WEBVTT - How Impeachment Works

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know from House Stuff Works

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark,

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>There's Charles W Chuck Bryant, there's Jerry over there, and

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>this is business Baby Stuff you Should Know on Impeachment. Yeah, guilty. Uh,

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>how how are you doing? First? Let's get the pleasant

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>treats out of the way. I'm doing well. And I

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>want to give a shout out at the head here

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>because just yesterday, in real time, I went over to

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>my in law's house for my grandmother in law's seven birthday.

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Happy Birthday, Mary, Happy Birthday Mary. The lead general the

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Army, I don't know you're not on Facebook.

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>So every year I put a happy Birthday on the

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know page and have every and chime

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in from where they are because she literally sits there

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and reads through like six comments from all over the

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>world and it is like one of the best things

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that's real. It's really neat. So anyway, we're over there

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in my my father in law, Steve, who is the

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>best dude, comes up to me and says, uh, how

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>about a show on impeachment? Yeah? And he you know,

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>he didn't recommend he knows better. He doesn't recommend shows topics,

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and he went about one on impeachment. Went wow, Steve,

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a great idea and said it is. Why haven't

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>we done that yet? Because it's uh relevant, as we

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>will see at the end of our show today, we'll

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about kind of what's going on in today's terms.

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's just a really weird, vaguely written, as it

0:01:54.840 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>turns out, strange act American st um. I'm'm not exactly

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>sure how they do it in other countries, but the

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>way we do it is weird. I think it's just

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:11.239
<v Speaker 1>about as weird in other countries because it was adopted

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>either from the British or from the Americans, and we

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>adopted it from the British. Yeah, it seems to have

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>like been understood in Great Britain, but the framers of

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution didn't bother to ask what anybody meant. They

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>just kind of borrowed it. So anyway, big shout out

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to Steve. Alright, Steve, good idea for this idea. It's

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:37.799
<v Speaker 1>the summer of Steve. It's winter, although he's from Ohio,

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>but now he's in Georgia, so it is like for

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>him for I'm sure. Alright, So Chuck, let's get down

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 1>to this. Let's get down to impeachment. Are we going

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>on the way back machine? Run off the bad here?

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to go back to eight eight? You

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>want to start there? Well, you know I do. Okay,

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>let's get in the way back machine then, because you

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>know I loved me the Spring of eighteen sixty eight.

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>It was a good one. That's funny you say that.

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>There's this really great short story from the fifties or sixties.

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's like a horror short story called

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the Vintage Season. It's about like these future travelers who,

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 1>like in in the future, you can travel through time

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and find like the perfect spring or the perfect whatever.

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>It's it's pretty good. Check it out. Okay, all right,

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>well now let's get in the way back machine. Alright, okay,

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>so remember we're invisible. We can do anything. I know.

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:37.119
<v Speaker 1>I just I just booped Edmond Ross on the nose. Yeah,

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I just took off my shoes and everyone's like, what's

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that on my nose? And what's that in my nose? Right,

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>So there's this dude, that dude you just popped on

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the nose Edmund Ross he's a senator actually, uh, and

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of new his what is this? This is

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>May of eight, just the previous July. He was appointed

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to his seat, um as the senator or the junior

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Senator of Kansas. He had like some experience in newspapers

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and that was his his jam, no real political experience.

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And now all of the entire Senate is wondering, what

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>is this guy going to do? Um. There, we're right

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of an impeachment trial, the actually the

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>impeachment hearing of President Andrew Johnson, who is the successor

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of Abraham Lincoln. Right, that's right. And so by December,

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>after the assassination of Lincoln in April of sixty five, UM,

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>his own party was turning against him and saying, hey,

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>we want to get this guy out of here. So

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>let's we we haven't tried this impeachment thing on a

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>president yet, and we're kind of eager to. Yeah. And

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you can make the case that he was kind of

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>set up the his own party to turning on totally

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>set up. But the but the Republicans hated him out

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of the gate. The Republicans were the ones who were

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>pushing reconstruction and really wanted the South to pay for

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>succeeding and for the Civil War. UM and Johnson was

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>from Tennessee and wasn't having that. He vetoed a bill

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that would have given like basic basic civil rights to

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 1>black Americans. He was against the Fourteenth Amendment. He decided

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it should be up to the states to figure out

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>how they wanted to handle the post slavery laws, regardless

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of what that what effect that had on on the

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.359
<v Speaker 1>former slaves. So it wasn't very well liked by the

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>abolitionist Republicans, and they wanted to get rid of them.

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>And the way that they did was to set up

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>this new law which was patently unconstitutional, and it was

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>called the what was it called the you can't fire

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that dude law? Why didn't Yeah, that's that's basically the

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>gist of it. Um. The Tenure Act, I believe, is

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the Tenure of Office Act. So you know, when when

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 1>president comes in and they appoint like cabinet members or

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, a Supreme Court judge or something. They can

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>pick the person, but the Senate has to either confirm

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>them or say no, not this one. Right, So the

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Senate has confirmation powers and the President's ability to hire.

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>The Constitution even says it in there. The Constitution doesn't

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>say anything about firing those appointees. And so it had

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>long been that the president could fire whoever of their

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>appointees he wanted to write. So what the what the

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>radical Republicans did was pass a bill that said, you,

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>if you hire somebody, if you appoint somebody, we get

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to confirm them. If you try to remove somebody, we

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you we have to approve that as well. And again

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it was just it just flew in the face of

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution as we know it. And um, the right away,

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:57.559
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Johnson fired his Secretary of War, Edwin Stanton, and um,

0:06:57.560 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>he was impeached right out, right out of the gate.

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>That reminds me. That reminds me of when earlier this

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>year when Jared Kushner was taking his first big tour

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of the White House after the election. Remember when he

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>like met all the Obama employees and was like, oh, so, like,

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>how many of these people are gonna be staying on?

