WEBVTT - IMF, Western Alliance, ETFs, and Kurodanomics

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I was thunderstruck in

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>your speech and what your world economic outlook says about

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:30.319
<v Speaker 1>a five year vision of the International Monetary Fund of

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>growth from three point eight percent down to three percent,

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a twenty one percent decline in the five year vision,

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>are you modeling global recession? And dare I say global

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>recession for five years? What permodelink is a period of

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>slow growth that is being held back by a number

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of factors. One is not so dramatic. Some of the

0:00:55.960 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>fuzz growing economies like China or South Korea are growing

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>fast no more. But you would expect that there would

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>be others to pick up the torch of strong growth

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and this is not happening. What is holding growth back

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>are three groups of factors. First, low productivity. We have

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 1>been struggling with this phenomenon before the pandemic and we

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>continue to struggle with it. Second, it is fragmentation, the

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that the world economy does not enjoy the same

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>impetus that comes from more to understand, we're going to

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>spend this entire interview on trade for imitation. Give you

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the third point right now. And the third point is

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that countries that we would expect to add to growth

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>from TM markets, low income country are in particularly difficult

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>place because they have been innocent bystanders, repetitive shocks that COVID,

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Russia's invasion. The fact that the world ecolling me as

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 1>a whole, is now less able to support the weakest members.

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 1>Why the piece divident is gone well, and we're through COVID,

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and it is a celebration of these meetings as we

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>come beyond COVID, the assistance of you and other institutions

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in getting us beyond this pandemic. But you end your

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>speech talking about the ropes that tie us together. The

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>ropes between Washington and Beijing are afraid as you and

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen from our youth. How does the IMF

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>tie the ropes between Beijing and Washington back together? Where

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>we see an opportunity to do better is to identify

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>very proud practically areas where cooperation is a must. Climate

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>change cannot be fought by individual countries. The criticality of

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>adjusting to more supply security at the lowest possible cost,

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>engaging on securing areas of the world that have become

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>more fragile. It is in everybody's interest that we do

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>not have more civil wars more comright, But in everybody's

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>interest in the tone here and particularly in the Economist

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>article of two or three days ago, is China doesn't

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>want to participate. Now you've spoken your comments in your

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>speech of the new practicality of the Premier of China,

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>can you report that there's a new practicality out of

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Beijing to help us with those ropes. Tie together what

0:03:56.760 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I hurt in our bilateral meeting, can also publicly from

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Premier Li Chang. Are three important messages. First, Chinese commitment

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 1>to continue to open its economy for private investors from

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>all over the world. Second, China's commitment to play a

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>constructive role in multi lateral institutions, including the IMAN, and third,

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 1>Chinese commitment to support developing countries that are struggling with

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>high that levels for making them China, the major A

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>major sore so important here and this goes to our

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>en Rehardens conversation with the Speaker of the House last

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>night in Los Angeles. But to take it away from

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the politics and go back to IMF one on one,

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.919
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese don't want to participate in the normal and

0:04:55.120 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>historic IMF restructuring process. They don't want to exgeneration, they

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want to take a hair cut and bring down

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the interest rate. They don't even want to write down

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the debts that they were directly or indirectly

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>involved in. I spoke to our Matthew Hill and Mozambique

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and Zambia today. Can Chinese help you with the challenges

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of Zambia. What I am very mindful of is that

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>China has been very slow to recognize that multilateral debt

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>restructuring requires China to play by the rules that are

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>already established. It is now the time for China to

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 1>demonstrate that they are capable of playing by these rules. Yes,

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>we have had very slow process on that restructuring on Chat,

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>but we have completed it. We have now initiated a

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>debt restructuring for Zambia, and I got the assurances from

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese premier that China would play its role. They're

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>the largest creditor to Zambia for Zambia to move to

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a more reliable path. The same applies to Sri Lanka,

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.919
<v Speaker 1>where China has taken a commitment to play by the

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>international rules. The same applies to Ghana, Tree Ekiopia. We

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>have created, together with the World Bank and India as

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>G twenty Presidency, a new global sovereign that round table.

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>China is participating, They're they're part of it. They're participating

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>fully and they're participating constructively. Where we need to continue

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to engage with China is on how we can achieve

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 1>the same result for countries in terms of shrinking that

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that level that China can implement meant domestically given their

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>own internal domestic constraints. Direct haircut is the most straightforward way,

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:15.119
<v Speaker 1>but we can achieve the same shrinking of death through

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that reprofiling, in other words, extending by many more years

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the time of services trying to agree to that traditional methodology.

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>They are not well. They have agreed in the case

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of chat We are now working on having them agreeing

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in the case of Zambia. But look proof of the

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>pudding is where it is in the meeting, so I

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>can say we got reassurances from the Chinese leadership that

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>they would play constructively. From now we need to eat

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the cake. Now we need to see China delivering on

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>How urgent is it, as you said in your speech,

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>as you start these spring meetings, this difficult climb. How

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>urgent is it for President Biden to meet President to

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>begin the path of practicality and the path towards the

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>huge tensions that we have now to improve those tensions. Well,

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>this is for the leadership of the of these two

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>countries to decide. What I can say is that when

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>there is so much tension between the two largest economies,

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>then the innocent bystanders are being hurt. We calculated the

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>economic impact of the taris US impulsed on China for

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 1>last year. This shrunk global growth by zero point four

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>or you want to player, come on, it's a working

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>paper the IMF and basically we're shrinking in Japan and

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.839
<v Speaker 1>Germany out of the global system. Right Well, now, this

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is this is a separate issue. I'm talking specifically about

0:08:55.080 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the tariffs. Okay, the taris that have been impulse they

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>reduce global GDP because the impact of trade restrictions. We

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>know it from I'm running out of time. Are gonna

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>make some news. Are you suggesting that President Biden should

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>eliminate or diminished the Trump tariffs? We think that getting

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>on a path of less fragmentation in the world economy

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is good for everybody, including for middle class in the

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>United States, because when we impose more costs, they trickled

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>down and somebody pays. Who pays it is in the

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>end consumers here, consumers everywhere. So less fragmentation in the

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>world economy means the highest standard of living for people everywhere.

