WEBVTT - Jonathan Miller on Urban Real Estate

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>M HM. This is Mesters in Business with Very Renaults

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:11.400
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. This week on the podcast, I have

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>an extra special guest, Jonathan Miller. I've been reading his

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>research and writing about real estate and appraisals and home

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.959
<v Speaker 1>price trends and anything related to residential real estate for

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's got to be close to twenty years.

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>He is the co founder of Miller Samuel. His data,

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>analytics and research powers the back end of some of

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the biggest real estate agencies in the country. He always

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>has a tremendous amount of insight as to the current

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>state of the market and the best way to contextualize

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in real estate. And we really talked

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 1>about everything from aspirational UH pricing to our markets at

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a peak, and how when markets do peak and roll over.

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>In real estate, why it takes so long for prices

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 1>to adjust UH newsflash, sellers are anchored via the endowment

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>effect to their own value of their home prices, which

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>lagged the actual market UH for a long time. We

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the death of cities being greatly overstated

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 1>and and why it's so challenging to convert all that

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>excess office space into residential properties. If you are at

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>all interested in real estate, buying a house, selling a house,

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>renting an apartment, owning a condo, or cooper just want

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to know what the heck is going on with real

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>estate today. Uh, you will find this conversation to be

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely fascinating. So, with no further ado, my conversation with

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Miller. You're listening to Masters in Business with Very

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>rid Holts on Bloomberg Radio. I'm Barry rid Holts. You're

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My extra

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>special guest this week is Jonathan Miller. He is the

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>CEO and co founder of Miller Samuel, a real estate

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>appraisal and consulting firm he first founded in six His

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>data and analytics powers many of the largest brokerage firms

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:24.959
<v Speaker 1>um reporting and information about the state of the housing market. Uh.

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>He is our returning champion. I think you and Scott

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Galloway are tied for the most Masters in Business appearances.

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Miller, Welcome back to Bloomberg. Great to be here, Barry. Thanks. So,

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>so let's just talk a little bit about your background.

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>You co found Miller Samuel in in six what what

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>led you to the appraisal, real estate and consulting business

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>way back then. Well, UH, initially I worked for a

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>management company that was bought by Marriott back in the

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>mid eighties, and I said, well, what am I gonna

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>do with myself? And I got my real estate license

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and I became a real estate agent in Chicago, and

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>UH was more on the analytics side, you know, sort

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of the bean counter type. And then I moved to

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>New York and UH was eventually became a sales director

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>on a new condominium building and saw these appraisers coming

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.239
<v Speaker 1>in without really data. There was no multiple listening system

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in Manhattan. And I eventually got together with my family

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 1>and we started our firm, Miller Samuel in the eighties

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>six and it covers the New York City metro area.

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And then UH, starting in n I started offering UM

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>market studies UH for the real estate company UH Douglas

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Solomon and basically follow their footprints. I'm covering about forty

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>different housing markets in the US right now, and that's

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>really fun. And then it sort of marked in. I

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>teach market analysis at Columbia for grad students UM, and

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>so you know, it's just been this sort of progression

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of but everything related to housing in real estate trends. Well,

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I love that you are are one of the number

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.359
<v Speaker 1>crunchers who dive into the data and come up with

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>analytics to really teach us about what's going on in

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace. And so I have to start with that question,

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>what are you seeing these days in the real estate

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>markets you cover? Are prices and volumes still going up?

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>As of this recording, mortgage rates have just about doubled

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to six from you know, the low threes or even

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>high twos um. What's going on in real estate? Well,

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>I think of it as you know, you know, with

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>affordability dropping literally by half since the end of December,

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the market is going through a pause where there is

0:04:55.160 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous pullback in demand and you know, this is

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a significant jump in rates. So you have this pullback,

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and what that's done initially is you know, new sign

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>contract volume is down across all the markets we cover. Uh,

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>And actually that's been occurring for the last couple of months.

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>This is you know, the slowdown now is has accelerated,

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>but really we started to see contract activity slowed down

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>at the end of March, beginning of April. Initially it

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>was because inventory had collapsed, uh and was keeping sales

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.559
<v Speaker 1>from occurring because there was no product. But it's really

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>completely morphed into an affordability issue because nationally, you know,

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>depending on the metrics you follow, we're looking at increase

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in housing prices plus rates doubling. What else could happen

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to slowdown? I think you told me this, or you

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>got this from the internet somewhere somewhere you said, one

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of the best things for high housing prices or high

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>housing prices. Well, that's that's the that's the old commodity

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>trader's joke. The cure for high poses are high prices.

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>At a certain point, either the demand cools or the

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 1>supply rushes to meet it. Yeah, And I think what

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>people generally have wrong with with the market cool down is,

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, initially, when you have an external event like

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>great Spiky, you have sales activities slow immediately, and you

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>have inventory rise immediately, albeit from an unusually low place.

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>And I'll expand on that. But but the part, the

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>third step that I think most people get wrong is

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>they expect crisis to immediately fall and there's really a

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>one or two year period that it takes sellers to

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>capitulate to market conditions, although I do think that they'll

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>capitulate faster in this condition, uh than in the past.

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But I you know, buyers are in already, you know,

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that's their hesitation. And then you throw in a war,

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, record or you know, high inflation. Um, you

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>have all these uncertainties, and everybody just I mean, it's

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest enemies of the housing market is uncertainty.

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>And we certainly have a basketfull of that right now.

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have a very vivid recollection at like

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>cocktail parties and barbecues in two thousand and nine, even

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>people saying, why can't I get X from my house?

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>The same house down the street sold for X and

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not as nice as mine, and that was sold

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand six. And my answer is always, well,

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you could get that money first. You need a time

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>machine go back to two thousand six and you could

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>get That's what the market was. And I watched what's amazing,

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>especially about all the online services today. I watched these

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>home sellers chase the price down. They were always lagging

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>behind the market. Is that really a two year process

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>for people? Before people you know, find religion and say

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>here's where the market is. If I want to sell this,

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I have to get that. So yeah, So in my

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>own you know, thirty eight years of experience, you know,

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a sort of anecdotal experience that has telling me

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that it takes an average nationally about fifteen sixteen months.

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>But call it you know, year, two year and a half,

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>two years, sort of, it's not a couple of months. Um.

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.959
<v Speaker 1>And to clarify, what I'm really saying is that it

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>takes a long time for the seller to capitulate to

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 1>the market so that they feel like closing, like they

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't leave money on the table, right, So so it's

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.079
<v Speaker 1>where they didn't like walk away from a sure thing,

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and that takes a lot of time. Um. I think

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>what's a little different in this cycle is there's been

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 1>so much equity build up because of the rapid run

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>up at prices that maybe it's less painful, uh, because

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it's money on paper too many um, you know in

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that in the sense of um, you know, people uh,

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, worried about walking away from something that they

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>had in their in their hands. So if you're a contrarian,

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you become a buyer in the summer of Yes, yeah,

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I think so, and and and what what I find,

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>uh interesting, is that, um, you know, when people look

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>at pivoting conditions, pivoting markets, you append the word forever,

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>like prices are falling forever, prices are rising forever. It's

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:49.079
<v Speaker 1>like this linear view. And if you look at some

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>serious downturn periods in the housing market, like the housing bubble, um,

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, fifteen or so years ago, thirteen fifteen years ago. Uh, really,

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>prices really didn't recover, took about six years, but activity

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>actually returned pretty quickly by two thousand, late two thousand nine,

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>early two thousand and ten. So this isn't like a

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>decade or a you know, a generational thing. Um, it's

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a shorter window than that. And um, honestly,

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I felt, you know, rap should have been raised specifically

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>through housing market optics about a year ago. Uh. It

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>feels like the fed plate to the party, because you

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>could just see the obliteration nationwide of inventory. Like one

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of the ways I think about housing supply, I think

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we have a tremendous amount of over reliance on when

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at the state of the housing market of

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>looking at new construction, new development, which in most local

0:10:55.840 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and national we're really talking you know, ten percent, and

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you know ebbs and flows of total inventory, Well what

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 1>about the other eighty five or of supply? Um? That

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>is the think of that supply as sort of the

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>life cycle of occupants of the real estate. You know,

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>they're they're you know, they're they're trading up to a

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>larger home because they have an expanding family. They're trading down,

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>they're downsizing. Um. You know, there's all these sort of

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>life changes. And when you come at them with a

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>two point six you know that market with a two

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:38.839
<v Speaker 1>point six thirty year fixed uh, you create this sensatiable

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>demand this and you obliterate supply. And so this became

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a housing market of bidding wars. Most of the forty

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>plus markets I covered for Douglas Sellman are seeing bidding

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>like in southern California two thirds to three quarters depending

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>on the segment of closings. In the early part of

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>this year, we're above the asking price. You know, Uh,

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that would be our proxy forbidding wars. In Fairfield County, Westchester,

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Long Island, you know that ring New York City, we

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>were looking at forty five. How is that sustainable? How

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is that a good thing? So I'm quite relieved at

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>least thinking long term that we're moving out of this

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>untenable frenzy. And you know, you and I have spoken

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>about another aspect of UM, not the demand side, but

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the supply side. You know, there's normally that chain of

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>purchases that takes place. Someone moves into a starter home,

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a move up, there's a move to a larger home,

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to a nicer neighborhood, eventually to waterfront, and that last

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>person is downsizing. During the pandemic, especially when people were

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>locked down in apartments, there were a lot of purchases

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>with no correlating out. People just went out and bought

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a second or third house. That had to have a

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>massive impact on the supply out there. Yeah, there's two

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>things that happened. One was, uh so specifically with a

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan example, after the lockdown, the pandemic lockdown, rental prices

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>fell a lot. They fell, um, you know, but there

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:31.439
<v Speaker 1>was no vaccine, there was you know that the city

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>was the global hotspot, and so the rental demand weakened

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>because would be tenants with the collapse and mortgage rates

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>fled to the you know that sort of in air quotes,

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the narrative was fleeing the city or another air quote

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of a headline was exodus. UM. And so it

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>was all outbound migration and no inbound And you had

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>these these renters buying, and then you had people weren't

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>selling during the pandemic. They in the city, they were

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 1>buying a second home, something that I dubbed co primary,

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>which should be you know, they're looking at a second

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>primary residence that they can sort of toggle back and

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>forth between the city and the suburbs and um. And

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it there was no seasonality you had. You had maybe

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>five years of you know, the typical you know, young

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>couple moves to the suburbs to have kids. You know

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that compressed into like three months, UM. And they had

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>this whole distortion of sort of migration patterns UM. And

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>then on top of it all you have remote, which

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>became you know, zoom became ubiquitous in twenty four hours,

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden, you have a rethinking of

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>what remote meant, and it became a powerful force. What

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I was saying during the lockdown was the tether between

0:14:56.080 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>work and home became infinitely longer because you have a

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>lot more flexibility. And on top of it, you have

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>this skewed towards higher end meeting that you know, because

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of the economic damage from the lockdown was heavily weighted

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>towards lower wage earners. The upper half of the market

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>was where what woke up or saw this boom first.

