WEBVTT - MLK and Liberty versus Tyranny

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the buck Sexton Show where the mission where

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>mission is to decode what really matters with passionable intelligence,

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>magnor mistake America, You're a great American. Again the buck

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Show begins. Remember he's a great guy. No, welcome

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to the buck Sexton Show. This is Ben wein Garten

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>in for Buck Sexton here on this Monday Martin Muth

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:32.559
<v Speaker 1>and Luther King Junior Day. Hope you all had a

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>great weekend, maybe enjoyed some football, some time with the family.

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Nice relaxation, a break from the craziness in the world

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and probably in your own personal lives as well. As

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>we head into this twenty twenty election cycle, of which

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the impeachment is inextricably interlinked. I want to start today.

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about a few different things. I want to

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>pick up on some threads that we talked about on

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Thursday and Friday. In particular, we're going to talk about

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the Afghanistan Papers, maybe the most overlooked critical story that

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>has emerged about not only American national security and foreign policy,

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>but also what kind of government we have and whether

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we're really represented ultimately when they're trillions of dollars in

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>treasure and all this blood sacrificed and what have we

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>gotten for it? And I talked about the link between

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>General Michael Flynn and those Afghani standpapers last week. We'll

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>pick up on that thread today as well with Julie

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Kelly just a little bit later in the hour. We're

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>also gonna again look at China, but actually through the

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>lens of Taiwan, a country we don't talk about a lot,

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>but which is actually the front line in the Chinese

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party's march first for regional hegemony and then for

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.759
<v Speaker 1>global dominance. And why should we as Americans care about that?

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>And what should the US relationship with Taiwana look like.

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>And there were recently presidential and broader elections there as well,

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>which have not gotten a lot of press in the US,

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>but are actually quite significant and a good news out

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of that part of the world. So we'll talk with

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Steve Yates about that a little bit later in the show,

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and then also talk with Margot Cleveland of The Federalist,

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a senior contributor there, colleague of mine, who is doing

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>some exceptional work parsing going through page by page of

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the four hundred and seventy eight pages or whatever it

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>is of the IG report on FISA abuse and also

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:26.399
<v Speaker 1>looking at potential corruption in the FISA court itself, huge

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>vital matters that are not being addressed. People are not

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>going in and doing the journalistic homework that they ought

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to do. And Margo has a very extensive legal background

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>looks at this or the eyes of our eyes the

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>way that we look at these issues and doing some

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>vital work on this. We'll talk about that in our three,

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>but I want to start with this being Martin Luther

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>King Junior Day. A little bit about the politics of this,

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and I don't believe that national holidays should be politicized.

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that politics should be taken out of all

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of these major cultural benchmarks, these celebrations that we have.

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>But the Left has injected politics into everything. So if

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about the political aspect of a

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>day like Martin Luther King Day, I would suggest that

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>this should be an anti identity politics holiday, because that

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>is actually what Martin Luther King Jr. Espoused, certainly in

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the most famous speech he ever delivered. He talked about colorblindness,

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>content of character mattering more than color of skin, skin pigmentation.

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>You and I have no control over that. What we

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>do have control over is what we contribute society, to

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>our families, to our communities, what we bring to the

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>table based upon our individual merit, and that truly is

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the basis by which we should be judged, not things

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that are completely out of our control, arbitrary by nature.

0:03:56.520 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Thomas soul the great economist who grew up at Harlem Back,

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe in the thirties or forties, came up through

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the ranks of basically militant black nationalism leftism, had an

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>epiphany and switched and became one of this nation's leading

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>free market economists, written some of the finest books there

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>are on these subjects. And he wrote something back in

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirteen on the fiftieth anniversary of Kings, I have

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a dream speech. Then I think it is worth reading

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>at some length, because it puts in context how distorted Americans,

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>particularly on the left, have got in on issues of race,

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>how far away they have traveled from Martin Luther King's

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>ideal where color blindness used to be the highest ideal,

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the virtue that we sought, the principle that we sought.

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>And now what is the most virtuous is the opposite.

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>It is, let's judge everything explicitly on the basis of

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>what the races of one person versus another person. That's

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>really identity politics and multiculturalism. What, at the end of

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the day, is it really about. Yes, they've come up

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>with this academic veneer to try to rationalize the views

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that have pervaded our law schools and all of our

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>schools and now all of our cultural institutions since the

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Civil rights era. It's actually about dividing us. It's about

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>dividing us and then conquering us, rubbing the wounds, old wounds,

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>historical wounds for political gain, playing one group and I

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>hate the term group because we're individuals and we should

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>be judged individually. Pitting groups against each other and that

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>is totally antithetical to what King argued in that speech.

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to read a little what soul Is said

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty thirteen, because it's just as relevant today,

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to remain just as relevant until in

0:05:56.360 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 1>athless we thwart the identity politics obsessed multiculturalist focus march

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>and get back to judging people by who they are

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>caring most about. The smallest minority, the minority of one

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the individual under assault by this group ideology of identity politics,

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>which of course is just a ruse a guys to

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 1>cover their leftism. It's using the veneer of being virtuous

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>because you're supporting the oppressed, as a means of justifying

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>tyrannical collectivism, where the individual is destroyed, the smallest minority

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is destroyed. Here's a widow of what Soul wrote, Judging

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 1>individuals by their individual character is that the opposite poll

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>from judging how groups are statistically represented among employees, college students,

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>or political figures. Yet many, if not most, of those

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>who celebrate the I have a Dream speech today promote

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:56.559
<v Speaker 1>the directly opposite approach of group preferences, especially those based

0:06:56.600 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>on skin color. He goes on, what was historic about

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>King's speech was not only what was said, but how

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>powerfully its message resonated among Americans of that time across

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum of race, ideology, and politics. A higher percentage

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of Republicans than Democrats voted in Congress for both the

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Civil Rights Act of nineteen sixty four and the Voting

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Rights Act of nineteen sixty five. To say that was

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a hopeful time would be an understatement. To say that

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>many of those hopes have since been disappointed. Would also

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>be an understatement. There's been much documented racial progress since

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty three, but there's also been much retroaggression, of

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>which the disintegration of the black family has been central,

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>especially among those at the bottom of the social pyramid.

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Many people, especially politicians and activists, want to take credit

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>for the economic and other advancement of blacks, even though

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a larger proportion of Blacks rose out of poverty in

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the twenty years before nineteen sixty than the twenty years afterwards.

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>We should add to that these trends have only gotten worse,

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and that the great society itself, when measure in terms

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of the racial progress, has really been a flop. But

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>no one wants to take responsibility for the policies and

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>ideologies that led to the breakup of the black family,

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>which had survived centuries of slavery and generations of discrimination.

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>And we cannot downplay enough by the way, the disintegration

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of the black family is a trend that has accelerated

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>across Americans of all races, and the disintegration of family

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>ultimately means the disintegration of communities, society, and a nation. Altogether,

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>because absent that family structure, everything else collapses. He goes on,

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>many hopes were disappointed because those were unrealistic hopes to

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>begin with. Economic and other disparities between groups have been

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>common for centuries and countries around the world, and many

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of those disparities have been and still are larger than

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the disparities between blacks and whites in America. Even when

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>those who lagged behind have advanced, they have not always

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>caught up, even after centuries, because others were advancing at

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the same time. But when blacks did not catch up

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>with whites in America within a matter of decades, that

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>was treated as strange or even a sinister sign of

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>crafty and covert racism. Civil rights were necessary, but far

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>from sufficient. Education and job skills are crucial, and the

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>government cannot give you these things. All it can do

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is make them available. Race hustlers who blame all lags

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>on the racism of others are among the obstacles to

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>taking the fullest advantage of education and other opportunities. What

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>does that say about the content of their character? Soul

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>goes on a little bit to talk about the passage

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Civil Rights Act and how high hopes were

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>following that act, He says, the bitter anti climax that

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>did follow provoke no rethinking. Instead, it provoked all sorts

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of new demands. Judging everybody by the same standards came

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to be regarded in some quarters as racist because it

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>precluded preferences and quotas. That is, we should judge everyone

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>by different standards, and that's supposed to be anti racist.

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>It's absurd on its face. Soul goes on. There are

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>people today to talk justice when they really mean payback,

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>including payback against people who were not even born when

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>historic injustices were committed. By the way, this applies to

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>a criminal justice system, for example, in New York, where

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, we now have this no bail reform where

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>criminals get protected under the guise of justice, but innocent

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>victims walking the streets have to deal with these repeat

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>offenders going out and committing all sorts of crimes through

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.839
<v Speaker 1>no fault of their own, and the criminal is treated

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>as the aggrieved. So it pervades a lot of things.

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 1>It's not just the racial relations in this country, Soul concludes.

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And this was talking back in twenty thirteen. Remember, so

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>this was the Trayvon whole hullo below Trayvon Martin case transpiring.

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>The nation has just been through a sensationalized murder trial

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and fard on which many people took fear positions before

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a speck of evidence was introduced based on nothing more

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>than judging those involved by the color of their skin.

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>President Obama did that himself, by the way, in the

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>case of the Trayvon Martin Travails tragedy. We have a

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>long way to go to catch up to what Martin

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Luther King said fifty years ago, and we are moving

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in the opposite direction. And I think the record absolutely

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>proves what Thomas soul was saying. Take for example, something

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about in the show before, the sixteen nineteen project.

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>It is a project by the New York Times to

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>reframe history as if American history really begins when slavery

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 1>was introduced to the shores of at the time Virginia,

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and slavery actually had existed here decades, if not a

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 1>century or more prior to that point. But that is

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the point at which The New York Times traces our history.

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>So seventeen seventy six isn't the start of America sixteen

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>nineteen is our original sin of slavery is that's where

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>America and history should start. So it suggests from the

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>very beginning that we were built on tyranny, not liberty,

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and that every evil aspect of America derives from its

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>this original evil seed of slavery being introduced here, rather

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>than the fact that America was an experiment in liberty

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>where slavery was the great exception to it, where the

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>founding fathers themselves said it was basically intolerable, completely incompatible

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>with what our founding principles were, completely incompatible with the

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Declaration of Independence with a constitution not referenced in the

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Constitution by name, because they knew that it was a

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>blight on our nation, and most of the founders, in

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>particular the abolitionist founders all said basically they found this

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to be an abhorrent system, one that had to be

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>tolerated or there would not be a union. And then

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>they had language specifically in the Constitution to phase out

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the slave of trade within twenty five years. The document itself,

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of course, could not support slavery on its own merits

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>on the words in it, But the Times instead wants

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.599
<v Speaker 1>to reframe our history and introduce a curriculum in to

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>school is consistent with the sixteen nineteen Project, which explicitly

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>says that America was basically a country founded on and

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>built in tyranny, that capitalism and all of our other

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>institutions spawn from it, that ultimately it is a deplorable experiment.

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:24.079
<v Speaker 1>And if it's a deplorable, evil experiment, then obviously the

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>answer is you have to turn it on its head.

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>You have to shred the Constitution, you have to repudiate

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the Declaration of Independence. These documents aren't viewed as the

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>answers to discrimination and to a society that is flourishing

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 1>and tolerant and truly pluralistic and judges people on their merits,

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>like King asked for, and like Douglas identified centuries before,

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>over a century before, they'd have us believe. It's the

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>exact opposite, Totally inconsistent. I would argue the sixteen nineteen

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>project with what King called for. Robert Woodson wrote a

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>great editorial on this in the Wall Street Journal recently,

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and he talked about sixteen nineteen. He said that today

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the progressive left wants to ignore the achievements and pretend

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that Blacks are perpetual victims of white racism sixteen nineteen

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Project essay series. It's the latest salvo in this attack

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>on America's founding, claiming anti black racism runs in the

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>very dna of this country. This statement is an abomination

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of everything doctor King stood for. When come right back,

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk a little bit more about doctor King sixteen

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen project and context of it and the importance of

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the content of character over the collar of his game.

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Right back, this Ben Wangarton in for Buck sex And

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>on the Buck Sex And Show. Back in just a second.

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>You're in the Freedom Hut. This is the Buck Sexton

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Show podcast. Welcome back to the Buck Sex And Show.

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Ben Wangarten in for Buck Sexton. We've been

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about the ideals and principle as that Martin Luther

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>King stood for and the left standing in contradiction to

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>those principles today sadly, and I was talking about this

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Robert Woodson Wall Street Journal editorial and he quotes from

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>King and juxtaposes it with a sixteen nineteen project says,

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>in sharp contrast to the claims of sixteen nineteen which

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>disparages the American Revolution and Declaration of independence and insists

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>America's hopelessly racist king believed deeply in the need to

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>remain true to the founder's vision, quoting him the Patriot

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Dream that sees beyond the years. To him that that

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>was the only evidue toward fulfilling America's promise, As he

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>wrote in his nineteen sixty three Letter from a Birmingham jail,

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>one day the South will know that when these disinherited

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>children of God sat down on lunch counters, they were

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in reality standing up for what was best in the

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>American dream and for the most sacred values in our

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Judeo Christian heritage, thereby bringing our nation back to those

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>great woes of democracy which were dug deep by the

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>founding fathers in their formulation of the Constitution and the

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Declaration of Independence. Okay, well, our leftists today who would

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>claim to carry the banner of king say that the

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Constitution and the Declaration are inherently evil documents based upon

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the people that drafted them and what they derived from

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Judeo Christian heritage. They'd say, that's code word for white

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>nationalism and ethnocentric Europeanism and these other assinine concepts that

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>they've come up with to try to create an academic

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>veneer that legitimizes they're just anti Western ideology. At its core,

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>our sacred American values in the American dream, our understanding

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of the American dream as conservative Americans, as traditional Americans,

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>is the American nightmare. In the left's reading of things,

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>King added, we will reach the goal of freedom in

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Birmingham and all over the nation because the goal of

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>America's freedom, abuse and scorn, though we may be, our

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>destiny is tied up with America's destiny. And then whitson

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>goes on. Doctor King, who saw full participation in America,

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>would never have indulged today's grievance based on any politics

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>whose social justice warriors use race as a battering ram

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>against the country. In fact, in a letter from Birming M. Jail,

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>King is explicitly warned against the type of group think

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that characterizes identity politics. Individuals may see the moral light

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and voluntarily give up their unjust posture, said King, But

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 1>as Ronald niber has reminded us, groups tend to be

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>more immoral than individuals. I would say to the left,

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>how can you look at what King said and what

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>he wrote, and then support an ideology that is inherently

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 1>about color of skin, maybe to the total exclusion of

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>content of character, certainly to some extent to the exclusion

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of content of character. But merit and the individual worth

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>and dignity of a person should be all the matters

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day in America. And we

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>might not always achieve that ideal, but that should be

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the ideal, not the opposite, not the antithesis. We're gonna

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 1>switch gears here and just after the break we're gonna

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>have Julie Kelly on to talk about something I talked

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>about last week, which does deal incidentally without our individual

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>liberties and civil rights in context of General Michael Flynn certainly,

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and also in context of the government versus the people

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Afghanistan papers. This Ben Weegarden in for Buck

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Sex and on the Buck Sexton Show. Back just after this.

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the bus Sex Show podcasts. Remember

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show.

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>This is Ben Weingarten in for Buck Sexton, and as

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 1>you recall, on Friday, we did a very deep dive

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 1>into the plight of General Michael T. Flynn and in

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>particular went into great depth on what I think is

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a document that in and of itself explains why Flynn

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>had to be targeted as persona non grata the number

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>one priority for the deep staters in the Trump administration

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>based on this one interview alone, and that interview was

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a product of the Afghanistan Papers, one that was flagged

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>for me by a great writer, one of the best

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>trolls certain way on the conservative side, but also someone

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>who writes just fantastic editorials and does some great journalistic work.

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's Julie Kelly, a senior contributor to American Greatness,

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 1>and she joins us now, Julie, thanks so much for

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>coming on the program. Thanks Ben, thanks for having me on. Well,

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>it's my pleasure. And I want to start actually with

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.719
<v Speaker 1>a news story that I'm sure you saw, you know,

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 1>one of these stories rolled out once or twice a week,

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>This one about just these bombshew revelations about President Trump

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>defying the generals and other senior officials in the administration,

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>in particular leading national security and foreign policy officials. I

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>wonder if you put that well, first of all, isn't

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 1>that what he was elected to do? Right? He absolutely was,

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know he was right to question. I mean,

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>we all support the military. We know what a hard

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>job they've all had to past two decades, from Afghanistan

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>through Iraq and other kind of like. But look, we

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 1>now know, thanks to the expose that's been published in

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Post, what did debacle the Afghanistan war has

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>been from the beginning. And Trump promised his base and

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>his voters that he would look to end these perpetual wars.

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that was the crux of his

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 1>questioning of these military officials in twenty seventeen. And so anyway,

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:28.919
<v Speaker 1>that questioning, I think perfectly parallels what General Flynn asserted

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in his interview with the Aspects Special Inspector General for

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the Afghanistan reconstruction efforts, because basically what he was calling

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>out is, look, we've spent now seven trillion dollars in

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 1>treasure and all manner of blood, and you know, at

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, what did we get for it?

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.239
<v Speaker 1>It's or what is the return on the investment of

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>our nation's resources. I wonder if you would summarize for

0:20:54.920 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>us what you've found in parsing the Afghanistan papers thus far. Well,

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>just so everyone can understand where these keepers came from.

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>So this is, as you said, the Special Inspector General

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>who was tasked in two thousand and eight really to

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>look at all the reconstruction efforts, what was what's been

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 1>going on in Afghanistan since really two thousand and two

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>after the invasion. So this Special Inspector General has conducted

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of interviews not just with US officials but LA

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>forces and Afghan government officials as well, looking into what

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>worked and what didn't work. And unfortunately we found out

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:39.479
<v Speaker 1>that most of what we've been doing there has not worked.

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>So these interviews give really some insight into what has

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>been happening for almost two decades. And one of those

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:53.479
<v Speaker 1>interviews was Mike Flynn, who has been an intelligence officer

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>for decades and served in both Afghanistan and Iraq, and

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>so he also worked in the Obama administration for James Clapper.

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>So his interview was very interesting and we can get

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>into some of the details, but it makes more sense

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of why the Obama White House targeted him in twenty fourteen. Yeah,

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.479
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing in some ways to my mind that he

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>rose to be the head of DA the Defense Intelligence Agency,

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>on the Obama administration. Given his outspoken views. The only

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>thing to which I can attribute it is really that

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>he was so competent that that competence overcame the political

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>correctness that would normally pervade a decision like elevating him

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to that role. Do you see it that way as well?

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's true, and his experience really is unmatched.

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>And so, but he was founding the alarm early on

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and how the intelligence was being manipulated and politicized coming

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>out of Afghanistan, and how it was causing people to

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>make really bad decisions. And he alerted not just the

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Obama White House, but also CIA officials. I believe it

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>was probably John Brennan, because I mean they weren't exactly equals,

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>but pretty close, and questioning why the intelligence was being

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>manipulated and politicized, and as it got higher up the chain,

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>meaning to the president, he was not getting the truth.

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Therefore he was not telling the American people the truth either,

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>And thus far in reviewing those Afghanistan papers, what's been

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>the most remarkable thing that you've been that you found?

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.959
<v Speaker 1>You know? But I have to say, these are a

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of the same people, and I'm going to have

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a piece on this later in the week as well.

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>These are the very same people who have been criticizing

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump since he first announced he was running for president.

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 1>And I hate to make everything about Trump, but he

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 1>is such a good clarifying figure. So a lot of

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>these same former diplomats and national security officials, state Department

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 1>officials who've been high critical of Donald Trump and his

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of ad hoc approach to foreign policy and diplomacy.

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>These are the same people who have been misleading US,

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.919
<v Speaker 1>who now admit they really didn't know what was happening

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>in Afghanistan. They really didn't know how to fix the

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>problems that they had helped perpetuate, and now we're still

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 1>in this disastrous war. I mean, we had two US

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>soldiers killed earlier this month. We had twenty three kills

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in the country last year, not that anyone in Washington

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is paying attention. And so you really see this permanent

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>ruling class in Washington at every level just really doesn't

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>know what they're doing. Yeah, one of the things that

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>struck me in reviewing in great detail the General Flynn interview,

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>was he basically showed that there is rampant policization, as

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned of intelligence, there's out and out corruption in

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>terms of the billions of dollars and ultimately trillions of

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars that were poured into Afghanistan and where it all went.

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the other aspect which is uncomfortable to discuss,

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>which is the fact that the bureaucracies themselves, like any bureaucracy,

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>has vested interest in growing bigger, in claiming issues where

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>they may not be there necessarily, or in basically defining

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:23.679
<v Speaker 1>a mandate which demands then greater and greater funds, because

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>every government agency and every bureaucracy period is subject to

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>those kind of pressures, and bureaucracies don't shrink themselves, they

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>only expand. What did you make of his interview generally,

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he was extremely candid in what he told

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the interviewers, and he addressed all the topics you just said,

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the corruption, the opiate industry that we've also poured billions

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:54.719
<v Speaker 1>into trying to help Afghanistan's production of olbiit and destroy

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>their poppy fields. That's been a complete disaster. And so

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>he really touched on the intelligence, the ongoing corruption, the

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>failure to address all of the other rampant problems there,

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and the notion that he alerted top officials about this,

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and so, just to give people the timeline, so this

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>would have been between twenty twelve and twenty fourteen when

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>he was sounding the alarm. And he basically says in

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the interview in one passage, if we're if everything seems

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to be going so great, why does it feel like

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.199
<v Speaker 1>we're losing? And he was not just telling, and he

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>also was testifying. I couldn't get a copy of it.

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was behind closed doors to the Homeland

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Security Committee in twenty fifteen about this issue too, and

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>so he you know, so the Obama people were aware

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Mike Flynn was making this public to lawmakers on Capitol

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Hill and also to the press. So they viewed him

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>as a problem. And as I wrote in my first piece,

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>he really was essentially a whistleblower, and at a very

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>precarious time. So this would have been, you know, around

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve, twenty thirteen, twenty fourteen, the surge was over,

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>they were bringing troops home, the situation was deteriorating. Joe

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Biden and Barack Obama were trying to make this sound

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:23.880
<v Speaker 1>like a success, but it was not, and for many reasons.

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And so now we know it's, you know, in worse

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 1>condition than when Obama and Biden left it, and another

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>mess for Donald Trump to try to clean up. Yeah,

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.919
<v Speaker 1>it bears emphasizing the point that you made about General

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Flynn being a true, true whistleblower, and you wrote a

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>column about this, which is what drew my attention to

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Flynn's interview. I wasn't even aware that it was in

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.959
<v Speaker 1>those archives in the first place. He was a whistleblower,

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>and he paid the real price for it, first in

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the Obama administration and then subsequently for a short lived

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 1>time in the Trump administration. So he should be the

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>one that's really held up as the blower, not the

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 1>so called whistleblower that's at the core of a you know,

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 1>a sham of an impeachment process who will probably never testify.

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>It seems no, no, he won't. He's been protected and

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>heralded as a hero and a martyr, and so we

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>never have to hear from him. Meanwhile, Mike Flynn's life

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>is destroyed. Obama's FBI under Jim Callmey, as we know

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>know opened up an investigation into Mike Flynn. The targeting

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of Mike Flynn actually preceded any of that. It really

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>started in twenty fourteen. So now you know, we see

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the unequal fates of two whistleblowers. Well, why aren't the

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Afghanistan papers in your view, given that it's living history,

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it remains relevant and there has never been a lessons learned,

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it seems, either in the executive branch or the legislative

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>branch on this issue. Why aren't they getting more attention? Well,

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a few reasons. One, the Washington Poet

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>published this series in the beginning of December, so it

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>was buried amid the impeachment drama and also the Michael

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Horrowitz report advisor abuse. So I think that that was

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>part of it. And obviously, you know, official Washington does

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>not want to bring attention to the documents and interviews

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>contained in that exposed a so they are willfully ignoring it.

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's part of this distraction. Now with

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:31.479
<v Speaker 1>what Donald Trump allegedly said to military officials in twenty

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>seventeen about the war, and these were excerpts from a

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>book that were published in The Washington Post, the same

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>paper that's published the Afghanistan Papers. So this almost seems

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>like a little bit of a cover up for what

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, these officials are now being exposed as having done.

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>There's not one person to blame as far as the

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Afghanistan War. I mean, this runs over three administrations and

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands of officials, so there's not one person

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to really target here. Although I do have a piece

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>up tomorrow about Joe Biden. We can talk a little

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>bit about that. He's now trying to rewrite history. Big

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>surprise about his role in Afghanistan from the very beginning

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one, you know, up to the present date.

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>And so it's unfortunate, and that's why we are trying

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to cover the papers a little bit more to bring

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>more attention, because it really has been buried since you've

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>given us that little tease about Joe Biden. We'll pick

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it up on the other side of a short break.

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>This has Ben Weegarden in for Buck Sex and on

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>The Buck Sexton Show more with Julia Kelly. Just after this,

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Show podcast. Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. This

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is Ben Weegarden in for Buck Sexton, and we've been

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>talking with Julie Kelly, a senior contributor to American Greatness

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>about the Afghanistan papers. I think Julia just made an

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>excellent point that bears repeating, which is that there is

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>no one person to whom we should point a finger

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>at with respect to the morass. And frankly, the failure

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>called a success repeatedly for almost two decades of Afghanistan.

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>The fact that it has transcended administrations, secretaries of defense,

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>all manner of generals, folks at every level of government,

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and in the military as well, and that we've ended

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 1>up in this situation. I think if anything speaks to

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a much more pervasive problem, it would be even better.

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>It would be a much better situation if you could

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>actually point fingers and there would be lessons learned that

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>only implicated a few people, and we could make corrective

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 1>action going forward. But the fact is that it transcends

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>party year generation. That speaks to a serious failure that

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>we have currently in our government and in our ability

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to execute wars to the extent we should be executing

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the wars that we're entering in the first place. But

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring back Julie specifically to talk about

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>something that is coming in a fourth coming calm, I believe.

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And that is how Joe Biden is implicated in all

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>things Afghanistan. So Julie, take it away. So Ben, You'd

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>be hard pressed to find a politician in Washington who

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 1>has his fingerprints more on the Afghanistan War than Joe Biden. Right. So,

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 1>he has been a Senator since the nineteen seventies. He

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>was chairman and then ranking member of the Foreign Relations Committee.

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>He voted to approve the authorization for the war in

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one. In two thousand and two, he

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>helped co author legislation that authorized this rebuilding effort that

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 1>now has cost over one hundred and thirty billion dollars

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>more than the Marshall Plan, if you can believe in

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>current dollars. And interestingly, in two thousand and seven, when

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>he was running against Barack Obama, Joe Biden wanted a

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>new surge of troops, a new influx of troops. He

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>called it a surge into Afghanistan, redirecting troops from Iraq

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>into Afghanistan. Now he's on a campaign trail claiming that

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>he opposed the surge, which there's some details about that

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that he's kind of right but mostly wrong, because he

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>did he did support a search, just not to the

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>degree that the generals wanted and that Obama eventually settled on.

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>So again we're getting half truths from Joe Biden. And

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I detailed this in a column tomorrow from Joe Biden

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>might qualify as successful. And when you consider his whole

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>record and foreign policy and national security, I mean, I

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's almost safe to say that his only success

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>when it come with any implications for foreign policy, is

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>enriching his family members. Is that accurate? I think that

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that's probably true, and I think that that was his interest.

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it would be interesting for somebody to

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>go back in detail how anyone profited off of his

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>continued support of reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan, because he was

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>an early champion of this, and so I'm sure that

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>there's I'm sure there's some Biden family members who have

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 1>profited off of that too. But look now he's promising

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to end the warren Afghanistan. Think about this, then, if

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden somehow miraculously takes the White House when he

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>is sworn in if Donald Trump does not bring all

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of our troops home. If Joe Biden is sworn in,

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 1>he will inherit a war that he helped start two

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 1>decades ago that he has perpetuated, that he has approved.

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 1>His fingerprints are on every aspect of the Afghanistan War

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 1>since the beginning. But now he's allowed to, of course,

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:42.360
<v Speaker 1>rewrite history and back away from his involvement. And he

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be, especially in light of these reports that we have.

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, it would be great for someone to challenge

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden on the Mike Flynn interview and what he

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>knew about intelligence. I mean, he brags all the time

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 1>how he is, you know, Barack Obama's foreign policy whisper. Well,

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>what did he Oh? I'm sure that he would challenge

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the person asking that question to a push up contest

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and that would be the end of it. He'd say, Hey, look, Jack,

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you know that's not true. Jack, come on, man, talk

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 1>about the facts. His favorite pivot. We've got about under

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 1>a minute left. I did want to touch on one

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>more piece that you wrote recently related to this, and

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that concerns ice IG corruption. That is, the Intelligence Community

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Inspector General who's implicated in the whistleblower that the quote

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>unquote whistleblower that we talked about before and bringing his

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>case forth tell us a little about that. So here's

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the guy at the center. This is the one transcript

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that Adam Schiff won't release, and this is the transcript

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>closed or testimony of Michael Atkinson, who's the Intelligence Community

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>inspector general who kind of helped launch this latest impeachment crusade.

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>He handled the complaint the whistleblower I use scare quotes

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>whistleblower complaint. He told Congress that it was a matter

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>of urging concern, tried to go over his body, his

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>head and bring attention to this. Michael Atkinson is closely

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:07.720
<v Speaker 1>tied to many of the key figures in the Russia

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Gate scandal. He worked directly for the head of the

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 1>National Security Division, which was in charge of handling Carter

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Page's FAIZA. He was the chief counsel for Mary McCord,

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>who was the head of that division, who also oversaw

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the Russian collusion bogus Russia collusion investigation, and he worked

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>for her for months. He stayed in that agency until

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 1>he was inexplicably approved by the Republican Senate to serve

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>as the watchdog for an intelligence community that's been trying

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to destroy Donald Trump from the beginning. Anyway, my point,

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's in my piece, is that Senate Republicans are smart.

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a big if. Their very first witness, in my opinion,

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 1>should be Michael Atkinson asked him about his role in

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Russia Gate from the beginning from July twenty sixteen, when

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>all of this really started happening, until he left at

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of twenty seventeen. Here and we're gonna have

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to leave it right there. Joy, Thank you so much

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>for coming on the program. This Ben one Garden in

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>for Buck Sex and on the Buck Sexton Show back

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 1>just after this. Thanks for listening to the bus Sex

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcast, the iHeartRadio app,

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome back to the

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton Show. This is Ben Weegarten in for Bucks Sexton.

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>And although I hate talking about this topic impeachment, obviously

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we're rolling right into it. This week is where it

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>really takes off in the Senate, and there was some

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:37.879
<v Speaker 1>substantial developments over the weekend with the Democrats putting out

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a brief explaining making their case for why Trump must

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 1>be removed from office, even though they know they can't

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>get the two thirds in the Senate. It's pretty funny actually,

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:52.399
<v Speaker 1>if you look at some of what they discuss in

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>their brief. They say, they tell other senators follow the

0:37:57.080 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>constitution and rise above partisan differences. As you hear the case,

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:04.800
<v Speaker 1>president Trump abused the power of his office to solicit

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 1>foreign interference in our elections for his own personal political gain,

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>thereby jeopardizing our national security, the integrity of our elections,

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:16.399
<v Speaker 1>and our democracy. The impeachment manager said in a statement, So,

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you want senators to rise above partisan differences and follow

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the constitution, but you are putting forth an entirely partisan

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 1>impeachment process where you had Democrats in the House either

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of staying or switch parties altogether. But you want senators

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to rise above what does that mean? They want senators

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to turn their backs and stab stab their voters in

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the back, basically is what they're asking for senators to do. Really,

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:42.799
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know this is just a charade to

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:45.279
<v Speaker 1>try to throw as many things as against the wall

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>as possible while taking those going against for example, Joe

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Biden off the campaign trail in the Senate as a

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>means of trying to inflict maximum political punishment rolling into

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty election. So then the White House put

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 1>out a short concise, I think, pretty strong defense, and

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 1>they say the articles of impeachment violate the Constitution. They

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 1>are defective in their entirety. They're the product of invalid

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 1>proceedings that flagrantly denied the president any due process rights.

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 1>They rest on dangerous distortions of the Constitution that would

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 1>do lasting damage to our structure of government. And then

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it goes on to say that in the first article

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of the House attempts to seize the president's power on

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Article two of the Constitution to determine foreign policy. This

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is the abuse of power quote article. In the second article,

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 1>this is the obstruction of Congress. None of these are

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:39.879
<v Speaker 1>high crimes defined as high crimes and misdemeanors, or any

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:42.879
<v Speaker 1>of the other actual crimes stated in the impeachment quause

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Constitution. Of course, in the second article, the

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:47.360
<v Speaker 1>House attempts to control and penalize the assertion of the

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:51.319
<v Speaker 1>executive branches constitutional privileges while simultaneously seeking to destroy the

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Framers system of checks and balances. By approving the article,

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:57.319
<v Speaker 1>is the House violate our constitutional order, legally abused its

0:39:57.360 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>power of impeachment and attempted to obstruct President Trump's ability

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to faithfully execute the duties of his office. They sell

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to undermine his authority under Article two of the Constitution,

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>which vest the entirety of the executive power in a

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 1>president of the United States of America, in order to

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 1>presume and I think this is, by the way, the

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 1>most important paragraph and the whole thing, in order to

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 1>preserve our constitutional structure of government, to reject the poisonous

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>partisanship that the Framers warned against, and by the way,

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 1>many of the House Democrats who were there during the

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Quinton impeachment warned against. To ensure one party political impeachment

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 1>vendettas did not become the new normal, and to vindicate

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the will of the American people, the Senate must reject

0:40:35.920 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 1>both articles of impeachment. In the end, this entire process

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is nothing more than a dangerous attack on the American

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>people themselves and their fundamental right to vote. And that's true.

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 1>And again, what drives me nuts about this whole thing

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 1>is that this even has to be written. There shouldn't

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:54.879
<v Speaker 1>have to be a brief because the whole process is illegitimate.

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>The process is illegitimate, the substance is illegitimate. It's a joke.

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 1>And it pains me that Republicans are being forced to

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>play defense by Democrats rules when Democrats don't control the Presidency,

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 1>and they don't control the Senate either, And that is why,

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 1>as I said last week, it is so imperative that

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Mitch McConnell and the other Republicans step up and fight

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats just as hard as the Democrats are fighting them,

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 1>whether they realize it's an attack on themselves or not.

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:28.880
<v Speaker 1>If for no other reason, then protect the institutions, whatever

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>reason you have to find to muster the defense that

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the President deserves, the American people deserve, the Constitution deserves

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:41.240
<v Speaker 1>against an anti constitutional, poetical adversary. So there was news

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 1>that Mitch McConnell has built in a kill switch in

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the rules governing the impeachment, and you always, the devil

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:50.360
<v Speaker 1>is always in the details in a process like this,

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 1>And as I've said, McConnell knows all the different kind

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of parliamentary procedures, how you can phrase the language properly

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:01.839
<v Speaker 1>to fight the Democrats with the same fervor that they're

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:08.560
<v Speaker 1>fighting the President and the Republicans. So he supposedly inserted

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 1>this kill switch. What does that mean? There's a measure.

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 1>According to Senator Josh Holly, Republican from Missouri who has

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>been very good on impeachment and many other issues for

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that matter, a freshman senator who emerged as a top

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:28.360
<v Speaker 1>eye of the president, had previously drafted a measure dismissing

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the charges if the House did not formally transmit them

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:33.360
<v Speaker 1>by changing Senate rules to do so. He said that

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the rules package for the impeachment trial includes a measure

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that allows for the president's legal team to quickly push

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 1>for a summary judgment or dismissal at any time should

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:47.759
<v Speaker 1>things get wild. The way Hally describes it himself is

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 1>my understandings that the resolution will give the president's team

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:52.839
<v Speaker 1>the option to either move to judgment or to move

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to dismiss at a meaningful time. And it's sad that

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:58.919
<v Speaker 1>it's come to this because we couldn't get enough Republicans

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to dismiss the thing general. Now instead we have to

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in some sense legitimize a charade, and that is what

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:09.279
<v Speaker 1>really sticks in My craw about this whole issue is

0:43:09.320 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that if it's illegitimate, the fact that we put all

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 1>these constitutional niceties on it, these bells and whistles, and

0:43:15.600 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>we're treating some we're treating an adversary who wants to

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>kill us, as if they're operating in some form of

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:29.360
<v Speaker 1>good faith. And that's why it's not just about dismissing

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>or acquitting. It should be about punishing Democrats for putting

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 1>this thing forth in the first place. And again, sort

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of like with Hillary Clinton, how she was never actually

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 1>brought to real justice. The only justice was her losing

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the American people putting Donald Trump in the Oval office.

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:49.360
<v Speaker 1>It's the same thing in twenty twenty. I have a

0:43:49.360 --> 0:43:51.319
<v Speaker 1>feeling that we're going to be the only ones that

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 1>have a say in terms of whether Democrats really pay

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a price for this fraud that they've been foisting on

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the American people. Another illustration of the fraudulent, the whole

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:13.360
<v Speaker 1>fraudulent tenor of this quote unquote impeachment non impeachment, and

0:44:13.400 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 1>this is from Jonathan Turley, again a civil libertarian on

0:44:16.560 --> 0:44:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the left. He wrote a little post on Gerald Nadwer,

0:44:21.200 --> 0:44:25.239
<v Speaker 1>House Judiciary Chair. Complete phony in this by the way.

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I wrote about this right after the mid term elections

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 1>when he was on a train ride back from New

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:32.720
<v Speaker 1>York and Molly hamming Away, of my colleague at the Federalists,

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 1>reported that she just happened to be sitting in the

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 1>train car behind him where he announced basically that they

0:44:38.040 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 1>were going to be doing impeachment, and a bunch of

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 1>calls to supposedly private cause should have been private cause,

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:47.960
<v Speaker 1>no discretion, I guess from nadwer were he telegraphed that

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 1>this is the way that we were going into impeachment.

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And I wrote after that about some video that if

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 1>anyone go on c SPAN, take a look at the

0:44:57.560 --> 0:45:01.879
<v Speaker 1>impeachment proceedings during Quentin nat were made the most rigorous

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:05.919
<v Speaker 1>defense you could ever have for President Donald Trump. Never

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 1>have it. You should never have a partisan impeachment. It

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 1>should never be one sided. It's a disaster for the

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:12.880
<v Speaker 1>American people, it's a disaster for the constitution, it's a

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 1>disaster for liberty. Showing himself to be a complete hypocrite

0:45:18.320 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 1>now and so Turley talks about the fact that Nader

0:45:22.239 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want Hunter Biden to be called as a witness.

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:33.799
<v Speaker 1>He says there will be no trades of witnesses. Well,

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:41.799
<v Speaker 1>here's what Turley says, if true, that nadver will not

0:45:41.920 --> 0:45:47.279
<v Speaker 1>do this trade of witnesses if Hunter Biden is a

0:45:47.320 --> 0:45:49.799
<v Speaker 1>part of the deal, witnesses to be called during the

0:45:49.880 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Senate trial. So if Democrats get to call John Bolton,

0:45:53.520 --> 0:45:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Republicans get to call Hunter Biden. If true, is the

0:45:57.440 --> 0:46:00.239
<v Speaker 1>House prepared to give up on proving its case to

0:46:00.360 --> 0:46:04.880
<v Speaker 1>protect the Bidens from the ignoble moment of answering questions

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:08.840
<v Speaker 1>about the Ukraine contract. That is a considerable price to

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 1>pay to protect Joe Biden. It's also another reason why

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the decision to rushed impeachment vote was such a historic

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 1>blunder by Speaker Pelosi. They waited a couple of months,

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 1>They could have called these witnesses and not handed over

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:22.320
<v Speaker 1>control of the Senate. Instead, they impeached by Christmas and

0:46:22.320 --> 0:46:24.400
<v Speaker 1>then waited a month. So why would they do that?

0:46:24.840 --> 0:46:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Was that a blunder a tactical blunder by Pelosi and

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:34.319
<v Speaker 1>her colleagues. Well, again, I think it points to a

0:46:34.320 --> 0:46:42.080
<v Speaker 1>motive potentially for or pretext a justification for taking off

0:46:42.120 --> 0:46:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the fields Joe Biden's competitors. If you looked at impeachment

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:52.959
<v Speaker 1>purely through a Biden prism, his competition has been taken

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:55.560
<v Speaker 1>off the playing field. If this trial goes for weeks

0:46:55.560 --> 0:47:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and weeks number one and then number two, Biden unethical behavior,

0:47:01.920 --> 0:47:05.719
<v Speaker 1>real quid pro quo, real bribery is at the heart

0:47:05.760 --> 0:47:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of the whole impeachment sham. So is the impeachment sham,

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:13.799
<v Speaker 1>like the more Special Council, in effect, another cover up

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>more special council tied up a bunch of loose ends

0:47:20.440 --> 0:47:24.320
<v Speaker 1>with respect to misconduct on the government side in pursuing Trump.

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Is this again Democrat attempt to obstruct misconduct on their

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:36.360
<v Speaker 1>side with Biden because qui quid pro quo and bribery

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:39.439
<v Speaker 1>which Democrats would no longer apply to President Trump because

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 1>they know that it's not there and they know that

0:47:41.680 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't fit their impeachment article. Is when they pull tests,

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, what are the words that work? Could it

0:47:50.239 --> 0:47:52.800
<v Speaker 1>once again be that they engaged in the very behavior

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:55.239
<v Speaker 1>that they accused Trump and Republicans of? And could it

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:56.960
<v Speaker 1>be once again that they are trying to cover up

0:47:57.040 --> 0:48:04.239
<v Speaker 1>that malfeasance by claiming malfeasance on the other side. Urge

0:48:04.280 --> 0:48:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you to read by the way Peter Schweitzer's column on

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:12.880
<v Speaker 1>how five Biden family members have all profited handsomely during

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:15.920
<v Speaker 1>his time in office, sometimes directly and other times indirectly

0:48:15.960 --> 0:48:18.839
<v Speaker 1>related to the positions senior level positions that he's held

0:48:19.080 --> 0:48:24.440
<v Speaker 1>for decades and decades, and then I'll leave it with this.

0:48:24.520 --> 0:48:27.399
<v Speaker 1>On the impeachment subject, Byron York also wrote a great

0:48:27.440 --> 0:48:31.080
<v Speaker 1>column where he talks about two of the deceptions at

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:35.399
<v Speaker 1>the heart of the brief that the Democrats put forth

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 1>explaining why it is imperative that we must remove the

0:48:38.200 --> 0:48:42.960
<v Speaker 1>president today even though they have no case, and they

0:48:42.960 --> 0:48:45.960
<v Speaker 1>say for protecting the integrity of the current presidential race

0:48:46.000 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 1>since last time he got help from Russia and he

0:48:48.080 --> 0:48:52.279
<v Speaker 1>accepted it. Read York's column, I urge you to read it.

0:48:52.360 --> 0:48:54.839
<v Speaker 1>He talks about these two deceptions, one of them being

0:48:54.880 --> 0:48:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that Trump wanted Ukraine to investigate quote unquote a debunked

0:48:57.719 --> 0:49:00.399
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theory that Russia did not interfere in the twenty

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 1>sixteen presidential election to aid President Trump, but instead of

0:49:03.200 --> 0:49:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine interfered in that election to aid President Trumps opponent

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton. Okay, I would question that assertion York gives

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:17.760
<v Speaker 1>them concedes the fact that effectively Russia was solely trying

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to aid President Trump. I mean it doesn't say solely

0:49:20.280 --> 0:49:23.160
<v Speaker 1>in their quote, but trying to aid President Trump, when

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in reality, Russia was trying to sow discord. And if

0:49:25.480 --> 0:49:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you look at it, they paid for ads for a

0:49:27.239 --> 0:49:30.359
<v Speaker 1>bunch of candidates, not just President Trump, including Democrats. But

0:49:30.560 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 1>weave that aside for the sake of argument. There's never

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:39.840
<v Speaker 1>been an argument that Ukraine interfered to help Hillary Clinton

0:49:40.120 --> 0:49:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and not know Russia involvement. That's a flat out lie.

0:49:43.760 --> 0:49:45.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's York's first points, which was a very good point,

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:49.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's very clear that there's absolutely evidence out there

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:51.719
<v Speaker 1>of Ukrainian officials who did not want Trump to win

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and put out words to records to that effect, including

0:49:54.600 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I believe the New York Times reporting on this thrown

0:49:59.640 --> 0:50:04.279
<v Speaker 1>under the rug now shoved under the rug. And then

0:50:04.320 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the other part is about asking Russia for help when obviously,

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:12.080
<v Speaker 1>as you know, Trump welcomed Russian election interference. Was not

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:14.800
<v Speaker 1>what Trump did, he said release the emails. It was

0:50:14.840 --> 0:50:19.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously in jest in a context of a much broader narrative.

0:50:21.480 --> 0:50:24.200
<v Speaker 1>So what York argues that it's totally misleading to say

0:50:24.239 --> 0:50:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that that was genuinely asking for Russian help and Russian

0:50:26.640 --> 0:50:32.400
<v Speaker 1>interference in the election. As he writes, Trump did in

0:50:32.440 --> 0:50:35.280
<v Speaker 1>fact welcome Russia based weeks, but grossly out of context.

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:38.799
<v Speaker 1>The context is this Trump welcome Russia based weeks about

0:50:38.800 --> 0:50:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the Quinton campaign because the media were enthusiastically embracing and

0:50:42.160 --> 0:50:46.400
<v Speaker 1>repeating Russian based weeks about the Quintin campaign print, Internet TV.

0:50:46.600 --> 0:50:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Everyone was accepting, repeating and amplifying the material release by

0:50:50.000 --> 0:50:52.600
<v Speaker 1>wiki weeks from the Russian hack of top Quinton campaign

0:50:52.640 --> 0:50:55.239
<v Speaker 1>official John Podesta, and then he runs through a bunch

0:50:55.280 --> 0:50:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of articles talking about this as well. It's just representative

0:50:59.280 --> 0:51:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that these two assertions would be at the

0:51:02.040 --> 0:51:05.200
<v Speaker 1>heart of the Democrats brief It's just so representative of

0:51:05.200 --> 0:51:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this whole thing is a sham. It's

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a joke, and that's why it should be treated as such.

0:51:09.760 --> 0:51:12.400
<v Speaker 1>It should be taken seriously from the perspective Democrats are

0:51:12.400 --> 0:51:14.160
<v Speaker 1>going to fight tooth and nail and claw and do

0:51:14.280 --> 0:51:17.400
<v Speaker 1>everything they possibly can to extract as much blood as

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:20.960
<v Speaker 1>they possibly can from this process. But it is a

0:51:21.040 --> 0:51:23.640
<v Speaker 1>joke on the merits and it should be treated as

0:51:23.680 --> 0:51:28.359
<v Speaker 1>such by us certain way. It's a serious attack on us,

0:51:28.800 --> 0:51:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party, the president, representative of the forgotten man

0:51:32.760 --> 0:51:36.680
<v Speaker 1>in this country. But the way that it's being handled

0:51:36.800 --> 0:51:40.160
<v Speaker 1>exposes the nature of our opponent and they cannot be

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:42.120
<v Speaker 1>dealt with is if we're fighting on an even playing

0:51:42.120 --> 0:51:45.440
<v Speaker 1>fielder here for them, it's always the ends justify the means.

0:51:45.880 --> 0:51:48.520
<v Speaker 1>We need to take that deathly seriously. This has been

0:51:48.560 --> 0:51:50.480
<v Speaker 1>one going in for Buck Sexon on the Buck Sexton Show.

0:51:50.560 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Back just after this, you're in. This is the Buck

0:51:56.640 --> 0:52:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Show podcast. Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show.

0:52:03.120 --> 0:52:06.640
<v Speaker 1>This has Ben Weingarten in for Buck Sexton. I want

0:52:06.640 --> 0:52:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to turn from domestic developments to international developments, and on

0:52:12.600 --> 0:52:15.120
<v Speaker 1>this show, I like to talk about China as the

0:52:15.160 --> 0:52:17.719
<v Speaker 1>main focus on the national security and foreign policy side,

0:52:17.719 --> 0:52:21.000
<v Speaker 1>because we should never lose track of it. Number one,

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:24.800
<v Speaker 1>number two. Much of the main news stories that the

0:52:24.800 --> 0:52:27.560
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media is going to focus on are only seeing

0:52:27.640 --> 0:52:30.879
<v Speaker 1>through the Trump focus prism. Number one and number two

0:52:30.960 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 1>missed the context of just how substantial this reorientation in

0:52:35.280 --> 0:52:38.560
<v Speaker 1>US national security and foreign policy is towards viewing China

0:52:38.640 --> 0:52:42.480
<v Speaker 1>as the number one international threat to our liberty. That

0:52:42.640 --> 0:52:46.319
<v Speaker 1>is the essential story. It shouldn't be lost in the

0:52:46.360 --> 0:52:50.560
<v Speaker 1>fog of a disinformation war that the left has created

0:52:50.840 --> 0:52:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and propagated through their communications arm in the media. And

0:52:55.680 --> 0:52:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in just a couple of minutes we're going to bring

0:52:57.080 --> 0:52:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on someone who is, in my view, one of the

0:52:59.800 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 1>best China experts and very focused on Taiwan in particular.

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:06.160
<v Speaker 1>But I do think again it pays to level set

0:53:06.200 --> 0:53:09.359
<v Speaker 1>always with what is the nature of this regime? And

0:53:09.640 --> 0:53:11.759
<v Speaker 1>last week I talked about some of the brutal human

0:53:11.840 --> 0:53:15.960
<v Speaker 1>rights abuses, the tyrannical totalitarian nature of the Chinese Communist

0:53:15.960 --> 0:53:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Party that controls every entity in China and then seeks

0:53:20.000 --> 0:53:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to control dissenters abroad and suppress them as well. There's

0:53:23.960 --> 0:53:26.399
<v Speaker 1>an article I really I urge you to read it

0:53:26.480 --> 0:53:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in its entirety because it is chilling and it should

0:53:30.880 --> 0:53:37.080
<v Speaker 1>underscore just how serious this threat is emerging and coming

0:53:37.120 --> 0:53:41.800
<v Speaker 1>on fast. There's an article in The Diplomat titled Exporting

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:45.840
<v Speaker 1>China's Social Credit System to Central Asia and the subtitle

0:53:46.040 --> 0:53:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is Beijing building a cross border social engineering system, one

0:53:49.040 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 1>software solution at a time. Now, you know, this social

0:53:52.680 --> 0:53:57.640
<v Speaker 1>credit system is basically where China collects intelligence, monitors, tracks

0:53:57.680 --> 0:54:00.640
<v Speaker 1>all of their citizens and assigns them a score based

0:54:00.719 --> 0:54:04.720
<v Speaker 1>upon effectively how closely do they adhere to the Chinese

0:54:04.719 --> 0:54:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party line and the aims of the states. And

0:54:07.120 --> 0:54:10.120
<v Speaker 1>if you don't, you pay all sorts of penalties, including

0:54:10.200 --> 0:54:13.600
<v Speaker 1>not being able to take flights outside the country. It

0:54:13.640 --> 0:54:16.600
<v Speaker 1>could impact your actual credit score, your ability to get

0:54:16.640 --> 0:54:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a mortgage. There every aspect of your life under a

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:26.360
<v Speaker 1>microscope of the Chinese Communist Party. So here are a

0:54:26.440 --> 0:54:29.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of the anecdotes about that. By September twenty eighteen,

0:54:29.239 --> 0:54:32.920
<v Speaker 1>fourteen point six million untrustworthy Chinese nationalists were banned from

0:54:32.960 --> 0:54:35.360
<v Speaker 1>buying plane tickets. By December twenty eighteen, three and a

0:54:35.400 --> 0:54:39.040
<v Speaker 1>half million Chinese nationals have reversed their untrustworthy status through

0:54:39.120 --> 0:54:41.279
<v Speaker 1>various forms of community service, so they came in line

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:45.560
<v Speaker 1>with the party. Many Chinese nationals have quickly adapted to

0:54:45.600 --> 0:54:47.760
<v Speaker 1>this new way of discipline. It works, and now China's

0:54:47.760 --> 0:54:50.400
<v Speaker 1>handing out a system to its neighbors, and that's the problem,

0:54:50.400 --> 0:54:51.880
<v Speaker 1>by the way, for us and the rest of the world.

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:54.480
<v Speaker 1>So this article goes into all these other countries that

0:54:54.520 --> 0:54:58.240
<v Speaker 1>have been consulting with China in its near and further

0:54:58.320 --> 0:55:03.400
<v Speaker 1>abroad about implementing this sort of system. Theirself to judge

0:55:03.400 --> 0:55:07.160
<v Speaker 1>their own citizens. And who runs those systems operates four

0:55:07.160 --> 0:55:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of them. Where's the software coming from in the hardware, Oh,

0:55:09.680 --> 0:55:13.680
<v Speaker 1>comes from China. Can you imagine what China can do

0:55:13.760 --> 0:55:18.759
<v Speaker 1>with that information, that power, and that control. When they

0:55:18.760 --> 0:55:21.160
<v Speaker 1>say you are the product and China's offering this free

0:55:21.200 --> 0:55:24.839
<v Speaker 1>in many instances, you really are the product. Here take

0:55:24.880 --> 0:55:26.759
<v Speaker 1>a short break. This has been one for Buck Sex

0:55:26.800 --> 0:55:28.640
<v Speaker 1>on the Buck Sex and Show. More on China just

0:55:28.719 --> 0:55:32.239
<v Speaker 1>after this. Thanks for listening to the bus Sex and

0:55:32.320 --> 0:55:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,

0:55:37.239 --> 0:55:40.920
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome back to the

0:55:40.960 --> 0:55:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sex and Show. This is Ben Weingarten in for

0:55:44.080 --> 0:55:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton, and before the break, I was talking a

0:55:46.719 --> 0:55:50.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit about China's social credit system, one of the

0:55:50.080 --> 0:55:53.760
<v Speaker 1>most Orwellian advents that we've seen in the twenty first century,

0:55:54.200 --> 0:55:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and they're exporting of that system abroad. And it speaks

0:55:57.960 --> 0:56:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to a more fundamental issue, which is at China does

0:56:01.560 --> 0:56:04.279
<v Speaker 1>not and the Chinese Communist Party itself does not just

0:56:04.320 --> 0:56:09.120
<v Speaker 1>desire to obviously dominate its own mainland, but it has expansionist,

0:56:09.520 --> 0:56:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you could argue imperialist ambitions as well, and one of

0:56:13.480 --> 0:56:18.400
<v Speaker 1>those imperialist ambitions concerns Taiwan. Here to join me to

0:56:18.440 --> 0:56:21.360
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about recent developments in Taiwan and

0:56:21.480 --> 0:56:24.160
<v Speaker 1>this theme that I just mentioned is former Deputy National

0:56:24.200 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Security Advisor to the Vice President, Dick Cheney and CEO

0:56:27.640 --> 0:56:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of consulting firm DC International Advisory, Steve. Thanks so much

0:56:31.640 --> 0:56:36.240
<v Speaker 1>for coming on the program. My pleasure. Happy to join. So, Steve,

0:56:36.320 --> 0:56:40.759
<v Speaker 1>you were recently in Taiwan for their elections, which was

0:56:41.000 --> 0:56:44.680
<v Speaker 1>resulted and I believe a resounding victory for the DPP

0:56:45.640 --> 0:56:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Progressive Party. First of all, why should Americans care

0:56:50.320 --> 0:56:55.400
<v Speaker 1>about what just went down in Taiwan. Well, Americans should

0:56:55.400 --> 0:56:59.719
<v Speaker 1>care because, first and foremost, this is the only democracy

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:04.720
<v Speaker 1>on the planet that the establishment deep state folks in Washington,

0:57:04.800 --> 0:57:09.480
<v Speaker 1>DC have convinced the US government to help isolate and ignore,

0:57:10.080 --> 0:57:14.120
<v Speaker 1>so we don't give them diplomatic relations. We've sent former

0:57:14.200 --> 0:57:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Secretaries and State when they were in office to negotiate

0:57:17.800 --> 0:57:21.680
<v Speaker 1>with the likes of the Iranians. We've established diplomatic relations

0:57:21.680 --> 0:57:24.840
<v Speaker 1>with Cuba, but somehow this self governing, free and democratic

0:57:24.880 --> 0:57:28.440
<v Speaker 1>island we've been complicit in isolating. So first and foremost,

0:57:28.440 --> 0:57:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I think as Americans, we should want to fix this mistake.

0:57:32.360 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 1>But second, the Communist Party of China has taken on

0:57:36.280 --> 0:57:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a very aggressive kind of all options on the table

0:57:40.400 --> 0:57:44.600
<v Speaker 1>approach to influence operations, in other words, trying to shape

0:57:45.000 --> 0:57:49.480
<v Speaker 1>politics and national security decision making in many parts around

0:57:49.480 --> 0:57:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the world to their favor. Their right to try, but

0:57:53.720 --> 0:57:56.240
<v Speaker 1>we have been slow in the free world to wake

0:57:56.320 --> 0:58:00.200
<v Speaker 1>up to this challenge. Taiwan is by far per but

0:58:00.280 --> 0:58:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of the most attacked territory on the planet by the

0:58:03.360 --> 0:58:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party of China in these ways, and so watching

0:58:06.920 --> 0:58:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the democracy of Taiwan and action is a good lesson

0:58:10.880 --> 0:58:13.920
<v Speaker 1>for us to basically be smarter about what we do

0:58:14.040 --> 0:58:16.560
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States and how to bolster our

0:58:16.600 --> 0:58:21.200
<v Speaker 1>allies to keep the pressure on the Chinese Communist Party

0:58:21.240 --> 0:58:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in Asia so they can't place so much on our

0:58:23.880 --> 0:58:28.520
<v Speaker 1>own turf. And I mentioned the Democratic Progressive Party their

0:58:28.560 --> 0:58:32.360
<v Speaker 1>president remaining in power and it being really a resounding

0:58:32.440 --> 0:58:36.040
<v Speaker 1>victory in contrast to the party that is viewed as

0:58:36.400 --> 0:58:40.720
<v Speaker 1>more aligned with the Chinese Communist Party and open amenable

0:58:40.840 --> 0:58:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to some form of a reunification. What were your takeaways

0:58:45.520 --> 0:58:48.919
<v Speaker 1>from the recent election. Well, I think the Communist Party

0:58:48.920 --> 0:58:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of China was on the ballot in this Taiwan election.

0:58:52.200 --> 0:58:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I take nothing away from President taining One, who did

0:58:55.560 --> 0:58:59.360
<v Speaker 1>indeed win a resounding reelection, but there are a couple

0:58:59.400 --> 0:59:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of unusual well things that happened. In most developed democracies,

0:59:04.480 --> 0:59:08.400
<v Speaker 1>we have polling that shows the youth vote going strongly

0:59:08.520 --> 0:59:11.400
<v Speaker 1>one way or another when it comes to their candidate

0:59:11.440 --> 0:59:14.800
<v Speaker 1>preference or party preference, but then they don't tend to

0:59:14.840 --> 0:59:17.760
<v Speaker 1>turn out to vote as well. Well. The developments of

0:59:17.880 --> 0:59:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong changed that profoundly for the younger demographic in Taiwan.

0:59:23.160 --> 0:59:25.400
<v Speaker 1>They saw the youth of Hong Kong being willing to

0:59:25.520 --> 0:59:29.880
<v Speaker 1>risk everything and frankly continue to get arrested to stand

0:59:29.960 --> 0:59:33.240
<v Speaker 1>up for their fundamental rights against the Communist Party's encroachment,

0:59:33.640 --> 0:59:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and the youth of Taiwan felt even more committed to

0:59:37.160 --> 0:59:39.880
<v Speaker 1>turning out. There were a lot of people from Hong

0:59:39.960 --> 0:59:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Kong that were in Taiwan for the election. It was

0:59:42.960 --> 0:59:47.400
<v Speaker 1>really moving commentary to hear them tell Taiwan audiences about

0:59:47.400 --> 0:59:50.440
<v Speaker 1>why they need to protect the democracy that they have,

0:59:51.040 --> 0:59:54.560
<v Speaker 1>don't let themselves become the next Hong Kong. So I

0:59:54.600 --> 0:59:58.360
<v Speaker 1>think really Hijingping, the leader of the Communist Party, of

0:59:58.440 --> 1:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>China and the party itself the ballot and overwhelmingly lost

1:00:03.080 --> 1:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in Taiwan, which represents the second popular massive rebuke of

1:00:08.280 --> 1:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the Communist Party if you count the local elections in

1:00:11.520 --> 1:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong. Not that long ago. You mentioned real genuine

1:00:16.240 --> 1:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>foreign interference in Taiwan's democratic election system and government. What

1:00:22.800 --> 1:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>are some of the lessons for Americans based upon Taiwan's

1:00:26.920 --> 1:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>experience dealing with in effect attacks, information warfare attacks, at

1:00:31.560 --> 1:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the very least from the Chinese Communist Party there? Well.

1:00:36.080 --> 1:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Number one, we have to stop playing sort of junior

1:00:39.520 --> 1:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>high school games about the twenty sixteen election and whatever

1:00:44.240 --> 1:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>was done by way of Facebook adds. What the Chinese

1:00:46.920 --> 1:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party is doing is much larger in scale in

1:00:51.400 --> 1:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of geographical reach, but also in terms of money

1:00:54.280 --> 1:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and assets involved. And they don't limit their information operations

1:00:58.600 --> 1:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>or influence operations to just some online postings of fake news.

1:01:03.960 --> 1:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>They have ways of trying to put pressure on our

1:01:06.720 --> 1:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>academic institutions, putting pressure on our media organizations. And this

1:01:12.360 --> 1:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>is what you learn when you watch things in Taiwan

1:01:14.680 --> 1:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>up close and personal. They have learned that they have

1:01:17.920 --> 1:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to track what they call red capital money that comes

1:01:21.080 --> 1:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>from the mainland directly or indirectly to control or shape

1:01:26.440 --> 1:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the information environment they operate in. And so they have

1:01:30.560 --> 1:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the classical spy versus spy stuff where former military officers

1:01:36.120 --> 1:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>get induced to come to the mainland to sell out

1:01:38.360 --> 1:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>their country. We have to watch out for that. But

1:01:41.640 --> 1:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>they also have these modern techniques that are quite successful

1:01:45.000 --> 1:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, where they throw money at universities, and

1:01:48.160 --> 1:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the universities become less open to free speech and free thought,

1:01:52.560 --> 1:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and they basically conform to what their donors do. And

1:01:56.800 --> 1:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it's one thing if those donors are from free market,

1:02:00.200 --> 1:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>free world. It's another thing if they're basically taking their

1:02:03.880 --> 1:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>marching orders from the Communist Party of China. And that's

1:02:06.640 --> 1:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>happened in American universities. But the Taiwanese have more educated

1:02:11.160 --> 1:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and engage population now taking it seriously. We can learn

1:02:14.400 --> 1:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>from what they're doing to resist. I think it's worth

1:02:17.680 --> 1:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>reiterating the point that's sort of implicit in all of this,

1:02:20.920 --> 1:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>which is that information warfare is really a fight to

1:02:25.560 --> 1:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>win a war of ideas, so that you can ultimately

1:02:28.280 --> 1:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>triumph in the way of getting other nations to bend

1:02:31.240 --> 1:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to your will or even worse, without ever having to

1:02:34.120 --> 1:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>fire a shot at the core isn't really what China

1:02:37.400 --> 1:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>is attempting to do, to exert their power wherever they

1:02:41.440 --> 1:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>see fit, whenever they see fit. At the end of

1:02:43.680 --> 1:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the day, I think it is. I don't think it's

1:02:47.520 --> 1:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>much more complicated than that, and they have every right

1:02:50.200 --> 1:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to try. But we just need to remember that this

1:02:53.360 --> 1:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>is not just two average athletes taking the field. We

1:02:57.840 --> 1:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>have a force that is fundamental evil and taking free

1:03:01.640 --> 1:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>will away from the people that governs, and another force

1:03:05.400 --> 1:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that sacrifices every single day preserve that freedom to choose.

1:03:09.600 --> 1:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not just for ourselves but others around the world,

1:03:12.880 --> 1:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Communist Party of China has been at this

1:03:15.520 --> 1:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. We have chosen, I think unwisely

1:03:19.480 --> 1:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to invest in ways that have made them more modern,

1:03:22.360 --> 1:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>more capable, and more powerful to our disadvantage. And I

1:03:25.960 --> 1:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>think we've sobered up a bit. But the challenge is

1:03:29.720 --> 1:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>very real and we're at the front end of figuring

1:03:32.600 --> 1:03:34.919
<v Speaker 1>out how to meet it. And you're quite right to note,

1:03:34.960 --> 1:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>if we're smart about this, we have a lot of

1:03:37.280 --> 1:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>means at our disposal where this doesn't have to end

1:03:39.960 --> 1:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>up in a classical military clash. We can and should

1:03:43.920 --> 1:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>be doing more to make things more complicated for them

1:03:47.120 --> 1:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>at home. After all, they're failing their people too, not

1:03:50.600 --> 1:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>just challenging ours. Yea. And to that end, there were reports,

1:03:54.920 --> 1:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>for example, of a directive from the National Security Council

1:03:59.360 --> 1:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that would have authorize the US engaging more an offensive

1:04:03.040 --> 1:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>cyber warfare, which clearly would implicate China. What would you

1:04:07.680 --> 1:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>advocate that the US government to do in terms of

1:04:10.440 --> 1:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>going on the offensive as opposed to being reactive or,

1:04:13.880 --> 1:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>as we've been in the past, wilfully ignorant or willfully

1:04:16.840 --> 1:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>blind to it. Well, sadly, you're right, you have been

1:04:20.600 --> 1:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>willfully ignorant and too passive. And I do support offensive

1:04:25.640 --> 1:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>cyber operations, after all, our enemies are going to do

1:04:28.480 --> 1:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that to us. I just don't believe in the false

1:04:31.280 --> 1:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>distinction between offensive versus defensive capabilities. If I have a

1:04:36.840 --> 1:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>gun in my hand and the barrel is pounded outward,

1:04:39.720 --> 1:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it's defensive to me and it's offensive to somebody else.

1:04:43.080 --> 1:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's nearly no different with a lot of the

1:04:45.080 --> 1:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>tools that are in the cyber world. But fundamentally, what

1:04:48.760 --> 1:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about is trying to break down the great

1:04:51.400 --> 1:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>firewall of China that is keeping people in and under

1:04:55.600 --> 1:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>control and basically turn some of these tools that were

1:04:59.760 --> 1:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>men to promote freedom and empowerment and prosperity into really

1:05:05.320 --> 1:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>meeting those ends. In other words, within China, the internet

1:05:09.400 --> 1:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and social media have really been used to create an

1:05:12.560 --> 1:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Orwellian surveillance and control state. But we have been complicit

1:05:17.360 --> 1:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and being passive about pushing information, choices and the truth

1:05:21.920 --> 1:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>in the China so that the leaders would have to

1:05:23.720 --> 1:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>be accountable to that truth. We're very behind that. On

1:05:27.080 --> 1:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, we've allowed our freedom in some ways

1:05:30.200 --> 1:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to be our vulnerability. We want people to like us,

1:05:33.160 --> 1:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>we want them to have a taste of what we have.

1:05:35.880 --> 1:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>We think it will influence them, and that works some

1:05:38.680 --> 1:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of the time. It just doesn't work as well when

1:05:41.720 --> 1:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you have a determined, basically ideologically committed enemy that's operating

1:05:46.320 --> 1:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>against you. How one of the things, just to level

1:05:49.880 --> 1:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>set a bit on Taiwan specifically, that our listeners may

1:05:54.280 --> 1:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>not be aware of, is that China basically undertook a

1:05:57.880 --> 1:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>campaign to other nations to a test you're either with

1:06:02.400 --> 1:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>us or you're with Taiwan, and most people sided with

1:06:06.520 --> 1:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the People's Republic of China so called not Taiwan, and

1:06:11.160 --> 1:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>thus Taiwan sort of is in diplomatic limbo in some ways,

1:06:14.960 --> 1:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in terms of not being recognized by many nations that

1:06:18.880 --> 1:06:21.919
<v Speaker 1>we see an official basis, including being in a sort

1:06:21.920 --> 1:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of fluid position with respect to the US. How much

1:06:25.040 --> 1:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of a propaganda coup would it be against the Chinese

1:06:28.680 --> 1:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party if nations started to recognize Taiwan one Domino

1:06:33.480 --> 1:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>foul and then several foul, Well, it would be a

1:06:37.280 --> 1:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>diplomatic cool of sorts. But I'm afraid it really would

1:06:40.440 --> 1:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>just be a reclamation of common sense and truth. And so,

1:06:45.640 --> 1:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not something that you would do out

1:06:47.920 --> 1:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of any sense of malice towards China. It's something we

1:06:50.920 --> 1:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>should do out of self respect and sort of looking

1:06:54.640 --> 1:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>at this island nation of Taiwan as never having been

1:06:58.640 --> 1:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>under the sovereign control the People's Republic of China. The

1:07:01.960 --> 1:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party of China declared revolution on the Chinese people

1:07:06.640 --> 1:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>back in the nineteen forties. They did, in fact when

1:07:09.800 --> 1:07:12.439
<v Speaker 1>that civil war and took control of the mainland. They

1:07:12.520 --> 1:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>never took control of Taiwan. And I think it's been

1:07:15.720 --> 1:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>weak minds, an appeasement mindset that has granted them the

1:07:19.840 --> 1:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>latitude to control our language and our thought for the

1:07:22.920 --> 1:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>better part of the last fifty years in trying to

1:07:25.440 --> 1:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>say there is one China in the world and the

1:07:27.560 --> 1:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan is a part of it. What all you have

1:07:29.440 --> 1:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to do is look at a map and you'll see

1:07:31.360 --> 1:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that the island is significantly offshore. And if you just

1:07:34.560 --> 1:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>read a little bit of history, you'll realize the Communist

1:07:37.680 --> 1:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Party has never controlled it. If they want to unify

1:07:40.320 --> 1:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>with Taiwan, it's their business, but we should be there

1:07:43.200 --> 1:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to help insist that it be peaceful and with the

1:07:45.800 --> 1:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>consent of the Taiwan people. I don't think that they'll

1:07:48.680 --> 1:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>win that consent, but really that is where we need

1:07:51.880 --> 1:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to be. And I think the US government under the

1:07:54.560 --> 1:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration has made a significant shift in the right direction,

1:07:58.840 --> 1:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>at least initially in pressuring Taiwan's remaining allies to stay

1:08:03.200 --> 1:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>firm and not get bought off by Chinese inducements. But

1:08:06.760 --> 1:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>we would do right by ourselves, not just as a

1:08:09.280 --> 1:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>favorite of Taiwan, to say we're going to increase levels

1:08:13.320 --> 1:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of diplomatic recognition for Taiwan. And it's really only after

1:08:16.880 --> 1:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the United States leads the way that others will have

1:08:19.760 --> 1:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the courage and common sense to do so as well.

1:08:22.479 --> 1:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be an investment in ultimately peace

1:08:25.360 --> 1:08:28.439
<v Speaker 1>and prosperity and put the pressure on the mainland to

1:08:28.479 --> 1:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>improve itself if it really wants the acceptance of the

1:08:31.280 --> 1:08:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan people and US. Lastly, looking just to our north, today,

1:08:36.560 --> 1:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>March the beginning of the extradition trial of Huawei's CFO,

1:08:41.920 --> 1:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>who is being held effectively under house arrest in Canada

1:08:46.640 --> 1:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>based upon US brought charges involving both bank fraud and

1:08:50.479 --> 1:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>then dealings with Iran that Huawei allegedly lied about. What

1:08:56.760 --> 1:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>do you make of this trial and what is its significance? Well,

1:09:02.200 --> 1:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple of things that play in it.

1:09:03.960 --> 1:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Number One, we have the relatives of high ranking communist

1:09:07.479 --> 1:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>leaders that get posh exceedingly well paid jobs to go

1:09:11.840 --> 1:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>around the world pretending as if they're not affront for

1:09:15.240 --> 1:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the Communist Party of China and their commercial enterprise. That's

1:09:19.360 --> 1:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>an important wake up call for people to look at.

1:09:22.160 --> 1:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>The second, this company, Huawei, was actively engaged in avoiding

1:09:27.720 --> 1:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>sanctions against the Iran. So we have the dublicity of

1:09:31.880 --> 1:09:36.559
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese government at the United Nations occasionally going along

1:09:36.600 --> 1:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>with a broad based vote on sanctions related to counter

1:09:41.320 --> 1:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>proliferation or otherwise, but then commercially actively working to undermine

1:09:48.640 --> 1:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>those sanctions. And then the other thing I think is

1:09:52.400 --> 1:09:56.879
<v Speaker 1>really really important not to forget this high ranking Huawei

1:09:56.920 --> 1:10:02.479
<v Speaker 1>officer was, in fact looks pretty guilty of doing these

1:10:02.479 --> 1:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>things that undermine our national security. But the Chinese, in

1:10:06.680 --> 1:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>retaliation against the Canadian government took a couple of Canadian

1:10:11.560 --> 1:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>NGO workers who haven't been seen since. And so we

1:10:16.720 --> 1:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>have this dichotomy of Chinese commercial slash party person on

1:10:23.360 --> 1:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>trial in Canada but living in Martha Stewart luxury prison accommodations.

1:10:29.560 --> 1:10:32.479
<v Speaker 1>And then we have these two poor NGO workers that

1:10:32.640 --> 1:10:35.519
<v Speaker 1>have been put into what I'm sure is a much

1:10:35.880 --> 1:10:40.719
<v Speaker 1>less humane environment in China and have been taken off

1:10:40.760 --> 1:10:43.639
<v Speaker 1>the grid. So that's what that stake in that trial.

1:10:44.280 --> 1:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to have rule of law and a

1:10:46.280 --> 1:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>China that honors obligations and put outward. Are these companies

1:10:51.120 --> 1:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>for real commercial or are they political and strategic? And

1:10:54.800 --> 1:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>then we have this whole issue of retaliation that really

1:10:57.960 --> 1:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>hasn't got the international attention to deserve. We're gonna have

1:11:01.439 --> 1:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to leave it right there. Steve, thanks so much for

1:11:03.240 --> 1:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>coming on the program. Always appreciate it my pleasure to

1:11:05.640 --> 1:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>take care of And this is Ben Wegarden in for

1:11:07.600 --> 1:11:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexon on the buck Sexton Show. Back just after

1:11:09.680 --> 1:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>this you're in the Freedom Hud. This is the buck

1:11:15.240 --> 1:11:21.519
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Show podcast. Welcome back to the buck Sexton Show.

1:11:21.600 --> 1:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Ben wein Garden in four Buck Sexton. I

1:11:24.320 --> 1:11:28.519
<v Speaker 1>want to transition from Asia to the Middle East. And

1:11:28.560 --> 1:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>there was a story out of the Middle East that well,

1:11:32.120 --> 1:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>someone was brought to justice who should have been brought

1:11:33.960 --> 1:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to justice. Let's put it that way. The headline on

1:11:35.920 --> 1:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>American Greatness was Islamic State heavyweight nabed in Iraq so

1:11:40.080 --> 1:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>fat he had to be loaded onto flatbed truck. The

1:11:44.400 --> 1:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Iraqi military have bagged a biggin the five hundred and

1:11:47.280 --> 1:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty pound Islamic state Mufti, known as Job of the

1:11:50.080 --> 1:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Hut or Job of the Jihad. I believe is the

1:11:52.200 --> 1:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>way the New York Post wrote it up. It's so

1:11:53.960 --> 1:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>enormously fat. After he was captured, Iraqi forces had to

1:11:56.800 --> 1:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>load him on into a flatbed truck because he couldn't

1:11:59.200 --> 1:12:03.440
<v Speaker 1>fit in a police car. The ices heavyweight at Abu Abdullabari,

1:12:03.720 --> 1:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>also known as Shifa Alima, put the fat in Fatua.

1:12:07.920 --> 1:12:10.759
<v Speaker 1>According to The New York Post, he was napped Thursday

1:12:10.800 --> 1:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>by an AID swat team of the Ninevah Regiment in

1:12:13.920 --> 1:12:16.879
<v Speaker 1>the city of Mosul. Stars and Stripes reported on Friday.

1:12:17.439 --> 1:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Despite his more bid obesity, the Islamic state official was

1:12:19.800 --> 1:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>known to be a cruel monster who raped and murdered civilians.

1:12:23.439 --> 1:12:26.479
<v Speaker 1>So I think this is a good representative of who

1:12:26.560 --> 1:12:29.519
<v Speaker 1>these Islamic supremacists are because this guy could not move

1:12:30.160 --> 1:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>and he was a coward sending out people to commit

1:12:33.880 --> 1:12:37.479
<v Speaker 1>the most heinous of acts in the name of his religion.

1:12:37.680 --> 1:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>This Islamic supremacist monster. We're gonna talk a little bit

1:12:41.960 --> 1:12:45.559
<v Speaker 1>more about some Islamic supremacist monsters right after this quick break.

1:12:45.680 --> 1:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>This has been wager in for Buck sexon on the

1:12:47.240 --> 1:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Buck Second Show. Back just after this. Thanks for listening

1:12:50.960 --> 1:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to the bus Sex Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on

1:12:54.439 --> 1:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcast, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get

1:12:57.840 --> 1:13:02.599
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts. Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. This

1:13:02.720 --> 1:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is Ben Weingarten in four Bucks Sexton and before the

1:13:06.240 --> 1:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>break we were talking a little bit about this transition

1:13:08.520 --> 1:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>from Asia to the Middle East, and in particular in

1:13:11.920 --> 1:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>this case a little bit north to Iran, and there

1:13:15.439 --> 1:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>was a video making the rounds over the weekend, being propagated,

1:13:20.320 --> 1:13:25.759
<v Speaker 1>of course, by the Islamic supremacist regime in Tehran's minions.

1:13:25.840 --> 1:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's call them Solomani because them Solomani holding his grandson

1:13:31.479 --> 1:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and cooing and coddling him. And so one commenter on

1:13:36.360 --> 1:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>this was noting, Iran carefully shaped his image in life

1:13:39.000 --> 1:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and continues to do so in depth. And all I

1:13:42.040 --> 1:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>could think to myself looking at these images and there

1:13:45.000 --> 1:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it's revolting to see them try to portray this man

1:13:48.760 --> 1:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>as some kind of humanitarian. Remember, Solomani had the blood

1:13:53.240 --> 1:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of hundreds of Americans on his hand, Dad Americans from

1:13:58.240 --> 1:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>roadside bombs that he was responsible for perfecting, thousands of

1:14:06.400 --> 1:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>other Americans injured, maimed, not to mention thousands of other

1:14:12.920 --> 1:14:15.519
<v Speaker 1>civilians around the world. It's hundreds of thousands of people

1:14:15.520 --> 1:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in Syria, all of the Europeans who have had to

1:14:18.080 --> 1:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>deal with the Syrian refugee crises themselves. This man has

1:14:22.200 --> 1:14:26.759
<v Speaker 1>done incalculable damage as a human being, as the leader,

1:14:26.880 --> 1:14:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the orchestrator of Iran's imperialist ambitions, growing them around the world.

1:14:35.840 --> 1:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>And they put out this picture and all I can

1:14:38.880 --> 1:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>think to myself is this man is a monster. And

1:14:41.120 --> 1:14:43.479
<v Speaker 1>you should read the comments because the comments in this case,

1:14:43.680 --> 1:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>read the comments because those other people have hit the

1:14:46.720 --> 1:14:48.559
<v Speaker 1>nail on the head with respect to this sort of

1:14:48.600 --> 1:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>jihadas propaganda coming out of Iran. And you know, the

1:14:53.320 --> 1:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>sickening thing really when you think about it, is how

1:14:56.880 --> 1:15:00.759
<v Speaker 1>much different is this image being portrayed of him holding

1:15:00.760 --> 1:15:05.519
<v Speaker 1>his grandson. Well, first of all, again, how many people

1:15:05.760 --> 1:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>will never be able to hold their child or their

1:15:07.920 --> 1:15:10.559
<v Speaker 1>grandchild because of what this man did in his life.

1:15:10.560 --> 1:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>This monster did in his life. That's my real takeaway.

1:15:19.840 --> 1:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>This man has destroyed an incalculable number of families and

1:15:24.760 --> 1:15:31.559
<v Speaker 1>nations for that matter. But also this is sort of

1:15:31.560 --> 1:15:34.559
<v Speaker 1>the way that our media portrayed him as well. Yeah,

1:15:34.640 --> 1:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>not an austere religious scholar per se, but whatever is

1:15:38.640 --> 1:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>analogous to that when it comes to being the architect,

1:15:41.280 --> 1:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the mastermind of Iran's imperialist global ambitions exporting it's Islamist

1:15:47.960 --> 1:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>revolution around the world. There was other news out of

1:15:53.080 --> 1:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Iran as well, though that was overshadowed by some of

1:15:56.240 --> 1:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>these other headlines, but is husually significant. So here's a

1:15:59.400 --> 1:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>headline from the Daily mail exclusive secret document that proves

1:16:02.960 --> 1:16:05.519
<v Speaker 1>Iran was voting a nuclear weapon as far back as

1:16:05.520 --> 1:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and two, even while they claimed the technology

1:16:08.280 --> 1:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>was only for peaceful purposes. Document was seized as part

1:16:11.280 --> 1:16:13.799
<v Speaker 1>of a raid by Israeli intelligence agents on a compound

1:16:13.880 --> 1:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in Tehran in twenty eighteen from an Iranian official. This

1:16:17.840 --> 1:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>document requesting the parameters of a warhead fitted on a

1:16:20.760 --> 1:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>missile in November two thousand and two, and scribbled in

1:16:24.200 --> 1:16:26.439
<v Speaker 1>the top life corners a note from its nuclear chief

1:16:26.680 --> 1:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>who signs off on the plans. And this document is

1:16:29.280 --> 1:16:33.679
<v Speaker 1>apparently the centerpiece of an as yet unreleased report highlighting

1:16:33.680 --> 1:16:41.559
<v Speaker 1>Iran's quandestine nuclear activities. Once again, how could you have

1:16:41.600 --> 1:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a deal with a regime that's lied about and concealed

1:16:44.720 --> 1:16:48.479
<v Speaker 1>and obviouscated and deceived on every aspect of its nuclear

1:16:48.479 --> 1:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>effort going back a couple of decades. It's the same

1:16:50.920 --> 1:16:55.519
<v Speaker 1>guys in power, and it is the supreme leader Kamane

1:16:56.680 --> 1:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>running the whole regime. Yeah, when the Obama aministration tried

1:17:00.800 --> 1:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to create this moderates hardliners split within leadership, what they

1:17:06.040 --> 1:17:08.479
<v Speaker 1>failed to address is the fact that the elected leaders

1:17:08.520 --> 1:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote are only eligible to achieve those positions if

1:17:14.200 --> 1:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the malocracy controlled by Commander and others around him approve

1:17:19.160 --> 1:17:22.839
<v Speaker 1>of them. It's a rubber stamped regime. It's a puppet regime.

1:17:22.960 --> 1:17:26.120
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, it's a puppet regime.

1:17:26.560 --> 1:17:29.559
<v Speaker 1>So how can you have a deal with them? What

1:17:29.760 --> 1:17:31.559
<v Speaker 1>is the deal? The deal isn't worth the paper that

1:17:31.560 --> 1:17:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it's printed on. The deal is Iran continues to advance

1:17:34.400 --> 1:17:37.719
<v Speaker 1>his program more quandestine way, with one hundreds of billions

1:17:37.760 --> 1:17:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of dollars more, and then gets it legitimated at the

1:17:41.280 --> 1:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>end because of the Sunset provisions that allow Iran to

1:17:44.280 --> 1:17:47.400
<v Speaker 1>be treated as a legitimate nuclear power to continue its

1:17:47.439 --> 1:17:56.360
<v Speaker 1>ballistic missile proliferation. And meanwhile, our media, of course headline

1:17:56.439 --> 1:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>from the Atlantic this is pretty good. And this is

1:17:58.280 --> 1:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>in context of the unraveling of the so called i

1:18:01.040 --> 1:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Ran nuclear deal, as even our European partners start to

1:18:04.120 --> 1:18:06.880
<v Speaker 1>suddenly realize, hey, maybe this isn't a regime that would

1:18:06.880 --> 1:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>actually honor the garbage JCPOA. This is a tweet from

1:18:15.479 --> 1:18:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Mike Duran and the headline is from the Atlantic, which

1:18:20.680 --> 1:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>grudgingly admit that the killing of Solomoni was a masterstroke,

1:18:23.800 --> 1:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>but it can't bring itself to give Trump credit for

1:18:26.000 --> 1:18:28.559
<v Speaker 1>knowing what he was doing. So here's the headline, Donald

1:18:28.600 --> 1:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Trump stumbles into a foreign policy triumph that when you

1:18:32.479 --> 1:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>have to resort to that, you know we must have

1:18:35.920 --> 1:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>done something right. And the article is actually, I think

1:18:38.320 --> 1:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty revealing. This is from a European correspondent for The Atlantic,

1:18:44.840 --> 1:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and he writes, well, it's clearly too early to judge

1:18:47.120 --> 1:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the long term ramifications of the president's decision to order

1:18:49.840 --> 1:18:54.599
<v Speaker 1>the killing. The initial assessment among many in the foreign

1:18:54.640 --> 1:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>policy establishment here in London is not quite what you

1:18:57.120 --> 1:19:00.439
<v Speaker 1>might expect. The attack, in the view of Anos and

1:19:00.479 --> 1:19:03.719
<v Speaker 1>British officials I spoke with the letter of whom requested

1:19:03.720 --> 1:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and inimitated discuss government discussions, has at a stroke reasserted

1:19:07.920 --> 1:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>American military dominance and revealed the constraints of Iranian power.

1:19:14.920 --> 1:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Although Trump's foreign policy strategy, if one even accepts that

1:19:17.920 --> 1:19:19.479
<v Speaker 1>there is such a thing, of course, they have to

1:19:19.479 --> 1:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>be snarky like this and question everything, legitimacy of everything,

1:19:23.200 --> 1:19:26.519
<v Speaker 1>has many limits. His unpredictability, and most crucially is willingness

1:19:26.520 --> 1:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to escavate a crisis. Okay, that's one way to portrait.

1:19:29.160 --> 1:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Another way is diffuse a crisis by using overwhelming force

1:19:32.439 --> 1:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>such that Iran will think twice about doing anything hostile

1:19:35.320 --> 1:19:40.439
<v Speaker 1>to the US willingness to escavate a crisis using the

1:19:40.520 --> 1:19:43.120
<v Speaker 1>US military and economic strength have turned the table as

1:19:43.160 --> 1:19:46.599
<v Speaker 1>on Iran in away few thought possible. What is more,

1:19:46.720 --> 1:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the strike has exposed the gaping irrelevance of Europe's leading

1:19:50.280 --> 1:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>powers Britain, France and Germany in this whole crisis. The

1:19:55.200 --> 1:19:58.360
<v Speaker 1>E three, which were the main parties to the deal,

1:19:58.400 --> 1:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>along with the United States and Iran, which have long

1:20:00.760 --> 1:20:03.640
<v Speaker 1>sought to keep the Iranian nuclear deal alive by undermining

1:20:03.680 --> 1:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the US policy of maximum pressure in Iran, have so

1:20:06.320 --> 1:20:09.759
<v Speaker 1>far failed to do so. This week, they were finally

1:20:09.800 --> 1:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>forced to admit the apparently terminal collapse of the Obama

1:20:12.640 --> 1:20:15.439
<v Speaker 1>era a nuclear deal, releasing a joint statement to announce

1:20:15.479 --> 1:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that they were triggering its dispute resolution clause because of

1:20:21.000 --> 1:20:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Tehran's failure to abide by the terms of the agreement.

1:20:24.240 --> 1:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>The reality of the situation is startling. Europe's attempts to

1:20:27.280 --> 1:20:29.599
<v Speaker 1>keep the deal alive have achieved little in Tehran because

1:20:29.600 --> 1:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of the continent's powerlessness. In European opposition to Trump's Iran

1:20:33.280 --> 1:20:37.160
<v Speaker 1>policy has achieved even less in Washington. In an interview,

1:20:37.200 --> 1:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Boris Johnson all but admitted defeat in keeping the nuclear

1:20:39.880 --> 1:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>deal alive, calling instead for a new Trump deal. In

1:20:43.000 --> 1:20:45.640
<v Speaker 1>other words, Trump exposed reality there was no deal to

1:20:45.680 --> 1:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>be had. And as I've written in a couple of

1:20:48.040 --> 1:20:51.880
<v Speaker 1>articles recently at the Federalists and I'll share them, they

1:20:51.880 --> 1:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>were cheating on the deal the whole time. We have

1:20:54.880 --> 1:20:58.160
<v Speaker 1>documentary evidence of it. But beyond that, we couldn't even

1:20:58.200 --> 1:21:02.400
<v Speaker 1>have visibility into any of the military sites where likely

1:21:02.920 --> 1:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the nuclear weapon work took place. So okay, they could

1:21:07.000 --> 1:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>argue that they may be complied with some of the

1:21:08.720 --> 1:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of a deal, but we only saw the places

1:21:11.120 --> 1:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that they wanted us to see. Iran wouldn't let internationally

1:21:15.240 --> 1:21:20.479
<v Speaker 1>recognized inspectors certified under the deal to verify and do

1:21:20.600 --> 1:21:24.559
<v Speaker 1>actual checks at the sites where their malign activities actually

1:21:24.600 --> 1:21:29.719
<v Speaker 1>took place likely take place. So my friend Omri Seran,

1:21:29.760 --> 1:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>who's the National security advisor for Senator Ted Cruz and

1:21:32.960 --> 1:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>must read it on all things I ran, tweets out

1:21:36.000 --> 1:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>news out of Iran. The regime is threatening to decrease

1:21:38.240 --> 1:21:41.439
<v Speaker 1>cooperation on nuclear issues if the Europeans pressure them over

1:21:41.479 --> 1:21:45.400
<v Speaker 1>their checks. Notes confirms yep. If the Europeans pressure them

1:21:45.400 --> 1:21:49.559
<v Speaker 1>over their lack of cooperation on nuclear issues, and that

1:21:49.640 --> 1:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>was in response to an article I may review cooperation

1:21:52.960 --> 1:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>with IAEA. That's the inspector body. If EU pressure mounts

1:22:01.000 --> 1:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>so they didn't abide by the deal, they wouldn't let

1:22:03.120 --> 1:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>us check if they were abiding by the deal. And

1:22:05.000 --> 1:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>now now if we pressure them over lack of cooperation,

1:22:11.200 --> 1:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>they might really get angry. There's no deal to be

1:22:18.960 --> 1:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>had with Iran at the end of the day. The

1:22:22.800 --> 1:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>only deal ultimately is either this momocratic regime stays in

1:22:27.200 --> 1:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>power and advances towards nuclear weaponry, and ultimately we're probably

1:22:31.439 --> 1:22:35.360
<v Speaker 1>forced to engage in a military response, massive military response,

1:22:36.320 --> 1:22:41.360
<v Speaker 1>or and the Trump's policies, whether by design or as

1:22:41.439 --> 1:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>part of a way to get towards forcing a surrender

1:22:44.080 --> 1:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of this regime, has destabilized this regime to an unprecedented degree.

1:22:49.439 --> 1:22:52.400
<v Speaker 1>And while a destabilized regime may lash out, at the

1:22:52.439 --> 1:22:55.679
<v Speaker 1>same time, Iran has been exposed to have major problems,

1:22:55.680 --> 1:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and the incompetence was on foe display. Tragic incompetence was

1:22:58.760 --> 1:23:01.360
<v Speaker 1>on fot display when they shot down a passenger plan

1:23:02.120 --> 1:23:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and killed dozens of their own people. As well as

1:23:05.640 --> 1:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>people from all over the world, from Canada elsewhere. It's

1:23:12.080 --> 1:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a big deal that even for the European countries, Iran

1:23:15.320 --> 1:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>has breached too many of the steps in the deal,

1:23:18.960 --> 1:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>too many of the constraints, the strictures and the deal

1:23:21.320 --> 1:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>at this point that even they can't stand by IDOI anymore.

1:23:24.400 --> 1:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, this dispute resolution mechanism that was

1:23:27.320 --> 1:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>discussed in that Atlantic article I mentioned, ultimately it could

1:23:30.720 --> 1:23:35.160
<v Speaker 1>get towards the UN reimposing sanctions on Iran, crippling sanctions

1:23:35.160 --> 1:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>which in a country that is already they lost Solamani,

1:23:38.880 --> 1:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>They're overstretched abroad, dealing with protesters in all of the

1:23:43.040 --> 1:23:47.880
<v Speaker 1>different countries that they count as their proxies, Chaos in Iraq,

1:23:49.479 --> 1:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>streets of Lebanon, on their own streets, having to resort

1:23:53.200 --> 1:23:57.599
<v Speaker 1>to murdering, persecuting thousands of their own people. Right now,

1:23:58.320 --> 1:24:03.120
<v Speaker 1>their coffers going dry, shut out of the international oil markets,

1:24:03.840 --> 1:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>main source of revenue. They could be on the ropes

1:24:09.320 --> 1:24:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and worth it pointing out one more thing while we're

1:24:12.120 --> 1:24:15.519
<v Speaker 1>sticking on the Iran topic, this was a good piece,

1:24:15.640 --> 1:24:19.599
<v Speaker 1>a good reminder. Urge you to check out this article

1:24:19.600 --> 1:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>on power Line Bernie's history with Iran. Like I said,

1:24:24.840 --> 1:24:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the left historically in our last episode always stands with

1:24:30.439 --> 1:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>these horrible totalitarian regimes. This is in the Daily Beast

1:24:35.000 --> 1:24:38.360
<v Speaker 1>on April nineteen seventy nine. This is Powerline, quoting that article.

1:24:38.600 --> 1:24:41.599
<v Speaker 1>April nineteen seventy nine, the theocratic Islamic Republic of Iran

1:24:41.720 --> 1:24:45.400
<v Speaker 1>was proclaimed Aetola Rojola Commani, who had returned to Iran

1:24:45.439 --> 1:24:47.839
<v Speaker 1>from exile to assume command of the revolt, became supreme

1:24:47.920 --> 1:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>leader in December of that year. His rise was accelerated

1:24:50.800 --> 1:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>by the seizure on November four of fifty two American

1:24:53.240 --> 1:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>diplomats and citizens and citizens of other countries at the

1:24:55.880 --> 1:24:59.360
<v Speaker 1>usmbassy in Tehran. Then we have the hostage crisis. Virtually

1:24:59.360 --> 1:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>all American Democrats, Republicans and independence united and support of

1:25:02.600 --> 1:25:05.479
<v Speaker 1>the hostages and the international call for their freedom. One

1:25:05.520 --> 1:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>prominent political figure on the twenty twenty stage, then almost

1:25:08.200 --> 1:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>completely unknown, stood apart by joining a Marxist Leninist party

1:25:12.479 --> 1:25:15.479
<v Speaker 1>that not only pledged support for the Iranian theocracy but

1:25:15.560 --> 1:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>also justified the hostage taking by insisting the hostages were

1:25:19.080 --> 1:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>all likely CIA agents. Who was that person? It was

1:25:22.360 --> 1:25:27.759
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Sanders, Bernie Sanders, member of a Trotsky eight party,

1:25:30.200 --> 1:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>stood with the Iranian moocracy. By the way, he's not

1:25:35.160 --> 1:25:38.360
<v Speaker 1>alone in that romance of those sort of regimes, none

1:25:38.400 --> 1:25:41.920
<v Speaker 1>other than Elizabeth Warren. And this this was unveiled previously,

1:25:42.240 --> 1:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>revealed previously, but brought up again recently in an article

1:25:44.880 --> 1:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>at front Page called on the Obama administration to clear

1:25:52.479 --> 1:25:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Ethel Rosenberg's record. Who is Ethel Rosenberg. Well, you'll recall

1:25:56.880 --> 1:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>she was tried for treason essential in helping the Soviet

1:26:02.000 --> 1:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Union develop nuclear capabilities the Adam bomb. Rather, as the

1:26:11.800 --> 1:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>article states, she could be the next commander in chief.

1:26:15.000 --> 1:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Caught on the Obama administration to formally exonerate Soviet atomic spy.

1:26:19.479 --> 1:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Ethel Rosenberg sent a letter data January ten, twenty seventeen,

1:26:24.160 --> 1:26:27.640
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of one of her sons, constituent request that

1:26:27.680 --> 1:26:29.519
<v Speaker 1>you provide a thorough review of their request that you

1:26:29.560 --> 1:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>issue a proclamation exonerating his mother. Ethel Rosenberg, executed by

1:26:33.320 --> 1:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the US for conspiracy to commit espionage in nineteen fifty three,

1:26:37.120 --> 1:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>effectively a treason this act. She wasn't alone, by the way,

1:26:41.840 --> 1:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Democratic Party. But that goes to show you

1:26:44.680 --> 1:26:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the nature of who we're dealing with on the other side.

1:26:46.800 --> 1:26:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Right now, once again there has been one going in

1:26:49.400 --> 1:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>for buck Sex and on the buck Secon Show back

1:26:50.960 --> 1:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>just after this, you're in the Freedom Art. This is

1:26:56.320 --> 1:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the buck Sexton Show podcast. Welcome back to the buck

1:27:02.720 --> 1:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Show. This is Ben Weiningerten in four bucks Sexton

1:27:05.960 --> 1:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and let's transition. We just talked about a little bit

1:27:08.880 --> 1:27:13.599
<v Speaker 1>at the Middle East, Iran's malevolence, the left embrace of

1:27:13.640 --> 1:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that those totalitarian regimes, be it Iran or elsewhere around

1:27:17.960 --> 1:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the globe, and there's another similarity in terms of their ideology.

1:27:24.000 --> 1:27:25.719
<v Speaker 1>And I'll get there by waye First of talking about

1:27:25.720 --> 1:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this week President Trump is scheduled to

1:27:28.960 --> 1:27:34.559
<v Speaker 1>be at Davos. What is the main topic at Davos

1:27:34.640 --> 1:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>this year? Naturally climate change? The head of the World

1:27:41.240 --> 1:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Economic Forum, it's founder, Klass Schwab said, we do not

1:27:45.439 --> 1:27:48.599
<v Speaker 1>want to reach the tipping point of irreversibility on climate change.

1:27:49.240 --> 1:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>We do not want the next generations to inherit a

1:27:51.320 --> 1:27:56.120
<v Speaker 1>world which becomes evermore hostile and ever less habitable. Just

1:27:56.160 --> 1:27:58.120
<v Speaker 1>think of the wildfires in Australia and we'll get to

1:27:58.160 --> 1:28:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that in a second. An annual risk survey published by

1:28:02.360 --> 1:28:05.479
<v Speaker 1>his organization, put climate and other environmental threats ahead of

1:28:05.560 --> 1:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>risks posed by geopolitical tensions and cyber attacks the first time.

1:28:09.160 --> 1:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>The survey found the top five long term risks were

1:28:11.840 --> 1:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>all environmental. Talk about groupthink, from extreme weather events to

1:28:15.640 --> 1:28:18.759
<v Speaker 1>businesses and governments failing to mitigate and adapt to climate change.

1:28:19.120 --> 1:28:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Part of this is sustainability, the theme at this year's

1:28:21.760 --> 1:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Davos meeting to deal with grapple with global warming becoming

1:28:26.080 --> 1:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>worse because of growing divisions among nations and businesses on

1:28:28.880 --> 1:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>how to tackle it. The meetings, which will see over

1:28:34.080 --> 1:28:36.479
<v Speaker 1>fifty heads of state and government, including German Chance or

1:28:36.760 --> 1:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Angolo Miracle and Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte, descend on

1:28:40.160 --> 1:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the Alpine resort, seeking to give concrete meaning to stakeholder capitalism,

1:28:44.120 --> 1:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a concept that businesses should serve the interests of all

1:28:46.320 --> 1:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>society rather than simply their shareholders. Remember I talked about

1:28:50.040 --> 1:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>woke chroning capitalism last week when it came to Blackrock.

1:28:53.280 --> 1:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>That's the agenda on the table for all of the leaders,

1:28:56.760 --> 1:28:59.799
<v Speaker 1>the business heads, the politicians around the world meeting at Davos,

1:29:00.080 --> 1:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and I cannot wait for Trump to smash them. Into

1:29:03.800 --> 1:29:08.240
<v Speaker 1>smithereens during this meeting. Over this fifty three heads of

1:29:08.240 --> 1:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>stayed at Davos, seventeen hundred business leaders, including CEOs from

1:29:12.120 --> 1:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>eight of the ten most valuable companies in the world.

1:29:15.080 --> 1:29:17.479
<v Speaker 1>Eighty percent of the cars used by the World Economic

1:29:17.520 --> 1:29:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Forum are electric or hybrid. Climate is the excuse for

1:29:24.560 --> 1:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the totalitarian, anti capitalist system that they all they're all

1:29:29.120 --> 1:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>like minded, all the globalist leaders, they're are like minded

1:29:31.920 --> 1:29:34.639
<v Speaker 1>on this. Why do they care about the environmental stuff

1:29:34.720 --> 1:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>because it means power and control. It's a way to

1:29:37.200 --> 1:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>use science to justify control over your life. And they

1:29:40.640 --> 1:29:42.719
<v Speaker 1>will profit, of course from it, because they're the ones

1:29:42.920 --> 1:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>in charge of all of these green initiatives, invested in

1:29:45.320 --> 1:29:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the green companies. It's a wealth redistribution scheme to them.

1:29:50.439 --> 1:29:54.559
<v Speaker 1>In the process it impoverishes all of us. So I

1:29:54.600 --> 1:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>was happy to see on this topic the Bernie Sanders

1:29:58.000 --> 1:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and as well AOC Alexander Acazio Quartez came out and

1:30:02.120 --> 1:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>panned the USMCA that the Trump administration just was able

1:30:06.400 --> 1:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to push through in the Senate. Here's Bernie, not a

1:30:12.720 --> 1:30:15.439
<v Speaker 1>single damn mention of climate change in his tweets. Seems

1:30:15.479 --> 1:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>like a happy guy and the Sanders suggested on the

1:30:17.720 --> 1:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>campaign trail that fossil fuel executives are probably criminally liable

1:30:21.120 --> 1:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for climate change, and he's expressed interests in potentially prosecuting them.

1:30:25.080 --> 1:30:30.599
<v Speaker 1>That's totalitarianism. That's if you have wrong think, you should

1:30:30.640 --> 1:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>be shut up stifled. So urge you to read this

1:30:34.439 --> 1:30:37.599
<v Speaker 1>article from Rupert Darwall in The Hill, and I've interviewed

1:30:37.640 --> 1:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>him separately as well. Look it up on YouTube and

1:30:39.439 --> 1:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I can share it as well. Climate religion is fueling

1:30:41.880 --> 1:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Australia's wildfires. Getting back to that, and what he shows

1:30:46.560 --> 1:30:49.839
<v Speaker 1>is that the wildfires in Australia that have been husually

1:30:49.840 --> 1:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>destructive to their environment are largely the consequence of environmentalist policies.

1:30:54.960 --> 1:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not because of climate change, quote unquote, it's because

1:30:57.960 --> 1:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>they haven't been able to control the brush that has

1:31:00.360 --> 1:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>led to these massive wildfires. They're not allowing people to

1:31:04.360 --> 1:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>burn the brush which would prevent them there for being

1:31:07.280 --> 1:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>these massive conflagrations. So environmentalism has real consequences. It is irrational,

1:31:14.880 --> 1:31:17.799
<v Speaker 1>is what Darwa argues in this article. It is a religion,

1:31:18.040 --> 1:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's a religion that the true believers truly believe

1:31:20.360 --> 1:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>in science is infallible and that the science is settled

1:31:23.120 --> 1:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>on this issue, which is not. But it's also a

1:31:25.160 --> 1:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>religion that totalitarians use for control over all of us.

1:31:29.320 --> 1:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>This Benegart in for Buck sex And on the Buck

1:31:31.040 --> 1:31:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Sex and Show. Back just after this. Thanks for listening

1:31:34.479 --> 1:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Bus Sex and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe

1:31:37.840 --> 1:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get

1:31:41.400 --> 1:31:44.759
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts. Welcome back to the Buck Sex and Show.

1:31:44.840 --> 1:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>This is Ben weine Garden in for Buck Sexton, and

1:31:48.400 --> 1:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we were just talking about totalitarianism of one kind, which

1:31:52.360 --> 1:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is the use of infallible science in furtherance of an

1:31:56.400 --> 1:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>anti capitalist agenda that ultimately is about power and can

1:32:00.080 --> 1:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>troll over you and for the people loarding those policies

1:32:04.280 --> 1:32:07.679
<v Speaker 1>over us and imposing them upon us to our great detriment,

1:32:08.439 --> 1:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>impoverishing us while they benefit. We'll shift to a different

1:32:12.920 --> 1:32:16.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of creeping sort of totalitarianism, which is an assault

1:32:17.160 --> 1:32:20.799
<v Speaker 1>on our individual civil liberties under the guise of national

1:32:20.840 --> 1:32:24.439
<v Speaker 1>security while the bad guys actually remand get off scott

1:32:24.479 --> 1:32:28.439
<v Speaker 1>free and there's no justice. And that concerns the recent

1:32:28.520 --> 1:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Inspector General report on FIZO abuses, which comes of course

1:32:32.680 --> 1:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in the broader sort of mosaic around Spygate and what

1:32:37.360 --> 1:32:40.479
<v Speaker 1>we've been dealing with laboring under for the last three

1:32:40.479 --> 1:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>plus years, and I fear we're going to continue dealing

1:32:43.000 --> 1:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>with for many more years to come, unfortunately. So we're

1:32:46.760 --> 1:32:49.559
<v Speaker 1>going to talk with senior contributor to the federalistic colleague

1:32:49.600 --> 1:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of mine, Margot Cleveland, who spent nearly twenty five years

1:32:52.280 --> 1:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>as a permanent lawkwork for a Federal Appellet judge on

1:32:54.960 --> 1:32:57.559
<v Speaker 1>the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals and as a former

1:32:57.600 --> 1:33:00.439
<v Speaker 1>full time faculty member and current adjunct instructor for the

1:33:00.479 --> 1:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>College of Business at the University of Notre Dame. Margo,

1:33:04.439 --> 1:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Thanks so much, Ben.

1:33:07.840 --> 1:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>So let's start by level setting a little bit the

1:33:11.560 --> 1:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>IG report on FISA abuse with respect to carter Page.

1:33:15.600 --> 1:33:18.559
<v Speaker 1>So it's seventeen significant and accuracies and omissions and the

1:33:18.560 --> 1:33:23.839
<v Speaker 1>bureaus applications for warrants to surveil carter page under FISA,

1:33:24.360 --> 1:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>starting I believe back in twenty sixteen. What is the

1:33:29.080 --> 1:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>most underreported element of the IG report that you've discovered

1:33:34.080 --> 1:33:38.640
<v Speaker 1>thus far in parsing it in great depth. So I

1:33:38.680 --> 1:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>would say there's actually a tie for two. One is

1:33:43.200 --> 1:33:51.759
<v Speaker 1>that the IG completely missed that the DOJ FBI had

1:33:52.040 --> 1:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>told the FISA Court that Steele has this network of

1:33:57.800 --> 1:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>sources because he used to work as a spy for

1:34:03.360 --> 1:34:06.559
<v Speaker 1>the British government. And the reason that is such a

1:34:06.720 --> 1:34:11.240
<v Speaker 1>huge revelation is the five The court didn't really do

1:34:11.479 --> 1:34:14.879
<v Speaker 1>much here. They did pretty much a rubber stamp except

1:34:14.960 --> 1:34:17.760
<v Speaker 1>for the first goal round. And on the first goal

1:34:17.920 --> 1:34:22.880
<v Speaker 1>round they presented what they present a copy to get

1:34:22.920 --> 1:34:25.439
<v Speaker 1>some feedback, so they presented what they call a read

1:34:25.680 --> 1:34:30.760
<v Speaker 1>copy to a liaison at the court. The recopy gives

1:34:30.800 --> 1:34:33.479
<v Speaker 1>them a chance to go through and see if there

1:34:33.479 --> 1:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>are any issues. And one of the issues that was

1:34:37.280 --> 1:34:42.679
<v Speaker 1>raised was how does your source, Christopher Steele have this

1:34:42.880 --> 1:34:46.920
<v Speaker 1>network of sources that he was able to get this

1:34:47.000 --> 1:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>information from. And the response that was given is because

1:34:52.840 --> 1:34:55.880
<v Speaker 1>he used to work and it's redactive, but everyone knows

1:34:55.880 --> 1:34:57.320
<v Speaker 1>what it is. He used to work for m I

1:34:57.479 --> 1:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>six and the liaison, the lawyer working for the FISI

1:35:03.160 --> 1:35:07.240
<v Speaker 1>court told of the government to change and put that

1:35:07.400 --> 1:35:11.719
<v Speaker 1>detail in there. I'll swear though in the IG report

1:35:12.560 --> 1:35:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is a finding that Steel was not using those sources,

1:35:17.840 --> 1:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>None of those sources that he used for his dossier

1:35:23.080 --> 1:35:28.200
<v Speaker 1>had the connection of being from his former work with

1:35:28.520 --> 1:35:33.799
<v Speaker 1>the UK British intelligence and significant because the court cared

1:35:33.800 --> 1:35:37.240
<v Speaker 1>about that, they asked about it, and all the government

1:35:37.280 --> 1:35:39.479
<v Speaker 1>said was, oh, yeah, he has this network of sources

1:35:39.520 --> 1:35:45.080
<v Speaker 1>because he used to be an intelligence for our British colleagues.

1:35:45.760 --> 1:35:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Think about that as a judge, You're looking at and saying, well,

1:35:49.320 --> 1:35:52.599
<v Speaker 1>this subsource, this is going to be a legit because

1:35:53.400 --> 1:35:56.800
<v Speaker 1>British intelligence relies on the same people. But the truth

1:35:56.960 --> 1:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is no, they don't. They did not. Steel did not

1:36:00.680 --> 1:36:04.400
<v Speaker 1>use the same sources. So I would say that is

1:36:04.520 --> 1:36:09.240
<v Speaker 1>one underreported story that it should be huge. I think

1:36:09.240 --> 1:36:11.919
<v Speaker 1>that he should have called that out as an eighteenth mistake.

1:36:12.479 --> 1:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that was significant and maybe even more so

1:36:15.120 --> 1:36:19.439
<v Speaker 1>than other ones because the five courts specifically asked for it.

1:36:20.640 --> 1:36:24.559
<v Speaker 1>And then I would say the second mistake or second

1:36:24.640 --> 1:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>underreported comment here was that in the IG report there

1:36:30.520 --> 1:36:35.599
<v Speaker 1>was this just little passage exchange where it said that

1:36:36.040 --> 1:36:41.599
<v Speaker 1>or Bruce Orr, who was one of the DOJ deputy

1:36:42.640 --> 1:36:45.240
<v Speaker 1>assistant Deputy Attorney generals, he was the one who was

1:36:45.640 --> 1:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of feeding stuff from Steel to the FBI. It

1:36:49.320 --> 1:36:54.559
<v Speaker 1>said that he had called a meeting an interagency meeting,

1:36:54.800 --> 1:36:58.200
<v Speaker 1>And the only reason we know about this is after

1:36:58.240 --> 1:37:02.679
<v Speaker 1>the meeting, one of his colleagues asked, Or, why would

1:37:02.760 --> 1:37:07.320
<v Speaker 1>we work with this Russian oligarch? And it was Olga

1:37:07.760 --> 1:37:09.599
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not even sure how to pronounce his name.

1:37:10.320 --> 1:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Ar Yes, thank you. So the colleague asked after the meeting,

1:37:16.320 --> 1:37:21.080
<v Speaker 1>why would the US work with him? And Or said

1:37:21.439 --> 1:37:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that the reason why was because there was corruption in

1:37:26.640 --> 1:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the Trump campaign. The question was all the way to

1:37:30.080 --> 1:37:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the president and he said yes. So there's a couple

1:37:33.280 --> 1:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of things here that no one's really picked up on.

1:37:37.560 --> 1:37:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Was he Or called this inter agency meeting? So who

1:37:42.320 --> 1:37:46.599
<v Speaker 1>was at this meeting? What other agencies were involved? And

1:37:47.120 --> 1:37:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it seems to tie back to Or's official role, which

1:37:52.040 --> 1:37:56.719
<v Speaker 1>was in charge of this interagency group. But Or said, oh,

1:37:56.760 --> 1:37:59.639
<v Speaker 1>I didn't talk to my bosses about Christopher Steele because

1:37:59.640 --> 1:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it had nothing to do with my real job. So

1:38:03.080 --> 1:38:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that's one component of it. But two, it looks like

1:38:07.120 --> 1:38:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Or was trying to push cutting a deal with the

1:38:11.000 --> 1:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>oliguard in order to get Trump, because he told his

1:38:13.920 --> 1:38:17.360
<v Speaker 1>colleague that afterwards. The other part of the is the

1:38:17.439 --> 1:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>timing of this. This came after Or had met with

1:38:22.439 --> 1:38:25.439
<v Speaker 1>a couple I think there were three other folks that

1:38:25.479 --> 1:38:30.840
<v Speaker 1>were looking at the charges against Paul Maniford and it

1:38:30.920 --> 1:38:33.559
<v Speaker 1>had nothing to do with them. Yet they were trying

1:38:33.560 --> 1:38:37.679
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how to get this pushed. And Andrew

1:38:37.720 --> 1:38:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Wiseman was one of the individuals, And one of the

1:38:40.720 --> 1:38:43.160
<v Speaker 1>things that the IG report said is they were trying

1:38:43.200 --> 1:38:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to come up with strategies of how to move that

1:38:46.479 --> 1:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>case along. So one of the questions I have was

1:38:50.040 --> 1:38:54.760
<v Speaker 1>this reach out to these other agencies part of the strategy.

1:38:55.520 --> 1:38:57.879
<v Speaker 1>So I have two separate pieces over at the Federalists

1:38:57.880 --> 1:39:01.040
<v Speaker 1>there a couple maybe a week or so old. There's

1:39:01.080 --> 1:39:04.280
<v Speaker 1>been so much on the IG report that has gone unreported,

1:39:04.280 --> 1:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>but those two really should be blockbusters and people should

1:39:08.760 --> 1:39:11.920
<v Speaker 1>be focusing on this, and I hope that bar and

1:39:12.000 --> 1:39:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Gurham are because those are a huge missing components to it.

1:39:18.240 --> 1:39:21.200
<v Speaker 1>How culpable is the fiz Accort itself? And I think

1:39:21.240 --> 1:39:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you have identified them as being culpable in some of

1:39:25.200 --> 1:39:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the abuses with respect to the case of Carter Page, which,

1:39:28.280 --> 1:39:30.479
<v Speaker 1>of course that invites the question of how many other

1:39:30.560 --> 1:39:34.439
<v Speaker 1>cases has the fiz Coort effectively botched or not held

1:39:34.479 --> 1:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to the proper standard that such important cases should be

1:39:39.120 --> 1:39:42.519
<v Speaker 1>held to how culpable is the court and what would

1:39:42.520 --> 1:39:46.599
<v Speaker 1>be the proper way for their culpability to be remedied

1:39:46.640 --> 1:39:48.639
<v Speaker 1>or for there to be justice for the FISI court

1:39:49.160 --> 1:39:53.960
<v Speaker 1>individuals personnel involved with this themselves. Right, So on the

1:39:54.040 --> 1:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>latter point is, judges make mistakes. Lawyers who work for

1:39:58.680 --> 1:40:03.679
<v Speaker 1>judges make mistakes. There really is no culpability other than

1:40:03.920 --> 1:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>that it's a black eye on them, and it should be.

1:40:07.360 --> 1:40:10.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's unfortunate because it doesn't seem as if they're

1:40:10.760 --> 1:40:14.920
<v Speaker 1>recognizing that they're pointing all the fingers at the DOJ

1:40:15.040 --> 1:40:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and the FBI, and their fingers should be pointed there.

1:40:18.560 --> 1:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>The PHIZE Court trusted the lawyers, and they should have

1:40:23.640 --> 1:40:27.559
<v Speaker 1>been able to trust the lawyers. But at the same time,

1:40:28.560 --> 1:40:33.880
<v Speaker 1>someone should have caught that there was no established reliability

1:40:34.000 --> 1:40:38.479
<v Speaker 1>for these subsources. That Steele was the only one who

1:40:38.520 --> 1:40:42.760
<v Speaker 1>supposedly had reliability, and that's where it's the DOJ and

1:40:42.800 --> 1:40:49.920
<v Speaker 1>FBI's fault for misrepresenting that. But he cannot build up

1:40:50.080 --> 1:40:53.799
<v Speaker 1>the subsources and the sub subsources, and yet the phiz

1:40:53.840 --> 1:40:59.240
<v Speaker 1>A Court allowed what the subsources said happened to be

1:40:59.320 --> 1:41:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the basis for probable cause, even though the fires of

1:41:02.360 --> 1:41:08.080
<v Speaker 1>warrant or fies that applications were clear that neither neither

1:41:08.160 --> 1:41:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Steal nor his primary subsource had the direct knowledge of this,

1:41:14.080 --> 1:41:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and that actually ties back to the point I just

1:41:16.560 --> 1:41:21.559
<v Speaker 1>made about They likely thought that these subsources were ones

1:41:21.640 --> 1:41:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that the British intelligence information and intelligence, and because of that,

1:41:27.800 --> 1:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>assumed that they were reliable and didn't go that next

1:41:30.720 --> 1:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>step and say where in the application doesn't see that,

1:41:33.560 --> 1:41:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So there is culpability. I don't think it's nearly as

1:41:36.880 --> 1:41:41.280
<v Speaker 1>great as the DOJ's and the FBI because they made

1:41:41.439 --> 1:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>so many mistakes, but they should learn from this and

1:41:45.040 --> 1:41:49.360
<v Speaker 1>hopefully look at things more closely. The other part of

1:41:49.400 --> 1:41:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it that I found in reading the IG report and

1:41:52.760 --> 1:41:55.280
<v Speaker 1>some of the kind of the text messages that were

1:41:55.320 --> 1:41:58.760
<v Speaker 1>going back and forth between the parties is it looks

1:41:58.800 --> 1:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>like there was a little bit too They were concerned

1:42:01.560 --> 1:42:06.480
<v Speaker 1>about how one of the individuals involved in the process

1:42:06.520 --> 1:42:10.479
<v Speaker 1>would kind of lead the talk to the liaison. So

1:42:10.560 --> 1:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>apparently someone from the group that handles the FISA applications

1:42:15.880 --> 1:42:20.160
<v Speaker 1>talks to the laison and they were concerned. Peter Struck

1:42:20.280 --> 1:42:22.800
<v Speaker 1>was concerned with how is he going to set it up?

1:42:23.439 --> 1:42:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Is he going to make it iffy or is he

1:42:26.120 --> 1:42:28.280
<v Speaker 1>going to make it sound like a done deal, which

1:42:28.320 --> 1:42:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to me indicates that there's a little bit too much

1:42:31.439 --> 1:42:36.760
<v Speaker 1>reliance on the DOJ's presentation and that they should be

1:42:36.800 --> 1:42:39.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at it a little bit more objectively. So I

1:42:40.120 --> 1:42:43.400
<v Speaker 1>think that again it's much more on the DOJ and FBI,

1:42:43.560 --> 1:42:48.759
<v Speaker 1>but the FISA Court definitely has some culpability for it.

1:42:48.920 --> 1:42:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Looking at the remedy is that the FBI proposed when

1:42:52.200 --> 1:42:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the fifth pointed the finger, as you said, back at

1:42:54.400 --> 1:42:56.960
<v Speaker 1>them and said what will you do basically to ensure

1:42:57.040 --> 1:43:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that the court isn't missweat again in the future. It

1:43:00.479 --> 1:43:03.320
<v Speaker 1>as a wayman, and your eyes can easily gaze over

1:43:03.520 --> 1:43:05.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at the sort of language that's used to explain

1:43:05.920 --> 1:43:08.519
<v Speaker 1>what the FBI is going to do down the road

1:43:08.600 --> 1:43:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to reform themselves. Is that they were basically toothless reforms.

1:43:13.960 --> 1:43:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that a fair assessment? You know? Then I'll have

1:43:17.000 --> 1:43:19.519
<v Speaker 1>to be frank, I have not looked at what they

1:43:19.600 --> 1:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>suggested doing. I'm still so buried in what they did

1:43:23.960 --> 1:43:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in the past. And I also kind of look at

1:43:26.960 --> 1:43:28.599
<v Speaker 1>it as you're always going to say the nice stuff.

1:43:28.680 --> 1:43:31.479
<v Speaker 1>That's when the rubber meets the road. That I really

1:43:31.640 --> 1:43:33.680
<v Speaker 1>am going to care about it, and I think that

1:43:33.720 --> 1:43:37.759
<v Speaker 1>there's the more significant change would be that the FISA

1:43:37.840 --> 1:43:41.799
<v Speaker 1>court requires that you have and amycus someone who's arguing

1:43:41.800 --> 1:43:46.519
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of the person who's going to be tapped.

1:43:46.640 --> 1:43:49.600
<v Speaker 1>So I really have no idea if it's going to

1:43:49.640 --> 1:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>be toothless or not. But there's there's so much that

1:43:54.160 --> 1:43:57.200
<v Speaker 1>went wrong, and until we know everything that went wrong,

1:43:57.320 --> 1:44:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to say how do you reform it. One

1:44:00.320 --> 1:44:02.519
<v Speaker 1>more point that I think is worth thinking is that

1:44:02.600 --> 1:44:06.840
<v Speaker 1>before this FIZO abuse report came out, there was another

1:44:06.880 --> 1:44:09.800
<v Speaker 1>IG report that didn't get nearly as much focus by

1:44:09.840 --> 1:44:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the media, which was on confidential human sources i e.

1:44:12.880 --> 1:44:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Informants i e. Spies. How significant is that report in

1:44:17.479 --> 1:44:21.800
<v Speaker 1>context of the FIZO abuse report. It was so key

1:44:21.920 --> 1:44:23.559
<v Speaker 1>And I guess now I'm going to have to say

1:44:23.600 --> 1:44:26.559
<v Speaker 1>it's a three way tie. What's the most underreported stories.

1:44:26.720 --> 1:44:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So the IG report that came out, I want to

1:44:30.000 --> 1:44:34.880
<v Speaker 1>say two weeks before the Carter page one made clear

1:44:35.640 --> 1:44:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that the FBI was not putting derogatory information in the

1:44:41.760 --> 1:44:48.600
<v Speaker 1>confidential human source files because it was harming the prosecutors

1:44:48.600 --> 1:44:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the US Attorney's ability to use them. Because they would

1:44:53.320 --> 1:44:55.720
<v Speaker 1>have to turn it over in discovery to the defendants,

1:44:56.479 --> 1:45:00.439
<v Speaker 1>and then it would make them not seem as credible.

1:45:01.680 --> 1:45:05.400
<v Speaker 1>That should be huge. We're not talking about one guy

1:45:05.520 --> 1:45:09.720
<v Speaker 1>who accidentally made a mistake or one guy who purposely

1:45:09.960 --> 1:45:14.599
<v Speaker 1>deleted or changed an email. The IG report made it

1:45:14.680 --> 1:45:20.479
<v Speaker 1>clear that this was a fairly prevalent approach, a very

1:45:20.600 --> 1:45:25.679
<v Speaker 1>prevalent opinion that the FBI recognize that they don't want

1:45:25.800 --> 1:45:30.040
<v Speaker 1>certain things put in these files, which means, how in

1:45:30.080 --> 1:45:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the world can the FBI say that this individual is credible,

1:45:35.479 --> 1:45:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that there is nothing derogatory when they don't put it

1:45:38.600 --> 1:45:42.160
<v Speaker 1>in the file. And to me, you read those two

1:45:42.240 --> 1:45:47.320
<v Speaker 1>things in conjunction, it makes the second report even more damning.

1:45:47.479 --> 1:45:50.360
<v Speaker 1>But everyone was so focused on what the Page report

1:45:50.479 --> 1:45:53.679
<v Speaker 1>was going to say and looking forward to that they

1:45:53.800 --> 1:45:58.639
<v Speaker 1>missed what the IG admitted the FBI was doing. So

1:45:58.880 --> 1:46:02.600
<v Speaker 1>there's so much that has gone unreported, and part of

1:46:02.600 --> 1:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just amusing to me that for two years, every

1:46:07.040 --> 1:46:12.360
<v Speaker 1>little thing that happened that maybe looked like Russia collusion

1:46:12.680 --> 1:46:18.520
<v Speaker 1>was blown up and just read into so much and reported.

1:46:19.040 --> 1:46:22.320
<v Speaker 1>The IG Report's been out from what two three weeks,

1:46:22.400 --> 1:46:26.599
<v Speaker 1>and it's old news and there's so much buried in it. Yeah,

1:46:26.640 --> 1:46:29.519
<v Speaker 1>and you've done it, just an exceptional job reporting on it.

1:46:29.600 --> 1:46:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I urge all of our listeners and viewers to check

1:46:32.280 --> 1:46:34.800
<v Speaker 1>out Margot's work at The Federalist. We're going to have

1:46:34.840 --> 1:46:36.439
<v Speaker 1>to leave it right there, but Margot, thanks so much

1:46:36.439 --> 1:46:39.559
<v Speaker 1>for coming around the program today. Thanks so much. Bennett

1:46:39.600 --> 1:46:41.519
<v Speaker 1>was nice to talk with you. And this has been

1:46:41.560 --> 1:46:43.160
<v Speaker 1>one in for Buck sex on on the Buck Sex

1:46:43.240 --> 1:46:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and show back with some closing thoughts just after this.

1:46:48.320 --> 1:46:51.280
<v Speaker 1>You're in the Freedom mund This is the Buck Sexton

1:46:51.360 --> 1:46:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Show podcast. Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. This

1:46:57.840 --> 1:47:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is Ben Weingarten in for Buck Sexton. And during the

1:47:02.040 --> 1:47:03.800
<v Speaker 1>break it was just thinking about what is sort of

1:47:03.800 --> 1:47:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the unifying theme that ties today together, and that is

1:47:07.920 --> 1:47:14.960
<v Speaker 1>really one of liberty versus tyranny, the tyranny of an

1:47:15.000 --> 1:47:20.559
<v Speaker 1>all powerful government that uses science as an excuse to

1:47:20.640 --> 1:47:25.240
<v Speaker 1>stifle our rights and profit personally from it. Whether it's

1:47:25.280 --> 1:47:28.519
<v Speaker 1>our adversaries, be they the Chinese Communist Party or the

1:47:28.560 --> 1:47:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Iranian molocracy and their malign imperialist expansionist efforts, or whether

1:47:35.479 --> 1:47:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it be our leftists at home not only in the

1:47:38.720 --> 1:47:42.559
<v Speaker 1>realm of under climate change, turning us into an anti

1:47:42.600 --> 1:47:46.920
<v Speaker 1>capitalist bastion, but as well seeking to divide us as

1:47:46.960 --> 1:47:51.799
<v Speaker 1>a means of conquering us through poisonous identity politics. And again,

1:47:51.960 --> 1:47:55.280
<v Speaker 1>what Martin Luther King Junior argued for was the antipthesis

1:47:55.360 --> 1:47:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of that. It was about freedom, individual liberty, respecting the

1:47:58.920 --> 1:48:04.439
<v Speaker 1>dignity of the smallest minority, the individual, consistent with what

1:48:04.479 --> 1:48:07.760
<v Speaker 1>our founders advocated for in those founding documents. And one

1:48:07.760 --> 1:48:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of these enemies of what unifying Americanism, which is the

1:48:12.240 --> 1:48:15.519
<v Speaker 1>strongest bulwark against all of this, is ilhan Omar. And

1:48:15.560 --> 1:48:17.679
<v Speaker 1>I tease this last week and I'll reveal the title

1:48:17.680 --> 1:48:22.639
<v Speaker 1>of my book now forthcoming next month is American ingrit

1:48:23.400 --> 1:48:27.719
<v Speaker 1>ilhan Omar and the Progressive Islamist Takeover of the Democratic Party.

1:48:27.720 --> 1:48:29.479
<v Speaker 1>And I'll be talking more about the book in the

1:48:29.520 --> 1:48:32.200
<v Speaker 1>coming days. But subscribe to my newswetter. I'll give you

1:48:32.200 --> 1:48:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a heads up when it's available. It's bit dot ly

1:48:35.680 --> 1:48:40.160
<v Speaker 1>slash bhw News. Urge you to subscribe there and you'll

1:48:40.200 --> 1:48:42.960
<v Speaker 1>be abreast when the book comes out. I want to

1:48:43.000 --> 1:48:45.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you for taking the time to listen or watch

1:48:45.120 --> 1:48:46.960
<v Speaker 1>us over the last few days, as I've had the

1:48:46.960 --> 1:48:49.320
<v Speaker 1>privilege to fill in for Buck. Want to thank Buck

1:48:49.360 --> 1:48:51.679
<v Speaker 1>for giving me the opportunity to fill his big shoes.

1:48:52.040 --> 1:48:53.720
<v Speaker 1>This has been ben wingaren in for Buck Sex and

1:48:53.760 --> 1:48:55.280
<v Speaker 1>on the Buck Sex and Show. Give me a follow

1:48:55.360 --> 1:48:58.639
<v Speaker 1>at BH Winegarden. Look forward to talking next time. Thanks

1:48:58.640 --> 1:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>so much