WEBVTT - Swipe Right

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Swipe right. It's one more thing. I'm strong and getty.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>One more thing.

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 2>We've already get into swiping Wright left, which I only

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 2>know about from hearing people reference it.

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I've never done it myself.

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Before we get to that, here's a little John Stewart

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 2>from the Daily Show earlier this week.

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 3>And the Harris campaign has a massive ground game, fifty

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 3>thousand volunteers.

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 4>This is the first time some Democrats have told me

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 4>they've ever heard of people knocking on the same doors

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 4>a second time or a third time.

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, if there's one thing people love more than

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 3>someone appearing randomly at their door once, it's that same

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 3>in Parson coming back two or three times to talk politics,

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 3>even though everyone from vacuum salesman to Jehovah's witnesses, No,

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 3>that's a losing strategy.

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>In fact, they own that for decades.

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Let's just spend a quarter of a billion.

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Dollars on it.

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 3>You know what Democrats should do, whatever money is left over,

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 3>send those same people back to those voters' doors and

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:17.479
<v Speaker 3>just knock again during dinner, and when the homeowner comes

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.119
<v Speaker 3>to the door, go, what the scot.

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought we connected? Wow?

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 2>John Stewart as usual pointing out the obvious that everybody

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 2>miss misses. That was a different era, back when campaigns

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 2>built their their ground game with door knockers. Who it's

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 2>the same with answering your phone. Nobody answers the phone

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 2>if it's a number they don't know. And most people

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 2>in the modern era, probably not for better, probably for worse,

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 2>but don't like people coming and knocking on their door,

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Like John Stewart's how about that person coming back a

0:01:58.200 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 2>second time?

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Really makes you want to vote for that candidate, doesn't he.

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 2>This is a second time you've knocked on my door

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 2>until I finally got up and came and answered the door,

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 2>hoping you would go away.

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that's just getting back to the.

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 5>Incomprehensible amount of money that the Harris campaign spent well

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 5>over a billion dollars for a crushing defeat. I mean, God,

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 5>bless you. If you want to give away your money

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 5>to a political campaign, that's up to you entirely. But man,

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 5>that's a lot of money spent for naught. Of course,

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 5>anybody who got it is thinking, yeah, I'm loving this trend.

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 5>I don't even have to win, and they give me

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 5>a you know, they spend a billion dollars. But and

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 5>certainly in the advertising industry it's appreciated. But holy cow,

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 5>how much would they have lost by if they'd only

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 5>spent as much as Trump?

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 4>Right, there was a video that went viral right before

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 4>the actual election took place of Kamala going to some

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 4>family's home and she was going to do get a

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 4>video of a door knock, and one of the people

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 4>somewhere around the scene took a cell phone video of

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 4>her having the family go back inside so they could

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 4>get a better take of her doing a door Nah,

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 4>that's like it's.

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 5>A reality TV show.

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. Times change.

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 2>There was a time when I guess you would have

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 2>been perfectly happy to have somebody knock on your door

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 2>and you open the door and you engage them in conversation.

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 2>That people aren't that way anymore.

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 1>Also, the way couples meet.

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 2>This gets to the swipe left or swipe right thing

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 2>that I teased a Have you ever seen those graphs?

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 2>I usually see them on YouTube, but it's a moving

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.839
<v Speaker 2>graph and you see how things shift over time.

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever seen those graphs? Are really cool?

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Like I saw one of the most dominant websites and

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 2>it started in like nineteen ninety five, and you'd have

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 2>the biggest.

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Long bar graph.

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 2>At the top was was AOL, And then as the

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 2>months and years went by, the AOL graph kept shrinking.

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 2>But then all of a sudden, a Yahoo shows up,

0:03:57.880 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Then a Google shows up and moves a clear fossile

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 2>screen and dominates it. Can you just see how things

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 2>change over time?

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 5>I came acrossos animations, They're really cool. I've come across

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 5>some like world population, Yeah, immigration flow and that's right thing.

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, IDP.

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 2>This one was how couples met, and it started in

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 2>nineteen thirty and it went until now. And I screen

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 2>captured a couple of different points which I thought were interesting.

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 2>But starting in nineteen thirty, how couples met almost two

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 2>thirds from one source, well, three sources put together, but

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 2>they're kind of similar ish sort of things. Family number one,

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 2>school number two, friends number three. Almost two thirds of

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 2>couples met from family, school, or friends. And then you

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:47.239
<v Speaker 2>get to twenty twenty four, and that's only eighteen percent

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 2>of people meet through family, school and friends. The two

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 2>thirds replaced little by little over time. Obviously you guessed

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 2>it with online. I didn't realize that almost two thirds

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 2>of couples now meet online. It's the most most common

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 2>way to me. I think some of that trend probably

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 2>has to do with age. You know, if you're going

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 2>to form a permanent or would be permanent life relationship

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 2>at age eighteen, say to twenty one, you're going to

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 2>do it differently. I think, Well, I got to believe

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 2>if you eliminate, you know, people fifty and up, maybe

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 2>this number of online couples meeting goes up.

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Probably it might Jesus might be eighty.

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Percent or something for forty and under. I don't have

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 2>any idea. Do you have any sense of that, Katie?

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Like most of your friends do they single? Friends?

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Do they meet people online? Most of them online?

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 4>Actually, I've got one friend who met her fiance at

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 4>work and then the rest of them have been online dating.

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, everybody I know who's single, they really only talk

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 2>about online dating. I mean, as if that is the

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 2>option for meeting people, and it might be. I don't know.

0:05:57.920 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 2>I haven't tried it, and I'm scared to death of

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 2>trying it for a variety of reasons, and I don't

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 2>think I ever will. But if that's how everybody else

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 2>is meeting it, does you know what scares you about it?

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Being ending up in a vent as all.

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 2>That being a minor celebrity makes it weird in some ways. Okay, yeah,

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't want anybody getting any personal details about me

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 2>and you know, just screen capturing and.

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Posting them or whatever. I mean that just that weirds

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>me out a lot.

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 2>And then I don't know, it just sounds like a

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 2>lot of work and people I know who do it,

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 2>and maybe if you're an extrovert, it's awesome. You go

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 2>on a lot of dates and get to meet a

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of people, and then it either goes from there.

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 4>I just had to I've been on two online dates

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 4>and they were both hillacious, So you're not really missing

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 4>a hole.

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, I guess you have to weed through a lot

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 2>of hilatious to get to the one that is great,

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 2>and you know you end up together for a while

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 2>or forever, which doesn't surprise me.

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, correct me if I'm wrong. Isn't hilacious apart positive?

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm an idiot.

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:05.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm right.

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was awful. Yeah, you had drinks, fell

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 2>in love and hooked up. That's a hlatious date.

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm not quibbling for the point of quibbling. I

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 5>just love words, but hilatious. So I understood perfectly well

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 5>what you meant, and I get it very.

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Great, bad or overwhelming. There was a hilacious hailstorm.

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 5>Well you're right, it means extraordinary, remarkable, Yes, Michael, thank you,

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 5>thank you. So you used a Prochael, who was the

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 5>editor in chief of the Oxford English Dictionary for twenty years.

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Katie used the probably, but they learned that one.

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 2>They were bad because what I picture is you both

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 2>know within two seconds that you don't want to do this,

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 2>and you still got to go through with the half

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 2>hour cup of coffee or meal or whatever it is

0:07:57.600 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 2>you do.

0:07:57.880 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, my The worst one for me was this guy.

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 4>He was beautiful online. I mean he was in a suit,

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 4>he was wakeboarding, and he seemed super outdoorsy and fun.

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I was like, all right, cool.

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 4>He showed up to this really nice restaurant wearing the

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 4>longest jean shorts I've ever seen in my life. Wow,

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 4>a Lakers jersey down to his knees and a flat

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 4>built hat worn crooked, and I went, what the f right?

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 4>And it turns out he was in a suit because

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 4>he was a bodyguard at a strip club across the

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 4>street from the radio station where I worked.

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 5>So, oh, there you go.

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>He could have hung Yeah, the.

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 2>People that the people that mislead the real them, because

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't want.

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>To do that, be God.

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 2>The last thing I would want is to walk into

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 2>a room and see the look of disappointment in their eyes.

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I just it just sounds horrible. I wouldn't.

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 5>I've seen that so many times. I've seen it enough

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 5>for me too.

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I just I can't have I can't imagine wanting to

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 2>over sell myself to that point.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>But I don't.

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I don't know, I know, I know

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 2>it's a very very common thing. I heard from men

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 2>and women.

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 5>You know, Katie. A man who's willing to rock the

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.599
<v Speaker 5>extra long jorts is got confidence.

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 2>And showing up to a restaurant which is a tank top.

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 2>He knows who he is exactly, which is fine. But

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 2>why wouldn't you want to portray who you are in

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:26.079
<v Speaker 2>the picture to people that might like who you are,

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 2>might think cool. They want a guy dressed like that.

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.319
<v Speaker 2>I see attractive women with guys dressed like that. There

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 2>are women out there who want that just wasn't you.

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, not me?

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 4>And that Yeah, there was not one photo of I

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 4>think there were like eight or nine on his page

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.839
<v Speaker 4>that indicated that that was his sense of style at all.

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>So when he showed up.

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 4>And Greg Gory, who we had on the Extra Long,

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 4>Extra Large Prora the podcast, he came with me as

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 4>like a covert guy that was sitting at another table,

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 4>just to make sure I was safe.

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>And I looked over at him and went, I got

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I gotta get out of here so bad. It was

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>so bad now.

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 5>To cover wing Man. I like that.

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I'd go with in my description single parent.

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 2>I've got roughly thirty minutes every two weeks to spend

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 2>time with you, and I'm angry most of the time.

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 2>So line up over, take a number exactly.

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 5>Let them to the left, Ladies. I'm thinking about my kids,

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 5>two of whom are in stable relationships, one of whom

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 5>is not at this point, and it was school and

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 5>they're in their mid twenties to early thirties, school mutual friends.

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:41.959
<v Speaker 5>And my son is not currently in a stable relationship,

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 5>but his last girlfriend that was mutual friends. I think

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 5>now maybe it's they grew up under me. In a

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 5>family slash cult that makes the Amish look like the jetsums.

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 5>So maybe that rubbed off on them and they've gone

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 5>old school.

0:10:57.800 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 2>My whole life is made up of almost entirely friends

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 2>acquaintances through things like that.

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Anyway, I've been to two weddings this year, both

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of them Tender. Really Yeah wow? Now is Tinder still

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a uh?

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Because it had the reputation originally of being more of

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 2>a hookup app than a meet.

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>People to get married? But is that still the case?

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:20.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any idea.

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 4>I believe there's one that came out in the last

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 4>couple of years post Tender that is more of the

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 4>hookup app.

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Now, I can't remember what a lot of people I

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>know talk about. Bumble that's the one. Oh really?

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Bumble is the one that I've heard is more

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 4>for hooking up. Really, Or there's Bumble and Hinge. Yeah,

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't I think, Yeah, take your word for it.

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.479
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, these names are increasingly random. I'd ringe.

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 2>I'd never thought about it before, but that actually would

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 2>be a stumbling block.

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>So say, for whatever reason.

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 2>They're not appalled by my photo and uh, and we

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 2>and we decide we want to meet and uh, and

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 2>my immediate aggression doesn't turn them off. We just want

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.719
<v Speaker 2>to meet. I would say, let me get in my

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 2>calendar two Thursdays after next between one and three in

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 2>the afternoon, before I pick up my kid. I think

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 2>if you're in my neighborhood, we could meet for a

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 2>little while.

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll make it least.

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:20.199
<v Speaker 5>We could pull up next to each other to stop

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 5>light and say, how are you doing good? How are

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 5>you good?

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Nice to meet you.

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 2>I gotta go pick up my kid from school, and

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 2>I got some laundry to do in a meal to prepare.

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm hungry. You can follow me through the Mickey D's

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>drive stream as well. We'll do that thing where I

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>buy your meal the car ahead of you. I'll pay

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>it forward to your meal behind me, and then see

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you later.

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 5>You want to do a bang bang, No, that's not sexual, Well,

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 5>let me explain.

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>It's two different kinds of meals. And never mind true

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>love over a mcflurry. Well, I guess that's it.