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Team Cancer ALIGNE program, Bloomberg Markets

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>We Jason ten A m Eastern Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>r Heard radio app, and the Bloomberg Business app. We're

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>listening on demand wherever you get your podcast. I want

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it. Now. We have an economist who

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 1>has a PhD. Wow, that's big. I'm not that's University

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of Maryland. When you make the commitment for PhD, that

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 1>is a huge commitment. I mean the masters I got

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:23.839
<v Speaker 1>my NBA is two years. I spent half of it

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>on the golf course. But when you go to get

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a PhD. You know, that is a commitment. Uh some

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>more rigorous than an MBA. It's a little bit more rigorous.

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah some. I have chief economists at Core Lodgist Joints

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>this year. We want to talk about the housing market here,

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>so Selma, give us a sense here. We've had these

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>rates move up dramatically. That didn't stop me from diving

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>into the real estate market. Well, and then, as Critti

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, we've had rates then moved down dramatically. I

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>mean the ten year was over four percent like what

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>three weeks ago, and now we're at three twenty eight. Selma,

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 1>is that like a concern? Um? Yes, Well, first of all,

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for having me on the show. Um. Yeah,

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean we've we've been muddling through this transition in

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the housing market brought on by by Surgeon mortgage rates

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, we had a really miserable winter.

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Homesales ended up with the thirty to forty percent lower

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>activity at the end of the year than than at

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the end of twenty twenty one. But now mortgages have

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 1>come down from the November peak. You know, after picking

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>seven at seven percent, mortgage rates have been. You know,

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>they even came down to six percent, went up to

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>six and a half, coming back down towards six percent.

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>So um. You know, lower mortgage rates have definitely helped

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the home sales activity which has which was really really

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>strong in the first couple of months of this year.

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>And we are seeing is that the buyers are very

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>very responsive to these low lower mortgage rates. Um and

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>then as soon as mortgages start coming down, buyers jumped in.

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.599
<v Speaker 1>It's the only problem really at this point is inventory

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that continues to be extremely scarce. And you know, the

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>usually spring increase that we see for spring homebuying season,

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just not there this time. Run well, and also

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the question, you know, why our rates coming down so quickly.

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's great to have lower mortgages, obviously more

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>people can afford to buy a house, but if we're

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.959
<v Speaker 1>heading into a recession, that's got to concern you a little. Right.

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the World to interest rate probability

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>page on the Bloomberg Terminal, which is how we calculate

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>what markets are forecasting for the FED, there was a

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent chance of a rate hike at the beginning

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of this week. Now it's only a forty four percent chance.

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>So that means the market is really worried that the

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Fed is going to freak out a pause right right, absolutely,

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>And and that's actually reflected in the mortgage ry spread,

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you know it has. It's we've had one of the

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>most volatil years in terms of mortgage ry spread, and

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:03.199
<v Speaker 1>we ended the year at three hundred basis points. It's

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>over the ten year treasury from thirty year fixed. You know,

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>this is almost double that that, you know, the long

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>term average of a five hundred and seventy based points.

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 1>It has come down and now again over the last

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>month or so, it has jumped back to closer to

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.719
<v Speaker 1>three hundred basis points. So he has mortgage right, volatility

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>is huge, and I mean, imagine how difficult it is

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.719
<v Speaker 1>for potential homebuyers to plan in this environment because you

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you're going to be space six percent,

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna bay seven percent. And for some folks

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that matters a lot in terms of how much they

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>can afford. Well, I'm going to refinance my mortgage I

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>just got into I'm gonna say twelve to eighteen months,

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna have a four handle on the front.

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>That's my prediction. So you got a floating rate, Well,

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll see about that. Yeah, we got some we got

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>some work going on there in the mortgage market. So

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gona talk to us about the regionality of what's

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>going on out there in the housing market. Is it

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 1>as simple as everybody's moving down to the sun belt

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's good, and everybody's moving out of the coastal cities.

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Is that kind of the story? Um, well, I don't

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>know that it's as simple as that, but I mean

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>that's actually what the data is reflecting at this point.

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's very the home price changes are

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>varying so so much across the US. On the West coast,

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Mountain West, we've seen significant declines from last year's peaks,

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>as much as ten to fourteen percent, so double digit declines.

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>On the East coast, Southeast Texas, New England not as much.

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Home prices are down in very low single digits, up

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to down three percent, So there is huge variation. But

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really it's it's about affordability. You know,

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Mortgage rates really took a huge chunk of the purchase

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>budget for buyers, so it's about affordability, it's about lack

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of inventory. The areas that are doing much better are

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>areas that do have new construction activity where builders have

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>been able to compensate buyers for that and mortgage rates.

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's about more than just um sunshine. Right, Yeah,

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it's taxes, It's all that kind of good stuff. Real

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>quickly m thirty seconds. Some what's your expectation for where

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>mortgage rates are going to go? Well, I think we're

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to see volatility in mortgage rates, but

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I think generally speaking, we're going to be uh driving

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a mortgagees are going to be coming lower. Um. You

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>know when you look at the consensus forecast, it's all

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>over the place. I mean, it's it's so uncertain and

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>wide ranging. Um. I think generally speaking, uh, we expect

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>mortgage rates to come below six percent by the end

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Um. Some expect still in that six

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>percent handle, but but I think we're going to be

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>drifting lower to five and a half. All right, SMA,

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. I'm again I'm holding out for

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>something with a four handle on it, So see what

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you can do for me. Some have she's a chief

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>economist at a core logic coming up and just moments. Yeah,

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>so I'm confused. Did you buy I actually asked, are

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you no? I haven't fixed or I have a fixed mortgage,

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna be financi that bad boy. Um oh,

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I see okay, yeah, okay. For a second, I suspected

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>you just bought in cash and then you're waiting to no,

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I need that. I like the tax deduction. I didn't

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>have that for a while. So you're listening to the

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>tape Cancer Live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Bloomberg Radio tuning half, Bloomberg dot Com and

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business Half. You can also listen live on

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just say

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. You know, cars for the

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>American market designed and built more quickly. Now, absolutely, this

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>is a journey, Matt, So it would not be from

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>one day to the next. It's not gonna happen tomorrow.

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think by bringing digitalization engineering combined with the design,

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it will increase the amount of vehicles that we'll bring

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to the market, and it would decrease the amount of time.

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>This would not be possible if we would not have

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the support from Bozai and in Germany. Yeah, I know

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that Oliver Bloom fully supports. They studied along with the board. Yeah,

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>we have our non leads and we are also the

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>bd W brand CEO, Tomas Schaeffer. So everybody's supporting the

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>strategy that we need to get more responsibility for the

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>design on the developer of the vehicles. She in the US.

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I was just down in Mexico and I saw down

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>there some of the original bugs, right, and my heart

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>flutters a little bit. It's such an iconic design. I

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>grew up partially in Germany, so for me, the golf

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 1>is almost synonymous with car. Right. My mother has pined

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>for a Volkswagen bus for the better part of my life,

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'm old. Are these iconic nameplates gonna come back?

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I was worried when I heard the golf this may

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>be the last generation of the Golf. Yeah, So going

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to your point, they will come back. I mean, we're

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>going to maintain the DNA of the brand, the iconic products.

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>For example, we are launching the ID bus in a

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>couple of months here in the US. It will be

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>a global launch. It will be in the beginning of June,

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and the launch of the product will be available in

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four. So this type of vehicles, iconic vehicles,

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we will preserve the DNA of the brand. Going forward,

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>there will be a next gen golf. We're gonna still

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>see a golf in twenty thirty. We're gonna maintain the

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>DNA of the brand, probably a golf. I cannot guarantee you,

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 1>but I guarantee you that the DNA of the brand

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of these iconic products will remain in Let means you, yes,

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>have to buy your mother one as sure. Okay, so

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>she's just getting on. So speaking of demand, what is

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>your view on where the US is right now in

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of recessionary fears, et cetera. Yeah, So, first of all,

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you that on the first quarter of

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>this year, the marker is growing nine percent, So despite

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the recession fears, despite inflation, and despite the interest rate

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the market, we mains strong and we have gained market

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>share as VAW over the last three three months, so

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that's very positive. How strong nine percent market growth is

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 1>very strong, I mean, and we grew almost ten percent,

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>so I think that, Yeah, there's inflation pressure. There's interest

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>rates obviously, particularly on the least. When the consumers go

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to the dealer and they see that the least has

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, almost double, he has an impact. But he

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>has not slowed down the industry. Now. I think the

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>FED has made really good decisions on increasing the indust

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>rate to keep the interest rate under control. I think

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 1>this strategy will pay off by the year end twenty

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, and I would expect that the interestry would

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>start coming down slowly early next year. We've seen in

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of days a number of carmakers put

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>out news about their own finance arms. Right, it's really

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>important to have your own finance arm, especially in this

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of situation, a high prices, rising rates, How do

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you plan to finance your growth? So we do have

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>estric customers, so we do have a bank here in

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the US, a very solid bank. But again it goes

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>back to the products. So let me give you an

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 1>example of the eighty four, which when we started manufacturer

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in Chatauga in the state of Tennessee last year, it's

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>our first electric vehicle manufacturing in the US. Today, for

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the first three months, we're number four in the rankings

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in the electric vehicles. And then on top of that,

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>we have a company called Electrify America which are charging stations,

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, three hundred charging stations, three thousand, five hundred superchargers.

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna duble that in two years. And the most

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>important thing is that one percent of that comes from

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>renewable energy. Yeah, and then we give the buyer of

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the i D four up to three years thirty minute

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 1>charge for free, included in the package of a vehicle

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>which starts around thirty nine thousand dollars. So when you're

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a consumer and you look at the total picture, you're

0:20:55.440 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 1>an affordable I D four with three energy renewal energy

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:05.120
<v Speaker 1>for the next three years on, you have some financing options.

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>On top of that, you had the IRD credit. That's

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a company package. All right, Pablo, thank you so much.

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate it. Matt also appreciate having a set

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>with me. Thank you for allowing me to come Pablo

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to see Volkswagen of America CEO and Bloomberg's Matt Miller.

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. You're listening to the Team Cancer Line

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastering on Bloomberg

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com. The I Heart Radio app and the Bloomberg

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Business app. We're listening on demand wherever you get your podcast.

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's bring in Herman Chan. He covers the

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>regional banks for Bloomberg Intelligence. He's been a busy, busy

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>analyst over the last several weeks here, So Herman, I

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 1>guess I'm just looking at Western Alliance. That's kind of

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the one of the banks I have on my screen

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep an eye on. Is maybe a potential at

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>risk type of institution out there on the West coast.

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>It's up five percent today. I don't know what to

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>make of it. What are we hearing from some of

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>these banks or are we just waiting for earnings to

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>really get a sense of how their balanceies are, how

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>their deposit levels are. Is that kind of where we are? Yeah?

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I heard the segment earlier in terms of Western Alliance

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and how they positioned themselves over the last couple of

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>days in terms of their update and lack of the

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>deposit disclosure. The disclosure that they subsequently came out with

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>yesterday afternoon was actually pretty positive in the grand scheme

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of things. Deposits down and they finally gave that number.

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>They didn't give that initial number in the in the

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday update, so that was a big consternation for them.

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Eleven percent pretty decent. I think some of the analysts

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>were expecting something that was worse than that, So I

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 1>think that's why you're seeing a bit of a relief

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>rally from Western. Liane. If I'm a banker and I've

0:22:55.800 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>got like Western in my name, I'm gonna I've probably

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>lost deposits, or i got some kind of Silicon Valley

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>name in my name, I'm losing deposits. Well, right, what

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 1>do I do if I'm a banker? Do I literally

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>get on the phone and call these people up and say,

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>take your money back from JP Morgan Chase, from Bank

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:18.479
<v Speaker 1>of America wherever you put it, and bring it back.

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Is we're okay? Is that what I'm doing? Yeah, that's

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing. Uh, you're going, dude that listen, I

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>give you a toaster. Although I'm perfectly happy with my bank,

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>um full disclosure to bank, they have obviously no branches here,

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>so it makes banking for me particularly difficult. Nonetheless, I

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>have not changed my bank since I moved here from

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Ohio like thirty years ago. Right, I'm more likely to

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>change my wife than my bank, right, I mean, it's

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>just something people don't do, right. She doesn't listen to radio,

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 1>so um, I just can't imagine that people would change

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 1>their bank and then change back, right, unless I mean,

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm also maybe extraordinarily lazy and disorganized. But you're a

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>super loyal customer that I'm sure Huntington is glad to

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 1>have you. But some of these other institutions, specifically technology

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:19.479
<v Speaker 1>and startup companies, have had this heard mentality where they

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want to operate within a regional bank structure because

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:26.120
<v Speaker 1>they view them as less safe. So you've seen them

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 1>jettison their deposits over to a larger, too big to

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 1>fail banks. It's unfortunate, but the hope is that when

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>things start to stabilize, and you've seen that a bit

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>with SBB being acquired by for Citizens and the signature

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>deal with New Your Community, it has quelled some of

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the concerns and specifically within regional banks that they are

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>operating as as expected. So the hope is that the

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>concern sort of goes away and then things can move

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>back to normal and deposits can come back to the regionals. Yeah,

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>because I think the greater or wider economic concern is, Hey,

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>if regional bank A has lost deposits, that bank is

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>less likely to lend to my new little store I

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>want to open up on main Street and that could

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>impact you know, growth, economic growth GDP in this in

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>this country. I mean, when the banks report numbers, how

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>do I get a gauge of whether that's happening, whether

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>they're getting credit is a lot tougher than it used

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to be. Yeah, I think the analyst community will ask

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>those questions and those the management teams will talk about

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that in terms of their guidance for long growth. The

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>general expectation is that if funding costs and deposit costs

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>are increasing because banks need to pay up to retain

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>your deposits, and the availability of funding with deposits declining

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 1>is weekend, then banks should have less appetite to land,

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 1>and so credit underwriting will be tougher for for folks

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that are looking to borrow. So you're going to see

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>hiring bar and costs, You're going to be tougher underwriting standards,

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.959
<v Speaker 1>and that all can trickle through the economy and deliver

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>some slower GDP growth. As you mentioned, So is that

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>something that you'll see in the numbers, or that's just

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you're going to hear in a commentary from the companies.

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to see it quite in the numbers yet.

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>You'll see potentially slowing loan growth, But more in focus

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>for us is the commentary and the guidance in terms

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of what loans will look like for the full year,

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and i'd expect those the guidance for that to come down. Generally,

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>loans growth mirrors GDP growth, so you could potentially see

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that decline for at least the regionals because of all

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the funding issues that they're facing. When when is the

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>tide going to turn so that these banks can make

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>money like net interus margin money, old school bank banking money, right,

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So what we are expecting is that it's going to

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>be tough for them because margins are tightening for for

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 1>across the regional banks, space funding costs are rising and

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>your loan yields aren't going to go up as fast,

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 1>so you need a competition to raise They got to

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>pay more right to depositors, so they got to pay

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 1>more for depositors to keep them in the door. And

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>what you need from a macro perspective is the FED

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to cut rate so they can lower their deposit costs

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>by by cutting what they're paying out, So that that's

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>what can drive margin expansion going forward. Number though, because

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you know now that investors that depositors, I'm sorry, have

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>gotten used to actually making money, um by giving it

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 1>to banks, and uh, they've gotten mobility right now, Depositors

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>are like, oh, I can move my money out of

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>bank A and into bank B. Um. They're going to

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:55.360
<v Speaker 1>be doing so with more frequency, right um, So it's

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be hard for banks to go back to

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>getting you know, money for nothing. The good thing, at

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.680
<v Speaker 1>least from a bank perspective, is that you have a

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of price reactivity wants interest rates to do cuts.

