WEBVTT - Episode 837: Protecting the American Worker

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>On this episode of Nuts World.

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 2>In twenty eighteen, Vincent Fernuccio and Jennifer Butler created Institute

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 2>for the American Worker to better inform policy makers and

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 2>stakeholders in Washington, d C. About current developments and labor policy.

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 2>The Institute for the American Worker worked with Congressman Burgess

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Owens to introduce the Start Applying Labor Transparency, or SALT Act,

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 2>to amend the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 2>nineteen fifty nine, requiring greater transparency and financial transactions between

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 2>unions and labor consultants, closing loopholes that have allowed backroom

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 2>deals to thrive. Here to discuss the SALT Act, I'm

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 2>really pleased to welcome my guest, Vincent Bernuccio. He is

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 2>the president and co founder of Institute for the American Worker.

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 2>He previously served in the US Department of Labor Transition

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.959
<v Speaker 2>team for both Trump administrations and served in the Joy

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 2>gege W. Bush Administration's Department of Labor. Vincent, welcome and

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 2>thank you for joining me on Each World.

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Mister speaker, Thank you so much for having me on.

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 3>It is an absolute honor and I appreciate it.

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>How did you get interested in this whole topic.

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, I graduated law school and I was looking for

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 3>a job. I actually we met when I was running

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 3>for Congress in Michigan. I was a sacrificial land against

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 3>John dingle.

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:35.479
<v Speaker 1>An active courage it.

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Was, but you know, helped me my career. I got

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 3>on themigp and eventually it got me a appointment to

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 3>the Department of Labor under then Assistant Secretary for Administration

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Management and Deputy Secretary and Acting Secretary Pat Pizzella. And

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 3>then I was off to the races. And that's what

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 3>got me into labor policy and been doing it ever

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:56.559
<v Speaker 3>since the Bush administration.

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>That's great.

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with President Trump's recent executive action restoring accountability

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 2>to policy influencing positions within the federal workforce. Can you

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 2>walk us through what Schedule F is and why the

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration sees it as essential for restoring accountability in

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 2>the federal workforce.

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, so this is going to be one of the

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 3>most impactful things I think the President does. I'll just

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 3>give you a little bit of history. There's kind of

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 3>been a ping pong on this. So in the first

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Trump administration, he issued an executive order called Schedule F

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 3>President Biden got elected and put his hand on the Bible,

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 3>went to the Oval Office, and it was one of

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 3>the first things that he repealed. And then to President

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Trump in the current administration, one of the first things

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 3>he did is reinstitute that the executive Order, and he's

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:48.519
<v Speaker 3>actually moved it from Schedule F to this Career Policy Schedule.

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 3>And let me tell you what this does. This essentially

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 3>makes fifty thousand federal employees, or two percent of the

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 3>federal workforce, makes them at well employees just like most

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 3>of the private sector, just like states like Utah, Texas, Florida, Kentucky,

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Georgia and others already have. And the reason this is

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:12.239
<v Speaker 3>so important is because if you have career federal employees

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 3>that aren't doing their job, whether because they're either just

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 3>not good, they just don't want to, or they simply

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 3>just do not like the policies the president is putting forward,

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 3>this gives politicals the ability to say, well, you're not

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 3>doing your job, you should be let go. And you know,

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 3>I've seen this firsthand in multiple administrations that you can

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 3>see career federal bureaucrats actually throw sand in the gears

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 3>of policy. And this would go a long way to

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 3>make sure that that doesn't happen.

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 2>When Lincoln became president, there were about fifteen hundred policy positions.

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 2>He eliminated twelve hundred of them because he knew that

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 2>with Southerners and with Democrats, he couldn't win a civil

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 2>war if they were the instrument of affecting things. So literally,

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 2>out of a total fifteen hundred and twelve hundred left.

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 2>And I always remind people that that giving the elected

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 2>official the ability to actually drive the bureaucracy is central,

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 2>because if you don't do that, the bureaucrats really are

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 2>running the place and the elected officials are just on

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 2>the surface. Does Schedule F still exist or has it

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 2>now got a new title.

