WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2019 NFL MegaPod Week 17 Preview

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Tom check It on Man No Down Now Thursday Morning, December,

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Team Up Beating the Book podcast Megapod Week seventeen in

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the National Football League be scuoreliest of all weeks. It's

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Gill Alexander Skeletal Crew because it's the week between Christmas

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 1>and New Year's. We didn't used to do a podcast

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>between Christmas and New Year's, but we are that dedicated.

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>The Skeletal Crew on my left from Showtime's action docuseries

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and of course Wednesday's on the Numbers game at Visa

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Todd Wishnev, how are you doing Toddy here? Gil Todd

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.319
<v Speaker 1>is Todd is having Todd is having some issues at

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>his building. So thus the quick response and Jeff parlay

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the laugh you heard on the right. My producer number

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 1>five cant enough to join us. How you doing, Jeff better?

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>You know I'm better than Todd. Because the fiasco to

0:00:57.600 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Mr Wishnevs had to deal with over the last two

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>days does not sound fun. Todd tell the people what

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>happened at three am on Christmas Eve, three o'clock in

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the morning, I hear a big sound in my apartment.

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 1>I go, I think it's coming from outside. I can't

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>figure out what it is. Then my neighbor starts, somebody's

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>banging on my door at three o'clock in the morning.

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting a little nervous. It's my neighbor. He's like, oh,

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>there's water from in the downstairs apartment, coming from my

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>water heater. We go outside, my water heater has exploded

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>and there's water everywhere. And of course you can't get

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a plumber on Christmas Eve or Christmas, so just tons

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of fun. So is the water heater or the building

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>water heater in your apartment specifically, it's the it's the

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>water heater that's in my apartment out on the patio.

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize that, So now you have you also

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>have the burden of that, the guilt of that. Well,

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>well it's not it's not my fault. It's just the

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>owners of the apartment that didn't you know, don't have

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a good water here, right, I know. But that's why

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>they came banging on your door. Anyway. Oh yeah, I'm

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>so sorry, Tod. It's actually just it's lucky I was

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>in town because it would have been a real major disaster. Yeah.

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I had a burst from the apartment next door and

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I said the same thing. There was. There was water

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>all over my apartment from the burst in the apartment

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>next door. I was like, if I had been out

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of town, the entire apartment would have been toast. So

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>let's do the podcast. Let's get you out of there

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>watching football. Get you out of the cold, because you

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>must be freezing. Man, are you cold? It's a little

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>chili in here. Oh my god, Todd Wish and have

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>planned hurt. There will be no singing on this podcast.

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you're telling us right now? Off the top,

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really in a case seeing the Sunshine band

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>mood today. It was phenomenal last week. All right, well,

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>let's talk football. Let's get through it. We should be

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>real quick. Then a week seventeen tough to come up

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>with three games or three sides or totals every week,

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>but in week seventeen it's nearly impossible. But we will

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>try to do so because people have the thirst for

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the at least opinions, and then they can choose to

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>go with them or not. There's no Circle update because

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Mike Palm cannot make it today. We'll try to at

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>Mike's picks by the end of the show. You want

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to send him a text home just to see what's up.

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>If you can get text like last week, we'll do that.

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Let us begin with and there's and by the way,

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no Thursday night games, so there's nothing to talk

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>about there. Let's begin with the best bets Jeff Parlay.

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Jeff Parlay hosts the show at Visa

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. I bury the headline he hosted as Jeff

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Parl's each and every Monday through Friday called market Watch

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. People should know about that. Four to six,

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>seven and nine yep, seven and nine Eastern time to

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>seven nine Eastern time. You know, Gil, this is a

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>terrible weeks. Terrible. So so what I'm going to do is,

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go back to the Todd Wish Nev

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Well and I'm gonna go over in a Tampa Bay

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneer games since we had one that went under last week.

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>And Jamis Winston is two interceptions away from joining the

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>ranks of jose Can saco and and Barry Bonds and

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>William Made. I'll wait a second, that's the wrong sport.

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Jamie throws two picks that he gets the thirty picks

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>along with the thirty one touchdowns he already has. He

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.119
<v Speaker 1>nearly threw two pick six is in the first two

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>minutes of the game against Houston on Saturday. The second

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>one was called back on a on a penalty on

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the return. But look, I'm seeing for gil it's a

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>forty seven and a half or forty eight on this

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>total for Atlanta and Tampa. Because I'm seeing both on

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>my screen. It doesn't matter the number. I'll go over

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>either of the forty seven and a half wins out.

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the less I'll take the lesser number very happily.

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.239
<v Speaker 1>I'll go over to forty seven and a half. Look, Atlanta,

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta's offense, Julio Jones has been absolutely incredible. Uh, he's

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I would expect that he's expected to play. Uh. Dan Quinn,

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't know if he's gonna be out or not

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>after this game. But I'll go over to forty seven

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half in Tampa Atlanta forty seven and a half.

