WEBVTT - Spike in Mail Theft Fueled by Black Market

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Well. Among the headlines we

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 1>are following at this hour about the Russian invasion of

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 1>and war with Ukraine is more businesses exiting, Credit Suites

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Group and Abu Dhabi's Well Fund will stop investing in Russia,

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>while beer makers Carlsberg and Heineken announcing plans to exit

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the country. So we have been following that. We've also

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>been following what's going on with Ukraine's I T and

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>tech community in a big way. Buscar Chalk Revordy is

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Dean of Global Business at the Fletcher School at Tufts University. That,

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Dean joins us once again on the phone from Boston.

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>How are you, Dean. I'm doing very well, thank you

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and you we're doing well. It's good to have you

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>back with us. UM. I wanted to just start by

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>because you are in constant conversations and Carolin I have

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot over the last month, in the last

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>five six weeks about the I T community on the

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>ground in Ukraine and how much international businesses, American businesses

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>rely on tech workers in that part of the world. UM,

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>but you're in constant contact with with the I T

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>community there and give us an idea of what's happening.

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:37.199
<v Speaker 1>Has it been disrupted and if they're still able to work, Yes,

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely so, no question, it has been disrupted and they are.

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>The community, of course, is spread out across the country,

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and in my conversations with them, UM, I realized that

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you know Ukraine, you know, just to look at the

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>map will remind us of the fact that Ukraine is

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a very large geographic area. So the I T community

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>is spread out across the country and they literally seem

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to break the country up into what they called the

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>hot zone and you know, perhaps the cooler zones and

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the cooler zones are towards the western side of the country,

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and many of the I T firms that are still

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>operating are on the western side or they have relocated

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>their personnel and and and other equipment to the western side.

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>So they're adapting their adjusting, and certainly the ones that

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.399
<v Speaker 1>are based on the western edge of the country, they're

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>operating and they're looking for business well. And as Tim said,

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, we unfortunately as a result of this war

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine, we are realizing what a important and large

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I T and tech community is in Ukraine and how

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>many you know, global companies interact or rely on that

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>tech community. From what I understand, you have been as

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you said, you know, entire with many members of that

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>community on the ground. I believe they call themselves the

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I T Army. What are you hearing though, about what

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>they are seeing, their expectations maybe about when this ends? Uh?

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>And what is the future? Can they even think about

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it at this point? Yes? So of course, uh, you know,

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>their guests as to how and when this ends is

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>um just as challenging you know, for them as it

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is for us, and you know us being all those

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of us who are watching this UH, this war UH

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in in horror and shocks on the outside because the

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>end game is still unclear. What they are doing is

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>they have set up backup plans and they are continuing

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to at least the ones, as I mentioned on the

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>western side of the country see themselves as the economic

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>soldiers food soldiers in this war. President Zelenski has encouraged UH,

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody who is a significant contributor to the economy to

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>do their best to keep the economy running. They have

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>also the Ukrainian government has made some significant changes to

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the tax code and they have essentially made the tax

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>scheme simple, pay two percent tax and it's voluntary. It's voluntary.

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So they're trying to encourage people to get back to

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>work to keep the economy running. And they see the

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>I T industry as the prime engine for the economy

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to be running because it's the one industry that can

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 1>survive as long as the internet infrastructure survives. So this

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>industry has at least the ones that have been successful

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>have got internet connectivity, they have got backup power. UH,

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 1>they are storing their data offshore, and they're continuing to

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>do work with their science. As you mentioned, they do

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>see themselves as the i T Army. They see that

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>they are contributing to the war by keeping people employed,

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>by bringing in revenues and potentially contributing to the TACH

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>survenues that the government sorely needs in order to you know,

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>keep everything that it is doing uh operating. So here

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>here's my question. If you're a startup right now and

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you have a germ of an idea and you're somewhere

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>outside of Ukraine but you need I T workers, are

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you less likely to look to Ukraine for that I

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>T work given the disruptions there? And my question is

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>really about long term economic damage to the country as

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a result of this, because I imagine that if you're

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:35.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for stability, it perhaps isn't the right

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>place to go right now if you're that startup founder. Absolutely,

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and I would empathize with everybody who is either a

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 1>startup or an established company, because when you're looking to

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>get any kind of outsource work done, whether it's I

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 1>T or any other kind of service, you're looking for

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>not only quality, but also agreements at the service level

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:01.359
<v Speaker 1>and the stability you know that even if I have

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, a great talent and capital I want the

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 1>work done and I want to make sure that the

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>work doesn't get disrupted by something like a war going on.