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 1>So the differential you mentioned banks can see their depositis

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>go to other places where're focused on what's going on

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in the muddy market mutual fun complex, which is seeing

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>very strong inflows over the past several weeks after the

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>SBB fallouts. You know, the attractive of that sort of

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>asset class world diminished once we see some FED rate cuts,

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 1>so that differential should narrow and that's only going to

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>be positive for the banks. So Herman if I'm a

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 1>regional bank investorate. I might just mind banks in Texas

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and Florida and Nashville or something. Yeah, I think that's

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the right perspective. Folks that are in Middle America

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and Ohio, like Huntington, aren't going to be affected by

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the fallout with with SBB and signature. These are all

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of coastal markets in California and New York and

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>so I'm sure out of the folks in Columbus probably

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>haven't even heard of SBB. So that's actually a good thing,

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and we'd expect more stability from some of the smaller

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>banks that operates in the Midwest or the southeast real quickly.

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>There are worldly people in Columbus, Ohio, you know, Ohio

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>State University. It's not like we're these provincial you know,

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>We're not a town of farmers. We're pretty advanced. What's

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty advanced. We can play football. You can play football

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and get great all right, Herman Chen real quick scale

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>one to ten. How's your experience at Penn State Back

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in the day, Penn State was great. Go Lion's got

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a great football team, gonna be potentially in the playoffs

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>next year. So really looking forward to the seas ago

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>like a little Penn State plug in their Hermit Chin

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>senior analyte covers the regional banks in fintech for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Proud graduate of the Penn State University. Here looking at

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the markets here, kind of unched here, not much a

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit of red on the tape, but not a

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>whole lot going on. You're listening to the tape. Catch

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>our line program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. Tune in ALF, Bloomberg dot Com and

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business ALF. You can also listen live on

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just say Alexa,

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:15.719
<v Speaker 1>play Bloomberg eleven thirty. Let's talk ETFs again, I mean

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>again just in my career. This is one of the

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>most amazing growth stories that I've seen in my career,

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>just the growth of ETF some money coming out of

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>mutual funds into ETFs, just extraordinary when you think about

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>all the funds flows into ETFs. We welcome Amanda Robello.

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>She's had a passive sales US on shore for DWS Group. Man.

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining us here on a Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio.

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>You get a gold star today for showing up. It's

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:42.239
<v Speaker 1>more than we can say about most of our people here.

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 1>But you guys recently announced the listening of X trackers

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF. Oh boy, what is that.

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a mouthful, that's a big one. Tell us about

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>this ETF. Yeah, absolutely, thanks very much for KAM has

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the chance to do that. So it is tracking the

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>MSCI USA Climate Action Index. And so what we're looking

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to do is with this product invest in US equities

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>which are on a strong trajectory towards minimizing or reducing

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>their carbon emissions. Have there any changes? I mean, MSCI

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>recently said they're going to change their way they grade

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess other funds. Yeah, are they making changes to

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>their index as well? So as far as we know,

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they're not making changes to their indices. The data universe

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>is always evolving for them, so as they kind of

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>update all of their individual data points and then this

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>then feeds in when we have the index rebalances, which

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>then get executed inside the funds. But great news, actually,

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I think in terms of them further enhancing their ESG

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>rating methodology for funds. But I think this only helps

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>investors more. Is ESG? I mean, it was such a

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:55.959
<v Speaker 1>huge draw for a while, and then there has been

0:31:56.080 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>backlash recently, at least in the US. I'm not sure

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>if it's backlash against ESG specifically, but against that as

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>an investment product. Is it coming back? I mean, is

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>it here this day? I think in the long run

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it is here to say, when we look at, you know,

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>where markets are, I think maybe it's not at the

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>forefront of investor's mind like it was before. They're more

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:24.959
<v Speaker 1>concerned with generating returns, generating yield, reducing volatility in their

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>pose things should be aligned, though, Yeah, And the thing

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is actually, in reality they are. So I think that

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing more and more is that clients start

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to use, especially that governance piece in ESG, for risk reduction,

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>for drawdown reduction. So it's good. It's funny because actually

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>we were just talking about this the due diligence sessions

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that we do with some of the largest investors globally. Beforehand,

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 1>ESG would be like a little ten minutes segment in

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that kind of one day agenda, And now it's intrinsic

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and pretty much all of the different segments. Yeah, I

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>want to follow on when Matt was going the pet

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Matt was going down because you know here in the

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 1>US we have seen some pushback and I probed some

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of our European colleagues that are based in our London

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>office and they say no, in Europe it is the

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 1>ESG push is as strong as ever and if and

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>they particularly called out Finland, Swedeland, you know, the Nordic countries.

