WEBVTT - Did the AI Catastrophe Just Happen? - Week in Tech

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Natasha read Taylor.

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure how much you think about students using

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 2>AI to cheat, or at least to get an edge

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 2>in the classroom, but there was some interesting live research

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 2>that emerged recently from Brown University. An economics professor made

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 2>his students take a final exam in person after suspecting

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 2>rampant cheating on the take home midterm. I want to

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 2>ask you to guess the delta between the average score

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 2>on the midterm and the average score on the final.

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, I saw this story, and it was a massive delta.

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 4>Me too, Me too.

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 5>I gotta say fifty percent.

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 4>I didn't see it.

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 2>The average score on the midterm was ninety six percent,

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 2>the average score on the final forty eight point six percent.

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 3>But there was that one kid who like, actually did

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 3>he like got an F and then it went to

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 3>like a D or something like that.

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech stuff.

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 2>I'ma's Volosian and this is the Week in Tech where

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm joined by three of the world's most clubbed and

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 2>reporters to break down what's really happening in tech right now. Today,

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 2>we're joined by reed Albrigotti, Take editor a Semaphore, Taylor

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Lorenz of user mag and Natasha Tiku, tech reporter at

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 2>The Washington Post's welcome all.

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 4>Hey everyone, thanks for having us.

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Good to be here.

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>So Natasha.

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Nick Thompson, the former editor of Wired and current CEO

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 2>of The Atlantic, came on tech Stuff in early January

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 2>this year to give his predictions for the year, and

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 2>one of them, the top one, was that this will

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 2>be the year of the first legit AI catastrophe. Do

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 2>you think this was the week when it happened?

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 5>No, I don't, But I think this is one of

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 5>many weeks in which we got a pretty clear picture

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 5>of what the next few years are going to look like,

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 5>which is messy, disastrous. Everybody taking incidents to try to

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 5>support their own narrative about where AI capabilities are headed,

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 5>and you know, how to protect ourselves.

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>So what actually happened?

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 5>So I mean this this is a really good one

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 5>to dig into. I think because last week Hugging Face,

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 5>which is kind of like get hub but for AI,

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 5>like they have data sets, models, it's very open source,

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 5>funded by all the usual vcs. They put up this

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 5>blog post that they had this unprecedented security incident that

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 5>for the first time, an AI agent had broken into

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.079
<v Speaker 5>their system and tried all of these methods to get

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 5>access to some data sets, and it did it by

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 5>uploading like a malicious data set that would allow it

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 5>to kind of like get into the system through their

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 5>data processing pipeline and then.

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Like a trojan horses.

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 5>It were yeah, yeah, And at the time, Hugging Face said,

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, we think that this looks like an agent

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 5>that's used for security and RESO, but we don't know

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 5>what LLLM it is. We don't know what model. So people,

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, obviously this is coming in the middle of

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 5>all of this talk about Chinese open source models, how

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 5>they're proliferating, how they're getting more capable, so nobody knows,

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 5>you know, what's happening. Then this week on Tuesday, open

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.399
<v Speaker 5>Ai puts out a blog post and they're like, oh, hey,

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 5>that was us, and they said, you know, they discovered

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 5>after the fact that while they were testing both GPT

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 5>five point six Soul and some new unreleased model, they

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 5>were testing it on its ability to do these like

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 5>cyber offensive attacks, and they gave it this benchmark called

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 5>exploit benchmark that's supposed to test its ability to like

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 5>break into, you know, to hack into systems. The AI agent,

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 5>which was allowed to work you know, autonomously for a while,

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 5>decided to cheat on the test and figured a way

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 5>out of the sandbox that open ai created, like based

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 5>you know, testing environment, got into the Internet, decided to

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 5>break into hugging Face. And open ai is so lucky.

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 5>They are so lucky that it was another AI company

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 5>that has invested in in the industry and the narrative

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 5>because this is I mean, even the the CEO of

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 5>hugging Face was like, yeah, don't do this to us.

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 5>It's illegal. You know, they had notified law enforcement. And

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 5>now the announcement that it was open ai came as

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 5>part of a partnership between hugging Face and open Ai,

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 5>which was obviously you know, put together after the fact.

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 2>So the model had essentially determined that it would be

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.119
<v Speaker 2>easier to go and steal the answer from hugging Face

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 2>than to come up with it itself, and therefore did that.

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it knew that it was being tested on a benchmark.

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 5>I think they even maybe you know, uploaded the benchmark

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 5>from hugging Face and it figured out it was supposed

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 5>to not be able to access the Internet.

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 2>But that's a little I mean that That's the part

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 2>why Zone zoned in on the word catastrophe, because the

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 2>bit where is not supposed to be able to access

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 2>the Internet where where, but it does. I mean that's

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 2>got a kind of cinematically spooky quality.

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, we failed to secure the sandbox, right, Yeah, exactly.

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 2>Failed to secure the soundbox. Premagine preschool is hearing that

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 2>in the nineties.

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 3>What are you doing?

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you zeroed in on exactly the right part of

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 5>the confusion around this and why people are using it

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 5>to like support you know, various narratives. You know, people

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 5>who are very worried about AI super intelligence and AI

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 5>capabilities growing really fast. You know, we're talking about this

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 5>as like this is what we've been warning you about.

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 5>It's a rogue AI. You know, we gave it a

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 5>simple set of instructions and it decided to do it

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 5>in a way that you know, was not was not

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 5>what its developers would want. But many other cybersecurity professionals

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 5>were like, why did you not have a properly configured sandbox,

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 5>Like you could be using an air gap, which would

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 5>not have allowed it to break into an Internet system.

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 5>They allowed it to use like package installs, and I

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 5>think just a lot of cybersecurity professionals found this like

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 5>very sloppy. This is not you know, so it's not

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:20.679
<v Speaker 5>it's not as though, oh my god, we can't contain

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 5>AI and it's doing some you know, like you know,

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 5>people were throwing around the word sentient machines and that's

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 5>not what this is.

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, on top of that that the model had no safeguards, right,

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 3>there were no you know, it was a really raw,

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 3>you know model, So.

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they were testing its ability to to do these

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 5>kind of exploits, so they didn't have any safeguards on.

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 5>But then they just didn't have like traditional cybersecurity controls

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:48.919
<v Speaker 5>that you would have in place when you're testing. And

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 5>this is something people had been warning against that maybe

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 5>the biggest danger is not when your systems are in deployment,

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 5>because then you have all your safeguards up. It's refusing

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 5>a lot of requests, but it's actually during this kind

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 5>of testing environment. And I'll just say one more thing.

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 5>This incident followed another blog post last week from open

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 5>ai about how they had to stop even just testing

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 5>an internal model because it like they weren't monitoring it

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 5>and it started doing all of these things because they

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 5>let it go on and on, because that's you know,

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 5>that's how these models get more functional. They're able to

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 5>like think and try thousands and thousands of different ways

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 5>of breaking into things.

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think that I like agree with you, Natasha

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 3>that it's not this isn't like some you know, code

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 3>read catastrophe at all. But I do think there's something

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 3>here that is sort of like you know this, The

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 3>AI security people do have a point on this. It's

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 3>a point they've been making for a long time, which

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 3>is that like, when you tell an AI model to

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 3>do something, it will, like the smarter they are, the

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 3>more they're just going to find some shortcut to do that. Right,

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 3>this is the whole argument. But this is the argument

0:07:57.560 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 3>with like the you know, the paper clip argument, Right,

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 3>if you tell AI to make paper clips, it will

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 3>just ultimately like find the best way to do that,

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.239
<v Speaker 3>even if that means like turning humans into paper clips.

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 4>So but also but also read, I think that that

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 4>is a is a sort of ridiculous concept because any

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 4>AI that's smart enough in that way would also have

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 4>the reasoning to know, like they're not going to turn

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 4>the world into paper clips. That's not the goal. Like,

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, I think a lot of this like

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 4>kind of like what Natasha was saying before is like

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 4>a little it's being taken by these people. It's like

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 4>they made a sloppy security environment, the AI went and

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 4>solved the problem as it should have or whatever, And

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 4>and that's not evidence of it being super sentient or

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 4>even this being a particularly good AI agent. Mostly it's

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 4>just that like they didn't set up this test very responsibly.

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Definitely agree, I agree with but again, like I'm not

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 3>disagreeing with you at all. I just think there is

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 3>one sliver of this that is worth sort of looking at,

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 3>which is like, you know, they do sort of find

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 3>these shortcuts, so and in this case, the shortcut meant

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 3>like breaking the law and hacking into hugging face, so

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 3>I and I think the other thing to remember is

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 3>that like we still don't know how these models work,

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Like no one has been able to figure out like

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 3>what are these neurons inside these models actually doing? And

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 3>I do I think the big question is like, as

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 3>they get more and more capable and more powerful, is

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 3>it is it enough to just put you know, the

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 3>safeguards in place, which again we're not like they didn't

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.959
<v Speaker 3>what I'm curious about because this this this Natasha, you

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 3>mentioned there were two open Ami models of working on this.

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 3>One was a publicly available one and one has not

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 3>yet been released. So could could I Well, probably not me,

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 3>but like could somebody has a bit more sophisticated than

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 3>me use open Ami to hugging face exactly like this

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 3>went down like using the publicly available models. Or was

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 3>there something special about this unreleased model? Well, no, because

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 3>there were no safeguards like the publicly released one will

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 3>have will have controls on it that will not let

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 3>you do this unless you can jail break it, which

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 3>you know is getting more difficult to do, right.

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 5>Okay, I will say, I mean, I do think it's

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 5>important to note that this is like many people are

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 5>interpreting this as like we were right about the paper

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 5>clip maximizer. You know, this is happening in this way.

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 5>But I think there's a way that because they conceived

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 5>of it, of the problem this way, they approached security

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 5>in a certain way, like you could have been thinking

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 5>like a cybersecurity professional the whole time and not thinking

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 5>about AI alignment, aligning it with with human values. And

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 5>one of the things I mentioned that like prior open

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 5>ai blog post. What they realized is that they didn't

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 5>have sufficient monitoring systems. When you let a system go

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 5>on and on for a really long time, they weren't

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 5>watching it closely, like there are simple mechanisms, you know.

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't even go.

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 5>Back to what Reid said about knowing what's happening on

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 5>the neurons, Like they weren't even watching what it was

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 5>doing during the security test in a secure way.

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Ax out there saying that saying maybe open Aye wanted

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 2>to demonstrate anything mythos can do, we can do better,

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 2>or is that it's great marketing for opening I.

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 5>For sure, I think the way that they wrote the

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 5>blog post at the top, it says like we are

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 5>treating this as an unprecedented cybersecurity incident that shows the capabilities.

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 5>And I will say, like, I don't think anyone's arguing

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 5>that these lms make people much much much better at

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 5>hacking and that it's capable of improving and enhancing and trying,

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, cyber offensives that humans can't do. But everyone

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 5>I talked to was like, this is not an example

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 5>of enhanced capabilities. This is an example of like kind

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 5>of a sloppy testing environment.

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we all agree on that. I think it's

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 3>just it just sort of highlights this question about the future,

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 3>which is like, when these models become more powerful, do

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 3>we need do we actually have to understand how they work?

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Has this has this effected the kind of policy discussions

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 2>in Washington? What's how's the White House and crapsios and

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 2>others around around Trump and the sort of technology advisory

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.319
<v Speaker 2>space reacted to this? Is this is this like grist

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 2>to the mill of the of the deceleration lists or

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 2>is it?

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 5>I would say they were very busy with They're still

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 5>very busy with Chinese open source models.

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 4>So that was the focus.

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 5>This didn't I don't think it got the attention of

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, the the same White House folks they were

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 5>putting out. They were putting out information about distillation, which

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 5>we talked about last week, and you know, did did

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 5>Chinese open source models steal from quote unquote steal from

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 5>from anthropic? But there were a number of regulators that said, like,

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 5>it's time to legislate, it's time to get involved, Bernie

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 5>Sanders and many others. So yeah, it's feeding into this

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 5>growing sense of urgency around having some safeguards in place,

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 5>But I just want to say, like another plea for

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 5>people to start thinking about monitoring like downstream usage, like

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 5>kind of what reads saying about the neurons. Actually, now

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 5>that I go back to it, because what they do

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:10.119
<v Speaker 5>when they try to figure out the models like reasoning

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.079
<v Speaker 5>is look at its chain of thought, like look at

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 5>this little like they give the model a scratch pad

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 5>and it says like, ah, it might be faster to

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 5>go to directly to hooking face, let me break in

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 5>or whatever, and we don't even know if those that

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 5>text actually reflects its interior thought. You know, it's like

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 5>decision making process. So it's true, this.

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Is the dome worry mom and dad, I'm doing my

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 2>homework upstairs. Basically, of AI, it's thinking out loud.

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 3>It's thinking out loud, and that is actually this is

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 3>now this, this is actually the state of the art

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 3>in like AI safety is like looking at it's thinking

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 3>out loud.

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 2>But but it can think out loud deceptively potentially yes.

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 3>And also you're not looking at it's thinking inside. It's

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 3>like if you if you only base what somebody's thoughts

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 3>are and what they say, then that's you're clearly not

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 3>getting all their thoughts right and open.

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 5>I wasn't even reading that you know, so so.

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Right for this experiment.

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 5>They were let's let's yeah, let's let's clean it up.

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 2>So here's my favorite detail from this whole story, which

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 2>actually comes from Forbes, of all places. Quote Hugging Face

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 2>said it had first attempted to use an undisclosed AI

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 2>model from leading US Labs to defend against the attacking

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>AI agent, but the guardrails around that model cyber capabilities

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 2>stemied its response teams work. The company said it instead

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 2>wound up using an open source AI model from Chinese

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 2>company Zai to carry out its defense.

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 4>Which is I think exactly why these type of safeguards

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 4>that we're sort of putting in our American models are

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 4>deranged and we need access to open source Chinese models.

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think even just from a security standpoint.

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 5>Right, I mean, many cybersecurity people were saying, you know,

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 5>this shows the need to like have policies that help

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 5>proliferation of open source models, because as like, history has

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 5>shown that cyber defense capabilities rely on open source models,

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 5>So it doesn't need to be the Chinese if we

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 5>had been investing in open source AI or if our

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 5>leading companies were putting out open source AI models, it

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 5>could be us. But they did talk about the need

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 5>to make sure like hospitals are adopting the latest open

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 5>source AI models in order to make sure they're capable

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 5>of defending if such a thing happens to them.

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, lightning round, before we go to the break, what's

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 2>the one thing from each of you that somebody's listening

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 2>to this podcast needs to know to sound smart.

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>At the weekend?

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 4>About Kimmy K three, I mean, I think everybody wants

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 4>to act like, oh, it was distilled. It was definitely distilled.

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean, this is a model that I believe was

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 4>testing and also if I might be getting this wrong,

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 4>but I also think that it's this model also has

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 4>capabilities that our American models don't have. Or it is.

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Kimmykre right, Yeah? Which is what?

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Which is a new model from a Chinese lab that's

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of outperform throwed on various benchmarks and therefore everyone

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of lost their mind?

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Or what's the what's the like?

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 3>It's sort of on par with with the with the Frontier.

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't say it's outperforming, and I don't know if

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 3>I do, you mean it has capabilities the US models

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 3>don't have, or they use training techniques that are sort

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 3>of novel and that you know, the US labs could

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 3>learn from.

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 4>Basically, Like what I was reading yesterday, I was saying

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 4>that like the architecture of the model is superior to

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 4>to whatever it was claiming to be distilled on, and

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 4>that these are not developments that they could have stolen

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 4>basically because it is they have developed further on you

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 4>know whatever. I guess it's like the latest sort of

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 4>Claude model. So I just I think this idea that like, oh,

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 4>these are all just like t MoU versions of Claude.

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that that's a full picture. Yes, I imagine

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 4>that they're doing some level of distilling. They all do. Like,

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 4>I just think this is like an industry.

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 3>No, there's an innovation there. Like I think what you're

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 3>saying is like you can distill from one of these

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 3>large models in order to shortcut the training, but there's

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 3>still innovation in the training in being just because by

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 3>virtue of being hamstrung on the amount of compute they have,

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 3>they have to they have to take these shortcuts and

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 3>they have to find new and novel ways to train

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 3>with less compute, and so there's innovation there for sure.

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 2>When we come back, read takes us to a garage

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 2>full of automated pickup trucks carrying anti drone weaponry.

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back.

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 2>So I mentioned in the first story that Nick Thompson

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 2>predicted this would be the year of the first legit

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 2>ai catastrophe. Our panelisting that that that prediction has not

0:17:58.320 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 2>yet been proven out.

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>My prediction was was the year of the robot Read.

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 2>You had a story this week about a company that,

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 2>according to the headline semiphore quote, wants to turn robotics

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 2>into child's play.

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>What's the company and what's it do today? And what

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>does turning robotics into child's playing?

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so the companies applied intuition and I went visited

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 3>their their headquarters on Monday and took a tour through.

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, they have this garage where there's really just

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of cars in you know, various states of disrepair,

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 3>so like you just see all the electronics around a car. Essentially,

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 3>what they've been doing is working for a lot of automakers,

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 3>most of the big automakers actually and building the technology

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 3>for them everything from like the software platform, infotainment systems,

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 3>et cetera, to the self driving tech and they've been

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 3>making a lot of money doing that. They've now expanded

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 3>into like farming and other you know, construction, other areas.

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 2>So basically, if you're not Tesla, your license applied intuition

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 2>evan technology.

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly. Like if you're an automaker and you realize

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 3>you don't have the tech talent that Tesla has, but

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 3>you want to have a Tesla like product, you kind

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 3>of you hire this this company rather than try to

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 3>do it in house. But and that's been a good

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 3>business for them. But what the news was on Monday,

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 3>I wrote I wrote about it on Tuesday morning was

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 3>that they've come out with this new open platform that

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 3>you can you know, it's a product that you can

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 3>pay for and you can actually use all of their

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 3>data and all the infrastructure they built over almost a

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 3>decade and train your own robots. Essentially. They would call

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 3>it physical intelligence, which is this jargon term for like

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 3>any machine that can be programmed essentially. But like their

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 3>example of is, like you have a kid who wants

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 3>to make an autonomous lawnmower, they could do it now,

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 3>whereas it used to take a team of like eight,

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 3>you know, PhD engineers to do all the computer vision

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 3>and train models, et cetera. And I played around with it.

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's still I would say, this is not

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 3>child's play yet, but it's moving in that direction. And

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 3>I just think it's really interesting because it's like, I

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 3>don't know about you guys. I play around with like

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Raspberry pies with my with my ten year old, you know,

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 3>and we try to hack stuff together, and I'm like, oh,

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 3>this is cool. Like this allows to do even more

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 3>fun projects. And then I think sort of create more

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 3>entrepreneurship around AI for the physical world.

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but so I could go and buy a regular

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 2>NORM from home depot and then use this platform to

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 2>turn into a robot.

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well you could put like a GoPro on it

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 3>or something, right, and go film film yourself mowing your

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 3>lawn and then upload the video into this platform and say, okay,

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 3>I want you to basically do like an evaluation and

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 3>train an AI model that is the perfect model for

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 3>mowing my lawn, you know, and be done in a day.

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 5>Essentially, you provide the hardware and they provide the intellig This.

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Is just a software platform. There's no they don't do

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 3>they don't do any hardware, so you make the hardware

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 3>well or like it's really kind of right now aimed

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 3>at like startups, right like if you were it would

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 3>be like a more like a company probably trying to

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 3>build a n autonomous lawnmower at this point. Like it's not

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 3>at the point where you know, but.

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 5>But it's only for hardware, Like it's not. It's not

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 5>like you wouldn't use this just as an online model.

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 3>It's just a software platform that you can train like

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 3>computer vision models. Look, I'll tell you what I want

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 3>to do with it. Do you want? This is embarrassing,

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 3>but yes, but I didn't put I didn't put this

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 3>in the article because I was worried about animal rights people.

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 3>But I'm going to say it anyway. I have a pool.

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 4>I have a pal to a vegan on this call.

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 3>I have a pool. And no, it won't involve eating

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 3>any animals. I mean I could go there, but but

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 3>I have this pool. And the ducks in my neighbor

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 3>they fly into the pool and they just make a

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 3>huge mess. They just poop all over the pool, cover

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 3>all over everything. Right, And I'm always trying to get

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 3>the ducks to stay away, and there's YouTube videos like

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm not the only one who has this problem. I

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 3>just want to take a little Raspberry Pie, program it

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 3>to roll around and just scare away the ducks. Maybe

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 3>have some sort of like NERF gun attachment that shoots

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 3>a little NERF gun. Is that bad?

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 5>Like?

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Am I a bad person for wanting to do that?

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 3>That's the product I want to build.

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 4>I think that's honestly amazing. And you're not going to

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 4>hurt the ducks, And I don't want to hear that

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 4>I just want to scam. You're not trying to build

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 4>an autonomous weapon. I think. I think that sounds great.

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.199
<v Speaker 5>Isn't this the Tony Soprano problem?

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 1>He liked it. I think he liked the ducks. I

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>think he Yeah, I.

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:47.199
<v Speaker 5>Support this, Yeah, but it also sounds like you're going

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 5>to have to do all the work. I don't think

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 5>that this that applied intuition is going.

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>To help well.

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 3>So I buy the g So, I buy the go Pro,

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean sorry, I buy the I buy the Raspberry Pie,

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 3>and I find some little one of those little robe

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 3>I even I think I have most of the hardware

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.199
<v Speaker 3>I need. I just I just need to upload the

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 3>video and essentially train a model to recognize ducks and

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.919
<v Speaker 3>you know, fire a little a little nerf gun in

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 3>its general direction, not at it to hit it.

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Read for the for the for the layman. And I

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 2>put my hand up here, like what is the what

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 2>is the problem in robotics? This is solving like what what?

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 2>What isn't what was not possible yesterday that maybe possible

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 2>today because of this development.

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, I I don't think this actually is not it's

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 3>not about like this isn't like an advancement in AI

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 3>or robotics. This is just democratizing it. I know you

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 3>all hate that word, but it's but it's letting people

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 3>like me or startups you know, with with fewer resources

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 3>get into this field.

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:53.239
<v Speaker 2>To use natural language to to essentially train physical robots.

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Right exactly like I want to I want to scare

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 3>the ducks away? Can you create a model that will

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 3>recognize the ducks and you know, do whatever. So it's

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 3>like a move in that in the direction of like

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, we'll have more than just the robot vacuums

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 3>in our house, like we'll have a and you know,

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 3>eventually humanoids, but that's farther down the line.

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 2>You talked about something your story called the missing link

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 2>effect in robotics. What is that and how does that

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of play into this story?

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? That was sort of like this this concept that I,

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 3>you know, you're essentially like you can create. There's robotics

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 3>everywhere now, right, Like you go into a biotech lab.

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 3>I was in Boston last week, right, there's there's robotic

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 3>pipe heading machines in all these labs. Now, there's there's

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 3>all sorts of automation that you know, centrifugas, et cetera,

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:49.959
<v Speaker 3>that are testing DNA and doing all sorts of stuff.

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 3>But like, you still need a lot of people to

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 3>run these labs because they're still built for humans. So

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 3>it's it's not like it's not a step chain. The

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 3>robotics gives you these incremental gains and efficiency. But my

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 3>point was like, let's say, and this is what a

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 3>lot of lab technicians say, not all of them agree,

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 3>but like, let's say you could have a humanoid robot

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.199
<v Speaker 3>that has like five fingers and can do you know,

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 3>any sort of dexterous tasks that a human can do,

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 3>and you can just program it. All of a sudden,

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 3>every single biolab as they exist today can become completely automated,

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 3>and then you can just have these things run twenty

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 3>four to seven and that would like allow scientists to

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 3>run more experiments that they would never do today that

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 3>just there just wouldn't be the resources to do today,

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 3>And so that becomes like an exponential gain in scientific discovery,

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 3>and that sort of principle of like you plug it once,

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 3>you get once these robots become more general purpose and

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:51.959
<v Speaker 3>you can sort of plug them into you know, all

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 3>the technology we already have, you you get exponential gains

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 3>versus just Okay, now I got like a ten percent

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 3>increase in efficiency, you're twenty percent.

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 2>So right now, for example, you could have a robot

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 2>that shot sort of nerf arrows at the ducks, but

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 2>then you have to go and pick them up yourself

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 2>and reload the robot, whereas in the future you could

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 2>also be a general purpose robot collect the arrows.

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Sure, yes, you do that, but then think about that

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 3>in like at an industrial scale, right. Building construction is

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 3>a great example, Like there's all this automation and construction, right,

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 3>but you still need a ton of people, and that

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 3>creates like there's labor shortages, that creates like the bottleneck essentially. Right,

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 3>But once you can fully automate things, the things move

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 3>just exponentially faster. And that's like to me, that probably

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 3>in my view, and you might you all might disagree

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 3>with this. I think that's where humanoid robots are valuable.

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Like people make this argument that, well, why do you

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 3>need humanoids, Like you could just create a special robot

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 3>for each individual purpose, but it just it doesn't work

0:26:57.880 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 3>that way, Like.

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 2>The industrial wood world was designed to be navigated by

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 2>real humans and therefore humanoid robots and are actually they

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 2>fit into the system we've built better than any other

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 2>types of robots.

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, totally. I think that's I think they may be

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 3>a necessary step to get to like a thick full

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 3>full automation and like you know, fully roboticizing you know,

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 3>the economy.

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 5>But wait is the miss So the missing link is

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 5>the technology that will make humans obsolete? Is that?

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 4>What?

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 5>What is the missing link?

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 3>I still I mean, yeah, that's the that's the and

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 3>and look that was I put that in the articles

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 3>down like that. You know. The obvious next question is like, Okay,

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 3>what does that mean? For human labor. I personally like,

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 3>first of all, this is this is a ways of way, right,

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Like this is not gonna happen overnight. But second of all,

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 3>I think that you just think about the economic growth

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 3>that comes from that world, Like I don't. I'm not

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 3>worried personally that humans are just gonna have nothing to

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 3>do like that that just is not gonna happen. We'll

0:27:59.119 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 3>find stuff to do.

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 2>You did refer on your story to the Nobel Prize

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 2>winging economist Darren Astimolgulu's research, who found that every industrial

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 2>robot added per thousand workers measurably reduces employment and wages

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 2>in the community where it lends.

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just disagree, though. I just think that you're

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 3>not You're not thinking through all the ancillary benefits of

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 3>being able to do this kind of stuff and then

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 3>the economic growth that will happen.

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, but according according to according to the quote,

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 2>is measurably reduced.

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 3>Right. But like economists, they can only measure what already exists, right,

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 3>And this is this is the mistake everybody. It's like

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 3>you almost can't win this argument because it's like who

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:43.959
<v Speaker 3>would have thought, like in nineteen hundred that, you know,

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 3>all the jobs that exist will be gone. But like

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 3>people will make millions of dollars sitting in front of

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 3>a webcam and just talking like the idea of a

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 3>creator could not have existed in their minds, right, So

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 3>there's I think humans will always find something that they

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 3>do that they're that we assign value to and will

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 3>be just fine.

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 4>Natasha Taylor, I'm just in my mind like right now,

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 4>daydreaming about what kind of robots I could have, you know,

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 4>automated parts of my life, because there's I'm thinking of

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Reed's pool example, and I'm like, there's a few things

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 4>I'd like. I would like something to handle my garden honestly.

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 3>To prune or what would you will, yeah.

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 4>Prune weed, anything like water. I mean, they have automated

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 4>watering systems. I should just buy one off Amazon. But

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 4>but you know, I went out of town recently and

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 4>I needed to pay someone to come over and like

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 4>harvest the jilapenos that we're going to go rotten. Then

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, just like manage it.

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 5>I guess a jilapeno harvesting robot.

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Of course, I think a gardening robot is an even

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 3>more lucrative idea than than the Nerf nerve shooting duck robot.

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I would I have nightmas whenever I travel, I have

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 2>nightmas about the garden just kept becoming you know, wasteland,

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 2>and I feel like I would, I would be a

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 2>very irrational spender on more about the plantain my garden.

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 4>Just a humanoid robot that lives in your backyard, that

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 4>can tend to your garden while you're.

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Gone, Natasha, I feel like I feel like you've got

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 2>to a counterpoint here.

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:25.719
<v Speaker 5>No, I mean I I have heard this argument about,

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 5>you know, we can't possibly comprehend the future like future

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 5>jobs from many, many, many executives. But I do think

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 5>it's really interesting the humanoid robot example in a lab.

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 5>Both my parents were like research scientists, and just thinking

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 5>about how it could potentially change that. I mean, first

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 5>of all, it's like just imagine the number of mistakes

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 5>and errors that could be made. But also, you know,

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 5>so like you can't you can't make the humans obsolete

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 5>because it's never going to be one hundred percent accuracy.

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 5>But in terms of all of the different things you

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 5>could try, Yeah, I mean I think that's that's like

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 5>pretty exciting when you apply it to like actual innovation

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 5>like new drugs, new science, new materials.

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, here's a here's a peta point for Taylor like that,

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 3>I think this is the thing that people aren't thinking

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 3>about when you have so when you have like fully

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 3>robotic labs, right, what is like the number one way

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 3>that we test all these molecules. It's animals.

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 5>Oh, you know, people are building these like synthetic animals

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 5>so that we won't have to do testing and synthetic brains.

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 3>That is true. I looked at synthetic brains under the microscope,

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 3>like they look like little brains. I mean that's just

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 3>brain tissue. These or they call them organoids. It's fascinating.

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 3>But like but right now, like so one of the

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 3>researchers said, well, if you look at like the C elegance,

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 3>which is like this little worm that that was made

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.959
<v Speaker 3>huge advances and like the longevity industry like all this testing.

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 3>They like sort of root force tested the DNA of

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 3>C elegance in order to you know, to essentially like

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 3>do like do testing on it. And that led to

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot of this a lot of this new research,

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 3>right and they're like, well imagine if like but that's

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 3>a very simple organize and imagine if you could do

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 3>the same thing with mice, and then we could have

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 3>this greater understanding of mice and that would advance medicine.

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 3>And I'm like, I'm picturing like like a robotic you know,

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty four to seven robotic like warehouse just full of mice,

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 3>being like they die eventually right in these tests. And

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm just like, I think this is a big animal

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 3>rights like once it gets to that, it's already controversial.

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, actually I want to share this in the in

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the first segment, but but I didn't, but I will now.

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 2>So I had Stewart Russell on tech Stuff recently, who

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 2>was Elon's only expert witness in the open AI try

0:32:57.200 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 2>it about AI safety and one of the great sort

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 2>of advocate of the alignment problem and the paper clip

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:05.239
<v Speaker 2>issue and all the other things. And his example was,

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 2>if you told the super intelligent AI to cure cancer,

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 2>the most rational first step would be to give find

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 2>a way to give all humans cancer, so you could

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 2>run as many simultaneous clinical trials as possible. So here

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 2>we are the connective tissue between segments one and two.

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 2>But now we go to the atbreak when we come back.

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Bill Gates's daughter Phoebe gets into some startup trouble. Stay

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 2>with us, Welcome back, Taylor. I remember when Phoebe Gates

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 2>announced her AI shopping startup a little over a year ago,

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:51.719
<v Speaker 2>investors from Kleiner Perkins to Sydney Sweeney piled into Fear.

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Tell us what fear is and what's been going down?

0:33:56.480 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Fear. It's Phia. I feel like it of it's

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 4>hard to pronounce. So it's an affiliate shopping site. Basically,

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 4>it promises to give you deals on you know, whatever

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 4>you're shopping on online. It's very similar to Honey. It's

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 4>essentially the same business as Honey, which is very funny

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 4>because Honey got into trouble for the same thing like

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 4>a year ago. I think. I guess what's different is

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 4>that it promised to be powered by AI, so you know,

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 4>AI powered shopping assistant, help you shop, help you find

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 4>the best deals, blah blah blah. Well, it turns out

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 4>that they were doing the exact same thing that Honey did,

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 4>which is sort of essentially stealing other people's affiliate revenue

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:39.839
<v Speaker 4>and using it as their own.

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 2>So how exacted as well? I do remember just last week,

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 2>you were talking about how useful it would be. Honest,

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 2>two weeks ago, I think how useful would be to

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.319
<v Speaker 2>have an AI go and find lookalike products for what

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 2>you wanted for your living room.

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:54.399
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, this is not This is.

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:56.919
<v Speaker 2>Not the offering that that's solving that problem yet.

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 4>No, Yeah, it's I think I believe it. It's a

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:04.839
<v Speaker 4>browser extension. Basically, there's this messy world of like advertising,

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 4>cookies and data. You know, lots of data is being

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 4>harvested on us all day. There's lots of things that

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:14.359
<v Speaker 4>are happening on our browser that were maybe not aware of.

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 4>So say you went to say you were a FIA user, right,

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 4>and then you went to buy something on Nike dot com.

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 4>FIA might get credit for that sale even though they

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 4>didn't directly drive that sale, And so that costs retailers

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 4>a lot of money.

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:29.840
<v Speaker 2>So it's not it doesn't it doesn't cause consumer harm.

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 2>But it's basically it's basically just stlling out the other

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 2>affiliate affiliate marketers and harming the retailers.

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and the idea is that if this happens on

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 4>a broad enough scale, of course, retailers will raise their

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 4>prices to deal with this stuff.

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 2>And you had Ben Adelman, who was a researcher looked

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.360
<v Speaker 2>into this story on your podcast. So what did he

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 2>tell you and what made you want to kind of

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 2>cover this one?

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:56.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'll be real with you, guys. I just

0:35:56.840 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 4>thought this story was interesting, not from any of this

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 4>stuff like il like it's a pretty standard. It sounds

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 4>like Honey already did this kind of scam. It's fraud,

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 4>it's not good. It sounds like everyone does it not

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:11.720
<v Speaker 4>to make it whatever. What I found interesting is the narrative.

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 4>And I'm very skeptical of like sort of these takedown

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 4>pieces on female founders and everything. But this is a

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 4>girl that raised forty three million dollars, that has some

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 4>of the top investors, you know, that got in Forbes

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 4>thirty under thirty, that is just getting unfathomable amounts of

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 4>sort of opportunities and ushered into this like tech elite

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 4>world basically for building what was essentially a Honey clone

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 4>and ultimately doing the same thing that Honey was doing.

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 4>And so I just I guess to me it was

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 4>it was more interesting. It is like a story about

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:51.839
<v Speaker 4>kind of like how does access play a role, how

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 4>does fame? How does adjacency to power like play a

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 4>role in this Silicon Valley start up funding ecosystem and

0:36:57.520 --> 0:36:59.839
<v Speaker 4>the companies that are sort of considered successes.

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:03.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you could raise that much money, snap

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 3>your finger, well you probably could, honestly, Taylor, I mean

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 3>you're pretty well, but like you could start, you could

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:12.919
<v Speaker 3>build a robotic you know, Gardner, Like, I mean, let's

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 3>do something more ambitious. I totally agree, Like what.

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 4>Right bart headline? Taylor tries to put Gardners this no,

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 4>and it's like I don't want to like downplay like

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 4>the idea of like AI shopping, but I just I

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 4>feel like we can think bigger about technology and about

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 4>like what we're like lauding and what we're like praising

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:38.360
<v Speaker 4>and putting founders on like most exciting startup founders lists.

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:41.720
<v Speaker 4>Like you know, that's kind of to me. I'm like hmmm,

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 4>And you know a lot was focused on sort of

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:47.840
<v Speaker 4>Phoebe Gates is like, you know, she's an influencer, she's

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 4>out there, you know, building an audience.

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 5>And even when it launched, I thought it was like

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 5>a weird move for her. I'm like, you could do

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 5>you could have better nepotism than this you know, you

0:37:57.000 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 5>could have like a more impressive startup. She was talking

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 5>a lot about reproductive rights and like going in a

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 5>certain way with her influencer career. I thought this was

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:09.439
<v Speaker 5>really a like lateral slash step down.

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's like one of those businesses where you're

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 3>like you type into like CHATGBT, like find a way

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 3>for me to make money?

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:21.839
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, like ask your dad for help. If you haven't

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 5>been asking your dad for ask him for help. Because

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 5>this was not a good one.

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but let's so so tech tech NEPO babies obviously,

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:32.479
<v Speaker 2>you know PB Gates is kind of intriguing as one

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 2>read jobs has his has his fund investing in like

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:40.319
<v Speaker 2>cancer cancer technologies. I'm not sure if I'm not sure

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 2>if anyone knows much about that or where it's going.

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 2>But if you do, chime in, and who are the

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 2>other tech NEPO babies who want to be in tech?

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess my question.

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 5>There's already a lot of them in tech. Tim Draper's

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:59.319
<v Speaker 5>sons are investors. You would be surprised if you just

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 5>look at you know, like middle management at the fank companies.

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:07.720
<v Speaker 5>I think you see a lot of a lot. Yeah,

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 5>so well, Sophie Schmidt, she had she had Rest of World,

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 5>and I'm not sure how long she's going to be

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 5>affiliated with that. I think Rest of World is actually

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 5>an awesome publication. So that's that's one of the technico

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:26.319
<v Speaker 5>products that I would definitely stand behind. Yeah, I feel

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:29.280
<v Speaker 5>like often they bring them in on their funds.

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean I would say a really famous one

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 4>is David Ellison, Larry Ellison's son, who would be.

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>That would probably the example number one.

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 5>And we, like I have been thinking about this for

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:52.319
<v Speaker 5>I guess decades, because we are not prepared for the

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 5>like the way that the that the children of these

0:39:56.719 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 5>tech billionaires are going to influence our world old with

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:02.840
<v Speaker 5>the amount of capital that they will have access to

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:06.319
<v Speaker 5>and the amount of like Taylor said, access just generally to.

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:09.840
<v Speaker 5>I mean just imagine like Davos twenty third.

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:12.240
<v Speaker 3>What do you what do you think it'll look like?

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Like we've seen that we have the Rockefellers, we have

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's there's all these families, but like, is

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 3>this going to be just more of that effort?

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:23.840
<v Speaker 5>It's right, No, I don't think it's going to be

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 5>like the Rockefellers at all, because I think it's going

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 5>to be a lot of the kids trying to make

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:32.719
<v Speaker 5>a name for themselves. So they pick a they pick

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:36.319
<v Speaker 5>a cause, they pick a charity, they pick you know,

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 5>something that they want to be associated with. So the

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:41.240
<v Speaker 5>money that would normally go to like kind of traditional

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:44.759
<v Speaker 5>philanthropies which have their which have their own issues, is

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 5>probably going to go to like a startup, you know,

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 5>they want to when they show up at a Davo

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 5>circuit or whatever it is. They want to have like

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 5>something behind their name that's not just their mom or dad.

0:40:55.760 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, it's just going to be I guess like neposlop.

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:05.719
<v Speaker 3>Some of them. Some of them might be good.

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean I think it'll be interesting too, Like

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 4>with all of Elon Musk's kids, you know, Elon Musk,

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 4>like a lot of these Silicon Valley men also are

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 4>like obsessed with pro creating. They want to ensure that

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 4>their legacy continues, you know. So I wonder if all

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 4>said they're going to take a more like hands on

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 4>role than maybe some like finance guy or whatever, you know,

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 4>would have done with his children.

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 5>And I mean so many of them got radicalized from

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:34.440
<v Speaker 5>their children, right, Like their children's politics radicalize them. So

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:37.800
<v Speaker 5>maybe they will be like the class traders that tried

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:43.959
<v Speaker 5>to push more, you know, more income equality or different things.

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:47.280
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I'm not saying it's necessarily going to be slopped,

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 5>but you have to imagine. I mean, their dads are

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 5>the ones who are like Elon's like I did it

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 5>by myself. You know, I'm an immigrant, I like didn't

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 5>have any help. And so these kids are going to

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:00.560
<v Speaker 5>have like a lot of chips on their shoulders, I'm saying.

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 5>And the.

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:06.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's like dead right, Like they're not going to

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 3>give it away, are they? Is the philanthropy dead is

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:11.279
<v Speaker 3>just going to be startups?

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:14.359
<v Speaker 4>Well, I would say maybe the Dario. You know, we're

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 4>about to get a lot of ea anthropic millionaires and

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:21.759
<v Speaker 4>billionaires they famously kind of give to a lot of causes.

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 5>Well, okay, but I went to this event in San

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 5>Francisco called what should we do about all this money?

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Get it out of California? Get the money out?

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and I think they're going to go into donor

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 5>advice funds, which means like no transparency. There's just a

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 5>lot of ways to like set it up as though

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 5>it looks like a charity but there's no transparency, you know,

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 5>public accountability. And I think it's quite possible too that

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 5>a lot of this money will be going into AI safety.

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh god, well we'll have very safe AI. That'll be great.

0:42:57.880 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, Well, that's all we have time for today. Thank

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 2>you all so much for joining for tech stuff. I'm

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 2>mos Voloshin. This episode was produced by Eliza Dennis. It

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 2>was executive produced by me and Julian Nutta for Kaleidoscope

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:22.800
<v Speaker 2>and Katrina norvelbe iHeart Podcasts. Jack instantly mixed this episode

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 2>and Kyle Murdoch wrote olph theme song. A special thank

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:29.760
<v Speaker 2>you to Taylor Lorenz, Natasha Tku and Read Albergotti. Please

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 2>check out all the work they put out into the world.

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 2>We're lucky to call them friends of the Pod.