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 1>So um, absolutely, people are concerned about the risk. That said,

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies, startups included, are looking for ways

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in which they can help this war effort. So my

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>ask for the startups would be take on some of

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the risk. And some of the folks are spoken within

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.559
<v Speaker 1>this I d Army. They're saying they have tried to

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>ensure against many of the priss and the contingencies. Of

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>course that's not guaranteed. Well, great to check in with

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you once again. Another important important aspect certainly to this

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>story in this reality buscar check Orty, he's doing of

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Global business at the Fletcher's School at Tufts University, joining

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>us once again on the phone from Boston. Really appreciate

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>his time on this Monday. I mean, I feel like

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I learned so much about Ukraine right in terms of

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the I T community, remarkable resilience. You're listening to Business Week,

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Carl Master, Tim Stanovic. This is Bloomberg Radio. This is

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes.

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio Now for something um a

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit different, but definitely on our radar. It's a

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>story coming up in the New is Shoe of Bloomberg

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>business Week, out later this week, already online and on

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg and Tim. It's about a Smike, a spike

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>in mail theft, and it's been fueled by a black

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>market for stolen checks. The story by Jack gil I'm

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>cybersecurity correspondent at Bloomberg News. He joins us from the

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>ninety and one studio in Washington, d C. With us

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in person here in New York City. Joel Weber, editor

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Business Week. He's with us in the Bloomberg

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Broker studio. Joel, It's interesting. We talked so much

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>about hacking and cybersecurity and then I read a story

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>like this, and it's like, does it get any more

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>old school than stealing checks from the mail and trying

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to change who they're addressed to. Yeah, there are the

0:07:58.240 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>new ways of hacks, and then I guess there's like

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate old school. This does involve technology? It does?

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>It does? And Jack's story and reporting like totally caught

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>r I because it was just like wait what And

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole scheme centers on basically getting people's mail like hardmail. Uh,

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>there's been a raft of thefts of mail keys which

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>can open boxes. There's all these Telegram videos online of

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.239
<v Speaker 1>of these grabbing as much meal as they can, stuffing

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it into cars getaway vehicles. But that's where it gets interesting,

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>because what do you do with those those checks that

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>are in the mail that you're still paying your your

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.839
<v Speaker 1>bills with. Jack, Well, this is an interesting theft or

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a thing of a string of thefts, right, It's like

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of bringing it back here, as you mentioned,

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to the old school, and what's happening here is it's

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a new twist, I would say on an on an

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>old problem. It's not new that people have tried to

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>fish letters out of the mailbox, right, but it is

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a new phenomenon that they are taking these checks, putting

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>them on apps like Telegram, and selling them by the thousands.

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's pretty straightforward. I mean, I've even looked at

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of YouTube videos about putting these a nail

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>polish remover, uh, stripping away the ink that you may

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>be right out to your your power company, maybe for

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>your mortgage or your rent check. Or Grandma sent it

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>or or right, yeah, Grandma sends you fifty bucks for

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>your birthday, you know, in lieu of a nice knitted sweater.

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>And guess what this thing gets posted online? Someone over

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>over draws your account like a gentleman. We spoke with

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>your in the DC area and it's off to the races.

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>So the whole thing here the scam is basically if

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you can remove who the check was was made out to,

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but keep the the amounts right so or do you

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>just strip it all and sell? Are you selling a

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>blank check? When you do it this way, you're essentially

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>selling a blink check. And one of the victims we

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>spoke with said that, you know, he found out at first,

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>he found out about it because I called him up

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and said, hey, did you try to make a credit

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>card pavement for such a chuch bank? And he says,

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>how do you know? I said, well, I'm looking at

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>your check right now, and he was very much taken aback.

