WEBVTT - Surveillance: Iran Has Capable Cruise Missiles, Stavridis Says

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jay Lee.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg. We

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>begin with our top story, tensions escalating in the Middle

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>East after President Donald Trump ordered an air strike in

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a rack, killing one of the rand's most powerful generals.

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>The U. S. Defense Department writing in a statement, at

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the direction of the President, the U. S. Military has

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 1>taken decisive defensive action to protect US personnel abroad by

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>killing Cassem Sulimani, the head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Corps Coud's Force, a US designated foreign terrorist organization around

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>supreme leader swiftly responding, writing the following a severe retaliation

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>awaits murderers who have the blood of Sulimani and that

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of other martyrs on their wicked hands from last night's incident.

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>We are pleased to join us by Nick Wadhams, Bloomberg

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>State Department reporter. He joins us on the phone. Nick,

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>my first question is decisive action from this administration action?

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>The President George W. Bush and Barack Obama did not

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 1>take Why is this administration chosen to do so? Well?

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm President Donald Trump has always said that he would

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>do what was necessary and respond with the greatest force

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>possible and the most report force required to protect what

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>he sees as US interests. The big question that's being

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>asked right now sort of in the national security community,

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is whether he's thought out the consequences. So there's no

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>doubt among the United States officials. The Customs Suermaney was

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a bad guy. He had UM according to the State Department,

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>was involved or responsible for the deaths of some six

0:01:56.360 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>U S troops in Iraq um And so the question

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>now is what is the off ramp? Like Pompeo tweeted

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>this morning, the UM, the U S is still interested

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in de escalation, but no one really knows where we go.

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Nick Wadams, is so important that we lead with you

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>in this hour because of your experience not only with

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.519
<v Speaker 1>Secretary State Pompeo, but also with Secretary Tillerson. This is

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>an original administration with original responses. How different is this

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 1>moment with a unique Trump administration and this Pentagon versus

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a more traditional administration and a Pentagon. Well, it's a

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>great question, because this is how they've shown they do

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>everything when it comes to foreign policy. I mean, remember

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago it just seemed unfathomable that

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>President Trump would meet the leader of North Korea and

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly there they were shaking hands in Singapore. This

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>is a This is a president who puts a lot

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of stock in his own ability to achieve deals. And uh, yeah,

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>but Nick, he's not going to do the art of

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Nicki's not I don't mean to interrupt, Nick, but you're

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the pro with this. How do you do an art

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of the deal with a nation, a people who's, from

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>what I can tell, war hero has just been murdered.

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's how they perceive it in Kerman to

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>bridge in Tehran, Isn't it right? And that is the

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>central flaw of the argument and the big question going forward. Uh.

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>The US claims that this was a defensive action and

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that uh, it's still interested in de escalation. But obviously,

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>as you guys mentioned, the response from Iran right now

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>is there is absolutely no interest. And that's been the

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>problem bedeviling Donald Trump for the last two years. He

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>got out of the Iron nuclear deal, and then he

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>said he wanted a deal without preconditions. That Run so

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>far has had absolutely no willingness to play ball. So

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the president's strategy so far toward I

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>RUN is not working. Well, let's talk about the strategy

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in the broader region. Two events over the last twelve

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>months that stand out for me the attack on Saudi

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>oil facilities back in September the United States, the Trump

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>administration chose to do nothing. Then we had the Trump

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>administration pulling out of Syria, Russia moved in the United

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>States chose to do essentially nothing. Nick, what was the

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>red line that has been crossed in the last week

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that has made the United States push forward with decisive action? Well,

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the administration has always said that attacks on US troops, uh,

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>would be something that was the red line, that that

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>would provoke what Secretary Pompeo called a decisive response. Uh.

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>You saw that a few days ago when the US

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>killed two militia members. UM. And then obviously today we're

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing the true limits of what the administration means by

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 1>a decisive response. UM. You know, the big question also

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is whether they felt provoked into this action because of

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the criticism that the administration faced over the fact that

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 1>it really hadn't done something. And of course President Trump's

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>defenders will say, well, look, we're not the one We're

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>not the ones who are instigating here. This is a

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>response to sustained aggression by the Iranian forces and something

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that they deserved and frankly had come. Nick aadums, thank

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you so much, greatly appreciated with the news. With true

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>expertise on are the U. S. State Department, Johanna Kristell

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>bring in our next guess. Emrita send Edward Morrisset's City

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Group publishes moments ago and he says this news of

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a rock ship push oil price is higher. He says

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously through seventy barrel, but very importantly at Morris, with

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>his knowledge of oil and also Saudi and the geopolitics

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>of the Middle East, suggests later in two thousand twenty,

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>there would be mitigating factors to drive oil lower. We

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>turn to the old market. Now we do that with

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Embrita send chief oil analysts, Energy aspects. I'm really fantastic

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to have you with us. Tremendously difficult to put a

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>price on geopolitical risk. We go back to September where

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>drones were used to attack Saudi Aramco facility. September four,

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Oil closed exactly where it was the Friday before the attacks.

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>By the end of the month, many people looking at

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>this situation and wondering at what point does this move

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>begin to fade and ready to How different is this

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>situation that we wake up to this Friday morning. Yeah,

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's exactly the question to ask. But

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the difference is, um, the red line was breached, which

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>is attack on the US personal and US facilities, and

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why there was an attack, right whereas

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>with the attack in Saudi Arabia it was made very

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>clear that the US is not going to get involved.

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Um And I think that's where the differences. But also

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 1>remember we haven't seen that kind of a movie. Was

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>like a ten dollar move under the Southy. This has

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>been more of a three to four percent move. The

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>markets already tied. The The issue in many ways is

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that this is going to get It's going to get

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 1>paid out over a long period of time. Iran isn't reckless,

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to come back tomorrow, and it's not

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be retaliation just yet, right it is going to

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>get played out over time, and the risk is of

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>victarian violence in Iraq, and then it becomes a question

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of do you start getting uh production affected in the region.

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>You've already seen foreign workers being evacuated. I in US,

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>foreign workers are being evacuated. What does it mean for

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>long term production in the country. UM, you know, say,

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>let's who we disagree on whether the market is tight

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>or not. Would you really be short oil over here? No?

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where Uh. That's kind of the very

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the clear difference. Also because this is coming out of

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>time when the Saudis have clearly said that they will

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>be supporting the floor at sixty and so they've card

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>production even more so, it's it's quite a different backdrop

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and taking you've touched on Iran's response. They say they

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>will respond, let's talk about it in greater detail. The

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>pressure within a RAND to respond will be sky higher.

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>As Tom points out, this particular general incredibly popular in

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the country. The question is how. The question is where

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>do you see them frustrating oil infrastructure, delivery channels the

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>straight of Homer's do you see that happening in the

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>coming months. I think they'll absolutely keep all their options open.

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>But if the red line, which again in some ways

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you know the the Iranians had been poking to see

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>where the redline was for the US. It wasn't the

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>drone strike, it wasn't really a huge attack on one

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of its allies, but it was very much on direct

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>US personnel. If they know that's the red line, they

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>probably are not going to go for anything similar there again, right,

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>But yes, attacks on other countries oil and gas facilities

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>or on the straits of foremost on shipping, which we've

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 1>already seen by the way, over the course of the

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>last year, absolutely very possible. But again I keep coming

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>back to Iraq. I think there's going to be a

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of pressure UH on Iraq and particularly kind of

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to push out the pro US forces from Iraq. I think, unfortunately,

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Iraq could just become the battleground and the Gubolito. We've

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>heard that from others. Emridson, thank you so much for

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>your cute analysis this morning, and she was brilliant earlier

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>on the distinction of the heavy crude of Iran and

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>how that folds it the Asian consumption of oil. Secretary

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Pompeio speaking to Fox News saying it Running and Leadership

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>understands the president will take action. The US needed to

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>take action to restore a deterrence. The president says the

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Solemnani strike decision was necessary. This according to Secretary Pompeio

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>just moments ago on Fox News that second headline, Tom,

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States needed to take action to restore a deterrence.