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>And part of it is because you know, just as

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of a generalized statement is that the higher the wage,

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the higher the mobility or you know, the ability to

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>work remote and it just dovetailed together really well, quite

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>quite interesting. So a couple of we're recording this UM

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of this week on the June one UM,

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>some really interesting data points came out this week. Existing

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>home sale prices hit a record of four hundred and

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>seven thousand, six hundred dollars in May, and at the

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>same time, home sales decline three point four in the

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>face of rising interest rates. Is it sort of contradictory

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that prices are going up even as sales decline or

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is that more about the mix of of hiring homes

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and lauren homes. So I think it's more about the

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>lag in UH closing information versus actual onmographic contract activity. Uh,

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it is UM. You know, if you can think of

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>home price trends at the caboose on the end of

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the train. I always use this analogy, even though there's

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>no cabooses on ends of trains anymore. UM. But really

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the initial impact you should really for trends, you should

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>be looking at sales like petting, home sales, contract activity

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in general, and then new inventory entering the market that's

0:16:55.760 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>much more fluid and in front of the prices occur

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>after the dust settles. So, for example, UM we published

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>monthly research in four different regions of the country, and

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>new stign contracts were already beginning to cool back in March,

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, eventually that leads to an uptick

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 1>in UM listing activity, which then eventually, uh you know,

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, levels off are cool sales. So I don't

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>think the pricing, the prices rising is a result of

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a shift in the mix towards higher property. I think

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>it's really just a lag in the actual data itself.

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 1>So so where are we in this housing cycle? I

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>noticed that more supply is coming online. There was a

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>great chart the other day at at Calculated Risk showing

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>the most single family home completion. Since I think, oh, seven,

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it is like a well over dead kid. Are we

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing that many more um new homes and existing homes

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>come on the market as supply or is it really

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>just been down so long it looks like up To me,

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the latter. So the way to think of it. Uh.

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And this is my analogy just using my my hometown

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>in Connecticut. Uh, my town saw two hundred listings pre

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>pandemic for the prior four or five years plus or

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>minus twenty listings, but it was, you know, straddling the

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>two D threshold. A year after the pandemic there were

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty and so you look at and go, wow, that's

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>a real drop. Uh. And then the beginning of the

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>year before the rate increases, there were twelve. Wow. And

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>so that's where I would call it a clap. So

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>now inventory has quadrupled, there's fifty. It's still s below

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemical bubbles. So when I look at I look

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>at that and say, yeah, inventories rising, and that's a

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>good thing. Um. But I don't know if people realize

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>how insanely low inventory became began. Um. And and you know,

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>one of the things, um, you know that I think

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to be apparent in the coming year or

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>two is that we have probably built too much multi

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>family rental product um right now. You know that it's

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>all sort of responding to this surge in you know,

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the in rental prices. But part of that search in

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:48.479
<v Speaker 1>rental prices is because, uh, the surge or the rising

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>rates are just the fact that lenders are not fast

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and loose that they are. You know, we're not going

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to have a banking crisis on the other side of this,

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>because lenders are ti or than they were in the

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>decades prior to the housing bubble um, and so people

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that don't qualify they tipped into the rental market, right,

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're not. Um, you know, we don't have

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't have financial engineering like we did. You know

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>in the mortgage world circa two thousand and five. Six,

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>What a what a funny coincidence that mortgage lenders were

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:28.919
<v Speaker 1>much looser before the housing crisis. I mean, you know,

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>sometimes these coincidences are just just amazing and sing And

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>since the financial crisis, it's become much harder to get

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>a mortgage. Um. And I'm not talking about you know,

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>all day or sub prime I mean prime borrowers really

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 1>had to jump through some hoops in the years after

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>o ee oh nine. Is it's still that tight or

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>has things you know normalized a little bit. So the

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>way to look at it is uh uh underwriting standards,

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>mortgage underwriting standards. You know, during the the housing bubble,

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 1>you just had to have a pulse or bogramere. In

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the years subsequent it has the restrictions have deteriorated, but

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>we're still not on par with sort of pre housing

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>bubble era lending standards. That that lending is generally more

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>conservative and there's less sort of maybe on the margin,

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:34.360
<v Speaker 1>but there's really less sort of alternative workarounds for financing.

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's much more sophisticated. I think some of

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>the restraints with Dodd Frank uh you know, have have

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 1>helped to a certain degree which makes us in a

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>much less vulnerable, vulnerable position. But that has helped create

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>much more tightness in the rental market in general. And

0:21:56.640 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we have this, you know, law large response

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>in multi family rental development being created, and I suspect

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in over the next year or two that that's going

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a um where it's gonna be apparent because

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>people when they look at the rental development being created,

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>there's assumption of well more units lower rent. But just

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>like new home construction, new rental constructions used to the

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 1>upper half of the market. It doesn't address the entire market.

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>So you're creating a lot more rental units, but you're

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 1>creating not necessarily the right distribution of rental units. And

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the challenge for the rental market going forward.

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Just for I was just gonna say, just in New York, um,

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we report every month the rental um

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the rental market, and in Manhattan, the median

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>rent was four thousand dollars, cracking the four thousand threshold

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in history. Average rents are just

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 1>shy of five thousand a month. It's still an all

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>time record. And we're not even to peek leasing season,

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>which is in August. The rental market sort of peaks

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the summer, and so there's still

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pressure in the rental market going forward

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>over the you know, whether or not we um you know,

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 1>we have rising inflation. It's it's very tenuous and this

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is not unique to much of the US so so

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 1>let's let's address that because during the pandemic, I read

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>at least in the New York Post, new York City

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>is dead. It's never coming back, No one's ever going

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to move here. It's all over for cities, and not

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>just New York, but San Francisco and Chicago and Austin

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>and Philadelphia and Boston. And go down the list. What

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is the state of real estate in in the big

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:59.360
<v Speaker 1>cities and and where are you seeing more of the

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>explosive of growth. Is that more the sun belt or

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>is that the coast? What's the state of well well, well,

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>so in terms of um urban markets, just starting with

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 1>New York first, since some base there, uh here we

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>have and this sort of speaks for what we're seeing

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:20.239
<v Speaker 1>across the US. You're looking at a city like New

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>York and the office towers are two thirds empty right now.

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Yet Ino we've had some of the highest sales volumes

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in history. We've had record pricing in the rental market.

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>We've had some of the highest new leasing activity in history,

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and we're having record rents. So people being in the

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>city again to this sort of tether between work at home,

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, you have empty office because of remote

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>but people are in the still in the city or

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>want to be in the city, So it is um.

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>This is uh. There is a white paper in the

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>source escapes me from NBR talking about price growth is

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>related during the pandemic era, is related to remote work

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>in the churn that it has created. UM. And there's

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a bigness nomer. You know, there has to be another

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 1>reason why people are in these urban coming back to

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>these urban markets. And I think part of it is

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.880
<v Speaker 1>just what the cities have to offer and what um,

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, the cultural activity. I'm not working for the

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>trade that the tourism bureau, but you know, there's other

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>reasons people are in the city, you know, lifestyle or

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever broker term you want to call it. UM. And

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>this is being borne out in the fact that office

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:50.719
<v Speaker 1>towers and two thirds empty still That almost sounds like

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 1>a problem that solves itself. And my frame of reference

0:25:56.640 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>was after September eleven, two and one, many of the

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>office towers in Lower Manhattan either were converted to residential

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>or partially converted to hotels and residential. How realistic is it?

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>And and you know, I'm glad I wasn't an investor

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in Hudson Yards that came online just as demand for

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>office space went through the floor. But how realistic is

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it to convert offices to to residential real estate? And

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and let me point out when I was in grad

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>school and for about a decade afterwards, I lived at

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>ninety Lexington Avenue that originally was a Blue Cross Blue

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Shield building that was converted to residential like a few

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>decades before I got there, and a decade after I

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>left it it went condo. So I know it's doable.