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>And I see here in your launch you had a

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>big support from the fund in Finland talked to us

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>about this h this etf you launch and in the

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>investment by uh this Finish firm. Yeah. Sure, So we

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>were working together with a very good client of US,

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>il Marin and it's in the public domain and they are, um,

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've worked with them previously. We launched a

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 1>fund for them four years ago, and with them and

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>also with a number of the other large investors in

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Europe and also where the regulation is heading, everyone has

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.479
<v Speaker 1>become more kind of precise in terms of what EESG

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to mean for them. So then we further

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>fine tune their exposure with this new product. I want

0:33:56.840 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to ask about your job, okay, um, the title head

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of passive sales. Yes, and your parents must be like,

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>do you don't not do anything? I just around exactly,

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>But no, to be more serious, active is getting so important, right,

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean we talk about that on the ETF show

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 1>all the time. The interesting active has just really climbed. Um,

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>can you take on that part of ETFs as well? Yeah,

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.440
<v Speaker 1>actually my job possible. My titles change is now extract

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of sales have refle But secondly, m yeah, you know

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 1>what the beauty of the ETF wrapper is that is

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 1>providing transparency access. You know, you don't need to think

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 1>about setting up an account with the transfer agent. You

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>can just buy things on exchange right with an ETF.

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>So um, yeah, this trend and we strongly believe it

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>at DWS as well that the mutual fund sadly is

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>not as relevant as it used to be, but the

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>ETF is exactly that's fantastic for you, right, I think

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of everyone. I wonder if we had a story in

0:34:56.640 --> 0:35:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg today about assets going into you know, mutual

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>funds and ultrashort treasury ETFs. I mean I think Barkley's

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>expects one and a half trillion dollars of assets to

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>go there in the next ten years or so. What

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of flows are you seeing and you know, is

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>there any future for the mutual fund? I mean, I

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>guess it still has a place in four o one ks,

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>but everyone is turning to an ETF. Yeah, we do

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>still think that there's a time and the face for that.

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Some clients don't need to pay, don't need to have liquidity,

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>They might have favorable share classes, for example, which are

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:34.279
<v Speaker 1>cheaper so they don't need to pay for all of

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the benefits. And then definitely from some tax consideration wrapper

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 1>consideration perspectives, it's still relevant. But I think for those

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:44.240
<v Speaker 1>clients that you want to be more tactical and also

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 1>just it's very It seems to be much easier as

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>well to launch GTF, so we have way more exposures

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>than you do on the mutual fund side. Choice is

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>provided there. But also as the markets are moving, when

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 1>we think that we're in this kind of part of

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the cycle that we've not seen for around fifteen years,

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.720
<v Speaker 1>right that then what was needed in the last fifteen

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 1>years is not what's needed for the next fifteen years necessarily,

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>So I would imagine that even more ETFs get launched

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>two and we see in terms of trends like a

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of searching for yields. So probably our most popular

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>fund this year has been our HDF product. It's international

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>equity dividends, So international equities typically yield more than the

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:25.479
<v Speaker 1>SMP stocks kind of for four and a half percent

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>versus one point five two percent, and then if you

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 1>then look at a dividend focused strategy on that asset class,

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>then that's even more juice around five point two percent.

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 1>So what's your pipeline look like? I mean, you don't

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>even have to imagine, you probably know if more ets, well,

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely going to How does twenty three look like?

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, because twenty twenty two was a huge year

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>for bringing ETFs to market, I don't know if it's

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>even reasonable to expect to match that again. So we're

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:56.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be keeping busy this year. Definitely, we're hoping

0:36:56.920 --> 0:37:00.040
<v Speaker 1>to launch ten new funds. Thematics is an area that

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>we think is really important in the market. So I think,

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's you can look at sectors, but also

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe thematics are better tool for tapping into broader megatrends,

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think especially where we are in the market

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>at the moments good at buying opportunities for those kinds

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of things. Additionally, as well, we have some strong active

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:21.799
<v Speaker 1>strategies on our DWS side and so look to bring

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 1>them into the ETF wrapper. Two. Also thinking as well

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 1>about kind of shorter dated fixed income as well, and

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 1>then I would say the last block of where we're

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:35.320
<v Speaker 1>building is going to be going further down the yield

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 1>trend like for fixed income. So breaking news here, I

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 1>know exactly you stuck coming. I mean, there's so many

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>ETFs out there for you guys at DWS. What's kind

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of a minimum size that you want to have? I

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>see like this on this one you just launched. You

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 1>had two billion come in on the first day, which

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:55.839
<v Speaker 1>is just monstrous. But what's kind of a minimum It's

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 1>worth your time. So I think the intention is always

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:00.879
<v Speaker 1>to have a fund that by the end of twelve

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 1>months is going to be a billion or more. But

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 1>depending on the on the exposure, it's not always easy

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:11.839
<v Speaker 1>to get that day one investment. Others are maybe more

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>relevant trends for like a more retail kind of investor,

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and so you need to get ticket by ticket by

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>your investors in your tfs. Typically we're very lucky that

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:27.239
<v Speaker 1>we are basically doing business with everyone, so retail platforms, wirehouses, IBDs,

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>ria's other asset managers, pension fund sovereign wealth funds. When

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you have a big institutional interest DW, when does this

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:39.320
<v Speaker 1>train end? I mean, it's been how long has the

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>ETF business been on this trajectory and how long is

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it going to continue? Do you think? I think that's

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 1>a great question to ask. I think we need to

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 1>we can't be complacent. So I think things that we

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:51.480
<v Speaker 1>start to think about as well at DWS is the

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 1>ETFs did so well because they are a great way

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to invest in something quickly. Right. Blockchain technology is also

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>very interesting when you start to think about, for example,

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 1>operational aspects of the Ledger and everything, tokenization, valization of assets,

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and so on. So expect some things here from I mean,

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>let me put the question this way. I have an

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 1>ETF show right now. It's a weekly program at one

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>pm on my invitation. You are invited, for sure, But

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 1>the thing is should we make it? Should we make

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it a full hour? Should we should we make it

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 1>an everyday show? In the future? Is that going to

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>be the case. I think the frequency will be important yeah. Um,

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:34.439
<v Speaker 1>we see yeah, because we see more and more types

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of investors using them now as well. It's not just

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 1>about the AUM, it's also about who's using them as well.