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 3>It's got a new title, and it makes sense. So

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 3>it was Schedule F under the first Trump administration. Now

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 3>it is this policy Career schedule. And the reason for

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 3>the change is, once again, these are still civil servants.

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 3>They're still governed by the Civil Service for Formact. The

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 3>only difference is that if they are in a what's

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:44.679
<v Speaker 3>known as policy influencing position, that if they're throwing sands

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 3>in the gears of that policy and they're thwarting the

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 3>people's elected representative. It's President Trump, it could be any president.

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 3>This goes beyond administration. It also goes beyond policy. This

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 3>isn't just a labor policy. This is energy, this is education,

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 3>this is financial services. That those elected representatives could say, well,

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 3>you know what, you're not doing your job. We don't

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 3>have to go through this long, lengthy review process to

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 3>dismiss you. It's just you're not doing your job. You're

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 3>now an out well employee. You're throwing sand to the

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 3>gears of policy. You should be removed.

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, obviously you're going to have some substantial opposition from

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 2>the American Federation of Government Employees in the National Treasure

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 2>Employees Union.

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>What's their counter.

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Are they in favor of not having elected officials be effective?

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 3>Yes. What they are trying to do is essentially throw

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 3>sand in the gears of these type of reforms. What

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 3>they are pushing for is making it as difficult as

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 3>possible to remove federal employees whether or not they're doing

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 3>their job. You see them opposing President Trump on this

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 3>executive order soon to be rule. You see them trying

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.479
<v Speaker 3>to throwart his other executive actions, such as, you know,

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 3>protecting national security. He issued another executive order recently that

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 3>said that, you know, you can't have collective bargaining and

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 3>multiple federal agencies that deal with national security, something that

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 3>the law very clearly gives him the right to do

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 3>and to determine which agencies those are. These unions they

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 3>like the status quo, they like the protections, and what

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 3>they don't like is accountability for those federal employees that

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 3>are not doing their job. And frankly, I think that's

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 3>a disservice to the good federal employees. And there are

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot of good federal employees out there. I've worked

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 3>with good career federal employees that then have to pick

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 3>up the slack for the ones that aren't doing what

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 3>they're supposed to do.

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 2>As a part of all this, you have been strongly

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 2>supporting Representing Burgess Owen's bill, the Start Applying Labor Transparency

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Act or SOLD Act. Walk us through what would that

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 2>do and why is that important?

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely so. Now we're shifting over from federal public sector

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 3>unions too. Now we're talking about mostly private sector unions here.

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 3>And this is what Representative Owen's bill does. There's a

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 3>thing called salting. When unions come to organize, they can

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 3>have organizers that take jobs will lie to the employer

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 3>and say, well, I want to take this job, you know,

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 3>just to work for you think, you know, I just

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 3>want to be a barista at Starbucks, so give me

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 3>a job. What they're really doing is they're actually paid

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 3>by the union to take that job and then to

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 3>start organizing. And not only do they lie to the employer,

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 3>but they also lie to the employees. I'm just your

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 3>fellow coworker. Hey, have you heard about this union? Maybe

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 3>it's a good idea. We've actually seen quotes of workers

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 3>that say, well, you know, we thought this was kind

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 3>of schemey, I thought this person was my friend. Now

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 3>I find out that they're being paid to organize me.

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 3>What is this about. It actually gets so bad that

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 3>you had a paid union salt testify before Congress and

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 3>not put in their disclosure form that they were getting

0:07:57.600 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 3>paid by the union. And they testified, Oh, I'm just

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 3>a Starbucks barista, and then it later came about oh,

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 3>actually no, you're not. You're actually being paid to organize Starbucks.

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 3>That really called into question that person's testimony.

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that also a felony? Oh?