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>How realistic is it? Uh, It's not very realistic at

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>all in terms of scale. Uh. And the reason there's

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple of reasons for it. One the financial districts

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh conversion frenzy that was mostly Class B office older

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>almost laugh like a lot of the development that I'm

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>familiar with Class A. Yeah. So the way I look

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>at it is um when you So there's a couple

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 1>of things. One is time, so a lot of the conversion. Listen,

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>there there will be some conversion. I'm saying there won't,

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 1>but I think nowhere near on the scale of what

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>could be. Uh, you know, the sort of the the

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>opening question in this discussion is what are we gonna

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>do with all these you know, empty offices. Well, part

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of what you're gonna do is you're going to drop

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 1>the rents um but somewhat you know, in theory, except

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>for that you've got them financed and this is a

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 1>collateral right and all of a sudden, you know, the

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>cash flow as much as half or you know, a

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>third of what it was precandemic. UM. You also have uh,

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, converting these buildings to red to have residential

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:16.919
<v Speaker 1>certificate of occupancies is tremendously expensive. And the third is

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>community approvals zoning approvals UM, which is a long process.

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it can't be done, but who knows

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>what the conditions are going to be like five years

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>from now. Um. One of the things we're seeing is, uh,

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a tremendous amount of uh, you know, well

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously vacancy, but also concessions because landlords some aren't feeling

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the pain because you know, say eight of the leases

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in the building have you know, five or more years

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>remaining on them. So uh, you know, if if if

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>there's if there's still an occupancy, the business hasn't gone under.

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>They're still paying their rent and they're paying sort of

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic levels. Um. What we're seeing a tremendous amount

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of in the commercial world is that leasing on a

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>per square foot basis. Everybody talks about sort of the

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>asking rent, and when you look at all the reports

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>on the state of the office market in cities, uh,

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>they never talked about like the net effective you know,

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>less the free rent and the build build outs and

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>all those expenses you know, which you know in reality

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>many land larger seeing thirty to fift hits at least

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in my you know, in my through my optics, um,

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>which is not an inconsequential amount. Um. And so I

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>think the asset that gets holding the bag on the

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>post pandemic world is really, um, you know, the commercial sector.

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>To a lesser degree, the retail sector, uh, which is

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, gets its oxygen, especially in central business districts

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>from commercial office buildings. So you know, we're in, we

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>still are in you know, three to five years of

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of figuring this out. This is this is a

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>slow motion train wreck. Um. You know I mentioned the

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>sun Belt earlier, where wherever I look, um, where the

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>weather is warmer and the taxes are lower, and that

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>could be places like Austin or Nashville or southern Florida.

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>It seems they've been a magnet for people leaving either

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>cold weather or higher tax state or or just sort

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of you know, retiring what's going on in the sun

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Belt and and and what does that look like going forward? Well,

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I cover almost two dozen housing markets in Florida, for example,

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>And uh, what's interesting about a lot of these markets

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>is just like you say, they're coming there for lower

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>taxics bosure, but also these areas are aggressively going after

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the c suite of companies to relocate in these places

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>for the tax credits UM and the weather and all

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing, and have been relatively successful. I

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>think initially after the the lockdown, you know where when

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you lines screamed in like to your earlier point about

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>New York City is dead forever, you felt like by

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of that there's going to be eleven people

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>left in New York City. You know that everybody was leaving. Um.

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>But what we're finding is that the people that have

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>left have been fairly quickly replaced. But we're still you know,

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>net net losing population markets like Florida or Texas. Those

0:31:54.680 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 1>housing markets are being restructured essentially because of remote and

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing for the first time really is we're

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing um uh you know. The sort of the story

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>was that the affluent you know, the wall streets that

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>would um, you know, buy a second home somewhere, they

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 1>would buy in Florida, they buy Palm Beach and Miami.

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>And now we're seeing luxury or high end real estate

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>statewide all over the place, like you know, and that's

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a sign of sort of structural I don't know if

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the word is dispersion, but it's just spreading out because

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the because the regional economy you know, has quickly adapted

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to um, you know, to this inbound cohort of the population.

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 1>That this isn't a boom and bus cycle for Florida. UM. Sure,

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 1>their market will slow down because of the spike and

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>reals in interest rates. UM, but this is I don't

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>think this is a flash in the pan. I think

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>this is real because of every seemingly every part of

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Florida is expanding. So it's a secular trend, not a

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>temporary issue. Let me let me ask you about California.

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I always thought California was a wonderland. The last few

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>times I've been there. I've been kind of surprised at

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, you drive to Lahoya from San Diego. There

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 1>used to be a lot of open space between the

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>two and and now it seems like every ridge has

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a house on it, every every hill, every mountain. You know,

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it really seems like it really seems like they've wildly built,

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe even overbuilt parts of Southern California. What are you

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing in that that region, well, well southern California of

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>all the regions that I cover. Uh, you know, the

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>average market and this is a little dated now where

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>it will be coming out with a second quarter in

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks, but the first quarter data was

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 1>showing that on average, UM, about six of the transactions

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>from Los Angeles down to San Diego. Uh, we're selling

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>above the last asking price, like a tremendous demand above

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>asked So our proxy forbidding wars is a purchase price

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 1>that closed higher than the last asking price. UM, it's

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>about two thirds of the transactions and in some sub

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>markets that's UM we're not seeing that intensity now, but

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 1>but still there's a significant in balance between supply and demand.

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Work demand is still overpowering UM. There has been a

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 1>tremendous outbound uh migration into low tax states like Texas.

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>But you know, at least in the housing market there's

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>still it's still extremely tight. UM. The thing about California,

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>they're going through a lot of problems draft and wildfires,

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, partly from overbuilding and are encroaching on woodlands,

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:13.360
<v Speaker 1>so it seems more tenuous, but it is still highly popular.

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Tremendous amount of demand at least in southern California that

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:22.240
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing. Um. But even in southern California, just like Florida, Uh,

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:24.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're seeing with the rise and raids, you're

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:29.839
<v Speaker 1>seeing a pullback in the intensity of contract volume. Really

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:33.840
<v Speaker 1>quite interesting. You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>My extra special guest today is Jonathan Miller. He is

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the CEO and co founder of Miller Samuel, a real

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>estate appraisal and consulting firm. His analytics power UH some

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 1>of the most influential real estate agencies, back offices and

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>back ends. He is also a professor at the Graduate

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:59.800
<v Speaker 1>School at Columbia University and additionally sits on the Mayor's

0:35:59.840 --> 0:36:03.240
<v Speaker 1>at Economic Advisory Panel and the New York State Budget

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Division Economic Advisory Board. So let's talk a little bit

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>about the the appraisal business. It has dramatically changed since

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the Great Financial Crisis and the mortgage boom and bust

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of the two thousands. Tell us what's going on in

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:24.839
<v Speaker 1>the world of real estate appraisals. Sure, so you have

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>this uh sort of butting heads between human beings and uh,

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh we call them a v MS automatee

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 1>evaluation models or press a button and you get a

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:46.319
<v Speaker 1>a number of value for the house. UM sort of

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the poster child for this. And if you don't mind

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>me talking about this estamate real quick, sure, just to

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 1>understand sort of the disparity between automation automating numbers and

0:36:56.520 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>housing and how dirty the data is UM and human beings. So,

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the zestimate nationwide, the nationwide accuracy

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 1>rate that let me clarify, the median accuracy rate of

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>as estimate is two. So that means that fifty of

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the time the z estimate is within two percent of

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>the actual value, and fifty at the time it's not.

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Now the consumer just sees, hey, two percent, it's within

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>two percent. That's pretty accurate, But it's only fifty percent

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of the time it's within two UM. But it gets

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.919
<v Speaker 1>if you dig a little bit deeper. UM, it's only

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>within two percent of the property is currently listed for sale.

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:47.840
<v Speaker 1>If it's not listed for sale as estimate, median accuracy

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>rate is seven percent in the US, so that means

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that's seven percent at the time it's within seven If

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not listed, it's within what it will sell for

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:00.879
<v Speaker 1>within seven percent and five two percent of the time

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:05.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not. So In other words, this estimate needs human

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 1>beings to price the listing to shave off five and accuracy. Listen,

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying as human beings like appraisers or brokers

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:20.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have our flaws. But it is kind of interesting

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 1>that it's been brilliantly marketed, yet it's wildly unreliable and

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>half the time it works every time, exactly, I think,

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:32.959
<v Speaker 1>well percent of the time half the time that works

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 1>every time. But but I but I look at that

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, it's sort of overpromising and under delivering.

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Because public record, the quality of public record across the

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the US is incredibly varied by municipality, by county. You know,

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>however you want to break it out, UM, and they're

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 1>they're they're largely reliant on that, and just a few

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:07.320
<v Speaker 1>years ago they started ah significantly waiting um the list price.

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you you know, house is worth a million

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 1>five according to this estimate, you put it on for

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:17.839
<v Speaker 1>two The next day the estimate is too and then

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't sell and you take it off. This estimate

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 1>goes down to a million and a half the next day.

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 1>What is that like? That is? I don't And so

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:30.239
<v Speaker 1>any time I see a news story that relies on

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>zestimate related information, to me, it's problematic because it's not

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:40.319
<v Speaker 1>what it is. It's certainly fun to poke around and

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:44.319
<v Speaker 1>look at stuff, but it's not necessarily it doesn't have

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the precision that has been brilliantly conveyed in their marketing. Well,

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:54.359
<v Speaker 1>obviously Zillo didn't do well trying to build a home

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>flipping business relying on their own home. Yeah, they took

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a giant right on that. Yeah, the Zelo offers uh uh,

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you know that broke And I think the same goes

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 1>for um, you know, the ie buyer, the Internet buyer

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>subset um, where you know, there's this automation promise UM,

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and there's some validity to it I'm not saying that,

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>but you've got the impression initially that that was going

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to just take over the entire market, and now it's

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:34.280
<v Speaker 1>something like one of transactions. It's a very small number.