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:40.839
<v Speaker 1>You raise your group and in the last twenty four

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>hours saying the following, Running and leaders can no longer

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>assume that Trump is a paper tiger who will not

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>take decisive and risky military action. This is key, many excuses,

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>many reasons across the President's desk in the last twelve

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>months to confront Iran. He hasn't taken the opportunity. Many

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>people out there today may suggest he had a little choice.

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess. On the phone. Mark Champion Bloomberg, senior reporter

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>for international affairs in London, joined us on the phone

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. Mark talked to me about that the need

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to restore a deterrence the president, who was increasingly being

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>viewed as a paper tiger. Your thoughts on that issue, Yes,

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it is the critical issue because you know,

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>here are the alternatives. One is that what happened recently

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>in Iran. And remember that it was Iranian bank militias

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:31.239
<v Speaker 1>in Iraq that attacked the US base and killed US contractor.

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And then it was militia's again Iranian bank that attacked

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 1>the US embassy um in response to U s retaliation

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>which had killed some of their members. So that was

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the background. So the question here is either what the

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>US was trying to do and that those events provided

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 1>the trigger for it was to restore belief that it

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>was willing to take military action in addition to the

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>maximum pressure economic UM policy that it has had in

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to pressure the Iranian economy, or one or both

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>sides actually want a war UM. And you know, I

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>think that's correct. The analysis correct is that they don't

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>want a war. Neither side wants a war, but the

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.719
<v Speaker 1>US wanted to draw a line where many of its

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>allies in the region, Saudi and so on for some

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>time have been saying the US was not drawing a line.

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Mark You've got such expertise on the depth of these

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>ancient debates frame or triangulate the United States Iranian battle

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 1>going back the nine for some of US, with the

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Shiai Sunni battle which goes back centuries and centuries, which

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>is more important to Tehran. Uh, you know, one would

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a it's a tough question to pose in

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>that sense. UM. You know, the obviously there is these

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>are two parallel narratives. You're absolutely right, UM. And the

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Iranian relationship to the US UM is

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>very has been very dominant ever since nineteen seventy nine. UM.

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, it is no coincidence that the

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>US has been a close ally of Iran's, the Iranian

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>regime's main sunny rivals in the region. So the two

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>things become very intertwined. UM. And it's kind of hard

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to pick them apart. You know, just to take an

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>example right now here, you have the Iranian regime UM

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to decide how it will respond to the US

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in a US action. But among the options that it

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>has there are, you know, not just lobbying a ballistic

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>missile at one of the American bases in the region,

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 1>which is something that the you know, the the Iranian

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>officials have said they can do, UM, but much more

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>likely is that they use some of their militias in

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>order to attack the interests of the US and it's

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>allies in the region, the militias that have been working

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>with them in Syria, in Yemen, in Afghanistan, and which

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Hassim Sonimney was absolutely instrumental in both putting together and

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 1>using what Markus you point out. At the epicenter of

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the effort to push a sphere of influence in the

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>region for the Shia it's from Iran was Kasan Sulimani.

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't end with his death, though, does it, Mark

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 1>And I just wonder what the next steps the Iranians

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>will take to maintain that sphere of influence in the region.

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:32.959
<v Speaker 1>Many people will remember just a week ago we had

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>naval exercises in the Gulf of a Mom between Russia,

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>China and Iran. What happens with some of these key

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>allies of Iran, Yes, um, So, on the one hand,

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you're you're absolutely right, because son of Money dies, that

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>does not mean that everything that he's built suddenly goes away.

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't, and those remain the primary tools that are

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>available to the Iranian regime as they decided on what

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to do. And then the secondary which is also an

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>absolutely key question. You know that you know a couple

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of people have already said, you know, this is a

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>bit reminiscent. This assassination of such an iconic figure in

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Iran is a bit reminiscent of what happened in nineteen

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>fourteen with the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, the Austrian Prince,

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and that of course began, um the World War One.

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>But the difference is the question there is, so what

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>do the other great powers do? Um? And that goes

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>directly to your question, what about Russia and China um?

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, obviously we don't we don't know exactly

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the answer. But my very strong uh, you know, guests

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>would be or that this is not the same as

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fourteen. Neither the US nor Iran actually wants a war,

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and neither China nor Russia would be willing to go

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to war with the US in you know, on Iran's behalf,

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>so completely different. Is usually must expand the conversation with

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Mark Champion, and I'm sure we'll do that in the

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>coming hours. Thinking is a bloomberg opinion of in Londard

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Senior Middle East corresponded. What we'd like to do is

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>spend the entire half hour rather with James Travidez. He's

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the dean, former dean, I should say of the Fletcher

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>School at Tufts University. I can say he's former Supreme

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Commander for NATO, but John Farrell, that doesn't matter because

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>what he really is is a former combat veteran on

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>destroyers and on fleets as well. A Mustavides thank you

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. I want you to speak

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to the people listening to our show coast to coast

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>who have family in the military. These people are out

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>on platforms, they're in the Army, the Navy, the Marines

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>at all. At what risk is our military this morning? Well,

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>as usual, Tom, there's good news and bad news here.

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll start with the obvious bad news, which is that

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>we have assassinated a leading Iranian political figure and there

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>will be repercussion. So Iran is going to lash out

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and that will put our troops at risk and to

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>some degree, their family. Here's the good news, Tom, our

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>military is ready for this. Iran does not have the

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>element of surprise here. At every base around the world.

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Security is increasing. We're moving missile defense systems in place.

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>We're ready, but it is going to be a very

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>challenging time ahead. So my my word for all of

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:39.479
<v Speaker 1>our military families, especially and certainly our troops were deployed

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and they know this is be ready because Iran will respond.

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>What is so important here, and I go back to

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the Sheffield and the Argentinean War, is there's all these

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>big plans and all of this work of big budgets

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and a pentagon in that and in it can be

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, one exo can be one excess at missile

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>uh which was the feeling done? And that's the nakedness,

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>if you will, of the American public. How do we

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>defend at the Persian Gulf gap? How do we defend

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 1>on a geography where Iran could respond? We've got to

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>take a three sixty view here, Tom. In other words,

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>there's no silver bullet. No one missile defense system is

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:26.719
<v Speaker 1>going to save you. No one intelligence capability is going

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to give you perfect knowledge. No one defensive system against

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 1>an incoming torpedo in the water is going to be perfect.

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>But if you put all of those elements together, you've

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>got a very good chance of defending yourself. And this

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>is both at sea and ashore and in the air.

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>And again we're quite capable of this. I think we

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>can handle just about anything Iran throws out. Tom let

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.479
<v Speaker 1>me tell you one thing I worry about the most.

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>It's cyber and cyber security. Here, I think our level

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of preparation is not as high relative to all the

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>obvious kinetic military effects that Iran could launch against us.

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>So for all who are involved in the cyber world today,

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>heads up, they will use cyber against US. Admiral Jonathan here,

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>let's explore that just a couple of steps further. Some

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:21.679
<v Speaker 1>of the American press, in fact, the international press, may

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>wish to paint Iran as some kind of reckless rogue state.

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>They're incredibly calculating foreign policy is wealth thought out. And

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering if you can take us into the

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>mind of the government with within Iran right now, the

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Iranian Revolutionary Guards, the thoughts, the process they'll be going

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>through to calculate their next step, their response. Indeed, let's

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>look at what Iran's options are, and so in the

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Iranian equivalent of the Pentagon this evening, it is evening

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 1>there they will be looking at attacking our troops in

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Afghanistan and Western Afghanistan. They will look at perhaps going

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>after that embassy in Baghdad again, although I think it's

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>unlikely because it's now well defended. Still look got strikes

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 1>against Israel. They will look at cyber attacks against the

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>US mainland as well as our command and control overseas.

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>And lastly, I think they'll look very seriously at the

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Persian Gulf at raritime options. Well, I'm gonna get the

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:23.719
<v Speaker 1>map out here, and this is something folks, I'm as

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>weak on our goldar Montevalis helped me so much with

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a fabric of the large geography of Iran atmalstvenis your

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>expert at this. There's Tehran in four or five miles south.

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>There's Kerman k e R m a n. We've seen

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that image this morning of the people of Kerman silently

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in the streets, standing in mourning. And then if you

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>go three hundred miles directly south, you get to your

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Persian Golf. It's distant from Tehran, but it's not, is it?

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>It is not? And of course the Iranian military has

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 1>very significant basis book inside the Persian Gulf. And then

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>you go through the straight up cor moves into the

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>North Indian Ocean tom as you can see on your map,

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and that is where the most significant of the Iranian

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:15.199
<v Speaker 1>naval bases are and by the way, Iran, China and

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Russia have just concluded a two week naval exercise in

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the Northern Indian Ocean, so the Iranian fleet is preparing

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to move to see. I think we will see a

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>potential response from them. What I know, Jonas again and

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>here again James Tavitis with us, and we'll be with

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>us through much of his half. Our amials Trevitas. When

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>you say the Iranian fleet, what is that? It's um

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>not remotely capable in the way that the U. S

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Fleet is. Tom, But I'll tell you three things that

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>are pretty good at They have diesel submarines which are

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>very quiet and capable of operating in the relatively shallow

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>waters of the Persian Gulf in the North Indian Ocean. Secondly,

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>they have small craft that they can deploy high numbers

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>in what are called swarm attacks. Uh. They have rocket

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.719
<v Speaker 1>fired missiles on them, and you can send twenty of

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>them to attack a big navy destroyer and that can

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>be a problem. Third finally, Tom, they have very capable

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>cruise missiles which they can launch both from at sea

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and from their naval platforms. So they're certainly not the U. S. Navy.

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>They're not ten feet tall, but they can inflict real

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>damage on a US warship. We ought to be very

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 1>concerned about that. As the next few days unfolds, Adam,

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the wall games taken place in the Gulf

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of a Mon in the last week between Russia, China

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 1>and Iran. What do you expect the response of Russian

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Shota to be in the coming days. They will undoubtedly

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 1>condemn this attack. They'll portray it as an assassination of

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 1>a political figure. They'll ignore the fact that Sulamani was

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>not only the Machiavelli, the cardinal richelieu of violence in

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>this Iranian hierarchy, but that he was also personally involved.

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>He literally has blood on his hands. They'll ignore all that,

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and they'll portray this as a rogue US military operation.

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I will say, um, we are to recognize that Sulimani

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.959
<v Speaker 1>was deadly and evil and taking his peace off the

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>chessboard is tactically a good thing. What we have yet

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to do is lay out a strategy to deal with

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the after effects and the longer term issues here. Well,

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about that. The opportunity to take down General

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Slimani existed in the president of the presidency of George W. Bush,

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the presidency of Barack Obama as well. Those opportunities weren't taken.

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Admiral why not because of the sense that that would

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>escalate a direct military confrontation between the US and Iran.

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So that begs the question why now, and my guests

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>is that within the White House the calculus was made

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that at this moment they have overwhelming evidence that Sulimani

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>was behind the rocket attacks that killed Contractor a couple

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 1>of days ago, that he was behind the attacks on

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>our embassy. He became a target of opportunity. His level

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>of threat and level of violence has only increased since

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the days of both Bush and Obama. I think those

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 1>three things came together and the administration, as the words

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>go in top Gun had a shot Maverick and they

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>took it. So you can argue with whether or not

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>that is pouring gasoline on a smoldering fire. I think

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it is. On the other hand, tactically we are ahead

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>for taking out Sulimani. Comgically, we still have work to do.

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking to Admirals tor Vetus about the military

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>impacts of the killing of this general of Iran, and

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 1>it has been absolutely brilliant, particularly admalster Vitus's comments on

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 1>what the Iranian navy can do at the Gulf of

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Her Moves. Now let us turn to Washington, and I

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 1>will say, deans to be this's formerly with a Fletcher

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>School at Touch University. This is occurring within the most

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>polarized Washington of our lifetimes. How does that change the

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Washington debate that we are so polarized in our modern politics. Unfortunately, Tom,

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 1>there's no good news here. Let's face it. We're about

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>to see an impeachment trial, we have an election in

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>eleven months. It's the most uh, as you say polarized,

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I would say highly charged environment I can remember in

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>my lifetime, my adult lifetime. So the unfortunate part about

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it is that we used to have a philosophy that

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy makes sure that there's bipartisanship at the water's edge.

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>That's not what we're seeing today. And I think you're

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>going to see both Republicans and Democrats on divergent paths

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>as we look at what we need to do going

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>forward with Iran. And that's a mistake because we have

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:10.959
<v Speaker 1>to pull together as a team here, inter agency working together,

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and indeed the branches of government working together, and must

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Vida's one final question if I made this morning, is

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:21.199
<v Speaker 1>the State Department any semblance of the State Department you

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.439
<v Speaker 1>have studied through your career or is it essentially a

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>state department run out of the White House. I would

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 1>say in this administration, the moves of foreign policy are

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 1>not strategic. As you know, Tom, We think back to

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 1>George Kennon and the Policy Planning staff, the creation of

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the strategy of containment that came out of the State

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Department into the inter agency. Today it's driven by the

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>National Security Council staff. We have a relatively new National

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Security Advisor, Robert O'Brien UH, and we have a Secretary

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of State in Mike Pompeo UH, who is a very

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 1>good tactical thinker, but hasn't created the long term strategy

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that would like to see. So yes, this is being

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 1>driven largely by diplomacy of tweets. Think of it as

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>shots of espresso into the system day after day, hour

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>after hour, and that is not a good way to

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>run foreign policy. I will do out today a full

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>court press on the authorship of James David is this

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>important new book chapter by chapter on the admirals of

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the Navy, including Mr Rickover, and I will of course

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:36.360
<v Speaker 1>mention his wonderful the Leader's Bookshelf Apple James Dravidas. Rather

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>with us this morning, Team Surveillance has done just such

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful job today to get perspective from military, from

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>those of international relations, and indeed from finance on these

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in Baghdad and the silence we see in the streets

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of Carmont to Bruce in Tehran, in Iran, and of

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 1>course the responses in Washington. We do that now in

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>some that now with a Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt Uh

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:17.239
<v Speaker 1>is with the Army. He is formally serving with the

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>State Department as well, and we're thrilled he could join us.

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I should mention as unusual he is expert in finance

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 1>with his c f A as well. General kimm It,

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:28.719
<v Speaker 1>I have to rip up the script, Uh this morning

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>with you, and I want to take you from the

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>staffing and strategy you are claimed for back to Fort Sill, Oklahoma,

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and that is a United States Army Field Artillery school.

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>How does our military with traditional events as you were

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>once a field artillery officer. How do we dovetail that

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>military into the new military that needs to defend against

0:27:55.400 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>unique Iranian strategies. Well, first of all, uh, this is

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>not the same army that my father was in nineteen

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>fifty four at Fort Sill when I was born. That

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>was a very heavy, conventional army that relied on tanks, artillery, airplanes.

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>We do have those same capabilities these days, and if

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we have a conflict with Iraq, we will certainly use

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>some of those capabilities, but that's not the way that

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.719
<v Speaker 1>iron will fight us, and will fight us an unconventional manner,

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's something that our unconventional forces have become premier

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.199
<v Speaker 1>experts in the world on. You take a look at

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 1>the special forces, which were virtually nothing in nineteen fifty

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>four two now the capabilities that they can bring to

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the battlefield. They're also going to fight us, not only

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>unconventionally with troops. They'll also use drones, will also use missiles,

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>will also use other kind of capabilities targeted assassinations. Um,

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>we've been training for decades on these types of conflicts.

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Were not perfect at it, but we're pretty damn good

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>at it within all this, and as Atmos Dravides told

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>us a bit ago, there is a new warfare that

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>James Dravidz talks about, which is cyber war. As well.

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 1>You're again a tune as an expert on this, explain

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>exactly how Iran commits cyber war against the people of

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Well, first of all, let me clarify

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I am no longer in the army. I am right, yes,

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of course. And second I would say Jimmy Stebritez has

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. If you took a look at take a

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the types of war in the shadows that

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>is going on right now on the Internet. Probably the

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 1>best example of that is when a combined effort went

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>after the stuck snet capability, used the stuck s net

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to stop the Iranian capability, the centrifuge capability. That we

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>have that capability, they have that capability. Of course, what

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:02.719
<v Speaker 1>they will try to do is attack some of our

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>critical infrastructure. And the important thing is they may have

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>an offensive capability. The important thing is how good is

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>our defensive capability. Um, They've got Tavern, we've got Silicon Valley,

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>They've got a bunch of ir GC guys running around

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>screaming depth to America. We have a bunch of millennials

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>sitting in cubicles out in Silicon Valley, and I think

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>we've got the better deal on that. I think we'll

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>be able to extend against anything they try to throw

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>at us. And the time that we've got left, we

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>can go back to your father, who had a nodding

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>acquaintance with the machinery of the Senate. A few years back,

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it was a less polarized Senate. How does General Kimmitt,

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>how do you perceive a deeply polarized Washington And is

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that a deterrence to the Pentagon. Well, it's not a

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:57.239
<v Speaker 1>deterrence to the Pentagon. It's certainly, in some ways an

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>impediment to the Thank you better said we we would

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>like to see a bipartisan Congress, even if bipartisan decisions

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>are not necessarily what the Pentagon believes in. But there's

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>this fist fight that's going on up there where you've

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>got one side of the aisle screaming at the other

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>side of the aisl It doesn't do for the Pentagon

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>what we needed to be doing, making bipartisan decisions for

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the best interests of the United States of America, and

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that's what we could use right now. Well, it's what

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>we could use right now, and certainly what the Pentagon requests.

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>And some would say, whether a Republican or Democrat, that

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration is original, Is it a factor that

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that's such a different administration method versus previous Republican and

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Democrat administrations. Um, there is. There are two sides of

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that coin. On one side of the coin, one would

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>argue that the conventional way of doing diplomatic relations negotiations

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen for years and years and places such

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>as North Korea haven't worked. And as President Obama once said,

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>when you've been doing the same thing for fifty years

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't work, and try something new. This president

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>is certainly trying something new, particularly in the areas of

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy. UM. He is taking a risk with this

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>action that he took over the past twenty four hours.

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I certainly hope his advisers and the Pentagon are prepared

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>for the inevitable backlash that we're going to see. Whether

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it will lead to the end to the forty year

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>conflict that we've had with Iran is yet to be seen. UM.

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>But that's what we pay presidents to do. Well, I

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>guess it's all Germaine. But what is so important here?

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>And Mark kemmed again, you have the synthesis of this

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>with in Washington is somewhat the cliche getting everyone on

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the same page. We have a state department that's certainly original.

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I think Secretary of State Pompeio would even admit that

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the Pentagon is a pentagon. And then we god, as

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, the fractured politics. Do you have any sense

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that these events of the last twenty four hours will

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>get people on the same page. Oh, I don't think so,

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>if for no other reason than it's an election year. However,

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>if it if it elevates to the point where we

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>have some pretty bleak scenarios where we have outcomes such

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>as large number of American troops killed, embassies being attacked,

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that may rally everyone to a common effort. But I

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>think as long as we are seeing the conflict and

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the crisis at at a moderate level, I think you're

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>going to see both sides of the out come out

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>with different press statements. Um none of them completely self serving,

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>but none of them completely with the interests of the

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 1>United States. In mind, General Kimmon, thank you so much,

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciated. Mark Kimmont, of course retired Brigadier General of

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the United States Army, his service also at the State Department.

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>We greatly appreciate it. We've talked to James Tavitaz this morning.

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 1>We've talked to Mark Kimmon, of course, with our expertise

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 1>in the Pentagon and with a certain authority. Here is

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Margaret Brennan, you of course know her from facin Nation

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 1>on CBS, and we'll talk a minute about this Sunday show,

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.359
<v Speaker 1>which I'm sure she's blowing up and destroying right now

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and rebuilding. But Margaret, I really thought of you about

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>your tour of duty covering State for CBS. We heard

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:46.759
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Pompeo on Fox News today on CNN. I'm sure

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>he'll do a walk through with CBS at some point.

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:54.840
<v Speaker 1>How different is the State Department now versus the State

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Department of a few years ago or of two thousand

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and eleven on the killing of Osama in Laudon, Oh,

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Completely different? I mean, the silence was deafening last night.

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Many State Department officials, uh WEAD policymakers for the Middle

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:12.919
<v Speaker 1>East were in the dark about this um. And this

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>is the kind of assassination of a leader that is

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of a step above taking out a Ben Lawden

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:26.760
<v Speaker 1>or bag Daddy in terms of actually challenging a state

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:31.879
<v Speaker 1>and having a war footing. So this is incredible, and

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>UH Secretary Pompeo this morning is making these oblique, kind

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 1>of mysterious references to UH imminent threats to the U S.

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 1>And we just don't have any explanation yet. Well, you

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 1>go right to the heart of the matter. And I'm

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 1>going to frame as Paul Sweeney as I did earlier.

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I was with Nora Robini on the stage at the

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Milk and Institute, and the clearest memory of the taxicab

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>right from l A X Margaret with an Ethiopian cab

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>driver in tears over to the Beverly Hills whatever I mean,

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that was such an important moment for America, the killing

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of Osama bin Laden. And you're suggesting this is actually

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a larger event. Well, I do not mean in any

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 1>way to lessen nine eleven by any stretch of the imagination.

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 1>But what really has the national security implications long term

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>for the United States were the dominoes that fell after

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Bin Lauden. That was or after Bin Lads attack on

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the United States, rather than the assassination of him. It

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 1>was the war in Iraq, it was the war in Afghanistan.

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 1>It was the US actions that were triggered by the

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 1>event itself, rather than a decade later, the targeting and

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>killing of a terrorist leader. Cosum Sulamani was considered an

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 1>enemy of the United States. He has blood on his

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 1>hands of at least six hundred US servicemen, thousands of

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 1>Middle East uh nations on his hands. But he was

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>also a red hand man to the Supreme leader of Iran.

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 1>This is like targeting the Vice President CIA director in

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the United States. This is an act of war Um,

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and this is a dramatic escalation, and a dramatic escalation

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 1>after Iran has been rationing up tensions incredibly over the

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 1>past two and a half years at the direction of Sulamani,

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:17.879
<v Speaker 1>after the US pulled out of that around nuclear deal

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 1>UH the sanctions the Trump administration is piled on have

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 1>not stopped Iran from meddling. It did not stop Sulamani.

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Assassinating him takes out the leader. Does it kill the organization? No, Margaret,

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I know it's very very early hours for this story,

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 1>just having broken overnight. But within the belt Way, are

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you getting any sense of kind of what the folks

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>in Washington believe the next steps will be, expectations for

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 1>some type of retaliation? I guess well, yes, I mean,

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:49.439
<v Speaker 1>there are obviously a lot of people going to horset

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 1>case scenarios there. And I do not want to be

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 1>hyperbolic here, but we are seeing, you know, messages of

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:58.239
<v Speaker 1>increased security from mayors across the country about the U

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>s homeland. We are seeing you a worst case scenarios

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 1>being drawn up by US allies who are concerned that

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Iran may ditch what remains of that nuclear deal that

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it has with the world powers that President Trump pulled

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 1>out of but still has been in place. Does this

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>make Iran decide to go forward? Right? There is a

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:18.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of um back of the envelope sort of risk

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 1>assessment here, and that is why it is so incredible

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 1>really that Trump administration hasn't explained what comes next, and

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>they are saying this is to deescalate. Most allies and

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:33.800
<v Speaker 1>adversaries are saying this is escalatory, Margaret, Instead of asking

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 1>who your guests are in fac the Nation, because I'm

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>sure you're working on a new show right now. What

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is your number one questions Sunday morning, whether it's a

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:45.760
<v Speaker 1>politician or someone from the military, etcetera. What's your number

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 1>one face the Nation question Sunday? How does this end?

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Is America safer? I agree? Is America's safer? That's one

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:57.799
<v Speaker 1>of been one of our themes today. Margaret Brennan, thank

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:00.359
<v Speaker 1>you so much, of course, with fac Nation can see

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it on CBS Sunday morning. You can hear facin Nation

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:07.800
<v Speaker 1>with Margaret Brennan. I'm Bloomberg Radio Sunday afternoon two pm

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in New York, Washington, d C. And now Bloomberg one

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 1>or six one Boston New Report Facin Nation this Sunday

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 1>at two. I'm Bloomberg Radio. Thanks for listening to the

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio.