WEBVTT - The Rubik's Cube Episode

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff. You should know, a production of My

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey, You'm welcome to the podcast.

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Clark, and there's Charles W. Chuck Bryant, Jerry's

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>over there, and we're cubing it up with Rubic the Cube.

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Did you see um that cartoon, Rubic the Amazing Cube?

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Did you come across that? Okay? I I feel like

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we are um well within our rights as far as

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>fair use goes, since we are talking about this, to

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>at least play the highly disturbing but also strangely cute

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>voice of Rubic the Amazing Cube. Can I play this

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>real quick? Sure? Okay? That is it. It is awfully unusual,

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>especially when you see this cube. They just basically took it.

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember the Goblin face on Maximum Overdrive on

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that on the front of that semi sort of it's

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a cuter version of that that they

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 1>put onto a Rubik's Cube, put some feed on it,

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and then gave it superpowers. That's Rubic the Amazing Cube.

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Before we go any further, Chuck, I just want to

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>give a shout out for my Chicago show. May I. Yes,

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing a solo End of the World Live show

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago on September twelve at Lincoln Hall and if

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you want tickets, go to l h hyphen st dot com. Okay, okay,

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So back to rubic Chuck. Yeah, it was kind of

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>hard to believe that it took until two thousand fourteen

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>for this thing to be granted National Toy Hall of

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Fame inductee status. Uh. It seems like it would have

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>been much sooner than that because they have sold hundreds

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and hundreds of millions of Rubik's Cube since I had one.

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I still have one. I could do it at one point.

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh really, Yeah, I could do it in a couple

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of minutes. Wow, Chuck, I'm impressed. I had no idea. Yeah,

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I can still do. I can still do one side

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and like the top row surrounding that side on all sides,

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's where I completely forget. Oh, I see, So

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't do it in a couple of minutes now

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you just have you could in the past. Yeah, when

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I was nine. Um, I'm impressed. I've never been able

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to solve a Rubik's Cube. I've never been sucked in

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>enough to, um like really spend a significant amount of time.

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>But um I was playing with my niece's Rubik's Cube

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 1>the other day studying for this, and um I was like, yeah,

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I could see how somebody would become obsessed with this

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing for sure. Yeah, it was fun and

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 1>it was you know, to call it all the rage

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>is an understatement. It was one of the most popular

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>toys of all time, invented in nine by a math

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>enthusiast and Hungary and architect professor named er No Rubik.

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Appropriately enough, they named him after the cube. That's right.

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't know what we're talking about, it

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 1>seems weird to describe a Rubik's Cube, but we'll probably

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>be taking a task if we do not. I would say,

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>just come out from under the rock that you've been

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>living under. But we may have some young listeners who

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>don't even know what this thing is, this piece of

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 1>eighties ephemera, even though it's not ephemera because they're still

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty popular. But it is a cube made up of

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty six little mini cubes called cubs, which is kind

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of a cute little name. I think, so not as

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>cute as Rubic the Amazing Cube, but yeah, little cubs

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and they're in a three inch by three inch by

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>three inch. Well that's not quite true, a three by

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>three by three grid eventually creating a cube that measures

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>two point two five inches or five point seven centimeters

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>per side. Right, And so what there's six six cube

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>faces because it's a cube, and each face has a

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>different color. There's orange, blue, green, yellow, white, and red

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and um. When you when you mix these things up,

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>it's just a jumble, a riot of different colors like

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you've never seen your life. But the point is to

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>move these cubes around through the eighteen different ways you

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 1>can move any given cube, um, so that all of

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the colors are lined up, all the colored cubes are

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>all the same on each face. And it sounds easy, friends,

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it is not easy, not at all. Like maybe for

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>some people it's easy, but for the rest of us,

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>normal focus normis, it is not easy in any way,

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>shape or form. No, it is not. Uh And in fact,

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>they even suggest that you read about how to solve

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the Rubik's cube. It is the very rare individual that

0:04:56.760 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>can literally just figure it out without any help at all. Um,

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that's really tough to do. So it's not like you're

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>not a cheat. If you look at like how to

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>solve the Rubik's cube and then memorize these patterns and

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 1>practice them. That's sort of the point, right, Yeah, like

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>go look it up like it's fine. No one will

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>will get mad at you for that, because it's no

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>fun to never solve a puzzle. Well, that's why I

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>think I've never gotten sucked in. I was like, I'm

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>not even there's no way I'm gonna possibly stumble across this,

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and I just don't think like this. My spatial reasoning

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is terrible. I'm not great at math. I'm color blind.

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Everything just looks white. No, it's really not. I can't

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>discern squares from from circles. It's just I'm off. So um. Originally,

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the Rubik's cube was called the magic cube, and it

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>was invented, like you said, by Erno Rubik, who was Hungarian.

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>So it was originally called the Beavish Kotzka, which is

0:05:55.800 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>magic cubean the Hungarian means butt head. I believe it does.

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>The magic butt head was Bevis and butt head a right,

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>nice man. It's like, where's he going with this after

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>all these years? It's no, I didn't, but I was like,

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm going with this will Chuck. I trust him

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and I paid off to So Mr Rubik got his

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Hungarian patent on the mechanical design of this in and

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>it was in Hungary only for a while. Uh, and

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it did pretty well and hungry. Um, but that's kind

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of where it stayed. It was. Uh. It was because

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of the politics of the time and the fact that

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>it was hungry. It was not super easy to get

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a an American patent or to bring it over and

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>market it here in the West, so it was pretty

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 1>much a Hungarian local sensation for its early like probably

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>first year. Yeah, he had like a Hungarian toy manufacturer

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>make like ten thousand of them, but he wasn't happy

0:06:57.320 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>with him, so we cut the run off at five thousand.

