WEBVTT - 2 Game Breakfast Special | Thur NBA Best Bets

0:00:00.810 --> 0:00:04.370
<v Speaker 1>What these young bloods have to understand, that this game

0:00:05.190 --> 0:00:09.090
<v Speaker 1>has always been and will always be about buckets.

0:00:09.970 --> 0:00:11.170
<v Speaker 2>Just attack the basket.

0:00:11.210 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Stop it!

0:00:12.490 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 2>Stop it! You cannot do it like that! Oh! With

0:00:19.739 --> 0:00:23.860
<v Speaker 2>no regard for human life!

0:00:23.900 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 3>Bang! Bang!

0:00:24.460 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 2>I cannot believe you've done it again! Are you kidding me?

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:34.589
<v Speaker 3>Oh! Welcome to bacon and eggs buckets. Your daily NBA

0:00:34.630 --> 0:00:38.470
<v Speaker 3>betting podcast presented by draft Kings. I'm your host, Brandon Kravitz.

0:00:38.930 --> 0:00:42.410
<v Speaker 3>I have come fully equipped with my action network coffee

0:00:42.450 --> 0:00:46.420
<v Speaker 3>mug for this early morning buckets episode. And I'm joined

0:00:46.780 --> 0:00:48.860
<v Speaker 3>by Brian Fonseca from the New York posts.

0:00:49.300 --> 0:00:53.140
<v Speaker 2>This is buckets. Best bet episode, Thursday edition.

0:00:53.180 --> 0:00:56.060
<v Speaker 3>We have two games to detail here and you've got

0:00:56.100 --> 0:00:59.690
<v Speaker 3>the right guys for it. Magic suns. and heat warriors.

0:00:59.770 --> 0:01:01.550
<v Speaker 3>So you've got the magic guy and the heat guy

0:01:01.590 --> 0:01:04.630
<v Speaker 3>here on the pod heat on the second night of

0:01:04.709 --> 0:01:08.170
<v Speaker 3>a back to back. And we did not do an

0:01:08.250 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 3>episode last night. We were ready to go sort of,

0:01:11.450 --> 0:01:14.310
<v Speaker 3>but the odds were not ready to go, Brian. So

0:01:14.350 --> 0:01:16.690
<v Speaker 3>we decided to push it to the morning. That way

0:01:16.709 --> 0:01:19.090
<v Speaker 3>we could give you the most accurate information and not

0:01:19.110 --> 0:01:21.530
<v Speaker 3>just guess as to what the lines are going to be.

0:01:21.590 --> 0:01:23.089
<v Speaker 2>I think we may have made the right call here.

0:01:23.690 --> 0:01:26.050
<v Speaker 1>Yeah ultimately we felt like it would be a better

0:01:26.090 --> 0:01:28.729
<v Speaker 1>show we didn't get lines until i don't know well

0:01:28.790 --> 0:01:31.490
<v Speaker 1>after midnight and on top of that you had uh

0:01:31.970 --> 0:01:35.590
<v Speaker 1>the heat go into overtime which then moved the lines

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.539
<v Speaker 1>even more if you were paying attention to them so

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:40.940
<v Speaker 1>he went into overtime with the clippers and they're going

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.340
<v Speaker 1>to be in golden state tonight um presumably already are

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>over there but yeah uh it was i don't I've

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:50.900
<v Speaker 1>never been part of an episode that had to move

0:01:50.940 --> 0:01:52.700
<v Speaker 1>into the morning, but we had to.

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:54.020
<v Speaker 2>It just wasn't what it was.

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>The Heat and the Clipper game was going on at

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:58.690
<v Speaker 1>damn near 1.30 East Coast time.

0:01:59.270 --> 0:02:02.010
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was like the perfect storm of not having

0:02:02.290 --> 0:02:04.750
<v Speaker 3>really anything actionable to talk about. When we have an

0:02:04.810 --> 0:02:06.590
<v Speaker 3>idea of what these lines are going to be, we

0:02:06.610 --> 0:02:08.269
<v Speaker 3>have an idea of what the props are going to be.

0:02:08.310 --> 0:02:09.790
<v Speaker 2>They don't change that much.

0:02:09.850 --> 0:02:13.710
<v Speaker 3>I think the juice associated with the props changes more

0:02:13.750 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 3>than the actual the physical number itself, but all that

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.700
<v Speaker 3>stuff matters, especially when you're talking about games that are

0:02:20.780 --> 0:02:22.900
<v Speaker 3>in action and we can be dealing with injuries in

0:02:22.940 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 3>real time. A spread with Giannis involved, if he goes down,

0:02:27.380 --> 0:02:29.630
<v Speaker 3>is going to move by six points. So there's not

0:02:29.690 --> 0:02:33.270
<v Speaker 3>a lot. These are things that we need to consider

0:02:33.310 --> 0:02:36.550
<v Speaker 3>when we lock in on these episodes. So Miami, second

0:02:36.570 --> 0:02:38.790
<v Speaker 3>night of a back-to-back. The Magic are starting a West

0:02:38.850 --> 0:02:43.220
<v Speaker 3>Coast road trip. with the Phoenix suns tonight, Miami trail

0:02:43.260 --> 0:02:45.940
<v Speaker 3>by 20 late in the second quarter last night was

0:02:45.980 --> 0:02:48.739
<v Speaker 3>still down 10 with four and a half minutes left

0:02:48.780 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 3>in the fourth quarter. They went on a nine Oh

0:02:51.900 --> 0:02:54.980
<v Speaker 3>run wound up pushing this game to overtime. Clay Thompson

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:59.260
<v Speaker 3>was awesome. Giannis got help from the other guys on

0:02:59.310 --> 0:03:02.030
<v Speaker 3>the team. And it was refreshing to see. It felt

0:03:02.090 --> 0:03:04.889
<v Speaker 3>like that at least the second half version of the heat,

0:03:04.930 --> 0:03:07.370
<v Speaker 3>like that's sort of what we thought we were signing

0:03:07.410 --> 0:03:08.090
<v Speaker 3>up for this season.

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:14.100
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, literally, if the second quarter doesn't happen, then overtime

0:03:14.139 --> 0:03:16.980
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen. And it took in the fourth quarter, they

0:03:17.220 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>defended their faces off. Davion Mitchell was not going to

0:03:21.340 --> 0:03:24.340
<v Speaker 1>let them lose that game. Like he's really he really

0:03:24.380 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>was the catalyst in that quarter for what ended up happening.

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>And then Bam Adebayo, obviously, he had a great night.

0:03:30.260 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>He has best game of the season so far from

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:36.060
<v Speaker 1>an offensive standpoint. Defensively, he was good as well. But

0:03:36.100 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>from an offensive standpoint, it was easily his best night.

0:03:39.110 --> 0:03:44.210
<v Speaker 1>And then Klay, who had a very costly mistake defensively

0:03:44.250 --> 0:03:47.350
<v Speaker 1>in fouling Ruri Hachimura late on an and one, but

0:03:48.010 --> 0:03:50.710
<v Speaker 1>had eight threes and had 30 points. And he's been

0:03:51.430 --> 0:03:54.050
<v Speaker 1>really good these last few games for them. Yeah, but

0:03:54.090 --> 0:03:56.660
<v Speaker 1>they just need to get more out of the quote

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:00.940
<v Speaker 1>unquote others like Tim Hardaway Jr. And Andrew Wiggins in particular,

0:04:01.700 --> 0:04:04.860
<v Speaker 1>Pella Larson, Nikola Jovic, even like they're just not getting

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:05.820
<v Speaker 1>enough from those guys.

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 2>But Davion has brought it this year.

0:04:09.100 --> 0:04:12.059
<v Speaker 1>Bam has been playing better lately, especially last night.

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:13.180
<v Speaker 2>And Klay's been better lately.

0:04:13.700 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And Giannis is Giannis. I don't think Giannis was like

0:04:17.620 --> 0:04:22.370
<v Speaker 1>Giannis level impactful last night, but he's been very, very productive. And,

0:04:22.810 --> 0:04:25.050
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're still tinkering, but they've won three of four.

0:04:25.830 --> 0:04:27.750
<v Speaker 1>They have a tough one tonight, as we'll talk about,

0:04:29.310 --> 0:04:31.950
<v Speaker 1>which maybe didn't look that tough a week and a

0:04:31.970 --> 0:04:34.330
<v Speaker 1>half ago. But now it's a tough one on the

0:04:34.370 --> 0:04:35.190
<v Speaker 1>second of a back to back.

0:04:35.830 --> 0:04:38.930
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at the fourth quarter box from last night.

0:04:39.570 --> 0:04:41.930
<v Speaker 3>It's amazing that the Heat were able to come back

0:04:42.089 --> 0:04:44.010
<v Speaker 3>the way that they did. They did not shoot the

0:04:44.050 --> 0:04:46.990
<v Speaker 3>ball well in the final quarter. 36% from the field.

0:04:47.029 --> 0:04:50.300
<v Speaker 3>They were 0-7 from three-point range in that final quarter,

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 3>but they just turned the water off for the Clippers.

0:04:53.140 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 2>They held L.A.

0:04:54.339 --> 0:04:56.620
<v Speaker 3>To 20 points in the final frame, able to push

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:58.539
<v Speaker 3>the game to overtime, some clutch buckets.

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.740
<v Speaker 2>How many turnovers did the Clippers have in that quarter?

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:03.900
<v Speaker 2>In the fourth or in the game? In the fourth quarter.

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:04.900
<v Speaker 2>In the fourth, they had six.

0:05:05.410 --> 0:05:05.950
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:05:06.029 --> 0:05:08.670
<v Speaker 2>And he'd had one. So those extra possessions, that's how

0:05:08.710 --> 0:05:11.169
<v Speaker 2>you push a game to OT when you're down.

0:05:11.890 --> 0:05:16.030
<v Speaker 3>Real quick, before we get to the games themselves, an

0:05:16.070 --> 0:05:19.770
<v Speaker 3>important note from last night. Maybe you've seen this by now.

0:05:20.310 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 3>The Victor Wimbenyama stat line. Holy hell. 52 points, 24 rebounds,

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 3>eight blocked shots. Let me give you some historical context

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.789
<v Speaker 3>from ESPN insights on this. No one has ever scored

0:05:35.790 --> 0:05:41.550
<v Speaker 3>50 plus points, grabbed 20 plus rebounds, blocked eight plus shots,

0:05:42.190 --> 0:05:46.030
<v Speaker 3>started 18 for 18 from the line and made a

0:05:46.050 --> 0:05:49.310
<v Speaker 3>three pointer. Now, what's even more incredible is what I

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:51.770
<v Speaker 3>just said is no one's ever done this. No one's

0:05:51.830 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 3>ever done this in NBA history.

0:05:54.130 --> 0:05:55.100
<v Speaker 2>For a season.

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 3>In a whole season, no one's ever done all of

0:05:59.500 --> 0:06:00.159
<v Speaker 3>those things.

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.060
<v Speaker 2>And Victor M. Benyama did it on Wednesday night.

0:06:03.660 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Really?

0:06:04.060 --> 0:06:05.780
<v Speaker 2>No one's ever done that in the season. No one's

0:06:05.860 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 2>ever done that in an entire season.

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm not tracking this stuff, but that's what

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 3>the numbers guys tell me.

0:06:12.020 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, somebody said that the stat line was Wilt Chamberlain-like.

0:06:17.060 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 2>And literally, I mean.

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.380
<v Speaker 3>Is there anybody else in league history, really, that could

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 3>do that other than Wilt and Wemby?

0:06:23.460 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, probably not.

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I guess... I guess Peek Shack. Although, I

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.170
<v Speaker 1>don't know about the A-blocks. You know what I mean?

0:06:32.230 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Kareem, obviously.

0:06:33.870 --> 0:06:37.909
<v Speaker 1>Uh hakeem olajuwon also like but but i was you

0:06:37.950 --> 0:06:38.990
<v Speaker 1>know it's funny.

0:06:38.790 --> 0:06:41.810
<v Speaker 2>Because i have he's not hitting threes though that's.

0:06:41.390 --> 0:06:44.570
<v Speaker 1>True i have wimby on my fantasy team which is

0:06:45.029 --> 0:06:46.469
<v Speaker 1>i mean i have wimby how many points did he

0:06:46.510 --> 0:06:49.650
<v Speaker 1>get last night wimby bam and kiante george um who

0:06:49.710 --> 0:06:54.070
<v Speaker 1>all was who all were great last night um wimby

0:06:54.130 --> 0:07:00.799
<v Speaker 1>had 112.80 points in fantasy last night Which is about

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>what Bam had the night he scored 83 points. I

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:06.620
<v Speaker 1>think even more. I think he might have had more

0:07:06.660 --> 0:07:08.870
<v Speaker 1>than Bam had when he had 83 and 9. And

0:07:08.890 --> 0:07:12.590
<v Speaker 1>I went to look up what's the best fantasy basketball

0:07:12.610 --> 0:07:15.050
<v Speaker 1>performance ever. And one of the answers I got was

0:07:15.070 --> 0:07:18.110
<v Speaker 1>like Hakeem Olajuwon in 87. I genuinely don't know if

0:07:18.150 --> 0:07:21.190
<v Speaker 1>we were doing fantasy basketball in 1987. I doubt it.

0:07:21.540 --> 0:07:23.700
<v Speaker 1>But Hakeem Olajuwon had a game where he had 38 points,

0:07:23.700 --> 0:07:28.100
<v Speaker 1>17 rebounds, 12 blocks. And I don't remember if it

0:07:28.140 --> 0:07:31.700
<v Speaker 1>was six steals and seven assists or seven steals and

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:35.980
<v Speaker 1>six assists. But that is kind of like what we

0:07:36.020 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>saw yesterday, but it was ridiculous. At one point, Wemby

0:07:38.260 --> 0:07:40.180
<v Speaker 1>made his first, I forget if it was 16 or

0:07:40.180 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>18 consecutive free throws.

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.230
<v Speaker 2>That was part of the stat. It was the 18. Yeah,

0:07:44.230 --> 0:07:47.330
<v Speaker 2>18 consecutive free throws. Yeah, it was the 18. That's right.

0:07:47.450 --> 0:07:51.450
<v Speaker 1>So Wemby, I mean, speaking of people who weren't going

0:07:51.470 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to let their team lose, not to put Davion Mitchell

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and Victor Weminyama in the same sentence, but Wemby was

0:07:56.900 --> 0:07:57.780
<v Speaker 1>not letting that happen.

0:07:57.800 --> 0:07:59.700
<v Speaker 2>And that game was slipping away from them.

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Like Dallas, Dallas is, it's early, but they're a little

0:08:04.820 --> 0:08:08.410
<v Speaker 1>bit more feisty than I expected even this soon.

0:08:08.430 --> 0:08:11.450
<v Speaker 2>I was high on Dallas coming into the season. I'm

0:08:11.490 --> 0:08:12.310
<v Speaker 2>kicking myself.

0:08:13.490 --> 0:08:15.750
<v Speaker 3>Obviously for not betting Wemby props, that would have been great.

0:08:15.810 --> 0:08:18.830
<v Speaker 3>But I was, I was staring at that Dallas line.

0:08:18.850 --> 0:08:20.890
<v Speaker 3>Dallas not only covers the spread, they only lost the

0:08:20.910 --> 0:08:23.410
<v Speaker 3>game by one and Cooper flag only scored 19 points.

0:08:24.210 --> 0:08:26.250
<v Speaker 1>They were down big too. And Cooper Cooper was like

0:08:26.890 --> 0:08:29.630
<v Speaker 1>one for nine to start one for eight, something like that.

0:08:30.310 --> 0:08:32.050
<v Speaker 3>He did not have a good game, but Kyrie Irving

0:08:32.110 --> 0:08:34.590
<v Speaker 3>was incredible last night. So it's good to see him

0:08:34.790 --> 0:08:37.860
<v Speaker 3>get back to form. I think in some respects, as

0:08:37.890 --> 0:08:40.220
<v Speaker 3>amazing as it is, the Victor Wimbenyama put up the

0:08:40.250 --> 0:08:41.420
<v Speaker 3>stat line he did last night.

0:08:41.660 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 2>It's a little troubling.

0:08:43.020 --> 0:08:45.260
<v Speaker 3>That he did that and they won the game by

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:47.110
<v Speaker 3>one against Dallas.

0:08:47.420 --> 0:08:51.650
<v Speaker 1>Stephon Castle shot 30%. Couldn't get it going. He always

0:08:51.690 --> 0:08:54.250
<v Speaker 1>tries his ass off. He had 10 rebounds, but the

0:08:54.270 --> 0:08:56.530
<v Speaker 1>shot wasn't falling. Dylan Harper was doing a very good

0:08:56.550 --> 0:08:59.510
<v Speaker 1>job of getting into the lane as per usual. And

0:08:59.530 --> 0:09:03.429
<v Speaker 1>he shot 60% from the floor. But yeah, like Devin

0:09:03.450 --> 0:09:05.730
<v Speaker 1>Vassell started the game and went over eight and scored

0:09:05.750 --> 0:09:06.190
<v Speaker 1>two points.

0:09:07.610 --> 0:09:10.110
<v Speaker 2>They still don't have Tobias Harris in the lineup.

0:09:10.990 --> 0:09:14.900
<v Speaker 1>And in watching the team, I'm like, okay, I think

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be a little bit more important than

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought. I don't know how many games you're going

0:09:18.780 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to get where, um, Devin Vassell and Julian Champagny in

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:27.170
<v Speaker 1>a combined 57 minutes, score two points and finish, you know,

0:09:27.290 --> 0:09:29.850
<v Speaker 1>over 14 from the field and over 10 from three,

0:09:30.650 --> 0:09:34.350
<v Speaker 1>you know, Kelvin Johnson really gave you nothing. Like all

0:09:34.370 --> 0:09:36.550
<v Speaker 1>of that is kind of concerning, but I don't think

0:09:36.710 --> 0:09:40.350
<v Speaker 1>all of that is going to be a constant forever either,

0:09:40.490 --> 0:09:44.740
<v Speaker 1>you know? Um, And I think I think Tobias Harris,

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.850
<v Speaker 1>when when it does happen, that infusion will be interesting

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:48.250
<v Speaker 1>to see.

0:09:48.730 --> 0:09:51.930
<v Speaker 2>But, yeah, you need more from Vassell, Champagne and Castle.

0:09:52.190 --> 0:09:55.929
<v Speaker 1>You know, Castle's offense just constantly somebody who also has

0:09:55.970 --> 0:09:57.010
<v Speaker 1>him on his fantasy team.

0:09:57.190 --> 0:09:58.910
<v Speaker 2>Constantly goes up and down. So.

0:10:00.450 --> 0:10:05.980
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a little unsteady from that regard. So, yeah,

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Wemby should not need to put up these numbers, but

0:10:07.980 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he can and be a plus 23,

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:12.140
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't one of these things where, like, the team

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>was just neutral despite him having a great game. It

0:10:14.780 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 1>was plus 23 in a game where, you know, the

0:10:17.460 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Spurs just won by one point, which is ridiculous.

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:21.589
<v Speaker 2>So there were 14 games last night.

0:10:21.610 --> 0:10:23.270
<v Speaker 3>We could go big picture on a lot of these,

0:10:23.410 --> 0:10:25.770
<v Speaker 3>but we'll save that for another day because we have

0:10:25.910 --> 0:10:29.630
<v Speaker 3>bets to get to. Let's talk about, we're going to

0:10:29.650 --> 0:10:33.190
<v Speaker 3>go rather than do three star, two star, one star, uh,

0:10:33.210 --> 0:10:35.050
<v Speaker 3>which you're still welcome to bring to the table.

0:10:35.070 --> 0:10:36.350
<v Speaker 2>We're going to go game by game.

0:10:36.429 --> 0:10:38.950
<v Speaker 3>Cause there's two of them and give out our best

0:10:38.990 --> 0:10:42.390
<v Speaker 3>bets for each one magic sons in Phoenix, the sons

0:10:42.929 --> 0:10:46.110
<v Speaker 3>favored by a point and a half total sitting at

0:10:46.170 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 3>two 22 and a half. Um, The Suns on the

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.020
<v Speaker 3>second night of a back-to-back. I was on them last

0:10:52.110 --> 0:10:56.989
<v Speaker 3>night against the Trailblazers. Looked great at first. And their defense,

0:10:57.550 --> 0:11:00.709
<v Speaker 3>which I think is due for some positive regression. They're

0:11:00.750 --> 0:11:04.340
<v Speaker 3>ranked among the worst in the NBA. It's just not

0:11:04.390 --> 0:11:07.980
<v Speaker 3>positively regressing. And if you can't get up for a

0:11:08.020 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 3>game against a Portland team that smacked you up in

0:11:12.860 --> 0:11:16.380
<v Speaker 3>the opener... this is like a classic revenge spot.

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:17.820
<v Speaker 2>You're at home.

0:11:18.020 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 3>You played this game two weeks ago and got embarrassed

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 3>and they got embarrassed in the second half again. So

0:11:26.220 --> 0:11:28.590
<v Speaker 3>not a lot of faith in the Phoenix suns. I

0:11:28.620 --> 0:11:31.090
<v Speaker 3>don't have a spread bet on this game. I would

0:11:31.140 --> 0:11:33.570
<v Speaker 3>take the magic plus one and a half. I have

0:11:33.590 --> 0:11:37.569
<v Speaker 3>this game projected at plus 1.25. So there's just not

0:11:37.610 --> 0:11:40.430
<v Speaker 3>much of an edge on the sun on, on the, uh,

0:11:40.570 --> 0:11:42.370
<v Speaker 3>on the magic here. But I think for me, the

0:11:42.390 --> 0:11:46.500
<v Speaker 3>bet is the team total over on the magic at

0:11:47.380 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 3>a one 11 and a half. They've struggled to shoot

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 3>at home, but they're first in the league at, as

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:56.900
<v Speaker 3>of right now, in terms of three point shooting on

0:11:56.980 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 3>the road, this team's actually shot the ball better away

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 3>from Kia center, 41% from long range on the road,

0:12:03.710 --> 0:12:07.569
<v Speaker 3>according to nba.com. And for whatever reason, the magic have

0:12:07.610 --> 0:12:10.150
<v Speaker 3>been productive in opposing environments. They're two and one on

0:12:10.170 --> 0:12:13.179
<v Speaker 3>the season away from Kia center and And the Suns,

0:12:14.170 --> 0:12:16.970
<v Speaker 3>I was wrong. They're just not positively regressing yet. The

0:12:17.030 --> 0:12:19.309
<v Speaker 3>defense is broken. They have the worst defensive rating in

0:12:19.330 --> 0:12:21.950
<v Speaker 3>the NBA right now. And while that might not hold

0:12:22.070 --> 0:12:24.830
<v Speaker 3>season long, I don't think second night of a back

0:12:24.850 --> 0:12:27.709
<v Speaker 3>to back is the time that you correct this stuff,

0:12:27.790 --> 0:12:30.940
<v Speaker 3>especially against a team that has been performing well.

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.260
<v Speaker 2>Away from the house. So I like the magic to

0:12:33.300 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 2>go over the team total tonight.

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.850
<v Speaker 1>Kind of like them to win, but I didn't. It's

0:12:38.890 --> 0:12:39.650
<v Speaker 1>not on the docket.

0:12:40.250 --> 0:12:43.690
<v Speaker 3>The Magic have also lost two in a row. They're 2-5.

0:12:43.730 --> 0:12:46.790
<v Speaker 3>There's a little bit of desperation there. So desperation spot,

0:12:46.830 --> 0:12:51.380
<v Speaker 3>taking the team that's better rested. I could endorse a

0:12:51.410 --> 0:12:53.660
<v Speaker 3>Magic play here, but I think just attacking the points,

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 3>because they're not winning this game if this game is

0:12:55.540 --> 0:12:58.319
<v Speaker 3>played in the mud and Phoenix figures out their defense tonight.

0:12:58.940 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then Phoenix against Portland last night, losing by

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:06.590
<v Speaker 1>13 points. um second night of a back-to-back we don't

0:13:06.630 --> 0:13:08.450
<v Speaker 1>have a long we don't have a big sample size

0:13:08.490 --> 0:13:10.450
<v Speaker 1>of anybody on the second night of back-to-back yet this

0:13:10.510 --> 0:13:13.130
<v Speaker 1>year teams have only done it really they've had one

0:13:13.190 --> 0:13:16.010
<v Speaker 1>maybe two back-to-back so far uh for the most part

0:13:16.550 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>so as we get more data on that you know

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll see um i like tristan da silva here over

0:13:23.500 --> 0:13:27.660
<v Speaker 1>uh two and a half threes he is shooting as

0:13:27.700 --> 0:13:32.449
<v Speaker 1>you know a ton of them most nights um which

0:13:32.510 --> 0:13:35.770
<v Speaker 1>is what frankly a not to keep bringing up my

0:13:35.809 --> 0:13:37.670
<v Speaker 1>fantasy team, I picked him up when Paolo got hurt

0:13:39.410 --> 0:13:42.589
<v Speaker 1>at the recommendation of Dan Titus, you know, our guy

0:13:42.610 --> 0:13:49.030
<v Speaker 1>from Yahoo. He, being Tristan Da Silva, he just shot

0:13:49.030 --> 0:13:52.429
<v Speaker 1>10 again, second time he's done that this year, 10 attempts.

0:13:54.020 --> 0:13:57.660
<v Speaker 1>Teams should, or people should know, Phoenix, I think up

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>until last night, the worst three-point defense in the NBA

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.490
<v Speaker 1>so far, teams were shooting As of a couple games ago,

0:14:05.590 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>it was 43%. It's down to 40%, but it's still

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:10.179
<v Speaker 1>at 40% against the Suns from three.

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:11.260
<v Speaker 2>It's them and the Heat.

0:14:11.580 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>These are the teams that are just bleeding the most

0:14:14.580 --> 0:14:17.939
<v Speaker 1>from beyond the arc and not defending the three-point shot well.

0:14:19.180 --> 0:14:20.850
<v Speaker 1>And part of it, yes, part of it is luck.

0:14:20.950 --> 0:14:23.170
<v Speaker 1>Part of it is teams are just making everything. Like

0:14:23.190 --> 0:14:25.610
<v Speaker 1>Darius Garland could not miss, it felt like, down the

0:14:25.630 --> 0:14:30.210
<v Speaker 1>stretch last night from distance, like from like real... I

0:14:31.150 --> 0:14:34.710
<v Speaker 1>think Brooke Lopez had a big one late as well. But,

0:14:35.170 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, it just is what it is as far

0:14:37.390 --> 0:14:40.660
<v Speaker 1>as that. But these two teams, and Phoenix in particular,

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>they've been getting up high quality, giving up high quality looks,

0:14:44.220 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>which is part of why their defense is broken so far,

0:14:46.220 --> 0:14:48.820
<v Speaker 1>and teams have been taking advantage of that. Tristan Da Silva,

0:14:49.540 --> 0:14:54.540
<v Speaker 1>in seven games this year so far, has taken 52 threes.

0:14:54.900 --> 0:14:58.100
<v Speaker 1>It's basically seven and a half per. And this is

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.700
<v Speaker 1>while not even averaging a full 30 minutes a game.

0:15:03.060 --> 0:15:06.750
<v Speaker 1>You know, like he's just he's just putting up basically

0:15:06.890 --> 0:15:09.190
<v Speaker 1>a three every four minutes he's out there.

0:15:09.910 --> 0:15:12.130
<v Speaker 2>So the volume is there. It's over two and a half.

0:15:12.190 --> 0:15:15.930
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned, he's over that three, four times this year,

0:15:15.970 --> 0:15:18.470
<v Speaker 1>as a matter of fact, where he's gone four for 10.

0:15:18.470 --> 0:15:20.510
<v Speaker 2>He's gone five for nine, four for five and a

0:15:20.580 --> 0:15:21.170
<v Speaker 2>five for eight.

0:15:22.020 --> 0:15:25.460
<v Speaker 1>Um basically there's only two instances this year where he's

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.119
<v Speaker 1>taken fewer than seven threes in the game which i

0:15:28.140 --> 0:15:30.260
<v Speaker 1>feel like is the sweet spot i'm look i like

0:15:30.300 --> 0:15:32.070
<v Speaker 1>to look at the attempts like well how much do

0:15:32.110 --> 0:15:35.170
<v Speaker 1>you need to get to get this obviously because you

0:15:35.190 --> 0:15:37.850
<v Speaker 1>don't want to bank on somebody going like three for

0:15:37.930 --> 0:15:40.390
<v Speaker 1>four you know if they're just not taking a ton

0:15:40.430 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>or whatever the case may be but he can do

0:15:42.630 --> 0:15:45.940
<v Speaker 1>that also that's always in the cards but he's averaging

0:15:45.980 --> 0:15:48.060
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. I think this is a game

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.310
<v Speaker 1>where you want to be aggressive in hunting that three

0:15:50.370 --> 0:15:52.930
<v Speaker 1>because of how Phoenix has defended it. So it would

0:15:52.970 --> 0:15:55.590
<v Speaker 1>surprise me if he fell below maybe like eight attempts,

0:15:56.310 --> 0:16:01.220
<v Speaker 1>but I think somewhere between seven, eight and like 10, that's,

0:16:01.340 --> 0:16:03.540
<v Speaker 1>that's what I would expect in terms of output. And that's,

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that's all he would need. I would think to get

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>this done. So good matchup for him. He's 44% from

0:16:08.220 --> 0:16:12.460
<v Speaker 1>three so far. Uh, I don't know if that's going

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to sustain itself, but he's a very good shooter. And

0:16:14.620 --> 0:16:18.020
<v Speaker 1>this is a team that needs his shooting. So he's

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:20.060
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to get those opportunities regardless.

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:21.300
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:23.180
<v Speaker 3>And I mentioned part of the reason why I like

0:16:23.220 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 3>the team total over for the magic is that the

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.370
<v Speaker 3>offense has been better away from home. And some of

0:16:27.410 --> 0:16:30.430
<v Speaker 3>that stuff does hold throughout the course of the year

0:16:30.450 --> 0:16:32.950
<v Speaker 3>where some teams, it's hard to put your finger on why,

0:16:33.010 --> 0:16:36.110
<v Speaker 3>but some teams are just better away from home. Some

0:16:36.130 --> 0:16:38.190
<v Speaker 3>teams are better at home. We see it every single

0:16:38.230 --> 0:16:39.850
<v Speaker 3>year in the NBA. And it seems like there's a

0:16:39.910 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 3>trend forming for the magic. And it's three-point shooting. 41%

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 3>on the road as a team. Well, who's helping to

0:16:46.700 --> 0:16:49.660
<v Speaker 3>lift that? It's Tristan Da Silva. So I'm completely with you.

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 3>I bet this, this morning as well, over two and

0:16:52.460 --> 0:16:55.820
<v Speaker 3>a half made threes at even money. He's shooting 65%

0:16:55.820 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 3>from long range on the road this year. So you

0:17:00.060 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 3>mentioned like he does. Yes, he can get up 10,

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.350
<v Speaker 3>but he can also get this done if he takes six.

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:08.850
<v Speaker 3>And he's probably not going to do that. The only

0:17:08.900 --> 0:17:12.050
<v Speaker 3>team that he's attempted five or fewer against is Toronto.

0:17:12.430 --> 0:17:15.530
<v Speaker 3>That's an elite defense. Phoenix is not that anytime he's

0:17:15.550 --> 0:17:18.350
<v Speaker 3>gone up against anything that resembles a weak defense, he's

0:17:18.390 --> 0:17:20.490
<v Speaker 3>getting up 10. It was a point of emphasis for

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.719
<v Speaker 3>Sean Sweeney in the preseason. If you look at his

0:17:22.780 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 3>preseason numbers, he had at least 10 three-point attempts in

0:17:26.580 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 3>every game in the preseason. So there was a specific

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:35.090
<v Speaker 3>focus and I attacked his props. In the last game

0:17:35.130 --> 0:17:38.110
<v Speaker 3>against Washington, because Anthony Black was ruled out, I thought

0:17:38.150 --> 0:17:40.290
<v Speaker 3>he was going to see an increase in minutes. While

0:17:40.310 --> 0:17:42.610
<v Speaker 3>he didn't hit his props, one thing that I think

0:17:42.630 --> 0:17:45.570
<v Speaker 3>is encouraging going into this game, where I believe Anthony

0:17:45.609 --> 0:17:48.810
<v Speaker 3>Black is going to play, is that I was dead wrong.

0:17:49.070 --> 0:17:52.010
<v Speaker 3>He didn't get an uptick in minutes, which means it's

0:17:52.050 --> 0:17:54.950
<v Speaker 3>not like there's no variance there as far as whether

0:17:54.970 --> 0:17:58.750
<v Speaker 3>or not AB plays or not. Tristan Da Silva is

0:17:58.790 --> 0:18:03.369
<v Speaker 3>going to get his static 30 to 35 no matter what. Um,

0:18:03.810 --> 0:18:06.460
<v Speaker 3>and he's got, he got 32 with Anthony black out

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 3>of the lineup game before he got 35 with Anthony

0:18:09.020 --> 0:18:12.180
<v Speaker 3>black in the lineup. So it's just not, it's something

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 3>to store in your back pocket in the future is

0:18:14.980 --> 0:18:18.500
<v Speaker 3>if you see, I thought that Tristan De Silva would

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.660
<v Speaker 3>be direct minutes replacement for Anthony black. That's not the case.

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.310
<v Speaker 3>So keep that in mind in the future. If you

0:18:24.350 --> 0:18:26.949
<v Speaker 3>see Anthony black miss, don't just go race after the

0:18:26.970 --> 0:18:29.010
<v Speaker 3>Tristan De Silva props because those two.

0:18:28.950 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Are not necessarily relevant. Well, we're in lockstep here to start.

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.540
<v Speaker 3>So do you have anything else on this game before

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 3>I move on to Heat Warriors?

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, just the injury report that came out. Phoenix hasn't submitted,

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>but Orlando does have, as expected, Paolo's out, Jalen Suggs

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:47.640
<v Speaker 1>is out, Jonathan Isaacs is out.

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 2>So just no real surprises there.

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so we have another game to get to. Warriors Heat.

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Heat on the second night of a back-to-back. Before we

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 3>get to the rest of our plays, let's.

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:00.500
<v Speaker 2>Kick it over to the crew for a quick word

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:02.750
<v Speaker 2>about From our sponsor, DraftKings.

0:19:03.210 --> 0:19:05.609
<v Speaker 4>Basketball season is here, and we've teamed up with DraftKings

0:19:05.630 --> 0:19:07.930
<v Speaker 4>to bring you a brand new offer. Whether you're following

0:19:07.950 --> 0:19:10.270
<v Speaker 4>the biggest matchups, keeping up with your favorite team, or

0:19:10.350 --> 0:19:13.550
<v Speaker 4>watching your favorite player all season long, DraftKings is now

0:19:13.609 --> 0:19:16.910
<v Speaker 4>available in all 50 states, from New York to California.

0:19:16.990 --> 0:19:19.180
<v Speaker 4>So no matter where you are, you can stay connected

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 4>to basketball. So if you're new to DraftKings, sign up

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.500
<v Speaker 4>with code BUCKETSPOD, spend $ 5, and get $ 200 in total rewards, plus.

0:19:28.930 --> 0:19:31.450
<v Speaker 4>So the Miami Heat have been pretty much asked to

0:19:31.470 --> 0:19:43.090
<v Speaker 4>start the draft Kings. The crown is yours.

0:19:45.970 --> 0:19:49.580
<v Speaker 3>So the Miami heat have been pretty much ass to

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.699
<v Speaker 3>start the year. They were less ass last night. Do

0:19:52.740 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 3>we trust them on the second night of a back

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 3>to back as seven and a half point underdogs here,

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:03.070
<v Speaker 3>the warriors favored by seven and a half total sitting

0:20:03.090 --> 0:20:05.950
<v Speaker 3>at two 35 and a half. We saw this steamed

0:20:06.390 --> 0:20:11.010
<v Speaker 3>to the under overnight while we were fast asleep. I

0:20:11.050 --> 0:20:13.250
<v Speaker 3>had this, there's the warriors opened as four and a

0:20:13.290 --> 0:20:15.750
<v Speaker 3>half point favorites in this game.

0:20:17.230 --> 0:20:17.770
<v Speaker 1>That's gone.

0:20:17.790 --> 0:20:22.889
<v Speaker 3>That, that flashed overnight. Then the heat go to overtime

0:20:24.130 --> 0:20:26.350
<v Speaker 3>and the lineup opens back up where it's seven and

0:20:26.369 --> 0:20:28.649
<v Speaker 3>a half. So I'm not really sure what to do

0:20:28.690 --> 0:20:32.429
<v Speaker 3>with that because that indicates to me that somebody out

0:20:32.490 --> 0:20:35.659
<v Speaker 3>there expects a key player for Miami to not play.

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 3>It would make sense for the heat to hold Giannis out,

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:43.020
<v Speaker 3>maybe hold Bam out, but they also aren't really in

0:20:43.060 --> 0:20:46.420
<v Speaker 3>the position where they can just hand wins to their opposition.

0:20:46.500 --> 0:20:49.530
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not sure that's smart of them to treat

0:20:49.590 --> 0:20:51.850
<v Speaker 3>that back to back like they would in the middle

0:20:51.869 --> 0:20:53.669
<v Speaker 3>of the season when they're sitting at third in the

0:20:53.750 --> 0:20:56.290
<v Speaker 3>Eastern conference. How do you see this one as far

0:20:56.369 --> 0:21:00.469
<v Speaker 3>as a game flow, how the heat managed the injury report,

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 3>that sort of thing before we get into the nitty

0:21:03.060 --> 0:21:04.020
<v Speaker 3>gritty of the game itself.

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.620
<v Speaker 1>And you also don't want to As we've seen, like

0:21:07.660 --> 0:21:10.409
<v Speaker 1>some teams are having are resting guys already, which is

0:21:10.450 --> 0:21:12.490
<v Speaker 1>so Tatum have rest, too, although he's coming back from

0:21:12.630 --> 0:21:16.870
<v Speaker 1>obviously a serious injury from, you know, he came back

0:21:16.930 --> 0:21:20.209
<v Speaker 1>from it eight months ago. So the teams are already

0:21:20.310 --> 0:21:22.750
<v Speaker 1>trying to find pockets of where can I rest, guys?

0:21:22.810 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>This would, in theory, be one of those under conventional

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:30.670
<v Speaker 1>circumstances if you were playing well. Because the Heat are

0:21:30.690 --> 0:21:35.710
<v Speaker 1>3-5 and really need wins and can't afford to backslide

0:21:35.750 --> 0:21:38.379
<v Speaker 1>too far in the Eastern Conference. You're on a road trip.

0:21:38.630 --> 0:21:41.100
<v Speaker 1>You're on a West Coast road trip. And that's the

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>other thing about this. You're 1-1 on this trip so far.

0:21:44.540 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 1>You got waxed by the Lakers on Monday, which is

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.429
<v Speaker 1>of the bad defensive showings that they've had so far.

0:21:53.730 --> 0:21:56.730
<v Speaker 1>They are now 26th in defense. That was the worst one.

0:21:58.010 --> 0:22:01.590
<v Speaker 1>But the Lakers have also just been insane shot makers

0:22:01.670 --> 0:22:06.070
<v Speaker 1>so far this season. Not just between Luka Doncic and

0:22:06.130 --> 0:22:09.490
<v Speaker 1>Austin Reeves, but the orbit around them because of how

0:22:09.530 --> 0:22:13.090
<v Speaker 1>they can generate these shots. They have the Warriors tonight,

0:22:13.130 --> 0:22:16.790
<v Speaker 1>Miami does. You have Sacramento Sunday and you have Utah

0:22:17.150 --> 0:22:21.470
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday. So you're kind of in a position where

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.810
<v Speaker 1>you need two of these shots. you need two of

0:22:24.830 --> 0:22:26.669
<v Speaker 1>these to feel good you go three and two on

0:22:26.710 --> 0:22:28.950
<v Speaker 1>a road trip after struggling early on you go back

0:22:28.990 --> 0:22:31.820
<v Speaker 1>home you have a big homestand a homestand but you

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.740
<v Speaker 1>you know you have cleveland and detroit back to back

0:22:34.780 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you have houston after that milwaukee after that which is

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:41.740
<v Speaker 1>going to be you know interesting tyler hero returns among

0:22:42.109 --> 0:22:44.129
<v Speaker 1>and kill our wear and hymie hawkins and everyone else

0:22:44.150 --> 0:22:47.590
<v Speaker 1>they traded oklahoma city after that so like you have

0:22:47.609 --> 0:22:50.250
<v Speaker 1>this homestand But the games are going to be more

0:22:50.310 --> 0:22:52.110
<v Speaker 1>difficult than the ones you just had on the road.

0:22:52.150 --> 0:22:53.790
<v Speaker 1>And then you go back on the road and it's Philly,

0:22:53.810 --> 0:22:56.770
<v Speaker 1>New York, Cleveland. Like, it doesn't stop. Like, this is

0:22:56.810 --> 0:22:59.710
<v Speaker 1>where the NBA is. So I don't know how they're

0:22:59.750 --> 0:23:01.619
<v Speaker 1>going to play this. We don't have an update on

0:23:01.630 --> 0:23:05.140
<v Speaker 1>the injury report yet for Miami as of when we're

0:23:05.180 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about this. And we definitely weren't going to get

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:08.780
<v Speaker 1>one if we did buckets last night because they were

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:12.020
<v Speaker 1>still playing. Giannis hasn't sat.

0:23:12.220 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Bam hasn't sat.

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.409
<v Speaker 1>Giannis did pop up on the injury report with a

0:23:16.450 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>wrist injury the other day. I think before actually last

0:23:19.540 --> 0:23:21.959
<v Speaker 1>night's game, but he was probable and ended up playing.

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Drew Smith had an injury and he sat actually. He

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.540
<v Speaker 1>did not play last night, although he was listed as available.

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.460
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I don't know how they're going to play this.

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:37.929
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be interesting to see the total. If

0:23:37.990 --> 0:23:41.350
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting into my angle for this, the total was

0:23:41.350 --> 0:23:45.250
<v Speaker 1>238 and a half. at some point last night, like

0:23:45.270 --> 0:23:46.970
<v Speaker 1>right after the game, as a matter of fact, it

0:23:47.010 --> 0:23:49.190
<v Speaker 1>was even after the game. So I liked the under

0:23:50.670 --> 0:23:54.710
<v Speaker 1>and then it dropped to two 35, you know?

0:23:54.750 --> 0:23:55.490
<v Speaker 2>So I got it.

0:23:55.690 --> 0:23:57.989
<v Speaker 3>I want to jump in here because what do you,

0:23:58.090 --> 0:24:01.350
<v Speaker 3>what did, what made you want to, you look at these,

0:24:01.369 --> 0:24:05.490
<v Speaker 3>this matchup, my initial inclination, looking at the numbers and

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 3>looking at the way these teams have been playing is

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:09.860
<v Speaker 3>to go over. What made you want to take the under?

0:24:09.900 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Was it just the overtime aspect or is there, An

0:24:13.350 --> 0:24:14.340
<v Speaker 3>X and O angle to it.

0:24:14.830 --> 0:24:17.430
<v Speaker 1>I was watching the game and I was like, they're

0:24:17.470 --> 0:24:18.810
<v Speaker 1>not going to fucking score tomorrow.

0:24:21.369 --> 0:24:23.490
<v Speaker 2>Look, I could be wrong. I know the Warriors have

0:24:23.530 --> 0:24:24.310
<v Speaker 2>won five in a row.

0:24:24.330 --> 0:24:26.510
<v Speaker 1>I was very pessimistic about them heading into the year

0:24:26.530 --> 0:24:29.660
<v Speaker 1>today for like Yaxel being real good and he's been

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:35.139
<v Speaker 1>the rookie of the year. But to the point where

0:24:35.180 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Zach Lowe is pondering, could he be the first rookie

0:24:38.020 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>to be an all-star since I think Blake Griffin would

0:24:41.420 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>have been the last one, right? So, maybe. But, like,

0:24:46.900 --> 0:24:49.350
<v Speaker 1>I think that... Unless Wemby did it. Did Wemby not

0:24:49.380 --> 0:24:49.679
<v Speaker 1>do it?

0:24:50.220 --> 0:24:55.310
<v Speaker 2>Hold on. I don't think he did. I just... Yeah, no.

0:24:55.369 --> 0:24:56.350
<v Speaker 1>He didn't.

0:24:56.390 --> 0:24:56.790
<v Speaker 2>He didn't.

0:24:56.869 --> 0:24:57.230
<v Speaker 1>He didn't.

0:24:57.270 --> 0:24:58.909
<v Speaker 2>He didn't. I think you're right. I think it was

0:24:58.950 --> 0:24:59.470
<v Speaker 2>Blake Griffin.

0:24:59.750 --> 0:25:00.030
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:25:00.050 --> 0:25:02.070
<v Speaker 2>It's a little surprising Wemby didn't. But I have to

0:25:02.109 --> 0:25:03.470
<v Speaker 2>go back and look at what the hell was going

0:25:03.530 --> 0:25:04.429
<v Speaker 2>on that year. He was probably hurt.

0:25:04.450 --> 0:25:05.270
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:25:05.410 --> 0:25:06.609
<v Speaker 2>I guess.

0:25:07.650 --> 0:25:08.030
<v Speaker 1>But, yeah.

0:25:08.070 --> 0:25:10.169
<v Speaker 2>So, I was just watching. I was like, there's just.

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:12.859
<v Speaker 1>Don't know if they're going to score that much in

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 1>this game. And then with Golden State, I mean, they're

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:21.900
<v Speaker 1>not playing fast either. They're at 24th in pace right now,

0:25:21.940 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>whereas Miami's obviously been trying to recklessly push pace. They're

0:25:24.700 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>second right now. It's a question of what's going to

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.900
<v Speaker 1>happen with the injury report, too. And then Golden State's defense,

0:25:30.980 --> 0:25:33.300
<v Speaker 1>although it's 23rd right now, it has been better. The

0:25:33.380 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>offense has been fourth, but the defense has been better. Miami,

0:25:38.380 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>even with their pace, their offense is middling which tells

0:25:41.820 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you they've actually been one of the worst offenses in

0:25:43.740 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the league, because despite all the opportunities, your league average

0:25:47.340 --> 0:25:50.700
<v Speaker 1>or around there at 16th right now. So I just

0:25:50.859 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think, and we've seen golden state win lately with

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.199
<v Speaker 1>defensive showings. Like they beat Phoenix one 16 or one

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.650
<v Speaker 1>13 defensive for today's NBA. I should clarify, not defensive

0:26:00.730 --> 0:26:02.310
<v Speaker 1>for like, you know, what you and I grew up

0:26:02.369 --> 0:26:06.310
<v Speaker 1>watching one 16, one 13 would have been very high scoring,

0:26:06.790 --> 0:26:07.850
<v Speaker 1>not terribly long ago.

0:26:07.930 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 2>And now it's just like a, random ho-hum oh the

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 2>total is 229.

0:26:11.020 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right but yeah to me um i my my

0:26:16.540 --> 0:26:19.580
<v Speaker 1>my gut instinct was like yeah this is probably not

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:24.669
<v Speaker 1>going to give us a ton of points unless the

0:26:24.710 --> 0:26:29.609
<v Speaker 1>heat's defense is so bad that they're just bleeding points

0:26:29.670 --> 0:26:32.050
<v Speaker 1>on the second of a back-to-back but this one more

0:26:32.070 --> 0:26:33.910
<v Speaker 1>of a lean than tristan to silver one i'll say

0:26:33.930 --> 0:26:36.620
<v Speaker 1>that um more of a lean i know matt more

0:26:36.660 --> 0:26:39.369
<v Speaker 1>hates that i don't care But yeah, that's, this is

0:26:39.410 --> 0:26:40.409
<v Speaker 1>where I'm.

0:26:40.609 --> 0:26:42.690
<v Speaker 3>At with it. I don't know where the lean hate

0:26:42.750 --> 0:26:45.550
<v Speaker 3>comes from. I mean, we're in the fiddle hates leans too.

0:26:45.570 --> 0:26:47.790
<v Speaker 3>You got, I think there's like a, we need to

0:26:48.050 --> 0:26:51.170
<v Speaker 3>create divisions and buckets of like the pro lean crowd

0:26:51.230 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 3>and the anti lean crowd. We're in, we're in the

0:26:53.900 --> 0:26:57.060
<v Speaker 3>content creation business. You know, we give you an idea

0:26:57.100 --> 0:26:59.540
<v Speaker 3>of what we like, but haven't necessarily to me, what

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.150
<v Speaker 3>a lean is, is If you forced me to bet

0:27:02.190 --> 0:27:03.820
<v Speaker 3>this game, this is how I would bet it, but

0:27:03.890 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 3>I haven't actually placed the wager yet.

0:27:07.180 --> 0:27:08.940
<v Speaker 2>If you have a knife to my throat, then fine.

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 3>Which would be a really weird way to commit a crime,

0:27:12.340 --> 0:27:14.980
<v Speaker 3>but I don't need that much violence to place bets.

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:16.659
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to think that I wouldn't let that happen,

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.859
<v Speaker 2>but you never know. With your boxing background, I would

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.620
<v Speaker 2>highly doubt it. I hope so.

0:27:23.020 --> 0:27:24.810
<v Speaker 3>When I wrote some notes for this game last night,

0:27:24.830 --> 0:27:26.830
<v Speaker 3>and this was before the Heat went to overtime, so

0:27:27.430 --> 0:27:32.020
<v Speaker 3>people have their own theories on what What is disrupted

0:27:32.100 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 3>the most the next day? Is it the effort on

0:27:34.180 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 3>defense because you were in OT and played extra minutes?

0:27:37.780 --> 0:27:42.580
<v Speaker 3>Is it the offense? Your shots now fall flat because

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 3>your legs are tired. Both of those things can be impacted,

0:27:45.420 --> 0:27:48.229
<v Speaker 3>and they also impact the game in opposite ways when

0:27:48.270 --> 0:27:50.210
<v Speaker 3>it comes to the total, so it just depends on

0:27:50.230 --> 0:27:53.630
<v Speaker 3>your own philosophy. I wrote the note to myself, Warriors

0:27:53.670 --> 0:27:56.870
<v Speaker 3>heat over is appealing when you consider the Warriors' efficiency

0:27:56.930 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 3>on offense. And the heat being God awful defensively golden

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.980
<v Speaker 3>state also 21st defensively this year. So I could not

0:28:04.020 --> 0:28:09.090
<v Speaker 3>get there on an under for this game. Bless your heart.

0:28:09.230 --> 0:28:11.930
<v Speaker 3>If you decide to make that bet. And clearly there

0:28:12.010 --> 0:28:13.150
<v Speaker 3>are sharps out there that.

0:28:13.070 --> 0:28:13.570
<v Speaker 2>Agree with you.

0:28:13.590 --> 0:28:18.530
<v Speaker 3>Miami third, worst defense in the NBA, 120.7 points allowed

0:28:18.570 --> 0:28:22.379
<v Speaker 3>per a hundred possessions. Also on the no rest, Brian mentioned,

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 3>we don't have much of a sample. So it's a

0:28:24.580 --> 0:28:26.780
<v Speaker 3>sample of one for the heat. They have played one

0:28:26.859 --> 0:28:28.820
<v Speaker 3>game on the second night of a back to back.

0:28:29.260 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 3>It was a loss to the Charlotte Hornets, which right

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:36.330
<v Speaker 3>now Brian is not aging. Well, so this line is

0:28:36.369 --> 0:28:37.449
<v Speaker 3>just so fat.

0:28:37.730 --> 0:28:39.970
<v Speaker 2>I would need to see this come down a little bit.

0:28:40.070 --> 0:28:44.710
<v Speaker 3>I need to see the warriors love subside and maybe

0:28:44.730 --> 0:28:48.250
<v Speaker 3>I could be walked into a warriors play. I'm not

0:28:48.290 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 3>going to take Miami the night after, um, kitchen sink win.

0:28:53.420 --> 0:28:56.020
<v Speaker 2>But what I do like, I didn't think about it. Admittedly.

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I did think, I did think once it got to

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:01.250
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half, I was like, Hmm, but I

0:29:01.410 --> 0:29:03.060
<v Speaker 1>just don't, I can't do it with Miami right now.

0:29:04.450 --> 0:29:07.010
<v Speaker 3>I'm telling you what, this is my bold prediction on

0:29:07.050 --> 0:29:09.590
<v Speaker 3>the line. This is the peak of it. If you

0:29:09.630 --> 0:29:11.990
<v Speaker 3>want Miami, I would buy it at seven and a half.

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.060
<v Speaker 3>I think they're going to play their guys. That's what my,

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 3>my NBA Spidey sense says. I think this line will

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:23.870
<v Speaker 3>drop at least a point. So if you want to

0:29:23.900 --> 0:29:25.810
<v Speaker 3>be on the Warriors, I would wait. I think you're

0:29:25.830 --> 0:29:27.210
<v Speaker 3>going to get a six and a half later.

0:29:28.170 --> 0:29:29.990
<v Speaker 1>You have two days off after this, if I fail

0:29:30.030 --> 0:29:32.630
<v Speaker 1>to mention that, because you have Sacramento and Utah next,

0:29:32.670 --> 0:29:35.270
<v Speaker 1>but you're off Friday and Saturday after this game.

0:29:35.290 --> 0:29:40.219
<v Speaker 2>That's good. analysis because that's important to the rest aspect.

0:29:40.420 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 2>They might try to get this one and then say,

0:29:44.500 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 2>you know what?

0:29:44.980 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>A couple of you guys can sit the Sacramento game.

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 2>That's probably the better way to handle this. Yeah, although.

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Would it stun me if Sacramento beat them at this point?

0:29:57.740 --> 0:30:00.850
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean? Like, I like, I just,

0:30:01.490 --> 0:30:05.050
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't, I'm there's certain teams that I'm,

0:30:05.250 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it's funny. I'm doing my show at 12 today and

0:30:08.260 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Ethan Skolnick who covers the heat will be on.

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about NBA teams that we're panicking about early

0:30:12.860 --> 0:30:15.020
<v Speaker 2>on this year. I think the heat are.

0:30:14.980 --> 0:30:17.260
<v Speaker 1>Going to come up because I'm definitely going to ask about,

0:30:17.340 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>about that because yeah.

0:30:18.980 --> 0:30:23.100
<v Speaker 2>How would they not? Yeah, I mean, the first team

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:23.620
<v Speaker 2>you bring up.

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, the photo I use is of Pascal

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:29.780
<v Speaker 1>Siakam guarding Giannis. So those, you know, those are two

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.580
<v Speaker 1>teams you got to start with. But yeah, I just

0:30:33.100 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>this game. This game is also going to be very late.

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:37.540
<v Speaker 1>So if you stay up, it'll be it'll be on

0:30:37.620 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>well after Thursday night football tonight.

0:30:39.700 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 3>So the Magic Suns doesn't start until nine. So you

0:30:42.620 --> 0:30:46.370
<v Speaker 3>have no NBA until nine o'clock Eastern tonight. Uh, that's

0:30:46.590 --> 0:30:49.170
<v Speaker 3>an interesting schedule. And neither of these games are on

0:30:49.270 --> 0:30:51.850
<v Speaker 3>anything that resembles prime time. The only game that's on

0:30:51.910 --> 0:30:55.950
<v Speaker 3>national ish TV is heat warriors. It's on an NBA TV,

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:59.060
<v Speaker 3>which is something to consider as far as the other

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:02.100
<v Speaker 3>side of that rest spectrum. If this game is on NBC,

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 3>these stars are a lot less likely to sit out.

0:31:05.900 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 2>That's not the case tonight. I wouldn't read too much

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 2>into that.

0:31:08.660 --> 0:31:10.420
<v Speaker 3>I think that's the sort of thing that mattered a

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:13.810
<v Speaker 3>lot more a couple of years ago now with streaming

0:31:13.830 --> 0:31:16.210
<v Speaker 3>and all these games being available all the time, probably

0:31:16.270 --> 0:31:19.820
<v Speaker 3>less impactful. I like the, uh, I like clay Thompson.

0:31:20.210 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to kick this up. His total right now

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 3>for points is 12 and a half.

0:31:24.740 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Are you, what was it? Yes. Was that a, was

0:31:26.940 --> 0:31:29.700
<v Speaker 2>that a positive grown? I was staring at my notes. No, no.

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:31.140
<v Speaker 2>I like that. Um, okay.

0:31:31.180 --> 0:31:33.140
<v Speaker 3>So it was 12 and a half 13. I'm buying

0:31:33.180 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 3>this up cause I don't want to lay the juice.

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:39.130
<v Speaker 3>It's minus one 20 minus one 25. Um, Depending on

0:31:39.150 --> 0:31:40.970
<v Speaker 3>where you look, if you want the over 12 and

0:31:40.990 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 3>a half. So for him to score 13 or more,

0:31:43.540 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm not really interested in that. I either want a

0:31:46.140 --> 0:31:49.580
<v Speaker 3>really good game or I'm out of the clay Thompson business.

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:53.260
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going extreme. I'm buying this up one or

0:31:53.300 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm selling a point. Let's go over 13 and a

0:31:55.740 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 3>half points.

0:31:56.300 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 2>At even money. He's balling right now. 30, 19, 25.

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 3>In his last three games. He's made 19 threes in

0:32:02.940 --> 0:32:05.620
<v Speaker 3>his last three games. Looks like vintage clay.

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:06.220
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:08.630
<v Speaker 3>It's the second night of a back to back. Yes,

0:32:08.670 --> 0:32:11.730
<v Speaker 3>he's 36 years old. This is typically when you would

0:32:11.770 --> 0:32:14.790
<v Speaker 3>want to fade a player like this, but he's playing

0:32:14.850 --> 0:32:17.750
<v Speaker 3>at the Oracle where his Jersey is going to hang

0:32:17.790 --> 0:32:20.290
<v Speaker 3>in the rafters one day. This is a big game

0:32:20.350 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 3>for him. There's no way he's sitting in this spot.

0:32:23.820 --> 0:32:26.260
<v Speaker 3>And if they do rest other guys, even more of

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:28.340
<v Speaker 3>a tick up for clay Thompson. So I like the

0:32:28.460 --> 0:32:31.340
<v Speaker 3>even money bet for him to get to 14.

0:32:31.340 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Also, they just need him way too much right now

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>because Tim Hardaway jr. And Andrew Wiggins in particular is,

0:32:38.510 --> 0:32:42.430
<v Speaker 1>who will also be, I guess, returning to the team

0:32:42.510 --> 0:32:44.470
<v Speaker 1>where he was once the second best player on the

0:32:44.510 --> 0:32:47.450
<v Speaker 1>finals team. So shout out to Andrew Wiggins, but he's

0:32:47.470 --> 0:32:51.460
<v Speaker 1>been terrible this year. So has Tim Hardaway Jr. And

0:32:51.980 --> 0:32:56.220
<v Speaker 1>because of that, now Klay Thompson has to really, I mean,

0:32:56.260 --> 0:32:58.180
<v Speaker 1>kind of do what he's been doing. 25, 19, and

0:32:58.180 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>30 in these last three games in terms of points.

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Seven threes, four threes, eight threes. Obviously, especially at this

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>point in his career, the threes are going to carry

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:11.110
<v Speaker 1>the offense. I would wonder, are the threes at three

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:13.230
<v Speaker 1>and a half yet or are they at two and

0:33:13.270 --> 0:33:14.050
<v Speaker 1>a half for this game?

0:33:14.490 --> 0:33:17.390
<v Speaker 3>I would imagine last I checked, they were at three

0:33:17.430 --> 0:33:20.510
<v Speaker 3>and a half, but I think it was plus money

0:33:20.850 --> 0:33:21.610
<v Speaker 3>at three and a half.

0:33:21.650 --> 0:33:24.270
<v Speaker 2>Let me double check. Yeah, it is. So over three

0:33:24.290 --> 0:33:26.510
<v Speaker 2>and a half is plus one thirty seven on one

0:33:26.570 --> 0:33:29.470
<v Speaker 2>thirty seven on DK. Yeah.

0:33:29.530 --> 0:33:33.030
<v Speaker 1>Which do you prefer, the points or the threes? I

0:33:33.070 --> 0:33:35.110
<v Speaker 1>like the points number more just because of where it's at.

0:33:35.170 --> 0:33:37.010
<v Speaker 1>Four threes, it does sound like a lot, although he's

0:33:37.030 --> 0:33:39.890
<v Speaker 1>done it in three straight, and he's got double-digit attempts

0:33:39.950 --> 0:33:43.390
<v Speaker 1>in two of those games. He had, I know last

0:33:43.430 --> 0:33:45.990
<v Speaker 1>night went to overtime. He got it in regulation. He

0:33:46.020 --> 0:33:47.500
<v Speaker 1>was already in the 20s by the time we got

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to regulation. He made the game winning three, but he

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 1>already had several of his threes, of what became eight

0:33:53.700 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>threes in regulation. So you're not getting a ton of

0:33:56.280 --> 0:34:00.620
<v Speaker 1>free throws there. Obviously, he's only shot two this entire season,

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:04.510
<v Speaker 1>both on and ones. but you know, like he will,

0:34:05.110 --> 0:34:07.530
<v Speaker 1>he will get the occasional layup, the occasional mid range

0:34:07.570 --> 0:34:10.489
<v Speaker 1>jumper yesterday. He actually pump faked from getting who the

0:34:10.510 --> 0:34:14.140
<v Speaker 1>defender was maybe Rihach Moore or Chris Dunn, um, two

0:34:14.180 --> 0:34:16.340
<v Speaker 1>very different people. So I shouldn't get them mixed up,

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>but he, uh, pump faked and actually shot a mid

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:19.500
<v Speaker 1>range jumper.

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:21.940
<v Speaker 2>And I was like, Oh man, yes. Like this is,

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:24.219
<v Speaker 2>this is, this is what I grew up on.

0:34:24.260 --> 0:34:27.089
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean? Um, but I do think

0:34:27.110 --> 0:34:29.940
<v Speaker 1>he'll get it. Like if not for the revenge angle alone,

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>just the way that Miami really needs him as part

0:34:32.540 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of the offense right now, but also him being back

0:34:35.060 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 1>in golden state, he's obviously looking forward to that. He

0:34:37.420 --> 0:34:40.779
<v Speaker 1>said as much in the post game interview that he

0:34:40.820 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>did on league pass. So yeah, like if not for

0:34:43.540 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the revenge angle alone, like what, why not, you.

0:34:45.620 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 3>Know, and familiar sight lines. I think that stuff really

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:51.359
<v Speaker 3>matters for these guys. If you, if you're familiar with

0:34:51.530 --> 0:34:55.590
<v Speaker 3>how to line up your shot based on the scope

0:34:55.630 --> 0:34:57.370
<v Speaker 3>of what's around you, that stuff matters.

0:34:58.070 --> 0:35:04.450
<v Speaker 2>Do you want his numbers against the Warriors since leaving? Yes,

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:06.030
<v Speaker 2>I would love that.

0:35:06.140 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 3>And I will mention the threes versus points. Five extra

0:35:11.460 --> 0:35:15.060
<v Speaker 3>shot attempts that were not threes last night. That's the

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 3>kind of thing I want on my side. So I

0:35:16.780 --> 0:35:19.479
<v Speaker 3>don't want to bank on the three-point shooting to stay

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 3>hot when it's not like he's just taking threes. So

0:35:23.340 --> 0:35:26.900
<v Speaker 3>what are the numbers after Golden State against Golden State?

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:27.980
<v Speaker 2>He's actually played.

0:35:28.370 --> 0:35:32.010
<v Speaker 1>Apparently seven games already because he was in Dallas, obviously

0:35:32.310 --> 0:35:37.010
<v Speaker 1>the last two seasons averaging 15 against golden state, just

0:35:37.090 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 1>North of 17 per game on the road. So in

0:35:40.890 --> 0:35:41.479
<v Speaker 1>golden state.

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:44.020
<v Speaker 3>Which is, which is to me like throw out the

0:35:44.060 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 3>games where you're playing golden state in a different arena.

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 3>This arena is that's the angle, the first return. So

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:51.739
<v Speaker 3>this was November 12th of 2024.

0:35:51.739 --> 0:35:52.180
<v Speaker 2>He had 22 in that.

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>6-12 from three, 7-17 overall. Actually did shoot a couple

0:35:59.140 --> 0:36:02.380
<v Speaker 1>of free throws. This is the first game back. And

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>then the second game back, a month later, he was

0:36:04.780 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 1>much better.

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:06.140
<v Speaker 2>He had 29.

0:36:06.140 --> 0:36:09.109
<v Speaker 1>He had seven threes, but he had nine field goals

0:36:09.150 --> 0:36:10.830
<v Speaker 1>made in total. He was also four or five from

0:36:10.850 --> 0:36:13.250
<v Speaker 1>the free throw line. And then the last two, he

0:36:13.270 --> 0:36:16.350
<v Speaker 1>would have gone under. So in 2025, later that same

0:36:16.370 --> 0:36:19.779
<v Speaker 1>24-25 season in February, he had 11. And then last year,

0:36:20.700 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>if you remember the Mavs played the Warriors on Christmas,

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>he had seven points to struggle there. So It's been

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:28.140
<v Speaker 1>going this way the last three games. We're going downward,

0:36:28.580 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 1>but new environment and one where they frankly need him

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:34.340
<v Speaker 1>more than that Dallas team did because that Dallas team

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 1>at that point was just kind of like, well, we

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:38.990
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's going to happen. We were wondering if

0:36:39.070 --> 0:36:41.089
<v Speaker 1>Clay was going to get traded where this Miami team

0:36:41.130 --> 0:36:43.750
<v Speaker 1>is like, we really actually want to win. We just

0:36:43.810 --> 0:36:47.130
<v Speaker 1>haven't quite gotten there yet. Their best win this season

0:36:47.170 --> 0:36:51.549
<v Speaker 1>was frankly the one in Atlanta, which was the real

0:36:51.870 --> 0:36:56.690
<v Speaker 1>desperate spot where they were 0-4, but they I wouldn't

0:36:56.710 --> 0:36:59.410
<v Speaker 1>be totally surprised if they pulled it off, but I

0:36:59.710 --> 0:37:03.009
<v Speaker 1>think clay, clay is a, is a, is a great look.

0:37:03.050 --> 0:37:04.630
<v Speaker 1>I think for this one at the very.

0:37:04.489 --> 0:37:10.740
<v Speaker 3>Least, let's go through our three star top end bets

0:37:11.100 --> 0:37:13.700
<v Speaker 3>on the night presented by draft Kings. What we're going

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:16.910
<v Speaker 3>to do is throw together a same game parlay because

0:37:17.140 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 3>our magic bets are highly correlated and Magic team total

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:26.739
<v Speaker 3>over 111.5 against the Phoenix Suns, and Brian and I

0:37:26.780 --> 0:37:31.760
<v Speaker 3>are in lockstep on Tristan Da Silva over 2.5 made threes.

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:36.230
<v Speaker 3>That is plus 242 when slammed together over on DraftKings.

0:37:36.290 --> 0:37:38.950
<v Speaker 3>Those are our best bets presented by DraftKings. Don't forget

0:37:38.969 --> 0:37:42.270
<v Speaker 3>to use the code BUCKETSPOD when signing up for a

0:37:42.310 --> 0:37:47.250
<v Speaker 3>great offer. DraftKings, where the crown is yours. That's going

0:37:47.270 --> 0:37:50.410
<v Speaker 3>to do it for us here on buckets, bacon and

0:37:50.610 --> 0:37:53.390
<v Speaker 3>eggs buckets. This has been so much fun. I am

0:37:53.430 --> 0:37:58.529
<v Speaker 3>going to try and commission for more morning buckets episode.

0:37:58.590 --> 0:38:02.490
<v Speaker 3>This is the campaign that the Kravitz administration is running

0:38:02.630 --> 0:38:06.660
<v Speaker 3>on morning buckets. For the people. That's going to do

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:08.180
<v Speaker 3>it for us here. Thanks for hanging out. Thanks to

0:38:08.219 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Brian Fonseca for his Tier 1 analysis. David Payne on production.

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:15.930
<v Speaker 3>No matter what time we go live, enjoy the games tonight,

0:38:16.150 --> 0:38:18.810
<v Speaker 3>win some money, and we will see you next time.

0:38:19.070 --> 0:38:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's get buckets. Action Network reminds you, please gamble responsibly.

0:38:28.180 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 2>If you or someone you care about has a gambling problem,

0:38:31.219 --> 0:38:32.460
<v Speaker 2>help is available 24-7 at 1-800-GAMBLER.