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>But then, you know, about a week later he said

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>that somebody tried to withdraw a much larger amount than he,

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of course had in his account at the time. His

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 1>bank had already been flagged for this and and said, oh,

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>look there's another check that got pounced. So I think

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.719
<v Speaker 1>it really it's kind of a guess, right, how much

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is somebody going to have in their account? Maybe they

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>seem wealthy, you know, maybe we'll try for a thousand bucks.

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>If it doesn't work, you know, no skin off our nose.

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>If it does, well, here's a stack of twenties. We

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>can now go around town with. Okay, jack, So many questions,

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>so little time. But I do wonder, uh, if somebody

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 1>makes a checkout to themselves, aren't they incriminating themselves then?

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Or do they make it out to cash? How does

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that work? So there are a few different ways that

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>could do this. Um, you know, these these channels that

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>we had talked about, This professor at Georgia State, uh,

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>David Mayman, had actually tracks not just stolen checks, but

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>stolen identities, bank account information, so user names and passwords

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to get into these accounts. So I wouldn't put it

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:03.199
<v Speaker 1>past these folks to actually create fraudulent identities that they

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>then used to make a check out to themselves to

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, a Joe Smith or maybe a less suspicious

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>looking name. Perhaps go to a check cashing place. It

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>might not be as reputable as a major bank and

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>walk out of the bank with the stack of twenties.

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>And these dudes and du dats man, they're not trying

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 1>to hide, right, They actually are posting photos of themselves

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>with piles of money. They are. I mean, some of

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>these videos I have to say no one other word

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>is just wild. I mean there are there are just

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>stacks of maile like flowing out of this one guy's

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>back seat when you open up at the back of it,

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>another guy's photograph with a you know, a real sort

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of you know ear to ear grin pulling a you know,

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.599
<v Speaker 1>a stack at Andrew Jackson's out of a out of

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 1>an envelope that he just got. Um, they don't hide themselves,

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the folks we spoke to you said,

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>is because there's no incentive for them to be anonymous.

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>These thefts have increased while the rate of at least

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>federal prosecuts of this mails have to have gone down.

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>So you know, you'd be the judge about how often

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>someone's actually gonna get caught and how how big of

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a problem do we think this is. I mean, I

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>know it's going to be difficult to put number on it.

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>But how how big of a spike in mail theft

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>are we seeing? So, I mean, if you look at

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the numbers that so the the the watchdog, the Inspector

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>General for the USPS says that at least in the

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>last year or so, the check thefts have gone up

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>by about a hundred and sixty one percent. Or rather,

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>complaints of mail thefts now the postal services. Not all

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 1>those are indeed bona fide. Maybe somebody lost how to

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>check lost in the mail, got upset reported as stolen

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and it was fine. But you know, by and large,

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>when we talked to some of the experts, some of

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the officials who study this, they say, look, these numbers

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 1>are significantly going up. And just by you know, Bloomberg's

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>view of looking at on these telegram channels of our own,

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean just anecdotally, every day, every hour, almost every minute,

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, these things get posted. Unbelievable. All right, we

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:01.479
<v Speaker 1>gotta leave with their jackuell um uh He is Sobersecurity

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>correspondent Bloomberg News from our ninety nine one studio in

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Washington and our thanks to Jill Webber, editor a Bloomberg

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. So,

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the stocks that we've been watching in today's session,

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and that is Test Lab stock is pretty much holding

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>onto its highs, up about seven point seven percent this company.

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I haven't done the math in the last half hour

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>or so or hour, but it looks like it's on

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>pace to add about eighty five billion to its market

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>cap today. Not too shabby. It's been on a tear.

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's up around the past ten trading days. Uh. Yeah,

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that was before the stock split was announced. That was

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>before that's with today's game. So that's with today's game.