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>So there were five thousands of these things floating around

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Budapest and and maybe Hungry in general. And it was

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>just total serendipity that there was a guy named Tibor Laxi.

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'm quite sure that's not exactly how you say

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>his last name, but that's how it's how it spelled.

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>It's probably like Lucia or something like that. But um,

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>t Bor, I'm I just love that name. It's a

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>great name. Um. He was an entrepreneur who had left

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Hungry and moved to Austria, so he had really developed

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a taste for capitalism. While he happened to be visiting

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>back home in Budapest when he was at a restaurant

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and he noticed a waiter playing with the Beavish kotska,

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the magic cube, and um, he said, you there, what

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is that? And uh, he said, well, it's the Beavish kotzka.

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>How about I sell it to you for a dollar?

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And I believe he bought that for a dollar, played

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>around with it for a minute. It was like this

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>could be big. So he found out who invented it,

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and he scheduled a meeting with Erno Rubic. Yeah, and

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>he would say later on that he that Erno Rubik

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>had a lot to do with why he decided to

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>get into business with him. And here's his quote. He said,

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>when Rubik first walked into the room, I felt like

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>giving him some money. He looked like a beggar. He

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>was terribly dressed. You gotta remember this guy as a professor,

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>so they're not known for their sharp attire. He was

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>terribly dressed and he had a cheap Hungarian cigarette hanging

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>out of his mouth. But I knew I had a

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>genius on my hands, and I told him we could

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>sell millions. Yeah he was right. Oh man, was he

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>ever right? He understated it actually, um the t Boar,

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna call him t Boar. He took this

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>magic cube and he started going to toy fairs, uh,

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think he struck out at a few of them.

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>But he really hit it out of the park at

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the Nuremberg Toy Fair when he met a toy expert

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 1>who had connections with Ideal Toy Company. Remember Ideal back

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in the day. I think I do for sure. I'm

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure they made that um the uh the uh

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>what was the daredevil's name, Evil Kin? I think they

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>made the Evil kinevil stunt bike. You know what's funny

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 1>is um they make those now for other they have

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>there's like an incredible stunt bike with plastic girl. It's

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the same exact function. We have one in our house

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and you load it up and crank it and there

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>she goes. Is it the exact same mold? They just

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>put like different pain on it or something like that.

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Knockoff toys. Man, it's slightly different, uh in its design,

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's clearly like the same exact toy. Do you

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>remember that gallery of knockoff toys I made back when

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>we used to blog those. I think it's still up

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>somewhere on our stuff. You should remember how excited we

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>would get about gallery page views. Yeah, oh, we'd be like,

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>holy cow, we're up to seventy and it's only been

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>up for a week and a half. So funny. So

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>at the Nuremberg Toy Fair, uh t boor runs into

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the guy from Ideal and they end up purchasing it.

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:07.719
<v Speaker 1>They purchased the rights to this, the global rights, and

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>they they they basically sign up to create a million

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Rubik's cubes. Yeah. Also we should say it this toy fair,

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>he did a pretty smart thing. Instead of like buying

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a booth, he just came and worked the floor with

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Rubik's cubes and got this like ground buzz going by

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.199
<v Speaker 1>walking around and giving these things to people, and like

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that's genius. Like for something like this, that's the perfect

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>way to pique someone's curiosity is not to have some

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>flashy uh like spinning giant Rubik's cube, is to actually

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 1>get in the hands of people walking around the floor,

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>especially if you say, I'm Tibor Let's party. I bet

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to call it t boards Cube. It's pretty

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 1>good name. He probably did, although he was smart because

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I remember originally it was called the Magic Cube. At

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>some point. If it wasn't t Boor, it was Ideal

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>who said we're gonna rename this the Rubik's Cube. And

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure Erno Rubik was like, oh, okay, I guess

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>if you insist. I wonder if he was into it

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>or not, or if he pushed forward, or if he

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>was like, I'm not really into that, but if you

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>think it'll sell cubes, that's what I'm guessing he probably did.

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he was going to stand in the

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>way of it, but he was not like vying for

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it by any means. That's my impression. But I'm just

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>totally making that up, but that I have the same impression,

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>which means that if you put our two impressions together,

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it equals fact. So Ideal sells one hundred million Rubik's

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>cubes in the first two years. They just signed up

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to sell one million. They sold a hundred million in

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>two years. Yeah, I mean, I'm sure they had problems

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:44.599
<v Speaker 1>keeping up with production. Uh, some of the accolades, and

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>eight and eighty one at won the UK's Toy the

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 1>Year Award two years running. Um In eighty two, there

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>were five books about solving it on the New York

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Times bestseller list, one of which I owned. I owned

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the classic, The Simple Solution to the Rubics Cube by

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>James G. Norris Q. He was a chemistry student at

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Stanford And get this, dude, this book was the number

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>one best selling book of night period. He sold six

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>point seven million books and it is still the fasting

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>selling book in the history of Bantam Books. Is that right?

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Can you believe that out of all the books that year,

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that was the number one? I can, because that really

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of underscores just how nuts the not just America,

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the world went for Rubicks cube. That the number one

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>selling book was a book about solving the toy. That

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that that was it. Yeah, they had sold five hundred

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>million of them by the time rolled around. So so

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about the books though for another second. At one

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>point the number one, two, and four positions on the

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>New York Times bestseller list where all Rubik's Cube Solution books.

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Three he was probably Stephen King or something, probably and

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those books was written by a twelve of

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>year old named Patrick Bossert called You Can Do the Cube,

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty adorable if you think about it, and

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Christians later made a movie called Gleaming the Cube, one

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of my all time favorites, which had nothing to do

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>with Rubik's cubes. As it turns out, it was about skateboarding. Um,

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 1>so there's a just a craze going on around the world,

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>like everyone is into the Ruby's Cube. Everyone's buying one.

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>They sold, like I've seen anywhere from three hundred and

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty million. The highest I've seen is six hundred million.

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>They sold a ton of these things, hundreds and hundreds

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of millions of them. Are those are the official ones too?

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>There were plenty of knockoffs. Sure, there was books on

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times bestseller list about this. It was

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>featured in Times Scientific, American News Scientists. Um. There was

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a paper that was printed in the New England Journal

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of Medicine that talked about cubists thumb, which is a

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>real thing. It's a type of tendonitis in your thumb

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that you get in your non dominant hand because that's

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the hand that you used to stabilize the Rubik's cube,

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and so the edge of the cube pressing into the

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>heel of your thumb where it meets the rest of

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>your thumb um, that could create tendonitis for people who

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>were staying up for days on end just playing with

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>this thing, trying to to beat this puzzle. There was

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a craze like like no other. I say, we take

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a break, okay, uh, and we come back and we

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about uh, Mr Rubic or maybe he's a doctor.

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call him Dr Rubic, and how he created

0:14:36.200 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the mechanics of this puzzle. Alright, so supposedly Dr Rubik,

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>surely he's a doctor. I would let's call him Professor

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Ruby because he was definitely an architecture professor in a

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>math genius. Though I'm I'm with he's got to be

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a doctor, all right, Professor Dr Rubik, uh supposedly was

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>not even trying to create this puzzle in n I'm

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>sorry seventy four when he first started out um, as

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>legend has it, he was trying to create a mathematical

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>model for three D design class, which makes sense considering

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>his job. Other people say, no, he was just really

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of guy that like to tinker. He was fascinated

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>by geometry and shapes, and he was trying to just

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>solve a problem of mechanics in three dimensions. But according

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to the Toy Hall of Fame, he was very much

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to invent a puzzle. Uh, and that may just

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>be folklore. Yeah, he he knew what he wanted. He

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to make this three by three cube that was

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>made up of smaller cubes that could all like interact

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in twist store around like. He had the idea for

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the Rubik's cube, which was step one, but step two

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>was a doozy, and that was figuring out how to

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>invent a mechanical solution to make this thing work the

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>way he wanted it to. And apparently he was. Um.

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>There was a pretty good article Mental Floss by a

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>guy named Noah Davis who recounted that um one day

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Rubic was walking down the Danube alongside the Danube in

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Budapest and looked down and noticed that there was just

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a pile of nice, polished rounded river rocks and thought,

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I've got it. I've been thinking about a cube. Everything's

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>got to be a cube. But what if I added

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a sphere to the mix? Two? And that these things

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>rotated around us. Fear that would give the freedom of

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>motion that I need to make this thing work. And

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that was that that that that was the solution to

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the puzzle, as it were. Yeah, I mean, if you're

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>like me and probably lots of other kids in the

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>early eighties, you took your rubiscube apart at some point,

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>did you? I never, I never saw one. Lots of

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 1>video on this. Yeah. Oh yeah, I've got a screw

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>driver out in pretty short order and pomp those things apart. Uh.

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 1>And it's kind of cool when you look at the

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you take all those cubs out, you

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>get down to the center and those three x s

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>um and they have each one is tipped with two

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>opposing center cubis. It's kind of cool looking. And then

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.959
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense how all these things fit together and

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 1>how it works. Yeah, another way to think about it

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:30.959
<v Speaker 1>is just think about like a sphere a ball, and

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>then you've got six arms sticking out in in um

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>at right angles from it, so that it forms a

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>three dimensional plus side plus signed and at the end

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 1>of each one of these arms is a cube, a

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>colored cube. And though that's the skeleton of the thing,

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and then what what erno Rubik figured out was that

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 1>that's all that needed to be attached to the center.

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>You could make the other cubes attached to those those

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>face cubes, those center cubes qubis. Um. You could make

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>some cubes qubis attached to those cubis, and then other

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>cubs attached to the other cubs, and then they will

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>all kind of rotate around each other. But they're all

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>really rotating on three different axis coming out of that sphere.

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a gene like this guy has gotten, like if

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>he started a craze and as you know, kind of

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:26.880
<v Speaker 1>viewed as this great inventor for the toy like math, physics, architecture,

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>um in the in a number of different fields. He's

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>botanical engineering for sure. Yeah, he's viewed as just a

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>god in some senses for for cracking this this problem

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and creating this three dimensional structure that actually works in

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in reality that people can learn and study from. That's right.

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>So he's figured out this the mechanics of it all,

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's still not a puzzle yet until he applies

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>these colors. That's what makes it a puzzle, because like

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we said that at the beginning, the idea is that

0:18:57.920 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you have all the colors on each side matching one,

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and there he applies these colored stickers all over mixes

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and twisted up a little bit, and he's like, I've

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>invented the cube. And then he's like, wait a minute,

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how to solve the puzzle. So he

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>actually had built this thing, stickered it up, and looked

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>at it, I imagine with some level of accomplishment, and

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>then realized that the biggest, probably uh, the hardest thing

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to do in this whole process, still lay in front

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of him, which was because there were no books out

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Right. He invented it, so he had

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how to solve his own puzzle, and

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>it took him a while. It took him a month

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>from what I saw, Yeah, and I imagine he worked

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>on this pretty much NonStop to figure this thing out.

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>He he did, and he would like write down like

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the different different moves, combination of moves which now they're

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>called algorithms. Um, it's just types of moves that if

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 1>you do them in a specific sequence, will solve a

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>specific jumbled Rubik's cube. Right, Um, So he wrote them down.

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 1>He kind of kept track of it, and that was

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>like the first the first um, first time anyone had

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of applied analysis to this, but it would not

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>be the last, obviously, is the New York Times bestseller shows.

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>But the reason why it's so difficult to solve a

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Rubik's cube just by happenstance is that just the sheer

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>number of possible configurations of the cube. Right, each face

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>has nine cubs, and there's six um faces, so there's

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty four cubs, but they all relate to one another,

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>and so if you move one, that's one configuration, If

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you move it another direction, that's another configuration, and so

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>on and so on, and so with these fifty four cubs, Chuck,

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:52.479
<v Speaker 1>are you ready for this? Yes? The possible number of

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>configurations is forty three quintillion, two hundred and fifty two quadrillion,

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>three trillion, two hundred and seventy four billion, four hundred

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and eighty nine million, eight hundred and fifty six thousand

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 1>possible configurations of a Rubri's cube. Amazing, and one of

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:14.400
<v Speaker 1>them one is the right one where all six faces

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>are all the same color. Qubi's just one. So just

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>doing it accidentally, your chances are one in about forty

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>three trillion that you're going to stumble upon that right combination,

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty amazing, don't you think. And by the way,

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I said in their fifty four there's twenty cubes.

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe there's fifty four faces. Yeah, I mean that's

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a deal. Each qub has three sides or two sides,

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>depending on if it's a corner or an edge, or

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>one if it's in the center. Right, So it's kind

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of confusing. But but nine times six, so nine nine

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>squares or nine different colors squares times six faces is

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty four I think fifty four faces twenty something cubies.

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 1>This is how good at Matthew Man, It's it's really

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's so funny because it's such a simple little thing.

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>But once you start really breaking it down, you're like,

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>we could make this super confusing if we dried hard,

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>for sure. But what people have figured out is that

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>they're they're like, you may have like a one and

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>forty three quintillion chance of stumbling across the right configuration

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>by accident, but what people have figured out is that

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>there are combination of moves like you know, um uh

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>front right up, up twice and then down. That's that's

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 1>an algorithm, and if you apply that to a certain

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of scrambled a certain configuration of a scrambled Rubik's cube,

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it will bring it back to solved. And so people

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.640
<v Speaker 1>have spent a lot of time developing algorithms, and that's

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 1>why Erno Rubik was originally doing when he was like, oh,

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:50.719
<v Speaker 1>if I do this, this and this, it will make

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it solved. And he wrote that down. That's what's called

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>an algorithm. Yeah, And I remember in the book, like

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 1>each book had their own little shorthand, I guess, but

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I remember the one that I had. It definitely had

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 1>the algorithms all spelled out with like shorthand for what

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>each move was called. So it would sort of look

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>like a math problem made out of letters, right, Like

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I saw you for up and dfer down, which makes

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense. But then also, um, you can

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you know there you can move something to the right.

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>You can twist one of the rows of cubes to

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>the right, but you can also twist it to the

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>left too. So I saw an apostrophe after like l

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>apostrophe would be counterclockwise left, and then you can add

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a number two, so you do that twice, which is

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>really a d eighty degree counterclockwise turn. So interesting. It

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>really is kind of interesting. It like at first, you know,

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 1>when I first, um went over this article the first time,

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 1>just taking it in, like how this is pretty neat.

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>But the Rubik's cube I found has many many layers

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to it, and you can really keep going deeply into it,

0:23:56.119 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>well beyond just playing with the cube and try to

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>solve it. Like there's a lot of math involved. There's

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of physics and mechanics involved. You. I mean,

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you can get us sucked into it as you like, Buddy,

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>just try not to go insane like erno Rubik did.

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 1>He did not when he set that that building on fire.

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>He Uh. It's interesting though, how big of a hit

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this became sort of it flew in the face of

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of um like sort of rules of the

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>toy industry and that uh it didn't make sounds, um,

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it didn't have interchangeable parts. It didn't have things that

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you could sell along with it, like you know, clothing,

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't. I guess you could dress your little Rubik's cube,

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.640
<v Speaker 1>but then you have a special relationship with it, I guess,

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>so you could dress it up and be like him Ruby.

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>It didn't have batteries. It was never like, well, I

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>guess it appeared on a TV show. Was that a

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 1>TV show? Yeah, it was. It was a Saturday morning

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 1>cartoon that came on right before pac Man, which was

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>honestly one of the all time great cartoons ever. Yeah,

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it just it wasn't Mark Codable though, like you would

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's toy would be. The reason that it appealed

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and endured is because it is a real challenge and

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you get a real sense of reward once you've done

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 1>it right, and that really hooks people. It really does

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>hook people. And again there's like not there's no shame

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:23.439
<v Speaker 1>in going and looking up algorithms to solve UM Rubik's cubes,

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>like just processes. And in fact, if you start doing

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>any kind of research on rubicscues, you'll find like there's

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>actually specific UM methods of attack that people suggest for

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>for beginners to start with. There's one called the white

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Cross method class which is um entails eating a handful

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of white Cross gas station speed up for four days

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>until you until you get done. It's actually you start

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>with the edge pieces and then you move to the

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>corner pieces, putting them all in place and then you

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>um go on from there, starting with the white face

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>of the cube. That's right. And uh, this toy was

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a big hit anyway, but it it is endured, Uh

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>not because of stocking stuffers or nostalgia, but it is

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>endured all these years later because of competition. Yeah. So

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>let's take a break now and we'll talk about speed

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>cubing right after this. Well, now we're on the road

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>driving in your truck. Want to learn a thing or

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>two from Josh Man Chuck. It's stuff you should know,

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, Okay, So the Rubik's Cube comes out in

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the world basically in ninety and the next year, the

0:26:56.720 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>very next year, countries around the world were whole holding

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>national championships for um solving Rubik's cubes as fast as

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you possibly could. It's called speed cubing. Yes. And then

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a year after that they all got together, all the

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>champions of the countries for the very first Rubik's Cube

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>World Championship in Budapest, which is kind of cool. Um,

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's what has kept people going for so long,

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>because there there's people are still trying to beat these records.

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I saw a kid and it's kind of hard to

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>tell what the top times because they list the top

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>times in these competitions. But I saw a kid on

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>YouTube do it in like six seconds or four or

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>five seconds. I saw one do it in three point

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>four seven. Yeah, I don't know how, like how it's

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>officially judged though there's a timer, um and one of

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>those there's one of those mats that you keep your

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:55.640
<v Speaker 1>hands on, But like, why does it say that that

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 1>those aren't world records? Then? I don't know. That's what

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I saw was the world record was in two thousand eighteen.

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>It was three point four seven seconds by Yu Shang

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Yu Shang do sorry of China. So you've seen other

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>things listed. I just don't know if there's like the

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>bodies aren't speaking to one another or what. Maybe it's

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 1>that was a a non championship uh time sanctioned event

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>or even even maybe it was a qualifier or something

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>like that. So it doesn't count as the world record

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>unless you get whatever time is done at the World

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:35.160
<v Speaker 1>championship that's considered the world record. Who knows. It's crazy

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 1>to see how fast these kids and it's usually kids

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that win, um, I guess with their little nimble fingers

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and brain sponges. Uh it's crazy how fast they're doing.

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't look real. It looks like some sort of

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>weird faked video. Yeah. And here's the other thing too.

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you mentioned brain sponges because it is like

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a um, an intellectual pursuit. Like from the beginning of this,

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>this toy's release in nine teen eighty, like they win

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a different route, like you're saying it doesn't require batteries.

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>It was you know, um, it doesn't make a noise

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that, so they went a different route

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in advertising it. And so this is an intelligent game,

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>like I'm sure Isaac Newton discovered gravity, but could he

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>solve a Rubik's cube? You know, So they really kind

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of play that up. And it's true because these kids

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 1>who are solving or people who are solving Rubik's cubes

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>super fast. It's not just like look or their fingers

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>are just moving forward them. They have memorized hundreds, if

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>not thousands, of these algorithms and have gotten to the

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>point where they can look at a cube and figure

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>out which algorithm is going to solve it the fastest,

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and then when the time starts, they can also move

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>their fingers really really quick and that's how they're getting

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>these amazing times. It's not just speed and dexterity, it's

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>also knowing what algorithm is going to work best. Yeah,

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>for sure, you know, it died out pretty quickly, like

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>most fad toys. Um, once you sell a lot of these,

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't need another one unless you break yours or something.

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of one of those things where and

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>which is again why it flew in the face of

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the toy industry because they couldn't sell ancillary products alongside it.

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you know, it died out pretty quickly in

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the championship. Uh two was the last one for about

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty years until the Internet comes along and all of

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a sudden there are people posting faster times than ever

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.959
<v Speaker 1>before than twenty years earlier. And in two thousand three,

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>UM in Canada, there was a speed cuber named Dan

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Gosby who organized a competition in Toronto. And this is

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>where they're getting it down to, like twenty seconds, and

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>they have different categories like blindfolded, fewest moves, one handed,

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>feet feet feet dude. Last year someone did it in

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty three seconds by foot, which was about the quickest

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>time by hand at the first competition, Yes, and it

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>took them longer to figure out that they had solved

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it then it did to actually solve it because they

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>had to use a stick to turn the Rubik's cube

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>over because they had used their feet to solve it.

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think, uh, when you participate, it didn't pay

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>off as well as I thought it would. Sight. Uh,

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you get fifteen seconds to look at the cube over.

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Um they are all started. Uh, like the cubes are

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>all started the same with like a computer generated random scramble.

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>It's just fair. You get that fifteen seconds, you check

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it out, you set it on your mat, and then

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you go and it's just like I said, it's amazing

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to see these things done in like sub four seconds. Yeah,

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>because they're there. I mean their hands actually do kind

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of blur, like you can't really follow where their hands

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>are at any given time. They barely touch the rubrics cube.

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And they're using To be fair, they're using specialized speed cubes.

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>They're not just using like off the shelf rubrics cubes.

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about those, go ahead, talk about them. Sure. Yeah.

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>So so people go to the trouble of getting a

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 1>speed cube. It's like, you know, you can get one

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>for you can get a good one from what I understand,

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>for about seventies seventy five bucks. And these things are

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>literally well oiled machines that are just super fast. Some

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of them use magnets so that you can tell when

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>they're snapped into place, and um, they move a lot

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>more easily and quickly. Um. There you can just look

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>at and be like, that's a high end Rubik's cube

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>right there. Yeah. Like you can pay to get your

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>cube serviced, uh and checked out at speed cube shop.

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So someone will take it apart, a technician and they

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 1>will look at each of those little cubs for defects

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and like, has it got a little bump here that

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>will slow it down? They'll smooth that out, like you said,

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they use magnets, um. And one of the reasons

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>for the magnets is it creates that snap when a

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 1>turn is completed. Because if you want to move these

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>things really fast, you don't want it to be you know,

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>even if it's an eighth of an inch out of whack,

0:32:56.760 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna be able to turn it the other way.

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>So you want it to snap up and lock into place. Uh,

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, you want it's just amazing, how how engineered

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>these things have become. What in these speed cubing competitions, right, well,

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean just to keep up, you've gotta you've gotta

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>get yourself a speed cube. If you showed up, like

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to an actual competition with just a regular Rubik's cube,

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you'd be laughed out of place,

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>but they would. They would certainly feel bad for you.

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>You know. What they should do is like because you know,

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I remember them loosening up really well and getting faster

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>just because you played with it more. Instead of giving

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>everyone speed cubes and trying to get this ultra red

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Bull record, which they sponsor the events now by the way, Uh,

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>they should give everyone like out of the package. Make

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it as hard as possible. I agree. I think that

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>there would be some um, you know, preteens who are

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>really high strung that would cry if they were confronted

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>with that challenge, if they had to put their speed

0:33:57.240 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>cube down. Yeah, they'd be like, this is not fair.

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>No one prepared me in my life for this. I

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>did mention Red Bull because it was kind of controversial

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>for many years. Uh, the Rubics World Championships, Uh, we're

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>co hosted by the World Cube Association with the support

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of the brand. But then clearly some money changed hands

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago. That was the Red Bull

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Rubik's Cube World Championship. Uh you know, red Bull got involved,

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the brand, Rubik got involved, which means there was money

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>changing hands. You're really fascinated with that money changing hands,

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't too? Well? I mean sure, because it was I

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 1>think everyone saw it as for what it was, which was,

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, there's a corporate sponsor attached to it. Yeah,

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and that that is like a pretty important point because

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 1>like this was there was already a World Championship and

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 1>it was like a grassroots organization that had grown up

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand and three and they were doing really well,

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 1>and then all of a sudden, fifteen years later, red

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Bull comes along attached to the Rubik's Brain is like,

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:57.800
<v Speaker 1>out of the way, nerds, this is the real one.

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:00.360
<v Speaker 1>And so apparently, um, it was a there was a

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of controversy, like you were saying, but um, now

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:06.840
<v Speaker 1>they kind of coexist and the Red Bull Rubics sponsored

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 1>one changed their name from World Championship to World Cup

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>so that they don't step on each other's feet. At all.

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>But if you think about it, that's a pretty big

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>win for this grassroots world cubing association to to be

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>able to keep their original name and not have to

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>change their name. You know, Hats off to them. Hats

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>off indeed. So um one of the uh the the

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>things that I said about the Rubik's cube, Chuck is

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's got a lot of layers too, and there's

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of surprising math involved. Specifically, there is a

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of algebra called UM group theory, and um one

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of the one of the things that has long kind

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 1>of fascinated mathematicians is that there is somewhere in there

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a a number of moves, there's an algorithm that has

0:35:57.760 --> 0:35:59.839
<v Speaker 1>or there's a number of moves associated with any number

0:35:59.840 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 1>of algorithms. Man, I'm making this way harder than it

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>actually is. Where it represents the maximum number of moves

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you would need to use to solve any configuration, any

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of the forty three quintillion configurations of a Rubik's cube.

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 1>And some people figured out that this number must exist,

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and brother they got obsessed with it. From to two

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:27.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand ten, some people almost set a building full of

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Rubik's cubes on fire yeah. I mean they've really researched

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:35.320
<v Speaker 1>this stuff to the point where, uh, like computer scientists

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>are looking into this. There was a guy, uh named

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>Thomas rakiki Um who got that the upper limit down

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to twenty two moves and this is like Google is

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>helping him out with the processing power. So they call

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it God's algorithm. I mean, in the case of Rubik's cube,

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:57.840
<v Speaker 1>um they got down to twenty is where they landed, right, Yeah,

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>But God's algorithm can be used for any uzzle really,

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, and that is and why do they

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>call it God's algorithm? It's what how God would solve

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the puzzle. So from what I saw is God's God's

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:13.920
<v Speaker 1>number is that the maximum number of moves that God

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 1>would require to solve any configuration of the puzzle. Got

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 1>a little confusing in this article because it's a bit

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of a brain trick. It's like the fewest moves, but

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a maximum number of moves right right exactly. It's

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to wrap your mind around. And then there's

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>actually fewer moves for other algorithms. So I saw God's

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>number is actually probably more like somewhere between nineteen and twenty.

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>But because there are algorithms out there that have to

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:51.359
<v Speaker 1>be done in no less than twenty moves. That's still

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>God's number. And there's also the Devil's number. I saw

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:56.879
<v Speaker 1>it too, which is the number of moves in an

0:37:56.880 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 1>algorithm that it would take to go through all forty

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>three plus quintillion um configurations before you solve it. Which

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a pretty good name for that one. Yeah,

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 1>now that's the one that they're on the trail of now.

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>But they're they're done at twenty, right, they are. But

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it's interesting that that we're not

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>entirely certain. It's not like, okay, this has been proven,

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it's done. What the reason why they arrived at twenties

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 1>because they actually built an algorithm to try to solve

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:32.239
<v Speaker 1>these algorithms. They taught an AI basically how to play

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Rubik's Cuba. They said, here's a Rubik's Cuba teacherself, and

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 1>then they had it play just just some mind numbing

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:44.359
<v Speaker 1>number of different Rubik's cubes hands trying to solve it,

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and it kept coming up with twenty and so it

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:49.799
<v Speaker 1>came up with twenty enough times that they're like, well,

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:52.360
<v Speaker 1>our computer God has told us that twenty is the

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:55.239
<v Speaker 1>is God's number. So there you have it. But we

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>no one, It wasn't proven, it wasn't solved. It was

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:00.799
<v Speaker 1>just like, this thing is so so smart that we're

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>just gonna go with twenty. So someone still working on

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 1>it then, probably, I guess, but I think I get

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the impression that they have moved on to the devil's number. So,

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 1>as you would imagine, with the toy of this caliber,

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 1>they were bound to be other people saying they invented it,

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and patent battles would ensue, and of course this was

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the case with the Rubik's Cube. Uh in ninety seven,

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 1>when Rubict got his Hungarian patent for the magic Cube,

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 1>there was another inventor named Larry Nichols who had already

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>patented something very similar in the US. Isn't that amazing? Yeah,

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 1>this was in nineteen seventy two, but his was for

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a two by two by two cube, a three by

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:43.880
<v Speaker 1>three by three, still same concept, And at first he

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 1>was like, this is this is hilarious. You know, I

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:48.320
<v Speaker 1>had the same idea, and now it's become a national craze.

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of satisfying. And somebody said, do you have

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>any idea. How much money you are losing out on

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:55.760
<v Speaker 1>right now? You should sue? He said, Oh my gosh,

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you're right, I should sue. And I get the impression

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that either the company he worked for or the company

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 1>he sold the patent to really lead the charge in

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>suing for this patent infringement. Um. But he had a

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty good case. I mean, he had invented it and

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 1>patented it years before. It was just the number of

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>cubes involved was smaller. Yeah, I mean there was another

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:18.840
<v Speaker 1>guy too, a guy named Frank Frank Fox, I thinking

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:21.880
<v Speaker 1>seventy four. He actually did the three by three by three,

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:26.719
<v Speaker 1>but he let his patent laps, whereas Nichols did not.

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:29.400
<v Speaker 1>And those people like you were talking about that he

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that actually owned nichols patent were called uh Molecular Research Corporation.

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 1>That sounds scary yeah and ligitious. Yeah, yeah they do.

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So I want to point out, though, it's definitely worth

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 1>saying out right, there is no evidence, and I don't

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>think anyone's ever leveled in accusation that Erno Rubic stole

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:53.359
<v Speaker 1>this idea. It was just arrived at independently, and he

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:55.879
<v Speaker 1>was working behind the iron curtain at the time too,

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 1>So the chances of any exposure are pretty low. It

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>was just some people kind of came up with the

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 1>same idea at the same time. And erno Rubik's is

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the one that hit trite. A federal district court ruled

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in favor of Moleculon, but then in eighty six and

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:15.719
<v Speaker 1>appeals court overturned that, saying only that two by two

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:20.879
<v Speaker 1>by two uh Rubik's cube because they started making different variations. Um,

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:22.760
<v Speaker 1>they made a smaller one that they said in French.

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I remember now I had a little guy

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 1>on a car key for a short time. Oh yeah,

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I remember that. I'm not mistaken. But then in nineteen

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:34.760
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine, another appeals court upheld the previous appeals court decision.

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I should I should say. I read an article by

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 1>that guy uh Nichols who had the original patent, and

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 1>they were like, you know you, I think they were

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>suing for like fifty million or something, and there were

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you satisfied with the outcome? He said, yeah, I was satisfied.

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 1>He's like, I got enough to put both of my

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:54.440
<v Speaker 1>kids through Harvard, so I'm pretty happy with that. And um,

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, like he invented this thing that he was

0:41:56.680 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>able to send his kid through Harvard with you know, yeah,

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that's always interesting when someone wins something like that. But

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't like stolen from him, right, It was just

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 1>he had the patent first and they agreed. You know

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 1>What's what's even crazier that makes that story just absolutely insane.

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>He had approached Ideal toys with and they had not

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 1>bought it, And then they went on years later to

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:27.400
<v Speaker 1>buy um the the Erno Rubic version. Yeah, they put

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 1>out a bunch of difference. They made big ones, like

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 1>the tiny ones I just talked about. I remember I

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 1>had a snake. I did too, and I had no

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 1>idea what to do with that. I just played with

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it like it was a snake. I did the same thing. Yeah,

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I just twisted around stuff. I still don't know what

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you were supposed to do with that thing. I think

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 1>eventually the snake would be put together in some sort

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of a three dimensional octagon or something, if I remember

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>for hexagon. Yeah, I was way off, but yeah, I

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't know how to I didn't even try to learn.

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:55.839
<v Speaker 1>I just kind of played with it. I taught mine

0:42:55.840 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 1>did drink water. Mine drinks from a ups right, that's

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:05.839
<v Speaker 1>very rough. Wickham Uh, Erno Rubik is still alive and well.

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>He lives in Hungary, still teaches architecture. Uh I imagine,

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:13.800
<v Speaker 1>has a boatload of money, so he's founded some multiple

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 1>foundations with the conventers. It's very cool. Yeah, he has

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a boatload of money, so much so that his success

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>story is considered by some to have been the thing

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:29.319
<v Speaker 1>that opened the gates to capitalism in Hungary. Amazing um.

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 1>They also made him the president of the Hungarian Engineering

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Academy and he's still I think shows up once in

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:40.399
<v Speaker 1>a while to the World Championships and maybe the World Cup.

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:43.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. He didn't seem like a very controversial type.

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>It seems like a good guy. And if you really

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:47.480
<v Speaker 1>want to go crazy, if you've solved a ton of

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Rubik's cubes, but this has kind of made your nostalgic

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:52.719
<v Speaker 1>to try something harder. They make a thirteen by thirteen

0:43:52.800 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>by thirteen Rubik's Cube, and there's something else called the

0:43:56.719 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 1>S Cube as K E W B and it is

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what you're supposed to do with it.

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like the Snake times a trillion to me. And

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:10.399
<v Speaker 1>there's also a movie called Cube which is like Saw

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 1>with math. Oh I saw that? Yeah, yeah, it has

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:16.880
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with Rubik's cubes. And there's uh, The

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Pursuit of Happiness where Will Smith gets a job as

0:44:21.040 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a stockbroker because somebody sees him solve a Rubik's cuban

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:27.840
<v Speaker 1>something like two minutes or less. And apparently while he

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>was promoting that movie he solved one in less than

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:34.919
<v Speaker 1>a minute himself in real life. You mean the movie

0:44:35.080 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>The Pursuit of Halpwayness. Did they explain that in the movie.

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I never saw it. I just always called

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:44.719
<v Speaker 1>it Hapwayness. Did you ever see that one where he

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:47.799
<v Speaker 1>was like super depressed in his his colleagues at work,

0:44:47.920 --> 0:44:52.840
<v Speaker 1>like just gaslight him into thinking he's being visited by angels? No?

0:44:53.320 --> 0:44:55.799
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. Did you see the one where he went

0:44:57.320 --> 0:44:59.120
<v Speaker 1>he was from West Philadelphia and he went to live

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 1>with his rich relative. Yeah, I did, as he dressed

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 1>very colorfully. He was I think in bel Air. Uh

0:45:08.920 --> 0:45:11.040
<v Speaker 1>what was it kill there? I think I was Santa Barbara.

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:13.719
<v Speaker 1>You're right, okay? Uh, Well, if you want to know

0:45:13.840 --> 0:45:16.439
<v Speaker 1>more about Will Smith, you can type his name into

0:45:16.480 --> 0:45:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the search bar at how stuff works dot com. And

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 1>since I said Will Smith it's time for listener mail.

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I've got a coconut tree correction. Hey, guys, correction on

0:45:30.920 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 1>something said during the episode The Cult of the Coconut

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:40.000
<v Speaker 1>when you guys talked about the culpa rishka. First of all,

0:45:40.480 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not pronounced that way. Uh, it is pronounced culpa rushka.

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 1>But we were way off, all right, She says, Uh,

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:56.360
<v Speaker 1>rushka or rushka depending on transliteration, simply means tree in Sanskrit. Okay.

0:45:56.840 --> 0:45:59.239
<v Speaker 1>Also always mispronounced by people in the West. By the way,

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, I don't feel that bad. Yeah, exactly correct

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:07.359
<v Speaker 1>pronunciation is uh sounds screwed. Now she's saying sanscrit as

0:46:07.360 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 1>always mispronounced. Oh oh, I see, so it's sand screwed.

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Sounds cruteus like as best I can convey. That's what

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:20.800
<v Speaker 1>she says. Wow, okay, yeah, I've always said sanscrit. This

0:46:20.920 --> 0:46:25.400
<v Speaker 1>person is a real really into words though, and very smart. Second,

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the coconut tree is just one of the trees considered

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a how do you pronounce it again, college called cold

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:35.719
<v Speaker 1>cold cook screw cock. Uh huh. There you getting you

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:39.879
<v Speaker 1>nailed it. Not because it is all you need to survive, though,

0:46:40.360 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 1>but because every single part of the coconut tree is

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 1>useful to humans, the bark that leaves, the fibers, and

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of course the coconuts and their entirety. This concept is

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:54.600
<v Speaker 1>tied closely with why Indians culturally revere certain animals e g.

0:46:54.840 --> 0:47:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Cow and plants and trees e g. Banyan and coconut. Okay,

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I've noticed on the podcast how you too often go

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:05.680
<v Speaker 1>out of your way to correctly pronounce words or names

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in foreign languages like we were, which is something I

0:47:09.040 --> 0:47:14.320
<v Speaker 1>appreciate as a bicultural uh penta lingual individual. Perhaps you

0:47:14.320 --> 0:47:16.760
<v Speaker 1>could explain your efforts to include not just Western languages,

0:47:17.120 --> 0:47:22.080
<v Speaker 1>but Eastern languages too. After all, sal Screwed belongs to

0:47:22.200 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the same language group as German. If you think about it,

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be true to the spirit of

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:29.320
<v Speaker 1>your show. Guys, keep up the good work. And that

0:47:29.560 --> 0:47:33.160
<v Speaker 1>is from Ruta our duty A Did Ruta say, did

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:38.239
<v Speaker 1>she sign off with later lamos? No, thanks a lot, Ruta. Yeah.

0:47:38.320 --> 0:47:40.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not like we're like, oh, we'll only go to

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:43.359
<v Speaker 1>the trouble of pronouncing something in German or French, which

0:47:43.440 --> 0:47:45.959
<v Speaker 1>by the way, we don't very often, and we thought

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:50.560
<v Speaker 1>we were pronouncing it correctly in the Eastern languages. So sorry, Ruda,

0:47:50.719 --> 0:47:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know what sand screwed. I had no idea,

0:47:53.840 --> 0:47:58.799
<v Speaker 1>not just us chuck. Like a million people just learned that. Yeah,

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:02.239
<v Speaker 1>close to a mill. I agree. Uh well, thanks a

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:04.360
<v Speaker 1>lot again, Bruta. And if you want to get in

0:48:04.440 --> 0:48:06.239
<v Speaker 1>touch with us, like Ruda did, you can go to

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:08.359
<v Speaker 1>stuff you Should Know dot com and check out our

0:48:08.440 --> 0:48:10.440
<v Speaker 1>social links, or you can send us a good old

0:48:10.480 --> 0:48:14.560
<v Speaker 1>fashioned email to stuff podcast at iHeart radio dot com.

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeart Radios

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:23.160
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works. For more podcasts for my heart Radio,

0:48:23.239 --> 0:48:25.880
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:48:25.960 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows