WEBVTT - Patriots Catch-22 11/9: Three-step Plan to Fix the Offense, Evaluating Mac Jones' Performance, Buying the Defense?

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the Patriots Catch twenty two Podcasts with Evan

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Lazar and Alex Barth. I'm in Lazar Lazar, Well, everybody

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>nailed it. Joined us always buy our Bark damage match.

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Here is Evan Lazar and Alex Barr. Band is back together.

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Hello everybody, and welcome into a new edition of the

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Patriots Catch twenty two podcast right here on Patriots dot Com.

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Evan Lazar, joined us Always by Alex Barth, and uh,

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>we do have some construction right outside. I was gonna say,

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I was very concious. Definitely some drilling. We're we're working

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>on it, um, so apologies for that. But I want

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to start with looking back on to Sunday, and then

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna look ahead and talk about some of the

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>big picture stuff that I I bet it is being

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about down the hall, honestly, about where they go

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>after the buy and what they can do these next

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of days and use these days to kind of

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>self scout and make some system. I think what he's

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>scheme tweaks or scheme adjustments, I think is what Belichick

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>called it yesterday. So there's some of that going on, certainly,

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>But I want to start with Sunday and also talk

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>about maca in a general sense as well moving forward,

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>because Alex, I think I've definitely come off on the

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>mac apologist side lately, right. I think the rest of

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>this thing around him has really torn him down. And

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the main reason why I feel that way is because

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>his strengths coming in the draft, his strengths last year, processing,

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>in accuracy down the field, right, Like those are his

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>two calling cards. When those things just regress out of nowhere,

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>like Mac Jones has been a smart, cerebral quarterback probably

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>his entire life, right, Like you probably would have to

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>go back to like Pop worn or to find like

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a time when Mac Jones was not seeing the field

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>or not getting the ball where it needed to go,

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>or like things like that, like how many you watched

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>him a ton of Alabama? How many times did that

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>happen at Alabama? Like he didn't, right, And it didn't

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>happen last year either, like the struggles that I saw

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>from Mac Jones and after the by last year along

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>with the rest of the team. But I thought what

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>we saw with Mac was more physical limitations, right, Like

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>he just doesn't have the rocket arm to fit the

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>ball twenty five yards down the field between two zone

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 1>defenders that are closing on his receiver, right like, and

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>teams I think caught onto some of those things, and

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.519
<v Speaker 1>we're adjusting to take away the short and intermediate stuff

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and force the ball and funnel the ball out towards

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the sideline. And that was the type of regression that

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 1>I was expecting from Mac Jones, was defense is adjusting

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to what he's good at, recognizing that he doesn't have

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>this the physical physical tools, excuse me, of a Josh

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Allen or a Justin Herbert or Patrick Mahomes and forcing

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>him to be that type of player as best as

0:02:55.480 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 1>they can schematically on defense, When he regresses, when his

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>strengths regress, that points to me to what's going on

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>around him, right Like. You don't just get to that

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>point on his own. And when we watched the tape

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>against the Colts, to me, this was the worst decision

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>making game that Mac Jones has ever played with the Patriots.

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>And I know he didn't even turn the ball over.

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>So just like, think about that for a second, right

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:24.359
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of pure processing, where he's supposed to

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>go with the football, when he's supposed to go there

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>with the football between the ears stuff, whatever you want

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to call it. Processing field vision. It was as bad

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>as I've ever seen it from him. And that has

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to point in my mind to trust and comfort, like

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>his comfort level and what they're doing, what he's being

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>asked to do, Like where is he supposed to start

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>in the progression? Is he supposed to start to the left,

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to the right, to the middle of the field. What's

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>his first read, what's his second read, what's his third,

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>what's his you know, where's his check down? Releasing into

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the pad? And like those types of things it has

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it stems from all of that, and then you also

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>get into the timing right of he has a three

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>step drop here, but we're asking receivers to run rout

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>step break at twelve yards down the field. Well, if

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>receivers are running vertical routes down the field on the

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 1>three step drop, then that's forcing the quarterback to just

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>sit there and hold the ball right, hold the ball

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and hold the ball, and hold the ball and wait

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>for guys to get open down the field. So you

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>saw a lot of that on this tape as well.

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>So his mental processing skills did not They just couldn't

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>have gone back to where they couldn't have hit rock

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>bottom like this without the whole thing around him being terrible. Now,

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>with that being said, he did not play well against

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the Colts on Sunday, And no one is trying to

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>sit here and say that mac Jones has been good, right,

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Like he's not been good contest context, it's explaining why

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>he looks the way that he does. And I mean

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>he talked about his comfort love with what they runn

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>how about his comfort level in the pocket? Yeah, he

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have time, and on the few plays he does,

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>he's sitting back there feeling rushed because he feels like

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 1>he's about to get hit in any second because he's

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>not used to having that kind of time. So again,

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think a lot of the macapologist thing,

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, No, it's explaining what's going on. People

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>will say, oh, I knew this was mac Jones. I

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>knew he was this guy. Well, then why wasn't he

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>this guy last year as a rookie when he had

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>less experience? Right? He said, oh, well last year doesn't count, Well,

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>then why does this year count so much more than

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>last year? Right? It's just adding context and right now

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>for a number of reasons. He's not comfortable, and when

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 1>you're not comfortable as a quarterback, you make mistakes because

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you get rushed, you get nervous, and that's what we're

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing right now. Yeah, that's the biggest thing I think

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>from this last game that really stood out on the

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>ALL twenty two was not progressing past the first read

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>in the progression right right, and at this stage of

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Mac Jones's career and even in his rookie season, because

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>he is a smart passer and he is somebody that

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>goes through his reads quickly typically until this year, they

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>are having him read full field progressions. He is not

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>reading half the field, right, or he's not supposed to

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>be reading half the field. But what's happening in a

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of these plays is he's only reading like the

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>first or second read in the progression and then he's

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of goes into panic mode a little bit, right

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>because he thinks he's about to get clocked. Because that's

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>how it's been this season. Yeah, either he's going to

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>be clocked or there's nobody open initially, So now where

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>do I go with the football? And it just doesn't

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>seem like I have seen recently. Mac Jones go from

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>one side of the field to another and hidden receiver

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in rhythm on the second reader on the backside of

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a play or whatever the case may be. And I

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>think the number one play that's going around is that

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that Kendrick Bourne pass that he missed. Dan Orlovsky tweeted it,

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I talked about it, but Dard talked about it. So

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you look at that play and the thought process in

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that play is not terrible because the way the safety

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>rotation plays out in the back end, He's got a

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>one on one matchup with Taekwon Thornton with no safety

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>help over the top right, So he's thinking, if Taikwon

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>beats to Fan Gilmour here at the line of scrimmage,

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I have a chance for a big play down the

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>field with no safety help. Take it out of the

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>fact for a second that he's asking his rookie wide

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>receiver to go up against a former defensive player of

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the year right and win them one on one matchup.

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Take that out for a second. As soon as Taekwon

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Thornton's covered on the play in the first let's call

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it initial stages of the route right at the release

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and at the beginning or through the stem as he's

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>getting vertical up the field and cancel it right, like

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>he's not open, like move on to something else. So

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>instead he just sits there and holds the ball and

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>holds the ball and holds the ball and eventually he

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>forces it to remandre on the checkdown and he's covered

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's incomplete. On the front side of the play,

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Kendrick Bourden is sitting open, wide open at the sticks

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>like this, like, yeah, hello over here, right. What the

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Patriots want him to do or what he should do.

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna say what the Patriots want him to

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>do because I don't know, first of all, and second

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of all, I have no idea what they're coaching him

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>right now. So what he should be doing there is

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give my guy a chance for half a

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>beat a beat to win that one on one. If

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not there, I'm gonna go to the front side

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 1>of the formation with the three receiver side, and I'm

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>going to just work out that progression. Right. It's a

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a sale concept. It's like stick corner vertical right, Yeah,

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna read the progression and make the right throw.

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>If he had done that, if he had given Taekwon

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a chance initially in his drop, he looks at it,

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>he sees Taekwon come off the line covered going back

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to my right, he would have had the first down.

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>But for whatever reason, he's getting frozen on those reads.

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a play earlier on in the game where he

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>had Hunter Henry open in the flat for a checkdown

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>and he's reading the vertical routes and the content is

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>actually the same style of play, the same floodplay, and

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>he's reading the corner and the vertical and trying to

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>throw it past the sticks to Jacobe Myers on third down.

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And by the time he makes a decision to not

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>throw the football, he then tries to run instead of

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>just checking the ball down a Hunter Henry and he

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>takes a sack. Right. So these types of things where

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>he's just not progressing past the initial reads and he

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel comfortable getting to the front side of a

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>play when he starts on the backside, or vice versa.

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>This stuff just was not happening during his rookie season.

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>This is not mac Jones has hit his physical ceiling

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>right and teams are catching on to it. This is

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>mac Jones is not seeing the field, which is a

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>totally different animal than anything that I expected, as like

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I just never expected us to be here, Like I

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>expected us to at least have that feather in our cap, right, right,

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's an accurate thrower within tw yards of

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the line of scrimmage, and he has good eyes. He

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>gets the ball where the ball needs to go. We're

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>not there anymore where we've completely aggressed. Yeah, and again

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of it is a situation they've

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:13.199
<v Speaker 1>put him in, right you talk. I heard you guys

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>talking on Unfiltered before this about the way they're kind

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of marrying some of the concepts to his responsibilities, some

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of the route concepts his responsibilities if if there's no

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>right answer on the play as it's designed, what's the

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>read right? Yeah, And it feels it's probably a bit

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of an oversimplification, but you know, essentially reading the field,

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for the right answer. You have, you have

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>your set, the defense is they're set, and somewhere in

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>there there's a right answer. Usually it feels like a

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of the plate, the the chances he's being given

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>right now, there's no right answers. So of course he

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>looks flumex. Yeah, I think the other concern and I

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>want to I think this is like the most fair

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>criticism of him I can give on this. There are

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:02.839
<v Speaker 1>some throws where quite his accuracy just isn't as good

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>as it was. Yeah, And I don't know if that's

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it is. I would say, like my take on it,

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I don't inside his head, so I don't know.

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 1>And my take on it is that this is all related,

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of course. Of course, no, of course, because suddenly, you know,

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>especially to half the success he had last year. He's

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>been successful his whole career, right right from Alabama, and

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's all gonna compound. Right if there's plays

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>where it's just not there and you can't get it done,

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>even if it's not your fault, you're gonna start thinking

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>it is or start second guessing yourself, and then when

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you do have those opportunities, that that doubts still there.

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>It's that that concept of being sped up is something

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that I've hammered. I think that's what it all comes

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>down to. He didn't get any pass protection going back

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to training camp, and it's just completely changed the way

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>he sees the game. It's gone from going through the

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>progressions and figuring it out and reading the defense because

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>now he feels like he doesn't have time to do it,

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to just try to make snap decisions. And now even

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>when he does have the time, he's just developed all

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>these bad habits because of all the instances when he didn't. Yeah,

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>totally fair. And the first read quarterback thing. You usually

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 1>hear about young quarterbacks, but in particular, usually hear about

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>young mobile quarterbacks right where their instincts are. If the

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>first read isn't there, I'm running. That was the whole

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>thing with Justin Fields, right. But luckily for Chicago, Justin

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Fields is an awesome runner. So lately, like against the Patriots,

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>he ran all over teams, right like last week against

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Miami's running all over them. So that's you know, the

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>other side of this is that Mac Jones in order

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to succeed, needs to be that cerebral pastor like he

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>needs to be a high level processor then order to succeed.

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>So all this other trickle down stuff he's got to

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>figure out. Now. The accuracy thing I think is really

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting because as much as I want i'm a quarterback apologist,

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Mac guy, right, that's where we're at now,

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, as much as I want to

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>put it on the offensive line and look at these

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>two plays and say, there's pressure in his face. His

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>line broke down and basically gave him no chance. There

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>were two plays in the game that I thought really

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>stood out from an accuracy standpoint, where I thought, if

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>he's comfortable in the pocket under pressure, he still hits

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.559
<v Speaker 1>these throws. And I think maybe hits these throws last year.

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>The first one was the wheel route to Ormandre right

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 1>where it works. It's pick wheel. Taekwon Thorton picks Rmandre's

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 1>guy in man coverage. He's got like a step and

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a half on the linebacker, and there is pressure in

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>mac Jones's face. Yannika Juice gets beat by quitty Pay

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>off the right edge, and Quittypay is right in his

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 1>grill as he releases the football. Still a throw i'd

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>like him to hit. Yeah, still throw, I'd like him

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to hit every once in a while. You're gonna have

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to make some plays under pressure, right, and that's still

0:13:56.360 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a throw that it's a hard throw. Hey, it's under press, sure,

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>But if he's the guy, if he's a franchise quarterback.

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I still want him to make that through. The other

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>throw was the crossing route to Kendrick Bourne the very

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>first third down of the game that Cole Strange gets

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>beat by DeForrest Buckner and Buckner's in his face. And

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>could Kendrick Borne have caught the ball. Probably? Could he

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>have not slown down on the route and run through it.

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Probably he still put it too far out. That's another

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>one too where and maybe in this situation helped with

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the blitz, But that was a one read play. Yeah,

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that was There was a clear out route. Right. It's

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the same play that they ran to Jacobe Myers on

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>third down the week before, right, and he's what is

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>He's like six seven yards short of the sticks. That's

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the Kendrick Borne is the only receiver Mac Jones can

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball too. On that play. Nobody else is

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>realistically in the pattern. So yeah, it wasn't a great throw.

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>But I look at that and say, well, why why

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>are they running that play? There? It goes back to

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>my thing where there's no right answer. Even if he

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>completes that, Kendrick Bourne gets tackled probably right there, maybe

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>picks up the yarch, not to his fault. The defenders

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>right on him, right, they come up, you know, third

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and fifteen they pick up or I think it was

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>third and fifteen, third and whatever it was. I have

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it right in front of me. I probably could actually

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>just say it right? Should I do that? Should I

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>be right? Evan? Let me be right here. I actually

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>think he had some room third and twelve, Third and twelve.

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>He caught it like five yards. He caught it like

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>five yards off the line of scrimmage, seven yards short

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of the sticks. Maybe he picks it up, but it's

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>not easy. Let's see he gets tackled. Then it's all, well,

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>why's mac throwing short of the sticks on third down?

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Is he doing that right? It goes back to my

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>point of there there are plays they're running where there's

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>just no right answer, and I think he's struggling to

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>figure out what to do with that. So to me,

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>what all this adds up? And this is sort of

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>what I got into and unfiltered. But you know, there's

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously a lot more voices in that room, so he

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>can hash it out more here. To me, these are

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>all not max like big picture, but some of this

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>execution stuff that we're talking about I think is micro

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>is fixable, right Like, I think that some of this

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>execution stuff, the timing of the drops and the routes,

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the uh you know, handling pressure or or improving the

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>offensive lines so he's not under a pressure as much.

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure about right tackle, Like that's the one

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>spot where we're going to get to in a second

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>where I'm not sure that that's fixable with their current

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>roster construction unless they do something something you have to

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to work around. Yeah, right, correct. But

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>on a macro level, Matt Macro, I think some of

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the like mac ah, there you go. On a macro level,

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there's two big things that that from a

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>coaching and coordinating standpoint that really stand out to me.

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Play design. It's simple and it's unimaginative, Like there's just

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>nothing create like, there's no conflict. It's not putting any

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>conflict into the defense, right, like just calling plays like

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 1>it almost reminds me of like what they talk about

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>when they talk about training camp. Right when they say

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>that training camp, we're just running basic, like we're just

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 1>running our install, like we're running day one stuff and

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:16.360
<v Speaker 1>we're just trying to get the execution down of our

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>basic play. I know you kind of hate this, but

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the term I always uses Madden offense, Yeah, because with

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the playbooks in Madden are if you ever played Madden, like,

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 1>they're just that's not really how NFL plays are called.

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a very oversimplified version of how NFL plays are called.

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>But teams will do it, you know, in training camp

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason when you have ninety guys and you're

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>just you know, it's one thing to run in the preseason.

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>It makes some sense to run in the preseason, not

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>necessarily in Week nine. Yeah. There's just so few times

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>where I sit there and I'm like, that was that

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>was a good design, right, that was like a cool play,

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Like that's why when they ran the touchdown to Jacobe

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>against the Bears the league playoff play action with Bailey Zappy,

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.239
<v Speaker 1>I lost my mind in the press box because I

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh, my goodness, don't admit that they finally

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>ran something that like that was cool, Like, yes, like

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're supposed to. That's coordinating. So it's that's

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>play design, I think, and maybe people who don't watch

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 1>the game as close as we do, just to kind

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of explain this a little further, because it's there are

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>people who I tell this to them and they're kind

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of surprised that this level goes into it. It's not

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>five guys running five routes. When you call a passing play,

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>they're all most of the time, they don't all have

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>to interconnect. But when we talk about route concepts, this

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is what we mean. You run a guy on a post,

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.439
<v Speaker 1>and then you run from the from the boundary, and

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>then you run a guy from the slot on a wheel.

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>This is just one of hundreds of concepts, but those

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>two work in tandem to create space. Right. That's and

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what you're talking about. Is you can

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>just give five guys five different assignments and have them

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>all run them, and that's all well and good, But

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>what you really want to do is pair. It can

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>be two together, it can be three together. There's probably

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>some plays where there's five together. I can't think of

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>one off the top of my head. I guess hoss

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of is five? Right, Well, that's those are like

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>full field progressions, right, Like that's the difference. But but

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the idea is that you're running, you're running these concepts

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>in tandem with one another to elicit some sort of

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>reaction from the defense, and that can be any various

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>number of things. But you're trying to put guys in

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>conflict by what you're showing them. And then what you

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>can do is take those concepts and build you take

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it to the next dimension. You build off of those

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>concepts throughout multiple plays where you know it's you set

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>them up one way and then you give them the

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>other that kind of thing. Whereas that that there's not

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a ton of that right now. Right, So the easiest

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>example that I can give is like the Shanahan tree,

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>because it's it is pretty simple stuff. Right, So it's

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>outside zone, outside zone, and now we're bootleg right, and

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we bootleg off of outside zone. And when we bootleg

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>off of outside zone, we have like five different route

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 1>concepts that we run off the bootleg. So some of

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it is just half field, like you know, crossers right

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>into that half of the field. It could be slant,

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 1>slant slant and then slant guard right. And then some

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>of it is half boot where actually the quarterback is

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>booting but then kind of stays more in the middle

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of the field instead of going all the way out

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to the into the boundary into the sideline, and then

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 1>those have different route concepts off of it and different

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 1>things that we can do off of it. So it's

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of complimentary plays. Like the Patriots all go

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to play for years. Off of play action is called

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Charles Barkley where they pull the backside guard. They made

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>all their play calls after like legendary basketball players. So

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>like Hosses is Michael Jordan right the goat, then like

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Charles Barkley is the pulling guard play. So they'll pull

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the guard right because they're a guard pulling heavy team.

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So when they run the football, it's it's counter, it's power.

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 1>We're pulling the guard and we're going through. So they'll

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>pull the guard and then they can pull the guard

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and they can put a crossing route behind it, right

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>where a Gronk or Julian Edelman would cross on an

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 1>over route across the field. Then they'll run Charles Barkley,

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>same blocking scheme, same everything up front, but now runs

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the seam right instead of running the crosser. So now

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>we have that. Now we have Julian Edelman. Instead of

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:19.719
<v Speaker 1>running the crosser, he's gonna run like a postcrosser right

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>where he fakes inside and then he breaks outside, right.

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>So those are the different compliments, are the different things

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that they can play with that allow them to build

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>plays up. And you don't hear Shack Leonard's calling out

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>our plays at the line of scriminals. And that's thing

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 1>because it all looks the same. It's like when you

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 1>see those videos of pitchers right on Twitter where a

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>guy's fastball and slider. You know, the arm actions the same,

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the release points the same, the first you know, ten

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>feet to the mound, it's the same, and then they

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>split in two different directions. Right. That's essentially kind of

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 1>what you're trying to do with your offense exactly. And

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that these types of things are like PhD level, right,

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>like this is like graduate school, this is like big leagues,

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>And right now you have an offensive coordinator and an

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>offensive staff really with Patricia and Joe Judge that are

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.239
<v Speaker 1>learning on the fly how to do this, so they

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>are elementary. And I kind of agree. I think Paul

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and Fred were talking about this unfiltered. I kind of

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>agree that Bill Belichick has sort of put Matt Patricia

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:26.120
<v Speaker 1>in a terrible spot, right like He's a defensive coach

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 1>his whole career. Now he's moving over to offense. They're

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 1>also dealing him a second a second year quarterback, right

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not like they have Tom Brady here still where

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like all right, Matt, like you're going to coordinate

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the offense, but really Brady's the coach, right, Like, there's

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>not that much going on right now. So I do

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 1>think that Matt Patricia is in a tough spot, Like

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's a difficult position to be in

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>for him. But I just think there's a level of sophistication.

