WEBVTT - July Mega Q&A

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid Verbal. I'm that for me.

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 2>I want to be happy. You want to be happy

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 2>for a day? Edith state is that?

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Whoo whoom? And then and Tye, welcome back to the

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Solid Verbal, boys and girls, my name is ty hilden Brandt,

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>joining me as always over there in beautiful New York City.

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>My man, the birthday boy Dan Rubinstein, sir, Happy birthday.

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 2>How are you? Thank you? I don't know if we

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 2>have we ever recorded on either one of our birthdays.

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh, we totally have, totally have.

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 2>When did we do this? I think we did it

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:42.319
<v Speaker 2>last year for.

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>My birthday on November twenty third.

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 2>And was it a good show? I mean it was

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 2>late in the scene. Probably have probably hit a wall

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 2>by them.

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it usually happens around the first week in November.

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>We hit that wall.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 2>This is true.

0:00:55.960 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So what did you do anything exciting for your birthday? Really?

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 2>I ate food that I wanted to eat, which is

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of the same thing I do every year. I mean,

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 2>I hung out with the solid Baby, which is the

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 2>first time I got to do that. So that was great.

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 2>I prepared for this show. I took a train ride

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 2>and I rode in a car and I just had

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 2>a great day ty, and it's continuing as we do

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 2>the show right now.

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, excellent, welcome one and all for coming to our

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>wonderful podcast here where we talk about college football today

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>on the Solid Verb. Well, we're going to be doing

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a mega Q and A show, So here is the gests.

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>What is today's date, July twenty fifth. We should know this,

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it's your birthday. Yeah, today is in effect our last

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>mega Q and A before we officially dive into actual

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>college football.

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Can you believe it? Yeah? You enunciated that incredibly. Well,

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 2>thank you.

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Actual college football is coming your way. Next week, we're

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>going to start up with our previews, and of course,

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>as you know, after our previews we start talking about games.

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have our fantasy things live shows coming up.

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Wink weink, nudge nudge. If you haven't already, tickets are

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:15.119
<v Speaker 1>going like hotcakes. Go to Solid rebletickets dot com Slash

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Texas if you'd like to be in the studio audience

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>for our wonderful show that we're planning in Dallas, Texas,

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>August the seventeenth at the Alamo Draft House. That show

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>starts at eight pm, and then the ve that's their

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>richardson Location, richardson Location, thank you.

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 1>And then the next morning, like we're the Kiss World Tour,

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 1>hopping on the bird, flying cross country or halfway across

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the country to DC doing a show Union Stage, seven

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>thirty pm, August the eighteenth. It's a Sunday night, two

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>shows one weekend. Both are gonna be Fantasy Draft. Both

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be a little bit different, and we have

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>now officially, I know people were very concerned, earned now

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>officially begun the process of fleshing out a little bit

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>what we might select from for both of those shows.

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, our list is growing. It's like we're recording an

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 2>album and we well, we brought it to you, Rick Rubin,

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 2>are four hundred and fourteen tracks. We got to narrow

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 2>this down. And if we don't make the DC show

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 2>because of some sort of travel issue, which we're not anticipating,

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 2>the weather looks great right now. It will be an

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 2>improv show with Jake Ruden and I'm trying to think

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 2>of a Nats player right now, Max, Max Scherzer. Yeah,

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 2>they will be doing they'll be doing improv comedy, which

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 2>is probably way better. So we are quite excited. If

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 2>you have not yet gotten tickets, If you're on the

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 2>fence about getting tickets, come hang. We'd love to meet you.

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 2>We'd love to do a show for you and you

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 2>won't regret it. And both places are air conditioned. If

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 2>nothing else, that's right, Yeah, you will be taken care

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 2>of comfort wise. I believe drinks are available at both places.

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Snacks and or even more bus food options than just

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 2>snacks are available at both places either way. If there

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 2>are not tenders available on premises, there will be following

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 2>the show because we like to go out afterwards and

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 2>say hi to everybody. Hashtag tenders with.

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Tie, hashtag tenders with ties. So Solidverbaltickets dot com, slash

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Texas is your link if you want to buy tickets

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to that Dallas show. Soliverbaltickets dot com, slash DC. If

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be in the DC metro area and

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.679
<v Speaker 1>we'd like to stop on buy Union stage. We're very excited.

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>We're planning. It's going to be an awesome, if not

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>hectic weekend. Taylor are beloved producer who has done our

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>reverbs for many years now, he will be in toe

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>with us both in Dallas and in his hometown of DC.

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>So stop on buy and say hello to all of us.

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Hope to see you out there. We're excited.

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I like it. I like the enthusiasm. May I ask

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 2>you a question before we get into please anything?

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Have you taken anything from I laugh as I say

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 2>this from any of the media days. Is there anything

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 2>that jumped out to you impact twelves taking the championship

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 2>game to Vegas eventually once they build that stadium. Yeah,

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 2>I think LSU. There's a bunch of stadiums that might

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 2>start selling alcohol, but LSU is one of them. Anything

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:21.039
<v Speaker 2>at all. On the preseason All Conference Teams on what

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 2>coaches had to say, Chris Peterson said, I don't know,

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 2>is there anything that really stood out to you?

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>The Vegas thing stood out to me a little bit, Okay,

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:29.919
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not you know, to be honest, I'm not

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>sure why. Right, It's just like another place. And obviously

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole industry built around gambling in Las Vegas,

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>which makes it a bit unique, but otherwise it's just

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of any other place. The fact that they would

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>have a game there shouldn't be a big deal, and

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>probably isn't a big deal, but at the same time,

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 1>still feels a little bit different. And I did see

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing that stood out, and I don't know if

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it came from media days or somewhere else, but that

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Colorado might be playing some really early games this year.

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Did you see that.

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 2>I saw that it was what eleven Mountain time or

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 2>even ten o'clock.

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's very early.

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 2>That is early. That to me, I mean that's a lot.

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that to me stood out a little bit because

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>we're always talking on this show, and I know you

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>spoke at length about the fact that the Pack twelve

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>needs to be a little bit more front stage center,

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>needs to be a little bit more self aware about

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the time zone puts them at a

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>distinct disadvantage.

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.679
<v Speaker 2>Nine am Pacific time kickoffs, so nine am local for

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 2>most of the schools, so that's noon Eastern, which is

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 2>when college football has begun, just not Pack twelve football.

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 2>So that's I mean, that's a little kid soccer kickoff

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 2>time as long as there are orange slices. I guess

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 2>that's that's a lot to ask. I mean, what is

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 2>this the body clock they're just steering fully into it, right,

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 2>because that's the excuse that I guess was given about

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Stateford with who they lose to Northwestern and an ugly

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 2>Northwest to go. Yes, so I guess they're really steering

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 2>into the body clock thing and scheduling Hawaii. I don't

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 2>know where the advantage is going to be by a

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 2>nine am game, other than so you'll get more exposure

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 2>because it's not like every week the ACC is putting

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 2>its absolute best game at noon and the SEC isn't

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 2>putting its absolute best game at noon, so hypothetically your

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 2>competition is a little bit lesser. I just don't know

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 2>if that makes people on the East Coast more likely

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 2>to watch PAC twelve football. I think still, as I've maintained,

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 2>it's just about quality at the top. People will watch Oregon.

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.239
<v Speaker 2>If Oregon's excellent, people will watch USC. If USC is excellent,

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 2>people will watch That might be it. But but now

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 2>if you with UCLA and Ship Kelly are excellent, if Washington,

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, develops into a more exciting, offensive brand, sure

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 2>people will watch those teams. That's just going to take

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 2>more than where they are right now. So that's where

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 2>they stand. Also, the Vegas thing. Do you know how

0:07:59.880 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 2>the capacity of the stadium that I don't think is

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 2>built yet or fully built. The capacity is sixty five

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 2>thousand big stadium. You think you think you're filling that

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 2>with like Washington USC? Maybe do you think you're filling

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 2>that with I don't know. I'm trying to be reasonable

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 2>and realistic here are you feeling that with Washington Utah?

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 2>No, we had last year? Ah, it's a big stadium.

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Half sixty five thousands of a big stadium. You can thirty

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>k It's not big compared to Michigan or Tennessee.

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 2>But you're attracting more people to Vegas and Santa Clara.

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, but in a place that doesn't have any kind

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:41.199
<v Speaker 1>of deep college football culture. I mean, no disrespect to UNLV.

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Sixty five thousands of that's a that's a pretty heavy

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>li It's easy.

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 2>It's easy to get to, hotels are reasonable. People want

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 2>to go to there, right. You know it's going to

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 2>be warmer than it is in eastern Washington, northern California

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 2>and the desert. So I understand the move more so,

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 2>I just you know, I have complicated feelings about conference

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 2>championship games and the PAC twelve going Away from Home sites,

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:06.719
<v Speaker 2>it's all it's all fine.

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, So here is the deal on today's show.

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, congratulations, Skippy, you've got.

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Mail, You've got mail on the Solid Verbal. We're doing

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>our best to pay homage to those of you who

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>wrote into Solid Verbal at gmail dot com, those of

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you who posted on Facebook, on Twitter, on Reddit, on Instagram,

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>on friendster, lord knows wherever else. It's our last MEGAQ

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and A before we actually get into real hard college

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>football content. Dan, m hm. Can we just come to

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>an agreement here before we start? Always and this is

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>this is entirely selfish of me. Okay, can we come

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to an agreement? No edits tonight?

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 2>Wow? Yeah, definitely? Okay.

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:56.839
<v Speaker 1>Who wants no Ties day job whatever? Who wants not

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>going there? Whatever happens happens on this show. I'm not

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>cutting any out.

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's fair.

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>If you're confident with that, so am I.

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, If you're confident with everybody knowing that Tie is

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 2>an executive at Cradle Jones, then I am too. Sounds

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:13.719
<v Speaker 2>good to me.

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, where do you want to go first?

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Here? Let's start with the question that lives atop our

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 2>document here, Okay, which is more realistic, more realistic, not likely,

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 2>more realistic Michigan going undefeated this year or Ohio State

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 2>losing three games. That's from Andrew.

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>This is an incredibly interesting question. Thank you, Andrew. I

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 1>thought long and hard about this one, and here here's

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the dilemma that I have. The dilemma is that it's

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>really hard to be undefeated. I don't care who you are.

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>You could have the easiest schedule in college football and

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 1>still very very difficult to go twelve and zero. But

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>then you look at Ohio State's roster and there's just

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>so much talent. I know that Urban Meyer is no

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 1>longer the coach, and it's Ryan Day. And Ryan Day

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>was pretty good at the first I don't know chunk

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of last year, right, but I can't see them losing

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>three games at all.

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 2>There's just so much talent there.

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, the Big Tenniece is pretty good, and you know

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>there could be a couple teams that sneak up on

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the buck Eyes. But if I'm picking the more realistic

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of the two, I am almost inclined to go to twelve

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>In oh Michigan.

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to go the opposite way. Was Maryland excuse me?

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Was Ohio State a sneeze and a half away from

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 2>losing to Maryland? Yes? And Penn State? Yes? How many

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 2>losses would that have given them in the regular season

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:40.439
<v Speaker 2>last year? Two?

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>More?

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Three?

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they lose to Purdue, right, So it's three total,

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 2>And that's what this question is asking. So it's not

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 2>unrealistic that Ohio State loses three games last season with

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 2>what we presume to be a better quarterback and at

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 2>different parts of this defense, even though he missed the

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 2>majority of the year, Nick Bosa the line, it's a

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 2>little bit better. So I think it is Ohio State losing.

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 2>It's easier to lose games than it is to go undefeated, right, generally, Yes,

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 2>there are more things. It's hard to stumble into wins

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 2>every week, but you can stumble into a couple losses.

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, right, absolutely, and especially on the Ohio State side

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of things. So everyone knows about justin fields being starting, no, no, no,

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>no different team, okay, But Ohio State and Michigan are

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the inverse of one another. If you

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>look at their returning talent, Ohio State has a lot

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of turnover on defense and it's going to take them

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, presumably to figure out who goes where.

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Clearly they've recruited very well over the last five years.

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>That's not going to be an issue. But could a

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>team sneak up on them? Sure, I just there's so

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>much talent there. Dan, I have a really hard time

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>convincing myself that it's more realistic that they lose three games.

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 2>I look at the mission schedule.

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Michigan schedule I think is a little bit harder than

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Ohio States this year. Obviously they've got that Notre Dame game.

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:09.719
<v Speaker 1>You look at the way it lays out, Otherwise it

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit harder. I still feel a little

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>bit comfortable, more comfortable if I'm picking between the two

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>going Michigan in this particular scenario.

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm curious. I'm still curious about Michigan. There's a

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of questions to me about but I'm saying the

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 2>more realistic one is to me Ohio State losing those games.

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 2>They lost what six games the year before? Urban Meyer

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 2>shout up, Luke Fickel, all right. On that similar note,

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 2>what is the most intriguing G five versus P five matchup?

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 2>This year? Also from Andrew shout out Andrew Good.

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Questions, Well, I guess Army isn't technically a G five,

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>but can we include.

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Them in this question? Army a G five, they're an independent, but.

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, not technically a.

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, non power five. Power five talked a lot. We've

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 2>talked a lot about Army. Michigan.

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that game is again keyword intriguing. That game's intriguing

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to me.

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, get away from Michigan. I'll go I'll run

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 2>through some of these.

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:14.959
<v Speaker 1>I've got another one here, but go ahead, run through

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>some other options.

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Fresno State, USC new quarterback, Fresno State, USC new offense, Ole,

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Miss Memphis. If you like shootouts, that's interesting.

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>That one's intrigument I thought about that one.

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 2>U QB for all Miss. I assume Brady White for

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 2>the four hundred and eleventh year for Memphis, Florida State,

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Boise State.

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>That's the one I have tone setter. By the way,

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>according to our friend Bill Connolly, Boise State will be

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>favored in that game. It's a neutral cider ish ish

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in Jacksonville at TIAA Creft Stadium or something of the ILK.

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, I don't know if the line you're supposed

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 2>to take medication for Tiaa Crefts. It could be true.

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, according to Bill's numbers, Boise would be a one

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>point six point favorite in that game. I think by

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the time it kicks off, obviously, Florida State is probably

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be more of the hometown favorite. But that that's

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the one that I have circled here as the most intriguing.

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Got Lincoln Riley and Dana holgo to Houston, Oklahoma. We

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 2>have Cincinnati, Ohio State. What will Justin Fields look like

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 2>presumably Justin Fields against a very very good Cincinnati defense,

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Washington State, Houston Mother Holgerson, Leech. So we got all

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 2>sorts of the air Raid disciples and the actual Leach

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Stanford UCF Wimbush.

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>That could be interesting. Yeah, I could see.

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm State North Carolina app State I believe is winless

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 2>since they became an FBS team against Power five programs

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 2>and UCF pitt which do not watch the highlights from

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 2>last year. It is ugly. My answer is in terms

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 2>of storylines, in terms of tone setting, for the rest

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 2>of the season, it's still gonna be Florida Stateise State,

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 2>even though I thought last year Boise stateed Oklahoma State

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 2>was gonna matter a lot more than it actually ended

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 2>up mattering so selfishly for pure entertainment reasons. If Derek

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 2>King has healed to a nice place, I am most

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 2>excited to just as a TV show watch Houston, Oklahoma.

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, sure enough, Okay, Yeah, a couple interesting ones in here.

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a lot of storylines in that game

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 2>that are interesting. Okay, pick a question, Dan, I'm gonna

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 2>go to ed with two d's. I love this.

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Will Auburn Oregon be a game to find a contender

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>for the year or another version of Auburn Washington from

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>last year that doesn't hold up as the year progresses.

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember previewing that Auburn Washington game from yeah,

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>last season. I actually went back and looked at my document,

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>okay to get my thoughts at the time, and look,

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Washington coming into the season seemed like a slam dunk

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>coming out of.

0:16:57.800 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 2>The Pac twelve.

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and Auburn was a little bit of an unknown quantity,

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>but we knew Jared Stidham was coming back, and you know,

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 1>I think in hindsight, maybe we expected a little bit

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>more from the running game. But by and large, this

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>seemed at the time, I think, to be a little

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>bit more of a high profile, higher profile matchup than

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>what Auburn Oregon looks to be this season. Is that

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>fair to say?

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I think so, because of there was a storyline

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 2>entering the season of like, Washington needs to win this game, right,

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 2>This set the tone.

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>This was going to be twelve, They're way to achieve

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that validity as an elite team.

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 2>They were representing the conference in a way that was

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 2>put on them that it was a little bit different

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 2>than other years, not necessarily fairly, and so game was closed.

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 2>There was that non call at the end that I

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 2>think Jake Browning was abused on that play uh too

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 2>late and it affected things. But ultimately, yes, Ed is right.

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 2>This game all did not Washington wins the Pac twelve

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 2>to make it to the Rose Bowl, but didn't matter

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.360
<v Speaker 2>because it's a non conference game. So will Auburn Oregon

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 2>be that a deciding clincher for somebody to make or

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 2>not make the playoff? I think is his implication. I

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 2>happen to think that Oregon running the pistol has a

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 2>nine wins ceiling. Okay, if they don't look decidedly different

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 2>this year. If they're not a new look offense with

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 2>basically the same players, they look like a nine win team.

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 2>But that's kind of like what Auburn's ceiling right now

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 2>looks like with the uncertainty a quarterback and now Gus

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Malson's taking back control of the offense west right in

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 2>the SEC West. So they could be a nine and

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 2>three team that looks like a ten and a half

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 2>and one and a half type team. But I'm going

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 2>to say one of these teams is in a playoff

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 2>conversation in early November. Doesn't necessarily mean they're there at

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.679
<v Speaker 2>the end, but I'm saying by early November, this is

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 2>like even a team that loses this game that could

0:18:59.000 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 2>be their only loss.

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 1>For the question itself is a bit flawed because the

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>game last year was starting from a different point than

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the game this year. The expectations going into the game

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 1>are different, and I think that influence is at least

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>how I feel about it. It's a really good non

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>conference matchup. I don't think we're going to be finding

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a contender. I don't think that going into the game.

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that coming out of the game. But

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 1>so whether or not that holds up moving forward. I

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>guess is in the eye of the beholder, But for

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>me anyway, I just I view it as a really

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting early season barometer for where these teams are at.

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Auburn obviously new starting quarterback, Oregon trying to do some

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>different stuff. It's interesting on a number of levels, just

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>not from a playoff perspective, maybe not even from a

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>conference championship perspective.

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Oregon looking completely inept on the road at all points

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 2>last season and barely backed into the Bowl win that

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 2>would I don't even know what the score was, seven, six, ten, seven,

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 2>something ridiculous. So just want I want competence from Oregon

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 2>on the road, and I want to see how much

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 2>control the new quarterback for Auburn has in this offense.

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Because it's somebody new, it's Gatewood, it's Nicks, whoever, whoever

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 2>it is, we'll have a sort of a tough time

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 2>I think with this Oregon defense.

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Daniel, this comes from happy ombre hombre. Yeah, if you

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>were unable to watch the game you've been waiting for

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>all season live, but we're able to listen on the radio,

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>would you tune in or would you wait to watch

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the game later on DVD. Again, that's from Happy Happy Ombre.

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 2>We may be the right I think you meant DVR,

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 2>but I like the idea that it's DVD. Oh did

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 2>I say DVD, I mean DV. Here you go, here's

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 2>your digital video disc. Same difference.

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we may be the wrong people to ask on

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>this because, as you know, we do a show very

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>early Sunday mornings. We have to pay attention to everything.

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>We're always, I think in this mode where we need

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to try and follow the action live. If we don't

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>see it live, it makes it hard.

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 2>We have to the fact we have weddings, we have

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 2>events that we need to go to that happen to

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.679
<v Speaker 2>coincide with games that we've been looking forward to for

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 2>a long time. We're real people, but only in a sense, right,

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 2>So what is it too? Is it listening to the

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 2>radio and you know, hearing what happens live as it's happening,

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 2>or holding out, abstaining maybe turning your phone off, listening

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 2>to music or podcast that kind of thing.

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I've never been able to do that.

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that radio's the answer.

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Radio is the answer. And Dan, I listened to a

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of games in the radio. I talk about it

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to the course of a season. I actually like listening

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to some of the team specific broadcasts. It gives you

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a flair for the game, insight into the game that

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't get watching some of the national commentators do it.

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So I've got no issue with listening to a game

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>on the radio. Granted it's not like watching it on TV,

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>so you can see with your own eyes what's going on.

0:21:57.800 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 2>But there is engrossing in its own way.

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>There's an art to that radio broadcast that I don't

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like I'm being deprived if I have to listen

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to view.

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you. I'm with you. Travis wants to know

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 2>can Kentucky use a running back by committee to get

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.400
<v Speaker 2>the same results as where they were with Benny Snell

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 2>last year or better? How much of a leap forward

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 2>will Terry Wilson have with or make with the passing

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 2>game this year?

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>It's okay, it's a good question because again we talked

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>about it on the Dude Show. Yeah, that offense was

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>very rush heavy, for sure. They ran a lot. They

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 1>had Benny Snell. He was a fourth round pick, went

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to the Steelers. Obviously, very very talented this season. Now

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>without him, it's obviously, as Travis said, more of a

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>running back by committee, and I think the offense as

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a whole is going to be a little bit more balanced.

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>So Terry Wilson's going to have more opportunities, presumably to

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>improve in the passing game. Wasn't terrific last season, obviously

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>has a ton of room for and for improvement in

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen.

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 2>They are going to need to do Eddie Grant in

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 2>this offensive staff figure out a way to manufacture yards

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 2>in a sort of indirect e facy way. Because Terry

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Wilson on third downs last year. I look this up

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:31.199
<v Speaker 2>in preparation for Travis. I care about Travis on third downs.

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 2>The number one hundred quarterback in the nation on third

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 2>downs had a rating of about one hundred and twenty.

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Not good at all, not great.

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 2>No, Terry Wilson was not listed in the top one hundred,

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 2>so I had to dig and look up situational stats

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 2>about Terry Wilson. He hit, he was at about one oh six,

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 2>So they need to get to a lot more third

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 2>and two's so that he's just dumping stuff off or

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 2>he's making plays with his legs, because any notion of

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 2>him developed being significantly as a passer would be almost

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 2>too much to ask for. That is probably not going

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 2>to be how Kentucky wins. I think they're going to

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:11.719
<v Speaker 2>try and open things up, but I think that's more

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 2>in the like, let's how do we find you know,

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 2>four yards in the screen game kind of thing, and

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 2>like a de facto way of running without having Benny Snell,

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 2>because ultimately, Benny Snell was the hammer that made the

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 2>offense go and it was an alley oop situation with

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 2>that defense that was able to get opposing offenses off

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 2>the field so quickly, so you wear down those opposing

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 2>defenses with a back like Benny Snell. He was the

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 2>perfect running back for them, and he was. He stays healthy,

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 2>he's able to get extra yardage. He was terrific and

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 2>he'll be missed. You know, maybe they go five and seven,

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 2>maybe they go six and six, which is still okay

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:49.959
<v Speaker 2>for Kentucky football. But if even third and seven feels

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 2>like a mile sometimes if they have to go downfield, yeah,

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 2>all right, So I'm not super optimistic on Terry Wilson

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 2>as a top eight quarterback in the SEC.

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Daniel let's go to lamb to slam.

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I went to high school with this guy. That's

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 2>not true.

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Better season, Shaye Patterson or Justin Herbert.

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh Man, this's a marriage question for me.

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel here?

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 2>I think it's Justin Herbert. I think there's going to

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 2>be a bit of a push pull for Michigan in

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 2>terms of philosophy on offense, where I think Jim Harbaugh

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 2>is saying all the right things in June, July, March, Oh, yeah,

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 2>we're looking to evolve, We're turning fully full control to

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Josh Gaddis. But it feels a little bit like Lebron

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.199
<v Speaker 2>saying like, oh, I'm gonna play center now, I'm not

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 2>going to dribble the ball up, I'm not going to

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 2>run fast breaks anymore. And then come February, Lebron has

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 2>the ball in his hands. Come November, Holy that Michigan

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 2>has a fullback out there and they're just going for

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 2>another dive on third and three. So I think Justin Herbert,

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 2>as much as I don't like the pistol, I think

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 2>think his upside downfield making plays is higher than Shape Patterson,

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 2>and I think the defenses he'll be dealing with are

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 2>a little bit easier to put put up numbers against.

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going Herbert, that's a fair assessment. I'm gonna

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>go shape Patterson. As you'll find once we get into

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>our actual team and conference previews. I'm very high on

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 1>Michigan this year. Yeah, and I think he stands to

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>benefit from an improvement elsewhere on offense. I think another

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>year in that system will help him dramatically. And if

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Michigan does what I think, it's going to be hard

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 1>not to answer Shape Patterson to this question. He's a

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>very good quarterback. He just needs another year in the system.

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 2>For give me, Shay. Let's get away from pure Michigan

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 2>for God's sakes. This comes to us from coach oh

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Is Lord, whoa coach?

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Is this actually maybe Ed Orzron asking this question?

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Not coach O is actually the handle of coach Orgeron,

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.439
<v Speaker 2>similar to LSU with Joe Burrow. What teams are just

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 2>one piece away from breakout years? And what pieces do

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 2>they need? And then he wants us to talk about

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 2>LSU's new locker room, which I guess we can for

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 2>a few seconds, but I don't know if that college

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 2>football is necessarily a one piece away unless it's quarterback,

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 2>and so do you have teams that right now, they

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 2>appear to be in pretty good shape, but at quarterback

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.439
<v Speaker 2>they're just a little too iffy. And with the right

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 2>quarterback they're winning two and a half, three, three and

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 2>a half more games. Hasn't this been?

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Like I feel like we've done full episodes on Florida

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>being this team for the last three seasons. Now, if

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 1>they get better quarterback play, they might party team.

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Part of it is quarterback slash coordinator. Right, It's hard

0:27:56.800 --> 0:28:00.199
<v Speaker 2>to say like it's just on the quarterback skill set,

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 2>but let's say one piece in saying that it's offense

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 2>and quarterback philosophy and the actual talent under center. Right,

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:13.360
<v Speaker 2>I think Penn State isn't that Penn State this year

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 2>could fall into that category. Sean Their offense took a

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 2>big tumble back last year. Sean Cliff was incredible.

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you starting quarterback, former Blue Chipper, but not Trace McSorley.

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Not the windiest quarterback in program history. So sure, I

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 1>think that's a fair assessment. There'll be a bit of

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a recalibration on the Penn State side

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of things.

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 2>What about Mississippi state. I think they're definitely winning more

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 2>games last year.

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>But one piece would you classify them as one piece away?

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 2>I would classify them as having a Nick Fitzgerald problem

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 2>last season, yes for sure. Yeah, their defense in his mundy,

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 2>even though they lose what they lose to the NFL

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 2>significant players up the middle of that defense. Even this year,

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 2>they've brought back an enough talent on both sides of

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 2>the ball that if you were to tell me again,

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 2>if Tommy Stevens hits that or whoever ends up starting

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 2>the Danny Etling line, then they are going to be

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 2>a very dangerous team.

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>He does say one piece away from breakout years, so

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a lower bar.

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 2>I think Iowa was an offensive coordinator away from being

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 2>a nine to ten win consistent team. Sure, yeah, LSU

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 2>he mentioned Auburn is interesting because they should have another

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 2>really good defense. I think Utah is an offensive coordinator away,

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 2>and I don't think it's Andy Ludwig. I think Troy

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Taylor's fine, but I think, yeah, I think.

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>You an interesting answer at quarterback.

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 2>TCU is definitely an interesting answer.

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>There are a couple other questions in here that involve TCU,

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>but TCU I think falls into this category as well.

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Troy Taylor is the form offensive coordinator

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 2>of Utah. I meant to say Tyler hunt Lake because

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:07.959
<v Speaker 2>it's very confusing to keep every name correct. Other teams

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 2>that are just I think Cal and I like Bo Baldwin,

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 2>but I think it's a quarterback issue for Cal and

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 2>it's maybe it's more just four pieces on offense for Cal.

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 2>But I thought, I think they're that away from a breakthrough.

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'm trying to think. And then Kentucky that's

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 2>that's the way to tie it all together.

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Walker.

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Did you want to mention the LSU locker room? Did

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 2>you say picture?

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>He said, I saw they've got beds in there or

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>fold out beds, sleep pods.

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'll say what I say to my wife. You

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 2>want to want to go to our sleep pod.

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Real quick, Here's what I'll say about that.

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>The best part about the new LSU locker room is

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the hype video that LSU made, I think in conjunction

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>with whatever architecture firm designed it. Right, If you could

0:30:57.960 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>find that, and I'm sure you can out on YouTube

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:03.479
<v Speaker 1>or two or wherever, go and watch that. They are

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>really shooting sunshine into that new locker room.

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 2>The new locker room is unquestionably excellent looking, and it

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 2>is very cool to see those players who work very

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 2>hard for LSU be very happy and very excited about

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 2>their new locker room. But as you and I were

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 2>talking about this, there is that whiff of are we

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 2>just quarantining football players so they never have to deal

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 2>with anybody outside of themselves?

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I made a Google reference too, right, so this is

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>like the google Plex never leave.

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like weird luxurious football house arrest. At least they.

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Get paid at the Google Plex.

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 2>They do get paid at the Google Plex handsomely. But yeah,

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 2>there is like that strange feeling where it's just like,

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 2>we have so much money. Look at all these donations

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 2>we're spending on sleep pods. These players are never gonna

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 2>have to leave and grow as humans around up other people.

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 2>It's strange. It's strange, Walker happy for the people.

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>What under the radar Week one matchup do you find

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to be the most intriguing? Okay, UCLA Cincinnati initially caught

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>my eye, he said, under the radar. Under the radar, Yeah,

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you're two of Chip versus the Cincinnati team. Trying to

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>deal with an unfamiliar expectation going into the year. But additionally,

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm digging FIU two Lane and the Toledo Kentucky games.

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>FIU two Lane and Toledo Kentucky would not be something

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:34.959
<v Speaker 1>that will Jason Candle action. So we already mentioned Boise

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and Florida State. You nailed Boise, great job, thank you.

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>The other one that I'll throw in here is Northwestern

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and Stanford Northwestern because I really truly never know how

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to put a finger on Northwestern. I just I can

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>never figure Northwestern out before at the start of the year.

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>They win eight or nine games every year, sort of like, Utah,

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>why don't you just why can't you make peace with

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Northwestern being good? I had no problem with Northwestern being good.

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying I can never predict how they're going to finish.

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 2>But they're always You could just say they're gonna be

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 2>pretty good and be right every year.

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Northwestern is probably gonna be pretty good. There it is

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Northwestern Stanford. There was that weird bodyclock game a couple

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of years ago. Yeah, Stanford lost. I have real questions

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>about Stanford this year.

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Same and this could be like a couple of pieces

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 2>on defense, but in terms of offense, there's a lot

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 2>to be a little bit wary of.

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>So those are my two answers. Boy C, Florida State,

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Northwestern Stanford. Anything else that I'm missing outside of once

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you got here FIU two lane.

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a few things here. I think Eastern Washington

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 2>at Washington even though no Bo Baldwin, o Vernon Adams

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 2>every year, no guy Ja Gubrut. Every year, Eastern Washington

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 2>puts the fear of life into a decent Pac twelve team.

0:33:56.920 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 2>There's that we mentioned ole Miss Memphis. We got Rich

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Rod calling plays for ole Miss. We've got all sorts

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 2>of fun storylines in this game. I think South Carolina,

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 2>North Carolina, the premiere of Mac Brown. The game generally

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 2>gets a little bit strange. I think what I was

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 2>looking through here, I mean Virginia Tech on offense can

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 2>be kind of wild. They have Boston College, they have

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 2>a conference game Week one. Here is my very under

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 2>the radar game, Oregon State Oklahoma State. I saw that

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 2>one Friday night ten thirty kick and Oregon State as

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:35.320
<v Speaker 2>a complete team as a team to challenge really anybody

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 2>on their schedule in the Pac twelve. But if you

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 2>remember last year Week one, they ran all over Ohio State.

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 2>They're a team that has taken lightly traditionally, I mean

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 2>not traditionally but lately, and they quietly have a very

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 2>good running back in Jamar Jefferson. Oklahoma State working in

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 2>new quarterback, new offensive coordinator. Strange Week one happenings at

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 2>night deep into central Western Oregon. I don't know. I

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 2>think that's under the radar, kind of interesting. Oregon State

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 2>will probably because they're not a deep team with talent,

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 2>they'll be as healthy as they'll ever be. So I

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 2>don't know. My Danny sense is tingling.

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to someone else named Daniel. Yeah, what are

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:27.240
<v Speaker 1>your favorite non marching band college football related songs? For example,

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Sandstorm at South Carolina, Answer Sandman at Virginia Tech, Zombiation

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Penn State, Neck at LSU, Country Roads at West Virginia,

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 1>jump Around at Wisconsin, etc.

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 2>Etc. Dan, I've been in the stadium for a number

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:46.800
<v Speaker 2>of these, yes, as have I. I've been in the

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 2>stadium for West Virginia. I've been in the stadium for

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 2>jump Around. I think Texas now does jump around as well.

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of lame that they're doing that interesting. I

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 2>have not been in the stadium. Oregon's been doing this

0:35:56.520 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 2>for a few years now. They do shout Okay, it's

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 2>because of Animal House and that's a good time.

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Ah. I think, I think is going to be jump around,

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't it?

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Jump Around is fun, But there's something that is more

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 2>enjoyable to me about country Roads. And I couldn't put

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 2>my finger on it until I randomly went to the

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 2>West Virginia Bar in Manhattan and New York City, New

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:32.760
<v Speaker 2>York City. As soon as halftime began, the bar mutes

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 2>the TV and they blast the hell out of this

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 2>and the entire bar sang it. And so by the

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 2>extension of the West Virginia fandom to this random bar,

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:45.879
<v Speaker 2>sold me on just how fun it is to sing

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 2>with a bunch of West Virginia fans instead of just

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 2>jumping around. So that's my answer.

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm gonna go jump around. That's pretty cool.

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to you, Andy, He says, our recruiting rankings

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>biased gosh towards recruits who commit to blue blood schools.

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Very good question.

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 1>We've done a number of shows here on recruiting over

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the years. Yeah, I would say Andy that you're close.

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 2>You're close. I think the answer is sort of but

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 2>sort of.

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 1>What I was going to say is it's not so

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 1>much where the recruits are committing, but rather who is

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>showing interest in the recruits that tends to influence the

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>star ranking. So, for example, if you are Toledo showing

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 1>interest in a quarterback, it might not have as much

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>pull as if let's say Ohio State, We're interested in

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the same quarterback. Then all of a sudden people are

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:44.839
<v Speaker 1>paying attention. That sound right to you, Yeah, I okay.

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:47.879
<v Speaker 1>So my answer to this is basically, we are never

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:50.399
<v Speaker 1>going to be armed with all of the information about

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the recruitment of anybody. What happens a lot of these

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 1>times is players will send footage or they will they'll

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 1>send footage to coaches, they will put footage online. The

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>people that come up with the recruiting rankings, it's a

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>number of people. So just saying like so and so

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>is ranked number thirty eight on two four seven, it

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that it's necessarily he is the number thirty

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>eight player in the country. It's just like this weird

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:20.760
<v Speaker 1>consensus in negotiation. Now, you will have times where somebody

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>who is who doesn't have a ranking all of a

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 1>sudden becomes a four star. A lot of that is

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 1>because they just haven't been evaluated. So all of a sudden,

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody jumps up and it's like, oh, this coach at

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin found this running back in Ohio and we really

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>hadn't he hadn't been to camp, so we don't know

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>anything about him. But then we saw him at this camp,

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:43.280
<v Speaker 1>or we saw him at this you know, the opening

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:45.439
<v Speaker 1>or one of those types of events. Sure, and yeah,

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense now that we've seen him alongside other guys.

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>So sometimes guys just aren't evaluated and make a big jump,

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and different services have like they're either nre not rated

0:38:54.880 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 1>or they are two stars or one stars if they

0:38:56.480 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>haven't been evaluated yet. Also, sometimes people that are presumed

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to be three stars were backups and you really couldn't

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 1>get an idea for how good they could potentially be

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:09.799
<v Speaker 1>against top notch competition, and then they go throw at

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina or they're you know, at the Elite eleven

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>camp and they make a big jump. It's a matter

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of having the data. A lot of the times where

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>these guys make jumps, and as soon as more people

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:23.760
<v Speaker 1>get data. The guys who are showing more positive traits

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and more potential are getting bigger offers. So sometimes it's

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 1>just a fluid process that all of the sudden, Alabama's

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 1>offering a guy doesn't mean they're necessarily becoming a five star.

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Alabama's offering a guy because there are more data points

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 2>that say, oh, he is this dude. So I think

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 2>that's where the confusion rests a little bit. But if

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:46.399
<v Speaker 2>it happens a week before signing day and we've had

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 2>all of these data points for however many years, and

0:39:48.719 --> 0:39:52.399
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, outside linebacker committed to Toledo this whole

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:54.919
<v Speaker 2>time as a three star suddenly gets a Notre Dame offer,

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 2>becomes a four star, that becomes a little shadier. But

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:01.319
<v Speaker 2>I think it's more complicated than oh, they committed to

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 2>this school, they got bumped a star because a lot

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 2>of times they commit to that school because more data

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 2>is available.

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So we're sort of on the same page here. I think, yeah, okay.

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's complicated, and it's not just a favoring of

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 2>the blue bloods in that other than the fact that,

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 2>like you know, top players want to play for the

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 2>schools that prove that they can develop them and that

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 2>have invested in them, whether it's facilities and academics whatever.

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:25.879
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's an investment begets investment kind of thing.

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Abbott writes in everyone knows Fluti's Hail Mary and the

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:36.760
<v Speaker 1>play between cal Stanford. Yeah, what play from the past

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 1>five years will be in the same historic category twenty

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>five years from now? Again, that's right.

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 2>So he specifically says five years because the kick six

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 2>was twenty.

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 1>The kick six was six years ago. That's right, right,

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So I went back, I looked at this. I think

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:56.840
<v Speaker 1>there's an obvious answer. Okay, I don't know if you

0:40:56.840 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 1>were able to find one.

0:40:57.960 --> 0:40:59.360
<v Speaker 2>What's your obvious answer?

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Answer is tua's past to win the national championship over.

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was like the NC State tippin' in nineteen

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 2>eighty whatever. To win the national championship winning it on

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 2>a single play is pretty significant. I think that's right,

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 2>because if you go back, you have you know, Vince

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Young run running it into the corner of the end zone.

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 2>You have all these plays. You have Michael Crabtree's play

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 2>obviously has withstood the test of time against Texas. So

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 2>there are the number of players number of plays. I

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 2>think it is toua. I think it's got to be

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 2>probably the play right now because it was the situation

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 2>was such where he's coming in in relief as a

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:40.520
<v Speaker 2>freshman and it's just a dime of dimes in a

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:43.280
<v Speaker 2>moment where he's taken sacks, he's looked kind of shaky

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 2>and just recognizes cover two and just laces it in perfectly.

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:52.440
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that's the as painful as it is sometimes

0:41:52.480 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 2>to say that's the answer, because they you have other

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:56.840
<v Speaker 2>plays that are that are wonky. You have what was

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 2>a Duke Miami with the last second king turn.

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean that was goofy, and there's questions about

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it was legal, but sure.

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:07.440
<v Speaker 2>I think Oklahoma States giving the who is it? Central

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:10.279
<v Speaker 2>Michigan That to me is still funny the end of

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:13.840
<v Speaker 2>that game with the hail Mary. But yeah, that's probably

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 2>the answer. That's probably too.

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:19.320
<v Speaker 1>We've got a question here, how would you fix college

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:21.359
<v Speaker 1>football's attendance problem?

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:23.799
<v Speaker 2>I got another one by the way that they still show.

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh please please not to mention Michigan even more than

0:42:29.120 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 2>we already have, but Michigan State's the botched punt to win.

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, that's right, that's still anytime you start looking

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 2>at bigger moments between those two schools, are, you know,

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 2>with Michigan State games or Michigan games that's inevitably played

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 2>for sure. Sorry Abbott, who I think is a Michigan fan.

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 2>How would you fix attendance better parking? Next question?

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was gonna say, how about cheaper tickets? That

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>would help?

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yes, and no, I mean the secondary market kind

0:42:57.280 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 2>of pushes things. But it's it's another lowder question.

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 1>It's a loaded question, yeah, and it's one we've been

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:08.719
<v Speaker 1>talking about for a couple of years now. The underlying

0:43:09.320 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>reason for asking this question is because the tendance is

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 1>down across college football. Just as many people go into games,

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:16.920
<v Speaker 1>aren't as many students interested in going to the games.

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you can blame cell phones and ticket

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:22.439
<v Speaker 1>prices and lord knows whatever else for it. I don't

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 1>think there's one answer to this question. I you know,

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 1>lowering the ticket prices helps. I don't know if anyone

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:32.440
<v Speaker 1>really wants to do that, though, because these programs, in

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 1>order to stay competitive, are very much relying on that revenue.

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 1>They need that in order to keep things up and

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 1>run and keep the lights on. So gosh, it's hard.

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess you make it more of a multimedia experience

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:51.799
<v Speaker 1>while you're in there. That could help, do you though, Yeah, I.

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Think everybody put their cell phones in I know, like

0:43:52.680 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 2>what comedians do.

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I know you put them in a lock box and

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 1>then you got I just think and I'm with you, Okay,

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't agree with that. I just think the direction

0:44:02.280 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 1>we're headed is one that needs to include more of

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a mixed media experience in order to attract people.

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean there. You can point to a number

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:15.400
<v Speaker 2>of things that have heard it right. The TV experience

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 2>is better, you know, watching games from home in general,

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:20.239
<v Speaker 2>smokers or less. You can get a pizza oven for

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 2>a couple hundred bucks. If that's what you're interested in.

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 2>You can use your own bathroom. The stadium experiences aren't great.

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 2>The college FOTBA playoff, I don't think is healthing's realignment

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:33.760
<v Speaker 2>where you have fewer interesting rivalry games and their teams

0:44:34.040 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 2>that are moving conferences and there's not you know, if

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 2>you're a West Virginia fan like oh man, I got

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:42.279
<v Speaker 2>to go to Stillwater, why, I understand you love your team,

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 2>but you don't have the history of saying Oh, man,

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 2>I can lean on all of this.

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Let me pause you for a second. Yeah, I'll take

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 1>this question in a slightly different direction because I know

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a point of contention between you and I. Yeah,

0:44:54.239 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>why do you feel that the college football Playoff has

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>hurt attendance?

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Because everything is suddenly through the lens of am I

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 2>one of the four best teams? And that starts I've

0:45:06.960 --> 0:45:10.439
<v Speaker 2>probably done since the end of last season, and I'm

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 2>just talking about the interviews in which I've been asked this. Sure,

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I've probably done twenty five interviews where I've been asked

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:20.719
<v Speaker 2>to pick my final four as a twenty nineteen season. Yeah.

0:45:20.719 --> 0:45:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Fair, That's totally fair.

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:24.360
<v Speaker 2>And it's the answer that like, no matter what I say,

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't mean anything, both because I'm dumb and because

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:32.319
<v Speaker 2>it's March and we're looking at college football through this

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:35.440
<v Speaker 2>lens where suddenly, if you're a Minnesota fan, if you're

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:38.359
<v Speaker 2>a San Diego State fan, if you are a UTSA fan,

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:41.440
<v Speaker 2>if you are a Florida State fan, and you are

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 2>five and three, well why am I going to these games?

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Like I was thinking, Well, if you're a team that

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:49.279
<v Speaker 2>expects to go to the playoff, I'm thinking if I'm

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:51.160
<v Speaker 2>a Florida State fan, if I'm a Clemson fan, whatever,

0:45:51.360 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 2>an Ohio State fan, and I start out in a

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 2>disappointing way, like, well, the season doesn't mean anything. These

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 2>games don't mean anything because we're not going to go

0:45:57.719 --> 0:45:59.360
<v Speaker 2>to the playoff. We're not going to be in that

0:45:59.400 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 2>conversation we're talking on that Tuesday night. But so all right,

0:46:02.080 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 2>hold on, hold on home on pause pause. Hasn't that

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:09.760
<v Speaker 2>always been the case, though, regardless of whether you're telling

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:14.160
<v Speaker 2>me a three loss team in an era pre playoff,

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:18.399
<v Speaker 2>maybe during championship for what twenty years, or during during

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:20.279
<v Speaker 2>the old championship ball.

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Format, a three loss team is still in the conversation.

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:27.200
<v Speaker 2>That's not that they're in the conversation, it's that they

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:29.880
<v Speaker 2>don't feel like they're part of college football in the

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 2>same way. I don't know if you're if you're a

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:35.319
<v Speaker 2>top team power if you are an upper half of

0:46:35.360 --> 0:46:38.839
<v Speaker 2>a Power five conference team. And it's not not even

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:40.960
<v Speaker 2>just the playoff, but so much attention has gone to

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:44.440
<v Speaker 2>the playoff that it everything else feels a little bit devalued.

0:46:44.560 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I am. I will grant you that a lot of

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 1>attention has gone to the Playoff. I don't know if

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:52.160
<v Speaker 1>more attention has gone to the playoff than went to

0:46:52.200 --> 0:46:55.439
<v Speaker 1>the BCS or than went to some of the top

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:58.759
<v Speaker 1>teams in the old ball format. Yeah, I think it's

0:46:58.760 --> 0:47:01.360
<v Speaker 1>about the same. If you lose three games, you're not

0:47:01.400 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be in that conversation. I don't care what

0:47:03.760 --> 0:47:05.160
<v Speaker 1>system you've got in the postseason.

0:47:05.760 --> 0:47:08.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, listen, if you have these four teams in the

0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 2>whatever games, the rotating games in the semi finals. Sure,

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 2>if you're saying, well, keep it local with you. If

0:47:15.000 --> 0:47:18.840
<v Speaker 2>you're a Penn State fan, does going to you know, Michigan.

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Michigan went to what They went to the Peach Bowl

0:47:21.280 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 2>last year, They went to the Orange Bowl a couple

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:25.719
<v Speaker 2>of years ago. They lost to Florida State. Those games

0:47:25.760 --> 0:47:28.520
<v Speaker 2>don't mean anything. But if you're Penn State in nineteen

0:47:28.600 --> 0:47:30.319
<v Speaker 2>ninety five and you go to the Orange Bowl even

0:47:30.360 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 2>though you're ten and two or nine and two, whatever,

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 2>and you're probably not going to be in consideration of

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:37.279
<v Speaker 2>the national championship, it is dope that you are Penn

0:47:37.280 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 2>State and you get to play Nebraska in the Orange Bowl.

0:47:39.320 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Right, But you just contradicted yourself by saying even though

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to win the national championship. It's the

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 1>same difference.

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:46.919
<v Speaker 2>No, but I'm saying if going to the Orange Bowl

0:47:46.960 --> 0:47:50.400
<v Speaker 2>now doesn't mean anything, I don't know, it's und You're not.

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm always going to disagree on this point. We're always

0:47:53.960 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>going to disagree on this point.

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Now, I'm telling you, I don't. I don't.

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't totally disagree with the fact that the playoff

0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to some degree may have hurt college boo ball or

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 1>collegeo ball attendants. They're trying to make it a thing

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:10.920
<v Speaker 1>or not in our case, downloads towards the latter half

0:48:10.960 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of the season. Yeah, let's be transparent. It happens. Yeah, Okay,

0:48:15.160 --> 0:48:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't doubt that for one second. I just don't

0:48:17.680 --> 0:48:21.400
<v Speaker 1>know if the playoff has had such an outsized effect

0:48:21.800 --> 0:48:23.239
<v Speaker 1>as you might think, Well.

0:48:23.200 --> 0:48:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Guess what happens. Standpoint, guess what happens either way, if

0:48:26.800 --> 0:48:28.560
<v Speaker 2>the experience of going to a game is not as

0:48:28.640 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 2>fun because maybe the stakes don't seem as important, or

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:33.359
<v Speaker 2>maybe you don't care about stakes. It gets cold by

0:48:33.360 --> 0:48:35.360
<v Speaker 2>the end of the year, it gets very so especially

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:38.759
<v Speaker 2>up here, really sure here, especially up here, it gets

0:48:38.760 --> 0:48:40.840
<v Speaker 2>cold by the end of the year. So sure you

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:43.759
<v Speaker 2>want you know you have a Minnesota Wisconsin rivalry game,

0:48:43.840 --> 0:48:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes you want to do that, But suddenly, if Wisconsin's

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:50.239
<v Speaker 2>no longer in the Big ten West race, do you

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 2>care as much? Like It's just there's all these little

0:48:52.719 --> 0:48:56.239
<v Speaker 2>races that seem like they mean something, but ultimately they

0:48:56.320 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 2>don't mean as much as they once did. That's what

0:48:58.719 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm trying to get here because I just I

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:05.480
<v Speaker 2>get why people don't go to games in November anymore.

0:49:05.520 --> 0:49:07.239
<v Speaker 2>And I think the rivalry thing is a thing that

0:49:07.280 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 2>you don't have. You know, the backyard brawl. You don't

0:49:10.120 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 2>have the border war, and I know the backyard ball

0:49:11.640 --> 0:49:13.680
<v Speaker 2>is coming back, but you don't have these. They're just

0:49:13.880 --> 0:49:17.120
<v Speaker 2>college football is picking off things that made it really

0:49:17.200 --> 0:49:21.600
<v Speaker 2>cool in the name of TV. More TV playoff at

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:22.000
<v Speaker 2>the end.

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:25.880
<v Speaker 1>More college football is on TV now than ever, sure,

0:49:26.480 --> 0:49:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think that before anything else has had the

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 1>most impact. I don't like going to games.

0:49:33.360 --> 0:49:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Can I say that.

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:35.279
<v Speaker 1>On a college football show? No?

0:49:35.280 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 2>No, you can say that I like going to games,

0:49:37.680 --> 0:49:40.439
<v Speaker 2>and I think I like tailgates more than games, which

0:49:40.440 --> 0:49:42.280
<v Speaker 2>is the least surprising thing I've said on the show.

0:49:43.320 --> 0:49:44.239
<v Speaker 2>I like going to games.

0:49:44.280 --> 0:49:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I like the emotion, but I like, I love the atmosphere, right,

0:49:48.000 --> 0:49:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I love the atmosphere way more than I actually like

0:49:51.280 --> 0:49:55.360
<v Speaker 1>watching the football game. Yeah, maybe my viewpoint is a

0:49:55.360 --> 0:49:59.279
<v Speaker 1>bit slanted. Given we got to do this every Sunday morning. Sure,

0:49:59.320 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you know we have to pay attention to the game.

0:50:00.680 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 1>We actually have to watch it and get a feel

0:50:02.200 --> 0:50:06.200
<v Speaker 1>for what's going on. But yeah, a lot going to

0:50:06.200 --> 0:50:06.520
<v Speaker 1>write in.

0:50:06.880 --> 0:50:07.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:50:07.239 --> 0:50:08.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a very loaded question.

0:50:08.800 --> 0:50:10.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, I want to go to the other thing. Go ahead,

0:50:10.320 --> 0:50:14.720
<v Speaker 2>go ahead. If you're an Arkansas fan, go to Arkansas

0:50:14.800 --> 0:50:17.960
<v Speaker 2>fan Arkansas games every year. Some years you're good, some

0:50:18.040 --> 0:50:19.719
<v Speaker 2>years you're not that good. Some years are terrible, some

0:50:19.800 --> 0:50:22.080
<v Speaker 2>years you're pretty damn exciting. Whatever the case is, you

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:26.560
<v Speaker 2>have your natural the variance of Arkansas success. Suddenly, more

0:50:26.560 --> 0:50:29.239
<v Speaker 2>and more games are on TV. It's not necessarily that

0:50:29.320 --> 0:50:31.279
<v Speaker 2>you was like, well, Arkansas is not having a good year,

0:50:31.280 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 2>I might as well just watch this game at home.

0:50:33.160 --> 0:50:38.200
<v Speaker 2>But now, if you live in wherever, in Arkansas, Missouri, wherever,

0:50:38.239 --> 0:50:41.759
<v Speaker 2>you're watching Arkansas football, all of a sudden, there's a

0:50:41.760 --> 0:50:44.080
<v Speaker 2>weekend where Arkansas is playing Alabama, and you know, like,

0:50:44.080 --> 0:50:46.000
<v Speaker 2>well they're going to lose by fifty one. There that

0:50:46.120 --> 0:50:48.200
<v Speaker 2>is just the reality of what's going to happen. I

0:50:48.200 --> 0:50:50.000
<v Speaker 2>could go to this game and hang out with friends

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:51.600
<v Speaker 2>and family and have a good time before the game

0:50:51.640 --> 0:50:53.520
<v Speaker 2>and watch them get killed whatever, and that's still going

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 2>to be fun in its own way that going and

0:50:56.680 --> 0:50:59.920
<v Speaker 2>hanging out with friends and family part. Or I could

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:05.160
<v Speaker 2>stay home and watch Michigan Michigan State, USC Oregon Sure,

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:08.759
<v Speaker 2>and Clemson Florida State and these are games because I

0:51:08.800 --> 0:51:11.560
<v Speaker 2>am now so much more aware of what's happening nationally

0:51:11.680 --> 0:51:15.319
<v Speaker 2>thanks of this all that's right now, I'm more aware

0:51:15.320 --> 0:51:17.160
<v Speaker 2>of things happening nationally because I have the option to

0:51:17.200 --> 0:51:20.600
<v Speaker 2>watch all of these games. The nationalization of the sport

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:23.160
<v Speaker 2>as much as we love it because we love watching it,

0:51:23.200 --> 0:51:27.799
<v Speaker 2>as the TV show is now making. In the same

0:51:27.800 --> 0:51:30.680
<v Speaker 2>way the NBA is like a star driven league. People

0:51:30.680 --> 0:51:33.480
<v Speaker 2>are fans of players more than teams. I think people

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:36.320
<v Speaker 2>more and more are becoming fans of the sport over

0:51:36.880 --> 0:51:40.560
<v Speaker 2>just and granted people are still on recruiting message boards

0:51:40.560 --> 0:51:42.320
<v Speaker 2>and all these things, but I think that's an element

0:51:42.680 --> 0:51:44.600
<v Speaker 2>where they look forward to games.

0:51:44.640 --> 0:51:46.720
<v Speaker 1>We've seen that trend. We've had people right in say,

0:51:47.360 --> 0:51:49.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, we used to go to games, Now we

0:51:49.320 --> 0:51:50.719
<v Speaker 1>just have people over at the house. We do a

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:52.160
<v Speaker 1>big tailgate like at the house.

0:51:52.239 --> 0:51:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a thing. It's the thing that.

0:51:54.000 --> 0:51:58.759
<v Speaker 1>People do, all right, Daniel, This comes from Mike. It

0:51:58.840 --> 0:52:03.919
<v Speaker 1>is addressed specifically to you. Oh, since it's your first

0:52:03.960 --> 0:52:06.960
<v Speaker 1>season watching with the solid for baby. Oh yeah, what

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:09.640
<v Speaker 1>strategies do you have in place to enjoy the games?

0:52:10.200 --> 0:52:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Whilst english of him fulfilling your fatherly duties, he says,

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:18.800
<v Speaker 1>as a father of three year old twins myself, I

0:52:18.880 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 1>could say the first two years were easy, but I

0:52:21.600 --> 0:52:25.799
<v Speaker 1>am wondering how to tackle this season myself. Thank you, Mike.

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:29.759
<v Speaker 1>A good question for the birthday boy here, Dan Rubinstein,

0:52:29.880 --> 0:52:31.879
<v Speaker 1>what are your strategies? Have you thought this through it all?

0:52:32.840 --> 0:52:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Work in college football and do so before you

0:52:36.719 --> 0:52:40.400
<v Speaker 2>met your wife, so you can say Saturdays a workday.

0:52:42.320 --> 0:52:44.840
<v Speaker 2>I in all honesty, if you are what is it

0:52:45.239 --> 0:52:48.320
<v Speaker 2>three year old twins? Yeah, that's a handful. That is

0:52:48.360 --> 0:52:50.239
<v Speaker 2>a definite handful. You are going to have to pick

0:52:50.280 --> 0:52:54.920
<v Speaker 2>and choose. It's just watching from twelve Eastern to midnight

0:52:55.000 --> 0:52:58.640
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. It's more than anybody can handle, unless they

0:52:58.680 --> 0:53:00.520
<v Speaker 2>can say I have to watch all of these it

0:53:00.600 --> 0:53:04.520
<v Speaker 2>is for what I do so you're picking and choosing.

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:08.480
<v Speaker 2>You are maybe staying up extra late past you know,

0:53:08.480 --> 0:53:10.959
<v Speaker 2>when they're your your your kids go to sleep, waking

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:13.320
<v Speaker 2>up extra early though imagine three year old twins probably

0:53:13.320 --> 0:53:16.720
<v Speaker 2>wake each other up pretty damn early. So it's watching

0:53:16.760 --> 0:53:19.880
<v Speaker 2>into the week. It's there are YouTube channels that have

0:53:19.960 --> 0:53:22.400
<v Speaker 2>these shortened and condensed games that are pretty great for

0:53:22.440 --> 0:53:25.279
<v Speaker 2>anything you missed to just have some part of it

0:53:25.320 --> 0:53:28.120
<v Speaker 2>in your life, and YouTube is on most TVs now

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:30.040
<v Speaker 2>so you can have a pretty good experience with it.

0:53:30.520 --> 0:53:36.160
<v Speaker 2>But really it's looking at the schedule tonight today and

0:53:36.480 --> 0:53:40.120
<v Speaker 2>talking to your significant other and circling some events and

0:53:40.160 --> 0:53:44.040
<v Speaker 2>saying I'm gonna be around, I'm gonna help. These are

0:53:44.040 --> 0:53:46.960
<v Speaker 2>the times that are important to me. I don't anticipate

0:53:47.000 --> 0:53:49.239
<v Speaker 2>being able to watch at all, but at least I'm

0:53:49.280 --> 0:53:51.759
<v Speaker 2>giving you the heads up that I yeah, i'd love

0:53:51.800 --> 0:53:54.399
<v Speaker 2>to watch Elis Alabama in early November. Yeah, I'd love

0:53:54.440 --> 0:53:58.760
<v Speaker 2>to watch Bedlam. Just pick your spots and give advance

0:53:58.880 --> 0:54:01.200
<v Speaker 2>noticed as as a long ahead as possible.

0:54:01.239 --> 0:54:04.600
<v Speaker 1>This is why the window of opportunity is so vital. Yes,

0:54:04.719 --> 0:54:06.400
<v Speaker 1>on the show, you know he started it as a

0:54:06.400 --> 0:54:09.640
<v Speaker 1>bit of a gag, but as time we're on. It

0:54:09.680 --> 0:54:11.920
<v Speaker 1>was apparent this is actually a useful this is this

0:54:12.360 --> 0:54:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is a thing that has a bit that has utility

0:54:15.040 --> 0:54:15.560
<v Speaker 1>on the show.

0:54:16.080 --> 0:54:17.799
<v Speaker 2>But little kids throw a wrench in that.

0:54:17.880 --> 0:54:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Little kids, you throw a wrench in that.

0:54:19.239 --> 0:54:21.960
<v Speaker 2>You're right, The window of opportunity is great if you

0:54:22.000 --> 0:54:24.400
<v Speaker 2>are just if you're dating somebody, if you're married, and

0:54:24.440 --> 0:54:27.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe they're not interested in college football, but you're super interested.

0:54:28.120 --> 0:54:30.400
<v Speaker 2>You're like, well, why don't we like, I'll do a

0:54:30.400 --> 0:54:32.640
<v Speaker 2>bunch of grocery shopping between three and four thirty. I

0:54:32.680 --> 0:54:35.279
<v Speaker 2>don't really care about what's happening between then, or you know,

0:54:35.320 --> 0:54:38.040
<v Speaker 2>we have this this party, so I'm going to go.

0:54:38.360 --> 0:54:41.319
<v Speaker 2>And that's fine. The windows great at you know, seven

0:54:41.360 --> 0:54:44.920
<v Speaker 2>to nine, whatever it is. But little kids need a

0:54:44.960 --> 0:54:47.719
<v Speaker 2>bunch of attention. This is true, yes, And they're not

0:54:47.920 --> 0:54:50.919
<v Speaker 2>willing to be on your schedule. So I think you're

0:54:50.960 --> 0:54:53.479
<v Speaker 2>going to have to negotiate in a pretty shrewd way.

0:54:53.680 --> 0:54:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Well in advance, Daniel Edward writes in he also asked

0:54:57.600 --> 0:55:00.760
<v Speaker 2>another question, Oh that's how you convene? Forgot?

0:55:01.280 --> 0:55:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I apologize, he writes in let me read this off here.

0:55:05.239 --> 0:55:07.879
<v Speaker 2>He says, oh, this is never mind. This is from

0:55:08.120 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 2>this is a guy named Will who we forgot to

0:55:09.719 --> 0:55:11.719
<v Speaker 2>write his name in it's right under Mike. But Will

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:12.200
<v Speaker 2>wants to.

0:55:12.160 --> 0:55:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Know what would it take to get tied to reveal

0:55:15.480 --> 0:55:17.040
<v Speaker 1>his mysterious day job? Yeah?

0:55:17.040 --> 0:55:20.480
<v Speaker 2>What would it take? And I'm saying, you're still there

0:55:20.719 --> 0:55:25.359
<v Speaker 2>and you're revealing it. Probably every single time we turned

0:55:25.400 --> 0:55:27.399
<v Speaker 2>the recorder off at the live show, somebody.

0:55:27.080 --> 0:55:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Asks that is, without fail, the number one question that

0:55:31.080 --> 0:55:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we get asked every live show. When we hit stop

0:55:34.080 --> 0:55:36.799
<v Speaker 1>on the recorder, somebody gets to microphone, this is what's

0:55:36.800 --> 0:55:37.799
<v Speaker 1>a mysterious day job?

0:55:38.120 --> 0:55:38.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:55:38.960 --> 0:55:39.960
<v Speaker 1>To him, I don't know if you could put a

0:55:39.960 --> 0:55:44.200
<v Speaker 1>price in this, Dan, it's a money thing. I don't

0:55:44.200 --> 0:55:45.480
<v Speaker 1>think you could put a price on it, is what

0:55:45.480 --> 0:55:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. I don't think it's a money thing.

0:55:47.560 --> 0:55:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Have you been told explicitly not to mention it? Or

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:53.960
<v Speaker 2>is this just an ongoing gag to get people just

0:55:54.040 --> 0:55:56.240
<v Speaker 2>riled up and as they have been for like a decade.

0:55:56.480 --> 0:56:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Can I be honest? Yeah, I can't answer this question.

0:56:01.160 --> 0:56:05.880
<v Speaker 2>You mother effort. Okay, nobody has told you or somebody

0:56:05.920 --> 0:56:08.640
<v Speaker 2>has told you I can't.

0:56:08.680 --> 0:56:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I cannot answer this question. You really can't say that

0:56:12.400 --> 0:56:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I cannot answer this question.

0:56:14.080 --> 0:56:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh my gosh, time do you think you would get

0:56:17.640 --> 0:56:18.080
<v Speaker 2>in trouble?

0:56:19.160 --> 0:56:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I you can't. You can push all you want. I

0:56:21.400 --> 0:56:23.319
<v Speaker 1>can't answer. I haven't answered the question in twelve years.

0:56:23.320 --> 0:56:24.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to answer it now.

0:56:24.280 --> 0:56:25.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying I'm not saying answer the question. I'm saying,

0:56:25.960 --> 0:56:27.640
<v Speaker 2>would you get in trouble if you were to reveal it?

0:56:30.760 --> 0:56:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Would you be called into an office? Potentially? WHOA?

0:56:35.680 --> 0:56:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I cannot reveal sources.

0:56:39.880 --> 0:56:43.200
<v Speaker 2>And here's my final question, yea is it more you

0:56:43.440 --> 0:56:50.080
<v Speaker 2>or is it more external? Is it you covering for

0:56:50.200 --> 0:56:50.680
<v Speaker 2>your making?

0:56:50.719 --> 0:56:53.200
<v Speaker 1>If? Very comfortable, now we agree to know edits, which

0:56:53.200 --> 0:56:54.960
<v Speaker 1>is why I mean I used to you and I

0:56:55.000 --> 0:56:56.440
<v Speaker 1>don't appreciate being put on the.

0:56:56.440 --> 0:56:59.279
<v Speaker 2>Spot like this. I used to ask you questions like

0:56:59.480 --> 0:57:02.759
<v Speaker 2>if a hall would actress move to your hometown, what

0:57:02.800 --> 0:57:05.120
<v Speaker 2>would your strategy be if she moved to like your

0:57:05.120 --> 0:57:05.640
<v Speaker 2>call to sack?

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I ever had to answer you for that question?

0:57:07.080 --> 0:57:09.759
<v Speaker 2>Did I I know? Not? Nothing that really satisfied me.

0:57:10.000 --> 0:57:10.200
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:57:10.560 --> 0:57:15.920
<v Speaker 2>I think I used Charlie's Theren as the example. All right,

0:57:16.040 --> 0:57:19.720
<v Speaker 2>next question, since Ty is now in, he's in a wad,

0:57:20.040 --> 0:57:21.120
<v Speaker 2>he's in a ball o.

0:57:21.280 --> 0:57:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Wow, thank you?

0:57:22.680 --> 0:57:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so yeah, Parker wants to know. I think he's

0:57:26.320 --> 0:57:30.320
<v Speaker 2>part of the Frogs or Frogs O War clan okayu site.

0:57:30.640 --> 0:57:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Tc is getting a lot of hype conditional on a

0:57:33.960 --> 0:57:37.120
<v Speaker 2>big if, as in, do they have a quarterback? How

0:57:37.120 --> 0:57:39.240
<v Speaker 2>big is that if? And are you buying stock on

0:57:39.280 --> 0:57:42.360
<v Speaker 2>the Frogs? Is a dark horse for this fall? Oh no,

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:46.520
<v Speaker 2>I assume it means dark horse big twelve contender.

0:57:46.200 --> 0:57:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Brother Parker. Yeah, he says big if?

0:57:51.000 --> 0:57:51.439
<v Speaker 2>How big?

0:57:51.440 --> 0:57:53.560
<v Speaker 1>And if are we talking here? Are we talking size

0:57:53.600 --> 0:57:56.400
<v Speaker 1>seventy two font or size three hundred and seventy two font?

0:57:56.480 --> 0:58:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Because for me, as somebody who has recently divorced on TCU,

0:58:01.560 --> 0:58:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it feels like it's about five hundred and ninety two

0:58:04.560 --> 0:58:07.240
<v Speaker 1>point funt such a huge if.

0:58:07.960 --> 0:58:11.640
<v Speaker 2>They added like a like seven dudes. You ever like

0:58:11.960 --> 0:58:14.280
<v Speaker 2>drive by a house that has eleven cars, but they're

0:58:14.320 --> 0:58:15.760
<v Speaker 2>all like Toyota turcells.

0:58:15.880 --> 0:58:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they've got options. There's one in the neighborhood here. Sure,

0:58:19.720 --> 0:58:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I have one near my parents' house. For like,

0:58:22.480 --> 0:58:32.000
<v Speaker 1>if they got eleven cars worth a combined twelve hundred dollars. Yeah,

0:58:32.600 --> 0:58:35.440
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, Cavante Turpin is gone. He gets in trouble.

0:58:36.400 --> 0:58:37.680
<v Speaker 1>They saw the Jalen Rager.

0:58:38.720 --> 0:58:40.960
<v Speaker 2>They've recruited, well, they've done a very good job identifying

0:58:40.960 --> 0:58:42.760
<v Speaker 2>guys on defense, as they always do. They've got two

0:58:42.800 --> 0:58:44.919
<v Speaker 2>really good looking tackles, but the inside of their line

0:58:44.960 --> 0:58:51.360
<v Speaker 2>isn't great. Terrus Anderson's there. Let's say they get a

0:58:51.480 --> 0:58:55.960
<v Speaker 2>B plus out of whoever starts at quarterback. Sure is

0:58:56.040 --> 0:59:02.040
<v Speaker 2>TCU pushing double ditch? They got some land mines on

0:59:02.080 --> 0:59:04.360
<v Speaker 2>the schedule they got to do, I believe early.

0:59:04.160 --> 0:59:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, early, not the easiest schedule pushing double digits.

0:59:10.240 --> 0:59:11.840
<v Speaker 2>They could get. So if I gave you, if I

0:59:11.880 --> 0:59:16.520
<v Speaker 2>said me, maybe, Okay, So if I gave you an

0:59:16.560 --> 0:59:18.160
<v Speaker 2>over under of eight and a half with.

0:59:18.360 --> 0:59:21.040
<v Speaker 1>B plus quarterback play, see, I'm the worst because I

0:59:21.120 --> 0:59:23.760
<v Speaker 1>jinx TCU, Like you really don't want to ask me

0:59:23.840 --> 0:59:26.320
<v Speaker 1>this question, Parker, I would go over. I always go

0:59:26.360 --> 0:59:28.680
<v Speaker 1>over on TCU. That's my problem. I went over last year.

0:59:28.720 --> 0:59:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I bet actual US currency on the over. I think

0:59:31.400 --> 0:59:34.280
<v Speaker 1>it was seven and a half last year. Okay, whatever

0:59:34.320 --> 0:59:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it was last year, I bet the over and I lost.

0:59:36.800 --> 0:59:38.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's go. How many of these quarterbacks are

0:59:38.560 --> 0:59:42.880
<v Speaker 2>you worried about? Arkansas, Pine Bluff? Whoever? It is? No, Okay,

0:59:43.480 --> 0:59:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Purdue and the cinularity Purdue always always. I'm not that

0:59:47.440 --> 0:59:54.320
<v Speaker 2>worried about him. Smu No, not terribly worried about their offense.

0:59:54.360 --> 1:00:00.960
<v Speaker 2>New quarterback Ben Hicks gone Kansas. No worried about their offense.

1:00:01.000 --> 1:00:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Brock Party at Iowa State. Names definitely, definitely worried. At

1:00:05.440 --> 1:00:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Kansas State, you're one of the Chris Climbing experiment experiment.

1:00:11.280 --> 1:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I'm worried, but I think they'll

1:00:13.560 --> 1:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>be pretty.

1:00:14.800 --> 1:00:16.880
<v Speaker 2>I think I saw the Chris climb and experience play

1:00:17.600 --> 1:00:23.680
<v Speaker 2>jazz fusion knitting factory. At Kansas State. It's tricky. Texas

1:00:24.280 --> 1:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Texas and Sam Ellinger one of the best probably eight

1:00:26.560 --> 1:00:30.600
<v Speaker 2>quarterbacks twelve quarterbacks in the country. Sure, at Oklahoma State,

1:00:30.800 --> 1:00:32.280
<v Speaker 2>I think there's reasonable worry there.

1:00:32.560 --> 1:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Quarterback is usually a position of strength and still one.

1:00:35.680 --> 1:00:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Pretty good new coordinator could be Drew Brown, Spencer Sanders,

1:00:38.280 --> 1:00:42.240
<v Speaker 2>who knows Baylor Charlie Brewers fine, but that's at home.

1:00:43.320 --> 1:00:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Texas Tech new coach, new coordinator Alan Bowman, we know

1:00:46.520 --> 1:00:49.800
<v Speaker 2>has a pretty impressive ceiling. When healthy. British comedy legend, Sure,

1:00:49.920 --> 1:00:52.880
<v Speaker 2>British comedy legend. In Oklahoma, West Virginia. There are some

1:00:53.000 --> 1:00:54.000
<v Speaker 2>serious land Mines.

1:00:56.000 --> 1:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

1:00:57.760 --> 1:00:59.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they're winning nine games this year.

1:01:00.200 --> 1:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Nine I think is the upper limit.

1:01:02.040 --> 1:01:03.440
<v Speaker 2>I think they're winning eight. I think they're going eight

1:01:03.440 --> 1:01:06.240
<v Speaker 2>and four to seven to five because they look pretty

1:01:06.360 --> 1:01:08.160
<v Speaker 2>ugly at times. Last year. I think they lost five

1:01:08.200 --> 1:01:13.680
<v Speaker 2>of six in the middle of the season. Oh here,

1:01:13.840 --> 1:01:17.080
<v Speaker 2>this is a good one, Nebraska. This is from literally

1:01:17.240 --> 1:01:20.960
<v Speaker 2>just some guys. How this person? Nebraska is getting a

1:01:20.960 --> 1:01:23.840
<v Speaker 2>lot of hype this preseason from four and eight to

1:01:24.240 --> 1:01:26.959
<v Speaker 2>Big ten West front runner or in Dan ro Loobski's case,

1:01:27.080 --> 1:01:32.080
<v Speaker 2>playoff contender wow Orlosky said that do you like Dan Rolovsky?

1:01:32.560 --> 1:01:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Not really really, I like him. I think he's good. Okay,

1:01:36.360 --> 1:01:39.000
<v Speaker 2>It seems like more often than not, teams like this

1:01:39.200 --> 1:01:44.640
<v Speaker 2>fall well short of expectations. Was it? See this? This

1:01:44.680 --> 1:01:46.360
<v Speaker 2>is why I hate when people ask me about the

1:01:46.400 --> 1:01:48.880
<v Speaker 2>who's in your top four playoff? Because I will forever

1:01:48.960 --> 1:01:51.520
<v Speaker 2>remember I think it was our friend Cole Kublick had

1:01:51.640 --> 1:01:54.520
<v Speaker 2>NC States a couple of years ago when they had

1:01:54.560 --> 1:01:58.200
<v Speaker 2>the Bradley Chubb line. What are some examples of teams

1:01:58.240 --> 1:02:01.200
<v Speaker 2>that actually lived up to the year two to leap hype?

1:02:01.840 --> 1:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>So all right, so pause for a second. I want

1:02:04.840 --> 1:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to go back to something that you raised there.

1:02:07.480 --> 1:02:10.439
<v Speaker 2>Do do Do Do Do Do Do do Thank you. M hmm.

1:02:10.560 --> 1:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Here's whey I stand in the playoff. We're gonna talk

1:02:12.880 --> 1:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>more about it as we get into our team previews

1:02:15.480 --> 1:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and conference previews and all that jazz. I've said it before,

1:02:18.840 --> 1:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>We've been saying it all summer. I don't think anyone's

1:02:21.360 --> 1:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the PAC twelve. Wow, if you don't

1:02:25.000 --> 1:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>think it, you know you feel the same. You don't

1:02:26.480 --> 1:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>think anyone's coming out either. I don't know if you

1:02:30.720 --> 1:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think anyone's coming out of the PAC twelve. The

1:02:33.480 --> 1:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>only other hope I think for a team crashing the

1:02:37.000 --> 1:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>playoff that isn't in one of those other conferences is

1:02:39.600 --> 1:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously Notre Dame. I don't feel like Notre Dame is

1:02:43.240 --> 1:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>going to go on another run. It could happen. The

1:02:45.680 --> 1:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>season runs essentially through games against Michigan, against Stanford, and

1:02:50.720 --> 1:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>against Georgia, but I don't.

1:02:52.320 --> 1:02:56.160
<v Speaker 2>See Notre Dame. Does Notre Dame fall into the one piece.

1:02:56.000 --> 1:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Away, No, No, they don't fall into that ketch.

1:03:00.120 --> 1:03:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Book is pretty good. Yeah, he's not a Terry Wilson

1:03:03.440 --> 1:03:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Garber's type.

1:03:04.240 --> 1:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So If you're ruling out Notre Dame and the

1:03:06.200 --> 1:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>PAC twelve, that means that, by process of elimination, you

1:03:09.520 --> 1:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>have four conferences to pick from. I'm picking Clemson in

1:03:12.720 --> 1:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the ACC. I am shocker picking Alabama in the SEC.

1:03:18.600 --> 1:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I am again picking Let's see, who do we want

1:03:23.000 --> 1:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Big twelve? Oklahoma, We'll go Oklahoma again?

1:03:25.840 --> 1:03:27.439
<v Speaker 2>Want to be a man? Why don't you be a man?

1:03:27.600 --> 1:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And I'm gonna go Miss Michigan in the Big ten.

1:03:31.840 --> 1:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Those are my fourth playoff teams.

1:03:33.640 --> 1:03:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

1:03:34.960 --> 1:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you've had a chance to think

1:03:36.280 --> 1:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>about this or not, but no, I just don't care.

1:03:38.440 --> 1:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>That's where I stand. So his question, though specifically second

1:03:44.120 --> 1:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>year leaps, he's talking specifically about Nebraska. I don't think

1:03:47.560 --> 1:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Nebraska is a playoff contender. Nebraska's gonna need a lot

1:03:51.280 --> 1:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of help on defense. I don't think their defense is

1:03:53.320 --> 1:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>far enough along yet. But I do like the moxie here.

1:03:57.640 --> 1:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Maxi's the wrong word. I like being old mister

1:04:00.640 --> 1:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Worlowski in going Nebraska?

1:04:03.520 --> 1:04:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Where do you? Where do you stand on?

1:04:04.560 --> 1:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>This? Is there?

1:04:04.920 --> 1:04:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Anighteen? What is that?

1:04:05.840 --> 1:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>What do you?

1:04:06.120 --> 1:04:08.080
<v Speaker 2>What do you you like that? Dan Rolovski's being bold

1:04:08.160 --> 1:04:09.919
<v Speaker 2>or that, or you're being bold and think that they're

1:04:09.920 --> 1:04:11.120
<v Speaker 2>making a big leap this year.

1:04:11.280 --> 1:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>No, I like that he's being bold saying playoff contender.

1:04:14.960 --> 1:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Nebraska's making I think they could challenge

1:04:18.320 --> 1:04:19.840
<v Speaker 1>for the Big Ten West. But they're not a playoff

1:04:19.840 --> 1:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>contender yet.

1:04:23.040 --> 1:04:27.320
<v Speaker 2>So the hype is not necessarily because people think. It's

1:04:27.360 --> 1:04:29.680
<v Speaker 2>not entirely because people think Nebraska is all a sudden

1:04:29.720 --> 1:04:33.439
<v Speaker 2>really good because they hung with good teams last year.

1:04:35.240 --> 1:04:38.360
<v Speaker 2>It's because Scott Frost himself goes undefeated two years ago

1:04:38.360 --> 1:04:41.480
<v Speaker 2>at UCF and went to Nebraska. So there is all

1:04:41.560 --> 1:04:45.240
<v Speaker 2>this added. There are these added layers of Scott Frost

1:04:45.320 --> 1:04:48.400
<v Speaker 2>and Nebraska hype, where like I went back to twenty fourteen,

1:04:48.520 --> 1:04:51.200
<v Speaker 2>so I think you know, when Abbott was saying, you know,

1:04:51.240 --> 1:04:53.240
<v Speaker 2>look at the last five years in terms of memorable play,

1:04:53.240 --> 1:04:55.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that's right. You can't really go back farther

1:04:55.240 --> 1:04:59.600
<v Speaker 2>than five years when you're discussing things, you know, modern hype, whatever.

1:05:00.040 --> 1:05:02.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, Baber's made a nice leap in year two

1:05:02.040 --> 1:05:05.360
<v Speaker 2>for Bowling Green. Jeff Brom made a really nice leap

1:05:05.440 --> 1:05:08.560
<v Speaker 2>for the Hilltoppers Western Kentucky, although he comes in after

1:05:08.600 --> 1:05:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Bobby Petrino, So you know it wasn't they think? They

1:05:11.520 --> 1:05:13.760
<v Speaker 2>win eight games his first year, so not a huge leap.

1:05:14.760 --> 1:05:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Tom Herman wins ten games, albeit it's including a Bowl game.

1:05:19.560 --> 1:05:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Year two at Texas with a lot of hype, with

1:05:22.000 --> 1:05:24.960
<v Speaker 2>for sure a lot of hype, and then my last example,

1:05:25.080 --> 1:05:28.040
<v Speaker 2>with almost no hype. Gary Anderson makes a nice sleep

1:05:28.040 --> 1:05:33.600
<v Speaker 2>at Wisconsin. Year two. Most of the time, the second

1:05:33.720 --> 1:05:39.840
<v Speaker 2>year of a rebuilding reclamation project, there's not a huge leap.

1:05:41.680 --> 1:05:44.360
<v Speaker 2>It's sort of the the year one is like, here's

1:05:44.360 --> 1:05:49.000
<v Speaker 2>how we're running things now. Year two is okay, we

1:05:49.440 --> 1:05:53.240
<v Speaker 2>understand we're moving in the right direction. Year three is,

1:05:54.320 --> 1:05:56.920
<v Speaker 2>oh yeah, we've gone ten and two because we've got

1:05:56.960 --> 1:06:01.160
<v Speaker 2>it all figured out. It's tough to make that leap

1:06:01.200 --> 1:06:04.720
<v Speaker 2>in year two when so much talent needs to filter

1:06:04.800 --> 1:06:06.040
<v Speaker 2>into the system.

1:06:06.560 --> 1:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, Dan, we've got about five minutes left here.

1:06:09.360 --> 1:06:11.320
<v Speaker 2>We have as much time as we want this media.

1:06:11.360 --> 1:06:14.640
<v Speaker 2>We could do a three hour show, Joe, we could

1:06:14.640 --> 1:06:18.840
<v Speaker 2>be Joe's Rogan and to a very long show. Five

1:06:18.880 --> 1:06:23.120
<v Speaker 2>minutes here, Dan, Capital twenty two question about post college

1:06:23.160 --> 1:06:24.160
<v Speaker 2>casual attire.

1:06:24.240 --> 1:06:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Great question, thank you, sir.

1:06:26.480 --> 1:06:28.040
<v Speaker 2>And I think my answer is the same for all

1:06:28.080 --> 1:06:31.640
<v Speaker 2>of his sub questions exactly, He says, the situation is

1:06:31.680 --> 1:06:36.800
<v Speaker 2>you're attending a non celebratory dinner and a relatively nice

1:06:36.880 --> 1:06:40.240
<v Speaker 2>sit down restaurant. Call it two steps above a Chili's

1:06:40.360 --> 1:06:44.040
<v Speaker 2>or an Applebee's. What is your go to outfit outfit

1:06:44.160 --> 1:06:48.000
<v Speaker 2>style for the following situations? So nowhere with a buzzer

1:06:48.040 --> 1:06:49.680
<v Speaker 2>to alert you that your table is ready?

1:06:50.320 --> 1:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Correct? Okay, dinner with a small group of fen of

1:06:53.880 --> 1:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>friends no significant others involved be a first date. See

1:06:59.240 --> 1:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>dinner with the significant other, d dinner with the significant

1:07:03.600 --> 1:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>other's family for the first time. I'm gonna be honest here, Okay.

1:07:07.800 --> 1:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>So the one that I need a little bit more

1:07:09.800 --> 1:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>clarity on is dinner with these small group of friends

1:07:12.600 --> 1:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>no significant others.

1:07:13.680 --> 1:07:15.560
<v Speaker 2>So is this just like a dude's gathering? Is that

1:07:15.600 --> 1:07:16.120
<v Speaker 2>what that is?

1:07:17.120 --> 1:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh?

1:07:17.840 --> 1:07:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it doesn't have to be only dudes,

1:07:20.040 --> 1:07:23.000
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, sure, I gathering of buds.

1:07:23.280 --> 1:07:25.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that might be the only of these four

1:07:25.520 --> 1:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>situations where I would not wear a collared shirt, or

1:07:27.760 --> 1:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>would at least consider not wearing a collar.

1:07:29.640 --> 1:07:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Two steps above a Chili's applebeas, what do you consider

1:07:31.960 --> 1:07:37.040
<v Speaker 2>two steps above a Chili's applebas of Paul Fleming's Chang's

1:07:39.080 --> 1:07:40.880
<v Speaker 2>I think that's one step. I think that's one step.

1:07:40.960 --> 1:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm not sure actually, but I think I probably

1:07:44.640 --> 1:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>go collar in all four situations.

1:07:47.360 --> 1:07:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the question it's also important to know, well, what

1:07:49.760 --> 1:07:50.480
<v Speaker 2>time of year is this?

1:07:51.040 --> 1:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>What time of year is this? Yeah, I don't know

1:07:53.240 --> 1:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>if it's if.

1:07:53.880 --> 1:07:56.560
<v Speaker 2>It's dead summer in Arizona. I think you're answering this

1:07:56.680 --> 1:08:02.880
<v Speaker 2>question a little bit differently then, if it's October in Louth, Minnesota.

1:08:02.120 --> 1:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>What I would say here in eastern Pennsylvania, since that's

1:08:04.400 --> 1:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>what I'm familiar with. Yeah, if it's I think any

1:08:13.720 --> 1:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of the first two okay, and it's let's say July

1:08:20.040 --> 1:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifth, I go short sleeve shirt with collar and

1:08:26.640 --> 1:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a pair of.

1:08:27.280 --> 1:08:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Polo type shirt or a button down short Yeah, and

1:08:29.320 --> 1:08:33.479
<v Speaker 2>a pair of shorts. I consider, Wait the first two minute,

1:08:33.479 --> 1:08:37.200
<v Speaker 2>you'd wear a pair of shorts on your first eight maybe?

1:08:37.320 --> 1:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe?

1:08:38.120 --> 1:08:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh got me?

1:08:39.960 --> 1:08:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Maybe me otherwise though, smoking jazz cigarettes otherwise though, I

1:08:45.479 --> 1:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>think I go long pants.

1:08:49.200 --> 1:08:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well you gotta be okay, I'll be more specific.

1:08:52.560 --> 1:08:55.360
<v Speaker 2>You weren't a collar, you're probably if it's we'll call

1:08:55.439 --> 1:08:58.120
<v Speaker 2>it sixty five degrees, so not too hot, not too cold.

1:08:58.479 --> 1:09:02.840
<v Speaker 2>It's sixty five degrees. Chinos and a button down or

1:09:03.000 --> 1:09:06.120
<v Speaker 2>a short sleeve, button down, long sleeve, rolled up the sleeves,

1:09:06.120 --> 1:09:08.760
<v Speaker 2>whatever she knows. I think are the move because you

1:09:08.760 --> 1:09:10.960
<v Speaker 2>can dress mobby, you can dress them down whatever I

1:09:11.000 --> 1:09:13.360
<v Speaker 2>would opt for, slim or skinny fit. This is not

1:09:13.400 --> 1:09:16.400
<v Speaker 2>to say wearing like painted on pants, because I think

1:09:16.400 --> 1:09:19.120
<v Speaker 2>that's a misnomer. But just pants that fit you. Nothing

1:09:19.160 --> 1:09:22.880
<v Speaker 2>too baggy. Get three colors to whatever you can afford.

1:09:22.920 --> 1:09:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Get you know, light gray, dark gray, navy goes with

1:09:26.200 --> 1:09:29.320
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of different other colors. Get five you know,

1:09:29.400 --> 1:09:33.280
<v Speaker 2>slim fit button downs. You're pretty set. They're not that expensive.

1:09:33.320 --> 1:09:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Go and try them on at a store. Go anywhere

1:09:35.960 --> 1:09:37.759
<v Speaker 2>you want. You an old Navy, you go a Banana Republic,

1:09:37.800 --> 1:09:39.960
<v Speaker 2>any of these places, Ja Crew, whatever you can afford.

1:09:40.360 --> 1:09:42.080
<v Speaker 2>But make sure they fit you and they don't look,

1:09:42.200 --> 1:09:44.519
<v Speaker 2>you know, like you're trying to sail out of the restaurant.

1:09:44.560 --> 1:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>At the end of it, my favorite part of this

1:09:47.120 --> 1:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>question is the conary.

1:09:48.720 --> 1:09:50.080
<v Speaker 2>At the end, he says, I know.

1:09:50.760 --> 1:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Mid twenties new adult, new adult fashion. Yeah, I heard

1:09:54.680 --> 1:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that before, has been discussed on the show in years past.

1:09:58.479 --> 1:10:00.479
<v Speaker 1>But a refresher would be great for some of your

1:10:00.520 --> 1:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>recent graduate listeners. Thanks. Yeah, guys, congratulations to you, sir

1:10:05.840 --> 1:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>or madam. If you are a new college grads.

1:10:09.120 --> 1:10:12.040
<v Speaker 2>And get your pants hemmed so they flatter you, it

1:10:12.080 --> 1:10:15.640
<v Speaker 2>costs like five bucks out of the cleaner. We have

1:10:15.680 --> 1:10:16.800
<v Speaker 2>a question here, Dan.

1:10:17.240 --> 1:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, have you guys ever considered video streaming on the

1:10:20.200 --> 1:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast on YouTube?

1:10:21.880 --> 1:10:24.360
<v Speaker 2>We have, and we sort of did a long time ago,

1:10:24.400 --> 1:10:27.640
<v Speaker 2>but that was when we were doing it for a company.

1:10:28.560 --> 1:10:33.040
<v Speaker 2>So let's let's pull back some onions onion layers here.

1:10:33.120 --> 1:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's see that.

1:10:34.280 --> 1:10:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's I'm turning the lights down low. We live. If

1:10:39.880 --> 1:10:41.479
<v Speaker 2>we were to do this in the same place we live,

1:10:41.479 --> 1:10:44.799
<v Speaker 2>about an hour and a half apart ish, Yeah, depending

1:10:44.800 --> 1:10:46.160
<v Speaker 2>on traffic. Ish.

1:10:46.240 --> 1:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:10:46.880 --> 1:10:49.880
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to set something up in New Jersey. I

1:10:49.920 --> 1:10:52.680
<v Speaker 2>love the state of New Jersey. I love the opportunities

1:10:52.720 --> 1:10:54.280
<v Speaker 2>in New Jersey. I'd love to set up a little

1:10:54.280 --> 1:10:59.240
<v Speaker 2>solidbal studio and get things going time. Meanwhile, we've talked

1:10:59.240 --> 1:11:03.280
<v Speaker 2>about this, I know, I know, so we could do it.

1:11:03.320 --> 1:11:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Isn't there like an MLB network show that every day

1:11:06.120 --> 1:11:07.320
<v Speaker 2>they're just in a different location.

1:11:07.760 --> 1:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Is that the one with Kevin the War?

1:11:09.800 --> 1:11:11.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I think I think that's right in Chris Rose,

1:11:12.320 --> 1:11:14.320
<v Speaker 2>who does it every day. They're in a different location.

1:11:14.720 --> 1:11:16.559
<v Speaker 2>I forget what it's called, but it's I think it's

1:11:16.800 --> 1:11:18.519
<v Speaker 2>you ready for it.

1:11:18.040 --> 1:11:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Intentional wall, intentional talk.

1:11:20.000 --> 1:11:22.280
<v Speaker 2>I think it's intentional talk. I hate that name.

1:11:22.320 --> 1:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>It is so bad.

1:11:25.920 --> 1:11:29.559
<v Speaker 2>It would not be terribly difficult to do from different

1:11:29.560 --> 1:11:33.479
<v Speaker 2>places and split screen it. Tye has an advantage in

1:11:33.520 --> 1:11:36.640
<v Speaker 2>that he could set up his studio to look like

1:11:37.200 --> 1:11:42.240
<v Speaker 2>a presentable TV place where I record in a walk

1:11:42.280 --> 1:11:45.160
<v Speaker 2>in closet is a little more difficult. I have a

1:11:45.160 --> 1:11:47.160
<v Speaker 2>little bit of a wall set up now in my

1:11:47.240 --> 1:11:50.040
<v Speaker 2>bedroom thanks to the Solid Baby for shooting some video

1:11:50.040 --> 1:11:51.920
<v Speaker 2>stuff like I did last year for Sports Illustrated, and

1:11:51.920 --> 1:11:56.200
<v Speaker 2>we'll see about this fall. But it's a little bit

1:11:56.240 --> 1:11:59.640
<v Speaker 2>more difficult on my end. And the places that do

1:11:59.720 --> 1:12:04.280
<v Speaker 2>a good job with it have other people working for them. Yeah,

1:12:04.400 --> 1:12:06.680
<v Speaker 2>we do not. We have Taylor who helps with a

1:12:06.720 --> 1:12:09.040
<v Speaker 2>bunch of stuff, but he is also remote. He's in

1:12:09.080 --> 1:12:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the DC area. So yes, is the short answer. We'd

1:12:13.160 --> 1:12:17.920
<v Speaker 2>like to but we aren't we.

1:12:18.280 --> 1:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>And let me let me also bookend that by saying

1:12:21.479 --> 1:12:26.439
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we've announced some of our live shows. Yeah,

1:12:26.479 --> 1:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and again. Solider will take us dot Com, slash Texas,

1:12:29.400 --> 1:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>slash DC if you want to get in on those, Yeah,

1:12:32.760 --> 1:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>we do. With some other stuff cooking in the Oven.

1:12:35.320 --> 1:12:38.240
<v Speaker 2>We do. There's stuff coming out hopefully soon.

1:12:39.120 --> 1:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>But we're excited about what's to come. I don't know

1:12:42.280 --> 1:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>if video will be a component of that. Probably not.

1:12:45.439 --> 1:12:47.559
<v Speaker 2>The places that do a really good job with that

1:12:47.840 --> 1:12:52.800
<v Speaker 2>also have a longer season, or like if you're doing

1:12:52.800 --> 1:12:58.000
<v Speaker 2>a political podcast every day, every week, whatever, people are interested.

1:12:58.479 --> 1:13:02.200
<v Speaker 2>People are most interested for three and a half four

1:13:02.280 --> 1:13:05.160
<v Speaker 2>months of a twelve month year with college football. So

1:13:05.960 --> 1:13:08.200
<v Speaker 2>to invest that kind of time and only doing it,

1:13:08.600 --> 1:13:12.599
<v Speaker 2>you know, once a week for fifteen weeks, I think

1:13:12.640 --> 1:13:14.400
<v Speaker 2>you need a lot more time to build up an

1:13:14.400 --> 1:13:17.840
<v Speaker 2>audience than that. And so if it's NBA, if it's

1:13:17.880 --> 1:13:20.799
<v Speaker 2>comedians doing it where you can watch it on YouTube

1:13:20.880 --> 1:13:22.800
<v Speaker 2>whenever you want. If there are two comedians that do

1:13:22.840 --> 1:13:25.800
<v Speaker 2>a podcast in LA they just have regular guests stream

1:13:25.840 --> 1:13:27.479
<v Speaker 2>in and out, and you're a fan of that show,

1:13:27.640 --> 1:13:29.559
<v Speaker 2>you can watch a show from two months ago on

1:13:29.600 --> 1:13:32.040
<v Speaker 2>YouTube and get everything out of it that you would

1:13:32.080 --> 1:13:34.160
<v Speaker 2>if you watched it a day after they've taped it.

1:13:35.000 --> 1:13:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Less So with doing a show about Week three picks.

1:13:39.240 --> 1:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>In week eight, Daniel, we have a question here from

1:13:42.120 --> 1:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>JJ Turp. Okay, what meals are you looking forward to

1:13:46.360 --> 1:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>on your DC slash Dallas Live show weekend?

1:13:50.240 --> 1:13:52.840
<v Speaker 2>So my first thought when we locked in the Dallas

1:13:52.840 --> 1:13:54.679
<v Speaker 2>state was like, oh, we got to go to pecn Lodge.

1:13:54.960 --> 1:13:56.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there would be a bigger mistake than

1:13:56.920 --> 1:13:59.720
<v Speaker 2>filling my gullet with barbecue before trying to do a

1:13:59.720 --> 1:14:03.439
<v Speaker 2>lot of show our performance. Yeah, so I'm gonna go

1:14:03.600 --> 1:14:06.680
<v Speaker 2>pretty light. Just you know, this is no chakra. I'll

1:14:06.680 --> 1:14:09.120
<v Speaker 2>probably find Mexican or something in Dallas. There's there's good

1:14:09.120 --> 1:14:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Mexican options d C. I don't know the food is

1:14:12.880 --> 1:14:14.920
<v Speaker 2>well in d C. But I've long wanted to get

1:14:14.920 --> 1:14:18.040
<v Speaker 2>in a good Ethiopian meal in DC. I don't know

1:14:18.040 --> 1:14:21.960
<v Speaker 2>if you've done Ethiopian before. Some good stuff. D C

1:14:22.360 --> 1:14:24.040
<v Speaker 2>is known for having good Ethiopians.

1:14:24.080 --> 1:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>See, I usually just trust in you to pick out food.

1:14:27.120 --> 1:14:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh, we'll do well, We'll do well. I think we

1:14:29.280 --> 1:14:32.200
<v Speaker 2>already are are pal Jane Cooston, who is a DC

1:14:32.360 --> 1:14:35.360
<v Speaker 2>local already. I don't know if she's planning on just

1:14:36.000 --> 1:14:38.400
<v Speaker 2>kidnapping us in a van and making us eat different

1:14:38.400 --> 1:14:41.320
<v Speaker 2>things old school style. I think so something like that.

1:14:41.400 --> 1:14:43.920
<v Speaker 2>So I might be just trusting her and you might

1:14:43.960 --> 1:14:46.800
<v Speaker 2>just be trusting me. But either way, we will keep

1:14:46.840 --> 1:14:49.280
<v Speaker 2>you posted. Do you I think we have Do we

1:14:49.320 --> 1:14:51.439
<v Speaker 2>have a wrinkle as well that we are going to

1:14:51.439 --> 1:14:54.080
<v Speaker 2>announce the next couple of weeks about the trip to Texas?

1:14:55.479 --> 1:14:57.639
<v Speaker 2>I believe we do. Yes, Yeah, we have a wrinkle.

1:14:57.680 --> 1:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>So state there are some things that are happening to

1:15:01.000 --> 1:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>give too much away? Yeah, okay, Joshua, do you have

1:15:04.280 --> 1:15:07.559
<v Speaker 1>a secret grilled cheese grill? I can't even talk. Do

1:15:07.600 --> 1:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you have a secret grilled cheese recipe?

1:15:11.320 --> 1:15:14.639
<v Speaker 2>No white bread, butter, American cheese, maybe a little cheddar.

1:15:15.000 --> 1:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I've always been fascinated by the people who put tomato

1:15:18.080 --> 1:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>on the grilled cheese.

1:15:19.080 --> 1:15:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh not for me.

1:15:20.080 --> 1:15:21.559
<v Speaker 1>I know that's not for you. It's not really for

1:15:21.640 --> 1:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>me either, And I like tomatoes.

1:15:23.160 --> 1:15:25.800
<v Speaker 2>How about this. Anything thicker than bacon on a grilled

1:15:25.880 --> 1:15:28.200
<v Speaker 2>cheese is no longer grilled cheese. It then just becomes

1:15:28.200 --> 1:15:31.800
<v Speaker 2>a melt of whatever that meat is. Like you see

1:15:31.840 --> 1:15:33.840
<v Speaker 2>grilled cheese chocs and like we put short rib. We've

1:15:33.840 --> 1:15:35.840
<v Speaker 2>got this giant short rib on our grilled cheese. Like, no,

1:15:35.920 --> 1:15:37.880
<v Speaker 2>it's a short melt. It's not a grilled cheese. Cheese

1:15:37.880 --> 1:15:38.439
<v Speaker 2>is not the star.

1:15:39.560 --> 1:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's not that hot to take. I have

1:15:43.080 --> 1:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a final question for you. Yeah, I need to get

1:15:46.120 --> 1:15:51.479
<v Speaker 1>from you your message for humanity on your birthday, this

1:15:51.560 --> 1:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>being July twenty fifth, Be.

1:15:55.040 --> 1:16:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Good to each other. Eat less sugar, exercise, making sure

1:16:02.080 --> 1:16:05.559
<v Speaker 2>you don't push yourself too hard, but you know, move around,

1:16:05.680 --> 1:16:08.840
<v Speaker 2>go outside and take more walks. Listen to more podcasts,

1:16:09.240 --> 1:16:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Drink more water, sleep more, Drink more water. Oh my gosh,

1:16:14.120 --> 1:16:17.840
<v Speaker 2>so inspirational here. Literally every day do I send my

1:16:17.960 --> 1:16:21.960
<v Speaker 2>wife an email saying, Hey, how's the day going. Go

1:16:22.080 --> 1:16:24.680
<v Speaker 2>drink a ton of water, because people just forget they're

1:16:24.720 --> 1:16:27.920
<v Speaker 2>busy during the day and they're not wetting down the

1:16:27.960 --> 1:16:30.840
<v Speaker 2>water slide. You don't slide down water slides that aren't

1:16:30.840 --> 1:16:32.600
<v Speaker 2>don't have a stream of water going down, right, But

1:16:32.720 --> 1:16:34.720
<v Speaker 2>you can't do it too much friction, you can't do it.

1:16:34.800 --> 1:16:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Drink more water, Listen to more podcasts, eat more vegetables,

1:16:42.200 --> 1:16:45.800
<v Speaker 2>do weight bearing exercises, pull ups, push ups, that kind

1:16:45.880 --> 1:16:50.600
<v Speaker 2>of thing. Call people up on the phone instead of

1:16:50.640 --> 1:16:54.920
<v Speaker 2>texting them. Hold on. Should we be saving all of

1:16:54.960 --> 1:16:57.120
<v Speaker 2>these for a future episode that we've already started talking

1:16:57.200 --> 1:17:00.240
<v Speaker 2>about doing with our friend Bill Barnwell. You can you

1:17:00.240 --> 1:17:02.479
<v Speaker 2>can use those because I can go on for a while.

1:17:02.800 --> 1:17:05.800
<v Speaker 2>So this is this is another opportunity to say, we've

1:17:05.800 --> 1:17:11.679
<v Speaker 2>done this annual show about email, email, EMO and sports

1:17:11.760 --> 1:17:14.920
<v Speaker 2>video games from the nineties, and last year we did

1:17:16.040 --> 1:17:18.240
<v Speaker 2>what was it interneting from the nineties?

1:17:18.360 --> 1:17:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Internet? Yeah, Internet habits of the nineteen nineties, that sort.

1:17:21.240 --> 1:17:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Of Internet habits of the nineteen nineties. We do a

1:17:23.160 --> 1:17:25.760
<v Speaker 2>special off topic show with ESPN's Bill Barnwell. And you

1:17:25.760 --> 1:17:27.479
<v Speaker 2>should be if you're an NFL fan at all, you

1:17:27.479 --> 1:17:29.240
<v Speaker 2>should be reading Bill Barnwell, you should be listening to

1:17:29.240 --> 1:17:32.880
<v Speaker 2>the Bill Barnwell podcast hot Terrific totally. We have locked

1:17:32.880 --> 1:17:36.720
<v Speaker 2>in a date for this year's Off topic Bill Barnwell Extravaganza.

1:17:36.760 --> 1:17:40.639
<v Speaker 2>It's coming in the next month or so, before the season. Darren,

1:17:40.800 --> 1:17:43.000
<v Speaker 2>I have one other thing I'd like to point out here.

1:17:44.040 --> 1:17:52.559
<v Speaker 2>What's that there is a new member of the solid

1:17:52.600 --> 1:17:53.640
<v Speaker 2>verbal family.

1:17:54.600 --> 1:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>The solid verbal family, Okay, the solid pop I've talked

1:17:58.880 --> 1:18:00.360
<v Speaker 1>about it for a couple of weeks now, but the

1:18:00.400 --> 1:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>soft Puppy people have been asking me. I've been getting emails.

1:18:04.040 --> 1:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I've been kept awake at night by Yeah, the pinging

1:18:07.240 --> 1:18:09.839
<v Speaker 1>of my phone. People wanting more info in the Solid puppy.

1:18:10.280 --> 1:18:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah on Meredith Bierra, Yeah, Baira.

1:18:15.439 --> 1:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Barro, the twelve twelve week old samoyed pup.

1:18:19.600 --> 1:18:22.599
<v Speaker 2>Okay, everything go well in dog ownership world.

1:18:22.720 --> 1:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>It's going wonderfully. Yeah, Okay, got the solid pup. We're

1:18:25.960 --> 1:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna find a way to incorporate her into the podcast,

1:18:28.320 --> 1:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>provided she doesn't eat the microphone. I'm gonna figure something out. Man.

1:18:31.479 --> 1:18:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Solid baby would definitely try to eat the microphone.

1:18:33.439 --> 1:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're gonna try and figure something out for this

1:18:36.040 --> 1:18:38.519
<v Speaker 1>coming football season. You know how they have like those

1:18:38.600 --> 1:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>cutesy things sometime to see online where you got to

1:18:41.360 --> 1:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>treat in one hand and treating the other and the

1:18:43.439 --> 1:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>treating the right hand is Alabama, the right is Zellousy,

1:18:46.040 --> 1:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. I have now advanced to the

1:18:49.120 --> 1:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>wise old age where I can do those sorts of

1:18:50.880 --> 1:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>things thanks to my Solid pup. Wow.

1:18:53.760 --> 1:18:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we're gonna be posting us a video. We

1:18:55.760 --> 1:18:57.120
<v Speaker 2>can do better than that. We can we can be

1:18:57.200 --> 1:18:59.200
<v Speaker 2>more creative. Ye the one hand, of.

1:18:59.240 --> 1:19:01.519
<v Speaker 1>Course, we can't. But I'm just saying generally speaking. You know,

1:19:02.400 --> 1:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you know you know how pet owners get into this.

1:19:04.680 --> 1:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>As a new pet owner, I'm looking forward to incorporating

1:19:07.120 --> 1:19:08.120
<v Speaker 1>our new pupp into.

1:19:07.920 --> 1:19:10.200
<v Speaker 2>So are you Are you feeling good about this about

1:19:10.240 --> 1:19:12.280
<v Speaker 2>the pet ownership thing, solid for puppy?

1:19:12.320 --> 1:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely?

1:19:13.360 --> 1:19:14.320
<v Speaker 2>You going on walks?

1:19:14.760 --> 1:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Going on? Why I'm gonna actually go on a walk

1:19:16.360 --> 1:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>after we get done recording here solo or with the

1:19:19.760 --> 1:19:22.719
<v Speaker 1>solid wife Kate, solid wife Kate will be with me too, okay,

1:19:22.960 --> 1:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Leish definitely, Yeah, she's still likes yet we've got her

1:19:27.840 --> 1:19:30.519
<v Speaker 1>to uh do a bunch of tricks, sit down, roll over,

1:19:30.560 --> 1:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>well not roll over. She can show us her belly

1:19:33.479 --> 1:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>same which is body train, getting there, getting there? Okay there, Yeah,

1:19:38.560 --> 1:19:39.599
<v Speaker 1>we're working on it though.

1:19:40.400 --> 1:19:41.160
<v Speaker 2>How's the shedding.

1:19:42.080 --> 1:19:45.519
<v Speaker 1>No shedding yet, that's a good part. Not yet eventually, yeah,

1:19:45.520 --> 1:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>but not yet. Sleeping where sleeping downstairs in a crate

1:19:50.600 --> 1:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>wakes up every morning at about five oh five.

1:19:52.960 --> 1:19:54.800
<v Speaker 2>And it's staying that way. It's not gonna be a

1:19:54.800 --> 1:19:57.559
<v Speaker 2>bed situation, not gonna be like in bed with you.

1:19:57.640 --> 1:20:00.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, that's good. Lay down that law. Can we

1:20:00.120 --> 1:20:02.360
<v Speaker 2>have a question that we fought to the death over

1:20:02.520 --> 1:20:05.639
<v Speaker 2>regarding a pet and bed. You were just like, here's

1:20:05.720 --> 1:20:09.040
<v Speaker 2>my solution be as passive aggressive as you possibly can.

1:20:09.120 --> 1:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Yeah, avoid confrontation wherever.

1:20:13.320 --> 1:20:17.360
<v Speaker 2>But it was like avoid confrontation. We have people write

1:20:17.400 --> 1:20:20.000
<v Speaker 2>in about that, like, what is ty I think we had?

1:20:20.080 --> 1:20:22.280
<v Speaker 2>We had our friend Andy Walls, any Wall, I remember

1:20:22.320 --> 1:20:24.800
<v Speaker 2>that's be an adult and talk here.

1:20:25.000 --> 1:20:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Since then, she probably thinks less of me.

1:20:28.000 --> 1:20:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Your response to anyone was like, I hear you, but

1:20:30.520 --> 1:20:36.400
<v Speaker 2>you could leave notes. It was great. It was such

1:20:36.400 --> 1:20:42.599
<v Speaker 2>a view into your soul that picking like the battle

1:20:42.600 --> 1:20:46.200
<v Speaker 2>for the Syhawk Trophy would never give us. Oh my god.

1:20:46.320 --> 1:20:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, thank you to everyone who wrote in. We've

1:20:49.479 --> 1:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>got six pages of questions here. Yeah that quite frankly

1:20:53.160 --> 1:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>are amazing. Soliverbleotgmail dot com apologies if we didn't get

1:20:57.080 --> 1:20:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to yours. We're gonna try and do our best over

1:20:59.400 --> 1:21:02.519
<v Speaker 1>the course of the next weeks and months to get

1:21:02.560 --> 1:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to all the questions that come in, but as you know,

1:21:05.000 --> 1:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty hard. Also, don't forget to follow us on Facebook,

1:21:08.920 --> 1:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, on Instagram, and on Reddit. We've got a

1:21:11.439 --> 1:21:15.559
<v Speaker 1>subreddit Reddit dot com slash our slash solid verbal starting

1:21:15.600 --> 1:21:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to heat up. Our friend Peter over there does a

1:21:17.680 --> 1:21:21.160
<v Speaker 1>great job moderating the sub it's where a bunch of

1:21:21.160 --> 1:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>our ballers gather, congregate and talk about each and every

1:21:24.800 --> 1:21:27.479
<v Speaker 1>episode that we do. And again, this is going to

1:21:27.520 --> 1:21:30.120
<v Speaker 1>be the third time that I say it now. If

1:21:30.120 --> 1:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you will be in the Dallas area on August the seventeenth,

1:21:34.640 --> 1:21:36.519
<v Speaker 1>or if you're going to be in the DC area

1:21:37.080 --> 1:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>on August the eighteenth, the very next night, soliverbaltickets dot com,

1:21:41.439 --> 1:21:45.679
<v Speaker 1>Slash Texas, solidverbaltickets dot com, Slash DC if you want

1:21:45.680 --> 1:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to get in on the action, still some tickets available.

1:21:50.040 --> 1:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>We do expect that we will sell out both locations.

1:21:53.439 --> 1:21:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Tickets are selling at a pretty good clip, but as

1:21:57.479 --> 1:22:00.360
<v Speaker 1>these things go, there are still a few available. So

1:22:00.400 --> 1:22:02.360
<v Speaker 1>we would encourage everyone if you'd like to see the show,

1:22:02.360 --> 1:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>if that come out and meet us, please do get

1:22:05.400 --> 1:22:08.839
<v Speaker 1>on out, go to those URLs and buy your tickets

1:22:08.840 --> 1:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>now before it's too late.

1:22:10.479 --> 1:22:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Cannot recommend it enough. Big things planned.

1:22:13.400 --> 1:22:16.559
<v Speaker 1>We're excited. We started talking about fantasy things selections this

1:22:16.600 --> 1:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>past week, didn't we m hm.

1:22:18.120 --> 1:22:22.400
<v Speaker 2>We did. I'm pumped, all right, all right, that's all

1:22:22.400 --> 1:22:22.760
<v Speaker 2>I got.

1:22:22.920 --> 1:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Dan Rubinstein one final time, Happy birthday to you.

1:22:25.240 --> 1:22:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Sir, Thank you, drink more water.

1:22:28.040 --> 1:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the rest of your evening to everyone out there.

1:22:30.439 --> 1:22:32.559
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the rest of your week, all of your weekend.

1:22:32.560 --> 1:22:37.439
<v Speaker 1>We will be back next week, same time, same place,

1:22:37.920 --> 1:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>slightly different topics, Still college football. Let's start talking about

1:22:41.760 --> 1:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the twenty nineteen season. For that guy over there, my

1:22:44.439 --> 1:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>good friend Dan Rubinstein, for myself, Tie Hildebrand. We will

1:22:48.040 --> 1:22:50.599
<v Speaker 1>talk to you all soon. In the meantime, stay soft, Heyce.