WEBVTT - Selects: How Police Lineups Work

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, it's me Josham. For this week's select I've

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:08.399
<v Speaker 1>chosen our twenty eighteen episode how police Lineups Work. It's

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that you just kind of know

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>about and then you find out about it and you

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>say to yourself, how are we doing this. It's a

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>great episode. I think you'll enjoy it. So sit back, relax,

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and get ready for police Lineups.

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Stuff you should know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. There's

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Charles w Chuck Bryant, there's Jerry out there outside the fishbowl,

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and also there's guest producer Noel and our pal Ben.

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I'm in the room this time, man, Yeah,

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.319
<v Speaker 3>on the mic. Thanks for having us.

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 2>This is way better than that time you have me

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 2>on the April Fools episode.

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm glad you brought that up because I may

0:00:57.600 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>remember Ben from that. I think it was two thousand

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>thirteen or fifteen something, ungodly time ago.

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 4>It's my replacement.

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was an April Fool's joke for the three

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>D printing episode. So this is your second time on

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the show.

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the Internet shredg you Ben was it were they

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 5>were you like a target of abuse.

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 2>I want to thank everybody for the very polite emails,

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 2>and as we could tell, thankfully, Chuck is fine.

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they took it easy on them. Okay, we have

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>very nice listeners, you know. And then Nol, this might

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>be the first time you're ever speaking on the podcast,

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>even though you've guest produced it like a million times.

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 3>I think I may have mumbled something in the background

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 3>the time. It really wow wow, Josh. So we're having

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 3>you two on.

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's cut, let's get down of business, because you two

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>have a podcast together, right, Uh, Noel, you also run

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>mini Crush movie Crush.

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 3>It's true. Yeah, you're also in a real world's colliding

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Right, there's a lot I'm going over them all. You're

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>on stuff they don't want you to know. But you

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>two Ben and Knowl have come together and made ridiculous history,

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>which is awesome.

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, that's right.

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 4>We're just missing God.

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to sweat. But you guys are on ridiculous

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:09.959
<v Speaker 1>history together. We are, Yeah, tell us about that.

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Uh So history is full of these cartoonish bizarre events

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 2>often not covered in your typical history class.

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Sounds familiar, right.

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Because for one reason or another, people thought, that's no way,

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 2>that didn't really happen. The first recorded instance of a

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 2>mooning did not result in the death of hundreds of people.

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 3>It's surely not, surely not, but it did.

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 5>It did, It did, And surely the US government did

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 5>not have a plan to shoot a nuclear missile at

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 5>the moon.

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Right, that was just a Mister Shows sketch. Surely not,

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 3>but she also was. It was kind of parallel thinking.

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 5>Is the Mister Show sketch happened before this story became declassified?

0:02:57.400 --> 0:02:57.839
<v Speaker 3>Is that right?

0:02:57.880 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 2>It is?

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 4>Nine yep.

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 2>So our continuing mission with ridiculous history, not to sound.

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.079
<v Speaker 3>Too star treky about it.

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Is to find those moments, the bizarre people, places, and

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 2>things throughout the span of human civilization that at least

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 2>crack the both of us up on.

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 3>A continual basis.

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 2>And sometimes we do have to stop recording just for

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 2>a second because we're so tickled.

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you really, Yeah, Wow, that's that's actually high quality,

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>mainly because we tickle each other.

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 3>I got to physically. Yeah, that's cheating, man. You're making

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 3>it sound so serious. It's actually a lot of fun.

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 4>It is.

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 3>It's a fun show. Right, Oh yeah, yeah, okay, yeah.

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 5>I mean I'm giving been a hard time, but yeah,

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 5>that's definitely like we touch on from time to time.

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 3>It it'll go into a heavier territory.

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 5>Like, for example, we did an episode about how women

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 5>in Kansas in the nineteen twenties were imprisoned in labor

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 5>camps for having STDs. What that certainly falls under ridiculous

0:03:57.840 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 5>not exactly fun or funny.

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Right haha, ridiculous. So it's it's it's all of those things.

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 5>Some of them are you know, crack you up hilarious

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 5>moments like Napoleon Bonaparte getting attacked by bunnies or you know,

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 5>the aforementioned SDT labor camps, or.

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 2>The racist special Olympics that were held here in the States.

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 2>And we're a complete, well to borrow phrase we use

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 2>on the show, a complete ship show.

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>So so wait a minute, I think you are, like,

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>you need to name the state that hosted that.

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh it was Saint Louis. Yeah, Saint Louis.

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 5>And it's because the World's Fair was happening in Saint

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 5>Louis and they were going to have it in Chicago.

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 5>But the people hosting the World's Fair said, if you

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 5>don't do your Olympics as part of the World's Fair,

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 5>we're going to totally blow you out of the water

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 5>with how awesome our World's Fair is.

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 3>And no one's going to come to your Olympics.

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 5>And scared them in the early days of like, you know,

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 5>not the earliest days of the Olympics, when they brought

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 5>it back like in the you know, it was not

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 5>ancient Rome.

0:04:57.839 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 3>It was not in fact ancient Rome.

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 2>And it was also it was not a good example

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 2>of the Olympics either, because the white supremacists who were

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 2>in charge of the whole shebang decided that this would

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 2>be the perfect time to prove their cockamamie ideas.

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 5>Of like eugenics, ideas of kind of like white superiority,

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 5>and like they would have indigenous people competing in these

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 5>Olympic events. Of course, they didn't teach them how to

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, do the events, so they didn't just automatically

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 5>know how to pull vault or throw a javelin or whatever.

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>And when supremacists can ruin anything, anything they put their

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>hands on, they really can't just turns to poop.

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we are doing an episode on flatulence later, so

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 2>stay tuned with you that there.

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>So before we give everything away, you guys, tell everyone

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>where they can find ridiculous history and win.

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 2>You can find ridiculous history at our website.

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 3>It's ridiculous History show.

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 5>I think so the website, guys definitely can't prepared for this.

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 3>I've got a stack of notes right here here, yeah.

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Rolling back.

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 2>So you can find us on Apple Podcast, you find

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 2>us on Spotify. You can find us wherever you find

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:12.919
<v Speaker 2>your favorite shows, like stuff you should know or stuff

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 2>they'll want you to know, or I should I list

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 2>the entire pantheon of all the shows we have. It's

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 2>too many at this point, but but yes, you can

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 2>find us in all of those places. We also have

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 2>a community page that we're really proud of and really

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 2>happy with, called Ridiculous Historians on Facebook.

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Taking a total cue from the cisk army. Yeah nice.

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, First of all, thank you for all of the

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>flattery that you've been heaping on us for the last

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>few minutes. It's much appreciated. But also thank you for

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>coming by. Appreciate it, guys.

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Thank you guys for having yes yank so much.

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's do this every week.

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 3>That might be a let me check the sketch.

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you, I love those guys, but I'm

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>glad to get out of that that new studio box.

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, it's like a Fema trailer man. It's formaldehyde

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 1>wafting off slowly poisoning us. It is still off gassing.

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>It feels like, yeah, big time. It's in my hair, yeah,

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>which is now falling out.

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 4>We're in bad shape. Well before, I like what you're wearing.

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 4>By the way, thank you.

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I spilled a tremendous amount of coffee on myself and

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>luckily I had a bunch of samples of our new

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>T shirt.

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and this is not a just to plug everyone.

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 6>Josh is literally wearing a Lewis the Child Skeptic T

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 6>shirt from the Stuff you Should Know store. Yeah, because

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 6>they sent us every shirt. I'm like, oh, great, to

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 6>the guy who has one hundred T shirts, here's twenty more.

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>But they are pretty cool. I'm pretty happy with.

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 4>This, Like, yeah, that's cool.

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 3>The size of it.

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Look at the size. It's a perfect size. It's not

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>so big that it wraps around and gets all mangled

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>by my love handles. But it's also not so small

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that it looks like, you know, a caved in chest.

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean.

0:07:57.600 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 4>I didn't remember that reference though.

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I didn't either like they listened to the Pie Piper episode.

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh there you go.

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 4>That sounds like a you thing, Yeah, Josh, But.

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>It was just an offhanded comment I made. Now it's

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a T shirt I'm wearing, which is I love. It

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>makes a pretty great time to be alive.

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 6>By the way, I need to give a shout out

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 6>to Brittany Schiff. Brittany Schiff sent this idea to us.

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 6>Oh okay, great, And the reason, you know, we don't

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 6>often take well that's not true. We kind of keep

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 6>a kitty of listener suggestions, but we don't often like

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 6>do one the next week and then shout out the person. Sure,

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 6>but I thought we had fully exhausted our Crime and

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 6>Punishment series.

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Nope.

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 6>So I was delighted that Brittany Shiff sent this in

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 6>and I was like, why haven't we done police line up?

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's a great question.

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 4>Was just sitting there, yeah, waiting.

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Yep. The only other one that's left is what kind

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of shoes detectives wear?

0:08:58.440 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 3>That is?

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the last one? You know what means is this? Yeah,

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that's gum shoe or crape sold I think.

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 4>You knew that, yeah, but I don't know how it

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 4>relates to cops.

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess they wore those because they were so comfortable.

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Cops are always walking around walking, yeah, you know, but

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>sometimes when they're walking, they're actually out on the street

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>looking for people who resemble a suspect that they have

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in the jailhouse. And they say, hey, you come on

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>over here, how'd you like to make ten bucks? And

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the person says exactly how copper and the cop says,

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>by standing in is what we call a filler in

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a police lineup.

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.559
<v Speaker 6>Or they do like Emer Simpson and when they're like

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 6>a boat raffle that they said he had to come

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 6>down to the police station.

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he won a boat. Yeah, and then they beat

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>him merciless for like parking unpaid parking tickets.

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 6>Also shout out to Beth at Shuster, who wrote this

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 6>article in the NIJ Journal the National Institute of Justice.

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe so, is that right? Yeah, they're pretty much

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>committed to keeping people from being wrongly convicted. So I

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>would guess the JAY stands for justice.

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and this is a good start. And we had

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 6>some other stuff we added to it. But thank you Ms. Schuster,

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 6>yeah for your work.

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Yep. Well, I already led into the episode and it

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't take, So let me try again. This nij article

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you sent calls out a dude named Jerry Miller, who

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>back in nineteen eighty one was twenty two years old,

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe, and Jerry Miller had a particularly bad day

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>when he was arrested and he was charged with robbing, kidnapping,

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and raping a woman. Yeah, and he got convicted. He

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>was convicted because two people, two eyewitnesses, saw him in

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 1>a lineup picked him out, and then later at trial

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the victim said, maybe that's him, maybe it's not, but

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>who cares. There's two eyewitnesses that picked the schmoe out

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of a lineup. He's done. Yeah, he did twenty four

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>years in prison. And you may notice from the tone

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that I'm using here he was wrongfully convicted.

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>He actually got out of prison and was living life

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>for leased on parole, wearing an ankle bracelet, a monitor constantly.

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 4>As a registered sex offender.

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Right, and then finally I think, oh, I'm not quite sure. Oh,

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and seven. In two thousand and seven, as

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>part of the Innocence Project, Yeah, which we've done an

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>episode on with.

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that lady what is her name?

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh, Hauleen.

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to say Laurville, but it's definitely not

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 4>Paula is on.

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Paula is on.

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, Jerry.

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wanted to say Pauli Shore so bad. I

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>just knew it was wrong. But we did Incent right,

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we did it Innocence Project episode And under the Innocence Project,

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Miller was exonerated through DNA evidence. He incontrovertibly did

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>not do this and lost twenty four years of his

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>life because of flawed eyewitness testimony.

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and so you know, this is all about police

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 6>lineups and more about I mean, we'll tell you how

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 6>they work in a general sense, but this is sort

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 6>of more about how you know, it's such an imperfect system.

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 6>But sort of the takeaway from all of this that

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 6>we're about to go over with all the studies and

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 6>the trying different things, is kind of like, you know,

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 6>it's an imperfect system and we can try and craft

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 6>it the best way we can, but human memory is imperfect.

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 6>Identifying people in lineups is imperfect, right, and we're just

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 6>it's kind of the best we got right now.

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, a lot of people are like, get rid

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of eyewitness testimony really all together, yes, all together. Humans

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>suck at eyewitness testimony. And there's a lot of reasons

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>why it's not like people are out there like I

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>want to have me a bad guy, show me a lineup.

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:11.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna pick one of those guys out. They're not

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>doing that. They're subject to basically the way our brains

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:21.359
<v Speaker 1>are wired. We don't walk around videotaping everything that we see,

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we get constantly bombarded with sensory information, and

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 1>under normal circumstances, you see a stranger on the street,

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you just see there's another human. I've identified them as

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>not a threat and keep walking by it. If that

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>person turned out to be accused of a crime or

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>perpetrated a crime, and you were brought in to say

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>was this the person you saw? Your brain is going

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to try to reconstruct what little pieces of memory it

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>formed of that person. And there's a lot of things,

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of factors that are involved that can make

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that really difficult task even harder.

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Like I am someone who has told myself Chuck

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 6>pay attention. Like, if you're ever in a situation like

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 6>pay attention, try and collect yourself and try and remember

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.439
<v Speaker 6>a few really good details about the car or the person.

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 4>So like this is on my mind.

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 6>And I actually had a situation when I lived in

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 6>LA happened to me where I had to go through

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 6>a police lineup and I failed.

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh really, was the suspect there?

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 6>Well no, here's here's the quick version. Is I was

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 6>in a hit and run. This lady, these two lady,

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 6>these two younger girls, they were probably teenagers, hit me

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 6>from behind.

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 4>In my car.

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 6>I stopped my car starting to get out, and they

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 6>take off, so it's a hit and run. I chase them,

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 6>which is you should not do.

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>No. Were you shooting into the air again to slow down,

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to shoot out their tires?

0:14:58.000 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:14:58.240 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 6>But I did chase them because I was so mad

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 6>and you're adrenaline just shoots through the roof when something

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 6>like that happens, so immediately you're just not yourself and

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 6>like recording details. So I was trying to catch up

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 6>to get a license plate. I saw that they went

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 6>down the street that I knew was a dead end.

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Like I got them now.

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 6>It wasn't a cul de sac, but it functioned like

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 6>a cul de sac. So I stopped where I was

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 6>got out of the car. Sure enough, twenty seconds later,

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 6>they come houling but back toward me, and the look

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 6>on their faces was like you know, oh, snap, there's

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 6>the guy. And they just sped right past me. And

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 6>I saw their faces as they sped past me in

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 6>their car. The cops found the car, found the people,

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 6>and they're like, we didn't do that, and so.

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Who are these girls? These teenagers?

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 4>Well that's the long and short of it. Is all

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 4>you have to do and something like that.

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 6>I say, didn't do it, and if I can't pick

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 6>you out, then you get away.

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 4>And they showed me pictures.

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 6>Of like, you know, these were like teenage young teenage

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 6>Hispanic women. They showed me probably probably fifteen pictures and

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 6>said can you identify them? I was like no, it

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 6>was a month ago. They sped past me for a second,

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 6>like I couldn't even hazard a guess, and I didn't

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 6>want to do that.

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, well that's very sensible of you.

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I just didn't want to take a stab at it.

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 6>So I was like, no, I have no idea, and

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 6>they're basically like sorry, They said they didn't do it.

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 4>It's like, but you have the car.

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 6>And it's damaged, and like none of that matters. They're like, no,

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 6>not if you can't identify.

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I could see that. They could be like, oh, yeah,

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that happened some other times, I know, and some other

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>hit and run.

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, but yeah.

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 6>The long story short though, is I'm someone who has

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 6>tried to tell myself to react in the right ways,

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 6>and I couldn't tell them much beyond like the color

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 6>of the car and sort of what it looked.

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 3>Like because you were seeing red.

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Because you're right, that's that our bodies are not prime

0:16:56.680 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to form memories. It's not where our energy. It's more

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>like getting away or shooting out the tires of a

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>car that just hit and ran. Right, But what you

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>did with that lineup is the other side of the coin.

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 1>The other problem with lineups is or eyewitness testimony from lineups,

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is that sometimes people pick out people who are innocent,

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and other times people fail to pick out the people

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>who are actually the perpetrators.

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's like you said, they're very They're very flawed.

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a flawed system. The problem is is the wrong

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>people can go to jail and the people who actually

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:36.719
<v Speaker 1>did it can get away with it. So that's an

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>extremely flawed system. And when something that important is on

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the table, then it needs to be fixed. And there's

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people looking into how it can be fixed,

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>but we're not there yet by any stretch.

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 6>No, And here's a stat you were talking about the

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 6>DNA exoneration, seventy five percent of the first one and

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 6>eighty three exonerations in the US were wrongfully convicted because

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 6>of eyewitness testimony and police lineups.

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 4>Say it again, seventy.

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Five seventy five percent of the first one hundred and

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.719
<v Speaker 1>eighty three. So, like, the Innocence Project is basically like

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 1>a pilot study to show through DNA exoneration all the

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>ways that we wrongfully convict people. And what is coming

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to the front is eyewitness testimony.

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and at the basis of that is the police lineup, right.

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And one other thing that's that's problematic with the eyewitness

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>testimony is if you want to wow a jury, bring

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>out an eyewitness who seems totally sure that what they

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 1>saw or that they saw the person they're pointing to

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and the defendants.

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 6>Table yeah, or that that dramatic moment it's like a

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 6>movie trope. Now, you know, is the person in this room.

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, Let the record show that this witness is pointing

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>at the defendant, right.

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>So the problem is it has a huge impact, but

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it's also so really cruddy wit, really cruddy evidence. There's

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this guy he he had a great quote.

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 3>He says that.

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Eyewitness testimony is a very unusual, complex kind of trace evidence,

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's difficult to recover, easy to contaminate, and very

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>hard to handle. Yeah, and that just there's no better

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:22.959
<v Speaker 1>description of eyewitness testimony.

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 6>If I was ever in court and someone identified me

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 6>from the witness stand, I would do that thing where

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 6>you look at behind you when they pointed at you,

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 6>just be like, I think they're talking about that guy

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 6>behind me, and they would say no, and they would

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 6>point again, and I would move a little bit more and.

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Be like, this is this witness is clearly disturbed.

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 1>And then if that, if that didn't work, you would

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>escalate to I'm rubber and you're glued.

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that usually works, right.

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>So there's a couple of other things that makes eyewitness

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:58.919
<v Speaker 1>testimony problematic, Chuck. In addition to not being like human

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>video recorders.

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 4>There are human vs.

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:07.439
<v Speaker 1>There are. There are circumstances, especially surrounding a crime, that

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>can make it really difficult to remember. If you're in

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a fight or flight situation, yeah, you're not forming memories.

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>If there's a weapon, there are people tend to focus

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>on the weapon.

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Sure you.

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Me was mugged once and the opposite happened to her.

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>She remember what the person looked like, but she didn't

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>even remember that there was a weapon. And her friends

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>are like, yeah, there was a gun. Interesting, Yeah, and

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>she went to a lineup and like picked the guy

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>out and yummy's bulletproof, so she is, So she's like,

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>take your gun and shove it. I'm not even going

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to recognize it.

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 4>No, but that makes sense.

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 6>If someone pulls a gun on you, or has a

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 6>switchblade or some other kind of creepy weapon, the human

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 6>instinct is to focus your attention on that thing pointed

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 6>at you.

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and apparently people can really describe the weapon, right,

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>But you're focusing on the weapon. You're not focused on

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the person who is holding the weapon typically.

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 4>Which helps a little bit, but not as much as

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 4>the face.

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Right. And then another problem is if you are say

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>an Hispanic dude, and you're a witness to a crime,

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's a white guy who's the perpetrator, You're going

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to have a tremendous amount of difficulty picking that white

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>guy out, as sad as it is to say, from

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a lineup of other white guys. Yeah, because eyewitness testimony

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that crosses race or ethnicities is known to be very

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>unreliable because it's just more difficult for somebody of an

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>ethnicity or a race to separate or identify people of

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>another ethnicity or race.

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and I don't think it's the case where people

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 6>are like, all white people look the same to me,

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:49.199
<v Speaker 6>it's just weird brain science, right, you know, right, you

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 6>just have a harder time.

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>From way back when we were basically tuktook and Tuktok

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>lived with fifteen other people that look just like him

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>because they'd all been inbreeding for generations and generations, and

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>they had to be on the lookout for another group

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of people who've been inbreeding for generations and generations that

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted their jackfruit tree that they live by.

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 4>What's jack fruit? Oh?

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>That word jack fruits, the big huge thing, the big

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>huge one. Yeah, it actually makes a killer barbecue vehicle.

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Uhreded like shredded pork vegan stand in.

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 4>Oh okay, it's really good. Gotcha, gotcha?

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 6>All right, let's take a break and we'll talk about

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 6>the fundamentals of the run of the mill police lineup.

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 4>Right after this.

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 6>All right, so, run of the mill police lineups. I

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 6>mentioned that before we left. Everyone's seen movies and TV shows,

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 6>and it's not too far off. Actually, I mean, there

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 6>are a couple of ways you can do it. There

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 6>are lineups where you'd look at someone in front of

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 6>your face, and then there are lineups like I had

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 6>in La where I look at photographs the ones. You know,

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 6>it's way more sexy for a TV show or a

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 6>movie to line them up in the traditional.

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:25.199
<v Speaker 1>Way, right, it's extraordinarily sexy, like a live police lineup

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>like you see on TV.

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:30.439
<v Speaker 6>Sure, and then they're the simultaneous or sequential. There's a

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 6>lot of debate, which we'll get into in a minute,

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 6>about which is best. To me, it's pretty obvious that

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 6>sequential is best. Simultaneous is the one that you see

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 6>on TV. They line up six or seven dudes or

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 6>ladies and you identify them usually, well, it depends. We'll

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 6>get into the fillers or the foils, but only usually

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 6>only one of those people is a suspect.

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>In like the best ideal version of it.

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 6>Then there's sequential, and that's when they bring out one

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 6>person at a time and bring out like seven guys,

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 6>just one at a time, and you say, you know,

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 6>let me know at the end of this which one

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 6>you think it was, or.

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 3>If it's a photo lineup, they show you one photo

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 3>at a time.

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:08.360
<v Speaker 4>Exactly.

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree with you. I think sequential is head

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and shoulders the better one of the of the two.

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 6>And here's the final little piece of how it can

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 6>vary is whether or not the administrator, that the person

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 6>that's in charge of administrating the lineup knows who the

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 6>purp is or not.

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a big one, man.

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 6>So it's either double blind, which means that they don't

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 6>even know. And to me, it seems obvious that that's

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 6>always the best way, because there are many many circumstances

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.719
<v Speaker 6>where you would actually even if you don't want to

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 6>or mean to lead a witness. And one example they

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 6>gave here in this article is if they say, and

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 6>if they identify a filler or a foil aka a

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 6>person that was paid ten bucks say that's the person.

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 6>The administrator might.

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 4>Say take your time, Yeah, are you sure like you

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 4>really need to take.

0:24:58.040 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Your time, which is basically like saying row.

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 4>Pretty much, they just.

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Or conversely, if when they're doing it sequentially, when they

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>get to like number four, they're like, whoa, get a

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>load of this guy. Huh geez, look at that bag character.

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 4>He's guilty of something.

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>But they can't like even just a smile or something

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>like that.

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 4>Off like a nonverbal que you don't even mean to.

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Do, right, or you may mean to do because you

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>know that that's the guy, and you know it in

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.679
<v Speaker 1>your bones that that guy did it, and you're leading

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>the witness, right, it can be some some sort of

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:39.119
<v Speaker 1>nonverbal gesture. The problem is is that most people, I

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>can't say most people, but it's been shown that some people,

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>when they're brought in as a witness for a police lineup,

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's their role. It's their job to pick

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>somebody for the cops. So they're more than happy to

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>be led by the cops because then they're fulfilling their

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>role and they did what they were supposed to do.

0:25:56.880 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So another another technique or way to administer a good

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>lineup is to say, here, here's the lineup, whether it's sequential,

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>one at a time or.

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:10.440
<v Speaker 4>All at once simultaneous.

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Yet right, the suspect may or may not be in

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 1>this lineup.

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that seems like I think they found that reduced

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 6>mistaken identity rates were lower when they did this, So

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 6>you would think just always do that right, right.

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Because it says to the witness like the person may

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>not be in here. It's like a none of the above,

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the dreaded letter e none of the above. You're like,

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>oh God, does that? Does that mean that they're that

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>the answer is not here? And so you may you

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>may say I don't I don't see them where. If

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>they don't say that, you're going to presume that the

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>suspect is in that lineup, right, and it's your job

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to find that person and you have to pick somebody. Yeah,

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 1>most people aren't going to think like, I can't say so,

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not going to They're gonna be like three.

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Well, first of all, it's a crime against you

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 6>most a lot of times when you're like picking out

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 6>this purp.

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Sure.

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so you want them to be you know, found

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 6>or whatever.

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a really good point too.

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 6>You want you don't want them to get away with it.

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 6>And the other thing too, is I think there's a

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 6>natural human instinct when given a test to not want

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 6>to say I can't like you might feel like you

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 6>have failed.

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Right. That's why I admire you saying that, like with

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>the phone lineup, you know, not not being not just

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>being like.

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 4>This these two right.

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, But if it that wouldn't matter to my case,

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 6>because if I would have said these two and if

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 6>they're like, na, that's not the lady whose car it was.

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 3>But a lot of people still would have right, right, right,

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 3>And they probably.

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't say no, that's wrong. They would have been like, Okay,

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks a lot for your time or whatever, and then

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you would have left and they'd.

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Been like, god, he was so close.

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 6>Some other research, it's interesting that suggests when there is

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 6>a defender in the lineup that young children and elderly

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 6>perform about as well as just regularly young adults. But

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 6>when the lineup does not have the actual offender, then

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 6>they commit mistakes a lot higher. And to me, that's

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 6>just because I think kids and elderly might not fully understand.

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 4>I think they have to pick.

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Somebody, Okay, yeah, I agree. I think that's exactly what

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it is too.

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 4>But the research bears that out. It looks like.

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, So there's there is some like you talked about research,

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of research in this, but it's become ambiguous.

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Right If you step back and you listen to all

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of the different different things that you can do with

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a lineup, it becomes very clear that a sequential double

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>blind lineup where either one photo of a suspect is

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>shown to the person at a time, or one live

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>suspect is brought out to be looked at one person

0:28:56.240 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 1>at a time, yeah, and is administered by a cop

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>or a worker or somebody who doesn't know who the

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 1>suspect is. That that's going to reduce the chance of

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a misidentification or a failure of an identification, and that

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the person who's being presented with these people is not

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to guess and if they actually

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>do remember who the perpetrator was, they're going to recognize them.

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just obvious that that's the best way to do it, right.

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>The thing is is there was a study in Illinois

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that just completely rocked that idea that that's the case,

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>because there was a three or five year study in

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Illinois that looked at different types of lineups and compared

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>them side by side and found that actually know that

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a double blind sequential lineup actually produces worse results than

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a simultaneous, non double blind one.

0:29:58.920 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 6>But and then again not so fast with that, because

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 6>other people since then have questioned the methodology they used

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 6>in that program and kind of said, you know, I

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 6>don't even know if we can take this research and

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 6>take these statistics seriously.

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, because methodologically it was a screwed up study, Like

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>they really dropped the ball on the study.

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, And I don't think we mentioned the two judgments either.

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 6>During simultaneous lineups, when everyone's standing there together, use what's

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 6>called relative judgment. In other words, you compare all the

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 6>dudes standing up there against one another, and with the

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 6>ones where they trot them out one at a time,

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 6>they use something called absolute judgment, which is supposedly means

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 6>that they're comparing it to only their memory and not

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 6>to the people that came before or after.

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Right, that's the hope, that's the ideal, right.

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 6>Right, But with this reasearch in research and the study,

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 6>I kind of didn't even know what to think because

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 6>it sort of went against the grain and the findings.

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 6>But then they said, I don't even know if we

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 6>can trust these findings because the methodology was no good, right,

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 6>So we ended up sort of back at square one

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 6>with the Illinois pilot program.

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>It seems like, yeah, the reason why the method methodology

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>was so terrible. They used the double blind procedure for

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>sequential lineups, but they didn't use it for simultaneous lineups.

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>So if cops were advertently or inadvertently leading people with

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>simultaneous lineups, then of course those are going to produce

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>correct choices with suspects better than the one that's a

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>double blind sequential one. They compared apples to oranges in

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>this study. It's almost like a sixth grader came up

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>with how to actually conduct this study that the Illinois

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>legislature said, Illinois State Police, go go figure this out.

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Do a three year study on this, and they came

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>back and said, huh yeah, and it was. It's terrible.

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>And the problem is is if it is true that

0:31:59.880 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a sequential double blind study is the way to go,

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that it is just smarter and works better, that study

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>set that back by years because now all the cops

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>all over the country heardh they did the study and

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it's actually worse not and the design of the study

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>was flawed methodologically, just it doesn't work.

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 6>They even went to the cops at the Illinois pilot program,

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 6>talked to them, and they said the majority of the

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 6>officers said they didn't think that it was superior and

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 6>said that witnesses who can identify the offender can do

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 6>so under either procedure, and officers express concerns that using

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 6>a blind administrator disrupts the relationship an investigator has tries

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 6>to build with a witness. So I interpret all that

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 6>as it's cops saying, can we just keep doing it

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 6>the way we've always done it?

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because it gets results right. But the thing is

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is they have some pretty good points in that if

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you are running a lineup or whatever, you put together

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>like a six pack is what it's called in the US,

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>where you've got three and three mugshots of people and

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>or I think in Canada they usually use twelve. But

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you put this thing together, then you have to find

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>like a patrol officer or a sergeant or somebody who

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>has no idea what's going on with your kids?

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 4>You want to do a double blind, right.

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>And then those that person has to go to the house,

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 1>record the the what the person did, and then come

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.959
<v Speaker 1>back and tell you. It's just an extra thing that

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>cops are like, come on, dude, this is just making

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it way too hard.

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. I mean they said in here that sometimes they

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 6>even have trouble coming up with the blind administrator, and

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 6>maybe it's a It probably has everything to do with budgets.

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 6>My thought is like, why isn't there one person that

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 6>does only this.

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that's a great question.

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 4>That just is called the administrator.

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 6>Right, and then so the line of administrator and goes

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 6>to the people's houses or runs them in the precinct

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 6>or whatever, and this is the only thing that they do, right,

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 6>I'll do.

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>It, bring in the administrator.

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's a TV show waiting to have it. Sure, Yeah,

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. It's probably budgetary.

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Its got to be.

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:17.439
<v Speaker 6>They also found with a lot of these when there's

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 6>multiple purpse, it just goes haywire. Yeah, because sometimes they'll

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 6>put two of the purpose in the same lineup right, right,

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 6>just super confusing.

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>That actually falls in line with like how to build

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 1>like a decent line up the right way and we'll

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>cover that and where they get people to stand in

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 1>as suspects right after this. All right, Chuck, So you

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>were just talking about how if you have lineup and

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you put two suspects that you've got, say, there are

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>two guys who rob some lady, and you have five

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>people in the lineup, but two of them are your suspects.

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:18.359
<v Speaker 1>That actually is totally unfair for the suspects because what

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you've done just then is increase the chance that somebody

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:27.839
<v Speaker 1>could guess, just guess randomly at the suspect. Right.

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, If you have five.

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:32.240
<v Speaker 1>People in a lineup and one of them are the suspect,

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>then that person has a one in five chance of

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.879
<v Speaker 1>being chosen by random chance. But if there's two suspects

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>in a five person lineup, they have a two out

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 1>of five chance, which is way more than a one

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in five chance. Some people might even say double the chance, right,

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 1>And so it's just less fair. So one of the

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.280
<v Speaker 1>standards that you want to fulfill if you're putting together

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a lineup in your cop is that you have one

0:35:56.280 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>suspect per lineup, which is tougher to do than you

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 1>would think.

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and it seems like a lot of The problem

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:06.800
<v Speaker 6>with this is, and they even say so in the

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 6>NIJ articles, that lab studies are one thing, but actually

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 6>implementing this in the field they get different results. And

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 6>people are doing lab research on one end, cops are

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.280
<v Speaker 6>out in the field, sometimes they're in people's home, sometimes

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:23.439
<v Speaker 6>they're in the precinct. And it seems like the two

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 6>heads aren't talking very much, right, And there are people,

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:28.919
<v Speaker 6>you know, they did like a live web chat at

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 6>some point to bring together all these experts from around

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:33.839
<v Speaker 6>the world, and they kind of all around me were like,

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 6>this is a big mess and we need to all

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 6>combine forces to try and do the right thing. And

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 6>the feeling I get is that a lot of these

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 6>police precincts just kind of want to be left alone.

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I mean, they know what works, and it works,

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, but does it well, that's the question.

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 4>Right. So they fingered a collar, right, is that the.

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Right the gumsh you finger to call it?

0:36:56.360 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, then it's all in a good day's work. They

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:04.479
<v Speaker 6>finger the wrong collar, then it's no good.

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>It's still all in. So one of the reasons it's

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that somebody cop would put a two suspects in a lineup.

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:15.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not just to increase the chances that one of

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 1>those suspects gets picked by an eyewitness. It's because sometimes

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 1>it can be hard to come up with people for

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a lineup.

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:23.839
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, this was hard to believe, Like, just they can't

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:25.320
<v Speaker 6>find people sometimes.

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, and the reason why is because let's say

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:32.319
<v Speaker 1>you have multiple witnesses, and each witness gives you a

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 1>different description of the perpetrator, right, right, Ideally you're going

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to find a different lineup for each witness.

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Like, if there's three witnesses, you should run three lineups, right,

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:52.240
<v Speaker 6>because their descriptions are probably somewhat different.

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Right. That can be difficult, right, And there's a couple

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:57.319
<v Speaker 1>of ways to handle a lineup. You can do a

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>suspect matched lineup, where you've got a suspect and to

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 1>keep your suspect from standing out, you make all the

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:11.320
<v Speaker 1>other people in the lineup look like you know your suspect. Yeah,

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that's one way to do it. Another is to do

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the perpetrator description match strategy, which is you've got.

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 4>And that's when you have no suspect, right, just witness accounts.

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:25.840
<v Speaker 1>You can have a suspect, but you're creating your lineup

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 1>based on what the what the witness has described the perpetrator.

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 4>To look like, and then just throw the suspect in there, right.

