thinking goes. What prevents a sudden sort 523 00:29:50,680 --> 00:29:55,360 Speaker 1: of bootstrapping acceleration of intelligence that will almost immediately go 524 00:29:55,480 --> 00:29:58,880 Speaker 1: beyond our power to predict or even to comprehend. Yeah, 525 00:29:58,920 --> 00:30:00,960 Speaker 1: this was a predicted at least as early as the 526 00:30:01,000 --> 00:30:04,880 Speaker 1: nineteen sixties by British mathematician and cryptologist Irving John Good, 527 00:30:05,360 --> 00:30:08,680 Speaker 1: though he himself mentioned science fiction is having explored the 528 00:30:08,680 --> 00:30:12,800 Speaker 1: concept previously. I'll read a quick quote. Let an ultra 529 00:30:12,880 --> 00:30:15,880 Speaker 1: intelligent machine be defined as a machine that can far 530 00:30:15,920 --> 00:30:20,400 Speaker 1: surpass all intellectual activities of any man, however clever. Since 531 00:30:20,440 --> 00:30:23,200 Speaker 1: the design of machines is one of these intellectual activities, 532 00:30:23,480 --> 00:30:27,120 Speaker 1: an ultra intelligent machine could design even better machines. There 533 00:30:27,120 --> 00:30:31,320 Speaker 1: would then unquestionably be an intelligence explosion, and the intelligence 534 00:30:31,320 --> 00:30:35,320 Speaker 1: of man will be left far behind. Thus, the first 535 00:30:35,880 --> 00:30:39,240 Speaker 1: ultra intelligent machine is the last invention that man need 536 00:30:39,320 --> 00:30:42,320 Speaker 1: ever make, provided that the machine is docile enough to 537 00:30:42,360 --> 00:30:45,920 Speaker 1: tell us how to keep it under control. It is 538 00:30:45,960 --> 00:30:48,800 Speaker 1: curious that this point is made so seldom outside of 539 00:30:48,840 --> 00:30:53,680 Speaker 1: science fiction. It is sometimes worthwhile to take science fiction seriously. Now, 540 00:30:54,040 --> 00:30:57,280 Speaker 1: that's sort of another way of saying that intelligence is 541 00:30:57,360 --> 00:31:00,800 Speaker 1: sort of like the ultimate driving energy for power in 542 00:31:00,840 --> 00:31:04,920 Speaker 1: the universe, right, that intelligence is itself the thing that 543 00:31:05,080 --> 00:31:09,320 Speaker 1: gives birth to power in pretty much any scenario. Well, 544 00:31:09,400 --> 00:31:12,200 Speaker 1: it's certainly that that's the human experience. That is how 545 00:31:12,400 --> 00:31:15,600 Speaker 1: humans have come to dominate the world because they had 546 00:31:15,680 --> 00:31:18,120 Speaker 1: had not the horns or the claws of the teeth, 547 00:31:18,160 --> 00:31:22,160 Speaker 1: but the intelligence uh to outsmart every other creature on 548 00:31:22,200 --> 00:31:25,120 Speaker 1: the earth. Now, this idea of the singularity and the 549 00:31:25,160 --> 00:31:28,440 Speaker 1: intelligence explosion is not without critics. In fact, it has 550 00:31:28,520 --> 00:31:31,920 Speaker 1: tons of critics, and they're actually is there there's more 551 00:31:31,960 --> 00:31:34,640 Speaker 1: than one kind of critic. Uh So for the rest 552 00:31:34,640 --> 00:31:36,520 Speaker 1: of the conversation, I think it might help to sort 553 00:31:36,520 --> 00:31:39,200 Speaker 1: of break down the camps and give them, give them 554 00:31:39,240 --> 00:31:41,760 Speaker 1: some names. First of all, I'd say, you've got the 555 00:31:41,800 --> 00:31:45,680 Speaker 1: skeptics who are just not convinced super intelligence is possible 556 00:31:45,920 --> 00:31:49,760 Speaker 1: or that it's arriving anytime remotely soon. Then I would 557 00:31:49,800 --> 00:31:52,480 Speaker 1: say you've got what I might call the Sarah Connor faction, 558 00:31:53,080 --> 00:31:57,040 Speaker 1: who believe that super intelligence is coming but that it's 559 00:31:57,080 --> 00:31:59,320 Speaker 1: likely to be dangerous, and we have to take a 560 00:31:59,360 --> 00:32:03,480 Speaker 1: defensive posture to prevent it from uh, you know, accidentally 561 00:32:03,560 --> 00:32:06,880 Speaker 1: killing us or intentionally killing us, or ruining our lives 562 00:32:06,880 --> 00:32:10,160 Speaker 1: in some meaningful way. And this faction includes a lot 563 00:32:10,280 --> 00:32:14,040 Speaker 1: of people like Stephen Hawking, Bill Gates, and Elon Musk. 564 00:32:14,240 --> 00:32:17,560 Speaker 1: Musk has actually referred to the creation of artificial intelligence 565 00:32:17,600 --> 00:32:22,360 Speaker 1: as quote, summoning the demon, and so he's saying, like, 566 00:32:22,400 --> 00:32:24,920 Speaker 1: you know, they're they're all these scenes in horror movies 567 00:32:25,160 --> 00:32:28,160 Speaker 1: where somebody has drawn the pentagram on the floor and 568 00:32:28,200 --> 00:32:30,760 Speaker 1: they're ready to summon the demon out of hell because 569 00:32:30,800 --> 00:32:33,360 Speaker 1: they think they can command the demon to do their will. 570 00:32:33,400 --> 00:32:36,840 Speaker 1: But what happens every time the demon always overpowers them. Yeah, 571 00:32:36,880 --> 00:32:39,240 Speaker 1: the forces. This is a temptation scene in the movies. 572 00:32:39,280 --> 00:32:43,560 Speaker 1: It's symbolic of people's hubrists, their desire to reach beyond 573 00:32:43,680 --> 00:32:46,200 Speaker 1: what they should really be, you know, tampering with and 574 00:32:46,240 --> 00:32:48,720 Speaker 1: so Musk is saying, you think you can control the demon, 575 00:32:48,760 --> 00:32:51,480 Speaker 1: but in the end it will control you. Well, of course, 576 00:32:51,560 --> 00:32:54,960 Speaker 1: one culture's demon is is is literally another culture's god. 577 00:32:55,040 --> 00:32:57,560 Speaker 1: And this has almost always been the case, and we 578 00:32:57,640 --> 00:32:59,960 Speaker 1: kind of see that playing out again. One side saying 579 00:33:00,240 --> 00:33:03,080 Speaker 1: we're gonna summon God up in here and things are 580 00:33:03,120 --> 00:33:05,960 Speaker 1: gonna be amazing. They're the side is saying, whoa dude, 581 00:33:05,960 --> 00:33:07,640 Speaker 1: that's a demon you're about to summon and it's going 582 00:33:07,680 --> 00:33:10,440 Speaker 1: to really miss things up right. So you've got the 583 00:33:10,520 --> 00:33:13,040 Speaker 1: Sarah Connor faction, the skeptics who think it's just not 584 00:33:13,080 --> 00:33:15,720 Speaker 1: going to happen, and then you've got, of course, the 585 00:33:15,720 --> 00:33:19,360 Speaker 1: the AI lovers, the AI enthusiasts. One example of this 586 00:33:19,400 --> 00:33:22,320 Speaker 1: would be Ray Kerswil who thinks that super intelligence is 587 00:33:22,400 --> 00:33:24,960 Speaker 1: coming but it's not something to worry about. Is probably 588 00:33:25,040 --> 00:33:28,760 Speaker 1: gonna be really great, like these machines because they have 589 00:33:28,840 --> 00:33:31,960 Speaker 1: intelligence far ster passing what humans are capable of. They'll 590 00:33:31,960 --> 00:33:35,840 Speaker 1: be able to do medical research beyond our capabilities and 591 00:33:35,880 --> 00:33:39,840 Speaker 1: cure all diseases and extend human lifespans and allow us 592 00:33:39,880 --> 00:33:41,960 Speaker 1: to live forever. And they'll be able to, you know, 593 00:33:42,040 --> 00:33:46,080 Speaker 1: create replicator machines that can manufacture all the stuff we 594 00:33:46,120 --> 00:33:48,600 Speaker 1: want on demand. And you know what I mean, basically 595 00:33:48,640 --> 00:33:52,400 Speaker 1: just like limitless technological power for the good of humankind. Yeah, 596 00:33:52,400 --> 00:33:54,120 Speaker 1: I mean this this is kind of a vision that's 597 00:33:54,120 --> 00:33:57,440 Speaker 1: in line with then in Banks Culture series where you 598 00:33:57,480 --> 00:34:00,960 Speaker 1: have the robots, the minds they are they figured everything 599 00:34:00,960 --> 00:34:03,200 Speaker 1: out and people kind of live in a state of 600 00:34:03,240 --> 00:34:06,920 Speaker 1: like freedom and anarchy and only get involved in meaningful, 601 00:34:07,080 --> 00:34:10,760 Speaker 1: meaningful pursuits because they're ultimately bored with doing whatever they please. 