WEBVTT - Job Creation Should Be Required for Corporate Tax Cuts, Macke Says

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. Right now,

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we've got Justin Sink also out of our DC bureau,

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and Justin you're covering the president and you know, we've

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>talked to us briefly about his planned trip to Puerto Rico.

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>When he gets there, he's not is he gonna find

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.959
<v Speaker 1>any love? Well, I think that's a big question. Obviously,

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the White House is depicted. Um, the response to the

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>storm is more than adequate, they've said, you know, they

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>think that, Uh, it's been a kind of unprecedented response

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>in terms of military personnel and getting supplies down there.

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>We've seen a lot of stories from the ground that

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>suggests that and heard from the mayor of San Juan

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>to suggest that there's a lot of frustration the things

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.119
<v Speaker 1>still aren't great there, that food and water aren't getting

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to people that need it. That power is still not

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>on and so uh we are. I think that's going

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to be the big question coming out of tomorrow is

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>what kind of reception he receives um and how far

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>he goes. It's possible that the president schedule just leaves

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>him kind of on a military base where he's unlikely

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to face some of the criticism. But if he does

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>decide to go out some of the more storm ravaged areas,

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a real question of how people are going to respond,

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you know. Justin I'm really struck by the normal playbook

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that we normally have when there are tragedies. And this

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of course is relevant to the comments that we are

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>waiting from President Trump imminently about the Las Vegas shooting. Normally,

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>presidents come out and they say, oh, what a horrible catastrophe.

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>We will do everything in our power to make things

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>as better as we can for the surviving victims. Whether

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it's in Puerto Rico, we have, you know, doubling down

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>all of our efforts. Our line is open, call us.

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>We want to hear from you. We want to figure

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>out how to go go forward in a better and

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>bigger way go you know, in the future. This is

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>this is so out of the norm to basically try

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to attack people and spin the picture in the process.

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Am I wrong? No? I think I think you're right.

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>The presidents of both parties have really tried to play

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 1>that consoler in chief role, you know, um, in the

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>light of tragedy, whether it's President Bush going down to

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Katrina after We're going down to New Orleans after Katrina

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and Jack Parking and trying to harness that moment, even

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>though obviously I think um it ended up being a

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>situation the damage is presidency. Uh. You mentioned Las Vegas,

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think some of the most memorable moments President

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 1>Obama's term were has response him actually in events the

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>church and Charleston being maybe at the top of that list.

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And Uh, it's not a role that that President Trump

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 1>has really had to confront until the last couple of weeks,

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's one where he seems a little uncomfortable. I

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>think that this is um, somebody who is throughout his

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 1>political career found um some of the most success in

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in rallying his core supporters and outraging UM some of

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>his critics. And and that's an approach that is different

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>from what many presidents have taken. At times where you

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>might see them try to, I think, bring together a

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>national unity. And so it might be a reflection of

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, of a changing political climate, of different expectations

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>among Americans. But it's going to be very interesting to

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>see how he tried to navigate the speech coming up

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of minutes. But also, uh, is that

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it's Puerto Rico tomorrow. So justin just sticking Puerto Rico,

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to get a sense of just how much

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of a humanitarian disaster it is and where the US

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>troops and other first responders are in in uh, in

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>dealing with what's going on. I mean power has been

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>restored to a lot of people, right, I mean are

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>we out of the danger zone? I don't think we're

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:19.559
<v Speaker 1>quite out of the danger zone yet. And the reason

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>that I say that is that, well, you know, there

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>has been measurable progress throughout much of the island. There

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>are still hospitals that aren't fully online. Um, there are

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 1>still remote areas of Puerto Rico where we don't have

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>great visibility into both what has already happened and the

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>current status. Uh. But things are getting better uh day

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>to day. And so I think one of the big

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of outstanding questions is what is the extent of

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the damage since we don't have full communications, since we

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't been able to clear all the roads and get

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to everywhere. Um, you know, we have a sense of

0:04:56.480 --> 0:05:01.119
<v Speaker 1>the major population centers starting to it into recovery mode,

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.799
<v Speaker 1>but I think especially in remote rural areas and areas

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 1>where communications continue to be a real issue. UM, we

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 1>just don't have a size or or scope of of

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>what this sort of damage is yet. You know, justin

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm struck by the notion that there may be a

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>connection between the damage that the commonwealth faces and economic

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>decisions that were made years hence in the sense that

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're not able to continually upgrade and

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>strengthen and bolster your infrastructure and to take account of

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>new information such as weather patterns and so on, Uh,

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>then you're faced with what the what has happened in

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Puerto Rico. Is there any way that in the rebuilding

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that takes place, it can be framed in such a

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>way that it would actually lead to something positive for

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>the future not only of the island itself, but of

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>the way the economy works. Yeah, So I think there's

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>two elements. This one is the sort of rebuilding of

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure on the island, and something that Trump administration

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>officials are really emphasized as they are sort of rebuilding

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the power grid, which is going to be a huge

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>undertaking UM. As they're rebuilding utility services like the sort

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of water and sewage systems, they're going to try to

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>future proof those in a way that UM makes them

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>less susceptible to the type of damage that we saw

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the after method that's hurricane. So that's going to be

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>hopefully positive for the people of Puerto Rico as they

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>confront future tropical storms. UH. The second part of this

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is the trickier part, which is that there's still tens

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of billions of dollars of debt that hangs over the

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>island's government and that's the problem that's only going to

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>get worse as they try to grapple with UM an

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>economy that's going to be as devastated as everything else

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>on the island. UM. So a big outstanding question is

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>whether cong steps in and provides any sort of bailout

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to help the island UM get from under that you know,

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>economic news that has really prevented them from doing the

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of maintenance and upgrades that that we've seen in

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>other states. So far, we haven't seen a big movement

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>for that on Capitol Hill. But it's justin let let

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>me just break in because it makes me think, is

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>there a possibility that the Republicans would take this as

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity and therefore, because you know, one of the

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>issues has always been if you were to in some

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>way smooth the path for Puerto Rico to become part

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of to become a state, that would tilt the balance

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate, and uh, is this an opportunity for

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans to maybe gain if they seize the moment. Well,

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's tricky politics for sure. The statehood um issue

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is not something that we've seen a lot of traction

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>on here in Washington, and I would be very surprised

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>if that was now come. But it is going to

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>be tricky to navigate, I think for politicians on both

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>sides of this, because a lot of Puerto Ricans who

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>are displaced by storm are going to end up moving

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to the Continental US where they can vote just like

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>any other American citizen and make their voices heard. But

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that it's likely to happen in Florida,

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>where a big influx influx into a state that has

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>historically been a swing state kind of fifty fifty Republican Democrat,

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>uh could really be impacted by tens or hundreds of

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>thousands of people moving there, and they if they are

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>upset by the government's handling of of the storm, that

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>could really create um some political trouble for Republicans. Similarly,

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>if Democrats aren't seen as responsive enough here or in

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>some way holding up the relief effort, then you know,

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>can swing back the other way. But I think a

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of politicians are sort of attuned to the political

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>consequences of what's happened, justin Do you have a sense

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of the response overwhelmingly in Puerto Rico, because we've seen

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>some conflicting reports out the governor trying to make peace

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 1>up between the mayor of San Juan and President Trump,

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>others saying look, we have a ways to go, trying

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to saying kumba ya. Is that the mood among the

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>residents or are they even following this because I know

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>internet has been down, yeah, exactly. So it's it's hard

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to get a real sense um of what sentiment on

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the island is both because uh, communications have been difficult,

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>but also I think the primary concern for most of

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the people in Puerto Rico is can I get somewhere

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that the air conditioned. Can I get food and clean

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>water and sort of the basic services that people need

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to to stay alive and live their lives. Can I

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>start rebuilding my business? So uh, it's not clear how

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>engaged um the sort of everyday people of Puerto Rico

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>are and this sort of back and forth spat that

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>we saw over the weekend, But you know, the governor's

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>comments are indicative of I think a politician who knows

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that massive federal aid is going to be needed and

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that is going to be distributed through the White House

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in some way. And so even if I think the

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>governor might be sensing frustration among um, the constituents in

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Puerto Rico or be a little uh starting to get

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.959
<v Speaker 1>agitated with the federal response, there is sort of a

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>strategic advantage and keeping uh that sort of come by

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a spirit together because it's gonna be a long rebuilding process.

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Justin is that is that a contrast to what would

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 1>happen to a state versus being a commonwealth that you

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>would go directly to the president rather than if you

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>were a state and you had a coalition or a

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>group of colleagues in the Senate in the House. Well,

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think you bring up an important point,

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>which is that, um, you know, one Florida or Texas

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>were hit by the massive hurricanes. They do have to

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of rely on the federal government for aide, but

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that they have both a state government that is more

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>equipped to borrow money to help with recovery efforts that

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing, and they have a congressional delegation of

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>at least you know, well two senators and at least

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>one member of the House of Representatives that can be

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of forceful advocates for them in Washington, and whose

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>colleagues have to interact with them and count on them

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and need their votes for a whole range of things. Well,

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>when we call upon Mark Gilbert are Bloomberg gad Fly columnists,

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>we want to know one thing, what is the aftermath

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of the vote in Catalonia, the northeastern region of Spain,

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>where the Spanish government from Madrid did just about everything

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>they could think of in order to prevent the vote

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>from taking place, What went on and what should we

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>take away? Everything went wrong? I mean, they've had three

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>years of notice that that Catalonia was was was heading

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>for an independence vote. They could have diffused it. They

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>could have granted more independence. Economically to Catalonia, it's it's

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the country's richest region. It contributes about a fifth of

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the economic output. And yet Prime Minister Mariano RADIOI he's

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>done just about everything wrong. And those those YouTube videos

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing today of police using rubble bullets and

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>batons against the ordinary people who are voting. It's just

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>terrible for for the country, you know. Just there was

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>one image that really stuck out to me when I

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>was looking at the videos and pictures of a woman,

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>an elderly woman with gray hair, with blood coming down

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.559
<v Speaker 1>her face, after getting into an altercation with the police

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>for voting allegedly illegally, because the Spanish government said that

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>this was not illegal vote. I'm just wondering what's the

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>path ahead. And markets seem incredibly sanguine given the amount

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 1>of turmoil now. Well even last week, the bookmakers odds

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.719
<v Speaker 1>were putting the chances of a vote in favor of

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>independence between eighty and but that's largely because of turnout.

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So they're about five million eligible voters in Catalonian, of

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>whom two point three million actually turned out, and of

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>whom two million backed independence. So you've got about voting

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.959
<v Speaker 1>in favor of independence, but only on a turnout of

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a bit more than forty. So the vote in terms

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of claiming to be the will of the people, that's

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>tricky because a lot of those who oppose independence didn't

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>turn out. They take the government's view that this is

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 1>an illegitimate vote on the Spanish constitution um and surely

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't turn out there. But you know, it's never a

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 1>good look on you, honestly, Mark, I mean in the US, honestly,

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>turnout isn't usually all that much more than that, frankly

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>for elections, which shouldn't be necessarily a model. But it's

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty amazing that nearly half of the population voted in

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this illegal referendum, according to the Spanish government, and then

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the violence sort of sets up ongoing and escalating tension

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>going forward. Now it does, but the turnout matters for

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>something as momentous as seceding, And let's bear in mind

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Catle only has debts of about six billion euros. The

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Spanish country as a whole as debt of about one

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>point two trillion euros. So not only will catalonly have

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to take on a chunk of that debt, as I said,

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it accounts for about a fifth of economic output, so

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>on on a competitive basis, it would end up with

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>about a fifth of those debts. The European Union says

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it won't be part of the EU even if it

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>man it's the succeed so it will be out there

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>on a limb. It would make Brexit look like a

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>walk in the park. And so the turnout really does

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>matter for something as momentous as a readion of Spain

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>seceding from the country as a whole. And the problem

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>is that the government has wanted the problem to go away.

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>It kind of wish they would go away. Now it's

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>on its doorstep. It's not really clear where roy can

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>turn next. Our investors expressing their doubts by pulling money

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>from the stock market. I'm just looking at a chart

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of the I becks thirty five and if you go

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>back to the beginning of May of of the year,

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you were looking at well, you know, a peak, right,

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>so over eleven thousand but now we're down almost eight

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>percent and it has been a steady decline. Is that

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>an expression that investors are saying, look, I'm really not

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>interested in adding more capital, so the prices are getting cheaper.

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>The benchmark stock index is down about two percent today,

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>whereas the rest of Euros benchmark indexes are up. In

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the past month, the IBEX index is underperformed the stock

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>six hundred, the benchmark for the Aurozone, by about four percent,

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>so clearly it's having an effect. A couple of the

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Barcelona based banks are down about five percent or so today,

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Kaiser Bank, Banco Sabadel. They're being hit the worriors that

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you can end up with a general strike in Catalonia

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>um and I think that some of the secessionists are

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>threatening to call a general strike in the idea is

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>if if, if, if we're in favor independence, then forty

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>percent not turn up for work, and again with the

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>reason contributing a fifth of Spanish economic output. You know

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a nascent economic recovery in Spain, unemployment down, but

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the last thing it needs as a general strike in

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>this kind of this kind of strife going on, investors

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>have have punished the bonds as well. A ten year

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>yields up about time basis points, but it's down from

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>where it was earlier this year, so there's not a

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:24.239
<v Speaker 1>sense of panic. There's not really a sense of crisis,

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and investors have known this was coming for for for

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks now um, but there's definitely a

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>feeling that this could turn nasty um and that Prime

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Minister Marini a ra high has got to do something.

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna have to offer some kind of olive branch

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>otherwise you can end up with this general strike and

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that would be economically very damaging to the region and

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to the country. Hey, Mark, when when do you think

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna start to get to those analysts reports to

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about how there's some value out there because these are, yes,

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>there are social and political events. They turned violent. They

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>make great headlines, and we feel for the people without,

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, with physical injury and all that. But as

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>an investor, you know your job is supposed to be

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>able to find those things that other people have dropped

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>or have neglected because they are swayed or they are

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>manipulated by fear or or things that may not be

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a long term positive. What you've sensed that at all,

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sorry if you're taking so long, give you

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 1>about ten seconds or so. Now, Well, the in the

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>broader market, the euros down as well today. Now that

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>could be partly dullar strength, but it's definitely part of

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 1>the sentiment. Look, we saw the German election with the

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>populous DAFD winning some of the votes. That comes after

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Macrome won the French election. This is populism in Spain.

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a reminded. Look, we've got Italian elections coming up

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>at some point. It's a reminder of the political landslape

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 1>in Europe is not completely settled, even after Macrome won

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the French presidency. It's a reminder of the risks. There

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>is it a buying opportunity? Well, I mean, what is

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>there Is there a particular company, let's say in Spain,

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>because you know, just because it's in Spain doesn't mean

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>it just has a Spanish market. I think for example

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>of Iberdrola, And I mean you have very large companies

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that are financials. I was looking at earlier. We Banko

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>San Sanderia is one of it's one of the biggest.

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>You say, you know, maybe this is you know, people

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.719
<v Speaker 1>that have been looking to get into equities. You know,

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>if there was a catastrophe the United States, God forbid,

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 1>then you know you look at the same kind of thing. Listen,

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>the Eurozone economic revival is here, it is real. The

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>p m I is the Purchasing Manager indexes have been

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>rebounding for Europe all this year. European central banks about

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to take its photoph the accelerator, but it's not quite

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>there yet. European stocks have been have been performing well. Um,

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and this is this is a hic up, but it

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>is a reminder that the political backdrop to the whole

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>European Union project, Brexit notwithstanding, is still not set in stone,

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 1>and there could still be my steps ahead. You know,

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I have to say I would take the other view. Frankly,

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>PIM is that you're saying there could be buying opportunities,

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>but there isn't that much selling. And perhaps the reason

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>why there isn't so much selling is because investors really

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>are looking at this and saying it's just a hiccup.