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I own an EF. Are you sure

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't. I don't know if the check because you

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 1>also have probably fun managers working for you that use

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 1>ETFs as part of their strategy. It's an important part

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of building your portfolio in a lot of cases. I'll

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 1>take a look. I got the app. I'll take a

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:57.440
<v Speaker 1>look to see what I got there. I got a

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of New Jersey municipals. John t Her over there,

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:03.240
<v Speaker 1>he's laughing. I want to I want a bond ETF

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that's in the market for that, so you can have

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:10.719
<v Speaker 1>many time infrastructure MEUNI so cash back to menis there

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you go see. Amanda Robello, thanks so much for joining us.

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Amanda Rebello, her title now is Head of xtrack Sales

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 1>US on Shore, Head of x Tracker Sales on Shore

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 1>US on shore US on Shore at DWS Group and

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>RVNU is the ticker she pointed out for you, John,

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:31.439
<v Speaker 1>that's the X Trackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Fund. You're

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 1>listening to the tape cancer Live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune in app,

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App. You can

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 1>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 1>York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. So

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:53.360
<v Speaker 1>newscooking out at Japan the back of Japan Governor Kuroda.

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:57.839
<v Speaker 1>He is stepping aside. It served two terms ten years

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 1>in total. What does this mean for Japan? What does

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it mean for the global economy? To get a sense

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of that, we walk in Kathleen. Hey, she is the

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>host of Bloomberg News. She joins us here in our

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker studios. So she gets a gold star

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>for showing up, not phoning it in, Kathleen. So big

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 1>changes for Japan. What does that mean for Japan? What

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 1>does that mean for kind of the global market? Well,

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Bank of Japan is there's there's the

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 1>big three of global central banks, and that's a Federal Reserve,

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 1>European Central Bank, and the Bank of Japan. And remember, uh,

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that's Japan with one hundred and twenty people, one hundred

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 1>five million people, is still the third largest economy in

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the world. Okay, so, and and it's uh, it's it's investors,

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh send a lot of capital out of

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the country. They attract a lot of the capital in

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Japan is quietly powerful on that stage. They have been

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 1>through a long period of abeonomics, which became corononomics. Abe,

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, the one of the most long serving successful

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 1>prime ministers in Japan's history recently deceased, started to see

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:10.359
<v Speaker 1>in the last year and Governor Krota two terms. He's

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the longest serving boj governor in there one hundred forty

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 1>year history. So we're it's, you know, a crux. We're

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:19.759
<v Speaker 1>at a point, maybe not a turning point. He got

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the yield curve control, which is kind of the main

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>thing I think that markets, maybe people participants that don't

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>know as much about the bankas fan as you. That's

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:32.399
<v Speaker 1>that's what they kind of grasp onto as the thing

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 1>that could change. Right well, they do. And remember when

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Krota Abe came back in office in twenty twelve and

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:43.319
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirteen, there was a he dragged in Kuroda or got,

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:46.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, to stimulate the economy. The previous governor had

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 1>been slow to do that. Cautious. No, he wanted quota

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to fire it up. So they did quantitative and qualitative easing.

0:42:54.680 --> 0:42:57.840
<v Speaker 1>They said, where're gonna get to two percent inflation within

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>as soon as we could, And then they said within

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:03.359
<v Speaker 1>two years fast forward. Things went up and down. Uh,

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and in it was twenty sixteen when inflation had been

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>rising but mostly oil prices, and it started falling back again.

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:13.360
<v Speaker 1>That's where they came up. They they had an almost

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 1>an all night meeting on a forty five vote, they

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 1>put in yield curve control and that's when they tied

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the ten year j JGB to to zero and then

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and gave it a little bit of a range on

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:26.840
<v Speaker 1>both sides. And over time they kind of had to

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>pull that out, but they bought trillions and trillions of

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:34.400
<v Speaker 1>yen to keep their ten year JGB anchored. I was

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:37.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, does anybody else own jgbs besides the Bank

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of Japan, Well, they own something like ninety percent of

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the ten year jgbs and over fifty percent of all

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:47.239
<v Speaker 1>the outstanding government bonds. Well, hey, it's it's it's like

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:50.520
<v Speaker 1>what a quantitative easing by the FED and the European

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Central Bank taken to like a whole other level. Has

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it worked well there there's kind of a two percent

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 1>plus inflation now, but is it going to stay there?

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>But not because of that, right having nothing to do,

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:07.759
<v Speaker 1>the whole world is facing rising inflation. I mean, yeah,

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>they've only gotten there without doing anything very lately. Will

0:44:11.760 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 1>you never know for sure? Will we if they if

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 1>they did absolutely nothing, Because they did, they did get

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Japan up to about consistently above zero Okay, not in deflation.