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is why, you know, I kind of downplayed

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the Shack Leonard thing, and I do think it does

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>deserve some downplaying. But at the same time, it does

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely suggest the fact that they're plays are pretty pretty

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 1>basic right now. And I'll sit up there in the

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>press box or you know, on all twenty two and

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>like be like they run this play every way, right,

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Like I see this play every week. I see this

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>play every week. I see that play every week. And

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>their most successful stuff has honestly been the RPOs lately,

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's because it's finally something that just organically creates

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>conflict in the defense, right, Like there, it's just a

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>play design that is already creating conflict in the defense,

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 1>even if you run it at the simplest of levels

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>like they're doing right now. Well, so that to go

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>back to what you said about it all like the

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>plays look basic. It's not even that the plays themselves

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>are basic. I mean that's a part of it. But

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 1>none of them look like each other. Yeah, right, they

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>all and they all look very different. So there's not

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a ton of you know, all right, we've seen this

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>look already, but is it going this way or this way?

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>They're not creating that. And again, the RPO, like you said,

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 1>is something that naturally, the whole concept behind the concept

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is is pick a defender, put him in conflict, right,

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.719
<v Speaker 1>That's what the entire thing is predicating on, right, So

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>it's built in. Yeah, it's a great point about how

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>there it doesn't look like they're building up to anything, right, Like,

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it never looks like they're sequencing together things to like

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 1>build up to a bigger thing. It all just kind

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of looks like they're just calling plays, right, like we're

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>just running plays. And that's the difference I think between

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a really experienced play caller and somebody that's doing it

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>for the first time, and that's where the Patriots are at. Offensively,

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I do want to talk about the offensive line, and

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of we kind of went into what

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I was going to do, which was sort of making

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 1>fixes and tweaks during the bye week. Here already, I

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 1>think the biggest thing as much as we can get

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:46.479
<v Speaker 1>into and I love the skiing talk as much as anybody,

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>as much as we can get into all the excess

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and knows and how they can improve there. At the

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, if they block better, the whole

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>thing is going to look better. It really is everybody

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about Max not the guy and this and that,

0:24:56.160 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>like you can't know. We can't know, because there's just

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>it all starts with the offensive line. If the offensive

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>line is not there, has Mack really been given a

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>fair shot this year? No, he hasn't. Isn't it time

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to throw anything? So and by the way, I'd say

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the same. I think the run game probably could be better.

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I know people are super high on Romandre and rightfully so,

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>he's been amazing. Standpoint, they're twenty second in DA feels

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>like his kind of potentials untapped right now, right with

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Damon Harris, like, they have much better runners than this.

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I would even say some of these receivers, a guy

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>like Taekwon Thornton whose roub tree is going to be

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:31.440
<v Speaker 1>mostly intermediate and deep stuff. You need time to throw

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>those routes, right. So I think it all even the

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>play calling, well, maybe they can't run some of the

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:39.719
<v Speaker 1>stuff that they want to get to at the next

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 1>level because they don't have time to block it, right.

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think it all ultimately comes back down to

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line. I'm not saying that if they fix

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line, they'll suddenly be, you know, the best

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>offense in the league, but we'll have a much better

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>idea of what everything else looks like if and when

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>they can just get some of this stuff blocked. Yeah, So,

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>speaking of that from a pure personnel standpoint, I wanted

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to go over well we felt is their best five

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>man combination. Okay, so right now, last week the combination

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>they rolled with the most and the one they ended

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>with was Yanni Kajused at right tackle. On when you

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>at right guard, James Farren said, center, Win at left guard,

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 1>Brown at left tackle. Now David Andrews back at practice

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to the right, which is massive. So put David Andrews

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>back at center. What are you doing? The two weak

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>points are the two you know, kind of tipping points

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>right now are clearly left guard and right tackle. Right

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>those are the two probats that you're really having a

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 1>ton of problems. Right guard has been rock solid, and

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I would say Trent's been solid too, So I'm not

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Trent Brown. Yeah, Trent Brown hasn't been perfect. But if

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Trent Brown was the worst performer on the offensive line

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>this year, they'd beat they'd be in great shape. Right excellent,

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>So center, right guard, and left tackle you feel good about.

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>It's those two spots. It's left guard, yeah, and it's

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>right tackle. So moving or who do you put in

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>those pots? Because at this point in Dante Scarneckia used

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to talk about this all the time, seeing it through

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the same set of eyes. At this point, you just

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.959
<v Speaker 1>have to pick a combination right and go with it.

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot like last year where on when it

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>was the odd man out and it was Ted Carriss,

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>but it was working, so they stuck with it. Right Like,

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>there's no going back at that position. So who are

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you starting at left guard? Coming off the buy and

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>who are you starting at right tackle? Well, so this

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>is where I have to go against a lot of

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 1>what you said what I would do. I know you

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>said right guard might be their best spot, but Michael

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and when who's the best right tackle on this team? Yeah,

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and I've said this in the past, I'd rather cover

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>up an issue with guard than an issue with tackle.

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I would move Michael and went out to right tackle,

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and then between Cole Strange, Isaiah Wynn and Chason Hines

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>when he comes back, and maybe go out and find

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody else in free agency, or even Marcus Cannon when

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>he comes back. Between those four, find two guards. Yeah,

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what I would do. And now I don't think

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what they'll do. No, And they obviously no more

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>than I do when they're in the room, so there's

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 1>probably a reason they're not doing that. But with the

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 1>information I have, that's what I would do. I'm with

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you that that's the best thing to do for this

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>team this year. Yeah, I think that they Yeah, we're

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about this yet, like this isn't into the office.

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I definitely think they want to develop Mike on Win,

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>who at right guard, and he's been playing so well

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>there that I think that they look at it maybe

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>more from a big picture thinked around with him for

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>two years. They want to leave him there. And you

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>can't think around with Cole Strange like you can't. Cole

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Strange is a left guard in college. He's a left

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>guard in the purpose. If he's moving any words center,

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a tough ass to move him to the right side.

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think the issue that you've had with Isaiah

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Winn is a lot to do with him transitioning to

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the right side as well. Now, can you mask things

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>like you know, footwork and the things that I talked about.

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I think last week about Isaiah Winn where he's not,

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting out of his stance quick enough and

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>he's not getting to his landmarks or his set points

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in his footwork is all messed up. I guess in

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>theory you can mask those more at guard because you're

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>not not setting out as far at guard, right like,

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to really kick out of your stances

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>as much at guard as you would at tackle. So

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I if they're just looking to maximize the team this

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>year and put everybody in a good position this year,

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>then moving on WHENU out to tackle, because this is

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>how bad it's got. Like I was really against this.

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I was, I said, well, I wanted him at right tackle,

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>but I said, wherever you put him, just put them there,

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>leave them, don't move them. I was again, I thought,

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a guard long term, and I think

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>he's best at guard. But at this point, I don't

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>know how you avoid this if you want the team

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to be the best it can be this year, right, Like,

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you're still on the five year plan

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and you're just thinking about the next three years or

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>whatever the next five years, then maybe you leave on

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Winnu at guard and continue to develop him there. But

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to maximize the team this year, then

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I have a hard time thinking about how you fix

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>right tackle any better than putting on WHENU out there? Yeah,

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>so what do you do at the guard spots? You know,

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I think Cole strange to me. It's similar to what's

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>been going on with Mac, you know, like against the

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Bears right where you just kind of have to ride

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it right, You just kind of have to ride it

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>out with him at left guard. You hope David Andrews

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>coming back right. The problem you hope that David Andrews

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>coming back fix a lot, and I personally think that

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it was a mistake pulling him from that game last week.

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>The first couple drives of the game were rough against

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>DeForrest Buckner. There's no question about it. Where he played

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>two drives, right, I think. I think it's like two

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half or yeah, first play of the game.

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the first play of the game.

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>They try to run outside zone to the left side.

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>He tries to pass off DeForrest Buckner to James Ferns,

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and DeForrest Buckner just blew up the play right like

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>tackled Vermondrate two yards behind the line of scrimmage. Then

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned the Kenner Bourne play where he gets beat

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>by DeForrest Buckner again, yeah, and forces Aaron pass and

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>they're punting the football. So basically on the first drive

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>or the first two drives, I can't remember exactly how

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>those plays are sequenced together. He ruined two plays right

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>like in the first like five plays that you ran.

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>So I understand from that standpoint kind of being like,

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:17.479
<v Speaker 1>all right, we gotta get him out of there, right right,

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think with him, you gotta ride the wave like,

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think you have any other choice. And

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>there has been some good tape, certainly earlier on in

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the season with David Andrews at center. There's been some

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>solid tape. So the question I think that boils down

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to is can Isaiah Win play right guard at a

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>somewhat acceptable level? I mean, I'd like to think between him,

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Cannon Chase, I guess those two guys are on

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to them, who do you trust more? Do you trust

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:51.959
<v Speaker 1>Isaiah Win at right guard or do you trust Yadney

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 1>could used at right tackle? I mean I thought Yadney

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>looked looked fine right, I mean, compared to what we've seen,

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>he held up well. I know we got beat a

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of times, but he got beat a lot early

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and I thought he settled down nicely after that. Quitty

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Pay gave him a ton of problems. But Quity Pay

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>is a good player, like he's starting to come on

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and come into his own for Indy. He can really

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>rush the passer, so he had him beat a lot

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>early on in that game. The run blocking tape was

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>solid for Yadney. He had a great block on Johnny

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Smith's screen, blocked the guy right off the screen on

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the broadcast coffee, so he had some good run blocking

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>screen tape. The pass protection stuff was iffy, but maybe

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you ride that wave right like. I don't know, but

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what it comes down to, I think for them

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is do you trust Win more or do you just

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>trust could just more? Like? And I don't know, I

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>have a tough time answering that question myself. I think

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>probably could just just from what we've seen, you know,

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>just going. But I don't think you're necessarily going to

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:58.239
<v Speaker 1>get one group and stick with it. I think you're

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to continue to tweak things, which is unfortune,

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>but I think that's just where they're at. Yeah, all right,

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>let's take some of these calls. I think that about

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>sums up the offense. I thought we're kind of um

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>getting lost in the weeds there a little bit, I

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>think with some of the scheme stuff, which I appreciate

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you that's what this show is. Patty, what's going on? Patty?

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And Agum? How you doing going on? Guys? Damn it?

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>You sold? You're sold. My question I was gonna ask

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you if you think Dante's saying what I asked to

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:29.719
<v Speaker 1>see you guys, yesterday, just sticking with five guys. But, um, Alex,

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll ask you a question. Um, I think I remember this.

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm not remembering correctly, but didn't didn't you have

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Schooler as like a special teams guy prior to

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>last year's draft and a guy that the Patriots would

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>want to take a look at. Probably I think I did. Yeah,

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that seems like a bar thing to do. To know

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>they're a random special teamer from Texas that nobody's ever

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 1>heard of. I'd have to pull up my spreadsheet. Honestly,

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, all the names kind

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of run together. I think I had him on my

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 1>radar like late. Yeah, and I mean that's all I got. Um,

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping that they just stick with five guys going forward,

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, if cold strange, like I said to

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the guys yesterday, if he's one of the guys that

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>he's struggling and just let him work through it. You know,

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>he's your first round pick, but just let the guys

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 1>freaking deal and get it over with. Yes. Yeah, No, Patty,

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 1>You're right in my opinion with that is uh. And

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 1>I think if they called Scarneckia and we're like you know,

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>give us your three things that we need to fix

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>on the offensive line. I think continuity would be number one.

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with that. And some of it's injury, right,

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>some of it you can't avoid. But yeah, there's too

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>much shuffling going on with that group. All right, Andrew

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and Wisconsin. What's up? Andrew? Hey guys, how are you

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>doing good? How are you? Thanks for hanging on doing well? Um? So,

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I have two questions here. Um. One of them I

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 1>have to preface and I'll try to go quick here. Um.

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>So as a casual fan and just just watching the games, U,

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I know it's I'm really not one of those bailey

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>baffy guys at all. I love Mac. I've bought the

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 1>four hundred dollars Nike jersey for him right away from

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the grass room. Um, but it looked a lot better

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 1>when when he was out there. Um. I'm just wondering

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 1>if it's build the play calling, if it's build the

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 1>difference there. Um. And then also kind of more of

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>a on the lighthearted side. Um, how likely do you

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 1>guys think it is to uh for Matthew jude On

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to break shack records this year? He's actually you know

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 1>it would take a little bit, it'd be pretty tough,

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>but it seems like he could do it all right.

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>So to the first point, the Bailey Zappy mac Jones thing,

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 1>I I did think we were kind of beyond this

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 1>when we saw Bailey Zappy against Chicago, like after they

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>lost the lead and when he was playing from behind,

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and that that game was as bad as any tape

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that mac Jones has put out there. You know, it

0:35:56.840 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>comes in, he plays great, they have a couple of

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:00.919
<v Speaker 1>play calls up there's for him, and then it really

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 1>started to unravel on him, gonna unravel on the whole team.

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 1>To be fair as well. I will say this though,

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we're at the point now and I was

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 1>as anti Bailey's Appy as you could possibly be. Right, Yeah,

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:13.240
<v Speaker 1>but I do think we're at the point now where

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>bailey'sz Appy was making quicker decisions with the football, maybe

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily better like aggressive decisions, right, I guess it's

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the way to put it. Like, you know, I don't

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 1>think he was making as many high, high level he

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>was just getting the ball out of his hand. He's

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>getting the ball out of his which is we talked

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>about Max's decision making ability. Bailey's Appy's best trade in

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 1>college was that ball was in and out, in and out,

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 1>in and out, and it was great to see that.

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Now some of it was I don't think Bailey's Appy

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:46.320
<v Speaker 1>ever got sped up. Those were probably his two starts

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 1>were the two best games in terms of pass pro

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:50.799
<v Speaker 1>for this team. And I know there's some people who

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>have these conspiracy theories that they're willing to block for

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:56.479
<v Speaker 1>Bailey's Appy more than Mac Jones. Now, they did things

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:59.839
<v Speaker 1>in those games to help out. There's a in those

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:03.800
<v Speaker 1>games significantly significantly higher rate where they keep running backs

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>indoor tight ends into block and only send three or

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>four guys out into the pattern that's naturally going to help.

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 1>They called more of these quick release plays that are

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>designed for the quarterback to get the ball in out

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of his hands. They called more of those plays in

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 1>those games. And they're calling for Max. So what I

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 1>would what I would say to that in terms of

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Zappy didn't look sped up. Zappy was getting the ball

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 1>out of his hands. Yes, they made it easier for

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:27.839
<v Speaker 1>him to do that. The answer is not necessarily going

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:32.399
<v Speaker 1>back to Bailey Zappy. It's called giving Mac Jones those opportunities. Yeah,

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is I will push back on one thing, not not

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>like to you directly necessarily, but we have two years basically,

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 1>not basically, we have two years of sample size now

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to work with. On Mac Jones, his under center passing

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>numbers are some of the worst than the league. Okay,

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 1>if you can do a lot of that stuff without

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 1>going under center. I don't think you can do some

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of the hard play action stuff they were doing with Bailey. No,

0:37:57.600 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>but you can do you can do six protection, you

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>can do quick quick throw kind of plays quilts things

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:05.839
<v Speaker 1>like that. Yeah, no, the quick throws. Certainly. I think

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 1>that the play action success that they had with Bailey

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Zappy is really it's a it's a Bailey Zappy thing,

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 1>right And I think the main reason when I say

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it to Bailey Zappy thing, I'm more mean it's a

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Lions and Browns thing, right Like. I think those two

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 1>teams saw a rookie quarterback making his first starts in

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, and they were just eight in the box

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 1>and were coming after the line of scrimmage, right Like.

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:31.439
<v Speaker 1>That was the game plan from their side of the things,

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and they were just getting the three on two in

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the back end. And Jacoby Myers or DeVante Parker was

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:39.719
<v Speaker 1>getting one on ones all over the place, and they're

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 1>just winning the one on ones against inferior quarters when

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>they play these better teams that have good cover guys

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in the back end and have better linebackers that can

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>read things out quicker, like a team like Indianapolis, Like,

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:54.840
<v Speaker 1>they're not gonna have average seventeen yards per play action

0:38:54.880 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 1>pass attempt against the Colts or against the Bills or

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:00.359
<v Speaker 1>against some of these better defense of the Jets. So

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of ways that that was like

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>an opponent driven thing. I think that they got Bailey

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 1>zappy or had to go to Bailey z Appy in

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a really good time to go to Bailey Zappy. Though,

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:13.240
<v Speaker 1>those two teams and those two defenses really struggled against

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots. So I think there's some elements of the

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Bailey Zappy offense that I wish they did more. I

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:22.800
<v Speaker 1>think mainly though, and this is sort of one of

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the big picture of things I wanted to hit on

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:26.880
<v Speaker 1>about where do they go from here and off the

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>bye week, I think they have to accept the fact

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that mac Jones is just not comfortable operating from under center.

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it is. Like I've tried to

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:40.319
<v Speaker 1>study some of the tape, and I think there are

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 1>some elements of like drops and like timing in his

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>drops and things like that. Or maybe the play action

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>fake like just isn't as as he doesn't sell it

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:51.879
<v Speaker 1>as well as he needs to or whatever. But like

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I said, two years now of data on mac Jones

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:58.359
<v Speaker 1>and all of it suggests that he struggles from under center.

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Right now, from under center a season, he's averaging five

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 1>point nine yards per attempt. It's thirty third in the NFL.

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>From the start of last season to this year, he's

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 1>thirty fifth in passer rating from under center. So he

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't do it well for whatever reason. So that's

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 1>why I'm always harping so much on RPOs, Because if

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna be an under center play action team

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:24.439
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna be a spread team and you're gonna

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>play out of the gun all the time, you have

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to run RPOs. Like That's how you get the same

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>idea of play action, right, that's the shotgun version of

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>play action is RPOs. Now, the next step, certainly for

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 1>their RPO package is downfield routes. Like we were talking

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:43.840
<v Speaker 1>about this before practice, like, can we get a slant

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:46.840
<v Speaker 1>on an RPO instead of all bubble screens, which is

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:49.320
<v Speaker 1>all they do right now is bubble screens off of RPOs.

0:40:49.800 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 1>They gotta start developing some routes down the field, slants

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:58.320
<v Speaker 1>like curls or hitches, anything like anything down the field

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that well, generally a bigger play if they do throw

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 1>the ball out of the RPO, because right now, you're

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:06.920
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get big plays off of bubble screens, Like

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that's just not gonna happen too frequently. You're gonna get

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 1>bigger plays out of hitting. You know, Kendrick Bourne on

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a slant and he's off off to the races, right, Like,

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>those are the big plays that you're going to get.

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:22.239
<v Speaker 1>What they were last year. That's what they were at Alabama, right,

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Like Davante Smith off the glance route was automatic, right, automatic,

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 1>big play. When I say last year big plays, I

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>mean like they not on RPOs, but like Kendrick Boorn

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:33.759
<v Speaker 1>catch and run right right, right, Yeah, that's totally what

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it is. So I think that you know, the Bailey's

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Appy stuff. To me, I do agree that Bailey's Appy

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 1>was getting the ball out quicker and seeing the field

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 1>faster than Mac Jones. But I do think that they

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:49.800
<v Speaker 1>need to start calling plays that fit Mac Jones and

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the under center stuff just doesn't. All right, uh Steve,

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and wait wait all right, let's take Steve the mate. Steve. Oh,

0:41:56.520 --> 0:42:02.719
<v Speaker 1>I forgot about that, Steve, what's up? Um? So you know,

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the thing was the offense. I think the

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:08.839
<v Speaker 1>first thing other than the offensive line that really needs

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 1>to be addressed is really the coaching. I if we

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 1>think that the team has enough talent, and we think

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that the quarterback shows potential, then good coaching should elevate players,

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, to their potential. I mean, Bill Belizick has

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:28.399
<v Speaker 1>been doing that for years. Obviously you had you know, uh,

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the goat as a quarterback, which which helps.

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:35.879
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know, I think that's something that needs

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to be addressed. I have no idea if they'll actually

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>look in and think, oh, wait a minute, maybe having

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Patricia's the offensive coordinator's not working. I don't know. But

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>when I look at Mac, I see him when he

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 1>is in the pocket, you can tell, you know, he

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 1>gets He has like happy feet where it looks like

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 1>he's processing so much more information than he supposed to. Like,

0:42:57.200 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he's thinking, all right, my wide receivers running

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:03.719
<v Speaker 1>the actual right routes um because if they don't and

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:06.279
<v Speaker 1>he throws the ball because he has to anticipate and

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:08.759
<v Speaker 1>it gets intercepted, people are gonna say, look at you know,

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we need to go back to Zappi And then you know,

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:17.800
<v Speaker 1>uh is you know, is this office the line gonna

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 1>protect me? Or am I going to get another you know,

0:43:19.840 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 1>just destroyed uh constantly? And I just don't know, you

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 1>know what is the other thing I was ass is

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:32.919
<v Speaker 1>you know Joe Burrow gets you know, constantly hit. Yeah,

0:43:32.960 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have or does he have the same characteristics

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that Mac is showing now? Yeah, So look, I think

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to sum it up, I think we agree or with

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>him on all points about the coaching. The first thing

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll just say about Joe Burrow, well, you know he

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 1>has Jamar Chase. Well, and so this is what I

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 1>was going to say, look at what he's looked like

0:43:55.120 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 1>without Jamar Chase, Right, go back to that game against Cleveland.

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 1>He looked and the defensive line couldn't block him. He's

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:04.319
<v Speaker 1>getting your team off on him. The Browns defense wasn't

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 1>That's a good bass rush, but he looked like Mac

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Jones has looked. Yeah, so there was something. Stephen Ruis

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of The Ringer wrote a good piece about the Bengals

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:18.000
<v Speaker 1>figuring out their offense a little bit before Jamar Chase

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:20.759
<v Speaker 1>got hurt, and he said that he wrote this whole like,

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, soliloqually about how the Bengals have pulled out

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:26.839
<v Speaker 1>of their early season rut and their offenses clicking again.

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:28.920
<v Speaker 1>And then I remember he tweeted and he was just like,

0:44:29.160 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>but at the end of the day, Jamar Chase is

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 1>just really good and he started winning all of his

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 1>one on one battles right right, Like that was like

0:44:35.200 --> 0:44:37.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of the trump card that a team like the Bengals,

0:44:38.040 --> 0:44:40.439
<v Speaker 1>or the team like the Dolphins, like, for all their

0:44:40.520 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 1>scheming and all of Mike McDaniel's craziness, at the end

0:44:43.520 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of the day, the Dolphins just have two receivers and

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Waddle and Tyreek Hill that are damn good and

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:51.600
<v Speaker 1>when they need a play, that's where two goes with

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the ball, right. And the Patriots might have like one

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in Jacobe Meyers, who I think can get open and

0:44:57.040 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 1>make plays like that, but it's certainly not as explosive

0:44:59.680 --> 0:45:02.800
<v Speaker 1>as those two guys. In terms of Patricia and his future,

0:45:03.120 --> 0:45:06.560
<v Speaker 1>let's call it that with the organization. I also tend

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to agree that Patricia is not going anywhere and they're

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:13.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna have him, just like a player would develop into

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:15.839
<v Speaker 1>this role, right, and hope that over time he gets

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:18.279
<v Speaker 1>better at it, just like players do with more repetition.

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:22.719
<v Speaker 1>I do hope two things. One, I hope that next

0:45:22.800 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 1>year they hire a real offensive line coach to take

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that off his plate. Right. I hope that there's a

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Carmen Brisillo or you know, a Googs, right, I can't

0:45:33.040 --> 0:45:35.880
<v Speaker 1>say his last name, but just somebody that's done offensive

0:45:35.880 --> 0:45:38.680
<v Speaker 1>line before. You know, maybe you're a guy from Iowa

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that you tell me is terrible, right that Okay, Brian

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Ferrins I said I was offense is terrible. I never

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 1>said Brian Ferns. Brian Ferrens. You kind of did, Brian Ferrens. Right.

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's Brian Ferris from Iowa who might get can

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:53.080
<v Speaker 1>buy his dad as the OC there, right because somebody

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 1>just butchered that whole thing. But essentially, yes, that whole thing, right,

0:45:56.680 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna he's he's looking at NFL coaching jobs to

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:02.319
<v Speaker 1>avoid getting maybe his NFL coaching job is coming to

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:04.920
<v Speaker 1>coach the offensive line here. He coach he was, He

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 1>was a quality control coach here for two years then

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eleven he was the tight ends coach, played

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:12.360
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. I would played offensive line in the NFL

0:46:12.640 --> 0:46:15.279
<v Speaker 1>coach that I would before becoming the quarterbacks coach in OC.

0:46:15.480 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, he would be a guy that would fit

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that description. Yes. The other hope that I have is

0:46:21.200 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 1>they have somebody that they hire, because I don't think

0:46:24.640 --> 0:46:26.759
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna hire like Bill O'Brien next year, Like I

0:46:26.760 --> 0:46:28.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think that that's gonna happen, and they're gonna bring

0:46:28.520 --> 0:46:31.319
<v Speaker 1>in like a veteran OC to run the whole thing.

0:46:31.840 --> 0:46:34.840
<v Speaker 1>But I would hope that maybe next year they would

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:37.800
<v Speaker 1>bring in like a consultant, right like a like a

0:46:38.080 --> 0:46:41.680
<v Speaker 1>some sort of quality control coach or consultant that's coached

0:46:41.719 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 1>offense his entire life and could come in and just

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:47.960
<v Speaker 1>be a professional offensive coach in the room to kind

0:46:47.960 --> 0:46:50.399
<v Speaker 1>of help point these guys in the right direction, sort

0:46:50.400 --> 0:46:52.719
<v Speaker 1>of like what you would do if if Patricia was

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>like a young coordinator, right like sort of like what

0:46:55.840 --> 0:46:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Dante Scarneckia and Ivan fears were for Josh McDaniels, right, Like,

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:02.759
<v Speaker 1>somebody like that that's been around the block and knows

0:47:02.760 --> 0:47:04.279
<v Speaker 1>what he's doing, I think would go a long way.

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 1>We missed the Matthew jude On thinking. And we've talked

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:10.920
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minutes now, Alex about the offense and the offensive struggles,

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't really touched at all on the defense.

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:15.759
<v Speaker 1>So Judean and the sack record, I could take that

0:47:15.920 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 1>or leave it. I don't really care if he breaks

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the sack record, but I do think that it's worth

0:47:20.320 --> 0:47:23.759
<v Speaker 1>talking about. What's an interesting, bigger conversation with him to

0:47:23.880 --> 0:47:25.759
<v Speaker 1>me because of how last season ended, we thought he

0:47:25.840 --> 0:47:28.760
<v Speaker 1>was gonna break it. Last season he was six sacks,

0:47:29.400 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 1>six sacks short with six games to go at least

0:47:31.560 --> 0:47:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots team sack record of eighteen and a half

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 1>set by Entree Tippet in nineteen eighty four, and then

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:39.040
<v Speaker 1>he never got another sack after the bye. Here we

0:47:39.080 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 1>are at the bye week again, and this is something

0:47:42.200 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that really applies to the team as a whole, but

0:47:43.680 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 1>we can use jude On as an example. The bye

0:47:46.120 --> 0:47:49.600
<v Speaker 1>week last year became a thing in that when they

0:47:49.640 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 1>struggled down the stretch, the bye, the bye? What happened

0:47:53.120 --> 0:47:54.640
<v Speaker 1>at the bye? What would they do? What didn't they

0:47:54.680 --> 0:47:56.359
<v Speaker 1>do during the bye? Right? And here we are again

0:47:56.920 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 1>now Matt to Judeon has talked this year about how

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:02.239
<v Speaker 1>he tried to get in better shape, better endurance. His

0:48:02.480 --> 0:48:04.839
<v Speaker 1>usage rate has been down ten percent this year. It's

0:48:04.840 --> 0:48:07.279
<v Speaker 1>seventy four percent, down from about eighty two eighty three

0:48:07.320 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 1>percent this time last year. So they've it seems like

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:12.279
<v Speaker 1>at least with him, they've made an effort to write

0:48:12.320 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that the pace he's on right now, eleven and a

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:18.359
<v Speaker 1>half sacks and nine games, he should blow by Andre

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Tippett's number of eighteen and a half. And you know,

0:48:21.440 --> 0:48:23.480
<v Speaker 1>does he flirt with the twenty two and a half

0:48:23.560 --> 0:48:25.319
<v Speaker 1>from t J. Watt from a couple of years ago

0:48:25.880 --> 0:48:29.799
<v Speaker 1>I tied with Michael Strahan, Right, Maybe maybe he does.

0:48:29.880 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 1>He's on that pace right now, He's on pace to

0:48:32.040 --> 0:48:35.399
<v Speaker 1>tie it. They need him to show up big down

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the stretch, which he didn't do last year. So that's

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:39.439
<v Speaker 1>where this gets very interesting. Yeah, and I think last

0:48:39.520 --> 0:48:44.080
<v Speaker 1>year to the their secondary rushers like Barmore came on

0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 1>right and he was somebody that emerged, but they didn't

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:49.279
<v Speaker 1>I think this year they have really good rushed depth,

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:53.400
<v Speaker 1>like guys like ja Dietrich Wise Barmore will be Barmore

0:48:53.440 --> 0:48:56.080
<v Speaker 1>when he comes back, right, So I think these guys

0:48:57.120 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 1>get into this point has really put the pass rush

0:49:01.719 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in the position that I'm much much more bullish on

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:06.839
<v Speaker 1>it even than I was last year, because last year

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it felt a lot until Barmore started to come on

0:49:09.760 --> 0:49:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in the middle part of the year, it felt a

0:49:11.920 --> 0:49:14.320
<v Speaker 1>lot like Judean was their entire pass rush, right, and

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 1>if you block jude On, you're gonna be okay. This

0:49:17.239 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 1>year they have some counters to just jude On. Their

0:49:20.360 --> 0:49:24.279
<v Speaker 1>five man or four man package on third down. Excuse me,

0:49:24.440 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 1>is is spectacular, Like it's just so much fun to watch,

0:49:27.239 --> 0:49:30.320
<v Speaker 1>how they scheme it up, how they run stunts or

0:49:30.400 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 1>games up front, how they blitz guys and then drop guys,

0:49:34.239 --> 0:49:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and like it's just there's so much great stuff going on.

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they had a play last week where they

0:49:43.360 --> 0:49:46.240
<v Speaker 1>dropped jude On into coverage and the whole protection slides

0:49:46.239 --> 0:49:48.440
<v Speaker 1>out to jude On and the Geltti Devi is just

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 1>unblocked through the middle of the line of scrimmage, like

0:49:50.680 --> 0:49:53.279
<v Speaker 1>they're just playing games with the offensive line and with

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the pass protection of these opposing offensive lines right now,

0:49:57.040 --> 0:49:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that's been really fun to watch now in the back end,

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's a little bit like what they were doing

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:06.680
<v Speaker 1>last year, where there's some disguise, there's some rotation. There's

0:50:06.680 --> 0:50:09.239
<v Speaker 1>definitely some zone, more zone maybe than we're accustomed to

0:50:09.440 --> 0:50:12.879
<v Speaker 1>on early downs, third downs of man coverage down for them.

0:50:13.880 --> 0:50:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I have reservations about whether or not the secondary is

0:50:18.160 --> 0:50:21.120
<v Speaker 1>truly gonna hold up against the elite offenses, right like

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:25.479
<v Speaker 1>when Josh Allen comes here in Stefon Diggs and Gabe

0:50:25.560 --> 0:50:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Davis and Isaiah McKenzie again, like how are they gonna

0:50:29.080 --> 0:50:33.279
<v Speaker 1>match up in man coverage against those types of teams

0:50:33.280 --> 0:50:35.520
<v Speaker 1>when they play the Bengals, Like and they have to

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:38.440
<v Speaker 1>face Jamar Chase, Like who's taken Jamar Chase? And do

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:41.719
<v Speaker 1>they have a guy that they can hold up in

0:50:41.800 --> 0:50:46.239
<v Speaker 1>the back end with that because Burrow Alan, you know,

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:48.440
<v Speaker 1>if they do make the playoffs, whoever they play in

0:50:48.480 --> 0:50:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, Like I shouldn't say whoever, because some maybe

0:50:51.560 --> 0:50:53.680
<v Speaker 1>they do play quarterback that they can spin the dial on.

0:50:53.800 --> 0:50:57.239
<v Speaker 1>But guys like Allen and Burrow, they're not gonna be

0:50:57.320 --> 0:50:59.120
<v Speaker 1>able to do what they did to Zach Wilson, right, Like,

0:50:59.160 --> 0:51:01.000
<v Speaker 1>they're not gonna be able to just muddy the waters

0:51:01.080 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 1>back there, make it confusing and get and get three turnovers. Like,

0:51:05.719 --> 0:51:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that those guys are gonna are

0:51:07.600 --> 0:51:10.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna fall for those tricks as much as the inexperienced

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:14.840
<v Speaker 1>guys do. So can they get bought? Can they actually

0:51:14.920 --> 0:51:18.560
<v Speaker 1>win with personnel instead of it all just being Belichick

0:51:18.640 --> 0:51:21.879
<v Speaker 1>smoke and mirrors, right, because last year they couldn't. Last

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:24.880
<v Speaker 1>year it was ended up all being Bill smoke and mirrors.

0:51:25.280 --> 0:51:27.359
<v Speaker 1>So is this How do you feel about the back end?

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Because their safety groups has me excited like that. I

0:51:30.320 --> 0:51:32.759
<v Speaker 1>think they can really do some cool things with but

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm still a little bit concerned with the fact that

0:51:35.480 --> 0:51:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you're outside corners or Jalen Mills and Jonathan Jones and

0:51:38.120 --> 0:51:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Johathan Jones has been great, don't get me wrong, well,

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and Jack Jones, and so maybe Jack Jones is the

0:51:42.960 --> 0:51:45.200
<v Speaker 1>answer a Marcus in the slot or you know whatever

0:51:45.520 --> 0:51:47.359
<v Speaker 1>upgrades of that unit. But how do you feel about

0:51:47.360 --> 0:51:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the back end right now? Because the front, I think

0:51:48.680 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 1>we can all agree, has been awesome. I think it's

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:52.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those things I know this is sort of

0:51:52.080 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a cop out, but I think it's one of those

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:55.800
<v Speaker 1>things where they've done as well as you can expect

0:51:55.840 --> 0:51:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to this point. Yeah, we're not going to know how

0:51:58.040 --> 0:52:00.399
<v Speaker 1>they you know, you talk about the Bills, right, We're

0:52:00.400 --> 0:52:02.040
<v Speaker 1>not gonna know what they look like against that kind

0:52:02.080 --> 0:52:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of test until they face it. Yeah, we're just not

0:52:04.200 --> 0:52:07.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think the biggest issue against the Bills last year.

0:52:07.080 --> 0:52:08.719
<v Speaker 1>I know people try to talk about the schemes and

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:10.440
<v Speaker 1>this and that, and your whole thing with the iPhone

0:52:10.480 --> 0:52:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and the flip phone and whatever. I think at the

0:52:14.680 --> 0:52:16.000
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, a lot of it was just speed.

0:52:16.520 --> 0:52:18.040
<v Speaker 1>They just didn't have the speed on the field that

0:52:18.120 --> 0:52:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bills did they needed to. Now you have Jonathan

0:52:20.320 --> 0:52:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Jones playing on the outside. You didn't even have him

0:52:22.080 --> 0:52:23.800
<v Speaker 1>last year at all, he was hurt, but you have

0:52:23.880 --> 0:52:26.080
<v Speaker 1>him playing on the outside. You have Marcus Jones in

0:52:26.120 --> 0:52:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the slot, you have Jack Jones, like, they have legitimate

0:52:29.719 --> 0:52:32.400
<v Speaker 1>speed in the secondary. Now. So does that mean that

0:52:32.440 --> 0:52:34.759
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna blank the Bills? Probably not. I guess we'll

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:38.399
<v Speaker 1>see what happens with Josh Allen's elbow, but they're better

0:52:38.520 --> 0:52:43.520
<v Speaker 1>equipped personnel wise, personnel wise for that matchup. The schematic

0:52:43.640 --> 0:52:46.719
<v Speaker 1>thing is another level of it, but it we won't

0:52:46.760 --> 0:52:50.320
<v Speaker 1>know until we know it's there really is no comp

0:52:50.440 --> 0:52:52.759
<v Speaker 1>for it. It's the Bills and the Bengals games really

0:52:52.840 --> 0:52:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that stand out. Maybe Miami is the closest comp for

0:52:55.880 --> 0:52:58.279
<v Speaker 1>how they would cover something like that, but but that

0:52:58.440 --> 0:53:02.520
<v Speaker 1>was Week one. We've come so saying they play Miami again, No,

0:53:02.680 --> 0:53:04.439
<v Speaker 1>I know, that's what I'm saying. And maybe the comp

0:53:04.719 --> 0:53:08.040
<v Speaker 1>for how they defend these explosive, you know, multi game

0:53:08.120 --> 0:53:12.640
<v Speaker 1>breaker receiver offenses is Miami. That was Week one. Jack

0:53:12.920 --> 0:53:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to Jack Jones playing that game. If he did, he

0:53:14.520 --> 0:53:16.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't play a lot. I gotten mossed by Tyree here, right,

0:53:17.280 --> 0:53:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Jones didn't play a ton. Jonathan Jones was still

0:53:20.239 --> 0:53:23.359
<v Speaker 1>very new to playing on the boundaries. So we're really

0:53:23.400 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to know until we know. With that kind

0:53:25.080 --> 0:53:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of yeah, I think the hesitation that I have with

0:53:27.280 --> 0:53:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the group maybe stems back from training camp and watching

0:53:30.160 --> 0:53:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams just dominate them for two days in Vegas,

0:53:33.880 --> 0:53:36.520
<v Speaker 1>because that's one of those examples where like this is

0:53:36.560 --> 0:53:39.560
<v Speaker 1>an outside receiver and you don't have a number one

0:53:39.600 --> 0:53:42.160
<v Speaker 1>outside corner like Jonathan Jones is a number one outside

0:53:42.239 --> 0:53:44.600
<v Speaker 1>corner in theory, but he's not a guy that matches

0:53:44.680 --> 0:53:46.759
<v Speaker 1>up against Davanta Adams, right, Like he's a guy that

0:53:46.840 --> 0:53:49.040
<v Speaker 1>can match up against Tyreek Hill. I think he can

0:53:49.120 --> 0:53:51.719
<v Speaker 1>take Stefon Diggs, right. I think that Diggs is more

0:53:51.719 --> 0:53:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of route runner than he is like a big body guide,

0:53:54.920 --> 0:53:58.080
<v Speaker 1>big explosive receiver like Adams. The Raiders game I think

0:53:58.200 --> 0:54:00.680
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting because it's like, is gonna be Jalen

0:54:00.760 --> 0:54:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Mills that's gonna get Davante Adams? Are they going to

0:54:03.560 --> 0:54:06.839
<v Speaker 1>trust Jack Jones at that point to be on Davante Adams? Now?

0:54:07.480 --> 0:54:11.520
<v Speaker 1>When I was watching Bill's Jets this past week, getting

0:54:11.520 --> 0:54:14.400
<v Speaker 1>ahead on next week for the Jets, and also just

0:54:14.520 --> 0:54:17.920
<v Speaker 1>watching the Bills a little bit. The thing that I

0:54:17.960 --> 0:54:20.319
<v Speaker 1>couldn't get out of my head when watching the Bills

0:54:20.360 --> 0:54:22.400
<v Speaker 1>because whenever I would watch any whenever I have a

0:54:22.480 --> 0:54:25.560
<v Speaker 1>chance to watch Buffalo, all my thoughts are about watching

0:54:25.640 --> 0:54:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen in that offense is like what do they

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:30.719
<v Speaker 1>do differently? Right? Like what how can they match up

0:54:30.719 --> 0:54:34.920
<v Speaker 1>against this? And I almost headed jokingly to myself, but

0:54:34.960 --> 0:54:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of serious, like how many dbs can they

0:54:37.040 --> 0:54:39.480
<v Speaker 1>get on the field? Right? Like how many dbs is

0:54:39.480 --> 0:54:42.279
<v Speaker 1>too many dbs because the way that I look at

0:54:42.360 --> 0:54:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo right now is even even still right at this point,

0:54:49.400 --> 0:54:52.160
<v Speaker 1>their running game is Josh Allen, right, like he's their

0:54:52.239 --> 0:54:56.120
<v Speaker 1>best running he's our best ball carrier, right, And that's

0:54:56.160 --> 0:54:58.640
<v Speaker 1>basically the design quarterback runs that they might be able

0:54:58.680 --> 0:55:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to hit the Patriots with are worrisome for sure, But

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:05.600
<v Speaker 1>like you said, it's all about getting speed on the field, right,

0:55:05.800 --> 0:55:09.560
<v Speaker 1>So can they play? I think now what the differences

0:55:09.640 --> 0:55:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of what I'm getting at You mentioned the speed at corner,

0:55:11.960 --> 0:55:13.960
<v Speaker 1>which I agree with you. I think they're faster at corner,

0:55:14.520 --> 0:55:16.840
<v Speaker 1>but I also think they're deeper at safety, right because

0:55:16.960 --> 0:55:22.040
<v Speaker 1>last year they did not have Jabriel Peppers. So is

0:55:22.080 --> 0:55:25.799
<v Speaker 1>there a world against Buffalo where they can get all

0:55:25.880 --> 0:55:29.759
<v Speaker 1>four safeties on the field at once? Because if they

0:55:29.800 --> 0:55:31.520
<v Speaker 1>can get all four of those guys, if they can

0:55:31.560 --> 0:55:34.600
<v Speaker 1>get Dugger, Phillips, Peppers and Devon all on the field

0:55:34.600 --> 0:55:36.719
<v Speaker 1>at once, then I think that they have a chance

0:55:37.000 --> 0:55:38.799
<v Speaker 1>because I think they have speed, and I think they

0:55:38.840 --> 0:55:41.080
<v Speaker 1>have open field tacklers at that point, right, like they

0:55:41.160 --> 0:55:44.760
<v Speaker 1>have guys that can bring people down, and Dugger Phillips

0:55:44.920 --> 0:55:47.120
<v Speaker 1>is not as physical as Dugger and Peppers is, but

0:55:47.239 --> 0:55:50.160
<v Speaker 1>he makes great reads from off the ball, and he

0:55:50.400 --> 0:55:53.080
<v Speaker 1>has some of the best run fits out of anybody

0:55:53.160 --> 0:55:55.920
<v Speaker 1>on the team. It really does. And Peppers and Dugger

0:55:56.000 --> 0:55:59.319
<v Speaker 1>bring a physicality that I think Oldie Bentley really does

0:55:59.520 --> 0:56:03.080
<v Speaker 1>at the backer spot. So to me, they the difference,

0:56:03.160 --> 0:56:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the like trump card that they might have this year

0:56:05.160 --> 0:56:10.600
<v Speaker 1>against Buffalo than they didn't have last year is basically

0:56:10.800 --> 0:56:12.879
<v Speaker 1>like playing like a dollar package. Like they could play

0:56:12.920 --> 0:56:14.840
<v Speaker 1>seven defensive back and the Bills still can't run the

0:56:14.880 --> 0:56:19.040
<v Speaker 1>ball outside of Josh Allen himself. Which if and I've

0:56:19.040 --> 0:56:22.200
<v Speaker 1>said this about Josh Allen for years, but now for real, Yeah,

0:56:22.280 --> 0:56:26.600
<v Speaker 1>if I'm the Bills, you cannot have him run this much.

0:56:26.920 --> 0:56:29.640
<v Speaker 1>You just can't. Patriots, he might have to run ten times.

0:56:31.520 --> 0:56:33.239
<v Speaker 1>He might have to, and they might have to turn

0:56:33.320 --> 0:56:35.520
<v Speaker 1>him into Justin Fields and Lamar Jackson ten times. It's

0:56:35.560 --> 0:56:37.759
<v Speaker 1>not a lot for him. Ten times is a lot

0:56:37.960 --> 0:56:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of design what I'm saying, but all of it,

0:56:41.160 --> 0:56:43.480
<v Speaker 1>all of it. You can't have him taking that many hits.

0:56:43.600 --> 0:56:46.600
<v Speaker 1>You can't. And that's the way to beat him is

0:56:46.640 --> 0:56:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to kind of just beat him up, right. That's what

0:56:48.640 --> 0:56:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Judah and said when they asked him, like how

0:56:50.520 --> 0:56:52.520
<v Speaker 1>do you how do you deal with mobile quarterbacks? Right?

0:56:52.600 --> 0:56:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Hit him? It was the same same with Josh Allen.

0:56:54.920 --> 0:56:56.160
<v Speaker 1>It was the same with Cam, It was the same

0:56:56.200 --> 0:56:57.719
<v Speaker 1>with Vic. It's the same with any of these guys.

0:56:57.800 --> 0:57:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Even Aaron Rodgers did an extent. Like the Bills still

0:57:01.560 --> 0:57:03.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have a tradition of running game. So to your

0:57:03.600 --> 0:57:06.399
<v Speaker 1>point about getting all four safeties on the field, if

0:57:06.400 --> 0:57:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you only need two true defensive lineman, right, if you

0:57:09.000 --> 0:57:11.600
<v Speaker 1>can go out there with just Dietrich Wise and Christian

0:57:11.640 --> 0:57:14.839
<v Speaker 1>Barmore as your defensive lineman, it's a big help. Now,

0:57:15.160 --> 0:57:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you think on first down, if you

0:57:17.200 --> 0:57:20.160
<v Speaker 1>go out there with like Lawrence guy and Devon god

0:57:20.200 --> 0:57:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Shaw and Barmore as a three man line, and maybe

0:57:23.320 --> 0:57:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Judan as a fourth guy on the line of scrimmage,

0:57:25.440 --> 0:57:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and you run like a four three, I mean, I

0:57:29.120 --> 0:57:30.960
<v Speaker 1>think those four guys have a chance to hold up

0:57:30.960 --> 0:57:33.640
<v Speaker 1>against any like, you know, as a devil singletary now

0:57:33.800 --> 0:57:35.600
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. If the Bills are going to see that

0:57:35.760 --> 0:57:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and decide to run the ball thirty thirty five times,

0:57:38.080 --> 0:57:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you've won. That's what I'm saying, right, So make them

0:57:40.600 --> 0:57:42.760
<v Speaker 1>do that. Yeah, I think that that's exactly what it is.

0:57:42.800 --> 0:57:45.880
<v Speaker 1>It's it's like those old matchups against Peyton, right, Like

0:57:46.000 --> 0:57:48.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like if you're gonna hand the ball off to

0:57:48.280 --> 0:57:50.600
<v Speaker 1>No Sean Moreno forty times in this game, like, we

0:57:50.760 --> 0:57:52.600
<v Speaker 1>consider that a win. Even if he runs for two

0:57:52.680 --> 0:57:55.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards, we still consider that a win. So I

0:57:55.720 --> 0:57:59.200
<v Speaker 1>think that that's the difference that they didn't have last year. John,

0:57:59.320 --> 0:58:02.000
<v Speaker 1>like you mentioned, Nathan Jones was hurt. They didn't have

0:58:02.120 --> 0:58:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the fourth guy at safety, they didn't have Peppers at safety.

0:58:06.280 --> 0:58:11.360
<v Speaker 1>So now last year when they played Buffalo, especially in

0:58:11.480 --> 0:58:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that second matchup, you know, the playoff game. I know

0:58:14.560 --> 0:58:16.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody goes back to the playoff game because of the score,

0:58:16.960 --> 0:58:19.680
<v Speaker 1>but they're they're like playing practice squad guys at corner

0:58:19.760 --> 0:58:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and the playoff game. Okay, So really the game that

0:58:22.360 --> 0:58:24.160
<v Speaker 1>worries me more is the second one because that was

0:58:24.200 --> 0:58:28.360
<v Speaker 1>like your best, right, right, that's your best. DeVante Bosby's

0:58:28.400 --> 0:58:30.560
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be out there, Jan Williams is right to

0:58:30.560 --> 0:58:33.480
<v Speaker 1>be out there right those that second game here in Foxborough.

0:58:33.560 --> 0:58:36.520
<v Speaker 1>That was your best eleven against their best eleven straight up.

0:58:37.200 --> 0:58:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So in that game and they were an interception away

0:58:40.920 --> 0:58:42.800
<v Speaker 1>from winning that game. In that game, they could not

0:58:42.960 --> 0:58:46.080
<v Speaker 1>get Miles Bryan off the field. They had nobody else

0:58:46.120 --> 0:58:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to put on ISAMH. McKenzie. They had no other answer

0:58:49.200 --> 0:58:52.680
<v Speaker 1>for Isaah McKenzie because Jonathan Jones was hurt and Miles

0:58:52.760 --> 0:58:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Bryant was their nickel, Like that's all they had this year.

0:58:55.960 --> 0:58:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they have more depth there because the rookies.

