WEBVTT - Surveillance: IMF Boosts World Growth Outlook

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm term Keene Jay Lee.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. The

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>IMF out with this outlook, lifting the forecast for the

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>global economy. But it's the story within regions that I

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>think gets a little bit more interesting. Downgrading Europe and

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>upgrading the United States get to go up and f

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the IMF chief economists right in the following Much now

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>depends on the outcome of this race between a mutating

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>virus and vaccines to when the pandemic and on the

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>ability of policies to provide effective support until that happens.

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Get around, please to say joins us now get it.

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Thankful you time this morning. I know you're exceptionally busy.

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's just start with that breakdown on the regional side.

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>What was behind the upgrade for the United States and

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the down grade for Europe. Firstly, it's a pleasure to

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>join you. What we have is that in the case

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:12.919
<v Speaker 1>of the US, we ended twenty twenty with an additional

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>uh stimulus that was provided and that is an important

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>factor for the upgrade for the US by almost a

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>percentage point in twenty also ended in some way in

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a you know, less worse place than what we had

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>projected for the US. In the case of the Euro Area,

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>we still have a strict containment measures in place. This

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>virus resurgence is leading to a decline and mobility, which

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>is much more than what we're seeing in the US,

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 1>and that's part of the reason why because we have

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a downgrade for the first quarter in the Euro Area.

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>For the year as a whole, we have a down

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>grade for twenty twenty one. So I'd like to start

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in the United States and the stimulus effort and then

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>we can turn to vaccines. It's what's happening in Europe.

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>So I want to stimulus effort. N billion is what

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you baked into the outlook the one point nine trillion.

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that just a little bit extra for you gatsor

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 1>what would that actually do to the outlook? And is

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it targeted enough? So of course the details, I mean,

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>it still has to be completely settled, so it's not

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>in our focus. We have a very preliminary estimate that

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>says that about one point nine trillion stimulus would raise

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the level of US g d P by five pcent

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 1>over three years, So that's between twenty one and twenty three. UM.

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean our view is that, of course we are

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>still in the midst of this health crisis. There is

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>need for much more faster vaccine rollout, force health spending

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>including and testing, UH, and also for providing support to

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable households and businesses and so you know, all of

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>those are important pieces that have to be addressed still. UH.

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>And so so you know that those are support measures

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.839
<v Speaker 1>that should be provided five over the next three years

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that decent numbers, But get basis on the size of

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the program one point nine or is there some specifics

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>about the composition of it the I M F likes

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and would like to see more of. So this is uh,

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you know where you know, I'm just making a statement

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>about our estimate impact of one point i triuly and

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>would be able three years. I mean, that's a fiscal

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>wants to player point six just taking into account what

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>we know from a previous data on how much of

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:28.639
<v Speaker 1>it tends to get saved based on the package that

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>was was you know, was talked about, but again the

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>details still have to be worked out, and so we'll

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>see what exact shape that finally takes. One thing you've

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>said in the outlook is the mutations the new strains,

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>And I just wander from your perspective, whether the strains

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing in the United Kingdom, Brazil, South Africa

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>actually raised the bar to reopen these economies gets So

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>how do you think about those things at the moment. Yeah,

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I think what it tells us that, you know, while

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>stay at home is difficult and social distancing is difficult,

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>we know that the the chances of the various mutiating

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is higher when all of us are out there and

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, mixing, and so I think this is an

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>additional reason for for you know, kind of being very

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>cautious about going out and very and very important to

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>wear masks and so on. So yes, I think we

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>have to, you know, continue to vaccinate a very high

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>basic It doesn't change what we need to do. I

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>think we'll we still need to do is simply to

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>exhilerate the pace of vaccine rollout, but also now we

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>have to just make it available to the world as

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a whole. I mean, the way it is right now

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is terribly inequitive, and we know that the virus mutication

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>can come from anywhere in the world. What you're building

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>them right now, the gator is absolutely critical. The conversation

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of having at the moment almost every day with market participants.

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just relative growth differentials between Europe the United States.

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>The vaccine rollout is good here, it's bad there. One

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>will do okay, one we'll do better, the other one

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>will do terribly. Would you be willing to make the

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>argument now that if we don't make a bigger effort

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to vaccinate those outside the developed world, that that ultimately

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>will drag down the global econom at some point anyway? Well, absolutely,

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean the arguments are obviousible on the health side,

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>on the economic side. On the health side, because of

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:10.919
<v Speaker 1>these new variants, we just know that the pandemic is

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>not over until it's over everywhere. But there's also a

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>strong economic argument. I mean, we estimate that if you

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>can get to a faster into this health crisis by

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 1>much more widespread rollout of vaccinism and therapies, you know,

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>we would add nine trillion dollars to the global economy

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>between twenty twenty and twenty five and everybody benefits, including

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the advanced economies who stand to gain four trillion dollars

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>around four trillion dollars. So this is, you know, a

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>very strong economic case for doing much more. Now, final

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>question gates there is a take amongst some people, especially

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>at markets. It seems to be a belief that if

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>we have to delay reopenings by an extra quarter or so,

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter, it won't be growth loss will make

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>up for it at the back end of the year

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>into two as well. Do you see it that way?

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>So there's a couple of things. Even if you just

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>look at when you have a lockdowns, the effect of

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 1>that on economic activity is much lower than what we

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>had in the spring last spring. You know, if you

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>look at, for instance, relation moving in mobility and economic

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>activity in the U S. Mobility has barely knew that much,

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>but economic activity has continued to recover. So countries have

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>gotten used to functioning with social distancing in place, so

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the effect is going to be less severe. And indeed,

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for many economies were wanting your higher savings

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>rates in the among households so you could rebound. But

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>again I just cannot emphasize enough the uncertain team. There

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:34.679
<v Speaker 1>is so much more we still need to know about

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>how this pandemic evolves. I think that's a message that

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 1>resonites with a lot of our audience. Kata, thank you

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>for your time. It's precious getting golopment at there. The

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I m f Chief economist right now. And this is

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a joy, folks for those of you that aren't speed

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>on United Kingdom academics. If you're John Pharaoh, there's a

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>point where you must learn rawsy injustice. It's what they

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>do in terms of theory in the United Kingdom. And

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>right now, one of our experts on human rights and

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>its application to our public health in our law, Lawrence

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Gonston joins us where Georgetown University. I want to go

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>back to your book Human Rights, Professor Gonston, and I

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about the shocking change in philosophy without

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>saying Republican or Democrat, but this tectonic shift we're having

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>right now in the perception of American human rights on

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>this transfer of government. Your observation, please, wow, it's like

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>not in day, isn't it. Um. You know, all of

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, we're you know, we're back to the truth.

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>We're back to freedom of expression. Um, we've rejoined the

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>World Health Organization. UM, We've rejoined the Climate Change Agreement

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in Paris. UM. So there. It's really been a tectonic

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>change from the last administration. It's kind of almost like

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a whip saw, you you know, go ego from one

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to the other. I think that the big thing is,

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether American allies are going to think, well, gosh,

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, is America here? Is this one America? Or

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is this two America's where we see the old America again?

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's you know, we don't know that. Well, this

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>is vitally important. And this spans your career of the

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Reagan and the Trumpian individualism of less government or indeed

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>no government, uh somewhat outitorialized, Professor Gunston, Do you see

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a shift here in an end or diminution of what

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we got from Ronald Reagan? Yeah, I mean, you know,

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>if we're we're in the middle of we're all kind

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of suffering. During the break, we were just having a

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>laugh about how COVID has completely gripped and changed our lives,

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, and if there was ever a time that

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>really government has come through for us, the government failed

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>for sure in the United States we were no match

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 1>for the virus. But then you know, government public private

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>partnerships through science pharmaceutical companies, the nih UM we ended

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>up with. You know, we we we the science was

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the match for the coronavirus. We've got this vaccine um

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:21.359
<v Speaker 1>in we've never seen it this quick um and we're

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>now poised by the end of the year um to

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>think that we might climb our way out of that.

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.719
<v Speaker 1>That was that was a partnership about what government can

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>do with the private sector. I think that the new

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>way that we move forward in America and globally are

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>really public private partnerships. Their nimble um they get the

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>best of both worlds. And you know, the proof of

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the pudding is is that now we're starting to get

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, vaccines and people's arms way too slowly, but

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that will improve. That's what I was going to ask

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Professor Gostin. How do we turbocharge getting vaccines and people's arms.

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, we we've been able to do it before.

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>It's really kind of shocking to see how badly we've

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>done in the United States thus far. But you know,

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>if you think about you know, polio in the United States,

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.599
<v Speaker 1>where we went through a massive campaign, or if you

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>think about UM the current polio eradication UM which the

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 1>United States UH is spearheading, or that we eradicated smallpox.

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean the way to do it is you open

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>up a lot of vaccine clinics. You get mobile units

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to go into rural areas, into elderly vulnerable people's homes,

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>into prisons, nursing homes. UM. You have UM drives right now.

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>What's the real problem with the American rollout is is

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that it's just far too complicated. You have you know,

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you just talk to any of your friends and they'll say, well,

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, have you called this number, have you been

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 1>on this website, did you try you know this pharmacy,

0:10:56.080 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>are you in this county, this state? UM. So it

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>privileges the people that are tech savvy, that kind of

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>know their way around, but the people who really need

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the vaccines really really can't compete in that kind of

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a way to search for them. So we know we

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>need to search for them, they don't need to search

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>for the vaccine. Looking forward, Professor Gossa, there's a question

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of whether what we have seen over the past two years,

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>year and a half will turbo charge investment in pharmaceutical

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>companies in the development of new drugs and new biological research.

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>And this comes as Israel gets a headstart in part

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>because of their production of some of these vaccines. Do

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you already see the groundwork being laid for more investment,

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 1>both on the public side as well as the private side,

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>for this type of development. It's a really interesting question,

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, I think, I think pharma is

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, certainly come come through for us

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>on this UM. But on the other hand, you know,

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 1>pandemics are funny things from an economic point of view. UM.

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>The reason companies don't invest in them, and the reason

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that the public doesn't invest in them is because they're

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>so unpredictable. Um. You know, it's very possible that you

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 1>know that the next uh novel coronavirus or novel influenza, UM,

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and we'll we'll we'll jump from an animal to a

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>human and then we'll just get it right under control.

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.559
<v Speaker 1>We're and and a lot of money putting into vaccines

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>won't work. And so what what what the new thinking

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is is is that we develop with public private partnerships.

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>You you need public investment for this platforms, and so

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the platform can be there, and then when the pathogen comes,

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you've already got kind of a way to a tackle it.

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what Fiser and Maderna have done with their

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>messenger RNA vaccines. You know, they started out as platforms.

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>We were looking at them for things like um the

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>stars virus, and then when this came, we were all

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>ready in the way ahead. And I think that's the future.

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Professor come back saying, great to catch up. Professor of Georgetown,

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. Let's stuff tell this together with

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Mr Burlin's comments with Fiser and bring it over to

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Tina Fordham, Avener's partner and ahead of Global political strategy.

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>We do this and welcome all of you on Bloomberg

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Radio and Bloomberg Television. Tina, I love how you address

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>in your note the walls of worry of January, and

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you make very clear they're not going to be the

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>same as the walls of worry of Q three. The

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>market right now is looking out at the politics of

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 1>the third and fourth quarter of this year. What will

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it look like? Well, I think your previous speakers have

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>have already taken us through some of the obstacles to

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the rollout. Um. I've been talking about my VACS popular

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>thesis for a while. I think there's phase one and

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>phase two. The phase one is the logistics, the government

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 1>capacity that the like willingness UM plus the risk of

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>mutant strainings. But I think the second phase is that

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>periods um following pandemics tend to see more political disruption

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and extremism. And whether we're thinking about the capital riots

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and Black Lives Matter or that we're anti curfew protests

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Netherlands yesterday, this is going to be a

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>volatile period as we look to get this under control. Tina,

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about the politics of getting

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine out. There is a question of what went

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>so wrong in the European Union that they are so

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>delayed there so behind the United Kingdom, the US and

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:43.479
<v Speaker 1>places like Israel. Does this raise questions about the integrity

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of the EU as a social experiment if they are

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>unable to plan on a routine and mass basis for

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>their population to be inoculated. Well, I think that's a

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly American point of view. Um. The US has just

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>started its role out and UM, you know, it's kind

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of starting from from nothing. The UK here where I'm

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>based is is very pleased that it's out doing Europe

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>UM so far, part of the logistics, part of its

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>government capacity, part of its federal universus, regional infrastructure. UM.

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I do think the EU will get there. I think

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>there's not any reflection on the EU as a as

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a social experiment. UM. As you suggested, UM, the U

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>S and the UK still have the highest death rates

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>out of the countries that we mentioned. UM. The UK,

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>out of all of the countries that we're talking about,

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>also has one big advantage, and that is a higher

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>rate of willingness to take the vaccine, which is helping

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and approval it approved before the EU did well. There's

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a question though, Tina, about the conservatism in the European

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Union approach and not necessarily going as aggressively after the

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>vaccines as early in prioritizing the price and trying to

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>be sort of more democratic about the whole situation in

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of who gets the vaccine, and it isn't necessarily

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>working in the same way. What kind of political reckoning

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>will there be in Europe as a result of this?

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I think when I you know, my conception of this vaccs.

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Popular risk idea is where there is a combination of

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>high futalities um a slow rollout plus or minus this

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>vaccine hesitancy factor and elections coming up. So if we

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>put that kind of lens over countries at risk, France

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously comes out, you know, quite quite near the top

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>with parliamentary elections this year, presidential next, Italy always because

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Italy has got kind of all of the risk factors

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and the government there is certainly starting to to wobble.

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>So it is imperative that governments find the capacity to

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to roll this out and they regain the advantage on

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>competence because that's the biggest political risk factor in the

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>government incompetence. Tuna Fordham, thank you so much. With Evan Hurst,

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>partner and head of Global Political Strategy, worked Green on

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the screen today, Tom and why not the Federal Reserve

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>back stopping this market. A lot of folks are saying,

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>have I missed my entry point? I've talked to a

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>few little have I missed my I'm getting solo Chris.

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Heisie Meryl and Bank of America Private Bank Chief Investment Officer. Chris,

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. You know you

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>take a look at this market. You see Tom's favorite

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>investment vehicle, SPACs almost on a daily basis, coming to

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the market. You see Robin Hood retail traders pushing stocks

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>all around the board like game stop. Give us a

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>sense of how you view this market in terms of

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the frothiness if you will, in this market. Yeah, I

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's a subject that it really started to take

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>off in no member of last year when small caps

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>had their best month ever and the whole head fake,

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Michael Jordan's head fake of investing started

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to go away, and people started to believe that cyclical

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>can actually extend some of their rally. And then now

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>we talk about offering three, four or five six a week.

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:23.239
<v Speaker 1>We talk about, you know, what's going on in the

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:26.120
<v Speaker 1>big story, little profit stocks that are out there being

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 1>bit up, the high enterprise value to sales companies that

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 1>are about a quarter of trading volume in the US.

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 1>And everybody remembers when or at least some of us

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>remember when right um fall in terms of but I

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>would point to this, you have to look at policy,

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:44.679
<v Speaker 1>You have to look at what are the tail winds

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that are driving not just the thin parts of the

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 1>market that the risk areas that are suggesting, you know,

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly flashing orange as you As you pointed out,

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the sentiment indicators are clearly at highs right now. For

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>all this is out there, there's a lot of discussion

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>as to did I miss it? Valuations are high, but

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>earnings are low, and mathematics tells you that when earnings

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 1>are at a trough, many times valuations are going to

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>be high. That's where we are right now. I would

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>think differently if earnings were at a peak and valuations

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>were high, and thank you so much for that analysis.

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I would point out, folks, Microsoft, Paul taught me the

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>symbol and the break Microsoft here with a jump condition

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>out to two thirty two. I believe that's out to

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a record high Dow well over SPX were on watch, Chris.

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>That's all great and well, but the way this always

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>ends is a cathartic move. Do you see an emotional

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 1>catharsis right now that leads you to say tippy tippy

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>top yea not yet, not yet Tom. It feels that

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>way because of headlines. It feels that way because of

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>focus that we read and whether you're talking about the

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>short squeezes that are going on. But actually, when you

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>talk to individual investors, and you talked to to folks

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 1>out there that are in the market already but not

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>participating as much, they don't believe that there are no

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>risks out there. They still build the five top risks.

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>They're still worried, they're concerned, and they're marching too risks. Still,

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>they're not coming into the market blindly, and that to

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>me means that whatever pause is coming at whatever time

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is a temporary pause and it's not the tippy top alright. So,

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>as you talked to the thundering herd at Mary Lynch,

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>that huge retail brokerage force across the country, here, what

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is the risk appetite here? Um, Chris? Are they willing

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.719
<v Speaker 1>to continue to take risk in this market that they

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>are they playing that reopening trade in the back half

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of this year. It's a fantastic question because it does

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>give you a really good feel for not only the

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>client side, but the advisors side. And from my perspective,

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>what we have done and we always do on a

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>quarter basis, as we we write down what are the

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>big questions out there and what's the mood. The mood

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is cautiously optimistic on the economy, but cautious on the market,

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>so they're waiting for that. Things are not only okay,

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>but we're not walking into a pullback of say ten percent,

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So there's still a little bit of trepidation out there.

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>There's cash on the sidelines, and I know cash has

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>come into the markets. We saw the record flows go in,

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>but if you go back to oh eight and even

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:43.360
<v Speaker 1>two eighteen, more than of all flows are still into

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>fixed income. So on a relative basis, you know, in

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:49.959
<v Speaker 1>about six percent eight percent or so into equities, So

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>we have a ways to go here. On a longer

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>term basis, shorter term, I would paint the mood as

0:21:56.240 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>there's cash out there waiting to invest. Advisors and callience

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>are cautious, but they're optimistic on the economy. So Chris,

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about this rotation trade? It's really

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>becoming to vote here, and it's you know, we're kind

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of four to five months into this trade where people

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>are willing to look to the other side of this pandemic,

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>look to an opening of this economy and saying, hey,

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take some cyclical risk here. I may even

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>go small cap here, looking for value and looking for performance.

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>How do you view that trade is? Is it something

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>we can depend upon you know going forward? We believe so.

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>We we just upgraded in January small caps two more

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of an overweight. We had a slight overweight. We were

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>waiting for some data to come through to make sure

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that there was more of a secular trend at play,

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>not just an ultra cyclical trend that we saw to

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 1>close the year. UM, we upgraded, UH, Financials and industrials

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and materials as well. UH, those areas you know, provide

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more cyclical value and growth quite frankly

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in those areas, and we are upgraded, and you know,

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we closed out of merging markets underweight and we went

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to neutral. The point is you're in the market, right.

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>How many people do you see his Paul mentions at

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Marylynch with the sprawl of your retail and institutional and

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:14.880
<v Speaker 1>high networth people, how many people are just flat out

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:20.439
<v Speaker 1>not in the market. It's tough to tell. UM, I

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>would say a low point are flat out not in Uh.

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>There has been a small increase of of of a

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>risk budget if you will, Tom where you've saw people,

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, because of a backup and yields lower, some

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 1>fixed income allocations raise, some equity allocations. But on the margin,

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we didn't see a huge know that so called great rotation. Yeah,

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>we do believe though, that one is a great rotation

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>foundational year for those long term institutional accounts that I

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 1>had going to have a hard time matching total return targets.

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>As you'll back up. I mean, Paul, just to put

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:58.360
<v Speaker 1>this in perspective, is chriss You know, I'm so used

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to the gloom of Lisa Bramo. It's that gets through it.

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 1>But a ten percent correction here, obviously three thousand down

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>points get you back to November six, it gets you

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>back to the second week of August, and it's just

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 1>beneath the peaky peak we'd never see again Valentine's Day

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic. I mean, the only thing I can say constructive, Paul,

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>from my entry point is a ten percent correction gives

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 1>me beneath the nirvana of Valentine's Day. So, Chris, how

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>about for the for the folks that feel like maybe

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>they've missed the market? Who would that be? What's your

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>advice for those folks? Chris? Yeah, I think it's tough.

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>We all point to dollar cost averaging, we point the seasonality,

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 1>we point to the calendar. I think use the capital

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>markets as your friend. I know that sounds like it's

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 1>easy to do. It's not. But if you're disciplined and

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you actually point to week periods in the market, as

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Thomas suggesting, you know, don't wait for that large invitation

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to the so called party, wait for the small invitation

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and figure out what your target is. If your target

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>here at sixty deployed to three on weekdays, week weeks

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the first quarter, and from our

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>perspective we see the Maverick bull market. We call it

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a Maverick bull market continuing because it's independently thinking. And

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what, from our perspective, is the more what I

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>would say, expective way to deploy money into the market. Chris,

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>as you think it's so much for the Marylynch and

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Bank of American Private Bank. Thanks for listening to the

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keane. Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide.

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg radio