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>If you propose stock split right, I'd love those. West

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Coast correspondent for Bloomberg News. He joins us from the

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg nine sixties studio in San Francisco, also joining us

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>on camera for our YouTube audience, h D. When it

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>comes to stock splits, nothing fundamental changes about a company

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>when more shares are created. And in this day age

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>when you can buy slices of stock through trash wa

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the delity, Robin Hood and more, why do we still

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>see investor optimism with an announcement like this. Yeah, I

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>mean we've been having this debate on Bloomberg television and

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>radio all day. Right. Essentially, the rationale in the past

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>has been to lower the barrier to entry. You know,

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.479
<v Speaker 1>a thousand dollars a share for the retail investor who

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>only wants to buy a few shares, you can't get

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>access to them. Now, you made the good point. You

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>could go on one of the trading apps or platforms

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and buy a fraction of a share um, but it's

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>not the same sensation, right, And remember that Elon Musk

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>has talked about this in the past. Tesla shareholders retail

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>investors are normally people who own the vehicles, they own

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the Tesla energy products. They believe in the long term thesis,

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>they believe in Elon Musk, And it's about shared ownership

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and democratizing that ownership. And we don't know what the

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>rational is here. All we have is the eight K

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>filing and the tweet to go on, Right, but you'd

0:14:56.280 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>assume that lowering that barried entries what their motivation was. Well,

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's interesting because I was thinking about, right, you

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>reduced when you do buybacks. That's initially when investors get excited,

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and because you reduce the amount of shares and then

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>improves your earnings per share. Right, that's just simple math. Yeah,

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know the way the mechanics of this will work.

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>We don't know, because again in the eight K filing,

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>all they said was they're going to ask shareholders to

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>approve the idea of a stock split at the annual meeting.

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>But in the past, what usually happens is you you

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>do a split three for one, five, one, twenty, foe,

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever it may be, and you offer a nominal tent

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of a cent value for each additional share you issue.

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think what's really interesting is that it depends

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>on how big the split is. But a lot of

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>folks they've been talking about whether Tester could be included

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>on the dal Jones Industrial Average, for example, because the

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>mechanics of that index work differently to the SMP five

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and therefore you have a broader slice of the population

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>having a slice of Tesla investing in this company. Okay,

0:15:55.480 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>so the news coming out in a tweet before even

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the a K came out, and what if you follow

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Tesla really closely, it doesn't really have a formal communications

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>department those days, which is I think still so so yesterday, Tim,

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>What is that it doesn't have a formal communications Yeah,

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean what Elon Musk does all the they have

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a formal communications. It's called Twitter and media. Well that's

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that's why. But it but it truly is that that's

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>unique in the sense of large companies like this. But

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>we have more questions than we have answers. Right, this

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is what you and I are discussing now. And don't

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>shed a tear for me. But it's difficult, you know,

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>covering Tesla, you come in for a lot of criticism

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>for from Tesla owners test the shareholders to say, oh,

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>we get it. You know, why can't you guys report

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>on this and that they disbanded disbanded their press team

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>in UM But that's the point, you know, there isn't information.

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>We don't know what the rationale behind this move was.

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>We don't know what the stock split will be in

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of the ratio. We just have an idea that

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>it will happen if shareholders of appre We don't even

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>know where the annual meeting is. You know, last year

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is in October. The year before it was in June.

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>It's difficult, all right, So what do we know? Like

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I always think about, you know, God blessed Jina Martin Adams,

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>because whenever we're like lost among debates, whether it's about markets,

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:12.239
<v Speaker 1>rates or blah blah blah, She's like, Okay, here are

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals. Here's what folks are saying about earnings and stuff.

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>What do we know fundamentally about Tesla in terms of

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>its growth trajectory? We just saw, right, the German facility

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>being opened up, But so what do we know it? Yeah,

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>this is the question. And by the way, you pointed

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>out the stock move, it's one fords worth of value gained.

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>But until that move today, the stock was down here today, right,

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>that's a nice metric, right, But the stock has been

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>under pressure. It's caught up in this narrative around the

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>outlook for higher rates and the fed um and also

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>you know what drives it higher. Well, you're right, Berlin's

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 1>online now, Austin will come on line next month in April.

