Speaker 1: Want to remind you too. If you're an unhappy timeshare owner,
Speaker 1: you want on a vacation you have in the time
Speaker 1: of your life. Somebody says you can duplicate this every
Speaker 1: year for the rest of your life, and then you
Speaker 1: never end up going back, And then you realize there
Speaker 1: are other nice places I could go too, and I
Speaker 1: could better use that money. But every year you gotta
Speaker 1: pay the maintenance fees and whatever other fees associated with it.
Speaker 1: You wish you never did it. Well, there's a way out.
Speaker 1: Thanks to my friends at lone Star Transfer, Brian and Karen.
Speaker 1: They were on a family owned business. They will make
Speaker 1: sure that your experience is a pleasant one. They will
Speaker 1: get you out of your time share legally, ethically and quickly.
Speaker 1: I have an eight plus rating with a better business
Speaker 1: bureau and this is what they do. Don't let another
Speaker 1: year go by and you're paying all this money for
Speaker 1: a timeshare you're never gonna use now. Two ways to
Speaker 1: get them online at lone star transfer dot com. All right,
Speaker 1: or give my friends a call no obligation called pound
Speaker 1: two fifty on your mobile keyword timeshare. Just hit pound
Speaker 1: two fifty on your mobile phone say the keyword timeshare
Speaker 1: or just go to Lonestar transfer dot com. All right,
Speaker 1: glad you with us, Happy Monday, and write down our
Speaker 1: toll free telephone number you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program, eight hundred and nine for one Sean
Speaker 1: if you want to join us. President makes his very
Speaker 1: first veto as the President of the United States. And
Speaker 1: some of the people that were at that ceremony, Angel
Speaker 1: moms and Dad's, you know, permanent separation, people that nobody
Speaker 1: seems in the media is ever willing to talk about.
Speaker 1: They're gonna join us. Eraldo and Dan Bongino debate a
Speaker 1: bunch of issues later on in the program, and we
Speaker 1: have got a lot of deep state news. There's now
Speaker 1: going to be an avalanche of information cascading down at
Speaker 1: a rate that it's going to be tough to keep
Speaker 1: up with, as we've now seen in the last week
Speaker 1: with Bruce Ors closed door testimony released, Lisa Pages closed
Speaker 1: door testimony released, Peter Struck's closed door testimony released, and
Speaker 1: John McCain's aid his testimony released. And I'm gonna tell
Speaker 1: you one of the more interest things I'm keeping an
Speaker 1: eye on this. I don't have more information yet, but
Speaker 1: Nellie or you know if you listen and Fusion GPS
Speaker 1: Devin Nunez is doubtful that Christopher Steele even wrote the
Speaker 1: majority of this docier and they just need we're using
Speaker 1: steel to launder the information, so it could, you know,
Speaker 1: come from somewhere somewhere, somebody else. But if that's the case,
Speaker 1: what we're beginning to believe and what my sources are
Speaker 1: telling me, we need a little more time to vent this.
Speaker 1: I'm just keeping you in the loop of what we're
Speaker 1: investigating now. Not what we've confirmed is that a lot
Speaker 1: of this information in the phony dossier that Hillary paid
Speaker 1: for and that the DNC paid for, etc. It's likely
Speaker 1: to have come from Russia. Yeah, which is even more
Speaker 1: despicable considering the witch hunt we've been through now for
Speaker 1: almost three years, that began in July of twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: That's when it started. And remember we learned through pages
Speaker 1: instructs testimony last week that after nine months investigating this
Speaker 1: before the appointment of Muller, they found no evidence of
Speaker 1: Trump Russia collusion, not even a single bit of it.
Speaker 1: The fact that there's been no interest at all in
Speaker 1: the Special Council's office, none, zero, and what we now
Speaker 1: know is a paid for dossier by Hillary Clinton, full
Speaker 1: of Russian lies disseminated to the American people before the election,
Speaker 1: impact the election results, and even worse than that, used
Speaker 1: as the bulk of information in these FISA applications when
Speaker 1: and they withheld purposely that Hillary paid for this. They held,
Speaker 1: you know, they presented it as if it was verified
Speaker 1: and corroborated. Bruce Orr told everybody in August, it's not verified,
Speaker 1: it's not corroborated. Steel hates President Rump and is invested
Speaker 1: in him losing, and that Hillary paid for it. That
Speaker 1: was August twenty sixteen. They go to these FISA judges
Speaker 1: with an application the bulk of information the dossier which
Speaker 1: we will be getting, and in the dossier in the
Speaker 1: application they say the dossiers true. James Comey signs that
Speaker 1: original FISA warrant that's October twenty sixteen. January twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: Trump Tower. President elect Trump says, I need to talk
Speaker 1: to you alone. There's this dossier out there that's sealastious,
Speaker 1: but it's not verified. Did James Comey testify in October
Speaker 1: that it was verified when he signed the FISA application
Speaker 1: so they could use the dossier as a that's not verified,
Speaker 1: as a means of spying on the Trump campaign and
Speaker 1: getting into all things Trump again to influence the election.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's all now beginning to come down. The
Speaker 1: bigger revelation last week is Struck in page saying, Yeah,
Speaker 1: the Attorney General of Barack Obama is up to our
Speaker 1: eyeballs in all of this, and that they knew that
Speaker 1: the indictment there would never be an indictment of Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton on the Espionage Act or of course the email
Speaker 1: issue and the de Lesians and obstruction because all the
Speaker 1: people that worked at the Department of Justice that overstepped
Speaker 1: their bounds and authority and ripped the investigation a lot
Speaker 1: of it and made every decision about the investigation from
Speaker 1: the FBI. Now, at that point, the FBI upper echelon
Speaker 1: had ripped it out of the hands of the field
Speaker 1: agents that would normally do this type of work. So
Speaker 1: everybody that hated Trump ended up controlling the entire process.
Speaker 1: And you know, if Muller wanted to get to Russia collusion,
Speaker 1: what about the Russian lies that were used to as
Speaker 1: the basis of applications to lie to fies, A court
Speaker 1: judges and a conspiracy to deny not only an American
Speaker 1: citizen as constitutional rights, but also on a more profound level,
Speaker 1: to impact and influence the twenty sixteen election, the very
Speaker 1: thing he's supposed to be mandated to be looking into.
Speaker 1: That's somewhat shocking to me, you know. So we'll watch
Speaker 1: all of this now. We're all waiting for the FISA
Speaker 1: abuse report from the Inspector General. Horowitz. I imagine he's
Speaker 1: waiting until Muller finishes. I can't. I mean, last time,
Speaker 1: it took this guy eighteen months. He's got six hundred
Speaker 1: employees working for him. I don't know why he worked
Speaker 1: so pathetically slow, but he did give us a lot
Speaker 1: of the information we have today. When he's the one
Speaker 1: that found the page and struck text messages. Now we
Speaker 1: we knew that they hated Donald Trump in every way imaginable. Mueller,
Speaker 1: you know, you know, much of the important part of
Speaker 1: the insurance policy is all of this, meaning the dossier.
Speaker 1: Mueller has been running and controlling everything of the DJ
Speaker 1: until bar got there. Now, Horowitz, if his hands were tied,
Speaker 1: you know, Mueller maybe has been keeping things from him.
Speaker 1: They won't be tied much longer. Longer and we need,
Speaker 1: we need to hear from these Fizer Court judges themselves.
Speaker 1: And this is gonna make a one eighty turn you want.
Speaker 1: It's going to be faster than to make your head spin,
Speaker 1: and it's all going to point in one direction is
Speaker 1: that it's been corrupt, a witch hunt from the beginning,
Speaker 1: and the evidence of abuse of power, corruption and Russian
Speaker 1: influence was on the other side. And the script has
Speaker 1: been flipped as a new poll out mainstream media actually
Speaker 1: revealing the public distrust of Muller's growing USA Today amid
Speaker 1: signs that Mueller's investigation into the Russian election interference may
Speaker 1: be near its conclusions. A USA Today Suffolk University poll
Speaker 1: finds that trust and Muller has eroded. Half of Americans
Speaker 1: now agree with the President and his contention that this
Speaker 1: is and he has been a victim of a witch hunt.
Speaker 1: Fifty percent agree with the President at it that he's
Speaker 1: been subjected to more investigations than previous presidents and it's
Speaker 1: all political, pretty sad. And one bit of breaking news
Speaker 1: that I'm finding really fascinating is, you know, remember the
Speaker 1: one revelation that came out last week was about Lisa Page,
Speaker 1: and Lisa Page said, Oh, there's some type of file
Speaker 1: within the FBI that verified the Steel Dosier. Well, I
Speaker 1: want to see that file because that file is impossible
Speaker 1: to have been verified. Why because even the supposed author,
Speaker 1: Christopher Steele himself bought and paid for with funnel money
Speaker 1: through Perkins Cooey, through Fusion GPS. If he even is
Speaker 1: the author, well, he has sworn under oath he has
Speaker 1: no idea. If it is true, that's raw intelligence. And
Speaker 1: we know that he used Russian sources, probably often single sources.
Speaker 1: Or was he being lied to and propagandized on purpose
Speaker 1: by Russian agents again that wanted to impact the election anyway,
Speaker 1: So Christopher Steele, we now find out, which gets very interesting, Well,
Speaker 1: what did he use for his sources beyond his Russian contacts? No.
Speaker 1: Fox News reported on Saturday that Steele, testifying in a
Speaker 1: defamation lawsuit filed against the Russian Entrepreneurs, said that he
Speaker 1: obtained information about this particular guy on something called cn
Speaker 1: and I Report. Now CNN I Report, it's not really CNN,
Speaker 1: but it is fake news, just like CNN now apparently
Speaker 1: is out of service. But CNN I Report was an
Speaker 1: invitation to members of the public to submit their own
Speaker 1: content to the website. In other words, you know these
Speaker 1: keyboard warrior people in their underwear. You know, I got
Speaker 1: this information. He used that as a means of putting
Speaker 1: together his dossier. You gotta be kidding me. Anyway, the
Speaker 1: views on this and even they have a disclaiming the
Speaker 1: views on content on this side of the Eye Report,
Speaker 1: CNN makes no guarantees that the content on the coverage
Speaker 1: about the Eye Report. How could they? They don't know
Speaker 1: who these people are. Anybody can put anything up there.
Speaker 1: CNN is known to have known about the contents of
Speaker 1: the dossier, etcetera, etcetera. I mean, that's pretty nuts. You know.
Speaker 1: Devin Nunez is going to join us on Hannity tonight
Speaker 1: confirming the Spentcral Central Spygate element. And he's really beginning
Speaker 1: as others have been telling me now for a while,
Speaker 1: and I just I had a hard time believing it
Speaker 1: that Steel was not the only author of the dossier.
Speaker 1: And it's looking more and more like, you know, we
Speaker 1: need to dig deeper into the role of Nellie or
Speaker 1: who's the wife of Bruce or who at the time,
Speaker 1: he's been demoted twice work for Fusion GPS which is
Speaker 1: a conflict in and of itself. And you know, Muller says,
Speaker 1: some of these probes continue, etc. There's been no evidence.
Speaker 1: It's interesting that Andrew Weissman is getting the hell out
Speaker 1: of there as quickly as he can. But you know,
Speaker 1: you want to know about the real collusion that was
Speaker 1: between Obama's Department of Justice and the FBI. And I
Speaker 1: think one of the biggest things we learned is that
Speaker 1: the Attorney General Lynch, the same woman that met with
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton days before the decision on the tarmac some
Speaker 1: Phoenix FBO. You know, they have a forty five minute
Speaker 1: conversation about their grandchildren. Seems a little too coincidental to me.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure if I could talk about my grandkids
Speaker 1: for forty five minutes, but apparently they can if you
Speaker 1: believe them. And that was just days before Loretta Lynch
Speaker 1: was in charge of making the decision about whether or
Speaker 1: not to prosecute his wife more than inappropriate. And when
Speaker 1: you have the test stimonial Lisa Page, Well, now we
Speaker 1: learned that the same Loretta Lynch that told James Comey
Speaker 1: the Clinton investigation was no investigation at all, It was
Speaker 1: only a matter and Lisa page saying we knew at
Speaker 1: the FBI when they were taking this out of our
Speaker 1: hands and not letting us do our job, and they
Speaker 1: were micro managing it, and they were making all the
Speaker 1: big decisions, not us. And they even allowed Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: to be interviewed with two other people in the room
Speaker 1: that never happens, and Peter Struck confirmed the same, And
Speaker 1: now we're learning that. Okay, so all of this was
Speaker 1: run by the attorney general, Obama's attorney general. Well what
Speaker 1: did Obama know about this? You know, where are the
Speaker 1: emails and the text messages from former Attorney General Lauretta Lynch.
Speaker 1: Sure they've been bleach pit by now. So we'll have
Speaker 1: to wait, watch and see all that happens here, and
Speaker 1: we'll get to all of that. But I'm gonna tell
Speaker 1: you something, this is just the beginning. We're learning a
Speaker 1: lot about Democratic candidates. You got New Jersey's largest city
Speaker 1: now planning to test a universal basic income program. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna explain what that means. Bozo or Rourke is in
Speaker 1: a lot of trouble. He had the worst weekend and
Speaker 1: of any presidential that you can ever have as a
Speaker 1: newly announced presidential candidate. I'm going to outline all of
Speaker 1: that for you. We have a North Carolina county now
Speaker 1: declaring itself a sanctuary county. The gun owners. Guess things
Speaker 1: work in both directions. Will have the latest on what
Speaker 1: happened in New Zealand and Democratic blame for New Zealand.
Speaker 1: It's unbelievable left wing radicals, you know, blaming anybody and
Speaker 1: everybody but the person responsible. You know, there were more
Speaker 1: than thirty four million American smokers. I bet that finding
Speaker 1: a satisfying alternative to cigarettes is at the top of
Speaker 1: your list if you're a smoker. Look, I've been there before,
Speaker 1: but after many years of smoking, I finally made the
Speaker 1: switch to Jewel. Is no more worrying about the way
Speaker 1: my clothes smell, worrying about we are gonna say with Jewel,
Speaker 1: everything is so much easier now. Jewel is a vaporizer
Speaker 1: that contains nicotine for a satisfying transition. When I found Jewel,
Speaker 1: it was a complete game changer. Jewel was designed by
Speaker 1: smokers for smokers to be an alternative to cigarettes. From
Speaker 1: it's simple to use interface to its clean technology. Well,
Speaker 1: Jewel has no cigarette ash, odor or mess. So if
Speaker 1: you're one of the thirty four million adults who smoke
Speaker 1: know that there is an alternative to cigarettes. How to
Speaker 1: discover the smoking alternative that's nothing like you've tried. Visit
Speaker 1: Juul dot com slash switch America. That's Juul dot com
Speaker 1: slash switch America and warning this product does contain nicotine
Speaker 1: and nicotine is an addictive chemical. I really really bizarre
Speaker 1: news about Robert Francis Spado Bozo O'Rourke. Um, Now, this
Speaker 1: is pretty amazing. Imagine any media outlet doing this to
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. Reuters reported late on Friday night that the
Speaker 1: reporter who broke the story about Robert Francis O'Rourke belonging
Speaker 1: to a hacker group had the story for two years,
Speaker 1: made an agreement to sit on the story until after
Speaker 1: O'Rourke Senate race against Ted Cruz. Then, the report published
Speaker 1: Friday documented O'Rourke's involvement with a hacker group named Cult
Speaker 1: of the Dead Cow included multiple pass writings from O'Rourke,
Speaker 1: some of which were described as disturbing. After more than
Speaker 1: a year of reporting, well Joseph Men persuaded O'Rourke to
Speaker 1: talk on the record in an interview in twenty seventeen,
Speaker 1: In late twenty seventeen, O'Rourke acknowledged that he was a
Speaker 1: member of the group, on the understanding the information would
Speaker 1: not be made public until after a Senate raise against
Speaker 1: Ted Cruz. The writer for Reuters, said that he learned
Speaker 1: about his involvement in the group after he decided to
Speaker 1: write about a hacking story, which he called the most
Speaker 1: interesting influential hacking group in history. And while I was
Speaker 1: looking into the Cult of the Dead Cow, I found
Speaker 1: out that they had a member who was a city
Speaker 1: member of Congress. I didn't know which one, and I
Speaker 1: figured out which one, and the members of the group
Speaker 1: wouldn't talk to me about who it was. They wouldn't
Speaker 1: confirm that it was this person unless I promised that
Speaker 1: I would write about it. Wouldn't write about it till
Speaker 1: after the November election. He says he approached O'Rourke for
Speaker 1: an interview about the book and told O'Rourke. O'Rourke that
Speaker 1: the book was going to publish after November and your
Speaker 1: Senate raises over O'Rourke agreed to give the interview. Some
Speaker 1: of his old writings were discovered in an online discussion
Speaker 1: in a forum that started with Taco land. One piece
Speaker 1: of the writing O'Rourke was especially troubling as he described
Speaker 1: mowing down children in a car. I'm not making this up.
Speaker 1: Yeahoo News had this up. You know. We're gonna go
Speaker 1: into Brett Kavanaugh's high school. Let's go into Bozo's archive.
Speaker 1: Versions of his writings and you know, and under an
Speaker 1: alias Psychedelic Warlord, including one that criticized some women as slots,
Speaker 1: mocked them for having violent boyfriends, suggested the way to
Speaker 1: deal with these women is to call them completely uglier
Speaker 1: in form Nazis skinheads. I guess in your area and
Speaker 1: go on from there. And he says another one when
Speaker 1: he was written as fifteen you know as a piece
Speaker 1: of fiction. I was driving home from work. I noticed
Speaker 1: two children crossing the street, and they were happy to
Speaker 1: be free of their troubles. The happiness was mined by
Speaker 1: right I had earned it. As I neared the young ones,
Speaker 1: I put my all my weight on my right foot
Speaker 1: hit the accelerator. Simply Save Home Security. This is a
Speaker 1: truly good, honest, great company, and you don't find many
Speaker 1: of those anymore. And Simply Safe is one percent committed
Speaker 1: to helping you fear less in your home now they'll
Speaker 1: protect your home twenty four seven and they really take
Speaker 1: care of you. Now. Safe CEO started the company from
Speaker 1: the ground up, right at his kitchen counter. Now it's
Speaker 1: the fastest growing home security company in the entire country
Speaker 1: and they protect millions of Americans every single day. But
Speaker 1: they still run like a small company with the same
Speaker 1: values that they started with. And that's why Simply Safe
Speaker 1: has no contracts, no hidden fees, no installation fees. Now
Speaker 1: the system is wireless and practically invisible in your home,
Speaker 1: and you can order it online just a few clicks
Speaker 1: and you'll see that it feels good to fear less.
Speaker 1: Just go to simply safe dot com slash Shawn to
Speaker 1: get ten percent off. That's simply safe dot com slash
Speaker 1: sean free shipping, free returns, and ten percent off. Because
Speaker 1: you listen to my show simply Safe dot com slash
Speaker 1: Shawn more fascinating It is twenty five now till the
Speaker 1: top of the hour, eight hundred nine for one Shawn.
Speaker 1: If you want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 1: let me go back and read this more slowly, so
Speaker 1: just to reiterate my earlier point, you have a Reuters
Speaker 1: reporter who knew that O'Rourke is part of this Cult
Speaker 1: of the Dead Cow, a hacking group, and um apparently
Speaker 1: one of the biggest and more influential hacking group. And
Speaker 1: he agreed to sit on the story until after the
Speaker 1: race between Ted Cruz and and Beto took place in
Speaker 1: for the Senate race anyway, So this Reuters reporter persuaded
Speaker 1: O'Rourke to go on the record with the agreement that
Speaker 1: he would hold it back until after the November twenty
Speaker 1: eighteenth election. Well, I kind of call this cheating. What
Speaker 1: reporters ever going to agree to, you know, hold back
Speaker 1: a big story like that. Anyway, he learned about the
Speaker 1: Cult of the Dead Cow, found out it was a
Speaker 1: member of Congress, and it found out it was Beto
Speaker 1: Robert Francis. They wouldn't confirm it until they promise he
Speaker 1: promised not to write about it until after of the
Speaker 1: November election. I don't I don't imagine if a Fox
Speaker 1: newsperson did that, not opinion, but a newsperson did that.
Speaker 1: I mean, I can only imagine the freak out that
Speaker 1: would occur on such a big story like that. You know,
Speaker 1: there's he's apparently has this online discussion for him that
Speaker 1: he's a part of called Taco Land, and one particular
Speaker 1: piece of writing is really weird and scary. But anyway,
Speaker 1: one of the things from an O'Rourke was is written
Speaker 1: when He's fifteen, short, disturbing piece of fiction. One day,
Speaker 1: as I was driving home from work, I noticed two
Speaker 1: children crossing the street. They were happy, happy to be
Speaker 1: free from their troubles. This happiness was mine, by right,
Speaker 1: I had earned it in my dreams. By the way,
Speaker 1: what's the disclaimer? It's three thirty kids are in the car.
Speaker 1: Might just be nice to have a little disclaimer. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, if your kids are in the car, moms
Speaker 1: and dads, you know, hanging there. As I neared the
Speaker 1: young ones, I put all of my weight on my
Speaker 1: right foot, keeping the accelerator pedal on the floor until
Speaker 1: I heard the crashing of the two children on the hood,
Speaker 1: and then a sharp cry of pain from one of
Speaker 1: the two. I was so fascinated for a moment that
Speaker 1: when after I had stopped my vehicle, I just sat
Speaker 1: in the days, sweet visions filling my head. Okay, you
Speaker 1: gotta be kidding me, right, Normal people don't think like this.
Speaker 1: Yahoo on Friday reported other or writings. Archive versions of
Speaker 1: his writings attributed to his alias Psychedelic Warlord. You know
Speaker 1: and as I was beginning to describe earlier, including one
Speaker 1: that criticizes women as quote sluts, mocks them for having
Speaker 1: quote violent boyfriends, suggesting a way to deal with these
Speaker 1: women was to call them completely ugly or informed Nazi
Speaker 1: skins in your area that they had aids. One text
Speaker 1: file that was dated nineteen eighty nine, when he was
Speaker 1: sixteen or seventeen, Psychedelic war Lord is back, describing a
Speaker 1: new creature, the ul ultra trendy, in an over the
Speaker 1: top sarcastic tone. Ultra trendis are usually the scene sluts
Speaker 1: quote that many of the men folk admires. So they
Speaker 1: show up, they get drunk with the band. Tell the
Speaker 1: lead singer, I really like your music and I think
Speaker 1: it's a lot like the sex pistol. So you wanna
Speaker 1: boop Psychedelic Warlord Beto? Do we have to change his
Speaker 1: name now to Psychedelic Warlord or should we keep it
Speaker 1: Robert Francis Beto Bozo? What do you think I would
Speaker 1: like to use either? This is a really you have
Speaker 1: to have a messed up head to do this. One
Speaker 1: of these, you know, it sounds like you ever see
Speaker 1: like the writings of these crazy kids that you know,
Speaker 1: commit these horrible act that seems like a weird mindset
Speaker 1: to me. One of those other pieces, Psychedelic Warlord Robert
Speaker 1: Francis O'Rourke writes that the perspective of a from the
Speaker 1: perspective of a narrator who confronts a feeling of boording,
Speaker 1: boredom and aimlessness by going on a killing spree, including
Speaker 1: the one that I just mentioned Data nineteen eighty eight,
Speaker 1: continues with describing the murder as an act of love,
Speaker 1: saying it was the feeling it provoked was simple ecstasy.
Speaker 1: I had killed nearly thirty eight people by the time
Speaker 1: of my twenty third birthday. Each one was more fulfilling
Speaker 1: than the last, he writes. Psychedelic Warlord Robert Francis O'Rourke
Speaker 1: writings included some youthful attempts that profane humors, such as
Speaker 1: a nineteen eighty eight poems Psychedelic Warlord crafted by the
Speaker 1: Cult of the Dead Cow. I can't even read this,
Speaker 1: you know, I just can't. I mean, it's pretty amazing.
Speaker 1: This is your media, this is who they are. You
Speaker 1: don't think this is an example. Think any media person
Speaker 1: for any conservative ever running, any Republican ever running, would
Speaker 1: give this type of protection to that candidate. No, never,
Speaker 1: you know, And did they ever vet Obama? No, they
Speaker 1: never vetted Obama. Did they ever tell you of his
Speaker 1: atrocious record after No, they never did that either. We're
Speaker 1: gonna get into the president's first veto coming up later
Speaker 1: in the program, because that's really important. So apparently people
Speaker 1: are mad when you say Robert Francis O'Rourke, which is
Speaker 1: his first name, and Beato and I don't know where
Speaker 1: Beato came from, or psychedelic warlord or Bozo's what I've
Speaker 1: been calling him is the latest far left Democrat throwing
Speaker 1: his hat in the ring. So he's a three term congressman,
Speaker 1: most famous for his love of skateboarding, wanting to tear
Speaker 1: down walls, losing to Senator Cruz. Asked by the media,
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi could not name a single legislative accomplishment of
Speaker 1: Robert Francis O'Rourke. She wasn't alone. Texas Democrat chair also
Speaker 1: struggled to describe any Beto accomplishments. I mean, but Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi was asked today about his biggest accomplishment, and she
Speaker 1: couldn't really name one, even though he served in the
Speaker 1: House for a brief time admittedly, but you're telling me
Speaker 1: he's an honest politician. That's his biggest accomplishment. The entire
Speaker 1: time that he served in the United States House of Representatives,
Speaker 1: the Republicans controlled the House of Representatives. They wouldn't allow
Speaker 1: anything to pass there was sponsored by a Democrat. So
Speaker 1: the fact that he was enabled to getting so name
Speaker 1: was something else. I'm not even pidding it on Congress.
Speaker 1: I asked you his biggest accomplishment. So what did he
Speaker 1: do about? You know? Okay, Well, let brought it out
Speaker 1: to be fair. He's been a United States congressman. He
Speaker 1: was he was a city council member. So what did
Speaker 1: he get done to people? He would he got a
Speaker 1: lot done. He's about the issues that were important to
Speaker 1: the people of the state of Texas. Got a lot done.
Speaker 1: They can't name a thing that he got taught. I
Speaker 1: can't name one thing. Wow, But you know he's Look,
Speaker 1: he's like most of the candidates we see, far left
Speaker 1: socialist and that's just pretty much who he is. It's like,
Speaker 1: it's not hard to figure out who these these liberal
Speaker 1: Democrats are. It's really not and he had to apologize
Speaker 1: Friday night it was in Iowa, and made some joke.
Speaker 1: It was not a good weekend for him anyway, launched
Speaker 1: his bid I Guess on Friday, and then Thursday, would
Speaker 1: I Guess? They put out? The video were marks recorded
Speaker 1: on Political Party Live and ceedar rapids and he begged
Speaker 1: for gasoline so we could drive around the city. And
Speaker 1: the comments triggered complaints from many Democratic activists and operatives,
Speaker 1: many of them women, that female candidates could never similarly
Speaker 1: joke about their roles of raising children. Not only will
Speaker 1: I not say that again, but I'll be more thoughtful
Speaker 1: going forward in the way that I talk about our
Speaker 1: marriage and also the way in which I acknowledge the
Speaker 1: truth of the criticisms I have enjoyed white privilege, and
Speaker 1: he pointed to his ability to walk away from two
Speaker 1: arrests as a young man without any serious consequences as
Speaker 1: an example. So, yes, I think the criticisms right on
Speaker 1: my ham handed attempt to try and highlight the fact
Speaker 1: that Amy has the lion's share of the burden and
Speaker 1: our family, that she actually works but is the primary
Speaker 1: parent in our family, especially when I served in Congress,
Speaker 1: especially when I was on the campaign trail, should have
Speaker 1: also been a moment for me to acknowledge that that
Speaker 1: is far too often the case, not just in politics,
Speaker 1: but life in general. I hope I've been in some instances.
Speaker 1: I hope as I have been in some instance as
Speaker 1: part of the problem, I can now be part of
Speaker 1: the solution. He adds he's the only candidate from the
Speaker 1: US Mexico border. Says he's a beneficiary of white privilege.
Speaker 1: He went on, didn't go on any length about that.
Speaker 1: I don't know what he's thinking or doing here, but
Speaker 1: he is pretty much in sync with the modern liberal,
Speaker 1: leftist Democratic Party. Some people got mad at I guess
Speaker 1: the RNC tweeted out a picture on Saint Patty's Day
Speaker 1: because he has a mugshot. I guess he's picked up
Speaker 1: for a duy. Now. That situation was really weird because
Speaker 1: he was accused of running away from the scene of
Speaker 1: an accident or a scene you know, from that scene,
Speaker 1: even tried to flee the scene before the police arrived,
Speaker 1: and he was arrested for driving under the influence. Just
Speaker 1: a lot worse and anyway, so they put up a
Speaker 1: picture of you know, with like a leprechaun half of
Speaker 1: Saint Patrick's day yesterday. Please drink responsibly, you say, and
Speaker 1: then look, I'm irish. I don't find it offensive. Do
Speaker 1: you find it? You're Irish, Linda, you find it offensive.
Speaker 1: It takes a lot to offend me. It takes a
Speaker 1: lot to offend me. Everyone's so sensitive, you know. They
Speaker 1: used to tell the joke about, oh, what's an Irish
Speaker 1: seven course meal? A six pack on a potato ah
Speaker 1: ha ha. I'm not offended by I think we're way
Speaker 1: too uptight. But you know Carlin, oh, George Carlin who
Speaker 1: recently pat Don rickles Joan Rivers, and we had Joan
Speaker 1: Rivers on the show. I think we had a bleep
Speaker 1: for fifteen times and one one appearance. It's just he
Speaker 1: can't even be funny anymore. He can't. It's just the
Speaker 1: only one that gets away with it is Howard Stern,
Speaker 1: and he's he's like grandfathered in a level careful. Now.
Speaker 1: I haven't noticed that he's careful at all when I
Speaker 1: heard him. Yeah, well I usually get to hear him
Speaker 1: like the best of two weeks around Christmas when I
Speaker 1: drive my car a lot, and I'm like, oh, this
Speaker 1: guy can say anything he wants, which, by the way,
Speaker 1: I don't want to change. I think it's good, you know,
Speaker 1: but you can't do that. He just nobody else can
Speaker 1: get away with it. And it's just everyone's so uptight.
Speaker 1: If I mean, I could feign outrage and act like
Speaker 1: I really cared that somebody told a joke or please
Speaker 1: drink responsibly in the leprechn hat on Bozo, but I
Speaker 1: would be faking it. That would be lying. I'm not
Speaker 1: offended Routers hiding Beto's hacking story. Wow, what does that
Speaker 1: mean for Reuters? Isn't that a campaign contribution on their part?
Speaker 1: Imagine if it was a reporter at Fox Nudes that
Speaker 1: did this for Donald Trump. Forget it. There's a PJA
Speaker 1: media piece. So Rooks gaftastic day and he went through
Speaker 1: all of the comments that he made on the campaign
Speaker 1: first swing through Iowa, you know, marred by a joke
Speaker 1: about his wife. It's just everyone's really but the guy's
Speaker 1: just an idiot, and you really can't You can't get
Speaker 1: away from the fact and his policies are insane. Can't
Speaker 1: get away from that fact either. New Jersey. This is interesting.
Speaker 1: Their largest city plans to test whether universal basic income
Speaker 1: is feasible, making it the latest government to flirt with
Speaker 1: a program that would guarantee income for residents whether or
Speaker 1: not they have a job. Newark Mayor Baraca Ross Baraca
Speaker 1: announced the decision late last week to create a task
Speaker 1: force and a pilot program to study whether the program
Speaker 1: is possible. Quote, we believe in universal basic income, especially
Speaker 1: in a time where studies have shown that families have
Speaker 1: a crisis of just four hundred dollars a month, may
Speaker 1: experience a setback that may be difficult or even impossible
Speaker 1: to recover from. And then, of course, the Newark mayor
Speaker 1: went on to say, and you know, adding that one
Speaker 1: third of the city still lives in poverty. Fox five
Speaker 1: New York said the mayor did not release any details
Speaker 1: of the plan. You know, one thing that on the
Speaker 1: new Deal, they never want to explain how they're gonna
Speaker 1: pay for it. Paying for it's irrelevant when your life
Speaker 1: is at stake. As a joke, by the way, House
Speaker 1: Democrats launch an investigation into the media bias at Fox News,
Speaker 1: like really, sorry, that's you know anyway. A Casio Cortez's
Speaker 1: unfavorable rating is skyrockety and she's getting pissed and blaming
Speaker 1: Fox News. In the meantime, Universal income program whether you
Speaker 1: work or don't work. Wow, we were gonna get the
Speaker 1: money to pay for all of this. Well, you know
Speaker 1: what today is? It is in New York City public schools.
Speaker 1: It's what do they call it? Meatless? Mondays, I'm very
Speaker 1: I'm urging every kid in New York City public schools
Speaker 1: to head to McDonald's immediately upon leaving school today and
Speaker 1: make up for the whatever garbage they fed you with
Speaker 1: your government healthy food. Wow. By the way, isn't it
Speaker 1: one one of the greatest things ever invented? A Wendy's
Speaker 1: single with cheese, A quarter pounder with cheese, French fries,
Speaker 1: and a coke. Love it. I don't eat it much,
Speaker 1: but when I do, oh so good, so delicious. Dan
Speaker 1: Bongino Horaldo next. As president, the protection of the nation
Speaker 1: is my highest duty. Yesterday, Congress passed a dangerous resolution that,
Speaker 1: have signed into law, would quit countless Americans in danger,
Speaker 1: very grave danger. The Democrat sponsored resolution would terminate vital
Speaker 1: voter security operations by revoking the national emergency issued last month.
Speaker 1: It is definitely a national emergency. Rarely have we had
Speaker 1: such a national emergency. Therefore, to defend the safety and
Speaker 1: security of all Americans, I will be signing and issuing
Speaker 1: a formal veto of this reckless resolution. And that's what
Speaker 1: it was, all right, glad you with us? Howur to
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity show the president's first veto over the issue
Speaker 1: of his emergency declaration, which now allows him, as past
Speaker 1: presidents have done, to use well unused funds from the
Speaker 1: Defense Department and elsewhere as a means of funding the
Speaker 1: border wall. We have covered this extensively, you know. For example,
Speaker 1: I've been making the argument and it's not really one
Speaker 1: that needs to be made. But we have legislatively ten USC.
Speaker 1: Two eighty four that the President has the authority to complete,
Speaker 1: quote the construction of roads and fences and obstacles and
Speaker 1: installation of lighting to block drug smuggling corridors across international
Speaker 1: boundaries of the United States and the primary smuggling quarters
Speaker 1: into the corridors into the US or at our southern border.
Speaker 1: Ninety percent of heroin. Heroin was responsible for three hundred
Speaker 1: deaths each and every week in the US. How is
Speaker 1: that not a national emergency? We're going to talk to
Speaker 1: some angel families at the bottom of the hour. And
Speaker 1: you have sanctuary cities, you have criminal illegal immigrants. Well
Speaker 1: doesn't matter in terms of you know, now you have
Speaker 1: states and cities literally aiding and abetting in future crimes
Speaker 1: and ignoring federal law. But the bottom line is the
Speaker 1: President keeps fighting for what he made a promise. I
Speaker 1: don't think they're going to override this veto. I don't
Speaker 1: think they can override this veto joining us now. Dan Bongino,
Speaker 1: Fox News contributor, former MYPD officers secret Service agent, author
Speaker 1: of the bestseller Spygate. Haraldo Rivera Fox News legal analysts
Speaker 1: author the best seller of The Horaldo Show. You know, Horaldo,
Speaker 1: I think you've come around a lot on this issue,
Speaker 1: and I think you come to see that the president,
Speaker 1: especially during the shutdown, was being pretty reasonable Democrats, you know,
Speaker 1: in the second term of Obama, they were more than
Speaker 1: willing to fund a border wall. They say repeatedly they
Speaker 1: care about Dhaka and they care about Dreamers. The president
Speaker 1: put that on the table. They didn't even go bother
Speaker 1: meet with him. Similarly, the president, you know, made offers
Speaker 1: about getting the government open because they said they cared
Speaker 1: about furloughed workers. They didn't care about them enough to
Speaker 1: go sit down with the president. So they had probably
Speaker 1: a comprehensive deal on the table with all the things
Speaker 1: they said they wanted, and they turned it down. Well,
Speaker 1: the thing is that really irks me, Jean Great to
Speaker 1: be with you and brothers, Dan, is the fact that
Speaker 1: the President wrote discretion when it comes to national security
Speaker 1: in a national emergency. I think the Congress should have
Speaker 1: given deference to his point of view. I have absolutely
Speaker 1: no problem with his using funds for from other areas
Speaker 1: to build some portions of the wall where the experts
Speaker 1: tell him and me and us where it's necessary. I
Speaker 1: believe that the Democrats drew a line in the sand,
Speaker 1: a wall, if you will, because they wanted to hurt
Speaker 1: the president politically. It had nothing to do with the
Speaker 1: practical aspects of what do you do to stop drug smuggling,
Speaker 1: what do you do to stop human smuggling, what do
Speaker 1: you do to secure the border. It had all to
Speaker 1: do with giving the president first and the government shutdown
Speaker 1: in December, a defeat, and I think that that is
Speaker 1: what is at work right now, and because they're playing politics.
Speaker 1: I have absolutely no problem with the president doing an
Speaker 1: end run around them. Short. Oh, they're not going to
Speaker 1: overturn the veto. They don't have the votes too, So
Speaker 1: that Bill's gonna stand, and he will do what every
Speaker 1: other president, starting with Jimmy Carter, has done. There are
Speaker 1: still thirty three national emergencies from past presidents, including Obama,
Speaker 1: on the books today, so it's not like something that
Speaker 1: has been manufactured by Donald Trump. I would argue not
Speaker 1: only ten usc which I just cited, but I also
Speaker 1: would argue two eighty four. But I'd argue that constitutionally,
Speaker 1: as the commander in chief, if you have four thousand
Speaker 1: homicides in two years, and thirty thousand sexual assaults in
Speaker 1: two years, and one hundred thousand violent assaults in two years,
Speaker 1: and ninety percent of heroin and fentin all crossing the
Speaker 1: borders with cartels and gang members, how do you say
Speaker 1: that's not a manufactured crisis, Dan Bongino, Yeah, well you don't, Sean,
Speaker 1: I mean it. You just stated the numbers clear as day.
Speaker 1: I mean, any rational, sane, reasonable person, what's happening at
Speaker 1: the border is the crisis, Sean. I don't know if
Speaker 1: you so. Even the Washington Post, Right's the Compost of
Speaker 1: All Places ran a story of this weekend about this
Speaker 1: new scheme to smuggle illegals into the country. And the
Speaker 1: new scheme is this, get ready, Sean's very complicated. They
Speaker 1: actually bust you up to the border and they just
Speaker 1: drop you off where you turn yourself in. I'm not
Speaker 1: making that up, like that's the scheme. Like obviously you
Speaker 1: can sense the dripping sarcasm. But because we have effectively
Speaker 1: no border anymore due to Flores, we have created The Democrats,
Speaker 1: not President Trump, is trying to stop it. The Democrats
Speaker 1: have essentially created an emergency. There's no doubt about this
Speaker 1: amongst reasonable people. I am not making that story up.
Speaker 1: By the way, that's from the Washington Post. They are
Speaker 1: now taking buses people not clear to be in the country.
Speaker 1: We have no idea who these people are. They are
Speaker 1: dropping off the board. They're not doing stash houses anymore,
Speaker 1: where they used to stash illegals and then ned way
Speaker 1: to make a run when they thought they could get
Speaker 1: past border patrol. They're not even doing that. They're just
Speaker 1: turning themselves in as the border. Now. Explain to me
Speaker 1: again with a straight face to our listeners out there,
Speaker 1: anyone not on the conservative side of this issue, which
Speaker 1: is the right side. How that's not an emergency. I'm
Speaker 1: open to hearing. Let me push back. I could push back, Dan.
Speaker 1: I think that one of the good things. And I
Speaker 1: saw this in McAllen where the wall construction is underway.
Speaker 1: I'm okay with the smugglers and there's going to be
Speaker 1: illegal crossings of the border. At least when they seek asylum,
Speaker 1: you know that someone is going to at least interview
Speaker 1: them and see if they're on the Interpol list of
Speaker 1: the most ten most wanted. It's better than them just
Speaker 1: sneakuing the growth on their bellies and caring into the
Speaker 1: American system. You know, I love when you call me
Speaker 1: brother Dan because you are brother Haraldo. Whatever he says
Speaker 1: a brother Dan, that means he's about to hit your
Speaker 1: right over the head, batters you up because you know
Speaker 1: as I like them, Horaldo. But you're a smart guy.
Speaker 1: How can you not figure this out? If you claim asylum,
Speaker 1: there has to be some stipulation the law. They're gonna
Speaker 1: have to change the law that you were going to
Speaker 1: have to do it exclusively from the country you're claiming
Speaker 1: asylum from. Because what's happening now is people from Honduras
Speaker 1: and Guatemala who claim they're claiming asylum to escape danger. Right,
Speaker 1: we can all agree that's what that is. Right, they're
Speaker 1: leaving for Mexico. Okay, so wait, let me finish. So
Speaker 1: you're out of Guatemalan house, so claim asylum in Mexico. No,
Speaker 1: we don't want to claim asylum of Mexico. We want
Speaker 1: to come to the United States. But you just said
Speaker 1: you were claiming asylum. You didn't say you wanted to
Speaker 1: come to the United States. Those are not the same thing.
Speaker 1: You are going to claim one political one political observation.
Speaker 1: Look at the twelve Republican senators that just stabbed the
Speaker 1: president in the back up. The twelve eleven are up
Speaker 1: for not up for reelection. Eleven are not up for reelection,
Speaker 1: so and they're not going to be primaried by another
Speaker 1: GEOP Trump supporter candidate. So there's no courage at all
Speaker 1: for the mitt Romneys of the world who opposed the
Speaker 1: president on the emergency declaration. Susan Collins, as far as
Speaker 1: I know, is the only one of the twelve GEOP
Speaker 1: senators who is up for election. She's the only one
Speaker 1: that had the courage to stand by her principles. And also,
Speaker 1: let me say this, there's not going to be any
Speaker 1: asylum law changes in this Congress as only as the
Speaker 1: House is controlled by the Democrats. You're never gonna get
Speaker 1: the lord that you're making my point, not yours, that
Speaker 1: the Democrat point. I make the judges surge, the judges
Speaker 1: to the border surge the impast for all though, how
Speaker 1: are you gonna have judges for one hundred thousand people
Speaker 1: a month? That's insane? How are you gonna do that?
Speaker 1: Can you judge? Horlo hold on, I was an agent.
Speaker 1: I was a federal I'm not trying to pat myself
Speaker 1: on the back. I'm just trying to explain you something.
Speaker 1: When I was a federal agent in the Secret Service,
Speaker 1: we had three thousand agents across the whole country. You
Speaker 1: know how many credit card frond cases we turned down
Speaker 1: because we don't have enough people, enough judges. You think
Speaker 1: a hundred thousand people crossing a month, you're gonna search
Speaker 1: the judges. What are you gonna do? How many judges?
Speaker 1: You're gonna hire a million? I mean, hold, the numbers
Speaker 1: don't work like you gotta think this stuff through. I mean,
Speaker 1: come on, guy, you gotta think about this rash. You
Speaker 1: gotta start somewhere. You gotta start somewhere. You gotta bring
Speaker 1: order to the border, which already the President has already
Speaker 1: done a pretty darn good job in terms of enforcement
Speaker 1: turning away bad people. I think that there's the situation
Speaker 1: is better now than it was a couple of years ago.
Speaker 1: Even though they're trying harder, they're getting snagged at a
Speaker 1: higher rate. I think you got to deal with the
Speaker 1: reality that exists. And that's my that's my whole thing.
Speaker 1: You gotta here's the president that is besieged. I siege
Speaker 1: by a media that is so hateful that anything he
Speaker 1: does is construed against him, that they're blaming him from
Speaker 1: mass murders on the other side of the world. I
Speaker 1: think that he's he's got to speak up and speak out,
Speaker 1: and he's mad. He's made this emergency declaration. We support him,
Speaker 1: we back him. Congress will not be able to override
Speaker 1: this veto. Let's go forward, take the small incremental victories.
Speaker 1: You're not gonna get the sweeping reforms that you ask for. Well,
Speaker 1: then then listen, you're just acknowledging the fact that what
Speaker 1: I said in the beginning is true that the Democrats
Speaker 1: want open borders. They're not in this for any victory
Speaker 1: at all. They don't want to change the system. And
Speaker 1: I'm let me, can I take issue one thing to listen.
Speaker 1: I get it that there were twelve senators run the
Speaker 1: Republican side, but we can't put them all in the
Speaker 1: same basket. Some are clearly just politicians. But you know
Speaker 1: Ram Paul and Mike Lee, they they're constitutionalists. They're not
Speaker 1: They're not ejecting that to the president. On the fact
Speaker 1: that this is an emergency, it's a funding mechanism. I
Speaker 1: think that's why the President was pretty clear and he
Speaker 1: said this himself, President Trump, why support and I agree
Speaker 1: with him on the emergency, but he said he did
Speaker 1: not pressure people. He had them vote. They're conscious because
Speaker 1: there are some people out there who have been consistent
Speaker 1: on this issue, Democrat or Republican. So I agree, but
Speaker 1: not agree. I like I'm a Rampall fan myself. I
Speaker 1: like the guy, and let me move on to a
Speaker 1: different issue. So over the weekend, we have Reuters reporting
Speaker 1: that they had a reporter broke a story about Bozo,
Speaker 1: Beto O'Rourke or Robert Francis O'Rourke belonging to a hacker group. Uh,
Speaker 1: they had the story for two years. They agreed to
Speaker 1: sit on it until the race with Ted Cruise was over,
Speaker 1: and it documented O'Rourke's involvement in a hacker group named
Speaker 1: Cult of the Dead Cow. Included multiple pass writing I'm
Speaker 1: not making this up. I don't know why you'll laughing
Speaker 1: multiple pass writings from a Rourke, some of which were
Speaker 1: pretty disturbing. After more than a year reporting on this,
Speaker 1: they persuaded Rourke to talk on the record. The interview
Speaker 1: took place in twenty seventeen or Rourke acknowledge he was
Speaker 1: a member of the group, on the understanding that the
Speaker 1: information would not be made public until the Senate races
Speaker 1: over with Ted Cruz. Roy, How does routers get to
Speaker 1: make that acknowledgement? You know, when do they When do
Speaker 1: they run defense? Because that obviously would have had a
Speaker 1: big impact on the people of Texas in that race.
Speaker 1: So that's their campaign contribution to what the show? You
Speaker 1: think about this? Right? Is this story not just a
Speaker 1: microcosm of the entire media universe? So Donald Trump agree
Speaker 1: the media stories about Donald Trump if they completely made up,
Speaker 1: they fabricated put them in a New York Times without
Speaker 1: this whole collusion hoax and reported it like it was fact.
Speaker 1: Yet they get a story. Beto acknowledges he's a Cult
Speaker 1: of the Dead Cow member, and that's fights so funny,
Speaker 1: Like you said, that's snappier name. Oh my gosh, so
Speaker 1: the Dead Cow. I mean, you get the judges. Let
Speaker 1: me ask both of you this. Now, I'm Irish. You
Speaker 1: know what an Irish seven course meal is, right, HAROLDO?
Speaker 1: Guinness and Guinness and Guinness what no six pack and
Speaker 1: a potato? Right now? I can make that joke. I'm
Speaker 1: actually mine can make that joke. I can't make that joke,
Speaker 1: I know. But the funny thing. But the funny thing is,
Speaker 1: um what I did a DNA test? Who did our
Speaker 1: ancestry did it? And actually one of the few people
Speaker 1: I was one hundred percent British Isle in other words
Speaker 1: Irish or four of my grandparents came from Ireland. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I guess the RNC sent out a picture and they
Speaker 1: put it like an erringold brawl LEPrecon hat on Beato
Speaker 1: and put up a picture. When I didn't like that, well,
Speaker 1: why didn't you like it? Because it's stereotypes, Irish stereotypes
Speaker 1: Irish exactly if you're gonna put it, if it was,
Speaker 1: why does it not bother me the same thing I would.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be very blunt. It doesn't bother me at all.
Speaker 1: I mean, I know what, I know my immigrant grandparents
Speaker 1: bodies that. I see you. I don't that kind of stuff.
Speaker 1: I think that even though it makes you nicker, no
Speaker 1: matter why. It's hard not to grin about it. It It
Speaker 1: was a give a guffaw. But there's got to be
Speaker 1: some decency. If if if there RNC of all organizations
Speaker 1: it's stooping to that, then then then Trump is open
Speaker 1: season on the many. It wasn't that funny. I think
Speaker 1: my joke was much funnier. Well, I remember Bloomberg made
Speaker 1: a similar joke. Yeah he did, he got and I,
Speaker 1: by the way, defended him. I just I don't take
Speaker 1: that seriously. I know other people do. I don't. Just relax.
Speaker 1: Everyone needs to laugh a little, you know. I thought
Speaker 1: Don Rickles was funny as hell, and he picked on everybody.
Speaker 1: But let's let's show the civility thing girl though, listen,
Speaker 1: I'm with you, man, But I'd love to return to
Speaker 1: civility too. But let's be candidate. You think the Conservatives
Speaker 1: brought this about, this destructive politics. I mean when when
Speaker 1: the liberals want to return to civility and a nice
Speaker 1: whatever tip O'Neill Reagan alleged back and forth and bears
Speaker 1: in the White House would probably never happen anyway. It's
Speaker 1: after like anyone else. But I ain't gonna have because
Speaker 1: the lift the left isn't interested in any of that. Okay. Brother,
Speaker 1: By the way, Horald the when you're moving back to
Speaker 1: New York, I mean you've been living in clear I'm
Speaker 1: here here. Are you here all week? I'm here all
Speaker 1: week through Sunday? Okay, that's awesome to here. All right, Dan,
Speaker 1: we'll see you soon as well. Quick break, right back, news,
Speaker 1: round up, information overload coming, and you're gonna meet the
Speaker 1: angel moms and dad that were in the room in
Speaker 1: the Oval Office when the President vetoed the emergency spending
Speaker 1: bill the Congress voted down. They won't override the veto.
Speaker 1: He'll get the money straight ahead. As president, the protection
Speaker 1: of the nation is my highest duty. Yesterday, Congress passed
Speaker 1: a dangerous resolution that I signed into law. Would quit
Speaker 1: countless Americans in danger, very grave danger. The Democrat sponsored
Speaker 1: resolution would terminate vital voter security operations by revoking the
Speaker 1: national emergency issued last month. It is definitely a national emergency.
Speaker 1: Rarely have we had such a national emergency. Therefore, to
Speaker 1: defend the safety and security of all Americans, I will
Speaker 1: be signing and issuing a formal veto of this reckless resolution.
Speaker 1: And that's what it was. You talk about the mainstream media.
Speaker 1: Apparently you made an effort to talk to CNN's Jim
Speaker 1: Acosta and an interview yourself or a representative of the
Speaker 1: evangel Mom movement. What did he say? Well, I called
Speaker 1: him out right after I got up after the President
Speaker 1: left the podium in the Rose Garden, and I called
Speaker 1: him out on first of all, calling him undocumented immigrants.
Speaker 1: They are illegal aliens by law, that's defined how it's
Speaker 1: not racist. And I called him out on always quoting
Speaker 1: that illegals committed less crimes than Americans. And I told
Speaker 1: him that we should have zero crime by illegal aliens.
Speaker 1: They shouldn't even be here, and my son's death was
Speaker 1: one too many. And he put on this Oscar worthy performance,
Speaker 1: putting his hand on his heart and telling me how
Speaker 1: sorry he was for our laws and how CNN felt,
Speaker 1: and I called him out on not having us on
Speaker 1: in seven years. I've been on there twice. Some have
Speaker 1: never been on. And I told him I wasn't going
Speaker 1: to be his problem when he offered to stand behind
Speaker 1: him when he goes life and he will point to us,
Speaker 1: how disrespectful and just arrogant. And then when he called
Speaker 1: out that the President calls him fake news, I said, well,
Speaker 1: I have to agree with him. President he is and
Speaker 1: he keeps proving that. So it was a beautiful moment
Speaker 1: that I still have to laugh about. And I gave
Speaker 1: him my business card and glad I didn't hold my
Speaker 1: breath because he hasn't called yet or contacted me. All right,
Speaker 1: twenty four now till the top of the hour, eight
Speaker 1: hundred nine for one Sean Tolfree telephone number. You want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program. The President's first veto,
Speaker 1: as we predicted, it will not be overridden. He will
Speaker 1: get to transfer the money. In other words, everything the
Speaker 1: President said he was going to do is going to
Speaker 1: get done. That was Sabine Dirt and talking about her
Speaker 1: that moment in the Rose Garden with the President and
Speaker 1: Acosta being who Acosta is and the presidents that will
Speaker 1: want don't you talk to them? I did not know
Speaker 1: they were on fake news CNN even once, so that
Speaker 1: was somewhat shocking anyway. Sabine illegal immigrant from Germany. Her
Speaker 1: son Dominic was struck and killed July twelfth, twenty twenty
Speaker 1: twelve with an unlicensed pickup truck driving illegal immigrant with
Speaker 1: a history of drunk driving, made a wrong turn and
Speaker 1: struck Dominic's motorcycle. Laura Wilkerson is back with US her
Speaker 1: eighteen year old son Joshua brutally beaten, strangled, tortured to
Speaker 1: death by a young illegal immigrant. This goes back to
Speaker 1: twenty ten November the sixteenth, and also with US. Mary
Speaker 1: Anne Mandoza, her son Brandon, was a Mesa police officer.
Speaker 1: He was killed on May twelve, twenty fourteen, had on
Speaker 1: collision with a man who authorready say was intoxicated and
Speaker 1: an immigrant in this country illegally, and both Brandon, Mendoza
Speaker 1: and the other driver were killed in the crash. All
Speaker 1: three of these women or with the President when he
Speaker 1: signed the veto pushback against Congress to make sure this
Speaker 1: doesn't happen to any other kids. In America. I know
Speaker 1: the people on the left and the media were obsessed
Speaker 1: about child separation. Well this is a case a permanent separation.
Speaker 1: You know, it's almost mind numbing to me that the
Speaker 1: media ignores. You know, they keep saying a manufactured crisis.
Speaker 1: But in a two year period of time, there's four
Speaker 1: thousand homicides against Americans by illegal immigrants, thirty thousand sexual
Speaker 1: assaults by illegal immigrants against Americans. There's one hundred thousand
Speaker 1: violent assaults against Americans by illegal immigrants. Then you have
Speaker 1: the cartels and the gangs, and ninety percent of our
Speaker 1: heroin comes across us that southern border. We're losing three
Speaker 1: hundred kids a week. And then of course wouldn't add that.
Speaker 1: Now the new phenomenon that everybody tried to warn the
Speaker 1: Obama administration about, which is fenten al, which is killing
Speaker 1: people at a faster rate than any other drug ever manufactured.
Speaker 1: And we all know what happened to my good friend
Speaker 1: Eric Bowling's son, Chase. I mean, he bought a xanax
Speaker 1: on the street, maybe he was feeling anxious, and you
Speaker 1: know it was laced with fenton al and he died
Speaker 1: that night. He's nineteen years old. Anyway, Sabine, Laura, Marianne,
Speaker 1: thank you all for being with us. We appreciate your
Speaker 1: time and again our thoughts our prayers go out to you.
Speaker 1: And how did you feel being there, Sabine at this
Speaker 1: ceremony with the president and what were your thoughts? Hi, Sean,
Speaker 1: It's good to be back with you. I felt so
Speaker 1: honored in place to be invited to stand with our
Speaker 1: president vice president in such a historic setting and historic
Speaker 1: event because we elected this it in to fight for Americans,
Speaker 1: not illegal And the sad part is that the emism media,
Speaker 1: the mainstream media, refuses to tell the truth to their viewers.
Speaker 1: That's why they are so oblivious some of them and
Speaker 1: don't believe what the president is doing is for their
Speaker 1: good as well they know they actually ignore these facts purposefully.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's not that hard to figure out. I've
Speaker 1: gotten to know all of you very well over the
Speaker 1: years of many other angel families, moms and dads, and
Speaker 1: I was a little surprised. What did you say, you
Speaker 1: were invited on CNN? How many times and how many years?
Speaker 1: I was, Yeah, in seven years, almost seven years, I've
Speaker 1: been on CNN twice and I was shocked that I
Speaker 1: was invited to emiss NBC one time. Okay, how many
Speaker 1: times have you been on my program and other Fox programs? Oh?
Speaker 1: Numerous times, too many to even remember, because Fox is
Speaker 1: pretty much the only voice we have to share our
Speaker 1: stories of our kids in our permanent separation, and something
Speaker 1: we should have to talk about. We should enjoy life
Speaker 1: with our kids, our family members. Well, the one thing
Speaker 1: I've I've gotten to know from all of you is
Speaker 1: that you've taken I think the hardest hit that anyone
Speaker 1: can take in life, and that is the death of
Speaker 1: their precious child. Look. I've met people that have lost
Speaker 1: their kids and they never ever recover. They're never the
Speaker 1: same person. It's like the life was sucked out of
Speaker 1: the minute they heard the news. All of you have
Speaker 1: taken all of that pain and all of that suffering,
Speaker 1: and you have redirected your attention and focused to make
Speaker 1: sure that other people don't have to live through the
Speaker 1: same thing. Laura, you and I have talked about that
Speaker 1: many times together. Absolutely, thank you for having me back.
Speaker 1: You know that that's our only hope. We know our
Speaker 1: kids aren't coming back, but our only hope is to
Speaker 1: save another family from the absolute, you know, travesty of this,
Speaker 1: and it destroys life for you and family. There's so
Speaker 1: many ripples that go out. It's not just our met
Speaker 1: a family, but it actually destroys us. And I suddenly
Speaker 1: hope is that no other family will go through it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: your son Joshua only eighteen years old. His was particularly
Speaker 1: dark and evil. You know, he was beaten, he was kidnapped,
Speaker 1: he was strangled and tortured. Tell everybody what happened to
Speaker 1: your young son and who this person was that did this. Yes,
Speaker 1: the young man that killed Joshua was nineteen and he
Speaker 1: was here illegally. From believes his parents had brought him
Speaker 1: here I think when he was about ten, and he
Speaker 1: asked Josh for a ride home from school and Josh
Speaker 1: gave it to him, and for unbeknownst to us then
Speaker 1: we realized now that he wanted to kill Josh to
Speaker 1: scrap his money for scrap his truck for some money,
Speaker 1: and he did just that. He hit him in the
Speaker 1: face first so that he would couldn't fight back, and
Speaker 1: then he need him so hard in the stomach that
Speaker 1: it sliced. Josh was spling and Josh kept trying to
Speaker 1: get up off the ground, and he beat him in
Speaker 1: the head of the closet rod so hard it broke
Speaker 1: it four pieces. And then he proceeded to strangle him
Speaker 1: and let him go see if he was still alive,
Speaker 1: over and over until he finally died. And then he
Speaker 1: tied him up like an animal and put a couple
Speaker 1: dollars for the gasoline on Josh and set him on fire. Well,
Speaker 1: and what was the punishment in this case. The punishment
Speaker 1: in this case was life, which means in Texas, thirty
Speaker 1: years before parole. But right now in Texas there are
Speaker 1: trying to write past legislation that will allow these killers
Speaker 1: to accrue good time. And if that, if that were
Speaker 1: to pass, and if that's the case, then he will
Speaker 1: come up for prole much shorter than thirty years. And
Speaker 1: it's something we will have to deal with families or
Speaker 1: revictimize every time that someone comes up for parole, and
Speaker 1: you have to go on there and beg and plead,
Speaker 1: you know, to keep your killer in jail or your
Speaker 1: kids killer in jail. And so it's in the constant
Speaker 1: fight at either a state level or the federal level.
Speaker 1: It's constant battle for American citizens. And it just seems
Speaker 1: it's just unbelievable almost. And Marianne, you like Sabine, you
Speaker 1: know you are a son. I'm sure you are very
Speaker 1: proud of it. Was a Mason police officer. He was
Speaker 1: in this head on collision with collision with a guy
Speaker 1: that authority said was intoxicated illegally in the country. And
Speaker 1: didn't he have a track record of this as well? Yes,
Speaker 1: he had committed crimes up in Colorado years prior to
Speaker 1: that and never showed up for his court date and
Speaker 1: you know, was on the run back and forth over
Speaker 1: the border. When they apprehended him early two thousands. They
Speaker 1: took him back up to Colorado to face his charges
Speaker 1: and basically he got a slap on the wrist and
Speaker 1: he ultimately ended up in Arizona and uh, you know,
Speaker 1: killed my son. So you know, this is a problem
Speaker 1: we have within our court systems that our federal judges
Speaker 1: really take it upon themselves to figure out what kind
Speaker 1: of a punishment and show leniency so many times to
Speaker 1: these illegal alien criminals that are president in our country
Speaker 1: committing crimes and just release them back out onto the
Speaker 1: streets to continue committing crimes. And that's that's the case
Speaker 1: in almost all the Angel Families situations, the majority of
Speaker 1: them have been you know, have committed crimes prior to
Speaker 1: our loved ones. So you know, the federal judges and
Speaker 1: the things that people vote for, You guys need to
Speaker 1: pay attention of those types of things and don't just
Speaker 1: go down and ballot mark SCSS. Find out what these
Speaker 1: judges stand for and how they rule on certain things,
Speaker 1: because we have to start getting those people out of
Speaker 1: our court system and make sure they are intent on
Speaker 1: following our laws and protecting Americans and not deciding how
Speaker 1: they're going to interpret the laws and let these people
Speaker 1: go into our country. At some point, though, separation, the
Speaker 1: separation at the border, I want people to know the
Speaker 1: majority of the time, it's not separating families. It's separating
Speaker 1: human traffickers and their victims. Is what's going on at
Speaker 1: our border. People need to understand that well. At some time,
Speaker 1: when you have states with sanctuary policies or cities with
Speaker 1: sanctuary policies, or the utter refusal to recognize what's happening
Speaker 1: down at our southern border, they're aiding and embedding those
Speaker 1: people that end up committing more and more and more
Speaker 1: serious crimes. In your three cases, even the death of
Speaker 1: your loved one. You know, at some point they bear
Speaker 1: some of the blame here. I always tend to blame
Speaker 1: the person that's responsible. But when you're aiding them, and
Speaker 1: you're abetting them, and you're supporting them, and you're allowing
Speaker 1: them to continue to be here when they shouldn't be here,
Speaker 1: at some point, there's got to be some culpability. All right,
Speaker 1: quick break, we'll come back more at Sabine, Laura and
Speaker 1: Mary m Mendoza eight hundred and nine for one Sean,
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. A
Speaker 1: lot of breaking developments as it relates to the deep state.
Speaker 1: Sidney Powell, Greg Jarrett will join us grant as we
Speaker 1: can continue heading into our analysis. More deep state developments
Speaker 1: this week that are breaking we'll get to in the
Speaker 1: next hour. News round Up, Information over Load hour final
Speaker 1: thoughts from Sabine Durden and Laura Wilkerson and Mary m
Speaker 1: Mendoza all lost their kids permanently to illegal immigrants. And
Speaker 1: we're at the president vetoing of this bill that would
Speaker 1: prevent his emergency declaration that they can't override the veto.
Speaker 1: Obviously they don't of the votes Sabine fifteen seconds. The
Speaker 1: President's commitment to this, he seems to be winning. He
Speaker 1: uses whatever strategy is necessary to win, and he's getting
Speaker 1: the money. He's absolutely winning. And he's keeping his promise
Speaker 1: that he made to each one of us when he
Speaker 1: said our children didn't die in vain, and he will
Speaker 1: continue to fight for American life. So they won't know
Speaker 1: what this feels like when for me, I lost my
Speaker 1: only child, Dominick was thirty years old, love of my life.
Speaker 1: I will never be a grandmother, never have him walked
Speaker 1: me down the aisle, and no parents should have to
Speaker 1: deal with this because of an illegal that shouldn't have
Speaker 1: been here in the first place. Well, so sad, Laura,
Speaker 1: I think President turns doing a great job. I mean,
Speaker 1: he faces an obstacle every day, all day since he's
Speaker 1: been there. And I wanted to say one last thing
Speaker 1: for everyone that wants to say you aren't for border control,
Speaker 1: but they're learning they're not for border control. They'll say
Speaker 1: I'm for border patrol, but it's not a national emergency.
Speaker 1: They're learning, I'm for border patrol, but we don't need
Speaker 1: a wall. They're lying absolute national you know, it's absolutely
Speaker 1: it should be the top thing our basis, securing our
Speaker 1: border and making America great again just like it's you know,
Speaker 1: used to be. All right, Maryann, we give you the
Speaker 1: last word. I appreciate our president. He has followed through
Speaker 1: on his promises to angel parents and securing our country
Speaker 1: and you know, following through on us oth to this
Speaker 1: country to protect Americans, which a lot of our politicians
Speaker 1: fail to remember. And you know, I live in Phoenix, Arizona,
Speaker 1: and these illegals are being bust in by the thousands
Speaker 1: every week here into Arizona thanks to Judge Tiger in
Speaker 1: the Ninth Circuit Court who overruled our our president trying
Speaker 1: to keep these people out our borders and have their
Speaker 1: asylum hearings there. And we're being flooded in the interior
Speaker 1: of the United States. They're coming into Phoenix to the
Speaker 1: Greyhound bus station, being shipped everywhere in the United States.
Speaker 1: And this is thousands of them every week, and people
Speaker 1: need to wake up and realize this is a national emergency.
Speaker 1: Support our president because he is protecting us. So one shot,
Speaker 1: I think to get this right. You always get the amnesty,
Speaker 1: you never get the border wall, you always get the
Speaker 1: spending increase, you never get the tax cut. It seems
Speaker 1: like this is the president going all in. I wish
Speaker 1: some Republicans were as principled as he is. We love
Speaker 1: you all, Sabine, thank you, Laura, thank you Mary Anne.
Speaker 1: You're always in our prayers. We wish you and your
Speaker 1: family's the best, as you know, and we will be
Speaker 1: in touch and we'll never let up on this story
Speaker 1: until things get fixed. Eight hundred nine four one, Shawn
Speaker 1: toll free telephone number. Much Deep State News will hit
Speaker 1: that next and your calls. Final hour free for all
Speaker 1: and news round up coming up straight ahead, Stay right
Speaker 1: here for our final news round up and information overload.
Speaker 1: All right, News round Up, Information overload. Hannity Watch on
Speaker 1: the Deep State eight hundred nine four one, Sean if
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. So
Speaker 1: in the last week and a half, we have gotten
Speaker 1: a boatload of information, all further confirming and more everything
Speaker 1: we've been telling you about the abusive power corruption scandal,
Speaker 1: the biggest in American history. You know it began when
Speaker 1: Congressman Doug Collins first released the testimony behind closed doors
Speaker 1: of Bruce Or and how Bruce Or, fourth highest ranking
Speaker 1: member of the Justice Department at the time that Bruce
Speaker 1: Or warned everybody about Hillary Clinton's dirty dossier and how
Speaker 1: it was paid for by Clinton, and how it was
Speaker 1: unverified and not corroborated, and how Christopher Steele was a
Speaker 1: Trump pater, and then Lisa Page, and then after that
Speaker 1: we got testimony from Peter Struck, and then after that
Speaker 1: we got John McCain's eight that all happened in the
Speaker 1: last little over a week. Now, Now, in that testimony,
Speaker 1: what did we learn That the FBI was totally incompletely
Speaker 1: handing over the investigation right to the highest levels of
Speaker 1: the Obama administration, and Lisa Paige saying, no, the Justice
Speaker 1: Department was making all of the decisions that Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 1: for example, didn't have to be in viewed a loan,
Speaker 1: that was their decision. Peter Struck corroborating that point, making
Speaker 1: the point that it was Loretta Lynch, the same Loretta
Speaker 1: Lynch who when Comy mentioned the Clinton investigation, looked at
Speaker 1: him and said, it's a matter. And basically Lisa Page
Speaker 1: even going as far as to say, well, we knew
Speaker 1: there were all Democrats in the Department of Justice and
Speaker 1: that that investigation was going to be rigged. We also
Speaker 1: know that the number one lawyer at the FBI, the
Speaker 1: General Council under Comey James Baker had recommended that Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton by indicted for violating the Espionage Act. That was
Speaker 1: all stopped because of politics. In other words, the entire
Speaker 1: investigation was rigged by deep state operatives that had it
Speaker 1: out for Trump and then had it out and did
Speaker 1: everything they could do to ensure that Hillary Clinton would
Speaker 1: be elected president. Well, then we learned some other things
Speaker 1: about the dirty dossier, and we learned it was never verified.
Speaker 1: Andrew Weisman was told by the way he was in
Speaker 1: the August meeting with Bruce Orr was also at Hillary's
Speaker 1: victory party. And we learned that in fact, everybody knew
Speaker 1: about the dossier. Everybody knew it was bought and paid for,
Speaker 1: everybody knew it wasn't verified. Everybody knew Steele hated Trump.
Speaker 1: And further, we learned that in fact, Christopher Steele was
Speaker 1: in contact with the Special Counsel's Office visa vie, trying
Speaker 1: to even after he's fired for lying in leaking getting
Speaker 1: information through the Special Councils to the Special Council's Office
Speaker 1: through Bruce Or. And then we learned that you know,
Speaker 1: for anybody that says Lisa Page pointed out that there
Speaker 1: was some type of document that had quote vetted the dossier,
Speaker 1: which we now know would have been a task impossible
Speaker 1: because Christopher Steele himself, well, he couldn't corroborate the dossier
Speaker 1: when he was put under oath in that interrogatory down
Speaker 1: a Great Britain. Now we're getting more information as we
Speaker 1: speak that Christopher Steele, who created, supposedly, although Devin Nunez
Speaker 1: is now having doubts about that, the anti Donald Trump
Speaker 1: dirty Russian dossier, apparently used unverified information himself from the
Speaker 1: get go information that he found Get this on a
Speaker 1: fake news on fake news CNN's website where users generated
Speaker 1: their own content. He actually told that to a court
Speaker 1: last year that Steel, testifying in the defamation lawsuit filed
Speaker 1: by a Russian entrepreneur, said that he obtained the information
Speaker 1: about one of this guy's companies on something called CNN
Speaker 1: I Report. The lawsuit was dismissed in December. As Fox
Speaker 1: News is noted, CNN I Report, which is now apparently
Speaker 1: out of service, invited members of the public to submit
Speaker 1: their own content citizen journalism gee that there's a real
Speaker 1: source to put in a phony dossier, and the views
Speaker 1: and the content on the site are solely those of
Speaker 1: I Report contributors. CNN makes no guarantees about their content
Speaker 1: or coverage, or their veracity or truthfulness. I mean, that
Speaker 1: is a huge discovery that that's how not even coppy.
Speaker 1: This is just made out a whole cloth. What he's
Speaker 1: emitting here, you know, a user generated And it's like
Speaker 1: going online and looking at the comments people make about articles,
Speaker 1: and people are pretty outrageous and saying, uh, yeah, that's
Speaker 1: that's gotta be true. Let's put it in a dossier.
Speaker 1: We learned that not only was Christopher Steel paid by
Speaker 1: Hillary and the money that Hillary controlled of the DNC,
Speaker 1: but also a Russian oligarch and the FBI. Not a
Speaker 1: bad job if you can make up lives and get
Speaker 1: paid from four separate sources for the same lines. And
Speaker 1: we also know that the dossier, again never verified it
Speaker 1: would be impossible to verify, was used as the bulk
Speaker 1: of information to spy on the Trump campaign and a
Speaker 1: conspiracy that led to committing fraud on the fiser Chord
Speaker 1: on multiple levels, especially not telling the fiser Chord who
Speaker 1: paid for the dirty Russian dossier and then not telling
Speaker 1: the court that they never verified it. And then the
Speaker 1: dossiers used as a backdoor into the Trump campaign when
Speaker 1: they get the Fiser Warren against Carter Page, and then
Speaker 1: it goes from there and then Trump wins, and then
Speaker 1: the insurance policy kicks in, and that is what nine
Speaker 1: months of investigation, they had no evidence of Trump Prussia collusion,
Speaker 1: according to Page and Struck, But then the appointment of
Speaker 1: the Special Council anyway, because they were angry that Jim
Speaker 1: Comey was in fact, you know, fired, which Jim Comey
Speaker 1: admitted he had the right to do himself anyway. Joining
Speaker 1: us now is Greg Jarrett, author of the number one
Speaker 1: best seller of The Russian Holk. Sydney Powell, attorney, author
Speaker 1: of the best seller License to Lie, exposing corruption in
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice. Thank you both for being will
Speaker 1: us our pleasure. Sydney, you look at the release of
Speaker 1: these testimonies last week, and now you look at this
Speaker 1: interrogatory a little bit more closely, and you begin to see,
Speaker 1: you know, a guy like Comey signs off on the
Speaker 1: FISA warrant in October, but tells Trump in January before
Speaker 1: he's inaugurated that it's alacious and unverified, the opposite of
Speaker 1: what he said to the FISA court judges back in
Speaker 1: the day. Yes, Sean, it's just confirming what we've known
Speaker 1: all along. And I think we're going to have to
Speaker 1: go back to me giving illegal access to the raw
Speaker 1: NSA data collection system to three private contractors, one of
Speaker 1: whom I would bet money was Fusion GPS. That's one
Speaker 1: of the things we need unredacted from Rosemary Collier's decision
Speaker 1: of about a year ago where she scolds the FBI.
Speaker 1: It goes back at least to twenty fifteen, if not before,
Speaker 1: And I would just bet money that Fusion Gps was
Speaker 1: mining that database for whatever they wanted in terms of
Speaker 1: political opposition research. And that's part of where the information came.
Speaker 1: That Fusion Gps generated most of what is the Steel
Speaker 1: dossier and then simply laundered it through Christopher Steel and
Speaker 1: other people to get pieces of it coming from different places,
Speaker 1: to appear to come from different places to go to
Speaker 1: the FBI to make up that dossier. Well, it's Devin
Speaker 1: Dunas very interestingly suggested to me in an interview that
Speaker 1: Steele may have never even written the report. Greg Jared,
Speaker 1: I think he did. Why. I wrote that in a
Speaker 1: chapter in my book that experts on Russian affairs have
Speaker 1: looked at this and it said it has some of
Speaker 1: the language that Russians use in disinformation. So either they
Speaker 1: fed it or they helped to compose it. But one
Speaker 1: thing's for sure. If there are if I had to
Speaker 1: identify three villains in the Russia hooks, it would be
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton's campaign and you know they always try to
Speaker 1: keep her fingerprints off it, but she was behind it.
Speaker 1: And Glenn Simpson Affusion GPS and Christopher Steele, Steele and
Speaker 1: Simpson having been funded by Hillary. We're pedaling this fake
Speaker 1: dossier all over Washington, d C in New York, to ABC,
Speaker 1: New York Times, Washington Posts, Yahoo, CNN, Mother Jones, BuzzFeed
Speaker 1: New York or the list goes on and on. You
Speaker 1: got roughly, you know, more than a dozen journalists who
Speaker 1: are being fed a phony, false, fabricated document, and they're
Speaker 1: feeding it to the FBI and there and then you
Speaker 1: have Hillary Clinton, allays like Sidney Bloomethal and Cody Sheer
Speaker 1: getting into the act. They take the dossier, they write
Speaker 1: their own second dossier based on it, and they start
Speaker 1: peddling it to the FBI. And then you've got John
Speaker 1: McCain's top aide, David Kramer. He flies over to one
Speaker 1: and meets with Steele, gets his hands on the dossier.
Speaker 1: He's peddling this thing to journalists, he's peddling it to
Speaker 1: the FBI, and none of it was true. It was
Speaker 1: all made up. The thing is is, look at what
Speaker 1: how far this is made up? Dossier went? Now, Sydney,
Speaker 1: I know you've been critical of Andrew Weismann, and you
Speaker 1: know his work behind Enron and the Merrill executives he
Speaker 1: put away and losing nine oho in the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: and losing tens of thousands of jobs and losing an
Speaker 1: appeal in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. He was
Speaker 1: up to his eyeballs. How does a guy that said
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton's victory party get appointed by Mueller? How does
Speaker 1: another woman who represented Clinton on the Clinton Foundation, Jeanie Ring,
Speaker 1: how does she get appointed? And what would you expect
Speaker 1: we can anticipate with Mueller's whatever report he comes out with,
Speaker 1: whenever he's going to come out with it, well, his
Speaker 1: report's going to be totally tainted. Weissman can make giving
Speaker 1: your mother a Christmas present sound like a criminal offense,
Speaker 1: and that's what I'm going to expect the report to
Speaker 1: read like. He'll cherry pick pieces of information and put
Speaker 1: them where he wants in the chronology to make something
Speaker 1: sound bad that isn't. But I have a question. We
Speaker 1: do have Russian collusion, Why didn't Why didn't Mueller show
Speaker 1: any interest? And a phony bought and paid for Russian
Speaker 1: dossier of Hillary Clinton that was used to get inside
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign in an opposition party in an election
Speaker 1: year and by Democrats, and then further used to disseminate
Speaker 1: false and propaganda and information to the American people before
Speaker 1: the to similarly influence those votes. Because he's an important
Speaker 1: part of let him do it. Mueller is a very
Speaker 1: important part of the insurance policy. If they didn't have
Speaker 1: the Special Counsel investigation going, it would have been all
Speaker 1: over for them. This was crucial because it's been the
Speaker 1: tail wagging the dog of the Department of Justice. Mueller's
Speaker 1: been able to hold up any valid investigation of any
Speaker 1: of the wrongdoing. He's been able to cover up god
Speaker 1: only knows what, including deleting all the Peter Stroke text
Speaker 1: messages on strokes. Special Counsel cell phone and Lisa Page's
Speaker 1: special counsel cell phone. He's been able to stop Huber's investigation.
Speaker 1: He's been able to stop the ig investigation. Everything had
Speaker 1: to stop because of Muller and Andrew Weissman, undoubtedly along
Speaker 1: with Rosenstein, had a hand in picking Muller to be
Speaker 1: special counsel. All these people have known each other, and
Speaker 1: you know they've been flying in the same circles all
Speaker 1: these years. But what about all these people that tell me, Hannity,
Speaker 1: you're wrong about Muller. He's a man of integrity. He's
Speaker 1: used to be. Mueller's been protecting and promoting Weiseman for
Speaker 1: more than twenty years. And there's new evidence out just
Speaker 1: in the last week of Weiseman literally threatening to indict
Speaker 1: anyone that wanted to talk to any defendant in the
Speaker 1: Enron litigation, threatening to increase their sentences if they spoke
Speaker 1: to any defendant and the Enron litigation information that he
Speaker 1: managed to get sealed for the last twenty years, information
Speaker 1: of his other wrongdoing in those cases has gone mysteriously missing,
Speaker 1: thing after the other. Now you had found and you
Speaker 1: put in your book information that in fact, Andrew Weiseman
Speaker 1: withheld exculpatory evidence and was experientated by a judge. Which
Speaker 1: case was that? That was the Merrill Lynch Enron case,
Speaker 1: where the Fifth Circuit found that he and Katherine Rummler,
Speaker 1: who became Obama's White House counsel, and Matthew Friedrich, who
Speaker 1: became acting Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division, plainly
Speaker 1: suppressed evidence favorable to the defense in the Merrill Lynch
Speaker 1: Enron case while they for Merrill Lynch executives to prison
Speaker 1: for up to a year on an indictment that they
Speaker 1: had made up a crime in unbelievable. What do you think, Greg,
Speaker 1: I mean, we know there's no collusion, so they don't
Speaker 1: have anything. I mean, it seems like I have to
Speaker 1: guess based on the fact that you know they ignored
Speaker 1: all the real collusion in this story. I think now
Speaker 1: that is beginning to unfold. I think those people that
Speaker 1: use the phony dociera Clinton, those people that protected her
Speaker 1: from certain indictment. I think those people that tried to
Speaker 1: bludgeon Trump with lies and with this phony witch hunt,
Speaker 1: I think a lot of them are going to be
Speaker 1: held accountable before it all is said and done. Am
Speaker 1: I wrong? Well? I think you're right. And the question is,
Speaker 1: should there be, as Lindsay Graham argues, a special counsel
Speaker 1: to investigate the corruption at the FBI and the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice in both at Clinton case as well as
Speaker 1: the Trump investigation that was based on nothing but a hoax,
Speaker 1: or should it be handled by the new Attorney General
Speaker 1: William Barr a point a select group of top prosecutors
Speaker 1: to present evidence in front of a grand jury. But
Speaker 1: I am confident that if either one of those things happen,
Speaker 1: that people like Tomy and McCabe and Struck and Page
Speaker 1: and the list goes on and on will likely be
Speaker 1: prosecuted for a variety of selonies. Do you agree with that, Sydney, Yes?
Speaker 1: I do. The only way to restore the rule of
Speaker 1: law and any sense of integrity and fairness to the
Speaker 1: system is to hold everyone accountable for the cover up
Speaker 1: and the botched investigations and all the atrocities they've committed
Speaker 1: against the courts and the country writ large. Do you
Speaker 1: think we're going to hear from judges from the rule
Speaker 1: of law? Yes? I think we should. Yeah, how does
Speaker 1: it take two years to hear from them? All? Right,
Speaker 1: we'll watch, We'll wait, We'll see and is it going
Speaker 1: to be a duddle Muller report or is it going
Speaker 1: to be oh innuendo Muller report. I think it's going
Speaker 1: to be chocked full of innue window. But no, yeah,
Speaker 1: I agree they're there, but they'll engage in elaborate storytelling
Speaker 1: ad that will be nothing more than something that should
Speaker 1: rest on a fiction bookshelf. Well, exactly, all right, thank
Speaker 1: you both. Eight. Do you guys trust the new Attorney General?
Speaker 1: Real quick, Sydney. Do you think he'll do his job?
Speaker 1: I think so? What do you think? Greg? I'm willing
Speaker 1: to give him the chance to do his job. He
Speaker 1: has a record of doing it. Let's hope does it here?
Speaker 1: All right, quick break, when we come back, wide open
Speaker 1: telephones eight hundred nine four one sean. You want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. Right to the phones
Speaker 1: when we get back on this busy breaking news Monday,
Speaker 1: straight ahead, Hannity tonight at nine, all right, twenty five
Speaker 1: now until the top of the hour, eight hundred and
Speaker 1: ninety four one sean, you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program. All right, let's get some calls in.
Speaker 1: I got complaints last week. Take more calls. You're not
Speaker 1: takating enough calls and Linda talks too much. Why does
Speaker 1: Linda interrupt you all the time? Who said that? I'm
Speaker 1: just making it up. Yeah, I want that person to call.
Speaker 1: I want to talk to them personal. You want to
Speaker 1: talk to that person. You want that person to call
Speaker 1: cal In. This is a call looking forward to talking
Speaker 1: to that person. Chad is well, this is something I
Speaker 1: know we both agree on. We both love Rocky movies.
Speaker 1: Chad is in Midland, Florida, I believe, or no, Midland, Texas,
Speaker 1: of course. How are you, Chad? Glad you called? And
Speaker 1: in ten years I'm really sorry all the all the
Speaker 1: oil industry in Midland is going to be shut down,
Speaker 1: and I'm sorry that you. You don't have to worry though,
Speaker 1: because you'll have more time for art rather than working.
Speaker 1: That's funny, Sean, thank you for taking the call. It's
Speaker 1: always great to speak with you. But the good thing
Speaker 1: about here in Midland, Texas is we have one regulator
Speaker 1: main one, and that's Texas Railroad Commission, and they let
Speaker 1: it loose out here, um, but you keep up with
Speaker 1: the one and gas, so that's great to hear. I
Speaker 1: have one talking point and something fun good to say
Speaker 1: about New York City right right after the talking point.
Speaker 1: You would lend to play the cut from Rocky Balboa
Speaker 1: quite often, and um, there's one. You mean what you're
Speaker 1: talking about? You mean the speech between the father and
Speaker 1: the son. Yes, and that when you guys play it
Speaker 1: and it really hits home. I think for a lot
Speaker 1: of people. But the other night it's turn from me.
Speaker 1: Nothing hits his heart of life. Got to keep moving,
Speaker 1: keep moving, play that cuts everybody was talking about. Let's
Speaker 1: play yourself. You already know the world ain't all sunshining rainbows. Nope,
Speaker 1: it's a very mean and nasty place. And I don't
Speaker 1: care how tough you are. It will beat you to
Speaker 1: your knees and keep you there permanently if you let it. You,
Speaker 1: me or nobody. He's gonna hit as hard as life.
Speaker 1: But it ain't about how hard you hit. It's about
Speaker 1: how hard you can't get hit and keep moving forward,
Speaker 1: how much you can take and keep moving forward. That's
Speaker 1: how Witted has done. Now, if you know what you're worthy,
Speaker 1: go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta
Speaker 1: be willing to take the hits and not pointing fingers
Speaker 1: saying you ain't where you want to be because of
Speaker 1: him or her or anybody coward. You're better than that.
Speaker 1: That's a powerful scene, it really is. Last week, without
Speaker 1: even hearing that, it made me think about it and
Speaker 1: that one specifically, it doesn't matter how hard you hit,
Speaker 1: but how hard you get hit and keep me moving forward,
Speaker 1: how much you can take a moving forward. It hit
Speaker 1: me all of a sudden, that is our president, Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: As much as he gets hit every single day. I
Speaker 1: mean you talk about it every day. He gets hit
Speaker 1: every second, minute, hour, every day he gets hit. And
Speaker 1: we've heard it all, you know, seeing the movie, heard
Speaker 1: a quote all in all the time, and it just
Speaker 1: hit me that that that's Donald Trump in today's world. Uh,
Speaker 1: no one would ever think that the president at the
Speaker 1: United States, which is the leader of the free world,
Speaker 1: would get ridiculed and hit by his own I don't
Speaker 1: want to say country, but a certain group in this country,
Speaker 1: and it's really sad. Uh. That's my one main talking point.
Speaker 1: But last week by Sun and I were in New
Speaker 1: York City last week and we had we had an
Speaker 1: amazing time. We saw Fox News the building. Uh, it
Speaker 1: was really great. As bad as the tax issue is
Speaker 1: and the abortion as bad as it is it's pretty bad.
Speaker 1: It's pretty bad, but go ahead. I'm glad it's got
Speaker 1: to see Fox. I mean, people come all the time
Speaker 1: to see it. It was it was amazing. We had
Speaker 1: such an amazing time. You know. My son was like
Speaker 1: everybody hawks about here, like what you got to move
Speaker 1: and talk best. You can't hold nobody up or whatever.
Speaker 1: So it was it was really great. I didn't run
Speaker 1: into anybody, any Fox people inside the building, but it
Speaker 1: was really really really good. And uh but the main
Speaker 1: thing was the quote that you will lend to play.
Speaker 1: Y'all just played it. It. It just hit mean that
Speaker 1: that's our president, Donald Trump. And as much criticism as
Speaker 1: he has um, I think he has a lot more
Speaker 1: supporters than criticism. But people and life is not sunshine,
Speaker 1: rainbows and cotton candy. It's just not And I know
Speaker 1: it's not designed to be cotton candy and rainbows, you
Speaker 1: know everybody. Now you might look at it from a
Speaker 1: financial point of view. Rich people have it easy. They
Speaker 1: don't have any problems. It's a bunch of crap, just garbage.
Speaker 1: Everybody has issues and struggles and challenges and obstacles in life.
Speaker 1: And I think Sylvester salone just captures it, but saying,
Speaker 1: you know, it's not sunshine and rainbows. It's a matter
Speaker 1: about how hard you get hit, because nothing will hit
Speaker 1: harder than life itself. But it's about seeing how hard
Speaker 1: you get hit and keep on moving. You know, we
Speaker 1: just talked to Angel Moms in the last hour. You know,
Speaker 1: I can't think of a harder punch in life than
Speaker 1: to lose a child. I just can't. And I've watched
Speaker 1: people crumble and never recover, and I've watched like the
Speaker 1: people we had on they somehow find the inner fortitude
Speaker 1: and strength that I I don't even imagine I would have,
Speaker 1: and they they stand themselves up and they keep pushing forward.
Speaker 1: And they have you know, channeled that pain and that
Speaker 1: misery and on that that unhappiness into trying to prevent
Speaker 1: other people from ever experiencing that which nearly destroyed them.
Speaker 1: Same with you know, some drug addicts, I mean the
Speaker 1: ones that get through, so many of them want to
Speaker 1: spend the rest of their lives teaching those that haven't
Speaker 1: gotten through, haven't gotten off, how to save their lives
Speaker 1: before it's too late. Anyway, good call appreciated. Back to
Speaker 1: our busy phones. Larry is in Columbus, Larry, Hi, how
Speaker 1: are you glad you called yo Adrian? I mean did it? Yeah?
Speaker 1: How do you follow subvestrous to loan? Right? I mean
Speaker 1: a morning. I want to thank you for many things.
Speaker 1: I'm a Jewish American who want to thank you for
Speaker 1: your support of Israel. I want to tell you that
Speaker 1: many of us are I used to be a Democrat,
Speaker 1: We're not anymore. And you'll see a lot more of
Speaker 1: that happening. Let me say what about this, because I'm
Speaker 1: worried about Israel. They got to vote? How many weeks?
Speaker 1: Is the vote about a month away? April ninth election?
Speaker 1: April ninth is the vote in Israel. Prior to Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: for so many years, there's been one, one courageous Churchillian
Speaker 1: voice of moral clarity on the world stage that understood
Speaker 1: radical islamis understood, terrorism understood because they've lived under this.
Speaker 1: You know, when I go to Stout in Israel at
Speaker 1: the Gaza border, when I was there during the last war,
Speaker 1: what was that twenty fourteen? I think, and we go
Speaker 1: into the tunnels and we go to Starote and we're
Speaker 1: out with the IDF, and you know, I see a
Speaker 1: bomb blow up. You know, half a mile from where
Speaker 1: I am, and I watched the Iron Doome and you
Speaker 1: look at the history for forty eight, sixty seven, seventy three,
Speaker 1: and you see Israel surrounded this little tiny country the
Speaker 1: size of New Jersey, surrounded by enemies. And one of
Speaker 1: the good things that has emerged is that is that
Speaker 1: Bbe now has an ally who also understands radical islamis
Speaker 1: Amasa's charter calls for the destruction of Israel. Iran constantly
Speaker 1: saying they want to wipe Israel off the map. And
Speaker 1: that election, you know that the idea that Israel that
Speaker 1: they're making such a big deal about cigars. I've been
Speaker 1: to the Prime Minister's house. It is shockingly um. It
Speaker 1: is just it looked like a New York too better
Speaker 1: of an apartment to me. There is absolutely no pomp
Speaker 1: and circumstances. It's nothing like that, not ostentatious in any way.
Speaker 1: And you know, what are you supposed to do? Give
Speaker 1: back to cigars? All right, we'll give you back to cigars.
Speaker 1: And they've turned this into nothing. You know, it would
Speaker 1: be like getting rid of Churchill in our times. That's
Speaker 1: how bad it would be. Anyway, go ahead, and well,
Speaker 1: most Israelis are very supportive of Trump, and I think
Speaker 1: that you're worried about it. I think that they're going
Speaker 1: to make the right decision. They know what they what's
Speaker 1: at stake there. I mean, I have a personal friend
Speaker 1: in said wrote and he's had his house sleeping downstairs
Speaker 1: as upstairs with bomb. He had a fix his backyard
Speaker 1: a month ago because a missile hit it. So he's
Speaker 1: moving out of there. But I've called originally because I'm
Speaker 1: actually at a without mentioned names them, at a trade
Speaker 1: show in the T shirt industry, and I'm having customers
Speaker 1: tell us that they cannot even get anybody, for example,
Speaker 1: in California, will not even print Second Amendment shirts for them,
Speaker 1: Trump shirts or anything. They are so crazy and the
Speaker 1: censorship that is happening now is so crazy that thank
Speaker 1: god that you had a few other voices out there.
Speaker 1: Not enough are letting us know what's happening. I mean,
Speaker 1: the left in Israel is the same as the leftist here.
Speaker 1: They're all nuts. Well, I gotta tell you it's you know,
Speaker 1: the same arguments, the same battles, the same conflicts. Um,
Speaker 1: But this election is important. This election now, I mean,
Speaker 1: you saw the rockets fired last week. You saw Bibi's response,
Speaker 1: and you need a strong leader that understands the nature
Speaker 1: of this enemy. And one of those shocking things that
Speaker 1: when I went into those tunnels and I think it
Speaker 1: was twenty fourteen during the last conflict, and that's all
Speaker 1: is really cement and electricity that was supposed to be
Speaker 1: used for hospitals and schools and for people, and it's
Speaker 1: just wasted. And you know, we we've chronicled the the
Speaker 1: indoctrination even of children with cartoons to quote hate Israel,
Speaker 1: hate the Jews. You see this rise of anti Semitism
Speaker 1: around the world, Europe, the United States, these these radicals
Speaker 1: just it's scary. Anyway, I'll give you the last word,
Speaker 1: sure net Yah who was the right man at the
Speaker 1: right time, because you might view Amon as the biggest issue,
Speaker 1: which I do, but he was also eight years of
Speaker 1: a very hostile president and he stood his ground, he
Speaker 1: fought back. And now, really Trump is probably the best
Speaker 1: president ever. He can argue about his tweets and all
Speaker 1: that kind of stuff, that he's been awesome and he's reel,
Speaker 1: he's appreciated, and hopefully, I think the next big issue
Speaker 1: needs to be the Golon Heights for me and which
Speaker 1: is Israel's and I think an American president supporting that.
Speaker 1: The only two people that I think can get that
Speaker 1: done would be President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu. Because
Speaker 1: you need securable borders period, you can you can't be
Speaker 1: surrounded by enemies like this. I also think there is
Speaker 1: an emerging opportunity to thread a needle like we've never
Speaker 1: had before. And because everybody sees the real danger of
Speaker 1: the Iranian regime and understands that if they don't unite
Speaker 1: and share intelligence and have a joint defense, that it
Speaker 1: could all end up badly. And that would be the
Speaker 1: United States, Israel, the These, the Egyptians, Jordanians, the Emirates,
Speaker 1: If they align against Iranian hegemony, the region will be
Speaker 1: saved and not allowing Ran to ever have a nuclear weapon,
Speaker 1: the moles and Iran will use it. It is it's
Speaker 1: almost a guarantee. We cannot let that moment arise. And
Speaker 1: the people that would be strongest in that situation would
Speaker 1: be President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu. All right, thank you, sir,
Speaker 1: eight hundred nine for one Sean Tolfree telephone number, Joe
Speaker 1: and Ella j Joe, how are you Sean, great show, Sean,
Speaker 1: I think all those twelve people that voted against Trump
Speaker 1: need to be primaried along with any other people that
Speaker 1: do not support Trump, any other politician. We got to
Speaker 1: get the Republicans behind Donald John Trump. He's the best
Speaker 1: president history and I'm sinking tired of these Republicans like
Speaker 1: Marco Rubio not supporting President Trump. Well, I didn't like
Speaker 1: to vote either. The good news is they won't over
Speaker 1: ride the veto and the president wins. Winning is what matters.
Speaker 1: Let's say hi to Joseph in Biloxi, in Mississippi. What's up, Joseph?
Speaker 1: How are you, Sean? How are you doing good? Sir?
Speaker 1: How are you? I'm pretty good? You know. I was
Speaker 1: listening to the show the other day Friday. Thank you,
Speaker 1: and I love the show. I love you. You're fantastic.
Speaker 1: I love the job you're doing, doing a great job.
Speaker 1: But I've noticed now one person has hit on this point.
Speaker 1: You know, I'll a tent in all this coming across
Speaker 1: the border. What does it take to be considered a
Speaker 1: weapon of mass destruction? Yeah, fettl Listen, you take the
Speaker 1: equivalent of three grains of salt. How are your salt shaker?
Speaker 1: That's and you instead of sault, it's fenton al that's
Speaker 1: enough to kill a two hundred and fifty pound healthy guy.
Speaker 1: And they're lacing they're lacing these drugs to quote give
Speaker 1: the kids even a bigger high. Problem is you're basically
Speaker 1: playing Russian roulette and you're going to die if you
Speaker 1: use this garbage. That's how bad it is. Oh, we've
Speaker 1: got so much problem with the border. And all was pushback,
Speaker 1: why can't the why can't we use the Patriot Act
Speaker 1: and considered a weapon of mass destruction. Well, look, if
Speaker 1: you can't look at the fentanyl issue, the heroin issue,
Speaker 1: if you can't look at the human trafficking, even young
Speaker 1: girls into prostitution, and then you can't look at the homicide,
Speaker 1: sexual assaults and violent assaults and the cartels and gangs
Speaker 1: organized to do such. And if these drones are being
Speaker 1: flown over the United States to find the perfect way
Speaker 1: to sneak in drugs and do some human trafficking and
Speaker 1: we can't even take them out of the sky, then
Speaker 1: you know we're being not being smart. Building the wall
Speaker 1: will stop the vast majority of it. Similarly, and simultaneously,
Speaker 1: you've got to also have the other equipment that will
Speaker 1: identify drugs at the port of entries. I mean, because yeah,
Speaker 1: some of it's happening there, and you need the manpower,
Speaker 1: you need the latest equipment. You need to watch for
Speaker 1: underground tunnels, you need to know every bit of this
Speaker 1: needs to be secure. We have the ability to do it.
Speaker 1: We've proven, you know, Uma Arizona, for example, five point
Speaker 1: five miles of fencing, you turn it into you know,
Speaker 1: seventy miles of fencing and that entire area gets shut down. Done,
Speaker 1: and you know, we owe it to the country. How
Speaker 1: many kids have to die of a heroin overdose three
Speaker 1: hundred a week before we say it enough is enough? Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's a national emergency like that raps things up for today.
Speaker 1: Hannity Tonight, nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel. Huge
Speaker 1: more breaking news as now the onion is ready to
Speaker 1: be completely unraveled as it relates to the deep state.
Speaker 1: Hannity Watch on the Border, we investigate both global warming
Speaker 1: and crazy. Robert Francis, Beto Bozo, O'Rourke. All coming up tonight, Hannity, Glennbeck,
Speaker 1: Devin Newness, Mark Meadows, Pam Bandi, and Moore on the
Speaker 1: Fox News Channel