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Which can be bad for the suspect because if the suspect,

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the person you actually think did it, doesn't look anything

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 1>like the eyewitness said. There's going to be four redheads

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and the one blonde guy who's actually the suspect, and

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 1>he's going to stand out like a sore throum. So

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of different things that have to be

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 1>massaged here to try to make everybody in the lineup

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>basically look all like the perpetrator, yeah the eyewitness described,

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>or all like the suspect that you've got, because you

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:00.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want the suspect to stand out. And there's a

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:02.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of techniques that they use to try to make

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:03.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody look the same.

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:04.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 6>One of the I mean they like you said they

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 6>dressed people. It was funny that one article said in

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 6>the Bronx precinct, they usually.

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 4>Put them in Yankees hats. Right, Just line up a

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:15.879
<v Speaker 4>bunch of guys in Yankees right.

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 1>That means that they have like five Yankees hats hanging

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>outside of the you know that room where they.

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:22.799
<v Speaker 6>Walk them into wasn' Kramer in a lineup when he

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 6>was a suspect, a totally serial killer suspect.

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I don't remember it was a serial killer, but

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I remember he was in the line I he kept

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:31.479
<v Speaker 1>turning the wrong way.

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think he was misidentified on the when they

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 6>went to LA to pitch the TV show. Huh, Kramer

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 6>got caught up in some like serial killer things. I

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 6>think of that, and I think of the great lineup

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 6>scene in the Usual Suspects.

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's address that real quick.

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:49.399
<v Speaker 6>When they have to say something so well, we can't

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:50.760
<v Speaker 6>repeat it here because there's bad words.

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Right. No, what I was going to say is that

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that lineup would never happen because not only do you

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>have two suspects in there, all five people in the

0:39:59.080 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 1>lineup are your.

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 4>And they're not dressed the same.

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's it's a total movie lineup.

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 1>It would never happen. No, Or are you going to

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 1>say about them saying something.

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 6>Well, they had to recite a line. I don't know

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 6>how typical that is, though.

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:12.719
<v Speaker 3>Uh, you me.

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>When she did her line up, she remembered what the

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:16.720
<v Speaker 1>guy was saying.

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:19.720
<v Speaker 4>Oh, and they say that, okay, so that's the thing.

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 1>And she was like, wait a minute, can I do

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 1>they have to say whatever I say they said? And

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the cop was like yeah, and she's like, really, what

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 1>I want him to say? Yeah, he's like, no, you

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:30.400
<v Speaker 1>have to say what they actually said.

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:33.799
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, how did that result? Did she get the guy?

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh? She picked him out immediately? Oh okay, yeah, yeah,

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I got busted.

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 4>Nice.

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, man, you don't mug you me. I'll tell you that, buddy.

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 4>You hear that, purpose.

0:40:42.880 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 1>Right, you started quaking in your boots.

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 6>The one thing too, that caught me, uh sort of

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 6>off guard, is that I never thought about is the uh,

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 6>the part about whether or not they're clean shaven, Like

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 6>there could be details of omission, Like if an eyewitness

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 6>doesn't remember or doesn't mention that they either were clean

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 6>shaven or not, then I think they default to something

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 6>that may not be accurate. And so all of a sudden,

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:12.880
<v Speaker 6>your lineup, well, your lineup should have all clean shaven dudes.

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:15.239
<v Speaker 1>You should just assume that if they didn't say the

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>guy had a beard, that that doesn't that that doesn't

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:20.360
<v Speaker 1>mean that the guy had a beard and they just

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:22.279
<v Speaker 1>didn't say it. You should just assume it means that

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>they're clean shaven.

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 6>And they should all be clean shaven in a lineup,

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:28.399
<v Speaker 6>because if you have five clean shaven guys in one

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 6>filler or one foil with a big beard like.

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 4>Me, right, I might get picked out just because I

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 4>look different.

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:34.759
<v Speaker 3>Right exactly?

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Or if the one guy's clean shaven, and you're like, well,

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>they didn't say that the person had a beard, but

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 1>they also didn't say they didn't have a beard, right,

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:46.120
<v Speaker 1>so I can put this clean shaven suspect in with

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 1>four other guys who all have beards and make them

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>stand out. That's the opposite. And apparently there was this

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.240
<v Speaker 1>New York Times article from years back about a guy

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>named that dude, what was his.

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 4>Name, casting agent, basically Robert Weston.

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Robert or western It's it's a pretty interesting little article.

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:07.320
<v Speaker 1>But in the article it says that the Bronx cops

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:09.319
<v Speaker 1>that use this guy to help fill lineups, which we'll

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:12.879
<v Speaker 1>talk about in a second, that that when they give

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the perpetrators like the Yankees hats or whatever for the lineup,

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>like the perpetrator is always the one who pulls it

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>down over his eyes, and they have to be like, dude,

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>see how everybody else to wear in their hat makes

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:26.239
<v Speaker 1>us exactly like that, or else they're going to pick

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you out. So they actually are trying to help the

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 1>perpetrator at least not stand up and be like me,

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:36.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, and instead just keep it on the on

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:39.879
<v Speaker 1>the level, at least as far as the Yankees hat

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:40.480
<v Speaker 1>brooms go.

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 4>I so want to be a filler.

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you could do it. I want you just

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 1>have to hang around long enough until a dude who

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 1>looks like you commits a crime, which in Atlanta's a

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of hipsters running around. For sure.

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:53.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't look like a hipster.

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I.

0:42:56.360 --> 0:42:58.879
<v Speaker 4>Look like it the hipster gone bad.

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, need enough to be h. You look like

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a hit and run hipster.

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:05.279
<v Speaker 4>Hipsters are super well coffed and like squared away.

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:07.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh I know it to me, you know, Yeah, your

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 1>jeenes aren't pegged.

0:43:09.320 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 4>No, I look like a hipster who slept in.

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:15.359
<v Speaker 6>So back to Robert Weston, this guy in New York

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:18.359
<v Speaker 6>at the time, at least, I can't believe how little

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:21.400
<v Speaker 6>money he made. He only got ten dollars for putting

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 6>together a complete lineup. Yeah, and they said sometimes he

0:43:25.200 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 6>does as many as four in a day, and sometimes

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 6>not at all.

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, so a good day for him is forty bucks,

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 4>that's what it sounds like. Man, Maybe that's the problem

0:43:34.000 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 4>is they need to Well again, it's budgetary. Probably it's

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 4>going to say pay a little bit more, get a

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:40.560
<v Speaker 4>casting agent in there, get.

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Some of those college educated fillers in there, right.

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 4>I guess.

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:47.880
<v Speaker 6>And also it made it sound like, I don't know,

0:43:47.920 --> 0:43:50.319
<v Speaker 6>he's kind of pulling people off the street. Sometimes they're

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:54.319
<v Speaker 6>homeless people. Sometimes they're like drug addicts. Well yeah, I

0:43:54.320 --> 0:43:57.279
<v Speaker 6>mean I guess it depends on who the purp is.

0:43:57.719 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 6>Sometimes they get other cops that are busy to stand in.

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, I mean, these are people need people will go

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to a police station and stand in the lineup for

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:07.280
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars.

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 4>Right, They get paid as much as the guy who

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:10.080
<v Speaker 4>organized the party.

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, But if Robert Weston stands in himself, he'll get

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>an extra twenty bucks on top of putting the thing together.

0:44:16.239 --> 0:44:16.399
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 4>How many times he tries to do that.

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 1>But he even said, like if they want white guys,

0:44:21.200 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know any white guys. So they go to

0:44:23.080 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 1>homeless shelters for that. And that's very much what cops do.

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Cops will go find people on the street. They will

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:32.360
<v Speaker 1>go to homeless shelters. They will have casting agents like

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Robert Weston on their speed dial, and what they'll say is,

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I've got a middle aged white guy with a graying

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>beard and he's about six feet tall. Give me four

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:53.200
<v Speaker 1>other people that match that description, and ideally four other

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>people that match that description will show up, and not

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 1>three and then one another total outlier or something like that.

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 6>One cop was complaining about his work. It was kind

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:04.719
<v Speaker 6>of funny, right, complaining about Robert Wesson. He was like,

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 6>he didn't bring in good people. He always like right.

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:09.840
<v Speaker 4>Budges, the ages and the races and stuff.

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 1>But the reason why they keep using this guy is

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:15.520
<v Speaker 1>because he answers his phone, doesn't matter what time you

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:17.920
<v Speaker 1>call him. He can put a lineup together for you.

0:45:18.000 --> 0:45:19.959
<v Speaker 1>And if you have a very limited amount of time,

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you can only hold a suspect for so long without

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 1>charging them, but you want to put them in a

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 1>lineup for what's called an investigatory lineup, to where you

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:31.360
<v Speaker 1>just want to see maybe bringing one witness just to

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 1>see if you're on the right track. You've got a

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 1>very limited amount of time and you need people like that,

0:45:36.440 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 1>which means that you may have a lower quality one. Yeah,

0:45:39.120 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 1>fortunately that would just be for an investigatory one. If

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it were for a confirmatory one, that's the one that

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:47.319
<v Speaker 1>you see on TV where it's like you bring in

0:45:47.360 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a witness and you've got your suspect and they're sitting

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in jail, and you bring them out. That is the

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 1>one where like, all the t should be crossed and

0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:58.959
<v Speaker 1>the eyes should be dotted, because a good court will

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:01.879
<v Speaker 1>here and we'll want to know the details of how

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:05.439
<v Speaker 1>that lineup went, and if anything sounds hinky, they'll toss

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that lineup right out, that eyewitness testimony out.

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 6>The worst possible version of all of this is something

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:14.840
<v Speaker 6>called a show up. And this is something this is

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:17.319
<v Speaker 6>also a movie trope that you see, and that's when

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:20.919
<v Speaker 6>an officer brings a witness to a place to show

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:25.359
<v Speaker 6>the witness the suspect that's been apprehended. So like they're

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:28.440
<v Speaker 6>in the back of a car, or here's what happens

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:30.319
<v Speaker 6>in the movie. There's a guy in the back of

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 6>a police car handcuffed. They'll bring the person who was

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:37.319
<v Speaker 6>robbed or whatever they're to the scene. They'll yank him

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 6>out of the back of the car and say, is

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:41.160
<v Speaker 6>this the dirt bag who did it?

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 4>Like just one guy.

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:45.839
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and that's clearly the worst possible version of.

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 4>All of this.

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And the guy's like, I need more pace, a pay,

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm coming down. So one of the here's the reason

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 1>why that show up is so terrible, Chuck.

0:46:55.120 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's no other people that they're comparing them to.

0:46:57.400 --> 0:47:00.520
<v Speaker 1>That's one. But they're also in handcuffs, in the back

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of a cop car or something like that. They're in

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:06.120
<v Speaker 1>place custody, and so the eyewitness is going to assume that,

0:47:06.239 --> 0:47:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in addition to their testimony, the cops obviously have something

0:47:09.600 --> 0:47:12.400
<v Speaker 1>on this person, and so that must mean that the

0:47:12.440 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 1>cops know it's that person, and this is just a formality,

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:17.000
<v Speaker 1>so I'll be like, yeah, sure, that was that person.

0:47:17.719 --> 0:47:20.279
<v Speaker 1>That's the first problem with it. The second problem is

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is that from that point on, that person that they've

0:47:23.680 --> 0:47:28.160
<v Speaker 1>just seen now becomes the star of their memory of

0:47:28.200 --> 0:47:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that crime. It's like they photoshop this person's face into

0:47:33.360 --> 0:47:36.239
<v Speaker 1>that vague, shadowy face that's holding the gun that they

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>were actually focused on, and from that moment on they

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:42.840
<v Speaker 1>just get more and more certain that that was the

0:47:42.920 --> 0:47:46.200
<v Speaker 1>person because that person's not starring in their memories and

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not just the problem with the show up, but

0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 1>with any misidentification. When they see that person and that

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:56.239
<v Speaker 1>person becomes seared in their brain, they're positive from that

0:47:56.320 --> 0:47:58.759
<v Speaker 1>point on and they can seem very confident in court,

0:47:58.800 --> 0:48:02.240
<v Speaker 1>which again he's buy even though it's garbage.

0:48:02.320 --> 0:48:06.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, in weeks and months can go by, right between

0:48:06.280 --> 0:48:09.480
<v Speaker 4>the point that you have experienced a crime and when

0:48:09.520 --> 0:48:12.399
<v Speaker 4>you may be identifying someone or a court for sure

0:48:12.440 --> 0:48:16.799
<v Speaker 4>as months and months and months later. So man, part

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 4>of me does think, like, get rid of all this.

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:21.120
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people say that, or at the very

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:25.120
<v Speaker 1>least say this is eyewitness testimony. It's actually terrible testimony.

0:48:25.239 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Actually it's terrible evidence.

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 4>But let's do it anyway.

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Right. But and if they did say that, if they

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 1>basically lowered what how much weight eyewitness testimony held in court,

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:40.279
<v Speaker 1>then those cases that were built entirely on eyewitness testimony

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:42.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have a leg to stand on it. They have

0:48:42.120 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to go build a bigger case.

0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:47.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, But like in Yumi's case, it worked, it did. No,

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:50.000
<v Speaker 6>it was like that guy might have walked, you know, right, That's.

0:48:49.800 --> 0:48:54.160
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that, you know, if if twenty five

0:48:54.160 --> 0:48:56.880
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time is wrong, right, seventy five percent

0:48:56.920 --> 0:48:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of the time, is right, we think. So, I mean

0:48:59.560 --> 0:49:03.239
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's not like Arson investigation, which we're going

0:49:03.280 --> 0:49:05.200
<v Speaker 1>to do one on one day, Yeah, where it's just

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:08.120
<v Speaker 1>totally made up. Like it does have some veracity, but

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:09.959
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of flaws with it, and.

0:49:09.880 --> 0:49:12.680
<v Speaker 4>The lives are at stake though it's really dicey.

0:49:12.840 --> 0:49:16.120
<v Speaker 1>They need to figure it out because of that. Yeah,

0:49:16.480 --> 0:49:17.879
<v Speaker 1>so they need to go do that now.

0:49:18.200 --> 0:49:21.960
<v Speaker 6>I mean, can you imagine anything worse than being misidentified

0:49:22.000 --> 0:49:25.759
<v Speaker 6>and serving no, two decades in prison for something you

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 6>really didn't do?

0:49:27.560 --> 0:49:29.400
<v Speaker 1>No, I really can't.

0:49:29.560 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 6>I mean I remember how up said I got when

0:49:31.000 --> 0:49:33.520
<v Speaker 6>we did the Innocence Project. It's just, yeah, you hear

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:34.920
<v Speaker 6>these stories and then they get out and they're like,

0:49:35.040 --> 0:49:37.319
<v Speaker 6>well here's here's four hundred thousand bucks.

0:49:37.360 --> 0:49:38.280
<v Speaker 4>We feel pretty bad.

0:49:38.239 --> 0:49:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Right, go get yourself something nice. Try to forget about

0:49:40.200 --> 0:49:42.919
<v Speaker 1>all this, right. Yeah, did you ever see that movie

0:49:43.360 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 1>An Innocent Man with Tom Selleck. It scared the Bejesus

0:49:49.640 --> 0:49:51.480
<v Speaker 1>out of me. The same thing happened to him when

0:49:51.480 --> 0:49:54.120
<v Speaker 1>he was when he was he was framed.

0:49:54.840 --> 0:49:56.680
<v Speaker 4>Oh wait, that's high Road to China.

0:49:57.160 --> 0:49:59.799
<v Speaker 1>Oh right, I got my stuff? Makes it? No that's

0:50:00.360 --> 0:50:03.279
<v Speaker 1>down under that. Oh right, Uh, you got anything else?

0:50:03.400 --> 0:50:03.680
<v Speaker 4>Nope?

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:05.880
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well that's it for police.

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Lineups for now. We'll do an update whenever they get

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:08.839
<v Speaker 1>it figured out.

0:50:08.920 --> 0:50:12.040
<v Speaker 4>We did one on police sketches, right, yeah, okay, is

0:50:12.080 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 4>this it?

0:50:12.600 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Are we done?

0:50:13.239 --> 0:50:13.319
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:20.400
<v Speaker 1>We still got Arson investigation. We've got a lot all right, yeah, okay, okay.

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:23.480
<v Speaker 1>If you want to know more about police lineups, then

0:50:23.880 --> 0:50:25.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, go hang around a police station. See

0:50:25.760 --> 0:50:27.560
<v Speaker 1>if you can stand in one learn firsthand.

0:50:28.239 --> 0:50:31.279
<v Speaker 6>Okay, get a little sign that says I will be

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:32.880
<v Speaker 6>your foil ten dollars.

0:50:33.120 --> 0:50:33.359
<v Speaker 4>Yep.

0:50:33.960 --> 0:50:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:50:34.320 --> 0:50:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And since I said ten dollars, it's time for listener.

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:43.000
<v Speaker 4>Now, I'm gonna call this youngest fan. This very cute email. Hey, guys,

0:50:43.000 --> 0:50:43.760
<v Speaker 4>love the podcast.

0:50:43.800 --> 0:50:48.200
<v Speaker 6>You're doing it right, It's not this email is not

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:50.840
<v Speaker 6>episode specific, but I had to tell you about this.

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:52.920
<v Speaker 6>My husband and I welcomed our baby boy into the

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:55.480
<v Speaker 6>world a couple of months ago. When I was pregnant,

0:50:55.480 --> 0:50:57.040
<v Speaker 6>we joked that the baby would think that one of

0:50:57.080 --> 0:51:00.319
<v Speaker 6>you was his dad because he heard your voices so often.

0:51:02.480 --> 0:51:04.920
<v Speaker 6>That's a very funny joke in a family, you know,

0:51:06.400 --> 0:51:10.640
<v Speaker 6>joke about the paternity of your child. Now that he's here,

0:51:10.719 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 6>I've been playing music in the car instead of the podcast,

0:51:13.480 --> 0:51:16.279
<v Speaker 6>thinking music helps calm him. Well, one day he was

0:51:16.280 --> 0:51:17.960
<v Speaker 6>crying and crying in the car. I couldn't get him

0:51:17.960 --> 0:51:18.480
<v Speaker 6>to calm down.

0:51:18.640 --> 0:51:22.320
<v Speaker 1>She was like, what's wrong with DOCN? Why isn't docin working.

0:51:23.520 --> 0:51:24.840
<v Speaker 6>I couldn't get him to calm down with any of the

0:51:24.920 --> 0:51:26.480
<v Speaker 6>usual tricks, so I decided to heck with it. I'm

0:51:26.480 --> 0:51:28.400
<v Speaker 6>gonna put on the podcast, and I kid you not,

0:51:28.719 --> 0:51:30.920
<v Speaker 6>as soon as you guys started talking, he stopped crying.

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:36.160
<v Speaker 6>My husband says it was coincidence. Jealous, I say, stuff,

0:51:36.160 --> 0:51:36.560
<v Speaker 6>you should know.

0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:36.960
<v Speaker 4>Magic.

0:51:39.120 --> 0:51:40.880
<v Speaker 6>Now we're back to always listening to you guys in

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:42.959
<v Speaker 6>the car. You keep up the great work. And thanks

0:51:42.960 --> 0:51:46.239
<v Speaker 6>for soothing my baby boy. And that is from Sarah

0:51:46.320 --> 0:51:51.960
<v Speaker 6>Strantz and our youngest fan, Frank from beautiful Mount Pleasant,

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:52.799
<v Speaker 6>South Carolina.

0:51:52.840 --> 0:51:55.560
<v Speaker 1>That's awesome. Thank you so much for that email, Frank,

0:51:55.640 --> 0:51:56.839
<v Speaker 1>go to sleep quiet now.

0:51:56.920 --> 0:51:58.879
<v Speaker 4>They named their baby after our chair?

0:51:59.160 --> 0:51:59.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:52:01.200 --> 0:52:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Pretty? Wouldn't that be amazing if they actually did it?

0:52:03.520 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Well? Now?

0:52:05.080 --> 0:52:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And thank you also to unnamed husband for being a

0:52:07.680 --> 0:52:08.240
<v Speaker 1>good sport.

0:52:08.880 --> 0:52:09.240
<v Speaker 4>Agreed.

0:52:09.800 --> 0:52:12.320
<v Speaker 1>If you want to send us a great email about

0:52:12.320 --> 0:52:14.759
<v Speaker 1>how We're magic. You can hang out with us on

0:52:14.800 --> 0:52:17.399
<v Speaker 1>social media. Just go to our website stuff you Should

0:52:17.440 --> 0:52:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Know dot com, and you can also send us an

0:52:19.440 --> 0:52:24.400
<v Speaker 1>email to Stuff podcast at HowStuffWorks dot com.

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio.

0:52:28.640 --> 0:52:31.840
<v Speaker 5>For more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:52:32.000 --> 0:52:34.960
<v Speaker 5>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.