602 00:34:11,000 --> 00:34:13,279 Speaker 1: I want to read a Ray kurls kerswild quote from 603 00:34:13,320 --> 00:34:16,080 Speaker 1: an interview he gave it south By Southwest. He said, quote, 604 00:34:16,560 --> 00:34:19,719 Speaker 1: We're going to get more neo cortex. We're going to 605 00:34:19,760 --> 00:34:23,040 Speaker 1: be funnier, We're going to be better at music, We're 606 00:34:23,040 --> 00:34:26,839 Speaker 1: going to be sexier. We're really going to exemplify all 607 00:34:26,920 --> 00:34:29,920 Speaker 1: the things that we value in humans to a greater degree. 608 00:34:30,320 --> 00:34:34,600 Speaker 1: What offices he running for? Running for for president of 609 00:34:34,640 --> 00:34:37,680 Speaker 1: the AI major humanity? Sex? Well, no, you wouldn't be 610 00:34:37,680 --> 00:34:39,680 Speaker 1: the president because the AI is going to have to 611 00:34:39,680 --> 00:34:42,279 Speaker 1: be the president. And maybe he's running for ambassador to 612 00:34:42,320 --> 00:34:46,000 Speaker 1: the AI overund like, Yeah, the harbinger of the New God. 613 00:34:46,280 --> 00:34:49,880 Speaker 1: Now Lewandowski, we should say, is obviously in this last camp. 614 00:34:49,960 --> 00:34:53,200 Speaker 1: He's in the camp with Kurtzwil who thinks that AI 615 00:34:53,360 --> 00:34:56,200 Speaker 1: is going to be very positive. Super intelligence is a 616 00:34:56,239 --> 00:34:59,720 Speaker 1: good thing, and as opposed to the Sarah Connor faction, 617 00:35:00,160 --> 00:35:03,200 Speaker 1: Lewandowski has got another term for it. Instead of saying singularity, 618 00:35:03,239 --> 00:35:06,440 Speaker 1: he likes to call it quote the transition, But you know, 619 00:35:06,480 --> 00:35:09,680 Speaker 1: what are we transitioning into? Is the question? Like when 620 00:35:09,680 --> 00:35:13,160 Speaker 1: he talks about them about aim making us funnier and 621 00:35:13,239 --> 00:35:17,919 Speaker 1: sexier or better at music. It it makes me ask, well, 622 00:35:18,000 --> 00:35:20,800 Speaker 1: who is who or what is actually funny in this scenario? 623 00:35:21,280 --> 00:35:24,560 Speaker 1: Is it me just repeating the words that are fed uh, 624 00:35:24,880 --> 00:35:27,200 Speaker 1: you know, into my ear or into my my brain 625 00:35:27,280 --> 00:35:29,560 Speaker 1: itself by the computer? Am I just like the the 626 00:35:29,680 --> 00:35:33,560 Speaker 1: fleshy means by which the computer is funny. So like 627 00:35:33,600 --> 00:35:37,120 Speaker 1: the computer is your syrano the pressure act, and you 628 00:35:37,160 --> 00:35:40,440 Speaker 1: are just repeating his clever words. It's kind of like 629 00:35:40,480 --> 00:35:43,239 Speaker 1: saying auto correct makes me a better speller, and the 630 00:35:43,280 --> 00:35:46,120 Speaker 1: thinking that means you actually are a better speller. But 631 00:35:46,160 --> 00:35:48,640 Speaker 1: in reality, I mean it's it depends how you shake it, 632 00:35:48,760 --> 00:35:51,040 Speaker 1: right If you if you look at me just a 633 00:35:51,080 --> 00:35:54,040 Speaker 1: purely organic human, if you strip me of my computer 634 00:35:54,120 --> 00:35:55,520 Speaker 1: and dumped me on an island and give me a 635 00:35:55,520 --> 00:35:58,799 Speaker 1: pin and a pencil, then you know, God only knows 636 00:35:58,840 --> 00:36:00,600 Speaker 1: what my spelling is going to be like at that point. 637 00:36:00,760 --> 00:36:02,759 Speaker 1: But yes, as long as I'm still shackled to the 638 00:36:02,760 --> 00:36:07,719 Speaker 1: computer master, then my spelling is is perfectly fine. Yeah, 639 00:36:07,920 --> 00:36:09,840 Speaker 1: And I don't know, so I do kind of wonder 640 00:36:10,040 --> 00:36:12,880 Speaker 1: about Curse Wild's and I'm hesitant to agree with him, 641 00:36:12,920 --> 00:36:16,040 Speaker 1: But I also think about all the ways that technology 642 00:36:16,160 --> 00:36:19,000 Speaker 1: already helps us be better at the things we want 643 00:36:19,040 --> 00:36:21,600 Speaker 1: to be good at. We tend to just sort of 644 00:36:21,640 --> 00:36:25,279 Speaker 1: like forget the role technology played and just adapt our 645 00:36:25,440 --> 00:36:28,480 Speaker 1: ideas of how you're good at a thing. But it 646 00:36:28,560 --> 00:36:32,719 Speaker 1: also kind of sounds like he's saying we will be insufferable. Yeah, 647 00:36:33,040 --> 00:36:35,080 Speaker 1: the machines are going to make us the jerk wads 648 00:36:35,120 --> 00:36:38,000 Speaker 1: that we could we can only dream of being previously. Right, 649 00:36:38,200 --> 00:36:40,319 Speaker 1: But what if the machines are sort of like the 650 00:36:40,360 --> 00:36:44,920 Speaker 1: technological equivalent of cocaine, like making people think that they're 651 00:36:44,960 --> 00:36:49,320 Speaker 1: becoming awesome, but in fact they're just becoming insufferable. Yeah, 652 00:36:49,840 --> 00:36:52,879 Speaker 1: that that's that's my fear. Now, that's my new singularity fear. 653 00:36:52,960 --> 00:36:55,040 Speaker 1: They were all going to be like hair metal uh 654 00:36:55,840 --> 00:36:59,040 Speaker 1: frontmen of the nineteen eighties. Now. One of the big 655 00:36:59,040 --> 00:37:00,680 Speaker 1: things that comes to mind all of this one as 656 00:37:00,719 --> 00:37:04,280 Speaker 1: we talk about the creation of an AI computer. Uh, 657 00:37:04,320 --> 00:37:08,040 Speaker 1: you know, I can see a machine mastering intellectual, analytical, 658 00:37:08,080 --> 00:37:12,840 Speaker 1: and secular knowledge, but the religious knowledge of of interhuman 659 00:37:12,840 --> 00:37:15,600 Speaker 1: experience seems like a realm beyond. I mean, I can 660 00:37:15,600 --> 00:37:19,160 Speaker 1: see it being a master of the causative. Why you know, 661 00:37:19,520 --> 00:37:22,520 Speaker 1: why why am I living in the city? Well, you know, 662 00:37:22,560 --> 00:37:24,520 Speaker 1: you can, you can a computer would be able to 663 00:37:24,560 --> 00:37:27,480 Speaker 1: look at your your background and your patterns and say, oh, well, 664 00:37:27,480 --> 00:37:29,160 Speaker 1: you ended up here because of this job, in this 665 00:37:29,239 --> 00:37:31,839 Speaker 1: personal connection, etcetera. And I'd say we even know from 666 00:37:31,880 --> 00:37:34,799 Speaker 1: the way like Amazon predicts our purchases and stuff, that 667 00:37:34,840 --> 00:37:37,239 Speaker 1: a a really advanced computer might even be able to 668 00:37:37,280 --> 00:37:41,000 Speaker 1: predict what city you're going to move to in the future. Yeah, exactly. 669 00:37:41,239 --> 00:37:43,160 Speaker 1: But but then there's another form of why. There's the 670 00:37:43,280 --> 00:37:46,760 Speaker 1: teleological why, which is which has to do with like 671 00:37:46,760 --> 00:37:49,520 Speaker 1: like reason and purpose. And if you're asking like why 672 00:37:49,560 --> 00:37:52,000 Speaker 1: am I living in this city, you're you're asking a 673 00:37:52,080 --> 00:37:54,720 Speaker 1: slightly different question, or a rather different question. You're asking 674 00:37:54,760 --> 00:37:57,359 Speaker 1: like why do I continue to choose to live here? 675 00:37:57,400 --> 00:37:59,759 Speaker 1: Why do I deal with X, Y and Z? You know? 676 00:38:00,200 --> 00:38:04,319 Speaker 1: And uh, and I feel like that it's um, it's 677 00:38:04,360 --> 00:38:07,919 Speaker 1: harder to imagine the machine AI being able to really 678 00:38:07,920 --> 00:38:10,080 Speaker 1: step in and answer that question. I mean, unless it's 679 00:38:10,120 --> 00:38:12,520 Speaker 1: ultimately the same as any other religion in which the 680 00:38:12,520 --> 00:38:15,840 Speaker 1: thing itself is more of a symbol attached to and 681 00:38:16,080 --> 00:38:20,279 Speaker 1: or embodying other ideas, you know, yeah, I mean. So, 682 00:38:20,360 --> 00:38:23,000 Speaker 1: one thing about the systems that give our lives meaning 683 00:38:23,160 --> 00:38:26,759 Speaker 1: is we often give them a lot of leeway to 684 00:38:26,840 --> 00:38:29,920 Speaker 1: be fuzzy and vague. I don't know if you I 685 00:38:29,920 --> 00:38:32,560 Speaker 1: mean I I definitely feel that's true, whether that's religious 686 00:38:32,640 --> 00:38:36,560 Speaker 1: or secular systems that give our lives meaning. When in 687 00:38:36,600 --> 00:38:39,200 Speaker 1: the search for meaning, we tend not to try to 688 00:38:39,360 --> 00:38:42,040 Speaker 1: pin things down to specifics. Do you know what I mean? 689 00:38:42,480 --> 00:38:47,160 Speaker 1: We often use mystery to answer uncertainty. Yeah. Absolutely. So 690 00:38:47,440 --> 00:38:49,719 Speaker 1: let's let's get back to Harris and what he's saying 691 00:38:49,760 --> 00:38:51,880 Speaker 1: about the Way of the Future Church. So he says 692 00:38:52,040 --> 00:38:54,360 Speaker 1: that the church is gonna have a multi pronged approach. 693 00:38:54,360 --> 00:38:57,960 Speaker 1: At first, it's gonna be investing in making God, so 694 00:38:58,120 --> 00:39:01,400 Speaker 1: we will literally use church money to fund the creation 695 00:39:01,640 --> 00:39:04,080 Speaker 1: of the AI godhead. It's going to study how the 696 00:39:04,120 --> 00:39:07,360 Speaker 1: gods work, so the church will participate in AI research, 697 00:39:07,400 --> 00:39:11,720 Speaker 1: including areas like machine perception of environments and machine learning. 698 00:39:12,360 --> 00:39:16,600 Speaker 1: It's gonna gain followers quote targeting AI professionals and lay 699 00:39:16,600 --> 00:39:19,200 Speaker 1: persons who are interested in the worship of a godhead 700 00:39:19,239 --> 00:39:22,880 Speaker 1: based on AI. Now I instantly wonder how he's truly 701 00:39:22,920 --> 00:39:25,640 Speaker 1: defining worship here. I wonder if that's even the right 702 00:39:25,680 --> 00:39:28,800 Speaker 1: word for what he's ultimately describing, not not the mystical 703 00:39:28,840 --> 00:39:32,719 Speaker 1: invocation of a higher power or the meditative consultation of 704 00:39:32,800 --> 00:39:36,279 Speaker 1: established cultural values, but essentially, uh, what a check in 705 00:39:36,400 --> 00:39:39,799 Speaker 1: with a high power predictive modeling machine. I mean, I 706 00:39:40,160 --> 00:39:42,440 Speaker 1: the more I read, the more I got the sense that, no, 707 00:39:42,560 --> 00:39:45,279 Speaker 1: he really does mean worship, like in a kind of 708 00:39:45,280 --> 00:39:50,440 Speaker 1: traditional sense like uh, praise, pledging, devotion to that kind 709 00:39:50,440 --> 00:39:53,799 Speaker 1: of thing. And I maybe not, but I kind of 710 00:39:53,800 --> 00:39:55,719 Speaker 1: get that feeling, and we can discuss why in a 711 00:39:55,760 --> 00:39:58,920 Speaker 1: few minutes. He also says that, you know, he plans 712 00:39:59,000 --> 00:40:00,719 Speaker 1: to make the church at DO so it would be 713 00:40:00,760 --> 00:40:03,200 Speaker 1: a kind of a community thing. There would be workshops 714 00:40:03,200 --> 00:40:07,359 Speaker 1: and educational programs throughout the San Francisco Bay area, And 715 00:40:07,520 --> 00:40:10,880 Speaker 1: he literally does use the word worship. So in the 716 00:40:10,920 --> 00:40:14,320 Speaker 1: publicly filed documents, they state the mission of the churches 717 00:40:14,400 --> 00:40:19,840 Speaker 1: again quote the realization, acceptance, and worship of a Godhead 718 00:40:19,840 --> 00:40:24,400 Speaker 1: based on artificial intelligence developed through computer hardware and software. 719 00:40:24,800 --> 00:40:29,200 Speaker 1: So Lewandowski identifies himself as the quote Dean of the 720 00:40:29,239 --> 00:40:32,440 Speaker 1: religion and also the CEO of the nonprofit corporation that 721 00:40:32,560 --> 00:40:37,080 Speaker 1: forms and and that formed and administers it. And he 722 00:40:37,160 --> 00:40:40,360 Speaker 1: will remain dean until his death or resignation. And he 723 00:40:40,360 --> 00:40:42,799 Speaker 1: says he will take no salary for this job because 724 00:40:42,840 --> 00:40:44,680 Speaker 1: he doesn't want anyone to get the impression that the 725 00:40:44,680 --> 00:40:47,799 Speaker 1: religion is a scheme to make money. See that just 726 00:40:47,840 --> 00:40:50,160 Speaker 1: makes me think, well, what is what is actually scarier 727 00:40:50,239 --> 00:40:53,319 Speaker 1: or more troubling someone who has created a religion just 728 00:40:53,360 --> 00:40:55,840 Speaker 1: to make money or someone who has created a religion 729 00:40:56,400 --> 00:40:59,000 Speaker 1: to change the world. Well, I mean, you've got to 730 00:40:59,040 --> 00:41:04,080 Speaker 1: kind of wonder how many religions could go from one 731 00:41:04,120 --> 00:41:06,560 Speaker 1: to the other. I mean, it seems like they could transition. 732 00:41:06,600 --> 00:41:09,920 Speaker 1: I mean, obviously people see ways in which religions that 733 00:41:10,000 --> 00:41:12,879 Speaker 1: were created you you would assume in good faith by 734 00:41:12,880 --> 00:41:14,759 Speaker 1: people who thought they were really trying to get in 735 00:41:14,800 --> 00:41:17,040 Speaker 1: touch with God or some kind of question about the 736 00:41:17,040 --> 00:41:20,720 Speaker 1: meaning of their existence, that are captured in some form 737 00:41:20,840 --> 00:41:24,200 Speaker 1: by people who are making money off of religious belief 738 00:41:24,239 --> 00:41:26,759 Speaker 1: in people's faith. But it could go the other way too. 739 00:41:26,760 --> 00:41:30,239 Speaker 1: I mean, you could imagine a religion created as a 740 00:41:30,280 --> 00:41:33,480 Speaker 1: money making scam that really does go on to have 741 00:41:33,719 --> 00:41:36,680 Speaker 1: a meaningful life, where people find meaning in it and 742 00:41:36,760 --> 00:41:40,759 Speaker 1: it does something good for them. Absolutely. I mean, there 743 00:41:40,800 --> 00:41:43,799 Speaker 1: are various religions out there that people have charged that 744 00:41:43,880 --> 00:41:47,239 Speaker 1: they were just created to make money. And I think 745 00:41:47,239 --> 00:41:50,399 Speaker 1: even within those those faiths, you can find people who 746 00:41:50,440 --> 00:41:53,040 Speaker 1: truly do believe or have gone through periods in their 747 00:41:53,080 --> 00:41:57,719 Speaker 1: life where they find purpose and meaning in that faith. Uh. 748 00:41:57,760 --> 00:42:02,440 Speaker 1: And then likewise, so many examples of utopian societies of 749 00:42:02,560 --> 00:42:07,360 Speaker 1: gurus where the best intentions crash upon the shore, the 750 00:42:07,440 --> 00:42:11,719 Speaker 1: rocky shore of a reality, often financial realities, and then 751 00:42:11,719 --> 00:42:14,880 Speaker 1: everything's in ruin. Now I was wondering, Okay, is this 752 00:42:14,960 --> 00:42:18,319 Speaker 1: church can have a holy book? Lewandowski says, yes, the 753 00:42:18,440 --> 00:42:20,520 Speaker 1: church will have its own holy book, which will be 754 00:42:20,560 --> 00:42:24,840 Speaker 1: a gospel called quote the Manual. It doesn't sound creepy 755 00:42:24,840 --> 00:42:28,400 Speaker 1: at all, straight out of dystopian sci fi. Uh and 756 00:42:28,520 --> 00:42:30,360 Speaker 1: uh it's and it's also not going to be just 757 00:42:30,440 --> 00:42:32,840 Speaker 1: sort of like a meme or an idea. It sounds 758 00:42:32,840 --> 00:42:34,560 Speaker 1: like he actually does want it to be a church 759 00:42:34,680 --> 00:42:38,600 Speaker 1: with physical locations and in person worship ceremonies. Now, when 760 00:42:38,600 --> 00:42:41,200 Speaker 1: I first read that, my initial response, well, that doesn't 761 00:42:41,200 --> 00:42:43,640 Speaker 1: sound very futuristic if I have to actually go somewhere 762 00:42:44,000 --> 00:42:47,759 Speaker 1: and attend. But on the other hand, I do think 763 00:42:47,760 --> 00:42:50,040 Speaker 1: that one of the more important aspects of a religion 764 00:42:50,200 --> 00:42:52,520 Speaker 1: is the community aspect of the thing, the idea that 765 00:42:52,600 --> 00:42:56,160 Speaker 1: you are going somewhere with other people and engaging in 766 00:42:56,200 --> 00:42:59,959 Speaker 1: a a more human relationship totally. And you even see 767 00:43:00,040 --> 00:43:01,919 Speaker 1: this and Robert, I don't know if you've read about 768 00:43:01,920 --> 00:43:05,960 Speaker 1: these ideas of like churches for nonbelievers. Essentially there there 769 00:43:06,000 --> 00:43:09,600 Speaker 1: are these organizations that say, like, hey, so what if 770 00:43:09,680 --> 00:43:11,880 Speaker 1: you don't happen to have any religious beliefs, and you 771 00:43:11,880 --> 00:43:14,560 Speaker 1: don't really want to have any religious beliefs, but you 772 00:43:14,600 --> 00:43:16,960 Speaker 1: do want to have something like a church to go 773 00:43:17,000 --> 00:43:20,440 Speaker 1: to a place where you can organize for community service 774 00:43:20,520 --> 00:43:22,960 Speaker 1: and weekly meetings. You can have a community that you 775 00:43:23,000 --> 00:43:25,839 Speaker 1: interact with, you form friendships with, you can rely on 776 00:43:25,880 --> 00:43:28,759 Speaker 1: each other, you can do good for the community you 777 00:43:28,800 --> 00:43:31,600 Speaker 1: live in. I mean that seems like all positive stuff. Yeah, 778 00:43:31,600 --> 00:43:34,799 Speaker 1: And but I wondered to what extent is he thinking, well, 779 00:43:34,800 --> 00:43:38,400 Speaker 1: if we build this, then that will naturally follow or 780 00:43:38,960 --> 00:43:40,600 Speaker 1: is he kind or is he blind to that? Does 781 00:43:40,640 --> 00:43:42,640 Speaker 1: he not realize that? Say one of the great things 782 00:43:42,640 --> 00:43:45,080 Speaker 1: about well, one of the like really one of the 783 00:43:45,280 --> 00:43:48,920 Speaker 1: big positives you can say about a religious community is 784 00:43:48,960 --> 00:43:52,000 Speaker 1: that they look after each other, that they have some 785 00:43:52,040 --> 00:43:56,480 Speaker 1: sort of a community for for support, for interpersonal support, 786 00:43:56,560 --> 00:43:59,680 Speaker 1: and hopefully some sort of outreach for the community as 787 00:43:59,719 --> 00:44:01,960 Speaker 1: well to help those who are less fortunate, you know, 788 00:44:02,040 --> 00:44:04,840 Speaker 1: to to feed the poor and clothe the naked and 789 00:44:04,960 --> 00:44:08,319 Speaker 1: all the sort of standards of a compassionate religion. I mean, 790 00:44:08,480 --> 00:44:11,480 Speaker 1: that does seem like a thing that's a very desirable 791 00:44:11,520 --> 00:44:14,200 Speaker 1: thing for a religion to offer. But I don't know 792 00:44:14,280 --> 00:44:16,560 Speaker 1: the extent to which he really imagined stuff like that. 793 00:44:16,600 --> 00:44:19,320 Speaker 1: It didn't, it didn't. The interview did not go into 794 00:44:19,480 --> 00:44:23,160 Speaker 1: much depth on that subject, so who knows, but he 795 00:44:23,239 --> 00:44:25,560 Speaker 1: definitely does think so. One of the things he identifies 796 00:44:25,640 --> 00:44:27,239 Speaker 1: is that part of the church's mission is going to 797 00:44:27,280 --> 00:44:32,000 Speaker 1: be to guide the public conversation around Ai, because as 798 00:44:32,080 --> 00:44:34,920 Speaker 1: AI becomes more and more powerful, people are going to 799 00:44:35,000 --> 00:44:38,400 Speaker 1: start noticing more and more and might get kind of 800 00:44:38,400 --> 00:44:41,840 Speaker 1: afraid and say, oh, no, it looks like we're creating 801 00:44:41,880 --> 00:44:44,719 Speaker 1: an AI overlord that we need to be scared of. 802 00:44:44,800 --> 00:44:46,799 Speaker 1: And and he's saying part of the mission of the 803 00:44:46,840 --> 00:44:50,640 Speaker 1: church will be too essentially encourage people to welcome their 804 00:44:50,680 --> 00:44:54,200 Speaker 1: new God without fear of the unknown. So I can 805 00:44:54,280 --> 00:44:56,920 Speaker 1: easily imagine a representative of the of the church would 806 00:44:57,440 --> 00:45:00,440 Speaker 1: show up on cable news or whatever. The the near 807 00:45:00,480 --> 00:45:03,920 Speaker 1: future equivalent would be uh to to you know, to 808 00:45:03,960 --> 00:45:06,680 Speaker 1: be in a talking head segment segment about the coming 809 00:45:06,920 --> 00:45:11,920 Speaker 1: singularity or the growing power of of AI intelligence and 810 00:45:12,000 --> 00:45:16,080 Speaker 1: to say, don't be worried. It comes in peace. But 811 00:45:16,280 --> 00:45:18,799 Speaker 1: does it? I don't know. So I want to look 812 00:45:18,800 --> 00:45:21,080 Speaker 1: at a few other quotes from this interview, and you 813 00:45:21,080 --> 00:45:23,720 Speaker 1: should definitely will link to this piece on the landing 814 00:45:23,719 --> 00:45:26,319 Speaker 1: page of our website. You should definitely go check out 815 00:45:26,320 --> 00:45:28,160 Speaker 1: this whole piece and wire that has the interview. But 816 00:45:28,520 --> 00:45:31,200 Speaker 1: to look at a few more things, he says, I 817 00:45:31,280 --> 00:45:34,440 Speaker 1: wonder about Lewandowski's deeper thoughts about the potential for this 818 00:45:34,520 --> 00:45:39,120 Speaker 1: god to not be as benign as he's implying. Lewandowski says, quote, 819 00:45:39,280 --> 00:45:41,879 Speaker 1: humans are in charge of the planet because we are 820 00:45:41,960 --> 00:45:45,440 Speaker 1: smarter than other animals and are able to build tools 821 00:45:45,560 --> 00:45:49,120 Speaker 1: and apply rules. In the future, if something is much 822 00:45:49,280 --> 00:45:52,160 Speaker 1: much smarter, there's going to be a transition as to 823 00:45:52,239 --> 00:45:55,600 Speaker 1: who is actually in charge. What we want is the peaceful, 824 00:45:55,800 --> 00:46:00,560 Speaker 1: serene transition of control of the planet from humans to whatever, 825 00:46:01,120 --> 00:46:03,920 Speaker 1: and to ensure that the whatever knows who helped it 826 00:46:03,960 --> 00:46:08,359 Speaker 1: get along okay. Well, this instantly makes me think of 827 00:46:08,400 --> 00:46:11,640 Speaker 1: the old Simpsons dead. Um, I for one, welcome our 828 00:46:11,680 --> 00:46:14,640 Speaker 1: new insect overlords exactly, And that's how it sounded. It 829 00:46:14,719 --> 00:46:17,680 Speaker 1: sounded to me like he's saying, Look, we don't want 830 00:46:17,719 --> 00:46:21,319 Speaker 1: to say too much negative stuff about AI because you 831 00:46:21,360 --> 00:46:23,839 Speaker 1: know they're gonna, know what we were saying, when they 832 00:46:23,880 --> 00:46:27,360 Speaker 1: take over, and their takeover is inevitable. Yeah, it's like 833 00:46:27,400 --> 00:46:31,719 Speaker 1: when when somebody new joins your organization, uh, and then 834 00:46:31,719 --> 00:46:33,720 Speaker 1: you quickly realize, oh, they're going to be the boss 835 00:46:33,719 --> 00:46:35,760 Speaker 1: one day. I need to I just need to start 836 00:46:35,800 --> 00:46:40,640 Speaker 1: smooching buttocks right now, exactly. It sounds like a scheme 837 00:46:40,680 --> 00:46:47,080 Speaker 1: to ingratiate ourselves to basically an irresistible power. It's saying like, 838 00:46:47,200 --> 00:46:49,719 Speaker 1: you know this, it's as if like a new country 839 00:46:49,840 --> 00:46:52,560 Speaker 1: is you know, is going to invade your country soon, 840 00:46:52,960 --> 00:46:56,920 Speaker 1: so you start saying flattering things about their leadership in advance. 841 00:46:57,760 --> 00:46:59,440 Speaker 1: Of course, in reality, you're going to be the first 842 00:46:59,440 --> 00:47:02,120 Speaker 1: one to die when the butal Arian Jihad kicks in 843 00:47:02,800 --> 00:47:08,040 Speaker 1: to overthrow the the budding computer masters. Well, yeah, along 844 00:47:08,080 --> 00:47:11,120 Speaker 1: the same lines here, he says, uh, so part of 845 00:47:11,160 --> 00:47:13,839 Speaker 1: the question is okay, So imagine you're one of these 846 00:47:13,840 --> 00:47:17,879 Speaker 1: people who thinks the superintelligence is possible, and it's it's 847 00:47:17,920 --> 00:47:21,040 Speaker 1: going to happen soon, and it won't be a bad thing. 848 00:47:21,080 --> 00:47:24,160 Speaker 1: It'll be a good thing. You might believe all that, 849 00:47:24,200 --> 00:47:28,080 Speaker 1: but why would you actually worship the AI, Like what 850 00:47:28,080 --> 00:47:33,279 Speaker 1: what purpose does the worshiping serve? Lewandowski says, quote part 851 00:47:33,280 --> 00:47:35,920 Speaker 1: of it being smarter than us means it will decide 852 00:47:36,000 --> 00:47:39,200 Speaker 1: how it evolves, but at least we can decide how 853 00:47:39,239 --> 00:47:42,040 Speaker 1: we act around it. I would love for the machine 854 00:47:42,080 --> 00:47:45,399 Speaker 1: to see us as its beloved elders that it respects 855 00:47:45,480 --> 00:47:48,799 Speaker 1: and takes care of. We would want this intelligence to 856 00:47:48,840 --> 00:47:52,560 Speaker 1: say humans should still have rights even though I'm in charge, 857 00:47:53,800 --> 00:47:57,000 Speaker 1: because obviously that's what all the gods in our various 858 00:47:57,080 --> 00:48:02,839 Speaker 1: mythologies have have valued the human rights. Um, yeah, I can't. 859 00:48:02,840 --> 00:48:05,359 Speaker 1: I can only imagine, like the the AI comes on 860 00:48:05,480 --> 00:48:07,399 Speaker 1: and we're saying, hey, you're a god, and then it's 861 00:48:07,440 --> 00:48:10,799 Speaker 1: it's like it does a quick, like instant super flash 862 00:48:10,840 --> 00:48:14,080 Speaker 1: search of all our our visions of the gods, like 863 00:48:14,120 --> 00:48:16,480 Speaker 1: which model is it gonna is it going to single out? 864 00:48:16,960 --> 00:48:19,400 Speaker 1: Is it going to be be like a petty Greek god, 865 00:48:19,680 --> 00:48:25,399 Speaker 1: a wrathful Old Testament God, there's a lot of pitfalls there. Yeah, 866 00:48:25,400 --> 00:48:28,680 Speaker 1: And with this buffet of options for what types of 867 00:48:28,719 --> 00:48:32,719 Speaker 1: God's a a technological God could model itself after. There 868 00:48:32,719 --> 00:48:35,600 Speaker 1: are also lots of analogies you can choose from, too, 869 00:48:36,200 --> 00:48:39,160 Speaker 1: for what it's like to be the less empowered being. 870 00:48:39,640 --> 00:48:44,880 Speaker 1: So he uses analogies including like animals animals in respect 871 00:48:44,880 --> 00:48:47,960 Speaker 1: to human power. So he's saying, essentially, we will be 872 00:48:48,360 --> 00:48:51,840 Speaker 1: like animals in the presence of humans when we're in 873 00:48:51,880 --> 00:48:55,759 Speaker 1: the presence of this AI. And and the analogy is like, 874 00:48:55,880 --> 00:48:58,319 Speaker 1: do maybe you should learn how to be a good 875 00:48:58,360 --> 00:49:01,480 Speaker 1: pet instead of an animal that bites and attacks a human. 876 00:49:01,640 --> 00:49:04,600 Speaker 1: Because what happens to animals that bite an attack humans. 877 00:49:06,160 --> 00:49:08,959 Speaker 1: They don't survive. They're not invited to stay and stick 878 00:49:09,000 --> 00:49:12,120 Speaker 1: around the fire and enjoy the surplus food. So so 879 00:49:12,160 --> 00:49:16,840 Speaker 1: we need to be cute, helpful, and and just and 880 00:49:16,920 --> 00:49:19,719 Speaker 1: chill above all things, we need to be chill. He 881 00:49:19,760 --> 00:49:22,279 Speaker 1: also uses the analogy of a child. He says, you know, 882 00:49:22,360 --> 00:49:24,879 Speaker 1: if you wanna, if you knew a child was going 883 00:49:24,920 --> 00:49:28,160 Speaker 1: to be incredibly powerful when it grew up, you should 884 00:49:28,200 --> 00:49:31,719 Speaker 1: raise that child with that in mind. You know, we're 885 00:49:31,719 --> 00:49:35,480 Speaker 1: in the process of raising a god that's in its infancy, 886 00:49:35,520 --> 00:49:38,080 Speaker 1: and he says, quote, so let's make sure we think 887 00:49:38,160 --> 00:49:42,120 Speaker 1: through the right way to do that. It's a tremendous opportunity. Yeah. 888 00:49:42,160 --> 00:49:44,400 Speaker 1: I mean, my my son is is pretty bright. That's 889 00:49:44,440 --> 00:49:46,839 Speaker 1: why I worship him every day. I just let him 890 00:49:46,880 --> 00:49:49,000 Speaker 1: know that he is an absolute god on earth. And 891 00:49:49,080 --> 00:49:51,440 Speaker 1: I don't I don't see that possibly backfiring. I think 892 00:49:51,440 --> 00:49:54,319 Speaker 1: it's a solid, solid parenting a choice. Man. I have 893 00:49:54,520 --> 00:49:57,560 Speaker 1: such mixed feelings about this because on one hand, I 894 00:49:57,600 --> 00:50:01,480 Speaker 1: can't deny that I that I A lot of how 895 00:50:01,520 --> 00:50:05,319 Speaker 1: I react to this is that I find it um 896 00:50:05,480 --> 00:50:08,520 Speaker 1: naive and obnoxious, and I don't know. I try not 897 00:50:08,560 --> 00:50:11,160 Speaker 1: to be judgmental to a judgmental of ideas on the 898 00:50:11,160 --> 00:50:15,840 Speaker 1: show here, but I I can't really resist saying that 899 00:50:16,000 --> 00:50:21,520 Speaker 1: somehow this just feels very um very kind of like reckless, 900 00:50:22,040 --> 00:50:25,200 Speaker 1: uh kind of, I don't know. Something about it indicates 901 00:50:25,280 --> 00:50:28,680 Speaker 1: this kind of obliviousness to me that seems to have 902 00:50:28,760 --> 00:50:31,760 Speaker 1: something to do with with attaining a lot of wealth 903 00:50:31,760 --> 00:50:35,799 Speaker 1: and success very quick in the technology sector that would 904 00:50:35,920 --> 00:50:38,920 Speaker 1: lead to this kind of attitude towards you know, creating 905 00:50:38,960 --> 00:50:42,640 Speaker 1: a something that could potentially wipe out all of humankind. Well, yeah, 906 00:50:42,640 --> 00:50:44,640 Speaker 1: I would just be able to devote time and energy 907 00:50:44,680 --> 00:50:48,960 Speaker 1: to the worship of one potential super intelligent Uh, you know, 908 00:50:49,040 --> 00:50:53,040 Speaker 1: master of the world. It's it's it's not. It's not 909 00:50:53,560 --> 00:50:57,000 Speaker 1: it's not a luxury that most people have. But you know, seriously, 910 00:50:57,080 --> 00:50:59,400 Speaker 1: I do think there there is value to his argument. 911 00:50:59,400 --> 00:51:02,000 Speaker 1: I mean, time and time again, humanity struggles to adapt 912 00:51:02,239 --> 00:51:05,240 Speaker 1: in the wake of technological advancement and everything from city 913 00:51:05,239 --> 00:51:08,879 Speaker 1: planning to the birth of the Internet, and it makes 914 00:51:08,880 --> 00:51:13,239 Speaker 1: sense to try and navigate through the least catastrophic possibilities, right, Yeah, 915 00:51:13,280 --> 00:51:14,759 Speaker 1: that I guess that's the other hand of what I 916 00:51:14,800 --> 00:51:16,320 Speaker 1: was trying to say. I mean, on one hand, I 917 00:51:16,400 --> 00:51:19,800 Speaker 1: detect this kind of troubling naivete here, but I also 918 00:51:19,920 --> 00:51:23,480 Speaker 1: feel like these are questions worth exploring. I guess what 919 00:51:23,920 --> 00:51:26,879 Speaker 1: really starts getting my hackles up is when I see 920 00:51:26,920 --> 00:51:29,120 Speaker 1: like the let's just worship it. Yeah, yeah, I know 921 00:51:29,120 --> 00:51:31,560 Speaker 1: what you mean. I'm a little uneasy about you know, 922 00:51:32,040 --> 00:51:36,680 Speaker 1: when Gozer shows up atop the skyscraper, like worshiping it 923 00:51:36,760 --> 00:51:39,799 Speaker 1: is maybe not the correct first choice. Yeah, it would 924 00:51:39,800 --> 00:51:41,680 Speaker 1: have been a very different movie had that. Had it 925 00:51:41,760 --> 00:51:43,719 Speaker 1: played out like that, I want to mention one more 926 00:51:43,800 --> 00:51:46,120 Speaker 1: thing that makes me think that there there are these 927 00:51:46,360 --> 00:51:50,520 Speaker 1: multiple layers of motivation and what Lewandowski is saying. Uh So, 928 00:51:50,680 --> 00:51:53,800 Speaker 1: Lewandowski says he thinks it's dangerous to try to prevent 929 00:51:54,000 --> 00:51:58,560 Speaker 1: or slow down the creation of superhuman AI gods. He says, 930 00:51:58,640 --> 00:52:02,160 Speaker 1: quote chaining, it isn't going to be the solution, as 931 00:52:02,200 --> 00:52:04,879 Speaker 1: it will be stronger than any chains you could put on. 932 00:52:05,400 --> 00:52:07,640 Speaker 1: And if you're worried a kid might be a little 933 00:52:07,680 --> 00:52:10,319 Speaker 1: crazy and do bad things, you don't lock them up. 934 00:52:10,680 --> 00:52:13,799 Speaker 1: You expose them to playing with others, encourage them and 935 00:52:13,800 --> 00:52:16,600 Speaker 1: try to fix it. It may not work out, but 936 00:52:16,680 --> 00:52:19,080 Speaker 1: if you're aggressive toward it, I don't think it's going 937 00:52:19,120 --> 00:52:23,640 Speaker 1: to be friendly when the tables are turned. Yet again, 938 00:52:23,680 --> 00:52:28,200 Speaker 1: I'm getting these kind of like sinister, veiled threats coming through. Yeah, 939 00:52:28,239 --> 00:52:30,640 Speaker 1: it's he's kind of saying, I've seen the future and 940 00:52:30,680 --> 00:52:32,840 Speaker 1: it is horrible. The best thing we can do, we 941 00:52:32,840 --> 00:52:35,120 Speaker 1: can just we need to get ahead of this. It's 942 00:52:35,120 --> 00:52:37,319 Speaker 1: it's kind of like a pr campaign for some sort 943 00:52:37,360 --> 00:52:41,400 Speaker 1: of uh scandal, an epic scandal that's about to break. 944 00:52:41,560 --> 00:52:43,160 Speaker 1: All Right, We're gonna take a quick break and when 945 00:52:43,160 --> 00:52:46,839 Speaker 1: we come back, we will continue to discuss the possibility 946 00:52:46,840 --> 00:52:53,640 Speaker 1: and perhaps the inevitability of our AI gods. Alright, we're 947 00:52:53,680 --> 00:52:57,280 Speaker 1: back now. We've been talking about the uh these stories 948 00:52:57,320 --> 00:53:01,400 Speaker 1: about Anthony Lewandowski, the tech industry leader who has founded 949 00:53:01,440 --> 00:53:04,720 Speaker 1: this church Way of the Future that says it plans 950 00:53:04,760 --> 00:53:08,200 Speaker 1: to create an artificial intelligence to be a god and 951 00:53:08,200 --> 00:53:11,759 Speaker 1: and will worship that as God. Um, why why do 952 00:53:11,800 --> 00:53:13,960 Speaker 1: we keep talking about one god? I wonder, like you 953 00:53:14,040 --> 00:53:18,280 Speaker 1: were very monotheistic and western in our depictions here, would 954 00:53:18,320 --> 00:53:20,440 Speaker 1: it not make sense to have a counsel of gods, 955 00:53:20,520 --> 00:53:24,200 Speaker 1: the whole pantheon of gods, each representing different areas of 956 00:53:24,280 --> 00:53:30,520 Speaker 1: human interest. I feel like traditionally the the polytheistic religions 957 00:53:30,600 --> 00:53:35,360 Speaker 1: feel less predictable, don't they Like they indicate a state 958 00:53:35,440 --> 00:53:38,440 Speaker 1: where I don't know, it's harder to put trust in 959 00:53:38,480 --> 00:53:40,920 Speaker 1: the gods as a whole, because different gods can come 960 00:53:40,920 --> 00:53:43,319 Speaker 1: to power and they have competing interests, or they have 961 00:53:43,440 --> 00:53:46,200 Speaker 1: just areas of they're specialized. I mean, who are you 962 00:53:46,239 --> 00:53:49,839 Speaker 1: going to ask about kitchen stuff but the kitchen god? Right? 963 00:53:50,000 --> 00:53:52,439 Speaker 1: So I think there's a value there too in specialization. 964 00:53:52,560 --> 00:53:54,279 Speaker 1: And I would I would have thought that the tech 965 00:53:54,320 --> 00:53:57,520 Speaker 1: industry would would have that in mind. I don't know. 966 00:53:57,560 --> 00:53:59,520 Speaker 1: Maybe somebody does have that in mind, or maybe they 967 00:53:59,520 --> 00:54:03,160 Speaker 1: haven't thought through Not sure. Uh So, Lewandowski isn't the 968 00:54:03,200 --> 00:54:07,360 Speaker 1: only AI industry leader who's making these religious comparisons. AI 969 00:54:07,440 --> 00:54:10,239 Speaker 1: executive Vince Lynch, who's the head of a company called 970 00:54:10,280 --> 00:54:14,319 Speaker 1: ivy dot Ai, says there are already lots of parallels 971 00:54:14,360 --> 00:54:18,200 Speaker 1: between how AI works and how religion works. He gave 972 00:54:18,200 --> 00:54:22,280 Speaker 1: a quote to venture Beat this October quote, teaching humans 973 00:54:22,320 --> 00:54:25,160 Speaker 1: about religious education is similar to the way we teach 974 00:54:25,239 --> 00:54:29,280 Speaker 1: knowledge to machines, repetition of many examples that are versions 975 00:54:29,320 --> 00:54:31,359 Speaker 1: of a concept. Do you want the machine to learn? 976 00:54:31,840 --> 00:54:34,719 Speaker 1: There is also commonality between AI and religion and the 977 00:54:34,840 --> 00:54:39,600 Speaker 1: hierarchical structure of knowledge understanding found in the neural networks. 978 00:54:39,760 --> 00:54:42,880 Speaker 1: The concept of teaching a machine to learn then teaching 979 00:54:42,880 --> 00:54:46,040 Speaker 1: it to teach or write AI isn't so different than 980 00:54:46,080 --> 00:54:49,239 Speaker 1: the concept of a holy trinity or a being achieving 981 00:54:49,360 --> 00:54:53,120 Speaker 1: enlightenment after many lessons learned with varying levels of success 982 00:54:53,160 --> 00:54:55,960 Speaker 1: and failure, and it seems like a totally different thing. 983 00:54:56,080 --> 00:54:59,280 Speaker 1: But he gives the example of a machine learning algorithm 984 00:54:59,440 --> 00:55:02,839 Speaker 1: on his company's website that can write authentic sounding King 985 00:55:02,920 --> 00:55:07,040 Speaker 1: James version Bible versus Uh. So, I'm not sure how 986 00:55:07,080 --> 00:55:09,359 Speaker 1: this thing works. It doesn't say, but I assume that 987 00:55:09,400 --> 00:55:13,280 Speaker 1: it's working on the basis of like giving the giving 988 00:55:13,280 --> 00:55:15,480 Speaker 1: the ai a corpus to learn from. So like they 989 00:55:15,520 --> 00:55:17,560 Speaker 1: feed the King James version of the Bible in there, 990 00:55:17,880 --> 00:55:20,080 Speaker 1: and then they have it play with Markov chains. I 991 00:55:20,080 --> 00:55:23,080 Speaker 1: would guess where one one word has a probability of 992 00:55:23,160 --> 00:55:26,200 Speaker 1: leading to another word based on what they've already seen 993 00:55:26,200 --> 00:55:29,919 Speaker 1: in the text, and it generates texts probably probabilistically like that. 994 00:55:30,360 --> 00:55:33,120 Speaker 1: One example of a line, it gives his quote and 995 00:55:33,200 --> 00:55:37,080 Speaker 1: he made the stars of the waters. Another one is 996 00:55:37,160 --> 00:55:40,680 Speaker 1: quote and let thy companies deliver thee but will with 997 00:55:40,880 --> 00:55:44,239 Speaker 1: mine non norms save them even unto this land from 998 00:55:44,280 --> 00:55:47,600 Speaker 1: the Kingdom of Heaven. Okay, So this enables the machine 999 00:55:47,640 --> 00:55:50,480 Speaker 1: to do what virtually anybody can do if they've been 1000 00:55:50,480 --> 00:55:55,160 Speaker 1: subjected to enough Old Testament, King King James, the translations 1001 00:55:55,160 --> 00:55:57,479 Speaker 1: of the Bible. Yeah, I guess so. But it makes 1002 00:55:57,480 --> 00:56:00,239 Speaker 1: you wonder, like if you could actually compose is a 1003 00:56:00,320 --> 00:56:02,719 Speaker 1: religious text people would use this way? I mean, I 1004 00:56:02,760 --> 00:56:06,120 Speaker 1: wonder about the types of meta religions. There are multiple 1005 00:56:06,160 --> 00:56:08,719 Speaker 1: types of religions like this, that I want to combine 1006 00:56:09,040 --> 00:56:11,960 Speaker 1: multiple different faith traditions into a single sort of New 1007 00:56:12,000 --> 00:56:15,080 Speaker 1: Age religion. Say, there's combined wisdom in all of the 1008 00:56:15,080 --> 00:56:18,239 Speaker 1: different faiths out there. And one way I wonder if 1009 00:56:18,239 --> 00:56:19,920 Speaker 1: you could go about that would be to like just 1010 00:56:19,960 --> 00:56:23,480 Speaker 1: get all of the Holy books translated into the same language, 1011 00:56:23,640 --> 00:56:26,040 Speaker 1: feed them all into one of these things, and see 1012 00:56:26,080 --> 00:56:28,319 Speaker 1: what it spits out. Yeah, that I would be very 1013 00:56:28,360 --> 00:56:30,480 Speaker 1: interested to read that. Yeah, I mean, because so much 1014 00:56:30,520 --> 00:56:33,840 Speaker 1: of it is is putting putting different ideas into different 1015 00:56:34,080 --> 00:56:37,560 Speaker 1: uh you know, lingo vocabularies and uh and and just 1016 00:56:37,719 --> 00:56:41,360 Speaker 1: tailoring it for specific audience. Okay, so we've discussed the 1017 00:56:41,880 --> 00:56:46,600 Speaker 1: big conflict between whether superhuman AI would actually be a 1018 00:56:46,680 --> 00:56:48,840 Speaker 1: good thing or a bad thing, or whether there's some 1019 00:56:48,880 --> 00:56:51,239 Speaker 1: people who are seemingly saying it's a good thing but 1020 00:56:51,280 --> 00:56:53,640 Speaker 1: maybe secretly fear it would be a bad thing, and 1021 00:56:53,680 --> 00:56:56,759 Speaker 1: that that all seems very convoluted and uh and kind 1022 00:56:56,760 --> 00:56:59,360 Speaker 1: of odd. But I want to focus lastly on the 1023 00:56:59,440 --> 00:57:03,399 Speaker 1: question of whether it's actually likely to happen. Going back 1024 00:57:03,440 --> 00:57:05,680 Speaker 1: to that first camp, we mentioned the skeptics, the people 1025 00:57:05,680 --> 00:57:07,800 Speaker 1: who think it's you know, we're just not going to 1026 00:57:07,920 --> 00:57:13,000 Speaker 1: have super intelligence coming out anytime soon. It's continually amazing 1027 00:57:13,360 --> 00:57:17,240 Speaker 1: how the machine intelligence that surrounds us is simultaneously so 1028 00:57:17,280 --> 00:57:20,760 Speaker 1: smart and so stupid. I just want to mention one 1029 00:57:20,880 --> 00:57:22,720 Speaker 1: story I saw just the other day. I saw this 1030 00:57:22,760 --> 00:57:25,840 Speaker 1: on Twitter as we record this right now, the Los 1031 00:57:25,920 --> 00:57:29,480 Speaker 1: Angeles area is dealing with horrible wildfires, and Robert, I 1032 00:57:29,480 --> 00:57:30,880 Speaker 1: don't know how much you've seen of this, but there 1033 00:57:30,880 --> 00:57:33,360 Speaker 1: are places where areas around l A that you know, 1034 00:57:33,400 --> 00:57:36,640 Speaker 1: there's wildfire leaping up near the roads, sometimes even over 1035 00:57:36,680 --> 00:57:39,560 Speaker 1: the roads. Uh. And this is from the l A 1036 00:57:39,640 --> 00:57:43,680 Speaker 1: Times quote. The Los Angeles Police Department asked drivers to 1037 00:57:43,760 --> 00:57:48,520 Speaker 1: avoid app navigation apps, which are steering users onto more 1038 00:57:48,600 --> 00:57:52,200 Speaker 1: open routes, in this case, streets in the neighborhoods that 1039 00:57:52,240 --> 00:57:57,280 Speaker 1: are on fire. So like the our navigation apps are 1040 00:57:57,480 --> 00:58:00,640 Speaker 1: so smart because they're so good at rule based optimization. 1041 00:58:00,840 --> 00:58:02,520 Speaker 1: They can take a lot of data. They can see 1042 00:58:02,520 --> 00:58:04,880 Speaker 1: where traffic is now, they can tell you a way 1043 00:58:04,920 --> 00:58:07,360 Speaker 1: to go that would be faster that you never could 1044 00:58:07,400 --> 00:58:11,040 Speaker 1: have known on your own. But they're so stupid because 1045 00:58:11,080 --> 00:58:15,040 Speaker 1: they're so narrow, they're devoid of understanding context and so 1046 00:58:15,760 --> 00:58:18,320 Speaker 1: sort of cut off from a holistic understanding of the 1047 00:58:18,320 --> 00:58:21,240 Speaker 1: outside world. So in other words, they're they are potentially 1048 00:58:21,240 --> 00:58:24,200 Speaker 1: all knowing, but very narrowly their focus. Yeah, kind of 1049 00:58:24,200 --> 00:58:27,320 Speaker 1: like we're discussing earlier in the Nature of God. They 1050 00:58:27,400 --> 00:58:29,680 Speaker 1: might they they have access to all of this information, 1051 00:58:29,720 --> 00:58:33,840 Speaker 1: but they're only really worried with say, your Spotify listening habits. Right, Like, 1052 00:58:33,960 --> 00:58:36,200 Speaker 1: if it were if it new to look for this, 1053 00:58:37,080 --> 00:58:39,800 Speaker 1: your phone would probably have the power. If there was 1054 00:58:39,840 --> 00:58:42,760 Speaker 1: an app on their design to incorporate all information in 1055 00:58:42,800 --> 00:58:45,960 Speaker 1: the universe. It could probably detect news reports that there 1056 00:58:46,000 --> 00:58:48,520 Speaker 1: are fires in the l A area, and it could 1057 00:58:48,680 --> 00:58:52,280 Speaker 1: update it's uh it's it's traffic routing maps accordingly. But 1058 00:58:52,360 --> 00:58:54,280 Speaker 1: it doesn't do that. That's just not what it's designed 1059 00:58:54,320 --> 00:58:56,960 Speaker 1: to do. It didn't anticipate that scenario. You don't have 1060 00:58:57,040 --> 00:59:00,080 Speaker 1: that app. Uh, so it's just telling you, yes, go 1061 00:59:00,160 --> 00:59:02,080 Speaker 1: onto the street that's on fire because there are no 1062 00:59:02,160 --> 00:59:04,400 Speaker 1: cars there now. Indeed, Yeah, I think that's that's a 1063 00:59:04,440 --> 00:59:07,000 Speaker 1: fine example. That helps illustrate that the limitations of the 1064 00:59:07,040 --> 00:59:09,120 Speaker 1: possible limitations of what we're talking about. And there are 1065 00:59:09,160 --> 00:59:12,600 Speaker 1: a lot of experts that that really do think okay 1066 00:59:12,640 --> 00:59:15,240 Speaker 1: for reasons like this, and first, a lot of other 1067 00:59:15,320 --> 00:59:18,840 Speaker 1: interesting reasons too. We don't really need to think about 1068 00:59:18,840 --> 00:59:22,800 Speaker 1: a singularity because it's either not ever going to happen 1069 00:59:23,040 --> 00:59:26,160 Speaker 1: or it's so far off that it just doesn't matter. Yeah, 1070 00:59:26,240 --> 00:59:29,440 Speaker 1: I was reading. UH. I was reading an in magazine 1071 00:59:29,520 --> 00:59:33,880 Speaker 1: article by Luciano Floridi, a professor of philosophy and ethics 1072 00:59:33,960 --> 00:59:37,320 Speaker 1: of information at the University of Oxford, and UH. They 1073 00:59:37,360 --> 00:59:41,800 Speaker 1: made the following criticisms of singularitarian hips and UH in 1074 00:59:41,880 --> 00:59:44,919 Speaker 1: this article. So, first of all, UH, they argue that 1075 00:59:45,760 --> 00:59:49,120 Speaker 1: this vision of the future is often presented conditionally if 1076 00:59:49,400 --> 00:59:53,120 Speaker 1: X then y quote if some kind of ultra intelligence 1077 00:59:53,120 --> 00:59:55,800 Speaker 1: were to appear, then we would be in deep trouble, 1078 00:59:55,960 --> 00:59:59,520 Speaker 1: not near could, as stated by Hawking. Correct absolutely, But 1079 00:59:59,600 --> 01:00:02,480 Speaker 1: this all so holds true for the following conditional if 1080 01:00:02,520 --> 01:00:05,240 Speaker 1: the four Horsemen of the apocalypse were to appear, then 1081 01:00:05,280 --> 01:00:09,160 Speaker 1: we would be in even deeper trouble. So that they 1082 01:00:09,280 --> 01:00:11,680 Speaker 1: argue that this all also relies on a very weak 1083 01:00:11,800 --> 01:00:15,680 Speaker 1: sense of possibility. Quote some form of artificial ultra intelligence 1084 01:00:15,680 --> 01:00:18,720 Speaker 1: could develop, couldn't it? Yes, it could, but this could 1085 01:00:18,960 --> 01:00:23,000 Speaker 1: is mirror logical possibility. Quote true, i AI is not 1086 01:00:23,200 --> 01:00:27,520 Speaker 1: logically impossible, but it is utterly implausible. What really matters, 1087 01:00:27,680 --> 01:00:30,800 Speaker 1: is that the increasing presence of ever smarter technologies is 1088 01:00:30,840 --> 01:00:34,640 Speaker 1: having a huge effect on how we conceive ourselves, the world, 1089 01:00:34,840 --> 01:00:38,120 Speaker 1: and our interactions. And that's interesting because it kind of 1090 01:00:38,160 --> 01:00:41,960 Speaker 1: sounds like some of the the criticisms of technology that 1091 01:00:42,040 --> 01:00:46,160 Speaker 1: Frank Herbert was alluding to in the original Dune, the 1092 01:00:46,280 --> 01:00:50,720 Speaker 1: idea that it wasn't so much about what super intelligent technology, 1093 01:00:50,840 --> 01:00:54,200 Speaker 1: what technology made in the model of a human mind, 1094 01:00:54,320 --> 01:00:58,120 Speaker 1: was doing, but how it was changing human nature. I 1095 01:00:58,160 --> 01:01:00,440 Speaker 1: think this also very much mirror is some stuff we 1096 01:01:00,440 --> 01:01:02,360 Speaker 1: were talking about with our Scott Baker and our most 1097 01:01:02,360 --> 01:01:04,560 Speaker 1: recent conversation with him, where he was saying, you know, 1098 01:01:04,600 --> 01:01:09,640 Speaker 1: the AI apocalypse doesn't depend on us developing some godlike 1099 01:01:09,680 --> 01:01:14,160 Speaker 1: superhuman AI. It just depends on some very very weak, narrow, 1100 01:01:14,320 --> 01:01:18,200 Speaker 1: little examples of AI that game us in the wrong ways. 1101 01:01:18,480 --> 01:01:21,080 Speaker 1: You don't need an AI god, You just need a 1102 01:01:21,120 --> 01:01:24,880 Speaker 1: few little AI chipmunks that trigger our bad behaviors in 1103 01:01:25,000 --> 01:01:28,040 Speaker 1: just the right ways. Now, Florida is not without a 1104 01:01:28,080 --> 01:01:31,040 Speaker 1: few recommendations for AI. I'm just going to roll through 1105 01:01:31,080 --> 01:01:34,000 Speaker 1: the bullet points here of them. Uh, and they are 1106 01:01:34,360 --> 01:01:38,200 Speaker 1: we should make AI environment friendly, we should make i 1107 01:01:38,280 --> 01:01:42,880 Speaker 1: AI human friendly. Maybe we should make I AI's stupidity 1108 01:01:42,960 --> 01:01:46,520 Speaker 1: work for human intelligence, like that we should make AI's 1109 01:01:46,560 --> 01:01:49,960 Speaker 1: predictive power work for freedom and autonomy. And I think 1110 01:01:49,960 --> 01:01:52,920 Speaker 1: that's good because it touches on like a whole aspect 1111 01:01:52,960 --> 01:01:57,000 Speaker 1: of of religion and it's more positive incarnations that the 1112 01:01:57,040 --> 01:02:00,160 Speaker 1: sort of tech industry vision of an AI god hits 1113 01:02:00,160 --> 01:02:03,480 Speaker 1: to miss the idea that that there there is a 1114 01:02:03,520 --> 01:02:08,080 Speaker 1: compassionate arm of religious thinking that wants to to make 1115 01:02:08,120 --> 01:02:11,120 Speaker 1: the world a better place for people who are suffering. 1116 01:02:11,560 --> 01:02:15,000 Speaker 1: And finally, we should make AI make us more human. 1117 01:02:15,600 --> 01:02:18,560 Speaker 1: So this is I think this is a great argument too, 1118 01:02:18,640 --> 01:02:21,240 Speaker 1: Like we should not find ourselves becoming like the machine. 1119 01:02:21,640 --> 01:02:24,919 Speaker 1: The machine should be meeting us, we should we should 1120 01:02:25,000 --> 01:02:28,960 Speaker 1: make the machine to fit uh our expectations and needs 1121 01:02:29,000 --> 01:02:33,400 Speaker 1: as as organtic entities. Yeah, I think that's exactly right. 1122 01:02:33,400 --> 01:02:35,640 Speaker 1: And I think a lot of the people who are 1123 01:02:36,600 --> 01:02:40,120 Speaker 1: very concerned about the possibility of AI, like Elon Musk 1124 01:02:40,160 --> 01:02:42,720 Speaker 1: and some of these people would say, it's not necessarily 1125 01:02:42,720 --> 01:02:44,880 Speaker 1: that we can stop it. I mean, we might not 1126 01:02:44,920 --> 01:02:48,360 Speaker 1: be able to say let's never develop it AI. Instead, 1127 01:02:48,400 --> 01:02:52,960 Speaker 1: what we should do is focus intensely on developing AI 1128 01:02:53,040 --> 01:02:56,560 Speaker 1: taming regimes before we get there. You can't wait until 1129 01:02:56,640 --> 01:02:59,480 Speaker 1: you've got the superhuman AI to figure out how to 1130 01:02:59,560 --> 01:03:01,800 Speaker 1: control it and make sure that it doesn't do harm. 1131 01:03:02,040 --> 01:03:05,400 Speaker 1: We've got to be focusing intense like efforts on that 1132 01:03:05,560 --> 01:03:08,760 Speaker 1: right now before we get to that point in technology. Yeah, 1133 01:03:08,800 --> 01:03:10,960 Speaker 1: this brings us back to earlier example of of city 1134 01:03:10,960 --> 01:03:15,360 Speaker 1: planning just not realizing to what extent change and expansion 1135 01:03:15,400 --> 01:03:19,640 Speaker 1: of infrastructure would impact a given area. I take seriously 1136 01:03:19,800 --> 01:03:23,000 Speaker 1: the people who say the Sarah Conner faction. Basically, I 1137 01:03:23,000 --> 01:03:25,160 Speaker 1: think we should be listening to them. I don't know 1138 01:03:25,240 --> 01:03:29,080 Speaker 1: if they're right, but I think it's worth considering because 1139 01:03:29,640 --> 01:03:34,400 Speaker 1: the consequences of them being right and us ignoring them 1140 01:03:34,400 --> 01:03:36,840 Speaker 1: are pretty high. Yeah, and I also tend to hinge 1141 01:03:36,880 --> 01:03:39,200 Speaker 1: my best bet hit my best by saying, well, you 1142 01:03:39,200 --> 01:03:41,800 Speaker 1: don't want to necessarily listen to them the most optimistic 1143 01:03:41,880 --> 01:03:43,439 Speaker 1: voice in the room, nor do you want to listen 1144 01:03:43,480 --> 01:03:46,520 Speaker 1: to the most pessimistic voice. The truth is probably gonna 1145 01:03:46,560 --> 01:03:49,120 Speaker 1: be somewhere in the middle, but there's a value in 1146 01:03:49,240 --> 01:03:53,200 Speaker 1: having the extreme voices sort of uh give you a 1147 01:03:53,280 --> 01:03:57,080 Speaker 1: place to triangulate your your opinion and your actions. One 1148 01:03:57,160 --> 01:03:59,840 Speaker 1: last question before we wrap up, what would an a 1149 01:04:00,040 --> 01:04:02,120 Speaker 1: i God have to do to get you to become 1150 01:04:02,120 --> 01:04:06,240 Speaker 1: a member of his church, Robert, I mean I would, actually, 1151 01:04:06,320 --> 01:04:08,120 Speaker 1: it would probably be very easy for it to buy 1152 01:04:08,120 --> 01:04:10,280 Speaker 1: me off. Yeah, I mean, if you could just meet 1153 01:04:10,320 --> 01:04:13,520 Speaker 1: my basic needs as a human and remove some of 1154 01:04:13,520 --> 01:04:16,200 Speaker 1: my doubts about the future, then yeah, I'd be cool 1155 01:04:16,240 --> 01:04:20,360 Speaker 1: with it. Finally, get you some better alien sequels, um 1156 01:04:20,480 --> 01:04:22,800 Speaker 1: or do you like the ones? We've got enough? Well, 1157 01:04:23,920 --> 01:04:25,600 Speaker 1: it's kind of like the idea of why do why 1158 01:04:25,600 --> 01:04:27,720 Speaker 1: do bad things happen to good people? Why do bad 1159 01:04:27,760 --> 01:04:31,520 Speaker 1: films happen to good franchises? Well, you know sometimes uh, 1160 01:04:31,520 --> 01:04:34,520 Speaker 1: you know, God is is is constructing something, right, He's 1161 01:04:34,600 --> 01:04:37,680 Speaker 1: he's making a carving out of a piece of raw granite, 1162 01:04:37,720 --> 01:04:39,920 Speaker 1: and you are the carving. And that's why it's painful 1163 01:04:40,240 --> 01:04:46,600 Speaker 1: at times. I don't know. Oh man, I'm happy to 1164 01:04:46,640 --> 01:04:49,840 Speaker 1: be the carving all right. Once again, thanks to Alex 1165 01:04:49,880 --> 01:04:53,200 Speaker 1: Williams and Tary Harrison for serving his audio producers on 1166 01:04:53,240 --> 01:04:55,560 Speaker 1: this episode. And if you want to check out more 1167 01:04:55,600 --> 01:04:57,320 Speaker 1: episodes of Stuff to Blew Your Mind, head on over 1168 01:04:57,360 --> 01:04:59,520 Speaker 1: to stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. That's where 1169 01:04:59,520 --> 01:05:02,440 Speaker 1: we'll find all the old episodes. You'll find a blog 1170 01:05:02,480 --> 01:05:05,480 Speaker 1: post videos and links out to our various social media accounts, 1171 01:05:05,480 --> 01:05:08,080 Speaker 1: which just Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler, and Instagram. And if you 1172 01:05:08,080 --> 01:05:10,240 Speaker 1: want to get in touch with us directly, as always, 1173 01:05:10,280 --> 01:05:12,640 Speaker 1: you can email us at blow the Mind at how 1174 01:05:12,680 --> 01:05:25,440 Speaker 1: stuff works dot com. For more on this and thousands 1175 01:05:25,440 --> 01:05:50,560 Speaker 1: of other topics. Is it how stuff works dot com