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:23.719
<v Speaker 1>And you're right now a lot of the gain has

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:26.640
<v Speaker 1>been in commodity prices, but right now they're almost a

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 1>four percent. They're starting to pull back a bit. But no,

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a big deal for the rest of the

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>world because if the Japanese have already started repatritating some

0:44:33.200 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of their bonds from overseas, and if they continue to

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:39.800
<v Speaker 1>do that, they this is going to be a major

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 1>upward pressure potentially on global bond deals. And they have Sorry,

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:47.759
<v Speaker 1>I just have a million questions. I love getting you

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in the studio because we hardly ever gets talked to you.

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I wonder about how much treasuries do the Japanese own.

0:44:56.120 --> 0:44:59.000
<v Speaker 1>They used to be a huge holder of US debt right, well, yeah,

0:44:59.000 --> 0:45:00.959
<v Speaker 1>and they still own a lot. And I wonder about

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:03.000
<v Speaker 1>what happens if yield control is a way they're going

0:45:03.040 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to go away from yield control? Are you gonna do

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it slowly? Okay? The way there is the new Bank

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of Japan governor. Right. He's at the Bank of Japan

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:13.759
<v Speaker 1>from nineteen ninety eight to two thousand and five. He

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:17.400
<v Speaker 1>at the time was one of the few when they

0:45:17.480 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>decided to cut rates when they shouldn't have. Who voted

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a race rates I should say, voted against it. So

0:45:21.400 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 1>here you got this man an academic over the years,

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:26.360
<v Speaker 1>knows everybody. He's about seventy. He's been around for a

0:45:26.440 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>long time. I think the bet right now is eventually

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:32.440
<v Speaker 1>he'll have to do something and they may start signing them.

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:36.000
<v Speaker 1>But they're not going to move around right away. So

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what do people think of yended? This ten

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>year career for Krota? Did he do a good job?

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Will you miss him? You interviewed him a lot. Well,

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:49.640
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, I'm a fan. Um he will people miss him?

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:53.919
<v Speaker 1>I think? Or was he successful? Well? We had a poll,

0:45:54.360 --> 0:45:56.400
<v Speaker 1>had a pole I think fifty six percent said he

0:45:57.400 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 1>was a success and forty four percent saying no, and

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the people say no, it's it's your argument, okay that uh,

0:46:06.360 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 1>well you didn't. The yeld curve control and all that

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:11.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't really get you sustainably there. But I would say, look,

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:15.800
<v Speaker 1>if he's leaving office with inflation at coming down to

0:46:15.840 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 1>about three percent year over yere from four percent with

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the boj at his last outlook update on the economy

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and inflation saying well, it's going to be one point

0:46:25.320 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 1>nine percent by the end of the year, and then

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>it's but you know that's two percent. Okay, that's a

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 1>rounding area, you guys. So he leaves office with two

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:34.320
<v Speaker 1>percent inflation. The Shuntel the spring wage negotiations, who do

0:46:34.400 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that every year, came out on the stronger side, not

0:46:37.600 --> 0:46:39.759
<v Speaker 1>super strong, but strong enough to give a sense, well,

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:43.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's there's a shift, a shift in the country

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 1>where the companies are realizing they have to pay people more.

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 1>The people are are wanting to see all that. They're

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 1>they're ready for a little more inflation, right, And that

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>was his biggest One of his biggest obstacles was deflationary mindset.

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Japanese don't want to pay more for anything. That's their culture, seriously,

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 1>but now that seems so shifted to It's the biggest

0:47:07.480 --> 0:47:09.160
<v Speaker 1>problem though, is getting out of it, Getting out of

0:47:09.239 --> 0:47:11.920
<v Speaker 1>ye curve control when you own so many bonds? How

0:47:12.040 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 1>do you do that gracefully? And oh and another big

0:47:14.719 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 1>one more thing I forgot to throw in politics. They've

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 1>got a big budget deficit ruling Democratic party there there

0:47:20.600 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of old aubeonomics people and two

0:47:24.640 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty four percent of GDP or something like that,

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:32.799
<v Speaker 1>and so not surprising a lot of politicians. Hey, don't

0:47:32.880 --> 0:47:35.919
<v Speaker 1>get away from yel curve control too quickly. We don't

0:47:35.960 --> 0:47:38.360
<v Speaker 1>want our financing costs to go up. So that's another

0:47:38.440 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 1>thing go and wait is going to have to face.

0:47:40.239 --> 0:47:42.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's pretty much inevitable that they'll be

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:46.479
<v Speaker 1>gradual adjustments. They'll go from point five on either side

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of zero, and they'll gradually widen that out to get

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a more a kind of a gradual shift that the

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world financial markets can deal with, can

0:47:55.080 --> 0:47:57.360
<v Speaker 1>deal with, all right, Kathleen Hasty, great stuff, Thank you

0:47:57.480 --> 0:48:01.120
<v Speaker 1>very much for coming into our Bloomberg Interactive studio. Kathleen Hayes,

0:48:01.320 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a host of Bloomberg next time. Later, we should have

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Kathleen off for like a half hour because I have

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:08.239
<v Speaker 1>a million still half a million. Yeah, you guys make

0:48:08.320 --> 0:48:11.920
<v Speaker 1>me think. My god, see, there's really challenging. That's exactly good.

0:48:11.960 --> 0:48:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Stove all right, Kathleen, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:48:15.360 --> 0:48:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:48:18.480 --> 0:48:22.240
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:48:22.360 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:29.719
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three. I'm fall Sweeney. I'm

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:32.319
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio