Speaker 1: Our two Sean Hannity show told free it is eight
Speaker 1: hundred and ninety four one, Shawn. If you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program, you know earlier today
Speaker 1: the Vice President, after saying that we have made great
Speaker 1: progress in Iran, he says, look more at their actions
Speaker 1: than you should at what their words are, which kind
Speaker 1: of makes sense and on a lot of levels, because
Speaker 1: you have these different factions of Iranian leadership. But let
Speaker 1: me play for you him claiming they've made great progress
Speaker 1: in these talks.
Speaker 2: Let's say it was a very very good day. We
Speaker 2: made a lot of good progress. We did exactly what
Speaker 2: we wanted to do, which is accomplish four things for
Speaker 2: the American people. First, we wanted to build a mechanism
Speaker 2: for keeping the straight of Horror moves open.
Speaker 1: It is open.
Speaker 2: We've seen, of course, gas prices and oil prices come down,
Speaker 2: millions and millions of barrels of crude and natural gas
Speaker 2: flowing through the straight of Horror moods that weren't flowing before.
Speaker 2: But we also wanted to make sure that we actually
Speaker 2: set up the coordination mechanism so that we could demine
Speaker 2: the straits of horror moves so that when there are
Speaker 2: the conflicts that inevitably come up, we can make sure
Speaker 2: we work through them rather than that leading to escalation.
Speaker 2: And that is exactly what we did yesterday. And that
Speaker 2: leads me to the final thing that we want to accomplish,
Speaker 2: which has actually set up the process for the technical
Speaker 2: negotiations that will follow. Our teams with the working with
Speaker 2: the Iranians, the Kataris and the Pakistani's made great progress yesterday.
Speaker 2: They will continue to work at the technical level with
Speaker 2: the teams here in Bergenstock, and then those technical negotiations
Speaker 2: are going to continue over the weeks and days to come.
Speaker 1: Now, Lindsay Graham, South Carolina Senator laid it out just
Speaker 1: the way the President did. President has been very clear,
Speaker 1: consistent that he'll send them straight to hell if in
Speaker 1: fact they can't come up with a deal ultimately, which
Speaker 1: really puts time on his side, no pressure on us.
Speaker 1: But this is Lindsay Graham describing his aspect of it.
Speaker 3: I spent four and a half hours with President Trump.
Speaker 3: Here's what I think will happen next. If this deal fails,
Speaker 3: President Trump is going to take the Strait of horror
Speaker 3: moves over by force. The United States will control the
Speaker 3: Strait of Hormuz, will charge a fee for all those
Speaker 3: who go three through to pay for the operation. And
Speaker 3: we're going to expand to Abraham Accords and calendar year
Speaker 3: twenty twenty six. We're going to get Saudi Arabia joined
Speaker 3: the Abram Accords, and which is the biggest change in
Speaker 3: five thousand years in the Mideast. And if Iran contests
Speaker 3: control of the Strait of Hormuz by the United States,
Speaker 3: will obliterate them. So to all the people listening, if
Speaker 3: this diplomatic effort fails, President Trump is going to take
Speaker 3: the Strait of Hormones.
Speaker 1: We're going to run it.
Speaker 3: We're going to try to get Saudi Arabia to join
Speaker 3: the Abraham Accords and the Arab Israeli conflict in twenty
Speaker 3: twenty six. And if Aran continues to attack Israel in Lebanon,
Speaker 3: the new policy will be will hit Iran. So to
Speaker 3: the Iranians, if you're listening, when you use as blot
Speaker 3: to attack israel I, think the new policy will be
Speaker 3: we will attack a run.
Speaker 1: Now, there's one comment DHS Secretary Mark Wayne Mullen made
Speaker 1: how Iran tried to smuggle IRGC officials, having them pose
Speaker 1: as members of a World Cup organization, which should scare
Speaker 1: the living hell out of everyone because we know that
Speaker 1: there are very likely after Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and
Speaker 1: Alejandro majorcis probably a lot of sleeper cells already in
Speaker 1: the country. Here's what he said.
Speaker 4: So do we know if those people trying to come
Speaker 4: through the US's northern border are being directed by the IRGC,
Speaker 4: or they people are there, or are they people fleeing
Speaker 4: from Iran?
Speaker 5: Most of the individuals have ties to it directly to
Speaker 5: the IRGC. Listen, it's hard to get out of the
Speaker 5: country of Iran unless you have a path to do so.
Speaker 5: We're also seeing this with the games they're playing with FIFA.
Speaker 5: You know, we're still hosting the the World Cup and
Speaker 5: Iron has a team that's playing, and in fact the
Speaker 5: team is playing today in La. Most teams travel with
Speaker 5: around one hundred and twenty people. That's their support staff, doctors, coaches,
Speaker 5: everybody else that comes along with them and their delegation.
Speaker 5: We had over we accepted fifty three individuals coming in.
Speaker 5: The rest of the individuals that Iran had tried to
Speaker 5: bring in all also had direct ties at OURGC and
Speaker 5: aren't their normal traveling group.
Speaker 1: All right, joining us now for reaction to all of this.
Speaker 1: Lisa Daftari is with us. She's the editor in chief
Speaker 1: Foreign Desk. James Robbins is the special assistant to was
Speaker 1: the special assistant to Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, and the
Speaker 1: Institute of World Politics Dean Welcome back both of you. Lisa.
Speaker 1: Let's get your take on these new developments. Everything always
Speaker 1: to me comes down to trust but verify. But certainly
Speaker 1: something is happening.
Speaker 6: Absolutely, I don't know if this regime deserves our trust
Speaker 6: after what we've for forty seven years and even now
Speaker 6: during negotiations, if we truly are in a phase of diplomacy,
Speaker 6: are we seeing the proper concessions and posturing from the
Speaker 6: Iran regime when they have their proxies in Lebanon operating
Speaker 6: under the name has Balady tried to separate themselves from
Speaker 6: the proxy when it behooves them and also try to
Speaker 6: put that into the deal when it benefits them. That way,
Speaker 6: they are used the leverage they have at Hormuz. They
Speaker 6: are still making threats. Doesn't look like they are going
Speaker 6: to have any sort of change in the way that
Speaker 6: they have been behaving. You know, and you are raising
Speaker 6: a child, you say nature or nurture. In this case,
Speaker 6: we are definitely trying to nurture. We're trying to use diplomacy.
Speaker 6: But you have to look at the nature of this regime.
Speaker 6: No deal will change the DNA of a regime whose
Speaker 6: ideology is based on death to America. It's based on
Speaker 6: having deadly weapons, whether it's a nuclear weapon or having
Speaker 6: missiles and drones and proxies and killing its own innocent
Speaker 6: protesters at home. I don't think we're able we will
Speaker 6: be able to nurture them into being a normal state
Speaker 6: with which we can have stability in the Middle East.
Speaker 1: Well, I tend to agree with that. But what was
Speaker 1: the president's goal going in and in many ways, at
Speaker 1: least in the near term, maybe defined as the next
Speaker 1: five years minimum. Hasn't he really achieved his goal of
Speaker 1: preventing a nuclear armed Duran. I would argue he has.
Speaker 1: I would like to see the rest of it finished
Speaker 1: and done and over with, But in terms of regime change,
Speaker 1: that was never the president's stated position, was it.
Speaker 7: No?
Speaker 6: But I think at the same time, we are where
Speaker 6: we are because of kinetic action. We're not where we
Speaker 6: are because the arm regime had a change of heart
Speaker 6: and size to sit down with him.
Speaker 1: I'm not arguing with you, But did Donald Trump at
Speaker 1: any point ever say regime change is the only way
Speaker 1: to handle this.
Speaker 6: No, and I don't think. Look, that might be the
Speaker 6: foregone conclusion for many of us who have studied this
Speaker 6: regime if we want to get the changes. Look, did
Speaker 6: Donald Trump speak to then and people say we're coming
Speaker 6: to your rescue, We're going to collapse the regime? You
Speaker 6: take the baton after that? That's yes, that did happen?
Speaker 6: Now does it? Now we're looking at at the strategic
Speaker 6: imperative of the United States being that this regime should
Speaker 6: not have nuclear weapons. I agree with you one hundred
Speaker 6: percent that We've got to where we got because of
Speaker 6: Donald Trump's actions, because he had the same set of
Speaker 6: facts that seven presidents had before him, and he was
Speaker 6: the only one who had the moral courage to begin
Speaker 6: this kinetic war against the Iran regime. I do believe
Speaker 6: all of that. What I'm arguing, and I wrote this
Speaker 6: in an op ed over the weekend for Fox News,
Speaker 6: is that we shouldn't now lose the leverage that we
Speaker 6: have gained by giving them sanctions release upfront, giving them
Speaker 6: money upfront, and what we had in the GCTOI, which
Speaker 6: was an assumption that.
Speaker 1: They will let me interrupt you that. Do you not
Speaker 1: believe what Witkoff and Kushner and the Vice president are
Speaker 1: proclaiming is they only get their money back, no American
Speaker 1: tax dollars, only based on specific actions that they take
Speaker 1: and promise that are kept. Do you believe that to
Speaker 1: be true?
Speaker 6: It doesn't matter to me whose money that is. I'm
Speaker 6: looking at the actions of this regime. Any dollar they
Speaker 6: get will not go into pharmaceuticals. I'm into the mainstream
Speaker 6: and into the people's economy. It will go into proxies,
Speaker 6: It will go into missiles and drone It will go
Speaker 6: into their nuclear program when they have an opportunity to
Speaker 6: do so. I'm not moved by the fact that IA
Speaker 6: inspectors can go back in because I know this regime,
Speaker 6: and I know they will manipulate and they will work
Speaker 6: around sanctions, and they will work around they will turn
Speaker 6: off the surveillance cameras like we saw in the past.
Speaker 6: That's what I'm worried about. I believe that wit Cough
Speaker 6: and Kushner and Vans and Trump are all working in
Speaker 6: the best way possible. They are working through an American
Speaker 6: lens of diplomacy. What they have to take into account
Speaker 6: is the Irunian way. There's regime's a way, the Mullah's way,
Speaker 6: which is terrorism, which is an ideology which drives them,
Speaker 6: and that is it's not the American way of diplomacy.
Speaker 1: And when you get to the bottom of it, let's
Speaker 1: bring in James Robbins. I mean, now, I guess been
Speaker 1: to the fourth tier of leadership in many ways. You
Speaker 1: can say successfully they did have regime change multiple times.
Speaker 1: Now in Iran, is that true?
Speaker 8: Well, they certainly had leadership change. I mean, the nature
Speaker 8: of the regime is certainly the same, although the people
Speaker 8: who have been left may be now thinking more clearly
Speaker 8: about what's possible. I mean, no president and in this
Speaker 8: case also Prime mister net Yahoo. In the past, we're
Speaker 8: willing to take out the entire leadership structure of Iran.
Speaker 8: I mean, we've had little strikes at them in the past,
Speaker 8: but I think it's significant that in this current war
Speaker 8: we were willing to just go for it and take
Speaker 8: out those leaders. So I think that those who are left,
Speaker 8: there's probably those who are now more extreme iron GC
Speaker 8: types who just say let's fight to the death and
Speaker 8: to martyrdom and so forth, and others who are a
Speaker 8: little more pragmatic and say, you know what, maybe I
Speaker 8: don't want to die today. Maybe I would rather just
Speaker 8: make a deal with the United States. You know, we
Speaker 8: can deceive them later, but I don't think I want
Speaker 8: to get in a position where I want a bomb
Speaker 8: falling on my head.
Speaker 1: I did think the President's message has been clear too,
Speaker 1: and even in private conversations I've had with him, and
Speaker 1: I've asked him straight up if he has any compunctions,
Speaker 1: any problems, any issues with going back militarily, He's very
Speaker 1: clear he has none, which is why he keeps reminding
Speaker 1: them that he will go back there. There seemed James
Speaker 1: to be a tipping point when he hit them twice
Speaker 1: in a row and said the third day is going
Speaker 1: to be harder and that he's taking carg Island. I've
Speaker 1: been told by my sources that that was the tipping
Speaker 1: point for them at that point. They believed him. At
Speaker 1: that point, they would have signed any not only memorandum
Speaker 1: of understanding, but they would have signed on any deal
Speaker 1: at that moment.
Speaker 7: Yeah.
Speaker 8: I think so. When we look at our past strikes
Speaker 8: on them, even though taking out leadership, but in terms
Speaker 8: of the military targeting and so forth, it was limited.
Speaker 8: We weren't going after their entire infrastructure, their whole electrical grid,
Speaker 8: their whole economic grid, energy grid. We didn't do all
Speaker 8: those things, and that would have been much tougher for
Speaker 8: them to come back from. I think it's also significant
Speaker 8: that in the recent exchange between them and the Israelis,
Speaker 8: the Israelis did do a short strike on carg Island.
Speaker 8: It wasn't a devastating one, but it was a signal
Speaker 8: to Iran that yes, we can take everything out and
Speaker 8: do you really want to be in that position? So
Speaker 8: I think that President Trump is right if he's threatening
Speaker 8: them with escalation, and we have a lot of ways
Speaker 8: that we can escalate. At some point they're going to
Speaker 8: think that while, okay, he's serious, he's going to do something.
Speaker 8: Let's downshift into a diplomatic process, which is what they're
Speaker 8: doing now. And we're seeing them using all of the
Speaker 8: tricks of their trade in terms of negotiating, and they're
Speaker 8: trying to spin everything to their favor. But I don't
Speaker 8: think that they want to go back to the military option.
Speaker 8: And so in that sense, yes, President Trump's determs has worked.
Speaker 1: Hi quick break right back as we continue with Lisa
Speaker 1: the Tari, editor in cheat the Foreign Desk, James Robbins,
Speaker 1: former special assistant to the former Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, that
Speaker 1: much more. Eight hundred and ninety four one. Shawn is
Speaker 1: on number this Monday. If you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program.
Speaker 9: Kennedy is on right now, the busiest man.
Speaker 10: In media here for you three hours a day, bringing
Speaker 10: you information that no one else will.
Speaker 9: Sean Hannity is on right now.
Speaker 1: All right, we get to tell you now with Lisa Tari,
Speaker 1: she's the editor in chief of the Foreign Desk. James Robbins,
Speaker 1: former special assistant to former Defense Secretary of Rumsfeld, that
Speaker 1: the President did say to me in one conversation, and
Speaker 1: least I'll give this to you is that there are
Speaker 1: ninety four million other people there that have been impressed
Speaker 1: for forty seven years. And when he said to me,
Speaker 1: I said, you could wipe out their infrastructure in an
Speaker 1: hour half hour, he goes, no, I can wipe it
Speaker 1: out in five minutes. What he was saying to me
Speaker 1: is it would impact the future of the entire country.
Speaker 1: Even the people that would like to bring back this
Speaker 1: great Persian culture that has contributed over the many centuries
Speaker 1: to the advancement of mankind. And that was definitely in
Speaker 1: his head. It doesn't get talked about a lot, but
Speaker 1: it's in his head.
Speaker 6: Yeah, absolutely, And I think that's the biggest challenge, right
Speaker 6: to preserve enough of the country even if there would
Speaker 6: have been regime change, so they can build Iran back greater.
Speaker 6: But then at the same time, we're seeing the Iranian people,
Speaker 6: many of whom were begging or for foreign intervention on
Speaker 6: their soil. This is something that has not been explained
Speaker 6: well to the American audience about how the Iranian people
Speaker 6: were at such a point of desperation to really want
Speaker 6: Donald Trump to launch this war and then to celebrate
Speaker 6: whether it's it was on the streets of expatriate communities
Speaker 6: like in Los Angeles or London, or in Toronto or
Speaker 6: in Iran, where they were passing out suites because they
Speaker 6: were so optimistic about what this could potentially mean and
Speaker 6: hopefully lead to regime collapse. Now, the one thing I
Speaker 6: think it's very very important at this moment is that
Speaker 6: if you look at Iran government media out lists or
Speaker 6: obviously mouthpiece of the regime. They're saying something entirely different.
Speaker 6: They obviously don't believe that Donald Trump has the appetite
Speaker 6: to go back to military war. They don't believe that.
Speaker 1: You know, if they don't believe that, they are beyond
Speaker 1: stupid at a level I can't even describe, a.
Speaker 7: Go ahead should be.
Speaker 6: They shouldn't ever believe. This is my only point is
Speaker 6: that they should never believe that we want this deal
Speaker 6: more than they do. And if time is being bought,
Speaker 6: it should be bought in the favor of the United States.
Speaker 6: While they're still marinating in very very cutting sanctions where
Speaker 6: they're losing money every single day, and they don't become
Speaker 6: enriched during this time period where they feel like they
Speaker 6: ran circles around us at the negotiation table. That has
Speaker 6: always been their number one weapon of choice, where they
Speaker 6: get to come to the negotiating table, they get to
Speaker 6: play their tricks, and they believe that they walk away.
Speaker 6: They don't believe that it was this American diplomacy where
Speaker 6: we want to actually work with other nations, where we
Speaker 6: want to see them prosperous. They play along. The Abraham
Speaker 6: Accords is the best example of that, but we have
Speaker 6: to also make sure that we're not letting off the
Speaker 6: hook or taking our foot off of the neck of
Speaker 6: a major, major global terror threat for all of us.
Speaker 1: Lisa do Tari, thank you so much. James Robins, thank you.
Speaker 10: Sean Hannity, always concerned for our country, always honoring our
Speaker 10: servicemen and service women, and standing up for liberty every day.
Speaker 1: I'm Linda, how long have I been saying that Europe
Speaker 1: is dying as a continent? How long have I said this?
Speaker 11: At least ten years?
Speaker 1: Okay? How long have I talked about how these globalist
Speaker 1: organizations have been nothing but a waste of taxpayer money
Speaker 1: and an unmitigated disaster for America, And we always get
Speaker 1: ripped off, always get taken advantage of.
Speaker 2: Forever long has I been here?
Speaker 1: How long have I said the UN is a useless body. Oh,
Speaker 1: I'm fully on board with you there.
Speaker 11: I'd like to move them off to an island somewhere.
Speaker 1: I want to send it to China. Let China foot
Speaker 1: the bill. How long? How long have I said the
Speaker 1: Paris Accords we got so ripped off. India and China
Speaker 1: get classic is developing nations and we pay the freight.
Speaker 1: We're so stupid sometimes. The problem with Europe, and I've
Speaker 1: gone into great specificity and detail for decades and decades now,
Speaker 1: they have neglected their own national defense. They have done
Speaker 1: it individually as countries, they have done it collectively as
Speaker 1: a continent. They have weakened their defenses to such a
Speaker 1: low level that without the US, I don't think they
Speaker 1: could survive any real, clear present danger, national security disaster.
Speaker 1: They have adopted radical climate alarmism, radical socialism. They have
Speaker 1: had unfettered illegal immigration without assimilation, and it just keeps
Speaker 1: going from bad to worse. Now. The reason I bring
Speaker 1: this up is that when Operation Epic Fury happened, if
Speaker 1: you don't have the moral clarity, we don't get a
Speaker 1: drop of oil really, although we're taking out hundreds of
Speaker 1: billions of barrels of oil or millions of barrels of
Speaker 1: oil from the straight over moves now, but that's only
Speaker 1: because we're in charge of it all. And that's probably
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's way of making them pay for it. But
Speaker 1: the people that have been hurt now, oil trading today
Speaker 1: it's almost in the sixties for crying out loud, so
Speaker 1: you know it's been around seventy two to seventy three
Speaker 1: most of the day. And that benefits Europe, that benefits Russia,
Speaker 1: that benefits China, that benefits the rest of the world.
Speaker 1: We are the number one producer of energy oil in
Speaker 1: the entire world right now, the USA. So I'm watching
Speaker 1: today and there's Keir Starmer announcing his resignation, and I'm like,
Speaker 1: it's inevitable. And you know, there's a lot of articles
Speaker 1: written about this today. I don't think most people actually
Speaker 1: understood it, but this woke ideology, climate alarmism, socialism, neglecting
Speaker 1: national defense, not demanding assimilation has all contributed to this.
Speaker 1: And it's kind of ironic because you have most European
Speaker 1: nations have yet to take any serious steps to walk back,
Speaker 1: you know, the insanity of open borders without assimilation. One
Speaker 1: country that is been cracking down on this, Linda, did
Speaker 1: you see this articles on zero Hedge. It's Sweden. Sweden
Speaker 1: passed a new immigration law that will allow resident permits
Speaker 1: to be refused or revoked if a foreign national is
Speaker 1: deemed not to have lived in an orderly manner, in
Speaker 1: other words, going along with the laws, the assimilation the
Speaker 1: mores of society in Sweden. I would not have expected them,
Speaker 1: would you.
Speaker 11: Yeah, well they are the rape capital of the world
Speaker 11: right now, and they better get it together.
Speaker 9: So I'm through.
Speaker 1: Is that true, yes, Sweeten, rape capital of the world. Yeah,
Speaker 1: because there.
Speaker 7: Is no assimilation, there's just domination from third world migrants.
Speaker 1: So under the new rules, a foreign national's conduct will
Speaker 1: carry greater weight when authorities decide whether to grant, extend,
Speaker 1: or revoke a resident permit, and government representatives there investigators
Speaker 1: there have cited several examples of conduct that may count
Speaker 1: against an applicant, including failing to follow Swedish laws, regulations,
Speaker 1: ignoring decisions by public authorities, systemically avoiding debts, fines, working illegally,
Speaker 1: failing to pay taxes, criminality, links to extremist organizations. Anyone
Speaker 1: who doesn't make the effort to do the right thing
Speaker 1: should not be able to count on staying. According to
Speaker 1: the their migration minister in a statement that he put out,
Speaker 1: I'm like, well, good for them, maybe they're learning the lesson.
Speaker 1: You know, how did we end up with one hundred
Speaker 1: career courts in Great Britain and how do we end
Speaker 1: up with Nogo zones and other parts of Europe including
Speaker 1: countries like France, it is madness. Now there's other considerations
Speaker 1: here is that is, you know, in play political correctness,
Speaker 1: fear of accusations of racism, fear of losing electoral support
Speaker 1: because they've allowed so many unvetted people from all over
Speaker 1: the world then that haven't assimilated. So now it's a
Speaker 1: huge voting block within these individual countries and within the
Speaker 1: continent that has now struck fear in the hearts of
Speaker 1: most people, including you know, Kiir Starmer. So you know,
Speaker 1: when Keir Starmer makes this announcement earlier today, I could
Speaker 1: care less. As a matter of fact, good riddens to
Speaker 1: bad rubbish. One answer I see right now is one
Speaker 1: guy that I think could do the best job, and
Speaker 1: that's Nigel Faraj. That's who I would vote for anyway.
Speaker 1: But here's Ker announcing his resignation.
Speaker 12: Every decision I've taken has been about putting the country
Speaker 12: I love first. That is why I will resign as
Speaker 12: leader of the Labor Party. I have spoken to His
Speaker 12: Majesty the King this morning to inform him of my decision.
Speaker 12: I will ask the National Executive Committee of the Labor
Speaker 12: Party to set out a timetable with nominations opening on
Speaker 12: the ninth of July and complete it by the summer recess.
Speaker 1: Now he got emotional during this announcement as well. Let's
Speaker 1: play that for it.
Speaker 12: And when I leave the biggest job in the country,
Speaker 12: I shall spend more time on the most important job,
Speaker 12: being the best husband I can to my fantastic wife Vick,
Speaker 12: who has been a rock by my side through good
Speaker 12: times and bad, and being the best dad I can
Speaker 12: to my beautiful children who are my pride and my joy.
Speaker 1: Thank you very much, my pad announcement made outside of
Speaker 1: ten Downing Street. I mean, you know he wasn't up
Speaker 1: to the job. I think the only guy that would
Speaker 1: dare be as Trumpian as Donald Trump, that would have
Speaker 1: the most potential to turn this on a dime. Remember
Speaker 1: during Brexit it was Nigel Farage that actually forced that through.
Speaker 1: I mean it's a force of nature and I would
Speaker 1: say is probably the front runner going into this ABE
Speaker 1: in Texas. God blessed Texas. Abe. How are you glad
Speaker 1: you called?
Speaker 7: I'm good Sean.
Speaker 11: I just had two topics real quick.
Speaker 7: Uh.
Speaker 11: The people that are running for office in a Democrat
Speaker 11: part it is uh, you know, activists and you know activists.
Speaker 11: They can make these empty promises and they know how
Speaker 11: to agitate and motivate the crawl, but they may they
Speaker 11: don't know how to govern.
Speaker 7: That's one and then.
Speaker 11: The other subject is seun Is there any way that
Speaker 11: we can like sue the mainstream media for infecting everyone,
Speaker 11: well most of Democrats, infecting them with their t.
Speaker 1: With TD is well, I mean the lying, probably not.
Speaker 1: I mean if they went after you personally and there's
Speaker 1: a libel case specifically against you, you know, if they
Speaker 1: said Abe in Texas uh is a you know, a murderer, Yeah,
Speaker 1: then you you you'd have liability. You know. One of
Speaker 1: the frustrating to me and my life and my career.
Speaker 1: And it's not that frustrating. I mean on the overall
Speaker 1: list of positives and negatives, it's not that high on
Speaker 1: my negative list. But I have been lied about. I
Speaker 1: have been smeared, I have been besmirched, I have been slandered.
Speaker 1: I've had my personal text messages released, my privacy invaded
Speaker 1: over and over again. I've had threat after threat to
Speaker 1: get me thrown off this show and boycotted and demonetized.
Speaker 1: I mean, I've lived through all of this, and then
Speaker 1: I go to my lawyer and I say, I want
Speaker 1: to sue, and because I'm a public figure, and there's
Speaker 1: a precedent case called Times v. Sullivan, which means I'd
Speaker 1: have to prove they did this with malice, which is
Speaker 1: a standard nobody can prove. I just have to take it.
Speaker 1: But if you're a private citizen, that standard does not
Speaker 1: apply to you. So if they ever go after you specifically, yes,
Speaker 1: you can go after them, you know, for their average
Speaker 1: daily propaganda, misinformation, you know, lying, you probably can't go
Speaker 1: after them. They'll say, oh, we just made a mistake.
Speaker 11: Yeah, but it was actually a humor, you know, the
Speaker 11: jokes as you know, because it seems as if all
Speaker 11: the lion that they did, they do it by Trump
Speaker 11: is what gave pep td Is that was humor. I
Speaker 11: get it, yes, yes, And I would like you to
Speaker 11: address the other topics by all these activists that are
Speaker 11: running in a Democratic party, because at first activists, all
Speaker 11: they did was that, but now they're running.
Speaker 1: I like the Democratic Party right where they are. I
Speaker 1: like the Party of Elsaiahed, I like the Party of
Speaker 1: Graham Platner. I like the Party of six gender tall.
Speaker 1: Rico got his non binary the party of Mamdannie and
Speaker 1: Pocahontas and Grandpa Bernie and the squad and AOC and
Speaker 1: a party that has lost its conscience and its soul,
Speaker 1: because I'll take our odds as being infinitely higher in
Speaker 1: this pending mid term. Anyway, appreciate the call, my friend.
Speaker 1: God bless you, Mike and Maryland. Mike, you're next.
Speaker 13: Picking up on something you touched on Friday, the nil
Speaker 13: and the transfer portal. In college football, as far as yes,
Speaker 13: the minute they take a penny of money, they're professionals.
Speaker 13: They're no longer amateurs and have no business playing college football.
Speaker 1: The only slight disagreement I have is this, Let's say
Speaker 1: it's there are different estimates out there. Let's say it's
Speaker 1: under five percent of college football players, for example, use
Speaker 1: that sport. We'll ever make it to the NFL. And
Speaker 1: you know, for a college athlete, a top college athlete,
Speaker 1: it is a it is more than a full time job.
Speaker 1: They train like a professional team. These schools make hundreds
Speaker 1: and hundreds of millions of dollars off of their play.
Speaker 1: I know we talk about they get a free college education,
Speaker 1: but to be very honest, if you look deep down,
Speaker 1: a lot of These players are not exactly taking you know,
Speaker 1: physics and biology, and they're not pre med and pre law.
Speaker 1: There they are to play football, and many of them
Speaker 1: will leave college with lifelong injuries. To get some level
Speaker 1: of compensation a piece of that pie and not give
Speaker 1: it all to the school does not seem unfair to me.
Speaker 13: No, but the players knew what they were getting into
Speaker 13: way early on, and like Pop Borner, they were getting injuries.
Speaker 13: Then it hurts. Then it's not going to be the
Speaker 13: same injuries, only a little more direct because they're bigger
Speaker 13: players now.
Speaker 1: So look, I hear what you're saying. So you're saying
Speaker 1: the school should keep all the money. These guys will
Speaker 1: have life sustained injuries and they shouldn't get anything. Yeah, okay, No,
Speaker 1: I appreciate it. Thanks for being blunt, All right, quick
Speaker 1: break right back to our phones eight hundred and ninety
Speaker 1: four one, sewn our number. If you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program.
Speaker 13: The Final Hour roundup is next.
Speaker 10: You do not want to miss it, and stay tuned
Speaker 10: for the final hour free for all on the Sean
Speaker 10: Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: A right back to our busy phones eight hundred and
Speaker 1: ninety four one Sean if you want to join us.
Speaker 1: Kevin Montana, what's up, Kevin? How are you?
Speaker 7: Yes, Hello, mister Sean, how are you today?
Speaker 1: I'm good? Happy Monday, my friend. What's going on Monday?
Speaker 7: Monday workday? Right?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Gotta earn o Liven? No problem?
Speaker 7: Uh yeah, no, I got no problem with that. You
Speaker 7: gotta everybody's gotta work. My question, and hopefully you're such
Speaker 7: an astute man you will be able to enlighten me
Speaker 7: a little bit. I had a question, God forbid that
Speaker 7: the fact that the Liberals get back into office here
Speaker 7: in the future, what would they do with the I
Speaker 7: Ran deal that they have now? Would they just tear
Speaker 7: that like of course, mister Trump, which I fully support,
Speaker 7: would they just and throw that away? Or like, just
Speaker 7: God forbid, like you know, Hell's end comes to it
Speaker 7: and they want to do what they're doing.
Speaker 1: Go back to Reagan. What did Reagan admonish us about
Speaker 1: that freedom is but one generation away from extinction. It's
Speaker 1: up to every generation to fight their battle. We have
Speaker 1: our battles. My parents had theirs, my grandparents had theirs,
Speaker 1: and we have to instill the good values in our
Speaker 1: children so they know what is at stake. Here and
Speaker 1: they take on the responsibility of leaving a better country
Speaker 1: than they inherited, and that is a big task for
Speaker 1: every generation. To be honest, I mean, I can't even
Speaker 1: tell you what happens post Trump. To be very blunt,
Speaker 1: I mean, I hope we stay the chorus. I hope
Speaker 1: that the progress is so great people won't even, you know,
Speaker 1: think about going with the radicalism that now represents the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party. But every generation has their moment of truth.
Speaker 7: They yes, sir, yes, sir. Yeah, we're always so surprised
Speaker 7: by the way these guys are doing this stuff and
Speaker 7: just the ideology that they are working with. None of
Speaker 7: what they say really truly makes sense. I mean in
Speaker 7: my mind, I'm just a Montana guy, but it doesn't
Speaker 7: make sense to me with what they're trying to run with.
Speaker 7: And then also like, what do you think, Well.
Speaker 1: What do I think they I'm a running out of time.
Speaker 1: But I'm going to tell you, if they don't change,
Speaker 1: if we don't adapt, if we go back to stupid,
Speaker 1: you get stupid as a result. That's simple, you know. Sadly,
Speaker 1: at the end of the day, we'll get the government
Speaker 1: we deserve if we get suckered by the communist left.
Speaker 1: We will get the country the government we deserve. I
Speaker 1: hope we're smarter