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.120
<v Speaker 1>This has all been smoothed out in the past, even Brexit.

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes we've seen consequences, but it hasn't been that serious.

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 1>Even the ten year treasure ten year yields in Spain.

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>It went up not tremendously. People don't seem that worried,

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps it's because it's never been paid off to

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to be too worried about some of these political events,

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 1>right well. I think that this one is particularly pressing

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>because of the implications for what it says about populism

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, which you know, investors thought was off the

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>table with the election of Macron in France, which has

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>come back with the German election a few weekends ago.

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.959
<v Speaker 1>This reminds people that in Italy, which is the really

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of the the core of of of the problem

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Eurozone and its political issues, Italy still has

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a five Star movement which is doing well in the polls,

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 1>which is still anti the euro and at some point

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be an election in Italy. I think

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's a reminder that that maybe the political backdrop

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you're investing against is not too settled as as it

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>looked even a few weeks ago. Mark Gilbert, thank you

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>so much for your insights. Mark Gilbert is a Bloomberg

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>gad Flight columnists covering asset management and debt markets. Talking

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:23.719
<v Speaker 1>about the Catalonia independence referendum and the ongoing turbulence that

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>has that it has engendered. I want to bring in

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Chris Mackie now. He is the founder of Solution Nomics,

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>based in New York, and it is a platform described

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>as being dedicated to developing and disseminating return on investment

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>based corporate tax policy. Chris Mackie, thank you very much

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. A former contributed to the Federal

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Reserve Beije book. Uh your topic, and I want you

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to expand if you can, though, because tax reform is

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, it can lead you down a rabbit hole.

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>But specifically, what is the the US administration trying to

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>do with the relationship between US corporations, what they earned overseas,

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>how much tax they should pay, and how to get

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>as much of that money back to the United States

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 1>as possible. Well, good morning, it's a pleasure to be

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>with you. What they are trying to do is, and

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this is their broader perspective in their entire proposal is

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to stimulate job growth and higher wages. And

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>one of the theories is that if we lower the

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>tax rate on the earnings from overseas, that will entice

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>companies to use that cash to create more jobs in America.

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And well, I commend the Republicans for undertaking a reform

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>of the tax code. That the problem is it's actually

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>not a reform, it's just more of the same. It's

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>let's lower the tax rates more unconditionally, which means that

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 1>whether or not those the foreign or in profits create

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>jobs in America, the tax rates will go down. Now

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 1>there's an alternative, which is to say, when companies increase

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>American employment and when they increase American wages, then we'll

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>have lower tax rates. And that's what we mean by

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>an r o I based tax policy. But Chris, I

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>wonder how much of this is a rhetorical exercise. And

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>so many companies pay a lower tax rate, they probably

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 1>pay more in line with where the government would like

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>to cut the taxes due to all of the deductions

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and other engineering that accountants do. So to me, I mean,

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>is this just you know, you could say, you know what,

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>what sounds better if you use it on a stump speech,

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>but in reality, the plan is just to try to

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>simplify things, uh, you know, to to get things into

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a more kind of understandable level. Well, you bring up

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 1>a very good point, because the effective tax right, the

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>tax rate that companies have paid on average since two

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand has actually been nineteen and a half percent, So

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>that's already below the statutory right. Now, the devils in

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 1>the details and whether or not they eliminate all of

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the deductions that are currently out there that get companies

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.919
<v Speaker 1>down to nineteen and a half percent. But regardless of

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>what they do with the rate, if they don't tie

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>each company's tax rate to each company's rate of job

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>creation and wage level, it won't be real reform. It

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>will be just a continuation of a hope based policy.

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Well but hold on a second, Chris, because if you

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>start to single out companies and start to evaluate what

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>job creation means, what individual companies sort of contribution to

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Economy is, this starts to look a

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>little more subjective and could end up being uh, somewhat

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:56.159
<v Speaker 1>counter to sort of the spirit of capitalism. Now, oh no,

0:23:56.400 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not. It is the embodiment of capitalism. It is

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a merit based approach. I mean, you know, you know

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about overseas profits. Well, that's you know, subjective,

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 1>whether or not the profits were how much the profits

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>were overseas or sys domestics. So the solution i'mics approaches. Look,

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>rather than haggling over winnowing profits in the US versusan

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>tax havens, let's actually focus on the job creation. Mean, look,

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>these companies already know how many people they're hiring, how

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>many people they're firing, they know the wages of their pain.

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>So we've already got the information. So it's just a

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 1>matter of using that information in creating a merit based

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>tax policy. You know, the Republicans talk about a postcard

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>for the individual tax fair, Well, we're proposing a postcard.

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So you just have four metrics. You score each company

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>on those four metrics, and that determines their tax rate. Okay,

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>so can we I just want to get a bigger

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>sense here, because let's just get you know, scrub away

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the phography can and say, all right, let's

0:24:57.400 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>just pretend for a minute that all the companies really

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>want to do and all the government really wants to

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>do is help them get the money that's now uh

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is sitting in accounts overseas back to the United States.

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>What would be the most effective way to make that happen?

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Because let's forget about time frames. What would what would

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 1>they need to do to make that happen? Do you think? Well,

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>first of all, the objective is not to get the

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>money back to the United States. The objective is to

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:26.199
<v Speaker 1>get them to increase hiring and higher wages. So you

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>could have two companies they could both bring the profits back.

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>No, No No, I understand that. I understand that. But I'm

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>just asking what would let's be you know, I want

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to be as a cynical as possible here. What what

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>what would be the way to get it back quickly? Oh?

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>The way to get it back quickly is to say, look,

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 1>the more jobs that you create in America and the

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 1>higher wages you pay, we're going to lower your tax

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:51.120
<v Speaker 1>rate on those foreign earned profits you do. That will

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>lower the rates. Chris Mackie, thank you so much for

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Chris mackey is a founder of Solution Omics,

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 1>which is based in New York, and also a contributor

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>to the Beige Book, so he has a good handle

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>on the US economy. Talking about what has been proposed

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>with respect to the tax code and what Chris would

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>like to see, which is uh, some kind of merit

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>based tax rate based on how many jobs you create

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>for the US. Here with us is Lily Kat's, a

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>fintech reporter for Bloomberg News who wrote a couple of

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>fascinating pieces in the past few days. First of all,

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about overstock dot Com, which I

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>think of when I was looking for bunk beds for

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>my kids and I saw a lot of overstocked items

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that they were selling. Um. I think of this as

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a sort of discount online retailer. I do not think

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of this as a cyber currency provider, and yet that

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>is what's fueling it's returns right now. Can you can

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 1>explain a little bit. Yeah, it's pretty interesting. You know,

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>first Stock actually got into the cryptocurrency blockchain space back.

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>They were one of the first, if not the first

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 1>retailer to start letting people buy stuff online with cryptocurrencies.

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>And so they first started letting people use bitcoin to

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 1>buy you know, that bunk bett you might want to

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 1>purchase for your kid. Um. And they also inteen started

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 1>this initiative to develop blockchain technology. They called it Medici

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Ventures and Medici Uh. The main part of Medici is

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>this other business called t zero, which I think includes

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>as it includes a fintech company and two broker dealers

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and UM recently, the most recent exciting news that they've

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 1>announced is that they're starting a cryptocurrency exchange to actually

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>let people buy and sell different cryptocurrencies, so I they

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Other than that, they've also started letting people pay with

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 1>other cryptocurrencies aside from Bitcoin on their website. So yeah,

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty interesting to see a re tailor in in

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.360
<v Speaker 1>this space, right. You know, I'm not going to make

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you do the definition thing because it always goes over

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 1>my head. Anyway. I want to know, though, if you

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>said cryptocurrencies, take out the word crypto, do they need

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a license in order to be able to do this

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in the public venue. That is a great question, a

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>very dimond question, and a question that a lot of

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>people have different answers to. You know, the sec recently

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 1>came out with guidance saying, uh, you know, cryptocurrency, some

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:33.719
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies might be securities if um, you know, if you're

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>buying them and you're getting a return on them. Um.

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:39.959
<v Speaker 1>The CFTC has come out and said these things might

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>be commodities. There are also lots of different licensees you

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>can get within different states, so a lot of exchanges,

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>for example, are regulated by state and maybe not by

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>federal regulators. So it's kind of like this big gray area.

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of it's still such a new area, and

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think regulators have fully figured out how to

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>regulate it yet. Well. And it's interesting because the Commodity

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of Futures UH Trading Commission just right now is looking

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>at some odd trading on coin base that they're calling

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a flash crash in a cryptocurrency that you wrote about

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in a story on the Bloomberg today. I thought this

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>was fascinating. You have UH cryptocurrency flash crash and the

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>specter of perhaps an unknown amount of leverage behind this

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>transaction that might have spurred such a crash. Can you

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of what happened here? And is

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>this is this? Does this matter? I mean, is this

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>enough money to matter at this point? Yeah, it's a

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:39.959
<v Speaker 1>lot to digest, but um on. So back in June,

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 1>what happened was so there's this very popular cryptocurrency exchange

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>called coin base. It's where you know, most people go

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to buy and sell Bitcoin and the second largest cryptocurrency,

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>which is called ether UH. And on June one, there

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>was this flash crash, and basically there was this big

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>twelve point five million dollar cell order that came in,

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>which was like one of the biggest ever on the exchange,

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and that the exchange kind of couldn't handle that much volume,

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and it caused the price of ether too plunge a bit,

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and then that triggered a lot of other cell orders

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to happen and so zooming out the price of Ether

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>within like forty five milliseconds crash from you know, around

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>three to ten cents and then shot back up because

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of a twelve and a half million dollar or right yeah,

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's I mean in the greatest scheme of things

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at the stock market, right like that. And the

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>reason that then we all care so much about this

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>is what because the hype around digital currencies and blockchain

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>technology is so great that there's a proliferation of potential

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>uses or well a lot of people, I mean people

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>are putting a lot of money into this space, right Like,

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>people lost a lot of money from that flash crash happening,

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and the space is only getting bigger and bigger. In

0:30:57.720 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the last just this year alone, I think two billy

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>in dollars has flowed into initial coin offerings, which are

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>these new cryptocurrencies that are getting started. Um, but with

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the flashcraft thing that I was just talking about. Um,

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the CFTC we just learned is looking into what happened here,

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and they've sent coin Base they Exchange a letter asking

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of questions about one like about that twelve

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>point five million dollar trade, and to about margin trading,

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>which is when you extend buyers and sellers leverage so

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>they can you know, buy or sell more of an

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>asset than they'd otherwise be able to. Are these cryptocurrencies

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>not very frequently traded or is it just that they

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>usually treated in much smaller sizes the latter. Yeah, they

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>are frequently traded, right, most people don't do twelve point

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>five million dollar trade. Well, but but it's sort of

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>surprising because if coin base wants to be the big

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>player in this going forward, they have to have the

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>technology to be able to manage this. No, this is

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>commonplace and almost any other market out there. Yeah, No,

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it's true. And they've they've been plagued by a lot

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of other issues, uh, in the last year. So they've

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>had outages, they've had issues with the exchange being slow,

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>which you know, prevented people from being able to buy

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and sell at certain points. And I mean, if you

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>think about it, it's kind of like like the startup

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>company that came into the space and maybe it didn't

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>expect this crazy volume to start hitting the exchange. So

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're not prepared for this much. That's heavy of

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a flow, you know. Thank you very much, Lily Cats,

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>fintech reporter for Bloomberg News. You know, just a quick

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>thing I want you, can you tell people your Twitter handled,

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>because this is a topic that we need all the

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>guidance we can get on and you're one of the

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>best sources I can. It's a very simple Twitter handle.

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>It's at Lily Cat's l A L y K A

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>t Z. Anything else you recommend us should be read.

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean we read everything you right here at Bloomberg.

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Read Read Bloomberg. We have good coverage of cryptocurrencies lately.

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Well done. Thanks very much, Lily Cat's fintech reporter for

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>pim Fox, I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast. You

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio