WEBVTT - The Future of TechStuff (Is So Bright, Karah Has to Wear Shades)

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts. And for the

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>last time from me, y'all, how the tech are you? Yes,

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it is the Swan song. I'm bowing out, I'm done,

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm tagging out, and I've been teasing it for more

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>than a month. Now it is time for us to

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>meet the intrepid hosts who are going to take tech

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Stuff into the future and grow it to heights I

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>can only dream of. Welcome back, my friends, Oz Volishin

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and Cara Price. Welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, Johnthan, thank you so much for

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 2>having us back on, and thank you for passing the torch.

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 2>It's incredibly exciting. I'm not sure we'll scale heights that

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 2>you can barely dream of, but I hope we'll, you know,

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 2>do almost as good a job as you've done over

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 2>an incredible sixteen years.

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the kindest thing you could say to me,

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>considering how decorated the two of you are. For those

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>who are unfamiliar with our now hosts of tech Stuff,

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Oz and Kara you both have have storied backgrounds in

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:23.119
<v Speaker 1>producing for television. I mean there's we talk about things

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like documentaries. Uh, there's a little book club that Merritt's mentioned.

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's pretty phenomenal, like you've achieved so much,

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think it's false modesty for me to

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>say I have great expectations Dickensian great expect Yeah, yeah, yeah, no,

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I got I got an English lit background. We can

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>throw down if you like, but uh, yeah no, it's

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it is Dickensian in nature. Yes, I am a little

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>street rat here, just pleased to see that the show

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that I have fostered for the better part of two

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>decades is going to a good home. So I have

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot to thank you or for that. That's I'm

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>really excited. I can't wait. I'm going to be a

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>big fan of the show. It's will be a nice

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>change of pace because currently.

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Trust us, you don't like listening to yourself?

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh do you like listening to yourself?

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Kara, Absolutely, I'm I'm glad you'll enjoy the show.

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, that's I mean, I think anyone who has

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>done any podcasting like when you get to that stage,

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're doing your own editing or QA work.

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>It's something you dread because you're just like, oh no,

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 1>can I just read a transcript please? I don't need

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to hear me at least that's how I am. So

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm really excited to talk about your vision for tech

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff and where you're taking it in sort of the

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>what you're working with, you know, what's the format of

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 1>the show going to be like? And over the last

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks, we've been talking a lot on this

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>show about stuff in tech that's happened since we first launched,

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's just kind of funny to see how much

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>has changed in the time that, you know, from June

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight when we started to now. So

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the big example I give is, did you know in

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>June two thousand and eight when we started, iTunes had

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>not opened an app store yet, so there were no

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>apps other than the once preloaded up.

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 3>What was I doing on iTunes? I guess I was

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 3>just listening to music on iTunes.

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>You could listen to podcasts, but there were no other apps, like,

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>other than the stuff that Apple already preloaded. And but

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>then even then, like it would take a couple of

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>years for Apple to really change the world by introducing

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple maps and guiding everybody to drive into rivers and stuff.

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:31.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was.

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 2>I was listening to your Thanksgiving episode and it's crazy

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 2>now with like data analytics and like immediate you know,

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 2>user feedback, And am I right in remembering that when

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 2>you launched tech stuff, you didn't even know if anyone

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 2>at all was listening to it.

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>That's true. Yeah, I'm sure that the producers had access.

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't even remember what the We've been through so

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>many different publication platforms. I can't even tell you what

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it was back in the day. So I'm sure that

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>they had access to analytics, but the show creators, as

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>far as I know, were largely unaware unless it was

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that just would make the trades, right,

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>so stuff, you should know. It was an incredible success

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>nearly right out of the gate, because Chuck and Josh

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>are fantastic. They do such a great job and have

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>since they started, And so that we knew because like

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that would get up there on the top iTunes podcast

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>charts all the time. But beyond that, yeah, you know,

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you record a show, publish it, and it was like

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>shouting into the void and wondering if anyone could hear you. Yeah,

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 1>so exciting stuff.

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 2>We were planned to do two episodes a week, I think.

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it seems like your height, you've done like

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 2>four or five episodes a week, So we were starting

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 2>with a level of humility about I mean, your output,

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan is insane.

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 3>Particular.

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 2>I know there have been times when you had a

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 2>co host and like, yeah, times when you've had guests,

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 2>but I just I can't believe how much stuff you've covered.

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>It was a lot. Yeah, yeah, I talked about this

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>on the show, so I'm not shy about talking about

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 1>it now. But up until just the beginning of twenty

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, I was doing really four new episodes a

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>week and then one rerun typically right unbelievable, And each

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>episode usually meant that I was spending around eight hours

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of researching and writing before I even wrote record, So

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about, you know, thirty two hours of research

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and writing for around four hours of audio than the reruns,

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>and then I would the rest of what little time

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I had would deal with other stuff. But I found

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the secret to dealing with that workload is to have

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>a near stroke and be hospitalized and then suddenly you

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>have to change. So I've joked about it, but really

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that is what told me that I had to make

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 1>a change, and so we scaled back to three those

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>three new episodes. I didn't do very many reruns this year,

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>unless say or this past year. Keep saying this year,

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>because twenty twenty five doesn't seem real to me yet.

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 1>But uh yeah, I think two is a great play

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to really create a foundation, and if you ever build

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>on that, that's fine. But I think two is actually

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the sweet spot personally. It was one of those things

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in Tech Stuff where we were performing really well, and

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>so there was always this desire to add to inventory.

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, I like, by the way, and you well you

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 2>did the kind of history of Tech Stuff episode kind

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 2>of explaining the mechanics of how the ad business change

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 2>and the host red ads and the insertions and stuff.

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 2>But yes, I mean obviously like inventory is a key

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 2>sort of driver of the viability of podcasts, right.

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, And I think transparency with your listeners is

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 1>always a good thing, Like you can feel icky to

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about that sort of stuff, because you know, there's

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I think of a friend of mine who was an

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>artistic director for a theater here in Atlanta, And I

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>was once talking to him about his job, and I said,

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>what's the toughest thing about your job? And he said,

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>for me, the toughest thing is balancing art and commerce.

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Because the theater is a business, so you have to

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>treat it as a business, but it's also in the

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>business of fostering and delivering art to an audience. So

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>how do you find that balance where the two can

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>be in harmony and you can do both things well.

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I think podcasting is very much the same, and that

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to be able to say something that's worth hearing, right.

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to just be like you don't want

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to just be chattering nonsense into a microphone and then

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>pushing it out. You want it to have meaning and

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>for it to be of value. But at the same time,

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, you got to keep the lights on. And

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>so there's a balance there, even for people who are

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>passionate about podcasts and they want to follow it as

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a passion. If you're going to do it in a

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>way that it's self sustainable, you have to start making

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>these calls, and it's not always.

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Easy, absolutely, And I think that because you're in people's ears.

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 3>I think there's an expectation for honesty, which is something

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 3>that you know, having listened to some episodes of yours

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 3>over the years, there's a certain level of just speaking

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 3>right to the listener. Yeah, and I think that's something

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 3>that we really like to adopt and that you've done

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 3>very well.

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So early on with podcasting, I was listening to

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>podcasts before I was making them. So I was one

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of the few because I was because I was already

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a geek before I even started working for house Stuff

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Works way back in the day. So I was a

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>big fan of There was a show called buzz Out

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Loud from ce.

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 3>Neet and oh my god, it still exists.

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it still exists. Although the people that I listened

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to all moved on to do other things like tom

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Merritt is doing his own thing and Molly Wood she's

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>doing her own thing. But these were people who I

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>looked up to and I admired their work ethic and

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I loved the output they were creating. And so when

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it came time for me to be able to do

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a podcast, I jumped on it because I had already

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>been a big fan of the form, and so one

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of those things that drove me in the early years

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and stuck with me through the entirety of it. And

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason why is there's a sense of

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>intimacy because you're listening, you know, often with headphones on,

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a real sense of intimacy between you and whomever's delivering,

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a single host show or it's people, Like,

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>if it's a conversation, it feels like you're in the

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>room as that conversation is unfolding. And transparency and honesty

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to me are absolutely necessary because in that intimate moment,

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>unless you're a really good social engineer slash liar, people

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>will pick up on insincerity or fibbing or anything you

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>want to call. And I've said over and over again

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the biggest mistake I find some podcasters making is a

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>drastic underestimation of how smart their audience is. And I'm like,

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>especially when you talk about ads, like, we live in

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a world inundated with ads. We've all experienced it, so

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>there's no way to tiptoe around ads where people aren't

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be like, well, that.

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Passes the smell test right totally.

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>We're going to take a quick break to thank our

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 1>sponsors when we come back I'll talk more with our

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>future Tech Stuff hosts Oz and Kara, both about my

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>experiences int and where they planned to take the show next.

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Stay tuned.

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Karen and I have been friends for approaching ten years. Yes,

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 2>and we became I would say, much closer friends by

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 2>doing a podcast together Sleepwalker Sleepwalkers. Wish we were on

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 2>your show to talk about it. Yeah, this show five

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 2>years ago.

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's about AI. Y'all did amazing work, Like the

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Sleepwalkers episodes are to this day very compelling. It's also

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see where the conversation is an AI now

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>compared to when you were doing the show, because you know,

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>those conversations y'all were having. It was in days when

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream public really, I mean we had all heard AI.

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>We had all heard about it. Maybe we had even

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>gone to see the Steven Spielberg stat slash Stanley Kubrick film,

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>but that was about the extent of it. And you

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 1>were getting into some of those conversations that now are

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in mainstream news and are part of like, you know,

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>water cooler conversations because AI has become an inescapable topic

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>just in everyday life.

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we had the tagline for the show. You may

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 2>not care about AI, but AI cares about you. Now

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 2>now I think probably you care about AI as well,

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 2>but A.

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Still cares about yea and more and more, more and more.

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 2>But one of my one of my favorite episodes of Sleepwalkers, actually, Jonathan,

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 2>just because you mentioned, you know, the personal and your

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 2>health problems, Cara, was actually the episode where we made

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 2>a fake copy of your voice to try and scam

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 2>your cousin.

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 3>With Liarbird Aier.

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Bird AI, which now has become Runway m L which

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 2>is a multi billion dollar company. But I mean, I

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 2>thought that that was both fun because we used your

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 2>voice to trick a family member and it kind of

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 2>spoke to that thing in podcasting about voice and authenticity

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 2>and all those things. But then you went on to

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 2>reflect about you know, losing your father and would you

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 2>want to interact with a digital version of him, which

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 2>again now is something which is part of the mainstream conversation.

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 2>But I was very very moved by that piece of that.

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 3>You well, and similar not to talk too much about

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 3>our show in the episodes, but for those who don't know,

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 3>you know, we also did an episode that focused more

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 3>on sort of health and AI healthcare, and I was

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 3>able to speak to a woman who was an engineer

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 3>who was also diagnosed with breast cancer. And this was

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 3>very early on in the conversation about you know, how

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 3>to train data sets on hundreds of thousands of mammograms,

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 3>for example, to then be able to recognize what does

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 3>breast cancer look like in a woman's breast, you know,

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 3>And these were things that at the time, I think

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 3>both Oz and I felt very much at the forefront

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.959
<v Speaker 3>of that conversation, not because we're pioneers, but because these

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 3>are fairly new conversations unless you're working outside of you know,

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 3>engineering sci goals and data science programs, and so we're

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 3>really excited about, I think in terms of one of

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 3>the things we're really excited about in terms of taking

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 3>over this or having the baton passed to us digitally.

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Taking it overt hostile takeover. He held a bunch of

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>zeros and ones to my throat and I no, no,

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously no.

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 3>But I think one of the things we're really excited

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 3>about is that a lot of what we reported on

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 3>for Sleepwalkers is evergreen, and the difference now is actually

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 3>just how much faster processing has become and how the

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 3>rate of change is even faster than it was when

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 3>we were reporting, you know however many years ago, and

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 3>so in a certain sense, like the stories still remain

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 3>very human. I think it's like the capability of the

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 3>technology that keeps changing. And I think you, as someone

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 3>who has been doing this for so long, has probably

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 3>seen how the rate of change affects the rate of change, right,

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.439
<v Speaker 3>I mean, sure, GPT is twenty twenty two. Right, Yeah,

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 3>that's like essentially post main COVID. It's so ubiquitous at

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 3>this point, like to think that that was three years

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 3>ago that like most people did not know what chat

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 3>GPT was. What a year and a half ago? Sure,

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 3>or two years ago? So, I mean these are the

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 3>kinds of things that I think we find very exciting

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 3>as reporters, but also as you know, like you, I

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 3>think two nerds who are very interested in the ways

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 3>in which you know, technology intersects both personally and also culturally.

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 3>It seems to be very important because I think a

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 3>lot of people lay people whose most people don't know

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 3>how to dissect this information and don't want to be

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 3>told what to think, but they do want to be

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 3>told what to think about Yeah.

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, I mean like I have been famously rather rather

0:14:56.240 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>critical about a lot of AI implementations, not because of

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the issues I have with the technology, but rather the

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>nature of those implementations in some pretty high profile cases,

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>like when you're using AI to do things like image

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>analysis and recognition for things like looking at mammograms to

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>increase the accuracy of diagnoses. I think that is brilliant.

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's wonderful. I think that's something that we

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>strive for. And it also is a reminder that you

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>can't paint all AI with the same brush. That AI

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is an enormously broad spectrum of disciplines, and that we

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>often will reduce that down to chad GBT is stealing artists'

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>work and passing it off as their own. But the

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff that tends to make the news tends to fall

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>on that second category. Like occasionally you'll get like a

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>nice optimistic story about how AI could make a positive impact,

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of the stories tend to be on

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the more critical side. So whether it's artists who are

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>worried about their work being used to train up the

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>next generation of the I and then put themselves out

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of work in the process, or it's a boss of

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a major tech company saying we're not going to fill

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>those two thousand positions, We're going to let Ai do it,

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and I envision a future where HR is entirely Ai. Like,

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>those are tough stories to deliver in a way that

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't come across as somewhat dystopian in nature. So that's

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>why I've often said that tech Stuff's guiding principles have

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>always been critical thinking and compassion. You want to have

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>critical thinking, to ask the questions, to make sure that

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you have a proper understanding of the story. You want

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>compassion not just for the people who are being impacted

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>by that story, but maybe the people who are making

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the decisions, so that you can understand where they're coming from.

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Because it's too easy to paint everything as this is

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>evil fat cat capitalist and they just do evil, fat

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>cat capitalist things because they are a two dimensional villain

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>from a vaudevillian production, and you're like, no, people are

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a little more complicated that. Maybe not Elon Musk, but

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone else is more complicated than that.

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, so we actually ask Google Gemini how to how

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 2>to prepare for this? Prepared for this, and one of

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 2>the pieces of advice was to be clear with the

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 2>audience about what to expect going forward. So there's a

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 2>lot a lot of the advice was obviously, like very

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 2>was very cliche, but some of it was was relevant

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 2>as well. So you asked Jonathan, what kind of what

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.479
<v Speaker 2>people can expect from the show going forward. We're going

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 2>to do two episodes a week. We're calling the Wednesday

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 2>episode the Story, and the idea is that it will

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 2>be a kind of evergreen interview with somebody conversation with

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 2>me and Kara. Then one or the other of us

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 2>will will kind of present an interview and then we'll

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.719
<v Speaker 2>discuss it afterwards, but with somebody who either has an

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 2>incredible story about the intersection of technology and humanity and culture,

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 2>or who in some sense is kind of a builder of,

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, the future. And so you mentioned just now

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 2>this how it's very hard not to be kind of,

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, sound negative about in many cases. One of

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 2>the interviews we have that we've already done and which

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 2>we'll be publishing in the next few weeks is with

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 2>Meredith Whittaker and she as i'm sure you know, led

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 2>the protest movement at Google and the walkouts having to

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 2>do with Project Maven and the defense contracting and she

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 2>now runs Signal, the encrypted messaging app, which is obviously

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 2>really cool. And one of the things she said was,

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, I often get criticized for being negative or pessimistic,

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 2>but actually I'm an optimist, and if I wasn't an optimist,

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't bother calling out the bad stuff because the

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 2>very factor doing that means that I believe in the

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 2>better future, and I believe that there is some value

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 2>in continuing to surface places where tech could do better.

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 2>So I really liked because I think Carrie, you're in

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 2>general more upbeat than I have, and I'm slightly more cynical,

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 2>But I like that explanation of how you know to

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 2>your point about critical thinking and compassion. It kind of

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 2>for me it captured something about how you can, you know,

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 2>do critical thinking without being negative per se, and in

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 2>fact it's because you want something better.

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, Yeah, I love that that perspective. Honestly, I've also

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>thought of optimism in the same way, about how the

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>pat description of optimism tends to go right along with naivete,

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 1>like the idea, the idea that the only way you

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 1>can be an optimist is if you're looking at the

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>world through rose colored glasses. Kara, I can't see what

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>color your glasses are, but I'm pretty sure they're not roses.

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 3>They're sort of green. They're sort of green, which is

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 3>the way I look through the world.

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Excellent, Excellent, We're gonna we're getting into more of an

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>alphabet defying gravity situation, you know. By the way, y'all,

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry that you can't see the video version of this,

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>because we did do the whole loathing dance number, as

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 1>per required in contracts whenever entertainers meet in person. I

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I like that a lot, though. Yeah, I think that

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>optimists have to be the kind of people who they

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>see the future as it possibly could be and the

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>steps that need to be taken in order to get there,

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and they're ready to put in the work to make

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it happen. Whereas you know, often you dismiss people as

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>optimists if you mean, oh, you just expect good things

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to happen without having to put any work in. That's

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>not to me when optimist is that's a lazy person.

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>An optimist is someone who they have a vision of

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the future and a vision for getting there, And to me,

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it also is sort of the difference between the founding

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>principles of open AI and arguably kind of the more

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>recent direction of open AI. Not to say that open

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>AI is necessarily going the wrong way, but certainly like

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the founding principle was all about responsible and accountable development

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and deployment of artificial intelligence in a transparent and open way,

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 1>and that has not been what we've seen over the

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years in large part. And so I

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>guess it can be really easy for folks to become

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>cynical because even the people who are saying, hey, we

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>need to do this don't seemed to be following through

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>on their vision, at least from a surface level. But

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 1>I've never had deep conversations with anyone in Opening I

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>just know the board of directors tried to tried to

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>change things by alting Sam Altman, and then paid for

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that dearly once he returned.

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 2>So actually, one of the other guests we have on

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 2>in fact, the first guest we're planning for Wednesday, the

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 2>fifteenth of January, is Jeffrey Hinton, who just won the

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Nobel Prize in Physics for his work as the of

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:34.719
<v Speaker 2>the pioneers of AI, and Ilia Sutskeev graduate students and

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Hinton has just joined the amicus brief filed by a

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 2>nonprofit who are arguing that open ai shouldn't be allowed

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 2>to change from a nonprofit to a for profit status.

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 2>So that should be a super interesting conversation as well.

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 2>On Fridays, we're going to do something which is more topical.

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 2>I think you had something called like tax stuff news

0:21:57.840 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 2>right for a while.

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would do a tech news on Fridays typically

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>where I would grab different headlines and give I would

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>say brief, but you know me, brief is not something

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 1>I do. But the yes, yes, whether it'sis tediousness of

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the limbs and not reflourishes or too Yeah, no, I

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>would be as brief as possible, but yes, I would

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>do news on Fridays.

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 2>So we're going to do the same. We're going to

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 2>news on Fridays. We're gonna Karen and I'm going to

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 2>talk about some headlines and then we're going to have

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 2>a brief sort of news roundup segment with this company

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 2>called four or for Media. It's actually a collective. It

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 2>was the team basically who did Motherboard Advice, and when

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Vice kind of imploded, they left to start their own

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 2>thing called for a form media. So I'll be a

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 2>second segment, and the third segment we're going to do

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 2>something called.

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Just to say when did this become a thing? Is

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 3>basically my singular obsession, and it can really range, you know,

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 3>it can run the gamut of you know, different tech innovation.

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 3>I think most interestingly the things that we encounter in

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:08.679
<v Speaker 3>our everyday lives. You know, I think GPT. As I

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 3>said to you, it's like, when did people start saying, oh,

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to use chat ebt to like come up

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 3>with that wedding speech. Right? When did this become a thing?

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 3>But also when did it become a thing that I

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 3>can opt into facial recognition on Delta? You know, when

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 3>did this become a thing? You know, when did it

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 3>become a thing that there are you know, digital labels

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 3>in my clothing because all of a sudden we're trying

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 3>to invest more in a circular economy. You know, there's

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 3>a number of touch points I think day to day.

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why I always think of airline apps,

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 3>but like we just are so naturally inclined to accept

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 3>that there are upgrades to things, whether it be you know,

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 3>speaking of the app store. It's like there are always

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 3>just natural upgrades to apps, and we don't ask the

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 3>question when did this become a thing? Yeah, and so

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 3>that's really the spirit of this segment. Oz and I

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 3>I think both self identify as digital natives, although Oz

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 3>really tries to keep broken technology around for as long as possible.

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 3>But we're both digital natives, and one of the first

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 3>things that we're going to explore is when did that

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 3>become a thing? You know, because certainly gen x I

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 3>don't think would consider themselves digital natives, even if they

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 3>knew how to turn the TV on without their parents.

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, as a gen xer, I can I can verify

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that I turned fifty this year, y'all.

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, congratulations, you look good.

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks, thanks, Yeah, I appreciate it. Yeah, No, I'm fifty

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>years old this year. So yeah, I think that's brilliant because,

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>like I remember getting online and accessing the internet before

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the web was a thing, you know, I remember how

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>did you do that? So I used tellnet mostly. I

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>would tell them into servers and go to like chatrooms.

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>That's how I met my wife. Honestly, no fun story.

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 3>That tracks I mean in the sense of you host text.

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, yeah, I met my wife. I met my wife

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>on a on chat, a digital chat room, text based

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>chat room.

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 3>No picks at that, no picks.

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>No, there wasn't even an easy way of sharing a

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>pic because digital cameras were really expensive. Now this is

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>like the mid early mid nineties, so you know, a

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>digital camera was an unthinkable expense, like I would be

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a luxury that I could not even dream of. Usually

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>if I were using a camera, it was one of

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 1>those cardboard disposable things that you would find it like

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>weddings or whatever. You would actually have to have the

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:34.719
<v Speaker 1>film developed.

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Then love those.

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, now those are coming back because everyone's addicted to

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 3>analog again. It's another story.

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Well that's a whole episode in itself, right, very much.

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm definitely like, if you ever.

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Want me on it, I'll be on it y because

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 3>I will talk anytime.

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I would love to talk about how the changes in

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>how we access our media have driven this desire to

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>return to physical formats. Because I'm one of those people.

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was done with DVDs and Blu rays.

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was done with Well, I don't do

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>cassettes or CDs anymore, but I do. I do vinyl.

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was done with all that and now

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm like right back into it, So I would I

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 1>would love to talk about that. I love the idea

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of when did this become a thing? Like the im

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>media topic that sprung to my mind is when did

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in game purchases start to become a thing, Because you mean.

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 3>When did parents go broke basically, or.

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Or gen xers who grew up playing games and never

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>grew out of it. But like, like, like I think

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:39.159
<v Speaker 1>about those in game purchases that have become like you know,

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>living games are sometimes what they're refer to, right, these

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 1>games that are designed to never be sunset because it's

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>an ongoing revenue generator.

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was one of the very interesting points

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 2>in you in the piece you did about I know

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 2>you're looking back at each year of tech stuff and

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 2>in the app store obviously, like I know what the

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 2>app store is, and I know that's where I get apps.

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 2>But like the bit about how like Apple like basically

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 2>charging thirty percent for all in app purchases, I knew

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:05.439
<v Speaker 2>as well, but I didn't really put the pieces together

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 2>until your piece. And obviously the very interesting thing was

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't apply to the physical world, which is kind

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 2>of crazy but makes sense. You know, they didn't charge

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 2>they wouldn't charge like thirty percent for the delivery of

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 2>pizza through one of the apps right from that, right, but.

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>If it were a digital pizza in a game, they

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>would right.

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, So there was a class action against Apple

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 3>from a number like there because there were single families

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 3>that had found out that kids were spending thousands and

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.919
<v Speaker 3>thousands of dollars on Minecraft, and all of a sudden,

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.479
<v Speaker 3>these parents are looking at their Apple bills and seeing, like,

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, a six year old spending ten thousand dollars

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 3>on an in app purchase. So it's a very interesting story.

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, any service where you have a method of payment

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 1>tied to that service, you should be very very careful

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>about how that is used by either you or your

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 1>family because it can quickly lead to those situations and

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a child or it's someone who has just

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of that addictive personality where you know, there are

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 1>games I've played and everyone is familiar with these, the

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>games where like you can you can hit a certain

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 1>level of advancement and then you're you're hit with an

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 1>artificial time limitter where it's like, all right, you can't

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>do any more of this until you wait till you know,

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, twelve more hours, or you can pay a

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>dollar and you can play right now. And I'm one

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of those people who I'm like, no, I got other

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>things can distract me. I can walk away. But there

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>are folks who are like you know that that dopamine

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>release where they're they want to feel that they've had

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a sense of accomplishment, they'll just pay right into it.

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>And kids, in particular, if they don't have a real

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>understanding of how money works, because I certainly didn't for.

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 3>A very long I don't.

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Arguably I don't now.

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm just like, Actually, I bounced around in my in

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 2>my career doing various things as well as journalism. But

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 2>for a time I was actually a a consultant and

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 2>I worked on a project for Google and they were

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 2>very interested in mobile games and psychology and mobile games,

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 2>and so I ended up being sent on a world

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 2>tour to do basically like in home research with like

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 2>very heavy game players, and I got to go to

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Taiwan and Japan and Korea. It was just incredible. I mean,

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 2>it was an incredible experience that basically hang out with

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 2>like you know all kinds of different people who played

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 2>mobile games, and it was it was interesting. So some

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 2>people were like clearly in control and they're like, I

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 2>have a budget of like X, and I spend it

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 2>on games and like that's fine.

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh my good for you.

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.479
<v Speaker 2>And some people would like I played for three days

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 2>and then I had to wait for twenty seven days

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 2>until my next check comes in from work because I

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 2>just I can't control it. So I mean it was

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 2>it was pretty remarkable. I think in Japan they have

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 2>this thing called gotcha, and it was the idea of

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 2>like being obsessed with those.

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah laws, I'm quite good at them.

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Next tip I go to the carnival, I'm taking care

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of with me.

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 3>You should take me on a little keychain. You can

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 3>fit me on a keychain that you could win in

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 3>a gotcha machine.

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 2>So none of us are at CES this week, sadly.

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 3>But I remember.

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Sneaking a cigarette with with Cara on the floor of the.

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 3>I've quit and I don't vape speaking, this is tech stuff.

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't vape.

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, good, you won't be endulsing any company.

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 3>But sorry us continue I interrupted you, No.

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 2>No, I just I just I just babbling on actually,

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 2>we need to.

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Take a quick break to think our sponsors, but we'll

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>be right back with Kara. And as.

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 3>The last part of this second you know, episode per

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Week that we've been talking about is something that's really

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 3>near and dear to me as a sort of pop

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 3>culture fanatic and as someone who's been you know, thinking

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 3>about how to take over the mantle of tech stuff.

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Is like, you know, how do we tell technology stories

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 3>through the lens of culture and every day and it

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 3>excites me to no end. But like every day there

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 3>are new culture stories where AI is just kind of

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 3>thrown in the mix, you know, there's a sort of

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 3>sprinkle of AI, and so, you know, I think one

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 3>of the things that I'm really excited to do is

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 3>to find those stories and then tell people who might

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 3>not think of said story as a technology story that oh,

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 3>actually behind this, technology is actually either really affecting this

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 3>or somehow intersecting, for example, with the lives of the

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Kardashians in a way that we did not expect. And

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 3>here's how you.

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Did something on the Optimist robot, right, Jonathan.

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Yeah, I talked about I talked about it briefly.

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>When I want to say it was the because that's

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the Tesla one, right, Yeah, yeah, I talked about it.

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I know, I talked about briefly a couple times in

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>news episodes. But when there was the big Tesla press

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>event where they had robots dancing and bartending, I talked

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>about it wasn't that Tesla was trying to pass them

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>off as working entirely autonomously, so I do not wish

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to cast aspersions upon the company. They never said they're

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>doing that, but it was like, oh yeah, those were

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>often being controlled, you know, just off to the side

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>by someone with a computer or whatever. I'm like, yeah,

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of course they were. We're not at a point where

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>they could where you're going to be boogying down with

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a robot just completely autonomously, and like it would be

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>different if they claimed it otherwise, but they never did,

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>so I feel okay about that one.

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 2>But we were pretty fascinated. Well, Cara was you know,

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 2>one of the sort of Kim Kardashian optimist robot posts

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 2>as it went live. But you know, could you ever imagine,

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 2>like in two thousand and eight or notthen like that,

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, robotics would become like something which the biggest,

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 2>most mainstream celebrity in the US was like excite to

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 2>be associated.

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>With absolutely not. I remember, okay, so this goes pretech stuff.

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But one of my first article assignments when I started

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>writing for How Stuff Works was how Asimo works. Asimo

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>being a robot that Honda created, and it was the

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>first humanoid robot that could run. And by run, it

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>means that both feet for a split second lose contact

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>with the ground as it propels itself forward. Now, when

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it ran, it looked like a little short person having

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to go to the bathroom because it was this little,

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>weird little squad run. But it could run. And when

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you start thinking about how complicated that is from a

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>robotics standpoint, and how do you engineer that so that

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the robot maintains balance, that's really a complex thing. And

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>at the time I was thinking, I might be the

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>only person who's really jazzed about this. And I could

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 1>never imagine that someone who is famous mostly for being famous,

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.959
<v Speaker 1>would ever be associated with robots. I thought, Oh, well,

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>geeky people like me, who's you know, my dad wrote

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Star Trek novels, so like, yeah, I am genetically engineered

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to be to be a geek who freaks out about robots.

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:08.839
<v Speaker 1>But I didn't think it was ever going to become

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a thing where, you know, one of the most well

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 1>known celebrities, especially in the influencer world, is associated with them.

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>That just never occurred to me. I did freak out

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 1>when I got to meet Asimo at Disneyland. That was

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 1>a high point.

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Was he nice to you?

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Very taciturn I'd say, but to be fair, he did

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>just drain his battery doing a show.

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 3>So I was going to say, to your point, just

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 3>even about influencers, I don't think you would have you know,

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of seen Lil Mikayla coming either, that there would

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 3>be actual digital influencers who which is It's funny there

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 3>are things. I'm sure you've noticed this. I'm not going

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 3>to get on a tangent because I want to go

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 3>back to the fact that your father wrote Star Trek novelge.

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Sure.

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but there are things that come and go to

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 3>that are really interesting that I think are worth mentioning,

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 3>like web like you know, Web three, you know, like

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 3>things that people were really excited about. I mean, VR

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:06.319
<v Speaker 3>is one of these things that is like we are

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:10.240
<v Speaker 3>constantly like climate to you know, how to what extent

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 3>are people really going to adopt virtual worlds outside of

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:17.280
<v Speaker 3>gaming and bluff And you know, I think.

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 1>The metaverse really going to be the future of how

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:20.760
<v Speaker 1>we interact online.

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, right, exactly. And I think it's our job both

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 3>to not even critique, but to sort of point out

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 3>that there's a lot of stuff thrown at the wall,

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 3>much of it does not stick, and I think it's

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 3>important to remind people of what doesn't stick. You know,

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Google X being one of the things that we covered

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 3>on What was Google?

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 2>So you're talking about the Google Social plan.

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:46.839
<v Speaker 3>I like.

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:51.800
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned, like, yeah, you were like in twenty eleven

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Google Plus launch.

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 3>But plus they were early to the Plus though. So

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 3>your dad wrote Star Trek novels.

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:01.280
<v Speaker 1>My dad.

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 3>My dad also wrote and published a lot of graphic

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:08.280
<v Speaker 3>novels and novelizations of comics.

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:13.720
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, my excess. My dad's a science fiction, fantasy, horror,

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 1>mystery novelist. He's written probably around eighty books at this point,

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe more. I'd have to ask him. But the Star

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Trek ones were young adult novels that he wrote that

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>were in the Starfleet Academy series, where he had ones

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:31.280
<v Speaker 1>about Kirk and Spock, and he had ones about Picard,

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>so he wrote for those. But he also wrote, I

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:36.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know if either of you know this reference, but

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>there used to be a PBS show called Wishbone in

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 1>which a little Jack Rustle tw you're.

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 3>Kidding me, Okay. He was my first crash my dad,

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 3>and I think.

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:46.359
<v Speaker 2>He was licensed from Britain as well.

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, oh yeah, well Wishbe was so English. Wishman was

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 3>not an American dog. He had a feather in his cap.

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>My dad, my dad wrote Wishbone books. If you look

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 1>up What Deal Wolf, it's the adaptation of Wolf and

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Salty Dog, which was which was Treasure Island. Dad's favorite novel,

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Treasure Island. I'm really well, actually I think Dad's favorite

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:08.720
<v Speaker 1>novel might be something Wicked This Way comes by Ray Bradbury.

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 1>But but it's which is a fantastic book. But yeah,

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, he's he wrote, He's written lots and lots.

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 3>Of stuff, very connected by those things. I was the

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 3>girl in school who and maybe this sort of I

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 3>don't know made me destined for this conversation right now.

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 3>But I was the girl in school who you know,

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 3>everybody else had the sort of oily stickers with Lisa

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Franks and I had the I had the Star Trek.

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 3>What do you call the logo? What is that?

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh the little emblem?

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, oh yeah, that's what I was trading.

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 2>So one of the one of the other upcoming episodes

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 2>we have recorded for the Wednesday the story episode is

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 2>with a guy called Nathaniel Rich who wrote an incredible

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 2>piece of the New York Times magazine about how NASA

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 2>is simulating Martian colonies on Earth and there are these

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 2>people who basically a volunteering to spend you know, three

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty plus days in the Johnston Space Center

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 2>in these in these Martian colonies, and how it's kind

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 2>of part of the research efforts to you know, understand

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 2>exactly what it will take to colonize Mars. But picking

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 2>up on the rape Bradbury reference that Nathaniel wanted to

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 2>title his piece Mars is Heaven, but the New York

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Times came up with can humans with standard psychological torture

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 2>of Mars?

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 3>Which I clicked on more descriptive.

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is this is where we're reminded that sometimes

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 1>writers get don't have the luxury of being able to

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>pick their own headlines. But it's all because it's not

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 1>because people who are really smart about what makes people

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 1>click on things are the ones naming those articles as

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 1>long as the article doesn't give away alex headline doesn't

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 1>give away that too much, where people just scan it

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:54.040
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook and they feel like they read the thing

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and all they did was read the headline.

0:38:56.000 --> 0:39:00.359
<v Speaker 3>In your most Johnathannian way, or actually in in your

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 3>most Start Treking way. You know, what wisdom do you

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 3>have to impart on us and what would you like

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 3>to see in terms of not the you know, the

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 3>next to steal a Star Trek reference, the next gen

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 3>of tech stuff or, as my friend likes to call

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:19.760
<v Speaker 3>gen Z, the new gen of tech stuff.

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, in true next generation fashion, I recommend you skipped

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>straight to mid season two because the first season and

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a half of Star Trek Next Generation is almost unwatchable.

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:33.319
<v Speaker 1>There are a couple of good episodes, but man or

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>there's some clunkers in there. Now. More seriously, I think

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:38.840
<v Speaker 1>like there's no advice I can give you that you

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>don't already have well at hand. I mean, I think

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you're both adept at asking questions and I think getting

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>back to things like the web three and the metaverse stuff,

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that we have this huge surge in

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 1>in hype around certain technologies at certain times, asking the

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:00.880
<v Speaker 1>questions of why are the people who are pushing this,

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 1>why are they doing that, why are they excited about it?

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it? Is it because they have a legitimate passion

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 1>for this thing and that they really believe that this

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 1>is something that's going to drive the future. Or is

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:15.959
<v Speaker 1>it that they have a vested interest in this thing

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're desperately trying to get it to gain traction

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 1>so that their investment pays off. Like, I feel a

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:25.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of crypto communities fall into that second category. Like

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:29.760
<v Speaker 1>we all remember the disaster that was the NFT boom

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and then bust.

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 3>I literally forgot about NFTs for like a year.

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm sorry to bring it back, but I feel

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:39.959
<v Speaker 1>like NFTs could have been a legitimate thing that had

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a place, but we're appropriated so quickly and then pushed

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:48.799
<v Speaker 1>by a speculative market so hard that for NFTs to

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:52.320
<v Speaker 1>recover from that and to become something beyond just being

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:56.319
<v Speaker 1>this joke right is going to take way more work

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>than it would have if we just had been able

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to keep the speculator at Bay for like five more minutes.

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 1>So I feel like that to me is always the

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 1>thing is that it's good to be excited about tech.

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:10.719
<v Speaker 1>It's good to be passionate about it. Like I love

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that feeling too. I love hearing about a new gadget

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:15.359
<v Speaker 1>that's coming out that I'm just like, I can't wait

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:16.799
<v Speaker 1>to get my hands on this and see what it

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>really does. But I think it's also good to take

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>a step back and ask the questions of, well, why

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 1>is this a thing? Why is this being done in

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>this specific way? Why are these specific people pushing this

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 1>narrative out? You know, for me, it would be like,

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:32.399
<v Speaker 1>why does Zuckerberg want the metaverse to be a thing?

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 1>As opposed to having the idea that the metaverse is

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 1>going to be the thing? Like putting that ahead of

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:42.839
<v Speaker 1>everything else makes no sense to me, Like you're it's

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the whole putting the cart before the horse thing, Like

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you've already presupposed that it's destined to be a thing.

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:50.720
<v Speaker 3>We saw what happened with Google glass.

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I literally did, because I had a pair.

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:57.840
<v Speaker 2>You got gifted them by Google.

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:01.040
<v Speaker 1>It was a company purchase from How Stuff Works, a

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 1>company I no longer work.

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 2>For and Jonathan you mentioned coming on you know, we

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:11.160
<v Speaker 2>would love you know whenever, whenever you want to have

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 2>you come back on the show, and also to get

0:42:14.680 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 2>your notes on, you know, on our early early episodes.

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 2>We also started a Gmail Today tech Stuff podcast at

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:27.840
<v Speaker 2>gmail dot com because we love for listeners to write

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 2>in as well and let us know you know, what

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 2>we're doing well, but more importantly, what we can do better,

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 2>how we can continue to honor the spirit of tech

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Stuff and the reason you know, you guys have been

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 2>listening to this show for for many years, so you know,

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:45.040
<v Speaker 2>do do write us and let us know, because you know,

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:47.359
<v Speaker 2>we want this to be continue to be a place

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 2>where you come once a week, twice a week, as

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 2>much as five times a week in Jonathan Jonathan's in

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan's Craziest Days.

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Nice nice back catalog for you to dive into if

0:42:57.440 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you want to. Now, I love that so Os and

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:02.759
<v Speaker 1>care are doing something that I wish I could have

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:05.840
<v Speaker 1>done more of. And I've often talked about how since

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen, Tech Stuff's been a solo host show and

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I've been the only person researching, writing, recording the shows.

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I have a wonderful producer named Tari. Tari does phenomenal work,

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>but everything on the pre production side is on me,

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and as such, that workload was to a point where

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I withdrew from social It was too much. It was

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:31.640
<v Speaker 1>too much for me. I couldn't be both the creator

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:36.239
<v Speaker 1>and runner of the show and also be actively marketing it.

0:43:35.320 --> 0:43:39.320
<v Speaker 1>It was too heavy a lift, and as a result,

0:43:39.840 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel my biggest regret is that I didn't do

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:46.279
<v Speaker 1>more to foster a community around the show. There is

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a community around the show. I just was kind of

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 1>apart from it, and I love that you and your

0:43:52.680 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 1>team are taking a concerted effort to foster a community

0:43:57.200 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 1>because they're out there. They found ways to get in

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 1>touch with me, and I'm not easy to get in

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:03.399
<v Speaker 1>touch with.

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:06.400
<v Speaker 2>On to be fat, didn't one of the inventors of

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 2>the world why wide Web write in and tell you

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:10.799
<v Speaker 2>that you'd explained it wrong.

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Vinton Surf. Vint and Surf did that. He was

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 1>not shy about it either.

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Uh, you've had some listener engagement, yeah, I mean part

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:24.960
<v Speaker 2>of me both. It's both like a huge compliment in handles.

0:44:24.800 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 3>Like exactly the biggest troll ever.

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, like like you you feel embarrassed at the same time,

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:34.239
<v Speaker 1>you're like freaking inventor of like one of the architects

0:44:34.320 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet listened to my show, which is again

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:41.959
<v Speaker 1>getting back to that idea of like, oh wow, people

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:44.680
<v Speaker 1>are actually listening. A lot of people do, and uh,

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I love that you're you're reaching out to them and

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:50.520
<v Speaker 1>welcoming them to talk to you, because it's clear like

0:44:50.760 --> 0:44:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the people who found ways to get in touch with me,

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and again I'm not easy to get in touch with,

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:58.239
<v Speaker 1>they were all giving me very sweet messages, very encouraging

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 1>thanking me for my time on the show, which I deeply,

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>deeply appreciate. And it just shows to me that your

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:08.560
<v Speaker 1>era of tech stuff is going to be phenomenal because

0:45:08.640 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have elements in place that I simply

0:45:11.719 --> 0:45:14.880
<v Speaker 1>felt unable to do, and you're going to be able

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to have a collaborative relationship with your audience. And while

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 1>I feel like my era of tech stuff was more

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:25.719
<v Speaker 1>almost more like a lecture in the sense that I

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:28.960
<v Speaker 1>was bringing stuff that I found interesting and then synthesizing

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the information and communicating it to the audience, but it

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 1>was very one way. It was very rare that I

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 1>would get feedback because I just didn't make it easy

0:45:36.000 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 1>for people to talk to me. And now that I

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:41.360
<v Speaker 1>am no longer the host, I can complete my plan

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:44.919
<v Speaker 1>and move out into the woods. I found a really

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 1>nice ditch, just a little bit of a fixer upper.

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Can you get Wi Fi and a ditch?

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Now you cannot? And that's why I'm happy, No but

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:59.239
<v Speaker 1>no more. Seriously, I'm so enthusiastic about where the show

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is going. Your work speaks for itself, both of you.

0:46:03.280 --> 0:46:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've done incredible work in the past. Like

0:46:06.120 --> 0:46:09.080
<v Speaker 1>for my listeners who are unfamiliar, look it up. There

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 1>is a library a phenomenal work in are now hosts

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of tech stuff in their background. You will not be disappointed.

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:26.000
<v Speaker 1>You will find things that are heartbreaking and fascinating and joyful,

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 1>like the entire spectrum of human experience is represented in

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the work you guys have made, and for that to

0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:34.840
<v Speaker 1>be the backbone of tech Stuff moving forward, I couldn't

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:37.640
<v Speaker 1>be more excited and I couldn't be more optimistic to

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 1>bring it back to that perspective about the future of

0:46:40.640 --> 0:46:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the show and that you'll be having this conversation, ongoing

0:46:44.480 --> 0:46:48.160
<v Speaker 1>conversation with the audience is phenomenal. This is why I

0:46:48.200 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 1>feel confident saying tech stuff's going to reach heights that

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it couldn't have because I ran up against my physical

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:55.760
<v Speaker 1>limitations as a host, Like as much as I possibly

0:46:55.800 --> 0:46:58.200
<v Speaker 1>could do, I was doing and I could not do

0:46:58.360 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 1>more and the show needed more. And you guys are

0:47:00.800 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 1>able to do that. So I'm really excited about that.

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, thank you Johnson. It means the world coming from you.

0:47:06.280 --> 0:47:10.360
<v Speaker 2>And and yeah, I mean, we're we're, we're. It's having

0:47:10.400 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 2>having two of us is great. I think we really

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:15.759
<v Speaker 2>encourage each other and so we do annoy each other,

0:47:15.880 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 2>but we were why Actually, one of our listeners on

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Sleepwalkers compared in a very flattering comparison. He said, Sleepwalkers

0:47:23.680 --> 0:47:27.799
<v Speaker 2>is like a Shelock Combs mystery theater in terms of

0:47:27.920 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of looking at these technology things and taking a

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:34.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of really inquisitive approach. And I told Cara about this,

0:47:35.000 --> 0:47:37.359
<v Speaker 2>and you immediately said, Sharlock Combs is not a colp.

0:47:37.480 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 3>And I said, well, he was a consultant for Scotland

0:47:40.239 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Yard Detective. And I think that the point being is that,

0:47:44.520 --> 0:47:48.880
<v Speaker 3>like we are not experts, you know, specifically not experts.

0:47:48.920 --> 0:47:51.200
<v Speaker 3>And I think Oz is probably more of the Sherlock

0:47:51.280 --> 0:47:53.799
<v Speaker 3>and I'm definitely more of the Watson, which is not

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 3>to say that I'm going to narrate Oz's lived experience,

0:47:57.640 --> 0:48:00.359
<v Speaker 3>although maybe who knows, gould be fun. I have an

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 3>American accent, but no, I think for us, it's about

0:48:03.760 --> 0:48:07.160
<v Speaker 3>what we have to hope that what we think is

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 3>interesting will sort of act as a filter to the audience.

0:48:12.160 --> 0:48:14.520
<v Speaker 3>And in that way we are I mean not to

0:48:14.560 --> 0:48:17.000
<v Speaker 3>be sort of self aggrandizing it. In that way, we

0:48:17.080 --> 0:48:20.640
<v Speaker 3>are sort of detectives because we have these big questions

0:48:21.120 --> 0:48:24.120
<v Speaker 3>that we want answers to and assume that because we

0:48:24.160 --> 0:48:26.360
<v Speaker 3>want answers to them, that other people are going to

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:28.839
<v Speaker 3>want answers to them. And in that way you can

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:32.799
<v Speaker 3>also be you know, both optimistic and suspicious.

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:34.839
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think I think I think that's right.

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:36.799
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think we come to this, you know,

0:48:37.360 --> 0:48:41.319
<v Speaker 2>somewhat as outsiders in the same way that you did originally, Jonathan, Right,

0:48:41.360 --> 0:48:44.080
<v Speaker 2>And I think a lot of tech journalism we talked

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:47.320
<v Speaker 2>about like clickbait headlines, like there is a reward system

0:48:47.360 --> 0:48:49.720
<v Speaker 2>that comes with hyping tech, and there is a reward

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 2>system that comes with doomsday headlines. Right, The reward system

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:56.200
<v Speaker 2>around like which I think white podcast needs the perfect

0:48:56.239 --> 0:49:01.880
<v Speaker 2>medium around like consistently asking you know, interesting questions or

0:49:01.880 --> 0:49:05.360
<v Speaker 2>trying to ask interesting questions and answering them with the

0:49:05.400 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 2>most relevant people in a balanced way. Like it doesn't

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:11.319
<v Speaker 2>lend itself to like social media based journalism. I think

0:49:11.440 --> 0:49:14.040
<v Speaker 2>it does lend itself to audio based journalism.

0:49:14.080 --> 0:49:18.279
<v Speaker 3>So you know, we say slow food, slow news, but.

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:20.719
<v Speaker 2>We but we also you know, we don't. We don't

0:49:20.760 --> 0:49:24.080
<v Speaker 2>take the responsibility lightly. Also, Jonathan, we don't take your

0:49:24.280 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 2>generosity and grace lightly. One of my favorite media stories, Karen, Jonathan,

0:49:28.719 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 2>do you know this one about jay Leno hiding in

0:49:30.680 --> 0:49:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the closet? So I think when this, I mean that

0:49:35.880 --> 0:49:39.359
<v Speaker 2>may be not true, So you know, potentially, please Park

0:49:39.480 --> 0:49:44.000
<v Speaker 2>spare me exactly. But I'm pretty sure that when when

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 2>they were looking at bringing on Conan, jay Leno actually

0:49:49.400 --> 0:49:52.680
<v Speaker 2>hid in a closet of a conference room to h

0:49:52.760 --> 0:49:55.080
<v Speaker 2>to hear the deliberations and try.

0:49:54.880 --> 0:49:58.080
<v Speaker 3>And to overhear the conversation.

0:49:57.680 --> 0:50:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Exactly and try and make sure that the trans I

0:50:01.239 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 2>can't remember exactly what it was. He was not a gracious,

0:50:04.880 --> 0:50:08.560
<v Speaker 2>graciously passing the baton in the way that in the

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:10.400
<v Speaker 2>way that you are, Johnson, So thank you.

0:50:10.719 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, and I mean again, like, if it weren't for

0:50:12.680 --> 0:50:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you both have proven yourself time and

0:50:15.280 --> 0:50:18.399
<v Speaker 1>time again with an incredible work. I mean like, I'm

0:50:18.440 --> 0:50:24.279
<v Speaker 1>talking to award winning journalists here, I'm I'm award adjacent.

0:50:24.680 --> 0:50:30.240
<v Speaker 1>So so I am fine with generously passing the baton

0:50:30.360 --> 0:50:33.320
<v Speaker 1>because I feel that it's in very good hands. And

0:50:33.760 --> 0:50:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and karas you were saying, you know, the approach of

0:50:37.760 --> 0:50:40.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about things you find interesting in the hopes that

0:50:40.160 --> 0:50:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the audience find it interesting. That's always been my approach

0:50:43.760 --> 0:50:46.520
<v Speaker 1>as well, and I think it works because the worst

0:50:46.560 --> 0:50:48.719
<v Speaker 1>thing that can happen is you talk about something because

0:50:48.719 --> 0:50:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you feel that you're compelled to talk about it because

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:54.440
<v Speaker 1>wagging the yeah again. Listeners are smart. They will know

0:50:54.560 --> 0:50:58.280
<v Speaker 1>immediately if you're not actually engaged with the material or interested,

0:50:58.760 --> 0:51:01.320
<v Speaker 1>or even have any inter questions to ask about it.

0:51:01.400 --> 0:51:03.960
<v Speaker 1>They'll know immediately. Even if you're able to mask it,

0:51:04.280 --> 0:51:08.200
<v Speaker 1>they'll suss it out. So being able to say, this

0:51:08.320 --> 0:51:10.600
<v Speaker 1>is something I'm really excited about and you can tell

0:51:10.640 --> 0:51:13.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited about it, and now I'm going to take

0:51:13.800 --> 0:51:16.440
<v Speaker 1>what I've learned, like I said, synthesize it presented to

0:51:16.480 --> 0:51:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a conversation with someone else who might have

0:51:18.680 --> 0:51:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a completely different point of view than I do, and

0:51:21.280 --> 0:51:24.600
<v Speaker 1>then we'll see where the conversation goes. To me, that's

0:51:24.680 --> 0:51:26.920
<v Speaker 1>like the heart of what tech Stuff started. As you know,

0:51:27.160 --> 0:51:29.279
<v Speaker 1>from twenty and eight to twenty fourteen, it was a

0:51:29.360 --> 0:51:31.560
<v Speaker 1>two host show, and I feel like this in some

0:51:31.719 --> 0:51:34.120
<v Speaker 1>ways is getting back to the roots, but with much

0:51:34.719 --> 0:51:37.759
<v Speaker 1>more qualified journalists taking the part behind.

0:51:37.840 --> 0:51:40.759
<v Speaker 3>I would say, just with very different stories. Although I

0:51:40.840 --> 0:51:42.839
<v Speaker 3>mean you were really at the forefront of a lot

0:51:42.880 --> 0:51:45.680
<v Speaker 3>of this stuff. I mean, now it's you know, falling

0:51:45.719 --> 0:51:47.040
<v Speaker 3>off the trees sing.

0:51:47.080 --> 0:51:49.319
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's exactually right. I mean tech stuff when

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:53.280
<v Speaker 2>you started was like a kind of somewhat niche topic area,

0:51:53.920 --> 0:51:57.560
<v Speaker 2>and now it's like the architecture, the infrastructure which we

0:51:57.680 --> 0:51:59.920
<v Speaker 2>all are plugged into. And I know you've done this

0:52:00.160 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 2>thing where you've kind of talked about each year in

0:52:02.719 --> 0:52:05.080
<v Speaker 2>tech since you've been doing the show and kind of

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:07.000
<v Speaker 2>some of the highlights. But I guess on a more

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 2>like personal level, like what's the journey been, what is

0:52:09.239 --> 0:52:11.920
<v Speaker 2>some of the highlights been, and how have you seen

0:52:12.200 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 2>technology go from like a product to a system kind

0:52:15.000 --> 0:52:15.640
<v Speaker 2>of firsthand?

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it's part of a larger social conversation too, right,

0:52:19.960 --> 0:52:22.759
<v Speaker 1>because from the same perspective, you could say, like the

0:52:22.880 --> 0:52:26.520
<v Speaker 1>things that were once associated with being a geek or

0:52:26.560 --> 0:52:28.919
<v Speaker 1>a nerd, like back in the eighties, where that would

0:52:28.920 --> 0:52:32.759
<v Speaker 1>be a pejorative our mainstream, right, Like if you like

0:52:32.840 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 1>superheroes when I was a kid, then you were that

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:38.080
<v Speaker 1>geek who liked superheroes. If you like superheroes, now you're

0:52:38.280 --> 0:52:42.000
<v Speaker 1>someone who just goes to the cinema, right, because nine

0:52:42.080 --> 0:52:44.040
<v Speaker 1>movies out of ten are superhero movies.

0:52:44.360 --> 0:52:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:52:44.680 --> 0:52:48.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think it was a change that was gradual

0:52:48.640 --> 0:52:53.400
<v Speaker 1>enough where it's hard to like put a finger on

0:52:53.880 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly when the tipping point was. But I would argue

0:52:58.200 --> 0:53:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Steve jobs decline in health and then his passing was

0:53:01.520 --> 0:53:05.800
<v Speaker 1>probably a real indicator because here was somebody who in

0:53:05.920 --> 0:53:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the seventies would have been considered a geeky co founder

0:53:09.520 --> 0:53:12.359
<v Speaker 1>of a personal computer company, back when we didn't even

0:53:12.400 --> 0:53:14.759
<v Speaker 1>know that personal computers could be a viable business. Like

0:53:15.000 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that might have just, you know, imploded on itself if

0:53:17.760 --> 0:53:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it hadn't been for a lot of people doing very

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:23.560
<v Speaker 1>creative things and a hobbyist community that kept it alive

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:25.680
<v Speaker 1>until it can find its feet. Then you get down

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to like two thousand and nine where you start having

0:53:27.800 --> 0:53:32.480
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media following Steve jobs because he's having these sabbaticals

0:53:32.520 --> 0:53:35.040
<v Speaker 1>from work and he's being very secretive about his health.

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:37.399
<v Speaker 1>And then twenty eleven, of course, when he passed away,

0:53:37.760 --> 0:53:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and it was huge news, and it was reinforcing the

0:53:41.680 --> 0:53:46.480
<v Speaker 1>idea that Apple had managed to make things that could

0:53:46.600 --> 0:53:50.879
<v Speaker 1>have just been stuff for executives and geeks into an

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:54.880
<v Speaker 1>item that everybody wanted, like starting with the iPod, actually

0:53:55.000 --> 0:53:59.200
<v Speaker 1>arguably starting with the iMac, but then the iPod definitely

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:02.920
<v Speaker 1>becoming that mainstream consumer product once you get past the

0:54:03.520 --> 0:54:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Mac only days of the first two generations to the iPhone,

0:54:07.320 --> 0:54:09.919
<v Speaker 1>which really opened up the doors to the point where

0:54:09.960 --> 0:54:13.120
<v Speaker 1>even the iPad, something that people like me I talk

0:54:13.160 --> 0:54:15.320
<v Speaker 1>about all the time. I dismissed the iPad because no

0:54:15.400 --> 0:54:18.920
<v Speaker 1>one had made a tablet computer that anyone wanted, Like

0:54:19.040 --> 0:54:23.520
<v Speaker 1>there were tablet computers, but nobody outside of specific jobs

0:54:23.680 --> 0:54:26.160
<v Speaker 1>like in nursing or whatever, we're using them. I give

0:54:26.200 --> 0:54:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple a hard time. I'm not an Apple person, but

0:54:28.680 --> 0:54:30.359
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I can't think of any other

0:54:30.520 --> 0:54:35.960
<v Speaker 1>company that was as responsible for making tech into this sexy,

0:54:36.200 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 1>mainstream consumer idea than Apple. I mean, arguably, social networks

0:54:42.719 --> 0:54:45.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of did that for the web because they made

0:54:46.280 --> 0:54:49.040
<v Speaker 1>initially they made it easy for you to connect with

0:54:49.080 --> 0:54:51.680
<v Speaker 1>your friends or if you were a Facebook, to rate

0:54:51.760 --> 0:54:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the attractiveness of your student colleagues. Let's never forget that, y'all.

0:54:56.800 --> 0:54:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's never forget that Facebook started off as a way

0:54:59.719 --> 0:55:03.359
<v Speaker 1>for dude bros. To say how hot they found their

0:55:03.600 --> 0:55:06.480
<v Speaker 1>female colleagues at school.

0:55:06.640 --> 0:55:10.160
<v Speaker 3>And then swayed the outcome of an election. Very interesting. Yeah,

0:55:10.239 --> 0:55:11.160
<v Speaker 3>the double edged sword.

0:55:11.360 --> 0:55:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I think just keeping in mind where people came from

0:55:13.600 --> 0:55:15.279
<v Speaker 1>is always a good idea. Not to say that people

0:55:15.360 --> 0:55:18.200
<v Speaker 1>can't change, but just you know, sometimes you know that

0:55:18.600 --> 0:55:21.879
<v Speaker 1>you get at the heart of who someone is. But yeah,

0:55:22.640 --> 0:55:24.919
<v Speaker 1>I think those would be the big things I would

0:55:24.920 --> 0:55:27.400
<v Speaker 1>point at as the stuff that stands out to me

0:55:27.719 --> 0:55:32.520
<v Speaker 1>was that Apple kind of forging this new appreciation of technology,

0:55:32.920 --> 0:55:35.000
<v Speaker 1>which is phenomenal. If you look at Apple in the

0:55:35.040 --> 0:55:37.960
<v Speaker 1>mid nineties, that company was in danger of going out

0:55:38.000 --> 0:55:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of business. Yeah, so for it to go from that

0:55:40.480 --> 0:55:44.279
<v Speaker 1>to becoming the definer, the style maker, if you will,

0:55:44.360 --> 0:55:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of tech, Yeah, phenomenal story. And then flip side the growth,

0:55:48.840 --> 0:55:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the consolidation, the failure in several cases of social networks.

0:55:53.840 --> 0:55:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Those would be the two big things that just leap

0:55:56.000 --> 0:55:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to my mind. If I were to sit down and

0:55:57.880 --> 0:56:00.160
<v Speaker 1>think about it for forty five minutes, I'd probab they

0:56:00.200 --> 0:56:02.719
<v Speaker 1>come back to you with like an eight page long

0:56:02.880 --> 0:56:06.399
<v Speaker 1>list of stuff you know, I love. Like we mentioned VR, Kara,

0:56:06.520 --> 0:56:09.399
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned VR earlier, and I laughed because you talked

0:56:09.400 --> 0:56:13.560
<v Speaker 1>about the embrace or the the whether a VR is

0:56:13.600 --> 0:56:16.800
<v Speaker 1>falling short, whether it's actually getting traction, because I remember

0:56:16.840 --> 0:56:19.839
<v Speaker 1>those conversations again in the early nineties the first time.

0:56:20.280 --> 0:56:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, tried to make it, you know, so good time.

0:56:23.280 --> 0:56:24.839
<v Speaker 3>And I mean that's the thing. Some of these things

0:56:24.880 --> 0:56:27.279
<v Speaker 3>are cyclical, you know, and that they don't work, and

0:56:27.400 --> 0:56:30.399
<v Speaker 3>then it comes back around when the technology gets better

0:56:30.440 --> 0:56:33.200
<v Speaker 3>around they see if people will adopt them again.

0:56:33.040 --> 0:56:35.759
<v Speaker 1>They might get rebranded, they might get you know, a

0:56:35.880 --> 0:56:38.040
<v Speaker 1>new new code of pain on. But it's the same idea,

0:56:38.360 --> 0:56:42.680
<v Speaker 1>like Apple Vision. Apple Vision, I still haven't tried one.

0:56:43.000 --> 0:56:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean in there, I hate the eyes on the outside.

0:56:46.520 --> 0:56:50.080
<v Speaker 3>It is very weird. It's very wally. Yeah, yeah, it's

0:56:50.320 --> 0:56:50.840
<v Speaker 3>very strange.

0:56:51.120 --> 0:56:52.560
<v Speaker 1>It makes me think of the first time I wore

0:56:52.600 --> 0:56:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the Google glass out to friends of mine. Everyone was

0:56:55.760 --> 0:56:59.160
<v Speaker 1>suddenly visibly uncomfortable around me because I was wearing a

0:56:59.280 --> 0:57:01.759
<v Speaker 1>headset that everyone knew. It had a camera, and it

0:57:01.800 --> 0:57:04.000
<v Speaker 1>had a microphone and had a screen, and so that

0:57:04.200 --> 0:57:07.320
<v Speaker 1>immediately made people uncomfortable. And I thought, how interesting, because

0:57:07.480 --> 0:57:10.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone in this place has a device in their pocket,

0:57:11.239 --> 0:57:14.560
<v Speaker 1>has all of these elements all the time. But because

0:57:14.600 --> 0:57:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm wearing mine on my face, that's what's making them uncomfortable. Interesting.

0:57:18.200 --> 0:57:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's because Apple designed it. That's fine.

0:57:21.280 --> 0:57:23.000
<v Speaker 1>If they designed the thing in the they designed the

0:57:23.040 --> 0:57:24.400
<v Speaker 1>thing on my face, they'd be like, oh, well this

0:57:24.520 --> 0:57:25.960
<v Speaker 1>is cool. But all this is really doing is just

0:57:26.040 --> 0:57:28.240
<v Speaker 1>drag it to your face. Come on.

0:57:29.280 --> 0:57:32.120
<v Speaker 2>I think Apple got a gotta find recently because of

0:57:32.280 --> 0:57:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Siri listening to private conversations. I think it was like

0:57:34.520 --> 0:57:37.040
<v Speaker 2>ninety five million bucks, which which is like the equivalent

0:57:37.080 --> 0:57:39.320
<v Speaker 2>of the two million dollar fine Jet Blue got for

0:57:39.600 --> 0:57:41.960
<v Speaker 2>being consistently late. It's like, guys, this is like.

0:57:42.560 --> 0:57:45.400
<v Speaker 3>The Air or the Jordan fine where Michael Jordan was

0:57:45.440 --> 0:57:47.800
<v Speaker 3>fined every time he wore his sneakers and he covered it.

0:57:47.880 --> 0:57:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, he covered it.

0:57:49.520 --> 0:57:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, I know. If you'd just shaken a couch

0:57:51.800 --> 0:57:55.360
<v Speaker 1>over an Apple, it would cover that, but yeah, and

0:57:55.480 --> 0:57:58.360
<v Speaker 1>then it ends up going back into that concern people

0:57:58.440 --> 0:58:00.800
<v Speaker 1>had with smart speakers, right, anything that has a smart

0:58:00.840 --> 0:58:03.520
<v Speaker 1>speaker in it, like or in my phone. For example,

0:58:03.560 --> 0:58:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I have an Android phone, and if a song is

0:58:06.160 --> 0:58:09.640
<v Speaker 1>playing and the phone recognizes it, it'll tell you, you know,

0:58:09.760 --> 0:58:11.920
<v Speaker 1>what the song title and who's singing it, just like

0:58:12.040 --> 0:58:14.280
<v Speaker 1>if you were using an app like Shazam. But it

0:58:14.320 --> 0:58:17.040
<v Speaker 1>does it automatically, which immediately raises the question of wait,

0:58:17.600 --> 0:58:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that means that the phone's listening even when I'm not

0:58:19.680 --> 0:58:22.880
<v Speaker 1>actively using it. What else is it doing when it's listening,

0:58:23.240 --> 0:58:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and those questions like you can be told again and again,

0:58:26.440 --> 0:58:29.600
<v Speaker 1>oh well, nothing's being sent. You know, it's all native

0:58:29.640 --> 0:58:32.919
<v Speaker 1>to the phone. It's not actually consulting the cloud or whatever.

0:58:33.000 --> 0:58:35.240
<v Speaker 1>But you're still thinking, well, yeah, but it could, right

0:58:35.400 --> 0:58:38.520
<v Speaker 1>because obviously it's doing something like that now even if

0:58:38.560 --> 0:58:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it's native on the phone, so it could do the

0:58:40.800 --> 0:58:43.520
<v Speaker 1>things you're saying it's not doing. You're just telling me

0:58:43.640 --> 0:58:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that you pinky swear it's not doing those things. And

0:58:47.080 --> 0:58:49.919
<v Speaker 1>whenever those stories pop up, I think, man, you're making

0:58:49.960 --> 0:58:53.080
<v Speaker 1>my job so much harder. I don't want to be

0:58:53.160 --> 0:58:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the person immediately jumping to conspiracies, but if all the

0:58:56.600 --> 0:58:59.000
<v Speaker 1>technology facilitates it, it's hard.

0:58:58.840 --> 0:59:02.560
<v Speaker 2>To avoid unless we forget you to give stuff they

0:59:02.600 --> 0:59:04.360
<v Speaker 2>don't want you to know, or his name.

0:59:04.320 --> 0:59:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, I did, I did? That was that was

0:59:06.920 --> 0:59:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a fun story too. Yeah. Stuff you Should Know was

0:59:08.880 --> 0:59:12.280
<v Speaker 1>already out and we were working on a new podcast

0:59:12.360 --> 0:59:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that was gonna cover fringe theories, conspiracy theories, that kind

0:59:15.480 --> 0:59:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of thing, and they were workshopping ideas for the name,

0:59:18.880 --> 0:59:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and I said, why don't you just call it stuff

0:59:20.320 --> 0:59:21.840
<v Speaker 1>they don't want you to know? Because we already have

0:59:21.920 --> 0:59:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you should Know? And everyone's like, oh, that's brilliant.

0:59:24.920 --> 0:59:27.720
<v Speaker 1>And to this day Ben Bolin, who's one of the hosts,

0:59:28.040 --> 0:59:30.360
<v Speaker 1>whenever this comes up, he's like, yeah, if we had

0:59:30.400 --> 0:59:32.760
<v Speaker 1>thought about it for a second, we would say, shut up, Jonathan,

0:59:32.800 --> 0:59:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that name's too long. We'll never put on any you know,

0:59:36.600 --> 0:59:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the acronym doesn't make any sense. It has to be

0:59:38.840 --> 0:59:43.760
<v Speaker 1>an initials. Yeah. So so with great power comes something,

0:59:43.880 --> 0:59:45.680
<v Speaker 1>something is what we learn.

0:59:45.920 --> 0:59:47.640
<v Speaker 3>That's right, all right, y'all?

0:59:47.800 --> 0:59:50.960
<v Speaker 1>This conversation ran long. Who would have thunk a conversation

0:59:51.120 --> 0:59:53.920
<v Speaker 1>with me would go long? And that means we need

0:59:54.000 --> 0:59:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to take another quick break to think our sponsors, but

0:59:56.760 --> 1:00:00.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll be right back to conclude our conversation about tech Stuff,

1:00:00.720 --> 1:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and you want to stick around for the end, folks.

1:00:12.880 --> 1:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>This has been an epic episode, which is fitting for

1:00:15.880 --> 1:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>my last one. But what I want to walk away

1:00:19.120 --> 1:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>with in this episode is again, tech Stuff continues. You know,

1:00:22.600 --> 1:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>it started with me and Chris Poullette in two thousand

1:00:24.920 --> 1:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and eight. Chris left around twenty thirteen early, you know,

1:00:28.800 --> 1:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve at the end of twenty twelve, and Lauren

1:00:31.240 --> 1:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>came on until twenty fourteen. You know, we each had

1:00:35.000 --> 1:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>our own impact in forging what the show is. To me,

1:00:38.680 --> 1:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be the exciting future of the show,

1:00:41.560 --> 1:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>arguably one of the most transformative. But at the same time,

1:00:44.120 --> 1:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>from talking to you, it sounds to me like it's

1:00:46.280 --> 1:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>really getting at the heart of what the show was

1:00:48.120 --> 1:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>all about from the very beginning, and I could not

1:00:51.480 --> 1:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>ask for better Stewards, So thank you for coming onto

1:00:54.760 --> 1:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the show to talk about it, and I cannot wait

1:00:57.400 --> 1:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to listen to Friday's episode.

1:00:58.960 --> 1:01:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. Jonathan be going from fans and listeners to hosts,

1:01:02.800 --> 1:01:05.280
<v Speaker 2>and you said it was your last episode, I would

1:01:05.280 --> 1:01:06.800
<v Speaker 2>say it was your last episode as host.

1:01:07.120 --> 1:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I would like to have you as a guest. As

1:01:09.400 --> 1:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a guest, boy, you're not gonna like it because uh,

1:01:12.320 --> 1:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>my writer is super long, so many demands for low

1:01:18.680 --> 1:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>sodium snacks you want and believe now.

1:01:22.520 --> 1:01:24.640
<v Speaker 2>No, but thank you seriously, and and and thank you

1:01:24.760 --> 1:01:27.880
<v Speaker 2>to anyone on everyone listening to for giving us a

1:01:28.000 --> 1:01:30.600
<v Speaker 2>chance as a new host, and please do right into

1:01:30.880 --> 1:01:33.640
<v Speaker 2>tech Stuff Podcast at gmail dot com with any with

1:01:33.760 --> 1:01:36.680
<v Speaker 2>any feedback, because I think the most important thing for

1:01:36.800 --> 1:01:40.640
<v Speaker 2>me and Kara is to honor your time and we're grateful,

1:01:40.760 --> 1:01:41.320
<v Speaker 2>we're great.

1:01:41.120 --> 1:01:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Fans forgiving the ways in which technology intersects with your life.

1:01:44.200 --> 1:01:46.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean not I don't want any feedback personally.

1:01:47.800 --> 1:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>What I want to know is we are one and

1:01:51.160 --> 1:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the same.

1:01:53.360 --> 1:01:55.120
<v Speaker 3>No, I want, I want to know you know the ways.

1:01:55.280 --> 1:01:58.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean. I think ring camera technology is one of

1:01:58.600 --> 1:02:02.920
<v Speaker 3>my favorite Just the way that that has unleashed itself

1:02:03.600 --> 1:02:07.000
<v Speaker 3>onto the world is some of just the great comedy

1:02:07.120 --> 1:02:09.720
<v Speaker 3>and great darkness that we have in our world. And

1:02:09.840 --> 1:02:11.880
<v Speaker 3>I use that as an example because I think that

1:02:12.040 --> 1:02:15.520
<v Speaker 3>people listening to this show who already hopefully think in

1:02:15.600 --> 1:02:18.160
<v Speaker 3>this way, or maybe don't yet and will in the future.

1:02:18.360 --> 1:02:21.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, have plenty of day to day interactions that

1:02:22.240 --> 1:02:24.960
<v Speaker 3>you know should be shared, and you know things that

1:02:25.040 --> 1:02:27.520
<v Speaker 3>they're thinking in terms of how their life intersects with

1:02:27.640 --> 1:02:30.160
<v Speaker 3>technology on a daily basis that I think sometimes we

1:02:30.400 --> 1:02:31.040
<v Speaker 3>just won't think of.

1:02:31.400 --> 1:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think anytime anyone out there has an interaction

1:02:35.640 --> 1:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>with technology or something related to tech and you're left

1:02:38.920 --> 1:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>with a question like why is it like this?

1:02:41.600 --> 1:02:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Right?

1:02:41.800 --> 1:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>How did it get this way? Right? To textuff podcast

1:02:45.200 --> 1:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>at gmail dot com and ask your question, because that

1:02:48.320 --> 1:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>will launch an investigation and conversation that will be so

1:02:53.600 --> 1:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>entertaining and informative. It will not only answer your question,

1:02:56.520 --> 1:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>but it will get you excited about other elements of

1:03:00.000 --> 1:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>tech and critical thinking. Like I said, it's not just

1:03:02.560 --> 1:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>for technology, that's for every part of your life. The

1:03:05.280 --> 1:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>more often you start to engage that skill, the better

1:03:08.640 --> 1:03:10.439
<v Speaker 1>you will get at it. It will always be something

1:03:10.520 --> 1:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to engage. Can't just count on it because

1:03:13.160 --> 1:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>like I certainly have fallen victim to more than a

1:03:16.160 --> 1:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>few japes, let us say, because of a failure to

1:03:20.040 --> 1:03:23.439
<v Speaker 1>apply my own critical thinking. But yeah, I absolutely loved

1:03:23.640 --> 1:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>all of that. And again, you think of a question,

1:03:26.320 --> 1:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>send it their way because it's going to be a

1:03:28.800 --> 1:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>wild a wild ride and a fascinating look into technology

1:03:32.960 --> 1:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and how it impacts culture. I also love that you

1:03:36.480 --> 1:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>look at it that way. Specifically, I've always said technology

1:03:38.960 --> 1:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>does not exist in a vacuum. The one criticism I

1:03:41.920 --> 1:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>would receive that I never really paid much mind to was, hey,

1:03:45.040 --> 1:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you're bringing too much you know, politics or culture into

1:03:48.480 --> 1:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>this conversation. Like, well, yeah, because tech doesn't exist on

1:03:51.880 --> 1:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>its own. Tech exists because we built it, and we

1:03:54.840 --> 1:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>built it to do something for us, So we have

1:03:57.840 --> 1:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to take that relationship into consider it or else what

1:04:00.880 --> 1:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>are we doing? Like I guess I could tell you

1:04:03.440 --> 1:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>how a circuit board works on a very technical level,

1:04:07.000 --> 1:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>but you can go take a class in that. That's

1:04:09.760 --> 1:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>not an interesting story. So that to me is again

1:04:13.600 --> 1:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the heart of what I tried to do. So I'm

1:04:15.600 --> 1:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>always happy to be a guest. I will I promise

1:04:17.440 --> 1:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll be as gracious as possible and hopefully less verbose.

1:04:25.120 --> 1:04:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Never Thank you, Jonathan, Thank you so much.

1:04:28.040 --> 1:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's what editors are for. Well, y'all, thank you

1:04:32.360 --> 1:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>so much. It has been my honor to host this

1:04:35.760 --> 1:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>show for sixteen and a half years. The day this

1:04:39.120 --> 1:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>episode goes out January eighth, like I started June eighth,

1:04:43.400 --> 1:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight January eighth, twenty twenty five. What

1:04:47.040 --> 1:04:49.919
<v Speaker 1>a heck of a run. It has been fantastic. You'll

1:04:50.120 --> 1:04:53.439
<v Speaker 1>hear my voice again, I'm sure. And usually I would

1:04:53.480 --> 1:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>say at the end of an episode, I look forward

1:04:55.360 --> 1:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to talking to you again really soon, but I guess

1:04:58.160 --> 1:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>today I'm just going to say, sure, has been nice

1:05:00.880 --> 1:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>talking to you. Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For

1:05:14.520 --> 1:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:05:19.440 --> 1:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.