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>And they're like, nobody, this wasn't a corporate takeover. You

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>realize it's not how government works. He's like, oh yeah, sure,

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>well yeah, no, I didn't hear about that. It was

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty funny, like like he just bought a company. He's like,

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>how many people are gonna be staying around? Oh yeah?

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>So um so now so, now Andrew Johnson is impeached.

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>He's he's broken a law that Congress had just passed,

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:51.559
<v Speaker 1>and they've they've impeached him. So what's going on. Well,

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>here's the deal. At the time, they and you know,

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like this now to a certain degree,

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>but everybody knew how everyone was going to vote ahead

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of time, um, except for him. So basically Ross right, Yeah,

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>basically everybody knew the outcome what the outcome was going

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to be, except for Ross, meaning that he was the

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>deciding vote. Like it was that slim of a margin,

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and so that's why he was so nervous. He was

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>he was just sitting there, apparently, just shredding this paper

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>up as they were going around the room, and everyone's

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>saying guilty or not guilty, because you need two thirds

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Senate vote or a supermajority to to enact

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>this impeachment. So he was just sitting there and no

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>one knew what was gonna happen. He stood up, he

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>said he thought later on that he were facing death

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and he said not guilty, and everyone side and this

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>article points out they don't know if it was a

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>side of relief or upset, probably both, depending on which

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>side of the aisle you're on. Yeah, the the whole

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 1>things recounted really well in this book called Impeached by

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the historian David oh Stewart, um, which I think where

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>this guy got this, but he, um, he does a

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>good job like getting to the heart of the matter,

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>which was this guy Emmon Ross was from that moment

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>on celebrated as this hero, this constitutional hero, like he

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>stood up and said, you know what, I'm not going

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to let the Constitution be railroaded because you guys don't

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>like Andrew Johnson. And he's been kind of honored as

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that since then. I've read it a couple of articles

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that are like, mm, actually he was just looking out

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:36.839
<v Speaker 1>for himself. Johnson was his benefactor and um, he had

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>basically appointed him, and uh, he had a lot of

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>favoritism with him, and this new guy who would have

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>come in, I think Benjamin Ward would not have carried

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>on the same thing. But regardless, if you are a constitutionalist,

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>this guy is your hero. Because he did save the

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>constitution with that one vote. So what that what what

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>took place was an impeachment proceeding, and that one was

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>awfully close. That was the first impeachment proceeding of the

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>US president, but that would not be the last. There's

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>been three more or two more presidents, three total, yes,

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that have have faced down the impeachment gun. Uh. And

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>there have been varying results. But as yet there's never

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>been a president that was successfully convicted once they've been impeached,

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>because impeachment is not convictions. A couple of different things.

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>You want to take a break and then get into it, Yeah,

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.439
<v Speaker 1>because Uh, I don't want to confuse people right off

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the bat here any more than we need to. I

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's a little late for that. So we'll go

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>gather our thoughts. Take a little podcaster potty break. Be

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>back right after this. If you want to know, luck

0:10:45.160 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>just to chuck all right. Should we talk about French

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and Latin real quick? Yes, because the roots of words

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>are always fun to talk about. The French word impatia

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>means to prevent, related to the English word impede, and

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>both originally derived from the Latin tern impedical man, your

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>friends is just so romantic, and that means to fedter.

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>So basically what impeachment root wise means is to put

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a stop to movement of something. In this case, the

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>uh not always a president, as we'll see. Um any

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>um is it any elected official, any federal civil civil

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>officers what they finally landed on. But yeah, like a

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>federal official, somebody who is appointed by the president, the president,

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 1>the vice president, um, judges typically, but not senators or

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>congress people. They can just be run out of town

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>on a on a bail of Hey, there's the yeah.

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>They basically yeah, man, w you see that bail of

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:16.719
<v Speaker 1>hay coming and you know that it tolls for the

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you know the tars right behind it. That's a bad

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>day for you. Um alright, So the origins of impeachment

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>though pre United States. UM, so we're talking British legal

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>history here. There's a dude named T. F. T. Plunkett Plucknet. Interesting,

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>m hmm Plucknett. Uh he's in his Storian I guess so, uh,

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I could have sworn it was Plunkett. So T. F. T.

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Plucknett says that um fourteenth century Parliament was the first

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>time impeachment came about. And during that time there were

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of different cases over like an eleven year

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>period that had a pretty big shift from one to

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the next that we kind of frame how impeachment works. Right.

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>So at the time, back then in the fourteenth century,

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>right the the king could appoint. They were all manner

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of like positions that the king could appoint, and once

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you were appointed by the king, that was it. You

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>only answered to the king. You could do anything you wanted,

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and as long as you had the king's favor, there

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>was nothing anyone could do. So UM at one point,

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not sure how they took it upon themselves,

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>but this article says that it grew out of a

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 1>trial of Roger Mortimer, who was convicted in um executed

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>for arranging the murder of King Edward the second, and

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>then a Chief Justice Willoughby, who was accused of corruption

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and tried UM. These two guys were like high appointed

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>officials and they were removed from office, and the way

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that they were removed was basically the parliament got involved.

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>So this idea of impeaching people grew out of the

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>notion that wait a minute, Parliament and specifically the House

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of Commons, which is, if you take Parliament and Congress

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, the House of Lords is like

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, and the House of Commons is like the

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>House of Representatives, right. Um, the House of Commons were

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the ones who would take it upon themselves to say

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>this person is bad and we're going to get rid

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of them. We're going to act as their jury and

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>try them and remove them from their appointed position. And king,

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing you can do about it, because we're the

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>ones who hold the purse strings, really, so you better

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>go along with this. And this idea of impeaching was huge.

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>It was revolutionary in Great Britain, and it was equally

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>revolutionary in in the founding of the United States too,

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>because if you'll remember, the United States was founded at

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a time where Americans were very very wary of kings

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>pushing them around. And in the Constitution as this role,

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>this office of the Press that did see which is

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a very strong executive ruler a king almost um. And

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a legal scholar, Cass Sunstein, who wrote this great

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>article about all this about impeachment, and he says a

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of historians agree that the Constitution probably wouldn't have

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>been ratified if these few words about impeachment hadn't been

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>added into the Constitution to give Americans the power to

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>remove a corrupt president from office. Yeah, I mean they

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it was almost I mean, it ended up being very important,

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>but it was almost an afterthought and how they went

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>about it because up front they weren't saying, hey, we

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>need to really like make sure we include this impeachment

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.239
<v Speaker 1>thing in here. They're worried about framing the US Constitution.

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And then at the end Ben Franklin very famously said, hey,

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, without impeachment, you know what, you know what,

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the only other thing we can do is is, uh,

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>if we get a bad president is shoot him in

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the head. And they went, oh, well that won't do

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>bully bully to that, So maybe we should we should

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>write something down. I know, we're all tired. We've been

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>working on this document for minutes. They had fatigue, and

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>they so they ended up saying over what hundred and

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>eighty words? I think it was actually less than I

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know, really I came up with that. Yeah, alright,

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>well seven sentences. Now it's even less than that, really, Yeah,

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>good lord, I kind of four run on sentences two

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of which included Colon's but that I mean, it's a sentence,

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>four sentences in a hundred and three words, says microsoft word.

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Really Yeah, well they didn't have microsoft word back then,

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>so alright, So regardless of how long it was, it

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>was short, and it was here's the thing it was.

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>It was written in a very vague language, which ended

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>up being very troublesome because they weren't quite sure. I

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>think they didn't want to hem themselves in too much,

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>is my feeling on exactly what it would take to

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to start this process. Like, uh so, initially they called it, uh,

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it was it. George Mason called it um mal mal

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>administration in other words, just being a bad president. Yeah,

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 1>and they took that out. There was a couple of

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 1>reasons why they said, no, this is a little it's

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a little vague. But later constitutional scholars have interpreted the

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>fact that it was suggested and removed that the framers

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of the Constitution didn't consider not being a very good

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 1>president as a reason to be removed from office. James

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Imagine at the very least, said, this is just really

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>unclear as to what this couldn't even mean. Sure, so

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>maladministration comes out they hit upon and I'm not sure

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>if they hit upon it right out of the gate

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>or if it came later, but they hit upon bribery

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and treason, which there's no issues with that. Everyone knows

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>what bribery is, everyone knows what treason is. It's pretty clear.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>But they they're still like her saying no, this isn't

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it's still not quite there. James Mason spoke up again.

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>He said, you can really screw with the democracy of

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>America even without taking bribes, even without committing a statutory

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 1>treason his act. So maybe we need to add something.

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's when he came up with mal administration and said, no, no,

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it's stupid. But then they came up with something else. Yeah,

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>he finally said, because again they didn't want to be

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>hinderen too much, but they also didn't want to be

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>so specific with just bribery and treason that that was

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that you could use uh impeachment for.

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>So he finally said, alright, good god, it's late. What

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>about high crimes and misdemeanors and everyone, yeah, that's great. Well,

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 1>no one even knows what it means. It will be perfect.

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.719
<v Speaker 1>What's funny is no one. No one now knows what

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it means, but apparently it was quite clear what it

0:18:56.080 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>meant at the time. Yeah, it's supposedly high crime. Is.

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean like, oh my god, that's that's such

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a huge crime crime right, Yeah, they did grow hemp

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>by the way. Um, but the high crime or a

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>high misdemeanor is it's a type of crime that can

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>only be committed by a high person a k a.

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>An elected or federal official. That's it's still just a

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>crime or a misdemeanor. Like I think it's still vague,

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>so okay, So later later scholars have interpret high crimes

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 1>and misdemeanors. I mean, it's a it's a crime or

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a misdemeanor that is carried out and can only be

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>carried out by somebody in an elected position. So it's

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a betrayal of the public trust that an elected or

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>federal official is given. Okay, and that the crimes part

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that throws people off. A high crime can be Um,

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.959
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have to be an actual crime, Okay, So

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.719
<v Speaker 1>you can be impeached for a high crime that, if

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you go and read the US Code, is not actually

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a federal crime. You're not breaking the law, but you

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>could still be impeached for it even though it's not

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>an actual crime. And then conversely, an actual crime isn't

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 1>necessarily an impeachable offense. That what the framers were trying

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 1>to get at here was that the the president or

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the vice president, whoever was being impeached, had betrayed the

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>public trust, had used their elected position, their high position,

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in a way that was that rendered them unfit to

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>serve any longer. They could not be trusted any longer.

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>They had proven themselves a alleged a terrible person, and

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 1>had had discharged their duties as president in a in

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>a mallow malodorous way, said the guy who shoes her

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 1>off in Congress. That cleared the room man pretty quick.

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>It's like Elizabeth Warren taking the taking to the podium.

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>When she takes her shoes off, people clear out of there.

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 1>She's had like onions for lunch, that lady. You'll just

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the whole onion raw? Have you ever seen it? It's amazing.

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Where did I see that recently? A whole onion raw?

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like a movie or something. Oh, I know what

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it was. The movie that was the kid was hungover

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and the parent comes in the next morning and they're

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>like here, like, eat this onion, trust me, And the

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:30.479
<v Speaker 1>kid starts to eat the onion and they're like, just kidding.

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember what movie it was. Back to the

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:39.439
<v Speaker 1>Future too, Yeah, that was it, when Marty Marty's Hangover.

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 1>That was the full name Back the Future to Marty's

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Hangover colon the onion. Um. So here's the deal though

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>with it's one of two things though, when it comes

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to impeachment. It's either literally a crime, but it doesn't

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>have to be. And if it's not a crime literally,

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>then it's probably something political going on in that it is.

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>They feel that it is subverting the office of the president. Right,

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the general interpretation. But again I mean like they

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't say high crimes and demeanor or high crimes and

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>misdemeanors asterisks, right and then define that. So it's open

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to interpretation and it still is today, which is why

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>unless you are a president or a vice president have

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>been actually caught, um, accepting bribes or committing treason, there's

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of wiggle room for you to get out

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of this. Yeah, an impeachment doesn't send you to jail,

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 1>like you can then be tried for treason and that

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>would continue to jail. Yeah, it's specifically says in the

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Constitution that this is strictly to remove the person from office,

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>possibly to prevent them from ever holding federal office again.

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>But that do you have to leave it to the

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>regular courts to um to try and punish them. If

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it's an rual crime separately, that's different. But it's weird

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>because the impeachment processes will see is very much like

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a uh trial, a kangaroo court trial. Basically, well, let's

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>go and talk about it, okay, So if you're impeached,

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>if you're a president and you do something that enough

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>people in the House of Representatives find unsavory, you may

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>find yourself facing impeachment. Usually that means the people in

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the House of Representatives are representatives are in a different

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 1>political party than your own. Usually, yes, you would have

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to be pretty bad for your own party to be

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>the ones who drew up the articles of impeachment to start, right,

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So with the articles of impeachment, it can be introduced.

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.199
<v Speaker 1>Typically these days, from what I understand, there's a judiciary

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Judiciary committee in the House, and they will be responsible

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 1>for drumming up the articles of impeachment and then introducing

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>them to the House as a whole. But in individual

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>representative can come up with articles of impeachment himself for

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>herself and introduce it on the House flora to be

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>voted one way or another, which just happened actually at

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of December. Um as a loan representative, Al

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>King I think from Texas introduced articles of impeachment and

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it got voted down. So you can do it yourself.

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Is just a just a loan dude or DoD s um.

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>But normally it's the Judiciary Committee, I think, because the

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>parties tend to try to keep a strangle hold on

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. And like even with this case, the

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Democrats were like easy, easy, ol, like just settle down

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>where we're going to get there, but Al was like

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I hate him so much too early, Al stand down,

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>so as Al stalks off. But the process continues apparently

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>under more normal circumstances. But he was a great example

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that any any representative can introduce articles of impeachment, and

0:24:56.520 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>an article of impeachment Chuck is like presidents who have

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>been impeached have had I believe Johnson too, but definitely

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Nixon and Clinton, UM and now Trump. He wasn't impeached,

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>but he's had articles of impeachment brought up against him,

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>which is a significant in and of itself, because what

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it's saying is we are accusing this president of this crime,

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 1>and each crime or each betrayal of office, whatever you

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>want to call it, each high crime and misdemeanor or

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>each actual crime, it gets its own article of impeachment.

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 1>So very frequently and president will be impeached with multiple

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>articles of impeachment and the House is forced to vote

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 1>on each one. So so if you if you have

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>like five, that means there's five chances that that president

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>can be impeached depending on the evidence. And so each impeachment,

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 1>each article of impeachment is going to say, this is

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>what the president did. Here's all the evidence that backs

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>up us saying this, Um and House, what do you think?

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Then the House will vote on it. That was Al Green,

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>by the way, not now King, his legendary soul singer,

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Al Green. It was Al Green. It wasn't Al King.

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>His name is Al Green, Yeah, but it wasn't legendary

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>soul singer. Right. Um, So if the vote gets the majority,

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>then the president is officially impeached to that point, um,

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>which and it's just a simple majority, yeah, in the House,

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and that means that basically, that means it's a it's

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>like a criminal indictment, um if we're gonna be comparing

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it to like, you know, the civilian legal standard. So

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you're officially accused of this wrongdoing, which could mean you

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>could be removed from office officially if the House is

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>voted with a simple majority. But it's not over because

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>then what happens is it moves over to the Senate.

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.400
<v Speaker 1>And at that point that's where you need the two

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:51.239
<v Speaker 1>thirds majority another to finish the prosecution. And here's the

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 1>thing is, they didn't, like I said, it was a

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>very kind of short um insert as far as how

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to go about this. So there there aren't any like

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:04.400
<v Speaker 1>hard and fast rules. So whenever this has happened, they're

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of just like, all right, how do you want

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:09.439
<v Speaker 1>to do this? Um, We're not gonna have prosecutors. We're

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna have what we call managers, which is a weird

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>word for sure, but they're gonna act as prosecutors and

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be called to argue the case before the Senate.

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>And these are members of the House who are managing

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the impeachment proceedings in the Senate on behalf of the House,

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 1>because the House has said, we the House, I think

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>this president should be removed, and now we're gonna send

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>some of our members to argue this case. Yes, and

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 1>the Senate is essentially the jury at this point in

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the proceedings, right, But they're the jury, and they're also

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the ones who are making up the rules. They're in

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>charge of that as well, which is very strange. It

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is you want to hear something kind of fun. But

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:52.640
<v Speaker 1>my uncle was a manager for Clinton's impeachment trial. No

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Bob Bars your uncle. No, not Bob Barr. There there

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>are several managers. My uncle ed Bryan really yeah, talk

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of before he was Republican congressman from Tennessee and he

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>was one of the managers because he was an attorney

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and a former Army judge advocate general and judge Japoka general.

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that what he was jack? Was he a jack?

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>But that's what it stands for. I can't remember now,

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'm just thinking to the TV show. But he

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>held the legal position in the Army, uh and then

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>was well the Navy. I think are the Jags right? Oh,

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. He was in the army though, okay,

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>but he was one of the managers in the in

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the Clinton impeachment that is fascinating trial. And he and

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, like Uncle Ed and I are are

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>politically divergent. But he's a good dude and an honest,

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>like kind man. I can say that for sure. Uh

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>So I was always proud of him as a person,

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>even though he didn't like see I politically, but he was, Um,

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>he's such a good guy that Monica Lewinsky requested him

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>personally to depose her because he was just regarded as

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>like one of the good guys and one of the

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>like fair like decent humans. So he was the guy

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>who deposed Monica Lewinsky for the Clinton impeachment trial. My

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>father's brother. He needs a T shirt that says that man, right,

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that's crazy and that wouldn't it wow? So how does

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>he feel about it? Because most, um, I shouldn't say most,

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>A significant number of legal scholars and historians look back

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>at that and the Andrew Johnson won and say those

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>impeachment proceedings never should have happened, never should have passed.

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>The House and that they were partisan proceedings. Yeah, I

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know. You know, we're not super in touch anymore.

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>But now that I'm older, I would love to pick

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>his brain a little bit about this. Uh, and I'm

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>sure he would spill it, you know, conference me in Okay,

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I like the next Christmas, I'll be like, yeah, uncle, Lettie,

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>just um, hold on a minute, I'm just gonna put

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>this phone down next to you, and don't pay attention

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to that picture of Josh his avatar. I'll be like,

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>did you give my T shirt I sent you? Ah? Yeah,

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting, so I know. Right. So, at any rate,

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the managers are they're arguing the case before the Senate,

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>who acts as jury that are also making up the

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>rules as they go. And uh, two thirds, like we

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>said a couple of times, you need that two thirds

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Senate vote. And then at that point, if two thirds

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>vote guilty, then that's it man, the president you're done. Yeah,

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and then the vice president takes over and um, that's that.

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>You probably can't hold a federal office again after that either,

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>although I don't think it's automatic. Right, So let's should

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>we take a break. Yeah, all right, let's take a

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>break and we'll talk about We've already talked about Johnson.

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk a little bit more about Mr. Bill Clinton

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and President Richard Milhouse Nixon. Right it for this If

0:30:54.120 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to know Luck, just to Chuck, Okay, Chuck. Yes. So,

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>like you said, we talked about Johnson, he got off

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>by one vote. Man, that must have been so tense. Um.

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>And then up next was so president wise. We'll find

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that there are plenty of other people who've been impeached,

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>but in the United States, president wise, the next president

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>was Richard Millhouse Nixon. Was a long break in between. Yeah,

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred years, like a hundred and four years,

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I think something like that. So Nixon is getting his

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>own episode. Were you're doing a Watergate episode hopefully in

0:31:53.080 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the not too distant future. Such a fascinating case. So um. Well,

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>but the whole, the whole premise of what Nixon was

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>eventually moved out of office for what. He didn't actually

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>get impeached. He resigned, but he probably would have been

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>removed from office. He probably would have been impeached, He

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>probably would have been convicted, and he would have been removed.

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>But he didn't give him the satisfaction he resigned. But

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>he he went and this was just in a few weeks.

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>He won the election by an enormous margin. Um. The

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>electoral college vote was five twenty Nixon seventeen, McGovern seventeen,

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>five to seventeen. That's what that's the landslide that he

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>won re election with. And within a few weeks he

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>was he was out of office. And it was all

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>because of that Watergate break in. And it wasn't even

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the break in, which was bad enough that like

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>some operatives from the White House broke into Democratic headquarters

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Watergate hotel and we're caught trying to replace

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the phone tap that they had on the phone um

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and it turned out that it was traced back to

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the to the White House. The president probably had involvement.

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 1>That's bad enough, but the cover up is what ultimately

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>led to Nixon being railroaded out of out of the

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>White House. Yeah, for sure, But like you said, the

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 1>writing was on the wall, and he said, well, you

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>know what, I quit, I resign, And everyone went, oh, man,

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I know, we really wanted to impeach you. We brought

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the bail of Hay and everything. I mean, I saw

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>all the presidents men again the other day for the

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>first Simon so great, so um so Nixon was He's

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a pretty pretty instructive example as well. Like he had

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 1>multiple articles of impeachment against him. One was tax evasion

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>when he was president he failed to pay like four

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>grand and taxes, which is like two point six million today,

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>which that's a substantial amount of money. Plus he was

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:00.959
<v Speaker 1>president when he failed to pay those taxes, so crazy.

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>He didn't get he again, he was never here. They

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't get to the point where they voted on the

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 1>articles of impeachment. But that was one against the obstructing

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 1>justice was one. Using the office to um obstruct justice

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 1>was a big one. He had like a hand pick

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>c I a task force um that was trying to

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 1>keep the FBI from investigating Watergate. So he had a

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of different articles of impeachment against him, and surely

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>one of them would have stuck and he would have

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 1>been removed. But then after Nixon that was two up

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>comes Clinton about twenty I think twenty six years later,

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't it. M M. I think yeah, okay, well depends

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>on you know, the whole the whole kitten caboodle was

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>over a couple of years for sure, right. So Clinton

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>was up next, Yes, and very famously he um. He

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>did not get impeached because he uh did bad things

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in the White House with Monica Lewinsky. He was impeached

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>because he perjured himself, very famously said I did not

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>have sexual relations with that woman. Yeah, that was good,

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>did uncle. I'll bet uncle and Clinton to doubt it. Uh. Yeah,

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean I remember in college, in uh actually just

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>post college, I remember Bill Clinton looking America in the

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>eye on television and lying to all of us. Very disappointing.

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>And he was a man in power who used that

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>power to Some people say, take advantage of a younger coworker.

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Other people say, you know, it was consensual relationship. But

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:40.840
<v Speaker 1>he was the president and she was a political junkie,

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 1>so sure. And he also was accused of trying to

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 1>get her too. She was a witness. Monica Lewinsky was

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a witness in a sexual harassment case against him by

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Paula Jones, and he was he was accused of trying

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to get her to lie for him as a witness,

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:04.800
<v Speaker 1>which is big time obstructing justice, especially if you're president. Um,

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and so if you if you look at it in

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that light. Was he having that relationship with Lewinsky to

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 1>influence her to lie to the jury, which makes it

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 1>doubly worse somehow tripoli or quadruple e worse. Even so,

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 1>there was, um, there were a lot of there was

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of beef against him. I mean, the stink

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 1>from that mess affected this most recent election, you know,

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, for sure, definitely. I mean, like the

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Clinton's have a pretty bad rep still from that among

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:42.280
<v Speaker 1>certain parties, pretty pretty extensive parties, I would say, and earned,

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean I remember being very upset that

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton lied to my face. Well that's not why

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>he was. Um, he didn't perjured to the American people.

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:57.399
<v Speaker 1>He he lied to a grand jury as well under oath.

0:36:57.560 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, but he said the same thing to the

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>grand juries. He said our faces. But I remember feeling

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 1>especially let down because he looked me in the eye,

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, like when the president is facing camera and

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 1>says something very seriously like that, Uh, they're talking to you,

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 1>They're talking to their constituents like it's a personal relationship.

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I remember being just really upset about the whole thing. Well, okay,

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:25.759
<v Speaker 1>I didn't I don't think I felt quite like that.

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Really yeah, I just assumed he I just assumed he

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>was lying. Really yeah, he's president, man, I believed him.

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:36.879
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was much more naive in my younger days. Well,

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's sweet Chuck. Yeah, that's slick Willy always

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:44.399
<v Speaker 1>with the smooth talk. That's right, Tricky Dick and slick Willy.

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:47.839
<v Speaker 1>You need to stop electing people with those nicknames. Right now,

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 1>we're just asking what about what about honorable Frank Why

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>did he ever get elected? He doesn't have any campaign money. So, okay,

0:37:57.080 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 1>so Clinton escaped fit at the vote was fifty fifty. Um. Yeah, yeah,

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>so he was actually impeached like Andrew Johnson was, and

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>they did it did come up to vote, the articles

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of impeachment came up to vote, and they were It

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>was fifty fifty, which was pretty close to party lines. Um.

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I think five Republicans five Democrats voted for impeachment and

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>ten Republicans voted against. Like I can't remember, but it

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:28.280
<v Speaker 1>was very close to party law. Was ten Republicans voted

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:33.320
<v Speaker 1>for acquittal. Um. Two of which are still there. Susan

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Collins of Maine. She was a brand new either freshman

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 1>or sophomore. And Richard Shelby of Alabama. Wow, is still there.

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So they voted against acquittal, they voted, they voted against impeachment,

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I should say, yeah, yeah, they were Republicans. So, uh

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 1>so Clinton Clinton made it out and I was reading this,

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 1>there's this really fascinating five thirty eight blog about UM.

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I think it's called will Trump be Impeached? And it's

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:06.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's five thirty eight. So they've got all

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>this data and everything to back up what they're saying.

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>So they were saying one of the one of the

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>sure signs that uh, an impeachment's probably not going to

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>go through is like how divided the parties are. If

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the parties are are um within themselves, no no between

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the two, Like, if you're probably going to have a

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 1>party line vote, it's probably people. Probably people aren't gonna

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 1>defect enough to actually vote for impeachment, or if they do,

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:38.959
<v Speaker 1>they're not gonna defect enough to vote for um for

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 1>conviction in the Senate. Right, And that was the case

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of Clinton, right right, right, But today it would take

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Republican senators to say to get together and say, hey,

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:54.919
<v Speaker 1>maybe even get this guy out of here and get

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 1>pens in there, and like and commit uh you know,

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:04.720
<v Speaker 1>what's it called on ship mutiny? Commit mutiny? Yeah, it almost.

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, with the introduction of Pen's out of nowhere,

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 1>it definitely seemed like that was plan B from the

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 1>party all along. I would not be at all surprised

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>if that actually happened. I don't think very many people

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>would be surprised if that happened. But I saw that

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in that same five thirty eight blog there's um like

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a betting odds website that they cited that that gave

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 1>like even odds that Trump would um would not finish

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 1>out his full four year term, which is that's pretty significant,

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, fifty chance, that's crazy. Yeah. My call from

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the beginning was that he would not finish out his

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>four year term because he would resign. He would not

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:49.879
<v Speaker 1>allow himself to be impeached. I don't think so either,

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:52.319
<v Speaker 1>is that he would resign and claim to be a

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>victim of the political system and basically say I told

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you all along it was the swamp. I couldn't drain it.

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm a victim of it. Man. So p T.

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Barnum played by Hugh Jackman, Hugh Jackman from Subway And

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:16.879
<v Speaker 1>then now this one if this goes through, just call

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 1>me nostro Chukas from now on. Oh man, it's not fat.

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So there's I have two T shirts. Uh, there's a

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 1>very um interesting And the reason I said that this

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is right after he got elected was because I was like,

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he really wants to be president for

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 1>four years. I read that in multiple places that he's

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:42.359
<v Speaker 1>not He doesn't actually enjoy the actual presidency. Yeah, and

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and from what I've heard, he gets very bored with

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 1>doing the same thing and politics is certainly not the

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 1>way he's used to doing business. And like, I was

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>just like, man, the guy's gonna get tired of this

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 1>after a couple of years and just want to go

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:58.400
<v Speaker 1>back to his kushy civilian life. Uh, and then be

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a be a martyr political and say, yeah, I couldn't

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 1>do what I wanted to do, so I'm a victim.

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 1>M So that's ducks. You heard it here first. So

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>so if so, Trump hasn't been impeached it, but they

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 1>they've already brought it up. It sounds like, although it

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:19.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of waxed and waned in early December, all of

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:23.799
<v Speaker 1>the especially the left leaning um news outlets, were like impeachment.

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 1>People are actually talking about impeachment. It is probably gonna

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>happen now, and then if you look like a week later,

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 1>all of those articles are gone. They just moved on

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to something else, right, which is pretty ridiculous, But the

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 1>status quo these days, so, um, who knows what's gonna

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:43.839
<v Speaker 1>happen with Trump, But the chances of him actually being

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:49.439
<v Speaker 1>impeached and convicted are extraordinarily low because he's president. Right.

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:52.840
<v Speaker 1>That's just such an enormous thing to remove a president

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 1>from office. What's not quite as enormous is to remove

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a federal judge, which is why out of the sixty

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:02.400
<v Speaker 1>people in the Ied States who have ever been impeached,

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's even more than sixty, um and convicted,

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 1>which is down to fifteen, all of those I believe

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 1>were federal judges. Correct, Um, they were you know, you

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 1>name it. They were d u I drunks or drunk

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in court, or tax evaders or accepted bribes or perjuring themselves.

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Like yeah, federal judges have have sort of carried the

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 1>mantle for impeachment, you know. Yeah, and in a really

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 1>weird way they are laying their impeachment trials have laid

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:41.759
<v Speaker 1>the groundwork for the big ones that you see. Yeah,

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure if you asked your uncle he would tell

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you that. Yeah. They went back and looked at impeachment

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>trials for federal judges to see, you know, what procedures

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:52.840
<v Speaker 1>were used and followed and what the rules were. So these,

0:43:52.840 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the impeachment of federal judges who were drunk on the bench,

0:43:56.480 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 1>are paving the groundwork for for presidents to be in

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 1>peached with you know, impeached by um. And then there

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:07.840
<v Speaker 1>was a Senator, William Blunt from North Carolina. He was

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the only Senator to ever be impeached, and his trial

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 1>actually established that senators and representatives couldn't be impeached. They

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 1>were immune to impeachment because they weren't civil officers. That instead,

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:24.840
<v Speaker 1>their own party could run them or their own body.

0:44:24.920 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. So, if you were a senator, two thirds

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Senate could vote for you to get out

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:32.239
<v Speaker 1>of the Senate. If you were a representative, two thirds

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of the House could vote for you to get out

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of the House. And that's what they did to Blunt.

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>They said, we can't impeach you, but we can use

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:40.600
<v Speaker 1>this other thing. And and it's basically like a vote

0:44:40.640 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 1>of no confidence, which also comes from Parliament as well. Interesting. Yeah, uh,

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>well this week in real time, this will already have

0:44:48.600 --> 0:44:51.360
<v Speaker 1>happened by the time this is released. But I think

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:57.280
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow there is a special election within the Democratic Party

0:44:57.960 --> 0:45:00.399
<v Speaker 1>on who will be the top Democrat on the House

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Judiciary Committee. Uh, this is gonna happen in the midterms.

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:09.560
<v Speaker 1>But when Democratic Representative John Conyers stepped down over sexual

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:13.839
<v Speaker 1>harassment allegations a couple of weeks ago, um, they had

0:45:13.840 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 1>to hold a special caucus for an election. It's gonna

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:19.920
<v Speaker 1>happen tomorrow. And it looks like two people, either Jerry

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Nadler of New York or Zoe Lofgren of California, are

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the top two competing for this top spot. And they're

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>both well aware that, um what that means. Uh. In

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:33.280
<v Speaker 1>this article here, it's called the battle to lead Trump's

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 1>potential impeachment. Um, they know what they're It says they're

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:42.400
<v Speaker 1>signing up to be Trump's chief antagonist. But they also said, hey, listen,

0:45:44.800 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna go in there and just start saying impeachment, impeachment.

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:51.759
<v Speaker 1>Like if this is ever going to happen, it's got

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to be the will. We have to feel like it's

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the will of the American people, Like we have to

0:45:57.000 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>feel like there are enough Trump supporter is out there

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that have turned on him because of something he's done. Well, yeah,

0:46:05.560 --> 0:46:07.879
<v Speaker 1>it'll it'll be like what you said, where it's it's

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you've just proven everything the guy has said from the

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:15.360
<v Speaker 1>moment he started campaigning him from the beginning, and that

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the elites have it so rigged that even if you

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>do win, they'll just get rid of you. Yeah, I

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:21.920
<v Speaker 1>mean one of them they Nadler even said there's not

0:46:21.960 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>some there's not much point in impeaching and president and

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:26.640
<v Speaker 1>having him acquitted in the Senate because that's what happened

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:29.759
<v Speaker 1>with Clinton. And like you said, even Republicans largely look

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>back and say, of course that was just a big

0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 1>distracting waste of time. Yeah, that's I mean, that's what

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I've read as well, is that they it's not looked

0:46:38.200 --> 0:46:43.720
<v Speaker 1>upon as the finest moment in legal American legal history. Yeah,

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:45.799
<v Speaker 1>so what we'll know the outcome tomorrow in real time.

0:46:45.840 --> 0:46:47.520
<v Speaker 1>And and both of them they are kind of on

0:46:47.560 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the same page as as far as that goes there,

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:52.920
<v Speaker 1>like we need it needs to be something like legit

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 1>worth impeaching and president for that most of the American

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 1>people would agree with. We're not just out to get him,

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:01.239
<v Speaker 1>but if he does something, we're out to get him.

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Or if we find something that he's already done. Yeah exactly. Yeah,

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 1>So well there you have it. Yeah, if it turns

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:13.520
<v Speaker 1>out that he um did obstruct anything, that that would

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:17.960
<v Speaker 1>be a big deal to the Two of the three

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 1>presidents who have been impeached were had at least articles

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:27.759
<v Speaker 1>impeachment that included obstruction against them. Yeah, but his his

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 1>attorneys are saying, have literally said the president can't be

0:47:32.520 --> 0:47:36.120
<v Speaker 1>guilty of obstruction of justice because they are justice. That's

0:47:36.239 --> 0:47:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the most ridiculous legal interpretation I've ever heard in my life.

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go on record as saying that they're

0:47:44.960 --> 0:47:49.400
<v Speaker 1>saying they're above the law. I I am the law.

0:47:49.440 --> 0:47:52.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what it says. How can I obstruct the law?

0:47:52.160 --> 0:47:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm the law? A crush At any rate, we should

0:47:56.840 --> 0:47:59.640
<v Speaker 1>probably stop now, all right, Well, if you want to

0:47:59.640 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 1>know more about impeachment, uh, you can type that word

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:07.799
<v Speaker 1>into the internet and some really interesting stuff. I Mean

0:48:07.840 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it is bone dry, but it's like

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 1>people are really into like the legal history and um

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 1>constitutional interpretation. So you can find some pretty interesting articles

0:48:18.120 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 1>all around the internet on stuff like this. So just

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:23.000
<v Speaker 1>give it a shot, see if it's if it's up

0:48:23.040 --> 0:48:26.239
<v Speaker 1>your alley. Yeah, and at the very least, if this

0:48:26.440 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 1>does happen to play out over the next couple of years,

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's good to know how it all works.

0:48:30.560 --> 0:48:34.439
<v Speaker 1>You know exactly exactly you can I press your friends. Yeah,

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 1>it could be like they're they're never going to get

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a supermajority and your friends will be like, what did

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you just say? What magic word was? What does this

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:46.719
<v Speaker 1>have to do with comic books? So, since Chuck said

0:48:46.760 --> 0:48:51.840
<v Speaker 1>comic books, it's time for listener mail. Uh, this is

0:48:51.880 --> 0:48:55.120
<v Speaker 1>follow up on cakes. Hey guys, listen episode on cakes

0:48:55.120 --> 0:48:56.600
<v Speaker 1>so that you might like you might like to know

0:48:56.640 --> 0:48:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about the color of red velvet

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:03.160
<v Speaker 1>cakes and experi arians amateur baker who's tested several several

0:49:03.200 --> 0:49:06.759
<v Speaker 1>red velvet recipes learned it will now mails some down

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to Johnson Chalk. That's right. It's true that red velvet

0:49:09.640 --> 0:49:11.680
<v Speaker 1>cake originally got their color from the chemical reaction of

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the cocoa, vinegar and buttermilk. That is no longer the case.

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:17.440
<v Speaker 1>The way cocoa's process has changed since the recipe was invented,

0:49:17.840 --> 0:49:20.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you rely on the chemical reaction for the color,

0:49:20.280 --> 0:49:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you will be sorely disappointed. Your cake will simply be brown,

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but it will be nothing like the red we have

0:49:26.000 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>come to expect from red velvet cakes. Originally, red velvet

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:32.120
<v Speaker 1>cakes from more of a rust color than the bright

0:49:32.160 --> 0:49:35.239
<v Speaker 1>red we think of now. The cacao in the cake

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:42.120
<v Speaker 1>cocoa that the two on the cake also as minimal

0:49:42.120 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in comparison to a chocolate cake. Cocoa was originally added

0:49:45.040 --> 0:49:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to cut the flour create a silky or less glutinous texture,

0:49:49.160 --> 0:49:52.680
<v Speaker 1>rather than create a chocolate cake. Velvet cakes using vinegar,

0:49:53.120 --> 0:49:55.839
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's where the velvet comes from. Uh. Using

0:49:55.920 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 1>vinegar is a rising agent have a long has a

0:49:57.520 --> 0:50:00.400
<v Speaker 1>long tradition in American baking, and it is not deserved

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:04.120
<v Speaker 1>only for red velvet cakes. Also, you mentioned banana bread

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:06.680
<v Speaker 1>with some confusion over age musty bananas, and a lot

0:50:06.680 --> 0:50:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of people wrote in about this. I'm just a dummy.

0:50:08.760 --> 0:50:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get it. Bananas are softer, it cuts back

0:50:11.600 --> 0:50:14.640
<v Speaker 1>on the work of the baker. Also, banana is naturally

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:17.479
<v Speaker 1>sweetened as they ripe yeah, I didn't think about that either,

0:50:18.040 --> 0:50:21.279
<v Speaker 1>So I guess they're just so sugary and sweet. Once

0:50:21.280 --> 0:50:23.920
<v Speaker 1>they get black like that, you get little fuzzy sweaters

0:50:23.920 --> 0:50:26.240
<v Speaker 1>on your teeth when you bite into them. They're that sweet.

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I remember the first time I heard that expression, sweaters

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:30.560
<v Speaker 1>on your teeth, and I was like, oh my god,

0:50:30.640 --> 0:50:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that's it. Nailed it. Um blah blah blah. Baking, baking,

0:50:36.480 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 1>baking nice. Who is that from? Uh? Diana, By the way,

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:44.000
<v Speaker 1>she says, if you're not adding chocolate chips your banana

0:50:44.120 --> 0:50:46.640
<v Speaker 1>nut bread, then you're doing it wrong. Huh, and then

0:50:46.640 --> 0:50:50.200
<v Speaker 1>she says, best wishes from Diana Garten. Thanks a lot, Diana.

0:50:50.280 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 1>That's very nice. If you please do send us some

0:50:52.280 --> 0:50:55.839
<v Speaker 1>baked goods. It's not joking at all. Uh. If you

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:57.799
<v Speaker 1>want to send us some bake goods or just say

0:50:57.840 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 1>hi or whatever, who cares. You can tweet to us

0:51:01.120 --> 0:51:03.680
<v Speaker 1>at josh onm clark or s y s K podcast.

0:51:04.040 --> 0:51:06.160
<v Speaker 1>You can hang out with us on Facebook dot com,

0:51:06.200 --> 0:51:09.160
<v Speaker 1>slash Stuff you Should Know or slash Charles W. Chuck Bryant,

0:51:09.400 --> 0:51:11.560
<v Speaker 1>send us an email the Stuff podcast at how Stuff

0:51:11.600 --> 0:51:13.799
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com, and as always, joined us at at

0:51:13.800 --> 0:51:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Home on the Web Stuff you Should Know dot com

0:51:20.480 --> 0:51:22.920
<v Speaker 1>for more on this and thousands of other topics. Is

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:34.640
<v Speaker 1>It How stuff works? Dot com