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>It is, Todd, I don't know if that's allowed. Is

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.239
<v Speaker 1>it allowed that he bites your pick? Tampa Bay overs

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>It was gonna be my first pick too, So alright,

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>well there you go, there you go. First pick for both.

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>We've said this many times before this season, but I'll

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>say it again. That was the most Jamis game ever

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>against Houston on Saturday, forty five, one touchdown, four picks,

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>three sacks. It was his eleventh career game with at

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>least three interceptions, and Bradley Robbie returned one of those

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 1>four picks. Is Jeff mentioned twenty seven yards to the

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 1>house to begin the game. It's the sixth pick six

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks QB has thrown this season. Six and the

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Bucks say we're going with Jamison. They are going with

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston. And here's the one thing I will say

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>about Jamis Winston. Could you imagine having a just the

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>ability to not care like he did, like having that

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>type of conscience where you're like, I'm just gonna play through.

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter what happens short memory, I'm playing the

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>next series. So I guess in that respect, I give

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>him credit. But Tampa Bay Atlanta, Jeff going over forty

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. By the way, Tampa Bay now

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>one point favorite in that game. But are both of

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you guys over forty seven and a half on Tampa

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Bay Pick number one for me, Kansas City, I'm taking

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs. I'm laying the points against the Chargers. On

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>guessing lines, I guess that this would be ten, much

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 1>to my surprise, and one of those picks where Christie

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Andrews said, I like your number a lot better. It

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 1>was seven to open, it's now nine. I'm still taking it.

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>As long as it's below ten, I am grabbing the Chiefs. Now.

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>The NFL has legislated out the possibility of correlated parlays

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>or games that impact other games occur at different times.

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>This is concurrent. This is happening at the same time

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>as the New England Miami game. So again, if New

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>England wins, they get the number two position in the

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a f C playoffs and therefore first round by Kansas

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>City would need to win and have New England lose

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>for Kansas City to jump them and get to the

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>number two seed in the first round by. So I

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know how much scoreboard watching is gonna be going on.

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>If Kansas City sees that New England's up three touchdowns

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>let's say against the Dolphins, Sure could they whole back

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and not cover this? Yeah, I'll take that risk. The

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Chargers last week, and I talked about it a lot

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>on Guessing Lines, the display by Anthony Lynn at the

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>end of the first half, and I won't get into

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the details again, but just the mismanagement, the fact that

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers is allowed to just run things and make

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>all the bad decisions. They don't do things on offense

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>when they're supposed to, they call time outs when they're

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to. And then there's the whole Philip Rivers

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that he's checked out. There was a block he

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>could have made. I said this on Guessing Lines. You

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>need a difference between Philip Rivers and Tom Brady. Besides everything,

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Tom Brady will throw a key block

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>in a key situation, but Philip Rivers will punt on it,

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that he will make an executive decision and just say,

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you know what, business decision. I'm not blocking. Oh my

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>thumb hurts. I gave it a try. I could have

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>sprung Auston Ekeler for a fifteen yard game, just decided

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>not to block. I think the Chargers are done. I

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>think they're already on vacation Kansas City giving the nine points.

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>That's pick number one, number two. Jeffrey, all right, I'm

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>going against the I'm going against the team that has

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to win here, Gil, and I am going against the

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>team that is playing their backups. I'm taking the Baltimore

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Ravens plus the two against Pittsburgh. Gil, your guy r

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>G three is better than whoever Pittsburgh is gonna start

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback on Sunday. If it's Duck Hodges, which looks

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>like it's going to be. I know Rudolph got put

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>on I R Paxton lynches his back up, so it's

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be Duck Hodges all the way through. Look, I

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>don't care to Baltimore sitting there, Guys, it's still Baltimore Pittsburgh,

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Pittsburgh Steelers offense is horrendous. If the Steeler

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>defense is going to have to score once in order

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>for them to even beat the RG three lad Ravens,

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're gonna be able to do that. Look.

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>R G three has always protected the ball in his career,

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>regardless of his regardless of how good or bad he was.

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Even though he was never bad, he just was not never,

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>never the same obviously as he was in that unbelievable

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>rookie pain before that h c L there. But I'm

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>going with the Ravens plus the two I'm going. I'm

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>going against the must win team here, so I'll take

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore plus two at all. Thanks for cleaning up that

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>RG three bit For a second there, I thought you

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>were gonna say something negative about RG three. That would

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>be the instant That would be the instant ejection. By

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the way, I'll go through the Pittsburgh Steelers playoff permutation?

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Shall I do that real quick? Do you guys have

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes us Pittsburgh clinches a playoff berth with a

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh win here against Baltimore and a Tennessee loss or

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>tie Tennessee playing Houston week seventeen. These are late games,

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>both the Pittsburgh and Tennessee games running concurrent in a

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>late window. Or if Pittsburgh ties and Tennessee loses, or

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>if Tennessee loses in Indianapolis wins plus Oakland loses or ties,

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>or if Tennessee loses an Indianapolis wins and Pittsburgh ties

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Oakland in strength of victory tiebreaker. You got all that Pittsburgh,

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>by the way, with tye Oakland and strength of victory.

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>If all of the following teams win Minnesota, Green Bay

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City, and Miami. So all of those are ways

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that the Steelers could get into the playoffs. The easiest way,

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of course, Pittsburgh wins and Tennessee loses their ties. That's

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>really all you have to remember there. So Baltimore the

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of contrarian pick for young Jeff taking r G three.

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>By the way, shout out to r G three, who

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>some people had left for dead in this league. Make

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>it himself a super Bowl ring this year. Who knows

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore Jeff's number two pick, taking the two points Todd

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>pick number two. Jeff's taking all my picks. I like

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore plus two. Also, I saw this, Uh, I saw

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>this line and I was like, oh, that's ridiculous. Um,

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>at least Baltimore is playing with a quarterback. The Steelers

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>have zero quarterbacks. Baltimore is playing with RG three. Who

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 1>knows how good he'll be, but he can't be worse

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>than my friends Duck Hodges and Mason Rudolph. The Baltimore

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>defense is still going to be out there. I've seen

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>this a million times. The team who who has to

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>win doesn't end up winning, and uh, the team that

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really need it ends up winning. I've seen it

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>too many times. Baltimore is just way too much for Pittsburgh,

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>especially at home. They don't want to let Pittsburgh into

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. Give me Baltimore plus two as well. Baltimore,

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>who has already clinched home field advantage through the a

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:19.959
<v Speaker 1>f C playoffs, have nothing to play for here r

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>G three at the help Man and you're right, Todd.

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>What Todd says right there. We've seen it so many

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>times before, and Dr Bob was great to have on

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the show last week. Again, teams and absolute must win situations,

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 1>which we just documented. Pittsburgh is not exactly in that

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:36.239
<v Speaker 1>situation here. What Bob was talking about teams like Oakland

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Oakland applies this week. They're an absolute must win situation

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>against the team that has nothing to play for. It

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>is a losing proposition and a big time losing proposition

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>over time. But even a team like Pittsburgh, which for

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>all intents and purposes, are in a must win we

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>see it all the time. They just lay an egg

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>pick number two for me along those lines, I'm taking

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the New York Giants plus the four and a half

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>against the Philadelphia Eagles in the Again, the late window,

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the afternoon window, if you will, for PM Eastern kickoff

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Pacific for the Eagles. The Eagles simply will win the

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 1>NFC East by beating the Giants. All they got to do. Dallas,

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:16.719
<v Speaker 1>of course, will be watching it. They're playing at the

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>same time they're playing the Redskins. For Dallas to get

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the NFC East titled, they must beat the Redskins and

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>have the Eagles lose. I think the Giants are gonna

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>do the Cowboys of solid I actually think they win

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>this game out right, but I'm certainly taking the four

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half points as pick number two. I think

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the Giants are live here. I know they were playing

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a horrific Redskins defense last week and they were able

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to just go nuts, winning ultimately in overtime for thirty

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>five Daniel Jones five touchdown passes against the Skins, and

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I know the Eagles defense is a much different animal.

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 1>But on the other side of the ball, for all

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>this talk about Philadelphia beating Dallas, and they did do

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it with the Skeletal Crew, and Troy Aikman called it

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the greatest team win he's ever seenen which might be hyperbole,

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but the Philadelphia offense is terrible, and

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>it's really not their fault. They don't have players. Gary

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Ward is the guy for Carson Wentz right now. They

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>just have a mash unit in Philadelphia. I will take

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>the Giants plus those points. I look for an outright

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>upset here. And by the way, just let me list

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>some of those Philadelphia players. Jordan Howard, Nelson, aghil Or,

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Lane Johnson, Darren Sprouls, Shawn Jackson, Al Shan, Jeffrey, Malik Jackson,

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun is supposed to show up for the playoffs if

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles get there. I don't think they do. Eagles

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>only scored seventeen against Dallas last week. With all that

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>hoopla plus Sa Kwan all of a sudden looks like

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>say Kwan again. I'll certainly take the Giants and the

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>points is pick number two, pick number three Jeffrey. Okay,

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>there's no reasoning other than the fact that my favorite

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>football team likes to screw upt their draft position as

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>good as any team in the history of professional sports.

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm taking the New York Jets plus one and

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a half at Buffalo, mostly because a the Bills are

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.839
<v Speaker 1>have nothing to play for. We're not certain on who's

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna play in that game for the Bills, but at

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>trade Avious White and Josh Allen play more than three

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.839
<v Speaker 1>snaps apiece. There is something horribly wrong with with what

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bills are doing in that game. But this is

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>solely there is no true, real rationale of this one,

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'm I'm going to assume Todd is not going

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to have the same pick as me on this one

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. But I'm taking the Jets plus one and

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a half. So the Jets screw their draft position and

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>move deeper into the first round and miss out on

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>some franchise left tackle, And we're doing this whole ridiculous

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>song and dance again in twelve months from now, the

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Jets plus one and a half at Buffalo to screw

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>up their draft position. Todd number three, you know I'm

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna go back to the Miami Dolphins. Well, uh, the

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins gave me one of the worst beats of

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in game betting I've ever had in my life. Class

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I had the Dolphins minus three and a half. They

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>were up sixteen with less than a minute ago. Cincinnati

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>gets a touchdown, a two point conversion and on side

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>kicking another touchdown on the last play. Uh, and I

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>take a horrible beating when Miami wins by three in

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>overtime and my three and a half goes down the train.

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>But I will take Miami this week. Uh, sixteen point

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>favorites New England. Uh. New England had to pull out

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>all the stops to beat the Buffalo Bills last week.

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>That was really a toss up game Miami. As we've

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>said all year, they're not as bad as they seem. Uh.

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Sure they could get blown out, but I could just

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>as easily see Belichick playing at real conservative here and

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>winning like twenty seven or something like that. So I'll

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>take Miami with all those zillions of points. I think

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>it's plus sixteen now, and uh, I hope I can

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>get in under the number. Don't sell yourself short, tupped.

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>That was a far worse beat than you're even giving

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>yourself credit for. Down twenty three, thirty five to twelve

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>with five minutes left, down sixteen, Miami gave up sixteen

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>points in the final twenty nine seconds of regulation. So,

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>as Jeff put it before a numbers game on Monday,

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you know all those times where you're on the wrong

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>side of a bet and you try to convince yourself

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you have a chance where you go, well, uh, you know,

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>if we just scored touchdown on this drive and then

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>like we stopped them, and then we score and get

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the two point conversion, and then we get an onside

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>kick and we recover that and get a touchdown another

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>two boy conversion, it'll be a tie game. Like you know,

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you go through those things sometimes it happened. That's exactly

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>what happened with Cincinnati, and they forced over time and

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>poor time. Had I sweat games that that I have

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>no business losing, and r G in the book it's

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>all mad at me because he's like, there's no way

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you can lose. Relax. I wasn't even sweating this game.

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>That's how much I had thought it was a win.

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't even sweating. I was like, there's just no way. Cincinnati,

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>even after they got the onsets kick, they still had

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>no time out from their own forty yard line with

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>like forty seconds to go. It was unbelievable that they

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>were able to get a touchdown there. So whatever, you know,

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>just chalk it up to a beautiful week for me.

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I've had, you know, busting water heaters in the middle

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of the night and beautiful bad beats and all kinds

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of fun. You're a joy to listen to. A joy. Uh,

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it's you're right, though, Like literally, I had stopped watching

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that score, and then all of a sudden, I get

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a text from my buddy Ray and he goes, oh

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>my god, Bengals, and I'll tell you this is the

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>God's honest truth. I thought that something about my phone

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 1>was glitchy and that I was getting a text from

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>him on delay because what he was texting me couldn't

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>possibly make any sense at that moment because the last

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I had seen Miami was winning by twenty three points.

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So when he said, oh my god, Bengals, I thought, oh,

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>there must have been something that happened early in the

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 1>game and on win. I'm like, let me, let me

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>check the score. I'm like, oh my god, Bengals. You know,

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 1>like that's exactly what someone should text. Couldn't believe it,

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>could not believe it. And then of course I don't

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>know how you give up even on the last play

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>there at the twenty three yard line, just line up

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>at the goal line and don't let anybody catch the ball.

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>They just let they just throw it. I'm ready at

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>the goal and it is unbelievable. And also and also Gil, Yeah,

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.719
<v Speaker 1>the first touchdown, and I think this gets totally thrown

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>out because of all the chaos the first touchdown. I'm

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>still not sure the Bengals got pass catcher boy was

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>actually in the end zone across the plane, but it didn't. No,

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.439
<v Speaker 1>I know, That's what I'm saying. Yeah, I don't like

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it gets thrown out because, oh who cares, They're still

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>they still have to make the two and recover the

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>on site kicking and score a touchdown and make another

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>two for this to really matter. I'm still not certain

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that I was a touchdown. Um, so it was really

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Todd suffered the worst speed I think I've ever seen.

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Really did. Todd brings up something else though, when he said, like,

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>just just put all your men back Miami actually did.

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>When When when since Sinnet he got to the twenty

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>five yard line, they recover the onside kick, they get

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to the twenty five yard line, there's four seconds left,

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>four seconds left, they got one play and Miami actually

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.719
<v Speaker 1>dropped eight defenders back to the goal line, and Tyler

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Eiffort still goes over two of them and and catches

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the ball, and then of course Dalton can't find anybody

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in the end zone on the two point conversion and

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>he runs it in scrambles it to the corner. So

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>that was you know, we talked about this on Guessing Lines, Jeff,

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>where it's like they did drop eight back. Then there

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>are situations like your Jets against the Steelers, and the

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 1>Steelers we've seen them do this earlier in the year

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>against the against the Dolphins, they do late first half

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Jedi mind tricks on the opponent. The Jets made no sense,

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>didn't end up mattering because they ended up winning. But

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>they're up ten to three on the Steelers late in

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the first half, and Mason Rudolph's in the game at

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this point because they had benched Devlin Hodges the way

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>none of the Jets were the Jets blitz they put

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>they put their corners on an island and the first

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>one almost was a touchdown and like it just barely

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't connect. And then the Jets were like, instead of

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>learning their lesson on the next play, they're like, yeah,

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>let's do that again. The top of it. All the

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>all the defenders have to do is tackle the receivers

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 1>and it's a it's a five yard holding penalty and

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>they have to and then Steelers have to kick the

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>field goal. These coaches at the end of the first

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>half don't understand that if the other teams at like,

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, further back than the ten yard line, all

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to do is is tack all the receivers.

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Although in that case where the Steelers in field goal

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>range at that point the Steelers, the Steelers would have

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>had a forty nine yard Yeah. Yeah, I'm not sure

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you tackle it. I don't know if I agree. The

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Jets corners are Arthur Mallet and Bless Austin. I mean,

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>come on, those are those aren't real people? Jeff stopped it.

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if Miami had all eight guys back.

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 1>Part of having all eight guys back because they have

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to play defense when the ball is thrown on Todd

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that I mean, they just let I forget what I

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>think it was. It wasn't if it wasn't Iford who

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 1>caught the one. Yes, I mean they just left him

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>uncovered for about three and a half seconds. I mean,

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that when you're all back in Pittsburgh

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>through over the Jets over the Jets heads like I don't.

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Todd, did you hear Jeff and I

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 1>this morning, first segment on a numbers game. All we

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 1>did was dissect B y U Hawaii from you know.

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I was listening to the crack part. I didn't hear

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the first part yet. Oh did you enjoy the crack part? Todd?

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>This morning I was listening to I didn't. I was.

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I was fielding plumber calls at the same time. I

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Did you enjoy it? Yeah? I always, I always enjoyed crack,

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>but it was it was it was getting I was

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>getting distracted from all the calls from the plumber and

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the water eater. Well, well, Gil, the list of Bill's

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>favorite movies is actually still going in the studio. Last segment,

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>sem I enjoyed it? Yeah, quite quite enjoyable, all right. Uh.

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>In my final pick, I'm doing a Todd like pick.

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Todd went with Miami plus the sixteen. I'm taking the

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Redskins plus the ten and a half. Now, let's call it.

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the Redskins plus a ten and a half.

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Not because I don't think the Cowboys are gonna win.

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I actually think the Cowboys are winning, and I think

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles are losing. But it's case Keenum, y'all. It's

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Case Keenum. Case Keenom tried to single handedly ruin the

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Redskins winning the Chase Young Sweepstakes last week. Thankfully he

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>did not, but he did everything in his power to

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 1>get the Redskins a win and spoil the Redskins getting

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the number two pick in the draft. I, as a

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Redskin lifelong fan, am worried that case Keendom is gonna

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>try to do it again. You're giving me ten and

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a half with Case Keenum and the Redskins, and it's

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 1>like a Ryan Fitzpatrick situation. Whatever you think about the Dolphins,

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever you think about the Redskins, they don't suck when

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>those two guys are playing. They're not great, but they're

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent of like a seven and nine football team.

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>They're perfectly credible. They don't suck at all. Ten and

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>a half points give me the Skins, and as a

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Redskin fan, I'll just pray that they don't win it,

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:04.120
<v Speaker 1>because all these teams are just my goodness, the way

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys are playing down the stretch. We're talking this

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 1>morning with Lombardi. All the people. I mentioned that the

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys under the Jason Garrett era have squandered UH the

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>windows the talent UH in their primes, Tony Romo, Dez Bryant,

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Shawn Lee, Tyron Smith, Zach Laartin, Travis Frederick Jason went

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and to Marcus Ware, to Marco Murray, dak Zeke Amari

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 1>just goes on and on. It's terrible, But give me

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the redskins plus the points that will be picked number

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>three for me happily in a week that is squirrely,

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>might as well grab all the points you can. Not

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>a bad philosophy, by the way. The other betting point besides,

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're in a must win situation, you

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.360
<v Speaker 1>must not be that good and that better should resist

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the temptation to just automatically bet teams that have something

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to play for against teams that don't buy in large,

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I was mentioning to crack this morning on a numbers

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>game at Visa on Serious XM channel two oh four.

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>This is also a week where books are looking at

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>their season win total ledgers and their liabilities, and they

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>might shade each individual shop could shade. We're not talking

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>about more than a half point here or juice. But

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>watch you know what these numbers are from book to book,

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 1>and watch what the juices from book to book, because

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>if a book doesn't need a team to win, or

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>needs a team to win, it may affect how they

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>shade the final game price on these as well in

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the spread. As always guts support for today's show comes

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 1>from Bookmaker dot eu and industry leader for close to

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty years. Pro players consider them a musk because their

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 1>first post odds take the highest limits and pride themselves

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>on never having kicked out a winning player. That is huge. Bookmakers,

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a hig volume sports book best suited for the sophisticated player,

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>also caters to large recreational players, and their motto is

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>always is where the lines originate, because chances are the

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 1>sports book at which you've been betting follows their lines.

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Pretty damn good chance as a matter of fact. And

0:24:57.400 --> 0:24:59.959
<v Speaker 1>right now, if you visit bookmaker dot eu slash year

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that's bookmaker dot use last g I l L you'll

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 1>claim your exclusive welcome botus of up to three hundred dollars.

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 1>That's Bookmaker dot euse last skill to join and claim

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>your welcome bonus of up to three hundred dollars right now.

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>You will not regret it betting the only way I

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>know how the indispensable bookmaker dot eu check it out.

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>We are to the teaser portion of the show. Six

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>point two team teaser of the week. So teasers last

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>week once again? Uh, Bob and I lose because we

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 1>both had Tennessee you and Jeff both win. What did

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>you have? Todd? Giants? And who I had? Bills and giants?

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And Jeff would you have had? And Broncos well done?

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Well done, Broncos gave you a scare there, but they

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>got back. How about the Broncos three and one with

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Drew Lock Interesting? The only loss in the snow in

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City? All right, Jeff, we start with you your

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>two team six point teaser of the week. All right,

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna go with your Washington Redskins up to

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 1>sixteen and a half as the first leg, and then

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City with Gil You went with Kansas City nine

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>or eight and a half earlier. Nine, Okay, so we'll

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>make k C at three. It doesn't matter Kansas that

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 1>that feels like Kansas City is gonna be able to

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>name their score if they If Mahomes plays the whole game.

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>So I'll go with the Redskins sixteen and a half

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and k C minus three totty. I'll go with Baltimore

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 1>plus eight. Even if they lose the game, they ain't

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna get beat by eight with the team that has

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>no quarterback. So I'll go Steelers should just line up

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in in um in in my wildcat the whole game.

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>They do much better Baltimore plus eight. And then for

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>my second one, I will I'm like, so ridiculous here,

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the second one will be I'm really struggling with the

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>second one. But you know what, well, because i've been

0:26:57.520 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I've been debating it the whole show. Who I want

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>for the second part of the teaser, and I guess

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll take uh. I'll take Houston plus nine and a half,

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Houston plus nine and a half. I'm taking two of

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>my three best bets and putting them together. I'm taking

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City taking it down to three, and normally nine

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 1>is the teaser prevention mode for bookmakers because it doesn't

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>get you through the three. But I'm with Jeff. I

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>just think they can name their score here against the Chargers,

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm tying it in with the new York Football Giants.

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll take that through the seven and the ten to

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>ten and a half again. I think the Giants are

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>winning that game out right. I'm sprinkling on the money. Spreckle,

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>sprinkle s Yeah. Tom C. Todd was ready to tell

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 1>me I did something a foul. I'm not Mike Palm Tod,

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>not my Paul, my fault. It doesn't look like we've

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 1>got Mike Palms picks. Wait a minute, hot off the press,

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>we have Mike Palms picks of the week. First pick,

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs minus eight. No, I'm sorry, not even eight and

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a half. That's Chiefs minus nine. Pig number two Tennessee Titans.

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.640
<v Speaker 1>He says minus three. No, I'm sorry, that's minus three

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half and sens this on that one. So

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it's Titans minus three and a half. He did get

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>this one right, Eagles minus four and a half. Oh,

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Mike and I are opo on that one. So Chief's

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>minus nine, Titans minus three and a half, Eagles minus

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>four and a half, and his two teams six point teaser. Uh,

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:31.120
<v Speaker 1>these are correct. He's taking green Bay, teasing him down

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to six and a half at Detroit game that green

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Bay needs to get a first round by at the

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>very least, and he is teasing Chicago up to seven

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half from one and a half at Minnesota,

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a game that Minnesota has nothing to play for in

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>either Well, let me just ask you this before we go,

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>because obviously the biggest game on the board in terms

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of playoff implications for multiple teams is the Sunday Night game,

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the final game of the football A regular season in

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the National Football League this year game number two fifty

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>six San Francisco, a three point favorite with extra juice.

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Matter of fact, I see almost as many three and

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a half, but it is three in most locations, still

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>three with extra juice on the road at Seattle. Seattle

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>has a running back problem. There's no Chris Carson, there's

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>no Rashod Penny, there's no CJ process, whereas al Michael

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>says c J pros, but there is Marshawn Lynch now

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and Robert durban Is even back on the roster, as

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>we pointed out. So Seattle's got problems on defense too.

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Guys haven't played. Hopefully they get guys back. They're just

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>banged up royally. Any thoughts on that game, just because

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I know it's not the best bet, But any thoughts

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>on that game, Jeff, if you're San Francisco and you're

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>actually a real Super Bowl championship caliber team, you go

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>there and you smoke Seattle. You didn't even mention it.

0:29:57.560 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Gil No Dwayne Brown, no, Dwayne Brand be the That

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>might be the biggest killer of them all for Seattle,

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>because that offensive line with Dwayne Brown at least became

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>lea average to maybe a little bit above league average.

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Without Dwayne Brown, it reverts to when it was really awful.

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I know Tom Cables in Oakland and not Seattle anymore,

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>but it reverts to it just really just mediocre to

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>bad offensive line. Look, Seattle was awful last week against Arizona.

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I know they were battered defensively, but they were really

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>listless in that loss. As a big favorite at home

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to the Cardinals, I I just don't I don't see

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Seattle having a manpower. I will lay with the Niners. Uh.

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>This feels like a good in game game, obviously, as

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>all these games can turn into so I would lean Niners.

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>But no, obviously, no, Well we're at it. Not only

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>did I not mentioned Dwayne Brown, I mean I didn't

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>mention of course, guys who are on suspension like Josh

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Gordon al Woods and I didn't mention that Seattle didn't

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>have Quandrie Digs, they didn't have Shaquille Griffin, they didn't

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>have Jadeveon Clowney last game. And so it looks like

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Clowney and Griffin will play. They were back on they

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>were back at practice on Tuesday, right before Christmas. At

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>least those two will play. Will have to check on

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the status of digs. But they're getting guys back on

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>d at least that's the case. Todd. Any thoughts, I

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>don't really have any thoughts in this game. Uh. I

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>guess if you're watching the game and you see Seattle

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 1>moving the ball, it's probably going over because I think

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco get there's But I don't really have any

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>good feel in this game. Yeah. I like the three

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot better than like three and a half,

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that's for sure. If I was forced to pre flop it,

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I would play San Francisco, But nothing for me at

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>this point of course. If San Francisco wins, not only

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>do they win the NFC West, but it's home field

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 1>advantage throughout the NFC playoffs and Mike Palum and I

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>get to cash our San Francisco to win the NFC

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>West prop bets we made before the season. I got

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>plus three nine five. I think Mikey got plus three seventy.

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Seattle they've clinched a playoff berth. But here's the deal

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>again with the Seahawks, and we went through these exhaustively

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the other day, but they all clinch the NFC West

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>with a win, they'll clinch a first round by with

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a win in a green Bay loss, they'll clinch home

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>field advantaged throughout the NFC playoffs with the number one

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>seed with a win, a green Bay loss and a

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans loss. So a little clearer now that we've

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 1>cleared the Monday night game this past week between the

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Vikings and the Packers. And by the way, it doesn't

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>need to be said about that, all of a sudden,

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the Green Bay defense, which we've been ragging on all

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>year long, all of a sudden they're the eight five Bears.

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>What was that like, Minnesota couldn't block them at all?

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 1>We didn't even talk about that today, Jeff gil Minnesota's

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>offensive line still is still what it was last year.

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>They just flipped a few pieces around, and when you

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 1>take Dalvin Cook, they're a whole different team. Take them

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>out of the equation. Yeah, yeah, And and that makes

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the other note that we need to say. Minnesota is

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>locked into a sixth seed, Buffalo is locked into a

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 1>fifth seed NFC and a f C, respectively. So Minnesota

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>sixth seed NFC, Buffalo fifth seed AFC, those can't change.

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>So neither of those teams have any thing to play

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>for this week. Houston, it should be pointed out, which

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>right now are in the number four position in the

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a f C, could technically get to the number three

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>position in the a f C if they win and

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City loses. But again one of these things, where

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Houston is playing late, Kansas City is playing earlier, they

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>will already know if they have anything to play for

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>by the time they take the field. And again with

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>my conversation with Michael Lombardi this morning, I don't think

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>any of these teams really care about seating. They care

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>about buy or no by or in or out of playoffs.

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of seating three or four, I think

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 1>we make too much of that stuff. I really do.

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, we get out with the final two questions,

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>then gentlemen, As always, which are the big favorites in

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>your opinion, is the most likely to lose out right?

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>The choices are as follows. New Orleans thirteen point favorites

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>at Carolina, New England's sixteen point favorites hosting the Dolphins,

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>The Packers, who have every incentive to win here, twelve

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half or thirteen point favorites at Detroit and

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>David Blow Kansas City nine point favorites at home against

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers, The Rams seven point favorites at home against Arizona,

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.800
<v Speaker 1>neither team playing for anything there. Dallas ten and a

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:22.360
<v Speaker 1>half point favorites against Washington. Those are your choices, Jeff,

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:24.840
<v Speaker 1>which is the most likely in your opinion to lose outright?

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Most likely to lose outright is the Dallas Cowboys. I'm

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>going with them because, as you mentioned before, Gil Case

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Keenum in there instead of Dwayne Haskins. Now, Haskins was

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:39.800
<v Speaker 1>much better the last two weeks, but Keenum still significantly better,

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 1>and it would be a perfect end to the clappers

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>tenure if they blew a game like this, get the

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>help they need in the meadowlands, and I'm los to

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the three were three win Redskins at home? So I

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>could you imagine Dallas? Oh? Would it would be perfect

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 1>if it happened? Would be perfect? Did that happen? It really? Yeah?

0:34:58.160 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 1>And you were and you were saying today earlier you

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 1>could you imagine that happens to Oakland? To Oakland still

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 1>has a shot to make the playoffs in the a

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 1>f C. Could you imagine if Oakland had everything go

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>their way, a pit loss, the Tennessee loss, in Indianapolis win,

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:14.319
<v Speaker 1>and then Oakland themselves loses, which would be the four

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 1>team parlay that would need to happen. Wouldn't that be

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 1>fitting for Jason Garrett? By the way, that Green Bay

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.399
<v Speaker 1>game against Detroit, because we haven't really covered green Bay.

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>They'll clinch the first round by with a win or

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a New Orleans loss, or a tie in a San

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Francisco lost, a tie in New Orleans tie, all kinds

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of different ways. That's for a first round by for

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>home field advantage throughout the playoffs, they need to win

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco would need to lose or tie, or

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>they tie in San Francisco loses, and New Orleans loses

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 1>or tied, but basically a win and they guarantee themselves

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:46.839
<v Speaker 1>a first round by at Detroit Todd, same question, who's

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the most likely to lose? Out right, I'm gonna go

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>with that other game that means nothing. The Rams. I

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:55.399
<v Speaker 1>know Hanley is a quarterback, probably for Arizona, but either

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Rams probably are disinterested, so I could see them losing.

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Could you imagine Todd Gurley could be a salary cap

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 1>casualty man and I still don't feel like we have

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the whole story about him. I will say it's the

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys, because wouldn't I will say the same thing,

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't it be just like a Redskins Cowboys game with

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Case keenom to end that way? So the Cowboys would

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>be my choice as well. And then the final question,

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 1>And what a week to ask this, because you could

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 1>have about ten different responses to this. But if you

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>had to play god, what a terrible thing that would

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 1>be had to play aside on all of these games,

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:31.359
<v Speaker 1>but one, what would be the one above all that

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you would not want to play? Here? Jeff, see you later.

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Bears and Vikings, I had nothing to do with it

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 1>at all, period, Goodbye to see you later. That's the one.

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm picking. Vikings who have nothing to play for against

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bears, who seemingly never have anything to play for.

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>By the way, that total is thirty six and a half.

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Vikings favored by one or one and a half, but

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeff wants nothing to do with that. Above all. Todd,

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:55.800
<v Speaker 1>same question the Chargers. I just can't stand the Chargers.

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 1>I can't stand Philip Rivers. I can't stand Anthony Lynn. Uh.

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Lynn seems to now be coaching b y U

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 1>as well, so I don't want any part of that.

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 1>I am going to say Cleveland Cincinnati, Cleveland Cincinnati, because

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Cincinnati. If you told me Cincinnati won that

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 1>game by three touchdowns, I don't think I'd be surprised.

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>They can't lose the first pick in the draft. They

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 1>can play balls out and if you told me Cleveland

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 1>crushed them by twenty one, I wouldn't be surprised. So

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's Cleveland Cincinnati. Thank you, gentlemen, skeletal crew. Todd,

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I hope things get better for you at your apartment.

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for manning up and doing this nonetheless. And

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Parlay, thank you as well. Thanks to everybody listening.

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Good luck. Week seventeen in the National Football League next week,

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the return of Mike Palm, the return of guests. Maybe

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll get Lombardi in here. Maybe we'll get Joe Forton

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Boy in here. Mega Pod for wild Card weekend a

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>week from today. Good luck with all your picks this week.

0:37:51.719 --> 0:38:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for listening that bat batt