0:58:58.120 --> 0:59:00.440
<v Speaker 1>They have more depth at safety because of Pepper. So

0:59:01.400 --> 0:59:03.880
<v Speaker 1>if Miles Bryan's getting beat like a drum again on

0:59:04.040 --> 0:59:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Isaam McKenzie, well, then maybe you move Jonathan Jones inside,

0:59:07.360 --> 0:59:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you put Jack Jones in the game. Maybe put

0:59:09.440 --> 0:59:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Jones in the game, right, Like, do you have

0:59:11.120 --> 0:59:13.920
<v Speaker 1>counters down too? So that's the hope I would give it,

0:59:14.080 --> 0:59:16.080
<v Speaker 1>give you there's some hope. Yeah, I'm not saying they're

0:59:16.080 --> 0:59:18.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna beat Buffalo. I'm just saying there's they're better equipped

0:59:18.440 --> 0:59:23.919
<v Speaker 1>to do so Yeah, absolutely, all right, Tyler, what's going on? Tyler? Hey,

0:59:24.080 --> 0:59:27.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a little off topic, more about the future

0:59:27.600 --> 0:59:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of the show, and y'all may not know, but come

0:59:30.080 --> 0:59:33.000
<v Speaker 1>draft time, would y'all be doing those videos where you

0:59:33.160 --> 0:59:36.360
<v Speaker 1>do like mock drafts a singing later again, I was

0:59:36.400 --> 0:59:39.000
<v Speaker 1>just cured, we're definitely going to be doing a ton

0:59:39.160 --> 0:59:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of draft content on the show in the off season,

0:59:41.520 --> 0:59:43.880
<v Speaker 1>for sure, And thanks for the call, Tyler. We're gonna

0:59:43.920 --> 0:59:46.000
<v Speaker 1>try to do something like that. We haven't really worked

0:59:46.040 --> 0:59:49.240
<v Speaker 1>out the logistics of how it's gonna be done exactly,

0:59:49.360 --> 0:59:51.280
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, we're gonna we're gonna try our best to

0:59:51.360 --> 0:59:53.400
<v Speaker 1>do the mocks or do some sort of symbol. Day

0:59:53.440 --> 0:59:55.280
<v Speaker 1>after the Super Bowl, I will be blowing up Evan's

0:59:55.280 --> 0:59:57.160
<v Speaker 1>phone about what we're gonna do for the draft. All right,

0:59:57.240 --> 0:59:59.280
<v Speaker 1>last call here, and then we got to wrap it up. Andrew,

0:59:59.400 --> 1:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>what's going on, Andrew? Andrew? Andrew, Hey ah, sound wow?

1:00:08.160 --> 1:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>The last one? All right? Well, that's all right, we

1:00:10.840 --> 1:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>got We're at the hour martin anyway, so we gotta

1:00:13.040 --> 1:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>call it a day. Give me before we wrap up

1:00:15.760 --> 1:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>really quickly, just don't go too deep into this. Oh boy,

1:00:19.720 --> 1:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>give me the one thing that you want them to

1:00:22.640 --> 1:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>fix during the bye weekend. You can't say mac Jones

1:00:24.960 --> 1:00:28.439
<v Speaker 1>because that's like, dude, I know it's it's the offensive line.

1:00:28.440 --> 1:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>The offensive line will fix everything out. That's a really

1:00:30.400 --> 1:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>easy question, really, the offensive line, because it fixing the

1:00:34.080 --> 1:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>offensive line fixes at least to an extent, Mac Jones.

1:00:36.680 --> 1:00:39.520
<v Speaker 1>It fixes the wide receivers, It fixes elements of the offense,

1:00:39.760 --> 1:00:42.959
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line, there any other It's not an opinion question.

1:00:43.040 --> 1:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>That's the correct answer. That is the correct answer. So

1:00:45.960 --> 1:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give you another answer just because you already

1:00:48.440 --> 1:00:52.520
<v Speaker 1>gave the correct answer. You like being wrong. Wow. If

1:00:52.640 --> 1:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots do not come off this bye week and

1:00:55.400 --> 1:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>run a downfield RPO, I'm gonna lose my mind, Alex,

1:00:58.320 --> 1:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna lose my mind. I'm gonna start yelling. I'm

1:01:00.680 --> 1:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose my mind. I'm gonna get all viled up

1:01:03.280 --> 1:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>like I did when John Rook got me riled up

1:01:05.360 --> 1:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>about Bailey z Appy and Marie and my god, you

1:01:07.840 --> 1:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>gotta have a block to throw it down the field.

1:01:09.760 --> 1:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>If they do not start expanding this RPO package beyond,

1:01:14.480 --> 1:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>if I see another inside zone RPO the bubble screen,

1:01:17.200 --> 1:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna lose my mind. And you are going to

1:01:18.960 --> 1:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>really like what I'm writing for ninety eight five sports

1:01:21.040 --> 1:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>up dot com this week. Nice tis no more, not

1:01:24.480 --> 1:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>no more bubble screens off RPOs. But we gotta we

1:01:27.240 --> 1:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>gotta graduate just other ar no I got. Honestly, I

1:01:30.160 --> 1:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>love bubble screen RPOs. I think they're fine. And when

1:01:32.760 --> 1:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you run them in the right spots. They're very effective. Yeah,

1:01:35.720 --> 1:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>but part of what makes them so effective is when

1:01:38.000 --> 1:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you set them up with other RPOs. Right, Yes, I'm

1:01:40.560 --> 1:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>fine if they keep running them, just start adding to them.

1:01:42.920 --> 1:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I gotta be honest. I think this often should be

1:01:45.240 --> 1:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent RPOs. Right, Alabama Mac Jones is last the

1:01:49.080 --> 1:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>lead percentage is like twelve thirteen percent. Yeah. Mac Jones's

1:01:52.400 --> 1:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>last season in Alabama they were nineteen percent RPO. All right,

1:01:56.080 --> 1:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>they should be twenty percent no one else. I know

1:01:58.360 --> 1:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you said be quick, but one more point, because I've

1:02:00.000 --> 1:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and thinking about RPOs a lot. Be quick. In Alex's versions,

1:02:02.720 --> 1:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>like ten minutes later. One of the best individual attributes

1:02:06.000 --> 1:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for any player on the offense is Rmandre Stevenson's field vision.

1:02:09.560 --> 1:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Would you disagree with that or just reminder Stevenson No,

1:02:12.400 --> 1:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>But like when if we're going into individual traits, right,

1:02:14.680 --> 1:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>what makes Romandra so good? I think his field vision

1:02:16.880 --> 1:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is a big part of it. He sees the field

1:02:18.080 --> 1:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>incredibly well. Yeah, that that plays huge on RPOs. That

1:02:22.160 --> 1:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>plays huge. Forget the mac part of it, right, which

1:02:25.360 --> 1:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously matters, But I'm just saying put that aside for

1:02:27.320 --> 1:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a second. Romandra is also a great RPO back. Oh yeah,

1:02:30.840 --> 1:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>so you could take advantage of this on both sides

1:02:32.960 --> 1:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of him, yeah, he says. And Damion Harris too, Obviously

1:02:35.160 --> 1:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>he ran him a ton at Alabama. But he says

1:02:36.840 --> 1:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>it all the time Remandra that he prefers running like

1:02:39.120 --> 1:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that because he can make cuts and reads on his own, right,

1:02:41.520 --> 1:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>He's not like following a blocker or something like that,

1:02:44.280 --> 1:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and opens it up. That's how he ran at Oklahoma,

1:02:46.720 --> 1:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>those spread formations, and I I you know what Oklahoma's

1:02:49.360 --> 1:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>RPO percentages, it's high, right, pretty high? Yeah, yeah, or

1:02:52.200 --> 1:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>at least when it was Lincoln when yeah back and yeah,

1:02:54.960 --> 1:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>so when with Remandra, he's always talked about, I like

1:02:58.560 --> 1:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>running from spread formations because lightens the box and it

1:03:01.040 --> 1:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>gives me freedom to make cuts and make reads. That's

1:03:04.120 --> 1:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the biggest thing to me, is like the under center stuff.

1:03:06.760 --> 1:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>It's like, okay, we're putting the quarterback under center. We're

1:03:09.200 --> 1:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>getting a single high against it. There's seven eight guys

1:03:12.080 --> 1:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in the box, and like, if you don't have a

1:03:14.080 --> 1:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>dominant offensive line, you're just not running the ball against

1:03:16.680 --> 1:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>those looks. So the RPO allows you to open up

1:03:19.640 --> 1:03:21.959
<v Speaker 1>the box, right, It puts six guys in the box

1:03:22.120 --> 1:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>against your five, and now there's conflict in the defense

1:03:26.000 --> 1:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>off off the you know, the pass action on the outside,

1:03:29.440 --> 1:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and now you're reading guys and you're creating conflict, and

1:03:32.160 --> 1:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you're creating lighter numbers in the middle of the field.

1:03:34.320 --> 1:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>They've been really good at running the football out of

1:03:36.320 --> 1:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the gun. Five yards per attempt out of the gun,

1:03:38.360 --> 1:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>three and a half from under center. Like this is

1:03:40.640 --> 1:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>all these numbers are just staring right at him. I

1:03:42.920 --> 1:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>wrote this Patriots dot Com today, so you can check

1:03:44.840 --> 1:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that out. What I would say, everybody gets all excited

1:03:46.560 --> 1:03:48.919
<v Speaker 1>about RPOs, about the past elements of it, right, Yeah,

1:03:48.960 --> 1:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and yo, you can expand the passing game with RPOs.

1:03:51.520 --> 1:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>It is a run pass option. Yeah, you can also

1:03:55.480 --> 1:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>make plays in the running game with them as well.

1:03:57.200 --> 1:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that gets because the modern error and

1:03:59.360 --> 1:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the nerds and they're running the football, the run element

1:04:03.200 --> 1:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>is running the football against light boxes off of like RPO.

1:04:08.880 --> 1:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Like the nerds are okay with that? All right, I

1:04:11.880 --> 1:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but all right, anyways, so h like we said,

1:04:16.520 --> 1:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>fix the offensive line, run more just sophisticated RPOs. That's

1:04:20.720 --> 1:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the fix for the offense. Yes, step three profit. Okay,

1:04:24.320 --> 1:04:27.479
<v Speaker 1>so we'll be back next Wednesday, same time, same place

1:04:27.840 --> 1:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the New York Jets. This is a

1:04:30.760 --> 1:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>weird one to play the Jets this closely together. They

1:04:34.200 --> 1:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>only have one They're off this week as well. So

1:04:36.400 --> 1:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>they played Buffalo last week and then play you again

1:04:39.200 --> 1:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>after the buy, just like you played the Colts and

1:04:41.160 --> 1:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>then play the Bills, or then play the Jets. Excuse

1:04:43.520 --> 1:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>me right off the by so big big game here

1:04:45.920 --> 1:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>in Foxborough, Patriots Jets. We'll have you covered here on

1:04:49.640 --> 1:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Patriots Catch twenty two full preview next Wednesday. We'll see

1:04:52.480 --> 1:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you guys then. Thanks for listening. Thank you for downloading

1:04:56.560 --> 1:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. Subscribe on Apple, Google Play, and everywhere else

1:05:00.360 --> 1:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you listen. Like the show, please rate and review us.

1:05:03.520 --> 1:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Listener comments and ratings help keep us high in the

1:05:06.120 --> 1:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>podcast rankings so new listeners can find us. Be sure

1:05:09.440 --> 1:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to Checkpatriots dot com for more news and more podcasts.