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 3>I know that this was undee Chairwoman Virginia Fox. I

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 3>know there were investigations going on to see what exactly happened,

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 3>especially when that union salt signed that truth and Testimony form.

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Would this spill basically require that somebody who is being

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 2>salted has to make it public.

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 3>That's it? So right now, if an employer goes out

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 3>and they hire a consultant to talk to their employees

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 3>and say, you know, we don't think a union's right

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 3>for us, that employer and the person they hire have

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.079
<v Speaker 3>to fill out certain forms with the Department of Labor.

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 3>And you know, the first ones you do within a month.

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 3>So we're just saying, why don't we have parity here?

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 3>If the employer has to report hiring someone to talk

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 3>to employees about unionization, the unions, if they hire someone

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 3>to talk to employees about unionization, they should file the

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 3>exact same forms.

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>All of this is built in a sense.

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 2>When the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of nineteen

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 2>fifty nine, which was the first big effort to create

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 2>transparency in this area, why was it not adequate?

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Basically, you know, it gave discretion. I would argue that

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 3>the Department of Labor actually has the ability to say

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 3>that if you're talking to employees, whether you're on the

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:47.719
<v Speaker 3>union side or whether you're on the employer side, you

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 3>should file these forms. However, that's not how it is

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 3>being interpreted. So what Representative Owen's bill does is it says, well,

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 3>since it's not being interpreted that way, let's be crystal

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 3>clear within the STAF that if you're talking to employees,

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 3>whether it's union or employer side, you should file these forms.

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 2>The whole process of getting all this out in the

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 2>open also relates back to what's really kind of a

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 2>bizarre model in the government, where we the taxpayers, are

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 2>actually paying for the union members to organize the government.

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 2>See if people who are supposedly being paid to be

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 2>civil servants, but they're actually being paid to be union organizers.

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 3>That's right. That's a process called official time. And it's

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 3>not just union organizers. It's actually doing all sorts of

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 3>work on the taxpayer dime for the union. It's being

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 3>a union official, in some cases, working full time for

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 3>the union. This is actually something that President Trump did

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 3>away with in his first term. You had union officials

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 3>working full times in some cases for years for the union,

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 3>but still getting their taxpayer salary. So once again President

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Trump deserves a lot of credit with this. He's put

0:10:57.800 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 3>forth a policy to make sure that this is reported.

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Was reported in his first term, President Biden simply did

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 3>not report it. Now President Trump is saying it has

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 3>to be reported again. But he has actually gone further,

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 3>and it's not just about how much the government is

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 3>paying union officials with taxpayer dollars instead of doing their

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 3>job to do union work. It's actually about how much

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 3>time federal employees, agency employees are doing just to negotiate

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 3>with the union, to handle grievances and all of these things.

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Once again, to this administration's credit, the Office of Personnel

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Management a couple weeks ago said not only should agencies

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 3>report official time, but they should also report how much

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 3>agency time is spent on collective bargaining and speaker if

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 3>you like, I can get into some of the just

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 3>kind of crazy things that we have seen unions negotiate

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 3>over in the federal workforce.

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 2>I think for the average taxpayer that would be really

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 2>helpful because most of us, including me, I know in

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 2>general that it's much worse than we think it is,

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:01.599
<v Speaker 2>but we don't really have specific examples.

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 3>The first one is. I was on a panel under

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 3>the first Trump administration, the Federal Service Impasses panel that

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.959
<v Speaker 3>did mediation and arbitration between the federal government and federal

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 3>unions when they came to an impass. So I saw

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot of these cases firsthand. They're all public, and

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 3>we actually put a study out on our website detail

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 3>of all of this. It's all available at I the

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 3>number four AW dot org, IFAW dot org. But let

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 3>me give you a couple examples. So one you had

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 3>a union negotiating over being able to smoke on tobacco

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 3>free federal facilities. You had another one where they were

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 3>negotiating over the right mister speaker reminds you the right

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 3>to wear spandex in the office. And they had another

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 3>one where they were negotiating over the height of modesty

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 3>panels under cubicles. It was an office move and does

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 3>the cubicle go two inches or four inches above the

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 3>bottom of the floor. Now, they negotiated for years over

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 3>this two inches versus four inches. They could have probably

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.599
<v Speaker 3>purchase go plated cubicles for the entire office. For the

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 3>amount of money that they spent in official time, in

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 3>staff time and travel and supplies, you name it. So

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 3>those are the things that they're bargaining over, and those

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 3>are the things that, thankfully will continue to come to

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 3>light with these transparency measures from the administration.

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Turns out across the whole government to be a lot

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 2>more money than people think.

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, official time alone in the first Trump administration was

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 3>well over one hundred million three was one hundred and

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty something million dollars in official time, and that doesn't

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 3>count how much on the agency side was spent. So

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 3>we're going to see probably some very high numbers, and

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 3>that's year over year.

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 2>A different front. Senator Josh Holly proposed the Faster Labor

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Contracts Act, the Speed Up Union contract negotiations. I find

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Holly interesting and complicated. What do you make of this bill?

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 3>I think complicated is the right term. And unfortunately Senator

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Howlly has this larger framework, and this is the first

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 3>bill from his larger framework, and it is pretty much

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 3>part and parcel borrowed from the Democrat Union wish List Bill,

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 3>the Protecting the Right to Organize Act or pro Act. Unfortunately,

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 3>the timing was a little unfortunate for Senator Hawley. So

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 3>what this bill does is it would allow federal bureaucrats

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 3>to impose an arbitration panel on two private parties. So

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 3>if a union organizes an employer and within a couple

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 3>of weeks, if they don't reach a collective bargaining agreement,

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 3>first they say would go to mediation. So that's where

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 3>both sides come together as essentially marriage counseling, try to

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 3>get to an agreement. If that doesn't work within a

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 3>very short amount of time, then they go to arbitration,

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 3>where these federal bureaucrats would impose this three person panel

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 3>that would actually write a contract for two private parties,

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 3>one of which maybe never even agreed to the process

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 3>in the first place. And I mean this everything at

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 3>a work site, ours, pay, working conditions, you name it.

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 3>So it's extremely troubling.

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Two questions, guys.

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 2>One, it strikes me that that literally gives the union

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 2>every reason not to agree.

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 3>We've seen this in the public sector, not so much

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 3>in the private sector, but in the public sector where yeah,

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 3>you'll have one side and maybe it's the union, we'll

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 3>stall the negotiations and then they get it to the arbitrator,

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 3>and the arbitrator will just look at maybe another unionized

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 3>facility and go well, they're getting this, so that works

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 3>for them. This should work for this, whether city, town

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 3>or in the Haley bill, now private company over here.

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 3>But let me tell you kind of the unfortunate timing

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 3>of this. So those federal bureaucrats, they are at the FMCS,

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 3>the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, and right after this

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 3>bill was introduced, President Trump announced that he was ratcheting

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 3>back how much funding was going to fmcs. And actually,

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 3>at the same time, it was a little old, was

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 3>about a decade old, but there was re unearthed reports

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 3>of corruption and overspending and all these problems with fmcs.

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 3>So that was right after Senator Hawley introduced this bill

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:17.239
<v Speaker 3>that basically gave all of this power to the FMCS.

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 3>So we'll see what happens with it. But I know

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people are extraordinarily skeptical of having federal

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 3>bureaucrats dictate these panels that could then write entire contracts

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 3>for two private parties.

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 2>It seems to me that private sector unions have been

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 2>steadily shrinking as a percent of the whole workforce, So

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 2>trying to design a coercive bargaining system, it is essentially

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 2>an effort to fit back to growing the unions in

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.640
<v Speaker 2>the face of the fact that the American workers seem

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 2>to be leaving them.

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 3>That's right. So this was the first year, and this

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 3>is public in private that union membership drop below double

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 3>digits nationwide. This is Baxsin's early nineteen hundreds. In the

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 3>private sector, it's below six percent. I believe it's about

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 3>five point nine percent right now. And it's not so

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 3>much unions. I mean, I think unions can do good.

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:32.679
<v Speaker 3>I think unions can really help workers. The problem is

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 3>that they are in this antiquated, one size fits all

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 3>kind of industrial revolution collective bargaining model that does not

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 3>allow for flexibility, It does not allow for ingenuity, it

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 3>does not allow for individual workers to be rewarded. I

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 3>think today's modern workforce is looking at that model and saying, no,

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 3>that's not what I want. So instead of having this

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 3>framework that center Hawley is putting out, instead of having

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 3>all of these government mandates to think that if you

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 3>really want to grow union membership and have unions thrive

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 3>is have them adopt a new, flexible, individual focused professional

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 3>service business model as opposed to the compulsion they have today.

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 2>In a sense, you'd move people towards more of a

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 2>everybody gets to be a professional, as in a law firm,

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 2>rather than the kind of classic indust show era mass unionization.

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's making them professional service organizations that you can

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 3>join voluntarily. The employers aren't compelled to negotiate with them,

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 3>but they will because unions can provide top notch services.

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 3>But I think that's the way of the future, you know. Unfortunately,

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 3>even for workers now, a lot of unions not only

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 3>have a floor for pay, but they also have a ceiling.

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 3>So in a lot of unions and a lot of

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 3>collective bargaining agreements, the only way you get ahead is

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 3>unless you get another degree, is logging another year on

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 3>the job. Doesn't matter how hard you work, how productive

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 3>you are, how much money you make your boss, it's well,

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 3>you're under the CBA and the only way you're getting

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 3>a raise is by seniorti logging another year on the job.

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 3>So I think that is why a lot of workers

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 3>are looking at unions and saying, yeah, it's just not

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 3>for me.

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>We're entering a different era.

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 2>It seems to me when you look both at the

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 2>kind of bills like Halley for the private sector, and

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 2>then you look at what's happening with the Trump administration

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 2>reforms in the public sector. What do you think is

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 2>the impact of public opinion? How important is it that

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 2>the American people understand these things.

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's interesting because you see poll after poll unions

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 3>do get high approval ratings. But the interesting thing is

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 3>that when you scratch the surface and this goes to

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 3>you that business model that a lot of workers just

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 3>aren't buying right now is that, yeah, unions are good,

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 3>we like unions. But then you scratch the surface and well,

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 3>would you want a union at your workplace? Would you

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 3>want to join a union? And that approval drops significantly.

0:19:56.400 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 3>Unions they do have that public perception that they have support,

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 3>but it's a lot of well it's good that they're

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 3>out there, but I just don't think it's right for me.

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 3>That's where I think that if you change that business

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 3>model of the unions, the paradigm a collective bargaining, not

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 3>what Senator Hawley is trying to do with his framework,

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:18.400
<v Speaker 3>and certainly not what we're seeing out of the Democrats

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 3>with the Proact and all this force and compulsion and

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 3>making it harder for workers to work for themselves or

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, attacking the franchise business model. All of this

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 3>in the proact, that's the problem. But workers just want

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 3>something different.

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean it does anyway that you have to put

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 2>all this in the context of both competition from around

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 2>the world and the scale of change that the emerging

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 2>artificial intelligence is going to imply, and that, if anything,

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 2>you're going to see more fluidity and more flexibility rather

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 2>than more rigidity and the way the labor market operates

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 2>over the next two or three generations. I mean, does

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 2>that sort of fit your sense of it?

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 3>That's absolutely correct, and you know you do see what

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 3>does come to the flexibility and put AI aside for

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 3>a second. When it does come to flexibility, being able

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 3>to work for yourself, being able to achieve by your

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 3>merit or how hard you work. You see that that's

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 3>what workers are looking for. That's what modern and young

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 3>workers are looking for, not this one size fits all model,

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 3>not the compulsion of you have to do this or

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:24.439
<v Speaker 3>you have to live by this rigid contract. That is

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 3>really where I think the future is. And I see

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 3>the future in independent contract. You know, I was an

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 3>independent contractor for a long time, and it can be

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 3>very lucrative and it also gave me a lot of flexibility,

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, take on projects clients. I liked determine my

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 3>own schedule when I wanted to be with my family.

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 3>You see things like Representative Kylie has his Modern Worker

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Empowerment Bill and his Modern Worker Security Bill, and they're

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 3>leaning into independent contracting, making it easier for workers to

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 3>work for themselves, to get benefits if they're working for themselves.

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 3>You saw that during the first Trump administration with their

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 3>independent contract rule in the Department of Labor. Unfortunately, you

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 3>see with the Proact in Congress, and what you saw

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 3>coming out of the Body administration is that they were

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 3>just going in the exact opposite direction and trying to

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 3>make everyone in an employee and you know, borrowing the

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 3>failed ideas from California of saying you can't work for yourself.

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Don't you think that to some extent that whole model

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 2>of independent contractor may eventually be applied to the civil service.

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.239
<v Speaker 3>Federal government has a lot of independent contractors now. You

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 3>do see that. You do see a lot of efforts

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 3>out there, you know, kind of right size government. You know,

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 3>there's ideas out there, like the Yellow Pages test if

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 3>you can find something in the yellow pages. You shouldn't

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 3>have a career sort of a servant doing it. It

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 3>should just be contracted out. Contracting is something that you know,

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 3>the federal government specifically does a lot of, and you

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 3>know you do hear a lot about that, and I

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 3>think there the efforts are to make contracting fair, you know,

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 3>to get the best and most economical contractors without a

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 3>lot of extra strings attached. And once again you saw

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot of those strings, especially in the Union context

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 3>during the Biden administration.

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>The whole process.

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 2>It seems to me the long term trend is towards

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 2>more flexibility, more unique designs, more opportunities because we now

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 2>have the technology that can handle the complexity.

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 3>Not only do we have the technology that can handle

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 3>the complexity on that, but I think we have a

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 3>workforce that that's what they want. They want that flexibility,

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 3>they want that ability to earn and achieve on their

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 3>own without being put into some one size fits all

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 3>contract That essentially is a business model that is several

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 3>generations too old and really has not adapted with the times.

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.439
<v Speaker 3>But unfortunately, we're seeing a lot of the bills that

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 3>look to favor that Model's simply just doubling down on

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 3>that failed business model of the past that has not

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 3>kept up with the economy and the modern workforce.

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, as you look out over the next three to

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 2>five years, what do you see as the major projects

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:12.239
<v Speaker 2>that you will be undertaking.

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 3>For I for a w Obviously we want to support

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 3>the administration. They have this rule making out right now,

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 3>going back to that policy career schedule. So we have

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 3>a portion of our website, I the number four aw

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 3>dot org that goes into detail on that rule. We

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 3>have it on a regulation watch portion of O website,

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 3>and we actually have a link there where people can

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 3>go and comment and say, yes, this is a good idea.

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, the people's elected representatives should have a civil

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.959
<v Speaker 3>service that is not throwing sand in the gears of

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 3>the policies that they were enacted to create. We see

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 3>good labor bills that are coming out of Congress, like

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 3>those two Kylie bills we were talking about before, the

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 3>Modern Worker Empowerment Act and the Modern Worker Security Act.

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 3>We see Representative Bob Ander, who's a freshman who I

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.959
<v Speaker 3>worked with very closely when he was in the Missouri

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 3>state legislator. He introduced a bill called the Worker Enfranchisement Act,

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 3>And this bill would say that if unions want to

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 3>monopoly to represent everyone once again in a private sector workplace,

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 3>that they should get a majority of everyone. And it

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 3>actually calls for the same quorum that the National Labor

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.959
<v Speaker 3>Relations Board that will do these elections does and says that,

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 3>you know, you should have two thirds of the employees voting,

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 3>and if a majority of those two thirds, so really

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 3>you're roughly saying, if you know, thirty three percent plus

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 3>one of workers vote for the union, that's how they

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 3>get in. But you shouldn't have these elections where single

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:37.479
<v Speaker 3>digits of percentages of employees vote to bring a union in.

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:39.199
<v Speaker 3>So those are just some of the bills. You know,

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 3>we're very excited on. The Employee Rights Act was introduced

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 3>last Congress. That was kind of all the good ideas

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 3>that a lot of the Republicans had, or most of

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 3>the good ideas a lot of Republicans had. So hopefully

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 3>that will reintroduce this Congress, and that you know, there's

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 3>a whole bunch of other good ideas out there, both

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 3>coming from Congress and coming from the administration.

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 2>You know, you mentioned in passing the new effort to

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 2>basically outlaw independent working. Can you talk to us for

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 2>a second about the whole political structure of California as

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 2>it relates to compulsory unionization.

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, unions, as you can imagine, are extremely powerful in California,

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's a reason why there's some of

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 3>the issues out there. So if we're talking about their

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.439
<v Speaker 3>attacks on independent contracting, and you know what put that

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 3>in context of, you know, some of the federal work

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 3>that we do is they passed what was known as

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 3>AB five several years ago, and imediately after AB five

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 3>was enacted, they realized we went too far. We did

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 3>this thing, it was called the ABC test. It made

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 3>independent contracting nearly impossible, and wanted to make everyone into

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 3>an employee. Well, they realized that went too far, and

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 3>they actually passed another bill and it was actually the

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 3>same author of the original AB five passed another bill

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 3>to create all these exemptions from AB five. And then

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 3>after they did that, voters said, well, it still goes

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 3>too far, and then they on when the ballot, passed

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 3>more exemptions and ratcheted back AB five. But now that

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 3>ABC test without those exemptions, that is exactly what's in

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 3>Congress's protecting the right to organize act so without the exemptions,

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 3>and when even California said you went too far, now

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Congress is pushing the exact same thing. So it is

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 3>extremely troubling. And on our website we also have stories

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 3>from California and AB five And I can think of

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 3>one woman that actually had to leave the state because

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 3>she wanted the flexibility. She did online teaching and she

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 3>wanted to take care of her infant children and she

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 3>couldn't do that if she was an employee. And when

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 3>AB five passed, she realized, well, my business is drying up,

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 3>so she actually moved out of state to make sure

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 3>that she could keep helping to support her family and

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 3>also have the flexibility to spend time with her kids.

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:53.120
<v Speaker 3>We have a lot of those stories on the website

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 3>and it really is telling.

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Well till Marco, Well, look, I want to thank you

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 2>both for the leadership you're providing for joining us today.

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Our listeners can find out more about what you do

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 2>at the Institute for the American Worker by visiting your

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 2>website at IFOAW dot org. And I really appreciate Vincent

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 2>you're taking time to.

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Be with us.

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Hey, thank you for having me on.

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Thank you to my guest, Vincent Nuccio. You can learn

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 2>more about the Institute for the American Worker on our

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 2>show page at newtsworld dot com. Newsworld is produced by

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:33.159
<v Speaker 2>Ganglish Sweet sixty and iHeartMedia. Our executive producers Guarnsey Sloan.

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Our researcher is Rachel Peterson. The artwork for the show

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 2>was created by Steve Penley. Special thanks to the team

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 2>at gingwishweet sixty. If you've been enjoying Newtsworld, I hope

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 2>you'll go to Apple Podcasts and both rate us with

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:48.959
<v Speaker 2>five stars and give us a review so others can

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 2>learn what it's all about.

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Right now, listeners of.

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 2>News World can sign up for my three free weekly

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 2>columns at gingwishree sixty dot com slash newsletter.

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm newt Gingga, which this is news World.

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Hm