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 1>That will add to their production. And then in Shanghai

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you have a resurgent COVID nineteen situation that's halted production

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>at Testas plant. According to Bloomberg, sources. The cars built

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in China, those are the profit drivers, right, iron margin

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>vehicles because they've produced more efficiently there. So you know,

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>amongst all the noise, I think you know, Wall Street investors,

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors will look at this and say, as Tim said,

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really fundamentally change much. Thank you. I appreciate that, um,

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 1>because this is something I've been talking about whenever we

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 1>talk Stark splits. Hey, uh, ed you mentioned the shutdown

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in Shanghai, the disruption there in general. How is how

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 1>is Tesla doing managing the supply chain crisis? Yeah, Look,

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Tesla has demonstrated over the duration of the supply chain crisis,

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>which from memory has been going on for about two

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and a half years, but they've demonstrated their more nimbles.

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>So in the case of semi conductors, they've said, we're

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>impacted by a shortage of semi conductors, but what we're

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>able to do is use alternative semi conductors and rewrite

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the code on our end. Remember, semi conductors are used

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 1>to transmit electronic single signals essentially, um, what where they

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>have less flexibilities on the commodities side, right, you can't

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>impact raw price, raw materials prices that degree. But Tesla

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 1>also has long term contracts with a lot of metal

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:07.199
<v Speaker 1>supplies for example, so they are hurting. They did discuss

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>at the prior innings about the potential for margin erosion.

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>But what did they do? Guys? They raised prices because

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the demands there and they have pricing power which a

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of corporate America can't necessarily say right now with

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>higher input costs. It does feel like in terms of visibility,

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>we see more and more players getting into this market.

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>But it does feel like there's been a lot of

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 1>writing about this that in terms of at least for them,

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe mid term, longer term, I mean, Tesla is kind

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of fairly entrenched in this market. Yeah. I would say

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that the most bullish elements of the street would argue,

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm talking about cell side analysts, but people don't

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>want an electric vehicle necessarily, they want a Tesla. You

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>know that there's two different things here. If you believe

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in the transition, right and so the demand that's out

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>there for Tesla products, remember their supply constrained. You go

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 1>on Tesla dot com right now and try and get

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>yourself a vehicle. You could be waiting until August or

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you could be rating until October November of this year.

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>That's how backlog they are. But that's not really that's

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>an outlaw. That's what would have been an outlier in

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a different world. But if you want an electric car

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 1>from Ford right now, you're probably gonna have to wait

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>in a similar amount of time. That's true, And so

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>let's bring it full circle to Shanghai. In February, Tesla

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>delivered fifty six thousand vehicles from that plant, which indicates

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that their stated capacity of food vehicles a year from China,

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 1>they're actually beating that. But now the plant shut down,

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 1>and so what's incredible is that Tesla is able to

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>navigate the supply chain crunch, bring new plants online, but

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>maintain volumes globally and pull ahead. Whereas you know, you

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of the other legacy players they argue, well,

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>we're having some problems lifting up our production ramp because

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of supply chain constraints. Yeah, it's pretty impressive how he's

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>been able to navigate so much, But I go back

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 1>to when he wanted to open up the facility in

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>China and how quickly he got the deal done Like

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 1>that just doesn't happen. But Elon must somehow figures it

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 1>out ed Ludlow, so terrific. Thank you so much. We

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>appreciate at Blomberg News West Coast correspondent head Ludlow. Let

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 1>me try to try that again, Bloomberg News West Coast

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>correspondent Ludlow joining us from Bloomberg nine sixty studio in

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. Tesla shares up about eight percent. I was

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>doing some quick math. It looks like arc uh in

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of their position as at the end of last year,

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe about a hundred and forty six million dollar game

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>based on that bump in Tesla. If that share position

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is still go look at what ARC is done in

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the last three point four percent today. It's just in

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the last few days. Yeah, yeah, exactly. I'm broad. Yeah,

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive. No, no, no, run leaves.

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive. It's a good question. Good drive

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in the drive to the Clobe on Bloomberg Radio. All right,

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting to sound like a broken record because we're

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 1>seen buying into the clothes. In fact, folks, we are

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty much at our eyes to the session. Go figure SMP.

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:04.400
<v Speaker 1>As you heard from Charlie right now, just up about

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty four points. Not a big move, um, but we're

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing buying into the clothes. I always feel like that's

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to some extent significant about the yield curve in version

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>which yield curve? Because which which curve do you look at?

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Wells's which curve matters? That's a that's a question for

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Gina mart And Adams or Mike McKinney. Right, we've talked

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to him about like three months in the ten year

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 1>like which want to focus on? Anyway, let's get to

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it in terms of the equity trade. Dave don Obedient,

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>let's say, if he's got a yield curve preference. His

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer over at CIBC Private Wealth Management on

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Baltimore. I have to say, Dave, it's

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>easy for Tim and I to get like, like, ah,

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>there's so many yield curves that people are looking at.

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>What do you look at when it comes to figuring

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>out where to allocate money for your clients, your institutional

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 1>clients who really for the most part are making long

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 1>term bets. Well, it's a great question. And the divergence

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and what different yield curves or for her thing right

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>now is uh, you know, dimergen as I can ever remember,

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>I tend to place more emphasis on looking at the

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>ten year and then and then comparing it to something

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I would say one year or in now. You know,

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the FED itself, they place emphasis

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>on the FED funds rad of the three months t bill. Uh.

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>That's what's used in the Index of Leading Economic Indicators

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>as a as an important measure um. And you know

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>they're signaling something so different from the twos to tend

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>spread now. But but we tend to look one year

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and in and so the message there is that yes,

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the yield curve is h is flattening, but that it's

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>more gradual. It's going to continue to flatten, but it's

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty far away, um, you know, for from going inverted.

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>So two tends to get a lot of a lot

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of the attention we would say today that's overstating recession risk. Okay,

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>so what should then? What should? Because they're does seem

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:02.919
<v Speaker 1>to be like there is this disconnect, dave between what

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 1>the bond market is telling us some of the equity

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 1>market is telling us. How do you make sense of this? Well,

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's tricky. I think a lot of it um

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 1>revolves around commodity prices, where they've already come and where

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>they might go because of course, uh, you know, commodity

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>prices give us sort of more certainty about the near

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>term inflation outlook, which is it's going to stay high

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and probably go higher, and more uncertainty about the negative

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>impact it might have on growth later in the year

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 1>if this level of commodity prices sustained or um or

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:38.360
<v Speaker 1>goes higher. So, guys, I think what we're seeing now, um,

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's somewhat mystifying to people to see such

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a strong rebound in the equity market since the invasion

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of Ukraine. And it's not because markets decided that was

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>a good thing obviously. Um. I think it goes back

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Fed and and it just the timing just

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>happens to have kind of converged with what happened in

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine when the FED really clarified that it's an inflation

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>fighting mode clearly, and I think that's what the market

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>needed to hear. And of course now we'll go through

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the phase of where they're going to do too much

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>too soon and and all of that. It just speaks

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>to a year of uh, you know, of you know,

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>reduced return expectations in the equity market and enhanced volatility expectation.

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we've got some great reporting on the

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg today, Dave and maybe a lot of folks just

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>thinking about kind of the last couple of weeks and

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out where we go from here. And

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.880
<v Speaker 1>one was about demand destruction, about a world that's more

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>expensive starting to destroy demand, and I do think we

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>have to think think about that. We need to think

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 1>about we're seeing slowdowns potentially in China or increasingly slowdowns

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:48.239
<v Speaker 1>because of economic shutdowns, economy cities being shut down once

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>again because of COVID, you know. And then we've got

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a story that that talks about the fed's best hope

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>increasingly looks like a semi hard landing. They're talking about

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a growth recession, that we will have an economy that's

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:02.479
<v Speaker 1>expanding but a lot more slowly than everybody anticipated, and

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>so we will have an outright contraction, but it's not

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:08.479
<v Speaker 1>going to feel so great. And I think I think

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>your story that you like, because I like them all

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>know that ladder scenario is probably closest to where were

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 1>we came into the year with a strong growth three

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half to four percent real GDP growth year

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>based on what we're seeing in the job market, the

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>housing market, etcetera. UM, But I do think that that

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 1>commodity prices are likely to stay elevated. The demand destruction

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that you talked about will start to seep in. What

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 1>do you think the demand destruction happens. I think we'll

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>start to see some of it in the second half

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of the year. And we know from prior inflation about

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you do reach a point where you know, here from companies, now, well,

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>well we're passing price increases along and our customers are

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:49.360
<v Speaker 1>paying it. You do get a point where you start

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to get a buyer strike right where they just say no,

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>not paying it. Um. And I think that may emerge

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:56.239
<v Speaker 1>in the in the second half of the year. So

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>we've marked our GDP four gast down from a three

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half to four change to the two and

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a half, which isn't a hard landing, but it's kind

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of mediocre growth. And um. You know, and I think

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you look at all the variables out there and you

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>can't say that there's no chance of procession. We would

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>put the odds of procession. You know, things go badly

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in the next year at um at one and three.

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So our base cases the economy grows but more slowly

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 1>than we thought. But tell lists of risen Do you

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's what we're gonna hear from CEOs? You

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>start to report earnings because our Gina Martin Adams, who

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>covers the equity markets for US, so that when stocks

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>were recently at their lows, that's when you had a

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of analysts coming out and raising their earnings estimates,

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and not just for the first quarter, but for the

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>second quarter or third quarter. I'm going to sound like

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a broken record, but to me, that's fundamental analysis and

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that gives you some indication and maybe what's to come

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>this year. Yeah, I'm really curious on not so much

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the numbers, but the color. You know, CEOs and CFOs

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about their at their force Quark results and guidance

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>for the future. I would expect them to kind of, uh,

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, as usual, have a lot of hedging about

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>commodity prices and you know a lot of I think

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.919
<v Speaker 1>statements about how they've been able to pass along price increases,

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>but that's you know, that's unknown going going forward. Um

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>So I I think that you know, you're putt on.

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Analystis right that the every week the consensus expectation for

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>earnings growth this year creeps a little higher. That doesn't

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 1>make sense to me. Uh So, you know, you look

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>at that nine kind of consensus earnings expectation, that's I

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>think a roll over some at some point this this year.

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>And you know another likely source of volatility, Jay, let's

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>talk monetary policy here, because a week ago we'd be

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>sitting here talking about FED share J Powell's hawkish comments

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>at that for at that forum that they and they

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>were so much more hawkish than what we heard from

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>him just a few days prior when we heard from

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the f O m C. What's what is the FED?

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>What should the Fed do? Or what are you banking

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>on the FED doing at its next policy meeting? I mean,

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I think they've they've laid out a pretty clear course. UM.

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I expect that the next meeting that we'll get visibility

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>on the plan for for quantitative tightening and that will commence,

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, shortly um, shortly after the meeting. Um. You know,

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a question about do they do a fifty basis

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>point increase? I think that's data dependent, data dependent on

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the employment report coming up on this Friday will will

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>be an important input. Um. And I also think that

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the inflation data, that there's a chance

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that the next you know, print on the the c

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>p I, you know, could get up close with a

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>double digit print. And so I think they'll be evaluating

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>all that they Had the Russian aggression not happened, they

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>probably would have gone fifty at the last meeting if

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.959
<v Speaker 1>I had to guess CPI double digit, Tim and I

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>we just turned up from Mikes and like, did you

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>just say CPI double digit? How how much would that

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>freak out investors? We know, we understand the reasons why fundamentally,

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>but just quickly, you know, was as when you see

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>something like that, it doesn't matter, you know, your logical

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>side of your brain kind of like like rule pushes

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 1>aside the fundamental reason just quickly. How much might that

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>freak out markets? Maybe even just for a day or

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>for a few hours. Yeah, I think it would round

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers get get a lot more attention. And I think

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>if you see very significant acceleration and the say the

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>energy and food components, that would be most of the

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>reason why you get big acceleration from here. Yeah, but

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we still think we're not seeing the most

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of what we're going to see. See how a service

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 1>extor inflation, uh, shelter related inflation and just the general

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, kind of core inflation rise due to

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>uh uh you know the excess of money and wage growth.

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we gotta run, Hey, Dave, thank you so much.

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Dave dan obed and he's chief investment officer over at

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>CIBC Private Wealth Management on the phone from Baltimore. Thanks

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News