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh and in a declining market. They haven't really been tested. Um,

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:44.759
<v Speaker 1>they've only existed in rising housing markets, flats arising. So

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be an interesting few years to see

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 1>how they do huh, really really intriguing. I'm kind of surprised,

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 1>um that they didn't do better, because you would have thought, hey,

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:59.359
<v Speaker 1>forget the what we're sharing publicly, we have our own

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>internal net tricks. Let's let's see how we can use that.

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out they were just relying on everybody else. Uh,

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:09.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, everybody the same date to everybody else saw

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't really work out. No, no, it didn't.

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 1>And I think it also says something about there's just

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 1>too many people in the space. Uh. And so I

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 1>think there's gonna be some compression in participation just because

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:28.759
<v Speaker 1>the scale of investment is so enormous, the stakes are

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 1>so high. Um. Yeah, I wish so well. I just

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's been a little bit over over hyped. Um.

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 1>But back to your question, sort of the state of

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the of the appraiser, sort of the appraisal world. Um,

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the you know, we're going through a period. It's it's fascinating. Um.

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>You know the appraiser I was told by someone senior

0:41:56.239 --> 0:42:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to me a long time ago. You know, UM doesn't

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 1>have the answer in the transaction has the answer, the

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:09.400
<v Speaker 1>answer being the price. The brokers have the answer, the

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 1>mortgage company has the answer. The buyer and the seller

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 1>all have the answer because they all have skin in

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the game, right, they're all sort of part Right, everybody's smart.

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 1>They all know what the value is, what the number is.

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And the external third party that doesn't have they get

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 1>paid whether it's high or you know, they're above or

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 1>below or at the the purchase price. UM. Uh, you

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:37.320
<v Speaker 1>know they and they don't. We don't have as an industry,

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't have much representation. Um. In Washington, we're just

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a fraction. There's only about you know, optimistically, there's seventy

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:49.040
<v Speaker 1>five thousand appraisers in the US versus a million and

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a half real estate agents. So you know, we're vastly outnumbered.

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:58.440
<v Speaker 1>In lobbying, you might have two lobbyists really of any um,

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:03.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, UM gravitas in Washington compared to a much

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>different world, so we tend to be sort of run over. However,

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 1>our industry also has some real problems where we have

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 1>no diversity UM as an industry. UM the beer of

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Labor Statistics ranks four occupations by diversity, you know, inclusion

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of women and yes, who's dead last in the BLS

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:38.280
<v Speaker 1>ratings the eppraisal industry, it's it's night white and so

0:43:38.400 --> 0:43:43.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm a middle aged white guy and I'm I'm I'm

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the profile of of the industry. And yet we go

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 1>through periods like re five booms where those of chronic

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 1>shortage and a lot of the problems UH stem from

0:43:56.520 --> 0:44:01.400
<v Speaker 1>primarily UH an organization called the Appraisal Foundation, which I

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 1>have been a pain in the neck for them for

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a few years. You are anticipating a question of mine

0:44:08.200 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and let me frame this for listeners. So so you

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 1>put out a weekly email that I've been getting for

0:44:15.280 --> 0:44:18.799
<v Speaker 1>a hundred years. It comes out Friday afternoon, and it's

0:44:18.880 --> 0:44:21.240
<v Speaker 1>just a broad overview of the state of the market

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 1>with lots of charts and data, and at the end

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>there are a whole bunch of lengths including a bunch

0:44:26.760 --> 0:44:29.399
<v Speaker 1>of real estate links and your links and some more

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:33.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting odd bowl lengths. But every now and then, it

0:44:33.480 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 1>seems that you and the UM I keep calling them

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the Appraisal Institute, the Appraisal Foundation. You seem to have

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a beef with the organization that supposedly represents your field.

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Is this the underlying basis of your ongoing UM harassment

0:44:56.040 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of them for everything from incompetency to I don't know

0:45:00.640 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 1>if I could say criminality, but you've certainly come pretty

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 1>close to accusing them of that. Yeah, I just think

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 1>it's um. So what the Appression Foundation does is they

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:17.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially maintain, uh, for lack of about a word, sort

0:45:17.000 --> 0:45:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of the standards that I, as an appraiser to be certified,

0:45:22.800 --> 0:45:27.759
<v Speaker 1>have to adhere to, and that's embedded in states and

0:45:27.920 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 1>means un territories, fifty five states and territories. And every

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 1>time there's an update, you know that all the fifty

0:45:36.480 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 1>five states and territories have to update. And they've wildly

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 1>overstepped what I think their charter is. Like, they they

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the diversity thing, I told you, uh, you know they're

0:45:50.320 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 1>so they hired the head of their new diversity effort

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:58.279
<v Speaker 1>is a middle aged white guy seems that I have

0:45:58.360 --> 0:46:03.719
<v Speaker 1>a problem with it. And and also, um, they have

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 1>created a essentially UM it's called us PATH. That's our license.

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Are the standards uniform standards of professional appraisal practice that

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:18.279
<v Speaker 1>we have to follow and sign certifications and our reports

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 1>um to you know, it's a whole idea is to

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:24.840
<v Speaker 1>protect the public trust. The problem is that it's really

0:46:24.880 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 1>a sort of an effort. The rules that are are

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:35.839
<v Speaker 1>our world doesn't change very much, um, and yet this

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is updated every two years and UM. And they what

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:44.400
<v Speaker 1>they do is they make changes and then they and

0:46:44.400 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 1>then they embed that into state law and two years

0:46:47.880 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 1>later they remove those same changes or four years later,

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and and it just kind of goes back and forth.

0:46:54.719 --> 0:46:57.080
<v Speaker 1>And the reason for that is that they can sell

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and charge for classes to maintain your license by providing

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 1>new materials every two years that the praisers have to buy.

0:47:06.320 --> 0:47:09.560
<v Speaker 1>So you can show me that this, you know, year

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:13.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, two thousand to two thousand four, two thousand six,

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and oh four were the same O two

0:47:17.160 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and oh six. I mean, is it that metronomic? Are

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 1>they that blatant? Uh? It's it's more through incompetence. So

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you, I'll give you an idea. So uh,

0:47:29.960 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they they changed a rule that said if you're intentionally

0:47:38.560 --> 0:47:44.879
<v Speaker 1>or unintentionally misleading, then you violated your license. So in

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>other words, if you made a typo, you've basically uh,

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, can lose your license. And and uh, they

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 1>don't have counts up until at least you know, lately,

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:01.280
<v Speaker 1>they don't have lawyers to review this. This is getting

0:48:01.320 --> 0:48:05.879
<v Speaker 1>embedded into fifty states and municiparia that keep saying MUNI

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:11.600
<v Speaker 1>about territories uh, across the US. And yet uh, there's

0:48:11.640 --> 0:48:13.920
<v Speaker 1>no review of this. It's just a bunch of appraisers

0:48:13.920 --> 0:48:16.239
<v Speaker 1>on a board that sort of say, Hey, wouldn't it

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:19.279
<v Speaker 1>be nice because I know this because I've been there, Uh,

0:48:19.440 --> 0:48:23.879
<v Speaker 1>would it be nice to just define misleading when definitions

0:48:23.920 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 1>like that should be done in a court of law,

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 1>interpreting a court a lot, and not just by a

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:31.000
<v Speaker 1>bunch of appraisers on a board, um the other And

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and so that came, that became challenge because of my writings, um.

0:48:35.520 --> 0:48:38.360
<v Speaker 1>And then there's just an endless example of this. The

0:48:38.719 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 1>bottom line is that, uh, I'm against anything that damages

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:50.399
<v Speaker 1>the credibility of appraisers in the public eye, because if

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:56.279
<v Speaker 1>you don't have that public trust, which is what this

0:48:56.440 --> 0:49:02.359
<v Speaker 1>organization is charter, you know, supposed to maintain UM, then

0:49:02.400 --> 0:49:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you're doing a disservice to everybody in the industry UM

0:49:06.640 --> 0:49:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you know that has a license that you know puts

0:49:08.880 --> 0:49:12.359
<v Speaker 1>their their job on the line every day when they

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:15.680
<v Speaker 1>do sign off on an appraisal. It's just sort of

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:19.800
<v Speaker 1>amateur hour. And I'm doing it, and I've I've myself

0:49:19.840 --> 0:49:22.759
<v Speaker 1>and sort of a band of other people I think

0:49:22.840 --> 0:49:28.120
<v Speaker 1>have really created pressure to UM to invoke change, but

0:49:28.200 --> 0:49:33.280
<v Speaker 1>it's slow going, quite quite fascinating. So so let's talk

0:49:33.280 --> 0:49:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about one of my favorite topics, which

0:49:36.320 --> 0:49:40.279
<v Speaker 1>is a phrase that you coined a couple of years

0:49:40.280 --> 0:49:46.400
<v Speaker 1>ago called aspirational pricing, to tell us about that. Sure,

0:49:46.719 --> 0:49:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, it's sort of a safety and numbers really

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:58.879
<v Speaker 1>started seeing this in luxury vacation UH locations where I'll

0:49:58.920 --> 0:50:01.920
<v Speaker 1>just throw out random numb versay, a home luxury at

0:50:01.920 --> 0:50:05.960
<v Speaker 1>home is purchased for five million dollars and they put

0:50:06.000 --> 0:50:08.759
<v Speaker 1>a million into it or two million into it, and

0:50:08.800 --> 0:50:11.000
<v Speaker 1>then they put it on the market for thirty million,

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and and and you're like, okay, well, that's silly, right,

0:50:16.880 --> 0:50:19.680
<v Speaker 1>but but you know, they become a bold faced name

0:50:19.800 --> 0:50:23.359
<v Speaker 1>in on page six on the post, you know, because hey,

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:25.840
<v Speaker 1>they've got a home on the market for thirty million.

0:50:26.560 --> 0:50:31.880
<v Speaker 1>And then what happens The ten houses in that vicinity

0:50:32.200 --> 0:50:36.919
<v Speaker 1>put their homes on the market for million and none

0:50:36.920 --> 0:50:40.279
<v Speaker 1>of them ever sell because they're not worth that. But

0:50:40.360 --> 0:50:42.439
<v Speaker 1>it's like the safety and numbers and that was quite

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:46.799
<v Speaker 1>a phenomenon, uh, leading up to the sort of the

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:50.799
<v Speaker 1>pandemic era. And this is another sort of this is

0:50:50.840 --> 0:50:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a recent development, UM that is starting to starting to

0:50:56.080 --> 0:51:01.000
<v Speaker 1>see uh. And it's like the if we you know,

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:06.840
<v Speaker 1>for your nationalists, be the Park Avenue, fifth Avenue, Manhattan

0:51:06.880 --> 0:51:14.640
<v Speaker 1>type apartment luxury sort of old world type apartments, and um,

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you have they have boards that approved the buyers and

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:23.640
<v Speaker 1>uh and and making the numbers up to say, someone

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you know pays ten million dollars for an apartment and uh,

0:51:29.600 --> 0:51:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you know three years ago something in the same line

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:38.840
<v Speaker 1>sold for fifteen or thirteen, um, and it sold for less,

0:51:38.840 --> 0:51:43.359
<v Speaker 1>and so the board kills the sale because they're not

0:51:43.400 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 1>happy about the price because it went down. And then

0:51:46.960 --> 0:51:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the seller put you know, puts it back on the

0:51:49.040 --> 0:51:51.720
<v Speaker 1>market and they get another offer of ten million. Department

0:51:51.760 --> 0:51:55.520
<v Speaker 1>has been clearly vetted by the market, and it's the

0:51:56.560 --> 0:52:01.080
<v Speaker 1>board kills that sale. And and I'm aware of a

0:52:01.160 --> 0:52:06.720
<v Speaker 1>handful of those recently. And and that's as operational pricing

0:52:06.760 --> 0:52:09.800
<v Speaker 1>in the context of the the co op board. Because

0:52:09.840 --> 0:52:15.799
<v Speaker 1>they think that they're protecting their you're performing their fiduciary

0:52:15.880 --> 0:52:20.480
<v Speaker 1>duties of protecting the value. However, they can't control the market.

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:22.840
<v Speaker 1>The market is the market is, you know, as someone

0:52:22.880 --> 0:52:26.279
<v Speaker 1>once said, and um, and what they're actually doing is

0:52:26.480 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>damaging value of you know, they're violating their fiduciary responsibility.

0:52:33.120 --> 0:52:35.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's going to be We always see

0:52:35.200 --> 0:52:38.480
<v Speaker 1>this in a in a market that's cooling, We tend

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to see this activity and then we get involved in litigation,

0:52:42.719 --> 0:52:47.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, as an expert, um to to um sort

0:52:47.800 --> 0:52:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of empirically demonstrate this. Just just a reminder that there's

0:52:52.680 --> 0:52:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a special room in hell for anyone who's ever served

0:52:55.320 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on a condo board or cooper you know, it's they're endless.

0:53:01.160 --> 0:53:02.959
<v Speaker 1>If you're in New York for any length of time,

0:53:03.280 --> 0:53:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure other cities have comparable things. There are endless, endless,

0:53:07.719 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 1>endless stories about UM. The relentless stupidity of the behavior

0:53:12.800 --> 0:53:14.839
<v Speaker 1>of boards. I don't know what it is you put

0:53:15.160 --> 0:53:18.879
<v Speaker 1>six people together in a room involving real estate and

0:53:19.400 --> 0:53:24.120
<v Speaker 1>their average I Q haves. It's it's quite amazing. Um

0:53:24.160 --> 0:53:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that that that's kind of fascinating and related to you know,

0:53:28.080 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned old world New York City, Um, Fifth Avenue

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and Park Avenue apartments. Um? Am I stating this wrong?

0:53:36.040 --> 0:53:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Or have you pretty much been into just about every

0:53:39.160 --> 0:53:44.640
<v Speaker 1>penthouse in Manhattan? How how accurate is that statement? I'd

0:53:44.719 --> 0:53:50.680
<v Speaker 1>say I've been in probably nine I mean, I'm I'm

0:53:50.760 --> 0:53:55.200
<v Speaker 1>wild guessing here nine plus percent. The one missing, the

0:53:55.239 --> 0:53:58.480
<v Speaker 1>big one missing from my list is the Pierre Hotel.

0:53:59.360 --> 0:54:01.760
<v Speaker 1>And how so been in the Sherry, Netherlands and about

0:54:02.160 --> 0:54:05.120
<v Speaker 1>most of the penthouses on Central Park South and West.

0:54:06.080 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the one big one that's left over. I came close,

0:54:08.719 --> 0:54:12.439
<v Speaker 1>but it didn't quite make it. And it's it's it's

0:54:12.440 --> 0:54:17.680
<v Speaker 1>always very exciting, um, you know, to see very large space,

0:54:18.000 --> 0:54:22.080
<v Speaker 1>spectacular views. Um. And it's really a mixture of Some

0:54:22.160 --> 0:54:26.239
<v Speaker 1>apartments are in amazing condition and some haven't been renovated

0:54:26.280 --> 0:54:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, multiple decades. But but just being and

0:54:32.239 --> 0:54:36.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing the entirety of it is quite never gets old,

0:54:37.080 --> 0:54:40.239
<v Speaker 1>you know. I can imagine and and do those go

0:54:40.520 --> 0:54:45.239
<v Speaker 1>for market prices or are we still seeing aspirational pricing now?

0:54:45.280 --> 0:54:49.359
<v Speaker 1>They go they go for market Like during this sort

0:54:49.360 --> 0:54:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of five or so years ago sort of peak aspirational pricing,

0:54:54.640 --> 0:54:57.680
<v Speaker 1>there was a penthouse I want to say it was

0:54:58.440 --> 0:55:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I can't recall off and by where it was,

0:55:00.719 --> 0:55:07.000
<v Speaker 1>but it was asking a million, and uh, you know,

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:09.719
<v Speaker 1>catch a following knife. The price kept dropping and I

0:55:09.760 --> 0:55:12.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's sold for in the forties, all right, but

0:55:12.800 --> 0:55:15.799
<v Speaker 1>you anchored people up at a hundreds, so maybe it

0:55:15.800 --> 0:55:18.319
<v Speaker 1>would have gone for twenty otherwise. Is is that the

0:55:18.360 --> 0:55:23.480
<v Speaker 1>thought process behind this, let's get people anchored higher. I

0:55:23.520 --> 0:55:27.759
<v Speaker 1>think that's the the the the idea. But you know,

0:55:27.840 --> 0:55:30.240
<v Speaker 1>after it's on the market for three or four years,

0:55:31.840 --> 0:55:36.759
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine that being a uh sort of a

0:55:36.880 --> 0:55:43.520
<v Speaker 1>positive uh positive thought for the owner, um, especially if

0:55:43.560 --> 0:55:46.759
<v Speaker 1>they're barely living in it and they're paying twenty five

0:55:47.200 --> 0:55:51.759
<v Speaker 1>a month in homeowner association piece. You know. So so

0:55:52.320 --> 0:55:55.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe initially that was the strategy, but I find that

0:55:55.680 --> 0:56:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that almost never works. Uh. It just you know empirically that, um,

0:56:03.120 --> 0:56:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the market is not that dumb. Right, So let's talk.

0:56:08.920 --> 0:56:10.680
<v Speaker 1>You and I have talked about one of my favorite

0:56:10.760 --> 0:56:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Zillo tricks. Pick a town, especially higher in town. You

0:56:16.040 --> 0:56:20.239
<v Speaker 1>could do Greenwich, Connecticut, or Santa Barbara, California, or by

0:56:20.239 --> 0:56:25.040
<v Speaker 1>me Sands Point, New York, and uh, you'll get a

0:56:25.080 --> 0:56:29.440
<v Speaker 1>full listing of everything that's for sale. Um. And you

0:56:29.480 --> 0:56:32.279
<v Speaker 1>could then use the Zillo app to sort and I

0:56:32.280 --> 0:56:34.520
<v Speaker 1>always like to sort by. Now, show me the most

0:56:34.560 --> 0:56:38.759
<v Speaker 1>recent listings, and then I scroll all the way down

0:56:38.800 --> 0:56:41.879
<v Speaker 1>to the bottom. And your shocked that this has been

0:56:41.920 --> 0:56:44.839
<v Speaker 1>the hottest housing market certainly since O eight oh nine,

0:56:44.880 --> 0:56:49.000
<v Speaker 1>if not oh six oh seven, if not our lifetimes.

0:56:49.320 --> 0:56:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's amazing. There are houses that have been listed

0:56:51.640 --> 0:56:54.880
<v Speaker 1>for sale for three hundred days, five hundred days, fifteen

0:56:54.960 --> 0:56:58.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred days. I mean, is are those homes really for sale?

0:56:59.120 --> 0:57:02.680
<v Speaker 1>If they can't find a buyer after five years, that

0:57:02.800 --> 0:57:09.000
<v Speaker 1>just seems absurd. Yeah, yeah, I mean they are. And

0:57:09.120 --> 0:57:13.360
<v Speaker 1>it's all based on the notion that hey, you know, somebody,

0:57:13.640 --> 0:57:15.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, I get you know, it's sort of like

0:57:16.040 --> 0:57:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll get lucky. Uh. Didn't Google have that a search

0:57:20.320 --> 0:57:22.640
<v Speaker 1>button at one time? I don't know it still does?

0:57:23.200 --> 0:57:27.520
<v Speaker 1>You know? Uh? I feel lucky. Yeah, Yeah, it's sort

0:57:27.560 --> 0:57:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of analogous to that. Maybe I don't know, but it is.

0:57:31.920 --> 0:57:35.720
<v Speaker 1>It is amazing. I also think part of that is

0:57:35.800 --> 0:57:40.440
<v Speaker 1>just dirty Zello data, you know that it's just not removed. Um.

0:57:40.640 --> 0:57:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, a lot of this stuff is. I'm gonna

0:57:43.000 --> 0:57:47.080
<v Speaker 1>disagree with you on that because I sifted through a

0:57:47.120 --> 0:57:52.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of these um most recently. So most recently. Uh,

0:57:53.160 --> 0:57:58.600
<v Speaker 1>this kind of small waterfront um supposed to be on

0:57:58.640 --> 0:58:00.680
<v Speaker 1>an acre and you look at the map and it's like,

0:58:00.720 --> 0:58:04.320
<v Speaker 1>there's no way that's an acre. And they were asking

0:58:04.480 --> 0:58:09.080
<v Speaker 1>nine five, which I thought was insane, when right, you know,

0:58:09.320 --> 0:58:12.800
<v Speaker 1>three houses down. So this is like a three thousand

0:58:12.880 --> 0:58:19.520
<v Speaker 1>square foot UM, one car garage, no basement, waterfront, lovely

0:58:19.560 --> 0:58:25.200
<v Speaker 1>house on a built around a um sort of center courtyard,

0:58:25.360 --> 0:58:29.160
<v Speaker 1>but tiny down just like three or four houses down

0:58:29.320 --> 0:58:32.120
<v Speaker 1>is like a twenty five thousand square foot three acre

0:58:32.200 --> 0:58:35.160
<v Speaker 1>house is half the price. So I called the agent

0:58:35.160 --> 0:58:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and said, I don't understand. I'm not looking at bust

0:58:38.040 --> 0:58:41.120
<v Speaker 1>your chops, but how do you figure nine and a

0:58:41.120 --> 0:58:43.920
<v Speaker 1>half when for four and a half I get four

0:58:44.000 --> 0:58:47.040
<v Speaker 1>times out? Well, you know, the owner is a collector

0:58:47.120 --> 0:58:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of fine arts, and he thinks eventually he'll get his price.

0:58:50.600 --> 0:58:52.280
<v Speaker 1>So now I have to go back through the Zillo

0:58:52.440 --> 0:58:55.400
<v Speaker 1>history and it was originally up for sale for like

0:58:55.520 --> 0:58:59.480
<v Speaker 1>twelve or fourteen, six years ago, off back on for

0:58:59.560 --> 0:59:02.360
<v Speaker 1>eleven and off back on for ten off, And I'm like,

0:59:03.160 --> 0:59:05.560
<v Speaker 1>so this house really isn't for sale. This is just

0:59:05.600 --> 0:59:09.800
<v Speaker 1>someone goofing around. Call me when the call me when

0:59:09.800 --> 0:59:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the estate has to dispose of it, and the market

0:59:13.040 --> 0:59:16.440
<v Speaker 1>will find a real price. Yeah. I mean if if

0:59:16.440 --> 0:59:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at a listing that in this market that

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you know is a hundred eighty days or older just

0:59:23.880 --> 0:59:27.240
<v Speaker 1>as us, or it's not even serious, right, I mean,

0:59:27.560 --> 0:59:31.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not even Um I had a situation. Um I

0:59:31.800 --> 0:59:35.120
<v Speaker 1>remember this is four or five years ago when Grenwage

0:59:35.360 --> 0:59:37.600
<v Speaker 1>was really a weak market. I may have told you

0:59:37.640 --> 0:59:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the story of the past. And you know, some well

0:59:41.440 --> 0:59:45.440
<v Speaker 1>known financier you know, had a house I'm guessing you

0:59:45.480 --> 0:59:48.840
<v Speaker 1>know was worth six or seven million, put it on

0:59:48.960 --> 0:59:52.280
<v Speaker 1>for fifteen million, no offers. You know, this is that

0:59:52.440 --> 0:59:58.960
<v Speaker 1>aspirational pricing era. Uh, no no activity. And then they

0:59:59.000 --> 1:00:01.280
<v Speaker 1>cut the price to a eleven you know, it's worth

1:00:01.320 --> 1:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>six or seven probably on a good day, cut it

1:00:04.280 --> 1:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to eleven four million dollars and uh, sat on another

1:00:09.120 --> 1:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>year and no offers, and then they go on stage

1:00:14.160 --> 1:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and say you can't give a house away in Grants, Connecticut.

1:00:18.960 --> 1:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, well, you know, that's really not fair

1:00:22.160 --> 1:00:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to Gramwich, Connecticut because you're, you know, your view of

1:00:26.840 --> 1:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the value of your property has nothing to do with

1:00:29.680 --> 1:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>what the market will support. And I find that I

1:00:34.440 --> 1:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we would see that all the time, you know,

1:00:36.600 --> 1:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>where it's like they view the original price as like

1:00:41.280 --> 1:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>their equity, and then out of the goodness of their heart,

1:00:44.160 --> 1:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>they're giving away, um, you know, a chunk of it,

1:00:48.000 --> 1:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>even though you know it's all based on nothing. One

1:00:50.680 --> 1:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I do as a hobby is

1:00:54.000 --> 1:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I collect listings I'm sorry, closed sales around the u

1:01:00.040 --> 1:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>US that sold at or above million dollar. You've had

1:01:04.920 --> 1:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a chart of this that you update on a regular basis. Yes, yes,

1:01:09.560 --> 1:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's sort of a hobby gone wild because in

1:01:13.440 --> 1:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and fourteen, I remember I was approached by

1:01:17.360 --> 1:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a homeowner that had a house in California and I

1:01:23.000 --> 1:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>don't even know what it was probably worth, but you know,

1:01:25.800 --> 1:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>it was single digit, you know, but a lot of money,

1:01:28.920 --> 1:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and they put on the market for like thirty plus

1:01:31.360 --> 1:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>million and that's when we started to see this sort

1:01:34.680 --> 1:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of aspirational prop pricing phenomenon occur. And it never sold.

1:01:40.520 --> 1:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>And um, I just started tracking them nationwide and not

1:01:45.280 --> 1:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>listings but just actual sales and U as in one

1:01:52.120 --> 1:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>was the biggest year by far, and they were well

1:01:56.080 --> 1:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>over forty transactions in the US residential that whether single

1:02:01.800 --> 1:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>family condo or co op that sold for UM fifty

1:02:07.240 --> 1:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>million or higher. And and this is sort of just

1:02:11.920 --> 1:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>before uh, you know, well up through today. I think

1:02:17.120 --> 1:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>there's been if you if you were to annualize, you know,

1:02:20.680 --> 1:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>so optimistically, if you annualize the sales to date, it

1:02:24.120 --> 1:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>would be the second highest in history. And there was

1:02:26.720 --> 1:02:30.479
<v Speaker 1>just a closing of a hundred seventy five million dollar

1:02:30.560 --> 1:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>transaction in Florida just this week. Um. And so what

1:02:35.040 --> 1:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and fourteen was something I would add

1:02:37.080 --> 1:02:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to the list once a month or two months, It

1:02:40.080 --> 1:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>literally is now once a week. I remember the I

1:02:44.840 --> 1:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>remember the developer that had created that five hundred million

1:02:48.880 --> 1:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars spec house in l A, which seemed absurd. He

1:02:52.640 --> 1:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>filled it with you know, high end sports cars and art,

1:02:56.560 --> 1:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and I believe, if I remember correctly, it was ventually

1:03:00.440 --> 1:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>auctioned off at bankruptcy for about a quarter of that price.

1:03:05.200 --> 1:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah about him. I think it was a million five.

1:03:07.480 --> 1:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that was yeah, that was the one. It was

1:03:11.600 --> 1:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>called the one, and well now you can call it

1:03:14.320 --> 1:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the quarter. Yeah, the corn exactly. Uh. But but you know,

1:03:20.160 --> 1:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it's funny because it's sort of this circus side show

1:03:22.840 --> 1:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>for housing, because you know, just like in New York

1:03:26.000 --> 1:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>there was a two nine million dollar condo, and there

1:03:28.920 --> 1:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>was a hundred million dollar condo, and at least these

1:03:31.400 --> 1:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>big numbers and so um. You know, you'd see people

1:03:36.360 --> 1:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>with modest houses saying, hey, if someone's willing to pay,

1:03:40.920 --> 1:03:45.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, h million for a home, then my home

1:03:45.480 --> 1:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>has to be worth ten more. And you're like, no,

1:03:48.720 --> 1:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it has nothing to do with you. It's a it's

1:03:50.680 --> 1:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a circus side show, you know. That's the aspirational pricing

1:03:54.840 --> 1:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>is great for your realistic neighbors. So the six million

1:03:59.320 --> 1:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>dollar house that's up for sale for thirty million, Hey,

1:04:02.360 --> 1:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're two houses down and your house is five,

1:04:05.440 --> 1:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you could say, hey, I really am looking for seven.

1:04:08.000 --> 1:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Look at that house down the street. It's thirty million.

1:04:10.400 --> 1:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Seven is a bargain if you're realistic. Yeah, Well, we

1:04:14.480 --> 1:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>were having people in Manhattan in a you know, six

1:04:19.560 --> 1:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>floor tenement walkout. Uh. You know, looking at you see

1:04:24.200 --> 1:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to walk up six flights of sarious your

1:04:25.880 --> 1:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>your apartment, you know, much more modest pricing. Uh, making

1:04:31.840 --> 1:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>comments that, you know, when Michael Bell bought his for

1:04:34.840 --> 1:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a little over a hundred million at seven that hey,

1:04:38.440 --> 1:04:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you know mine has to be worth more. And we're like, no,

1:04:42.240 --> 1:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a different market. It's a different market, has nothing

1:04:44.680 --> 1:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to do with you. Plus, he's worth twenty three billion

1:04:47.920 --> 1:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars and a hundred million is a rounding era to him,

1:04:52.040 --> 1:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>right right, exactly. People, people forget that. All right, I

1:04:55.640 --> 1:04:58.439
<v Speaker 1>have one curve bawl question for you before we get

1:04:58.480 --> 1:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to our favorite question, and that is why does your

1:05:03.240 --> 1:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Twitter bio mention that you're a lobster fisherman. Well, let's

1:05:09.120 --> 1:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>just say I'm kind of hanging onto the past. Um.

1:05:12.560 --> 1:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I lived close to Long Island Sound, um, big body

1:05:17.800 --> 1:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of water, and when I I'm an empty nest now.

1:05:21.200 --> 1:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>But I had four sons and we used to drop

1:05:23.880 --> 1:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>lobster pots and you know, fish for lobster. But I

1:05:27.840 --> 1:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>only caught We only caught one legal lobster a year.

1:05:32.040 --> 1:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Everything else we had to throw back the end to

1:05:33.600 --> 1:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>be a certain weight, and you know, we had a

1:05:36.800 --> 1:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>instrument to measure them and um. And I always said

1:05:40.480 --> 1:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it was the most expensive lobster caught on the Eastern

1:05:43.440 --> 1:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Seaboard every year, because when you add up the cost

1:05:46.640 --> 1:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of the boat, the dock, the fuel, the winterization, um.

1:05:51.200 --> 1:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>The time, uh, you know, and then half the time

1:05:54.840 --> 1:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>when we caught a legal lobster, I just threw it

1:05:57.560 --> 1:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>back in cast and release. But it was it was really,

1:06:02.400 --> 1:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>it was really fun. Um. Uh. They I think they've

1:06:05.680 --> 1:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty I think they've banned UM. I sold my boat

1:06:09.160 --> 1:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>two years ago, so we don't lobster fish anymore. But

1:06:11.960 --> 1:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm very proud that I was once a lobster fisherman,

1:06:14.800 --> 1:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>even though if you delve in deeper, I wasn't that

1:06:17.600 --> 1:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>good at it. All Right, let's jump to our favorite

1:06:20.920 --> 1:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>questions that we ask all of our guests, starting with

1:06:25.360 --> 1:06:27.840
<v Speaker 1>tell us what you're streaming these days? What was keeping

1:06:27.880 --> 1:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you entertained during lockdown and beyond? So I'm going to UH.

1:06:37.280 --> 1:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I was anticipating this question as I listened to other

1:06:41.120 --> 1:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>UH interviews, and I'm very sad to say that I

1:06:47.400 --> 1:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>hardly watch any television and I don't stream anything. My

1:06:51.680 --> 1:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>wife does. I could answer for her, but I literally

1:06:56.000 --> 1:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think, I don't know where this came from.

1:06:59.520 --> 1:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>But my grandfather was a motion picture projections at the

1:07:05.480 --> 1:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Town Theater. And my my dad was a latchkey kid

1:07:09.800 --> 1:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and watched you know the same movie a hundred times

1:07:13.840 --> 1:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>only in sections and did his homework with his dad

1:07:17.760 --> 1:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and so as a kid, I we never

1:07:20.400 --> 1:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>went to movies. Um. And so I'm like, it's funny.

1:07:25.160 --> 1:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I don't know what it is. I guess

1:07:27.960 --> 1:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe that makes me old fashioned or something. I don't

1:07:30.880 --> 1:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>know what it is. I just don't care. So I

1:07:33.720 --> 1:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>became a full blown television idiot during the lockdown, just

1:07:38.800 --> 1:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we couldn't go anywhere, we couldn't do anything, and it's

1:07:41.280 --> 1:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>just stream stream stream, And now I'm trying it's become

1:07:44.800 --> 1:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a habitual. And now I'm trying to break that habit

1:07:49.360 --> 1:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and uh get out of the house more as the

1:07:52.160 --> 1:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>world rights up again. But it's a rabbit hole that

1:07:56.360 --> 1:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you can use. I just I just like screen time

1:07:58.880 --> 1:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>for me is I just I try to fight it.

1:08:03.240 --> 1:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm on my laptop so much, you know, working at

1:08:07.240 --> 1:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>all that that I try not to um, try not

1:08:12.160 --> 1:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to do it. It probably makes me dull and boring,

1:08:15.080 --> 1:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>but not at all. So so I'm gonna give you

1:08:17.280 --> 1:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>one streaming recommendation, which is a very broad one. I

1:08:21.439 --> 1:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>signed up for YouTube Premium, so there's no ads, no commercials.

1:08:26.800 --> 1:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>YouTube is an endless world of just whatever your favorite

1:08:34.120 --> 1:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>topic is, There's an infinite amount of it and more

1:08:38.320 --> 1:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>every day. It's genuinely astonishing, right. I mean, if you

1:08:44.600 --> 1:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>think HBO or Netflix has a lot of stuff, YouTube

1:08:49.160 --> 1:08:56.679
<v Speaker 1>believes them in the dust. Amazing. Yeah, I I, Um,

1:08:56.720 --> 1:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I have Hulu, but I really just use that to watch,

1:09:00.800 --> 1:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the occasional sports or whatever. Um. We cut

1:09:05.160 --> 1:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the cable connection during the pandemic. Interesting, Um, tell us

1:09:10.320 --> 1:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>about some of your early mentors who helped to shape

1:09:13.160 --> 1:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>your career. Uh So, one of them was, um, it

1:09:21.080 --> 1:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>was a gentleman named John Nelson, who was my first

1:09:25.360 --> 1:09:30.599
<v Speaker 1>job out of college. I worked as a department head

1:09:30.600 --> 1:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in a hospital and and he taught me. Um. First

1:09:38.200 --> 1:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of all, you know, very organized guy, but he spoke

1:09:41.920 --> 1:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>very softly. And one of the things I learned when

1:09:45.800 --> 1:09:51.439
<v Speaker 1>you're speaking in public, uh, is that it the less.

1:09:51.640 --> 1:09:55.519
<v Speaker 1>I just found that the audience leans in a little

1:09:55.520 --> 1:09:59.559
<v Speaker 1>bit more when you're not shouting, you're soft spoken. I

1:09:59.640 --> 1:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>just found bit very It's been very effective for me

1:10:02.960 --> 1:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and sort of that's just how I present. And I

1:10:05.960 --> 1:10:09.439
<v Speaker 1>just before that, I always, you know, thought public speaking

1:10:09.479 --> 1:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>was sort of shouting and you know, really being it's

1:10:13.960 --> 1:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're slower and delivery in a little bit less um,

1:10:18.479 --> 1:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say less animated. I just find

1:10:21.800 --> 1:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>at least in the subject material that I speak with,

1:10:24.200 --> 1:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm I'm a better presenter than I would be otherwise.

1:10:29.280 --> 1:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>And so I've always appreciated it was like a subtle thing.

1:10:32.120 --> 1:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>And I've always appreciated that. Let's talk about books. Tell

1:10:35.240 --> 1:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>us some of your favorite books, and what are you

1:10:38.200 --> 1:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>reading right now? So I'm I'm on an auto industry

1:10:45.040 --> 1:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>kick and uh and so um, partly because my father

1:10:51.400 --> 1:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>in law, I'm in Detroit. Um, my father in law

1:10:54.320 --> 1:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>worked for Ford for thirty nine years and like most

1:10:58.000 --> 1:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of my wife's family, had some connecttion to the auto industry.

1:11:01.200 --> 1:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So I've always been intrigued by it. And I just

1:11:03.960 --> 1:11:07.679
<v Speaker 1>read an amazing book called finns Um and it's it's

1:11:07.680 --> 1:11:13.719
<v Speaker 1>all about Harley Earl, who was essentially the GM uh

1:11:13.760 --> 1:11:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you know sort of yeah, just lad lead the industry

1:11:19.040 --> 1:11:22.639
<v Speaker 1>brought Finns into the mix. And uh. And one thing

1:11:22.680 --> 1:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I learned in the book was I didn't didn'tonomy that that.

1:11:30.240 --> 1:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, the president of GM his last name was Sloan,

1:11:34.560 --> 1:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and the second in command was Kettering. And my one

1:11:37.960 --> 1:11:41.559
<v Speaker 1>of my daughter, Dodden Lawyers, works at Sloan Kettering because

1:11:41.600 --> 1:11:45.639
<v Speaker 1>they were sort of behind the that hospital in terms

1:11:45.680 --> 1:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of getting it started, is my understanding. And who would

1:11:48.920 --> 1:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>have thought. I'm reading a book about Detroit auto industry

1:11:51.760 --> 1:11:57.479
<v Speaker 1>and they had this cancer hospital in Manhattan, which is

1:11:57.560 --> 1:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of, you know, this world class saying. So I

1:11:59.479 --> 1:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>thought that was really interesting. And then the other thing,

1:12:01.920 --> 1:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and I've read like that. I just reread The Reckoning

1:12:05.360 --> 1:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>by David Halberstan and and and and I just never

1:12:13.120 --> 1:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>realized how backwards Henry Ford was, uh, you know, beginning

1:12:18.360 --> 1:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in from the Depression on, he just built one car.

1:12:21.360 --> 1:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, the famous saying you can you can have

1:12:23.960 --> 1:12:26.599
<v Speaker 1>any color you want as long as it's black, um.

1:12:26.880 --> 1:12:30.559
<v Speaker 1>All that um. And how the industry really changed and

1:12:30.720 --> 1:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Harley Earl really sort of brought it into accessorizing and

1:12:35.360 --> 1:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>making cars decorative and a sort of a statement of yourself. Um.

1:12:40.000 --> 1:12:43.599
<v Speaker 1>And and that's been my my focus. I've read several

1:12:43.880 --> 1:12:46.759
<v Speaker 1>auto industry books just in the last couple of months,

1:12:46.800 --> 1:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>just because, Um. I think I was subconsciously because I

1:12:52.360 --> 1:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>was preparing to go to Detroit and I wanted something

1:12:54.920 --> 1:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to talk about with me and loss. You know. The

1:12:57.720 --> 1:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>funny thing is, I just read the book some seven

1:13:02.040 --> 1:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>UM trying to remember who who wrote it, but I

1:13:04.800 --> 1:13:08.439
<v Speaker 1>love everything he writes and he talks about. That was

1:13:08.600 --> 1:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of a myth that it was you can get

1:13:11.360 --> 1:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a Model T in any color you want, as long

1:13:13.320 --> 1:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>as it it's black, um, Bill bright. It turns out

1:13:18.320 --> 1:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of if you've got the coupe, you could get in

1:13:20.240 --> 1:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>this color and the convertible and that color or or

1:13:23.120 --> 1:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>they were like adding, Yeah, I started. It's like three

1:13:26.880 --> 1:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>or four colors they started adding, but only after intense

1:13:30.120 --> 1:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>pressure and shutting the factory down for a year to

1:13:32.439 --> 1:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>retool for the next Really interesting Yeah, Ford was in

1:13:39.280 --> 1:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Ford was in a lot of trouble and and GM

1:13:42.280 --> 1:13:44.759
<v Speaker 1>had really given them a run for the money in

1:13:44.920 --> 1:13:51.559
<v Speaker 1>the twenties, UH by introducing design and new innovations right,

1:13:51.600 --> 1:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people because of the car itself,

1:13:54.040 --> 1:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>made fun of ed Salt like what EDEL stood for,

1:13:57.720 --> 1:14:00.519
<v Speaker 1>but exel is really the one that kept are going

1:14:01.479 --> 1:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>as you know, the father sort of you know, was

1:14:04.080 --> 1:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of anchored to the past and not such a

1:14:06.080 --> 1:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>nice guy, um to say the least. But yeah, yeah,

1:14:10.160 --> 1:14:14.799
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Let's talk about advice to a recent college

1:14:14.800 --> 1:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>grad who was interested in a career in either real

1:14:18.160 --> 1:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>estate or appraisal. What what sort of advice would you

1:14:21.000 --> 1:14:27.559
<v Speaker 1>give them? Well, uh, I think, you know, in when

1:14:27.600 --> 1:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I think of real estate or valuation, I think there's

1:14:31.960 --> 1:14:35.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot more upside in terms of future potential going

1:14:35.760 --> 1:14:39.439
<v Speaker 1>into the commercial side rather than the residential side of

1:14:39.560 --> 1:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the of the business. Um, I think there's more opportunity. Um,

1:14:45.360 --> 1:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a on the residential side. And this is going

1:14:48.120 --> 1:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>back to my earlier criticism the appraisal foundation. To get

1:14:52.360 --> 1:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>into residential you essentially have to work for two years

1:14:56.520 --> 1:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>for nothing or barely anything. You have to hire somebody.

1:15:01.000 --> 1:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>You have to be hired by somebody is willing to

1:15:03.000 --> 1:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>mentor you. And the reason why they generally don't is

1:15:06.200 --> 1:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>because after they teach you everything you know for two years,

1:15:10.920 --> 1:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>many many times the new person goes out on their

1:15:14.120 --> 1:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>own right. So there is a UM, it's an industry

1:15:18.439 --> 1:15:21.439
<v Speaker 1>that's aging out and That's part of the reason why

1:15:21.520 --> 1:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm so emphatically you know, trying to um sort of

1:15:27.200 --> 1:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>hit a swing a baseball bat against what the Appraisal

1:15:31.200 --> 1:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Foundation has done. They've essentially you know, part of the

1:15:34.520 --> 1:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>problem is this to your mentoring system, which accountants and

1:15:39.520 --> 1:15:42.719
<v Speaker 1>lawyers and like, no one has this. After you take

1:15:42.760 --> 1:15:46.679
<v Speaker 1>your license recensing test, you can function and make a living.

1:15:46.720 --> 1:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>You don't make as much as somebody with more experience,

1:15:49.320 --> 1:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>but you let the market sort it out in terms

1:15:51.920 --> 1:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of you know, feed for service. In our industry, you

1:15:56.320 --> 1:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>can't do that. So I wonder if there's a correlation

1:15:59.520 --> 1:16:04.479
<v Speaker 1>between mentoring process and the lack of diversity. If you're

1:16:04.640 --> 1:16:07.519
<v Speaker 1>hiring a friend or a family member, hey, maybe that

1:16:07.600 --> 1:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>person is less likely to be different than you are. Oh. Absolutely,

1:16:13.240 --> 1:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a big part of it, And that's part of

1:16:14.960 --> 1:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the problem. Uh, you know, it just it just um,

1:16:20.120 --> 1:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of continues the sort of the composition

1:16:25.520 --> 1:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of the industry, which industry desperately needs, you know, new voices. Um.

1:16:32.280 --> 1:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I've been very outspoken about it. Um. So,

1:16:37.400 --> 1:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I have four boys. I they're all adult men now,

1:16:41.920 --> 1:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and they all are gainfully employed. So I feel like

1:16:44.800 --> 1:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>we did our job as parents. Um, they're all, you know,

1:16:48.360 --> 1:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>doing well and all that, But I with my wife

1:16:51.400 --> 1:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and I wouldn't let them take over from us because

1:16:56.080 --> 1:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I fear for the future. Um of the infloor are

1:17:01.800 --> 1:17:07.479
<v Speaker 1>of the residential industry. Uh And and you know also too,

1:17:07.680 --> 1:17:10.479
<v Speaker 1>I think kids taking over the family business. I feel

1:17:10.479 --> 1:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>like they need to be out in the world for

1:17:12.400 --> 1:17:15.559
<v Speaker 1>five or seven years, UM, and then come back if

1:17:15.600 --> 1:17:18.919
<v Speaker 1>they really want to come back. But I think that

1:17:18.920 --> 1:17:22.759
<v Speaker 1>that ship has sailed really interesting. And our final question,

1:17:23.479 --> 1:17:25.799
<v Speaker 1>what do you know about the world of real estate

1:17:26.000 --> 1:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>appraisals market pricing today that you wish you knew way

1:17:31.120 --> 1:17:33.959
<v Speaker 1>back in the nine eighties when you were first launching

1:17:34.000 --> 1:17:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Miller Samuel. Uh So, this is really a a I

1:17:40.439 --> 1:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>thought a lot about this. UM. People with experience in

1:17:45.920 --> 1:17:50.360
<v Speaker 1>real estate don't know as much about market pricing as

1:17:50.400 --> 1:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you think they do. Just because someone is experienced has

1:17:54.360 --> 1:17:58.439
<v Speaker 1>been around a long time doesn't mean they're any better

1:17:58.479 --> 1:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>than someone that has experience that is a fraction of that.

1:18:02.320 --> 1:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why I say that is there's a

1:18:05.040 --> 1:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of lethargy where UM, individuals, Hey, I've been doing

1:18:09.960 --> 1:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>it this way for twenty five years, UM. And As

1:18:14.360 --> 1:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, real estate in the last decade or

1:18:17.880 --> 1:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit longer last years, has become a

1:18:21.720 --> 1:18:25.640
<v Speaker 1>lot more volatile. So all the rules of thumb, so

1:18:25.800 --> 1:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to speak, that someone you know with my my sort

1:18:29.920 --> 1:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of level of experience in terms of you know, time, um,

1:18:35.160 --> 1:18:39.559
<v Speaker 1>is it relevant and uh and so I think I

1:18:39.560 --> 1:18:41.880
<v Speaker 1>think you don't want to have that sort of age

1:18:41.960 --> 1:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>bias towards you know that youth is is also a

1:18:48.640 --> 1:18:53.719
<v Speaker 1>good source of feedback on market conditions. Huh, really really

1:18:53.760 --> 1:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>quite interesting. Thank you Jonathan for being so generous with

1:18:58.240 --> 1:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>your time. That was Jonathan Miller. He is the CEO

1:19:01.479 --> 1:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and co founder of Miller Samuel. If you enjoyed this conversation,

1:19:06.160 --> 1:19:09.440
<v Speaker 1>well check out any of the previous four hundred discussions

1:19:09.479 --> 1:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we've had over the past oh, I think it's just

1:19:12.200 --> 1:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>about seven years. You can find those at iTunes, Spotify,

1:19:16.479 --> 1:19:19.919
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your favorite podcasts. We love your comments,

1:19:19.920 --> 1:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>feedback and suggestions right to us at m I be

1:19:23.400 --> 1:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>podcast at Bloomberg dot net. Sign up from my daily

1:19:27.360 --> 1:19:30.360
<v Speaker 1>reading list at Rid Halts dot com. Follow me on

1:19:30.400 --> 1:19:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at rid Halts. I would be remiss if I

1:19:33.479 --> 1:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>did not thank the team that helps put this conversation

1:19:36.720 --> 1:19:42.120
<v Speaker 1>together each week. Sebastian Escobar is my audio engineer. Sean

1:19:42.200 --> 1:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Russo is my head of research. Attica Valbron is my

1:19:46.080 --> 1:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>project manager. Paris Wald is my producer. I'm Barry Rihlts.

1:19:51.680 --> 1:19:55.479
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.